Recruitment and Relocation Incentive Waivers, 78243-78249 [2023-25199]
Download as PDF
78243
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 219
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 575
[Docket ID: OPM–2023–0027]
RIN 3206–AO36
Recruitment and Relocation Incentive
Waivers
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing a
proposed rule to expand the authority to
approve waivers of the normal payment
limitations on recruitment and
relocation incentives. An expansion of
the waiver approval authority would
provide agencies with access to higher
payment limitations for these
flexibilities without requesting approval
from OPM. Under this proposed rule,
agencies would have the authority to
approve a recruitment or relocation
incentive of up to 50 percent of an
employee’s annual rate of basic pay
multiplied by the number of years in a
service agreement (not to exceed 100
percent of annual basic pay) based on a
critical agency need. In addition, this
proposed rule would give agencies
flexibility to set the length of the
required service period for recruitment
incentives to a period less than 6
months but not more than 4 years,
which would align the service
requirements for recruitment incentives
with those for relocation incentives and
provide agencies with additional
flexibility in taking advantage of this
incentive as a recruitment tool.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) number ‘‘3206–AO36’’
and title, using the following method:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
The general policy for comments and
other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene Holson by telephone at (202) 606–
2858 or by email at pay-leave-policy@
opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101 of the Federal Workforce
Flexibility Act of 2004 (Act) (Pub. L.
108–411, October 30, 2004) amended 5
U.S.C. 5753 and 5754 by providing
enhanced authorities to pay
recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentives. Congress originally provided
the authority to pay such incentives
under the Federal Employees Pay
Comparability Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–
509, November 5, 1990). In the 2004
Act, Congress expanded the
circumstances under which these
flexibilities may be paid and enabled
agencies to make the payments in more
ways to enhance their desired effect in
assisting Federal agencies’ efforts to
recruit and retain the kind of workforce
needed in the 21st century. OPM’s
regulations at 5 CFR part 575, subparts
A, B, and C, implement these
authorities. This rulemaking proposes
changes to the recruitment incentive
regulations at 5 CFR part 575, subpart A,
and relocation incentive regulations at 5
CFR part 575, subpart B, to provide
agencies additional payment options. To
differentiate these kinds of payments—
which are designed to provide a
monetary incentive for an individual to
accept a new position, as opposed to
rewarding an individual for quality of
performance (the typical context in
which the term ‘‘bonus’’ is used)—
OPM’s regulations use the term
‘‘incentive’’ in place of the term
‘‘bonus,’’ which is used in the statute.
Recruitment Incentives
Under 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5 CFR part
575, subpart A, an agency may pay a
recruitment incentive to an employee
newly appointed to a General Schedule
or other covered position in the Federal
service when the agency determines the
position is likely to be difficult to fill in
the absence of an incentive. The
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
employee must sign an agreement to
fulfill a period of service with the
agency. A recruitment incentive may
not exceed 25 percent of the employee’s
annual rate of basic pay in effect at the
beginning of the service period,
multiplied by the number of years
(including fractions of a year) in the
service period (not to exceed 4 years).
Currently, this cap may be increased to
up to 50 percent with OPM approval,
based on a critical agency need, as long
as the total incentive does not exceed
100 percent of the employee’s annual
rate of basic pay. A recruitment
incentive may be paid as an initial
lump-sum payment at the beginning of
the service period, in installments
throughout the service period, as a final
lump-sum payment upon completion of
the service period, or in a combination
of these methods. (See 5 CFR 575.109.)
Before paying a recruitment incentive,
an agency must establish a recruitment
incentive plan. (See 5 CFR 575.107(a).)
The plan must include the designation
of officials with authority to review and
approve the payment of recruitment
incentives, the designation of officials
with authority to waive the repayment
of a recruitment incentive, the
categories of employees who may not
receive recruitment incentives, the
required documentation for determining
that a position is likely to be difficult to
fill, requirements for determining the
amount of a recruitment incentive, the
payment methods that may be
authorized, requirements governing
service agreements (including criteria
for determining the length of a service
period, the conditions for terminating a
service agreement, and the obligations
of the agency and the employee if a
service agreement is terminated), and
documentation and recordkeeping
requirements. Unless the head of the
agency determines otherwise, an agency
recruitment incentive plan must apply
uniformly across the agency. (See 5 CFR
575.107(c).)
For each determination to pay a
recruitment incentive, an agency must
document, in writing, the basis for
determining that the position is likely to
be difficult to fill in the absence of a
recruitment incentive, the amount and
timing of the incentive payments, and
the length of the service period. The
determination to pay a recruitment
incentive must be made before the
prospective employee enters on duty in
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
78244
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
the position for which they are
recruited. The authorized agency official
must review and approve the
recruitment incentive determination
before the agency pays the incentive to
the employee. (See 5 CFR 575.107(b),
575.108.) Payment of a recruitment
incentive is subject to the aggregate
limitation on pay under 5 CFR part 530,
subpart B. (See 5 CFR 575.109(f).)
An agency may determine that a
position is likely to be difficult to fill if
the agency is likely to have difficulty
recruiting candidates with the
competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills,
abilities, behaviors, and other
characteristics) required for the position
(or group of positions) in the absence of
a recruitment incentive based on a
consideration of the factors listed in 5
CFR 575.106(b). An agency also may
determine that a position is likely to be
difficult to fill if OPM has approved the
use of a direct-hire authority applicable
to the position. (See 5 CFR 575.106(c).)
The use of recruitment incentives can
help agencies expand applicant pools to
include more diverse candidates.
Before receiving a recruitment
incentive, an employee must sign a
written agreement to complete a
specified period of employment with
the agency of not less than 6 months.
The service agreement must specify the
length, commencement date, and
termination date of the service period;
the total amount of the incentive; the
method, timing, and amounts of
incentive payments; the conditions
under which an agreement will be
terminated by the agency; any agency or
employee obligations if a service
agreement is terminated (including the
conditions under which the employee
must repay an incentive or under which
the agency must make additional
payments for partially completed
service); and any other terms and
conditions for receiving and retaining a
recruitment incentive. (See 5 CFR
575.110.) OPM has provided a fact sheet
with additional information on
recruitment incentives.1
Relocation Incentives
Under 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5 CFR part
575, subpart B, an agency may pay a
relocation incentive to a current
employee who must relocate to accept a
General Schedule or other covered
position in a different geographic area
(permanently or temporarily) if the
agency determines that the position is
likely be difficult to fill in the absence
1 Office of Personnel Management. ‘‘Fact Sheet:
Recruitment Incentives.’’ https://www.opm.gov/
policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitmentrelocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/
recruitment-incentives/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
of an incentive. (See 5 CFR 575.205(a).)
A relocation incentive may be paid only
when the employee’s rating of record
under an official performance appraisal
or evaluation system is at least ‘‘Fully
Successful’’ or equivalent. (See 5 CFR
575.205(c).) Like a recruitment
incentive, a relocation incentive may
not exceed 25 percent of the employee’s
annual rate of basic pay in effect at the
beginning of the service period
multiplied by the number of years
(including fractions of a year) in the
service period (not to exceed 4 years).
With OPM approval, this cap may be
raised to up to 50 percent (based on a
critical agency need), as long as the total
incentive does not exceed 100 percent
of the employee’s annual rate of basic
pay at the beginning of the service
period. The incentive may be paid as an
initial lump-sum payment at the
beginning of the service period, in
installments throughout the service
period, as a final lump-sum payment
upon completion of the service period,
or in a combination of these methods.
(See 5 CFR 575.209.)
Before paying a relocation incentive,
an agency must establish a relocation
incentive plan. A relocation incentive
plan must generally address the same
information required in a recruitment
incentive plan, as described above. (See
5 CFR 575.207.)
For each relocation incentive
authorized, an agency must document
in writing the justification for approving
the incentive that addresses factors
similar to those needed for recruitment
incentive authorizations, as described
above. The agency must also document
that the worksite of the new position is
in a different geographic area than the
previous position. The determination to
pay a relocation incentive must be made
before the employee enters on duty in
the position at the new duty station. The
authorized agency official must review
and approve the relocation incentive
determination before the agency pays
the incentive to the employee. (See 5
CFR 575.207(b), 575.208.) Agency
determinations to pay a relocation
incentive must generally be made on a
case-by-case basis. (See 5 CFR 575.208.)
Payment of a relocation incentive is
subject to the aggregate limitation on
pay under 5 CFR part 530, subpart B.
(See 5 CFR 575.209(e).)
The factors an agency may consider in
determining that the new position is
likely to be difficult to fill in the
absence of a relocation incentive are
also similar to those that may be
considered for recruitment incentives.
(See 5 CFR 575.206(b).) The use of
relocation incentives can help agencies
expand applicant pools to include more
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
diverse candidates. Before receiving a
relocation incentive, an employee must
sign a written agreement to complete a
specified period of employment with
the agency at the new duty station (not
to exceed 4 years). The relocation
incentive service agreement
requirements and payment termination
provisions are consistent with those
required for recruitment incentives,
except there is no minimum service
period required. (See 5 CFR 575.210 and
575.211.) OPM has provided a fact sheet
with additional information on
relocation incentives.2
Recruitment and Relocation Incentive
Waivers
Agencies currently have the authority
to approve a recruitment or relocation
incentive without OPM approval for
payments of up to 25 percent of an
employee’s annual rate of basic pay
times the number of years in a service
agreement (not to exceed 4 years or 100
percent of annual basic pay). However,
OPM approval is required when an
agency would like to exceed this
payment limit to make larger payments
over shorter service agreement lengths.
Under a recruitment or relocation
incentive waiver, agencies can approve
a recruitment or relocation incentive of
up to 50 percent of an employee’s
annual rate of basic pay times the
number of years in a service agreement
(not to exceed 100 percent of annual
basic pay). (See 5 CFR 575.109(c) and
575.209(c).)
For example, an OPM waiver is not
required for an agency to pay a
recruitment or relocation incentive of
up to 25 percent of annual basic pay for
a 1-year service agreement, 50 percent of
basic pay for a 2-year service agreement,
or 100 percent of basic pay for a 4-year
service agreement. An OPM waiver
currently is required for an agency to
pay a recruitment or relocation
incentive of 50 percent of annual basic
pay for a 1-year service agreement or
100 percent of annual basic pay for a 2year service agreement. OPM has
provided a fact sheet on calculating
maximum recruitment and relocation
incentives for service periods of various
lengths.3
2 Office of Personnel Management. ‘‘Fact Sheet:
Relocation Incentives.’’ https://www.opm.gov/
policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitmentrelocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/
relocation-incentives/.
3 Office of Personnel Management. ‘‘Fact Sheet:
Calculating Maximum Recruitment and Relocation
Incentives for Service Periods of Various Lengths.’’
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/payleave/recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/
fact-sheets/calculating-maximum-recruitment-andrelocation-incentives-for-service-periods-of-variouslengths/.
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A waiver request must include a
description of the critical agency need
the proposed recruitment or relocation
incentive would address. The
authorized agency official must
determine that the competencies
required for the position(s) are critical to
the successful accomplishment of an
important agency mission, project, or
initiative (e.g., programs or projects
related to a national emergency or
implementing a new law or critical
management initiative). To assist
agencies in developing waiver requests,
OPM has provided waiver request
templates for recruitment incentives 4
and relocation incentives.5
The law, 5 U.S.C. 5754, does not
permit the expansion of the waiver
authority for retention incentives found
at 5 CFR part 575, subpart C. Therefore,
retention incentives are not included in
this proposed rule.
Proposed Changes to Recruitment
Incentive Rules
In 5 CFR part 575, subpart A, OPM is
proposing to amend the current
regulations as follows:
• Revise 5 CFR 575.106(a)(4) to
provide an authorized agency official
with sole and exclusive discretion,
subject only to OPM review and
oversight, to waive the limitation on the
maximum amount of a recruitment
incentive under 5 CFR 575.109(c).
• Require agencies at proposed 5 CFR
575.107(a) to designate the officials with
authority to waive the recruitment
incentive payment limitation in their
recruitment incentive plans.
• Amend the incentive approval level
provisions in 5 CFR 575.107(b)(1) to
state that if a determination to pay a
recruitment incentive includes a waiver
of the payment limitation under 5 CFR
575.109(c), the official who is
designated in the agency’s plan under 5
CFR 575.107(a) must approve the
determination.
• Revise 5 CFR 575.107(b)(2) to state
that when necessary to make a timely
offer of employment, an authorized
agency official may authorize an official
who is not lower than a candidate’s
supervisor to offer a recruitment
incentive to a candidate without further
review or approval in any amount
within a pre-established range up to the
normal payment limitation in 5 CFR
4 Office of Personnel Management. ‘‘Recruitment
Incentive Waiver Template.’’ https://www.opm.gov/
policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitmentrelocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/
recruitment-incentive-waiver-template.pdf.
5 Office of Personnel Management. ‘‘Relocation
Incentive Waiver Template.’’ https://www.opm.gov/
policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitmentrelocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/
relocation-incentive-waiver-template.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
575.109(b) or a higher cap if the agency
has approved a waiver to the normal
payment limitation under 5 CFR
575.109(c).
• Amend 5 CFR 575.109(c)(1) to
provide the conditions under which an
authorized agency official would be able
to waive the payment limitation in 5
CFR 575.109(b) for an employee or
group of employees based on a critical
agency need.
• Require in proposed 5 CFR
575.109(c)(2) that waiver determinations
be made in writing.
• Delete 5 CFR 575.109(c)(2)(iii)–(v)
to eliminate redundancy because those
requirements are covered by 5 CFR
575.109(c)(2)(ii).
• Amend 5 CFR 575.110(a) to remove
the minimum 6-month required service
period for recruitment incentives. Under
the proposed rule, a recruitment
incentive service agreement could be
any length up to 4 years, consistent with
the current allowable service agreement
lengths for relocation incentives. For
example, this would allow an agency to
determine that a summer internship
position is likely to be difficult to fill
and authorize a recruitment incentive
for an intern with a 3-month service
agreement.
Proposed Changes to Relocation
Incentive Rules
In 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, OPM is
proposing to amend the current
regulations as follows:
• Revise 5 CFR 575.206(a)(4) to
provide an authorized agency official
with sole and exclusive discretion,
subject only to OPM review and
oversight, to waive the limitation on the
maximum amount of a relocation
incentive under 5 CFR 575.209(c).
• Require agencies at proposed 5 CFR
575.207(a) to designate the officials with
authority to waive the relocation
incentive payment limitation in their
relocation incentive plans.
• Amend 5 CFR 575.207(b)(1) to state
that if a determination to pay a
relocation incentive includes a waiver
of the payment limitation under 5 CFR
575.209(c), the official who is
designated in the agency’s plan under 5
CFR 575.207(a) must approve the
determination.
• Revise 5 CFR 575.209(c)(1) to
provide the conditions under which an
authorized agency official may waive
the payment limitation in 5 CFR
575.209(b) for an individual or group of
employees based on a critical agency
need.
• Require in proposed 5 CFR
575.209(c)(2) that waiver determinations
be made in writing.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78245
• Delete 5 CFR 575.209(c)(2)(iii)–(v)
to eliminate redundancy because those
requirements are covered by 5 CFR
575.209(c)(2)(ii).
Other Changes
OPM is proposing to revise several
sections to use gender neutral language.
These changes are contained at 5 CFR
575.102, 5 CFR 575.110(f), 5 CFR
575.111(e), 5 CFR 575.111(f), 5 CFR
575.210(f), 5 CFR 575.211(e), and 5 CFR
575.211(f).
Expected Impact of This Proposed Rule
A. Statement of Need
OPM serves as the chief human
resources agency and personnel policy
manager for the Federal Government.
OPM provides human resources
leadership and support to Federal
agencies and helps the Federal
workforce achieve their goals as they
serve the American people. OPM
oversees merit-based and inclusive
hiring into the civil service, directs
human resources and employee
management services, administers
retirement benefits, manages health
insurance and insurance programs, and
manages personnel vetting policies and
processes.
As noted in OPM’s FY 2022–2026
Strategic Plan,6 ‘‘We will promote a
diverse, equitable, inclusive, and
accessible Federal workforce based on
merit; develop a strategic vision for the
Federal Government to prepare for the
future of work; support Federal agencies
to attract early career talent; and equip
current and future Federal workers with
the ability to build new skills over time
to adapt to a rapidly changing world.’’
In its March 2021 report,7 the
National Academy of Public
Administration (NAPA) recommended
that OPM adopt a more decentralized
and risk-based approach to executing its
transactional approval and oversight
responsibilities. Specifically, NAPA
recommended that OPM delegate, to the
maximum extent possible, decisionmaking authorities to agencies, and
conduct cyclical reviews to verify that
appropriate actions were taken. NAPA’s
Rec. 2.5 was incorporated into OPM’s
Strategic Plan as Objective 4.2, which
reads as follows: ‘‘Increase focus on
Governmentwide policy work by
6 Office of Personnel Management. ‘‘Strategic Plan
Fiscal Years 2022–2026.’’ https://www.opm.gov/
about-us/strategic-plan/03454-fy2022-2026strategicplan-lookbook-508pdf.pdf.
7 National Academy of Public Administration.
‘‘Elevating Human Capital: Reframing the U.S.
Office of Personnel Management’s Leadership
Imperative’’ https://www.volckeralliance.org/sites/
default/files/attachments/OPM-Final-ReportNational-Academy-of-Public-Administration.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
78246
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
shifting more low-risk delegations of
authorities to agencies.’’ Further,
Objective 4.6 is to streamline Federal
human capital regulations and guidance
to reduce administrative burden and
promote innovation while upholding
merit system principles.
Permitting agencies to review and
approve payment limit waivers at the
agency level will reduce administrative
burden on agencies and increase the
efficiency of using recruitment and
relocation incentives. This will allow
agencies to move more quickly in hiring
new employees and relocating those
who are moving into positions that are
likely to be difficult to fill. Such
efficiency could be especially helpful in
emergency or other critical situations in
which recruiting new employees or
relocating current employees rapidly is
necessary. Also, with increases in the
number of retirement-eligible
employees, recruiting early career and
experienced talent to the Federal
workforce is a high priority. Using
recruitment incentives can be a useful
tool in achieving this goal.
B. Impact
It is important to understand that
waivers to the normal payment
limitations do not alter the maximum
total amount of a recruitment or
relocation incentives that may be paid
to an individual employee. Agencies
have the authority to approve a
recruitment or relocation incentive for
payments of up to 25 percent of an
employee’s annual rate of basic pay
times the number of years in a service
agreement, not to exceed 4 years or 100
percent of annual basic pay. With a
waiver, agencies can approve a
recruitment or relocation incentive of
up to 50 percent of an employee’s
annual rate of basic pay times the
number of years in a service agreement,
but still not to exceed 100 percent of
annual basic pay. Therefore, the total
incentive paid under a waiver continues
to be limited to 100 percent of the
employee’s annual basic pay, but the
incentive may be paid over 2 years
rather than 4 years.
Section 101(a) of the Federal
Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (Pub.
L. 108–411, October 30, 2004)
established significantly enhanced
recruitment, relocation, and retention
incentive authorities that provided
Federal agencies with the flexibility to
use such incentives in more strategic
ways to help the Federal Government
improve its competitiveness in
recruiting and maintaining a high
quality workforce. The enhancements
provided by the Act included the
authority to waive the normal cap on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
recruitment and relocation incentives
because of a critical agency need and
provided authority to pay higher
amounts over shorter periods of time
(not to exceed a total of 100 percent of
the employee’s starting salary). The
implementing regulations 8 required
OPM approval to waive the recruitment
and relocation incentive limits.
Although this waiver authority was
effective upon publication of the
implementing regulations on May 13,
2005, OPM did not receive any agency
requests for recruitment or relocation
waivers until 2008. Since that time,
OPM has approved 15 recruitment
incentive waivers for 6 agencies and 11
relocation incentive waivers for 4
agencies. OPM has approved waivers for
healthcare, cybersecurity, and other
mission-critical occupations. OPMapproved waivers provide agencies the
discretionary authority to use a higher
recruitment or relocation incentive
payment limit for the covered
position(s) and employee(s). An agency
with an OPM-approved incentive
waiver is responsible for documenting
in writing the justification for paying
each incentive authorized for an
employee under the waiver and
obtaining approval from the appropriate
authorized agency official.
OPM does not know how agencies
would use the additional flexibility
provided by this proposed change. It is
possible that agencies would approve
more recruitment and relocation
incentive waivers if they are not
required to go through the process of
submitting a waiver request to OPM.
However, the criteria for approval will
not be changing, so agencies will still
need to determine that the situation
meets the critical need and other
requirements for approving a waiver. In
other words, approval of a waiver is not
automatic and agencies will need to use
discretion in granting waiver requests.
In addition, agencies will need to make
determinations about whether they have
funds available in their budgets to
provide waivers. The use of
discretionary pay flexibilities such as
recruitment and relocation incentives
may be limited by agency budgets.
As with the waiver authority, OPM
does not know how agencies would use
the additional flexibility of utilizing
recruitment incentive service
agreements of less than 6 months.
Agencies do not report data to OPM on
the length of the service agreements
they authorize. Since the amount of the
maximum recruitment incentive is
based on the length of the service
period, an agency would be limited in
8 70
PO 00000
FR 25732, May 13, 2005.
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
how much of an incentive they could
authorize. For example, under the
normal payment limitations, the
maximum recruitment incentive that
could be paid for a 3-month service
period is 6.25 percent (.25 (25 percent)
× .25 (3 months or 1⁄4 of 1 year) = 6.25
percent) of the employee’s annual rate
of basic pay at the beginning of the
service period. Under a waiver, the
maximum recruitment incentive that
could be paid for a 3-month service
period is 12.5 percent (.50 (50 percent)
× .25 (3 months or 1⁄4 of 1 year) = 12.5
percent) of the employee’s annual rate
of basic pay at the beginning of the
service period.
C. Regulatory Alternatives
An alternative to this proposed rule is
to continue to require agencies to
request approval from OPM when they
seek waiver of the normal recruitment
and relocation payment limitations.
OPM would continue to review agency
requests and grant waivers if the
regulatory criteria are met. However,
this slows down the approval process
for agencies that have a critical need to
recruit or relocate employees and need
to act quickly.
Another alternative would be to
expand the authority to waive the
normal recruitment and relocation
payment limitations, but require higher
approval levels within the agency. OPM
believes agencies are in the best position
to decide at what level to delegate this
authority within their agency.
Also, OPM could expand the agency
waiver authority, but require additional
approval criteria. Agencies may include
additional approval criteria in their
agency plan. OPM doesn’t believe it is
necessary to require agencies to use
additional approval criteria.
Finally, OPM could expand the
agency waiver authority, but institute
special reporting requirements for the
use of the new waiver authority.
Agencies are required to report to
OPM’s central data system when they
authorize a waiver of the normal
recruitment or relocation incentive
payment limitations using legal
authority code VPO. OPM doesn’t
believe additional reporting
requirements are necessary.
Regarding the amendment of the
service agreement requirement for
recruitment incentives, possible
alternatives include maintaining the
current 6-month minimum service
agreement or reducing it to a lesser
amount (e.g., 3 months). OPM believes
agencies are in the best position to
decide the appropriate length for a
recruitment incentive service
agreement.
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
D. Costs
This proposed rule would affect the
operations of more than 80 Federal
agencies—ranging from cabinet-level
departments to small independent
agencies—that have employees covered
by the recruitment and relocation
incentive regulations. OPM estimates
that this rule would require individuals
employed by these agencies to spend
time updating agency policies and
procedures as a result of the proposed
regulations. For this cost analysis, the
assumed average salary rate of Federal
employees performing this work will be
the rate in 2023 for GS–14, step 5, from
the Washington, DC, locality pay table
($150,016 annual locality rate and
$71.88 hourly locality rate). OPM
assumes the total dollar value of labor,
which includes wages, benefits, and
overhead, is equal to 200 percent of the
wage rate, resulting in an assumed labor
cost of $143.76 per hour.
To comply with the regulatory
changes in the proposed rule, affected
agencies would need to review the rule
and update their policies and
procedures. OPM estimates that, in the
first year following publication of a final
rule, this would require an average of
160 hours of work by employees with an
average hourly cost of $143.76 per hour.
This would result in estimated costs in
that first year of implementation of
about $23,000 per agency, and about
$2.7 million Governmentwide. There
are costs associated with administering
recruitment and relocation incentives,
but not necessarily an increase in
administrative costs for agencies that are
already using these pay flexibilities.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
E. Benefits
Permitting agencies to review and
approve waivers at the agency level will
reduce administrative burden on
agencies and increase the efficiency of
using recruitment and relocation
incentives. This will allow agencies to
move more quickly in approving
incentives when hiring new employees
and relocating those who are moving
into positions that are likely to be
difficult to fill. Such efficiency could be
especially helpful in emergency or other
urgent situations in which recruiting
new employees or relocating current
employees rapidly is necessary. Also,
with increases in the number of
retirement-eligible employees,
recruiting early career and experienced
talent to the Federal workforce is a high
priority. Providing agencies with more
flexibility in implementing recruitment
incentives by permitting greater latitude
in determining service agreement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
lengths and payment limits can be a
useful tool in achieving this goal.
F. Request for Comments
OPM requests comments on the
implementation and impacts of this
proposed rule. Such information will be
useful for better understanding the
effect of these regulations on
recruitment and relocation incentives.
The type of information in which OPM
is interested includes, but is not limited
to, the following:
• Are there additional ways that the
Federal Government can be a model
employer with respect to recruitment
and relocation incentives?
• How can the Federal Government
use recruitment and relocation
incentives more effectively and
efficiently?
• OPM has provided a fact sheet
addressing oversight and accountability
for these incentives.9 Are there any
additional ways in which the Federal
Government can provide better
oversight and accountability of
recruitment and relocation incentives?
E.O. 12866, 13563, 14094, Regulatory
Review
OPM has examined the impact of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 and Executive Order 13563, and
Executive Order 14094, which direct
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public,
health, and safety effects, distributive
impacts, and equity). A regulatory
impact analysis must be prepared for
major rules with economically
significant effects of $200 million or
more in any one year. While this
proposed rule does not reach the
economic effect of $200 million or more,
OMB has designated this rule as a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 14094.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of OPM certifies that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because they
will apply only to Federal agencies and
employees.
E.O. 13132, Federalism
This proposed rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
9 Office of Personnel Management. ‘‘Fact Sheet:
Oversight and Accountability.’’ https://
www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/
recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/factsheets/oversight-and-accountability/.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78247
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this proposed rule
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets the
applicable standards set forth in section
3(a) and (b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule will not result in
the expenditure by State, local or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of more than $100
million annually. Thus, no written
assessment of unfunded mandates is
required.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This regulatory action will not impose
any reporting or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in Title 5 CFR Part 575
Government employees, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to
amend 5 CFR part 575 as follows:
PART 575—RECRUITMENT,
RELOCATION, AND RETENTION
INCENTIVES; SUPERVISORY
DIFFERENTIALS; AND EXTENDED
ASSIGNMENT INCENTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 575
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) and 5307;
subparts A and B also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5753; subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5754; subpart D also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5755; subpart E also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5757 and sec. 207 of Public Law 107–273,
116 Stat. 1780.
Subpart A—Recruitment Incentives
2. In § 575.102, revise paragraph (3) of
the definition ‘‘Newly appointed’’ to
read as follows:
■
§ 575.102
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Newly appointed * * *
(3) An appointment of an individual
in the Federal Government when the
individual’s service in the Federal
Government during the 90-day period
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
78248
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
immediately preceding the appointment
was not in a position excluded by
§ 575.104 and was limited to one or
more of the following:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 575.106, revise paragraph (a)(4)
to read as follows:
§ 575.106 Authorizing a recruitment
incentive.
§ 575.109 Payment of recruitment
incentives.
(a) * * *
(4) Waive the limitation on the
maximum amount of a recruitment
incentive under § 575.109(c); and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 575.107, revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (b) to read as follows:
*
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
§ 575.107 Agency recruitment incentive
plan and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with
authority to—
(i) Review and approve payment of
recruitment incentives (subject to
paragraph (b) of this section), including
the circumstances under which an
official has the authority to approve
payment without higher-level approval
under paragraph (b)(2) of this section;
(ii) Waive the recruitment incentive
payment limitation under § 575.109(c)
(subject to the approval requirements in
paragraph (b) of this section); and
(iii) Waive the repayment of a
recruitment incentive under
§ 575.111(h);
*
*
*
*
*
(b) (1) Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an
authorized agency official who is at
least one level higher than the
employee’s supervisor must review and
approve each determination to pay a
recruitment incentive to a newly
appointed employee, unless there is no
official at a higher level in the agency.
If a determination includes a waiver of
the payment limitation in § 575.109(c),
the official who is designated in the
agency’s plan under § 575.107(a) to
approve waivers must approve the
determination. The authorized agency
official must review and approve the
recruitment incentive determination
before the agency may pay the incentive
to the employee.
(2) When necessary to make a timely
offer of employment, an authorized
agency official may establish criteria in
advance for offering recruitment
incentives to newly-appointed
employees and may authorize an official
who is not lower than a candidate’s
supervisor to use these criteria to offer
a recruitment incentive to a candidate
without further review or approval in
any amount within a pre-established
range up to—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
(i) The normal payment limitation in
§ 575.109(b); or
(ii) A higher cap if the agency has
approved a waiver to the normal
payment limitation under § 575.109(c).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 575.109, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) (1) An authorized agency official
may waive the limitation in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section for an employee or
group of employees based on a critical
agency need. The authorized agency
official must determine that the
competencies required for the
position(s) are critical to the successful
accomplishment of an important agency
mission, project, or initiative (e.g.,
programs or projects related to a
national emergency or implementing a
new law or critical management
initiative). Under such a waiver, the
total amount of recruitment incentive
payments paid to an employee in a
service period may not exceed 50
percent of the employee’s annual rate of
basic pay at the beginning of the service
period multiplied by the number of
years (including fractions of a year) in
the service period. However, in no event
may a waiver provide total recruitment
incentive payments exceeding 100
percent of the employee’s annual rate of
basic pay at the beginning of the service
period.
(2) Waiver determinations must be
made in writing and include—
(i) A description of the critical agency
need the recruitment incentive would
address;
(ii) The documentation required by
§ 575.108; and
(iii) Any other information pertinent
to the case at hand.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 575.110, revise paragraphs (a)
and (f) to read as follows:
§ 575.110 Service agreement
requirements.
(a) Before paying a recruitment
incentive, an agency must require the
employee to sign a written service
agreement to complete a specified
period of employment with the agency
(or successor agency in the event of a
transfer of function). An authorized
agency official must establish the
criteria for determining the length of a
service period. The service period may
not exceed 4 years.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The service agreement may include
any other terms or conditions that, if
violated, will result in termination of
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the service agreement under
§ 575.111(b). For example, the service
agreement may specify the employee’s
work schedule, type of position, and the
duties the employee is expected to
perform. In addition, the service
agreement may address the extent to
which periods of time on detail, in a
nonpay status, or in a paid leave status
are creditable towards the completion of
the service period.
■ 7. In § 575.111, revise paragraphs (e)
and (f) to read as follows:
§ 575.111 Termination of a service
agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) If an authorized agency official
terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (a) of this section, the
employee is entitled to all recruitment
incentive payments that are attributable
to completed service and to retain any
portion of a recruitment incentive
payment the employee received that is
attributable to uncompleted service.
(f) Except as provided in paragraph (j)
of this section, if an authorized agency
official terminates a service agreement
under paragraph (b) of this section, the
employee is entitled to retain
recruitment incentive payments
previously paid by the agency that are
attributable to the completed portion of
the service period. If the employee
received recruitment incentive
payments that are less than the amount
that would be attributable to the
completed portion of the service period,
the agency is not obligated to pay the
employee the amount attributable to
completed service, unless the agency
agreed to such payment under the terms
of the recruitment incentive service
agreement. If the employee received
recruitment incentive payments in
excess of the amount that would be
attributable to the completed portion of
the service period, the employee must
repay the excess amount, except when
an authorized agency official waives the
requirement to repay the excess amount
under paragraph (h) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—Relocation Incentives
8. In § 575.206, revise paragraph (a)(4)
to read as follows:
■
§ 575.206 Authorizing a relocation
incentive.
(a) * * *
(4) Waive the limitation on the
maximum amount of a relocation
incentive under § 575.209(c); and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. In § 575.207, revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
§ 575.207 Agency relocation incentive plan
and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with
authority to—
(i) Review and approve payment of
relocation incentives (subject to
paragraph (b) of this section);
(ii) Waive the relocation incentive
payment limitation under § 575.209(c)
(subject to the approval requirements in
paragraph (b) of this section); and
(iii) Waive the repayment of a
relocation incentive under § 575.211(h);
*
*
*
*
*
(b) (1) Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an
authorized agency official who is at
least one level higher than the
employee’s supervisor must review and
approve each determination to pay a
relocation incentive, unless there is no
official at a higher level in the agency.
If a determination includes a waiver of
the payment limitation in § 575.209(c),
the official who is designated in the
agency’s plan under § 575.207(a) to
approve waivers must approve the
determination. The authorized agency
official must review and approve the
relocation incentive determination
before the agency pays the incentive to
the employee.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 575.209, revise paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 575.209 Payment of relocation
incentives.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) (1) An authorized agency official
may waive the limitation in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section for an employee (or
group of employees, if the case-by-case
determination is waived under the
conditions in § 575.208(b)) based on a
critical agency need. The authorized
agency official must determine that the
competencies required for the position
are critical to the successful
accomplishment of an important agency
mission, project, or initiative (e.g.,
programs or projects related to a
national emergency or implementing a
new law or critical management
initiative). Under such a waiver, the
total amount of relocation incentive
payments paid to an employee in a
service period may not exceed 50
percent of the annual rate of basic pay
of the employee at the beginning of the
service period multiplied by the number
of years (including fractions of a year)
in the service period. However, in no
event may a waiver provide total
relocation incentive payments
exceeding 100 percent of the employee’s
annual rate of basic pay at the beginning
of the service period.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
(2) Waiver determinations must be in
writing and include—
(i) A description of the critical agency
need the relocation incentive would
address;
(ii) The documentation required by
§ 575.208;
and
(iii) Any other information pertinent
to the case at hand.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. In § 575.210, revise paragraph (f)
to read as follows:
to repay the excess amount under
paragraph (h) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–25199 Filed 11–14–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
SAFETY BOARD
10 CFR Part 1703
[Docket No. DNFSB–2024–01]
§ 575.210 Service agreement
requirements.
Freedom of Information Act Fee
Schedule
*
AGENCY:
*
*
*
*
(f) The service agreement may include
any other terms or conditions that, if
violated, will result in termination of
the service agreement. For example, the
service agreement may specify the
employee’s work schedule, type of
position, and the duties the employee is
expected to perform. In addition, the
service agreement may address the
extent to which periods of time on
detail, in a nonpay status, or in a paid
leave status are creditable towards the
completion of the service period.
■ 12. In § 575.211, revise paragraphs (e)
and (f) to read as follows:
§ 575.211 Termination of a service
agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) If an authorized agency official
terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (a) of this section, the
employee is entitled to all relocation
incentive payments attributable to
completed service and to retain any
portion of a relocation incentive
payment the employee received that is
attributable to uncompleted service.
(f) If an authorized agency official
terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (b) of this section, the
employee is entitled to retain relocation
incentive payments previously paid by
the agency that are attributable to the
completed portion of the service period.
If the employee received relocation
incentive payments that are less than
the amount that would be attributable to
the completed portion of the service
period, the agency is not obligated to
pay the employee the amount
attributable to completed service, unless
the agency agreed to such payment
under the terms of the relocation
incentive service agreement. If the
employee received relocation incentive
payments in excess of the amount that
would be attributable to the completed
portion of the service period, the
employee must repay the excess
amount, except when an authorized
agency official waives the requirement
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78249
Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB or
Board) is proposing to revise its
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) fee
schedule and to make conforming
amendments to two related provisions
of its FOIA regulations.
DATES: To be considered, comments
must be submitted by December 15,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments by either of the following
methods:
• Email: Send comments to
comment@dnfsb.gov. Please include
‘‘FOIA Fee Revision’’ in the subject line
of your email.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Send hard
copy comments to the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, Attn: General
Manager, 625 Indiana Avenue NW,
Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004–2901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tayrn L. Gude, Director, Division of
Operational Services, Office of the
General Manager, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana
Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC
20004–2901, (202) 694–7000 (Toll Free
(800) 788–4016).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Freedom of Information Act
requires Federal agencies to which it
applies to publish a schedule of the
costs that they may charge for the
expenditures incurred in responding to
requests for their records. Guidelines
published by the Office of Management
and Budget assist agencies in meeting
that requirement and provide a structure
for its consistent implementation across
the Executive Branch, 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(i), and ‘‘Uniform Freedom
of Information Act Fee Schedules and
Guidelines,’’ 52 FR 10012 (March 27,
1987), Revised 85 FR 81955 (Dec. 17,
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78243-78249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25199]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 78243]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 575
[Docket ID: OPM-2023-0027]
RIN 3206-AO36
Recruitment and Relocation Incentive Waivers
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed
rule to expand the authority to approve waivers of the normal payment
limitations on recruitment and relocation incentives. An expansion of
the waiver approval authority would provide agencies with access to
higher payment limitations for these flexibilities without requesting
approval from OPM. Under this proposed rule, agencies would have the
authority to approve a recruitment or relocation incentive of up to 50
percent of an employee's annual rate of basic pay multiplied by the
number of years in a service agreement (not to exceed 100 percent of
annual basic pay) based on a critical agency need. In addition, this
proposed rule would give agencies flexibility to set the length of the
required service period for recruitment incentives to a period less
than 6 months but not more than 4 years, which would align the service
requirements for recruitment incentives with those for relocation
incentives and provide agencies with additional flexibility in taking
advantage of this incentive as a recruitment tool.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 16, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the Regulation
Identifier Number (RIN) number ``3206-AO36'' and title, using the
following method:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
The general policy for comments and other submissions from members
of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing
at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Holson by telephone at (202) 606-
2858 or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101 of the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (Act)
(Pub. L. 108-411, October 30, 2004) amended 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5754 by
providing enhanced authorities to pay recruitment, relocation, and
retention incentives. Congress originally provided the authority to pay
such incentives under the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of
1990 (Pub. L. 101-509, November 5, 1990). In the 2004 Act, Congress
expanded the circumstances under which these flexibilities may be paid
and enabled agencies to make the payments in more ways to enhance their
desired effect in assisting Federal agencies' efforts to recruit and
retain the kind of workforce needed in the 21st century. OPM's
regulations at 5 CFR part 575, subparts A, B, and C, implement these
authorities. This rulemaking proposes changes to the recruitment
incentive regulations at 5 CFR part 575, subpart A, and relocation
incentive regulations at 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, to provide agencies
additional payment options. To differentiate these kinds of payments--
which are designed to provide a monetary incentive for an individual to
accept a new position, as opposed to rewarding an individual for
quality of performance (the typical context in which the term ``bonus''
is used)--OPM's regulations use the term ``incentive'' in place of the
term ``bonus,'' which is used in the statute.
Recruitment Incentives
Under 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5 CFR part 575, subpart A, an agency may
pay a recruitment incentive to an employee newly appointed to a General
Schedule or other covered position in the Federal service when the
agency determines the position is likely to be difficult to fill in the
absence of an incentive. The employee must sign an agreement to fulfill
a period of service with the agency. A recruitment incentive may not
exceed 25 percent of the employee's annual rate of basic pay in effect
at the beginning of the service period, multiplied by the number of
years (including fractions of a year) in the service period (not to
exceed 4 years). Currently, this cap may be increased to up to 50
percent with OPM approval, based on a critical agency need, as long as
the total incentive does not exceed 100 percent of the employee's
annual rate of basic pay. A recruitment incentive may be paid as an
initial lump-sum payment at the beginning of the service period, in
installments throughout the service period, as a final lump-sum payment
upon completion of the service period, or in a combination of these
methods. (See 5 CFR 575.109.)
Before paying a recruitment incentive, an agency must establish a
recruitment incentive plan. (See 5 CFR 575.107(a).) The plan must
include the designation of officials with authority to review and
approve the payment of recruitment incentives, the designation of
officials with authority to waive the repayment of a recruitment
incentive, the categories of employees who may not receive recruitment
incentives, the required documentation for determining that a position
is likely to be difficult to fill, requirements for determining the
amount of a recruitment incentive, the payment methods that may be
authorized, requirements governing service agreements (including
criteria for determining the length of a service period, the conditions
for terminating a service agreement, and the obligations of the agency
and the employee if a service agreement is terminated), and
documentation and recordkeeping requirements. Unless the head of the
agency determines otherwise, an agency recruitment incentive plan must
apply uniformly across the agency. (See 5 CFR 575.107(c).)
For each determination to pay a recruitment incentive, an agency
must document, in writing, the basis for determining that the position
is likely to be difficult to fill in the absence of a recruitment
incentive, the amount and timing of the incentive payments, and the
length of the service period. The determination to pay a recruitment
incentive must be made before the prospective employee enters on duty
in
[[Page 78244]]
the position for which they are recruited. The authorized agency
official must review and approve the recruitment incentive
determination before the agency pays the incentive to the employee.
(See 5 CFR 575.107(b), 575.108.) Payment of a recruitment incentive is
subject to the aggregate limitation on pay under 5 CFR part 530,
subpart B. (See 5 CFR 575.109(f).)
An agency may determine that a position is likely to be difficult
to fill if the agency is likely to have difficulty recruiting
candidates with the competencies (i.e., knowledge, skills, abilities,
behaviors, and other characteristics) required for the position (or
group of positions) in the absence of a recruitment incentive based on
a consideration of the factors listed in 5 CFR 575.106(b). An agency
also may determine that a position is likely to be difficult to fill if
OPM has approved the use of a direct-hire authority applicable to the
position. (See 5 CFR 575.106(c).) The use of recruitment incentives can
help agencies expand applicant pools to include more diverse
candidates.
Before receiving a recruitment incentive, an employee must sign a
written agreement to complete a specified period of employment with the
agency of not less than 6 months. The service agreement must specify
the length, commencement date, and termination date of the service
period; the total amount of the incentive; the method, timing, and
amounts of incentive payments; the conditions under which an agreement
will be terminated by the agency; any agency or employee obligations if
a service agreement is terminated (including the conditions under which
the employee must repay an incentive or under which the agency must
make additional payments for partially completed service); and any
other terms and conditions for receiving and retaining a recruitment
incentive. (See 5 CFR 575.110.) OPM has provided a fact sheet with
additional information on recruitment incentives.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Office of Personnel Management. ``Fact Sheet: Recruitment
Incentives.'' https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/recruitment-incentives/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relocation Incentives
Under 5 U.S.C. 5753 and 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, an agency may
pay a relocation incentive to a current employee who must relocate to
accept a General Schedule or other covered position in a different
geographic area (permanently or temporarily) if the agency determines
that the position is likely be difficult to fill in the absence of an
incentive. (See 5 CFR 575.205(a).) A relocation incentive may be paid
only when the employee's rating of record under an official performance
appraisal or evaluation system is at least ``Fully Successful'' or
equivalent. (See 5 CFR 575.205(c).) Like a recruitment incentive, a
relocation incentive may not exceed 25 percent of the employee's annual
rate of basic pay in effect at the beginning of the service period
multiplied by the number of years (including fractions of a year) in
the service period (not to exceed 4 years). With OPM approval, this cap
may be raised to up to 50 percent (based on a critical agency need), as
long as the total incentive does not exceed 100 percent of the
employee's annual rate of basic pay at the beginning of the service
period. The incentive may be paid as an initial lump-sum payment at the
beginning of the service period, in installments throughout the service
period, as a final lump-sum payment upon completion of the service
period, or in a combination of these methods. (See 5 CFR 575.209.)
Before paying a relocation incentive, an agency must establish a
relocation incentive plan. A relocation incentive plan must generally
address the same information required in a recruitment incentive plan,
as described above. (See 5 CFR 575.207.)
For each relocation incentive authorized, an agency must document
in writing the justification for approving the incentive that addresses
factors similar to those needed for recruitment incentive
authorizations, as described above. The agency must also document that
the worksite of the new position is in a different geographic area than
the previous position. The determination to pay a relocation incentive
must be made before the employee enters on duty in the position at the
new duty station. The authorized agency official must review and
approve the relocation incentive determination before the agency pays
the incentive to the employee. (See 5 CFR 575.207(b), 575.208.) Agency
determinations to pay a relocation incentive must generally be made on
a case-by-case basis. (See 5 CFR 575.208.) Payment of a relocation
incentive is subject to the aggregate limitation on pay under 5 CFR
part 530, subpart B. (See 5 CFR 575.209(e).)
The factors an agency may consider in determining that the new
position is likely to be difficult to fill in the absence of a
relocation incentive are also similar to those that may be considered
for recruitment incentives. (See 5 CFR 575.206(b).) The use of
relocation incentives can help agencies expand applicant pools to
include more diverse candidates. Before receiving a relocation
incentive, an employee must sign a written agreement to complete a
specified period of employment with the agency at the new duty station
(not to exceed 4 years). The relocation incentive service agreement
requirements and payment termination provisions are consistent with
those required for recruitment incentives, except there is no minimum
service period required. (See 5 CFR 575.210 and 575.211.) OPM has
provided a fact sheet with additional information on relocation
incentives.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Office of Personnel Management. ``Fact Sheet: Relocation
Incentives.'' https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/relocation-incentives/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recruitment and Relocation Incentive Waivers
Agencies currently have the authority to approve a recruitment or
relocation incentive without OPM approval for payments of up to 25
percent of an employee's annual rate of basic pay times the number of
years in a service agreement (not to exceed 4 years or 100 percent of
annual basic pay). However, OPM approval is required when an agency
would like to exceed this payment limit to make larger payments over
shorter service agreement lengths. Under a recruitment or relocation
incentive waiver, agencies can approve a recruitment or relocation
incentive of up to 50 percent of an employee's annual rate of basic pay
times the number of years in a service agreement (not to exceed 100
percent of annual basic pay). (See 5 CFR 575.109(c) and 575.209(c).)
For example, an OPM waiver is not required for an agency to pay a
recruitment or relocation incentive of up to 25 percent of annual basic
pay for a 1-year service agreement, 50 percent of basic pay for a 2-
year service agreement, or 100 percent of basic pay for a 4-year
service agreement. An OPM waiver currently is required for an agency to
pay a recruitment or relocation incentive of 50 percent of annual basic
pay for a 1-year service agreement or 100 percent of annual basic pay
for a 2-year service agreement. OPM has provided a fact sheet on
calculating maximum recruitment and relocation incentives for service
periods of various lengths.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Office of Personnel Management. ``Fact Sheet: Calculating
Maximum Recruitment and Relocation Incentives for Service Periods of
Various Lengths.'' https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/calculating-maximum-recruitment-and-relocation-incentives-for-service-periods-of-various-lengths/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 78245]]
A waiver request must include a description of the critical agency
need the proposed recruitment or relocation incentive would address.
The authorized agency official must determine that the competencies
required for the position(s) are critical to the successful
accomplishment of an important agency mission, project, or initiative
(e.g., programs or projects related to a national emergency or
implementing a new law or critical management initiative). To assist
agencies in developing waiver requests, OPM has provided waiver request
templates for recruitment incentives \4\ and relocation incentives.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Office of Personnel Management. ``Recruitment Incentive
Waiver Template.'' https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/recruitment-incentive-waiver-template.pdf.
\5\ Office of Personnel Management. ``Relocation Incentive
Waiver Template.'' https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/relocation-incentive-waiver-template.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The law, 5 U.S.C. 5754, does not permit the expansion of the waiver
authority for retention incentives found at 5 CFR part 575, subpart C.
Therefore, retention incentives are not included in this proposed rule.
Proposed Changes to Recruitment Incentive Rules
In 5 CFR part 575, subpart A, OPM is proposing to amend the current
regulations as follows:
Revise 5 CFR 575.106(a)(4) to provide an authorized agency
official with sole and exclusive discretion, subject only to OPM review
and oversight, to waive the limitation on the maximum amount of a
recruitment incentive under 5 CFR 575.109(c).
Require agencies at proposed 5 CFR 575.107(a) to designate
the officials with authority to waive the recruitment incentive payment
limitation in their recruitment incentive plans.
Amend the incentive approval level provisions in 5 CFR
575.107(b)(1) to state that if a determination to pay a recruitment
incentive includes a waiver of the payment limitation under 5 CFR
575.109(c), the official who is designated in the agency's plan under 5
CFR 575.107(a) must approve the determination.
Revise 5 CFR 575.107(b)(2) to state that when necessary to
make a timely offer of employment, an authorized agency official may
authorize an official who is not lower than a candidate's supervisor to
offer a recruitment incentive to a candidate without further review or
approval in any amount within a pre-established range up to the normal
payment limitation in 5 CFR 575.109(b) or a higher cap if the agency
has approved a waiver to the normal payment limitation under 5 CFR
575.109(c).
Amend 5 CFR 575.109(c)(1) to provide the conditions under
which an authorized agency official would be able to waive the payment
limitation in 5 CFR 575.109(b) for an employee or group of employees
based on a critical agency need.
Require in proposed 5 CFR 575.109(c)(2) that waiver
determinations be made in writing.
Delete 5 CFR 575.109(c)(2)(iii)-(v) to eliminate
redundancy because those requirements are covered by 5 CFR
575.109(c)(2)(ii).
Amend 5 CFR 575.110(a) to remove the minimum 6-month
required service period for recruitment incentives. Under the proposed
rule, a recruitment incentive service agreement could be any length up
to 4 years, consistent with the current allowable service agreement
lengths for relocation incentives. For example, this would allow an
agency to determine that a summer internship position is likely to be
difficult to fill and authorize a recruitment incentive for an intern
with a 3-month service agreement.
Proposed Changes to Relocation Incentive Rules
In 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, OPM is proposing to amend the current
regulations as follows:
Revise 5 CFR 575.206(a)(4) to provide an authorized agency
official with sole and exclusive discretion, subject only to OPM review
and oversight, to waive the limitation on the maximum amount of a
relocation incentive under 5 CFR 575.209(c).
Require agencies at proposed 5 CFR 575.207(a) to designate
the officials with authority to waive the relocation incentive payment
limitation in their relocation incentive plans.
Amend 5 CFR 575.207(b)(1) to state that if a determination
to pay a relocation incentive includes a waiver of the payment
limitation under 5 CFR 575.209(c), the official who is designated in
the agency's plan under 5 CFR 575.207(a) must approve the
determination.
Revise 5 CFR 575.209(c)(1) to provide the conditions under
which an authorized agency official may waive the payment limitation in
5 CFR 575.209(b) for an individual or group of employees based on a
critical agency need.
Require in proposed 5 CFR 575.209(c)(2) that waiver
determinations be made in writing.
Delete 5 CFR 575.209(c)(2)(iii)-(v) to eliminate
redundancy because those requirements are covered by 5 CFR
575.209(c)(2)(ii).
Other Changes
OPM is proposing to revise several sections to use gender neutral
language. These changes are contained at 5 CFR 575.102, 5 CFR
575.110(f), 5 CFR 575.111(e), 5 CFR 575.111(f), 5 CFR 575.210(f), 5 CFR
575.211(e), and 5 CFR 575.211(f).
Expected Impact of This Proposed Rule
A. Statement of Need
OPM serves as the chief human resources agency and personnel policy
manager for the Federal Government. OPM provides human resources
leadership and support to Federal agencies and helps the Federal
workforce achieve their goals as they serve the American people. OPM
oversees merit-based and inclusive hiring into the civil service,
directs human resources and employee management services, administers
retirement benefits, manages health insurance and insurance programs,
and manages personnel vetting policies and processes.
As noted in OPM's FY 2022-2026 Strategic Plan,\6\ ``We will promote
a diverse, equitable, inclusive, and accessible Federal workforce based
on merit; develop a strategic vision for the Federal Government to
prepare for the future of work; support Federal agencies to attract
early career talent; and equip current and future Federal workers with
the ability to build new skills over time to adapt to a rapidly
changing world.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Office of Personnel Management. ``Strategic Plan Fiscal
Years 2022-2026.'' https://www.opm.gov/about-us/strategic-plan/03454-fy2022-2026-strategicplan-lookbook-508pdf.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its March 2021 report,\7\ the National Academy of Public
Administration (NAPA) recommended that OPM adopt a more decentralized
and risk-based approach to executing its transactional approval and
oversight responsibilities. Specifically, NAPA recommended that OPM
delegate, to the maximum extent possible, decision-making authorities
to agencies, and conduct cyclical reviews to verify that appropriate
actions were taken. NAPA's Rec. 2.5 was incorporated into OPM's
Strategic Plan as Objective 4.2, which reads as follows: ``Increase
focus on Governmentwide policy work by
[[Page 78246]]
shifting more low-risk delegations of authorities to agencies.''
Further, Objective 4.6 is to streamline Federal human capital
regulations and guidance to reduce administrative burden and promote
innovation while upholding merit system principles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ National Academy of Public Administration. ``Elevating Human
Capital: Reframing the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's
Leadership Imperative'' https://www.volckeralliance.org/sites/default/files/attachments/OPM-Final-Report-National-Academy-of-Public-Administration.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permitting agencies to review and approve payment limit waivers at
the agency level will reduce administrative burden on agencies and
increase the efficiency of using recruitment and relocation incentives.
This will allow agencies to move more quickly in hiring new employees
and relocating those who are moving into positions that are likely to
be difficult to fill. Such efficiency could be especially helpful in
emergency or other critical situations in which recruiting new
employees or relocating current employees rapidly is necessary. Also,
with increases in the number of retirement-eligible employees,
recruiting early career and experienced talent to the Federal workforce
is a high priority. Using recruitment incentives can be a useful tool
in achieving this goal.
B. Impact
It is important to understand that waivers to the normal payment
limitations do not alter the maximum total amount of a recruitment or
relocation incentives that may be paid to an individual employee.
Agencies have the authority to approve a recruitment or relocation
incentive for payments of up to 25 percent of an employee's annual rate
of basic pay times the number of years in a service agreement, not to
exceed 4 years or 100 percent of annual basic pay. With a waiver,
agencies can approve a recruitment or relocation incentive of up to 50
percent of an employee's annual rate of basic pay times the number of
years in a service agreement, but still not to exceed 100 percent of
annual basic pay. Therefore, the total incentive paid under a waiver
continues to be limited to 100 percent of the employee's annual basic
pay, but the incentive may be paid over 2 years rather than 4 years.
Section 101(a) of the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004
(Pub. L. 108-411, October 30, 2004) established significantly enhanced
recruitment, relocation, and retention incentive authorities that
provided Federal agencies with the flexibility to use such incentives
in more strategic ways to help the Federal Government improve its
competitiveness in recruiting and maintaining a high quality workforce.
The enhancements provided by the Act included the authority to waive
the normal cap on recruitment and relocation incentives because of a
critical agency need and provided authority to pay higher amounts over
shorter periods of time (not to exceed a total of 100 percent of the
employee's starting salary). The implementing regulations \8\ required
OPM approval to waive the recruitment and relocation incentive limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 70 FR 25732, May 13, 2005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although this waiver authority was effective upon publication of
the implementing regulations on May 13, 2005, OPM did not receive any
agency requests for recruitment or relocation waivers until 2008. Since
that time, OPM has approved 15 recruitment incentive waivers for 6
agencies and 11 relocation incentive waivers for 4 agencies. OPM has
approved waivers for healthcare, cybersecurity, and other mission-
critical occupations. OPM-approved waivers provide agencies the
discretionary authority to use a higher recruitment or relocation
incentive payment limit for the covered position(s) and employee(s). An
agency with an OPM-approved incentive waiver is responsible for
documenting in writing the justification for paying each incentive
authorized for an employee under the waiver and obtaining approval from
the appropriate authorized agency official.
OPM does not know how agencies would use the additional flexibility
provided by this proposed change. It is possible that agencies would
approve more recruitment and relocation incentive waivers if they are
not required to go through the process of submitting a waiver request
to OPM. However, the criteria for approval will not be changing, so
agencies will still need to determine that the situation meets the
critical need and other requirements for approving a waiver. In other
words, approval of a waiver is not automatic and agencies will need to
use discretion in granting waiver requests. In addition, agencies will
need to make determinations about whether they have funds available in
their budgets to provide waivers. The use of discretionary pay
flexibilities such as recruitment and relocation incentives may be
limited by agency budgets.
As with the waiver authority, OPM does not know how agencies would
use the additional flexibility of utilizing recruitment incentive
service agreements of less than 6 months. Agencies do not report data
to OPM on the length of the service agreements they authorize. Since
the amount of the maximum recruitment incentive is based on the length
of the service period, an agency would be limited in how much of an
incentive they could authorize. For example, under the normal payment
limitations, the maximum recruitment incentive that could be paid for a
3-month service period is 6.25 percent (.25 (25 percent) x .25 (3
months or \1/4\ of 1 year) = 6.25 percent) of the employee's annual
rate of basic pay at the beginning of the service period. Under a
waiver, the maximum recruitment incentive that could be paid for a 3-
month service period is 12.5 percent (.50 (50 percent) x .25 (3 months
or \1/4\ of 1 year) = 12.5 percent) of the employee's annual rate of
basic pay at the beginning of the service period.
C. Regulatory Alternatives
An alternative to this proposed rule is to continue to require
agencies to request approval from OPM when they seek waiver of the
normal recruitment and relocation payment limitations. OPM would
continue to review agency requests and grant waivers if the regulatory
criteria are met. However, this slows down the approval process for
agencies that have a critical need to recruit or relocate employees and
need to act quickly.
Another alternative would be to expand the authority to waive the
normal recruitment and relocation payment limitations, but require
higher approval levels within the agency. OPM believes agencies are in
the best position to decide at what level to delegate this authority
within their agency.
Also, OPM could expand the agency waiver authority, but require
additional approval criteria. Agencies may include additional approval
criteria in their agency plan. OPM doesn't believe it is necessary to
require agencies to use additional approval criteria.
Finally, OPM could expand the agency waiver authority, but
institute special reporting requirements for the use of the new waiver
authority. Agencies are required to report to OPM's central data system
when they authorize a waiver of the normal recruitment or relocation
incentive payment limitations using legal authority code VPO. OPM
doesn't believe additional reporting requirements are necessary.
Regarding the amendment of the service agreement requirement for
recruitment incentives, possible alternatives include maintaining the
current 6-month minimum service agreement or reducing it to a lesser
amount (e.g., 3 months). OPM believes agencies are in the best position
to decide the appropriate length for a recruitment incentive service
agreement.
[[Page 78247]]
D. Costs
This proposed rule would affect the operations of more than 80
Federal agencies--ranging from cabinet-level departments to small
independent agencies--that have employees covered by the recruitment
and relocation incentive regulations. OPM estimates that this rule
would require individuals employed by these agencies to spend time
updating agency policies and procedures as a result of the proposed
regulations. For this cost analysis, the assumed average salary rate of
Federal employees performing this work will be the rate in 2023 for GS-
14, step 5, from the Washington, DC, locality pay table ($150,016
annual locality rate and $71.88 hourly locality rate). OPM assumes the
total dollar value of labor, which includes wages, benefits, and
overhead, is equal to 200 percent of the wage rate, resulting in an
assumed labor cost of $143.76 per hour.
To comply with the regulatory changes in the proposed rule,
affected agencies would need to review the rule and update their
policies and procedures. OPM estimates that, in the first year
following publication of a final rule, this would require an average of
160 hours of work by employees with an average hourly cost of $143.76
per hour. This would result in estimated costs in that first year of
implementation of about $23,000 per agency, and about $2.7 million
Governmentwide. There are costs associated with administering
recruitment and relocation incentives, but not necessarily an increase
in administrative costs for agencies that are already using these pay
flexibilities.
E. Benefits
Permitting agencies to review and approve waivers at the agency
level will reduce administrative burden on agencies and increase the
efficiency of using recruitment and relocation incentives. This will
allow agencies to move more quickly in approving incentives when hiring
new employees and relocating those who are moving into positions that
are likely to be difficult to fill. Such efficiency could be especially
helpful in emergency or other urgent situations in which recruiting new
employees or relocating current employees rapidly is necessary. Also,
with increases in the number of retirement-eligible employees,
recruiting early career and experienced talent to the Federal workforce
is a high priority. Providing agencies with more flexibility in
implementing recruitment incentives by permitting greater latitude in
determining service agreement lengths and payment limits can be a
useful tool in achieving this goal.
F. Request for Comments
OPM requests comments on the implementation and impacts of this
proposed rule. Such information will be useful for better understanding
the effect of these regulations on recruitment and relocation
incentives. The type of information in which OPM is interested
includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Are there additional ways that the Federal Government can
be a model employer with respect to recruitment and relocation
incentives?
How can the Federal Government use recruitment and
relocation incentives more effectively and efficiently?
OPM has provided a fact sheet addressing oversight and
accountability for these incentives.\9\ Are there any additional ways
in which the Federal Government can provide better oversight and
accountability of recruitment and relocation incentives?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Office of Personnel Management. ``Fact Sheet: Oversight and
Accountability.'' https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/recruitment-relocation-retention-incentives/fact-sheets/oversight-and-accountability/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E.O. 12866, 13563, 14094, Regulatory Review
OPM has examined the impact of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563, and Executive Order 14094, which
direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public, health, and safety effects,
distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis must be
prepared for major rules with economically significant effects of $200
million or more in any one year. While this proposed rule does not
reach the economic effect of $200 million or more, OMB has designated
this rule as a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
14094.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of OPM certifies that this proposed rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
because they will apply only to Federal agencies and employees.
E.O. 13132, Federalism
This proposed rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this proposed rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets the applicable standards set forth in
section 3(a) and (b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State,
local or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of more than $100 million annually. Thus, no written assessment
of unfunded mandates is required.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This regulatory action will not impose any reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in Title 5 CFR Part 575
Government employees, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 575 as follows:
PART 575--RECRUITMENT, RELOCATION, AND RETENTION INCENTIVES;
SUPERVISORY DIFFERENTIALS; AND EXTENDED ASSIGNMENT INCENTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 575 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) and 5307; subparts A and B also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5753; subpart C also issued under 5 U.S.C.
5754; subpart D also issued under 5 U.S.C. 5755; subpart E also
issued under 5 U.S.C. 5757 and sec. 207 of Public Law 107-273, 116
Stat. 1780.
Subpart A--Recruitment Incentives
0
2. In Sec. 575.102, revise paragraph (3) of the definition ``Newly
appointed'' to read as follows:
Sec. 575.102 Definitions.
* * * * *
Newly appointed * * *
(3) An appointment of an individual in the Federal Government when
the individual's service in the Federal Government during the 90-day
period
[[Page 78248]]
immediately preceding the appointment was not in a position excluded by
Sec. 575.104 and was limited to one or more of the following:
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 575.106, revise paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.106 Authorizing a recruitment incentive.
(a) * * *
(4) Waive the limitation on the maximum amount of a recruitment
incentive under Sec. 575.109(c); and
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 575.107, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 575.107 Agency recruitment incentive plan and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with authority to--
(i) Review and approve payment of recruitment incentives (subject
to paragraph (b) of this section), including the circumstances under
which an official has the authority to approve payment without higher-
level approval under paragraph (b)(2) of this section;
(ii) Waive the recruitment incentive payment limitation under Sec.
575.109(c) (subject to the approval requirements in paragraph (b) of
this section); and
(iii) Waive the repayment of a recruitment incentive under Sec.
575.111(h);
* * * * *
(b) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an
authorized agency official who is at least one level higher than the
employee's supervisor must review and approve each determination to pay
a recruitment incentive to a newly appointed employee, unless there is
no official at a higher level in the agency. If a determination
includes a waiver of the payment limitation in Sec. 575.109(c), the
official who is designated in the agency's plan under Sec. 575.107(a)
to approve waivers must approve the determination. The authorized
agency official must review and approve the recruitment incentive
determination before the agency may pay the incentive to the employee.
(2) When necessary to make a timely offer of employment, an
authorized agency official may establish criteria in advance for
offering recruitment incentives to newly-appointed employees and may
authorize an official who is not lower than a candidate's supervisor to
use these criteria to offer a recruitment incentive to a candidate
without further review or approval in any amount within a pre-
established range up to--
(i) The normal payment limitation in Sec. 575.109(b); or
(ii) A higher cap if the agency has approved a waiver to the normal
payment limitation under Sec. 575.109(c).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 575.109, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.109 Payment of recruitment incentives.
* * * * *
(c) (1) An authorized agency official may waive the limitation in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section for an employee or group of employees
based on a critical agency need. The authorized agency official must
determine that the competencies required for the position(s) are
critical to the successful accomplishment of an important agency
mission, project, or initiative (e.g., programs or projects related to
a national emergency or implementing a new law or critical management
initiative). Under such a waiver, the total amount of recruitment
incentive payments paid to an employee in a service period may not
exceed 50 percent of the employee's annual rate of basic pay at the
beginning of the service period multiplied by the number of years
(including fractions of a year) in the service period. However, in no
event may a waiver provide total recruitment incentive payments
exceeding 100 percent of the employee's annual rate of basic pay at the
beginning of the service period.
(2) Waiver determinations must be made in writing and include--
(i) A description of the critical agency need the recruitment
incentive would address;
(ii) The documentation required by Sec. 575.108; and
(iii) Any other information pertinent to the case at hand.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 575.110, revise paragraphs (a) and (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.110 Service agreement requirements.
(a) Before paying a recruitment incentive, an agency must require
the employee to sign a written service agreement to complete a
specified period of employment with the agency (or successor agency in
the event of a transfer of function). An authorized agency official
must establish the criteria for determining the length of a service
period. The service period may not exceed 4 years.
* * * * *
(f) The service agreement may include any other terms or conditions
that, if violated, will result in termination of the service agreement
under Sec. 575.111(b). For example, the service agreement may specify
the employee's work schedule, type of position, and the duties the
employee is expected to perform. In addition, the service agreement may
address the extent to which periods of time on detail, in a nonpay
status, or in a paid leave status are creditable towards the completion
of the service period.
0
7. In Sec. 575.111, revise paragraphs (e) and (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.111 Termination of a service agreement.
* * * * *
(e) If an authorized agency official terminates a service agreement
under paragraph (a) of this section, the employee is entitled to all
recruitment incentive payments that are attributable to completed
service and to retain any portion of a recruitment incentive payment
the employee received that is attributable to uncompleted service.
(f) Except as provided in paragraph (j) of this section, if an
authorized agency official terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (b) of this section, the employee is entitled to retain
recruitment incentive payments previously paid by the agency that are
attributable to the completed portion of the service period. If the
employee received recruitment incentive payments that are less than the
amount that would be attributable to the completed portion of the
service period, the agency is not obligated to pay the employee the
amount attributable to completed service, unless the agency agreed to
such payment under the terms of the recruitment incentive service
agreement. If the employee received recruitment incentive payments in
excess of the amount that would be attributable to the completed
portion of the service period, the employee must repay the excess
amount, except when an authorized agency official waives the
requirement to repay the excess amount under paragraph (h) of this
section.
* * * * *
Subpart B--Relocation Incentives
0
8. In Sec. 575.206, revise paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.206 Authorizing a relocation incentive.
(a) * * *
(4) Waive the limitation on the maximum amount of a relocation
incentive under Sec. 575.209(c); and
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 575.207, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as
follows:
[[Page 78249]]
Sec. 575.207 Agency relocation incentive plan and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with authority to--
(i) Review and approve payment of relocation incentives (subject to
paragraph (b) of this section);
(ii) Waive the relocation incentive payment limitation under Sec.
575.209(c) (subject to the approval requirements in paragraph (b) of
this section); and
(iii) Waive the repayment of a relocation incentive under Sec.
575.211(h);
* * * * *
(b) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an
authorized agency official who is at least one level higher than the
employee's supervisor must review and approve each determination to pay
a relocation incentive, unless there is no official at a higher level
in the agency. If a determination includes a waiver of the payment
limitation in Sec. 575.209(c), the official who is designated in the
agency's plan under Sec. 575.207(a) to approve waivers must approve
the determination. The authorized agency official must review and
approve the relocation incentive determination before the agency pays
the incentive to the employee.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 575.209, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.209 Payment of relocation incentives.
* * * * *
(c) (1) An authorized agency official may waive the limitation in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section for an employee (or group of
employees, if the case-by-case determination is waived under the
conditions in Sec. 575.208(b)) based on a critical agency need. The
authorized agency official must determine that the competencies
required for the position are critical to the successful accomplishment
of an important agency mission, project, or initiative (e.g., programs
or projects related to a national emergency or implementing a new law
or critical management initiative). Under such a waiver, the total
amount of relocation incentive payments paid to an employee in a
service period may not exceed 50 percent of the annual rate of basic
pay of the employee at the beginning of the service period multiplied
by the number of years (including fractions of a year) in the service
period. However, in no event may a waiver provide total relocation
incentive payments exceeding 100 percent of the employee's annual rate
of basic pay at the beginning of the service period.
(2) Waiver determinations must be in writing and include--
(i) A description of the critical agency need the relocation
incentive would address;
(ii) The documentation required by Sec. 575.208;
and
(iii) Any other information pertinent to the case at hand.
* * * * *
0
11. In Sec. 575.210, revise paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.210 Service agreement requirements.
* * * * *
(f) The service agreement may include any other terms or conditions
that, if violated, will result in termination of the service agreement.
For example, the service agreement may specify the employee's work
schedule, type of position, and the duties the employee is expected to
perform. In addition, the service agreement may address the extent to
which periods of time on detail, in a nonpay status, or in a paid leave
status are creditable towards the completion of the service period.
0
12. In Sec. 575.211, revise paragraphs (e) and (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 575.211 Termination of a service agreement.
* * * * *
(e) If an authorized agency official terminates a service agreement
under paragraph (a) of this section, the employee is entitled to all
relocation incentive payments attributable to completed service and to
retain any portion of a relocation incentive payment the employee
received that is attributable to uncompleted service.
(f) If an authorized agency official terminates a service agreement
under paragraph (b) of this section, the employee is entitled to retain
relocation incentive payments previously paid by the agency that are
attributable to the completed portion of the service period. If the
employee received relocation incentive payments that are less than the
amount that would be attributable to the completed portion of the
service period, the agency is not obligated to pay the employee the
amount attributable to completed service, unless the agency agreed to
such payment under the terms of the relocation incentive service
agreement. If the employee received relocation incentive payments in
excess of the amount that would be attributable to the completed
portion of the service period, the employee must repay the excess
amount, except when an authorized agency official waives the
requirement to repay the excess amount under paragraph (h) of this
section.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-25199 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P