Communications From Firms to Health Care Providers Regarding Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical Products: Questions and Answers; Revised Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability; Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 73031-73034 [2023-23372]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2023 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–D–0053]
Communications From Firms to Health
Care Providers Regarding Scientific
Information on Unapproved Uses of
Approved/Cleared Medical Products:
Questions and Answers; Revised Draft
Guidance for Industry; Availability;
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a revised
draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Communications From Firms to Health
Care Providers Regarding Scientific
Information on Unapproved Uses of
Approved/Cleared Medical Products:
Questions and Answers.’’ This revised
draft guidance, when finalized, will
provide FDA’s current thinking on
common questions regarding certain
communications by firms to health care
providers (HCPs) of scientific
information on unapproved use(s) of
approved/cleared medical products (the
scope of the italicized terms is further
explained in the revised draft guidance).
This revised guidance supersedes the
revised draft guidance entitled
‘‘Distributing Scientific and Medical
Publications on Unapproved New
Uses—Recommended Practices’’ issued
in 2014 (2014 revised draft guidance).
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the draft guidance
by December 26, 2023 to ensure that the
Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on
the final version of the guidance.
Submit electronic or written comments
on the proposed collection of
information in the draft guidance by
December 26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on any guidance at any time as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Oct 23, 2023
Jkt 262001
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2008–D–0053 for ‘‘Communications
From Firms to Health Care Providers
Regarding Scientific Information on
Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared
Medical Products: Questions and
Answers.’’ Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73031
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
You may submit comments on any
guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single
copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002; the Office of Communication,
Outreach and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002;
the Office of Policy, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002; or the Policy and
Regulations Staff, (HFV–6), Center for
Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your request. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to
the draft guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
With regard to the draft guidance:
Kathleen David, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Room 3203,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–1200; Anne Taylor, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
73032
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2023 / Notices
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
240–402–7911; Ana Loloei, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5504,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–8774; Office of Surveillance and
Compliance, Center for Veterinary
Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.
(HFV–6), Rockville, MD 20855, 240–
402–7082; Julie Finegan, Office of
Policy, Office of the Commissioner,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm.
4252, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
301–827–4830.
With regard to the proposed collection
of information: Domini Bean, Office of
Operations, Food and Drug
Administration, Three White Flint
North, 10 a.m.–12 p.m., 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, 301–796–5733, PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a revised draft guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Communications From Firms
to Health Care Providers Regarding
Scientific Information on Unapproved
Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical
Products: Questions and Answers.’’
Specifically, this revised draft guidance
relates to firms sharing the following
types of communications with HCPs:
• published scientific or medical
journal articles (reprints),
• published clinical reference
resources, as follows:
Æ clinical practice guidelines (CPGs),
Æ scientific or medical reference texts
(reference texts),
Æ materials from independent clinical
practice resources, and
• firm-generated presentations of
scientific information from an
accompanying published reprint.
For the purposes of this revised draft
guidance, these specific types of
communications from firms to HCPs of
scientific information on unapproved
uses (SIUU) of approved/cleared
medical products in combination with
the disclosures recommended in the
guidance are referred to as ‘‘SIUU
communications.’’ We acknowledge that
firms share SIUU communications
through different media (e.g., paper,
digital), and the recommendations in
this guidance apply regardless of the
medium of the communication. Other
communications by firms are not
specifically addressed by this revised
draft guidance, and we do not intend to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Oct 23, 2023
Jkt 262001
convey any views on such
communications in issuing this revised
draft guidance.
This revised draft guidance represents
a continuation of FDA’s ongoing efforts
to consider, develop, and refine its
policies and recommendations relating
to communications by firms about
unapproved uses of their approved/
cleared medical products. In 2009, FDA
issued a final guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Good Reprint Practices for the
Distribution of Medical Journal Articles
and Medical or Scientific Reference
Publications on Unapproved New Uses
of Approved Drugs and Approved or
Cleared Medical Devices’’ (74 FR 1694)
to provide guidance to firms on
distributing ‘‘journal articles’’ and
‘‘scientific or medical reference
publications.’’ Then, FDA issued the
2014 revised draft guidance (79 FR
11793) to clarify the Agency’s position
on firms disseminating scientific or
medical reference texts and CPGs that
include information on unapproved
uses of the firm’s medical products and
to provide additional explanation on
these topics.
In developing this revised draft
guidance, FDA considered stakeholder
feedback, including comments received
on the 2014 revised draft guidance. This
revised draft guidance will supersede
the 2014 revised draft guidance.
Changes include a revised title, a
question-and-answer format, and certain
changes in scope.
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act, the Public Health Service Act, and
their implementing regulations prohibit,
among other things, the introduction (or
causing the introduction) into interstate
commerce of a medical product that
fails to comply with applicable
premarket requirements or is otherwise
misbranded or adulterated. This
prohibition includes introducing (or
causing the introduction) into interstate
commerce a medical product that is
intended for a use that has not been
approved or cleared by FDA, even if that
same product is approved or cleared for
a different use. These premarket
requirements further multiple important
government interests and distributing
approved/cleared medical products for
unapproved uses can undermine these
interests. In certain circumstances,
however, HCPs may be interested in
scientific information about unapproved
uses of approved/cleared medical
products to inform clinical practice
decisions for the care of an individual
patient. In developing this draft
guidance, FDA has sought to strike a
careful balance between supporting HCP
interest in scientific information about
unapproved uses of approved/cleared
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
medical products to inform clinical
practice decisions for the care of an
individual patient, and mitigating the
potential that the government interests
advanced by these statutory
requirements will be undermined.
In light of those goals, FDA believes
it is critical that SIUU communications
be truthful, non-misleading, factual and
unbiased and provide all information
necessary for HCPs to interpret the
strengths and weaknesses and validity
and utility of the information in the
SIUU communication. In addition, any
study or analysis described in a source
publication that serves as the basis for
an SIUU communication should be
scientifically sound. The studies or
analyses should also provide
information that is relevant to HCPs
engaged in making clinical practice
decisions for the care of an individual
patient (as used in this revised draft
guidance, ‘‘clinically relevant’’). The
manner of presentation of SIUU
communications is also critical to
consider. This revised draft guidance
provides recommendations addressing
all of these considerations.
If a firm shares an SIUU
communication with HCPs in a manner
that is consistent with the
recommendations in this revised draft
guidance, FDA does not intend to use
such communication standing alone as
evidence of a new intended use.
This revised draft guidance is being
issued consistent with FDA’s good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR
10.115). The revised draft guidance,
when finalized, will represent the
current thinking of FDA on
‘‘Communications From Firms to Health
Care Providers Regarding Scientific
Information on Unapproved Uses of
Approved/Cleared Medical Products:
Questions and Answers.’’ It does not
establish any rights for any person and
is not binding on FDA or the public.
You can use an alternative approach if
it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521),
Federal Agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2023 / Notices
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Recommendations for Drug and Device
Manufacturer Communications With
Payors, Formulary Committees, and
Similar Entities; and Communications
From Firms to Health Care Providers
Regarding Scientific Information on
Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared
Medical Products
73033
Care Providers Regarding Scientific
Information on Unapproved Uses of
Approved/Cleared Medical Products:
Questions and Answers,’’ discusses
information disclosures that we
recommend firms include in SIUU
communications if the firms choose to
publicly share such communications.
We estimate the burden of the
information collection as follows:
Questions and Answers
OMB Control Number 0910–0857—
Revision
The revised draft guidance document,
‘‘Communications From Firms to Health
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Recommended disclosure activity; guidance section
A statement that the unapproved use(s) of the medical
product has not been approved by FDA and that the
safety and effectiveness of the medical product for
the unapproved use(s) has not been established; Q2.
A statement disclosing the FDA-approved use(s) of the
medical product, including any limitations of use
specified in the FDA-required labeling; Q2.
A statement disclosing any limitations, restrictions, cautions, or warnings described in the FDA-required labeling about the unapproved use(s); Q2.
A copy of the most current FDA-required labeling (or a
mechanism for obtaining this labeling, as appropriate); Q2.
A statement describing any contraindication(s) in the
FDA-required labeling for the medical product; Q2.
A statement describing any serious, life-threatening, or
fatal risks posed by the medical product that are in
the FDA-required labeling for the medical product or
known by the firm and that are relevant to the unapproved use(s). If a risk evaluation and mitigation
strategy (REMS) has been established under 21
U.S.C. 355–1, the statement should disclose that
fact and should describe the goal(s) of the REMS;
Q2.
A statement identifying any authors, editors, or other
contributors to publication(s) included in the SIUU
communication who were employees of or consultants to or who received compensation from the firm
at the time of writing, editing, or contributing to the
publication, to the extent that a firm acting reasonably would know of such relationship; Q2.
In the case of an SIUU communication that is based
on a source publication that is primarily focused on a
particular scientific study or studies, for each such
study where the following information is not included
in the publication, provide a description of:
—All material aspects of study design, methodology, and results;
—All material limitations related to the study design, methodology, and results; and
—When applicable, conclusions from other relevant studies that are contrary to, or cast doubt
on, the results shared, including citations for any
such studies; Q2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Oct 23, 2023
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
Total
annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total
hours
1,008
30
30,240
0.1 (6 minutes) ....
3,024
1,008
27
27,216
0.1 (6 minutes) ....
2,721.6
1,008
5
5,040
0.2 (12 minutes) ..
1,008
1,008
27
27,216
0.1 (6 minutes) ....
2,721.6
1,008
3
3,024
0.1 (6 minutes) ....
302.4
1,008
25
25,200
0.2 (12 minutes) ..
5,040
1,008
20
20,160
0.2 (12 minutes) ..
4,032
1,008
20
20,160
2.75 .....................
55,440
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
73034
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 24, 2023 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1—Continued
Number of
respondents
Recommended disclosure activity; guidance section
Total
annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total
hours
The publication date of any referenced or included
publication(s) (if not specified in the publication or citation); Q2.
When firms share an SIUU communication in the form
of an unabridged CPG or reference text in its entirety that discusses a wide range of medical products and that discussion is not primarily focused on
one or more of a firm’s medical products, the firm
should include, in lieu of some of the specific disclosures listed above, a more general statement in the
SIUU communication, such as ‘‘This [CPG/reference
text] describes some uses of medical products that
are not approved by the FDA and the safety and effectiveness of any unapproved use(s) have not been
established.’’; Q4.
When firms share an SIUU communication in the form
of a firm-generated presentation of scientific information from an accompanying reprint that SIUU communication should clearly disclose what portions of
the communication are firm-generated; Q4.
1,008
3
3,024
0.1 (6 minutes) ....
302.4
1,008
3
3,024
0.1 (6 minutes) ....
302.4
1,008
10
10,080
0.1 (6 minutes) ....
1,008
Total ........................................................................
........................
........................
174,384
.............................
75,902.4
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Based on a current listing of firms
promoting approved/cleared human and
animal drug products (747), combined
with an estimated number of device
firms marketing products (261), we
assume 1,008 firms (‘‘number of
respondents’’ in table (1) may each
choose to publicly share 30 SIUU
communications annually. Our estimate
of the burden per disclosure (2.5 hours)
reflects what we believe is the average
burden based on the number and
content and complexity of disclosures
as recommended in the guidance.
III. Request for Comment on Other
Issues for Consideration
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
FDA is interested in additional
matters related to communications by
firms about scientific information on
unapproved use(s) of approved/cleared
medical products. This revised draft
guidance pertains to these
communications by firms to HCPs
engaged in making clinical practice
decisions for the care of an individual
patient. FDA is specifically seeking
input on the following:
1. What considerations, if any, exist
that are unique to communications of
scientific information about unapproved
use(s) of approved/cleared medical
products by firms to researchers
(including HCPs working in their
capacity as researchers)?
2. What other factors should firms
consider when sharing firm-generated
presentations (as described in the draft
guidance) to ensure that presentations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Oct 23, 2023
Jkt 262001
are truthful, non-misleading, factual and
unbiased and provide all information
necessary for HCPs to interpret the
strengths and weaknesses and validity
and utility of the presented information?
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
IV. Electronic Access
Notice of Request for Public Comment
on Proposed Update to the Bright
Futures Periodicity Schedule as Part of
the HRSA-Supported Preventive
Services Guidelines for Infants,
Children, and Adolescents
Persons with access to the internet
may obtain an electronic version of the
draft guidance at https://www.fda.gov/
Drugs/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/
vaccines-blood-biologics/guidancecompliance-regulatory-informationbiologics/biologics-guidances, https://
www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
DeviceRegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/default.htm,
https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/
guidance-regulations/guidanceindustry, https://www.fda.gov/
regulatory-information/search-fdaguidance-documents, or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 18, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–23372 Filed 10–23–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Department of
Health and Human Services.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice seeks public
comment on a proposed update to the
Periodicity Schedule of the Bright
Futures Recommendations for Pediatric
Preventive Health Care (‘‘Bright Futures
Periodicity Schedule’’), as part of the
HRSA-supported preventive services
guidelines for infants, children, and
adolescents.
SUMMARY:
Members of the public are
invited to provide written comments on
the proposed update no later than
November 24, 2023. All comments
received on or before this date will be
reviewed and considered by the Bright
Futures Periodicity Schedule Working
Group and provided for further
consideration by HRSA in determining
the recommended updates that it will
support.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73031-73034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23372]
[[Page 73031]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-D-0053]
Communications From Firms to Health Care Providers Regarding
Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical
Products: Questions and Answers; Revised Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability; Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed
Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a revised draft guidance for industry entitled
``Communications From Firms to Health Care Providers Regarding
Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical
Products: Questions and Answers.'' This revised draft guidance, when
finalized, will provide FDA's current thinking on common questions
regarding certain communications by firms to health care providers
(HCPs) of scientific information on unapproved use(s) of approved/
cleared medical products (the scope of the italicized terms is further
explained in the revised draft guidance). This revised guidance
supersedes the revised draft guidance entitled ``Distributing
Scientific and Medical Publications on Unapproved New Uses--Recommended
Practices'' issued in 2014 (2014 revised draft guidance).
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by December 26, 2023 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance. Submit electronic or written comments on the
proposed collection of information in the draft guidance by December
26, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2008-D-0053 for ``Communications From Firms to Health Care
Providers Regarding Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of
Approved/Cleared Medical Products: Questions and Answers.'' Received
comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted
as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; the
Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; the
Office of Policy, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; or the Policy and Regulations Staff,
(HFV-6), Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration,
7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855. Send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in processing your request. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for information on electronic
access to the draft guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: With regard to the draft guidance:
Kathleen David, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Room 3203, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1200; Anne Taylor, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
[[Page 73032]]
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911; Ana Loloei, Center for Devices and Radiological Health,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm.
5504, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-8774; Office of
Surveillance and Compliance, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and
Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl. (HFV-6), Rockville, MD 20855,
240-402-7082; Julie Finegan, Office of Policy, Office of the
Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 32, Rm. 4252, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-827-4830.
With regard to the proposed collection of information: Domini Bean,
Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint
North, 10 a.m.-12 p.m., 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,
301-796-5733, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a revised draft guidance for
industry entitled ``Communications From Firms to Health Care Providers
Regarding Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared
Medical Products: Questions and Answers.'' Specifically, this revised
draft guidance relates to firms sharing the following types of
communications with HCPs:
published scientific or medical journal articles
(reprints),
published clinical reference resources, as follows:
[cir] clinical practice guidelines (CPGs),
[cir] scientific or medical reference texts (reference texts),
[cir] materials from independent clinical practice resources, and
firm-generated presentations of scientific information
from an accompanying published reprint.
For the purposes of this revised draft guidance, these specific
types of communications from firms to HCPs of scientific information on
unapproved uses (SIUU) of approved/cleared medical products in
combination with the disclosures recommended in the guidance are
referred to as ``SIUU communications.'' We acknowledge that firms share
SIUU communications through different media (e.g., paper, digital), and
the recommendations in this guidance apply regardless of the medium of
the communication. Other communications by firms are not specifically
addressed by this revised draft guidance, and we do not intend to
convey any views on such communications in issuing this revised draft
guidance.
This revised draft guidance represents a continuation of FDA's
ongoing efforts to consider, develop, and refine its policies and
recommendations relating to communications by firms about unapproved
uses of their approved/cleared medical products. In 2009, FDA issued a
final guidance for industry entitled ``Good Reprint Practices for the
Distribution of Medical Journal Articles and Medical or Scientific
Reference Publications on Unapproved New Uses of Approved Drugs and
Approved or Cleared Medical Devices'' (74 FR 1694) to provide guidance
to firms on distributing ``journal articles'' and ``scientific or
medical reference publications.'' Then, FDA issued the 2014 revised
draft guidance (79 FR 11793) to clarify the Agency's position on firms
disseminating scientific or medical reference texts and CPGs that
include information on unapproved uses of the firm's medical products
and to provide additional explanation on these topics.
In developing this revised draft guidance, FDA considered
stakeholder feedback, including comments received on the 2014 revised
draft guidance. This revised draft guidance will supersede the 2014
revised draft guidance. Changes include a revised title, a question-
and-answer format, and certain changes in scope.
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service
Act, and their implementing regulations prohibit, among other things,
the introduction (or causing the introduction) into interstate commerce
of a medical product that fails to comply with applicable premarket
requirements or is otherwise misbranded or adulterated. This
prohibition includes introducing (or causing the introduction) into
interstate commerce a medical product that is intended for a use that
has not been approved or cleared by FDA, even if that same product is
approved or cleared for a different use. These premarket requirements
further multiple important government interests and distributing
approved/cleared medical products for unapproved uses can undermine
these interests. In certain circumstances, however, HCPs may be
interested in scientific information about unapproved uses of approved/
cleared medical products to inform clinical practice decisions for the
care of an individual patient. In developing this draft guidance, FDA
has sought to strike a careful balance between supporting HCP interest
in scientific information about unapproved uses of approved/cleared
medical products to inform clinical practice decisions for the care of
an individual patient, and mitigating the potential that the government
interests advanced by these statutory requirements will be undermined.
In light of those goals, FDA believes it is critical that SIUU
communications be truthful, non-misleading, factual and unbiased and
provide all information necessary for HCPs to interpret the strengths
and weaknesses and validity and utility of the information in the SIUU
communication. In addition, any study or analysis described in a source
publication that serves as the basis for an SIUU communication should
be scientifically sound. The studies or analyses should also provide
information that is relevant to HCPs engaged in making clinical
practice decisions for the care of an individual patient (as used in
this revised draft guidance, ``clinically relevant''). The manner of
presentation of SIUU communications is also critical to consider. This
revised draft guidance provides recommendations addressing all of these
considerations.
If a firm shares an SIUU communication with HCPs in a manner that
is consistent with the recommendations in this revised draft guidance,
FDA does not intend to use such communication standing alone as
evidence of a new intended use.
This revised draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's
good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The revised draft
guidance, when finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on
``Communications From Firms to Health Care Providers Regarding
Scientific Information on Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical
Products: Questions and Answers.'' It does not establish any rights for
any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521), Federal Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they
conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records,
or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies to provide a
60-day notice in
[[Page 73033]]
the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Recommendations for Drug and Device Manufacturer Communications With
Payors, Formulary Committees, and Similar Entities; and Communications
From Firms to Health Care Providers Regarding Scientific Information on
Unapproved Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical Products
Questions and Answers
OMB Control Number 0910-0857--Revision
The revised draft guidance document, ``Communications From Firms to
Health Care Providers Regarding Scientific Information on Unapproved
Uses of Approved/Cleared Medical Products: Questions and Answers,''
discusses information disclosures that we recommend firms include in
SIUU communications if the firms choose to publicly share such
communications.
We estimate the burden of the information collection as follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Recommended disclosure Number of disclosures Total annual Average burden Total hours
activity; guidance section respondents per respondent disclosures per disclosure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A statement that the 1,008 30 30,240 0.1 (6 minutes). 3,024
unapproved use(s) of the
medical product has not been
approved by FDA and that the
safety and effectiveness of
the medical product for the
unapproved use(s) has not
been established; Q2.
A statement disclosing the FDA- 1,008 27 27,216 0.1 (6 minutes). 2,721.6
approved use(s) of the
medical product, including
any limitations of use
specified in the FDA-required
labeling; Q2.
A statement disclosing any 1,008 5 5,040 0.2 (12 minutes) 1,008
limitations, restrictions,
cautions, or warnings
described in the FDA-required
labeling about the unapproved
use(s); Q2.
A copy of the most current FDA- 1,008 27 27,216 0.1 (6 minutes). 2,721.6
required labeling (or a
mechanism for obtaining this
labeling, as appropriate); Q2.
A statement describing any 1,008 3 3,024 0.1 (6 minutes). 302.4
contraindication(s) in the
FDA-required labeling for the
medical product; Q2.
A statement describing any 1,008 25 25,200 0.2 (12 minutes) 5,040
serious, life-threatening, or
fatal risks posed by the
medical product that are in
the FDA-required labeling for
the medical product or known
by the firm and that are
relevant to the unapproved
use(s). If a risk evaluation
and mitigation strategy
(REMS) has been established
under 21 U.S.C. 355-1, the
statement should disclose
that fact and should describe
the goal(s) of the REMS; Q2.
A statement identifying any 1,008 20 20,160 0.2 (12 minutes) 4,032
authors, editors, or other
contributors to
publication(s) included in
the SIUU communication who
were employees of or
consultants to or who
received compensation from
the firm at the time of
writing, editing, or
contributing to the
publication, to the extent
that a firm acting reasonably
would know of such
relationship; Q2.
In the case of an SIUU 1,008 20 20,160 2.75............ 55,440
communication that is based
on a source publication that
is primarily focused on a
particular scientific study
or studies, for each such
study where the following
information is not included
in the publication, provide a
description of:
--All material aspects of
study design,
methodology, and results;
--All material limitations
related to the study
design, methodology, and
results; and
--When applicable,
conclusions from other
relevant studies that are
contrary to, or cast
doubt on, the results
shared, including
citations for any such
studies; Q2.
[[Page 73034]]
The publication date of any 1,008 3 3,024 0.1 (6 minutes). 302.4
referenced or included
publication(s) (if not
specified in the publication
or citation); Q2.
When firms share an SIUU 1,008 3 3,024 0.1 (6 minutes). 302.4
communication in the form of
an unabridged CPG or
reference text in its
entirety that discusses a
wide range of medical
products and that discussion
is not primarily focused on
one or more of a firm's
medical products, the firm
should include, in lieu of
some of the specific
disclosures listed above, a
more general statement in the
SIUU communication, such as
``This [CPG/reference text]
describes some uses of
medical products that are not
approved by the FDA and the
safety and effectiveness of
any unapproved use(s) have
not been established.''; Q4.
When firms share an SIUU 1,008 10 10,080 0.1 (6 minutes). 1,008
communication in the form of
a firm-generated presentation
of scientific information
from an accompanying reprint
that SIUU communication
should clearly disclose what
portions of the communication
are firm-generated; Q4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................... .............. .............. 174,384 ................ 75,902.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Based on a current listing of firms promoting approved/cleared
human and animal drug products (747), combined with an estimated number
of device firms marketing products (261), we assume 1,008 firms
(``number of respondents'' in table (1) may each choose to publicly
share 30 SIUU communications annually. Our estimate of the burden per
disclosure (2.5 hours) reflects what we believe is the average burden
based on the number and content and complexity of disclosures as
recommended in the guidance.
III. Request for Comment on Other Issues for Consideration
FDA is interested in additional matters related to communications
by firms about scientific information on unapproved use(s) of approved/
cleared medical products. This revised draft guidance pertains to these
communications by firms to HCPs engaged in making clinical practice
decisions for the care of an individual patient. FDA is specifically
seeking input on the following:
1. What considerations, if any, exist that are unique to
communications of scientific information about unapproved use(s) of
approved/cleared medical products by firms to researchers (including
HCPs working in their capacity as researchers)?
2. What other factors should firms consider when sharing firm-
generated presentations (as described in the draft guidance) to ensure
that presentations are truthful, non-misleading, factual and unbiased
and provide all information necessary for HCPs to interpret the
strengths and weaknesses and validity and utility of the presented
information?
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet may obtain an electronic
version of the draft guidance at https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information-biologics/biologics-guidances, https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm, https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/guidance-regulations/guidance-industry, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents, or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 18, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-23372 Filed 10-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P