Determination To Defer Sanctions; California; California Air Resources Board, 75236-75238 [2023-23608]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
75236
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
that Rule 415 regulates activities
covered by the CTG document ‘‘Control
of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck
Gasoline Loading Terminals’’ (EPA–
450/2–77–026, October 1977).4 That
proposal stated that Rule 415 was
revised in response to the EPA’s
previous conditional approval and that
the updated version of Rule 415
corrected the identified deficiencies.
Therefore, our approval of Rule 415 as
establishing RACT for this CTG cured
the identified deficiency associated with
our conditional approval of the portion
of the District’s RACT SIP associated
with Rule 415 in 40 CFR 52.248(i). Due
to an administrative oversight, our
notice approving Rule 415 neglected to
remove the conditional approval
language from 40 CFR 52.248(i). This
action addresses this administrative
oversight.
For the reasons described above, this
action corrects the regulatory text to
reflect the current status of AVAQMD’s
RACT SIP demonstration for the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The
EPA is removing Rule 1110.2,
‘‘Emission from Stationary, Non-road &
Portable Internal Combustion Engines,’’
and Rule 1151, ‘‘Motor Vehicle and
Mobile Equipment Coating Operations,’’
from the regulatory text at 40 CFR
52.248(b)(2) and 40 CFR 52.248(b)(3),
respectively. Consequently, AVAQMD
has met its RACT SIP obligations for
these 1997 and 2008 8-hour NAAQS
and, therefore, the EPA is removing the
prior conditional approvals for these
RACT SIP demonstrations from the
Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR
52.248(b)), leaving only the
subsequently approved rules in the
California SIP. This action also corrects
the regulatory text to reflect the current
status of ICAPCD’s RACT SIP
demonstration for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. ICAPCD has met its
RACT SIP obligations for this NAAQS
and, therefore, the EPA will remove the
prior conditional approval for this
RACT SIP demonstration from the Code
of Federal Regulations (40 CFR
52.248(i)), leaving only the subsequently
approved rule in the California SIP.
The EPA has determined that this
action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’
exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation where public notice
and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to public interest. Public notice and
comment for this action is unnecessary
because the underlying rules and RACT
4 86
evaluations were already subject to a 30day comment period, and this action is
merely making administrative changes
and updating the regulatory text
accordingly. Further, this action is
consistent with the purpose and
rationale of the final rules. Because this
action does not change the EPA’s
analyses or overall actions, no purpose
would be served by additional public
notice and comment. Consequently,
additional public notice and comment
are unnecessary.
The EPA also finds that there is good
cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for
these amendments to become effective
on the date of publication of this action.
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date of less than 30 days after
publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause found and
published with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day
waiting period prescribed in APA
section 553(d)(3) is to give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. This rule does not
create any new regulatory requirements
such that affected parties would need
time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. This action merely corrects
incomplete amendatory instructions in
previous rulemakings. For these
reasons, the EPA finds good cause under
APA section 553(d)(3) for these changes
to become effective on the date of
publication of this action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: October 19, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
FR 24835 (May 10, 2021).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 Nov 01, 2023
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subpart F—California
§ 52.248
[Amended]
2. Section 52.248 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraphs (b)
and (i).
■
[FR Doc. 2023–23740 Filed 11–1–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0479; FRL–11425–
02–R9]
Determination To Defer Sanctions;
California; California Air Resources
Board
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final determination.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is making an interim final
determination that the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) has submitted
a rule and other materials that correct
deficiencies in its Clean Air Act (CAA
or ‘‘Act’’) state implementation plan
(SIP) provisions concerning emissions
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from vapor recovery systems of gasoline
cargo tanks. This determination is based
on a proposed approval, published
elsewhere in this Federal Register, of
CARB’s California Code of Regulations,
Title 17, Division 3, Chapter 1,
Subchapter 8, Article 1, Section 94014
(‘‘Section 94014’’) which regulates this
source category. The effect of this
interim final determination is that the
imposition of sanctions that were
triggered by a previous limited
disapproval by the EPA in 2022 is now
deferred. If the EPA finalizes its
approval of CARB’s submission, relief
from these sanctions will become
permanent.
SUMMARY:
This interim final determination
is effective November 2, 2023. However,
comments will be accepted on or before
December 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2023–0479 at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
75237
Table of Contents
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need
assistance in a language other than
English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
I. Background
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
La
Kenya Evans-Hopper, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 942–3245 or by
email at evanshopper.lakenya@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
On April 5, 2022 (87 FR 19631), the
EPA issued a final limited approval and
limited disapproval action for the CARB
rule listed in Table 1 that was submitted
to the EPA for inclusion into the
California SIP. The action addressed the
procedures CARB uses to certify vapor
recovery systems on cargo tank trucks
used to transport gasoline from bulk
terminals to gasoline dispensing
facilities.
TABLE 1—CARB RULE WITH PREVIOUS EPA ACTION
Regulation or provision
Regulation title or subject
California Code of Regulations, Title Certification of Vapor Recovery
17, Division 3, Chapter 1, SubSystems for Cargo Tanks.
chapter 8, Article 1, Section 94014.
In the April 5, 2022 final rule, we
determined that although the CARB
regulation strengthened the SIP and was
largely consistent with the requirements
of the CAA, the submitted rule included
a deficiency that precluded our full
approval of the rule into the SIP.
CARB’s previously submitted Section
94014 incorporated by reference
Certification Procedure CP–204 (‘‘CP–
Amended
Submitted
EPA action in 2022
07/25/2013 ....
08/22/2018
Limited Approval and Limited Disapproval.
204’’) that allowed for CARB’s Executive
Officer to approve alternate test
procedures without EPA approval. The
EPA found that this provision was an
instance of unbounded director’s
discretion. Pursuant to section 179 of
the CAA and our regulations at 40 CFR
52, the disapproval action on CP–204
under title I, part D started a sanctions
clock for imposition of offset sanctions
18 months after the action’s effective
date of November 5, 2023, and highway
sanctions 6 months later.
On July 12, 2023, the CARB revised
Section 94014 and CP–204, and on
September 13, 2023, submitted it to the
EPA for approval into the California SIP
as shown in Table 2 below.
Regulation or provision
Regulation title or subject
Amended
Submitted
California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Division 3, Chapter
1, Subchapter 8, Article 1, Section 94014, excluding subsections (a)–(d).
Certification Procedure CP–204 .............................................
Certification of Vapor Recovery Systems for Cargo Tanks.
1 07/12/23
09/13/23
Certification Procedure for Vapor Recovery Systems of Cargo Tanks.
07/12/23
09/13/23
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
1 The California Air Resources Board amended the introductory paragraph of 17 California Code of Regulations Section 94014 on July 12,
2023, and the changed was filed with Thomson Reuters Westlaw on August 29, 2023. Therefore, the amendment for Section 94014 will be recorded as July 12, 2023.
On September 25, 2023, the Submittal
was determined to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51
Appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
The revised CARB section 94014 and
CP–204 in Table 2 is intended to
address the disapproval issues in our
April 5, 2022 final rule. Based on this
proposed action approving Section
94014 and CP–204 into the California
SIP, we are also making this interim
final determination, effective on
publication, to defer imposition of the
offset sanctions and highway sanctions
that were triggered by our final action
on April 5, 2022, because we believe
that the submittal corrects the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 Nov 01, 2023
Jkt 262001
deficiencies that triggered such
sanctions.
The EPA is providing the public with
an opportunity to comment on this
deferral of sanctions. If comments are
submitted that change our assessment
described in this interim final
determination and the proposed
approval of CARB Section 94014 and
CP–204, we would take final action to
lift this deferral of sanctions under 40
CFR 52.31. If no comments are
submitted that change our assessment,
then all sanctions and any sanction
clocks triggered by our final action on
April 5, 2022, would be permanently
terminated on the effective date of our
final approval of Section 94014 and CP–
204.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
We are making an interim final
determination to defer CAA section 179
sanctions associated with our limited
disapproval action on April 5, 2022, of
CARB’s section 94014 with respect to
the requirements of part D of title I of
the CAA. This determination is based
on our concurrent proposal to fully
approve CARB Section 94014 which
resolves the deficiencies that triggered
sanctions under section 179 of the CAA.
Because the EPA has preliminarily
determined that CARB Section 94014
and CP–204, amended on July 12, 2023,
address the limited disapproval issues
under part D of title I of the CAA
identified in our 2022 final action and
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
75238
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 211 / Thursday, November 2, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
the amended rule is now fully
approvable, relief from sanctions should
be provided as quickly as possible.
Therefore, the EPA is invoking the good
cause exception under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in
not providing an opportunity for
comment before this action takes effect
(5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)). However, by this
action, the EPA is providing the public
with a chance to comment on the EPA’s
determination after the effective date,
and the EPA will consider any
comments received in determining
whether to reverse such action.
The EPA believes that notice-andcomment rulemaking before the
effective date of this action is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The EPA has reviewed the
State’s submittal and, through its
proposed action, is indicating that it is
more likely than not that the State has
submitted a revision to the SIP that
corrects deficiencies under part D of the
Act that were the basis for the action
that started the sanctions clocks.
Therefore, it is not in the public interest
to impose sanctions. The EPA believes
that it is necessary to use the interim
final rulemaking process to defer
sanctions while the EPA completes its
rulemaking process on the approvability
of the State’s submittal. Moreover, with
respect to the effective date of this
action, the EPA is invoking the good
cause exception to the 30-day notice
requirement of the APA because the
purpose of this notice is to relieve a
restriction (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action defers sanctions and
imposes no additional requirements. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:47 Nov 01, 2023
Jkt 262001
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal
Governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The State did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. The EPA did not perform an
EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in
this action. Consideration of EJ is not
required as part of this action, and there
is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O.
12898 of achieving environmental
justice for people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This action is subject to the
Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House
of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. This action
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 2, 2024. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the EPA
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purpose of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see CAA
section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: October 19, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023–23608 Filed 11–1–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 230523–0136; RTID 0648–
XD467]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 2023
Tribal Fishery Allocations for Pacific
Whiting; Reapportionment Between
Tribal and Non-Tribal Sectors
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Inseason reapportionment of
tribal Pacific whiting allocation.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
reapportionment of 45,000 metric tons
of Pacific whiting from the tribal
allocation to the non-tribal commercial
fishery sectors via automatic action on
September 27, 2023. This
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75236-75238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23608]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0479; FRL-11425-02-R9]
Determination To Defer Sanctions; California; California Air
Resources Board
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making an interim
final determination that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has
submitted a rule and other materials that correct deficiencies in its
Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') state implementation plan (SIP)
provisions concerning emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from vapor recovery systems of gasoline cargo tanks. This determination
is based on a proposed approval, published elsewhere in this Federal
Register, of CARB's California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Division
3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8, Article 1, Section 94014 (``Section
94014'') which regulates this source category. The effect of this
interim final determination is that the imposition of sanctions that
were triggered by a previous limited disapproval by the EPA in 2022 is
now deferred. If the EPA finalizes its approval of CARB's submission,
relief from these sanctions will become permanent.
DATES: This interim final determination is effective November 2, 2023.
However, comments will be accepted on or before December 4, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2023-0479 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
[[Page 75237]]
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if
you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation
at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: La Kenya Evans-Hopper, EPA Region IX,
75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 942-3245 or
by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,''
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On April 5, 2022 (87 FR 19631), the EPA issued a final limited
approval and limited disapproval action for the CARB rule listed in
Table 1 that was submitted to the EPA for inclusion into the California
SIP. The action addressed the procedures CARB uses to certify vapor
recovery systems on cargo tank trucks used to transport gasoline from
bulk terminals to gasoline dispensing facilities.
Table 1--CARB Rule With Previous EPA Action
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation title
Regulation or provision or subject Amended Submitted EPA action in 2022
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Code of Regulations, Certification of 07/25/2013........ 08/22/2018........ Limited Approval
Title 17, Division 3, Chapter Vapor Recovery and Limited
1, Subchapter 8, Article 1, Systems for Cargo Disapproval.
Section 94014. Tanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the April 5, 2022 final rule, we determined that although the
CARB regulation strengthened the SIP and was largely consistent with
the requirements of the CAA, the submitted rule included a deficiency
that precluded our full approval of the rule into the SIP. CARB's
previously submitted Section 94014 incorporated by reference
Certification Procedure CP-204 (``CP-204'') that allowed for CARB's
Executive Officer to approve alternate test procedures without EPA
approval. The EPA found that this provision was an instance of
unbounded director's discretion. Pursuant to section 179 of the CAA and
our regulations at 40 CFR 52, the disapproval action on CP-204 under
title I, part D started a sanctions clock for imposition of offset
sanctions 18 months after the action's effective date of November 5,
2023, and highway sanctions 6 months later.
On July 12, 2023, the CARB revised Section 94014 and CP-204, and on
September 13, 2023, submitted it to the EPA for approval into the
California SIP as shown in Table 2 below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation or provision Regulation title or subject Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Certification of Vapor \1\ 07/12/23 09/13/23
Division 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8, Recovery Systems for Cargo
Article 1, Section 94014, excluding sub- Tanks.
sections (a)-(d).
Certification Procedure CP-204............. Certification Procedure for 07/12/23 09/13/23
Vapor Recovery Systems of
Cargo Tanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The California Air Resources Board amended the introductory paragraph of 17 California Code of Regulations
Section 94014 on July 12, 2023, and the changed was filed with Thomson Reuters Westlaw on August 29, 2023.
Therefore, the amendment for Section 94014 will be recorded as July 12, 2023.
On September 25, 2023, the Submittal was determined to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met
before formal EPA review.
The revised CARB section 94014 and CP-204 in Table 2 is intended to
address the disapproval issues in our April 5, 2022 final rule. Based
on this proposed action approving Section 94014 and CP-204 into the
California SIP, we are also making this interim final determination,
effective on publication, to defer imposition of the offset sanctions
and highway sanctions that were triggered by our final action on April
5, 2022, because we believe that the submittal corrects the
deficiencies that triggered such sanctions.
The EPA is providing the public with an opportunity to comment on
this deferral of sanctions. If comments are submitted that change our
assessment described in this interim final determination and the
proposed approval of CARB Section 94014 and CP-204, we would take final
action to lift this deferral of sanctions under 40 CFR 52.31. If no
comments are submitted that change our assessment, then all sanctions
and any sanction clocks triggered by our final action on April 5, 2022,
would be permanently terminated on the effective date of our final
approval of Section 94014 and CP-204.
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
We are making an interim final determination to defer CAA section
179 sanctions associated with our limited disapproval action on April
5, 2022, of CARB's section 94014 with respect to the requirements of
part D of title I of the CAA. This determination is based on our
concurrent proposal to fully approve CARB Section 94014 which resolves
the deficiencies that triggered sanctions under section 179 of the CAA.
Because the EPA has preliminarily determined that CARB Section
94014 and CP-204, amended on July 12, 2023, address the limited
disapproval issues under part D of title I of the CAA identified in our
2022 final action and
[[Page 75238]]
the amended rule is now fully approvable, relief from sanctions should
be provided as quickly as possible. Therefore, the EPA is invoking the
good cause exception under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in
not providing an opportunity for comment before this action takes
effect (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)). However, by this action, the EPA is
providing the public with a chance to comment on the EPA's
determination after the effective date, and the EPA will consider any
comments received in determining whether to reverse such action.
The EPA believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking before the
effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. The EPA has reviewed the State's submittal and,
through its proposed action, is indicating that it is more likely than
not that the State has submitted a revision to the SIP that corrects
deficiencies under part D of the Act that were the basis for the action
that started the sanctions clocks. Therefore, it is not in the public
interest to impose sanctions. The EPA believes that it is necessary to
use the interim final rulemaking process to defer sanctions while the
EPA completes its rulemaking process on the approvability of the
State's submittal. Moreover, with respect to the effective date of this
action, the EPA is invoking the good cause exception to the 30-day
notice requirement of the APA because the purpose of this notice is to
relieve a restriction (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)).
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action defers sanctions and imposes no additional
requirements. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal Governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA
did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action.
Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there
is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of
E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-
income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 2, 2024. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the EPA Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the purpose of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see CAA section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: October 19, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023-23608 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P