Removal of the Prohibition Against Certain Flights in Specified Areas of the Dnipro Flight Information Region (FIR) (UKDV), 73529-73532 [2023-23656]
Download as PDF
73529
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 206
Thursday, October 26, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0225; Amdt. No. 91–
331H]
RIN 2120–AL95
Removal of the Prohibition Against
Certain Flights in Specified Areas of
the Dnipro Flight Information Region
(FIR) (UKDV)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action removes the
current flight prohibition Special
Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) for
specified areas of the Dnipro Flight
Information Region (FIR) (UKDV). This
SFAR, which is scheduled to expire on
October 27, 2023, reflects risks to the
safety of U.S. civil aviation as they
existed prior to the Russian Federation’s
full-scale invasion of Ukraine in
February 2022 and is therefore obsolete.
This action is necessary to alleviate
confusion that might otherwise result
from leaving an obsolete rule in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) after
its scheduled expiration date of October
27, 2023. FAA Notice-to-Air-Missions
(NOTAM) KICZ A0004/22 remains in
effect and continues to prohibit U.S.
civil flight operations in the Lviv
(UKLV), Kyiv (UKBV), Dnipro (UKDV),
Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa (UKOV)
FIRs, as well as the Kyiv Upper
Information Region (UIR) (UKBU).
NOTAM KICZ A0004/22, together with
NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22 and A0005/
22, reflects the FAA’s current
assessment of the safety-of-flight risks
the Russia-Ukraine conflict presents to
U.S. civil aviation operations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
October 27, 2023.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 25, 2023
Jkt 262001
Bill
Petrak, Flight Standards Service,
through the Washington Operations
Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–3203; email 9-FAAOverseasFlightProhibitions@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Executive Summary
This action removes the FAA’s
current flight prohibition SFAR for
specified areas of the Dnipro FIR
(UKDV), SFAR No. 113, 14 CFR
91.1607.1 SFAR No. 113, § 91.1607,
which is scheduled to expire on October
27, 2023, reflects risks to the safety of
U.S. civil aviation as they existed prior
to the Russian Federation’s full-scale
invasion of Ukraine in February 2022
and is therefore obsolete. This action is
necessary to alleviate confusion that
might otherwise result from leaving an
obsolete rule in the CFR after its
scheduled expiration date of October 27,
2023. NOTAM KICZ A0004/22 remains
in effect and continues to prohibit U.S.
civil flight operations in the Lviv
(UKLV), Kyiv (UKBV), Dnipro (UKDV),
Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa (UKOV)
FIRs, as well as the Kyiv UIR (UKBU).
NOTAM KICZ A0004/22, together with
NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22 and A0005/
22,2 reflects the FAA’s current
assessment of the safety-of-flight risks
the Russia-Ukraine conflict presents to
U.S. civil aviation operations.
II. Authority and Good Cause
A. Authority
The FAA is responsible for the safety
of flight in the U.S. and for the safety
of U.S. civil operators, U.S.-registered
civil aircraft, and U.S.-certificated
airmen throughout the world. Sections
106(f) and (g) of title 49, U.S. Code
1 In its May 24, 2018, Aeronautical Information
Regulation and Control (AIRAC 1806) publication,
the Ukrainian State Air Traffic Services Enterprise,
the air navigation service provider for Ukraine,
renamed the FIR formerly known as the
Dnipropetrovsk FIR (UKDV) the Dnipro FIR
(UKDV). This rule uses the current FIR name,
including in historical references to the FIR.
2 NOTAM KICZ A0003/22 prohibits U.S. civil
aviation operations in the Minsk FIR (UMMV), and
NOTAM KICZ A0005/22 prohibits U.S. civil
aviation operations in specified areas of the
Moscow (UUWV), Samara (UWWW), and Rostov-na
Donu (URRV) FIRs within the 160 nautical miles of
the boundaries of those FIRs and the Ukrainianmanaged FIRs described in NOTAM KICZ A0005/
22.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(U.S.C.), subtitle I, establish the FAA
Administrator’s authority to issue rules
on aviation safety. Subtitle VII of title
49, Aviation Programs, describes in
more detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. Section 40101(d)(1) provides
that the Administrator shall consider in
the public interest, among other matters,
assigning, maintaining, and enhancing
safety and security as the highest
priorities in air commerce. Section
40105(b)(1)(A) requires the
Administrator to exercise this authority
consistently with the obligations of the
U.S. Government under international
agreements.
The FAA is promulgating this rule
under the authority described in 49
U.S.C. 44701, General requirements.
Under that section, the FAA is charged
broadly with promoting safe flight of
civil aircraft in air commerce by
prescribing, among other things,
regulations and minimum standards for
practices, methods, and procedures that
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce and national
security.
This regulation is within the scope of
the FAA’s authority because it removes
an obsolete flight prohibition that
prohibits the persons described in
paragraph (a) of SFAR No. 113,
§ 91.1607, from conducting flight
operations in specified areas of the
Dnipro FIR (UKDV) only. The February
2022 full-scale Russian invasion of
Ukraine and the ensuing armed conflict
between the Russian Federation and
Ukraine significantly expanded the area
of unacceptable safety-of-flight risks to
U.S. civil aviation beyond the
boundaries of SFAR No. 113, § 91.1607.
To address the resulting emergency
related to safety in air commerce, which
required immediate action, the FAA
Administrator issued emergency orders,
as authorized by 49 U.S.C. 46105(c), in
the form of NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22,
A0004/22, and A0005/22. As described
in NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22, A0004/22,
and A0005/22, these emergency orders
prohibit U.S. civil aviation operations
throughout all of the FIRs managed by
Belarus and Ukraine and in specified
areas of certain FIRs managed by the
Russian Federation. The FAA has
determined it is not practicable at this
time to give preference to a proceeding
to incorporate the flight prohibition
contained in NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
into the CFR, because the Russia-
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
73530
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 206 / Thursday, October 26, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
III. Background and Discussion of the
Final Rule
Ukraine conflict and the associated
areas of unacceptable safety-of-flight
risks to U.S. civil aviation have yet to
stabilize sufficiently.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. Good Cause for Immediate Adoption
Section 553(b)(B) of title 5, U.S. Code,
authorizes agencies to dispense with
notice and comment procedures for
rules when the agency for ‘‘good cause’’
finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Also, section
553(d) permits agencies, upon a finding
of good cause, to issue rules with an
effective date less than 30 days from the
date of publication. In this instance, the
FAA finds good cause to forgo notice
and comment and the delayed effective
date because they would be
unnecessary.
This action removes SFAR No. 113,
§ 91.1607, which only prohibits U.S.
civil aviation operations in specified
areas of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV) and is
scheduled to expire on October 27,
2023. As previously described, the
February 2022 full-scale Russian
invasion of Ukraine and the ensuing
armed conflict between the Russian
Federation and Ukraine significantly
expanded the area of unacceptable
safety-of-flight risks to U.S. civil
aviation, leading the FAA to issue
NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22, A0004/22,
and A0005/22 to address the resulting
emergency related to safety in air
commerce. NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
prohibits U.S. civil aviation operations
in all of the FIRs managed by Ukraine,
including the specified areas of the
Dnipro FIR (UKDV) in which SFAR No.
113, § 91.1607, prohibits U.S. civil
aviation operations. NOTAM KICZ
A0004/22 remains in effect until
modified, superseded, or rescinded by
the FAA.
Leaving SFAR No. 113, § 91.1607, in
the CFR after its scheduled expiration
date of October 27, 2023, might confuse
the regulated community. Therefore, to
alleviate the potential for confusion, the
FAA is removing SFAR No. 113,
§ 91.1607. This action is ministerial in
nature as it is only removing an expired
provision from the CFR and has no
substantive effect on the public.
For the reasons previously described,
the FAA finds that providing notice and
seeking public comment under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) are unnecessary. For the same
reasons, the FAA finds that good cause
exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making
this rule effective in less than 30 days.
Accordingly, the FAA finds good cause
exists to forgo notice and comment and
any delay in the effective date for this
rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 25, 2023
Jkt 262001
On April 25, 2014, the FAA published
SFAR No. 113, § 91.1607, which
initially prohibited certain flight
operations in a portion of the
Simferopol FIR (UKFV) after Russia
unlawfully seized Crimea from
Ukraine.3 In the months that followed,
the ensuing violence and the associated
safety-of-flight risks to U.S. civil
aviation expanded to encompass the
entirety of the Simferopol and Dnipro
FIRs (UKFV and UKDV, respectively).
Tragically, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17
(MH 17) was shot down on July 17,
2014, while flying over Ukraine at
33,000 feet, just west of the Russian
border. All of the 298 passengers and
crew on board MH 17 perished.
The FAA determined the use of
weapons capable of targeting and
shooting down aircraft flying on civil air
routes at cruising altitudes posed a
dangerous threat to U.S. civil aviation
operating in the Simferopol and Dnipro
FIRs (UKFV and UKDV, respectively).
On July 18, 2014, Coordinated Universal
Time (UTC), the FAA issued NOTAM
FDC 4/2182, which prohibited U.S. civil
aviation operations in the entirety of the
Simferopol and Dnipro FIRs (UKFV and
UKDV, respectively). The FAA
subsequently incorporated that flight
prohibition into SFAR No. 113,
§ 91.1607, on December 29, 2014.4
In the years that followed, the FAA
determined security and safety
conditions had stabilized sufficiently in
certain portions of the Simferopol and
Dnipro FIRs (UKFV and UKDV,
respectively) for U.S. civil aviation
operations to resume safely.5 Most
recently, in an October 2021 final rule,6
the FAA determined that an
unacceptable level of inadvertent risk to
U.S. civil aviation operations remained
in the specified areas of the Dnipro FIR
3 Prohibition Against Certain Flights in the
Simferopol (UKFV) Flight Information Region (FIR)
final rule, 79 FR 22862 (Apr. 25, 2014).
4 Prohibition Against Certain Flights in the
Simferopol (UKFV) and Dnipropetrovsk (UKDV)
Flight Information Regions (FIRs) final rule, 79 FR
77857 (Dec. 29, 2014).
5 Amendment of the Prohibition Against Certain
Flights in Specified Areas of the Simferopol and
Dnipropetrovsk Flight Information Regions (FIRs)
(UKFV and UKDV) final rule, 83 FR 52954 (Oct. 19,
2018); Amendment of the Prohibition Against
Certain Flights in Specified Areas of the Simferopol
and Dnipropetrovsk Flight Information Regions
(FIRs) (UKFV and UKDV) final rule, 85 FR 65678
(Oct. 16, 2020); and Extension of the Prohibition
Against Certain Flights in Specified Areas of the
Dnipro Flight Information Region (FIR) (UKDV)
final rule, 86 FR 55485 (Oct. 6, 2021).
6 Extension of the Prohibition Against Certain
Flights in Specified Areas of the Dnipro Flight
Information Region (FIR) (UKDV) final rule, 86 FR
55485 (Oct. 6, 2021).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(UKDV), which included the airspace
over and near the line of contact, as it
existed at that time, where most ceasefire violations occurred. Tensions
remained elevated, in part due to the
heightened Russian military force
posturing in Crimea and along the
Russia-Ukraine border and increases in
cease-fire violations. In addition, the
conflict between Ukraine and Russianback separatists in eastern Ukraine
continued. These circumstances
resulted in continued inadvertent risk to
U.S. civil aviation operations due to the
potential for miscalculation or
misidentification.
The February 2022 full-scale Russian
invasion of Ukraine greatly expanded
the area of unacceptable safety-of-flight
risks to U.S. civil aviation to include the
entirety of Ukrainian territorial airspace,
as well as the international airspace of
all of the FIRs managed by Ukraine. On
February 24, 2022, the FAA issued
NOTAM KICZ A0004/22, prohibiting
U.S. civil aviation operations in all of
the FIRs managed by Ukraine at all
altitudes.
The FAA has determined the situation
in all of the FIRs managed by Ukraine
continues to pose an unacceptable level
of risk for U.S. civil aviation safety.
Conflict-related risks affecting civil
aviation in these FIRs include near-daily
attacks using weaponized unmanned
aircraft systems (UAS), cruise missiles,
and attack helicopters, resulting in the
increased defensive use of advanced
surface-to-air missile systems and
electronic warfare. The Russian
Federation has demonstrated its
continuing capability and intent to use
standoff strike capabilities to engage
targets throughout Ukraine, including
the capital, Kyiv, and Lviv, located in
western Ukraine near the border with
Poland. In June 2023, Ukraine launched
its anticipated counteroffensive in
eastern and southern Ukraine,
prompting increased Russian standoff
attacks to put pressure on the Ukrainian
government. The protracted conflict is
expected to continue in the near to midterm, despite minimal changes in
territorial control so far as the Ukraine
counteroffensive takes shape. It remains
unclear when and how the conflict, and
the associated areas of unacceptable
safety-of-flight risks to U.S. civil
aviation, may eventually stabilize.
Under these circumstances, the FAA has
determined it is not practicable to give
preference to a proceeding to
incorporate the flight prohibition
contained in NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
into the CFR at this time.
The current version of SFAR No. 113,
§ 91.1607, which only prohibits U.S.
civil aviation operations in specified
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 206 / Thursday, October 26, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
areas of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV) and
which the FAA issued prior to the
February 2022 full-scale Russian
invasion of Ukraine, does not reflect the
area in which the FAA has determined
unacceptable safety-of-flight risks to
U.S. civil aviation currently exist as a
result of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Leaving this obsolete rule in the CFR
after its scheduled expiration date of
October 27, 2023, has the potential to
confuse the regulated community about
the FAA’s flight prohibition posture
with respect to U.S. civil aviation
operations in the FIRs managed by
Ukraine. Therefore, the FAA is
removing SFAR No. 113, § 91.1607 from
the CFR. NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
remains in effect and continues to
prohibit U.S. civil aviation operations in
the Lviv (UKLV), Kyiv (UKBV), Dnipro
(UKDV), Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa
(UKOV) FIRs, as well as the Kyiv Upper
Information Region (UIR).7
The FAA will continue to closely
monitor the conflict for changes in the
risk environment as it relates to the
safety and security of U.S. civil aviation.
IV. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
Federal agencies consider impacts of
regulatory actions under a variety of
executive orders and other
requirements. First, Executive Orders
12866 and 13563, as amended by
Executive Order 14094 (‘‘Modernizing
Regulatory Review’’), direct that each
Federal agency shall propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354), as codified in
5 U.S.C. 603 et seq., requires agencies to
analyze the economic impact of
regulatory changes on small entities.
Third, the Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (Pub. L. 96–39), as codified in 19
U.S.C. Chapter 13, prohibits agencies
from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, the Trade
Agreements Act requires agencies to
consider international standards and,
where appropriate, that they be the basis
of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4), as codified in 2 U.S.C. Chapter
25, requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
7 NOTAMS KICZ A0003/22 and A0005/22 also
remain in effect.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 25, 2023
Jkt 262001
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this final rule.
In conducting these analyses, the FAA
has determined this final rule has
benefits that justify its costs. This rule
is a nonsignificant significant regulatory
action, as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 as amended by
Executive Order 14094. As 5 U.S.C. 553
does not require notice and comment for
this final rule, 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not require regulatory flexibility
analyses regarding impacts on small
entities. This rule will not create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. This
rule will not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or Tribal
governments, or on the private sector,
by exceeding the threshold identified
previously.
A. Regulatory Evaluation
This rule removes the flight
prohibition SFAR for specified areas of
the Dnipro FIR (UKDV). Given that the
Russia-Ukraine conflict and the
associated areas of unacceptable safetyof-flight risks to U.S. civil aviation have
yet to stabilize sufficiently, the FAA has
determined it is not practicable to give
preference to a proceeding to
incorporate the flight prohibition
contained in NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
into the CFR at this time. To avoid the
potential confusion that leaving the
obsolete flight prohibition in the CFR
after its scheduled expiration date might
cause, the FAA is removing SFAR No.
113, § 91.1607.
U.S. civil flight operations in the Lviv
(UKLV), Kyiv (UKBV), Dnipro (UKDV),
Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa (UKOV)
FIRs, as well as the Kyiv UIR (UKBU),
remain prohibited by NOTAM KICZ
A0004/22. Accordingly, the removal of
SFAR No. 113, § 91.1607, which
prohibits U.S. civil aviation operations
in airspace fully encompassed within
the much larger area of airspace in
which NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
prohibits U.S. civil aviation operations,
has no incremental costs. This rule
alleviates the potential for confusion
amongst the regulated community.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
in 5 U.S.C. 603, requires an agency to
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis describing impacts on small
entities whenever 5 U.S.C. 553 or any
other law requires an agency to publish
a general notice of proposed rulemaking
for any proposed rule. Similarly, 5
U.S.C. 604 requires an agency to prepare
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73531
a final regulatory flexibility analysis
when an agency issues a final rule
under 5 U.S.C. 553 after that section or
any other law requires publication of a
general notice of proposed rulemaking.
The FAA concludes good cause exists to
forgo notice and comment and to not
delay the effective date for this rule. As
5 U.S.C. 553 does not require notice and
comment in this situation, 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604 similarly do not require
regulatory flexibility analyses.
C. International Trade Impact
Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or
engaging in related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Pursuant to this Act, the establishment
of standards is not considered an
unnecessary obstacle to the foreign
commerce of the United States, so long
as the standard has a legitimate
domestic objective, such as the
protection of safety, and does not
operate in a manner that excludes
imports that meet this objective. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards.
This rule removes an existing
prohibition on U.S. civil aviation
operations in specified areas of the
Dnipro FIR (UKDV), a location outside
the United States, that is scheduled to
expire on October 27, 2023. As this rule
relates to a location outside the United
States, the rule complies with the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979.
D. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more (in
1995 dollars) in any one year by State,
local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $177
million in lieu of $100 million.
This final rule does not contain such
a mandate. Therefore, the requirements
of Title II of the Act do not apply.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires the FAA to
consider the impact of paperwork and
other information collection burdens it
imposes on the public. The FAA has
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
73532
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 206 / Thursday, October 26, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
determined no new requirement for
information collection is associated
with this final rule.
F. International Compatibility and
Cooperation
In keeping with U.S. obligations
under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, the FAA’s policy is to
conform to International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the
maximum extent practicable. The FAA
has determined no ICAO Standards and
Recommended Practices correspond to
this regulation. The FAA finds this
action is fully consistent with the
obligations under 49 U.S.C.
40105(b)(1)(A) to ensure the FAA
exercises its duties consistently with the
obligations of the United States under
international agreements.
G. Environmental Analysis
The FAA has analyzed this action
under Executive Order 12114,
Environmental Effects Abroad of Major
Federal Actions, and DOT Order
5610.1C, Paragraph 16. Executive Order
12114 requires the FAA to be informed
of environmental considerations and
take those considerations into account
when making decisions on major
Federal actions that could have
environmental impacts anywhere
beyond the borders of the United States.
The FAA has determined this action is
exempt pursuant to Section 2–5(a)(i) of
Executive Order 12114 because it does
not have the potential for a significant
effect on the environment outside the
United States.
In accordance with FAA Order
1050.1F, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures, paragraph 8–
6(c), the FAA has prepared a
memorandum for the record stating the
reason(s) for this determination and has
placed it in the docket for this
rulemaking.
V. Executive Order Determinations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this rule under
the principles and criteria of Executive
Order 13132. The agency has
determined this action will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, or
the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, this
rule will not have federalism
implications.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 25, 2023
Jkt 262001
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211. The agency has
determined it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under the executive
order and will not be likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
C. Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation
Executive Order 13609 promotes
international regulatory cooperation to
meet shared challenges involving
health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to
reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements. The FAA has analyzed
this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive
Order 13609 and has determined that
this action will have no effect on
international regulatory cooperation.
VI. Additional Information
A. Electronic Access
Except for classified and controlled
unclassified material not authorized for
public release, all documents the FAA
considered in developing this rule,
including economic analyses and
technical reports, may be accessed from
the internet through the docket for this
rulemaking.
Those documents may be viewed
online at https://www.regulations.gov
using the docket number listed above. A
copy of this rule will be placed in the
docket. Electronic retrieval help and
guidelines are available on the website.
It is available 24 hours each day, 365
days each year. An electronic copy of
this document may also be downloaded
from the Office of the Federal Register’s
website at https://
www.federalregister.gov and the
Government Publishing Office’s website
at https://www.govinfo.gov. A copy may
also be found at the FAA’s Regulations
and Policies website at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies.
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of
Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, or
by calling (202) 267–9677.
B. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA) (Pub. L. 104–121) (set forth as
a note to 5 U.S.C. 601) requires the FAA
to comply with small entity requests for
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
information or advice about compliance
with statutes and regulations within its
jurisdiction. A small entity with
questions regarding this document may
contact its local FAA official, or the
persons listed under the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT heading at the
beginning of the preamble. To find out
more about SBREFA on the internet,
visit https://www.faa.gov/regulations_
policies/rulemaking/sbre_act/.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91
Air traffic control, Aircraft, Airmen,
Airports, Aviation safety, Freight,
Ukraine.
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends chapter I of title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND
FLIGHT RULES
1. The authority citation for part 91
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40101,
40103, 40105, 40113, 40120, 44101, 44111,
44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715,
44716, 44717, 44722, 46306, 46315, 46316,
46504, 46506–46507, 47122, 47508, 47528–
47531, 47534, Pub. L. 114–190, 130 Stat. 615
(49 U.S.C. 44703 note); articles 12 and 29 of
the Convention on International Civil
Aviation (61 Stat. 1180), (126 Stat. 11).
§ 91.1607
■
[Reserved]
2. Remove and reserve § 91.1607.
Issued in Washington, DC, under the
authority of 49 U.S.C. 106(f) and (g),
40101(d)(1), 40105(b)(1)(A), and 44701(a)(5).
Polly E. Trottenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023–23656 Filed 10–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 570
[FR–6411–N–01]
Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program:
Announcement of Fee To Cover Credit
Subsidy Costs for FY 2024
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Announcement of fee.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
fee that HUD will collect from
borrowers of loans guaranteed under
HUD’s Section 108 Loan Guarantee
Program (Section 108 Program) to offset
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73529-73532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23656]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 206 / Thursday, October 26, 2023 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 73529]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 91
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0225; Amdt. No. 91-331H]
RIN 2120-AL95
Removal of the Prohibition Against Certain Flights in Specified
Areas of the Dnipro Flight Information Region (FIR) (UKDV)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action removes the current flight prohibition Special
Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) for specified areas of the Dnipro
Flight Information Region (FIR) (UKDV). This SFAR, which is scheduled
to expire on October 27, 2023, reflects risks to the safety of U.S.
civil aviation as they existed prior to the Russian Federation's full-
scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and is therefore obsolete.
This action is necessary to alleviate confusion that might otherwise
result from leaving an obsolete rule in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) after its scheduled expiration date of October 27, 2023. FAA
Notice-to-Air-Missions (NOTAM) KICZ A0004/22 remains in effect and
continues to prohibit U.S. civil flight operations in the Lviv (UKLV),
Kyiv (UKBV), Dnipro (UKDV), Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa (UKOV) FIRs,
as well as the Kyiv Upper Information Region (UIR) (UKBU). NOTAM KICZ
A0004/22, together with NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22 and A0005/22, reflects the
FAA's current assessment of the safety-of-flight risks the Russia-
Ukraine conflict presents to U.S. civil aviation operations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on October 27, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Petrak, Flight Standards Service,
through the Washington Operations Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267-3203; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
This action removes the FAA's current flight prohibition SFAR for
specified areas of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV), SFAR No. 113, 14 CFR
91.1607.\1\ SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607, which is scheduled to expire
on October 27, 2023, reflects risks to the safety of U.S. civil
aviation as they existed prior to the Russian Federation's full-scale
invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and is therefore obsolete. This
action is necessary to alleviate confusion that might otherwise result
from leaving an obsolete rule in the CFR after its scheduled expiration
date of October 27, 2023. NOTAM KICZ A0004/22 remains in effect and
continues to prohibit U.S. civil flight operations in the Lviv (UKLV),
Kyiv (UKBV), Dnipro (UKDV), Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa (UKOV) FIRs,
as well as the Kyiv UIR (UKBU). NOTAM KICZ A0004/22, together with
NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22 and A0005/22,\2\ reflects the FAA's current
assessment of the safety-of-flight risks the Russia-Ukraine conflict
presents to U.S. civil aviation operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In its May 24, 2018, Aeronautical Information Regulation and
Control (AIRAC 1806) publication, the Ukrainian State Air Traffic
Services Enterprise, the air navigation service provider for
Ukraine, renamed the FIR formerly known as the Dnipropetrovsk FIR
(UKDV) the Dnipro FIR (UKDV). This rule uses the current FIR name,
including in historical references to the FIR.
\2\ NOTAM KICZ A0003/22 prohibits U.S. civil aviation operations
in the Minsk FIR (UMMV), and NOTAM KICZ A0005/22 prohibits U.S.
civil aviation operations in specified areas of the Moscow (UUWV),
Samara (UWWW), and Rostov-na Donu (URRV) FIRs within the 160
nautical miles of the boundaries of those FIRs and the Ukrainian-
managed FIRs described in NOTAM KICZ A0005/22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Authority and Good Cause
A. Authority
The FAA is responsible for the safety of flight in the U.S. and for
the safety of U.S. civil operators, U.S.-registered civil aircraft, and
U.S.-certificated airmen throughout the world. Sections 106(f) and (g)
of title 49, U.S. Code (U.S.C.), subtitle I, establish the FAA
Administrator's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle
VII of title 49, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope
of the agency's authority. Section 40101(d)(1) provides that the
Administrator shall consider in the public interest, among other
matters, assigning, maintaining, and enhancing safety and security as
the highest priorities in air commerce. Section 40105(b)(1)(A) requires
the Administrator to exercise this authority consistently with the
obligations of the U.S. Government under international agreements.
The FAA is promulgating this rule under the authority described in
49 U.S.C. 44701, General requirements. Under that section, the FAA is
charged broadly with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air
commerce by prescribing, among other things, regulations and minimum
standards for practices, methods, and procedures that the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce and national security.
This regulation is within the scope of the FAA's authority because
it removes an obsolete flight prohibition that prohibits the persons
described in paragraph (a) of SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607, from
conducting flight operations in specified areas of the Dnipro FIR
(UKDV) only. The February 2022 full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine
and the ensuing armed conflict between the Russian Federation and
Ukraine significantly expanded the area of unacceptable safety-of-
flight risks to U.S. civil aviation beyond the boundaries of SFAR No.
113, Sec. 91.1607. To address the resulting emergency related to
safety in air commerce, which required immediate action, the FAA
Administrator issued emergency orders, as authorized by 49 U.S.C.
46105(c), in the form of NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22, A0004/22, and A0005/22.
As described in NOTAMs KICZ A0003/22, A0004/22, and A0005/22, these
emergency orders prohibit U.S. civil aviation operations throughout all
of the FIRs managed by Belarus and Ukraine and in specified areas of
certain FIRs managed by the Russian Federation. The FAA has determined
it is not practicable at this time to give preference to a proceeding
to incorporate the flight prohibition contained in NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
into the CFR, because the Russia-
[[Page 73530]]
Ukraine conflict and the associated areas of unacceptable safety-of-
flight risks to U.S. civil aviation have yet to stabilize sufficiently.
B. Good Cause for Immediate Adoption
Section 553(b)(B) of title 5, U.S. Code, authorizes agencies to
dispense with notice and comment procedures for rules when the agency
for ``good cause'' finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Also, section 553(d)
permits agencies, upon a finding of good cause, to issue rules with an
effective date less than 30 days from the date of publication. In this
instance, the FAA finds good cause to forgo notice and comment and the
delayed effective date because they would be unnecessary.
This action removes SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607, which only
prohibits U.S. civil aviation operations in specified areas of the
Dnipro FIR (UKDV) and is scheduled to expire on October 27, 2023. As
previously described, the February 2022 full-scale Russian invasion of
Ukraine and the ensuing armed conflict between the Russian Federation
and Ukraine significantly expanded the area of unacceptable safety-of-
flight risks to U.S. civil aviation, leading the FAA to issue NOTAMs
KICZ A0003/22, A0004/22, and A0005/22 to address the resulting
emergency related to safety in air commerce. NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
prohibits U.S. civil aviation operations in all of the FIRs managed by
Ukraine, including the specified areas of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV) in
which SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607, prohibits U.S. civil aviation
operations. NOTAM KICZ A0004/22 remains in effect until modified,
superseded, or rescinded by the FAA.
Leaving SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607, in the CFR after its scheduled
expiration date of October 27, 2023, might confuse the regulated
community. Therefore, to alleviate the potential for confusion, the FAA
is removing SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607. This action is ministerial in
nature as it is only removing an expired provision from the CFR and has
no substantive effect on the public.
For the reasons previously described, the FAA finds that providing
notice and seeking public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) are
unnecessary. For the same reasons, the FAA finds that good cause exists
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this rule effective in less than 30
days. Accordingly, the FAA finds good cause exists to forgo notice and
comment and any delay in the effective date for this rule.
III. Background and Discussion of the Final Rule
On April 25, 2014, the FAA published SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607,
which initially prohibited certain flight operations in a portion of
the Simferopol FIR (UKFV) after Russia unlawfully seized Crimea from
Ukraine.\3\ In the months that followed, the ensuing violence and the
associated safety-of-flight risks to U.S. civil aviation expanded to
encompass the entirety of the Simferopol and Dnipro FIRs (UKFV and
UKDV, respectively). Tragically, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH 17)
was shot down on July 17, 2014, while flying over Ukraine at 33,000
feet, just west of the Russian border. All of the 298 passengers and
crew on board MH 17 perished.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Prohibition Against Certain Flights in the Simferopol (UKFV)
Flight Information Region (FIR) final rule, 79 FR 22862 (Apr. 25,
2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA determined the use of weapons capable of targeting and
shooting down aircraft flying on civil air routes at cruising altitudes
posed a dangerous threat to U.S. civil aviation operating in the
Simferopol and Dnipro FIRs (UKFV and UKDV, respectively). On July 18,
2014, Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the FAA issued NOTAM FDC 4/
2182, which prohibited U.S. civil aviation operations in the entirety
of the Simferopol and Dnipro FIRs (UKFV and UKDV, respectively). The
FAA subsequently incorporated that flight prohibition into SFAR No.
113, Sec. 91.1607, on December 29, 2014.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Prohibition Against Certain Flights in the Simferopol (UKFV)
and Dnipropetrovsk (UKDV) Flight Information Regions (FIRs) final
rule, 79 FR 77857 (Dec. 29, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the years that followed, the FAA determined security and safety
conditions had stabilized sufficiently in certain portions of the
Simferopol and Dnipro FIRs (UKFV and UKDV, respectively) for U.S. civil
aviation operations to resume safely.\5\ Most recently, in an October
2021 final rule,\6\ the FAA determined that an unacceptable level of
inadvertent risk to U.S. civil aviation operations remained in the
specified areas of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV), which included the airspace
over and near the line of contact, as it existed at that time, where
most cease-fire violations occurred. Tensions remained elevated, in
part due to the heightened Russian military force posturing in Crimea
and along the Russia-Ukraine border and increases in cease-fire
violations. In addition, the conflict between Ukraine and Russian-back
separatists in eastern Ukraine continued. These circumstances resulted
in continued inadvertent risk to U.S. civil aviation operations due to
the potential for miscalculation or misidentification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Amendment of the Prohibition Against Certain Flights in
Specified Areas of the Simferopol and Dnipropetrovsk Flight
Information Regions (FIRs) (UKFV and UKDV) final rule, 83 FR 52954
(Oct. 19, 2018); Amendment of the Prohibition Against Certain
Flights in Specified Areas of the Simferopol and Dnipropetrovsk
Flight Information Regions (FIRs) (UKFV and UKDV) final rule, 85 FR
65678 (Oct. 16, 2020); and Extension of the Prohibition Against
Certain Flights in Specified Areas of the Dnipro Flight Information
Region (FIR) (UKDV) final rule, 86 FR 55485 (Oct. 6, 2021).
\6\ Extension of the Prohibition Against Certain Flights in
Specified Areas of the Dnipro Flight Information Region (FIR) (UKDV)
final rule, 86 FR 55485 (Oct. 6, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The February 2022 full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine greatly
expanded the area of unacceptable safety-of-flight risks to U.S. civil
aviation to include the entirety of Ukrainian territorial airspace, as
well as the international airspace of all of the FIRs managed by
Ukraine. On February 24, 2022, the FAA issued NOTAM KICZ A0004/22,
prohibiting U.S. civil aviation operations in all of the FIRs managed
by Ukraine at all altitudes.
The FAA has determined the situation in all of the FIRs managed by
Ukraine continues to pose an unacceptable level of risk for U.S. civil
aviation safety. Conflict-related risks affecting civil aviation in
these FIRs include near-daily attacks using weaponized unmanned
aircraft systems (UAS), cruise missiles, and attack helicopters,
resulting in the increased defensive use of advanced surface-to-air
missile systems and electronic warfare. The Russian Federation has
demonstrated its continuing capability and intent to use standoff
strike capabilities to engage targets throughout Ukraine, including the
capital, Kyiv, and Lviv, located in western Ukraine near the border
with Poland. In June 2023, Ukraine launched its anticipated
counteroffensive in eastern and southern Ukraine, prompting increased
Russian standoff attacks to put pressure on the Ukrainian government.
The protracted conflict is expected to continue in the near to mid-
term, despite minimal changes in territorial control so far as the
Ukraine counteroffensive takes shape. It remains unclear when and how
the conflict, and the associated areas of unacceptable safety-of-flight
risks to U.S. civil aviation, may eventually stabilize. Under these
circumstances, the FAA has determined it is not practicable to give
preference to a proceeding to incorporate the flight prohibition
contained in NOTAM KICZ A0004/22 into the CFR at this time.
The current version of SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607, which only
prohibits U.S. civil aviation operations in specified
[[Page 73531]]
areas of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV) and which the FAA issued prior to the
February 2022 full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, does not reflect
the area in which the FAA has determined unacceptable safety-of-flight
risks to U.S. civil aviation currently exist as a result of the Russia-
Ukraine conflict. Leaving this obsolete rule in the CFR after its
scheduled expiration date of October 27, 2023, has the potential to
confuse the regulated community about the FAA's flight prohibition
posture with respect to U.S. civil aviation operations in the FIRs
managed by Ukraine. Therefore, the FAA is removing SFAR No. 113, Sec.
91.1607 from the CFR. NOTAM KICZ A0004/22 remains in effect and
continues to prohibit U.S. civil aviation operations in the Lviv
(UKLV), Kyiv (UKBV), Dnipro (UKDV), Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa (UKOV)
FIRs, as well as the Kyiv Upper Information Region (UIR).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ NOTAMS KICZ A0003/22 and A0005/22 also remain in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA will continue to closely monitor the conflict for changes
in the risk environment as it relates to the safety and security of
U.S. civil aviation.
IV. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
Federal agencies consider impacts of regulatory actions under a
variety of executive orders and other requirements. First, Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563, as amended by Executive Order 14094
(``Modernizing Regulatory Review''), direct that each Federal agency
shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination
that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354), as codified in
5 U.S.C. 603 et seq., requires agencies to analyze the economic impact
of regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as codified in 19 U.S.C. Chapter 13,
prohibits agencies from setting standards that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In developing
U.S. standards, the Trade Agreements Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis
of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4), as codified in 2 U.S.C. Chapter 25, requires agencies
to prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits, and other
effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). This portion of the preamble summarizes the FAA's analysis of
the economic impacts of this final rule.
In conducting these analyses, the FAA has determined this final
rule has benefits that justify its costs. This rule is a nonsignificant
significant regulatory action, as defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 as amended by Executive Order 14094. As 5 U.S.C. 553 does
not require notice and comment for this final rule, 5 U.S.C. 603 and
604 do not require regulatory flexibility analyses regarding impacts on
small entities. This rule will not create unnecessary obstacles to the
foreign commerce of the United States. This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or Tribal governments, or on the
private sector, by exceeding the threshold identified previously.
A. Regulatory Evaluation
This rule removes the flight prohibition SFAR for specified areas
of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV). Given that the Russia-Ukraine conflict and
the associated areas of unacceptable safety-of-flight risks to U.S.
civil aviation have yet to stabilize sufficiently, the FAA has
determined it is not practicable to give preference to a proceeding to
incorporate the flight prohibition contained in NOTAM KICZ A0004/22
into the CFR at this time. To avoid the potential confusion that
leaving the obsolete flight prohibition in the CFR after its scheduled
expiration date might cause, the FAA is removing SFAR No. 113, Sec.
91.1607.
U.S. civil flight operations in the Lviv (UKLV), Kyiv (UKBV),
Dnipro (UKDV), Simferopol (UKFV), and Odesa (UKOV) FIRs, as well as the
Kyiv UIR (UKBU), remain prohibited by NOTAM KICZ A0004/22. Accordingly,
the removal of SFAR No. 113, Sec. 91.1607, which prohibits U.S. civil
aviation operations in airspace fully encompassed within the much
larger area of airspace in which NOTAM KICZ A0004/22 prohibits U.S.
civil aviation operations, has no incremental costs. This rule
alleviates the potential for confusion amongst the regulated community.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), in 5 U.S.C. 603, requires an
agency to prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis describing
impacts on small entities whenever 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other law
requires an agency to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking
for any proposed rule. Similarly, 5 U.S.C. 604 requires an agency to
prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis when an agency issues a
final rule under 5 U.S.C. 553 after that section or any other law
requires publication of a general notice of proposed rulemaking. The
FAA concludes good cause exists to forgo notice and comment and to not
delay the effective date for this rule. As 5 U.S.C. 553 does not
require notice and comment in this situation, 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604
similarly do not require regulatory flexibility analyses.
C. International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to this Act, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards.
This rule removes an existing prohibition on U.S. civil aviation
operations in specified areas of the Dnipro FIR (UKDV), a location
outside the United States, that is scheduled to expire on October 27,
2023. As this rule relates to a location outside the United States, the
rule complies with the Trade Agreements Act of 1979.
D. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $177 million in lieu of $100
million.
This final rule does not contain such a mandate. Therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
the FAA to consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens it imposes on the public. The FAA has
[[Page 73532]]
determined no new requirement for information collection is associated
with this final rule.
F. International Compatibility and Cooperation
In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, the FAA's policy is to conform to
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has
determined no ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices correspond to
this regulation. The FAA finds this action is fully consistent with the
obligations under 49 U.S.C. 40105(b)(1)(A) to ensure the FAA exercises
its duties consistently with the obligations of the United States under
international agreements.
G. Environmental Analysis
The FAA has analyzed this action under Executive Order 12114,
Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions, and DOT Order
5610.1C, Paragraph 16. Executive Order 12114 requires the FAA to be
informed of environmental considerations and take those considerations
into account when making decisions on major Federal actions that could
have environmental impacts anywhere beyond the borders of the United
States. The FAA has determined this action is exempt pursuant to
Section 2-5(a)(i) of Executive Order 12114 because it does not have the
potential for a significant effect on the environment outside the
United States.
In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures, paragraph 8-6(c), the FAA has prepared a
memorandum for the record stating the reason(s) for this determination
and has placed it in the docket for this rulemaking.
V. Executive Order Determinations
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this rule under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132. The agency has determined this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, or the relationship
between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, this rule will not have federalism implications.
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211. The agency
has determined it is not a ``significant energy action'' under the
executive order and will not be likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy.
C. Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation
Executive Order 13609 promotes international regulatory cooperation
to meet shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements. The FAA has
analyzed this action under the policies and agency responsibilities of
Executive Order 13609 and has determined that this action will have no
effect on international regulatory cooperation.
VI. Additional Information
A. Electronic Access
Except for classified and controlled unclassified material not
authorized for public release, all documents the FAA considered in
developing this rule, including economic analyses and technical
reports, may be accessed from the internet through the docket for this
rulemaking.
Those documents may be viewed online at https://www.regulations.gov
using the docket number listed above. A copy of this rule will be
placed in the docket. Electronic retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the website. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded
from the Office of the Federal Register's website at https://www.federalregister.gov and the Government Publishing Office's website
at https://www.govinfo.gov. A copy may also be found at the FAA's
Regulations and Policies website at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies.
Copies may also be obtained by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9677.
B. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA) (Pub. L. 104-121) (set forth as a note to 5 U.S.C. 601)
requires the FAA to comply with small entity requests for information
or advice about compliance with statutes and regulations within its
jurisdiction. A small entity with questions regarding this document may
contact its local FAA official, or the persons listed under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT heading at the beginning of the preamble.
To find out more about SBREFA on the internet, visit https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/sbre_act/.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91
Air traffic control, Aircraft, Airmen, Airports, Aviation safety,
Freight, Ukraine.
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 91--GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES
0
1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40101, 40103, 40105,
40113, 40120, 44101, 44111, 44701, 44704, 44709, 44711, 44712,
44715, 44716, 44717, 44722, 46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506-46507,
47122, 47508, 47528-47531, 47534, Pub. L. 114-190, 130 Stat. 615 (49
U.S.C. 44703 note); articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on
International Civil Aviation (61 Stat. 1180), (126 Stat. 11).
Sec. 91.1607 [Reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve Sec. 91.1607.
Issued in Washington, DC, under the authority of 49 U.S.C.
106(f) and (g), 40101(d)(1), 40105(b)(1)(A), and 44701(a)(5).
Polly E. Trottenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-23656 Filed 10-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P