Constellation Energy Generation, LLC; Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, 73883-73886 [2023-23766]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2023 / Notices
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
2509; email: Nicholas.Smith@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–352 and 50–353; NRC–
2023–0182]
Constellation Energy Generation, LLC;
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1
and 2
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment application;
opportunity to comment, request a
hearing, and petition for leave to
intervene.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission) is
considering issuance of an amendment
to Renewed Facility Operating License
Nos. NPF–39 and NPF–85, issued to
Constellation Energy Generation, LLC,
for operation of the Limerick Generating
Station, Units 1 and 2 (Limerick). The
amendment would make changes to
technical specifications (TS) affecting
postulated accidents during cold
shutdown and refueling operations and
make temporary changes to the Limerick
TS related to anticipated transients
without scram (ATWS) mitigation
systems during power production
operation.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments by November
27, 2023. Request for a hearing or
petitions for leave to intervene must be
filed by December 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods
however, the NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website:
• Federal rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2023–0182. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, ATTN: Program Management,
Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Smith, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 26, 2023
Jkt 262001
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2023–
0182 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2023–0182.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS
accession number for each document
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that it is
mentioned in this document.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website (https://
www.regulations.gov). Please include
Docket ID NRC–2023–0182 in your
comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73883
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an
amendment to Renewed Facility
Operating License Nos. NPF–39 and
NPF–85, issued to Constellation Energy
Generation, LLC, for operation of the
Limerick Generating Station, Units 1
and 2, located in Montgomery County,
Pennsylvania.
In accordance with section 50.90 of
title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) ‘‘Application for
amendment of license, construction
permit, or early site permit,’’
Constellation Energy Generation, LLC
(Constellation) requests an amendment
to Appendix A, ‘‘Technical
Specifications’’ of Renewed Facility
Operating License Nos. NPF–39 and
NPF–85 for Limerick Generating
Station, Units 1 and 2, (Limerick)
respectively. The proposed TS changes
will establish consistency with the
Limerick accident analysis and the plant
design and support the installation of a
digital modification at Limerick during
upcoming refueling outages. The
proposed Limerick TS changes will
temporarily modify TS requirements
affecting the mitigation of ATWS events
during power production operations, for
example, removing the automatic
activation of the recirculating pumps for
a period of 30 days prior to the refueling
outage. The TS requirements for ATWS
systems to remain operational and
conduct surveillance on automatic
activation systems during cold
shutdown and refueling operations is
temporarily removed so that the systems
can be converted from analog to digital.
Constellation has evaluated whether a
significant hazards consideration is
involved with the proposed amendment
by focusing on the three conditions set
forth in 10 CFR 50.92, ‘‘Issuance of
amendment,’’ as discussed in the
question responses.
Before any issuance of the proposed
license amendment, the NRC will need
to make the findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), and NRC’s regulations.
The NRC has made a proposed
determination that the license
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration
(NSHC). Under the NRC’s regulations in
10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation
of the facility in accordance with the
proposed amendment would not (1)
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
73884
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2023 / Notices
involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2)
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated; or (3)
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its
analysis of the issue of NSHC, as
modified by NRC staff shown in square
brackets, which is presented as follows:
1. Does the proposed change involve
a significant increase in the probability
or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated?
Response: No.
[For changes related to cold shutdown
and refuel operations]
The proposed changes revise TS
requirements, actions, and testing
during cold shutdown and refueling to
be consistent with the accident analysis
and the plant design. The proposed
changes do not change any of the
previously evaluated accidents in the
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
(UFSAR). None of the accidents
previously evaluated in [cold shutdown
or refueling] assume a concurrent loss of
offsite power or automatic ECCS
[emergency core cooling system]
initiation. None of the accidents
previously evaluated in [cold shutdown
and refueling] assume automatic starting
of a diesel generator or automatic
sequencing of loads on the emergency
busses. None of the accidents previously
evaluated in [cold shutdown or
refueling] assume a manual reactor
scram during refueling. None of the
accidents previously evaluated assume
the reactor equipment interlocks are
engaged with the reactor mode switch in
Shutdown. Therefore, elimination of
these requirements from the TS will
have no effect on the likelihood of an
accident previously evaluated nor their
mitigation. Elimination of the
requirement to suspend core alterations
with no operable ECCS subsystem in
[cold shutdown or refueling] will not
affect the initiation of a draining event
nor its mitigation.
[For changes related to power
production operations]
The proposed changes establish a onetime Anticipated Transient Without
Scram Recirculation Pump Trip
(ATWS–RPT) LCO [limiting condition
for operation] Applicability condition
where ATWS–RPT is not required for 30
days under certain plant operational
constraints for both channels of ATWS–
RPT instrumentation, as well as the
applicability and surveillance
requirements for the associated Standby
Liquid Control System (SLCS) and the
Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 26, 2023
Jkt 262001
isolation instrumentation. The ATWS–
RPT instrumentation, the SLCS, and
RWCU instrumentation are mitigative
systems and components. As such, the
proposed changes do not impact any
accident or event precursors. The
probability of an ATWS event occurring
does not increase due to this proposed
change.
Therefore proposed change[s related
to power production operations] do not
involve a significant increase in the
probability of an accident previously
evaluated.
The consequences of the ATWS are
not increased since the plant will be
operating at a reduced power level [with
operational constraints] during the 30
days when ATWS–RPT system is
inoperable. The most severe/limiting
ATWS events are initiated by a
pressurization transient. With SCRAM
failure, a pressurization transient can
result in a large power spike which may
be significantly higher than rated power.
The large increase in power exacerbates
vessel pressurization.
[. . .]
[Based on the plant operating at a
lower power state with operational
constraints, and proposed risk
mitigation actions being adopted as
compensatory measures, there will be
no increase in consequences of this type
of event. If the mitigation of an ATWS
at full power is comparable to that of the
ATWS at this lower power state, with
the proposed compensatory measures,
then there is no significant increase to
the consequences of the systems being
changed.]
Therefore, proposed change[s related
to ATWS mitigation systems in power
production operations] [will] not
involve a significant increase in the
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated.
2. Does the proposed change create
the possibility of a new or different kind
of accident from any accident
previously evaluated?
Response: No.
[For changes related to cold shutdown
and refuel operations]
The proposed changes revise TS
requirements, actions, and testing
during cold shutdown and refueling to
establish consistency with the accident
analysis and the plant design. The
proposed changes do not change the
assumed design functions of the affected
systems in the applicable [cold
shutdown and refuel operations]. The
proposed changes do not create any
credible new accidents as the associated
initiating events, such as loss of power
and a draining event, are already
considered in the licensing basis.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[For changes related to power
production operations]
The proposed changes establish a onetime ATWS–RPT LCO Applicability
condition where ATWS–RPT is not
required for 30 days under certain plant
operational constraints for both
channels of ATWS–RPT
instrumentation, as well as the
applicability and surveillance
requirements for the associated SLCS
and the RWCU isolation
instrumentation. These changes impact
a mitigating system for an existing
transient. As such, the unavailability of
this mitigation system would not be
considered an initiator of a new or
different kind of accident.
Therefore, the proposed changes do
not create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed change involve
a significant reduction in a margin of
safety?
Response: No.
[For changes related to cold shutdown
and refuel operations]
The proposed changes revise TS
requirements, actions, and testing
during cold shutdown and refueling to
be consistent with the accident analysis.
The proposed changes do not affect the
analysis of any accident or event in the
plant’s licensing basis. The proposed
changes do not alter any design basis or
safety limit, or any controlling
numerical values for parameters
established in the UFSAR or the license.
[For changes related to power
production operations]
Based on a deterministic sensitivity
analysis of the ATWS AOR [abnormal
occurrence report], the proposed
changes will not cause a significant
reduction in the margin of safety
provided that the plant is operated at a
reduced thermal power level.
The use of available safety related and
non-safety related equipment during the
30-day RRCS [Redundant Reactivity
Control System] demolition period, at a
reduced power level [with operational
constraints], will continue to protect the
fuel, reactor, and containment from
failure during a postulated ATWS event.
The fuel cladding barrier is protected
via adequate cooling and SLCS
injection. The reactor coolant system
boundary is protected by ensuring
compliance with the ASME emergency
class pressure limit of 120% of design
pressure. The containment is protected
by ensuring the suppression pool
pressure and temperature limits are met.
Thus, there is no need for any reduction
in the margin of safety established in the
[Limerick] design and licensing basis for
the primary fission product barriers.
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Therefore, the proposed changes do
not involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety.
Based on the above, Constellation
concludes that the proposed
amendments do not involve a
significant hazards consideration under
the standards set forth in 10 CFR
50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of
no significant hazards consideration is
justified.
The NRC staff has reviewed the
licensee’s analysis, as modified by the
NRC staff, and based on this review, the
three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff
proposes to determine that the license
amendment request involves a NSHC.
The NRC is seeking public comments
on this proposed determination that the
license amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration. Any
comments received within 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice
will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
issue the amendment until the
expiration of the 60-day notice period.
However, if circumstances change
during the notice period, such that
failure to act in a timely way would
result, for example, in derating or
shutdown of the facility, the
Commission may issue the license
amendment before the expiration of the
notice period, provided that its final
determination is that the amendment
involves no significant hazards
consideration. The final determination
will consider all public and State
comments received. If the Commission
takes action prior to the expiration of
either the comment period or the notice
period, it will publish in the Federal
Register a notice of issuance. The
Commission expects that the need to
take this action will occur very
infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing
and Petition for Leave To Intervene
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, any person
(petitioner) whose interest may be
affected by this action may file a request
for a hearing and petition for leave to
intervene (petition) with respect to the
action. Petitions shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission’s
‘‘Agency Rules of Practice and
Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part 2. Interested
persons should consult 10 CFR 2.309. If
a petition is filed, the presiding officer
will rule on the petition and, if
appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be
issued.
Petitions must be filed no later than
60 days from the date of publication of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 26, 2023
Jkt 262001
this notice in accordance with the filing
instructions in the ‘‘Electronic
Submissions (E-Filing)’’ section of this
document. Petitions and motions for
leave to file new or amended
contentions that are filed after the
deadline will not be entertained absent
a determination by the presiding officer
that the filing demonstrates good cause
by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR
2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii).
If a hearing is requested and the
Commission has not made a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, the
Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, which
will serve to establish when the hearing
is held. If the final determination is that
the amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration, the
Commission may issue the amendment
and make it immediately effective,
notwithstanding the request for a
hearing. Any hearing would take place
after issuance of the amendment. If the
final determination is that the
amendment request involves a
significant hazards consideration, then
any hearing held would take place
before the issuance of the amendment
unless the Commission finds an
imminent danger to the health or safety
of the public, in which case it will issue
an appropriate order or rule under 10
CFR part 2.
A State, local governmental body,
Federally recognized Indian Tribe, or
designated agency thereof, may submit
a petition to the Commission to
participate as a party under 10 CFR
2.309(h) no later than 60 days from the
date of publication of this notice.
Alternatively, a State, local
governmental body, Federally
recognized Indian Tribe, or agency
thereof may participate as a non-party
under 10 CFR 2.315(c).
For information about filing a petition
and about participation by a person not
a party under 10 CFR 2.315, see ADAMS
Accession No. ML20340A053 (https://
adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/
main.jsp?Accession
Number=ML20340A053) and the NRC’s
public website at https://www.nrc.gov/
about-nrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/
hearing.html#participate.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings, including
documents filed by an interested State,
local governmental body, Federally
recognized Indian Tribe, or designated
agency thereof that requests to
participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must
be filed in accordance with 10 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73885
2.302. The E-Filing process requires
participants to submit and serve all
adjudicatory documents over the
internet, or in some cases, to mail copies
on electronic storage media, unless an
exemption permitting an alternative
filing method, as further discussed, is
granted. Detailed guidance on electronic
submissions is located in the ‘‘Guidance
for Electronic Submissions to the NRC’’
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13031A056)
and the NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at
Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov, or by
telephone at 301–415–1677, to (1)
request a digital identification (ID)
certificate, which allows the participant
(or its counsel or representative) to
digitally sign submissions and access
the E-Filing system for any proceeding
in which it is participating; and (2)
advise the Secretary that the participant
will be submitting a petition or other
adjudicatory document (even in
instances in which the participant, or its
counsel or representative, already holds
an NRC-issued digital ID certificate).
Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic
docket for the proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an
electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on the
NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
getting-started.html. After a digital ID
certificate is obtained and a docket
created, the participant must submit
adjudicatory documents in Portable
Document Format. Guidance on
submissions is available on the NRC’s
public website at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A
filing is considered complete at the time
the document is submitted through the
NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an
electronic filing must be submitted to
the E-Filing system no later than 11:59
p.m. ET on the due date. Upon receipt
of a transmission, the E-Filing system
time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email confirming
receipt of the document. The E-Filing
system also distributes an email that
provides access to the document to the
NRC’s Office of the General Counsel and
any others who have advised the Office
of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the
filer need not serve the document on
those participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
73886
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 207 / Friday, October 27, 2023 / Notices
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before adjudicatory
documents are filed to obtain access to
the documents via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system
may seek assistance by contacting the
NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk
through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located
on the NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC
Electronic Filing Help Desk is available
between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., ET, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing stating why there is good cause for
not filing electronically and requesting
authorization to continue to submit
documents in paper format. Such filings
must be submitted in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(b)–(d). Participants filing
adjudicatory documents in this manner
are responsible for serving their
documents on all other participants.
Participants granted an exemption
under 10 CFR 2.302(g)(2) must still meet
the electronic formatting requirement in
10 CFR 2.302(g)(1), unless the
participant also seeks and is granted an
exemption from 10 CFR 2.302(g)(1).
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in the NRC’s
electronic hearing docket, which is
publicly available at https://
adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the presiding
officer. If you do not have an NRCissued digital ID certificate as
previously described, click ‘‘cancel’’
when the link requests certificates and
you will be automatically directed to the
NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where
you will be able to access any publicly
available documents in a particular
hearing docket. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
personal phone numbers in their filings
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited
excerpts that serve the purpose of the
adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants should not include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for license
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 26, 2023
Jkt 262001
amendment dated February 17, 2023
(ADAMS Accession No. ML23052A023),
as supplemented on July 21, 2023
(ADAMS Accession No. ML23202A219),
July 31, 2023 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML23212B105), and August 16, 2023
(ADAMS Accession No. ML23228A094).
Attorney for licensee: Jason Zorn,
Associate General Counsel,
Constellation Energy Generation, LLC,
101 Constitution Ave. NW, Suite 400
East, Washington, DC 20001.
NRC Branch Chief: Hipolito J.
Gonzalez.
Dated: October 24, 2023.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Hipolito J. Gonzalez,
Chief, Plant Licensing Branch I, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2023–23766 Filed 10–26–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 030–02278; NRC–2023–0147]
Curators of the University of Missouri;
South Farm
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing a Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and
accompanying Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the unrestricted
release of the Curators of the University
of Missouri South Farm site located in
Columbia, Missouri. Based on the
analysis in the EA, the NRC staff has
concluded that there would be no
significant impacts to environmental
resources from the proposed
unrestricted release and, therefore, a
FONSI is appropriate.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on October
27, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2023–0147 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2023–0147. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. For the
convenience of the reader, instructions
about obtaining materials referenced in
this document are provided in the
‘‘Availability of Documents’’ section.
• NRC’s PDR: The PDR, where you
may examine and order copies of
publicly available documents, is open
by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please
send an email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov
or call 1–800–397–4209 or 301–415–
4737, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern
time (ET), Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael M. LaFranzo, Region III, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
630–829–9865; email:
Michael.LaFranzo@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
By letter dated November 9, 2018, the
Curators of the University of Missouri
requested the removal from License 24–
00513–32 of the South Farm site located
in Columbia, Missouri. The South Farm
site, approximately 60 m by 23 m (200
ft by 75 ft), was operated as a chemical
waste disposal facility, including the
radiological component, between 1969
and 1972. As required by section 51.30
of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Environmental
Assessment,’’ the NRC prepared an EA
that documents the NRC staff’s
independent evaluation of the potential
environmental impacts associated with
the unrestricted release of the South
Farm site. Based on the analysis in the
EA, the NRC staff has concluded that
there would be no significant impacts to
environmental resources from the
Curators of the University of Missouri
proposal and, therefore, a FONSI is
appropriate.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
By application dated November 9,
2018, as supplemented by letters dated
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 207 (Friday, October 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73883-73886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23766]
[[Page 73883]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353; NRC-2023-0182]
Constellation Energy Generation, LLC; Limerick Generating
Station, Units 1 and 2
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: License amendment application; opportunity to comment, request
a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission)
is considering issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility Operating
License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85, issued to Constellation Energy
Generation, LLC, for operation of the Limerick Generating Station,
Units 1 and 2 (Limerick). The amendment would make changes to technical
specifications (TS) affecting postulated accidents during cold shutdown
and refueling operations and make temporary changes to the Limerick TS
related to anticipated transients without scram (ATWS) mitigation
systems during power production operation.
DATES: Submit comments by November 27, 2023. Request for a hearing or
petitions for leave to intervene must be filed by December 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
however, the NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website:
Federal rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2023-0182. Address
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301-415-0624; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, ATTN: Program Management, Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Smith, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2509; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2023-0182 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2023-0182.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at 301-415-4737,
or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for
each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this document.
NRC's PDR: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies
of publicly available documents, is open by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to
[email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website (https://www.regulations.gov). Please
include Docket ID NRC-2023-0182 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at
https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions
into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility
Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85, issued to Constellation
Energy Generation, LLC, for operation of the Limerick Generating
Station, Units 1 and 2, located in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
In accordance with section 50.90 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) ``Application for amendment of license,
construction permit, or early site permit,'' Constellation Energy
Generation, LLC (Constellation) requests an amendment to Appendix A,
``Technical Specifications'' of Renewed Facility Operating License Nos.
NPF-39 and NPF-85 for Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2,
(Limerick) respectively. The proposed TS changes will establish
consistency with the Limerick accident analysis and the plant design
and support the installation of a digital modification at Limerick
during upcoming refueling outages. The proposed Limerick TS changes
will temporarily modify TS requirements affecting the mitigation of
ATWS events during power production operations, for example, removing
the automatic activation of the recirculating pumps for a period of 30
days prior to the refueling outage. The TS requirements for ATWS
systems to remain operational and conduct surveillance on automatic
activation systems during cold shutdown and refueling operations is
temporarily removed so that the systems can be converted from analog to
digital. Constellation has evaluated whether a significant hazards
consideration is involved with the proposed amendment by focusing on
the three conditions set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, ``Issuance of
amendment,'' as discussed in the question responses.
Before any issuance of the proposed license amendment, the NRC will
need to make the findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), and NRC's regulations.
The NRC has made a proposed determination that the license
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration (NSHC).
Under the NRC's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation
of the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1)
[[Page 73884]]
involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new
or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated;
or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As
required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of
the issue of NSHC, as modified by NRC staff shown in square brackets,
which is presented as follows:
1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
[For changes related to cold shutdown and refuel operations]
The proposed changes revise TS requirements, actions, and testing
during cold shutdown and refueling to be consistent with the accident
analysis and the plant design. The proposed changes do not change any
of the previously evaluated accidents in the Updated Final Safety
Analysis Report (UFSAR). None of the accidents previously evaluated in
[cold shutdown or refueling] assume a concurrent loss of offsite power
or automatic ECCS [emergency core cooling system] initiation. None of
the accidents previously evaluated in [cold shutdown and refueling]
assume automatic starting of a diesel generator or automatic sequencing
of loads on the emergency busses. None of the accidents previously
evaluated in [cold shutdown or refueling] assume a manual reactor scram
during refueling. None of the accidents previously evaluated assume the
reactor equipment interlocks are engaged with the reactor mode switch
in Shutdown. Therefore, elimination of these requirements from the TS
will have no effect on the likelihood of an accident previously
evaluated nor their mitigation. Elimination of the requirement to
suspend core alterations with no operable ECCS subsystem in [cold
shutdown or refueling] will not affect the initiation of a draining
event nor its mitigation.
[For changes related to power production operations]
The proposed changes establish a one-time Anticipated Transient
Without Scram Recirculation Pump Trip (ATWS-RPT) LCO [limiting
condition for operation] Applicability condition where ATWS-RPT is not
required for 30 days under certain plant operational constraints for
both channels of ATWS-RPT instrumentation, as well as the applicability
and surveillance requirements for the associated Standby Liquid Control
System (SLCS) and the Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) isolation
instrumentation. The ATWS-RPT instrumentation, the SLCS, and RWCU
instrumentation are mitigative systems and components. As such, the
proposed changes do not impact any accident or event precursors. The
probability of an ATWS event occurring does not increase due to this
proposed change.
Therefore proposed change[s related to power production operations]
do not involve a significant increase in the probability of an accident
previously evaluated.
The consequences of the ATWS are not increased since the plant will
be operating at a reduced power level [with operational constraints]
during the 30 days when ATWS-RPT system is inoperable. The most severe/
limiting ATWS events are initiated by a pressurization transient. With
SCRAM failure, a pressurization transient can result in a large power
spike which may be significantly higher than rated power. The large
increase in power exacerbates vessel pressurization.
[. . .]
[Based on the plant operating at a lower power state with
operational constraints, and proposed risk mitigation actions being
adopted as compensatory measures, there will be no increase in
consequences of this type of event. If the mitigation of an ATWS at
full power is comparable to that of the ATWS at this lower power state,
with the proposed compensatory measures, then there is no significant
increase to the consequences of the systems being changed.]
Therefore, proposed change[s related to ATWS mitigation systems in
power production operations] [will] not involve a significant increase
in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
[For changes related to cold shutdown and refuel operations]
The proposed changes revise TS requirements, actions, and testing
during cold shutdown and refueling to establish consistency with the
accident analysis and the plant design. The proposed changes do not
change the assumed design functions of the affected systems in the
applicable [cold shutdown and refuel operations]. The proposed changes
do not create any credible new accidents as the associated initiating
events, such as loss of power and a draining event, are already
considered in the licensing basis.
[For changes related to power production operations]
The proposed changes establish a one-time ATWS-RPT LCO
Applicability condition where ATWS-RPT is not required for 30 days
under certain plant operational constraints for both channels of ATWS-
RPT instrumentation, as well as the applicability and surveillance
requirements for the associated SLCS and the RWCU isolation
instrumentation. These changes impact a mitigating system for an
existing transient. As such, the unavailability of this mitigation
system would not be considered an initiator of a new or different kind
of accident.
Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a
new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety?
Response: No.
[For changes related to cold shutdown and refuel operations]
The proposed changes revise TS requirements, actions, and testing
during cold shutdown and refueling to be consistent with the accident
analysis. The proposed changes do not affect the analysis of any
accident or event in the plant's licensing basis. The proposed changes
do not alter any design basis or safety limit, or any controlling
numerical values for parameters established in the UFSAR or the
license.
[For changes related to power production operations]
Based on a deterministic sensitivity analysis of the ATWS AOR
[abnormal occurrence report], the proposed changes will not cause a
significant reduction in the margin of safety provided that the plant
is operated at a reduced thermal power level.
The use of available safety related and non-safety related
equipment during the 30-day RRCS [Redundant Reactivity Control System]
demolition period, at a reduced power level [with operational
constraints], will continue to protect the fuel, reactor, and
containment from failure during a postulated ATWS event. The fuel
cladding barrier is protected via adequate cooling and SLCS injection.
The reactor coolant system boundary is protected by ensuring compliance
with the ASME emergency class pressure limit of 120% of design
pressure. The containment is protected by ensuring the suppression pool
pressure and temperature limits are met. Thus, there is no need for any
reduction in the margin of safety established in the [Limerick] design
and licensing basis for the primary fission product barriers.
[[Page 73885]]
Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant
reduction in a margin of safety.
Based on the above, Constellation concludes that the proposed
amendments do not involve a significant hazards consideration under the
standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of
no significant hazards consideration is justified.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis, as modified by
the NRC staff, and based on this review, the three standards of 10 CFR
50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine
that the license amendment request involves a NSHC.
The NRC is seeking public comments on this proposed determination
that the license amendment request involves no significant hazards
consideration. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the
expiration of the 60-day notice period. However, if circumstances
change during the notice period, such that failure to act in a timely
way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility,
the Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of
the notice period, provided that its final determination is that the
amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final
determination will consider all public and State comments received. If
the Commission takes action prior to the expiration of either the
comment period or the notice period, it will publish in the Federal
Register a notice of issuance. The Commission expects that the need to
take this action will occur very infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To
Intervene
Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any
person (petitioner) whose interest may be affected by this action may
file a request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene
(petition) with respect to the action. Petitions shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission's ``Agency Rules of Practice and
Procedure'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested persons should consult 10 CFR
2.309. If a petition is filed, the presiding officer will rule on the
petition and, if appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be issued.
Petitions must be filed no later than 60 days from the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with the filing instructions
in the ``Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)'' section of this document.
Petitions and motions for leave to file new or amended contentions that
are filed after the deadline will not be entertained absent a
determination by the presiding officer that the filing demonstrates
good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)
through (iii).
If a hearing is requested and the Commission has not made a final
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration, the
Commission will make a final determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, which will serve to establish when
the hearing is held. If the final determination is that the amendment
request involves no significant hazards consideration, the Commission
may issue the amendment and make it immediately effective,
notwithstanding the request for a hearing. Any hearing would take place
after issuance of the amendment. If the final determination is that the
amendment request involves a significant hazards consideration, then
any hearing held would take place before the issuance of the amendment
unless the Commission finds an imminent danger to the health or safety
of the public, in which case it will issue an appropriate order or rule
under 10 CFR part 2.
A State, local governmental body, Federally recognized Indian
Tribe, or designated agency thereof, may submit a petition to the
Commission to participate as a party under 10 CFR 2.309(h) no later
than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice.
Alternatively, a State, local governmental body, Federally recognized
Indian Tribe, or agency thereof may participate as a non-party under 10
CFR 2.315(c).
For information about filing a petition and about participation by
a person not a party under 10 CFR 2.315, see ADAMS Accession No.
ML20340A053 (https://adamswebsearch2.nrc.gov/webSearch2/main.jsp?AccessionNumber=ML20340A053) and the NRC's public website at
https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html#participate.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including
documents filed by an interested State, local governmental body,
Federally recognized Indian Tribe, or designated agency thereof that
requests to participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302. The E-Filing process requires
participants to submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the
internet, or in some cases, to mail copies on electronic storage media,
unless an exemption permitting an alternative filing method, as further
discussed, is granted. Detailed guidance on electronic submissions is
located in the ``Guidance for Electronic Submissions to the NRC''
(ADAMS Accession No. ML13031A056) and the NRC's public website at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by
telephone at 301-415-1677, to (1) request a digital identification (ID)
certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign submissions and access the E-Filing
system for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise
the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition or
other adjudicatory document (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-
issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the proceeding if the
Secretary has not already established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on the NRC's public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. After a digital ID certificate is
obtained and a docket created, the participant must submit adjudicatory
documents in Portable Document Format. Guidance on submissions is
available on the NRC's public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the
time the document is submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. ET on the due date. Upon receipt of a
transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing
system also distributes an email that provides access to the document
to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any others who have
advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to participate in
the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the document on those
participants separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants
(or
[[Page 73886]]
their counsel or representative) must apply for and receive a digital
ID certificate before adjudicatory documents are filed to obtain access
to the documents via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC's Electronic
Filing Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's
public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by
email to [email protected], or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-
7640. The NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9 a.m.
and 6 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Participants who believe that they have good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR
2.302(b)-(d). Participants filing adjudicatory documents in this manner
are responsible for serving their documents on all other participants.
Participants granted an exemption under 10 CFR 2.302(g)(2) must still
meet the electronic formatting requirement in 10 CFR 2.302(g)(1),
unless the participant also seeks and is granted an exemption from 10
CFR 2.302(g)(1).
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the
NRC's electronic hearing docket, which is publicly available at https://adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC-issued digital ID
certificate as previously described, click ``cancel'' when the link
requests certificates and you will be automatically directed to the
NRC's electronic hearing dockets where you will be able to access any
publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket.
Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information
such as social security numbers, home addresses, or personal phone
numbers in their filings unless an NRC regulation or other law requires
submission of such information. With respect to copyrighted works,
except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants
should not include copyrighted materials in their submission.
For further details with respect to this action, see the
application for license amendment dated February 17, 2023 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML23052A023), as supplemented on July 21, 2023 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML23202A219), July 31, 2023 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML23212B105), and August 16, 2023 (ADAMS Accession No. ML23228A094).
Attorney for licensee: Jason Zorn, Associate General Counsel,
Constellation Energy Generation, LLC, 101 Constitution Ave. NW, Suite
400 East, Washington, DC 20001.
NRC Branch Chief: Hipolito J. Gonzalez.
Dated: October 24, 2023.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Hipolito J. Gonzalez,
Chief, Plant Licensing Branch I, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2023-23766 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P