Safety Zone; Ashtabula Power Plant Breakwater Armor Stone Removal, Lake Erie, Ashtabula, OH, 83029-83031 [2023-26149]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
you are the operator of a vessel in the
vicinity of the safety zone, you may not
enter, remain in, or transit through the
safety zone unless authorized to do so
by the COTP or his representative, and
you must comply with directions from
the Patrol Commander or any Official
Patrol displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
In addition to this notification of
enforcement in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard plans to provide
notification of this enforcement period
via the Local Notice to Mariners and
marine information broadcasts.
Dated: November 20, 2023.
David E. O’Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Maryland-National Capital
Region.
[FR Doc. 2023–26152 Filed 11–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0662]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Ashtabula Power Plant
Breakwater Armor Stone Removal,
Lake Erie, Ashtabula, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of Lake Erie. This action
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life and property on these navigable
waters near Ashtabula, Ohio during the
Ashtabula power plant breakwater
armor stone removal project. This rule
will prohibit persons and vessels from
entering the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from November 28, 2023
through 11:59 p.m. on December 1,
2024. For the purposes of enforcement,
actual notice will be used from 7 a.m.
on November 16, 2023, until November
28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0662 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
email Lieutenant Jared Stevens,
Waterways Management Division, MSU
Cleveland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
216–937–0124, email Jared.M.Stevens@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Caption of the Port
83029
yard radius zone centered on
coordinates 41°54′43″ N, 080°46′09″ W
(NAD83) located near the Ashtabula
power plant located at 2133 Lake Road
East, Ashtabula, Ohio. The zone may
require enforcement beyond the stated
times in the case that the construction
project runs into unforeseen delays.
The COTP Buffalo has determined a
safety zone is needed to protect vessels
during this deconstruction and removal
project. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP, or a designated representative.
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
V. Regulatory Analyses
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency, for good
cause, finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
insufficient time remains to publish an
NPRM and receive public comments
prior to commencement of the
deconstruction and removal project.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule to wait for a comment period
to run would be contrary to the public
interest by inhibiting the Coast Guard’s
ability to protect vessels in these
navigable waters during this
deconstruction and removal project.
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP
Buffalo has determined a safety zone is
needed to protect vessel traffic from
November 16, 2023, through December
1, 2024, during this deconstruction and
removal project which will remove the
breakwater armor stone near the
Ashtabula power plant in Ashtabula,
Ohio.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from 7 a.m. on November 16, 2023,
through 11:59 p.m. on December 1,
2024. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters encompassing a 350-
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based the need to ensure the safety of
vessels in these navigable waters during
this construction project.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
E:\FR\FM\28NOR1.SGM
28NOR1
83030
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishment of a temporary safety
zone intended to ensure the safety of
vessels near a construction project. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L63(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T09–0662 to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 165.T09–0662 Safety Zone; Ashtabula
Power Plant Breakwater Armor Stone
Removal, Lake Erie, Ashtabula, OH.
(a) Location. The safety zone will
cover all navigable waters encompassing
a 350-yard radius zone centered on
position 41°54′43″ N, 080°46′09″ W
(NAD83), located near the old Ashtabula
power plant (2133 Lake Road East,
Ashtabula, Ohio) on Lake Erie in
Ashtabula, Ohio.
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 7 a.m. on
November 16, 2023, through 11:59 p.m.
on December 1, 2024.
(c) Definitions. Official Patrol Vessel
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Sector Buffalo, (COTP) in the
enforcement of the regulations in this
section. Participant means all persons
and vessels attending the event.
(d) Regulations. (1) The Coast Guard
may patrol the event area under the
direction of a designated Coast Guard
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander may be contacted on
Channel 16 VHF–FM (156.8 MHz) by
the call sign ‘‘PATCOM.’’
(2) All persons and vessels not
registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels are
considered spectators. The ‘‘official
patrol vessels’’ consist of any Coast
Guard, state or local law enforcement
and sponsor provided vessels
designated or assigned by the COTP
Sector Buffalo, to patrol the event.
(3) Spectator vessels desiring to
transit the regulated area may do so only
with prior approval of the Patrol
Commander and when so directed by
that officer and will be operated at a no
wake speed in a manner which will not
endanger participants in the event or
any other craft.
(4) No spectator shall anchor, block,
loiter, or impede the through transit of
official patrol vessels in the regulated
area during the effective dates and
times, unless cleared for entry by or
through an official patrol vessel.
(5) The Patrol Commander may forbid
and control the movement of all vessels
in the regulated area. When hailed or
signaled by an official patrol vessel, a
vessel shall come to an immediate stop
and comply with the directions given.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion
from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both.
(6) Any spectator vessel may anchor
outside the regulated areas specified in
this chapter, but may not anchor in,
block, or loiter in a navigable channel.
E:\FR\FM\28NOR1.SGM
28NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(7) The Patrol Commander may
terminate the event or the operation of
any vessel at any time it is deemed
necessary for the protection of life or
property.
(8) The Patrol Commander will
terminate enforcement of the special
regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
Dated: November 17, 2023.
S.M. Murray,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate
Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2023–26149 Filed 11–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 51
RIN 2900–AR62
Payments Under State Home Care
Agreements for Nursing Home Care
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adopts as final, with one
change, a proposed rule amending its
State home per diem regulation to
provide a new formula for calculating
the prevailing rate VA would pay a State
home that enters into a State home care
agreement to provide nursing home care
to eligible veterans.
DATES: This rule is effective December
28, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Alvarez, Chief of Staff Home Per
Diem Program, Geriatrics and Extended
Care (12GEC), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–6750.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
document published in the Federal
Register (FR) on December 21, 2022, VA
proposed to amend its per diem
regulations in part 51 of title 38, Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) to provide
a new formula for calculating the
prevailing rate VA will pay a State home
that enters into a State home care
agreement to provide nursing home care
to eligible veterans. 87 FR 78038. VA
provided a 60-day comment period,
which ended on February 21, 2023. Two
comments were received, one of which
included multiple issues, and these
comments are addressed below by topic.
VA makes one change to the rule based
on the comments received.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and
Eligibility for Care in a State Home
One commenter questioned whether
veterans of the USPHS are eligible for
care in State homes even if the State
does not recognize service in the USPHS
for veteran status. The commenter
further asserts that USPHS veterans are
veterans by Federal law and eligible for
all VA benefits, and if a State home is
receiving funding from VA then a
USPHS veteran should be eligible for
care in that State home even if the State
does not recognize a USPHS veteran for
other State benefits.
While VA considers this comment
outside of the scope of the rulemaking,
we clarify that an individual is a veteran
under 38 United States Code (U.S.C.)
101(2) if the individual ‘‘served in the
active military, naval, air, or space
service and . . . was discharged or
released therefrom under conditions
other than dishonorable.’’ ‘‘Active
military, naval, air, or space service’’
includes ‘‘active duty’’ and certain
periods of ‘‘active duty for training’’ and
‘‘inactive duty training’’ which are all
defined by 38 U.S.C. 101(21)–(24).
These terms prescribe the type of
service an individual needs to have had
to be eligible for VA health care benefits
under 38 U.S.C. 1710 and 1705 and are
inclusive of service in the USPHS. 38
Code of Federal Register (CFR) 17.31
generally incorporates the 38 U.S.C. 101
definitions of active service, active duty,
active duty for training, and inactive
duty training, as well as certain other
service recognized as active service
under 38 U.S.C. 106. In short, § 17.31
addresses the duty periods considered
under active service for eligibility for
VA medical benefits, and it is inclusive
of service in the USPHS. Thus, an
individual with full-time service in the
USPHS may qualify as a ‘‘veteran’’ for
purposes of health care benefits
administered by VA.
However, the designation of veteran
for purposes of VA health care benefits
does not require a State home to accept
a veteran into State home. The VA State
home program pays per diem to State
homes for three types of care provided
to eligible veterans: nursing home care,
domiciliary care, and adult day health
care (ADHC). The statutory authority for
the payment program is set forth at 38
U.S.C. 1741–43 and VA has published
regulations governing this program at 38
CFR part 51. Sections 51.50 through
51.52 address which veterans are
eligible for purposes of payment of per
diem for nursing home care, domiciliary
care, and ADHC, respectively. An
important distinction is that while VA
can pay per diem to State homes for care
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
83031
provided to eligible veterans, State
homes are not obligated to accept all
eligible veterans. VA does not have
management authority over State
homes. State homes are owned and
operated by State governments and each
State establishes eligibility and
admission criteria for its homes. State
homes may have additional admission
requirements such as age, wartime
service, years of service, and residency
requirements. Therefore, VA is unable
to dictate which eligible veterans for
purposes of payment of per diem may
be admitted to a State home. VA makes
no changes based on this comment.
State Home Responsibilities Under the
Prevailing Rate
One commenter raised concerns that
VA is proposing to continue to use the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) Prospective Payment
System (PPS) for creating the baseline
for the prevailing rate without utilizing
Medicare’s consolidated billing
guidelines to confirm which services are
covered under the rate. Specifically, the
commenter referred to the Medicare
Claims Processing Manual Chapter 6—
Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Inpatient
Part A Billing and SNF Consolidated
Billing (Medicare Manual).1 The
commenter stated that all services
considered within the scope and
capability of nursing home care are paid
under the PPS rate and that the
Medicare Manual lists which services
are included and excluded under the
PPS rate. Further, the commenter
suggested that VA should use the
Medicare Manual to confirm which
services are covered under the
prevailing rate because State homes are
finding more instances where there is an
expectation for State homes to pay for
services that have been specifically
excluded under PPS. The commenter
specifically mentioned psychologist and
psychiatric services, and high-cost
medications (e.g., high-intensity anticancer drugs). The commenter also
stated that all drugs not listed on the
most recent VA formulary should
qualify for an exclusion from the
prevailing rate calculation since these
medications are not routinely
administered in a SNF or are
exceptionally expensive. Finally, the
commenter requested a guide for State
homes and VA staff to determine the
1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,
Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 6—
SNF Inpatient Part A Billing and SNF Consolidated
Billing (Rev. 11109, 11–04–21), https://
www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/
manuals/downloads/clm104c06.pdf (last visited
April 11, 2023).
E:\FR\FM\28NOR1.SGM
28NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 28, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83029-83031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26149]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2023-0662]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Ashtabula Power Plant Breakwater Armor Stone
Removal, Lake Erie, Ashtabula, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of Lake Erie. This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life and property on these navigable waters near
Ashtabula, Ohio during the Ashtabula power plant breakwater armor stone
removal project. This rule will prohibit persons and vessels from
entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from November 28,
2023 through 11:59 p.m. on December 1, 2024. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 7 a.m. on November 16,
2023, until November 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0662 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Jared Stevens, Waterways Management Division,
MSU Cleveland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 216-937-0124, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Caption of the Port
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency, for good cause, finds that
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because insufficient time remains to
publish an NPRM and receive public comments prior to commencement of
the deconstruction and removal project.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule to wait for a comment period to run would be contrary to the
public interest by inhibiting the Coast Guard's ability to protect
vessels in these navigable waters during this deconstruction and
removal project.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP Buffalo has determined a
safety zone is needed to protect vessel traffic from November 16, 2023,
through December 1, 2024, during this deconstruction and removal
project which will remove the breakwater armor stone near the Ashtabula
power plant in Ashtabula, Ohio.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from 7 a.m. on November 16,
2023, through 11:59 p.m. on December 1, 2024. The safety zone will
cover all navigable waters encompassing a 350-yard radius zone centered
on coordinates 41[deg]54'43'' N, 080[deg]46'09'' W (NAD83) located near
the Ashtabula power plant located at 2133 Lake Road East, Ashtabula,
Ohio. The zone may require enforcement beyond the stated times in the
case that the construction project runs into unforeseen delays.
The COTP Buffalo has determined a safety zone is needed to protect
vessels during this deconstruction and removal project. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP, or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based the need to ensure
the safety of vessels in these navigable waters during this
construction project.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
[[Page 83030]]
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
establishment of a temporary safety zone intended to ensure the safety
of vessels near a construction project. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L63(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of
DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0662 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0662 Safety Zone; Ashtabula Power Plant Breakwater
Armor Stone Removal, Lake Erie, Ashtabula, OH.
(a) Location. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters
encompassing a 350-yard radius zone centered on position 41[deg]54'43''
N, 080[deg]46'09'' W (NAD83), located near the old Ashtabula power
plant (2133 Lake Road East, Ashtabula, Ohio) on Lake Erie in Ashtabula,
Ohio.
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m.
on November 16, 2023, through 11:59 p.m. on December 1, 2024.
(c) Definitions. Official Patrol Vessel means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other
officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector
Buffalo, (COTP) in the enforcement of the regulations in this section.
Participant means all persons and vessels attending the event.
(d) Regulations. (1) The Coast Guard may patrol the event area
under the direction of a designated Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The
Patrol Commander may be contacted on Channel 16 VHF-FM (156.8 MHz) by
the call sign ``PATCOM.''
(2) All persons and vessels not registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels are considered spectators. The
``official patrol vessels'' consist of any Coast Guard, state or local
law enforcement and sponsor provided vessels designated or assigned by
the COTP Sector Buffalo, to patrol the event.
(3) Spectator vessels desiring to transit the regulated area may do
so only with prior approval of the Patrol Commander and when so
directed by that officer and will be operated at a no wake speed in a
manner which will not endanger participants in the event or any other
craft.
(4) No spectator shall anchor, block, loiter, or impede the through
transit of official patrol vessels in the regulated area during the
effective dates and times, unless cleared for entry by or through an
official patrol vessel.
(5) The Patrol Commander may forbid and control the movement of all
vessels in the regulated area. When hailed or signaled by an official
patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to an immediate stop and comply with
the directions given. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
(6) Any spectator vessel may anchor outside the regulated areas
specified in this chapter, but may not anchor in, block, or loiter in a
navigable channel.
[[Page 83031]]
(7) The Patrol Commander may terminate the event or the operation
of any vessel at any time it is deemed necessary for the protection of
life or property.
(8) The Patrol Commander will terminate enforcement of the special
regulations at the conclusion of the event.
Dated: November 17, 2023.
S.M. Murray,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2023-26149 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P