Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadline Extension for Reporting Companies Created or Registered in 2024, 83499-83504 [2023-26399]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
83499
REGULATORY REVIEW—UPDATED TEN-YEAR SCHEDULE—Continued
16 CFR part
Topic
309 ..............
429 ..............
20 ................
240 ..............
Labeling Requirements for Alternative Fuels and Alternative Fueled Vehicles ...................................
Rule Concerning Cooling-Off Period for Sales Made at Homes or at Certain Other Locations ..........
Guides for the Rebuilt, Reconditioned, and Other Used Automobile Parts Industry ...........................
Guides for Advertising Allowances and Other Merchandising Payments and Services [Fred Meyer
Guides].
Rules and Regulations under the Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 ..............................................
Rules and Regulations under Fur Products Labeling Act ....................................................................
Rules and Regulations under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act .........................................
Retail Food Store Advertising and Marketing Practices [Unavailability Rule] ......................................
Mail, Internet, or Telephone Order Merchandise ..................................................................................
Guides for the Advertising of Warranties and Guarantees ...................................................................
Guides for Private Vocational and Distance Education Schools ..........................................................
Energy Labeling Rule ............................................................................................................................
Automotive Fuel Ratings, Certification and Posting .............................................................................
Credit Practices .....................................................................................................................................
Regulations under Section 4 of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act .................................................
Exemptions from Requirements and Prohibitions under Part 500 .......................................................
Regulations under Section 5(c) of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act ............................................
Statements of General Policy or Interpretation [under the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act] ............
Interpretations of Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act .................................................................................
Disclosure of Written Consumer Product Warranty Terms and Conditions .........................................
Pre-Sale Availability of Written Warranty Terms ..................................................................................
Informal Dispute Settlement Procedures ..............................................................................................
Rules and Regulations under the Hobby Protection Act ......................................................................
Used Motor Vehicle Trade Regulation Rule .........................................................................................
Guides Against Deceptive Pricing .........................................................................................................
Guides Against Bait Advertising ............................................................................................................
Guide Concerning Use of the Word ‘‘Free’’ and Similar Representations ...........................................
Guide Concerning Fuel Economy Advertising for New Automobiles ...................................................
Disposal of Consumer Report Information and Records ......................................................................
Guides for the Jewelry, Precious Metals, and Pewter Industries .........................................................
Test Procedures and Labeling Standards for Recycled Oil .................................................................
Labeling and Advertising of Home Insulation .......................................................................................
CAN–SPAM Rule ..................................................................................................................................
Preservation of Consumers’ Claims and Defenses [Holder in Due Course Rule] ...............................
Contact Lens Rule .................................................................................................................................
Privacy of Consumer Financial Information ..........................................................................................
Prohibition of Energy Market Manipulation Rule ..................................................................................
Made in USA Labeling ..........................................................................................................................
Duties of Creditors Regarding Risk Based Pricing ...............................................................................
Duties of Users of Consumer Reports Regarding Address Discrepancies ..........................................
Prescreen Opt-Out Notice .....................................................................................................................
Duties of Furnishers of Information to Consumer Reporting Agencies ................................................
Affiliate Marketing ..................................................................................................................................
Model Forms and Disclosures ..............................................................................................................
Guides Concerning Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising ........................................
Trade Regulation Rule Pursuant to the Telephone Disclosure and Dispute Resolution Act of 1992
[Pay Per Call Rule].
Care Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel and Certain Piece Goods ..................................................
300 ..............
301 ..............
303 ..............
424 ..............
435 ..............
239 ..............
254 ..............
305 ..............
306 ..............
444 ..............
500 ..............
501 ..............
502 ..............
503 ..............
700 ..............
701 ..............
702 ..............
703 ..............
304 ..............
455 ..............
233 ..............
238 ..............
251 ..............
259 ..............
682 ..............
23 ................
311 ..............
460 ..............
316 ..............
433 ..............
315 ..............
313 ..............
317 ..............
323 ..............
640 ..............
641 ..............
642 ..............
660 ..............
680 ..............
698 ..............
255 ..............
308 ..............
423 ..............
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2023–26064 Filed 11–29–23; 8:45 am]
Year to initiate review
Final rule.
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
FinCEN is amending the
beneficial ownership information (BOI)
reporting rule (the ‘‘Reporting Rule’’) to
extend the filing deadline for certain
BOI reports. Under the Reporting Rule
prior to this amendment, entities
created or registered on or after the
rule’s effective date of January 1, 2024,
had to file initial BOI reports with
FinCEN within 30 calendar days of
notice of their creation or registration.
This amendment extends that filing
deadline from 30 calendar days to 90
calendar days for entities created or
registered on or after January 1, 2024,
and before January 1, 2025, to give those
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
31 CFR Part 1010
RIN 1506–AB62
Beneficial Ownership Information
Reporting Deadline Extension for
Reporting Companies Created or
Registered in 2024
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network (FinCEN), Treasury.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2023.
2023.
2024.
2024.
2024.
2024.
2024.
2024.
2024.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2025.
2026.
2026.
2027.
2027.
2027.
2027.
2027.
2028.
2028.
2028.
2029.
2029.
2030.
2031.
2031.
2031.
2031.
2031.
2031.
2031.
2031.
2031.
2033.
2033.
2033.
entities additional time to understand
the new reporting obligation and collect
the necessary information to complete
their filings. Entities created or
registered on or after January 1, 2025,
will continue to have 30 calendar days
to file their BOI reports with FinCEN.
DATES:
This rule is effective January 1,
2024.
The
FinCEN Regulatory Support Section at
1–800–767–2825 or electronically at
frc@fincen.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
83500
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
I. Introduction
In this final rule, FinCEN is amending
the Reporting Rule 1 to extend the
deadline to file initial BOI reports for
entities created or registered on or after
the rule’s effective date of January 1,
2024, and before January 1, 2025. The
Reporting Rule had required such
entities to file initial BOI reports with
FinCEN within 30 calendar days of
notice of their creation or registration.
This final rule extends that filing
deadline to 90 calendar days for entities
created or registered on or after January
1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025. The
extension will give those entities
additional time to understand the new
reporting obligation and collect the
necessary information to complete their
filings. Entities created or registered on
or after January 1, 2025, will continue
to have 30 calendar days from notice of
their creation or registration to file their
BOI reports with FinCEN.
II. Background
A. The Reporting Rule
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
On September 30, 2022, FinCEN
published the Reporting Rule, with an
effective date of January 1, 2024.2 The
Reporting Rule requires certain
corporations, limited liability
companies, and other similar entities
(‘‘reporting companies’’) 3 to report
certain identifying information about
the beneficial owners who own or
control such entities and the company
applicants who form or register them.4
These requirements are intended to
facilitate access to BOI for certain
authorized recipients, including law
enforcement and regulators, for the
purpose of countering money
laundering, the financing of terrorism,
and other illicit activity.5 The Corporate
Transparency Act (CTA) directs FinCEN
to promulgate regulations that achieve
the objectives of the statute, while
minimizing burdens on reporting
companies to the greatest extent
practicable and ensuring that the BOI
collected is ‘‘highly useful’’ for national
1 U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury),
FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership Information
Reporting Requirements, 87 FR 59498 (September
30, 2022).
2 The Reporting Rule is the first in a series of
rulemakings to implement the Corporate
Transparency Act (CTA), enacted on January 1,
2021, as part of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of
2020 and codified at 31 U.S.C. 5336. The CTA is
Title LXIV of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2021, Public Law 116–283 (January 1, 2021)
(NDAA). Division F of the NDAA is the Anti-Money
Laundering Act of 2020, which includes the CTA.
3 See 31 U.S.C. 5336(a)(11).
4 See supra footnote 1, at 59498–99.
5 CTA, Section 6402 (January 1, 2021).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
security, intelligence, and law
enforcement activities.6
For domestic or foreign reporting
companies created or registered to do
business in the United States before the
rule’s effective date of January 1, 2024,
the Reporting Rule requires that they
file initial BOI reports with FinCEN by
January 1, 2025.7 Prior to the
amendment of this final rule, a reporting
company created or registered on or
after January 1, 2024, however, would
have been required to file its initial BOI
report within 30 calendar days of the
earlier of the date on which it receives
actual notice or public notice that it has
been created or registered.8 The
Reporting Rule requires reporting
companies created on or after January 1,
2024, to report to FinCEN information
about themselves, as well as information
about two categories of individuals: (1)
their beneficial owners; and (2) their
company applicants, who are the
individuals who filed a document to
create the reporting company or
registered it to do business.9
B. The Reporting Deadline Extension
NPRM
On September 28, 2023, FinCEN
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking that would amend the
Reporting Rule by extending the period
for certain reporting companies to file
initial BOI reports (the ‘‘Reporting
Extension NPRM’’).10 Under this
proposed amendment, reporting
companies created or registered on or
after January 1, 2024, and before January
1, 2025, would have 90 calendar days to
submit their initial BOI reports, instead
of 30 calendar days. Reporting
companies created or registered on or
after January 1, 2025, would continue to
be required to submit their initial BOI
reports within 30 calendar days.
FinCEN proposed the extension based
on comments from trade associations,
non-profits, and other key stakeholder
organizations. As explained in the
Reporting Extension NPRM, extending
the deadline for reporting companies
created or registered on or after January
1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025,
would give those entities additional
time to: (1) understand and comply with
the Reporting Rule; (2) obtain the
information necessary to complete their
initial BOI reports; and (3) resolve
questions that may arise in the process
6 Id.
7 Reporting
Rule, 31 CFR 1010.380(a)(iii).
at 1010.380(a)(i)–(ii).
9 Id. at 1010.380(a)(ii).
10 Treasury, FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership
Information Reporting Deadline Extension for
Reporting Companies Created or Registered in 2024,
Proposed Rule, 88 FR 66730 (September 28, 2023).
8 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of completing the initial BOI reports.11
The Reporting Extension NPRM also
explained that the Reporting Rule
establishes a legal regime that is entirely
new to the United States, and the NPRM
explained that FinCEN assessed that
entrepreneurs and their service
providers that create or register new
business entities in the United States
need additional time to learn about the
Reporting Rule’s requirements during
the first year in which this regulation is
effective.
In response to the Reporting
Extension NPRM, FinCEN received 50
comments. Submissions came from a
variety of corporate organization
professionals, small business owners,
trade groups, and individual members
of the public. Many of these
commenters supported FinCEN’s
proposed rule. Other commenters, while
supportive of the intent behind the
proposed rule, suggested alternative
reporting deadlines such as 120 days
after reporting companies are created or
registered. Numerous commenters
wanted FinCEN to apply the 90-day
timeframe to all entities created or
registered on or after January 1, 2024,
not just those created or registered
before January 1, 2025. Still other
commenters suggested aligning the BOI
reporting deadline with a reporting
company’s tax filing deadline. One
comment was critical of the proposed
rule, claiming that the proposal did not
offer sufficient relief to reporting
companies. Lastly, FinCEN received
comments on several topics that were
not relevant to the Reporting Extension
NPRM, and which FinCEN has
addressed or will address in other CTArelated rulemakings or guidance.
III. Discussion of Comments Received
A. Support for the 90-Day Reporting
Extension
Comments Received. A majority of the
commenters agreed with the proposed
rule’s extended deadline and
encouraged FinCEN to promulgate the
rule as written. Generally, these
comments stressed the importance for
11 Although the CTA provides that reports are to
be filed by entities created or registered on or after
January 1, 2024, ‘‘at the time of formation or
registration,’’ 31 U.S.C. 5336(b)(1)(C), FinCEN may
prescribe an exemption from that requirement
consistent with the directive to ensure that the
database is highly useful to law enforcement while
at the same time minimizing burdens on reporting
companies. See CTA, Section 6402(8). FinCEN
believes it is appropriate to do so for entities
created or registered on or after January 1, 2024, and
before January 1, 2025, for the reasons noted here.
Under 31 U.S.C. 5318(a)(7), FinCEN has authority
to ‘‘prescribe an appropriate exemption from a
requirement under this subchapter,’’ which
includes the CTA in section 5336.
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
small businesses to receive additional
time to comply with the BOI filing
deadline. One commenter observed that
small businesses have a ‘‘myriad of
administrative tasks’’ and opined that
entities would feel rushed when
attempting to comply with the original
BOI filing deadline of 30 calendar days.
This sentiment was echoed by another
commenter who noted that new entities
must typically gather numerous
documents in coordination with other
parties, such as attorneys, and that the
original 30-day filing deadline would be
‘‘stressful.’’ This commenter argued that
the 90-day extension would reduce the
number of entities that would later have
to file corrective reports, and
consequently reduce the overall amount
of paperwork and expenses associated
with filing. Further, one commenter
noted that entity formation can take
longer than 30 days as other
governmental entities may require
greater than 30 days to ‘‘process’’
entities’ respective registration
applications.
A commenter noted that the proposed
extension would give attorneys and
others providing filing assistance to
reporting companies more time to
understand BOI reporting requirements.
One commenter noted that an extension
to this deadline would lighten entities’
initial regulatory burden.
Commenters also argued that the
extension will give FinCEN additional
time to implement the BOI regulations.
One commenter opined that this
proposed extension would give FinCEN
additional time so as not to be
‘‘overwhelmed’’ with new reports, while
another commenter stated that the
additional time would allow FinCEN to
publish frequently asked questions
(FAQs) or related guidance. One
commenter suggested that an extension
would reduce non-compliance and
potential penalties. No commenters
explicitly opposed extending the
deadline, though as discussed below in
Section III.B, one commenter was
critical of the proposed rule for not
offering sufficient relief to reporting
companies.
Final Rule. FinCEN has carefully
considered commenters’ views and
agrees that extending the reporting
deadline for reporting companies
created or registered on January 1, 2024,
and before January 1, 2025, will help
such companies to become aware of
their reporting obligations and submit
BOI reports to FinCEN. FinCEN
therefore adopts the rule as proposed
and extends the deadline for these
reporting companies from 30 to 90
calendar days.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
B. Alternatives to the 90-Day Reporting
Extension
Comments Received. Numerous
commenters, while in favor of extending
the initial filing deadline for reporting
companies created or registered on or
after January 1, 2024, and before January
1, 2025, argued for making the deadline
more than 90 calendar days after
creation or registration or, alternatively,
for an initial BOI report filing deadline
aligned to tax filing deadlines. These
commenters generally did not
distinguish between entities created or
registered in the first year of the new
reporting requirement (on or after
January 1, 2024, and before January 1,
2025), and new entities generally. One
commenter argued that with January 1,
2024, quickly approaching and FinCEN
having provided relatively little
guidance (in the commenter’s opinion),
all new entities should be given 120
days to file their initial BOI reports. The
commenter stated that a 120-day
timeframe would promote greater
accuracy in information submitted to
FinCEN. Another commenter suggested
the deadline be either 90 days or
‘‘within the calendar year,’’ whichever
was longer. The commenter argued that
this flexibility would help certified
public accountants (CPAs), who might
only discover a reporting company’s
BOI reporting obligation at tax time.
A trade organization representing
CPAs was critical of the extension
because it found the 90-day timeline to
be inadequate. This commenter argued
for an initial filing deadline of one year
from creation or registration. The
commenter cited various concerns, such
as the need for greater awareness of the
reporting requirements among small
businesses and the potential for these
businesses facing penalties for noncompliance.
Similarly, multiple commenters
argued that all new reporting
companies’ deadlines should be either
90 days or the income tax return
deadline specifically, whichever was
longer. These commenters argued that
new businesses, and in particular small
businesses, rely upon CPAs to assist
with filing income tax returns. To this
point, three commenters echoed others’
sentiments in stating that individuals
often make CPAs aware of new
businesses having been created when
seeking assistance with tax return
filings. Therefore, the commenters
argued that a deadline based upon the
tax return deadline would allow CPAs
to assist with both tax return filings and
BOI filings at the same time.
Final Rule. FinCEN has carefully
considered each comment supporting an
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
83501
extension greater than 90 calendar days,
or a deadline to be aligned with IRS tax
return filing deadlines, but declines to
adopt these changes to the proposed
rule. FinCEN believes the additional
published guidance, the availability of
the contact center FinCEN is preparing
that will allow members of the public to
contact FinCEN with questions
concerning BOI reporting, and the 90day timeframe will provide members of
the general public with sufficient time,
awareness, and opportunity to consult
third parties (such as CPAs or attorneys)
as the BOI regulatory framework is first
implemented. It will also provide both
those third parties and the general
public with guidance and other
information to assist in providing advice
and making decisions. FinCEN further
declines to extend the deadline to the
longer of 90 days or the ‘‘end of the
year.’’ 12 This arrangement would allow
a reporting company created or
registered in January to wait until
December 31 of the same year to file its
initial BOI report, while a reporting
company created or registered at or near
the end of September of that same year
would be required to file within 90
days. Such disparate treatment of
similarly situated reporting companies
is unwarranted and would not address
any difficulties caused by a novel
reporting requirement more effectively
than the filing extension that FinCEN
proposed.
FinCEN also declines to align its filing
deadline for initial BOI reports to
income tax return deadlines. Were
FinCEN to align the initial BOI report
deadline to the income tax return filing
deadline, some reporting companies
could file their BOI reports many
months, and even the following year,
after they have been created or
registered. This would create significant
discrepancies between the filing time
allotted to otherwise similarly situated
reporting companies. In addition, such
a delay would mean that filed
information about new reporting
companies would be significantly out of
date for the entire period from January
1, 2024, until after the 2025 tax filing
season, which would not align with the
CTA’s mandate to ‘‘collect information
in a form and manner that is reasonably
designed to generate a database that is
highly useful to national security,
12 Some comments discussed the merits of an
extended reporting deadline without reference to
the January 1, 2025, endpoint that FinCEN
proposed. FinCEN understands these comments to
be effectively in favor of a permanent alteration of
reporting deadline to 90 calendar days for all new
reporting companies, regardless of when created or
registered, and addresses those comments in section
III.C.
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
83502
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
intelligence, and law enforcement
agencies and Federal functional
regulators.’’ 13 Preserving the utility of
the database to the greatest extent
possible dictates that an extension of the
filing deadline should be only as long as
needed to provide meaningful relief in
the first year that the BOI reporting
framework is in effect.
C. The Timeframe To File for Entities
Created or Registered After 2024
Comments Received. Some
commenters urged FinCEN to apply the
90-day BOI reporting deadline extension
to all reporting companies created or
formed on or after January 1, 2024,
instead of limiting the 90-day extension
to only those new entities created in
calendar year 2024. One commenter
argued that the 90-day extension should
apply to all reporting companies created
or formed on or after January 1, 2024,
because law firms and corporate
formation services will find it
burdensome to create systems for a 90day BOI reporting timeframe in 2024
and then have to change their systems
in 2025 to account for the 30-day
timeline. Other commenters cited the
logic in the preamble to the Reporting
Extension NPRM as supportive of
extending the 90-day extension beyond
2024. These commenters noted the
rationale behind the proposed rule,
including the need to give reporting
companies additional time to
understand their obligations under the
Reporting Rule and obtain the
information required under the rule
during the first year the Reporting Rule
is effective. The reasons FinCEN
provided for giving reporting companies
more time in 2024 would also justify
giving reporting companies more time
in the years beyond 2024, according to
these commenters.
Final Rule. FinCEN has carefully
considered commenters’ arguments to
make the 90-day reporting extension
permanent, but FinCEN is declining to
adopt this change to the Reporting Rule.
FinCEN believes that new reporting
companies that are created or registered
in 2024 will be in a different position
than those reporting companies created
or registered in and after 2025, because
2024 is the first year in which the
Reporting Rule is effective. The
Reporting Rule creates an entirely new
legal framework for newly formed or
registered companies in the United
States. It is particularly important for
companies and company-formation
advisers to have additional time to
understand the new requirements and
learn how to comply with them when
13 CTA,
Section 6402(8)(C).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
the framework is new. After 2024,
however, FinCEN believes that the
public will be more familiar with this
new regime as a result of FinCEN’s
outreach and educational efforts, which
will continue throughout 2024.
Consequently, after 2024, newly created
or registered reporting companies will
have greater awareness of the Reporting
Rule’s requirements, and they will be in
a better position to comply with the
requirements within the 30-day timeline
set out in the Reporting Rule than they
would have been in 2024.
FinCEN recognizes commenters’
concerns that the 30-day timeframe for
filing BOI reports after 2024 may pose
difficulties because many small
businesses do not employ lawyers or
other corporate service providers and
therefore may not learn about the
Reporting Rule and associated BOI
reporting requirement within a 30-day
timeframe. FinCEN is taking into
account these concerns as it implements
its outreach strategy, in particular by
planning for its outreach and
educational efforts to reach the general
public, not only service providers.
FinCEN expects the public to become
increasingly aware of the BOI reporting
requirements as 2024 progresses, and in
the coming years FinCEN will build
upon its existing efforts to educate
entrepreneurs who start new reporting
companies.
Further, while following the CTA’s
directive to minimize burdens on
reporting companies to the greatest
extent practicable, which this final rule
aims to do, FinCEN must also satisfy the
CTA’s requirement that the BOI
database must be ‘‘highly useful’’ in
facilitating national security,
intelligence, and law enforcement
activities.14 To be ‘‘highly useful,’’ the
database must be reasonably up-to-date
and accurate, and FinCEN believes that
the Reporting Rule’s 30-day timeframe
for filing BOI reports to FinCEN will
help achieve this goal. FinCEN gives
weight to commenters’ concerns that
new reporting companies have many
challenges to grapple with in their first
few months of operation. However,
FinCEN does not believe these concerns
warrant a permanent departure from the
prompt BOI reporting regime specified
by Congress.15
14 CTA,
Section 6402(8)(C).
plain language of the CTA requires
reporting companies formed or registered after the
effective date of the Reporting Rule to file their BOI
reports with FinCEN ‘‘at the time of formation or
registration.’’ See 31 U.S.C. 5336(b)(1)(C). As
discussed above, FinCEN is using its exemptive
authority under 31 U.S.C. 5318(a)(7) to extend this
deadline to 90 days temporarily. See supra footnote
12. By not maintaining this extension any longer
15 The
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Considering the balance that FinCEN
must strike among reducing burdens on
reporting companies, making the BOI
database highly useful, and complying
with the directive set out in the CTA
that companies must report BOI ‘‘at the
time of formation or registration,’’ 16
FinCEN believes that the 30-day
timeframe is appropriate for reporting
companies that come into existence or
are registered after 2024. FinCEN makes
this determination based on the
information currently available,
including the comments it received in
response to the Reporting Extension
NPRM, which focused primarily on
reducing burdens to reporting
companies. During the first few years of
the implementation of the Reporting
Rule, FinCEN will monitor compliance
with the BOI reporting deadlines and
will consider whether any adjustments
to the permanent reporting timeframe
for newly created or registered reporting
companies are warranted.
D. Other Issues Raised by Commenters
Commenters also discussed a number
of issues that were not relevant to the
Reporting Extension NPRM, such as the
timeframe for updating or correcting
BOI reports, access to FinCEN’s BOI
database, the FinCEN identifier, and
other matters. Some of the issues raised
by these commenters have been or will
be dealt with in separate FinCEN
rulemakings that implement the CTA,
while other issues are addressed in
guidance. Comments on issues that go
beyond the scope of this final rule are
briefly discussed here.
Comments Received. A number of
comments addressed issues that FinCEN
raised, received comments on, and
made final determinations about in the
course of proposing and finalizing the
Reporting Rule. Several commenters
requested that FinCEN extend the
timeframe that reporting companies
have to update or correct their BOI
reports. These commenters claimed that
reporting companies need more than the
30 calendar days that the Reporting Rule
provided for them to update or correct
BOI reports. One commenter requested
clarification on what it means for
reporting companies to be ‘‘created’’ for
purposes of knowing when to begin the
90-day window within which reporting
companies created or formed in 2024
must file their BOI reports with FinCEN.
Another commenter claimed that as
important as the 90-day extension in the
NPRM is, equally important for FinCEN
than necessary to provide relief, however, this final
rule better aligns FinCEN’s BOI reporting
regulations with the overall statutory scheme.
16 31 U.S.C. 5336(b)(1)(C).
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
to consider is making FinCEN’s
electronic filing system available to
corporate formation service providers
prior to January 1, 2024, so that they are
prepared to quickly assist newly created
reporting companies in filing their BOI
reports. Other commenters emphasized
the need for FinCEN to conduct
additional outreach so that small
businesses, trade associations, and
professional service providers are aware
of the requirements of the Reporting
Rule. One commenter argued that the
Reporting Rule’s estimate of the costs
that reporting companies will incur in
complying with the rule is inaccurate
since these companies will need to
monitor changes that would require
updates to their initial BOI report, and
they will often incur costs associated
with professional services hired to
understand the reporting requirements.
Other comments that addressed issues
that went beyond the scope of the
Reporting Extension NPRM are more
relevant to ongoing FinCEN regulations
and guidance related to the CTA. For
example, one commenter asked FinCEN
to clarify, among other things, how
financial institutions will access the
FinCEN BOI database, how financial
institutions should obtain customer
consent to request BOI from the
database, how these institutions should
approach discrepancies between BOI
found in the database and BOI obtained
directly from customers pursuant to the
final rule on customer due diligence
obligations that FinCEN published in
2016 (the ‘‘2016 CDD Rule’’).17 Other
commenters had additional questions
regarding how financial institutions
should reconcile their existing CDD
obligations with the Reporting Rule and
the proposed requirements under the
proposed rule that FinCEN issued on
December 16, 2022, concerning access
to BOI and safeguards for protecting BOI
(the ‘‘Access NPRM’’).18
Final Rule. FinCEN has reviewed the
comments on issues that are not
relevant to the Reporting Extension
NPRM and is not adopting changes to
this final rule as a result of these
comments. However, FinCEN is
responding to several of the comments
in order to provide clarification on
certain issues.
First, as for questions about the
meaning of when a reporting company
is deemed to be ‘‘created’’ in order to set
the 90-day timeframe for reporting BOI
17 Treasury,
FinCEN, Customer Due Diligence
Requirements for Financial Institutions, 81 FR
29398 (May 11, 2016).
18 Treasury, FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership
Information Access and Safeguards, and Use of
FinCEN Identifiers for Entities, Proposed Rule, 87
FR 77404 (December 16, 2022).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
by reporting companies created or
formed in 2024, the Reporting Extension
NPRM did not propose to alter the
approach that FinCEN took in the
Reporting Rule. Under the Reporting
Rule, a domestic or foreign reporting
company is ‘‘created’’ or ‘‘registered’’
when it receives actual notice or
constructive (public) notice, whichever
is earlier, that the company has been
created or registered.19 This remains
unchanged.
Second, FinCEN considers that a
distinction needs to be made between
providing additional time for reporting
companies to file their initial BOI
reports, and providing additional time
for them to update or correct those
reports. FinCEN believes that extending
the deadline for reporting companies
created or registered on or after January
1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025, to
file their initial BOI reports is
appropriate because of the need to give
these companies additional time to
become aware of the Reporting Rule,
collect BOI and company applicant
information, and file their initial reports
during the first year that the Reporting
Rule is effective. But as reporting
companies and third party service
providers become aware of the
Reporting Rule and file their initial BOI
reports, FinCEN believes they will also
have time to review the rules
concerning updates and corrections to
these reports and to file updates or
corrections with FinCEN, or assist in
such filings, as appropriate. Thus, no
extension of the deadline to update and
correct BOI reports is necessary.
Finally, as for comments concerning
access to the BOI database, including
how financial institutions should obtain
customer consent in order to access the
database, these issues are the topic of
the Access NPRM and the forthcoming
final rule on beneficial ownership
access and safeguards. Similarly, issues
raised by one commenter concerning
discrepancies between BOI financial
institutions obtain directly from
customers and BOI obtained from the
FinCEN database will be addressed in a
future rulemaking on revisions to the
2016 CDD Rule required by the CTA.20
FinCEN is declining to address any
other issues raised by commenters to the
proposed rule that are not strictly
within the scope of the Reporting
Extension NPRM.
IV. Regulatory Analysis
FinCEN has analyzed the final rule as
required under Executive Orders 12866,
13563, and 14094; the Regulatory
19 Reporting
20 See
PO 00000
Rule, 31 CFR 1010.380(a)(i)–(ii).
CTA, Section 6304(d).
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
83503
Flexibility Act; the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act; and the Paperwork
Reduction Act. This rule would not
have an annual effect on the economy
of $200 million or otherwise constitute
a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, as amended. Pursuant to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, FinCEN
certifies that the final rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
FinCEN has assessed that the rule
would result in no additional costs to
small businesses. Furthermore, pursuant
to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act,
FinCEN has concluded that the final
rule would not result in an expenditure
of $177 million or more annually by
state, local, and Tribal governments or
by the private sector.21 FinCEN does not
estimate any burden, as defined by the
Paperwork Reduction Act, associated
with the final rule.
FinCEN assesses that the extension of
the reporting deadline for entities
created or registered in the first year of
the reporting requirement will not
impose new costs. The costs for BOI
reporting have been estimated in the
regulatory impact analysis (RIA) in the
Reporting Rule.22 In that RIA, FinCEN
estimated the total number of reporting
companies in 2024, the first year that
the Reporting Rule will go into effect, to
be approximately 32.6 million. The
Reporting Rule RIA also estimated the
costs for these reporting companies in
filing their initial BOI reports, analyzing
the potential cost of each step in the
filing process.23 FinCEN’s analysis in
the final Reporting Rule would not be
changed by the extension of the
reporting timeline for new reporting
companies created or registered in 2024
from 30 calendar days to 90 calendar
days.
FinCEN acknowledges that this 90day reporting timeframe would shift
some of the estimated aggregate cost in
the Reporting Rule RIA from ‘‘Year 1’’
(2024) to ‘‘Year 2’’ (2025) in the
analysis. This shift in cost is difficult to
quantify. However, FinCEN assesses
21 The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires
an assessment of mandates that will result in an
annual expenditure of $100 million or more,
adjusted for inflation. The U.S. Bureau of Economic
Analysis reports the annual value of the gross
domestic product (GDP) deflator in 1995, the year
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, as 71.823,
and as 127.224 in 2022. See U.S. Bureau of
Economic Analysis, ‘‘Table 1.1.9. Implicit Price
Deflators for Gross Domestic Product’’ (accessed
Friday, June 2, 2023). Thus, the inflation adjusted
estimate for $100 million is 127.224/71.823 × 100
= $177 million.
22 See Treasury, FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Requirements, 87 FR 59549–59591
(December 8, 2021).
23 Id.
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
83504
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 229 / Thursday, November 30, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
that the shift of these costs would be de
minimis and would not change the
conclusions of the Reporting Rule’s RIA.
Additionally, the per-reporting
company burden and cost estimate in
the Reporting Rule RIA would not be
affected by the final rule.
Furthermore, FinCEN notes that the
change in the reporting timeline for
reporting companies created or
registered in 2024 would likely have
multiple benefits. As discussed in
Section III.A above, FinCEN received
many comments in response to the
NPRM that supported the reporting
deadline extension and agreed with
FinCEN’s view that the extension would
benefit reporting companies. These
benefits include additional time for
these companies to understand and
comply with the requirements of the
Reporting Rule, as well as greater
opportunities for FinCEN to efficiently
respond to questions and address
problems that reporting companies may
have in complying.
V. Effective Date
This final rule will be effective
January 1, 2024, the same date as the
Reporting Rule it is amending but
potentially fewer than 30 days after this
rule’s publication in the Federal
Register. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), a
30-day delayed effective date is
required, except for ‘‘(1) substantive
rules which grant or recognize an
exemption or relieve a restriction; (2)
interpretative rules and statements of
policy; or (3) as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause found and
published with the rule.’’ A delayed
effective date of fewer than 30 days for
this rule is authorized under both 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and 553(d)(3).
First, this rule grants an exemption
and relieves a restriction by extending
the reporting deadline for certain
entities to 90 calendar days, relieving
these entities from the shorter 30-day
filing deadline under the Reporting
Rule. Thus, it may be effective without
a 30-day delay under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
Second, FinCEN finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make this
rule effective on January 1, 2024,
because a 30-day delayed effective date
is unnecessary. The purpose of the 30day delayed effective date is to ‘‘give
affected parties a reasonable time to
adjust their behavior before the final
rule takes effect.’’ Omnipoint Corp. v.
Fed. Commc’n Comm’n, 78 F.3d 620,
630 (D.C. Cir. 1996). The parties affected
by this rule, however, do not need time
to adjust their behavior because the rule
does not impose any new obligations on
them; to the contrary, this rule gives
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 29, 2023
Jkt 262001
affected parties additional time to adjust
their behavior to the requirements of the
Reporting Rule.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Parts 1010
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aliens, Authority
delegations (Government agencies),
Banks and banking, Brokers, Business
and industry, Citizenship and
naturalization, Commodity futures,
Currency, Electronic filing, Federal
savings associations, Federal-States
relations, Foreign persons, Holding
companies, Indians, Indian-law,
Indians-tribal government, Insurance
companies, Investigations, Investment
advisers, Investment companies, Law
enforcement, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Securities,
Small business, Terrorism, Time.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the U.S. Department of the
Treasury and Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network amend 31 CFR
part 1010 as follows:
PART 1010—GENERAL PROVISIONS
January 1, 2024, and before January 1,
2025, shall file a report within 90
calendar days of the earlier of the date
on which it receives actual notice that
it has been registered to do business or
the date on which a secretary of state or
similar office first provides public
notice, such as through a publicly
accessible registry, that the foreign
reporting company has been registered
to do business.
(B) Any entity that becomes a foreign
reporting company on or after January 1,
2025, shall file a report within 30
calendar days of the earlier of the date
on which it receives actual notice that
it has been registered to do business or
the date on which a secretary of state or
similar office first provides public
notice, such as through a publicly
accessible registry, that the foreign
reporting company has been registered
to do business.
*
*
*
*
*
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.
[FR Doc. 2023–26399 Filed 11–29–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
1. The authority citation for part 1010
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951–
1959; 31 U.S.C. 5311–5314 and 5316–5336;
title III, sec. 314, Pub. L. 107–56, 115 Stat.
307; sec. 2006, Pub. L. 114–41, 129 Stat. 458–
459; sec. 701, Pub. L. 114–74, 129 Stat. 599.
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
2. In § 1010.380, revise paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) and (ii) to read as follows:
Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017
Implementation; Correction
■
§ 1010.380 Reports of beneficial
ownership information.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i)(A) Any domestic reporting
company created on or after January 1,
2024, and before January 1, 2025, shall
file a report within 90 calendar days of
the earlier of the date on which it
receives actual notice that its creation
has become effective or the date on
which a secretary of state or similar
office first provides public notice, such
as through a publicly accessible registry,
that the domestic reporting company
has been created.
(B) Any domestic reporting company
created on or after January 1, 2025, shall
file a report within 30 calendar days of
the earlier of the date on which it
receives actual notice that its creation
has become effective or the date on
which a secretary of state or similar
office first provides public notice, such
as through a publicly accessible registry,
that the domestic reporting company
has been created.
(ii)(A) Any entity that becomes a
foreign reporting company on or after
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32 CFR Part 1665
RIN 3240–AA04
United States Selective Service
System.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments; correction.
AGENCY:
This document makes a
technical correction in the preamble to
a rule entitled Social Security Number
Fraud Prevention Act of 2017
Implementation, which the Selective
Service System published in the Federal
Register of November 16, 2023. This
notification corrects the effective date of
the final rule.
DATES: This correction is effective
November 29, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Kelly Cramer, Selective Service System,
Office of the General Counsel, 703–605–
4069, kcramer@sss.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Correction
In the Federal Register of November
16, 2023, starting on page 78639 in FR
Doc 2023–25036, make the following
corrections:
E:\FR\FM\30NOR1.SGM
30NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83499-83504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26399]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
31 CFR Part 1010
RIN 1506-AB62
Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadline Extension for
Reporting Companies Created or Registered in 2024
AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FinCEN is amending the beneficial ownership information (BOI)
reporting rule (the ``Reporting Rule'') to extend the filing deadline
for certain BOI reports. Under the Reporting Rule prior to this
amendment, entities created or registered on or after the rule's
effective date of January 1, 2024, had to file initial BOI reports with
FinCEN within 30 calendar days of notice of their creation or
registration. This amendment extends that filing deadline from 30
calendar days to 90 calendar days for entities created or registered on
or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025, to give those
entities additional time to understand the new reporting obligation and
collect the necessary information to complete their filings. Entities
created or registered on or after January 1, 2025, will continue to
have 30 calendar days to file their BOI reports with FinCEN.
DATES: This rule is effective January 1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FinCEN Regulatory Support Section
at 1-800-767-2825 or electronically at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 83500]]
I. Introduction
In this final rule, FinCEN is amending the Reporting Rule \1\ to
extend the deadline to file initial BOI reports for entities created or
registered on or after the rule's effective date of January 1, 2024,
and before January 1, 2025. The Reporting Rule had required such
entities to file initial BOI reports with FinCEN within 30 calendar
days of notice of their creation or registration. This final rule
extends that filing deadline to 90 calendar days for entities created
or registered on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025.
The extension will give those entities additional time to understand
the new reporting obligation and collect the necessary information to
complete their filings. Entities created or registered on or after
January 1, 2025, will continue to have 30 calendar days from notice of
their creation or registration to file their BOI reports with FinCEN.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury), FinCEN,
Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements, 87 FR 59498
(September 30, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background
A. The Reporting Rule
On September 30, 2022, FinCEN published the Reporting Rule, with an
effective date of January 1, 2024.\2\ The Reporting Rule requires
certain corporations, limited liability companies, and other similar
entities (``reporting companies'') \3\ to report certain identifying
information about the beneficial owners who own or control such
entities and the company applicants who form or register them.\4\ These
requirements are intended to facilitate access to BOI for certain
authorized recipients, including law enforcement and regulators, for
the purpose of countering money laundering, the financing of terrorism,
and other illicit activity.\5\ The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA)
directs FinCEN to promulgate regulations that achieve the objectives of
the statute, while minimizing burdens on reporting companies to the
greatest extent practicable and ensuring that the BOI collected is
``highly useful'' for national security, intelligence, and law
enforcement activities.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Reporting Rule is the first in a series of rulemakings
to implement the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), enacted on
January 1, 2021, as part of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020
and codified at 31 U.S.C. 5336. The CTA is Title LXIV of the William
M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2021, Public Law 116-283 (January 1, 2021) (NDAA). Division F
of the NDAA is the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, which includes
the CTA.
\3\ See 31 U.S.C. 5336(a)(11).
\4\ See supra footnote 1, at 59498-99.
\5\ CTA, Section 6402 (January 1, 2021).
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For domestic or foreign reporting companies created or registered
to do business in the United States before the rule's effective date of
January 1, 2024, the Reporting Rule requires that they file initial BOI
reports with FinCEN by January 1, 2025.\7\ Prior to the amendment of
this final rule, a reporting company created or registered on or after
January 1, 2024, however, would have been required to file its initial
BOI report within 30 calendar days of the earlier of the date on which
it receives actual notice or public notice that it has been created or
registered.\8\ The Reporting Rule requires reporting companies created
on or after January 1, 2024, to report to FinCEN information about
themselves, as well as information about two categories of individuals:
(1) their beneficial owners; and (2) their company applicants, who are
the individuals who filed a document to create the reporting company or
registered it to do business.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Reporting Rule, 31 CFR 1010.380(a)(iii).
\8\ Id. at 1010.380(a)(i)-(ii).
\9\ Id. at 1010.380(a)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. The Reporting Deadline Extension NPRM
On September 28, 2023, FinCEN published a notice of proposed
rulemaking that would amend the Reporting Rule by extending the period
for certain reporting companies to file initial BOI reports (the
``Reporting Extension NPRM'').\10\ Under this proposed amendment,
reporting companies created or registered on or after January 1, 2024,
and before January 1, 2025, would have 90 calendar days to submit their
initial BOI reports, instead of 30 calendar days. Reporting companies
created or registered on or after January 1, 2025, would continue to be
required to submit their initial BOI reports within 30 calendar days.
FinCEN proposed the extension based on comments from trade
associations, non-profits, and other key stakeholder organizations. As
explained in the Reporting Extension NPRM, extending the deadline for
reporting companies created or registered on or after January 1, 2024,
and before January 1, 2025, would give those entities additional time
to: (1) understand and comply with the Reporting Rule; (2) obtain the
information necessary to complete their initial BOI reports; and (3)
resolve questions that may arise in the process of completing the
initial BOI reports.\11\ The Reporting Extension NPRM also explained
that the Reporting Rule establishes a legal regime that is entirely new
to the United States, and the NPRM explained that FinCEN assessed that
entrepreneurs and their service providers that create or register new
business entities in the United States need additional time to learn
about the Reporting Rule's requirements during the first year in which
this regulation is effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Treasury, FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership Information
Reporting Deadline Extension for Reporting Companies Created or
Registered in 2024, Proposed Rule, 88 FR 66730 (September 28, 2023).
\11\ Although the CTA provides that reports are to be filed by
entities created or registered on or after January 1, 2024, ``at the
time of formation or registration,'' 31 U.S.C. 5336(b)(1)(C), FinCEN
may prescribe an exemption from that requirement consistent with the
directive to ensure that the database is highly useful to law
enforcement while at the same time minimizing burdens on reporting
companies. See CTA, Section 6402(8). FinCEN believes it is
appropriate to do so for entities created or registered on or after
January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025, for the reasons noted
here. Under 31 U.S.C. 5318(a)(7), FinCEN has authority to
``prescribe an appropriate exemption from a requirement under this
subchapter,'' which includes the CTA in section 5336.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to the Reporting Extension NPRM, FinCEN received 50
comments. Submissions came from a variety of corporate organization
professionals, small business owners, trade groups, and individual
members of the public. Many of these commenters supported FinCEN's
proposed rule. Other commenters, while supportive of the intent behind
the proposed rule, suggested alternative reporting deadlines such as
120 days after reporting companies are created or registered. Numerous
commenters wanted FinCEN to apply the 90-day timeframe to all entities
created or registered on or after January 1, 2024, not just those
created or registered before January 1, 2025. Still other commenters
suggested aligning the BOI reporting deadline with a reporting
company's tax filing deadline. One comment was critical of the proposed
rule, claiming that the proposal did not offer sufficient relief to
reporting companies. Lastly, FinCEN received comments on several topics
that were not relevant to the Reporting Extension NPRM, and which
FinCEN has addressed or will address in other CTA-related rulemakings
or guidance.
III. Discussion of Comments Received
A. Support for the 90-Day Reporting Extension
Comments Received. A majority of the commenters agreed with the
proposed rule's extended deadline and encouraged FinCEN to promulgate
the rule as written. Generally, these comments stressed the importance
for
[[Page 83501]]
small businesses to receive additional time to comply with the BOI
filing deadline. One commenter observed that small businesses have a
``myriad of administrative tasks'' and opined that entities would feel
rushed when attempting to comply with the original BOI filing deadline
of 30 calendar days. This sentiment was echoed by another commenter who
noted that new entities must typically gather numerous documents in
coordination with other parties, such as attorneys, and that the
original 30-day filing deadline would be ``stressful.'' This commenter
argued that the 90-day extension would reduce the number of entities
that would later have to file corrective reports, and consequently
reduce the overall amount of paperwork and expenses associated with
filing. Further, one commenter noted that entity formation can take
longer than 30 days as other governmental entities may require greater
than 30 days to ``process'' entities' respective registration
applications.
A commenter noted that the proposed extension would give attorneys
and others providing filing assistance to reporting companies more time
to understand BOI reporting requirements. One commenter noted that an
extension to this deadline would lighten entities' initial regulatory
burden.
Commenters also argued that the extension will give FinCEN
additional time to implement the BOI regulations. One commenter opined
that this proposed extension would give FinCEN additional time so as
not to be ``overwhelmed'' with new reports, while another commenter
stated that the additional time would allow FinCEN to publish
frequently asked questions (FAQs) or related guidance. One commenter
suggested that an extension would reduce non-compliance and potential
penalties. No commenters explicitly opposed extending the deadline,
though as discussed below in Section III.B, one commenter was critical
of the proposed rule for not offering sufficient relief to reporting
companies.
Final Rule. FinCEN has carefully considered commenters' views and
agrees that extending the reporting deadline for reporting companies
created or registered on January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025,
will help such companies to become aware of their reporting obligations
and submit BOI reports to FinCEN. FinCEN therefore adopts the rule as
proposed and extends the deadline for these reporting companies from 30
to 90 calendar days.
B. Alternatives to the 90-Day Reporting Extension
Comments Received. Numerous commenters, while in favor of extending
the initial filing deadline for reporting companies created or
registered on or after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025,
argued for making the deadline more than 90 calendar days after
creation or registration or, alternatively, for an initial BOI report
filing deadline aligned to tax filing deadlines. These commenters
generally did not distinguish between entities created or registered in
the first year of the new reporting requirement (on or after January 1,
2024, and before January 1, 2025), and new entities generally. One
commenter argued that with January 1, 2024, quickly approaching and
FinCEN having provided relatively little guidance (in the commenter's
opinion), all new entities should be given 120 days to file their
initial BOI reports. The commenter stated that a 120-day timeframe
would promote greater accuracy in information submitted to FinCEN.
Another commenter suggested the deadline be either 90 days or ``within
the calendar year,'' whichever was longer. The commenter argued that
this flexibility would help certified public accountants (CPAs), who
might only discover a reporting company's BOI reporting obligation at
tax time.
A trade organization representing CPAs was critical of the
extension because it found the 90-day timeline to be inadequate. This
commenter argued for an initial filing deadline of one year from
creation or registration. The commenter cited various concerns, such as
the need for greater awareness of the reporting requirements among
small businesses and the potential for these businesses facing
penalties for non-compliance.
Similarly, multiple commenters argued that all new reporting
companies' deadlines should be either 90 days or the income tax return
deadline specifically, whichever was longer. These commenters argued
that new businesses, and in particular small businesses, rely upon CPAs
to assist with filing income tax returns. To this point, three
commenters echoed others' sentiments in stating that individuals often
make CPAs aware of new businesses having been created when seeking
assistance with tax return filings. Therefore, the commenters argued
that a deadline based upon the tax return deadline would allow CPAs to
assist with both tax return filings and BOI filings at the same time.
Final Rule. FinCEN has carefully considered each comment supporting
an extension greater than 90 calendar days, or a deadline to be aligned
with IRS tax return filing deadlines, but declines to adopt these
changes to the proposed rule. FinCEN believes the additional published
guidance, the availability of the contact center FinCEN is preparing
that will allow members of the public to contact FinCEN with questions
concerning BOI reporting, and the 90-day timeframe will provide members
of the general public with sufficient time, awareness, and opportunity
to consult third parties (such as CPAs or attorneys) as the BOI
regulatory framework is first implemented. It will also provide both
those third parties and the general public with guidance and other
information to assist in providing advice and making decisions. FinCEN
further declines to extend the deadline to the longer of 90 days or the
``end of the year.'' \12\ This arrangement would allow a reporting
company created or registered in January to wait until December 31 of
the same year to file its initial BOI report, while a reporting company
created or registered at or near the end of September of that same year
would be required to file within 90 days. Such disparate treatment of
similarly situated reporting companies is unwarranted and would not
address any difficulties caused by a novel reporting requirement more
effectively than the filing extension that FinCEN proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Some comments discussed the merits of an extended reporting
deadline without reference to the January 1, 2025, endpoint that
FinCEN proposed. FinCEN understands these comments to be effectively
in favor of a permanent alteration of reporting deadline to 90
calendar days for all new reporting companies, regardless of when
created or registered, and addresses those comments in section
III.C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FinCEN also declines to align its filing deadline for initial BOI
reports to income tax return deadlines. Were FinCEN to align the
initial BOI report deadline to the income tax return filing deadline,
some reporting companies could file their BOI reports many months, and
even the following year, after they have been created or registered.
This would create significant discrepancies between the filing time
allotted to otherwise similarly situated reporting companies. In
addition, such a delay would mean that filed information about new
reporting companies would be significantly out of date for the entire
period from January 1, 2024, until after the 2025 tax filing season,
which would not align with the CTA's mandate to ``collect information
in a form and manner that is reasonably designed to generate a database
that is highly useful to national security,
[[Page 83502]]
intelligence, and law enforcement agencies and Federal functional
regulators.'' \13\ Preserving the utility of the database to the
greatest extent possible dictates that an extension of the filing
deadline should be only as long as needed to provide meaningful relief
in the first year that the BOI reporting framework is in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ CTA, Section 6402(8)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. The Timeframe To File for Entities Created or Registered After 2024
Comments Received. Some commenters urged FinCEN to apply the 90-day
BOI reporting deadline extension to all reporting companies created or
formed on or after January 1, 2024, instead of limiting the 90-day
extension to only those new entities created in calendar year 2024. One
commenter argued that the 90-day extension should apply to all
reporting companies created or formed on or after January 1, 2024,
because law firms and corporate formation services will find it
burdensome to create systems for a 90-day BOI reporting timeframe in
2024 and then have to change their systems in 2025 to account for the
30-day timeline. Other commenters cited the logic in the preamble to
the Reporting Extension NPRM as supportive of extending the 90-day
extension beyond 2024. These commenters noted the rationale behind the
proposed rule, including the need to give reporting companies
additional time to understand their obligations under the Reporting
Rule and obtain the information required under the rule during the
first year the Reporting Rule is effective. The reasons FinCEN provided
for giving reporting companies more time in 2024 would also justify
giving reporting companies more time in the years beyond 2024,
according to these commenters.
Final Rule. FinCEN has carefully considered commenters' arguments
to make the 90-day reporting extension permanent, but FinCEN is
declining to adopt this change to the Reporting Rule. FinCEN believes
that new reporting companies that are created or registered in 2024
will be in a different position than those reporting companies created
or registered in and after 2025, because 2024 is the first year in
which the Reporting Rule is effective. The Reporting Rule creates an
entirely new legal framework for newly formed or registered companies
in the United States. It is particularly important for companies and
company-formation advisers to have additional time to understand the
new requirements and learn how to comply with them when the framework
is new. After 2024, however, FinCEN believes that the public will be
more familiar with this new regime as a result of FinCEN's outreach and
educational efforts, which will continue throughout 2024. Consequently,
after 2024, newly created or registered reporting companies will have
greater awareness of the Reporting Rule's requirements, and they will
be in a better position to comply with the requirements within the 30-
day timeline set out in the Reporting Rule than they would have been in
2024.
FinCEN recognizes commenters' concerns that the 30-day timeframe
for filing BOI reports after 2024 may pose difficulties because many
small businesses do not employ lawyers or other corporate service
providers and therefore may not learn about the Reporting Rule and
associated BOI reporting requirement within a 30-day timeframe. FinCEN
is taking into account these concerns as it implements its outreach
strategy, in particular by planning for its outreach and educational
efforts to reach the general public, not only service providers. FinCEN
expects the public to become increasingly aware of the BOI reporting
requirements as 2024 progresses, and in the coming years FinCEN will
build upon its existing efforts to educate entrepreneurs who start new
reporting companies.
Further, while following the CTA's directive to minimize burdens on
reporting companies to the greatest extent practicable, which this
final rule aims to do, FinCEN must also satisfy the CTA's requirement
that the BOI database must be ``highly useful'' in facilitating
national security, intelligence, and law enforcement activities.\14\ To
be ``highly useful,'' the database must be reasonably up-to-date and
accurate, and FinCEN believes that the Reporting Rule's 30-day
timeframe for filing BOI reports to FinCEN will help achieve this goal.
FinCEN gives weight to commenters' concerns that new reporting
companies have many challenges to grapple with in their first few
months of operation. However, FinCEN does not believe these concerns
warrant a permanent departure from the prompt BOI reporting regime
specified by Congress.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ CTA, Section 6402(8)(C).
\15\ The plain language of the CTA requires reporting companies
formed or registered after the effective date of the Reporting Rule
to file their BOI reports with FinCEN ``at the time of formation or
registration.'' See 31 U.S.C. 5336(b)(1)(C). As discussed above,
FinCEN is using its exemptive authority under 31 U.S.C. 5318(a)(7)
to extend this deadline to 90 days temporarily. See supra footnote
12. By not maintaining this extension any longer than necessary to
provide relief, however, this final rule better aligns FinCEN's BOI
reporting regulations with the overall statutory scheme.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Considering the balance that FinCEN must strike among reducing
burdens on reporting companies, making the BOI database highly useful,
and complying with the directive set out in the CTA that companies must
report BOI ``at the time of formation or registration,'' \16\ FinCEN
believes that the 30-day timeframe is appropriate for reporting
companies that come into existence or are registered after 2024. FinCEN
makes this determination based on the information currently available,
including the comments it received in response to the Reporting
Extension NPRM, which focused primarily on reducing burdens to
reporting companies. During the first few years of the implementation
of the Reporting Rule, FinCEN will monitor compliance with the BOI
reporting deadlines and will consider whether any adjustments to the
permanent reporting timeframe for newly created or registered reporting
companies are warranted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 31 U.S.C. 5336(b)(1)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Other Issues Raised by Commenters
Commenters also discussed a number of issues that were not relevant
to the Reporting Extension NPRM, such as the timeframe for updating or
correcting BOI reports, access to FinCEN's BOI database, the FinCEN
identifier, and other matters. Some of the issues raised by these
commenters have been or will be dealt with in separate FinCEN
rulemakings that implement the CTA, while other issues are addressed in
guidance. Comments on issues that go beyond the scope of this final
rule are briefly discussed here.
Comments Received. A number of comments addressed issues that
FinCEN raised, received comments on, and made final determinations
about in the course of proposing and finalizing the Reporting Rule.
Several commenters requested that FinCEN extend the timeframe that
reporting companies have to update or correct their BOI reports. These
commenters claimed that reporting companies need more than the 30
calendar days that the Reporting Rule provided for them to update or
correct BOI reports. One commenter requested clarification on what it
means for reporting companies to be ``created'' for purposes of knowing
when to begin the 90-day window within which reporting companies
created or formed in 2024 must file their BOI reports with FinCEN.
Another commenter claimed that as important as the 90-day extension in
the NPRM is, equally important for FinCEN
[[Page 83503]]
to consider is making FinCEN's electronic filing system available to
corporate formation service providers prior to January 1, 2024, so that
they are prepared to quickly assist newly created reporting companies
in filing their BOI reports. Other commenters emphasized the need for
FinCEN to conduct additional outreach so that small businesses, trade
associations, and professional service providers are aware of the
requirements of the Reporting Rule. One commenter argued that the
Reporting Rule's estimate of the costs that reporting companies will
incur in complying with the rule is inaccurate since these companies
will need to monitor changes that would require updates to their
initial BOI report, and they will often incur costs associated with
professional services hired to understand the reporting requirements.
Other comments that addressed issues that went beyond the scope of
the Reporting Extension NPRM are more relevant to ongoing FinCEN
regulations and guidance related to the CTA. For example, one commenter
asked FinCEN to clarify, among other things, how financial institutions
will access the FinCEN BOI database, how financial institutions should
obtain customer consent to request BOI from the database, how these
institutions should approach discrepancies between BOI found in the
database and BOI obtained directly from customers pursuant to the final
rule on customer due diligence obligations that FinCEN published in
2016 (the ``2016 CDD Rule'').\17\ Other commenters had additional
questions regarding how financial institutions should reconcile their
existing CDD obligations with the Reporting Rule and the proposed
requirements under the proposed rule that FinCEN issued on December 16,
2022, concerning access to BOI and safeguards for protecting BOI (the
``Access NPRM'').\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Treasury, FinCEN, Customer Due Diligence Requirements for
Financial Institutions, 81 FR 29398 (May 11, 2016).
\18\ Treasury, FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership Information Access
and Safeguards, and Use of FinCEN Identifiers for Entities, Proposed
Rule, 87 FR 77404 (December 16, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Rule. FinCEN has reviewed the comments on issues that are not
relevant to the Reporting Extension NPRM and is not adopting changes to
this final rule as a result of these comments. However, FinCEN is
responding to several of the comments in order to provide clarification
on certain issues.
First, as for questions about the meaning of when a reporting
company is deemed to be ``created'' in order to set the 90-day
timeframe for reporting BOI by reporting companies created or formed in
2024, the Reporting Extension NPRM did not propose to alter the
approach that FinCEN took in the Reporting Rule. Under the Reporting
Rule, a domestic or foreign reporting company is ``created'' or
``registered'' when it receives actual notice or constructive (public)
notice, whichever is earlier, that the company has been created or
registered.\19\ This remains unchanged.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Reporting Rule, 31 CFR 1010.380(a)(i)-(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, FinCEN considers that a distinction needs to be made
between providing additional time for reporting companies to file their
initial BOI reports, and providing additional time for them to update
or correct those reports. FinCEN believes that extending the deadline
for reporting companies created or registered on or after January 1,
2024, and before January 1, 2025, to file their initial BOI reports is
appropriate because of the need to give these companies additional time
to become aware of the Reporting Rule, collect BOI and company
applicant information, and file their initial reports during the first
year that the Reporting Rule is effective. But as reporting companies
and third party service providers become aware of the Reporting Rule
and file their initial BOI reports, FinCEN believes they will also have
time to review the rules concerning updates and corrections to these
reports and to file updates or corrections with FinCEN, or assist in
such filings, as appropriate. Thus, no extension of the deadline to
update and correct BOI reports is necessary.
Finally, as for comments concerning access to the BOI database,
including how financial institutions should obtain customer consent in
order to access the database, these issues are the topic of the Access
NPRM and the forthcoming final rule on beneficial ownership access and
safeguards. Similarly, issues raised by one commenter concerning
discrepancies between BOI financial institutions obtain directly from
customers and BOI obtained from the FinCEN database will be addressed
in a future rulemaking on revisions to the 2016 CDD Rule required by
the CTA.\20\ FinCEN is declining to address any other issues raised by
commenters to the proposed rule that are not strictly within the scope
of the Reporting Extension NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See CTA, Section 6304(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Regulatory Analysis
FinCEN has analyzed the final rule as required under Executive
Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094; the Regulatory Flexibility Act; the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; and the Paperwork Reduction Act. This
rule would not have an annual effect on the economy of $200 million or
otherwise constitute a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended. Pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, FinCEN certifies that the final rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. FinCEN has assessed that the rule would result in no
additional costs to small businesses. Furthermore, pursuant to the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, FinCEN has concluded that the final rule
would not result in an expenditure of $177 million or more annually by
state, local, and Tribal governments or by the private sector.\21\
FinCEN does not estimate any burden, as defined by the Paperwork
Reduction Act, associated with the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires an assessment of
mandates that will result in an annual expenditure of $100 million
or more, adjusted for inflation. The U.S. Bureau of Economic
Analysis reports the annual value of the gross domestic product
(GDP) deflator in 1995, the year of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act, as 71.823, and as 127.224 in 2022. See U.S. Bureau of Economic
Analysis, ``Table 1.1.9. Implicit Price Deflators for Gross Domestic
Product'' (accessed Friday, June 2, 2023). Thus, the inflation
adjusted estimate for $100 million is 127.224/71.823 x 100 = $177
million.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FinCEN assesses that the extension of the reporting deadline for
entities created or registered in the first year of the reporting
requirement will not impose new costs. The costs for BOI reporting have
been estimated in the regulatory impact analysis (RIA) in the Reporting
Rule.\22\ In that RIA, FinCEN estimated the total number of reporting
companies in 2024, the first year that the Reporting Rule will go into
effect, to be approximately 32.6 million. The Reporting Rule RIA also
estimated the costs for these reporting companies in filing their
initial BOI reports, analyzing the potential cost of each step in the
filing process.\23\ FinCEN's analysis in the final Reporting Rule would
not be changed by the extension of the reporting timeline for new
reporting companies created or registered in 2024 from 30 calendar days
to 90 calendar days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Treasury, FinCEN, Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Requirements, 87 FR 59549-59591 (December 8, 2021).
\23\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FinCEN acknowledges that this 90-day reporting timeframe would
shift some of the estimated aggregate cost in the Reporting Rule RIA
from ``Year 1'' (2024) to ``Year 2'' (2025) in the analysis. This shift
in cost is difficult to quantify. However, FinCEN assesses
[[Page 83504]]
that the shift of these costs would be de minimis and would not change
the conclusions of the Reporting Rule's RIA. Additionally, the per-
reporting company burden and cost estimate in the Reporting Rule RIA
would not be affected by the final rule.
Furthermore, FinCEN notes that the change in the reporting timeline
for reporting companies created or registered in 2024 would likely have
multiple benefits. As discussed in Section III.A above, FinCEN received
many comments in response to the NPRM that supported the reporting
deadline extension and agreed with FinCEN's view that the extension
would benefit reporting companies. These benefits include additional
time for these companies to understand and comply with the requirements
of the Reporting Rule, as well as greater opportunities for FinCEN to
efficiently respond to questions and address problems that reporting
companies may have in complying.
V. Effective Date
This final rule will be effective January 1, 2024, the same date as
the Reporting Rule it is amending but potentially fewer than 30 days
after this rule's publication in the Federal Register. Under 5 U.S.C.
553(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), a 30-day delayed
effective date is required, except for ``(1) substantive rules which
grant or recognize an exemption or relieve a restriction; (2)
interpretative rules and statements of policy; or (3) as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the
rule.'' A delayed effective date of fewer than 30 days for this rule is
authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) and 553(d)(3).
First, this rule grants an exemption and relieves a restriction by
extending the reporting deadline for certain entities to 90 calendar
days, relieving these entities from the shorter 30-day filing deadline
under the Reporting Rule. Thus, it may be effective without a 30-day
delay under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
Second, FinCEN finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make
this rule effective on January 1, 2024, because a 30-day delayed
effective date is unnecessary. The purpose of the 30-day delayed
effective date is to ``give affected parties a reasonable time to
adjust their behavior before the final rule takes effect.'' Omnipoint
Corp. v. Fed. Commc'n Comm'n, 78 F.3d 620, 630 (D.C. Cir. 1996). The
parties affected by this rule, however, do not need time to adjust
their behavior because the rule does not impose any new obligations on
them; to the contrary, this rule gives affected parties additional time
to adjust their behavior to the requirements of the Reporting Rule.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Parts 1010
Administrative practice and procedure, Aliens, Authority
delegations (Government agencies), Banks and banking, Brokers, Business
and industry, Citizenship and naturalization, Commodity futures,
Currency, Electronic filing, Federal savings associations, Federal-
States relations, Foreign persons, Holding companies, Indians, Indian-
law, Indians-tribal government, Insurance companies, Investigations,
Investment advisers, Investment companies, Law enforcement, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities, Small business,
Terrorism, Time.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the U.S. Department of
the Treasury and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network amend 31 CFR part
1010 as follows:
PART 1010--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1010 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951-1959; 31 U.S.C. 5311-5314
and 5316-5336; title III, sec. 314, Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 307;
sec. 2006, Pub. L. 114-41, 129 Stat. 458-459; sec. 701, Pub. L. 114-
74, 129 Stat. 599.
0
2. In Sec. 1010.380, revise paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (ii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1010.380 Reports of beneficial ownership information.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i)(A) Any domestic reporting company created on or after January
1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025, shall file a report within 90
calendar days of the earlier of the date on which it receives actual
notice that its creation has become effective or the date on which a
secretary of state or similar office first provides public notice, such
as through a publicly accessible registry, that the domestic reporting
company has been created.
(B) Any domestic reporting company created on or after January 1,
2025, shall file a report within 30 calendar days of the earlier of the
date on which it receives actual notice that its creation has become
effective or the date on which a secretary of state or similar office
first provides public notice, such as through a publicly accessible
registry, that the domestic reporting company has been created.
(ii)(A) Any entity that becomes a foreign reporting company on or
after January 1, 2024, and before January 1, 2025, shall file a report
within 90 calendar days of the earlier of the date on which it receives
actual notice that it has been registered to do business or the date on
which a secretary of state or similar office first provides public
notice, such as through a publicly accessible registry, that the
foreign reporting company has been registered to do business.
(B) Any entity that becomes a foreign reporting company on or after
January 1, 2025, shall file a report within 30 calendar days of the
earlier of the date on which it receives actual notice that it has been
registered to do business or the date on which a secretary of state or
similar office first provides public notice, such as through a publicly
accessible registry, that the foreign reporting company has been
registered to do business.
* * * * *
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
[FR Doc. 2023-26399 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P