Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Addison Point, FL, 85498-85499 [2023-26986]
Download as PDF
85498
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–
1.
[Docket No. USCG–2023–0842]
2. Add § 100.T1199–0137 to read as
follows:
RIN 1625–AA09
■
§ 100.T1199–0137 2023 Lake Havasu City
Christmas Parade of Lights, Lake Havasu,
Arizona.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
33 CFR Part 117
(a) Regulated area. The regulations in
this section apply to the following area:
All waters of Lake Havasu, from surface
to bottom, on a predetermined parade
route starting in Thompson Bay,
proceeding north through the
Bridgewater Channel, turning around in
North Lake Havasu, proceeding south
back through the Bridgewater Channel,
and returning to the starting point of the
parade in Thompson Bay.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and
local officer designated by or assisting
the Captain of the Port Sector San Diego
(COTP) in the enforcement of the
regulations in this section.
Participant means all persons and
vessels registered with the event
sponsor as participants in the parade.
(c) Regulations. (1) All nonparticipants are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within the regulated
area described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Sector San Diego or their
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by calling (619) 278–
7000. Those in the regulated area must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the designated representative.
(3) The COTP will provide notice of
the regulated area through advanced
notice via local notice to mariners.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m.
on December 9, 2023.
J.W. Spitler,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2023–27038 Filed 12–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Dec 07, 2023
Jkt 262001
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Addison Point, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is removing
the existing drawbridge operation
regulation for the John F. Kennedy
Space Center Bridge (NASA Causeway),
across the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway (Indian River), mile 885, at
Addison Point, FL. The drawbridge was
replaced with a fixed bridge in 2023 and
the operating regulation is no longer
applicable or necessary.
DATES: This rule is effective December 8,
2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Type the docket
number (USCG–2023–0842) in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’. In
the Document Type column, select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Leonard Newsom, Coast
Guard; telephone 305–415–6946, email
Leonard.D.Newsom@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because it is
unnecessary. The John F. Kennedy
Space Center Bridge, that once required
the draw operations in 33 CFR
117.261(l), was removed from the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Indian
River) and replaced with a fixed bridge
in 2023. Therefore, the regulation is no
longer applicable and shall be removed
from publication. It is unnecessary to
publish an NPRM because this
regulatory action does not purport to
place any restrictions on mariners but
rather removes a restriction that has no
use or value because the new bridge
does not open.
We are issuing this rule under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making this
rule effective in less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. The
bridge has been removed from the
waterway and this rule merely requires
an administrative change to the Federal
Register, in order to omit a regulatory
requirement that is no longer applicable
or necessary. The modification has
already taken place and the removal of
the regulation will not affect mariners
currently operating on this waterway.
Therefore, a delayed effective date is
unnecessary.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(Advance, Supplemental)
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
FL Florida
AICW Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The John F. Kennedy Space Center
bridge was removed and replaced with
a fixed bridge in 2023. The elimination
of this drawbridge necessitates the
removal of the drawbridge operation
regulation, 33 CFR 117.261(l), that
pertain to the former drawbridge.
The purpose of this rule is to remove
the paragraph of 33 CFR 117.261(l) that
refers to the John F. Kennedy Space
Center Bridge, across the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway (Indian River) at
mile 885, from the Code of Federal
Regulations since it governs a bridge
that is no longer able to be opened.
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this final
rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
IV. Discussion of Final Rule
The Coast Guard is changing the
regulation in 33 CFR 117.261 by
removing restrictions and the regulatory
burden related to draw operations for a
bridge that is no longer a drawbridge.
The change removes § 117.261(l) of the
regulation governing the John F.
Kennedy Space Center Bridge since the
bridge has been removed from the
waterway and replaced with a fixed
bridge. This final rule seeks to update
the CFR by removing language that
governs the operation of the John F.
I. Table of Abbreviations
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Kennedy Space Center Bridge. This
change does not affect waterway or land
traffic. This change does not affect, nor
does it alter the operating schedules in
33 CFR 117.261 that govern the
remaining active drawbridges on the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St.
Marys River to Key Largo.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This proposed rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, as amended by Executive
Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory
Review). This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the fact that the bridge was
replaced and no longer operates as a
drawbridge. The removal of the
operating schedule from 33 CFR 117
Subpart B will have no effect on the
movement of waterway or land traffic.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section V.A above this final
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Dec 07, 2023
Jkt 262001
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
85499
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01, Rev.1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning Policy
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series) which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f). The Coast Guard has determined
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges and is
categorically excluded from further
review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter
3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1. Revision No. 01.3.
§ 117.261
[Amended]
2. Amend § 117.261 by removing and
reserving paragraph (l).
■
Dated: December 5, 2023.
Douglas M. Schofield,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Coast Guard Seventh District.
[FR Doc. 2023–26986 Filed 12–7–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 235 (Friday, December 8, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 85498-85499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26986]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2023-0842]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Addison Point, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is removing the existing drawbridge operation
regulation for the John F. Kennedy Space Center Bridge (NASA Causeway),
across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Indian River), mile 885, at
Addison Point, FL. The drawbridge was replaced with a fixed bridge in
2023 and the operating regulation is no longer applicable or necessary.
DATES: This rule is effective December 8, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Type the
docket number (USCG-2023-0842) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. In the Document Type column, select ``Supporting & Related
Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Leonard Newsom, Coast Guard; telephone 305-415-6946,
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
FL Florida
AICW Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is unnecessary. The John F.
Kennedy Space Center Bridge, that once required the draw operations in
33 CFR 117.261(l), was removed from the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
(Indian River) and replaced with a fixed bridge in 2023. Therefore, the
regulation is no longer applicable and shall be removed from
publication. It is unnecessary to publish an NPRM because this
regulatory action does not purport to place any restrictions on
mariners but rather removes a restriction that has no use or value
because the new bridge does not open.
We are issuing this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective in less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. The bridge has
been removed from the waterway and this rule merely requires an
administrative change to the Federal Register, in order to omit a
regulatory requirement that is no longer applicable or necessary. The
modification has already taken place and the removal of the regulation
will not affect mariners currently operating on this waterway.
Therefore, a delayed effective date is unnecessary.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The John F. Kennedy Space Center bridge was removed and replaced
with a fixed bridge in 2023. The elimination of this drawbridge
necessitates the removal of the drawbridge operation regulation, 33 CFR
117.261(l), that pertain to the former drawbridge.
The purpose of this rule is to remove the paragraph of 33 CFR
117.261(l) that refers to the John F. Kennedy Space Center Bridge,
across the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (Indian River) at mile 885,
from the Code of Federal Regulations since it governs a bridge that is
no longer able to be opened.
IV. Discussion of Final Rule
The Coast Guard is changing the regulation in 33 CFR 117.261 by
removing restrictions and the regulatory burden related to draw
operations for a bridge that is no longer a drawbridge. The change
removes Sec. 117.261(l) of the regulation governing the John F.
Kennedy Space Center Bridge since the bridge has been removed from the
waterway and replaced with a fixed bridge. This final rule seeks to
update the CFR by removing language that governs the operation of the
John F.
[[Page 85499]]
Kennedy Space Center Bridge. This change does not affect waterway or
land traffic. This change does not affect, nor does it alter the
operating schedules in 33 CFR 117.261 that govern the remaining active
drawbridges on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marys River
to Key Largo.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This proposed rule has not been designated a
``significant regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review). This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has
not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that the
bridge was replaced and no longer operates as a drawbridge. The removal
of the operating schedule from 33 CFR 117 Subpart B will have no effect
on the movement of waterway or land traffic.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A
above this final rule would not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series) which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for drawbridges and is categorically excluded
from further review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of
the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 00170.1. Revision No. 01.3.
Sec. 117.261 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.261 by removing and reserving paragraph (l).
Dated: December 5, 2023.
Douglas M. Schofield,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast Guard Seventh
District.
[FR Doc. 2023-26986 Filed 12-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P