Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, 88310-88315 [2023-28105]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
88310
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Proposed Rules
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
Georgia EPD did not evaluate EJ
considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and
did not consider EJ in this proposed
action. Consideration of EJ is not
required as part of this proposed action,
and there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal
of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for people of
color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 14, 2023.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2023–28085 Filed 12–20–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0630; FRL–11582–
01–R4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Vehicle
Inspection and Maintenance Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of
Georgia through the Georgia Department
of Natural Resources (GA DNR),
Environmental Protection Division
(EPD), on June 8, 2022, and on June 6,
2023. Georgia’s June 8, 2022, SIP
revision (hereinafter referred to as
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision)
removes obsolete references and
provisions; updates the State’s
inspection and maintenance (I/M)
requirements; updates terminology, in
part to reflect advances in test and
vehicle technology; and makes other
minor changes. The June 6, 2023, SIP
revision (hereinafter referred to as
Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision)
removes outdated terminology; updates
with new terminology; removes one
requirement; and makes other minor
changes to Georgia’s enhanced I/M
program. EPA is proposing to approve
these changes pursuant to the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 22, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2022–0630 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Weston Freund, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
8773. Mr. Freund can also be reached
via electronic mail at freund.weston@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Below provides the background for
EPA’s proposed actions on Georgia’s
2022 and 2023 I/M SIP revisions that
were submitted to EPA by GA DNR on
June 8, 2022, and on June 6, 2023,
respectively.
The CAA requires areas that are
designated as moderate, serious, severe,
or extreme ozone nonattainment areas to
establish motor vehicle I/M programs to
ensure regular monitoring of gasoline
fueled motor vehicle emissions. See
CAA sections 182(b)(4), (c)(3). The
required monitoring is performed by
periodic emissions testing of vehicles.
See CAA sections 182(a)(2)(B), (c)(3).
This emissions testing ensures that
vehicles are well-maintained and
operating as designed and that they do
not exceed established vehicle pollutant
limits. A basic I/M program is required
for moderate ozone nonattainment
areas, and an enhanced I/M program is
required for serious, severe, or extreme
ozone nonattainment areas.
In 1991, EPA classified a 13-county
area in and around the Atlanta, Georgia,
metropolitan area as a serious ozone
nonattainment area for the 1979 1-hour
ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS or standard),
triggering the requirement for the State
to establish an enhanced I/M program
for the area.1 In 1996, Georgia submitted
1 On November 6, 1991, EPA designated and
classified the following counties in and around the
Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan area as a serious
ozone nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS: Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb,
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
its enhanced I/M program to EPA for
incorporation into the SIP. EPA granted
interim approval of the State’s program
in 1997 and full approval in 2000. See
62 FR 42916 (August 11, 1997) and 65
FR 4133 (January 26, 2000),
respectively. Despite that approval, the
13-county area failed to attain the 1hour ozone NAAQS by the November
15, 1999, the CAA deadline for serious
ozone nonattainment areas. EPA issued
a final rulemaking action on September
26, 2003 (68 FR 55469), to reclassify the
area to severe ozone nonattainment.
Subsequently, this area attained the 1hour ozone NAAQS and EPA
redesignated the area to attainment. See
70 FR 34660 (June 15, 2005). In
addition, on April 30, 2004, EPA issued
a final rulemaking action (69 FR 23951)
to revoke the 1979 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, effective June 15, 2005.
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38856), EPA
established an 8-hour ozone NAAQS
and subsequently designated areas. On
April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858), EPA
designated a 20-county area in and
around metropolitan Atlanta as a
marginal ozone nonattainment area for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.2 EPA
reclassified this area as a moderate
ozone nonattainment area on March 6,
2008 (73 FR 12013), because the area
failed to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS by the required attainment date
of June 15, 2007. Subsequently, the area
attained the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard, and on December 2, 2013 (78
FR 72040), EPA redesignated the area to
attainment.
On March 12, 2008, EPA revised the
8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 73 FR 16436
(March 27, 2008). EPA designated a 15county area in and around metropolitan
Atlanta as a marginal ozone
nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS on April 30, 2012
(effective July 20, 2012).3 See 77 FR
30088 (May 21, 2012). EPA reclassified
these counties as a moderate ozone
nonattainment area on May 4, 2016
(effective June 3, 2016), because the area
failed to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS by the required attainment date
of July 20, 2015. See 81 FR 26697 (May
4, 2016). Subsequently, the area attained
the 2008 8-hour ozone standard and
Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry,
Paulding, and Rockdale. See 56 FR 56694.
2 The nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard consisted of the following counties:
Barrow, Bartow, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb,
Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton,
Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Newton, Paulding,
Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton.
3 The nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour
ozone standard consisted of the following counties:
Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb,
Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry,
Newton, Paulding, and Rockdale.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
EPA redesignated the area to attainment.
See 82 FR 25523 (June 2, 2017).
On October 1, 2015, EPA again
revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See
80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015). EPA
designated a 7-county area in and
around metropolitan Atlanta as a
marginal ozone nonattainment area for
the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS on April
30, 2018 (effective August 3, 2018).4 See
83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018).
Subsequently, the area attained the 2015
8-hour ozone standard and EPA
redesignated the area to attainment. See
87 FR 62733 (October 17, 2022).
EPA is proposing to approve changes
to the I/M regulations in Chapter 391–
3–20—Enhanced Inspection and
Maintenance of Georgia’s SIP that were
provided to EPA through a cover letter
dated June 8, 2022. Specifically,
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision seeks to
update Rule 391–3–20–.01—Definitions;
Rule 391–3–20–.04—Emission
Inspection Procedures; Rule 391–3–20–
05—Emission Standards; Rule 391–3–
20–.09—Inspection Station
Requirements; Rule 391–3–20–.10—
Certificates of Authorization; Rule 391–
3–20–.11—Inspector Qualifications and
Certification; Rule 391–3–20–.13—
Certificate of Emission Inspection; Rule
391–3–20–.15—Repairs and Retests;
Rule 391–3–20–.17—Waivers; and Rule
391–3–20–.22—Enforcement.
Further, EPA is proposing to approve
additional changes to Georgia’s I/M
regulations that were provided to EPA
through a cover letter dated June 6,
2023. Specifically, Georgia’s 2023 I/M
SIP revision seeks to update Rule 391–
3–20–.01, Definitions; Rule 391–3–20–
.03, Covered Vehicles; Exemptions; Rule
391–3–20–.04, Emission Inspection
Procedures; Rule 391–3–20–.05,
Emission Standards; and Rule 391–3–
20–.11, Inspector Qualifications and
Certification.
Collectively, the proposed changes
remove obsolete references and
provisions, update Georgia’s I/M
requirements, update terminology,
correct punctuation, and make other
minor changes to Georgia’s SIPapproved I/M requirements. EPA is
proposing to find that the changes
submitted by Georgia will not interfere
with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress, or any other applicable
CAA requirement.5 Thus, EPA is
proposing to approve the changes to
Georgia’s SIP as submitted in Georgia’s
4 The nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour
ozone standard consists of the following counties:
Bartow, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, Gwinnett,
and Henry.
5 See CAA section 110(l).
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
88311
2022 and 2023 I/M SIP revisions.
Section III, below, provides a summary
of these changes and EPA’s analysis.
II. EPA’s Analysis of Georgia’s
Submittals
A. Rule 391–3–20–.01, ‘‘Definitions’’
Both Georgia’s 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP
revisions update Rule 391–3–20–.01,
Definitions. Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP
revision makes a minor change to one
definition. Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP
revision makes further changes to Rule
391–3–20–.01 by adding a definition,
removing two definitions, revising one
definition, making minor grammatical
changes in three definitions, and then
renumbering the section to reflect these
changes.
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates the definition for ‘‘Emission
Inspection’’ in Rule 391–3–20–.01. The
revision changes the order of tests and
inspections listed in the definition.
Specifically, the ‘‘on-board diagnostic
system check’’ test is moved to the
beginning of listed tests and
inspections, and the ‘‘exhaust emissions
test’’ is moved to the end of the list. The
purpose of this change is to highlight
the more current widespread use of
OBD as the primary method used for
emission tests. Since this minor update
does not change any applicable limits or
requirements, it will have no impact on
emissions and is consistent with CAA
requirements.
Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision
further updates Rule 391–3–20–.01 by
adding a definition, removing two
definitions, revising one definition,
making minor grammatical changes in
three definitions, and then renumbering
the section to reflect these changes.
First, the revision adds a definition for
‘‘Biometrics.’’ The revision adds this
definition to reflect another method of
identification that can be used by an
inspector to initiate an inspection.
Specifically, inspectors will now be able
to use their own biometric login in lieu
of using their personal access code to
perform and record any inspections.
Second, the revision removes the
definitions ‘‘Grandfathered Vehicle’’
and ‘‘Gray Market Vehicle’’ since both
are encompassed in the newly revised
definition of ‘‘Non-conforming
Vehicle.’’ The new definition for ‘‘Nonconforming Vehicle’’ applies to those
vehicles that have not obtained an EPA
certification or ones that have an
emissions control component that is
obsolete according to the manufacturer.
Further, the revision to this definition
adds that vehicles that qualify as nonconforming ‘‘would be subject to an
alternative tail pipe emissions standard
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
88312
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Proposed Rules
based upon its model year to obtain a
vehicle registration in the Georgia
covered counties.’’ Since neither
grandfathered vehicles nor gray market
vehicles have EPA certification, both
types of vehicles fall under the new
definition for ‘‘Non-conforming
Vehicle,’’ so removal of ‘‘Grandfathered
Vehicle’’ and ‘‘Gray Market Vehicle’’
from the SIP does not result in any
changes. Subsequent subparagraphs are
being renumbered to reflect these
changes. Third, the revision makes
stylistic changes to the definitions of
‘‘Light Duty Truck,’’ and ‘‘Light Duty
Vehicle,’’ by adding commas to numbers
to aid with their readability. Finally, the
revision corrects a grammatical mistake
in the definition for ‘‘Time Extension’’
by removing an unnecessary period.
Given the nature of these changes, they
have no impact on emissions and are
consistent with CAA requirements.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Rule 391–3–20–.03, ‘‘Covered
Vehicles; Exemptions’’
Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.03, Covered
Vehicles; Exemptions, by removing
outdated terminology, removing one
requirement, making one stylistic
change, and one minor grammatical
change. First, the revision updates
paragraph 391–3–20–.03(8) by removing
the first sentence which states that
‘‘Provisions for grandfathered vehicles,
i.e., gray market vehicles, kit cars, hot
rods, and non-conforming vehicles are
described in this subparagraph’’ and by
removing the term ‘‘gray market’’ from
the second sentence. Neither kit cars nor
hot rod vehicles have EPA certification,
so both vehicles fall under the new
definition for ‘‘Non-conforming
Vehicle’’ in addition to those vehicles
that were previously considered
grandfathered or gray market. Second,
the revision removes the last sentence of
the paragraph which states that kit cars
and hot rods which are newly registered
in the counties subject to I/M after
December 31, 1998, are not eligible for
special inspection standards. According
to GA EPD, it has granted nonconforming status to 91 kit cars and hot
rods since 2007.6 As a result of the
proposed change to the last sentence of
391–3–20–.03(8), these 91 vehicles
would now be eligible for a special
inspection standard. Further, GA EPD
stated that 3.3 million emission
inspection tests were performed in 2022
alone. Given this proportionality, to the
extent that kit cars and hot rods are now
6 See email from Anna Aponte, GA EPD, to Josue
Ortiz Borrero, EPA Region 4 (November 16, 2023),
available in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
eligible for a special inspection
standard, EPA does not believe that this
change would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment or any other applicable CAA
requirement. Third, the revision makes
a stylistic change to subparagraph 391–
3–20–.03(1)(b), adding a comma to ease
with the readability of a number.
Finally, the revision updates paragraph
391–3–20–.03(3) with a grammatical
correction by removing a comma. Given
the nature of these changes, EPA is
proposing to find that they are
consistent with CAA requirements,
including 110(l).
C. Rule 391–3–20–.04, ‘‘Emission
Inspection Procedures’’
Both Georgia’s 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP
revisions update Rule 391–3–20–.04,
Emission Inspection Procedures.
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision removes
obsolete language related to an outdated
testing requirement. Georgia’s 2023 I/M
SIP revision further changes Rule 391–
3–20–.04 by updating terminology.
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.04, Emission
Inspection Procedures, by removing
obsolete language related to an outdated
testing requirement. Specifically, the
revision updates paragraph 391–3–20–
.04(1) by removing a requirement that
an emission inspector check whether a
vehicle has ‘‘tires with cords exposed’’
prior to inspecting it. The outdated
Acceleration Simulation Mode (ASM)
inspection test was performed on a
dynamometer, so the inspector was
required to look for any tires with cords
exposed because they could pose a
safety risk during the test. The ASM test
was removed as an inspection test from
the Georgia SIP in 2022 because all
vehicles covered under the Georgia I/M
program could be inspected using the
OBD inspection or TSI test instead. See
87 FR 41080 (July 11, 2022). Since the
ASM test is no longer part of Georgia’s
I/M program, this change has no impact
on emissions and is consistent with
CAA requirements.
Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision
further updates Rule 391–3–20–.04,
Emission Inspection Procedures, by
updating terminology in a
subparagraph. Specifically, the term
‘‘non-conforming’’ replaces the term
‘‘grandfathered’’ to describe vehicles
subject to the emission inspection
procedures in subparagraph 391–3–20–
.04(2)(c) and its corresponding
subsections. This subparagraph and its
corresponding subsections outline
emission inspection procedures for nonconforming vehicles. As mentioned in
subsection III.A of this document, the
definition for ‘‘Grandfathered Vehicle’’
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
has been removed from the enhanced I/
M rules, and instead, the newly revised
definition for ‘‘Non-conforming
Vehicle’’ covers these vehicles as well
as others. Given the nature of these
changes, they have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA
requirements.
D. Rule 391–3–20–.05, ‘‘Emission
Standards’’
Both Georgia’s 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP
revisions update Rule 391–3–20–.05,
Emission Standards. Georgia’s 2022 I/M
SIP revision makes one language change
and reorders subparagraphs to reflect
technological advances in testing.
Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision further
changes Rule 391–3–20–.05 by updating
terminology to be consistent with new
definitions the EPA is acting on in this
notice.
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.04, Emission
Inspection Procedures, by making one
language change and reordering
subparagraphs to reflect the more
widespread use of OBD testing. First,
the revision updates paragraph 391–3–
20–.05(2) to change the order of a list of
inspection tests a vehicle subject to the
I/M program must pass. Specifically, the
OBD test is moved to the beginning of
listed inspection tests, and the exhaust
emissions test is moved to the end of the
list. This change reflects the current,
wider-spread use of the OBD test for
inspection of motor vehicles as
compared to exhaust emissions tests.
Second, the revision changes the order
of the exhaust emission testing
requirements and OBD testing
requirements, which were previously
outlined in subparagraphs 391–3–20–
.05(2)(b) and 391–3–20.05(2)(d),
respectively. The revision switches the
order of these testing requirements so
now the OBD testing requirements are
housed in subparagraph 391–3–20–
.05(2)(b) and the requirements for
exhaust emissions tests are in
subparagraph 391–3–20–.05(2)(d). This
change has also been made to reflect the
wider-spread use of OBD tests as
compared to exhaust emissions tests for
motor vehicles subject to the Georgia I/
M program. Given the nature of these
changes, they have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA
requirements.
Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.05, Emission
Standards, by removing references to
hot rods in one subparagraph, and
references to gray market vehicles and
grandfathered vehicles in another
subparagraph, replacing them all with
references to ‘‘non-conforming’’
vehicles. First, in subparagraph 391–3–
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
20–.05(2)(a)4., the revision replaces the
term ‘‘hot rod’’ with ‘‘non-conforming’’
in describing vehicles that shall pass the
tampering inspection if either the
original vehicle or the replacement
engine was equipped with a catalytic
converter and a catalytic converter has
been installed. Since the new definition
for non-conforming vehicle covers hot
rods as well as certain other vehicle
types, the applicability of this
subparagraph expands, thus making it
more stringent. Second, in subparagraph
391–3–20–.05(2)(d)2., references to
‘‘gray market’’ vehicles and
‘‘grandfathered’’ vehicles are removed.
The result of this change is that the new
rule describes when a vehicle defined as
non-conforming is considered to have
passed an exhaust emissions test. Since
the new definition for non-conforming
covers all gray market vehicles and
grandfathered vehicles, the applicability
of the subparagraph has not changed.
Given the nature of these changes, they
have no impact on emissions and are
consistent with CAA requirements.
E. Rule 391–3–20–.09, ‘‘Inspection
Station Requirements’’
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.09, Inspection
Station Requirements, by removing
outdated language, making one stylistic
change, removing unnecessary language,
and adding clarifying language. First,
the revision removes outdated language
from subparagraph 391–3–20–.09(2)(g)
that requires the air intakes on both the
Georgia Analyzer System (GAS) and the
vehicle being inspected to be exposed to
the same ambient temperature, pressure,
and humidity conditions throughout an
inspection. The outdated ASM test was
sensitive to changes in temperature,
pressure, and humidity during
inspection, whereas the OBD and TSI
tests are not. Since the ASM test is no
longer part of the Georgia I/M program,
the removal of this language will not
impact emissions. In subparagraph 391–
3–20–.09(2)(i), the revision makes some
minor changes to several of its
corresponding subsections. First, in
subsection 391–3–20–.09(2)(i)(3) of the
rule, the revision makes a stylistic, word
choice change by replacing the phrase
‘‘tie into’’ with ‘‘connect to’’ in
describing a secure internet connection
that should connect GAS to each
Vehicle Information Database (VID).
Next, in subsection 391–3–20–
.09(2)(i)(7) of the rule, the phrase
‘‘capable of performing OBD system
checks’’ is deleted because all
inspection stations are now required to
be capable of performing OBD system
checks, making the language redundant.
Previously, Georgia had stations that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
that only tested older cars which did not
have OBD systems, so this language was
necessary. Finally, in subsection 391–3–
20–.09(2)(i)(8), language is added
indicating that a station owner will
receive the currently applicable version
of the Emissions Inspector Certification
Training Program Manual during the
inspector certification. Given the nature
of these changes, they have no impact
on emissions and are consistent with
CAA requirements.
F. Rule 391–3–20–.10, ‘‘Certificates of
Authorization’’
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.10, Certificates
of Authorization, by adding a new
requirement. Specifically, the added
language now requires station owners
who intend to renew their Certificate of
Authorization to operate an inspection
station to apply for renewal at least 30
days prior to the expiration date of the
existing certification. Previously, the
language said that station owners ‘‘may
apply’’ but this is now updated to say
that they ‘‘must apply’’ at least 30 days
prior to the expiration of the existing
certificate. Additionally, the revision
clarifies that this subparagraph
requiring a renewal application refers to
‘‘station owners intending to renew
their certificate.’’ This is simply
clarifying language as the subparagraph
already applied to owners who were
seeking renewal of their Certificate of
Authorization. Given the nature of these
changes, they have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA
requirements.
G. Rule 391–3–20–.11, ‘‘Inspector
Qualifications and Certification’’
Both Georgia’s 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP
revisions update Rule 391–3–20–.11,
Inspector Qualifications and
Certification. Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP
revision adds clarifying language and
makes some minor word choice
changes. Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP
revision further changes Rule 391–3–
20–.11 by updating language to reflect
advances in technology, to include some
new requirements, and to make one
minor grammatical change.
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.11, Inspector
Qualifications and Certification, to add
clarifying language in several places and
to make some word choice changes.
First, in subparagraph 391–3–20–
.11(5)(a), the revision adds language to
clarify that the requirement for a
complete application for renewal to be
submitted at least 30 calendar days prior
to the expiration of the existing
certificate applies to inspectors
‘‘intending to renew their certificate.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
88313
This new language does not add any
new requirements, but better describes
who the requirement applies to.
Another clarifying change is made in
paragraph 391–3–20–.11(6) to specify
that inspectors must have the picture on
their GA EPD-issued ID clearly visible
on the inspector’s upper body area
when performing an emissions
inspection. Previously, the language
indicated only that the ID itself must be
visible on the inspector’s upper body
area, so this change simply clarifies that
the inspector’s picture must be visible
in this location. Finally, one last
clarifying change is made to paragraph
391–3–20–.11(9), where the revision
adds the word ‘‘unauthorized’’ to clarify
who may not use a certified emission
inspector’s personal access code to
perform any part of an emissions
inspection. Previously, the paragraph
read that no person should use the
access code; however, this was not the
purpose of the rule as the certified
emission inspector should always be
able to use their personal access code to
perform any part of an emission
inspection. This clarifying change
eliminates the confusion previously
caused by this paragraph. Finally, the
revision makes several word choice
changes. First, in several parts of the
rule, the revision replaces the word
‘‘card’’ with ‘‘badge,’’ in describing the
picture ID. Second, the revision removes
the word ‘‘location’’ from the phrase
‘‘visible location’’ in paragraph 391–3–
20–.11(6). The phrase required that an
emission inspector have their ID badge
clearly visible on the inspector’s upper
body area, so the removal of the word
‘‘location’’ does not change the meaning
of the requirement. This removal is a
minor change that constitutes a change
in word choice. Given the nature of
these changes, they have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA
requirements.
Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision
further updates Rule 391–3–20–.11 by
adding language to reflect the use of
biometric identification to initiate an
inspection, to include some new
requirements, and to make one minor
grammatical change. First, paragraph
391–3–20–.11(8) is revised to require
inspectors to notify the Management
Contractor of a change to telephone or
email address contact information after
applying for and receiving a Certificate
of Authorization. Previously, inspectors
only needed to notify the Management
Contractor of a change of address.
Second, the revision revises paragraphs
391–3–20–.11(9) and .11(10) to reflect
that, in addition to using a personal
access code, inspectors may also use a
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
88314
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Proposed Rules
biometric login to perform parts of the
inspection. Further, the revision forbids
inspectors from divulging or authorizing
the use of their own biometric login to
any other person. This change reflects
the new use of biometric logins during
inspections described in section III.A of
this notice. Finally, the revision makes
one grammatical change to paragraph
391–3–20–.11(7) by removing a comma.
Given the nature of these changes, they
have no impact on emissions and are
consistent with CAA requirements.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Rule 391–3–20–.13, ‘‘Certificate of
Emission Inspection’’
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.13, Certificate
of Emission Inspection, with two minor
changes. First, the revision revises
subparagraph 391–3–20–.13(1)(i), which
specifies that inspection results for
applicable inspection tests must be
included in a Certificate of Emission
Inspection. The change rearranges the
order of applicable inspection tests to
place OBD testing first. This change is
made to reflect the wider-spread use of
the OBD test as compared to exhaust
emission tests. The second minor
change updates subparagraph 391–3–
20–.13(2)(c), which requires that
inspectors provide vehicle owners who
have failed an emission inspection with
the current, quarterly RepairWatch
Public Report. This report identifies
repair facilities. The change adds the
phrase ‘‘access to’’ at the beginning of
the subparagraph to specify that the
inspector must provide owners of
vehicles that have failed inspection
emission tests with access to the
current, quarterly reports. This change
is simply clarifying in nature. Given the
nature of these changes, they have no
impact on emissions and are consistent
with CAA requirements.
I. Rule 391–3–20–.15, ‘‘Repairs and
Retests’’
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
amends Rule 391–3–20–.15, Repairs
and Retests, by removing one outdated
requirement. Specifically, in paragraph
391–3–20–.15(4), ‘‘NOX’’ is deleted from
the list of pollutants for which a vehicle
must pass an exhaust test upon
reinspection. Usable NOX emission
information only came with an ASM
test since NOX was released from the
motor vehicle when it was under load
(i.e., while using the dynamometer).
Although a motor vehicle still may still
release NOX emissions during a TSI test,
the emissions are much lower since it is
performed at idle. This NOX information
is unusable to make any determination
as to whether a vehicle is adequately
preventing the release of NOX. Since the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
ASM test was removed in a previous SIP
revision, and because none of the
applicable exhaust emissions tests
would provide useable NOX emission
information, this requirement is
obsolete. Since the ASM test is not part
of Georgia’s I/M program, the changes to
Rule 391–3–20–.15 have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA
requirements.
J. Rule 391–3–20–.17, ‘‘Waivers’’
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.17, Waivers, by
deleting obsolete language in one
subparagraph and updating language in
another. First, the revision updates
subparagraph 391–3–20–.17(2)(c), by
deleting the phrase ‘‘on preprinted
repair forms’’ to describe how receipts
for parts and labor must be submitted
for repair waivers. Receipts must still be
submitted, but they no longer have to be
submitted on preprinted repair forms.
This change does not remove any
substantive requirement because
receipts must still be submitted, and the
minimum repair form entries have not
changed. Second, the revision updates
subparagraph 391–3–20–.17(2)(f) by
adding clarifying language specifying
that repairs for a waiver shall ‘‘address
the OBD failure’’ or produce a reduction
in ‘‘tailpipe’’ emissions for the pollutant
that failed the previous test. Since the
applicable tests required under the
Georgia I/M program are either the OBD
inspection test or a tailpipe emissions
test (i.e., TSI tailpipe emissions test), the
added language clarifies what repairs
should address in the event of a failure
of an applicable emissions test. Given
the nature of these changes, they have
no impact on emissions and are
consistent with CAA requirements.
K. Rule 391–3–20–.22, ‘‘Enforcement’’
Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision
updates Rule 391–3–20–.22,
Enforcement, with one minor word
choice change. Specifically, in
subparagraph 391–3–20–.22(2)(b), the
revision replaces the word ‘‘card’’ with
‘‘badge’’ to describe the picture ID that
certified emissions inspectors use. This
better describes the form of ID and adds
no new requirements. Given the nature
of this update, it will have no impact on
emissions and is consistent with CAA
requirements.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with the
requirements of 40 CFR 51.5, and as
explained in sections I and II of this
preamble, EPA is proposing to
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
incorporate by reference Georgia Rules
391–3–20–.09—Inspection Station
Requirements; 391–3–20–.10—
Certificates of Authorization; 391–3–20–
.13—Certificate of Emission Inspection;
391–3–20–.15—Repairs and Retests;
391–3–20–.17—Waivers; and 391–3–20–
.22— Enforcement, all of which have a
state-effective date of April 19, 2022,
into the Georgia SIP. Further, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Georgia Rules 391–3–20–.01,
Definitions; Rule 391–3–20–.03, Covered
Vehicles; Exemptions; Rule 391–3–20–
.04, Emission Inspection Procedures;
Rule 391–3–20–.05, Emission
Standards; and Rule 391–3–20–.11,
Inspector Qualifications and
Certification, all of which have a stateeffective date of March 21, 2023, into
the Georgia SIP. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Actions
EPA is proposing to approve changes
to Georgia’s SIP-approved I/M rules as
provided in Georgia’s June 8, 2022, and
June 6, 2023, SIP revisions. These SIP
revisions include changes to 391–3–20–
.01—Definitions; 391–3–20–.03,
Covered Vehicles; Exemptions; 391–3–
20–.04—Emission Inspection
Procedures; 391–3–20–.05—Emission
Standards; 391–3–20–.09—Inspection
Station Requirements; 391–3–20–.10—
Certificates of Authorization; 391–3–20–
.11—Inspector Qualifications and
Certification; 391–3–20–.13—Certificate
of Emission Inspection; 391–3–20–.15—
Repairs and Retests; 391–3–20–.17—
Waivers; and 391–3–20–.22—
Enforcement. EPA has made the
preliminary determination that these
changes are consistent with CAA
requirements. Thus, EPA is proposing to
these changes to Georgia’s SIP.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, these actions
merely propose to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, these proposed actions:
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Proposed Rules
• Are not significant regulatory
actions subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have federalism implications
as specified in Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
• Are not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
because they approve a state program;
• Are not significant regulatory
actions subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Are not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 20, 2023
Jkt 262001
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
EPD did not evaluate EJ
considerations as part of its SIP
submittals; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and
did not consider EJ in these proposed
actions. Due to the nature of the actions
being proposed here, these proposed
actions are expected to have a neutral to
positive impact on the air quality of the
affected area. Consideration of EJ is not
required as part of these proposed
actions, and there is no information in
the record inconsistent with the stated
goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving EJ for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 14, 2023.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2023–28105 Filed 12–20–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 131
[EPA–HQ–OW–2023–0222; FRL 10760–01–
OW]
RIN 2040–AG30
Water Quality Standards To Protect
Aquatic Life in the Delaware River
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On December 1, 2022, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) determined that revised water
quality standards are necessary to
protect aquatic life in certain water
quality management zones of the
Delaware River. Specifically, the EPA
issued an Administrator’s
Determination, pursuant to the Clean
Water Act (CWA), finding that a revised
designated use to protect aquatic life
propagation and corresponding
dissolved oxygen criteria to protect that
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
88315
use are necessary in Zone 3, Zone 4, and
the upper portion of Zone 5 (in total,
river miles 108.4 to 70.0) of the
Delaware River. The CWA requires the
EPA to publish proposed water quality
standards following an Administrator’s
Determination. Thus, the EPA is
proposing to promulgate an aquatic life
designated use that includes
propagation and protective water
quality criteria for dissolved oxygen for
Zone 3, Zone 4, and upper Zone 5 of the
Delaware River.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 20, 2024. Public
hearing: the EPA will hold two public
hearings during the public comment
period. Please refer to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
additional information on the public
hearings.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2023–0222, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov/ (our
preferred method). Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center,
Office of Water Docket, Mail Code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: EPA
Docket Center, WJC West Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket
Center’s hours of operations are 8:30
a.m.–4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
(except Federal holidays).
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received may be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hannah Lesch, Office of Water,
Standards and Health Protection
Division (4305T), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202) 566–1224;
email address: Lesch.Hannah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule preamble is organized as
follows:
I. Public Participation
A. Written Comments
B. Participation in Public Hearings
II. General Information
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 88310-88315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28105]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2022-0630; FRL-11582-01-R4]
Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
State of Georgia through the Georgia Department of Natural Resources
(GA DNR), Environmental Protection Division (EPD), on June 8, 2022, and
on June 6, 2023. Georgia's June 8, 2022, SIP revision (hereinafter
referred to as Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision) removes obsolete
references and provisions; updates the State's inspection and
maintenance (I/M) requirements; updates terminology, in part to reflect
advances in test and vehicle technology; and makes other minor changes.
The June 6, 2023, SIP revision (hereinafter referred to as Georgia's
2023 I/M SIP revision) removes outdated terminology; updates with new
terminology; removes one requirement; and makes other minor changes to
Georgia's enhanced I/M program. EPA is proposing to approve these
changes pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 22, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2022-0630 at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Weston Freund, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-8773. Mr. Freund can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Below provides the background for EPA's proposed actions on
Georgia's 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP revisions that were submitted to EPA by
GA DNR on June 8, 2022, and on June 6, 2023, respectively.
The CAA requires areas that are designated as moderate, serious,
severe, or extreme ozone nonattainment areas to establish motor vehicle
I/M programs to ensure regular monitoring of gasoline fueled motor
vehicle emissions. See CAA sections 182(b)(4), (c)(3). The required
monitoring is performed by periodic emissions testing of vehicles. See
CAA sections 182(a)(2)(B), (c)(3). This emissions testing ensures that
vehicles are well-maintained and operating as designed and that they do
not exceed established vehicle pollutant limits. A basic I/M program is
required for moderate ozone nonattainment areas, and an enhanced I/M
program is required for serious, severe, or extreme ozone nonattainment
areas.
In 1991, EPA classified a 13-county area in and around the Atlanta,
Georgia, metropolitan area as a serious ozone nonattainment area for
the 1979 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or
standard), triggering the requirement for the State to establish an
enhanced I/M program for the area.\1\ In 1996, Georgia submitted
[[Page 88311]]
its enhanced I/M program to EPA for incorporation into the SIP. EPA
granted interim approval of the State's program in 1997 and full
approval in 2000. See 62 FR 42916 (August 11, 1997) and 65 FR 4133
(January 26, 2000), respectively. Despite that approval, the 13-county
area failed to attain the 1-hour ozone NAAQS by the November 15, 1999,
the CAA deadline for serious ozone nonattainment areas. EPA issued a
final rulemaking action on September 26, 2003 (68 FR 55469), to
reclassify the area to severe ozone nonattainment. Subsequently, this
area attained the 1-hour ozone NAAQS and EPA redesignated the area to
attainment. See 70 FR 34660 (June 15, 2005). In addition, on April 30,
2004, EPA issued a final rulemaking action (69 FR 23951) to revoke the
1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS, effective June 15, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On November 6, 1991, EPA designated and classified the
following counties in and around the Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan
area as a serious ozone nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS: Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette,
Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Paulding, and Rockdale. See 56 FR
56694.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38856), EPA established an 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and subsequently designated areas. On April 30, 2004 (69 FR
23858), EPA designated a 20-county area in and around metropolitan
Atlanta as a marginal ozone nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.\2\ EPA reclassified this area as a moderate ozone
nonattainment area on March 6, 2008 (73 FR 12013), because the area
failed to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the required attainment
date of June 15, 2007. Subsequently, the area attained the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard, and on December 2, 2013 (78 FR 72040), EPA redesignated
the area to attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard
consisted of the following counties: Barrow, Bartow, Carroll,
Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth,
Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Rockdale, Spalding,
and Walton.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 12, 2008, EPA revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 73 FR
16436 (March 27, 2008). EPA designated a 15-county area in and around
metropolitan Atlanta as a marginal ozone nonattainment area for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on April 30, 2012 (effective July 20, 2012).\3\
See 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012). EPA reclassified these counties as a
moderate ozone nonattainment area on May 4, 2016 (effective June 3,
2016), because the area failed to attain the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS by
the required attainment date of July 20, 2015. See 81 FR 26697 (May 4,
2016). Subsequently, the area attained the 2008 8-hour ozone standard
and EPA redesignated the area to attainment. See 82 FR 25523 (June 2,
2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard
consisted of the following counties: Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton,
Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett,
Henry, Newton, Paulding, and Rockdale.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 1, 2015, EPA again revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See
80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015). EPA designated a 7-county area in and
around metropolitan Atlanta as a marginal ozone nonattainment area for
the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS on April 30, 2018 (effective August 3,
2018).\4\ See 83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018). Subsequently, the area
attained the 2015 8-hour ozone standard and EPA redesignated the area
to attainment. See 87 FR 62733 (October 17, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone standard
consists of the following counties: Bartow, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb,
Fulton, Gwinnett, and Henry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA is proposing to approve changes to the I/M regulations in
Chapter 391-3-20--Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance of Georgia's SIP
that were provided to EPA through a cover letter dated June 8, 2022.
Specifically, Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision seeks to update Rule 391-
3-20-.01--Definitions; Rule 391-3-20-.04--Emission Inspection
Procedures; Rule 391-3-20-05--Emission Standards; Rule 391-3-20-.09--
Inspection Station Requirements; Rule 391-3-20-.10--Certificates of
Authorization; Rule 391-3-20-.11--Inspector Qualifications and
Certification; Rule 391-3-20-.13--Certificate of Emission Inspection;
Rule 391-3-20-.15--Repairs and Retests; Rule 391-3-20-.17--Waivers; and
Rule 391-3-20-.22--Enforcement.
Further, EPA is proposing to approve additional changes to
Georgia's I/M regulations that were provided to EPA through a cover
letter dated June 6, 2023. Specifically, Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP
revision seeks to update Rule 391-3-20-.01, Definitions; Rule 391-3-
20-.03, Covered Vehicles; Exemptions; Rule 391-3-20-.04, Emission
Inspection Procedures; Rule 391-3-20-.05, Emission Standards; and Rule
391-3-20-.11, Inspector Qualifications and Certification.
Collectively, the proposed changes remove obsolete references and
provisions, update Georgia's I/M requirements, update terminology,
correct punctuation, and make other minor changes to Georgia's SIP-
approved I/M requirements. EPA is proposing to find that the changes
submitted by Georgia will not interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other
applicable CAA requirement.\5\ Thus, EPA is proposing to approve the
changes to Georgia's SIP as submitted in Georgia's 2022 and 2023 I/M
SIP revisions. Section III, below, provides a summary of these changes
and EPA's analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See CAA section 110(l).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. EPA's Analysis of Georgia's Submittals
A. Rule 391-3-20-.01, ``Definitions''
Both Georgia's 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP revisions update Rule 391-3-
20-.01, Definitions. Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision makes a minor
change to one definition. Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision makes further
changes to Rule 391-3-20-.01 by adding a definition, removing two
definitions, revising one definition, making minor grammatical changes
in three definitions, and then renumbering the section to reflect these
changes.
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates the definition for
``Emission Inspection'' in Rule 391-3-20-.01. The revision changes the
order of tests and inspections listed in the definition. Specifically,
the ``on-board diagnostic system check'' test is moved to the beginning
of listed tests and inspections, and the ``exhaust emissions test'' is
moved to the end of the list. The purpose of this change is to
highlight the more current widespread use of OBD as the primary method
used for emission tests. Since this minor update does not change any
applicable limits or requirements, it will have no impact on emissions
and is consistent with CAA requirements.
Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision further updates Rule 391-3-20-.01
by adding a definition, removing two definitions, revising one
definition, making minor grammatical changes in three definitions, and
then renumbering the section to reflect these changes. First, the
revision adds a definition for ``Biometrics.'' The revision adds this
definition to reflect another method of identification that can be used
by an inspector to initiate an inspection. Specifically, inspectors
will now be able to use their own biometric login in lieu of using
their personal access code to perform and record any inspections.
Second, the revision removes the definitions ``Grandfathered Vehicle''
and ``Gray Market Vehicle'' since both are encompassed in the newly
revised definition of ``Non-conforming Vehicle.'' The new definition
for ``Non-conforming Vehicle'' applies to those vehicles that have not
obtained an EPA certification or ones that have an emissions control
component that is obsolete according to the manufacturer. Further, the
revision to this definition adds that vehicles that qualify as non-
conforming ``would be subject to an alternative tail pipe emissions
standard
[[Page 88312]]
based upon its model year to obtain a vehicle registration in the
Georgia covered counties.'' Since neither grandfathered vehicles nor
gray market vehicles have EPA certification, both types of vehicles
fall under the new definition for ``Non-conforming Vehicle,'' so
removal of ``Grandfathered Vehicle'' and ``Gray Market Vehicle'' from
the SIP does not result in any changes. Subsequent subparagraphs are
being renumbered to reflect these changes. Third, the revision makes
stylistic changes to the definitions of ``Light Duty Truck,'' and
``Light Duty Vehicle,'' by adding commas to numbers to aid with their
readability. Finally, the revision corrects a grammatical mistake in
the definition for ``Time Extension'' by removing an unnecessary
period. Given the nature of these changes, they have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA requirements.
B. Rule 391-3-20-.03, ``Covered Vehicles; Exemptions''
Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.03, Covered
Vehicles; Exemptions, by removing outdated terminology, removing one
requirement, making one stylistic change, and one minor grammatical
change. First, the revision updates paragraph 391-3-20-.03(8) by
removing the first sentence which states that ``Provisions for
grandfathered vehicles, i.e., gray market vehicles, kit cars, hot rods,
and non-conforming vehicles are described in this subparagraph'' and by
removing the term ``gray market'' from the second sentence. Neither kit
cars nor hot rod vehicles have EPA certification, so both vehicles fall
under the new definition for ``Non-conforming Vehicle'' in addition to
those vehicles that were previously considered grandfathered or gray
market. Second, the revision removes the last sentence of the paragraph
which states that kit cars and hot rods which are newly registered in
the counties subject to I/M after December 31, 1998, are not eligible
for special inspection standards. According to GA EPD, it has granted
non-conforming status to 91 kit cars and hot rods since 2007.\6\ As a
result of the proposed change to the last sentence of 391-3-20-.03(8),
these 91 vehicles would now be eligible for a special inspection
standard. Further, GA EPD stated that 3.3 million emission inspection
tests were performed in 2022 alone. Given this proportionality, to the
extent that kit cars and hot rods are now eligible for a special
inspection standard, EPA does not believe that this change would
interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or any
other applicable CAA requirement. Third, the revision makes a stylistic
change to subparagraph 391-3-20-.03(1)(b), adding a comma to ease with
the readability of a number. Finally, the revision updates paragraph
391-3-20-.03(3) with a grammatical correction by removing a comma.
Given the nature of these changes, EPA is proposing to find that they
are consistent with CAA requirements, including 110(l).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See email from Anna Aponte, GA EPD, to Josue Ortiz Borrero,
EPA Region 4 (November 16, 2023), available in the docket for this
proposed rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Rule 391-3-20-.04, ``Emission Inspection Procedures''
Both Georgia's 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP revisions update Rule 391-3-
20-.04, Emission Inspection Procedures. Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision
removes obsolete language related to an outdated testing requirement.
Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision further changes Rule 391-3-20-.04 by
updating terminology.
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.04, Emission
Inspection Procedures, by removing obsolete language related to an
outdated testing requirement. Specifically, the revision updates
paragraph 391-3-20-.04(1) by removing a requirement that an emission
inspector check whether a vehicle has ``tires with cords exposed''
prior to inspecting it. The outdated Acceleration Simulation Mode (ASM)
inspection test was performed on a dynamometer, so the inspector was
required to look for any tires with cords exposed because they could
pose a safety risk during the test. The ASM test was removed as an
inspection test from the Georgia SIP in 2022 because all vehicles
covered under the Georgia I/M program could be inspected using the OBD
inspection or TSI test instead. See 87 FR 41080 (July 11, 2022). Since
the ASM test is no longer part of Georgia's I/M program, this change
has no impact on emissions and is consistent with CAA requirements.
Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision further updates Rule 391-3-20-.04,
Emission Inspection Procedures, by updating terminology in a
subparagraph. Specifically, the term ``non-conforming'' replaces the
term ``grandfathered'' to describe vehicles subject to the emission
inspection procedures in subparagraph 391-3-20-.04(2)(c) and its
corresponding subsections. This subparagraph and its corresponding
subsections outline emission inspection procedures for non-conforming
vehicles. As mentioned in subsection III.A of this document, the
definition for ``Grandfathered Vehicle'' has been removed from the
enhanced I/M rules, and instead, the newly revised definition for
``Non-conforming Vehicle'' covers these vehicles as well as others.
Given the nature of these changes, they have no impact on emissions and
are consistent with CAA requirements.
D. Rule 391-3-20-.05, ``Emission Standards''
Both Georgia's 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP revisions update Rule 391-3-
20-.05, Emission Standards. Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision makes one
language change and reorders subparagraphs to reflect technological
advances in testing. Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision further changes
Rule 391-3-20-.05 by updating terminology to be consistent with new
definitions the EPA is acting on in this notice.
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.04, Emission
Inspection Procedures, by making one language change and reordering
subparagraphs to reflect the more widespread use of OBD testing. First,
the revision updates paragraph 391-3-20-.05(2) to change the order of a
list of inspection tests a vehicle subject to the I/M program must
pass. Specifically, the OBD test is moved to the beginning of listed
inspection tests, and the exhaust emissions test is moved to the end of
the list. This change reflects the current, wider-spread use of the OBD
test for inspection of motor vehicles as compared to exhaust emissions
tests. Second, the revision changes the order of the exhaust emission
testing requirements and OBD testing requirements, which were
previously outlined in subparagraphs 391-3-20-.05(2)(b) and 391-3-
20.05(2)(d), respectively. The revision switches the order of these
testing requirements so now the OBD testing requirements are housed in
subparagraph 391-3-20-.05(2)(b) and the requirements for exhaust
emissions tests are in subparagraph 391-3-20-.05(2)(d). This change has
also been made to reflect the wider-spread use of OBD tests as compared
to exhaust emissions tests for motor vehicles subject to the Georgia I/
M program. Given the nature of these changes, they have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA requirements.
Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.05, Emission
Standards, by removing references to hot rods in one subparagraph, and
references to gray market vehicles and grandfathered vehicles in
another subparagraph, replacing them all with references to ``non-
conforming'' vehicles. First, in subparagraph 391-3-
[[Page 88313]]
20-.05(2)(a)4., the revision replaces the term ``hot rod'' with ``non-
conforming'' in describing vehicles that shall pass the tampering
inspection if either the original vehicle or the replacement engine was
equipped with a catalytic converter and a catalytic converter has been
installed. Since the new definition for non-conforming vehicle covers
hot rods as well as certain other vehicle types, the applicability of
this subparagraph expands, thus making it more stringent. Second, in
subparagraph 391-3-20-.05(2)(d)2., references to ``gray market''
vehicles and ``grandfathered'' vehicles are removed. The result of this
change is that the new rule describes when a vehicle defined as non-
conforming is considered to have passed an exhaust emissions test.
Since the new definition for non-conforming covers all gray market
vehicles and grandfathered vehicles, the applicability of the
subparagraph has not changed. Given the nature of these changes, they
have no impact on emissions and are consistent with CAA requirements.
E. Rule 391-3-20-.09, ``Inspection Station Requirements''
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.09,
Inspection Station Requirements, by removing outdated language, making
one stylistic change, removing unnecessary language, and adding
clarifying language. First, the revision removes outdated language from
subparagraph 391-3-20-.09(2)(g) that requires the air intakes on both
the Georgia Analyzer System (GAS) and the vehicle being inspected to be
exposed to the same ambient temperature, pressure, and humidity
conditions throughout an inspection. The outdated ASM test was
sensitive to changes in temperature, pressure, and humidity during
inspection, whereas the OBD and TSI tests are not. Since the ASM test
is no longer part of the Georgia I/M program, the removal of this
language will not impact emissions. In subparagraph 391-3-20-.09(2)(i),
the revision makes some minor changes to several of its corresponding
subsections. First, in subsection 391-3-20-.09(2)(i)(3) of the rule,
the revision makes a stylistic, word choice change by replacing the
phrase ``tie into'' with ``connect to'' in describing a secure internet
connection that should connect GAS to each Vehicle Information Database
(VID). Next, in subsection 391-3-20-.09(2)(i)(7) of the rule, the
phrase ``capable of performing OBD system checks'' is deleted because
all inspection stations are now required to be capable of performing
OBD system checks, making the language redundant. Previously, Georgia
had stations that that only tested older cars which did not have OBD
systems, so this language was necessary. Finally, in subsection 391-3-
20-.09(2)(i)(8), language is added indicating that a station owner will
receive the currently applicable version of the Emissions Inspector
Certification Training Program Manual during the inspector
certification. Given the nature of these changes, they have no impact
on emissions and are consistent with CAA requirements.
F. Rule 391-3-20-.10, ``Certificates of Authorization''
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.10,
Certificates of Authorization, by adding a new requirement.
Specifically, the added language now requires station owners who intend
to renew their Certificate of Authorization to operate an inspection
station to apply for renewal at least 30 days prior to the expiration
date of the existing certification. Previously, the language said that
station owners ``may apply'' but this is now updated to say that they
``must apply'' at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the existing
certificate. Additionally, the revision clarifies that this
subparagraph requiring a renewal application refers to ``station owners
intending to renew their certificate.'' This is simply clarifying
language as the subparagraph already applied to owners who were seeking
renewal of their Certificate of Authorization. Given the nature of
these changes, they have no impact on emissions and are consistent with
CAA requirements.
G. Rule 391-3-20-.11, ``Inspector Qualifications and Certification''
Both Georgia's 2022 and 2023 I/M SIP revisions update Rule 391-3-
20-.11, Inspector Qualifications and Certification. Georgia's 2022 I/M
SIP revision adds clarifying language and makes some minor word choice
changes. Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision further changes Rule 391-3-
20-.11 by updating language to reflect advances in technology, to
include some new requirements, and to make one minor grammatical
change.
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.11,
Inspector Qualifications and Certification, to add clarifying language
in several places and to make some word choice changes. First, in
subparagraph 391-3-20-.11(5)(a), the revision adds language to clarify
that the requirement for a complete application for renewal to be
submitted at least 30 calendar days prior to the expiration of the
existing certificate applies to inspectors ``intending to renew their
certificate.'' This new language does not add any new requirements, but
better describes who the requirement applies to. Another clarifying
change is made in paragraph 391-3-20-.11(6) to specify that inspectors
must have the picture on their GA EPD-issued ID clearly visible on the
inspector's upper body area when performing an emissions inspection.
Previously, the language indicated only that the ID itself must be
visible on the inspector's upper body area, so this change simply
clarifies that the inspector's picture must be visible in this
location. Finally, one last clarifying change is made to paragraph 391-
3-20-.11(9), where the revision adds the word ``unauthorized'' to
clarify who may not use a certified emission inspector's personal
access code to perform any part of an emissions inspection. Previously,
the paragraph read that no person should use the access code; however,
this was not the purpose of the rule as the certified emission
inspector should always be able to use their personal access code to
perform any part of an emission inspection. This clarifying change
eliminates the confusion previously caused by this paragraph. Finally,
the revision makes several word choice changes. First, in several parts
of the rule, the revision replaces the word ``card'' with ``badge,'' in
describing the picture ID. Second, the revision removes the word
``location'' from the phrase ``visible location'' in paragraph 391-3-
20-.11(6). The phrase required that an emission inspector have their ID
badge clearly visible on the inspector's upper body area, so the
removal of the word ``location'' does not change the meaning of the
requirement. This removal is a minor change that constitutes a change
in word choice. Given the nature of these changes, they have no impact
on emissions and are consistent with CAA requirements.
Georgia's 2023 I/M SIP revision further updates Rule 391-3-20-.11
by adding language to reflect the use of biometric identification to
initiate an inspection, to include some new requirements, and to make
one minor grammatical change. First, paragraph 391-3-20-.11(8) is
revised to require inspectors to notify the Management Contractor of a
change to telephone or email address contact information after applying
for and receiving a Certificate of Authorization. Previously,
inspectors only needed to notify the Management Contractor of a change
of address. Second, the revision revises paragraphs 391-3-20-.11(9) and
.11(10) to reflect that, in addition to using a personal access code,
inspectors may also use a
[[Page 88314]]
biometric login to perform parts of the inspection. Further, the
revision forbids inspectors from divulging or authorizing the use of
their own biometric login to any other person. This change reflects the
new use of biometric logins during inspections described in section
III.A of this notice. Finally, the revision makes one grammatical
change to paragraph 391-3-20-.11(7) by removing a comma. Given the
nature of these changes, they have no impact on emissions and are
consistent with CAA requirements.
H. Rule 391-3-20-.13, ``Certificate of Emission Inspection''
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.13,
Certificate of Emission Inspection, with two minor changes. First, the
revision revises subparagraph 391-3-20-.13(1)(i), which specifies that
inspection results for applicable inspection tests must be included in
a Certificate of Emission Inspection. The change rearranges the order
of applicable inspection tests to place OBD testing first. This change
is made to reflect the wider-spread use of the OBD test as compared to
exhaust emission tests. The second minor change updates subparagraph
391-3-20-.13(2)(c), which requires that inspectors provide vehicle
owners who have failed an emission inspection with the current,
quarterly RepairWatch Public Report. This report identifies repair
facilities. The change adds the phrase ``access to'' at the beginning
of the subparagraph to specify that the inspector must provide owners
of vehicles that have failed inspection emission tests with access to
the current, quarterly reports. This change is simply clarifying in
nature. Given the nature of these changes, they have no impact on
emissions and are consistent with CAA requirements.
I. Rule 391-3-20-.15, ``Repairs and Retests''
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision amends Rule 391-3-20-.15, Repairs
and Retests, by removing one outdated requirement. Specifically, in
paragraph 391-3-20-.15(4), ``NOX'' is deleted from the list
of pollutants for which a vehicle must pass an exhaust test upon
reinspection. Usable NOX emission information only came with
an ASM test since NOX was released from the motor vehicle
when it was under load (i.e., while using the dynamometer). Although a
motor vehicle still may still release NOX emissions during a
TSI test, the emissions are much lower since it is performed at idle.
This NOX information is unusable to make any determination
as to whether a vehicle is adequately preventing the release of
NOX. Since the ASM test was removed in a previous SIP
revision, and because none of the applicable exhaust emissions tests
would provide useable NOX emission information, this
requirement is obsolete. Since the ASM test is not part of Georgia's I/
M program, the changes to Rule 391-3-20-.15 have no impact on emissions
and are consistent with CAA requirements.
J. Rule 391-3-20-.17, ``Waivers''
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.17, Waivers,
by deleting obsolete language in one subparagraph and updating language
in another. First, the revision updates subparagraph 391-3-
20-.17(2)(c), by deleting the phrase ``on preprinted repair forms'' to
describe how receipts for parts and labor must be submitted for repair
waivers. Receipts must still be submitted, but they no longer have to
be submitted on preprinted repair forms. This change does not remove
any substantive requirement because receipts must still be submitted,
and the minimum repair form entries have not changed. Second, the
revision updates subparagraph 391-3-20-.17(2)(f) by adding clarifying
language specifying that repairs for a waiver shall ``address the OBD
failure'' or produce a reduction in ``tailpipe'' emissions for the
pollutant that failed the previous test. Since the applicable tests
required under the Georgia I/M program are either the OBD inspection
test or a tailpipe emissions test (i.e., TSI tailpipe emissions test),
the added language clarifies what repairs should address in the event
of a failure of an applicable emissions test. Given the nature of these
changes, they have no impact on emissions and are consistent with CAA
requirements.
K. Rule 391-3-20-.22, ``Enforcement''
Georgia's 2022 I/M SIP revision updates Rule 391-3-20-.22,
Enforcement, with one minor word choice change. Specifically, in
subparagraph 391-3-20-.22(2)(b), the revision replaces the word
``card'' with ``badge'' to describe the picture ID that certified
emissions inspectors use. This better describes the form of ID and adds
no new requirements. Given the nature of this update, it will have no
impact on emissions and is consistent with CAA requirements.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.5, and as explained in sections I
and II of this preamble, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference
Georgia Rules 391-3-20-.09--Inspection Station Requirements; 391-3-
20-.10--Certificates of Authorization; 391-3-20-.13--Certificate of
Emission Inspection; 391-3-20-.15--Repairs and Retests; 391-3-20-.17--
Waivers; and 391-3-20-.22-- Enforcement, all of which have a state-
effective date of April 19, 2022, into the Georgia SIP. Further, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference Georgia Rules 391-3-20-.01,
Definitions; Rule 391-3-20-.03, Covered Vehicles; Exemptions; Rule 391-
3-20-.04, Emission Inspection Procedures; Rule 391-3-20-.05, Emission
Standards; and Rule 391-3-20-.11, Inspector Qualifications and
Certification, all of which have a state-effective date of March 21,
2023, into the Georgia SIP. EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at
the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
IV. Proposed Actions
EPA is proposing to approve changes to Georgia's SIP-approved I/M
rules as provided in Georgia's June 8, 2022, and June 6, 2023, SIP
revisions. These SIP revisions include changes to 391-3-20-.01--
Definitions; 391-3-20-.03, Covered Vehicles; Exemptions; 391-3-20-.04--
Emission Inspection Procedures; 391-3-20-.05--Emission Standards; 391-
3-20-.09--Inspection Station Requirements; 391-3-20-.10--Certificates
of Authorization; 391-3-20-.11--Inspector Qualifications and
Certification; 391-3-20-.13--Certificate of Emission Inspection; 391-3-
20-.15--Repairs and Retests; 391-3-20-.17--Waivers; and 391-3-20-.22--
Enforcement. EPA has made the preliminary determination that these
changes are consistent with CAA requirements. Thus, EPA is proposing to
these changes to Georgia's SIP.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, these
actions merely propose to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, these proposed actions:
[[Page 88315]]
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
Do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because they approve a state program;
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Are not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that
``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
EPD did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP
submittals; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in these proposed actions. Due to the
nature of the actions being proposed here, these proposed actions are
expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air quality of the
affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of these
proposed actions, and there is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving EJ for
people of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 14, 2023.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2023-28105 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P