Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Key West, FL, 76133-76136 [2023-24471]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
River. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
670–7288. To seek permission,
concerned traffic may reach contact the
event organizers on channel 13 or at
(860) 573–6646. Those in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced each day from 8 a.m.
through 6 p.m. from November 3
through November 6, November 11
through November 12, December 2
through December 3, 2023, and January
8 through January 22, 2024. The
temporary safety zone will be enforced
during the 10 hour helicopter operation.
Justin R. Jolley,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting,
Captain of the Port, MSU Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2023–24388 Filed 11–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Marine Safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
[Docket Number: USCG–2023–0135]
RIN 1625–AA00
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T08–0850 to read as
follows:
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone on the Ohio River
from mile marker 2.5 to mile marker 3.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Pittsburgh (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
Designated representative includes
safety boat provided by the event
organizers.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the C’TP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative on Channel 16 or at 412–
16:25 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone to be enforced
in the event of hurricanes, tropical
storms, and other disasters in the
Florida Keys, FL. This action is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
waters of the Key West Captain of the
Port (COTP) zone. This regulation
establishes actions to be completed by
parties operating on and around the
navigable waterways of the Key West
COTP zone. This may include the
owners and operators, and those in
management and control positions of
regulated facilities, waterfront facilities,
and vessels, prior to landfall of
hurricanes, tropical storms, and other
disasters threatening the Florida Keys.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice November 6, 2023. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from November 1, 2023,
until November 6, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0135 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
SUMMARY:
§ 165.T08–0850 Safety Zone; Ohio River,
Brunot Island, PA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Key West,
FL
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76133
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notification
of enforcement, call or email Hailye
Wilson, Sector Key West Waterways
Management Department, Coast Guard;
telephone 305–292–8768; email:
hailye.m.wilson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CWA Clean Water Act
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MTSA Maritime Transportation Security
Act
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OPA90 The Oil Pollution Act of 1990
PWSA Ports and Waterways Safety Act
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Florida Keys has the potential to
be affected by hurricanes, tropical
storms, and other disasters on a yearly
basis, especially between the months of
June and November. The Key West
COTP is establishing a safety zone to
provide for the safety of life during such
storms and events. In response, on May
2, 2023, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).1 There, we stated why we
issued the NPRM and invited comments
on our proposed regulatory action
related to safety zone. During the
comment period that ended June 1,
2023, we received two comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and
contrary to public interest because
immediate action is needed to respond
to the potential safety hazards
associated with the rapid formation of a
tropical storm or hurricane that would
pose an imminent threat to vessels,
persons, structures, and shore areas.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
purpose of this rule is to protect the
general maritime public, to include
vessel owners, vessel operators, and
those in management and control
positions related to facilities and
waterways regulated by the Coast
Guard, along with those in management
and control positions related to any land
1 88
FR 27421.
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
76134
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
or shore area immediately adjacent to
those waterways in the COTP Key West
zone, in the event of a hurricane,
tropical storm, and other natural
disasters.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received two
comments on our NPRM published May
2, 2023. The first commenter positively
endorsed the Coast Guard’s
establishment of this safety zone. They
further recommended that small entities
and individuals who choose to reside in
Florida assume all the liability, risk and
responsibilities associated with
hurricanes. They also recommended
that tax-payer-funds not be expended to
combat the effects of climate change.
The Coast Guard acknowledges these
comments and determined no
recommended changes are needed in
response to these suggestions.
Additionally, this commenter
recommended the fossil fuel industry,
and their shareholders bear the cost
associated with climate change. With
regards to this suggestion, the
suggestion is outside the scope of this
rulemaking, which pertains to the
establishment of a safety zone to be
subject to enforcement in the event of a
hurricane, tropical storm, and other
disaster in the Florida Keys, FL.
The second commenter raised several
issues regarding the lack of clarity in the
proposed regulatory text and questioned
whether the rule is necessary. The rule
is necessary to protect the general
maritime public in the COTP Key West
zone, in the event of extreme weather or
other natural disasters. While the
regulations in 33 CFR part 160, subpart
B, ‘‘Control of Vessel and Facility
Operations’’ grants the COTP the broad
authority to direct the operations of
vessels on the navigable waters, and
waterfront facilities, land structures or
shore areas immediately adjacent to the
navigable waters, this rule is intended to
specifically streamline the COTP’s
actions and processes for specific
scenarios that may occur in the event of
extreme weather or other natural
disasters.
This rule is intended to inform the
general maritime public, to include
vessel owners and operators, regulated
facilities, and waterfront facilities of the
Coast Guard’s expectations in the event
of a hurricane, tropical storm, or other
disaster, thereby expediting the
enforcement of the safety zone, and
providing more advanced notice of the
Coast Guard’s expectations in the event
of a hurricane, tropical storm, or other
natural disaster. The rule is also
intended to provide vessel owners and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
operators, along with the owners and
operators of regulated facilities and
waterfront facilities with a deeper
understanding of how the Coast Guard
intends to handle extreme weatherrelated events so they can plan
accordingly.
To address the commenter’s concerns
regarding the regarding the lack of
clarity in the proposed regulatory text,
the Coast Guard is making the following
changes in the final rule regulatory text
in § 165.707.
The Coast Guard is adding three
definitions for ‘‘regulated facilities,’’
‘‘waterfront facilities,’’ and ‘‘authorized
law enforcement agencies’’ in paragraph
(a). The Coast Guard has the authority
to regulate facilities and land structure
or shore area immediately adjacent to
navigable waters under certain, specific
statutory and regulatory frameworks.
We are adding a definition for
‘‘regulated facilities’’ to clarify the
regulated facilities covered by this rule
are those regulated under the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act,2 Maritime
Transportation and Security Act,3 Clean
Water Act,4 and the Oil Pollution Act of
1990.5 These statutes give the Coast
Guard the authority and jurisdiction to
take certain actions on certain regulated
facilities that have a maritime nexus.
We are adding a definition for
‘‘waterfront facilities’’ to the regulatory
text which will include any land
structure or shore area immediately
adjacent to the navigable waters of the
Key West COTP zone. We also added a
definition for ‘‘authorized law
enforcement agencies’’ to clarify that
Federal, State, and local law
enforcement agencies that have received
specific authorization from or are
operating in concert with the Coast
Guard are authorized to conduct
operations related to the safety, security,
and stability of the Key West COTP
zone.
Additionally, the commenter raised
concerns related to enforceability and
notice requirements. The Coast Guard
understands that its regulations are not
enforceable on the public without
proper notice. While the publication of
this final rule document in the Federal
Register constitutes constructive notice
of the requirements within the
regulations. However, there will be
circumstances where individuals are
notified by the Coast Guard of an
impending extreme weather situation
causing the need for the safety zone to
be made subject to enforcement. In
2 46
U.S.C. 70001 et seq.
U.S.C. 70101 et seq.
4 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
5 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.
3 46
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
those types of circumstances, the Coast
Guard will provide affected individuals
with actual notice of the safety zone
prior to its enforcement or assessment of
any fines or penalties. In addition to
changes made to the regulatory text in
this final rule in response to comment,
we are making the following changes to
the regulatory text.
In paragraph (a), we are adding
‘‘regulated facilities, and ‘‘waterfront
facilities’’ to clarify that regulated
facilities and waterfront facilities as
defined in paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(7)
respectively are covered by this safety
zone when port conditions are met in
accordance with the requirements in
paragraph (c)(1) Port Condition
WHISKEY and (c)(2) Port Condition X–
RAY. Additionally, in paragraph (a), we
are deleting ‘‘during specified
conditions’’ because the location of the
safety zone is intended to be constant.
When the safety zone is subject to
enforcement it will be determinate of
conditions set forth in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (c)(5) of the regulatory text. In
paragraph (c)(1), we are deleting ‘‘port
facilities’’ and adding in its place,
‘‘regulated facilities and waterfront
facilities’’ for consistency as definitions
for these terms have been added in
paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7). In the event
Port Condition WHISKEY is set, all
vessels, regulated facilities, and
waterfront facilities within the Key West
COTP zone would have to comply with
the applicable regulations in (c)(1).
Additionally, in paragraph (c)(1), we
removed the sentence, ‘‘Vessels wishing
to remain in port are required to submit
an application to the COTP prior to
setting Port Condition X–Ray.’’ In its
place, we are adding the sentence,
‘‘Oceangoing vessels greater than 300
gross tons (GT) intending to remain in
the port during Port Condition Whiskey
must contact the Key West COTP prior
to the setting of port condition X–Ray.’’
We are taking this action to prevent
vessel owners and operators from
having to generate additional
documentation.
In paragraph (c)(2), we are deleting
‘‘port facilities’’ and adding in its place,
‘‘regulated facilities and waterfront
facilities’’ for consistency as definitions
for these terms have been added in
paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7). In the event
Port Condition X–RAY is set, all vessels,
regulated facilities, and waterfront
facilities within the Key West COTP
zone would have to comply with the
applicable regulations in paragraph
(c)(2). Additionally, in paragraph (c)(2),
we are deleting the sentence, ‘‘The
COTP may require additional
precautions to ensure the safety of the
ports and waterways’’ because it is
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
overly vague and may cause undue
confusion for owners and operators of
vessels and regulated facilities.
In paragraph (c)(3), we clarified we
are only limiting cargo operations at
‘‘regulated facilities.’’ We also removed
some the language that went into
specifics of cargo operations. Removing
the language made the regulatory text
more succinct, as the initial language
contained unnecessary redundancies.
We also clarified that only facilities
regulated under the MTSA will be
required to operate in accordance with
their security plan.
In paragraph (c)(4), we are removing
the words ‘‘are suspended’’ and
replacing it with, ‘‘must cease all cargo
operations’’ because the phrase ‘‘are
suspended’’ may be confusing in this
context. By using the phrase ‘‘must
cease all cargo operations’’ we are
making it clear to the regulated parties
that cargo operations must stop when
Port ZULU is set.
In paragraph (c)(6), we are revising
the text to clarify that the Coast Guard
Sector Key West will notify the
maritime community, ‘‘to the furthest
extent practicable’’ of the periods which
the safety zone in paragraph (a) will be
subject to enforcement via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners or by on-scene
designated representatives.
We are deleting paragraph (c)(7)
because it is duplicative of what is
contained in paragraph (c)(6). The
information previously described in
(c)(8) was thereby moved to (c)(7).
Lastly, we are making non-substantive
editorial changes and revising
terminology for consistency throughout
the final rule regulatory text.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
This regulatory action determination
is based on the necessity to protect life
and port infrastructure during a
hurricanes, tropical storms, and other
disasters. The absence of a safe harbor
in the Florida Keys precludes large
vessels from accessing adequate
facilities to weather a substantial storm
or natural disaster within the Key West
COTP zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the safety zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission
to remain in port.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received 00 comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76135
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone that would prohibit entry in
certain waters of the Key West COTP for
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
76136
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
the duration needed to ensure safe
transit of vessels and industry posthurricane, post-storm, and postemergency. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
■
2. Add § 165.707 to read as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
§ 165.707 Safety Zone; Hurricanes,
Tropical Storms and Other Disasters in
Florida Keys.
(a) Regulated Areas. All navigable
waters, regulated facilities, and
waterfront facilities within the Key West
Captain of the Port (COTP) zone, Key
West, Florida (as described in 33 CFR
3.35–40).
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Authorized Law Enforcement
Agencies means Federal, State, and local
law enforcement agencies that have
received specific authorization from or
are operating in concert with the Coast
Guard to conduct operations related to
the safety, security and stability of the
Key West COTP zone.
Designated Representative means
Coast Guard Patrol Commanders,
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:25 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
and local officers designated by or
assisting the COTP in the enforcement
of the regulated areas.
Port Condition WHISKEY means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained
gale force winds (39–54 mph/34–47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force
storm are predicted to make landfall at
the port within 72 hours.
Port Condition X–RAY means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained
gale force winds (39–54 mph/34–47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force
storm are predicted to make landfall at
the port within 48 hours.
Port Condition YANKEE means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that
sustained gale force winds (39–54 mph/
34–47 knots) from a tropical or
hurricane force storm are predicted to
make landfall at the port within 24
hours.
Port Condition ZULU means a
condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that
sustained gale force winds (39–54 mph/
34–47 knots) from a tropical or
hurricane force storm are predicted to
make landfall at the port within 12
hours.
Regulated Facilities means shoreside
facilities regulated by the Coast Guard
under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act,6 Maritime Transportation and
Security Act,7 Clean Water Act,8 and the
Oil Pollution Act of 1990,9 and
regulations in 33 CFR parts 105, 154,
156, and 158.
Waterfront Facilities means any land
structure or shore area immediately
adjacent to the navigable waters of the
Key West COTP zone.
(c) Regulations—(1) Port Condition
WHISKEY. All vessels, regulated
facilities, and waterfront facilities
within the Key West COTP zone must
exercise due diligence in preparation for
potential storm impacts. All regulated
facilities and waterfront facilities must
begin removing all debris and securing
potential flying hazards. Oceangoing
vessels greater than 300 gross tons (GT)
must make plans to depart no later than
the setting of Port Condition Yankee
unless authorized by the COTP.
Oceangoing vessels greater than 300 GT
intending to remain in port must contact
the COTP prior to the setting port
condition X–Ray.
(2) Port Condition X–RAY. All vessels,
regulated facilities, and waterfront
facilities within the Key West COTP
zone must ensure that potential flying
debris is removed or secured. Hazardous
materials/pollution hazards must be
secured in a safe manner and away from
waterfront areas. Vessels greater than
300 GT without an approval to remain
in port must depart prior to the setting
of Port Condition YANKEE. Vessels
with the COTP’s permission to remain
in port must implement their preapproved mooring arrangement.
Regulated facilities must prepare to
terminate all cargo operations.
(3) Port Condition YANKEE. Affected
ports are closed to inbound vessel
traffic. All oceangoing vessels greater
than 300 GT must have departed
designated ports within the Key West
COTP zone. Regulated facilities must
terminate all cargo operations, not
associated with storm preparations,
unless specifically authorized by the
COTP. All MTSA regulated facilities
must continue to operate in accordance
with their approved Facility Security
Plans and comply with the requirements
of the MTSA.
(4) Port Condition ZULU. The port is
closed to all vessel traffic except as
specifically authorized by the COTP.
Regulated facilities must cease all cargo
operations, including bunkering and
lightering. Waivers may be granted
except for when Cargo of Particular
Hazard or Certain Dangerous Cargo are
involved.
(5) Emergency Restrictions for Other
Disasters. Any natural or other disasters
that are anticipated to affect the Key
West COTP zone will result in the
prohibition of regulated facility
operations and vessel traffic transiting
or remaining in the affected port.
(6) Safety Zones Notice. Coast Guard
Sector Key West will notify the
maritime community, to the furthest
extent practicable, of the periods during
which the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) will be subject to
enforcement via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or by on-scene designated
representatives.
(7) Exception. This regulation does
not apply to authorized law
enforcement agencies operating within
the regulated area.
Jason D. Ingram,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Key West.
6 46
[FR Doc. 2023–24471 Filed 11–3–23; 8:45 am]
7 46
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
U.S.C. 70001 et seq.
U.S.C. 70101 et seq.
8 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
9 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\06NOR1.SGM
06NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76133-76136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24471]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number: USCG-2023-0135]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Atlantic Ocean, Key West, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone to be enforced
in the event of hurricanes, tropical storms, and other disasters in the
Florida Keys, FL. This action is necessary to ensure the safety of the
waters of the Key West Captain of the Port (COTP) zone. This regulation
establishes actions to be completed by parties operating on and around
the navigable waterways of the Key West COTP zone. This may include the
owners and operators, and those in management and control positions of
regulated facilities, waterfront facilities, and vessels, prior to
landfall of hurricanes, tropical storms, and other disasters
threatening the Florida Keys.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice November 6, 2023.
For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from
November 1, 2023, until November 6, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0135 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
notification of enforcement, call or email Hailye Wilson, Sector Key
West Waterways Management Department, Coast Guard; telephone 305-292-
8768; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CWA Clean Water Act
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MTSA Maritime Transportation Security Act
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OPA90 The Oil Pollution Act of 1990
PWSA Ports and Waterways Safety Act
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Florida Keys has the potential to be affected by hurricanes,
tropical storms, and other disasters on a yearly basis, especially
between the months of June and November. The Key West COTP is
establishing a safety zone to provide for the safety of life during
such storms and events. In response, on May 2, 2023, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).\1\ There, we stated
why we issued the NPRM and invited comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to safety zone. During the comment period that ended
June 1, 2023, we received two comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 88 FR 27421.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to public interest
because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety
hazards associated with the rapid formation of a tropical storm or
hurricane that would pose an imminent threat to vessels, persons,
structures, and shore areas.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The purpose of this rule is to protect the general maritime
public, to include vessel owners, vessel operators, and those in
management and control positions related to facilities and waterways
regulated by the Coast Guard, along with those in management and
control positions related to any land
[[Page 76134]]
or shore area immediately adjacent to those waterways in the COTP Key
West zone, in the event of a hurricane, tropical storm, and other
natural disasters.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received two comments on our NPRM published May
2, 2023. The first commenter positively endorsed the Coast Guard's
establishment of this safety zone. They further recommended that small
entities and individuals who choose to reside in Florida assume all the
liability, risk and responsibilities associated with hurricanes. They
also recommended that tax-payer-funds not be expended to combat the
effects of climate change. The Coast Guard acknowledges these comments
and determined no recommended changes are needed in response to these
suggestions. Additionally, this commenter recommended the fossil fuel
industry, and their shareholders bear the cost associated with climate
change. With regards to this suggestion, the suggestion is outside the
scope of this rulemaking, which pertains to the establishment of a
safety zone to be subject to enforcement in the event of a hurricane,
tropical storm, and other disaster in the Florida Keys, FL.
The second commenter raised several issues regarding the lack of
clarity in the proposed regulatory text and questioned whether the rule
is necessary. The rule is necessary to protect the general maritime
public in the COTP Key West zone, in the event of extreme weather or
other natural disasters. While the regulations in 33 CFR part 160,
subpart B, ``Control of Vessel and Facility Operations'' grants the
COTP the broad authority to direct the operations of vessels on the
navigable waters, and waterfront facilities, land structures or shore
areas immediately adjacent to the navigable waters, this rule is
intended to specifically streamline the COTP's actions and processes
for specific scenarios that may occur in the event of extreme weather
or other natural disasters.
This rule is intended to inform the general maritime public, to
include vessel owners and operators, regulated facilities, and
waterfront facilities of the Coast Guard's expectations in the event of
a hurricane, tropical storm, or other disaster, thereby expediting the
enforcement of the safety zone, and providing more advanced notice of
the Coast Guard's expectations in the event of a hurricane, tropical
storm, or other natural disaster. The rule is also intended to provide
vessel owners and operators, along with the owners and operators of
regulated facilities and waterfront facilities with a deeper
understanding of how the Coast Guard intends to handle extreme weather-
related events so they can plan accordingly.
To address the commenter's concerns regarding the regarding the
lack of clarity in the proposed regulatory text, the Coast Guard is
making the following changes in the final rule regulatory text in Sec.
165.707.
The Coast Guard is adding three definitions for ``regulated
facilities,'' ``waterfront facilities,'' and ``authorized law
enforcement agencies'' in paragraph (a). The Coast Guard has the
authority to regulate facilities and land structure or shore area
immediately adjacent to navigable waters under certain, specific
statutory and regulatory frameworks. We are adding a definition for
``regulated facilities'' to clarify the regulated facilities covered by
this rule are those regulated under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act,\2\ Maritime Transportation and Security Act,\3\ Clean Water
Act,\4\ and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.\5\ These statutes give the
Coast Guard the authority and jurisdiction to take certain actions on
certain regulated facilities that have a maritime nexus. We are adding
a definition for ``waterfront facilities'' to the regulatory text which
will include any land structure or shore area immediately adjacent to
the navigable waters of the Key West COTP zone. We also added a
definition for ``authorized law enforcement agencies'' to clarify that
Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies that have received
specific authorization from or are operating in concert with the Coast
Guard are authorized to conduct operations related to the safety,
security, and stability of the Key West COTP zone.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 46 U.S.C. 70001 et seq.
\3\ 46 U.S.C. 70101 et seq.
\4\ 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
\5\ 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the commenter raised concerns related to
enforceability and notice requirements. The Coast Guard understands
that its regulations are not enforceable on the public without proper
notice. While the publication of this final rule document in the
Federal Register constitutes constructive notice of the requirements
within the regulations. However, there will be circumstances where
individuals are notified by the Coast Guard of an impending extreme
weather situation causing the need for the safety zone to be made
subject to enforcement. In those types of circumstances, the Coast
Guard will provide affected individuals with actual notice of the
safety zone prior to its enforcement or assessment of any fines or
penalties. In addition to changes made to the regulatory text in this
final rule in response to comment, we are making the following changes
to the regulatory text.
In paragraph (a), we are adding ``regulated facilities, and
``waterfront facilities'' to clarify that regulated facilities and
waterfront facilities as defined in paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(7)
respectively are covered by this safety zone when port conditions are
met in accordance with the requirements in paragraph (c)(1) Port
Condition WHISKEY and (c)(2) Port Condition X-RAY. Additionally, in
paragraph (a), we are deleting ``during specified conditions'' because
the location of the safety zone is intended to be constant. When the
safety zone is subject to enforcement it will be determinate of
conditions set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(5) of the
regulatory text. In paragraph (c)(1), we are deleting ``port
facilities'' and adding in its place, ``regulated facilities and
waterfront facilities'' for consistency as definitions for these terms
have been added in paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7). In the event Port
Condition WHISKEY is set, all vessels, regulated facilities, and
waterfront facilities within the Key West COTP zone would have to
comply with the applicable regulations in (c)(1). Additionally, in
paragraph (c)(1), we removed the sentence, ``Vessels wishing to remain
in port are required to submit an application to the COTP prior to
setting Port Condition X-Ray.'' In its place, we are adding the
sentence, ``Oceangoing vessels greater than 300 gross tons (GT)
intending to remain in the port during Port Condition Whiskey must
contact the Key West COTP prior to the setting of port condition X-
Ray.'' We are taking this action to prevent vessel owners and operators
from having to generate additional documentation.
In paragraph (c)(2), we are deleting ``port facilities'' and adding
in its place, ``regulated facilities and waterfront facilities'' for
consistency as definitions for these terms have been added in
paragraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7). In the event Port Condition X-RAY is set,
all vessels, regulated facilities, and waterfront facilities within the
Key West COTP zone would have to comply with the applicable regulations
in paragraph (c)(2). Additionally, in paragraph (c)(2), we are deleting
the sentence, ``The COTP may require additional precautions to ensure
the safety of the ports and waterways'' because it is
[[Page 76135]]
overly vague and may cause undue confusion for owners and operators of
vessels and regulated facilities.
In paragraph (c)(3), we clarified we are only limiting cargo
operations at ``regulated facilities.'' We also removed some the
language that went into specifics of cargo operations. Removing the
language made the regulatory text more succinct, as the initial
language contained unnecessary redundancies. We also clarified that
only facilities regulated under the MTSA will be required to operate in
accordance with their security plan.
In paragraph (c)(4), we are removing the words ``are suspended''
and replacing it with, ``must cease all cargo operations'' because the
phrase ``are suspended'' may be confusing in this context. By using the
phrase ``must cease all cargo operations'' we are making it clear to
the regulated parties that cargo operations must stop when Port ZULU is
set.
In paragraph (c)(6), we are revising the text to clarify that the
Coast Guard Sector Key West will notify the maritime community, ``to
the furthest extent practicable'' of the periods which the safety zone
in paragraph (a) will be subject to enforcement via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners or by on-scene designated representatives.
We are deleting paragraph (c)(7) because it is duplicative of what
is contained in paragraph (c)(6). The information previously described
in (c)(8) was thereby moved to (c)(7).
Lastly, we are making non-substantive editorial changes and
revising terminology for consistency throughout the final rule
regulatory text.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the necessity to
protect life and port infrastructure during a hurricanes, tropical
storms, and other disasters. The absence of a safe harbor in the
Florida Keys precludes large vessels from accessing adequate facilities
to weather a substantial storm or natural disaster within the Key West
COTP zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the safety zone, and the
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to remain in port.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received 00 comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone that would prohibit entry in certain waters of the Key West
COTP for
[[Page 76136]]
the duration needed to ensure safe transit of vessels and industry
post-hurricane, post-storm, and post-emergency. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A,
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.707 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.707 Safety Zone; Hurricanes, Tropical Storms and Other
Disasters in Florida Keys.
(a) Regulated Areas. All navigable waters, regulated facilities,
and waterfront facilities within the Key West Captain of the Port
(COTP) zone, Key West, Florida (as described in 33 CFR 3.35-40).
(b) Definitions. As used in this section:
Authorized Law Enforcement Agencies means Federal, State, and local
law enforcement agencies that have received specific authorization from
or are operating in concert with the Coast Guard to conduct operations
related to the safety, security and stability of the Key West COTP
zone.
Designated Representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders,
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers
operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State, and local officers
designated by or assisting the COTP in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
Port Condition WHISKEY means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/34-47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make
landfall at the port within 72 hours.
Port Condition X-RAY means a condition set by the COTP when weather
advisories indicate sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/34-47 knots)
from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make landfall
at the port within 48 hours.
Port Condition YANKEE means a condition set by the COTP when
weather advisories indicate that sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/
34-47 knots) from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to
make landfall at the port within 24 hours.
Port Condition ZULU means a condition set by the COTP when weather
advisories indicate that sustained gale force winds (39-54 mph/34-47
knots) from a tropical or hurricane force storm are predicted to make
landfall at the port within 12 hours.
Regulated Facilities means shoreside facilities regulated by the
Coast Guard under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act,\6\ Maritime
Transportation and Security Act,\7\ Clean Water Act,\8\ and the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990,\9\ and regulations in 33 CFR parts 105, 154,
156, and 158.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 46 U.S.C. 70001 et seq.
\7\ 46 U.S.C. 70101 et seq.
\8\ 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
\9\ 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waterfront Facilities means any land structure or shore area
immediately adjacent to the navigable waters of the Key West COTP zone.
(c) Regulations--(1) Port Condition WHISKEY. All vessels, regulated
facilities, and waterfront facilities within the Key West COTP zone
must exercise due diligence in preparation for potential storm impacts.
All regulated facilities and waterfront facilities must begin removing
all debris and securing potential flying hazards. Oceangoing vessels
greater than 300 gross tons (GT) must make plans to depart no later
than the setting of Port Condition Yankee unless authorized by the
COTP. Oceangoing vessels greater than 300 GT intending to remain in
port must contact the COTP prior to the setting port condition X-Ray.
(2) Port Condition X-RAY. All vessels, regulated facilities, and
waterfront facilities within the Key West COTP zone must ensure that
potential flying debris is removed or secured. Hazardous materials/
pollution hazards must be secured in a safe manner and away from
waterfront areas. Vessels greater than 300 GT without an approval to
remain in port must depart prior to the setting of Port Condition
YANKEE. Vessels with the COTP's permission to remain in port must
implement their pre-approved mooring arrangement. Regulated facilities
must prepare to terminate all cargo operations.
(3) Port Condition YANKEE. Affected ports are closed to inbound
vessel traffic. All oceangoing vessels greater than 300 GT must have
departed designated ports within the Key West COTP zone. Regulated
facilities must terminate all cargo operations, not associated with
storm preparations, unless specifically authorized by the COTP. All
MTSA regulated facilities must continue to operate in accordance with
their approved Facility Security Plans and comply with the requirements
of the MTSA.
(4) Port Condition ZULU. The port is closed to all vessel traffic
except as specifically authorized by the COTP. Regulated facilities
must cease all cargo operations, including bunkering and lightering.
Waivers may be granted except for when Cargo of Particular Hazard or
Certain Dangerous Cargo are involved.
(5) Emergency Restrictions for Other Disasters. Any natural or
other disasters that are anticipated to affect the Key West COTP zone
will result in the prohibition of regulated facility operations and
vessel traffic transiting or remaining in the affected port.
(6) Safety Zones Notice. Coast Guard Sector Key West will notify
the maritime community, to the furthest extent practicable, of the
periods during which the safety zone described in paragraph (a) will be
subject to enforcement via Broadcast Notice to Mariners or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(7) Exception. This regulation does not apply to authorized law
enforcement agencies operating within the regulated area.
Jason D. Ingram,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Key West.
[FR Doc. 2023-24471 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P