Proposed Revisions to the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment, 78355-78357 [2023-25141]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Notices white-house-environmental-justiceadvisory-council. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Charter of the WHEJAC (available at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/ documents/2023-03/2023%20 White%20House%20 Environmental%20 Justice%20Advisory%20 Council%20Charter.pdf) states that the advisory committee will provide independent advice and recommendations to the Chair of CEQ and to the IAC. The WHEJAC provides advice and recommendations about how to increase the Federal Government’s efforts to address current and historic environmental injustice, which may include addressing broad cross-cutting issues related, but not limited, to issues of environmental justice and pollution reduction, energy, climate change mitigation and resiliency, environmental health, and racial inequity. The WHEJAC’s efforts include a broad range of strategic, scientific, technological, regulatory, community engagement, and economic issues related to environmental justice. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 I. Registration Individual registration is required for the public meeting. Information on how to register is located at https:// www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/ white-house-environmental-justiceadvisory-council. Registration for the meeting is available until the scheduled end time of the meeting. Registration to speak during the public comment period will close at 11:59 p.m., ET, on Wednesday, November 29, 2023. When registering, please provide your name, organization, city and state, and email address for follow up. Please also indicate whether you would like to provide public comment during the meeting, or if you are submitting written comments. A. Public Comment The WHEJAC is interested in receiving public comments relevant to the following charges, topics, and questions currently under consideration: (1) the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool; (2) the Environmental Justice Scorecard; (3) carbon management; (4) ways that the WHEJAC could recommend advancing environmental justice through a wholeof-government approach; and (5) environmental justice issues affecting Indigenous Peoples and Tribal Nations. With respect to environmental justice issues affecting Indigenous Peoples and Tribal Nations, the WHEJAC Indigenous Peoples and Tribal Nations Workgroup is particularly interested in receiving VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Nov 14, 2023 Jkt 262001 comments on: Examples of environmental hazards of particular concern for Indigenous Peoples and Tribal Nations (for example, environmental hazards related to Federal activities that may affect sacred sites and areas of cultural significance, cultural or other traditions or practices, subsistence, and ways of life); ways in which the Federal government can address community impacts on, and concerns of, Indigenous Peoples and Tribal Nations; and ways in which the incorporation of Indigenous knowledge into Federal decision-making could help address environmental hazards and environmental justice concerns. More information on WHEJAC Workgroup charges is located online at: https:// www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/ white-house-environmental-justiceadvisory-council, under WHEJAC Membership and Workgroups. Priority to speak during the meeting will be given to public commenters with comments relevant to the topics and questions listed above. Every effort will be made to hear from as many registered public commenters during the time specified on the agenda. Individuals or groups making remarks during the public comment period will be limited to three (3) minutes. Please be prepared to briefly describe your issue and your recommendation relevant to the current charges, topics, and questions under consideration by the WHEJAC. Submitting written comments for the record is strongly encouraged. You can submit your written comments in three different ways: (1) by creating comments in the Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OEJECR– 2023–0099 at https:// www.regulations.gov, (2) by using the webform at https://www.epa.gov/ environmentaljustice/forms/whitehouse-environmental-justice-advisorycouncil-whejac-public-comment, and (3) by sending comments via email to whejac@epa.gov. Written comments can be submitted through Wednesday, December 20, 2023. B. Information About Services for Individuals With Disabilities or Requiring English Language Translation Assistance To request special accommodations for a disability or other assistance, please submit your request at least five (5) working days prior to the meeting to give EPA sufficient time to process your request. All requests should be sent to PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78355 the email listed in the FOR FURTHER section. INFORMATION CONTACT Matthew Tejada, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Environmental Justice, Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights. [FR Doc. 2023–25232 Filed 11–14–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0456; FRL–11424– 01–OCSPP] Proposed Revisions to the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of and soliciting comment on proposed revisions to EPA’s document titled ‘‘Laboratory Quality System Requirements (LQSR) Revision 3.0’’ dated November 5, 2007, under the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). Proposed revisions reflected in the draft document titled, ‘‘Laboratory Quality Standards for Recognition’’ (LQSR 4.0),’’ are intended to update and streamline the guidance by referencing existing laboratory standards already in practice by NLLAP participating laboratories and directly related to laboratory lead analysis, and to update the test and sampling method standards to better complement EPA’s lead-based paint program activities. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 15, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0456, through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact: Scott Drewes, Existing Chemicals Risk Management Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1 78356 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Notices Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (202) 564–8833; email address: drewes.scott@ epa.gov. For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 554– 1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@ epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you perform or may perform testing under the Agency’s regulations regarding lead or otherwise interact with such testing programs. Specifically, entities potentially affected by these revisions are Fixed-Site, Mobile, and Field Sampling and Measurement Organizations (FSMOs) that perform lead testing. Analytical testing laboratories currently recognized by the NLLAP, and accreditation organizations that currently administer the NLLAP or other organizations that might seek a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Agency to become an accreditation organization could be affected by today’s revisions. In addition, certified inspectors, certified risk assessors, developers, manufacturers, distributors of equipment and supplies used by FSMOs testing lead might also be affected by these revisions; and EPA-authorized state and tribal lead-based paint training and certification programs may also be affected by these revisions. Other entities potentially affected by changes to the NLLAP for lead testing are the owners and managers of target housing and child-occupied facilities, as well as realtors, lessees, and residents, who ultimately pay for the testing services and stand to benefit by obtaining lead test results quicker. Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all of the specific entities that may be affected by this notice. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this notice to a particular entity, consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. Reasonable Availability to the Public You may access the International Organization for Standardization and International Electrochemical Commission (ISO/IEC) Standard 17025: 2017 (E) ‘‘General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.’’ through the ANSI IBR reading room at https://ibr/ansi.org as VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Nov 14, 2023 Jkt 262001 well as the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard E1583– 17 ‘‘Standard Practice for Evaluating Laboratories Engaged in Determination of Lead in Paint, Dust, Airborne Particulates, and Soil Taken from and Around Buildings and Related Structures’’ at https://astmy.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/ mpezzella_astm_org/EVDPKoF ENotKmA_Cx20yyZoB8A2L-Uh8ou1nfIE GZoHfgA?rtime=sxRRGVaB20g. These standards were incorporated into the LQSR 4.0 and referenced in this document. C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI Do not submit CBI to EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or email. If you wish to include CBI in your comment, please follow the applicable instructions at https://www.epa.gov/ dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules and clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ comments.html. II. Background EPA is identified by Congress as the federal agency responsible for establishing an accreditation program for laboratories participating in the analysis of lead in paint, soil and dust samples as a part of a national residential lead-based paint abatement and control program. In response to this federal mandate, the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) established the NLLAP which recognizes laboratories which have demonstrated the ability to accurately analyze for lead in paint, dust and soil samples. EPA also publishes the LQSR which sets the minimum lab standards under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 405(b) for laboratory analysis of lead in paint films, soil and dust. There are two basic components to the NLLAP. The first component is a laboratory proficiency testing program (the Environmental Laboratory PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program) administered by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) in conjunction with EPA’s NLLAP. AIHA sends out ELPAT proficiency testing samples on a quarterly basis (four test rounds per year). AIHA assimilates the test results for each test round and evaluates the laboratories performance on a statistical basis. The second component of the NLLAP is a systems audit to be conducted by a laboratory accrediting organization recognized by EPA. EPA currently recognizes the organizations as accrediting organizations through a memorandum of agreement (https:// www.epa.gov/lead/national-leadlaboratory-accreditation-programnllap). Once a laboratory successfully meets the requirements of the ELPAT Program and passes an NLLAP system audit, the laboratory is recognized by EPA under the NLLAP. In 1993, EPA issued its first version of the LQSR, which outlined minimum requirements for NLLAP recognized laboratories. An organization requesting NLLAP recognition shall be a laboratory capable of performing sampling and/or lead testing. A laboratory shall have distinct staffing, instrumentation, sampling and test methods, as appropriate, and depending upon the type, a laboratory may have multiple physical facilities and may use field test kits. Currently, an organization must meet the requirements listed in the third version of the LSQR, also referred to as LQSR 3.0, to attain recognition under the NLLAP as a lead-testing laboratory. The last revision of the LQSR was published in 2007 and EPA is now proposing to revise and rename it to ‘‘Laboratory Quality Standards for Recognition’’ (LQSR 4.0). III. Proposed Revisions The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) requires federal agencies to use technical standards already developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies if compliance would not be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impracticable. The current LQSR guidance (LQSR 3.0), refers to a now outdated 2005 version of a laboratory quality standard, ISO/IEC Standard 17025: 2005 (E) ‘‘General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories’’. In addition, there are other laboratory standards in LQSR 3.0 that are already in practice by NLLAP participating laboratories and directly related to laboratory lead analysis, making parts of the elements in LQSR 3.0 duplicative. Therefore, EPA is proposing to E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Notices streamline the LQSR by conforming and referencing the updated ISO 17025: 2017 (E) and ASTM E1583–17. OPPT has reviewed the updated laboratory standards and identified any gaps or areas where additional clarification or criteria are needed between ISO 17025: 2017 and ASTM E1583–17 and the proposed LQSR 4.0. These additional clarifications or criteria are included throughout the proposed draft. EPA is also proposing updates in LQSR 4.0 which are needed to support EPA’s implementation of EPA’s leadbased paint program, specifically the activities under 40 CFR part 745 which are being reconsidered in a separate action titled, ‘‘Reconsideration of the Dust-Lead Hazard Standards and DustLead Post-Abatement Clearance Levels’’ (88 FR 50444, August 1, 2023) (FRL– 8524–01–OCSPP). For example, EPA is proposing in this action to clarify that the laboratory must demonstrate that the test and/or sampling methods used can achieve a quantitation limit equal to or less than 50% of the lowest action level for dust wipe samples for the relevant surface area (e.g., windowsills, floors). EPA is requesting comment on the impact of the proposed revision as it relates to laboratory capabilities to meet the proposed lower regulatory limits. Learn more about EPA’s efforts to lower the dust-lead hazard standards and postabatement dust-lead clearance levels under TSCA sections 402 and 403: https://www.epa.gov/lead/hazardstandards-and-clearance-levels-leadpaint-dust-and-soil-tsca-sections-402and-403. Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq. Dated: November 8, 2023. Denise Keehner, Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2023–0562; FRL–11546–01– OCSPP] Pesticides; White Paper Describing Benefits of Structured and Digital Content Labels for Pesticide Products; Notice of Availability and Request for Comment Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the availability of and soliciting public VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:49 Nov 14, 2023 Jkt 262001 Submit your comments on or before March 14, 2024. DATES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2023–0562, through https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/ dockets. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [FR Doc. 2023–25141 Filed 11–14–23; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: comment on a white paper describing the benefits of the creation, submission, review, approval, and distribution of structured content and digital pesticide labels. Structured labels are information or content that is organized in a predictable way, and digital content is those categorized fields with metadata. The current process for submitting, reviewing, and approving labels is timeconsuming for both registrants and regulators. The increasing complexity of pesticide labels, inconsistent label language across products, and inconsistent placement of information on the labels often creates significant challenges for pesticide users and the public seeking information about how to use the products. Structured content and digital labels could streamline and standardize the submission, review, and access to label content, providing benefits across the spectrum of stakeholders. In addition to developing a framework for structured content and digital labels, EPA intends to identify the key information needed for the structured digital label. Christian Bongard, Information Technology and Resources Management Division (7602M), Office of Program Support, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (706) 566–2238; email address: bongard.christian@epa.gov. 78357 document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Chemical Producers (NAICS 32532), e.g., pesticide manufacturers or formulators of pesticide products, pesticide importers or any person or company who seeks to register a pesticide. • Agricultural Establishments (Crop Production) (NAICS code 111). • Nursery and Tree Production (NAICS code 111421). • Agricultural Pest Control and Pesticide Handling on Farms (NAICS code 115112). • Crop Advisors (NAICS codes 115112, 541690, 541712). • Agricultural (Animal) Pest Control (Livestock Spraying) (NAICS code 115210). • Forestry Pest Control (NAICS code 115310). • Wood Preservation Pest Control (NAICS code 321114). • Pesticide Registrants (NAICS code 325320). • Pesticide Dealers (NAICS codes 424690, 424910, 444220). • Research & Demonstration Pest Control, Crop Advisor (NAICS code 541710). • Industrial, Institutional, Structural & Health Related Pest Control (NAICS code 561710). • Ornamental & Turf, Rights-of-Way Pest Control (NAICS code 561730). • Environmental Protection Program Administrators (NAICS code 924110). • Governmental Pest Control Programs (NAICS code 926140), Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be interested in this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. What is the Agency’s authority for taking this action? This action is being taken under the authority of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: C. What action is the Agency taking? I. Executive Summary EPA is announcing the availability of and soliciting public comment on the document entitled ‘‘White Paper: Benefits of the Adoption of Structured Content and Digital Pesticide Labels’’ (also referred to as the White Paper), a copy of which is available in the docket. The White Paper describes a framework for the creation, submission, review, approval, and distribution of structured content and digital pesticide labels. A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are a producer, registrant, or user of pesticide products. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM 15NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78355-78357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0456; FRL-11424-01-OCSPP]


Proposed Revisions to the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation 
Program (NLLAP); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the 
availability of and soliciting comment on proposed revisions to EPA's 
document titled ``Laboratory Quality System Requirements (LQSR) 
Revision 3.0'' dated November 5, 2007, under the National Lead 
Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). Proposed revisions reflected 
in the draft document titled, ``Laboratory Quality Standards for 
Recognition'' (LQSR 4.0),'' are intended to update and streamline the 
guidance by referencing existing laboratory standards already in 
practice by NLLAP participating laboratories and directly related to 
laboratory lead analysis, and to update the test and sampling method 
standards to better complement EPA's lead-based paint program 
activities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 15, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification 
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0456, through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions 
for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information 
you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional 
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more 
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    For technical information contact: Scott Drewes, Existing Chemicals 
Risk Management Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200

[[Page 78356]]

Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 
(202) 564-8833; email address: [email protected].
    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 
554-1404; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you perform or 
may perform testing under the Agency's regulations regarding lead or 
otherwise interact with such testing programs. Specifically, entities 
potentially affected by these revisions are Fixed-Site, Mobile, and 
Field Sampling and Measurement Organizations (FSMOs) that perform lead 
testing. Analytical testing laboratories currently recognized by the 
NLLAP, and accreditation organizations that currently administer the 
NLLAP or other organizations that might seek a Memorandum of 
Understanding (MOU) with the Agency to become an accreditation 
organization could be affected by today's revisions. In addition, 
certified inspectors, certified risk assessors, developers, 
manufacturers, distributors of equipment and supplies used by FSMOs 
testing lead might also be affected by these revisions; and EPA-
authorized state and tribal lead-based paint training and certification 
programs may also be affected by these revisions.
    Other entities potentially affected by changes to the NLLAP for 
lead testing are the owners and managers of target housing and child-
occupied facilities, as well as realtors, lessees, and residents, who 
ultimately pay for the testing services and stand to benefit by 
obtaining lead test results quicker.
    Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not 
attempted to describe all of the specific entities that may be affected 
by this notice. If you have any questions regarding the applicability 
of this notice to a particular entity, consult the technical person 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. Reasonable Availability to the Public

    You may access the International Organization for Standardization 
and International Electrochemical Commission (ISO/IEC) Standard 17025: 
2017 (E) ``General requirements for the competence of testing and 
calibration laboratories.'' through the ANSI IBR reading room at 
https://ibr/ansi.org as well as the American Society for Testing and 
Materials (ASTM) standard E1583-17 ``Standard Practice for Evaluating 
Laboratories Engaged in Determination of Lead in Paint, Dust, Airborne 
Particulates, and Soil Taken from and Around Buildings and Related 
Structures'' at https://astm-y.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/mpezzella_astm_org/EVDPKoFENotKmA_Cx20yyZoB8A2L-Uh8ou1nfIEGZoHfgA?rtime=sxRRGVaB20g. These standards were incorporated 
into the LQSR 4.0 and referenced in this document.

C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBI
    Do not submit CBI to EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or 
email. If you wish to include CBI in your comment, please follow the 
applicable instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules and clearly mark the part or all of the information that 
you claim to be CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment 
that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that 
does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be 
disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 
2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments
    When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting 
tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Background

    EPA is identified by Congress as the federal agency responsible for 
establishing an accreditation program for laboratories participating in 
the analysis of lead in paint, soil and dust samples as a part of a 
national residential lead-based paint abatement and control program. In 
response to this federal mandate, the Office of Pollution Prevention 
and Toxics (OPPT) established the NLLAP which recognizes laboratories 
which have demonstrated the ability to accurately analyze for lead in 
paint, dust and soil samples. EPA also publishes the LQSR which sets 
the minimum lab standards under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 
section 405(b) for laboratory analysis of lead in paint films, soil and 
dust.
    There are two basic components to the NLLAP. The first component is 
a laboratory proficiency testing program (the Environmental Laboratory 
Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program) administered by the 
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) in conjunction with 
EPA's NLLAP. AIHA sends out ELPAT proficiency testing samples on a 
quarterly basis (four test rounds per year). AIHA assimilates the test 
results for each test round and evaluates the laboratories performance 
on a statistical basis. The second component of the NLLAP is a systems 
audit to be conducted by a laboratory accrediting organization 
recognized by EPA. EPA currently recognizes the organizations as 
accrediting organizations through a memorandum of agreement (https://www.epa.gov/lead/national-lead-laboratory-accreditation-program-nllap). 
Once a laboratory successfully meets the requirements of the ELPAT 
Program and passes an NLLAP system audit, the laboratory is recognized 
by EPA under the NLLAP.
    In 1993, EPA issued its first version of the LQSR, which outlined 
minimum requirements for NLLAP recognized laboratories. An organization 
requesting NLLAP recognition shall be a laboratory capable of 
performing sampling and/or lead testing. A laboratory shall have 
distinct staffing, instrumentation, sampling and test methods, as 
appropriate, and depending upon the type, a laboratory may have 
multiple physical facilities and may use field test kits. Currently, an 
organization must meet the requirements listed in the third version of 
the LSQR, also referred to as LQSR 3.0, to attain recognition under the 
NLLAP as a lead-testing laboratory. The last revision of the LQSR was 
published in 2007 and EPA is now proposing to revise and rename it to 
``Laboratory Quality Standards for Recognition'' (LQSR 4.0).

III. Proposed Revisions

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) 
requires federal agencies to use technical standards already developed 
or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies if compliance would 
not be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impracticable. The 
current LQSR guidance (LQSR 3.0), refers to a now outdated 2005 version 
of a laboratory quality standard, ISO/IEC Standard 17025: 2005 (E) 
``General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration 
laboratories''. In addition, there are other laboratory standards in 
LQSR 3.0 that are already in practice by NLLAP participating 
laboratories and directly related to laboratory lead analysis, making 
parts of the elements in LQSR 3.0 duplicative. Therefore, EPA is 
proposing to

[[Page 78357]]

streamline the LQSR by conforming and referencing the updated ISO 
17025: 2017 (E) and ASTM E1583-17. OPPT has reviewed the updated 
laboratory standards and identified any gaps or areas where additional 
clarification or criteria are needed between ISO 17025: 2017 and ASTM 
E1583-17 and the proposed LQSR 4.0. These additional clarifications or 
criteria are included throughout the proposed draft.
    EPA is also proposing updates in LQSR 4.0 which are needed to 
support EPA's implementation of EPA's lead-based paint program, 
specifically the activities under 40 CFR part 745 which are being 
reconsidered in a separate action titled, ``Reconsideration of the 
Dust-Lead Hazard Standards and Dust-Lead Post-Abatement Clearance 
Levels'' (88 FR 50444, August 1, 2023) (FRL-8524-01-OCSPP). For 
example, EPA is proposing in this action to clarify that the laboratory 
must demonstrate that the test and/or sampling methods used can achieve 
a quantitation limit equal to or less than 50% of the lowest action 
level for dust wipe samples for the relevant surface area (e.g., 
windowsills, floors). EPA is requesting comment on the impact of the 
proposed revision as it relates to laboratory capabilities to meet the 
proposed lower regulatory limits. Learn more about EPA's efforts to 
lower the dust-lead hazard standards and post-abatement dust-lead 
clearance levels under TSCA sections 402 and 403: https://www.epa.gov/lead/hazard-standards-and-clearance-levels-lead-paint-dust-and-soil-tsca-sections-402-and-403.
    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: November 8, 2023.
Denise Keehner,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2023-25141 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.