Proposed General Directive 24-1: Required Actions Regarding Assaults on Transit Workers, 88213-88217 [2023-28002]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices II. Background On October 31, 2023, FMCSA published a notice announcing its decision to renew exemptions for 13 individuals from the hearing standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(11) to operate a CMV in interstate commerce and requested comments from the public (88 FR 74560). The public comment period ended on November 30, 2023, and no comments were received. FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of these applicants and determined that renewing these exemptions would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved by complying with § 391.41(b)(11). The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding hearing found in § 391.41(b)(11) states that a person is physically qualified to drive a CMV if that person first perceives a forced whispered voice in the better ear at not less than 5 feet with or without the use of a hearing aid or, if tested by use of an audiometric device, does not have an average hearing loss in the better ear greater than 40 decibels at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz with or without a hearing aid when the audiometric device is calibrated to American National Standard (formerly ASA Standard) Z24.5—1951. This standard was adopted in 1970 and was revised in 1971 to allow drivers to be qualified under this standard while wearing a hearing aid (35 FR 6458, 6463 (Apr. 22, 1970) and 36 FR 12857 (July 8, 1971), respectively). III. Discussion of Comments ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 IV. Conclusion Based upon its evaluation of the 13 renewal exemption applications, FMCSA announces its decision to exempt the following drivers from the hearing requirement in § 391.41(b)(11). As of November 19, 2023, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b), the following 13 individuals have satisfied the renewal conditions for obtaining an exemption from the hearing requirement in the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (88 FR 74561): Jeffrey Barbuto (NH) Wayne Crowl (IN) Debbie Gaskill (GA) Jason Gensler (OH) Emil Iontchev (IL) Jerrell McCrary (NC) Danny McGowan (WV) Matthew Moore (TX) Abdiwahab Olow (MN) Stuart Randles (FL) 18:02 Dec 19, 2023 Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy. [FR Doc. 2023–27994 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit Administration [Docket No. FTA–2023–0032] Proposed General Directive 24–1: Required Actions Regarding Assaults on Transit Workers Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed general directive; request for comments. AGENCY: FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding. VerDate Sep<11>2014 Anthony Saive (TN) Jennifer Valentine (TX) Donald Weyand (MI) The drivers were included in docket numbers FMCSA–2014–0383, FMCSA– 2014–0385, FMCSA–2014–0387, FMCSA–2018–0139, FMCSA–2019– 0109, FMCSA–2019–0110, or FMCSA– 2021–0015. Their exemptions were applicable as of November 19, 2023 and will expire on November 19, 2025. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b), each exemption will be valid for 2 years from the effective date unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) the person fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained prior to being granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136, 49 U.S.C. chapter 313, or the FMCSRs. Jkt 262001 The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is proposing a General Directive to address the significant and continuing nationallevel safety risk related to assaults on transit workers. The General Directive would require each transit agency subject to FTA’s Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans (PTASP) regulation to conduct a safety risk assessment, identify safety risk mitigations or strategies, and provide information to FTA on how it is assessing, mitigating, and monitoring the safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers. As required by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, each transit agency serving a large urbanized area must involve the joint labor-management Safety Committee when identifying safety risk mitigations. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00173 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 88213 Comments should be filed by February 20, 2024. FTA will consider comments received after that date to the extent practicable. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by docket number FTA– 2023–0032, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for sending comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. • Hand Delivery/Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name (Federal Transit Administration and Docket Number (FTA–2023–0032). All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Docket: For internet access to the docket to read background documents and comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov. Background documents and comments received may also be viewed at the U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. EST, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program matters, contact Stewart Mader, Office of Transit Safety and Oversight, (202) 366–9677 or stewart.mader@ dot.gov. For legal matters, contact Heather Ueyama, Office of Chief Counsel, (202) 366–7374 or heather.ueyama@dot.gov. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FTA is seeking comment on a proposed General Directive to address the significant and continuing nationwide safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers.1 This General Directive is part of FTA’s ongoing comprehensive efforts to improve transit worker safety. FTA is also undertaking other actions related to DATES: 1 For purposes of this General Directive, transit worker means any employee, contractor, or volunteer working on behalf of a transit agency, who comes into contact with the public while performing their duties. E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM 20DEN1 88214 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices transit worker safety, including funding research, sponsoring training, soliciting public input, providing technical assistance. FTA intends to use information submitted to it pursuant to the General Directive and other FTA initiatives to inform future FTA actions, including rulemakings such as the planned Transit Worker and Public Safety rule. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Assaults on Transit Workers: NationalLevel Hazard From 2008 to 2021, the National Transit Database (NTD) documented an average of 241 assaults on transit workers major events 2 per year, including 192 per year occurring on transit vehicles, 44 per year occurring in transit revenue facilities, and five per year occurring in other non-public locations, such as maintenance shops and yards. The number of reported assaults on transit workers per 100 million vehicle revenue miles (VRM) increased by an average of eight percent per year from 2008 to 2021—a 121 percent total increase from the 2008 rate of assaults on transit workers. The NTD data collected and published in this period does not reflect the number and rate of all assaults on transit workers because it does not include assaults on transit workers that did not require medical attention. In the past, NTD reporting requirements focused on the most serious events that met the NTD ‘‘major event’’ reporting threshold, as defined by the NTD reporting manual. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117–58), significantly expands the data that FTA will collect through the NTD on assaults on transit workers. To implement this requirement, FTA recently finalized new NTD reporting requirements regarding assaults on transit workers on February 23, 2023, (88 FR 11506) and has begun collecting expanded data. While FTA does not collect data on precursor events to assaults, industry experts cite anecdotal evidence that assaults on operators are a product of direct interaction with the public 3 and 2 A major event reported as an assault, defined in the NTD at the time the data was collected is an unlawful attack by one person upon another, or homicide where a transit worker received immediate medical attention away from the scene or died within 30 days of the event. This includes NTD reporters that are required to report detailed safety and security data to the NTD (full reporters). Full reporters include all rail transit agencies and all urban transit providers with more than 30 vehicles operated in maximum service. Full reporters account for approximately 86% of all public transit service reported to the NTD (as measured by vehicle revenue miles). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Dec 19, 2023 Jkt 262001 that disputes over fares and other policy enforcement activities are a significant contributor to assaults on operators.4 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration states that workers who exchange money as part of their job duties, work in customer service or public service, and work alone are at higher risk for workplace violence.5 Similarly, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health found that risk factors for workplace assault include interaction with the public, exchanging money, delivering passengers, having a mobile workplace, working alone, working late or early hours, and working in high-crime areas or community settings.6 Many transit workers who perform their duties on transit vehicles and in revenue facilities, such as vehicle operators, station agents, and maintenance workers, perform their duties in such conditions. Respondents to FTA’s 2021 Request for Information (RFI) on transit worker safety 7 proposed numerous actions applicable across various types of agencies to protect transit workers from assault. These proposals included reducing bus operator involvement in fare and other policy enforcement; increasing frontline worker training on customer service, policy enforcement, and de-escalation; and changing bus designs to use barriers, among other mitigations. Responses also indicated that any new requirements for safety risk mitigations should be broad and flexible enough to work for transit agencies of all sizes and across all modes. Based on this information, FTA has determined that there is a national-level hazard 8 that transit workers must interact with the public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies, which presents a risk of transit workers being assaulted on transit vehicles and in revenue facilities. Previous FTA Efforts To Address Assaults on Transit Workers In a 2019 Federal Register notice (84 FR 24196) FTA highlighted that in cases where a transit agency identifies hazards associated with assaults on 3 https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/ files/Final_TRACS_Assaults_Report_14-01_07_06_ 15_pdf_rv6.pdf. 4 https://www.cutr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/ 2012/10/TCRP-Synthesis-93-Report.pdf. 5 https://www.osha.gov/workplace-violence. 6 https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-100/ default.html. 7 https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FTA-20210012/comments. 8 FTA has defined hazard to mean any real or potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or death; damage to or loss of the facilities, equipment, PO 00000 Frm 00174 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 transit operators, the PTASP regulation (49 CFR part 673) requires the agency to use the SMS Safety Risk Management (SRM) processes documented in its Agency Safety Plan (ASP) to assess the associated safety risk and, based on the results of the safety risk assessment, identify safety risk mitigations or strategies as necessary to address the safety risk. In 2021, concerned about the continued rise in reported assaults on transit workers, FTA analyzed through its internal SRM process the hazard that transit workers must interact with the public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies. FTA conducted a safety risk assessment to determine the likelihood and severity of two potential consequences of this hazard: assaults on transit workers on board transit vehicles, and assaults on transit workers in revenue facilities. The SRM process helps FTA determine effective and appropriate risk mitigations, such as technical assistance or regulatory responses, to support transit agencies in cultivating safer environments for their workers and riders. To support this SRM process, FTA established a likelihood scale, severity scale, and risk matrix for conducting a safety risk assessment for each identified potential consequence of a hazard. FTA uses these scales and risk matrix to determine a risk rating that helps FTA, if needed, develop its recommendations for safety risk mitigation. FTA’s Sample Safety Risk Assessment Matrices for Bus Transit Agencies 9 and Sample Safety Risk Assessment Matrices for Rail Transit Agencies 10 illustrate how a safety risk assessment matrix provides a structured approach to assess the likelihood and severity of the consequences of identified hazards, determine if the safety risk is acceptable with existing mitigations, or if additional action is needed, and prioritize hazards based on the safety risk of their potential consequences. FTA’s risk matrix is depicted in Figure 1 below. rolling stock, or infrastructure of a public transportation system; or damage to the environment. 49 CFR 673.5. A national-level hazard is one that exists at transit agencies across the country. 9 https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/public-transportation-agencysafety-program/sample-safety-risk. 10 https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/public-transportation-agencysafety-program/sample-safety-risk-0. E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM 20DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices 88215 Figure 1: Risk Matrix used in FTA Safety Risk Assessment Very High High 4 Likelihood 3 Moderate 2 Low 1 Very Low May cause May cause May cause death or minor injury, severe injury permanent minor first or minor or major injury or aid property property destruction of treatment damage damage property B C D E Severity Could cause A ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Potential Consequence 1: Transit Workers Are Assaulted on Transit Vehicles The first potential consequence of the hazard discussed above is that transit workers are assaulted on transit vehicles. To assess likelihood, FTA reviewed NTD major event reports from 2008 through 2020 that involved assaults on transit workers on transit vehicles throughout the country. Over the twelve-year period of 2008–2019,11 there were 2,225 major event reports matching the potential consequence, an average of 185 events per year. 1,805 (81 percent) of these occurred at bus modes, with the remaining 420 (19 percent) at rail modes. Due to the frequency of occurrence, the FTA determined a likelihood rating of Very High (5). To assess severity, FTA reviewed the severity of the events referenced in the likelihood analysis. These events resulted in three fatalities and 2,232 injuries.12 All three fatalities and 1,806 (81 percent) of injuries resulted from assaults on transit workers on buses, while the remaining 426 injuries (19 percent) resulted from assaults on transit workers on rail vehicles. NTD 11 2020 NTD safety and security data was preliminary and subject to revision at the time of FTA’s review. Therefore, the analysis results presented here do not include 2020 data. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Dec 19, 2023 Jkt 262001 event data from 2017 and later include information on the severity of injuries when rail modes reported assaults; over 98 percent of injuries from these assaults were minor. Because of this, FTA determined a severity rating of C. While there have been some instances of worker homicides and severe injuries in vehicles, the majority of these events result in a minor injury. Potential Consequence 2: Transit Workers Are Assaulted in Revenue Facilities The second potential consequence of the hazard discussed above is that transit workers are assaulted in revenue facilities. To assess likelihood, FTA reviewed NTD major event reports from 2008 through 2020 that involved assaults on transit workers in revenue facilities throughout the country. Over the twelve-year period of 2008–2019,13 there were 674 major event reports matching this potential consequence, an average of 56.17 events per year. 549 (81 percent) of these occurred at rail modes, with the remaining 125 (19 percent) at bus modes. Due to the rate of 12 The number of injuries (2,232) exceeds the number of assault major events (2,225) because an assault event can result in multiple injuries. PO 00000 Frm 00175 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 occurrence, FTA determined a likelihood rating of Very High (5). To assess severity, FTA reviewed the severity of the events referenced in the likelihood analysis. These events resulted in two fatalities and 732 injuries. A single fatality and 599 (82 percent) of injuries resulted from assaults on transit workers in rail revenue facilities, while the remaining 133 injuries (18 percent) and one fatality resulted from assaults on transit workers in bus revenue facilities. NTD event data from 2017 and later include information on the severity of injuries from assaults on transit workers in rail revenue facilities; over 95 percent of injuries from these assaults were minor. Because of this, FTA determined a severity rating of C. While there have been some instances of transit worker homicides and severe injuries in revenue facilities, the majority of these events resulted in a minor injury. Based on the risk ratings of the two identified potential consequences, FTA determined an overall risk rating of 5C, as noted in Figure 2. This risk rating reflects that the safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers is high. 13 2020 NTD safety and security data was preliminary and subject to revision at the time of FTA’s review. Therefore, the analysis results presented here do not include 2020 data. E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM 20DEN1 EN20DE23.009</GPH> Negligible 88216 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices Figure 2: FTA Risk Rating for Assaults on Transit Workers t~s\t~~rSc~~;;;~t•t,wJit }~t~'l:~"'1 the pu~licartd, a~tirn~!?(fllust .•.•• In addition, as part of FTA’s overall goal of reducing assaults on transit workers, FTA analyzed data on assaults on transit workers reported to the NTD between 2016 and 2021. Through this analysis, FTA determined that nine transit agencies accounted for 79% of all assaults on transit workers reported to the NTD. FTA issued Special Directives 14 to these agencies on October 4, 2023, to determine whether and how these agencies are addressing safety risk related to assaults on transit workers using their SMS processes and to determine if additional FTA intervention is necessary to mitigate the safety risk related to assaults on transit workers. FTA reviewed and analyzed the information received from these agencies. Of the nine agencies that received the Special Directives, only four reported the completion of a safety risk assessment prior to issuance of the Special Directives. This is troubling because, as noted above, FTA has previously alerted transit agencies of the need to address the risk of assaults on transit operators when identified through SMS. If these agencies have not completed a safety risk assessment, FTA is concerned that other transit agencies may not have done so either, despite the presence of the risk of assaults on transit workers on the systems they operate. Safety risk assessment is a required step of a transit agency’s SRM process.15 Moreover, safety risk assessment is a critical tool to understand the risk associated with assaults on transit workers and to help each agency and joint-labor management Safety Committee prioritize and develop safety risk mitigations. The importance of the safety risk assessment step of SRM is further underscored by its use by FTA to assess national-level safety risk. Now, 14 https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/fta-special-directives#SDTWA. 15 49 CFR 673.25(c). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Dec 19, 2023 Jkt 262001 based on the available safety data, FTA’s determination of a 5C risk rating reflecting a high nationwide risk of assaults on transit workers, and the results of the Special Directives, FTA has concluded that additional FTA intervention is necessary to address the safety risk related to assaults on transit workers nationwide. Purpose of General Directive As discussed above, FTA has determined that there is a national-level hazard that transit workers must interact with the public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies. FTA has identified that the potential consequences of this hazard are that transit workers may be assaulted on transit vehicles and in revenue facilities. Pursuant to 49 CFR 673.25(b), a transit agency must consider, as a source for hazard identification, data and information provided by FTA. FTA has determined that the nationallevel hazard and potential consequences discussed above constitute an unsafe condition or practice presenting a risk of death or personal injury for transit workers. Accordingly, pursuant to 49 CFR 670.25, FTA proposes issuing a General Directive that directs agencies to take action to address the identified national-level hazard and the potential consequences. FTA proposes that the General Directive require each transit agency that is required to have an Agency Safety Plan (ASP) under the PTASP regulation (49 CFR part 673) to use the Safety Risk Management (SRM) processes documented in its ASP to conduct a safety risk assessment related to assaults on transit workers on the public transportation system it operates. FTA is proposing that if a transit agency has conducted a safety risk assessment related to assaults on transit workers in the twelve months preceding the date of issuance of the final General Directive, PO 00000 Frm 00176 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and if the transit agency continues to believe that the results of that safety risk assessment are relevant, the transit agency need not conduct a new assessment. FTA also proposes to require each transit agency to use the SRM processes documented in its ASP to identify safety risk mitigations or strategies necessary as a result of the agency’s safety risk assessment. As required by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law at 49 U.S.C. 5329(d)(5), each transit agency serving a large urbanized area must involve the joint labormanagement Safety Committee when identifying safety risk mitigations to reduce the likelihood and severity of consequences identified through the agency’s safety risk assessment. The General Directive would also require each transit agency to provide information to FTA on how it is assessing, mitigating, and monitoring the safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers within 60 days of issuance of the final General Directive. FTA notes that this proposed directive is intended to work in conjunction with OSHA protections and is not intended to preempt OSHA’s standards or other enforcement authority. FTA is proposing this approach as it is grounded in SMS principles and methods, which FTA has adopted as the basis for enhancing public transportation safety. See 49 CFR 670.3. Further, FTA believes this approach will ensure that each transit agency is taking a formal look at the safety risk related to assaults on transit workers on their system. FTA also believes this approach will contribute to transit agencies and their joint labormanagement Safety Committees identifying scalable and effective mitigations across the range of services they provide and situations that contribute to the risk of assaults on transit workers. FTA proposes that each transit agency provides FTA E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM 20DEN1 EN20DE23.010</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 ct.arify·or,.,toreeagencv;policie~~ . Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2023 / Notices information on how it is assessing, mitigating, and monitoring the safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers, which FTA may use to inform future Federal action to protect transit workers. FTA is proposing to issue this General Directive to all transit agencies required to have an ASP under the PTASP regulation because FTA has determined that the hazard that transit workers must interact with the public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies, exists at transit agencies of all sizes and across all modes of public transportation, not just those in large urbanized areas. The proposed General Directive contains proposed binding obligations, which 49 U.S.C. 5334(k) defines as ‘‘a substantive policy statement, rule, or guidance document issued by the Federal Transit Administration that grants rights, imposes obligations, produces significant effects on private interests, or effects a significant change in existing policy.’’ Under 49 U.S.C. 5334(k) FTA may issue binding obligations if it follows notice and comment rulemaking procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553. FTA requests public comment on this proposed General Directive, which is available on the FTA website at https:// www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-andguidance/safety/fta-general-directives and in Docket No. FTA–2023–0032. Following an analysis of the public comments, FTA will publish a notice in the Federal Register that includes both a response to comments and announces a final General Directive or a statement rescinding or revising the proposed General Directive. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5329; 49 CFR 1.91, 670.25. Veronica Vanterpool, Deputy Administrator. [FR Doc. 2023–28002 Filed 12–19–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–57–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 [Docket ID Number: DOT–OST–2018–0068] Agency Request for Emergency Clearance To Extend Information Collection Request Related to Traveling by Air With Service Animals Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation (Department or DOT). ACTION: Notice of request for emergency OMB approval. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Dec 19, 2023 Jkt 262001 In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces DOT’s intention to seek emergency clearance to extend the information collection request (ICR) under Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 2105–0576, ‘‘U.S. Department of Transportation Service Animal Air Transportation Form’’ and ‘‘U.S. Department of Transportation Service Animal Relief Attestation Form.’’ We are seeking emergency clearance to temporarily extend the ICR to ensure that airlines may continue to collect service animal forms from passengers with disabilities, which provide assurances to the airline that the service animal does not pose a safety threat to passengers and crew onboard aircraft. DOT requests that OMB approve this extension request within 7 days. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 27, 2023. ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by the docket number DOT– OST–2018–0068 by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. (You may access comments received for this notice at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching docket DOT–OST–2018–0068.) • Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001; • Hand delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number DOT– OST–2010–0054 at the beginning of your comment. All comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received in any of DOT’s dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maegan Johnson or Livaughn Chapman, Jr., Office of Aviation Consumer SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00177 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 88217 Protection, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, telephone number (202) 366–9342 (voice), (202) 366–7152 (fax); maegan.johnson@dot.gov or livaughn.chapman@dot.gov (email). Arrangements to receive this document in an alternative format may be made by contacting the above-named individuals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 2105–0576. Title: Traveling by Air with Service Animals. Type of Request: Request for emergency extension of existing information collections. Background: The U.S. Department of Transportation (Department or DOT) published a final rule to amend the Department’s Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) regulation on the transport of service animals by air in the Federal Register on December 10, 2020 (85 FR 79742). 14 CFR 382.75 allows airlines to require passengers traveling with service animals to provide airlines with the following two forms of documentation developed by the Department as a condition of travel. The first form published in the rule, the U.S. Department of Transportation Service Animal Air Transportation Form (‘‘Behavior and Health Attestation Form’’), is designed to ensure and inform airlines of the service animal’s good health, disability-related task training, and good behavior; to educate passengers traveling with service animals on how service animals in air transportation are expected to behave; and to inform passengers traveling with service animals of the consequences of service animal misbehavior. The second form published in the rule, the U.S. Department of Transportation Service Animal Relief Attestation Form (‘‘Relief Attestation Form’’), may only be required by airlines when a passenger is traveling with service animals on a flight segment scheduled to take 8 hours or more. The purpose of this form is to provide assurances to airlines that the service animal will not need to relieve itself on the flight or that the animal can relieve itself in a way that does not create a health or sanitation issue, and to educate passengers of the consequences should an animal relieve itself on the aircraft in an unsanitary way. The Behavior and Health Attestation Form and the Relief Attestation Form are the only forms that airlines are permitted to require from passengers traveling with service animals as a condition of transport, except in rare E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM 20DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88213-88217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Transit Administration

[Docket No. FTA-2023-0032]


Proposed General Directive 24-1: Required Actions Regarding 
Assaults on Transit Workers

AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed general directive; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is proposing a 
General Directive to address the significant and continuing national-
level safety risk related to assaults on transit workers. The General 
Directive would require each transit agency subject to FTA's Public 
Transportation Agency Safety Plans (PTASP) regulation to conduct a 
safety risk assessment, identify safety risk mitigations or strategies, 
and provide information to FTA on how it is assessing, mitigating, and 
monitoring the safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers. 
As required by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, each transit agency 
serving a large urbanized area must involve the joint labor-management 
Safety Committee when identifying safety risk mitigations.

DATES: Comments should be filed by February 20, 2024. FTA will consider 
comments received after that date to the extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by docket number FTA-2023-
0032, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for sending comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
(Federal Transit Administration and Docket Number (FTA-2023-0032). All 
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
    Docket: For internet access to the docket to read background 
documents and comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. 
Background documents and comments received may also be viewed at the 
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, 
DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. EST, Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program matters, contact Stewart 
Mader, Office of Transit Safety and Oversight, (202) 366-9677 or 
[email protected]. For legal matters, contact Heather Ueyama, 
Office of Chief Counsel, (202) 366-7374 or [email protected].
    Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FTA is seeking comment on a proposed General 
Directive to address the significant and continuing nationwide safety 
risk associated with assaults on transit workers.\1\ This General 
Directive is part of FTA's ongoing comprehensive efforts to improve 
transit worker safety. FTA is also undertaking other actions related to

[[Page 88214]]

transit worker safety, including funding research, sponsoring training, 
soliciting public input, providing technical assistance. FTA intends to 
use information submitted to it pursuant to the General Directive and 
other FTA initiatives to inform future FTA actions, including 
rulemakings such as the planned Transit Worker and Public Safety rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For purposes of this General Directive, transit worker means 
any employee, contractor, or volunteer working on behalf of a 
transit agency, who comes into contact with the public while 
performing their duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assaults on Transit Workers: National-Level Hazard

    From 2008 to 2021, the National Transit Database (NTD) documented 
an average of 241 assaults on transit workers major events \2\ per 
year, including 192 per year occurring on transit vehicles, 44 per year 
occurring in transit revenue facilities, and five per year occurring in 
other non-public locations, such as maintenance shops and yards. The 
number of reported assaults on transit workers per 100 million vehicle 
revenue miles (VRM) increased by an average of eight percent per year 
from 2008 to 2021--a 121 percent total increase from the 2008 rate of 
assaults on transit workers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A major event reported as an assault, defined in the NTD at 
the time the data was collected is an unlawful attack by one person 
upon another, or homicide where a transit worker received immediate 
medical attention away from the scene or died within 30 days of the 
event. This includes NTD reporters that are required to report 
detailed safety and security data to the NTD (full reporters). Full 
reporters include all rail transit agencies and all urban transit 
providers with more than 30 vehicles operated in maximum service. 
Full reporters account for approximately 86% of all public transit 
service reported to the NTD (as measured by vehicle revenue miles).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NTD data collected and published in this period does not 
reflect the number and rate of all assaults on transit workers because 
it does not include assaults on transit workers that did not require 
medical attention. In the past, NTD reporting requirements focused on 
the most serious events that met the NTD ``major event'' reporting 
threshold, as defined by the NTD reporting manual. The Bipartisan 
Infrastructure Law, enacted as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs 
Act (Pub. L. 117-58), significantly expands the data that FTA will 
collect through the NTD on assaults on transit workers. To implement 
this requirement, FTA recently finalized new NTD reporting requirements 
regarding assaults on transit workers on February 23, 2023, (88 FR 
11506) and has begun collecting expanded data.
    While FTA does not collect data on precursor events to assaults, 
industry experts cite anecdotal evidence that assaults on operators are 
a product of direct interaction with the public \3\ and that disputes 
over fares and other policy enforcement activities are a significant 
contributor to assaults on operators.\4\ The Occupational Safety and 
Health Administration states that workers who exchange money as part of 
their job duties, work in customer service or public service, and work 
alone are at higher risk for workplace violence.\5\ Similarly, the 
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health found that risk 
factors for workplace assault include interaction with the public, 
exchanging money, delivering passengers, having a mobile workplace, 
working alone, working late or early hours, and working in high-crime 
areas or community settings.\6\ Many transit workers who perform their 
duties on transit vehicles and in revenue facilities, such as vehicle 
operators, station agents, and maintenance workers, perform their 
duties in such conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/Final_TRACS_Assaults_Report_14-01_07_06_15_pdf_rv6.pdf.
    \4\ https://www.cutr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TCRP-Synthesis-93-Report.pdf.
    \5\ https://www.osha.gov/workplace-violence.
    \6\ https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-100/default.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Respondents to FTA's 2021 Request for Information (RFI) on transit 
worker safety \7\ proposed numerous actions applicable across various 
types of agencies to protect transit workers from assault. These 
proposals included reducing bus operator involvement in fare and other 
policy enforcement; increasing frontline worker training on customer 
service, policy enforcement, and de-escalation; and changing bus 
designs to use barriers, among other mitigations. Responses also 
indicated that any new requirements for safety risk mitigations should 
be broad and flexible enough to work for transit agencies of all sizes 
and across all modes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FTA-2021-0012/comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on this information, FTA has determined that there is a 
national-level hazard \8\ that transit workers must interact with the 
public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies, which 
presents a risk of transit workers being assaulted on transit vehicles 
and in revenue facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ FTA has defined hazard to mean any real or potential 
condition that can cause injury, illness, or death; damage to or 
loss of the facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infrastructure 
of a public transportation system; or damage to the environment. 49 
CFR 673.5. A national-level hazard is one that exists at transit 
agencies across the country.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Previous FTA Efforts To Address Assaults on Transit Workers

    In a 2019 Federal Register notice (84 FR 24196) FTA highlighted 
that in cases where a transit agency identifies hazards associated with 
assaults on transit operators, the PTASP regulation (49 CFR part 673) 
requires the agency to use the SMS Safety Risk Management (SRM) 
processes documented in its Agency Safety Plan (ASP) to assess the 
associated safety risk and, based on the results of the safety risk 
assessment, identify safety risk mitigations or strategies as necessary 
to address the safety risk.
    In 2021, concerned about the continued rise in reported assaults on 
transit workers, FTA analyzed through its internal SRM process the 
hazard that transit workers must interact with the public, and, at 
times, must clarify or enforce agency policies. FTA conducted a safety 
risk assessment to determine the likelihood and severity of two 
potential consequences of this hazard: assaults on transit workers on 
board transit vehicles, and assaults on transit workers in revenue 
facilities.
    The SRM process helps FTA determine effective and appropriate risk 
mitigations, such as technical assistance or regulatory responses, to 
support transit agencies in cultivating safer environments for their 
workers and riders. To support this SRM process, FTA established a 
likelihood scale, severity scale, and risk matrix for conducting a 
safety risk assessment for each identified potential consequence of a 
hazard. FTA uses these scales and risk matrix to determine a risk 
rating that helps FTA, if needed, develop its recommendations for 
safety risk mitigation.
    FTA's Sample Safety Risk Assessment Matrices for Bus Transit 
Agencies \9\ and Sample Safety Risk Assessment Matrices for Rail 
Transit Agencies \10\ illustrate how a safety risk assessment matrix 
provides a structured approach to assess the likelihood and severity of 
the consequences of identified hazards, determine if the safety risk is 
acceptable with existing mitigations, or if additional action is 
needed, and prioritize hazards based on the safety risk of their 
potential consequences. FTA's risk matrix is depicted in Figure 1 
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/public-transportation-agency-safety-program/sample-safety-risk.
    \10\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/public-transportation-agency-safety-program/sample-safety-risk-0.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 88215]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20DE23.009

Potential Consequence 1: Transit Workers Are Assaulted on Transit 
Vehicles

    The first potential consequence of the hazard discussed above is 
that transit workers are assaulted on transit vehicles. To assess 
likelihood, FTA reviewed NTD major event reports from 2008 through 2020 
that involved assaults on transit workers on transit vehicles 
throughout the country. Over the twelve-year period of 2008-2019,\11\ 
there were 2,225 major event reports matching the potential 
consequence, an average of 185 events per year. 1,805 (81 percent) of 
these occurred at bus modes, with the remaining 420 (19 percent) at 
rail modes. Due to the frequency of occurrence, the FTA determined a 
likelihood rating of Very High (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 2020 NTD safety and security data was preliminary and 
subject to revision at the time of FTA's review. Therefore, the 
analysis results presented here do not include 2020 data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To assess severity, FTA reviewed the severity of the events 
referenced in the likelihood analysis. These events resulted in three 
fatalities and 2,232 injuries.\12\ All three fatalities and 1,806 (81 
percent) of injuries resulted from assaults on transit workers on 
buses, while the remaining 426 injuries (19 percent) resulted from 
assaults on transit workers on rail vehicles. NTD event data from 2017 
and later include information on the severity of injuries when rail 
modes reported assaults; over 98 percent of injuries from these 
assaults were minor. Because of this, FTA determined a severity rating 
of C. While there have been some instances of worker homicides and 
severe injuries in vehicles, the majority of these events result in a 
minor injury.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The number of injuries (2,232) exceeds the number of 
assault major events (2,225) because an assault event can result in 
multiple injuries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential Consequence 2: Transit Workers Are Assaulted in Revenue 
Facilities

    The second potential consequence of the hazard discussed above is 
that transit workers are assaulted in revenue facilities. To assess 
likelihood, FTA reviewed NTD major event reports from 2008 through 2020 
that involved assaults on transit workers in revenue facilities 
throughout the country. Over the twelve-year period of 2008-2019,\13\ 
there were 674 major event reports matching this potential consequence, 
an average of 56.17 events per year. 549 (81 percent) of these occurred 
at rail modes, with the remaining 125 (19 percent) at bus modes. Due to 
the rate of occurrence, FTA determined a likelihood rating of Very High 
(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 2020 NTD safety and security data was preliminary and 
subject to revision at the time of FTA's review. Therefore, the 
analysis results presented here do not include 2020 data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To assess severity, FTA reviewed the severity of the events 
referenced in the likelihood analysis. These events resulted in two 
fatalities and 732 injuries. A single fatality and 599 (82 percent) of 
injuries resulted from assaults on transit workers in rail revenue 
facilities, while the remaining 133 injuries (18 percent) and one 
fatality resulted from assaults on transit workers in bus revenue 
facilities. NTD event data from 2017 and later include information on 
the severity of injuries from assaults on transit workers in rail 
revenue facilities; over 95 percent of injuries from these assaults 
were minor. Because of this, FTA determined a severity rating of C. 
While there have been some instances of transit worker homicides and 
severe injuries in revenue facilities, the majority of these events 
resulted in a minor injury.
    Based on the risk ratings of the two identified potential 
consequences, FTA determined an overall risk rating of 5C, as noted in 
Figure 2. This risk rating reflects that the safety risk associated 
with assaults on transit workers is high.

[[Page 88216]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20DE23.010

    In addition, as part of FTA's overall goal of reducing assaults on 
transit workers, FTA analyzed data on assaults on transit workers 
reported to the NTD between 2016 and 2021. Through this analysis, FTA 
determined that nine transit agencies accounted for 79% of all assaults 
on transit workers reported to the NTD. FTA issued Special Directives 
\14\ to these agencies on October 4, 2023, to determine whether and how 
these agencies are addressing safety risk related to assaults on 
transit workers using their SMS processes and to determine if 
additional FTA intervention is necessary to mitigate the safety risk 
related to assaults on transit workers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/fta-special-directives#SDTWA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FTA reviewed and analyzed the information received from these 
agencies. Of the nine agencies that received the Special Directives, 
only four reported the completion of a safety risk assessment prior to 
issuance of the Special Directives. This is troubling because, as noted 
above, FTA has previously alerted transit agencies of the need to 
address the risk of assaults on transit operators when identified 
through SMS. If these agencies have not completed a safety risk 
assessment, FTA is concerned that other transit agencies may not have 
done so either, despite the presence of the risk of assaults on transit 
workers on the systems they operate.
    Safety risk assessment is a required step of a transit agency's SRM 
process.\15\ Moreover, safety risk assessment is a critical tool to 
understand the risk associated with assaults on transit workers and to 
help each agency and joint-labor management Safety Committee prioritize 
and develop safety risk mitigations. The importance of the safety risk 
assessment step of SRM is further underscored by its use by FTA to 
assess national-level safety risk. Now, based on the available safety 
data, FTA's determination of a 5C risk rating reflecting a high 
nationwide risk of assaults on transit workers, and the results of the 
Special Directives, FTA has concluded that additional FTA intervention 
is necessary to address the safety risk related to assaults on transit 
workers nationwide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 49 CFR 673.25(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Purpose of General Directive

    As discussed above, FTA has determined that there is a national-
level hazard that transit workers must interact with the public, and, 
at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies. FTA has identified 
that the potential consequences of this hazard are that transit workers 
may be assaulted on transit vehicles and in revenue facilities. 
Pursuant to 49 CFR 673.25(b), a transit agency must consider, as a 
source for hazard identification, data and information provided by FTA.
    FTA has determined that the national-level hazard and potential 
consequences discussed above constitute an unsafe condition or practice 
presenting a risk of death or personal injury for transit workers. 
Accordingly, pursuant to 49 CFR 670.25, FTA proposes issuing a General 
Directive that directs agencies to take action to address the 
identified national-level hazard and the potential consequences.
    FTA proposes that the General Directive require each transit agency 
that is required to have an Agency Safety Plan (ASP) under the PTASP 
regulation (49 CFR part 673) to use the Safety Risk Management (SRM) 
processes documented in its ASP to conduct a safety risk assessment 
related to assaults on transit workers on the public transportation 
system it operates. FTA is proposing that if a transit agency has 
conducted a safety risk assessment related to assaults on transit 
workers in the twelve months preceding the date of issuance of the 
final General Directive, and if the transit agency continues to believe 
that the results of that safety risk assessment are relevant, the 
transit agency need not conduct a new assessment. FTA also proposes to 
require each transit agency to use the SRM processes documented in its 
ASP to identify safety risk mitigations or strategies necessary as a 
result of the agency's safety risk assessment. As required by the 
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law at 49 U.S.C. 5329(d)(5), each transit 
agency serving a large urbanized area must involve the joint labor-
management Safety Committee when identifying safety risk mitigations to 
reduce the likelihood and severity of consequences identified through 
the agency's safety risk assessment. The General Directive would also 
require each transit agency to provide information to FTA on how it is 
assessing, mitigating, and monitoring the safety risk associated with 
assaults on transit workers within 60 days of issuance of the final 
General Directive. FTA notes that this proposed directive is intended 
to work in conjunction with OSHA protections and is not intended to 
preempt OSHA's standards or other enforcement authority.
    FTA is proposing this approach as it is grounded in SMS principles 
and methods, which FTA has adopted as the basis for enhancing public 
transportation safety. See 49 CFR 670.3. Further, FTA believes this 
approach will ensure that each transit agency is taking a formal look 
at the safety risk related to assaults on transit workers on their 
system. FTA also believes this approach will contribute to transit 
agencies and their joint labor-management Safety Committees identifying 
scalable and effective mitigations across the range of services they 
provide and situations that contribute to the risk of assaults on 
transit workers. FTA proposes that each transit agency provides FTA

[[Page 88217]]

information on how it is assessing, mitigating, and monitoring the 
safety risk associated with assaults on transit workers, which FTA may 
use to inform future Federal action to protect transit workers.
    FTA is proposing to issue this General Directive to all transit 
agencies required to have an ASP under the PTASP regulation because FTA 
has determined that the hazard that transit workers must interact with 
the public, and, at times, must clarify or enforce agency policies, 
exists at transit agencies of all sizes and across all modes of public 
transportation, not just those in large urbanized areas.
    The proposed General Directive contains proposed binding 
obligations, which 49 U.S.C. 5334(k) defines as ``a substantive policy 
statement, rule, or guidance document issued by the Federal Transit 
Administration that grants rights, imposes obligations, produces 
significant effects on private interests, or effects a significant 
change in existing policy.'' Under 49 U.S.C. 5334(k) FTA may issue 
binding obligations if it follows notice and comment rulemaking 
procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553.
    FTA requests public comment on this proposed General Directive, 
which is available on the FTA website at https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/safety/fta-general-directives and in Docket 
No. FTA-2023-0032. Following an analysis of the public comments, FTA 
will publish a notice in the Federal Register that includes both a 
response to comments and announces a final General Directive or a 
statement rescinding or revising the proposed General Directive.
    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5329; 49 CFR 1.91, 670.25.

Veronica Vanterpool,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-28002 Filed 12-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.