Payments Under State Home Care Agreements for Nursing Home Care, 83031-83034 [2023-25998]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(7) The Patrol Commander may
terminate the event or the operation of
any vessel at any time it is deemed
necessary for the protection of life or
property.
(8) The Patrol Commander will
terminate enforcement of the special
regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
Dated: November 17, 2023.
S.M. Murray,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Alternate
Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2023–26149 Filed 11–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 51
RIN 2900–AR62
Payments Under State Home Care
Agreements for Nursing Home Care
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adopts as final, with one
change, a proposed rule amending its
State home per diem regulation to
provide a new formula for calculating
the prevailing rate VA would pay a State
home that enters into a State home care
agreement to provide nursing home care
to eligible veterans.
DATES: This rule is effective December
28, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Alvarez, Chief of Staff Home Per
Diem Program, Geriatrics and Extended
Care (12GEC), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–6750.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
document published in the Federal
Register (FR) on December 21, 2022, VA
proposed to amend its per diem
regulations in part 51 of title 38, Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) to provide
a new formula for calculating the
prevailing rate VA will pay a State home
that enters into a State home care
agreement to provide nursing home care
to eligible veterans. 87 FR 78038. VA
provided a 60-day comment period,
which ended on February 21, 2023. Two
comments were received, one of which
included multiple issues, and these
comments are addressed below by topic.
VA makes one change to the rule based
on the comments received.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and
Eligibility for Care in a State Home
One commenter questioned whether
veterans of the USPHS are eligible for
care in State homes even if the State
does not recognize service in the USPHS
for veteran status. The commenter
further asserts that USPHS veterans are
veterans by Federal law and eligible for
all VA benefits, and if a State home is
receiving funding from VA then a
USPHS veteran should be eligible for
care in that State home even if the State
does not recognize a USPHS veteran for
other State benefits.
While VA considers this comment
outside of the scope of the rulemaking,
we clarify that an individual is a veteran
under 38 United States Code (U.S.C.)
101(2) if the individual ‘‘served in the
active military, naval, air, or space
service and . . . was discharged or
released therefrom under conditions
other than dishonorable.’’ ‘‘Active
military, naval, air, or space service’’
includes ‘‘active duty’’ and certain
periods of ‘‘active duty for training’’ and
‘‘inactive duty training’’ which are all
defined by 38 U.S.C. 101(21)–(24).
These terms prescribe the type of
service an individual needs to have had
to be eligible for VA health care benefits
under 38 U.S.C. 1710 and 1705 and are
inclusive of service in the USPHS. 38
Code of Federal Register (CFR) 17.31
generally incorporates the 38 U.S.C. 101
definitions of active service, active duty,
active duty for training, and inactive
duty training, as well as certain other
service recognized as active service
under 38 U.S.C. 106. In short, § 17.31
addresses the duty periods considered
under active service for eligibility for
VA medical benefits, and it is inclusive
of service in the USPHS. Thus, an
individual with full-time service in the
USPHS may qualify as a ‘‘veteran’’ for
purposes of health care benefits
administered by VA.
However, the designation of veteran
for purposes of VA health care benefits
does not require a State home to accept
a veteran into State home. The VA State
home program pays per diem to State
homes for three types of care provided
to eligible veterans: nursing home care,
domiciliary care, and adult day health
care (ADHC). The statutory authority for
the payment program is set forth at 38
U.S.C. 1741–43 and VA has published
regulations governing this program at 38
CFR part 51. Sections 51.50 through
51.52 address which veterans are
eligible for purposes of payment of per
diem for nursing home care, domiciliary
care, and ADHC, respectively. An
important distinction is that while VA
can pay per diem to State homes for care
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
83031
provided to eligible veterans, State
homes are not obligated to accept all
eligible veterans. VA does not have
management authority over State
homes. State homes are owned and
operated by State governments and each
State establishes eligibility and
admission criteria for its homes. State
homes may have additional admission
requirements such as age, wartime
service, years of service, and residency
requirements. Therefore, VA is unable
to dictate which eligible veterans for
purposes of payment of per diem may
be admitted to a State home. VA makes
no changes based on this comment.
State Home Responsibilities Under the
Prevailing Rate
One commenter raised concerns that
VA is proposing to continue to use the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) Prospective Payment
System (PPS) for creating the baseline
for the prevailing rate without utilizing
Medicare’s consolidated billing
guidelines to confirm which services are
covered under the rate. Specifically, the
commenter referred to the Medicare
Claims Processing Manual Chapter 6—
Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Inpatient
Part A Billing and SNF Consolidated
Billing (Medicare Manual).1 The
commenter stated that all services
considered within the scope and
capability of nursing home care are paid
under the PPS rate and that the
Medicare Manual lists which services
are included and excluded under the
PPS rate. Further, the commenter
suggested that VA should use the
Medicare Manual to confirm which
services are covered under the
prevailing rate because State homes are
finding more instances where there is an
expectation for State homes to pay for
services that have been specifically
excluded under PPS. The commenter
specifically mentioned psychologist and
psychiatric services, and high-cost
medications (e.g., high-intensity anticancer drugs). The commenter also
stated that all drugs not listed on the
most recent VA formulary should
qualify for an exclusion from the
prevailing rate calculation since these
medications are not routinely
administered in a SNF or are
exceptionally expensive. Finally, the
commenter requested a guide for State
homes and VA staff to determine the
1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,
Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 6—
SNF Inpatient Part A Billing and SNF Consolidated
Billing (Rev. 11109, 11–04–21), https://
www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/
manuals/downloads/clm104c06.pdf (last visited
April 11, 2023).
E:\FR\FM\28NOR1.SGM
28NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
83032
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
financial responsibility for the full
coordination of care.
We interpret that this commenter is
expressing concern that State homes are
not being adequately compensated by
VA under the prevailing rate for certain
care (such as psychologist and
psychiatric services, and high-cost
medications as mentioned in the
comment) by virtue of VA not using the
Medicare Manual to confirm which
services are covered and which services
are excluded. Further we interpret that
this commenter believes that if VA uses
the Medicare Manual to confirm
covered and excluded services, then
State homes would be allowed to seek
payment for excluded services in
addition to the prevailing rate. However,
VA has no clear indication that State
homes are being inadequately
compensated for care, even when drugs
and medications, and psychologist and
psychiatric services are furnished. We
also believe that VA’s current payment
structure for State home care will
remedy inadequate compensation were
it to become an issue. Under § 51.41,
payment by VA to State homes for care
of a veteran is payment in full for care
the State home provides that veteran. 38
U.S.C. 1745(a)(3). In accordance with 38
U.S.C. 1745(a)(2), VA has developed a
payment methodology to adequately
reimburse State homes for the care
provided under agreements with VA,
where VA has established two methods
of payment in 38 CFR 51.41, one each
for State home contracts and State home
care agreements, respectively. State
homes that enter into contracts will be
compensated at the rate negotiated in
the contract. On the other hand, State
homes that enter into State home care
agreements will be compensated using
the prevailing rate, which is calculated
to compensate State homes for the
average cost of providing nursing home
care to the veterans whose care is
covered under 38 CFR 51.41, including,
as indicated in § 51.41(c)(2), the cost of
drugs and medicines. Although the
costs of all drugs and medications,
including those that are not on the VA
formulary, as well as psychologist and
psychiatric services are not payable
separately from general payments under
State home care agreements, if a State
home cannot accept the prevailing rate
that VA offers in a State home care
agreement, that State home has the
option to request a contract under
§ 51.41 and would then be able to
negotiate with VA for a specific contract
rate.
We otherwise do not find that using
the Medicare Manual the commenter
references would be appropriate or
necessarily transferrable to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
determination of which services are
covered and which services are
excluded under the prevailing rate as
that Medicare Manual is used for care in
a SNF that is measured in only limited
benefit periods, whereas VA’s payments
are not so limited. In the cited Medicare
Manual, in each benefit period,
Medicare Part A covers up to 20 full
days of care, after that Medicare Part A
covers up to an additional 80 days with
the beneficiary paying coinsurance for
each day, and after 100 days, the SNF
coverage exhausts and the beneficiary
pays for all care, except for certain
Medicare Part B services.2 The benefit
period begins on the day a Medicare
beneficiary is admitted to a hospital or
SNF as an inpatient and ends after the
beneficiary has not been a hospital
inpatient or received skilled care in a
SNF for 60 consecutive days.3 Once the
benefit period ends, a new benefit
period begins when the beneficiary is
admitted to a hospital or SNF.4 Further,
a new benefit period does not begin due
to a change in diagnosis, condition, or
calendar year.5 However, unlike
Medicare part A coverage, under
§ 51.41, VA will pay a State home the
prevailing rate for the duration that a
State home provides care to a veteran,
even if it exceeds Medicare’s 100 day
benefit period. Therefore, VA believes
that because the Medicare Manual
referenced by the commenter is
premised on a limited benefit period, it
is not applicable or relevant to the
payment VA provides to State homes
under the prevailing rate for an
indefinite period of time.
For the reasons stated above VA
makes no changes based on this
comment.
Prevailing Rate for ADHC
One commenter stated that the ADHC
prevailing rate includes transportation
to and from the ADHC program and is
a key element of the service to veterans
and their caregivers. The commenter
asserted that due to the Coronavirus
Disease-2019 (COVID–19), the cost of
ambulette transportation has tripled in
labor, gas, vehicle maintenance, and
insurance and that these costs have
grown much higher than the typical
inflationary increase in the SNF
2 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,
Medicare Learning Network: Skilled Nursing
Facility Billing Reference, ICN MLN006846 (May
2022), https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-andEducation/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/
MLNProducts/EnrollmentResources/providerresources/snf-billing-reference.html (last visited
April 11, 2023).
3 Id.
4 Id.
5 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Consumer Price Index (CPI), which the
commenter asserted was used by VA to
calculate the proposed rate change. To
the extent the commenter is concerned
that the CPI index for medical care that
includes an item for nursing home and
adult day care services 6 is not sufficient
to cover the cost of ambulette
transportation, VA did not use any CPI
index as a factor in the proposed change
to the prevailing rate for nursing home
care. As stated in the proposed rule, VA
believes that the CMS SNF Market
Basket rate would more accurately
reflect actual costs than would an
alternate method such as a component
of the CPI. 87 FR 78040 (December 21,
2022). VA makes no changes based on
this comment.
One commenter raised concerns
regarding the proposed non-substantive
change for the title of § 51.41(c) from
‘‘Payments under State home
agreements.’’ to Payments for nursing
home care under State home care
agreements.’’ The commenter noted that
the calculation of the prevailing rate for
nursing home care is also the
foundation for the prevailing rate paid
for ADHC and that it is equally
important to ensure the rate paid for
ADHC is representative of the services
being provided. VA agrees with the
commenter that § 51.41(c) is the current
foundation for the prevailing rate paid
for ADHC. On March 27, 2018, the State
Veterans Home Adult Day Health Care
Improvement Act of 2017 (ADHC
Improvement Act), Public Law 115–159,
was signed into law. The ADHC
Improvement Act added a new
paragraph (d) to 38 U.S.C. 1745
authorizing VA to pay State homes for
providing medical supervision adult
day health care to eligible veterans. A
proposed rule to implement the ADHC
Improvement Act is currently being
developed which will be made available
to the public for comment. Any changes
to the title of § 51.41(c), if necessary,
will be addressed in that rulemaking;
therefore, VA will not finalize the
proposed revision to the title of
§ 51.41(c) and the title will remain as
‘‘Payments under State home care
agreements.’’
Based on the rationale set forth in this
document, VA is adopting the proposed
rule as final with one change as noted
above.
6 U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Consumer Price Index, Measuring Price
Change in the CPI: Medical Care (Feb. 10, 2023),
https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/medicalcare.htm (last visited April 7, 2023).
E:\FR\FM\28NOR1.SGM
28NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and
14094
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) directs agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
14094 (Executive Order on Modernizing
Regulatory Review) supplements and
reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing contemporary
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
and Executive Order 13563 of January
18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review). The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rulemaking is not
a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, as amended by
Executive Order 14094. The Regulatory
Impact Analysis associated with this
rulemaking can be found as a
supporting document at
www.regulations.gov.
Unfunded Mandates
Regulatory Flexibility Act
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 51
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612). The rulemaking
revises the formula VA uses to calculate
the per diem it pays State homes for
nursing home care of certain veterans.
The effect of the rule is to change VA
payments to State homes. Therefore,
this rule only affects veterans and State
homes.
All State homes are owned, operated,
and managed by State governments,
except for a small number operated by
entities under contract with State
governments. Neither these contractors
nor State governments are small entities
as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601. State homes
subject to this final rulemaking are State
homes that are currently under a State
home care agreement, those that enter
into a new agreement, and any facility
that begins an agreement for the first
time. The rule will impose no direct
costs on the State homes. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Adult Day Health
Care, Dental health, Domiciliary,
Government contracts, Health care,
Health facilities, Health professions,
Health records, Mental health programs,
Nursing homes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Travel and
transportation expenses, Veterans.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and Tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Although this action relates to
provisions constituting collections of
information at 38 CFR 51.41, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521), no
new or proposed revised collections of
information would be associated with
this final rule. The information
collection requirements for § 51.41(e)
are currently approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
have been assigned OMB control
numbers 2900–0091 and 2900–0160.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, signed and approved
this document on November 16, 2023,
and authorized the undersigned to sign
and submit the document to the Office
of the Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons described in the
preamble, Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 51 as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 51—PER DIEM FOR NURSING
HOME, DOMICILIARY, OR ADULT DAY
HEALTH CARE OF VETERANS IN
STATE HOMES
1. The general authority citation for
part 51 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1720,
1741–1743, 1745, and as follows.
*
*
*
*
*
2. In § 51.41 revise paragraph (c)(1) to
read as follows:
■
§ 51.41 Contracts and State home care
agreements for certain veterans with
service-connected disabilities.
*
Paperwork Reduction Act
83033
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) State homes must sign an
agreement to receive payment from VA
for providing care to certain eligible
veterans under a State home care
agreement. A State home care agreement
for nursing home care under this section
will provide for payments at the rate
determined by the following formula.
(i) Determine whether the Resource
Utilization Groups (RUG) or Skilled
Nursing Facility Prospective Payment
System (SNF–PPS) applies.
(A) For State homes in a metropolitan
statistical area, use the published fiscal
year Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS) RUG case-mix levels for
the applicable metropolitan statistical
area.
(B) For State homes in a rural area,
use the published fiscal year CMS SNF–
PPS case-mix levels for the applicable
rural area.
(ii) Compute the daily rate for each
State home, using the following formula
in the order described:
(A) Multiply the labor component by
the State home wage index for each of
the applicable case-mix levels.
(B) Add to that amount the non-labor
component.
(C) Divide the sum of the results of
these calculations by the number of
applicable case-mix levels.
(D) Add to this quotient the amount
based on the CMS payment schedule for
physician services. The amount for
physician services, based on
information published by CMS, is the
average hourly rate for all physicians,
with the rate modified by the applicable
urban or rural geographic index for
physician work, then multiplied by 12,
then divided by the number of days in
the year. The resulting sum is the per
diem baseline rate for the State home.
(E) Multiply the per diem baseline
rate from the previous year by the CMS
Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) Market
Basket increase in effect as of December
28, 2023. The sum establishes the
reference total per diem baseline rate
E:\FR\FM\28NOR1.SGM
28NOR1
83034
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 28, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
from which subsequent fiscal year per
diem rates will be calculated. For
calculation of SNF per diem rates for
subsequent fiscal years VA will apply
the CMS SNF Market Basket increase to
the total per diem each year.
Note 1 to paragraph (c)(1): The amount
calculated under this formula reflects the
prevailing rate payable in the geographic area
in which the State home is located for
nursing home care furnished in a State home.
The amount calculated under this formula
applies to both new and existing facilities
with State home care agreements. Further,
the formula for establishing these rates
includes CMS information that is published
in the Federal Register every year and is
effective beginning October 1 for the entire
fiscal year. Accordingly, VA will adjust the
rates annually.
*
*
§ 51.70
*
*
*
[Amended]
3. In § 51.70, in paragraph (n), remove
‘‘51.110(d)(2)(ii) of this part’’ and add in
its place ‘‘51.110(e)(2)(ii)’’.
■
§ 51.110
[Amended]
4. In § 51.110, in paragraph (d),
remove ‘‘Version 2.0’’ and add in its
place ‘‘Version 3.0’’.
■
§ 51.300
[Amended]
5. In § 51.300, in paragraph (d)(3),
remove ‘‘(a)(2)(i) through (vii)’’ and add
in its place ‘‘(d)(2)(i) through (vii)’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2023–25998 Filed 11–27–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0076; FRL–10663–
02–R9]
Air Plan Revisions; California; San
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the San Joaquin
Valley Unified Air Pollution Control
District (SJVUAPCD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). This revision concerns emissions
of particulate matter (PM) from wood
burning devices. We are approving a
local measure that regulates these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective December
28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0076. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
SUMMARY:
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
a disability who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elijah Gordon, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3158 or by
email at gordon.elijah@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On April 14, 2023 (88 FR 22978), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
measure into the California SIP.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED MEASURE
Local agency
SJVUAPCD ......................
Resolution No.
21–11–7
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
We proposed to approve this measure
because we determined that it complies
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the measure and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received three public
comments. The first two comments fail
to identify any issue that is germane to
our action on the measure and are
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
One of these comments included
offensive content and was therefore not
posted to the public docket. The other
comment discusses wildfires and
vehicle emissions. Our response to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 27, 2023
Jkt 262001
Measure title
Adopted
Burn Cleaner Fireplace and Woodstove Change-out
Incentive Measure (‘‘Burn Cleaner Incentive Measure’’).
third comment from Sheraz Gill, Deputy
Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO) of
SJVUAPCD, is below.
Comment: After providing a summary
of the measure, the commenter
expresses concerns that, although the
measure meets all four integrity
elements necessary for an incentive
measure to be fully approvable into the
SIP, the EPA has chosen to not give SIP
emission reduction credit. The
commenter states ‘‘. . . the District is
concerned with EPA’s proposed
approval not including emission
reduction credit for this measure, as the
program has achieved and will continue
to achieve significant emissions
reductions in the San Joaquin Valley.’’
The commenter recommends that the
EPA include in our final approval of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11/18/2021
Submitted
03/17/2022
this measure SIP credit for the specific
emission reductions quantified.
Response: As explained in our
proposal, SJVUAPCD regulates a PM2.5
nonattainment area classified as Serious
for the 1997 (24-hour 65 mg/m3 and
annual 15 mg/m3 limit), 2006 (24-hour
35 mg/m3 limit), and 2012 (annual 12 mg/
m3 limit) PM2.5 National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS). The
District adopted the 2018 Plan for the
1997, 2006, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
(2018 PM2.5 Plan) in November 2018 to
help bring the District into attainment
for these NAAQS.1 The 2018 PM2.5 Plan
includes aggregate emissions reduction
commitments by the SJVUAPCD to
achieve an additional 1.30 tons per day
(tpd), annual average, direct PM2.5
1 2018
E:\FR\FM\28NOR1.SGM
PM2.5 Plan, ES–8.
28NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 28, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83031-83034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25998]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 51
RIN 2900-AR62
Payments Under State Home Care Agreements for Nursing Home Care
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) adopts as final, with
one change, a proposed rule amending its State home per diem regulation
to provide a new formula for calculating the prevailing rate VA would
pay a State home that enters into a State home care agreement to
provide nursing home care to eligible veterans.
DATES: This rule is effective December 28, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colette Alvarez, Chief of Staff Home
Per Diem Program, Geriatrics and Extended Care (12GEC), Veterans Health
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-6750. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a document published in the Federal
Register (FR) on December 21, 2022, VA proposed to amend its per diem
regulations in part 51 of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
to provide a new formula for calculating the prevailing rate VA will
pay a State home that enters into a State home care agreement to
provide nursing home care to eligible veterans. 87 FR 78038. VA
provided a 60-day comment period, which ended on February 21, 2023. Two
comments were received, one of which included multiple issues, and
these comments are addressed below by topic. VA makes one change to the
rule based on the comments received.
U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and Eligibility for Care in a State
Home
One commenter questioned whether veterans of the USPHS are eligible
for care in State homes even if the State does not recognize service in
the USPHS for veteran status. The commenter further asserts that USPHS
veterans are veterans by Federal law and eligible for all VA benefits,
and if a State home is receiving funding from VA then a USPHS veteran
should be eligible for care in that State home even if the State does
not recognize a USPHS veteran for other State benefits.
While VA considers this comment outside of the scope of the
rulemaking, we clarify that an individual is a veteran under 38 United
States Code (U.S.C.) 101(2) if the individual ``served in the active
military, naval, air, or space service and . . . was discharged or
released therefrom under conditions other than dishonorable.'' ``Active
military, naval, air, or space service'' includes ``active duty'' and
certain periods of ``active duty for training'' and ``inactive duty
training'' which are all defined by 38 U.S.C. 101(21)-(24). These terms
prescribe the type of service an individual needs to have had to be
eligible for VA health care benefits under 38 U.S.C. 1710 and 1705 and
are inclusive of service in the USPHS. 38 Code of Federal Register
(CFR) 17.31 generally incorporates the 38 U.S.C. 101 definitions of
active service, active duty, active duty for training, and inactive
duty training, as well as certain other service recognized as active
service under 38 U.S.C. 106. In short, Sec. 17.31 addresses the duty
periods considered under active service for eligibility for VA medical
benefits, and it is inclusive of service in the USPHS. Thus, an
individual with full-time service in the USPHS may qualify as a
``veteran'' for purposes of health care benefits administered by VA.
However, the designation of veteran for purposes of VA health care
benefits does not require a State home to accept a veteran into State
home. The VA State home program pays per diem to State homes for three
types of care provided to eligible veterans: nursing home care,
domiciliary care, and adult day health care (ADHC). The statutory
authority for the payment program is set forth at 38 U.S.C. 1741-43 and
VA has published regulations governing this program at 38 CFR part 51.
Sections 51.50 through 51.52 address which veterans are eligible for
purposes of payment of per diem for nursing home care, domiciliary
care, and ADHC, respectively. An important distinction is that while VA
can pay per diem to State homes for care provided to eligible veterans,
State homes are not obligated to accept all eligible veterans. VA does
not have management authority over State homes. State homes are owned
and operated by State governments and each State establishes
eligibility and admission criteria for its homes. State homes may have
additional admission requirements such as age, wartime service, years
of service, and residency requirements. Therefore, VA is unable to
dictate which eligible veterans for purposes of payment of per diem may
be admitted to a State home. VA makes no changes based on this comment.
State Home Responsibilities Under the Prevailing Rate
One commenter raised concerns that VA is proposing to continue to
use the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Prospective
Payment System (PPS) for creating the baseline for the prevailing rate
without utilizing Medicare's consolidated billing guidelines to confirm
which services are covered under the rate. Specifically, the commenter
referred to the Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 6--Skilled
Nursing Facility (SNF) Inpatient Part A Billing and SNF Consolidated
Billing (Medicare Manual).\1\ The commenter stated that all services
considered within the scope and capability of nursing home care are
paid under the PPS rate and that the Medicare Manual lists which
services are included and excluded under the PPS rate. Further, the
commenter suggested that VA should use the Medicare Manual to confirm
which services are covered under the prevailing rate because State
homes are finding more instances where there is an expectation for
State homes to pay for services that have been specifically excluded
under PPS. The commenter specifically mentioned psychologist and
psychiatric services, and high-cost medications (e.g., high-intensity
anti-cancer drugs). The commenter also stated that all drugs not listed
on the most recent VA formulary should qualify for an exclusion from
the prevailing rate calculation since these medications are not
routinely administered in a SNF or are exceptionally expensive.
Finally, the commenter requested a guide for State homes and VA staff
to determine the
[[Page 83032]]
financial responsibility for the full coordination of care.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Claims Processing Manual
Chapter 6--SNF Inpatient Part A Billing and SNF Consolidated Billing
(Rev. 11109, 11-04-21), https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/clm104c06.pdf (last visited
April 11, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We interpret that this commenter is expressing concern that State
homes are not being adequately compensated by VA under the prevailing
rate for certain care (such as psychologist and psychiatric services,
and high-cost medications as mentioned in the comment) by virtue of VA
not using the Medicare Manual to confirm which services are covered and
which services are excluded. Further we interpret that this commenter
believes that if VA uses the Medicare Manual to confirm covered and
excluded services, then State homes would be allowed to seek payment
for excluded services in addition to the prevailing rate. However, VA
has no clear indication that State homes are being inadequately
compensated for care, even when drugs and medications, and psychologist
and psychiatric services are furnished. We also believe that VA's
current payment structure for State home care will remedy inadequate
compensation were it to become an issue. Under Sec. 51.41, payment by
VA to State homes for care of a veteran is payment in full for care the
State home provides that veteran. 38 U.S.C. 1745(a)(3). In accordance
with 38 U.S.C. 1745(a)(2), VA has developed a payment methodology to
adequately reimburse State homes for the care provided under agreements
with VA, where VA has established two methods of payment in 38 CFR
51.41, one each for State home contracts and State home care
agreements, respectively. State homes that enter into contracts will be
compensated at the rate negotiated in the contract. On the other hand,
State homes that enter into State home care agreements will be
compensated using the prevailing rate, which is calculated to
compensate State homes for the average cost of providing nursing home
care to the veterans whose care is covered under 38 CFR 51.41,
including, as indicated in Sec. 51.41(c)(2), the cost of drugs and
medicines. Although the costs of all drugs and medications, including
those that are not on the VA formulary, as well as psychologist and
psychiatric services are not payable separately from general payments
under State home care agreements, if a State home cannot accept the
prevailing rate that VA offers in a State home care agreement, that
State home has the option to request a contract under Sec. 51.41 and
would then be able to negotiate with VA for a specific contract rate.
We otherwise do not find that using the Medicare Manual the
commenter references would be appropriate or necessarily transferrable
to the determination of which services are covered and which services
are excluded under the prevailing rate as that Medicare Manual is used
for care in a SNF that is measured in only limited benefit periods,
whereas VA's payments are not so limited. In the cited Medicare Manual,
in each benefit period, Medicare Part A covers up to 20 full days of
care, after that Medicare Part A covers up to an additional 80 days
with the beneficiary paying coinsurance for each day, and after 100
days, the SNF coverage exhausts and the beneficiary pays for all care,
except for certain Medicare Part B services.\2\ The benefit period
begins on the day a Medicare beneficiary is admitted to a hospital or
SNF as an inpatient and ends after the beneficiary has not been a
hospital inpatient or received skilled care in a SNF for 60 consecutive
days.\3\ Once the benefit period ends, a new benefit period begins when
the beneficiary is admitted to a hospital or SNF.\4\ Further, a new
benefit period does not begin due to a change in diagnosis, condition,
or calendar year.\5\ However, unlike Medicare part A coverage, under
Sec. 51.41, VA will pay a State home the prevailing rate for the
duration that a State home provides care to a veteran, even if it
exceeds Medicare's 100 day benefit period. Therefore, VA believes that
because the Medicare Manual referenced by the commenter is premised on
a limited benefit period, it is not applicable or relevant to the
payment VA provides to State homes under the prevailing rate for an
indefinite period of time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Learning Network: Skilled
Nursing Facility Billing Reference, ICN MLN006846 (May 2022),
https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/EnrollmentResources/provider-resources/snf-billing-reference.html (last visited April 11, 2023).
\3\ Id.
\4\ Id.
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons stated above VA makes no changes based on this
comment.
Prevailing Rate for ADHC
One commenter stated that the ADHC prevailing rate includes
transportation to and from the ADHC program and is a key element of the
service to veterans and their caregivers. The commenter asserted that
due to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), the cost of ambulette
transportation has tripled in labor, gas, vehicle maintenance, and
insurance and that these costs have grown much higher than the typical
inflationary increase in the SNF Consumer Price Index (CPI), which the
commenter asserted was used by VA to calculate the proposed rate
change. To the extent the commenter is concerned that the CPI index for
medical care that includes an item for nursing home and adult day care
services \6\ is not sufficient to cover the cost of ambulette
transportation, VA did not use any CPI index as a factor in the
proposed change to the prevailing rate for nursing home care. As stated
in the proposed rule, VA believes that the CMS SNF Market Basket rate
would more accurately reflect actual costs than would an alternate
method such as a component of the CPI. 87 FR 78040 (December 21, 2022).
VA makes no changes based on this comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Consumer Price Index, Measuring Price Change in the CPI: Medical
Care (Feb. 10, 2023), https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/medical-care.htm (last visited April 7, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter raised concerns regarding the proposed non-
substantive change for the title of Sec. 51.41(c) from ``Payments
under State home agreements.'' to Payments for nursing home care under
State home care agreements.'' The commenter noted that the calculation
of the prevailing rate for nursing home care is also the foundation for
the prevailing rate paid for ADHC and that it is equally important to
ensure the rate paid for ADHC is representative of the services being
provided. VA agrees with the commenter that Sec. 51.41(c) is the
current foundation for the prevailing rate paid for ADHC. On March 27,
2018, the State Veterans Home Adult Day Health Care Improvement Act of
2017 (ADHC Improvement Act), Public Law 115-159, was signed into law.
The ADHC Improvement Act added a new paragraph (d) to 38 U.S.C. 1745
authorizing VA to pay State homes for providing medical supervision
adult day health care to eligible veterans. A proposed rule to
implement the ADHC Improvement Act is currently being developed which
will be made available to the public for comment. Any changes to the
title of Sec. 51.41(c), if necessary, will be addressed in that
rulemaking; therefore, VA will not finalize the proposed revision to
the title of Sec. 51.41(c) and the title will remain as ``Payments
under State home care agreements.''
Based on the rationale set forth in this document, VA is adopting
the proposed rule as final with one change as noted above.
[[Page 83033]]
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 14094
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) directs
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 (Executive Order on
Modernizing Regulatory Review) supplements and reaffirms the
principles, structures, and definitions governing contemporary
regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), and Executive Order 13563 of
January 18, 2011 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review). The
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this
rulemaking is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094. The Regulatory Impact
Analysis associated with this rulemaking can be found as a supporting
document at www.regulations.gov.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612). The rulemaking revises the formula VA uses to calculate the per
diem it pays State homes for nursing home care of certain veterans. The
effect of the rule is to change VA payments to State homes. Therefore,
this rule only affects veterans and State homes.
All State homes are owned, operated, and managed by State
governments, except for a small number operated by entities under
contract with State governments. Neither these contractors nor State
governments are small entities as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601. State homes
subject to this final rulemaking are State homes that are currently
under a State home care agreement, those that enter into a new
agreement, and any facility that begins an agreement for the first
time. The rule will impose no direct costs on the State homes.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and Tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Although this action relates to provisions constituting collections
of information at 38 CFR 51.41, under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), no new or proposed revised
collections of information would be associated with this final rule.
The information collection requirements for Sec. 51.41(e) are
currently approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
have been assigned OMB control numbers 2900-0091 and 2900-0160.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Adult Day Health
Care, Dental health, Domiciliary, Government contracts, Health care,
Health facilities, Health professions, Health records, Mental health
programs, Nursing homes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Travel and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, signed and approved
this document on November 16, 2023, and authorized the undersigned to
sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons described in the preamble, Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 51 as follows:
PART 51--PER DIEM FOR NURSING HOME, DOMICILIARY, OR ADULT DAY
HEALTH CARE OF VETERANS IN STATE HOMES
0
1. The general authority citation for part 51 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1710, 1720, 1741-1743, 1745, and
as follows.
* * * * *
0
2. In Sec. 51.41 revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 51.41 Contracts and State home care agreements for certain
veterans with service-connected disabilities.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) State homes must sign an agreement to receive payment from VA
for providing care to certain eligible veterans under a State home care
agreement. A State home care agreement for nursing home care under this
section will provide for payments at the rate determined by the
following formula.
(i) Determine whether the Resource Utilization Groups (RUG) or
Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (SNF-PPS) applies.
(A) For State homes in a metropolitan statistical area, use the
published fiscal year Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
RUG case-mix levels for the applicable metropolitan statistical area.
(B) For State homes in a rural area, use the published fiscal year
CMS SNF-PPS case-mix levels for the applicable rural area.
(ii) Compute the daily rate for each State home, using the
following formula in the order described:
(A) Multiply the labor component by the State home wage index for
each of the applicable case-mix levels.
(B) Add to that amount the non-labor component.
(C) Divide the sum of the results of these calculations by the
number of applicable case-mix levels.
(D) Add to this quotient the amount based on the CMS payment
schedule for physician services. The amount for physician services,
based on information published by CMS, is the average hourly rate for
all physicians, with the rate modified by the applicable urban or rural
geographic index for physician work, then multiplied by 12, then
divided by the number of days in the year. The resulting sum is the per
diem baseline rate for the State home.
(E) Multiply the per diem baseline rate from the previous year by
the CMS Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) Market Basket increase in
effect as of December 28, 2023. The sum establishes the reference total
per diem baseline rate
[[Page 83034]]
from which subsequent fiscal year per diem rates will be calculated.
For calculation of SNF per diem rates for subsequent fiscal years VA
will apply the CMS SNF Market Basket increase to the total per diem
each year.
Note 1 to paragraph (c)(1): The amount calculated under this
formula reflects the prevailing rate payable in the geographic area
in which the State home is located for nursing home care furnished
in a State home. The amount calculated under this formula applies to
both new and existing facilities with State home care agreements.
Further, the formula for establishing these rates includes CMS
information that is published in the Federal Register every year and
is effective beginning October 1 for the entire fiscal year.
Accordingly, VA will adjust the rates annually.
* * * * *
Sec. 51.70 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 51.70, in paragraph (n), remove ``51.110(d)(2)(ii) of this
part'' and add in its place ``51.110(e)(2)(ii)''.
Sec. 51.110 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 51.110, in paragraph (d), remove ``Version 2.0'' and add in
its place ``Version 3.0''.
Sec. 51.300 [Amended]
0
5. In Sec. 51.300, in paragraph (d)(3), remove ``(a)(2)(i) through
(vii)'' and add in its place ``(d)(2)(i) through (vii)''.
[FR Doc. 2023-25998 Filed 11-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P