Privacy Act Regulations for EPA-83, 80220-80222 [2023-24668]
Download as PDF
80220
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Proposed Rules
the result of the difficulty in IOCS
sampling in rural areas. Id. at 9–10.
Impact. The Postal Service asserts that
its proposal will result in ‘‘an overall
decrease of approximately $163 million
in attributable costs due to the
reformulation of the cost components,’’
mostly ‘‘due to the new Other
Supervisors costs component, which if
implemented would be classified as
institutional.’’ Id. at 10. Overall, the
proposal will result in a decrease in unit
costs for most product classes, except
for Market Dominant Services. Id. at 10–
11.
III. Notice and Comment
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2024–1 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition. More
information on the Petition may be
accessed via the Commission’s website
at https://www.prc.gov. Interested
persons may submit comments on the
Petition and Proposal Seven no later
than December 18, 2023. Pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 505, Almaroof Agoro is
designated as an officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public in this proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2024–1 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Proposed Changes in Analytical
Principles (Proposal Seven), filed
November 8, 2023.
2. Comments by interested persons in
this proceeding are due no later than
December 18, 2023.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Almaroof Agoro
to serve as an officer of the Commission
(Public Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this Order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023–25430 Filed 11–16–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OMS–2019–0371; FRL–10082–03–
OMS]
Privacy Act Regulations for EPA–83
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or Agency) is proposing to
revise the Agency’s Privacy Act
regulations to exempt a system of
records, EPA–83, the Personnel Security
System (PSS) 2.0, from certain
requirements of the Privacy Act because
the system will contain information
relevant to insider threat inquiries and
background investigations. If such
information is not kept confidential, it
could jeopardize EPA or a referring
agency’s ability to conduct background
investigations, insider threat inquiries,
or any related inquiries. In the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register, EPA is simultaneously
publishing the revision of the Agency’s
Privacy Act Regulations to include
EPA–83 as a direct final rule without a
prior proposed rule. If the Agency
receives no adverse comment, it will not
take further action on this proposed
rule.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before December 18, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OMS–2019–0371, at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
DATES:
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
John
Goldsby, Personnel Security Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency,
William Jefferson Clinton North
Building, Mail Code 3206A, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564–1569; email address:
Goldsby.John@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
40 CFR Part 16
PO 00000
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Sfmt 4702
I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed
rule?
The EPA proposes to revise the
Agency’s Privacy Act regulations in
order to exempt a system of records,
EPA–83, the Personnel Security System
(PSS) 2.0, from certain requirements of
the Privacy Act. The EPA has published
a direct final rule exempting this system
of records in the ‘‘Rules and
Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register because it views this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipates
no adverse comment. EPA explains its
reasons for the direct final rule in the
preamble to that rule. If EPA receives no
adverse comment, it will not take
further action on this proposed rule. If
EPA receives adverse comment, it will
withdraw the direct final rule and the
rule will not take effect. EPA will
address public comments in any
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA does not intend to
institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For
further information, please see the
information provided in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
II. General Information
The EPA published a Privacy Act
system of records notice for information
collected and maintained in the
Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0 (85
FR 32380, May 29, 2020), and a Notice
of a Modified System of Records
concurrently with this proposed rule.
PSS 2.0 supports the Personnel Security
Branch (PSB) with tracking the
documentation associated with
background investigations for Federal
and non-Federal personnel working for
EPA. PSS 2.0 contains investigatory
material compiled for the purpose of
determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, Federal contracts, or
access to classified information.
Additionally, the PSB plans to update
PSS 2.0 with a new module focused on
providing the agency with insider threat
inquiry management and coordination
capabilities. The Insider Threat Program
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Proposed Rules
module will contain information
relevant to insider threat inquiries on
cleared individuals with access to EPA
resources, including facilities,
information, equipment, networks, and
systems. At a later date, and once
relevant authorities are updated, the
insider threat module will also contain
information on uncleared individuals
with access to EPA resources.
Information maintained in the Insider
Threat Program module may be directly
collected by EPA’s Office of Homeland
Security (OHS) or may be obtained by
OHS from law enforcement agencies or
systems. Specifically, OHS will use the
module to detect, deter, and mitigate
potential insider threats before they
harm national security. OHS will collect
and maintain information in the module
to identify potential insider threats,
which may form the predicate of law
enforcement investigations conducted
by other law enforcement entities.
Further, if an inquiry uncovers insider
threat indicators, OHS may share
relevant data from the module with
authorized law enforcement
organizations, like EPA’s Office of
Inspector General or the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, for those organizations
to conduct any necessary investigations.
Pursuant to the Privacy Act, when
information is maintained for the
purpose of civil actions, the relevant
provision of the Privacy Act is 5 U.S.C.
552a(d)(5) which states ‘‘nothing in this
[Act] shall allow an individual access to
any information compiled in reasonable
anticipation of a civil action or
proceeding.’’ 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5).
In addition, section (k)(2) of the
Privacy Act provides that the head of an
agency may promulgate regulations to
exempt the system from certain
provisions of the Act if the system ‘‘is
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes, other than
material within the scope of subsection
(j)(2)’’ of 5 U.S.C. 552a. Accordingly,
EPA proposes to exempt all such
records in the PSS 2.0 system (including
certain background investigation
records and records maintained in the
Insider Threat module) from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3); (d); and (e)(1);) for the
following reasons:
(1) From subsection 552a(c)(3),
because making available to a named
individual an accounting of disclosures
of records concerning him/her/them
would alert the subjects of an
investigation or inquiry to the existence
of the investigation or inquiry. This
could allow record subjects to impede
the inquiry, e.g., destroy evidence,
intimidate potential witnesses, or flee
the area to avoid inquiries or
apprehension by law enforcement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
personnel. Further, such a disclosure
could reveal the identity of a
confidential source and hamper the
Agency’s inquiry.
(2) From subsection 552(d), which
requires an agency to permit an
individual to gain access to records
pertaining to him/her/them, to request
amendment to such records, to request
a review of an agency decision not to
amend such records, and to contest the
information contained in such records.
Granting requesters access to
information compiled for insider threat
inquiries, PSS 2.0 background
investigation information compiled to
investigate personnel/an applicant that
is/would be responsible for law
enforcement and/or national security
matters, or other PSS 2.0 information
related to such insider threat inquiries
or background investigations could
inform the subject of an investigation/
inquiry of an actual or potential
criminal violation, of the existence of
that investigation/inquiry, of the nature
and scope of the information or
evidence obtained as to their activities,
and of the identity of confidential
sources, witnesses, and law enforcement
personnel. Such a disclosure could
enable the subject to avoid detection or
apprehension. Specifically, granting
access to such information could
seriously impede or compromise an
investigation or inquiry; endanger the
physical safety of confidential sources,
witnesses, law enforcement personnel
and their families; lead to the improper
influencing of witnesses, the destruction
of evidence, or the fabrication of
testimony; and could disclose sensitive
or confidential investigative techniques
and procedures.
(3) From subsections 552a(e)(1),
which requires an agency to collect/
maintain only information about an
individual that is relevant and necessary
to accomplish a purpose of the Agency,
because the relevance of information
obtained in the course of a background
investigation or insider threat inquiry is
not always known when collected.
Material that may seem unrelated, or
irrelevant when collected may take on
added meaning or significance as the
inquiry progresses. Also, it is
appropriate to retain all information that
may aid in establishing patterns of
illegal or insider threat activity.
Therefore, it would impede the inquiry
process if it were necessary to assure the
relevance of all information obtained at
the time of collection.
Additionally, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(5), an individual’s request for
access to his or her or their record(s)
may be exempt from specific access
provisions of the Privacy Act where the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
80221
information is investigatory material
compiled solely for the purpose of
determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, military service, Federal
contracts, or access to classified
information if disclosure of such
material would reveal the identity of a
confidential source who furnished
information to the Government under an
express promise that the source’s
identity would be kept confidential.
Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), EPA is
proposing to exempt such materials
stored in PSS 2.0 from 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(c)(3) and (d) for the following
reason(s):
(1) From subsection 552a(c)(3),
because an accounting of disclosures of
records concerning the record subject
may contain information about the
identity of a confidential source, and if
the Agency was required to disclose this
information to the record subject, such
a disclosure would reveal the identity of
the confidential source, endangering the
physical safety of the confidential
source. Further, such a disclosure could
allow record subjects to impede a
background investigation or insider
threat inquiry by contacting and
intimidating confidential sources and
those that are potential witnesses.
(2) From subsection 552a(d), which
requires an agency to permit an
individual to gain access to records
pertaining to him/her/them, to request
amendment to such records, to request
a review of an agency decision not to
amend such records, and to contest the
information contained in such records.
Granting such access could cause the
identity of a confidential source to be
revealed, endangering the physical
safety of the confidential source, and
could impair the ability of the EPA to
compile, in the future, investigatory
material for the purpose of determining
suitability, eligibility, or qualifications
for Federal civilian employment,
Federal contracts, or access to classified
information.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is being submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
80222
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Proposed Rules
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. This action contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the PRA.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
17:48 Nov 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 16
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Government employees, Privacy.
Kimberly Y. Patrick,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Mission Support.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 16 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 16—IMPLEMENTATION OF
PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1. The authority citation for part 16
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552a (as revised).
2. Amend § 16.12 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(4)(i),
(a)(5) introductory text, and (b)(1);
■ b. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(iii); and
■ c. Revising paragraph (b)(5)
introductory text.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
§ 16.12
Specific exemptions.
(a) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i)
EPA–17 Online Criminal Enforcement
Activities Network (OCEAN).
(ii) EPA–21 External Compliance Case
Tracking System (EXCATS).
(iii) EPA–30 Inspector General
Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Hotline Module.
(iv) EPA–40 Inspector General
Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Investigative Module.
(v) EPA–63 eDiscovery Enterprise
Tool Suite.
(vi) EPA–79 NEIC Master Tracking
System.
(vii) EPA–100 OIG Data Analytics
Enterprise.
(viii) EPA–83 Personnel Security
System (PSS) 2.0.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) * * *
(i) EPA systems of records 17, 30, 40,
63, 79, and 100 are exempted from the
following provisions of the PA, subject
to the limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); and
(e)(1). EPA system of records 21 is
exempt from the following provisions of
the PA, subject to limitations set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C
552a(c)(3), (d), and (e)(1). EPA system of
records 83 is exempt from the following
provisions of the PA, subject to the
limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); and
(e)(1).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA
systems of records 17, 21, 30, 40, 63, 79,
83, and 100 are exempted from the
provisions of the PA in paragraph (a)(4)
of this section for the following reasons:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i)
EPA 36 Research Grant, Cooperative
Agreement, and Fellowship Application
Files.
(ii) EPA 40 Inspector General
Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Investigative Module.
(iii) EPA 83 Personnel Security
System (PSS) 2.0.
(iv) EPA 100 OIG Data Analytics
Enterprise.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(iii) EPA 83 is exempted from the
following provisions of the PA, subject
to the limitations of 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(k)(5): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), and (d).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA 36,
40, 83, and 100 are exempted from the
above provisions of the PA for the
following reasons:
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–24668 Filed 11–16–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 355
[EPA–HQ–OLEM–2023–0142; FRL–10285–
01–OLEM]
RIN 2050–AH31
Potential Future Regulation for
Emergency Release Notification
Requirements for Animal Waste Air
Emissions Under the Emergency
Planning and Community Right-toKnow Act (EPCRA)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 80220-80222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24668]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 16
[EPA-HQ-OMS-2019-0371; FRL-10082-03-OMS]
Privacy Act Regulations for EPA-83
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is
proposing to revise the Agency's Privacy Act regulations to exempt a
system of records, EPA-83, the Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0,
from certain requirements of the Privacy Act because the system will
contain information relevant to insider threat inquiries and background
investigations. If such information is not kept confidential, it could
jeopardize EPA or a referring agency's ability to conduct background
investigations, insider threat inquiries, or any related inquiries. In
the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is
simultaneously publishing the revision of the Agency's Privacy Act
Regulations to include EPA-83 as a direct final rule without a prior
proposed rule. If the Agency receives no adverse comment, it will not
take further action on this proposed rule.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 18, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OMS-2019-0371, at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Goldsby, Personnel Security
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, William Jefferson Clinton
North Building, Mail Code 3206A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564-1569; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is EPA issuing this proposed rule?
The EPA proposes to revise the Agency's Privacy Act regulations in
order to exempt a system of records, EPA-83, the Personnel Security
System (PSS) 2.0, from certain requirements of the Privacy Act. The EPA
has published a direct final rule exempting this system of records in
the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register because
it views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse
comment. EPA explains its reasons for the direct final rule in the
preamble to that rule. If EPA receives no adverse comment, it will not
take further action on this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse
comment, it will withdraw the direct final rule and the rule will not
take effect. EPA will address public comments in any subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. EPA does not intend to institute a
second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For further information, please see
the information provided in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
II. General Information
The EPA published a Privacy Act system of records notice for
information collected and maintained in the Personnel Security System
(PSS) 2.0 (85 FR 32380, May 29, 2020), and a Notice of a Modified
System of Records concurrently with this proposed rule. PSS 2.0
supports the Personnel Security Branch (PSB) with tracking the
documentation associated with background investigations for Federal and
non-Federal personnel working for EPA. PSS 2.0 contains investigatory
material compiled for the purpose of determining suitability,
eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment, Federal
contracts, or access to classified information. Additionally, the PSB
plans to update PSS 2.0 with a new module focused on providing the
agency with insider threat inquiry management and coordination
capabilities. The Insider Threat Program
[[Page 80221]]
module will contain information relevant to insider threat inquiries on
cleared individuals with access to EPA resources, including facilities,
information, equipment, networks, and systems. At a later date, and
once relevant authorities are updated, the insider threat module will
also contain information on uncleared individuals with access to EPA
resources. Information maintained in the Insider Threat Program module
may be directly collected by EPA's Office of Homeland Security (OHS) or
may be obtained by OHS from law enforcement agencies or systems.
Specifically, OHS will use the module to detect, deter, and mitigate
potential insider threats before they harm national security. OHS will
collect and maintain information in the module to identify potential
insider threats, which may form the predicate of law enforcement
investigations conducted by other law enforcement entities. Further, if
an inquiry uncovers insider threat indicators, OHS may share relevant
data from the module with authorized law enforcement organizations,
like EPA's Office of Inspector General or the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, for those organizations to conduct any necessary
investigations.
Pursuant to the Privacy Act, when information is maintained for the
purpose of civil actions, the relevant provision of the Privacy Act is
5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5) which states ``nothing in this [Act] shall allow an
individual access to any information compiled in reasonable
anticipation of a civil action or proceeding.'' 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(5).
In addition, section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act provides that the
head of an agency may promulgate regulations to exempt the system from
certain provisions of the Act if the system ``is investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the
scope of subsection (j)(2)'' of 5 U.S.C. 552a. Accordingly, EPA
proposes to exempt all such records in the PSS 2.0 system (including
certain background investigation records and records maintained in the
Insider Threat module) from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); and (e)(1);) for
the following reasons:
(1) From subsection 552a(c)(3), because making available to a named
individual an accounting of disclosures of records concerning him/her/
them would alert the subjects of an investigation or inquiry to the
existence of the investigation or inquiry. This could allow record
subjects to impede the inquiry, e.g., destroy evidence, intimidate
potential witnesses, or flee the area to avoid inquiries or
apprehension by law enforcement personnel. Further, such a disclosure
could reveal the identity of a confidential source and hamper the
Agency's inquiry.
(2) From subsection 552(d), which requires an agency to permit an
individual to gain access to records pertaining to him/her/them, to
request amendment to such records, to request a review of an agency
decision not to amend such records, and to contest the information
contained in such records. Granting requesters access to information
compiled for insider threat inquiries, PSS 2.0 background investigation
information compiled to investigate personnel/an applicant that is/
would be responsible for law enforcement and/or national security
matters, or other PSS 2.0 information related to such insider threat
inquiries or background investigations could inform the subject of an
investigation/inquiry of an actual or potential criminal violation, of
the existence of that investigation/inquiry, of the nature and scope of
the information or evidence obtained as to their activities, and of the
identity of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement
personnel. Such a disclosure could enable the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension. Specifically, granting access to such
information could seriously impede or compromise an investigation or
inquiry; endanger the physical safety of confidential sources,
witnesses, law enforcement personnel and their families; lead to the
improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the
fabrication of testimony; and could disclose sensitive or confidential
investigative techniques and procedures.
(3) From subsections 552a(e)(1), which requires an agency to
collect/maintain only information about an individual that is relevant
and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the Agency, because the
relevance of information obtained in the course of a background
investigation or insider threat inquiry is not always known when
collected. Material that may seem unrelated, or irrelevant when
collected may take on added meaning or significance as the inquiry
progresses. Also, it is appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of illegal or insider threat activity.
Therefore, it would impede the inquiry process if it were necessary to
assure the relevance of all information obtained at the time of
collection.
Additionally, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), an individual's
request for access to his or her or their record(s) may be exempt from
specific access provisions of the Privacy Act where the information is
investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining
suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, military service, Federal contracts, or access to
classified information if disclosure of such material would reveal the
identity of a confidential source who furnished information to the
Government under an express promise that the source's identity would be
kept confidential. Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), EPA is proposing to
exempt such materials stored in PSS 2.0 from 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(c)(3) and
(d) for the following reason(s):
(1) From subsection 552a(c)(3), because an accounting of
disclosures of records concerning the record subject may contain
information about the identity of a confidential source, and if the
Agency was required to disclose this information to the record subject,
such a disclosure would reveal the identity of the confidential source,
endangering the physical safety of the confidential source. Further,
such a disclosure could allow record subjects to impede a background
investigation or insider threat inquiry by contacting and intimidating
confidential sources and those that are potential witnesses.
(2) From subsection 552a(d), which requires an agency to permit an
individual to gain access to records pertaining to him/her/them, to
request amendment to such records, to request a review of an agency
decision not to amend such records, and to contest the information
contained in such records. Granting such access could cause the
identity of a confidential source to be revealed, endangering the
physical safety of the confidential source, and could impair the
ability of the EPA to compile, in the future, investigatory material
for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for Federal civilian employment, Federal contracts, or
access to classified information.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is being submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review.
[[Page 80222]]
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the PRA.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 16
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Government employees, Privacy.
Kimberly Y. Patrick,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Mission Support.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part
16 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 16--IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
1. The authority citation for part 16 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552a (as revised).
0
2. Amend Sec. 16.12 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(4)(i), (a)(5) introductory text, and
(b)(1);
0
b. Adding paragraph (b)(4)(iii); and
0
c. Revising paragraph (b)(5) introductory text.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 16.12 Specific exemptions.
(a) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i) EPA-17 Online Criminal
Enforcement Activities Network (OCEAN).
(ii) EPA-21 External Compliance Case Tracking System (EXCATS).
(iii) EPA-30 Inspector General Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Hotline Module.
(iv) EPA-40 Inspector General Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Investigative Module.
(v) EPA-63 eDiscovery Enterprise Tool Suite.
(vi) EPA-79 NEIC Master Tracking System.
(vii) EPA-100 OIG Data Analytics Enterprise.
(viii) EPA-83 Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) EPA systems of records 17, 30, 40, 63, 79, and 100 are exempted
from the following provisions of the PA, subject to the limitations set
forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); and (e)(1). EPA
system of records 21 is exempt from the following provisions of the PA,
subject to limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C
552a(c)(3), (d), and (e)(1). EPA system of records 83 is exempt from
the following provisions of the PA, subject to the limitations set
forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); and (e)(1).
* * * * *
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA systems of records 17, 21, 30, 40,
63, 79, 83, and 100 are exempted from the provisions of the PA in
paragraph (a)(4) of this section for the following reasons:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Systems of records affected. (i) EPA 36 Research Grant,
Cooperative Agreement, and Fellowship Application Files.
(ii) EPA 40 Inspector General Enterprise Management System (IGEMS)
Investigative Module.
(iii) EPA 83 Personnel Security System (PSS) 2.0.
(iv) EPA 100 OIG Data Analytics Enterprise.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) EPA 83 is exempted from the following provisions of the PA,
subject to the limitations of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(k)(5): 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), and (d).
* * * * *
(5) Reasons for exemption. EPA 36, 40, 83, and 100 are exempted
from the above provisions of the PA for the following reasons:
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-24668 Filed 11-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P