Proposed Revisions to the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment, 78355-78357 [2023-25141]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Notices
white-house-environmental-justiceadvisory-council.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Charter of the WHEJAC (available at
https://www.epa.gov/system/files/
documents/2023-03/2023%20
White%20House%20
Environmental%20
Justice%20Advisory%20
Council%20Charter.pdf) states that the
advisory committee will provide
independent advice and
recommendations to the Chair of CEQ
and to the IAC. The WHEJAC provides
advice and recommendations about how
to increase the Federal Government’s
efforts to address current and historic
environmental injustice, which may
include addressing broad cross-cutting
issues related, but not limited, to issues
of environmental justice and pollution
reduction, energy, climate change
mitigation and resiliency,
environmental health, and racial
inequity. The WHEJAC’s efforts include
a broad range of strategic, scientific,
technological, regulatory, community
engagement, and economic issues
related to environmental justice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
I. Registration
Individual registration is required for
the public meeting. Information on how
to register is located at https://
www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/
white-house-environmental-justiceadvisory-council. Registration for the
meeting is available until the scheduled
end time of the meeting. Registration to
speak during the public comment
period will close at 11:59 p.m., ET, on
Wednesday, November 29, 2023. When
registering, please provide your name,
organization, city and state, and email
address for follow up. Please also
indicate whether you would like to
provide public comment during the
meeting, or if you are submitting written
comments.
A. Public Comment
The WHEJAC is interested in
receiving public comments relevant to
the following charges, topics, and
questions currently under
consideration: (1) the Climate and
Economic Justice Screening Tool; (2) the
Environmental Justice Scorecard; (3)
carbon management; (4) ways that the
WHEJAC could recommend advancing
environmental justice through a wholeof-government approach; and (5)
environmental justice issues affecting
Indigenous Peoples and Tribal Nations.
With respect to environmental justice
issues affecting Indigenous Peoples and
Tribal Nations, the WHEJAC Indigenous
Peoples and Tribal Nations Workgroup
is particularly interested in receiving
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
comments on: Examples of
environmental hazards of particular
concern for Indigenous Peoples and
Tribal Nations (for example,
environmental hazards related to
Federal activities that may affect sacred
sites and areas of cultural significance,
cultural or other traditions or practices,
subsistence, and ways of life); ways in
which the Federal government can
address community impacts on, and
concerns of, Indigenous Peoples and
Tribal Nations; and ways in which the
incorporation of Indigenous knowledge
into Federal decision-making could help
address environmental hazards and
environmental justice concerns. More
information on WHEJAC Workgroup
charges is located online at: https://
www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/
white-house-environmental-justiceadvisory-council, under WHEJAC
Membership and Workgroups.
Priority to speak during the meeting
will be given to public commenters with
comments relevant to the topics and
questions listed above. Every effort will
be made to hear from as many registered
public commenters during the time
specified on the agenda. Individuals or
groups making remarks during the
public comment period will be limited
to three (3) minutes. Please be prepared
to briefly describe your issue and your
recommendation relevant to the current
charges, topics, and questions under
consideration by the WHEJAC.
Submitting written comments for the
record is strongly encouraged. You can
submit your written comments in three
different ways: (1) by creating comments
in the Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OEJECR–
2023–0099 at https://
www.regulations.gov, (2) by using the
webform at https://www.epa.gov/
environmentaljustice/forms/whitehouse-environmental-justice-advisorycouncil-whejac-public-comment, and (3)
by sending comments via email to
whejac@epa.gov. Written comments can
be submitted through Wednesday,
December 20, 2023.
B. Information About Services for
Individuals With Disabilities or
Requiring English Language Translation
Assistance
To request special accommodations
for a disability or other assistance,
please submit your request at least five
(5) working days prior to the meeting to
give EPA sufficient time to process your
request. All requests should be sent to
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78355
the email listed in the FOR FURTHER
section.
INFORMATION CONTACT
Matthew Tejada,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Environmental Justice, Office of
Environmental Justice and External Civil
Rights.
[FR Doc. 2023–25232 Filed 11–14–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0456; FRL–11424–
01–OCSPP]
Proposed Revisions to the National
Lead Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NLLAP); Notice of
Availability and Request for Comment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and soliciting comment
on proposed revisions to EPA’s
document titled ‘‘Laboratory Quality
System Requirements (LQSR) Revision
3.0’’ dated November 5, 2007, under the
National Lead Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NLLAP). Proposed revisions
reflected in the draft document titled,
‘‘Laboratory Quality Standards for
Recognition’’ (LQSR 4.0),’’ are intended
to update and streamline the guidance
by referencing existing laboratory
standards already in practice by NLLAP
participating laboratories and directly
related to laboratory lead analysis, and
to update the test and sampling method
standards to better complement EPA’s
lead-based paint program activities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2023–0456,
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting
the docket, along with more information
about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact:
Scott Drewes, Existing Chemicals Risk
Management Division, Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
78356
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Notices
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; telephone number: (202)
564–8833; email address: drewes.scott@
epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you perform or may
perform testing under the Agency’s
regulations regarding lead or otherwise
interact with such testing programs.
Specifically, entities potentially affected
by these revisions are Fixed-Site,
Mobile, and Field Sampling and
Measurement Organizations (FSMOs)
that perform lead testing. Analytical
testing laboratories currently recognized
by the NLLAP, and accreditation
organizations that currently administer
the NLLAP or other organizations that
might seek a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the Agency
to become an accreditation organization
could be affected by today’s revisions.
In addition, certified inspectors,
certified risk assessors, developers,
manufacturers, distributors of
equipment and supplies used by FSMOs
testing lead might also be affected by
these revisions; and EPA-authorized
state and tribal lead-based paint training
and certification programs may also be
affected by these revisions.
Other entities potentially affected by
changes to the NLLAP for lead testing
are the owners and managers of target
housing and child-occupied facilities, as
well as realtors, lessees, and residents,
who ultimately pay for the testing
services and stand to benefit by
obtaining lead test results quicker.
Since other entities may also be
interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all of the specific
entities that may be affected by this
notice. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this notice
to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. Reasonable Availability to the Public
You may access the International
Organization for Standardization and
International Electrochemical
Commission (ISO/IEC) Standard 17025:
2017 (E) ‘‘General requirements for the
competence of testing and calibration
laboratories.’’ through the ANSI IBR
reading room at https://ibr/ansi.org as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
well as the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) standard E1583–
17 ‘‘Standard Practice for Evaluating
Laboratories Engaged in Determination
of Lead in Paint, Dust, Airborne
Particulates, and Soil Taken from and
Around Buildings and Related
Structures’’ at https://astmy.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/
mpezzella_astm_org/EVDPKoF
ENotKmA_Cx20yyZoB8A2L-Uh8ou1nfIE
GZoHfgA?rtime=sxRRGVaB20g. These
standards were incorporated into the
LQSR 4.0 and referenced in this
document.
C. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI
Do not submit CBI to EPA through
https://www.regulations.gov or email. If
you wish to include CBI in your
comment, please follow the applicable
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules
and clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
II. Background
EPA is identified by Congress as the
federal agency responsible for
establishing an accreditation program
for laboratories participating in the
analysis of lead in paint, soil and dust
samples as a part of a national
residential lead-based paint abatement
and control program. In response to this
federal mandate, the Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT)
established the NLLAP which
recognizes laboratories which have
demonstrated the ability to accurately
analyze for lead in paint, dust and soil
samples. EPA also publishes the LQSR
which sets the minimum lab standards
under Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) section 405(b) for laboratory
analysis of lead in paint films, soil and
dust.
There are two basic components to
the NLLAP. The first component is a
laboratory proficiency testing program
(the Environmental Laboratory
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT)
Program) administered by the American
Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)
in conjunction with EPA’s NLLAP.
AIHA sends out ELPAT proficiency
testing samples on a quarterly basis
(four test rounds per year). AIHA
assimilates the test results for each test
round and evaluates the laboratories
performance on a statistical basis. The
second component of the NLLAP is a
systems audit to be conducted by a
laboratory accrediting organization
recognized by EPA. EPA currently
recognizes the organizations as
accrediting organizations through a
memorandum of agreement (https://
www.epa.gov/lead/national-leadlaboratory-accreditation-programnllap). Once a laboratory successfully
meets the requirements of the ELPAT
Program and passes an NLLAP system
audit, the laboratory is recognized by
EPA under the NLLAP.
In 1993, EPA issued its first version
of the LQSR, which outlined minimum
requirements for NLLAP recognized
laboratories. An organization requesting
NLLAP recognition shall be a laboratory
capable of performing sampling and/or
lead testing. A laboratory shall have
distinct staffing, instrumentation,
sampling and test methods, as
appropriate, and depending upon the
type, a laboratory may have multiple
physical facilities and may use field test
kits. Currently, an organization must
meet the requirements listed in the third
version of the LSQR, also referred to as
LQSR 3.0, to attain recognition under
the NLLAP as a lead-testing laboratory.
The last revision of the LQSR was
published in 2007 and EPA is now
proposing to revise and rename it to
‘‘Laboratory Quality Standards for
Recognition’’ (LQSR 4.0).
III. Proposed Revisions
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
requires federal agencies to use
technical standards already developed
or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies if compliance would
not be inconsistent with applicable law
or otherwise impracticable. The current
LQSR guidance (LQSR 3.0), refers to a
now outdated 2005 version of a
laboratory quality standard, ISO/IEC
Standard 17025: 2005 (E) ‘‘General
requirements for the competence of
testing and calibration laboratories’’. In
addition, there are other laboratory
standards in LQSR 3.0 that are already
in practice by NLLAP participating
laboratories and directly related to
laboratory lead analysis, making parts of
the elements in LQSR 3.0 duplicative.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Notices
streamline the LQSR by conforming and
referencing the updated ISO 17025:
2017 (E) and ASTM E1583–17. OPPT
has reviewed the updated laboratory
standards and identified any gaps or
areas where additional clarification or
criteria are needed between ISO 17025:
2017 and ASTM E1583–17 and the
proposed LQSR 4.0. These additional
clarifications or criteria are included
throughout the proposed draft.
EPA is also proposing updates in
LQSR 4.0 which are needed to support
EPA’s implementation of EPA’s leadbased paint program, specifically the
activities under 40 CFR part 745 which
are being reconsidered in a separate
action titled, ‘‘Reconsideration of the
Dust-Lead Hazard Standards and DustLead Post-Abatement Clearance Levels’’
(88 FR 50444, August 1, 2023) (FRL–
8524–01–OCSPP). For example, EPA is
proposing in this action to clarify that
the laboratory must demonstrate that the
test and/or sampling methods used can
achieve a quantitation limit equal to or
less than 50% of the lowest action level
for dust wipe samples for the relevant
surface area (e.g., windowsills, floors).
EPA is requesting comment on the
impact of the proposed revision as it
relates to laboratory capabilities to meet
the proposed lower regulatory limits.
Learn more about EPA’s efforts to lower
the dust-lead hazard standards and postabatement dust-lead clearance levels
under TSCA sections 402 and 403:
https://www.epa.gov/lead/hazardstandards-and-clearance-levels-leadpaint-dust-and-soil-tsca-sections-402and-403.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
Dated: November 8, 2023.
Denise Keehner,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2023–0562; FRL–11546–01–
OCSPP]
Pesticides; White Paper Describing
Benefits of Structured and Digital
Content Labels for Pesticide Products;
Notice of Availability and Request for
Comment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and soliciting public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:49 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
Submit your comments on or
before March 14, 2024.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2023–0562,
through https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Additional instructions on commenting
and visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2023–25141 Filed 11–14–23; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
comment on a white paper describing
the benefits of the creation, submission,
review, approval, and distribution of
structured content and digital pesticide
labels. Structured labels are information
or content that is organized in a
predictable way, and digital content is
those categorized fields with metadata.
The current process for submitting,
reviewing, and approving labels is timeconsuming for both registrants and
regulators. The increasing complexity of
pesticide labels, inconsistent label
language across products, and
inconsistent placement of information
on the labels often creates significant
challenges for pesticide users and the
public seeking information about how to
use the products. Structured content
and digital labels could streamline and
standardize the submission, review, and
access to label content, providing
benefits across the spectrum of
stakeholders. In addition to developing
a framework for structured content and
digital labels, EPA intends to identify
the key information needed for the
structured digital label.
Christian Bongard, Information
Technology and Resources Management
Division (7602M), Office of Program
Support, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (706) 566–2238; email address:
bongard.christian@epa.gov.
78357
document applies to them. Potentially
affected entities may include:
• Chemical Producers (NAICS 32532),
e.g., pesticide manufacturers or
formulators of pesticide products,
pesticide importers or any person or
company who seeks to register a
pesticide.
• Agricultural Establishments (Crop
Production) (NAICS code 111).
• Nursery and Tree Production
(NAICS code 111421).
• Agricultural Pest Control and
Pesticide Handling on Farms (NAICS
code 115112).
• Crop Advisors (NAICS codes
115112, 541690, 541712).
• Agricultural (Animal) Pest Control
(Livestock Spraying) (NAICS code
115210).
• Forestry Pest Control (NAICS code
115310).
• Wood Preservation Pest Control
(NAICS code 321114).
• Pesticide Registrants (NAICS code
325320).
• Pesticide Dealers (NAICS codes
424690, 424910, 444220).
• Research & Demonstration Pest
Control, Crop Advisor (NAICS code
541710).
• Industrial, Institutional, Structural
& Health Related Pest Control (NAICS
code 561710).
• Ornamental & Turf, Rights-of-Way
Pest Control (NAICS code 561730).
• Environmental Protection Program
Administrators (NAICS code 924110).
• Governmental Pest Control
Programs (NAICS code 926140),
Since other entities may also be
interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be interested in this
action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
This action is being taken under the
authority of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
(7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
C. What action is the Agency taking?
I. Executive Summary
EPA is announcing the availability of
and soliciting public comment on the
document entitled ‘‘White Paper:
Benefits of the Adoption of Structured
Content and Digital Pesticide Labels’’
(also referred to as the White Paper), a
copy of which is available in the docket.
The White Paper describes a framework
for the creation, submission, review,
approval, and distribution of structured
content and digital pesticide labels.
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are a producer,
registrant, or user of pesticide products.
The following list of North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
to help readers determine whether this
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78355-78357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25141]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0456; FRL-11424-01-OCSPP]
Proposed Revisions to the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NLLAP); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and soliciting comment on proposed revisions to EPA's
document titled ``Laboratory Quality System Requirements (LQSR)
Revision 3.0'' dated November 5, 2007, under the National Lead
Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). Proposed revisions reflected
in the draft document titled, ``Laboratory Quality Standards for
Recognition'' (LQSR 4.0),'' are intended to update and streamline the
guidance by referencing existing laboratory standards already in
practice by NLLAP participating laboratories and directly related to
laboratory lead analysis, and to update the test and sampling method
standards to better complement EPA's lead-based paint program
activities.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 15, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0456, through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact: Scott Drewes, Existing Chemicals
Risk Management Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
[[Page 78356]]
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-8833; email address: [email protected].
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you perform or
may perform testing under the Agency's regulations regarding lead or
otherwise interact with such testing programs. Specifically, entities
potentially affected by these revisions are Fixed-Site, Mobile, and
Field Sampling and Measurement Organizations (FSMOs) that perform lead
testing. Analytical testing laboratories currently recognized by the
NLLAP, and accreditation organizations that currently administer the
NLLAP or other organizations that might seek a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the Agency to become an accreditation
organization could be affected by today's revisions. In addition,
certified inspectors, certified risk assessors, developers,
manufacturers, distributors of equipment and supplies used by FSMOs
testing lead might also be affected by these revisions; and EPA-
authorized state and tribal lead-based paint training and certification
programs may also be affected by these revisions.
Other entities potentially affected by changes to the NLLAP for
lead testing are the owners and managers of target housing and child-
occupied facilities, as well as realtors, lessees, and residents, who
ultimately pay for the testing services and stand to benefit by
obtaining lead test results quicker.
Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all of the specific entities that may be affected
by this notice. If you have any questions regarding the applicability
of this notice to a particular entity, consult the technical person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. Reasonable Availability to the Public
You may access the International Organization for Standardization
and International Electrochemical Commission (ISO/IEC) Standard 17025:
2017 (E) ``General requirements for the competence of testing and
calibration laboratories.'' through the ANSI IBR reading room at
https://ibr/ansi.org as well as the American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) standard E1583-17 ``Standard Practice for Evaluating
Laboratories Engaged in Determination of Lead in Paint, Dust, Airborne
Particulates, and Soil Taken from and Around Buildings and Related
Structures'' at https://astm-y.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/mpezzella_astm_org/EVDPKoFENotKmA_Cx20yyZoB8A2L-Uh8ou1nfIEGZoHfgA?rtime=sxRRGVaB20g. These standards were incorporated
into the LQSR 4.0 and referenced in this document.
C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI
Do not submit CBI to EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or
email. If you wish to include CBI in your comment, please follow the
applicable instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets#rules and clearly mark the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment
that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that
does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part
2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments
When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting
tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
II. Background
EPA is identified by Congress as the federal agency responsible for
establishing an accreditation program for laboratories participating in
the analysis of lead in paint, soil and dust samples as a part of a
national residential lead-based paint abatement and control program. In
response to this federal mandate, the Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT) established the NLLAP which recognizes laboratories
which have demonstrated the ability to accurately analyze for lead in
paint, dust and soil samples. EPA also publishes the LQSR which sets
the minimum lab standards under Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
section 405(b) for laboratory analysis of lead in paint films, soil and
dust.
There are two basic components to the NLLAP. The first component is
a laboratory proficiency testing program (the Environmental Laboratory
Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program) administered by the
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) in conjunction with
EPA's NLLAP. AIHA sends out ELPAT proficiency testing samples on a
quarterly basis (four test rounds per year). AIHA assimilates the test
results for each test round and evaluates the laboratories performance
on a statistical basis. The second component of the NLLAP is a systems
audit to be conducted by a laboratory accrediting organization
recognized by EPA. EPA currently recognizes the organizations as
accrediting organizations through a memorandum of agreement (https://www.epa.gov/lead/national-lead-laboratory-accreditation-program-nllap).
Once a laboratory successfully meets the requirements of the ELPAT
Program and passes an NLLAP system audit, the laboratory is recognized
by EPA under the NLLAP.
In 1993, EPA issued its first version of the LQSR, which outlined
minimum requirements for NLLAP recognized laboratories. An organization
requesting NLLAP recognition shall be a laboratory capable of
performing sampling and/or lead testing. A laboratory shall have
distinct staffing, instrumentation, sampling and test methods, as
appropriate, and depending upon the type, a laboratory may have
multiple physical facilities and may use field test kits. Currently, an
organization must meet the requirements listed in the third version of
the LSQR, also referred to as LQSR 3.0, to attain recognition under the
NLLAP as a lead-testing laboratory. The last revision of the LQSR was
published in 2007 and EPA is now proposing to revise and rename it to
``Laboratory Quality Standards for Recognition'' (LQSR 4.0).
III. Proposed Revisions
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
requires federal agencies to use technical standards already developed
or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies if compliance would
not be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impracticable. The
current LQSR guidance (LQSR 3.0), refers to a now outdated 2005 version
of a laboratory quality standard, ISO/IEC Standard 17025: 2005 (E)
``General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration
laboratories''. In addition, there are other laboratory standards in
LQSR 3.0 that are already in practice by NLLAP participating
laboratories and directly related to laboratory lead analysis, making
parts of the elements in LQSR 3.0 duplicative. Therefore, EPA is
proposing to
[[Page 78357]]
streamline the LQSR by conforming and referencing the updated ISO
17025: 2017 (E) and ASTM E1583-17. OPPT has reviewed the updated
laboratory standards and identified any gaps or areas where additional
clarification or criteria are needed between ISO 17025: 2017 and ASTM
E1583-17 and the proposed LQSR 4.0. These additional clarifications or
criteria are included throughout the proposed draft.
EPA is also proposing updates in LQSR 4.0 which are needed to
support EPA's implementation of EPA's lead-based paint program,
specifically the activities under 40 CFR part 745 which are being
reconsidered in a separate action titled, ``Reconsideration of the
Dust-Lead Hazard Standards and Dust-Lead Post-Abatement Clearance
Levels'' (88 FR 50444, August 1, 2023) (FRL-8524-01-OCSPP). For
example, EPA is proposing in this action to clarify that the laboratory
must demonstrate that the test and/or sampling methods used can achieve
a quantitation limit equal to or less than 50% of the lowest action
level for dust wipe samples for the relevant surface area (e.g.,
windowsills, floors). EPA is requesting comment on the impact of the
proposed revision as it relates to laboratory capabilities to meet the
proposed lower regulatory limits. Learn more about EPA's efforts to
lower the dust-lead hazard standards and post-abatement dust-lead
clearance levels under TSCA sections 402 and 403: https://www.epa.gov/lead/hazard-standards-and-clearance-levels-lead-paint-dust-and-soil-tsca-sections-402-and-403.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
Dated: November 8, 2023.
Denise Keehner,
Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2023-25141 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P