Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; Under Attack: Assaults on Our Nation's Law Enforcement, 82915-82916 [2023-26091]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2023 / Notices false designation of source and false and misleading advertising, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States; (2) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (3) by reason of infringement of the ’369 mark, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (3) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘products containing tirzepatide or purporting to contain tirzepatide sold in powdered or constituted form’’; (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285 (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Arctic Peptides LLC, 2104 NE Oak Dr, Ankeny, IA 50021 Audrey Beauty Co., Flat C 23/F Lucky Plaza, 315–321 Lockhart Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong, China Biolabshop Limited, 25 Scotforth Road, Lancaster, PR1 4XX, United Kingdom Mew Mews Company Limited, RM C1 11/F Blk 1 152 Tai Lin Pai Road, Golden Dragon IND Ctr., Kwai Chung, New Territories, Hong Kong, China Strate Labs LLC, 18482 Kuykendahl Road #123, Spring, TX 77379–8123 Steroide Kaufen, W. Polna 2017, 15–698 Bialystok, Poland Super Human Store, Passeig Del Taulat 267, 5O 4A, Barcelona 08019, Spain Supopeptide, 371 Little Falls Road Ste 4, Cedar Grove, NJ 07009 Triggered Supplements LLC, (d/b/a The Triggered Brand), 1361 S Martin Luther King Jr Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 Nov 24, 2023 Jkt 262001 Unewlife, 371 Little Falls Road Ste 4, Cedar Grove, NJ 07009 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Xiamen Austronext Trading Co., Ltd. (d/ b/a AustroPeptide), Room 3001, No. 5998, Maqing Rd., Haicang District, Xiamen, Fujian, China 361026 [OMB Number 1110–0NEW] (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 21, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–26058 Filed 11–24–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 82915 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; Under Attack: Assaults on Our Nation’s Law Enforcement Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-Day notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Department of Justice (DOJ) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until January 26, 2024 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Kevin Harris/FBI CJIS, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, WV 26306, (304) 625–2000, OSAT@fbi.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM 27NON1 82916 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2023 / Notices Abstract: Serious assaults on law enforcement in the United States are a growing problem, with both assaults with injury and felonious killings of law enforcement officers trending upward (FBI, 2022). While the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) data collection answers many questions related to these assaults and deaths, such as the who, what, when, where, and how, the data does not answer why these assaults are happening. Without knowing and understanding why these assaults are happening, we cannot begin to prevent them. Outside of the previous studies conducted by the FBI, there is a lack of research into this question of why offenders assault police officers. In particular, there is a lack of research that looks at both the officer and the offender in such incidents, and how the relationship between the two impacts the assault. The purposes of this qualitative study are to examine the possibility of predicting assaults on officers and to use this information to prevent future assaults. To date, very few studies outside of the FBI’s Officer Safety Awareness Training (OSAT) research projects, have looked at these assaults from the perspectives of both the officer and the offender. By interviewing officers and offenders, this study seeks to gain a more thorough understanding of why these incidents take place, and the context surrounding them. Based on the recent trends and the modicum of previous research, it is expected the current study would make a large contribution to what is currently known about these attacks, and would play a substantial role in the preparedness, prevention, and mitigation of these incidents by informing those who develop training and operational practices. This mixed method research effort will use the Perpetrator-Motive Research Design (PMRD). PMRD is a 12step methodological design that focuses on gaining a thorough understanding of the motivations of offenders. Interviewing incarcerated offenders allows for increased accessibility, increased sample size, interviewer security, and avoidance of ethical or potential legal entanglements which interviewers might be exposed to while questioning offenders still at large or whose cases have not yet exhausted the criminal legal process. Because PMRD is suited to identify and understand offender motives, the findings can be used in the development of training interventions for law enforcement officials which could improve officer safety. As part of the study, researchers will also seek to examine the incident reports associated with the assaults and the FBI criminal history record information of offenders. Researchers will also seek to obtain, examine, and use any body-worn camera or dashboard camera recordings associated with the assaults for research and training purposes. Overview of This Information Collection 1. Type of Information Collection: New Collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Under Attack: Assaults on Our Nation’s Law Enforcement. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: There is no form number. The forms are titled ‘‘Officer Protocol Questionnaire’’ and ‘‘Offender Protocol Questionnaire’’/ FBI CJIS Division. 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as the obligation to respond: State, local, and tribal governments. The obligation to respond is voluntary. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: A total of 120 respondents. The time per response will be 2 hours per survey. Each participant will fill out either the officer form or the offender form. One questionnaire per respondent. The estimated response time will be 2 hours per respondent. 6. An estimate of the total annual burden (in hours) associated with the collection: This is not an annual collection. This is a one-time study. 7. An estimate of the total annual cost burden associated with the collection, if applicable: $0. TOTAL BURDEN HOURS Number of respondents Activity Total annual responses Time per response (hours) Total annual burden (hours) Officer Protocol Questionnaire ......................................... Offender Protocol Questionnaire ..................................... 60 60 1 per respondent ....... 1 per respondent ....... 60 60 2 2 120 120 Unduplicated Totals .................................................. 120 1 per respondent ....... 120 .................... 240 If additional information is required contact: Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W–218, Washington, DC. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Frequency Dated: November 21, 2023. Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2023–26091 Filed 11–24–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:43 Nov 24, 2023 Jkt 262001 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1140–0NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Recruitment Outreach Data Collection Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-Day notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register, on September 25, 2023, allowing a 60-day comment period. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 30 days until December 27, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please E:\FR\FM\27NON1.SGM 27NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 226 (Monday, November 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82915-82916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[OMB Number 1110-0NEW]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection 
eComments Requested; New Collection; Under Attack: Assaults on Our 
Nation's Law Enforcement

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice.

ACTION: 60-Day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Criminal Justice 
Information Services Division, Department of Justice (DOJ) will be 
submitting the following information collection request to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance 
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until 
January 26, 2024

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments 
especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, 
suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection 
instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact 
Kevin Harris/FBI CJIS, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, WV 26306, 
(304) 625-2000, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the 
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of 
information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of 
the following four points:

--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice 
Statistics, including whether the information will have practical 
utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
--Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information to be collected can be enhanced; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses.


[[Page 82916]]


    Abstract: Serious assaults on law enforcement in the United States 
are a growing problem, with both assaults with injury and felonious 
killings of law enforcement officers trending upward (FBI, 2022). While 
the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) data 
collection answers many questions related to these assaults and deaths, 
such as the who, what, when, where, and how, the data does not answer 
why these assaults are happening. Without knowing and understanding why 
these assaults are happening, we cannot begin to prevent them. Outside 
of the previous studies conducted by the FBI, there is a lack of 
research into this question of why offenders assault police officers. 
In particular, there is a lack of research that looks at both the 
officer and the offender in such incidents, and how the relationship 
between the two impacts the assault.
    The purposes of this qualitative study are to examine the 
possibility of predicting assaults on officers and to use this 
information to prevent future assaults. To date, very few studies 
outside of the FBI's Officer Safety Awareness Training (OSAT) research 
projects, have looked at these assaults from the perspectives of both 
the officer and the offender. By interviewing officers and offenders, 
this study seeks to gain a more thorough understanding of why these 
incidents take place, and the context surrounding them. Based on the 
recent trends and the modicum of previous research, it is expected the 
current study would make a large contribution to what is currently 
known about these attacks, and would play a substantial role in the 
preparedness, prevention, and mitigation of these incidents by 
informing those who develop training and operational practices.
    This mixed method research effort will use the Perpetrator-Motive 
Research Design (PMRD). PMRD is a 12-step methodological design that 
focuses on gaining a thorough understanding of the motivations of 
offenders. Interviewing incarcerated offenders allows for increased 
accessibility, increased sample size, interviewer security, and 
avoidance of ethical or potential legal entanglements which 
interviewers might be exposed to while questioning offenders still at 
large or whose cases have not yet exhausted the criminal legal process. 
Because PMRD is suited to identify and understand offender motives, the 
findings can be used in the development of training interventions for 
law enforcement officials which could improve officer safety. As part 
of the study, researchers will also seek to examine the incident 
reports associated with the assaults and the FBI criminal history 
record information of offenders. Researchers will also seek to obtain, 
examine, and use any body-worn camera or dashboard camera recordings 
associated with the assaults for research and training purposes.

Overview of This Information Collection

    1. Type of Information Collection: New Collection.
    2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Under Attack: Assaults on Our 
Nation's Law Enforcement.
    3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of 
the Department sponsoring the collection: There is no form number. The 
forms are titled ``Officer Protocol Questionnaire'' and ``Offender 
Protocol Questionnaire''/FBI CJIS Division.
    4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as 
well as the obligation to respond: State, local, and tribal 
governments. The obligation to respond is voluntary.
    5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of 
time estimated for an average respondent to respond: A total of 120 
respondents. The time per response will be 2 hours per survey. Each 
participant will fill out either the officer form or the offender form. 
One questionnaire per respondent. The estimated response time will be 2 
hours per respondent.
    6. An estimate of the total annual burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection: This is not an annual collection. This is a one-
time study.
    7. An estimate of the total annual cost burden associated with the 
collection, if applicable: $0.

                                                                   Total Burden Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                               Time per
                    Activity                      Number of                     Frequency                     Total annual     response    Total annual
                                                 respondents                                                    responses      (hours)    burden (hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Officer Protocol Questionnaire.................           60  1 per respondent.............................              60            2             120
Offender Protocol Questionnaire................           60  1 per respondent.............................              60            2             120
                                                --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Unduplicated Totals........................          120  1 per respondent.............................             120  ...........             240
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If additional information is required contact: Darwin Arceo, 
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, 
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two 
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC.

    Dated: November 21, 2023.
Darwin Arceo,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2023-26091 Filed 11-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.