Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule, 78249-78251 [2023-25074]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
§ 575.207 Agency relocation incentive plan
and approval levels.
(a) * * *
(1) The designation of officials with
authority to—
(i) Review and approve payment of
relocation incentives (subject to
paragraph (b) of this section);
(ii) Waive the relocation incentive
payment limitation under § 575.209(c)
(subject to the approval requirements in
paragraph (b) of this section); and
(iii) Waive the repayment of a
relocation incentive under § 575.211(h);
*
*
*
*
*
(b) (1) Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an
authorized agency official who is at
least one level higher than the
employee’s supervisor must review and
approve each determination to pay a
relocation incentive, unless there is no
official at a higher level in the agency.
If a determination includes a waiver of
the payment limitation in § 575.209(c),
the official who is designated in the
agency’s plan under § 575.207(a) to
approve waivers must approve the
determination. The authorized agency
official must review and approve the
relocation incentive determination
before the agency pays the incentive to
the employee.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 575.209, revise paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 575.209 Payment of relocation
incentives.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) (1) An authorized agency official
may waive the limitation in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section for an employee (or
group of employees, if the case-by-case
determination is waived under the
conditions in § 575.208(b)) based on a
critical agency need. The authorized
agency official must determine that the
competencies required for the position
are critical to the successful
accomplishment of an important agency
mission, project, or initiative (e.g.,
programs or projects related to a
national emergency or implementing a
new law or critical management
initiative). Under such a waiver, the
total amount of relocation incentive
payments paid to an employee in a
service period may not exceed 50
percent of the annual rate of basic pay
of the employee at the beginning of the
service period multiplied by the number
of years (including fractions of a year)
in the service period. However, in no
event may a waiver provide total
relocation incentive payments
exceeding 100 percent of the employee’s
annual rate of basic pay at the beginning
of the service period.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
(2) Waiver determinations must be in
writing and include—
(i) A description of the critical agency
need the relocation incentive would
address;
(ii) The documentation required by
§ 575.208;
and
(iii) Any other information pertinent
to the case at hand.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. In § 575.210, revise paragraph (f)
to read as follows:
to repay the excess amount under
paragraph (h) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–25199 Filed 11–14–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES
SAFETY BOARD
10 CFR Part 1703
[Docket No. DNFSB–2024–01]
§ 575.210 Service agreement
requirements.
Freedom of Information Act Fee
Schedule
*
AGENCY:
*
*
*
*
(f) The service agreement may include
any other terms or conditions that, if
violated, will result in termination of
the service agreement. For example, the
service agreement may specify the
employee’s work schedule, type of
position, and the duties the employee is
expected to perform. In addition, the
service agreement may address the
extent to which periods of time on
detail, in a nonpay status, or in a paid
leave status are creditable towards the
completion of the service period.
■ 12. In § 575.211, revise paragraphs (e)
and (f) to read as follows:
§ 575.211 Termination of a service
agreement.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) If an authorized agency official
terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (a) of this section, the
employee is entitled to all relocation
incentive payments attributable to
completed service and to retain any
portion of a relocation incentive
payment the employee received that is
attributable to uncompleted service.
(f) If an authorized agency official
terminates a service agreement under
paragraph (b) of this section, the
employee is entitled to retain relocation
incentive payments previously paid by
the agency that are attributable to the
completed portion of the service period.
If the employee received relocation
incentive payments that are less than
the amount that would be attributable to
the completed portion of the service
period, the agency is not obligated to
pay the employee the amount
attributable to completed service, unless
the agency agreed to such payment
under the terms of the relocation
incentive service agreement. If the
employee received relocation incentive
payments in excess of the amount that
would be attributable to the completed
portion of the service period, the
employee must repay the excess
amount, except when an authorized
agency official waives the requirement
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78249
Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB or
Board) is proposing to revise its
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) fee
schedule and to make conforming
amendments to two related provisions
of its FOIA regulations.
DATES: To be considered, comments
must be submitted by December 15,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments by either of the following
methods:
• Email: Send comments to
comment@dnfsb.gov. Please include
‘‘FOIA Fee Revision’’ in the subject line
of your email.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Send hard
copy comments to the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, Attn: General
Manager, 625 Indiana Avenue NW,
Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004–2901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tayrn L. Gude, Director, Division of
Operational Services, Office of the
General Manager, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana
Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC
20004–2901, (202) 694–7000 (Toll Free
(800) 788–4016).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Freedom of Information Act
requires Federal agencies to which it
applies to publish a schedule of the
costs that they may charge for the
expenditures incurred in responding to
requests for their records. Guidelines
published by the Office of Management
and Budget assist agencies in meeting
that requirement and provide a structure
for its consistent implementation across
the Executive Branch, 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(i), and ‘‘Uniform Freedom
of Information Act Fee Schedules and
Guidelines,’’ 52 FR 10012 (March 27,
1987), Revised 85 FR 81955 (Dec. 17,
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
78250
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2020), respectively. In accordance with
those authorities, the Board’s FOIA
regulations require it to publish and
regularly update a schedule identifying
the expenditures it might seek to
recover and the cost associated with
each request. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6).
Since implementing its FOIA
program, 56 FR 21261, May 8, 1991,
DNFSB has calculated the fees charged
for document search and review time
based on the average hourly pay rate of
its employees, plus the average hourly
projected benefit cost. DNFSB has
charged the costs of reproducing records
directly to the requester either at the
actual cost to the agency, or the amount
charged by a commercial service. As of
its most recent update, 80 FR 52174,
Aug. 28, 2015, DNFSB’s schedule of fees
is as follows:
Search or Review Charge: $85.00 per
hour
Copy Charge:
Paper: $.05 per page, if done in-house,
or generally available commercial
rate, approximately $0.10 per page
Electronic Media: $5.00 per electronic
media
Audio and Video Cassettes: Actual
commercial rates
Duplication CD or DVD: $25.00 for
each individual DVD; $16.50 for
each duplicate DVD
Large Documents, e.g., maps or
diagrams: Actual commercial rates
II. Overview of Proposed Rule
In this action, DNFSB is proposing the
following changes to the FOIA fee
schedule:
1. Incorporating a schedule of fees in
DNFSB’s FOIA fee regulation (at 10 CFR
1703.107(b)(6)), rather than publishing
the fees in a separate, non-codified
Federal Register publication;
2. Separating the fee schedule for both
manual and electronic record searches;
and
3. Including the direct cost of
computer time into the cost of electronic
record searches; and,
4. Changing the basis used for
calculating the cost of the time spent by
employees searching for and/or
reviewing records in response to FOIA
requests.
Pursuant to this proposal, those costs
will be calculated using the actual
salary rate(s) (i.e., basic hourly rate of
pay plus an additional 16 percent for
benefit costs) of the employee(s)
performing the work. DNFSB currently
uses the average of all employees’
hourly pay rates plus average projected
benefit costs as the basis for determining
fees. DNFSB finds that the methodology
should be changed for several reasons.
First, basing costs on the salary of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
employee performing the work is more
precise than basing them on an agencywide average pay rate. Second, basing
costs on the salary of the employee
accurately reflects the actual costs
incurred by the agency in searching for
and reviewing responsive documents.
Finally, it will eliminate the need to
annually republish the FOIA fee
schedule to account for the changed
amount of the average employee salary
resulting from Congressional changes to
rates of pay, the number of agency
employees, and their job classifications.
In this action, DNFSB is also
announcing a proposal to amend the
following four subsections of its FOIA
fee regulation, 10 CFR 1703.107, to
reflect the agency’s adoption of actual
salary cost(s) of the employee(s)
performing document search and review
activities for calculating response costs
to be charged to requesters:
1. § 1703.107(b)(1) ‘‘Direct Costs’’
2. § 1703.107(b)(2)(i) ‘‘Fees’’
(commercial use requests)
3. § 1703.107(b)(2)(iii) ‘‘Fees’’ (‘‘other’’
requesters)
4. § 1703.107(b)(6) ‘‘Annual adjustment
of fees’’
II. Regulatory Analysis
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, agencies must
consider the impact of their rulemakings
on ‘‘small entities’’ (small businesses,
small organizations, and local
governments) when publishing
regulations subject to the notice and
comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act. These
proposed regulations pertain to the
Board’s policies and practices for
processing FOIA requests, and do not
impose any new requirements on small
entities. Therefore, no analysis is
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, as amended, 5
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in
an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new reporting
or recordkeeping requirements under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. This update
to the Board’s FOIA regulations does not
require or request information from
members of the public. Therefore, this
rulemaking is not covered by the
restrictions of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
These proposed regulations meet the
applicable standards set forth in
Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
According to Executive Order 13132,
agencies must state in clear language the
preemptive effect, if any, of new
regulations. The amendments to the
Board’s FOIA regulations affect only
how the Board responds to requests for
information and have no effect on
preemption of State, tribal, or local
government laws or otherwise have
federalism implications.
Congressional Review Act
This is a rule under the Congressional
Review Act. The Board will send a copy
of this rulemaking to Congress and the
Government Accountability Office
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1703
Freedom of Information.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Defense Nuclear Facilities
Safety Board proposes to amend 10 CFR
part 1703 as follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for part 1703
continues to read:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552; 31 U.S.C.
9701; 42 U.S.C. 2286b.
2. Amend § 1703.107 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2)(i), (ii), (iii), and
(b)(6) to read as follows:
■
§ 1703.107
Fees for record requests.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Direct costs mean those expenditures
which DNFSB incurs in search, review,
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
and duplication, as applicable to
different categories of requesters, to
respond to requests under § 1703.105.
Direct costs include, for example, the
hourly salary and projected benefits
costs of agency employees who search
for, review, or duplicate records in
response to a request. Overhead
expenses such as cost of space, and
heating or lighting the facility in which
DNFSB records are stored are not
included in direct costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Fees. (i) If documents are
requested for commercial use, DNFSB
shall charge the hourly salary and
projected benefits costs of agency
employees who search for and review
records in response to a request, and for
the costs of duplication as set out in
subsection (b)(6) of this section.
(ii) If documents are not sought for
commercial use and the request is made
by an educational or noncommercial
scientific institution, whose purpose is
scholarly or scientific research, or a
representative of the news media,
DNFSB’s charges shall be limited to the
direct costs of duplication as set out in
subsection (b)(6) of this section.
(iii) For a request not described in
paragraphs (b)(2) (i) or (ii) of this
section, DNFSB shall charge the hourly
salary and projected benefits costs of the
agency’s employee(s) who search for
records in response to a request and the
direct costs of duplication as set out in
subsection (b)(6) of this section. There
shall be no charge for document review
time, and the first 100 pages of
reproduction and the first two hours of
search time will be provided without
charge.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Schedule of Fees. (1) To the extent
authorized by these regulations, DNFSB
is authorized to seek the following fees
to recover costs incurred in responding
to FOIA requests:
(i) Document Search Charges
(A) Manual: Salary rate(s) (basic
hourly pay plus 16 percent) of
employee(s) performing records search
or review.
(B) Electronic: Salary rate(s) (basic
hourly pay plus 16 percent) of
employee(s) performing search or
review.
(ii) Document Review Charges: Salary
rate(s) (basic hourly pay plus 16
percent) of employee(s) performing
search or review.
(2) DNFSB will charge requesters who
seek records for commercial purposes
for the cost of reviewing them to
determine whether they are exempt
from mandatory disclosure. The agency
will assess these charges only when the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:31 Nov 14, 2023
Jkt 262001
records are first analyzed to determine
the applicability of a specific exemption
to a record or portion thereof. DNFSB
will not charge for the review of an
exemption previously applied at the
administrative review level. If a record
or portion thereof was withheld in full
under an exemption that is
subsequently found inapplicable, it may
be reviewed again to determine the
applicability of other exemptions not
previously considered. DNFSB may
charge for the cost of such review.
(3) Copying Charges
(i) Paper: $.05 per page, if done inhouse, or generally available
commercial rate, approximately $0.10
per page.
(ii) Electronic Media: Direct cost,
including operator time (employee’s
basic hourly pay plus 16 percent).
(iii) Audio and Video Cassette: Actual
commercial rates.
(iv) Duplication of CD or DVD: Direct
cost, including operator time
(employee’s basic hourly pay plus 16
percent).
(v) Large Documents, e.g., maps or
diagrams: Actual commercial rates.
Dated: November 8, 2023.
Joyce Connery,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2023–25074 Filed 11–14–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–2000; Project
Identifier MCAI–2023–00415–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc., Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD–
700–1A10 and BD–700–1A11 airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by
reports that some overheat detection
sensing elements of the bleed air leak
detection system were manufactured
with insufficient salt fill, which can
result in an inability to detect hot bleed
air leaks. This proposed AD would
require maintenance records
verification, and if an affected part is
installed, would prohibit the use of
certain Master Minimum Equipment
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78251
List (MMEL) items under certain
conditions by requiring revising the
operator’s existing MEL. This proposed
AD would also require testing the
overheat detection sensing elements,
marking each serviceable sensing
element with a witness mark, and
replacing each nonserviceable part with
a serviceable part. This proposed AD
would also prohibit the installation of
affected parts under certain conditions.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by January 2, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2023–2000; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For Bombardier service information
identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer
Response Center, 400 Coˆte-Vertu Road
West, Dorval, Que´bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone 514–855–2999; email:
ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; website:
bombardier.com.
• For Liebherr-Aerospace Toulouse
SAS service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Liebherr-Aerospace
Toulouse SAS, 408, Avenue des EtatsUnis—B.P.52010, 31016 Toulouse
Cedex, France; telephone +33
(0)5.61.35.28.28; fax +33
(0)5.61.35.29.29; email:
techpub.toulouse@liebherr.com;
website: www.liebherr.aero.
• You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 2200 South 216th Street, Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\15NOP1.SGM
15NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78249-78251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25074]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
10 CFR Part 1703
[Docket No. DNFSB-2024-01]
Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule
AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB or Board)
is proposing to revise its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) fee
schedule and to make conforming amendments to two related provisions of
its FOIA regulations.
DATES: To be considered, comments must be submitted by December 15,
2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments by either of the following
methods:
Email: Send comments to [email protected]. Please include
``FOIA Fee Revision'' in the subject line of your email.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Send hard copy comments to the
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Attn: General Manager, 625
Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tayrn L. Gude, Director, Division of
Operational Services, Office of the General Manager, Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington,
DC 20004-2901, (202) 694-7000 (Toll Free (800) 788-4016).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Freedom of Information Act requires Federal agencies to which
it applies to publish a schedule of the costs that they may charge for
the expenditures incurred in responding to requests for their records.
Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget assist
agencies in meeting that requirement and provide a structure for its
consistent implementation across the Executive Branch, 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(i), and ``Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedules
and Guidelines,'' 52 FR 10012 (March 27, 1987), Revised 85 FR 81955
(Dec. 17,
[[Page 78250]]
2020), respectively. In accordance with those authorities, the Board's
FOIA regulations require it to publish and regularly update a schedule
identifying the expenditures it might seek to recover and the cost
associated with each request. 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6).
Since implementing its FOIA program, 56 FR 21261, May 8, 1991,
DNFSB has calculated the fees charged for document search and review
time based on the average hourly pay rate of its employees, plus the
average hourly projected benefit cost. DNFSB has charged the costs of
reproducing records directly to the requester either at the actual cost
to the agency, or the amount charged by a commercial service. As of its
most recent update, 80 FR 52174, Aug. 28, 2015, DNFSB's schedule of
fees is as follows:
Search or Review Charge: $85.00 per hour
Copy Charge:
Paper: $.05 per page, if done in-house, or generally available
commercial rate, approximately $0.10 per page
Electronic Media: $5.00 per electronic media
Audio and Video Cassettes: Actual commercial rates
Duplication CD or DVD: $25.00 for each individual DVD; $16.50 for
each duplicate DVD
Large Documents, e.g., maps or diagrams: Actual commercial rates
II. Overview of Proposed Rule
In this action, DNFSB is proposing the following changes to the
FOIA fee schedule:
1. Incorporating a schedule of fees in DNFSB's FOIA fee regulation
(at 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6)), rather than publishing the fees in a
separate, non-codified Federal Register publication;
2. Separating the fee schedule for both manual and electronic
record searches; and
3. Including the direct cost of computer time into the cost of
electronic record searches; and,
4. Changing the basis used for calculating the cost of the time
spent by employees searching for and/or reviewing records in response
to FOIA requests.
Pursuant to this proposal, those costs will be calculated using the
actual salary rate(s) (i.e., basic hourly rate of pay plus an
additional 16 percent for benefit costs) of the employee(s) performing
the work. DNFSB currently uses the average of all employees' hourly pay
rates plus average projected benefit costs as the basis for determining
fees. DNFSB finds that the methodology should be changed for several
reasons. First, basing costs on the salary of the employee performing
the work is more precise than basing them on an agency-wide average pay
rate. Second, basing costs on the salary of the employee accurately
reflects the actual costs incurred by the agency in searching for and
reviewing responsive documents. Finally, it will eliminate the need to
annually republish the FOIA fee schedule to account for the changed
amount of the average employee salary resulting from Congressional
changes to rates of pay, the number of agency employees, and their job
classifications.
In this action, DNFSB is also announcing a proposal to amend the
following four subsections of its FOIA fee regulation, 10 CFR 1703.107,
to reflect the agency's adoption of actual salary cost(s) of the
employee(s) performing document search and review activities for
calculating response costs to be charged to requesters:
1. Sec. 1703.107(b)(1) ``Direct Costs''
2. Sec. 1703.107(b)(2)(i) ``Fees'' (commercial use requests)
3. Sec. 1703.107(b)(2)(iii) ``Fees'' (``other'' requesters)
4. Sec. 1703.107(b)(6) ``Annual adjustment of fees''
II. Regulatory Analysis
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, agencies
must consider the impact of their rulemakings on ``small entities''
(small businesses, small organizations, and local governments) when
publishing regulations subject to the notice and comment requirements
of the Administrative Procedure Act. These proposed regulations pertain
to the Board's policies and practices for processing FOIA requests, and
do not impose any new requirements on small entities. Therefore, no
analysis is required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions are deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, as amended,
5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
This update to the Board's FOIA regulations does not require or request
information from members of the public. Therefore, this rulemaking is
not covered by the restrictions of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
These proposed regulations meet the applicable standards set forth
in Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
According to Executive Order 13132, agencies must state in clear
language the preemptive effect, if any, of new regulations. The
amendments to the Board's FOIA regulations affect only how the Board
responds to requests for information and have no effect on preemption
of State, tribal, or local government laws or otherwise have federalism
implications.
Congressional Review Act
This is a rule under the Congressional Review Act. The Board will
send a copy of this rulemaking to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1703
Freedom of Information.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board proposes to amend 10 CFR part 1703 as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for part 1703 continues to read:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 2286b.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1703.107 by revising paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2)(i), (ii),
(iii), and (b)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 1703.107 Fees for record requests.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
* * * * *
Direct costs mean those expenditures which DNFSB incurs in search,
review,
[[Page 78251]]
and duplication, as applicable to different categories of requesters,
to respond to requests under Sec. 1703.105. Direct costs include, for
example, the hourly salary and projected benefits costs of agency
employees who search for, review, or duplicate records in response to a
request. Overhead expenses such as cost of space, and heating or
lighting the facility in which DNFSB records are stored are not
included in direct costs.
* * * * *
(2) Fees. (i) If documents are requested for commercial use, DNFSB
shall charge the hourly salary and projected benefits costs of agency
employees who search for and review records in response to a request,
and for the costs of duplication as set out in subsection (b)(6) of
this section.
(ii) If documents are not sought for commercial use and the request
is made by an educational or noncommercial scientific institution,
whose purpose is scholarly or scientific research, or a representative
of the news media, DNFSB's charges shall be limited to the direct costs
of duplication as set out in subsection (b)(6) of this section.
(iii) For a request not described in paragraphs (b)(2) (i) or (ii)
of this section, DNFSB shall charge the hourly salary and projected
benefits costs of the agency's employee(s) who search for records in
response to a request and the direct costs of duplication as set out in
subsection (b)(6) of this section. There shall be no charge for
document review time, and the first 100 pages of reproduction and the
first two hours of search time will be provided without charge.
* * * * *
(6) Schedule of Fees. (1) To the extent authorized by these
regulations, DNFSB is authorized to seek the following fees to recover
costs incurred in responding to FOIA requests:
(i) Document Search Charges
(A) Manual: Salary rate(s) (basic hourly pay plus 16 percent) of
employee(s) performing records search or review.
(B) Electronic: Salary rate(s) (basic hourly pay plus 16 percent)
of employee(s) performing search or review.
(ii) Document Review Charges: Salary rate(s) (basic hourly pay plus
16 percent) of employee(s) performing search or review.
(2) DNFSB will charge requesters who seek records for commercial
purposes for the cost of reviewing them to determine whether they are
exempt from mandatory disclosure. The agency will assess these charges
only when the records are first analyzed to determine the applicability
of a specific exemption to a record or portion thereof. DNFSB will not
charge for the review of an exemption previously applied at the
administrative review level. If a record or portion thereof was
withheld in full under an exemption that is subsequently found
inapplicable, it may be reviewed again to determine the applicability
of other exemptions not previously considered. DNFSB may charge for the
cost of such review.
(3) Copying Charges
(i) Paper: $.05 per page, if done in-house, or generally available
commercial rate, approximately $0.10 per page.
(ii) Electronic Media: Direct cost, including operator time
(employee's basic hourly pay plus 16 percent).
(iii) Audio and Video Cassette: Actual commercial rates.
(iv) Duplication of CD or DVD: Direct cost, including operator time
(employee's basic hourly pay plus 16 percent).
(v) Large Documents, e.g., maps or diagrams: Actual commercial
rates.
Dated: November 8, 2023.
Joyce Connery,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2023-25074 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P