Air Plan Approval; California; Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 86093-86094 [2023-27108]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2023–0371 at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need
assistance in a language other than
English or if you are a person with
ADDRESSES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0371; FRL–11173–
01–R9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern definitions applicable
to local rules that control emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from processing, production, gathering,
and separation of crude oil and natural
gas, and the transfer and storage of
reactive organic compound liquids and
petroleum material. We are proposing to
approve a local rule to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’). We are taking
comments on this proposal and plan to
follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 11, 2024.
SUMMARY:
86093
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 947–4129 or by
email at sherman.donnique@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Improve the Rule
D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
proposal with the dates that it was
adopted by the local air agency and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
VCAPCD .................................
71
Crude Oil and Reactive Organic Compound Liquids .............
On April 15, 2022, the submittal for
VCAPCD Rule 71 was deemed by
operation of law to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51,
Appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
We approved an earlier version of
Rule 71 into the SIP on February 29,
1996 (61 FR 7706). The VCAPCD
adopted revisions to the SIP-approved
version on May 11, 2021, that CARB
submitted to us on October 15, 2021.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
Emissions of VOCs contribute to the
production of ground-level ozone, smog,
and particulate matter that harm human
health and the environment. Section
110(a) of the CAA requires states to
submit regulations that control VOC
emissions. Rule 71 was revised to
incorporate definitions in VCAPCD
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 11, 2023
Jkt 262001
Rules 71.3, ‘‘Transfer of Reactive
Organic Compound Liquids,’’ (approved
into the SIP on August 4, 1994 (59 FR
64330), and locally revised on May 11,
2021), and 74.10, ‘‘Components at Crude
Oil and Natural Gas Production and
Processing Facilities,’’ (approved into
the SIP on August 19, 1999, 64 FR
45175).
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
Rules in the SIP must be enforceable
(see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress or other CAA
requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
and must not modify certain SIP control
requirements in nonattainment areas
without ensuring equivalent or greater
emissions reductions (see CAA section
193).
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Revised
5/11/2021
Submitted
10/15/2021
Generally, SIP rules must require
reasonably available control technology
(RACT) for each category of sources
covered by a Control Techniques
Guidelines (CTG) document as well as
each major source of VOCs in ozone
nonattainment areas classified as
‘‘Moderate’’ or above (see CAA section
182(b)(2)). The VCAPCD regulates an
ozone nonattainment area classified as
‘‘Serious’’ for the 2008 and 2015 8-hour
ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) (see 40 CFR
81.305). Therefore, its rules must
require RACT where applicable.
Guidance and policy documents that
we used to evaluate enforceability,
revision/relaxation and rule stringency
requirements for the applicable criteria
pollutants include the following:
1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General
Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57
FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070
(April 28, 1992).
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
86094
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2023 / Proposed Rules
2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,’’
EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised
January 11, 1990).
3. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,’’
EPA Region IX, August 21, 2001 (the Little
Bluebook).
4. ‘‘Control Techniques Guidelines for the
Oil and Natural Gas Industry,’’ EPA–453/B–
16–001, October 2016.
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
This rule meets CAA requirements
and is consistent with relevant guidance
regarding enforceability and SIP
revisions. The TSD has more
information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Improve the Rule
The TSD includes recommendations
for the next time VCAPCD modifies the
rule.
D. Public Comment and Proposed
Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, the EPA proposes to fully
approve the submitted rule because it
fulfills all relevant requirements. We
will accept comments from the public
on this proposal until January 11, 2024.
If we take final action to approve the
submitted rule, our final action will
incorporate this rule into the federally
enforceable SIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
VCAPCD Rule 71, revised on May 11,
2021, which regulates definitions of
terms. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action
merely proposes to approve state law as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Dec 11, 2023
Jkt 262001
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
because it proposes to approve a state
program;
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The State did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. The EPA did not perform an
EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in
this action. Due to the nature of the
action being taken here, this action is
expected to have a neutral to positive
impact on the air quality of the affected
area. Consideration of EJ is not required
as part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 2, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023–27108 Filed 12–11–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[EPA–R04–OAR–2023–0535; FRL–11589–
01–R4]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations; Consistency Update for
North Carolina
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule; consistency
update.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to update a
portion of the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) Air Regulations. Requirements
applying to OCS sources located within
25 miles of States’ seaward boundaries
must be updated periodically to remain
consistent with the requirements of the
corresponding onshore area (COA), as
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 86093-86094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27108]
[[Page 86093]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0371; FRL-11173-01-R9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
(VCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These revisions concern definitions applicable to local rules that
control emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from processing,
production, gathering, and separation of crude oil and natural gas, and
the transfer and storage of reactive organic compound liquids and
petroleum material. We are proposing to approve a local rule to
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the
Act''). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with
a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 11, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2023-0371 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947-4129 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule
D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the dates
that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VCAPCD............................... 71 Crude Oil and Reactive 5/11/2021 10/15/2021
Organic Compound
Liquids.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 15, 2022, the submittal for VCAPCD Rule 71 was deemed by
operation of law to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51,
Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
We approved an earlier version of Rule 71 into the SIP on February
29, 1996 (61 FR 7706). The VCAPCD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved
version on May 11, 2021, that CARB submitted to us on October 15, 2021.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
Emissions of VOCs contribute to the production of ground-level
ozone, smog, and particulate matter that harm human health and the
environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit
regulations that control VOC emissions. Rule 71 was revised to
incorporate definitions in VCAPCD Rules 71.3, ``Transfer of Reactive
Organic Compound Liquids,'' (approved into the SIP on August 4, 1994
(59 FR 64330), and locally revised on May 11, 2021), and 74.10,
``Components at Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production and Processing
Facilities,'' (approved into the SIP on August 19, 1999, 64 FR 45175).
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)),
must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment
and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA
section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements
in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
Generally, SIP rules must require reasonably available control
technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of
VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as ``Moderate'' or above
(see CAA section 182(b)(2)). The VCAPCD regulates an ozone
nonattainment area classified as ``Serious'' for the 2008 and 2015 8-
hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (see 40 CFR
81.305). Therefore, its rules must require RACT where applicable.
Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
[[Page 86094]]
2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January
11, 1990).
3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region IX, August 21, 2001 (the Little
Bluebook).
4. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas
Industry,'' EPA-453/B-16-001, October 2016.
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
This rule meets CAA requirements and is consistent with relevant
guidance regarding enforceability and SIP revisions. The TSD has more
information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule
The TSD includes recommendations for the next time VCAPCD modifies
the rule.
D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to
fully approve the submitted rule because it fulfills all relevant
requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal
until January 11, 2024. If we take final action to approve the
submitted rule, our final action will incorporate this rule into the
federally enforceable SIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference VCAPCD Rule 71, revised on May 11, 2021, which regulates
definitions of terms. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these materials available through https://www.regulations.gov and at
the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law
as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it proposes to approve a state program;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA
did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action.
Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this action is
expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air quality of the
affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this
action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the
stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people
of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 2, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023-27108 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P