Transportation Services for Individuals With Disabilities: ADA Standards for Transportation Facilities, 76272-76275 [2023-24422]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
76272
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Notices
collection pertains specifically to 49
CFR 199.227(b)(4), that requires
operators to maintain records of
decisions not to administer postaccident employee alcohol tests for a
minimum of three years. Operators must
make those records available to PHMSA
upon request.
Affected Public: Operators of PHMSAregulated pipelines.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping
Burden:
Total Annual Responses: 609.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,218.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
3. Title: Recordkeeping Requirements
for Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities.
OMB Control Number: 2137–0048.
Current Expiration Date: 11/30/2024.
Type of Request: Renewal with no
change of a currently approved
information collection.
Abstract: Pursuant to the Federal
Pipeline Safety Regulations, liquefied
natural gas facility operators are
required to maintain records, make
reports, and provide information
regarding their liquefied natural gas
facilities to PHMSA upon request.
Affected Public: Operators of liquefied
natural gas facilities.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping
Burden:
Estimated number of responses:
40,400.
Estimated annual burden hours:
12,120.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
4. Title: Customer-Owned Service
Lines.
OMB Control Number: 2137–0594.
Current Expiration Date: 11/30/2024.
Type of Request: Renewal with no
change of a currently approved
information collection.
Abstract: Pursuant to 49 CFR 192.16,
operators of gas service lines who do not
maintain their customers’ buried piping
between service lines and building
walls or gas utilization equipment are
required to send written notices to their
customers prescribing the proper
maintenance of these gas lines and of
the potential hazards of not properly
maintaining these gas lines. Operators
also must maintain records that include
a copy of the notice currently in use and
evidence that notices were sent to
customers within the previous three
years. The purpose of the collection is
to provide PHMSA with adequate
information about how customer-owned
service lines are being maintained to
prevent the potential hazards associated
with not maintaining the lines.
Examples of sufficient notification
include a prepared notification with the
customer’s bill.
Affected Public: State and local
governments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping
Burden:
Estimated number of responses:
550,000.
Estimated annual burden hours:
9,167.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
5. Title: Periodic Underwater
Inspection and Notification of
Abandoned Underwater Pipelines.
OMB Control Number: 2137–0618.
Current Expiration Date: 11/30/2024.
Type of Request: Renewal with no
change of a currently approved
information collection.
Abstract: The Federal Pipeline Safety
Regulations at 49 CFR 192.612 and 49
CFR 195.413 require operators of
pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico and its
inlets in waters less than 15 feet (4.6
meters) deep to conduct periodic
underwater inspections to determine
whether the pipelines are exposed
underwater pipelines or pose a hazard
to navigation. If an operator discovers
that its underwater pipeline is exposed
or poses a hazard to navigation, among
other remedial actions, the operator
must contact the National Response
Center by telephone within 24 hours of
discovery and report the location of the
exposed pipeline or hazardous pipeline.
PHMSA’s regulations for reporting the
abandonment of underwater pipelines
can be found at 49 CFR 192.727 and 49
CFR 195.59. These provisions contain
certain requirements for disconnecting
and purging abandoned pipelines and
require operators to notify PHMSA of
each abandoned offshore pipeline
facility and each abandoned onshore
pipeline facility that crosses over,
under, or through a commercially
navigable waterway.
Affected Public: Operators of pipeline
facilities.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping
Burden:
Estimated number of responses: 92.
Estimated annual burden hours:
1,372.
Frequency of collection: On occasion
6. Title: Recordkeeping for
Underground Natural Gas Storage
Facilities.
OMB Control Number: 2137–0634.
Current Expiration Date: 11/30/2024.
Type of Request: Renewal with no
change of a currently approved
information collection.
Abstract: The Federal Pipeline Safety
Regulations at 49 CFR 192.12 require
operators of underground natural gas
storage facilities to maintain
documentation and provide information
to PHMSA upon request. Examples of
the required records include operations
and maintenance procedures, results of
required tests, records of inspections
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and repairs, and notifications to the
public.
Affected Public: Operators of
underground natural gas storage
facilities.
Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping
Burden:
Estimated number of responses: 136.
Estimated annual burden hours: 220.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Comments are invited on:
(a) The need for the renewal and
revision of these collections of
information for the proper performance
of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the Agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as
amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
John A. Gale,
Director, Standards and Rulemaking Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–24445 Filed 11–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2023–0166]
Transportation Services for Individuals
With Disabilities: ADA Standards for
Transportation Facilities
Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Request for information on
accessibility improvements for
transportation facilities.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT, or Department) is
considering whether to amend the
accessibility requirements for
transportation facilities under the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(ADA) currently contained in Appendix
A to DOT’s regulations governing
transportation services for individuals
with disabilities. The Department may
consider whether to improve access
beyond the minimum standards
established by the U.S. Access Board
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Notices
and Appendix A. The Department seeks
suggestions from all transportation
stakeholders—including transportation
agencies, transportation riders
(particularly those with disabilities),
community members, advocacy groups,
planning officials, States, cities,
researchers and technology companies,
and the private sector—on
enhancements that the Department
could consider with regard to the ADA
standards for transportation buildings
and facilities. The Department
specifically seeks feedback on areas
including, but not limited to vertical
access, communications, and
wayfinding. The Department also
invites comment on any other aspects of
the current accessibility requirements
for transportation facilities under the
ADA contained in DOT’s regulations
governing transportation services for
individuals with disabilities.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
on or before January 5, 2024. DOT will
consider comments filed after this date
to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments
identified by docket number DOT–OST–
2023–0166 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
All submissions received must
include the agency name and docket
number DOT–OST–2023–0166. All
comments received will be posted
without change to www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. For information on DOT’s
compliance with the Privacy Act, please
visit https://www.transportation.gov/
privacy.
For access to the docket to read
background documents or comments
received, go to www.regulations.gov at
any time and search for docket number
DOT–OST–2023–0166.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions, Holly Ceasar-Fox,
DOT Office of General Counsel, (202)
366–7420 or holly.ceasarfox@dot.gov.
For program questions related to transit,
John Day, FTA Office of Civil Rights,
(202) 366–1671 or john.day@dot.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
For legal questions related to transit,
Bonnie Graves, FTA Office of Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–0944 or
bonnie.graves@dot.gov. For questions
related to intercity or high-speed rail,
Alana Kuhn, FRA Office of Chief
Counsel, (202) 493–0842 or
alana.kuhn@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
42 U.S.C. 12204 requires the
Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board (Access
Board) to issue minimum guidelines for
accessibility under Titles II & III of the
ADA. The ADA statute at 42 U.S.C.
12149 requires the Secretary of
Transportation to develop and
implement regulations for certain public
transportation facilities, vehicles, and
services consistent with the Access
Board’s guidelines. The Secretary may
issue regulations that result in greater
accessibility than the minimum
guidelines established by the Access
Board.
The current guidelines were
developed nearly a quarter century ago
and adopted as regulatory standards by
the Department in 2006.1 The
Department’s experience administering
these minimum standards for the past
two decades suggests that they have
resulted in greater accessibility than the
standards 2 that preceded them, but in
many cases extra efforts may still be
required on the part of people with
disabilities to enter and use a facility.
For example, accessible entrances may
be located in isolated locations away
from entrances used by members of the
general public who do not require an
accessible entrance, and persons with
sensory disabilities may need to rely on
information on a message board at
station entrances while other members
of the general public are informed via
public address systems. In other cases,
persons unable to navigate staircases
may be faced with lengthy ramps to
cross from one rail platform to another.
Such continuing barriers may mean that
many wheelchair users and persons
with sensory, cognitive, or processing
disabilities remain dependent on
paratransit or private transportation
rather than being able to use integrated
fixed route service.
There have also been many
developments such as advances in
technology since the standards were last
1 The Access Board published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register on
November 16, 1999, and issued the Final Rule on
July 23, 2004. The Department of Justice adopted
the standards on September 15, 2010.
2 The standards adopted by the Department on
September 6, 1991, were in effect until 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76273
updated, and the Department is
considering both physical access to and
usability of facilities by persons with
sensory, cognitive, and other
disabilities. The Department strives to
provide for equitable access to persons
with disabilities similar to that available
to people without disabilities, including
the usability of the facility, so that
persons with disabilities are able to
access and navigate public transit with
the same ease, reliability, and
independence as any other user.
Complaints filed by the public,
feedback from the disability community,
observations of and information
gathered by Departmental employees
(with and without disabilities), media
articles, and the results of the
Department’s oversight activities have
led the Department to solicit feedback
on the current standards. For some
disabilities, such as those affecting
hearing, vision, or cognitive function,
the Department is aware of
technological advancements (for
example, induction loops and mobile
device applications), that would help
persons with those disabilities navigate
the transportation system with ease and
independence. The Department is
interested in learning more about these
technologies. For other disabilities, such
as those affecting mobility, the
Department seeks feedback regarding,
for example, minimum standards that
rely on a single point of access that
creates a situation where a single point
of failure renders an entire facility
inaccessible and unusable by persons
with disabilities, while access to
nondisabled persons is unaffected. The
Department is interested in learning
how transportation facilities can be
designed and constructed such that
accessibility features are resilient and
always available. The Department also
seeks input to assist it in understanding
the magnitude of potential access issues
that may exist in transportation facilities
and therefore requests any available
information and comments stakeholders
may have on the number of all endusers, not limited to users with
disabilities, who would benefit from
specific standards in 49 CFR part 37 that
may be improved or implemented.
In addition to learning about specific
standards in 49 CFR part 37 that may be
improved or implemented, the
Department is interested in the end-user
experience generally. These include
experiences in transportation facilities
related to vertical access,
communication, wayfinding, or any
other aspects of transportation facilities
that represent barriers for people with
disabilities. The Department will
consider the extent to which the
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
76274
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Department has authority under the
ADA to remove such barriers.
Through this request for information
(RFI), the Department seeks input as it
considers whether to revise the existing
DOT ADA requirements for
transportation buildings and facilities
including public transportation and
intercity rail transportation (including
Amtrak). The Department poses seven
questions below and looks forward to
feedback from all interested parties.
Vertical Access
1. It has become increasingly apparent
that elevator maintenance and reliability
are a critical component of ensuring the
accessibility of a multi-level
transportation facility such as subway
and rail stations. While the existing
DOT ADA regulations require
accessibility features to be maintained
in working order, repairs can be
complex and many entities do not have
employees with the skillset necessary to
repair an elevator or the necessary
components readily available, which
can add a level of difficulty to the repair
process.3 Thus, unreliable elevators
create operational and administrative
burdens for entities covered by DOT’s
ADA regulations and can render
transportation facilities inaccessible for
users for extended durations. The
Department is interested in learning
about standards that would ensure
elevator reliability in transportation
facilities.
2. Elevators that are frequently out of
service significantly impact the ability
of persons who cannot negotiate stairs
to use such transportation services. As
a result, the Department understands
that many agencies involved in the
construction or alteration of stations
initially plan for two or more elevators
per bank instead of just one, so that the
station is not rendered inaccessible
when one elevator requires maintenance
or repair. Despite planners’ intentions,
budgetary considerations often result in
the minimum legally required (not just
for accessibility), which means only a
single elevator is provided. The
Department seeks public input on the
impacts of the installation, for future
construction and alterations, of at least
two elevators in transportation facilities,
or a combination of ramps and
elevators, where currently one elevator
is required.
3 The Department recognizes that many elevator
manufacturers require that only their employees
work on the elevator, and that there are examples
of arrangements where the third-party repair person
is available 7 days a week, 24 hours per day, but
the Department is also aware of arrangements where
same-day, after hours, weekend, or holiday service
is not guaranteed (or is charged at a premium).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
3. Many commuter and intercity rail
stations rely on long switch-back ramps
to provide an accessible route between
platforms on either side of the tracks, or
to multiple platforms within a station.
These ramps, which can be hundreds of
feet long, often present a barrier to
persons who cannot negotiate steps, but
also cannot travel the distances required
to traverse the ramp. However, the
simplicity of a non-mechanical ramp
means that maintenance costs are
relatively low and repairs are few and
far between, unlike more complex
elevators. The Department is seeking
comment on the use of elevators in lieu
of ramps in transportation facilities, or
a single elevator in addition to the ramp,
if the vertical distance or ramp length
exceeds a certain threshold, including
information on an appropriate
threshold.
Communications
4. The Department of Justice’s current
ADA standards for buildings and
facilities contain provisions requiring
assistive listening systems in assembly
areas. See 28 CFR 35.151(c)(3); 36 CFR
pt. 1191, app. B at 344. The Department
seeks comment on the feasibility of
extending such requirements to
transportation facilities such as rail
stations to enable real-time
announcements for persons who are
deaf or hard of hearing or because of
their disability rely on text-based
communications to access information.
Current requirements for transportation
facilities stipulate only that the same
information provided audibly must be
provided visually. This often takes the
form of messages written on a dry-erase
board in the station entrance by
personnel or information relayed
directly to the passenger by personnel,
which prevents the transmission of realtime announcements that often relate to
service changes or safety/security
matters, forces passengers who are deaf
or hard of hearing to identify
themselves, is not reliable at larger
stations with multiple entrances, and is
not possible at unstaffed stations. The
Department is aware that induction loop
technology is in use in some stations,
enabling those with a T-coil in their
hearing aids to receive messages
directly, but seeks comment on how
widespread this technology is used
among deaf and hard of hearing persons.
The Department also seeks comment on
other technologies that may provide the
same benefit to the same or a larger
audience at transportation facilities,
such as real-time text-messaging.
5. The Department also seeks
comment on other means by which the
content of audible announcements of
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the type typically relayed by public
address systems at transportation
facilities can be provided in real-time in
a visual format, such as changeable
electronic message boards, as well as
information pertaining to the number
and placement of necessary displays
throughout a station environment,
including spacing, scale, and frequency.
6. In addition, the Department seeks
comment on technologies that can
provide an audible component to
information currently displayed in
visual format at transportation facilities.
For example, many transit systems and
intercity stations use changeable
electronic message displays to
communicate information about the
next train scheduled to arrive at a
station, such as the line, number of cars,
and estimated time of arrival. Most such
systems lack an audible component to
make this information accessible to
individuals who are blind or have low
vision. What commercially available
technologies might be appropriate for
deployment in a transit, Amtrak, or
commuter rail station environment to
convey information provided visually in
an audible format? How should such
information be broadcast? Would an
interface with a smart device be
appropriate or sufficient, or should an
audible component be provided directly
on the station’s display device?
Wayfinding
7. The Department seeks comment on
technologies to enable effective
wayfinding within the transit station,
intercity and commuter rail station
environments for persons who are blind
or have low vision, and to accommodate
neurodiversity (e.g., autism, intellectual
disability, etc.). The Department is
aware of technologies capable of realtime transcription of speech and those
involving the use of Bluetooth beacons
that interface with smart devices and
seeks comment on the usability of such
systems from the end-user perspective.
The Department is also interested in
alternative technologies that may be
available, potentially without the use of
handheld devices, and the acceptance of
technologies that do rely on such
devices within the general community
of persons who are blind, have lowvision, and/or are neurodiverse.
General
In addition, the Department invites
comment on all other areas of the
current DOT ADA standards, found in
Appendix A to 49 CFR part 37, which
govern rail stations and stops of all
types, bus stops and transfer stations,
landside facilities, office buildings
housing transit agency personnel,
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 213 / Monday, November 6, 2023 / Notices
conference facilities of the type often
employed for board meetings and public
hearings, businesses housed in transit
facilities, and individual elements such
as track crossings, ramps, parking lots
and structures, fare vending machines
and collection equipment, and
accessible paths of travel. If the public
has information on how these standards
do or do not currently support equitable
access, please submit comments to the
docket for this rulemaking activity.
All interested parties are encouraged
to respond to this RFI. Submissions are
strictly voluntary. Individuals or entities
responding to this RFI should state their
role as well as knowledge of and
experience with the ADA in a
transportation environment. DOT may
request additional clarifying
information from any or all respondents.
If a respondent does not wish to be
contacted by DOT for additional
information, a statement to that effect
should be included in the response. All
information submitted should be
unclassified and should not contain
proprietary information, as it will be
posted to www.regulations.gov without
changes.
DOT is not obligated to officially
respond to the information received, but
the responses will assist DOT in its
consideration of whether to revise the
ADA standards for transportation
buildings and facilities.
Comments may be submitted and
viewed at Docket No. DOT–OST–2023–
0166 at https://www.regulations.gov.
Signed pursuant to authority delegated at
49 CFR 1.27(a) on October 31, 2023.
Subash S. Iyer,
Acting General Counsel, Department of
Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2023–24422 Filed 11–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2023–0161]
Notice of Rights and Protections
Available Under the Federal
Antidiscrimination and Whistleblower
Protection Laws
Department of
Transportation—Office of the Secretary.
ACTION: No FEAR Act notice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
This Notice implements Title
II of the Notification and Federal
Employee Antidiscrimination and
Retaliation Act of 2002 (No FEAR Act of
2002). In doing so, the Department of
Transportation notifies all employees,
former employees, and applicants for
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Nov 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
Federal employment of the rights and
protections available to them under the
Federal Anti-discrimination and
Whistleblower Protection Laws.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yvette Rivera, Associate Director, Equity
and Access Division (S–32),
Departmental Office of Civil Rights,
Office of the Secretary, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W78–306,
Washington, DC 20590, 202–366–5131
or by email at Yvette.Rivera@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may retrieve this document
online through the Federal Document
Management System at https://
www.regulations.gov. Electronic
retrieval instructions are available under
the help section of the website.
No FEAR Act Notice
On May 15, 2002, Congress enacted
the ‘‘Notification and Federal Employee
Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act
of 2002,’’ now recognized as the No
FEAR Act (Pub. L. 107–174). The No
FEAR Act was amended on January 1,
2021, by the ‘‘Elijah E. Cummings
Federal Employee Antidiscrimination
Act of 2020,’’ now recognized as the
Cummings Act. One purpose of the No
FEAR Act, which was strengthened by
the Cummings Act, is to ‘‘require that
Federal agencies be accountable for
violations of antidiscrimination and
whistleblower protection laws.’’ (Pub. L.
107–174, Summary). In support of this
purpose, Congress found that ‘‘agencies
cannot be run effectively if those
agencies practice or tolerate
discrimination.’’ (Pub. L. 107–174, Title
I, General Provisions, section 101(1)).
The No FEAR Act also requires the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to
issue this Notice to all DOT employees,
former DOT employees, and applicants
for DOT employment. This Notice
informs such individuals of the rights
and protections available under Federal
antidiscrimination and whistleblower
protection laws.
Antidiscrimination Laws
A Federal agency cannot discriminate
against an employee or applicant with
respect to the terms, conditions, or
privileges of employment because of
race, color, religion, sex, gender
identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy,
national origin, age, disability, marital
status, genetic information, political
affiliation, or in retaliation for a
protected activity. One or more of the
following statutes prohibit
discrimination on these bases: 5 U.S.C.
2302(b)(1), 29 U.S.C. 631, 29 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76275
633a, 29 U.S.C. 206(d), 29 U.S.C. 791, 42
U.S.C. 2000e–16, 2000ff, 2000gg.
If you believe you have experienced
unlawful discrimination on the bases of
race, color, religion, sex, gender
identity, sexual orientation, pregnancy,
national origin, age, retaliation, genetic
information, and/or disability and wish
to pursue a legal remedy, you must
contact a DOT Equal Employment
Opportunity (EEO) counselor within 45
calendar days of the alleged
discriminatory action, or in the case of
a personnel action, within 45 calendar
days of the effective date of the action.
A directory of DOT EEO counselors is
available on the DOT Departmental
Office of Civil Rights website at https://
www.transportation.gov/civil-rights; you
can also contact the Departmental Office
of Civil Rights by phone at 202–366–
4648 for more information. Once you
contact the EEO counselor, you will be
offered the opportunity to resolve the
matter through the informal complaint
process; if you are unable to resolve the
matter through the informal complaint
process, you can file a formal complaint
of discrimination with DOT (see, e.g., 29
CFR part 1614). Parties who complete
the informal complaint process are
provided with an electronic Individual
Complaint of Employment
Discrimination Form. The form can be
submitted electronically at https://
secure.dot.gov/form/eeoc or by email at
Patricia.Fields@dot.gov. You may also
contact the EEO Complaints and
Investigations Division, Departmental
Office of Civil Rights by phone at 202–
366–9370 or by email at DOCR_CMB@
dot.gov if you need additional
assistance.
If you believe you experienced
unlawful discrimination based on age,
you must either contact an EEO
counselor as noted above or file a civil
action in a United States District Court
under the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act against the head of the
alleged discriminating agency. If you
choose to file a civil action, you must
give notice of intent to sue to the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC) within 180 days of the alleged
discriminatory action, and not less than
30 days before filing a civil action. You
may file such notice in writing with the
EEOC via mail at P.O. Box 77960,
Washington, DC 20013, the EEOC Public
Portal at https://www.eeoc.gov/
employees/charge.cfm, hand delivery at
131 M St. NE, Washington, DC 20507,
or Fax at 202–663–7022.
If you are alleging unlawful
discrimination based on marital status
or political affiliation, you may file a
written discrimination complaint with
the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC)
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76272-76275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24422]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. DOT-OST-2023-0166]
Transportation Services for Individuals With Disabilities: ADA
Standards for Transportation Facilities
AGENCY: Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for information on accessibility improvements for
transportation facilities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT, or Department) is
considering whether to amend the accessibility requirements for
transportation facilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (ADA) currently contained in Appendix A to DOT's regulations
governing transportation services for individuals with disabilities.
The Department may consider whether to improve access beyond the
minimum standards established by the U.S. Access Board
[[Page 76273]]
and Appendix A. The Department seeks suggestions from all
transportation stakeholders--including transportation agencies,
transportation riders (particularly those with disabilities), community
members, advocacy groups, planning officials, States, cities,
researchers and technology companies, and the private sector--on
enhancements that the Department could consider with regard to the ADA
standards for transportation buildings and facilities. The Department
specifically seeks feedback on areas including, but not limited to
vertical access, communications, and wayfinding. The Department also
invites comment on any other aspects of the current accessibility
requirements for transportation facilities under the ADA contained in
DOT's regulations governing transportation services for individuals
with disabilities.
DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before January 5, 2024. DOT
will consider comments filed after this date to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by docket number DOT-OST-
2023-0166 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
All submissions received must include the agency name and docket
number DOT-OST-2023-0166. All comments received will be posted without
change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For information on DOT's compliance with the Privacy Act,
please visit https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.
For access to the docket to read background documents or comments
received, go to www.regulations.gov at any time and search for docket
number DOT-OST-2023-0166.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, Holly Ceasar-
Fox, DOT Office of General Counsel, (202) 366-7420 or
[email protected]. For program questions related to transit, John
Day, FTA Office of Civil Rights, (202) 366-1671 or [email protected].
For legal questions related to transit, Bonnie Graves, FTA Office of
Chief Counsel, (202) 366-0944 or [email protected]. For questions
related to intercity or high-speed rail, Alana Kuhn, FRA Office of
Chief Counsel, (202) 493-0842 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
42 U.S.C. 12204 requires the Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board) to issue minimum guidelines
for accessibility under Titles II & III of the ADA. The ADA statute at
42 U.S.C. 12149 requires the Secretary of Transportation to develop and
implement regulations for certain public transportation facilities,
vehicles, and services consistent with the Access Board's guidelines.
The Secretary may issue regulations that result in greater
accessibility than the minimum guidelines established by the Access
Board.
The current guidelines were developed nearly a quarter century ago
and adopted as regulatory standards by the Department in 2006.\1\ The
Department's experience administering these minimum standards for the
past two decades suggests that they have resulted in greater
accessibility than the standards \2\ that preceded them, but in many
cases extra efforts may still be required on the part of people with
disabilities to enter and use a facility. For example, accessible
entrances may be located in isolated locations away from entrances used
by members of the general public who do not require an accessible
entrance, and persons with sensory disabilities may need to rely on
information on a message board at station entrances while other members
of the general public are informed via public address systems. In other
cases, persons unable to navigate staircases may be faced with lengthy
ramps to cross from one rail platform to another. Such continuing
barriers may mean that many wheelchair users and persons with sensory,
cognitive, or processing disabilities remain dependent on paratransit
or private transportation rather than being able to use integrated
fixed route service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Access Board published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
in the Federal Register on November 16, 1999, and issued the Final
Rule on July 23, 2004. The Department of Justice adopted the
standards on September 15, 2010.
\2\ The standards adopted by the Department on September 6,
1991, were in effect until 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There have also been many developments such as advances in
technology since the standards were last updated, and the Department is
considering both physical access to and usability of facilities by
persons with sensory, cognitive, and other disabilities. The Department
strives to provide for equitable access to persons with disabilities
similar to that available to people without disabilities, including the
usability of the facility, so that persons with disabilities are able
to access and navigate public transit with the same ease, reliability,
and independence as any other user.
Complaints filed by the public, feedback from the disability
community, observations of and information gathered by Departmental
employees (with and without disabilities), media articles, and the
results of the Department's oversight activities have led the
Department to solicit feedback on the current standards. For some
disabilities, such as those affecting hearing, vision, or cognitive
function, the Department is aware of technological advancements (for
example, induction loops and mobile device applications), that would
help persons with those disabilities navigate the transportation system
with ease and independence. The Department is interested in learning
more about these technologies. For other disabilities, such as those
affecting mobility, the Department seeks feedback regarding, for
example, minimum standards that rely on a single point of access that
creates a situation where a single point of failure renders an entire
facility inaccessible and unusable by persons with disabilities, while
access to nondisabled persons is unaffected. The Department is
interested in learning how transportation facilities can be designed
and constructed such that accessibility features are resilient and
always available. The Department also seeks input to assist it in
understanding the magnitude of potential access issues that may exist
in transportation facilities and therefore requests any available
information and comments stakeholders may have on the number of all
end-users, not limited to users with disabilities, who would benefit
from specific standards in 49 CFR part 37 that may be improved or
implemented.
In addition to learning about specific standards in 49 CFR part 37
that may be improved or implemented, the Department is interested in
the end-user experience generally. These include experiences in
transportation facilities related to vertical access, communication,
wayfinding, or any other aspects of transportation facilities that
represent barriers for people with disabilities. The Department will
consider the extent to which the
[[Page 76274]]
Department has authority under the ADA to remove such barriers.
Through this request for information (RFI), the Department seeks
input as it considers whether to revise the existing DOT ADA
requirements for transportation buildings and facilities including
public transportation and intercity rail transportation (including
Amtrak). The Department poses seven questions below and looks forward
to feedback from all interested parties.
Vertical Access
1. It has become increasingly apparent that elevator maintenance
and reliability are a critical component of ensuring the accessibility
of a multi-level transportation facility such as subway and rail
stations. While the existing DOT ADA regulations require accessibility
features to be maintained in working order, repairs can be complex and
many entities do not have employees with the skillset necessary to
repair an elevator or the necessary components readily available, which
can add a level of difficulty to the repair process.\3\ Thus,
unreliable elevators create operational and administrative burdens for
entities covered by DOT's ADA regulations and can render transportation
facilities inaccessible for users for extended durations. The
Department is interested in learning about standards that would ensure
elevator reliability in transportation facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Department recognizes that many elevator manufacturers
require that only their employees work on the elevator, and that
there are examples of arrangements where the third-party repair
person is available 7 days a week, 24 hours per day, but the
Department is also aware of arrangements where same-day, after
hours, weekend, or holiday service is not guaranteed (or is charged
at a premium).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Elevators that are frequently out of service significantly
impact the ability of persons who cannot negotiate stairs to use such
transportation services. As a result, the Department understands that
many agencies involved in the construction or alteration of stations
initially plan for two or more elevators per bank instead of just one,
so that the station is not rendered inaccessible when one elevator
requires maintenance or repair. Despite planners' intentions, budgetary
considerations often result in the minimum legally required (not just
for accessibility), which means only a single elevator is provided. The
Department seeks public input on the impacts of the installation, for
future construction and alterations, of at least two elevators in
transportation facilities, or a combination of ramps and elevators,
where currently one elevator is required.
3. Many commuter and intercity rail stations rely on long switch-
back ramps to provide an accessible route between platforms on either
side of the tracks, or to multiple platforms within a station. These
ramps, which can be hundreds of feet long, often present a barrier to
persons who cannot negotiate steps, but also cannot travel the
distances required to traverse the ramp. However, the simplicity of a
non-mechanical ramp means that maintenance costs are relatively low and
repairs are few and far between, unlike more complex elevators. The
Department is seeking comment on the use of elevators in lieu of ramps
in transportation facilities, or a single elevator in addition to the
ramp, if the vertical distance or ramp length exceeds a certain
threshold, including information on an appropriate threshold.
Communications
4. The Department of Justice's current ADA standards for buildings
and facilities contain provisions requiring assistive listening systems
in assembly areas. See 28 CFR 35.151(c)(3); 36 CFR pt. 1191, app. B at
344. The Department seeks comment on the feasibility of extending such
requirements to transportation facilities such as rail stations to
enable real-time announcements for persons who are deaf or hard of
hearing or because of their disability rely on text-based
communications to access information. Current requirements for
transportation facilities stipulate only that the same information
provided audibly must be provided visually. This often takes the form
of messages written on a dry-erase board in the station entrance by
personnel or information relayed directly to the passenger by
personnel, which prevents the transmission of real-time announcements
that often relate to service changes or safety/security matters, forces
passengers who are deaf or hard of hearing to identify themselves, is
not reliable at larger stations with multiple entrances, and is not
possible at unstaffed stations. The Department is aware that induction
loop technology is in use in some stations, enabling those with a T-
coil in their hearing aids to receive messages directly, but seeks
comment on how widespread this technology is used among deaf and hard
of hearing persons. The Department also seeks comment on other
technologies that may provide the same benefit to the same or a larger
audience at transportation facilities, such as real-time text-
messaging.
5. The Department also seeks comment on other means by which the
content of audible announcements of the type typically relayed by
public address systems at transportation facilities can be provided in
real-time in a visual format, such as changeable electronic message
boards, as well as information pertaining to the number and placement
of necessary displays throughout a station environment, including
spacing, scale, and frequency.
6. In addition, the Department seeks comment on technologies that
can provide an audible component to information currently displayed in
visual format at transportation facilities. For example, many transit
systems and intercity stations use changeable electronic message
displays to communicate information about the next train scheduled to
arrive at a station, such as the line, number of cars, and estimated
time of arrival. Most such systems lack an audible component to make
this information accessible to individuals who are blind or have low
vision. What commercially available technologies might be appropriate
for deployment in a transit, Amtrak, or commuter rail station
environment to convey information provided visually in an audible
format? How should such information be broadcast? Would an interface
with a smart device be appropriate or sufficient, or should an audible
component be provided directly on the station's display device?
Wayfinding
7. The Department seeks comment on technologies to enable effective
wayfinding within the transit station, intercity and commuter rail
station environments for persons who are blind or have low vision, and
to accommodate neurodiversity (e.g., autism, intellectual disability,
etc.). The Department is aware of technologies capable of real-time
transcription of speech and those involving the use of Bluetooth
beacons that interface with smart devices and seeks comment on the
usability of such systems from the end-user perspective. The Department
is also interested in alternative technologies that may be available,
potentially without the use of handheld devices, and the acceptance of
technologies that do rely on such devices within the general community
of persons who are blind, have low-vision, and/or are neurodiverse.
General
In addition, the Department invites comment on all other areas of
the current DOT ADA standards, found in Appendix A to 49 CFR part 37,
which govern rail stations and stops of all types, bus stops and
transfer stations, landside facilities, office buildings housing
transit agency personnel,
[[Page 76275]]
conference facilities of the type often employed for board meetings and
public hearings, businesses housed in transit facilities, and
individual elements such as track crossings, ramps, parking lots and
structures, fare vending machines and collection equipment, and
accessible paths of travel. If the public has information on how these
standards do or do not currently support equitable access, please
submit comments to the docket for this rulemaking activity.
All interested parties are encouraged to respond to this RFI.
Submissions are strictly voluntary. Individuals or entities responding
to this RFI should state their role as well as knowledge of and
experience with the ADA in a transportation environment. DOT may
request additional clarifying information from any or all respondents.
If a respondent does not wish to be contacted by DOT for additional
information, a statement to that effect should be included in the
response. All information submitted should be unclassified and should
not contain proprietary information, as it will be posted to
www.regulations.gov without changes.
DOT is not obligated to officially respond to the information
received, but the responses will assist DOT in its consideration of
whether to revise the ADA standards for transportation buildings and
facilities.
Comments may be submitted and viewed at Docket No. DOT-OST-2023-
0166 at https://www.regulations.gov.
Signed pursuant to authority delegated at 49 CFR 1.27(a) on
October 31, 2023.
Subash S. Iyer,
Acting General Counsel, Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2023-24422 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P