Special Conditions: Airbus Model A321neo XLR Airplanes; Flight Envelope Protection, Icing and Non-Icing Conditions; High Incidence Protection., 75513-75517 [2023-24311]
Download as PDF
75513
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 212
Friday, November 3, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2021–1032; Notice No. 25–
23–03–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A321neo XLR Airplanes; Flight
Envelope Protection, Icing and NonIcing Conditions; High Incidence
Protection.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplane. The airplane
will have a novel or unusual design
feature when compared to the state of
technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transportcategory airplanes. This design feature
is associated with flight-envelope
protections, in icing and non-icing
conditions, that use high-incidence
protection and an alpha-floor system to
automatically advance throttles when
the airplane angle of attack reaches a
predetermined value. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before
December 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2021–1032 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Nov 02, 2023
Jkt 262001
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any
time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy
Brown, Performance and Environment
Unit, AIR–621A, Technical Policy
Branch, Policy and Standards Division,
Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1801 S.
Airport Rd., Wichita, KS 67209–2190;
telephone and fax 405–666–1050; email
troy.a.brown@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposed special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
Certification of the Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplane is currently
scheduled for December 2023. The
substance of these special conditions, in
all material respects, has been subject to
the notice and public-comment
procedure in several prior instances.
Therefore, because a delay would
significantly affect the applicant’s
installation of the novel or unusual
design feature, and delay certification of
the airplane, the FAA is reducing the
public-comment period to 30 days.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date for
comments, and will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring delay. The FAA may
change these special conditions based
on the comments received.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Privacy
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special
conditions.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to these special
conditions contain commercial or
financial information that is customarily
treated as private, that you actually treat
as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to these special conditions, it
is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the
indicated comments will not be placed
in the public docket of these special
conditions. Send submissions
containing CBI to the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section below. Comments the
FAA receives, which are not specifically
designated as CBI, will be placed in the
public docket for these special
conditions.
Background
On September 16, 2019, Airbus
applied for an amendment to Type
Certificate No. A28NM to include the
new Model A321neo XLR airplane.
These airplanes are twin-engine,
transport-category airplanes with
seating for 244 passengers and a
maximum take-off weight of 222,000
pounds.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.101, Airbus must show that the
Model A321neo XLR airplane meets the
applicable provisions of the regulations
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
75514
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 212 / Friday, November 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
listed in Type Certificate No. A28NM, or
the applicable regulations in effect on
the date of application for the change,
except for earlier amendments as agreed
upon by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR
airplanes because of a novel or unusual
design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, or should any other
model already included on the same
type certificate be modified to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, these special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A321neo
XLR airplane must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, in accordance with
§ 11.38, and they become part of the
type certification basis under 14 CFR
21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Airbus Model A321neo XLR
airplane will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design feature:
Flight-envelope protections, in icing
and non-icing conditions, that use highincidence protection and an alpha-floor
function to automatically advance
throttles when the airplane angle of
attack (AoA) reaches a predetermined
value.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Discussion
The current airworthiness standards
do not contain adequate safety
standards for the high-incidence
protection system and the alpha-floor
system for the Airbus Model A321neo
XLR series airplanes. This is because the
current standards were designed for
more traditional electronic flight control
systems (EFCS), which involve less
advanced envelope protections, such as
stick shakers and pushers. These special
conditions address the more advanced
flight envelope protections, including
icing and non-icing conditions, that are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Nov 02, 2023
Jkt 262001
part of the EFCS design of the A321neo
XLR airplane.
The high-incidence protection system
prevents the airplane from stalling and,
therefore, the stall warning system is not
needed during normal flight conditions.
However, during failure conditions,
which are not shown to be extremely
improbable, the requirements of 14 CFR
25.203 and 25.207 apply, although
slightly modified. If there are failures
not shown to be extremely improbable,
the flight characteristics at the angle-ofattack for CLMAX must be suitable in the
traditional sense, and stall warning
must be provided in a conventional
manner-. These special conditions
address the need for modification
during icing conditions and non-icing
conditions.
The alpha-floor function
automatically advances the throttles on
the operating engines under flight
circumstances of low speed if the
airplane reaches a predetermined high
AoA. This function is intended to
provide increased climb capability.
These special conditions address
these novel or unusual design features
on the Airbus Model A321neo XLR and
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions apply to Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplane. Should Airbus
apply later for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
series of airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113,
44701, 44702, and 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Airbus
Model A321neo XLR airplane. These
special conditions are issued in lieu of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the paragraphs of 14 CFR part 25
referenced below.
Foreword
In the following paragraphs, ‘‘In icing
conditions’’ means with the ice
accretions, relevant for the flight phase,
as defined in part 25, amendment 121,
appendix C.
(a) Definitions
These special conditions address
novel or unusual design features of the
Airbus A321neo XLR and use
terminology that does not appear in part
25. For the purpose of these special
conditions, the following terms describe
certain aspects of these novel or unusual
design features:
High-Incidence Protection System
Angle-of-Attack Limiting Function
A system that operates directly and
automatically on the airplane’s flying
controls to limit the maximum angle of
attack (AoA) that can be attained to a
value below that at which an
aerodynamic stall would occur.
Alpha-Floor System
A system that automatically increases
thrust on the operating engines when
AoA increases through a particular
value.
Alpha Limit
The maximum angle of attack at
which the airplane stabilizes with the
high-incidence protection system
operating and the longitudinal control
held on its aft stop.
VCLmax
An airspeed calculated from a variety
of factors, including load factor normal
to the flight path at VCLmax, airplane
gross weight, aerodynamic reference
wing area, and dynamic pressure.
Vmin
The minimum steady flight speed in
the airplane configuration under
consideration with the high-incidence
protection system operating.
Vmin1g
Vmin corrected to 1g conditions. This
is the minimum calibrated airspeed at
which the airplane can develop a lift
force normal to the flight path and equal
to its weight when at an angle of attack
not greater than that determined for
Vmin.
(b) Capability and Reliability of the
High-Incidence Protection System
Acceptable capability and reliability
of the high-incidence protection system
can be established by flight test,
simulation, and analysis, as appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 212 / Friday, November 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(c) Minimum Steady Flight Speed and
Reference Stall Speed
In lieu of § 25.103, minimum steady
flight speed and reference stall speed,
the following requirements apply:
(1) The minimum steady flight speed,
Vmin, is the final stabilized calibrated
airspeed obtained when the airplane is
decelerated until the longitudinal
control is on its stop in such a way that
the entry rate does not exceed 1 knot per
second.
(2) The minimum steady flight speed,
Vmin, must be determined in icing and
non-icing conditions with:
(i) The high-incidence protection
system operating normally;
(ii) Idle thrust and alpha-floor system
inhibited;
(iii) All combinations of flaps setting
and landing gear position for which Vmin
is required to be determined;
(iv) The weight used when the
reference stall speed, VSR, is being used
as a factor to determine compliance
with a required performance standard;
(v) The most unfavorable center of
gravity allowable; and
(vi) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system.
(3) The 1g minimum steady flight
speed, Vmin1g, is the minimum calibrated
airspeed at which the airplane can
develop a lift force (normal to the flight
path) equal to its weight, while at an
angle of attack not greater than that at
which the minimum steady flight speed
of condition (c)(1), above, was
determined. It must be determined in
icing and non-icing conditions.
(4) The reference stall speed, VSR, is
a calibrated airspeed the applicant
defines. VSR may not be less than a 1g
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Nov 02, 2023
Jkt 262001
stall speed. VSR must be determined in
non-icing conditions and expressed as:
Where:
VCLmax = Calibrated airspeed obtained when
the load factor corrected lift coefficient
(nzw W/qS) is first a maximum during the
maneuver prescribed in condition
(c)(5)(viii) of these Special Conditions;
nzw = Load factor normal to the flight path
at VCLmax;
W = Airplane gross weight;
S = Aerodynamic reference wing area; and
q = Dynamic pressure.
(5) VCLmax is determined in non-icing
conditions with:
(i) Engines idling, or, if that resultant
thrust causes an appreciable decrease in
stall speed, not more than zero thrust at
the stall speed;
(ii) The airplane in other respects
(such as flaps and landing gear) in the
condition existing in the test or
performance standard in which VSR is
being used;
(iii) The weight used when VSR is
being used as a factor to determine
compliance with a required
performance standard;
(iv) The center of gravity position that
results in the highest value of reference
stall speed;
(v) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system, but not less than
1.13 VSR and not greater than 1.3 VSR;
(vi) Alpha-floor system inhibited; and
(vii) The high-incidence protection
system adjusted, at the option of the
applicant, to allow higher incidence
than is possible with the normal
production system.
(viii) Starting from the stabilized trim
condition, apply the longitudinal
control to decelerate the airplane so that
the speed reduction does not exceed 1
knot per second.
(d) Stall Warning
In lieu of § 25.207, the following
requirements apply:
(1) Normal Operation.
If the capabilities of the highincidence protection system are met,
then condition (b) of these Special
Conditions are satisfied. These
conditions provide an equivalent level
of safety to § 25.207, Stall Warning, so
the provision of an additional, unique
warning device is not required.
(2) High-Incidence Protection System
Failure.
(i) In non-icing conditions, following
failures of the high-incidence protection
system, not shown to be extremely
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
improbable, such that the capability of
the system no longer satisfies conditions
(b)(1), (2), and (3) of these Special
Conditions, stall warning must be
provided in accordance with
§ 25.207(a), (b), and (f).
(ii) In icing conditions, after a failure
leading to the loss of the high-incidence
protection system, a safety margin not
less than 3 percent or 3 knots between
stall warning and stall must be
maintained.
(e) Handling Characteristics at High
Incidence
(1) High Incidence Handling
Demonstrations.
In lieu of § 25.201: High-incidence
handling demonstration in icing and
non-icing conditions:
(i) Maneuvers to the limit of the
longitudinal control, in the nose up
sense, must be demonstrated in straight
flight and in 30-degree banked turns
with:
(A) The high-incidence protection
system operating normally.
(B) Initial power conditions of:
(1) Power off.
(2) The power necessary to maintain
level flight at 1.5 VSR1, where VSR1 is the
reference stall speed with flaps in
approach position, the landing gear
retracted, and maximum landing
weight.
(C) Alpha-floor system operating
normally unless more severe conditions
are achieved with inhibited alpha floor.
(D) Flaps, landing gear, and
deceleration devices in any likely
combination of positions.
(E) Representative weights within the
range for which certification is
requested; and
(F) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system.
(ii) The following procedures must be
used to show compliance in non-icing
and icing conditions:
(A) Starting at a speed sufficiently
above the minimum steady flight speed
to ensure that a steady rate of speed
reduction can be established, apply the
longitudinal control so that the speed
reduction does not exceed 1 knot per
second until the control reaches the
stop.
(B) The longitudinal control must be
maintained at the stop until the airplane
has reached a stabilized flight condition,
and must then be recovered through
normal recovery techniques.
(C) Maneuvers with increased
deceleration rates:
(1) In non-icing conditions, the
requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence
limit, up to the maximum rate
achievable.
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
EP03NO23.032
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
The capability and reliability required
are as follows:
(1) It must not be possible, during
pilot-induced maneuvers, to encounter a
stall; and handling characteristics must
be acceptable, as required by condition
(e) of these Special Conditions.
(2) The airplane must be protected
against stalling due to the effects of
wind-shears and gusts at low speeds as
required by condition (f) of these
Special Conditions.
(3) The ability of the high-incidence
protection system to accommodate any
reduction in stalling incidence must be
verified in icing conditions.
(4) The high-incidence protection
system must be provided in each
abnormal configuration of the high-lift
devices that are likely to be used inflight following system failures.
(5) The reliability of the system and
the effects of failures must be acceptable
in accordance with § 25.1309.
75515
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
75516
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 212 / Friday, November 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(2) In icing conditions, with the antiice system working normally, the
requirements must also be met with
increased rates of entry to the incidence
limit up to 2 knots per second.
(D) Maneuvers with ice accretion
prior to operation of the normal anti-ice
system: With the ice accretion prior to
operation of the normal anti-ice system,
the requirement must also be met in
deceleration at 1 knot per second up to
full back stick maintained for at least 3
seconds before normal recovery is
performed (requirement to be met with
and without alpha floor operating).
(2) Characteristics in High-Incidence
Maneuvers.
In lieu of § 25.203: Characteristics in
High Incidence.
In icing and non-icing conditions:
(i) Throughout maneuvers with a rate
of deceleration of not more than 1 knot
per second, both in straight flight and in
30-degree banked turns, the airplane’s
characteristics must be as follows:
(A) The airplane must not exhibit
abnormal nose-up pitching.
(B) The airplane must not exhibit
uncommanded nose-down pitching,
which would be indicative of stall.
However, reasonable attitude changes
associated with stabilizing the incidence
at alpha limit, as the longitudinal
control reaches the stop, would be
acceptable.
(C) The airplane must not exhibit
uncommanded lateral or directional
motion, and the pilot must retain good
lateral and directional control through
conventional use of the controls,
throughout the maneuver.
(D) Buffeting:
(1) In non-icing conditions, the
airplane must not exhibit buffeting of a
magnitude and severity that would act
as a deterrent from completing the
maneuver specified in condition (e)(1)(i)
of these Special Conditions.
(2) In icing conditions, the airplane
may exhibit buffeting of a stronger
magnitude and severity than in nonicing conditions, provided that the
airplane is demonstrated to be free from
excessive vibration and buffeting over
the range of speeds adequate for normal
operation.
(ii) In maneuvers with increased rates
of deceleration, some degradation of
characteristics are acceptable, associated
with a transient excursion beyond the
stabilized alpha limit. However, the
airplane must not exhibit dangerous
characteristics, nor characteristics that
would deter the pilot from holding the
longitudinal control on the stop for a
period of time appropriate to the
maneuver.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Nov 02, 2023
Jkt 262001
(iii) The pilot must always be able to
reduce incidence through conventional
use of the controls.
(iv) The rate at which the airplane can
be maneuvered from trim speeds
associated with scheduled operating
speeds such as V2 and Vref, up to alpha
limit, must not be unduly damped or be
significantly slower than can be
achieved on conventionally controlled
transport airplanes.
(3) Characteristics up to VCLmax.
Maneuvers with a rate of deceleration
of not more than 1 knot per second, up
to the angle of attack at which VCLmax
was obtained as defined in condition
(c)(4) of these Special Conditions, must
be demonstrated in straight flight and in
30-degree banked turns with:
(i) The high-incidence protection
system deactivated or adjusted, at the
option of the applicant, to allow higher
incidence than is possible with the
normal production system,
(ii) Alpha-floor system inhibited,
(iii) Engines idling,
(iv) Flaps and landing gear in any
likely combination of positions, and
(v) The airplane trimmed for straight
flight at a speed achievable by the
automatic trim system.
During such maneuvers, the airplane
must not exhibit dangerous
characteristics; the pilot must always be
able to reduce angle of attack by
conventional use of the controls. The
pilot must retain good lateral and
directional control, by conventional use
of the controls, throughout the
maneuver.
(f) Atmospheric Disturbances
Operation of the high-incidence
protection system must not adversely
affect airplane control during expected
levels of atmospheric disturbances, nor
impede the application of recovery
procedures in case of wind shear. This
must be demonstrated in non-icing
conditions only, and must allow for
drawing conclusion for icing conditions
without further demonstration.
(g) Speed Associated With Other
Requirements
The design must meet the following
modified requirements:
a. Section 25.145(a): Vmin in lieu of
‘‘stall identification.’’
b. Section 25.145(b): Vmin in lieu of
Vsw.
c. Section 25.1323(d): ‘‘From 1.23 VSR
to Vmin’’ in lieu of ‘‘1.23 VSR to stall
warning speed’’ and ‘‘speeds below
Vmin’’ in lieu of ‘‘speeds below stall
warning.’’
(h) Alpha Floor
In icing and non-icing conditions, the
alpha-floor setting must be such that the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
airplane can be flown at the speeds and
bank angles specified in § 25.143(h).
The applicant also must show that the
alpha-floor setting does not interfere
with normal maneuvering of the
airplane. In addition, the airplane must
exhibit no alpha-floor triggering unless
appropriate when the airplane is flown
in usual operational maneuvers and in
turbulence.
(i) Proof of Compliance
In addition to the requirements in
§ 25.21(b), the following requirement
applies:
The flying qualities will be evaluated
at the most unfavorable center-of-gravity
(CG) position.
(j) Performance in Icing Conditions
(1) Take-off
In lieu of compliance with
§ 25.105(a)(2)(i), the following special
conditions apply:
(a) In icing conditions, if in the
configuration used in showing
compliance with § 25.121(b), and with
the most critical of the ‘‘Take-off Ice’’
accretion(s) defined in 14 CFR part 25,
amendment 121, appendix C:
(i) The V2 speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h) for the take-off
configuration.
Note: This requirement does not apply if
the Vmin1g is increased in icing conditions,
with the ‘‘Take-off Ice’’ accretion defined in
part 25, amendment 121, appendix C, by less
than 2.5 knots or 2.5 percent, whichever is
greater.
(2) Climb: one-engine inoperative.
In lieu of compliance with
§ 25.121(b)(2)(ii)(A), the following
special conditions apply:
(a) In icing conditions, with the most
critical of the take-off ice accretion(s)
defined in appendix C, if in the
configuration used to show compliance
with § 25.121(b) with this take-off ice
accretion:
(i) The V2 speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability specified in
§ 25.143(h), for the take-off
configuration.
Note: This requirement does not apply if
the Vmin1g is increased in icing conditions,
with the ‘‘Take-off Ice’’ accretion defined in
14 CFR part 25, amendment 121, appendix C,
by less than 2.5 knots or 2.5 percent,
whichever is greater.
In lieu of compliance with
§ 25.121(c)(2)(ii)(A) and (B), the
following special conditions apply:
(a) In icing conditions, with the most
critical of the final take-off ice
accretion(s) defined in appendix C, if in
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 212 / Friday, November 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules
the configuration used to show
compliance with § 25.121(b) with the
take-off ice accretion used to show
compliance with § 25.111(c)(5)(i):
(i) The VFTO (final take-off speed)
scheduled in non-icing conditions does
not provide the maneuvering capability,
specified in § 25.143(h), for the en-route
configuration.
Note: This requirement does not apply if
the Vmin1g is increased in icing conditions,
with the ‘‘Final Take-off Ice’’ accretion
defined in 14 CFR part 25, amendment 121,
appendix C, by less than 2.5 knots or 2.5
percent, whichever is greater.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(ii) The degradation of the gradient of
climb, determined in accordance with
§ 25.121(b), with the take-off ice
accretion used in showing compliance
with § 25.111(c)(5)(i), is greater than
one-half of the applicable actual-to-net
take-off flight path gradient reduction
defined in § 25.115(b);
In lieu of compliance with
25.121(d)(2)(ii), the following special
conditions apply:
(a) In icing conditions, with the most
critical of the approach ice accretion(s)
defined in 14 CFR part 25, amendment
121, appendix C, as applicable, in a
configuration corresponding to the
normal all-engines-operating procedure,
the Vmin1g for this configuration does
not exceed 110 percent of the Vmin1g for
the related all-engines-operating landing
configuration in icing conditions, with a
climb speed established with normal
landing procedures, but not more than
1.4 VSR (VSR determined in non-icing
conditions).
(3) En-route flight paths.
In lieu of compliance with
25.123(b)(2)(i), the following special
conditions apply:
(a) In icing conditions with the most
critical of the en-route ice accretion(s)
defined in 14 CFR part 25, amendment
121, appendix C, if:
(i) The VFTO speed scheduled in nonicing conditions does not provide the
maneuvering capability, specified in
§ 25.143(h), for the en-route
configuration.
Issued in in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 27, 2023.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Manager, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and
Standards Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–24311 Filed 11–2–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Nov 02, 2023
Jkt 262001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2021–1034; Notice No. 25–
23–02–SC]
Special Conditions: Airbus Model
A321neo XLR Airplane; Electronic
Flight-Control System: LateralDirectional and Longitudinal Stability,
and Low-Energy Awareness.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplane. The airplane
will have a novel or unusual design
feature when compared to the state of
technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transportcategory airplanes. This design feature
is an electronic flight-control system
(EFCS) associated with lateraldirectional and longitudinal stability,
and low-energy awareness. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before
December 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2021–1034 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any
time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75517
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy
Brown, Performance and Environment
Unit, AIR–621A, Technical Policy
Branch, Policy and Standards Division,
Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1801 S Airport
Rd., Wichita, KS 67209–2190; telephone
and fax 405–666–1050; email
troy.a.brown@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposed special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
Certification of the Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplane is currently
scheduled for December 2023. The
substance of these special conditions, in
all material respects, has been subject to
the notice and public-comment
procedure in several prior instances.
Therefore, because a delay would
significantly affect the applicant’s
installation of the new or unusual
feature, and delay certification of the
airplane, the FAA is reducing the
public-comment period to 30 days.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date for
comments, and will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring delay. The FAA may
change these special conditions based
on the comments received.
Privacy
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special
conditions.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
E:\FR\FM\03NOP1.SGM
03NOP1
Provide the following information to help us resolve this problem: the URL of the page you were trying to access, the steps you followed to produce the error, specific search or browse terms, and/or a screenshot of the page where the error occurred.