Privacy Act Regulations for EPA-83, 80139-80141 [2023-24669]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
New Jersey. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L60 (a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative via VHF channel 16 or by
phone at (718) 354–4353 (Sector New
York Command Center). Those in the
safety zone must comply with all lawful
orders or directions given to them by the
COTP or the COTP’s designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
is effective from December 1, 2023,
through December 31, 2024, but will
only be enforced during periods when
heavy lift operations at the new bridge
are in progress.
Zeita Merchant,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2023–25447 Filed 11–16–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
AGENCY:
40 CFR Part 16
[EPA–HQ–OMS–2019–0371; FRL–10082–04–
OMS]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
2. Add § 165.T01–0286 to read as
follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 165.T01–0286 Safety Zone; Shrewsbury
River, S–32 Bridge, Boroughs of Rumson
and Sea Bright, NJ.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Shrewsbury River, within a 100-yard
radius of the center point of the S–32
Bridge, County Route 520 (Rumson
Road) in the boroughs of Rumson and
Sea Bright, New Jersey.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, Designated Representative
means a Coast Guard Officer, including
a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or
other officer operating a Coast Guard
vessel and a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port New York (COTP) in
the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, no person or vessel may enter
the safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port (COTP) or the
COTP’s designated representative.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Nov 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Goldsby, Personnel Security Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
William Jefferson Clinton North
Building, Mail code 3206A, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number, (202)
564–1569; email address,
Goldsby.John@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Privacy Act Regulations for EPA–83
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
The EPA is publishing this rule
without a prior proposed rule because
we view this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipate no adverse
comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of this issue of the
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule to exempt a new system
of records, EPA–83, the Personnel
Security System (PSS) 2.0, from certain
requirements of the Privacy Act if
adverse comments are received on this
direct final rule. We will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. For further
information about commenting on this
rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this
document.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or Agency) is taking direct
final action to revise the Agency’s
Privacy Act regulations to exempt a
modified system of records, EPA–83, the
Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0,
from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act because of the data sensitivity
contained within an insider threat
inquiry. A lack of protection of these
data could jeopardize the insider threat
inquiry or additional investigations if
warranted.
DATES: This rule is effective on January
16, 2024, without further notice unless
EPA receives adverse comment by
December 18, 2023. If EPA receives
adverse comment, it will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OMS–2019–0371, at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
SUMMARY:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
80139
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. General Information
The EPA published a Privacy Act
system of records notice for PSS 2.0 (85
FR 32380, May 29, 2020) to replace PSS
1.0, which was a module of the Office
of Administrative Services Information
System (OASIS, EPA–41), and create a
stand-alone system. The Personnel
Security Branch (PSB) plans to update
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
80140
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
PSS with a new module focused on
providing the agency with insider threat
inquiry management and coordination
capabilities. The PSS 2.0 supports the
PSB with tracking the documentation
associated with background
investigations for Federal and nonFederal personnel working for EPA.
This includes reporting requirements
that meet the Security Executive Agent
Directive (SEAD) 3, which establishes
reporting requirements for all ‘‘covered
individuals’’ who have access to
classified information or who hold a
sensitive position. Access to the system
is restricted to authorized users and PSS
is maintained in a secure, password
protected computer system, in secure
areas and buildings with physical access
controls and environmental controls. In
the performance of their official duties,
EPA federal personnel must input and
manage Sensitive Personally Identifiable
Information (such as social security
number) and Personally Identifiable
Information (such as home address and
email address). All personnel are
required to take annual Information
Technology Security and Privacy
Training to ensure the proper handling
and management of Sensitive Personally
Identifiable Information (SPII) and
Personally Identifiable Information (PII).
The data is required in the system to
start the onboarding process and to
manage personnel through lifecycle
activity at EPA (such as background
investigations). PSS 2.0 displays a
reminder about the appropriate PII and
SPII handling procedures every time a
user begins to enter data for a new
background investigation. Additionally,
PSS will include a module dedicated
specifically for insider threat inquiry
management and coordination. This
module will contain details of insider
threat inquiries, including the names
and identifiers of personnel involved in
such inquiries.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and
(k)(5), an individual’s request for access
to his or her record may be exempt from
specific access and accounting
provisions of the Privacy Act where the
‘‘investigatory material [was] compiled
for law enforcement purposes’’. See 40
CFR 16.12. Note that the (k)(5)
exemption applies only to access
requests for background investigation
records that would identify a
confidential source. Under 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5), EPA is
proposing to exempt the PSS 2.0 from
the following provisions of the Privacy
Act of 1974 as amended; 5 U.S.C. 552a;
(d); (e)(1); (e)(4) (G), (H), and (I); and
(f)(2) through (5) for the following
reasons:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Nov 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
(1) From subsection 552a(c)(3),
because making available to a named
individual an accounting of disclosures
of records concerning him/her/them
could reveal investigative interest on the
part of EPA and/or the Department of
Justice. This could allow record subjects
to impede the investigation, e.g., destroy
evidence, intimidate potential
witnesses, or flee the area to avoid
inquiries or apprehension by law
enforcement personnel. Further, such a
disclosure could reveal the identity of a
confidential source and hamper the
Agency’s investigation.
(2) From subsection 552a(c)(4), which
concerns providing notice to others
regarding corrections or disputed
information in accordance with
subsection (d) of the Privacy Act,
because no access to these records is
available under subsection (d) of the
Act.
(3) From subsection 552a(d), which
requires an agency to permit an
individual to access, contest or request
amendment of records pertaining to
him/her/them, because the records
contained in this system relate to
official Federal investigations.
Individual access to these records could
compromise ongoing investigations,
reveal confidential informants and/or
sensitive investigative techniques used
in particular investigations, or
constitute unwarranted invasions of the
personal privacy of third parties who
are involved in a certain investigation.
(4) From subsections 552a(e)(1) and
(e)(5), which require an agency to
collect/maintain only accurate and
relevant information about an
individual, because the accuracy or
relevance of information obtained in the
course of a law enforcement
investigation is not always known when
collected. Material that may seem
unrelated, irrelevant, or incomplete
when collected may take on added
meaning or significance as the
investigation progresses. Also, in the
interest of effective law enforcement, it
is appropriate to retain all information
that may aid in establishing patterns of
criminal activity. Therefore, it would
impede the investigative process if it
were necessary to assure the relevance,
accuracy, timeliness and completeness
of all information obtained.
(5) From subsections 552a(e)(4)(G)
and (H), which require an agency to
publish—in the Federal Register—
procedures concerning access to
records, because no access to these
records is available under subsection (d)
of the Privacy Act, for the reasons
explained above in the discussion of
subsection (d).
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(6) From subsections 552a(f)(2), (f)(3),
(f)(4), and (f)(5), concerning agency rules
for obtaining access to records under
subsection (d), because this system is
exempt from the access and amendment
provisions of subsection (d). Since EPA
is claiming that this system of records
is exempt from subsection (d) of the Act,
concerning access to records, the
requirements of subsections (f)(2)
through (5) of the Act, concerning
agency rules for obtaining access to such
records, are inapplicable and are
exempted to the extent that this system
of records is exempted from subsection
(d) of the Act.
(7) From subsection 552a(I),
concerning agency rules for use of
records from another agency under a
matching program. Such documents are
owned by and the responsibility of the
source agency, and only that source
agency can share or release the
information.
Note that the (k)(5) exemption applies
only to access requests for background
investigation records that would
identify a confidential source.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action was submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and reviewed without
comment.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. This action contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the PRA.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
K. The Congressional Review Act
This rule is exempt from the
Congressional Review Act (CRA)
because it is a rule of agency
organization, procedure or practice that
does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
Jkt 262001
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 16 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 16
continues to read as follows:
■
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
17:44 Nov 16, 2023
Kimberly Y. Patrick,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Mission Support.
PART 16—IMPLEMENTATION OF
PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
VerDate Sep<11>2014
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 16
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Government employees, Privacy.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552a (as revised).
2. Amend § 16.12 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(4)(i)
and (iii), (a)(5) introductory text, and
(b)(1);
■ b. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(iii); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (b)(5)
introductory text.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 16.12
Specific exemptions.
(a) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i)
EPA–17 Online Criminal Enforcement
Activities Network (OCEAN).
(ii) EPA–21 External Compliance Case
Tracking System (EXCATS).
(iii) EPA–30 Inspector General
Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Hotline Module.
(iv) EPA–40 Inspector General
Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Investigative Module.
(v) EPA–63 eDiscovery Enterprise
Tool Suite.
(vi) EPA–79 NEIC Master Tracking
System.
(vii) EPA–83 Personnel Security
System (PSS) 2.0.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) EPA systems of records 17, 30, 40,
63, and 79 are exempted from the
following provisions of the PA, subject
to the limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d);
(e)(1), (4)(G) and (4)(H); and (f)(2)
through (5). EPA system of records 21 is
exempt from the following provisions of
the PA, subject to limitations set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d), and (e)(1). EPA system of
records 83 is exempt from the following
provisions of the PA, subject to the
limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(d); (e)(1);
(e)(4)(G), (4)(H) and (4)(I); and (f)(2)
through (5).
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
80141
(iii) EPA–83 Personnel Security
System (PSS) 2.0 is exempted under 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA
systems of records 17, 21, 30, 40, 63, 79,
and 83 are exempted from the
provisions of the PA in paragraph (a)(4)
of this section for the following reasons:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i)
EPA 36 Research Grant, Cooperative
Agreement, and Fellowship Application
Files.
(ii) EPA 40 Inspector General’s
Operation and Reporting (IGOR) System
Personnel Security Files.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(iii) EPA 83 is exempted from the
following provisions of the PA, subject
to the limitations of 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(k)(5): 5 U.S.C. 552a(d); (e)(1);
(e)(4)(G), (4)(H) and (4)(I); and (f)(2)
through (5).
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA 36,
40, 83, and 100 are exempted from the
above provisions of the PA for the
following reasons:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–24669 Filed 11–16–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 424 and 455
[CMS–6084–F]
RIN 0938–AU90
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
Disclosures of Ownership and
Additional Disclosable Parties
Information for Skilled Nursing
Facilities and Nursing Facilities;
Medicare Providers’ and Suppliers’
Disclosure of Private Equity
Companies and Real Estate Investment
Trusts
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule will implement
portions of section 6101 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Affordable Care Act), which require the
disclosure of certain ownership,
managerial, and other information
regarding Medicare skilled nursing
facilities (SNFs) and Medicaid nursing
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80139-80141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24669]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 16
[EPA-HQ-OMS-2019-0371; FRL-10082-04-OMS]
Privacy Act Regulations for EPA-83
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is taking
direct final action to revise the Agency's Privacy Act regulations to
exempt a modified system of records, EPA-83, the Personnel Security
System (PSS) 2.0, from certain requirements of the Privacy Act because
of the data sensitivity contained within an insider threat inquiry. A
lack of protection of these data could jeopardize the insider threat
inquiry or additional investigations if warranted.
DATES: This rule is effective on January 16, 2024, without further
notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by December 18, 2023. If EPA
receives adverse comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OMS-2019-0371, at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Goldsby, Personnel Security
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, William Jefferson Clinton
North Building, Mail code 3206A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number, (202) 564-1569; email address,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
The EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no
adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this
issue of the Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposed rule to exempt a new system of records,
EPA-83, the Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0, from certain
requirements of the Privacy Act if adverse comments are received on
this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
II. General Information
The EPA published a Privacy Act system of records notice for PSS
2.0 (85 FR 32380, May 29, 2020) to replace PSS 1.0, which was a module
of the Office of Administrative Services Information System (OASIS,
EPA-41), and create a stand-alone system. The Personnel Security Branch
(PSB) plans to update
[[Page 80140]]
PSS with a new module focused on providing the agency with insider
threat inquiry management and coordination capabilities. The PSS 2.0
supports the PSB with tracking the documentation associated with
background investigations for Federal and non-Federal personnel working
for EPA. This includes reporting requirements that meet the Security
Executive Agent Directive (SEAD) 3, which establishes reporting
requirements for all ``covered individuals'' who have access to
classified information or who hold a sensitive position. Access to the
system is restricted to authorized users and PSS is maintained in a
secure, password protected computer system, in secure areas and
buildings with physical access controls and environmental controls. In
the performance of their official duties, EPA federal personnel must
input and manage Sensitive Personally Identifiable Information (such as
social security number) and Personally Identifiable Information (such
as home address and email address). All personnel are required to take
annual Information Technology Security and Privacy Training to ensure
the proper handling and management of Sensitive Personally Identifiable
Information (SPII) and Personally Identifiable Information (PII). The
data is required in the system to start the onboarding process and to
manage personnel through lifecycle activity at EPA (such as background
investigations). PSS 2.0 displays a reminder about the appropriate PII
and SPII handling procedures every time a user begins to enter data for
a new background investigation. Additionally, PSS will include a module
dedicated specifically for insider threat inquiry management and
coordination. This module will contain details of insider threat
inquiries, including the names and identifiers of personnel involved in
such inquiries.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) and (k)(5), an individual's request
for access to his or her record may be exempt from specific access and
accounting provisions of the Privacy Act where the ``investigatory
material [was] compiled for law enforcement purposes''. See 40 CFR
16.12. Note that the (k)(5) exemption applies only to access requests
for background investigation records that would identify a confidential
source. Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(5), EPA is proposing
to exempt the PSS 2.0 from the following provisions of the Privacy Act
of 1974 as amended; 5 U.S.C. 552a; (d); (e)(1); (e)(4) (G), (H), and
(I); and (f)(2) through (5) for the following reasons:
(1) From subsection 552a(c)(3), because making available to a named
individual an accounting of disclosures of records concerning him/her/
them could reveal investigative interest on the part of EPA and/or the
Department of Justice. This could allow record subjects to impede the
investigation, e.g., destroy evidence, intimidate potential witnesses,
or flee the area to avoid inquiries or apprehension by law enforcement
personnel. Further, such a disclosure could reveal the identity of a
confidential source and hamper the Agency's investigation.
(2) From subsection 552a(c)(4), which concerns providing notice to
others regarding corrections or disputed information in accordance with
subsection (d) of the Privacy Act, because no access to these records
is available under subsection (d) of the Act.
(3) From subsection 552a(d), which requires an agency to permit an
individual to access, contest or request amendment of records
pertaining to him/her/them, because the records contained in this
system relate to official Federal investigations. Individual access to
these records could compromise ongoing investigations, reveal
confidential informants and/or sensitive investigative techniques used
in particular investigations, or constitute unwarranted invasions of
the personal privacy of third parties who are involved in a certain
investigation.
(4) From subsections 552a(e)(1) and (e)(5), which require an agency
to collect/maintain only accurate and relevant information about an
individual, because the accuracy or relevance of information obtained
in the course of a law enforcement investigation is not always known
when collected. Material that may seem unrelated, irrelevant, or
incomplete when collected may take on added meaning or significance as
the investigation progresses. Also, in the interest of effective law
enforcement, it is appropriate to retain all information that may aid
in establishing patterns of criminal activity. Therefore, it would
impede the investigative process if it were necessary to assure the
relevance, accuracy, timeliness and completeness of all information
obtained.
(5) From subsections 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H), which require an agency
to publish--in the Federal Register--procedures concerning access to
records, because no access to these records is available under
subsection (d) of the Privacy Act, for the reasons explained above in
the discussion of subsection (d).
(6) From subsections 552a(f)(2), (f)(3), (f)(4), and (f)(5),
concerning agency rules for obtaining access to records under
subsection (d), because this system is exempt from the access and
amendment provisions of subsection (d). Since EPA is claiming that this
system of records is exempt from subsection (d) of the Act, concerning
access to records, the requirements of subsections (f)(2) through (5)
of the Act, concerning agency rules for obtaining access to such
records, are inapplicable and are exempted to the extent that this
system of records is exempted from subsection (d) of the Act.
(7) From subsection 552a(I), concerning agency rules for use of
records from another agency under a matching program. Such documents
are owned by and the responsibility of the source agency, and only that
source agency can share or release the information.
Note that the (k)(5) exemption applies only to access requests for
background investigation records that would identify a confidential
source.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and reviewed without comment.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the PRA.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments.
[[Page 80141]]
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
K. The Congressional Review Act
This rule is exempt from the Congressional Review Act (CRA) because
it is a rule of agency organization, procedure or practice that does
not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 16
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Government employees, Privacy.
Kimberly Y. Patrick,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Mission Support.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part
16 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 16--IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
1. The authority citation for part 16 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552a (as revised).
0
2. Amend Sec. 16.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(4)(i) and (iii), (a)(5) introductory
text, and (b)(1);
0
b. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(iii); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (b)(5) introductory text.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 16.12 Specific exemptions.
(a) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i) EPA-17 Online Criminal
Enforcement Activities Network (OCEAN).
(ii) EPA-21 External Compliance Case Tracking System (EXCATS).
(iii) EPA-30 Inspector General Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Hotline Module.
(iv) EPA-40 Inspector General Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Investigative Module.
(v) EPA-63 eDiscovery Enterprise Tool Suite.
(vi) EPA-79 NEIC Master Tracking System.
(vii) EPA-83 Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) EPA systems of records 17, 30, 40, 63, and 79 are exempted from
the following provisions of the PA, subject to the limitations set
forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (4)(G)
and (4)(H); and (f)(2) through (5). EPA system of records 21 is exempt
from the following provisions of the PA, subject to limitations set
forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), and (e)(1). EPA
system of records 83 is exempt from the following provisions of the PA,
subject to the limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C.
552a(d); (e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (4)(H) and (4)(I); and (f)(2) through (5).
* * * * *
(iii) EPA-83 Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0 is exempted under
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA systems of records 17, 21, 30, 40,
63, 79, and 83 are exempted from the provisions of the PA in paragraph
(a)(4) of this section for the following reasons:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i) EPA 36 Research Grant,
Cooperative Agreement, and Fellowship Application Files.
(ii) EPA 40 Inspector General's Operation and Reporting (IGOR)
System Personnel Security Files.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) EPA 83 is exempted from the following provisions of the PA,
subject to the limitations of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(k)(5): 5 U.S.C. 552a(d);
(e)(1); (e)(4)(G), (4)(H) and (4)(I); and (f)(2) through (5).
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA 36, 40, 83, and 100 are exempted
from the above provisions of the PA for the following reasons:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-24669 Filed 11-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P