Proposed General Directive 24-1: Required Actions Regarding Assaults on Transit Workers, 88213-88217 [2023-28002]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices
II. Background
On October 31, 2023, FMCSA
published a notice announcing its
decision to renew exemptions for 13
individuals from the hearing standard in
49 CFR 391.41(b)(11) to operate a CMV
in interstate commerce and requested
comments from the public (88 FR
74560). The public comment period
ended on November 30, 2023, and no
comments were received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of these applicants and determined that
renewing these exemptions would likely
achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level
that would be achieved by complying
with § 391.41(b)(11).
The physical qualification standard
for drivers regarding hearing found in
§ 391.41(b)(11) states that a person is
physically qualified to drive a CMV if
that person first perceives a forced
whispered voice in the better ear at not
less than 5 feet with or without the use
of a hearing aid or, if tested by use of
an audiometric device, does not have an
average hearing loss in the better ear
greater than 40 decibels at 500 Hz, 1,000
Hz, and 2,000 Hz with or without a
hearing aid when the audiometric
device is calibrated to American
National Standard (formerly ASA
Standard) Z24.5—1951.
This standard was adopted in 1970
and was revised in 1971 to allow drivers
to be qualified under this standard
while wearing a hearing aid (35 FR
6458, 6463 (Apr. 22, 1970) and 36 FR
12857 (July 8, 1971), respectively).
III. Discussion of Comments
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
IV. Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 13
renewal exemption applications,
FMCSA announces its decision to
exempt the following drivers from the
hearing requirement in § 391.41(b)(11).
As of November 19, 2023, and in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315(b), the following 13 individuals
have satisfied the renewal conditions for
obtaining an exemption from the
hearing requirement in the FMCSRs for
interstate CMV drivers (88 FR 74561):
Jeffrey Barbuto (NH)
Wayne Crowl (IN)
Debbie Gaskill (GA)
Jason Gensler (OH)
Emil Iontchev (IL)
Jerrell McCrary (NC)
Danny McGowan (WV)
Matthew Moore (TX)
Abdiwahab Olow (MN)
Stuart Randles (FL)
18:02 Dec 19, 2023
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–27994 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No. FTA–2023–0032]
Proposed General Directive 24–1:
Required Actions Regarding Assaults
on Transit Workers
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed general
directive; request for comments.
AGENCY:
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Anthony Saive (TN)
Jennifer Valentine (TX)
Donald Weyand (MI)
The drivers were included in docket
numbers FMCSA–2014–0383, FMCSA–
2014–0385, FMCSA–2014–0387,
FMCSA–2018–0139, FMCSA–2019–
0109, FMCSA–2019–0110, or FMCSA–
2021–0015. Their exemptions were
applicable as of November 19, 2023 and
will expire on November 19, 2025.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
31315(b), each exemption will be valid
for 2 years from the effective date unless
revoked earlier by FMCSA. The
exemption will be revoked if the
following occurs: (1) the person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained prior to being granted;
or (3) continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136, 49
U.S.C. chapter 313, or the FMCSRs.
Jkt 262001
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) is proposing a
General Directive to address the
significant and continuing nationallevel safety risk related to assaults on
transit workers. The General Directive
would require each transit agency
subject to FTA’s Public Transportation
Agency Safety Plans (PTASP) regulation
to conduct a safety risk assessment,
identify safety risk mitigations or
strategies, and provide information to
FTA on how it is assessing, mitigating,
and monitoring the safety risk
associated with assaults on transit
workers. As required by the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law, each transit agency
serving a large urbanized area must
involve the joint labor-management
Safety Committee when identifying
safety risk mitigations.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
88213
Comments should be filed by
February 20, 2024. FTA will consider
comments received after that date to the
extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by docket number FTA–
2023–0032, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for sending comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name (Federal
Transit Administration and Docket
Number (FTA–2023–0032). All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For internet access to the
docket to read background documents
and comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Background
documents and comments received may
also be viewed at the U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave.
SE, Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. EST, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
program matters, contact Stewart Mader,
Office of Transit Safety and Oversight,
(202) 366–9677 or stewart.mader@
dot.gov. For legal matters, contact
Heather Ueyama, Office of Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–7374 or
heather.ueyama@dot.gov.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FTA is
seeking comment on a proposed General
Directive to address the significant and
continuing nationwide safety risk
associated with assaults on transit
workers.1 This General Directive is part
of FTA’s ongoing comprehensive efforts
to improve transit worker safety. FTA is
also undertaking other actions related to
DATES:
1 For purposes of this General Directive, transit
worker means any employee, contractor, or
volunteer working on behalf of a transit agency,
who comes into contact with the public while
performing their duties.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
88214
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices
transit worker safety, including funding
research, sponsoring training, soliciting
public input, providing technical
assistance. FTA intends to use
information submitted to it pursuant to
the General Directive and other FTA
initiatives to inform future FTA actions,
including rulemakings such as the
planned Transit Worker and Public
Safety rule.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Assaults on Transit Workers: NationalLevel Hazard
From 2008 to 2021, the National
Transit Database (NTD) documented an
average of 241 assaults on transit
workers major events 2 per year,
including 192 per year occurring on
transit vehicles, 44 per year occurring in
transit revenue facilities, and five per
year occurring in other non-public
locations, such as maintenance shops
and yards. The number of reported
assaults on transit workers per 100
million vehicle revenue miles (VRM)
increased by an average of eight percent
per year from 2008 to 2021—a 121
percent total increase from the 2008 rate
of assaults on transit workers.
The NTD data collected and
published in this period does not reflect
the number and rate of all assaults on
transit workers because it does not
include assaults on transit workers that
did not require medical attention. In the
past, NTD reporting requirements
focused on the most serious events that
met the NTD ‘‘major event’’ reporting
threshold, as defined by the NTD
reporting manual. The Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law, enacted as the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
(Pub. L. 117–58), significantly expands
the data that FTA will collect through
the NTD on assaults on transit workers.
To implement this requirement, FTA
recently finalized new NTD reporting
requirements regarding assaults on
transit workers on February 23, 2023,
(88 FR 11506) and has begun collecting
expanded data.
While FTA does not collect data on
precursor events to assaults, industry
experts cite anecdotal evidence that
assaults on operators are a product of
direct interaction with the public 3 and
2 A major event reported as an assault, defined in
the NTD at the time the data was collected is an
unlawful attack by one person upon another, or
homicide where a transit worker received
immediate medical attention away from the scene
or died within 30 days of the event. This includes
NTD reporters that are required to report detailed
safety and security data to the NTD (full reporters).
Full reporters include all rail transit agencies and
all urban transit providers with more than 30
vehicles operated in maximum service. Full
reporters account for approximately 86% of all
public transit service reported to the NTD (as
measured by vehicle revenue miles).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
that disputes over fares and other policy
enforcement activities are a significant
contributor to assaults on operators.4
The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration states that workers who
exchange money as part of their job
duties, work in customer service or
public service, and work alone are at
higher risk for workplace violence.5
Similarly, the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health found
that risk factors for workplace assault
include interaction with the public,
exchanging money, delivering
passengers, having a mobile workplace,
working alone, working late or early
hours, and working in high-crime areas
or community settings.6 Many transit
workers who perform their duties on
transit vehicles and in revenue facilities,
such as vehicle operators, station agents,
and maintenance workers, perform their
duties in such conditions.
Respondents to FTA’s 2021 Request
for Information (RFI) on transit worker
safety 7 proposed numerous actions
applicable across various types of
agencies to protect transit workers from
assault. These proposals included
reducing bus operator involvement in
fare and other policy enforcement;
increasing frontline worker training on
customer service, policy enforcement,
and de-escalation; and changing bus
designs to use barriers, among other
mitigations. Responses also indicated
that any new requirements for safety
risk mitigations should be broad and
flexible enough to work for transit
agencies of all sizes and across all
modes.
Based on this information, FTA has
determined that there is a national-level
hazard 8 that transit workers must
interact with the public, and, at times,
must clarify or enforce agency policies,
which presents a risk of transit workers
being assaulted on transit vehicles and
in revenue facilities.
Previous FTA Efforts To Address
Assaults on Transit Workers
In a 2019 Federal Register notice (84
FR 24196) FTA highlighted that in cases
where a transit agency identifies
hazards associated with assaults on
3 https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/
files/Final_TRACS_Assaults_Report_14-01_07_06_
15_pdf_rv6.pdf.
4 https://www.cutr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/
2012/10/TCRP-Synthesis-93-Report.pdf.
5 https://www.osha.gov/workplace-violence.
6 https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-100/
default.html.
7 https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FTA-20210012/comments.
8 FTA has defined hazard to mean any real or
potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or
death; damage to or loss of the facilities, equipment,
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
transit operators, the PTASP regulation
(49 CFR part 673) requires the agency to
use the SMS Safety Risk Management
(SRM) processes documented in its
Agency Safety Plan (ASP) to assess the
associated safety risk and, based on the
results of the safety risk assessment,
identify safety risk mitigations or
strategies as necessary to address the
safety risk.
In 2021, concerned about the
continued rise in reported assaults on
transit workers, FTA analyzed through
its internal SRM process the hazard that
transit workers must interact with the
public, and, at times, must clarify or
enforce agency policies. FTA conducted
a safety risk assessment to determine the
likelihood and severity of two potential
consequences of this hazard: assaults on
transit workers on board transit
vehicles, and assaults on transit workers
in revenue facilities.
The SRM process helps FTA
determine effective and appropriate risk
mitigations, such as technical assistance
or regulatory responses, to support
transit agencies in cultivating safer
environments for their workers and
riders. To support this SRM process,
FTA established a likelihood scale,
severity scale, and risk matrix for
conducting a safety risk assessment for
each identified potential consequence of
a hazard. FTA uses these scales and risk
matrix to determine a risk rating that
helps FTA, if needed, develop its
recommendations for safety risk
mitigation.
FTA’s Sample Safety Risk Assessment
Matrices for Bus Transit Agencies 9 and
Sample Safety Risk Assessment
Matrices for Rail Transit Agencies 10
illustrate how a safety risk assessment
matrix provides a structured approach
to assess the likelihood and severity of
the consequences of identified hazards,
determine if the safety risk is acceptable
with existing mitigations, or if
additional action is needed, and
prioritize hazards based on the safety
risk of their potential consequences.
FTA’s risk matrix is depicted in Figure
1 below.
rolling stock, or infrastructure of a public
transportation system; or damage to the
environment. 49 CFR 673.5. A national-level hazard
is one that exists at transit agencies across the
country.
9 https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/public-transportation-agencysafety-program/sample-safety-risk.
10 https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/public-transportation-agencysafety-program/sample-safety-risk-0.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices
88215
Figure 1: Risk Matrix used in FTA Safety Risk Assessment
Very High
High
4
Likelihood 3
Moderate
2
Low
1
Very Low
May cause
May cause May cause
death or
minor injury, severe injury
permanent
minor first
or minor
or major
injury or
aid
property
property
destruction of
treatment
damage
damage
property
B
C
D
E
Severity
Could cause
A
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Potential Consequence 1: Transit
Workers Are Assaulted on Transit
Vehicles
The first potential consequence of the
hazard discussed above is that transit
workers are assaulted on transit
vehicles. To assess likelihood, FTA
reviewed NTD major event reports from
2008 through 2020 that involved
assaults on transit workers on transit
vehicles throughout the country. Over
the twelve-year period of 2008–2019,11
there were 2,225 major event reports
matching the potential consequence, an
average of 185 events per year. 1,805 (81
percent) of these occurred at bus modes,
with the remaining 420 (19 percent) at
rail modes. Due to the frequency of
occurrence, the FTA determined a
likelihood rating of Very High (5).
To assess severity, FTA reviewed the
severity of the events referenced in the
likelihood analysis. These events
resulted in three fatalities and 2,232
injuries.12 All three fatalities and 1,806
(81 percent) of injuries resulted from
assaults on transit workers on buses,
while the remaining 426 injuries (19
percent) resulted from assaults on
transit workers on rail vehicles. NTD
11 2020 NTD safety and security data was
preliminary and subject to revision at the time of
FTA’s review. Therefore, the analysis results
presented here do not include 2020 data.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
event data from 2017 and later include
information on the severity of injuries
when rail modes reported assaults; over
98 percent of injuries from these
assaults were minor. Because of this,
FTA determined a severity rating of C.
While there have been some instances of
worker homicides and severe injuries in
vehicles, the majority of these events
result in a minor injury.
Potential Consequence 2: Transit
Workers Are Assaulted in Revenue
Facilities
The second potential consequence of
the hazard discussed above is that
transit workers are assaulted in revenue
facilities. To assess likelihood, FTA
reviewed NTD major event reports from
2008 through 2020 that involved
assaults on transit workers in revenue
facilities throughout the country. Over
the twelve-year period of 2008–2019,13
there were 674 major event reports
matching this potential consequence, an
average of 56.17 events per year. 549 (81
percent) of these occurred at rail modes,
with the remaining 125 (19 percent) at
bus modes. Due to the rate of
12 The number of injuries (2,232) exceeds the
number of assault major events (2,225) because an
assault event can result in multiple injuries.
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
occurrence, FTA determined a
likelihood rating of Very High (5).
To assess severity, FTA reviewed the
severity of the events referenced in the
likelihood analysis. These events
resulted in two fatalities and 732
injuries. A single fatality and 599 (82
percent) of injuries resulted from
assaults on transit workers in rail
revenue facilities, while the remaining
133 injuries (18 percent) and one fatality
resulted from assaults on transit workers
in bus revenue facilities. NTD event
data from 2017 and later include
information on the severity of injuries
from assaults on transit workers in rail
revenue facilities; over 95 percent of
injuries from these assaults were minor.
Because of this, FTA determined a
severity rating of C. While there have
been some instances of transit worker
homicides and severe injuries in
revenue facilities, the majority of these
events resulted in a minor injury.
Based on the risk ratings of the two
identified potential consequences, FTA
determined an overall risk rating of 5C,
as noted in Figure 2. This risk rating
reflects that the safety risk associated
with assaults on transit workers is high.
13 2020 NTD safety and security data was
preliminary and subject to revision at the time of
FTA’s review. Therefore, the analysis results
presented here do not include 2020 data.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
EN20DE23.009
Negligible
88216
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices
Figure 2: FTA Risk Rating for Assaults on Transit Workers
t~s\t~~rSc~~;;;~t•t,wJit
}~t~'l:~"'1
the pu~licartd, a~tirn~!?(fllust .•.••
In addition, as part of FTA’s overall
goal of reducing assaults on transit
workers, FTA analyzed data on assaults
on transit workers reported to the NTD
between 2016 and 2021. Through this
analysis, FTA determined that nine
transit agencies accounted for 79% of all
assaults on transit workers reported to
the NTD. FTA issued Special
Directives 14 to these agencies on
October 4, 2023, to determine whether
and how these agencies are addressing
safety risk related to assaults on transit
workers using their SMS processes and
to determine if additional FTA
intervention is necessary to mitigate the
safety risk related to assaults on transit
workers.
FTA reviewed and analyzed the
information received from these
agencies. Of the nine agencies that
received the Special Directives, only
four reported the completion of a safety
risk assessment prior to issuance of the
Special Directives. This is troubling
because, as noted above, FTA has
previously alerted transit agencies of the
need to address the risk of assaults on
transit operators when identified
through SMS. If these agencies have not
completed a safety risk assessment, FTA
is concerned that other transit agencies
may not have done so either, despite the
presence of the risk of assaults on transit
workers on the systems they operate.
Safety risk assessment is a required
step of a transit agency’s SRM process.15
Moreover, safety risk assessment is a
critical tool to understand the risk
associated with assaults on transit
workers and to help each agency and
joint-labor management Safety
Committee prioritize and develop safety
risk mitigations. The importance of the
safety risk assessment step of SRM is
further underscored by its use by FTA
to assess national-level safety risk. Now,
14 https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/fta-special-directives#SDTWA.
15 49 CFR 673.25(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
based on the available safety data, FTA’s
determination of a 5C risk rating
reflecting a high nationwide risk of
assaults on transit workers, and the
results of the Special Directives, FTA
has concluded that additional FTA
intervention is necessary to address the
safety risk related to assaults on transit
workers nationwide.
Purpose of General Directive
As discussed above, FTA has
determined that there is a national-level
hazard that transit workers must interact
with the public, and, at times, must
clarify or enforce agency policies. FTA
has identified that the potential
consequences of this hazard are that
transit workers may be assaulted on
transit vehicles and in revenue facilities.
Pursuant to 49 CFR 673.25(b), a transit
agency must consider, as a source for
hazard identification, data and
information provided by FTA.
FTA has determined that the nationallevel hazard and potential consequences
discussed above constitute an unsafe
condition or practice presenting a risk of
death or personal injury for transit
workers. Accordingly, pursuant to 49
CFR 670.25, FTA proposes issuing a
General Directive that directs agencies
to take action to address the identified
national-level hazard and the potential
consequences.
FTA proposes that the General
Directive require each transit agency
that is required to have an Agency
Safety Plan (ASP) under the PTASP
regulation (49 CFR part 673) to use the
Safety Risk Management (SRM)
processes documented in its ASP to
conduct a safety risk assessment related
to assaults on transit workers on the
public transportation system it operates.
FTA is proposing that if a transit agency
has conducted a safety risk assessment
related to assaults on transit workers in
the twelve months preceding the date of
issuance of the final General Directive,
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and if the transit agency continues to
believe that the results of that safety risk
assessment are relevant, the transit
agency need not conduct a new
assessment. FTA also proposes to
require each transit agency to use the
SRM processes documented in its ASP
to identify safety risk mitigations or
strategies necessary as a result of the
agency’s safety risk assessment. As
required by the Bipartisan Infrastructure
Law at 49 U.S.C. 5329(d)(5), each transit
agency serving a large urbanized area
must involve the joint labormanagement Safety Committee when
identifying safety risk mitigations to
reduce the likelihood and severity of
consequences identified through the
agency’s safety risk assessment. The
General Directive would also require
each transit agency to provide
information to FTA on how it is
assessing, mitigating, and monitoring
the safety risk associated with assaults
on transit workers within 60 days of
issuance of the final General Directive.
FTA notes that this proposed directive
is intended to work in conjunction with
OSHA protections and is not intended
to preempt OSHA’s standards or other
enforcement authority.
FTA is proposing this approach as it
is grounded in SMS principles and
methods, which FTA has adopted as the
basis for enhancing public
transportation safety. See 49 CFR 670.3.
Further, FTA believes this approach
will ensure that each transit agency is
taking a formal look at the safety risk
related to assaults on transit workers on
their system. FTA also believes this
approach will contribute to transit
agencies and their joint labormanagement Safety Committees
identifying scalable and effective
mitigations across the range of services
they provide and situations that
contribute to the risk of assaults on
transit workers. FTA proposes that each
transit agency provides FTA
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
EN20DE23.010
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
ct.arify·or,.,toreeagencv;policie~~ .
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices
information on how it is assessing,
mitigating, and monitoring the safety
risk associated with assaults on transit
workers, which FTA may use to inform
future Federal action to protect transit
workers.
FTA is proposing to issue this General
Directive to all transit agencies required
to have an ASP under the PTASP
regulation because FTA has determined
that the hazard that transit workers must
interact with the public, and, at times,
must clarify or enforce agency policies,
exists at transit agencies of all sizes and
across all modes of public
transportation, not just those in large
urbanized areas.
The proposed General Directive
contains proposed binding obligations,
which 49 U.S.C. 5334(k) defines as ‘‘a
substantive policy statement, rule, or
guidance document issued by the
Federal Transit Administration that
grants rights, imposes obligations,
produces significant effects on private
interests, or effects a significant change
in existing policy.’’ Under 49 U.S.C.
5334(k) FTA may issue binding
obligations if it follows notice and
comment rulemaking procedures under
5 U.S.C. 553.
FTA requests public comment on this
proposed General Directive, which is
available on the FTA website at https://
www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/fta-general-directives
and in Docket No. FTA–2023–0032.
Following an analysis of the public
comments, FTA will publish a notice in
the Federal Register that includes both
a response to comments and announces
a final General Directive or a statement
rescinding or revising the proposed
General Directive.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5329; 49 CFR
1.91, 670.25.
Veronica Vanterpool,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023–28002 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
[Docket ID Number: DOT–OST–2018–0068]
Agency Request for Emergency
Clearance To Extend Information
Collection Request Related to
Traveling by Air With Service Animals
Office of the Secretary (OST),
Department of Transportation
(Department or DOT).
ACTION: Notice of request for emergency
OMB approval.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces DOT’s intention to
seek emergency clearance to extend the
information collection request (ICR)
under Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number 2105–0576,
‘‘U.S. Department of Transportation
Service Animal Air Transportation
Form’’ and ‘‘U.S. Department of
Transportation Service Animal Relief
Attestation Form.’’ We are seeking
emergency clearance to temporarily
extend the ICR to ensure that airlines
may continue to collect service animal
forms from passengers with disabilities,
which provide assurances to the airline
that the service animal does not pose a
safety threat to passengers and crew
onboard aircraft. DOT requests that
OMB approve this extension request
within 7 days.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before December 27,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2018–0068 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. (You may access comments
received for this notice at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching
docket DOT–OST–2018–0068.)
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building
Ground Floor Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001;
• Hand delivery: West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
OST–2010–0054 at the beginning of
your comment. All comments received
will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received in any of DOT’s dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maegan Johnson or Livaughn Chapman,
Jr., Office of Aviation Consumer
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
88217
Protection, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
telephone number (202) 366–9342
(voice), (202) 366–7152 (fax);
maegan.johnson@dot.gov or
livaughn.chapman@dot.gov (email).
Arrangements to receive this document
in an alternative format may be made by
contacting the above-named
individuals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 2105–0576.
Title: Traveling by Air with Service
Animals.
Type of Request: Request for
emergency extension of existing
information collections.
Background: The U.S. Department of
Transportation (Department or DOT)
published a final rule to amend the
Department’s Air Carrier Access Act
(ACAA) regulation on the transport of
service animals by air in the Federal
Register on December 10, 2020 (85 FR
79742). 14 CFR 382.75 allows airlines to
require passengers traveling with
service animals to provide airlines with
the following two forms of
documentation developed by the
Department as a condition of travel. The
first form published in the rule, the U.S.
Department of Transportation Service
Animal Air Transportation Form
(‘‘Behavior and Health Attestation
Form’’), is designed to ensure and
inform airlines of the service animal’s
good health, disability-related task
training, and good behavior; to educate
passengers traveling with service
animals on how service animals in air
transportation are expected to behave;
and to inform passengers traveling with
service animals of the consequences of
service animal misbehavior. The second
form published in the rule, the U.S.
Department of Transportation Service
Animal Relief Attestation Form (‘‘Relief
Attestation Form’’), may only be
required by airlines when a passenger is
traveling with service animals on a
flight segment scheduled to take 8 hours
or more. The purpose of this form is to
provide assurances to airlines that the
service animal will not need to relieve
itself on the flight or that the animal can
relieve itself in a way that does not
create a health or sanitation issue, and
to educate passengers of the
consequences should an animal relieve
itself on the aircraft in an unsanitary
way.
The Behavior and Health Attestation
Form and the Relief Attestation Form
are the only forms that airlines are
permitted to require from passengers
traveling with service animals as a
condition of transport, except in rare
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88213-88217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No. FTA-2023-0032]
Proposed General Directive 24-1: Required Actions Regarding
Assaults on Transit Workers
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed general directive; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is proposing a
General Directive to address the significant and continuing national-
level safety risk related to assaults on transit workers. The General
Directive would require each transit agency subject to FTA's Public
Transportation Agency Safety Plans (PTASP) regulation to conduct a
safety risk assessment, identify safety risk mitigations or strategies,
and provide information to FTA on how it is assessing, mitigating, and
monitoring the safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers.
As required by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, each transit agency
serving a large urbanized area must involve the joint labor-management
Safety Committee when identifying safety risk mitigations.
DATES: Comments should be filed by February 20, 2024. FTA will consider
comments received after that date to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by docket number FTA-2023-
0032, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for sending comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery/Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
(Federal Transit Administration and Docket Number (FTA-2023-0032). All
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Docket: For internet access to the docket to read background
documents and comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Background documents and comments received may also be viewed at the
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington,
DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. EST, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program matters, contact Stewart
Mader, Office of Transit Safety and Oversight, (202) 366-9677 or
[email protected]. For legal matters, contact Heather Ueyama,
Office of Chief Counsel, (202) 366-7374 or [email protected].
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FTA is seeking comment on a proposed General
Directive to address the significant and continuing nationwide safety
risk associated with assaults on transit workers.\1\ This General
Directive is part of FTA's ongoing comprehensive efforts to improve
transit worker safety. FTA is also undertaking other actions related to
[[Page 88214]]
transit worker safety, including funding research, sponsoring training,
soliciting public input, providing technical assistance. FTA intends to
use information submitted to it pursuant to the General Directive and
other FTA initiatives to inform future FTA actions, including
rulemakings such as the planned Transit Worker and Public Safety rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For purposes of this General Directive, transit worker means
any employee, contractor, or volunteer working on behalf of a
transit agency, who comes into contact with the public while
performing their duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaults on Transit Workers: National-Level Hazard
From 2008 to 2021, the National Transit Database (NTD) documented
an average of 241 assaults on transit workers major events \2\ per
year, including 192 per year occurring on transit vehicles, 44 per year
occurring in transit revenue facilities, and five per year occurring in
other non-public locations, such as maintenance shops and yards. The
number of reported assaults on transit workers per 100 million vehicle
revenue miles (VRM) increased by an average of eight percent per year
from 2008 to 2021--a 121 percent total increase from the 2008 rate of
assaults on transit workers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A major event reported as an assault, defined in the NTD at
the time the data was collected is an unlawful attack by one person
upon another, or homicide where a transit worker received immediate
medical attention away from the scene or died within 30 days of the
event. This includes NTD reporters that are required to report
detailed safety and security data to the NTD (full reporters). Full
reporters include all rail transit agencies and all urban transit
providers with more than 30 vehicles operated in maximum service.
Full reporters account for approximately 86% of all public transit
service reported to the NTD (as measured by vehicle revenue miles).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NTD data collected and published in this period does not
reflect the number and rate of all assaults on transit workers because
it does not include assaults on transit workers that did not require
medical attention. In the past, NTD reporting requirements focused on
the most serious events that met the NTD ``major event'' reporting
threshold, as defined by the NTD reporting manual. The Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law, enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs
Act (Pub. L. 117-58), significantly expands the data that FTA will
collect through the NTD on assaults on transit workers. To implement
this requirement, FTA recently finalized new NTD reporting requirements
regarding assaults on transit workers on February 23, 2023, (88 FR
11506) and has begun collecting expanded data.
While FTA does not collect data on precursor events to assaults,
industry experts cite anecdotal evidence that assaults on operators are
a product of direct interaction with the public \3\ and that disputes
over fares and other policy enforcement activities are a significant
contributor to assaults on operators.\4\ The Occupational Safety and
Health Administration states that workers who exchange money as part of
their job duties, work in customer service or public service, and work
alone are at higher risk for workplace violence.\5\ Similarly, the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health found that risk
factors for workplace assault include interaction with the public,
exchanging money, delivering passengers, having a mobile workplace,
working alone, working late or early hours, and working in high-crime
areas or community settings.\6\ Many transit workers who perform their
duties on transit vehicles and in revenue facilities, such as vehicle
operators, station agents, and maintenance workers, perform their
duties in such conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/Final_TRACS_Assaults_Report_14-01_07_06_15_pdf_rv6.pdf.
\4\ https://www.cutr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TCRP-Synthesis-93-Report.pdf.
\5\ https://www.osha.gov/workplace-violence.
\6\ https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-100/default.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondents to FTA's 2021 Request for Information (RFI) on transit
worker safety \7\ proposed numerous actions applicable across various
types of agencies to protect transit workers from assault. These
proposals included reducing bus operator involvement in fare and other
policy enforcement; increasing frontline worker training on customer
service, policy enforcement, and de-escalation; and changing bus
designs to use barriers, among other mitigations. Responses also
indicated that any new requirements for safety risk mitigations should
be broad and flexible enough to work for transit agencies of all sizes
and across all modes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FTA-2021-0012/comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on this information, FTA has determined that there is a
national-level hazard \8\ that transit workers must interact with the
public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies, which
presents a risk of transit workers being assaulted on transit vehicles
and in revenue facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ FTA has defined hazard to mean any real or potential
condition that can cause injury, illness, or death; damage to or
loss of the facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infrastructure
of a public transportation system; or damage to the environment. 49
CFR 673.5. A national-level hazard is one that exists at transit
agencies across the country.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous FTA Efforts To Address Assaults on Transit Workers
In a 2019 Federal Register notice (84 FR 24196) FTA highlighted
that in cases where a transit agency identifies hazards associated with
assaults on transit operators, the PTASP regulation (49 CFR part 673)
requires the agency to use the SMS Safety Risk Management (SRM)
processes documented in its Agency Safety Plan (ASP) to assess the
associated safety risk and, based on the results of the safety risk
assessment, identify safety risk mitigations or strategies as necessary
to address the safety risk.
In 2021, concerned about the continued rise in reported assaults on
transit workers, FTA analyzed through its internal SRM process the
hazard that transit workers must interact with the public, and, at
times, must clarify or enforce agency policies. FTA conducted a safety
risk assessment to determine the likelihood and severity of two
potential consequences of this hazard: assaults on transit workers on
board transit vehicles, and assaults on transit workers in revenue
facilities.
The SRM process helps FTA determine effective and appropriate risk
mitigations, such as technical assistance or regulatory responses, to
support transit agencies in cultivating safer environments for their
workers and riders. To support this SRM process, FTA established a
likelihood scale, severity scale, and risk matrix for conducting a
safety risk assessment for each identified potential consequence of a
hazard. FTA uses these scales and risk matrix to determine a risk
rating that helps FTA, if needed, develop its recommendations for
safety risk mitigation.
FTA's Sample Safety Risk Assessment Matrices for Bus Transit
Agencies \9\ and Sample Safety Risk Assessment Matrices for Rail
Transit Agencies \10\ illustrate how a safety risk assessment matrix
provides a structured approach to assess the likelihood and severity of
the consequences of identified hazards, determine if the safety risk is
acceptable with existing mitigations, or if additional action is
needed, and prioritize hazards based on the safety risk of their
potential consequences. FTA's risk matrix is depicted in Figure 1
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/public-transportation-agency-safety-program/sample-safety-risk.
\10\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/public-transportation-agency-safety-program/sample-safety-risk-0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 88215]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20DE23.009
Potential Consequence 1: Transit Workers Are Assaulted on Transit
Vehicles
The first potential consequence of the hazard discussed above is
that transit workers are assaulted on transit vehicles. To assess
likelihood, FTA reviewed NTD major event reports from 2008 through 2020
that involved assaults on transit workers on transit vehicles
throughout the country. Over the twelve-year period of 2008-2019,\11\
there were 2,225 major event reports matching the potential
consequence, an average of 185 events per year. 1,805 (81 percent) of
these occurred at bus modes, with the remaining 420 (19 percent) at
rail modes. Due to the frequency of occurrence, the FTA determined a
likelihood rating of Very High (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 2020 NTD safety and security data was preliminary and
subject to revision at the time of FTA's review. Therefore, the
analysis results presented here do not include 2020 data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To assess severity, FTA reviewed the severity of the events
referenced in the likelihood analysis. These events resulted in three
fatalities and 2,232 injuries.\12\ All three fatalities and 1,806 (81
percent) of injuries resulted from assaults on transit workers on
buses, while the remaining 426 injuries (19 percent) resulted from
assaults on transit workers on rail vehicles. NTD event data from 2017
and later include information on the severity of injuries when rail
modes reported assaults; over 98 percent of injuries from these
assaults were minor. Because of this, FTA determined a severity rating
of C. While there have been some instances of worker homicides and
severe injuries in vehicles, the majority of these events result in a
minor injury.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The number of injuries (2,232) exceeds the number of
assault major events (2,225) because an assault event can result in
multiple injuries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential Consequence 2: Transit Workers Are Assaulted in Revenue
Facilities
The second potential consequence of the hazard discussed above is
that transit workers are assaulted in revenue facilities. To assess
likelihood, FTA reviewed NTD major event reports from 2008 through 2020
that involved assaults on transit workers in revenue facilities
throughout the country. Over the twelve-year period of 2008-2019,\13\
there were 674 major event reports matching this potential consequence,
an average of 56.17 events per year. 549 (81 percent) of these occurred
at rail modes, with the remaining 125 (19 percent) at bus modes. Due to
the rate of occurrence, FTA determined a likelihood rating of Very High
(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 2020 NTD safety and security data was preliminary and
subject to revision at the time of FTA's review. Therefore, the
analysis results presented here do not include 2020 data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To assess severity, FTA reviewed the severity of the events
referenced in the likelihood analysis. These events resulted in two
fatalities and 732 injuries. A single fatality and 599 (82 percent) of
injuries resulted from assaults on transit workers in rail revenue
facilities, while the remaining 133 injuries (18 percent) and one
fatality resulted from assaults on transit workers in bus revenue
facilities. NTD event data from 2017 and later include information on
the severity of injuries from assaults on transit workers in rail
revenue facilities; over 95 percent of injuries from these assaults
were minor. Because of this, FTA determined a severity rating of C.
While there have been some instances of transit worker homicides and
severe injuries in revenue facilities, the majority of these events
resulted in a minor injury.
Based on the risk ratings of the two identified potential
consequences, FTA determined an overall risk rating of 5C, as noted in
Figure 2. This risk rating reflects that the safety risk associated
with assaults on transit workers is high.
[[Page 88216]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20DE23.010
In addition, as part of FTA's overall goal of reducing assaults on
transit workers, FTA analyzed data on assaults on transit workers
reported to the NTD between 2016 and 2021. Through this analysis, FTA
determined that nine transit agencies accounted for 79% of all assaults
on transit workers reported to the NTD. FTA issued Special Directives
\14\ to these agencies on October 4, 2023, to determine whether and how
these agencies are addressing safety risk related to assaults on
transit workers using their SMS processes and to determine if
additional FTA intervention is necessary to mitigate the safety risk
related to assaults on transit workers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/fta-special-directives#SDTWA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FTA reviewed and analyzed the information received from these
agencies. Of the nine agencies that received the Special Directives,
only four reported the completion of a safety risk assessment prior to
issuance of the Special Directives. This is troubling because, as noted
above, FTA has previously alerted transit agencies of the need to
address the risk of assaults on transit operators when identified
through SMS. If these agencies have not completed a safety risk
assessment, FTA is concerned that other transit agencies may not have
done so either, despite the presence of the risk of assaults on transit
workers on the systems they operate.
Safety risk assessment is a required step of a transit agency's SRM
process.\15\ Moreover, safety risk assessment is a critical tool to
understand the risk associated with assaults on transit workers and to
help each agency and joint-labor management Safety Committee prioritize
and develop safety risk mitigations. The importance of the safety risk
assessment step of SRM is further underscored by its use by FTA to
assess national-level safety risk. Now, based on the available safety
data, FTA's determination of a 5C risk rating reflecting a high
nationwide risk of assaults on transit workers, and the results of the
Special Directives, FTA has concluded that additional FTA intervention
is necessary to address the safety risk related to assaults on transit
workers nationwide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 49 CFR 673.25(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose of General Directive
As discussed above, FTA has determined that there is a national-
level hazard that transit workers must interact with the public, and,
at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies. FTA has identified
that the potential consequences of this hazard are that transit workers
may be assaulted on transit vehicles and in revenue facilities.
Pursuant to 49 CFR 673.25(b), a transit agency must consider, as a
source for hazard identification, data and information provided by FTA.
FTA has determined that the national-level hazard and potential
consequences discussed above constitute an unsafe condition or practice
presenting a risk of death or personal injury for transit workers.
Accordingly, pursuant to 49 CFR 670.25, FTA proposes issuing a General
Directive that directs agencies to take action to address the
identified national-level hazard and the potential consequences.
FTA proposes that the General Directive require each transit agency
that is required to have an Agency Safety Plan (ASP) under the PTASP
regulation (49 CFR part 673) to use the Safety Risk Management (SRM)
processes documented in its ASP to conduct a safety risk assessment
related to assaults on transit workers on the public transportation
system it operates. FTA is proposing that if a transit agency has
conducted a safety risk assessment related to assaults on transit
workers in the twelve months preceding the date of issuance of the
final General Directive, and if the transit agency continues to believe
that the results of that safety risk assessment are relevant, the
transit agency need not conduct a new assessment. FTA also proposes to
require each transit agency to use the SRM processes documented in its
ASP to identify safety risk mitigations or strategies necessary as a
result of the agency's safety risk assessment. As required by the
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law at 49 U.S.C. 5329(d)(5), each transit
agency serving a large urbanized area must involve the joint labor-
management Safety Committee when identifying safety risk mitigations to
reduce the likelihood and severity of consequences identified through
the agency's safety risk assessment. The General Directive would also
require each transit agency to provide information to FTA on how it is
assessing, mitigating, and monitoring the safety risk associated with
assaults on transit workers within 60 days of issuance of the final
General Directive. FTA notes that this proposed directive is intended
to work in conjunction with OSHA protections and is not intended to
preempt OSHA's standards or other enforcement authority.
FTA is proposing this approach as it is grounded in SMS principles
and methods, which FTA has adopted as the basis for enhancing public
transportation safety. See 49 CFR 670.3. Further, FTA believes this
approach will ensure that each transit agency is taking a formal look
at the safety risk related to assaults on transit workers on their
system. FTA also believes this approach will contribute to transit
agencies and their joint labor-management Safety Committees identifying
scalable and effective mitigations across the range of services they
provide and situations that contribute to the risk of assaults on
transit workers. FTA proposes that each transit agency provides FTA
[[Page 88217]]
information on how it is assessing, mitigating, and monitoring the
safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers, which FTA may
use to inform future Federal action to protect transit workers.
FTA is proposing to issue this General Directive to all transit
agencies required to have an ASP under the PTASP regulation because FTA
has determined that the hazard that transit workers must interact with
the public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies,
exists at transit agencies of all sizes and across all modes of public
transportation, not just those in large urbanized areas.
The proposed General Directive contains proposed binding
obligations, which 49 U.S.C. 5334(k) defines as ``a substantive policy
statement, rule, or guidance document issued by the Federal Transit
Administration that grants rights, imposes obligations, produces
significant effects on private interests, or effects a significant
change in existing policy.'' Under 49 U.S.C. 5334(k) FTA may issue
binding obligations if it follows notice and comment rulemaking
procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553.
FTA requests public comment on this proposed General Directive,
which is available on the FTA website at https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/fta-general-directives and in Docket
No. FTA-2023-0032. Following an analysis of the public comments, FTA
will publish a notice in the Federal Register that includes both a
response to comments and announces a final General Directive or a
statement rescinding or revising the proposed General Directive.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5329; 49 CFR 1.91, 670.25.
Veronica Vanterpool,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-28002 Filed 12-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P