Cranberries Grown in Massachusetts, et al.; Termination of Marketing Order and Data Collection Requirements for Cranberries Not Subject to the Marketing Order, 85130-85133 [2023-26887]
Download as PDF
85130
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 234
Thursday, December 7, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 929 and 926
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–23–0047]
Cranberries Grown in Massachusetts,
et al.; Termination of Marketing Order
and Data Collection Requirements for
Cranberries Not Subject to the
Marketing Order
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed action invites
comments on the proposed termination
of the Federal marketing order
regulating the handling of cranberries
grown in the States of Massachusetts,
Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota,
Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in
the State of New York and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder
(Marketing Order No. 929). The data
collection, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements applicable to cranberries
not subject to the cranberry marketing
order would also be terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
February 5, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments can be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the document number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
proposal will be included in the record
and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be made
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Dec 06, 2023
Jkt 262001
public on the internet at the address
provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennie M. Varela, Marketing Specialist,
or Christian D. Nissen, Chief, Southeast
Region Branch, Market Development
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375 or Email: Jennie.Varela@usda.gov
or Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Market Development Division, Specialty
Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–8085 or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes the termination of regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 929, as amended (7 CFR part 929),
regulating the handling of cranberries
grown in the States of Massachusetts,
Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota,
Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in
the State of New York. Part 929 referred
to as the ‘‘Order’’ is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
Cranberry Marketing Committee
(Committee) locally administers the
Order and is comprised of producers
operating within the production area
and a public member.
This proposed rule is also issued
under section 8d of the Act (7 U.S.C.
608d(3)), which authorizes the
collection of cranberry and cranberry
product information from producerhandlers, second handlers, processors,
brokers, and importers including those
not subject to regulation under the
Order.
The United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this
proposed rule in conformance with
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094. Executive Orders 12866, and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
14094 reaffirms, supplements, and
updates Executive Order 12866 and
further directs agencies to solicit and
consider input from a wide range of
affected and interested parties through a
variety of means. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review.
In addition, this proposed rule has
been reviewed under Executive Order
13175—Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether
their rulemaking actions would have
Tribal implications. Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
determined this proposed rule is
unlikely to have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to a marketing order
may file with the USDA a petition
stating that the marketing order, any
provision of the marketing order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the marketing order is not in accordance
with law and request a modification of
the marketing order or to be exempted
therefrom. A handler is afforded the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing, USDA would
rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United
States in any district in which the
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or
her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
The Order has been in effect since
1962 and regulates the handling of
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Proposed Rules
cranberries grown in the States of
Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin,
Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon,
Washington, and Long Island in the
State of New York. The Order provides
the cranberry industry with authority
for production research, marketing
promotion and development, to include
paid advertising, as well as authority for
volume regulation through producer
allotments or handler withholding. The
Order also authorizes reporting and
recordkeeping functions required for
operation of the program. The
Committee, which locally administers
the Order, is funded by assessments
imposed on handlers.
This rule proposes termination of the
Order and the rules and regulations
thereunder. This action is based on the
results of a continuance referendum in
which producers failed to support
continuation of the Order. USDA
believes termination of this program
would be appropriate as the Order is no
longer favored by industry producers.
Section 929.69 of the Order states
USDA shall conduct a referendum
during the month of May 1975 and
every fourth year thereafter to ascertain
whether continuance is favored by
producers. Under this section, USDA
shall terminate the Order if termination
is favored by a majority of the growers,
and that this majority has, during the
current fiscal year, produced more than
50 percent of the cranberries produced
in the production area. As required by
the Order, USDA held a continuance
referendum among cranberry producers
from June 9 through June 30, 2023, to
determine if they favored continuation
of the program.
USDA mailed ballots to 944 producers
in the production area. Those producers
cast 366 valid ballots. The results
indicate 73.5 percent of cranberry
growers, who produced 79.9 percent of
the production volume, voted in the
referendum and favored termination of
the program. Consequently, the vote met
the Order’s criteria for termination,
demonstrating a lack of the producer
support needed to carry out the
objectives of the Act.
Section 608c(16)(A) of the Act
provides that USDA shall terminate or
suspend the operation of any order
whenever the order or any provision
thereof obstructs or does not tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant to
section 608c(16)(A) of the Act and
§ 929.69 of the Order, USDA is
considering termination of the Order. If
USDA decides to terminate the Order,
trustees would be appointed to
conclude and liquidate the affairs of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Dec 06, 2023
Jkt 262001
Committee and would continue in that
capacity until discharged by USDA. In
addition, USDA would notify Congress
of USDA’s intent to terminate the Order
not later than 60 days before the Order
is terminated pursuant to section
608c(16)(A) of the Act.
A notice announcing the results of the
referendum was issued on August 16,
2023. On October 25, 2023, USDA
suspended collection of assessments
and all reporting requirements under
the Order while the proposed
termination of the program is being
processed. All other provisions,
including promotion and research,
would remain in effect until the Order
is terminated.
Section 608d(3) of the Act authorizes
the collection of cranberry and
cranberry product information from
producer-handlers, second handlers,
processors, brokers, and importers. This
data collection is codified in 7 CFR part
926, Data Collection, Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements
Applicable to Cranberries Not Subject to
the Cranberry Marketing Order,
establishing reporting requirements for
cranberry and cranberry products not
subject to the Order and how they were
to be reported to the Committee. Section
926.21 states this part shall be
suspended or terminated whenever
there is no longer a Federal cranberry
marketing order in effect. This proposal
would also terminate part 926 which
has been suspended since December 28,
2006.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), USDA has considered
the economic impact of this proposed
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
USDA has prepared this initial
regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act are unique in that they are brought
about through group action of
essentially small entities acting on their
own behalf.
There are approximately 950
cranberry growers in the regulated area
and approximately 45 cranberry
handlers subject to regulation under the
Order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having
annual receipts of less than $3,750,000,
(North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code 111334) and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
85131
those whose annual receipts are less
than $34,000,000 (NAICS code 115114)
(13 CFR 121.201).
According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
the average grower price for U.S.
cranberries during the 2022–23 season
was $36.60 per barrel and utilized
production was 8,010,070 barrels. The
value for cranberries that year totaled
$293,168,562, ($36.60 per barrel
multiplied by 8,010,070 barrels). Taking
the total value of production for
cranberries and dividing it by the total
number of cranberry growers provides
an average return per grower of
$308,598. Using the average price and
utilization information, and assuming a
normal distribution, the majority of
cranberry growers receive less than
$3,750,000 annually.
According to USDA’s Market News
retail averages report, the price per
pound of fresh cranberries on average
was $1.64 in December of 2022. On
average, NASS reports that grower
prices for fresh cranberries are almost
double (199 percent) grower prices for
processed cranberries. Dividing the
average fresh retail price as reported by
Market News ($1.64) by 1.99 calculates
to an estimated average retail processed
price of $0.82 per pound. There are 100
pounds of cranberries per barrel so the
average retail price for a barrel of
cranberries would be $82. Multiplying
the average retail price by total
utilization of 8 million barrels results in
an estimated cranberry retail value of
$656 million. Dividing this figure by the
number of handlers (45) yields an
estimated average annual handler
receipts of $14.6 million, which is
below the SBA threshold for small
agricultural service firms. Therefore, the
majority of producers and handlers of
cranberries may be classified as small
entities.
This rule proposes to terminate the
Order, and the rules and regulations
issued thereunder. Termination would
remove the Order from the Code of
Federal Regulations. Section 929.69 of
the Order provides that USDA shall
conduct a referendum during the month
of May 1975 and every fourth year
thereafter to ascertain whether
continuance is favored by producers.
The section states USDA shall terminate
the Order if termination is favored by a
majority of the growers, and if that
majority has, during the current fiscal
year, produced more than 50 percent of
the cranberries produced in the
production area. The results of a
continuance referendum held from June
9 through June 30, 2023, indicate 73.5
percent of cranberry growers, who
produced 79.9 percent of the production
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
85132
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Proposed Rules
volume, voted in the referendum and
favored termination of the program.
Consequently, the vote met the Order’s
criteria for termination, indicating
continuance of the program is no longer
favored by industry producers.
Consequently, USDA is considering
termination of the Order. This proposed
rule would also terminate part 926, the
suspended data collection requirements
for cranberries not covered under the
Order.
Marketing orders provide industries
with tools to assist producers and
handlers in addressing challenges facing
the industry. These tools include
establishing minimum grade, size,
quality, and maturity requirements,
setting size, capacity, weight,
dimensions or pack of the containers,
collecting and publishing market
information useful to producers and
handlers, conducting research and
promotions, and establishing volume
control requirements. Each marketing
order is different, with the industries
deciding the authorities needed and the
scope of their marketing order.
Marketing orders are approved by
producers through referenda and
regulate handlers to ensure compliance
with all requirements. The authority of
a marketing order allows each industry
to create a local administrative
committee that is made up of growers
and/or handlers that work collectively
to solve industry problems.
The Order has been in effect since
1962 and provides the cranberry
industry with authority for production
research, marketing promotion and
development, to include paid
advertising, as well as authority for
volume regulation through producer
allotments or handler withholding. The
Order also authorizes reporting and
recordkeeping functions required for
operation of the program. The
Committee, which locally administers
the Order, is funded by assessments
imposed on handlers. As this change
would terminate the Order and all the
rules and regulations issued thereunder,
the perceived benefits correlated with
the Order would be lost. However, there
would also be savings by eliminating
costs associated with the Order, which
include the payment of assessments and
costs related to reporting and occasional
volume regulation.
A review of the referendum results
shows that producers failed to reach the
necessary threshold for the vote to pass
by either vote or by volume as specified
in the Order, indicating that voting
producers believe the benefits of the
program no longer outweigh the costs to
handlers and producers. Although
marketing order requirements are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Dec 06, 2023
Jkt 262001
applied to handlers, the costs of such
requirements are often passed on to
producers. Termination of the Order,
and the resulting regulatory relaxation,
could therefore be expected to reduce
costs for both producers and handlers.
An alternative to this action would be
to maintain the Order and its current
provisions. However, the Order requires
that a continuance referendum be
conducted every fourth year to
determine industry support for the
program. The results of a recently held
producer continuance referendum on
the cranberry program indicated a lack
of producer support, indicating that the
Order no longer meets the needs of
producers and handlers. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected, and USDA is
considering terminating the Order and
removing the suspended data collection
requirements in part 926.
This proposed rule is intended to
solicit input and other available
information from interested parties on
whether the Order should be
terminated. USDA will evaluate all
available information prior to making a
final determination on this matter.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 Fruit
Crops. Termination of the Order, and
the reporting requirements prescribed
therein, would reduce the reporting
burden by 1,265 hours. Handlers would
no longer be required to file forms with
the Committee, which is expected to
reduce industry expenses. This
rulemaking would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either large or small
cranberry handlers.
This rulemaking would effectuate the
removal of reporting and recordkeeping
requirements on cranberry handlers,
both small and large. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this proposed rule.
USDA is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The producer referendum was well
publicized in the production area, and
referendum ballots were provided to all
known producers. As such, producers of
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S. cranberries had an opportunity to
indicate their continued support for the
Order. Further, interested persons are
invited to submit comments on this
proposed rule, including the regulatory
and information collection impacts of
this proposed action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Richard Lower at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on the
proposed termination of Marketing
Order No. 929, which regulates the
handling of cranberries grown in the
States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin,
Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon,
Washington, and Long Island in the
State of New York. A 60-day comment
period is provided to allow interested
persons to respond to this proposal. All
written comments timely received will
be considered before a final
determination is made on this matter.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant
to section 608c(16)(A) of the Act and
§ 929.69 of the Order, USDA is
considering termination of the Order. If
USDA decides to terminate the Order,
trustees would be appointed to
conclude and liquidate the Committee
affairs and would continue in that
capacity until discharged by USDA. In
addition, USDA would notify Congress
60 days in advance of termination
pursuant to section 608c(16)(A) of the
Act.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 926
Cranberries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 929
Acreage allotments, Cranberries,
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601–674, the Agricultural
Marketing Service proposes to amend
title 7, chapter IX of the Code of Federal
Regulations by removing parts 926 and
929.
■
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 / Proposed Rules
PART 926—[REMOVED]
PART 929—[REMOVED]
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–26887 Filed 12–6–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2023–2269; Airspace
Docket No. 23–ASO–4]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Jet Routes and
Domestic Very High Frequency
Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
Airways and Revocation of Jet Route;
Eastern United States
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend six jet routes and six domestic
Very High Frequency Omnidirectional
Range (VOR) Federal airways in the
eastern United States. In addition, this
action proposes to revoke one existing
jet route. These actions support the
Little Rock, AR (LIT), VOR/Tactical Air
Navigation (VORTAC) relocation
project.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 22, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by FAA Docket No. FAA–2023–2269
and Airspace Docket No. 23–ASO–4
using any of the following methods:
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
* Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
* Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
* Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at (202) 493–2251.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Dec 06, 2023
Jkt 262001
www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FAA Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. You may also contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Office of
Policy, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Vidis, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
85133
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments it receives, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this proposed rulemaking. Before acting
on this proposal, the FAA will consider
all comments it receives on or before the
closing date for comments. The FAA
will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The FAA may change
this proposal in light of the comments
it receives.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking
process. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal
information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends the
route structure to maintain the efficient
flow of air traffic within the National
Airspace System (NAS).
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s web page at www.faa.gov/air_
traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Operations office
(see ADDRESSES section for address,
phone number, and hours of
operations). An informal docket may
also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, Room 210, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA
30337.
Comments Invited
Incorporation by Reference
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. Comments are specifically
invited on the overall regulatory,
aeronautical, economic, environmental,
and energy-related aspects of the
proposal. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should submit only one
time if comments are filed
electronically, or commenters should
send only one copy of written
comments if comments are filed in
writing.
Jet routes are published in paragraph
2004 and domestic VOR Federal airways
are published in paragraph 6010(a) of
FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This
document proposes to amend the
current version of that order, FAA Order
JO 7400.11H, dated August 11, 2023,
and effective September 15, 2023. These
updates would be published in the next
update to FAA Order JO 7400.11. That
order is publicly available as listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
FAA Order JO 7400.11H lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic
service routes, and reporting points.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 85130-85133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26887]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2023 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 85130]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 929 and 926
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-23-0047]
Cranberries Grown in Massachusetts, et al.; Termination of
Marketing Order and Data Collection Requirements for Cranberries Not
Subject to the Marketing Order
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed action invites comments on the proposed
termination of the Federal marketing order regulating the handling of
cranberries grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon,
Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder (Marketing Order No. 929). The data
collection, reporting and recordkeeping requirements applicable to
cranberries not subject to the cranberry marketing order would also be
terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 5, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments can be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax:
(202) 720-8938; or internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments
should reference the document number and the date and page number of
this issue of the Federal Register and can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
proposal will be included in the record and will be made available to
the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennie M. Varela, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Chief, Southeast Region Branch,
Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (863) 324-3375 or Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-8085 or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes the termination of regulations issued to carry out a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under
Marketing Order No. 929, as amended (7 CFR part 929), regulating the
handling of cranberries grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode
Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota,
Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York. Part 929
referred to as the ``Order'' is effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674),
hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Cranberry Marketing
Committee (Committee) locally administers the Order and is comprised of
producers operating within the production area and a public member.
This proposed rule is also issued under section 8d of the Act (7
U.S.C. 608d(3)), which authorizes the collection of cranberry and
cranberry product information from producer-handlers, second handlers,
processors, brokers, and importers including those not subject to
regulation under the Order.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this
proposed rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094. Executive Orders 12866, and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 14094 reaffirms, supplements, and updates Executive
Order 12866 and further directs agencies to solicit and consider input
from a wide range of affected and interested parties through a variety
of means. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review.
In addition, this proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive
Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their
rulemaking actions would have Tribal implications. Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has determined this proposed rule is unlikely
to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to a marketing order may file with the USDA a
petition stating that the marketing order, any provision of the
marketing order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the
marketing order is not in accordance with law and request a
modification of the marketing order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
The Order has been in effect since 1962 and regulates the handling
of
[[Page 85131]]
cranberries grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon,
Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York. The Order
provides the cranberry industry with authority for production research,
marketing promotion and development, to include paid advertising, as
well as authority for volume regulation through producer allotments or
handler withholding. The Order also authorizes reporting and
recordkeeping functions required for operation of the program. The
Committee, which locally administers the Order, is funded by
assessments imposed on handlers.
This rule proposes termination of the Order and the rules and
regulations thereunder. This action is based on the results of a
continuance referendum in which producers failed to support
continuation of the Order. USDA believes termination of this program
would be appropriate as the Order is no longer favored by industry
producers.
Section 929.69 of the Order states USDA shall conduct a referendum
during the month of May 1975 and every fourth year thereafter to
ascertain whether continuance is favored by producers. Under this
section, USDA shall terminate the Order if termination is favored by a
majority of the growers, and that this majority has, during the current
fiscal year, produced more than 50 percent of the cranberries produced
in the production area. As required by the Order, USDA held a
continuance referendum among cranberry producers from June 9 through
June 30, 2023, to determine if they favored continuation of the
program.
USDA mailed ballots to 944 producers in the production area. Those
producers cast 366 valid ballots. The results indicate 73.5 percent of
cranberry growers, who produced 79.9 percent of the production volume,
voted in the referendum and favored termination of the program.
Consequently, the vote met the Order's criteria for termination,
demonstrating a lack of the producer support needed to carry out the
objectives of the Act.
Section 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that USDA shall terminate
or suspend the operation of any order whenever the order or any
provision thereof obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act. Based on the foregoing, and pursuant to section
608c(16)(A) of the Act and Sec. 929.69 of the Order, USDA is
considering termination of the Order. If USDA decides to terminate the
Order, trustees would be appointed to conclude and liquidate the
affairs of the Committee and would continue in that capacity until
discharged by USDA. In addition, USDA would notify Congress of USDA's
intent to terminate the Order not later than 60 days before the Order
is terminated pursuant to section 608c(16)(A) of the Act.
A notice announcing the results of the referendum was issued on
August 16, 2023. On October 25, 2023, USDA suspended collection of
assessments and all reporting requirements under the Order while the
proposed termination of the program is being processed. All other
provisions, including promotion and research, would remain in effect
until the Order is terminated.
Section 608d(3) of the Act authorizes the collection of cranberry
and cranberry product information from producer-handlers, second
handlers, processors, brokers, and importers. This data collection is
codified in 7 CFR part 926, Data Collection, Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements Applicable to Cranberries Not Subject to the
Cranberry Marketing Order, establishing reporting requirements for
cranberry and cranberry products not subject to the Order and how they
were to be reported to the Committee. Section 926.21 states this part
shall be suspended or terminated whenever there is no longer a Federal
cranberry marketing order in effect. This proposal would also terminate
part 926 which has been suspended since December 28, 2006.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), USDA has considered the economic impact
of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, USDA has prepared
this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant
to the Act are unique in that they are brought about through group
action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 950 cranberry growers in the regulated area
and approximately 45 cranberry handlers subject to regulation under the
Order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less than
$3,750,000, (North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code
111334) and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose
annual receipts are less than $34,000,000 (NAICS code 115114) (13 CFR
121.201).
According to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
the average grower price for U.S. cranberries during the 2022-23 season
was $36.60 per barrel and utilized production was 8,010,070 barrels.
The value for cranberries that year totaled $293,168,562, ($36.60 per
barrel multiplied by 8,010,070 barrels). Taking the total value of
production for cranberries and dividing it by the total number of
cranberry growers provides an average return per grower of $308,598.
Using the average price and utilization information, and assuming a
normal distribution, the majority of cranberry growers receive less
than $3,750,000 annually.
According to USDA's Market News retail averages report, the price
per pound of fresh cranberries on average was $1.64 in December of
2022. On average, NASS reports that grower prices for fresh cranberries
are almost double (199 percent) grower prices for processed
cranberries. Dividing the average fresh retail price as reported by
Market News ($1.64) by 1.99 calculates to an estimated average retail
processed price of $0.82 per pound. There are 100 pounds of cranberries
per barrel so the average retail price for a barrel of cranberries
would be $82. Multiplying the average retail price by total utilization
of 8 million barrels results in an estimated cranberry retail value of
$656 million. Dividing this figure by the number of handlers (45)
yields an estimated average annual handler receipts of $14.6 million,
which is below the SBA threshold for small agricultural service firms.
Therefore, the majority of producers and handlers of cranberries may be
classified as small entities.
This rule proposes to terminate the Order, and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder. Termination would remove the Order from
the Code of Federal Regulations. Section 929.69 of the Order provides
that USDA shall conduct a referendum during the month of May 1975 and
every fourth year thereafter to ascertain whether continuance is
favored by producers. The section states USDA shall terminate the Order
if termination is favored by a majority of the growers, and if that
majority has, during the current fiscal year, produced more than 50
percent of the cranberries produced in the production area. The results
of a continuance referendum held from June 9 through June 30, 2023,
indicate 73.5 percent of cranberry growers, who produced 79.9 percent
of the production
[[Page 85132]]
volume, voted in the referendum and favored termination of the program.
Consequently, the vote met the Order's criteria for termination,
indicating continuance of the program is no longer favored by industry
producers. Consequently, USDA is considering termination of the Order.
This proposed rule would also terminate part 926, the suspended data
collection requirements for cranberries not covered under the Order.
Marketing orders provide industries with tools to assist producers
and handlers in addressing challenges facing the industry. These tools
include establishing minimum grade, size, quality, and maturity
requirements, setting size, capacity, weight, dimensions or pack of the
containers, collecting and publishing market information useful to
producers and handlers, conducting research and promotions, and
establishing volume control requirements. Each marketing order is
different, with the industries deciding the authorities needed and the
scope of their marketing order. Marketing orders are approved by
producers through referenda and regulate handlers to ensure compliance
with all requirements. The authority of a marketing order allows each
industry to create a local administrative committee that is made up of
growers and/or handlers that work collectively to solve industry
problems.
The Order has been in effect since 1962 and provides the cranberry
industry with authority for production research, marketing promotion
and development, to include paid advertising, as well as authority for
volume regulation through producer allotments or handler withholding.
The Order also authorizes reporting and recordkeeping functions
required for operation of the program. The Committee, which locally
administers the Order, is funded by assessments imposed on handlers. As
this change would terminate the Order and all the rules and regulations
issued thereunder, the perceived benefits correlated with the Order
would be lost. However, there would also be savings by eliminating
costs associated with the Order, which include the payment of
assessments and costs related to reporting and occasional volume
regulation.
A review of the referendum results shows that producers failed to
reach the necessary threshold for the vote to pass by either vote or by
volume as specified in the Order, indicating that voting producers
believe the benefits of the program no longer outweigh the costs to
handlers and producers. Although marketing order requirements are
applied to handlers, the costs of such requirements are often passed on
to producers. Termination of the Order, and the resulting regulatory
relaxation, could therefore be expected to reduce costs for both
producers and handlers.
An alternative to this action would be to maintain the Order and
its current provisions. However, the Order requires that a continuance
referendum be conducted every fourth year to determine industry support
for the program. The results of a recently held producer continuance
referendum on the cranberry program indicated a lack of producer
support, indicating that the Order no longer meets the needs of
producers and handlers. Therefore, this alternative was rejected, and
USDA is considering terminating the Order and removing the suspended
data collection requirements in part 926.
This proposed rule is intended to solicit input and other available
information from interested parties on whether the Order should be
terminated. USDA will evaluate all available information prior to
making a final determination on this matter.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189 Fruit Crops.
Termination of the Order, and the reporting requirements prescribed
therein, would reduce the reporting burden by 1,265 hours. Handlers
would no longer be required to file forms with the Committee, which is
expected to reduce industry expenses. This rulemaking would not impose
any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either large
or small cranberry handlers.
This rulemaking would effectuate the removal of reporting and
recordkeeping requirements on cranberry handlers, both small and large.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap
or conflict with this proposed rule.
USDA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
The producer referendum was well publicized in the production area,
and referendum ballots were provided to all known producers. As such,
producers of U.S. cranberries had an opportunity to indicate their
continued support for the Order. Further, interested persons are
invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the
regulatory and information collection impacts of this proposed action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on the proposed termination of Marketing
Order No. 929, which regulates the handling of cranberries grown in the
States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey,
Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in
the State of New York. A 60-day comment period is provided to allow
interested persons to respond to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered before a final determination is made
on this matter.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant to section 608c(16)(A) of the
Act and Sec. 929.69 of the Order, USDA is considering termination of
the Order. If USDA decides to terminate the Order, trustees would be
appointed to conclude and liquidate the Committee affairs and would
continue in that capacity until discharged by USDA. In addition, USDA
would notify Congress 60 days in advance of termination pursuant to
section 608c(16)(A) of the Act.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 926
Cranberries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
7 CFR Part 929
Acreage allotments, Cranberries, Marketing agreements, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601-674, the Agricultural Marketing Service proposes to amend
title 7, chapter IX of the Code of Federal Regulations by removing
parts 926 and 929.
[[Page 85133]]
PART 926--[REMOVED]
PART 929--[REMOVED]
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-26887 Filed 12-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P