Waste Reduction Model (WARM) Version 16: Request for Public Comment, 88913-88914 [2023-28342]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2023 / Notices qualifications, and achieving an overall balance of different scientific perspectives across reviewers. The Agency will consider all nominations of prospective candidates for service as ad hoc reviewers for the SACC that are received on or before the date listed in the DATES section of this document. D. How can I stay informed about SACC activities? IV. Advance Notice of Other Planned Activities As indicated previously, EPA’s plans to publish separate documents in the Federal Register in early 2024 to announce the planned activities related to this peer review that are briefly discussed in this unit. (Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2625(o); 5 U.S.C 10) A. Planned Public Review of a Candidate List of ad hoc Reviewers Being Considered Although the final selection of ad hoc reviewers is a discretionary function of the Agency, EPA plans to make available for public comment a candidate list of ad hoc expert reviewers for this peer review in early 2024. The ‘‘List of Candidates’’ provides the names and biographical sketches of all interested and available nominees identified from respondents to this solicitation, other nominations received, and any additional candidates identified by EPA staff. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES B. Planned Public Meeting EPA plans to announce a 4-day public meeting of the SACC that is anticipated to be scheduled for May 2024. At that time, EPA will provide logistical information and instructions for registering to attend and/or provide oral comments at the SACC meeting. C. Planned Public Review of Materials Submitted for Peer Review EPA plans to announce the availability of and solicit public comment on the draft documents and related materials submitted to the SACC for peer review. At that time, EPA will provide instructions for accessing the materials provided to the SACC and will provide instructions for submitting written comments and instructions for registering to provide oral comments at the SACC meeting. These materials will also be available in Docket ID No. EPA– HQ–OPPT–2022–0613 at https:// www.regulations.gov and through the SACC website at https://www.epa.gov/ tsca-peer-review. As additional background materials become available and are provided to the SACC, EPA will include those additional background documents (e.g., SACC members and consultants participating in this meeting and the meeting agenda) in the docket and through the SACC website. VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:25 Dec 22, 2023 Jkt 262001 You may subscribe to the following listserv for alerts regarding this and other SACC-related activities: https:// public.govdelivery.com/accounts/ USAEPAOPPT/subscriber/new?topic_ id=USAEPAOPPT_101. Dated: December 20, 2023. Michal Freedhoff, Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. [FR Doc. 2023–28430 Filed 12–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OLEM–2023–0451; FRL–11466– 01–OLEM] Waste Reduction Model (WARM) Version 16: Request for Public Comment Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) version 16 and its supporting documentation, along with the WARM v16 methodology external peer review report and the WARM v16 data quality assessment report. WARM is a tool that estimates the potential greenhouse gas emissions, energy savings and economic impacts of baseline and alternative waste management practices of materials. This Notice is inviting public comment on WARM v16 and its supporting documentation from a broad range of individuals and organizations. The EPA will consider the public comments received to inform future improvements to WARM. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 9, 2024. ADDRESSES: Written Comments: Submit your written comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OLEM–2023–0451, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 88913 Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at: https://www.epa.gov/dockets. Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID No. EPA– HQ–OLEM–2023–0451 for this notice. Comments received may be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments, see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Priscilla Halloran, Resource Conservation and Sustainability Division, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Office of Land and Emergency Management, Mail Code 5306T, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202–566–0311, or Kimberly Cochran (same address); telephone number: 202–566–0308; email address: orcrWARMquestions@epa.gov. For more information on WARM, please visit https://epa.gov/warm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Public Participation Response to this request for public comment is voluntary. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OLEM–2023–0451, at https:// www.regulations.gov/ (our preferred method), or the other methods identified in the ADDRESSES section. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. The Environmental Protection Agency may publish any comment received to its public docket. Responses to this request for public comment may be submitted by a single party or a team. Responses will only be accepted using Microsoft Word (.docx) or Adobe PDF (.pdf) file formats. The response document should contain the following: D Two clearly delineated sections: (1) Cover page with company name and contact information; and (2) responses by topic and/or that address specific EPA questions. D 1-inch margins (top, bottom, and sides). D Times New Roman and 12-point font. Comments containing references, studies, research, and other empirical data that are not widely published should include copies or electronic E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM 26DEN1 88914 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2023 / Notices links to the referenced materials. Do not submit to EPA’s docket at https:// www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), Proprietary Business Information (PBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). Please visit: https:// www.epa.gov/dockets for additional submission methods; the full EPA public comment policy; information about CBI, PBI, or multimedia submissions; and general guidance on making effective comments. No confidential and/or business proprietary information, copyrighted information, or personally identifiable information should be submitted in response to this notice. Privacy Note: All comments received from members of the public will be available for public viewing on Regulations.gov. In accordance with FAR 15.202(3), responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Federal Government to form a binding contract. Additionally, those submitting responses are solely responsible for all expenses associated with response preparation. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES II. General Information A. What is the purpose of this request for public comment? The EPA will use the feedback and information received through this public comment process, along with findings of the external peer review and data quality assessment, to inform future improvements to WARM. The Environmental Protection Agency launched the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) in 1998. WARM has been updated and expanded fifteen times since its launch in 1998. In 2022 and 2023, WARM underwent an external peer review and a data quality assessment as part of the EPA’s on-going efforts to ensure WARM’s scientific integrity. (Reports are available in the docket EPA–HQ–OLEM–2023–0451 and on the web at https://epa.gov/warm.) The EPA created WARM to provide high-level comparisons of potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions, energy savings, and economic impacts (labor hours, wages and taxes when considering different VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:25 Dec 22, 2023 Jkt 262001 materials management practices. Materials management practices include—source reduction, recycling, anaerobic digestion, combustion, composting and landfilling. WARM models 61 materials commonly found in municipal solid waste (MSW) and construction and demolition debris (C&D), including aluminum cans, glass, paper, plastics, organics (including food waste) and building materials. WARM is a comparative tool rather than a comprehensive measurement tool. WARM was not developed for and, as such, should not be used for final site-specific materials management decisions, when other human health and environmental impacts of the different management methods may need to be considered (such as air pollution, water pollution, noise, etc.). It also should not be used for developing GhG inventories, which need to establish a baseline and measure reductions over time on an annual basis for an entity. III. Request for Information The Environmental Protection Agency requests public comment on WARM v16 and its supporting documentation from a broad range of individuals and organizations with an understanding of and interest in tools and models related to life cycle materials management, such as: federal, state, tribal, territorial, and local governments; industry; researchers; academia; non-profit organizations; community groups; individuals and international organizations. EPA is interested in receiving input on the following: • How can the scientific rigor and adherence to modeling best practices and assumptions in WARM regarding biogenic carbon emissions, carbon storage in forests, soils, and landfills, and utility offsets from combustion be improved? • How can WARM better align with best practices in climate change modeling and assumptions? • How can the alignment of data, assumptions, and model components in WARM with real market practices be improved? • In assessing WARM, how well do the modeled management practices represent the diversity of practices typically used in the United States? • When evaluating WARM, how accurately does it depict the common secondary use of recycled materials in the United States? • What recommendations can be made for enhancing the clarity, transparency, relevance, and usability of PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 WARM and its accompanying documentation? • Are there any studies or data sources that are relevant to WARM but are currently not integrated, and how could their inclusion be beneficial for future development? • What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of conducting future WARM model development in a more publicly accessible development environment, such as GitHub, to encourage increased transparency and public involvement? • What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of the EPA considering the use of readily available data from public sources (such as the Federal LCA Commons) in WARM, especially the use of non-waste management data, to enhance data consistency, accessibility and reliability across federal government life cycle work? The Environmental Protection Agency will use feedback and information received through this public comment, the external peer review and the data quality assessment to inform future improvements to WARM. Please identify the question(s) you are responding to when submitting your comments. IV. Disclaimer and Important Note This request for public comment is issued solely for information, research and planning purposes and does not constitute a Request for Proposals (RFP) or a Request for Applications (RFA). Responding to this notice will not give any advantage to or preclude any organization or individual in any subsequently issued solicitation, RFP, or RFA. Any future development activities related to this activity will be announced separately. This notice does not represent any award commitment on the part of the U.S. Government, nor does it obligate the Government to pay for costs incurred in the preparation and submission of any responses. Dated: December 13, 2023. Carolyn Hoskinson, Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery. [FR Doc. 2023–28342 Filed 12–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM 26DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88913-88914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28342]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0451; FRL-11466-01-OLEM]


Waste Reduction Model (WARM) Version 16: Request for Public 
Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released the 
Waste Reduction Model (WARM) version 16 and its supporting 
documentation, along with the WARM v16 methodology external peer review 
report and the WARM v16 data quality assessment report. WARM is a tool 
that estimates the potential greenhouse gas emissions, energy savings 
and economic impacts of baseline and alternative waste management 
practices of materials. This Notice is inviting public comment on WARM 
v16 and its supporting documentation from a broad range of individuals 
and organizations. The EPA will consider the public comments received 
to inform future improvements to WARM.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 9, 2024.

ADDRESSES: 
    Written Comments: Submit your written comments, identified by 
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0451, through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions 
for submitting comments.
    Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. Additional 
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more 
information about dockets generally, is available at: https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID 
No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0451 for this notice. Comments received may be 
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any 
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on sending 
comments, see the ``Public Participation'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Priscilla Halloran, Resource 
Conservation and Sustainability Division, Office of Resource 
Conservation and Recovery, Office of Land and Emergency Management, 
Mail Code 5306T, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-566-0311, or 
Kimberly Cochran (same address); telephone number: 202-566-0308; email 
address: [email protected]. For more information on WARM, 
please visit https://epa.gov/warm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Public Participation

    Response to this request for public comment is voluntary. Submit 
your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0451, at 
https://www.regulations.gov/ (our preferred method), or the other 
methods identified in the ADDRESSES section. Once submitted, comments 
cannot be edited or removed from the docket. The Environmental 
Protection Agency may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Responses to this request for public comment may be submitted 
by a single party or a team. Responses will only be accepted using 
Microsoft Word (.docx) or Adobe PDF (.pdf) file formats. The response 
document should contain the following:
    [ssquf] Two clearly delineated sections: (1) Cover page with 
company name and contact information; and (2) responses by topic and/or 
that address specific EPA questions.
    [ssquf] 1-inch margins (top, bottom, and sides).
    [ssquf] Times New Roman and 12-point font.
    Comments containing references, studies, research, and other 
empirical data that are not widely published should include copies or 
electronic

[[Page 88914]]

links to the referenced materials. Do not submit to EPA's docket at 
https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI), Proprietary Business 
Information (PBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the 
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish 
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents 
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or 
other file sharing system). Please visit: https://www.epa.gov/dockets 
for additional submission methods; the full EPA public comment policy; 
information about CBI, PBI, or multimedia submissions; and general 
guidance on making effective comments. No confidential and/or business 
proprietary information, copyrighted information, or personally 
identifiable information should be submitted in response to this 
notice.
    Privacy Note: All comments received from members of the public will 
be available for public viewing on Regulations.gov. In accordance with 
FAR 15.202(3), responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be 
accepted by the Federal Government to form a binding contract. 
Additionally, those submitting responses are solely responsible for all 
expenses associated with response preparation.

II. General Information

A. What is the purpose of this request for public comment?

    The EPA will use the feedback and information received through this 
public comment process, along with findings of the external peer review 
and data quality assessment, to inform future improvements to WARM.
    The Environmental Protection Agency launched the Waste Reduction 
Model (WARM) in 1998. WARM has been updated and expanded fifteen times 
since its launch in 1998. In 2022 and 2023, WARM underwent an external 
peer review and a data quality assessment as part of the EPA's on-going 
efforts to ensure WARM's scientific integrity. (Reports are available 
in the docket EPA-HQ-OLEM-2023-0451 and on the web at https://epa.gov/warm.)
    The EPA created WARM to provide high-level comparisons of potential 
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions, energy savings, and economic 
impacts (labor hours, wages and taxes when considering different 
materials management practices. Materials management practices 
include--source reduction, recycling, anaerobic digestion, combustion, 
composting and landfilling.
    WARM models 61 materials commonly found in municipal solid waste 
(MSW) and construction and demolition debris (C&D), including aluminum 
cans, glass, paper, plastics, organics (including food waste) and 
building materials.
    WARM is a comparative tool rather than a comprehensive measurement 
tool. WARM was not developed for and, as such, should not be used for 
final site-specific materials management decisions, when other human 
health and environmental impacts of the different management methods 
may need to be considered (such as air pollution, water pollution, 
noise, etc.). It also should not be used for developing GhG 
inventories, which need to establish a baseline and measure reductions 
over time on an annual basis for an entity.

III. Request for Information

    The Environmental Protection Agency requests public comment on WARM 
v16 and its supporting documentation from a broad range of individuals 
and organizations with an understanding of and interest in tools and 
models related to life cycle materials management, such as: federal, 
state, tribal, territorial, and local governments; industry; 
researchers; academia; non-profit organizations; community groups; 
individuals and international organizations. EPA is interested in 
receiving input on the following:
     How can the scientific rigor and adherence to modeling 
best practices and assumptions in WARM regarding biogenic carbon 
emissions, carbon storage in forests, soils, and landfills, and utility 
offsets from combustion be improved?
     How can WARM better align with best practices in climate 
change modeling and assumptions?
     How can the alignment of data, assumptions, and model 
components in WARM with real market practices be improved?
     In assessing WARM, how well do the modeled management 
practices represent the diversity of practices typically used in the 
United States?
     When evaluating WARM, how accurately does it depict the 
common secondary use of recycled materials in the United States?
     What recommendations can be made for enhancing the 
clarity, transparency, relevance, and usability of WARM and its 
accompanying documentation?
     Are there any studies or data sources that are relevant to 
WARM but are currently not integrated, and how could their inclusion be 
beneficial for future development?
     What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of 
conducting future WARM model development in a more publicly accessible 
development environment, such as GitHub, to encourage increased 
transparency and public involvement?
     What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of the 
EPA considering the use of readily available data from public sources 
(such as the Federal LCA Commons) in WARM, especially the use of non-
waste management data, to enhance data consistency, accessibility and 
reliability across federal government life cycle work?
    The Environmental Protection Agency will use feedback and 
information received through this public comment, the external peer 
review and the data quality assessment to inform future improvements to 
WARM. Please identify the question(s) you are responding to when 
submitting your comments.

IV. Disclaimer and Important Note

    This request for public comment is issued solely for information, 
research and planning purposes and does not constitute a Request for 
Proposals (RFP) or a Request for Applications (RFA). Responding to this 
notice will not give any advantage to or preclude any organization or 
individual in any subsequently issued solicitation, RFP, or RFA. Any 
future development activities related to this activity will be 
announced separately. This notice does not represent any award 
commitment on the part of the U.S. Government, nor does it obligate the 
Government to pay for costs incurred in the preparation and submission 
of any responses.

    Dated: December 13, 2023.
Carolyn Hoskinson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
[FR Doc. 2023-28342 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.