Plan-Specific Substitute Mortality Tables for Determining Present Value, 72409-72411 [2023-23268]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2023 / Proposed Rules
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11H,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 11, 2023, and
effective September 15, 2023, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM WA E5 Mitchell, OR [New]
Antone Ranch Airport, OR
(Lat. 44°29′34″ N, long. 119°50′38″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within 2.2 miles either
side of the 098° bearing extending to the
airport 8.4-mile radius, and within 2.2 miles
either side of the 278° bearing extending to
the airport 10.4-mile radius, and within an
area bounded by a line beginning at the 290°
bearing at 10.4 miles, then clockwise along
the airport’s 10.4-mile radius to the 317°
bearing, to the 327° bearing at 7.1 miles, to
the 310° bearing at 4.1 miles, thence to the
point of beginning.
*
*
*
*
This document sets forth
proposed regulations that would update
the requirements that a plan sponsor of
a single-employer defined benefit plan
must meet to obtain IRS approval to use
mortality tables specific to the plan in
calculating present value for minimum
funding purposes (as a substitute for the
generally applicable mortality tables).
These regulations would affect
participants in, beneficiaries of,
employers maintaining, and
administrators of certain retirement
plans.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by December 19, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly
encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic
submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and
REG–103525–23) by following the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Requests for a public hearing
must be submitted as prescribed in the
‘‘Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing’’ section. Once submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments
cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS will publish
for public availability any comments
submitted to the IRS’s public docket.
Send paper submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–103525–23), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, Arslan
Malik or Linda S. F. Marshall at (202)
317–6700 (not a toll-free number);
concerning submissions of comments
and requests for a public hearing, Vivian
Hayes at (202) 317–6901 (not a toll-free
number) or by sending an email to
publichearings@irs.gov (preferred).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
*
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
October 13, 2023.
B.G. Chew,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2023–23128 Filed 10–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Background
Section 412 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code) prescribes minimum
funding requirements for defined
benefit pension plans. Section 430
specifies the minimum funding
requirements that apply generally to
defined benefit plans that are singleemployer plans (that is, not
multiemployer plans).1 For a plan
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–103525–23]
RIN 1545–BQ67
Plan-Specific Substitute Mortality
Tables for Determining Present Value
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Oct 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
1 Section 302 of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93–406, 88 Stat.
829 (1974), as amended (ERISA), sets forth funding
rules that are parallel to those in section 412 of the
Code, and section 303 of ERISA sets forth
additional funding rules for defined benefit plans
(other than multiemployer plans) that are parallel
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72409
subject to section 430, section 430(a)
defines the minimum required
contribution for a plan year by reference
to the plan’s funding target for the plan
year. Under section 430(d)(1), a plan’s
funding target for a plan year generally
is the present value of all benefits
accrued or earned under the plan as of
the first day of that plan year.
Section 430(h)(3) provides rules
regarding the mortality tables to be used
under section 430. Under section
430(h)(3)(A), except as provided in
section 430(h)(3)(C) or (D), the Secretary
is to prescribe by regulation mortality
tables to be used in determining any
present value or making any
computation under section 430. Section
430(h)(3)(C) prescribes rules for a plan
sponsor’s use of substitute mortality
tables reflecting the specific mortality
experience of a plan’s population
instead of using the generally applicable
mortality tables. Under section
430(h)(3)(C), the plan sponsor may
request the Secretary’s approval to use
plan-specific substitute mortality tables
that meet requirements specified in the
statute. If the Secretary determines that
the proposed tables meet the statutory
standards and approves the request, the
substitute mortality tables are used to
determine present values and make
computations under section 430 during
the period of consecutive plan years
(not to exceed 10) specified in the
request.
Under section 430(h)(3)(C)(iii), a
substitute mortality table may be used
for a plan only if: (1) the plan has a
sufficient number of plan participants
and has been maintained for a sufficient
period of time to have credible mortality
information necessary to create a
substitute mortality table; and (2) the
table reflects the actual mortality
experience of the plan’s participants
and projected trends in general
mortality experience. Except as
provided by the Secretary, a plan
sponsor may not use substitute
mortality tables for any plan unless
substitute mortality tables are
established and used for each plan
maintained by the plan sponsor or a
member of its controlled group.
Final regulations (TD 9826) under
section 430(h)(3) were published in the
Federal Register on October 5, 2017 (82
FR 46388). The final regulations issued
to those in section 430 of the Code. Pursuant to
section 101 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978,
5 U.S.C. App., as amended, the Secretary of the
Treasury has interpretive jurisdiction over the
subject matter addressed in these proposed
regulations for purposes of ERISA, as well as the
Code. Thus, these proposed Treasury regulations
issued under section 430 of the Code would also
apply for purposes of section 303 of ERISA.
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
72410
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2023 / Proposed Rules
in 2017 include rules regarding
generally applicable mortality tables,
which are set forth in § 1.430(h)(3)–1
(the 2017 general mortality table
regulations), as well as rules regarding
substitute mortality tables, which are set
forth in § 1.430(h)(3)–2 (the 2017
substitute mortality table regulations).
The 2017 substitute mortality table
regulations provide that any substitute
mortality tables must be based on the
plan’s mortality experience during an
experience study period that consists of
2, 3, 4, or 5 consecutive 12-month
periods. In conjunction with the 2017
substitute mortality table regulations,
the Department of the Treasury
(Treasury Department) and the IRS
issued Rev. Proc. 2017–55, 2017–43 IRB
373, which sets forth the procedure by
which a plan sponsor of a defined
benefit plan may request and obtain
approval for the use of plan-specific
substitute mortality tables.
Beginning in 2020 and extending into
2023, for many pension plans, the
mortality experience of the plan
participants was significantly higher
than expected due to the COVID–19
pandemic. The Treasury Department
and the IRS are concerned that, if a plan
sponsor applied for approval of planspecific substitute mortality tables using
an experience study period that reflects
the actual mortality experience for the
plan’s population during those years,
then the existing rules and procedures
used for generating those tables would
result in plan-specific substitute
mortality tables that overstate the
expected future mortality for the plan’s
population. This is because substitute
mortality tables are constructed based
on a mortality ratio calculated for the
plan’s population, which is determined
by dividing the actual mortality
experience for plan participants during
the experience study period by the
expected mortality under the generally
applicable mortality tables. In the
absence of any changes to the rules and
procedures for generating plan-specific
substitute mortality tables, a mortality
ratio developed using an experience
study period that includes the period in
which the COVID–19 pandemic
occurred (COVID–19 pandemic period)
will likely be unusually high, as the
numerator of the mortality ratio (the
plan’s actual experience) will reflect the
actual number of deaths during this
period, while the denominator of that
ratio (the expected deaths for the plan
population) will be based on the
expected number of deaths from the
generally applicable mortality tables
(which reflect only a small fraction of
the significant short-term increase in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Oct 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
mortality rates that occurred during the
COVID–19 pandemic period).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are issuing final regulations updating
the generally applicable mortality tables
under section 430(h)(3)(A) (TD 9983) in
the Rules and Regulations section of this
issue of the Federal Register. Those
final regulations adopt mortality tables
that are based on the mortality tables in
the Pri-2012 Private Retirement Plans
Mortality Tables Report (Pri-2012),2
which were developed using the
mortality experience for private sector
pension plans during the period from
2010 to 2014. In light of the fact that the
Pri-2012 mortality tables did not reflect
any mortality experience from the
COVID–19 pandemic period, the
preamble to the proposed regulations
that preceded those final regulations
asked for comments about whether the
rules and procedures relating to
development of substitute mortality
tables should be modified to recognize
the potential that the mortality
experience for the COVID–19 pandemic
period is not accurately predictive of the
future mortality experience for
participants of a plan for which
substitute mortality tables are requested.
In response, commenters suggested
various solutions that included: (1)
excluding mortality data from the
COVID–19 pandemic period, (2)
applying a reduced weight to the
mortality data from the COVID–19
pandemic period in developing the
substitute mortality tables, (3) extending
the duration of the experience study
period (which has a similar effect of
reducing the weight of the mortality
data for that period), and (4) computing
the mortality ratio for a substitute
mortality table by comparing pre-2020
data to the Pri-2012 base mortality table
and post-2019 data to the Pri-2012 base
mortality table (as projected) with a
specified load.
Explanation of Provisions
These proposed regulations would
generally retain the methodology for
development of substitute mortality
tables included in the 2017 substitute
mortality table regulations but provide
additional rules regarding the use of
mortality experience data for the
COVID–19 pandemic period. In order to
develop a mortality ratio that is more
accurately predictive of future mortality
experience for a plan population, these
proposed regulations would provide
that the expected deaths for the plan
2 The Pri-2012 Report can be found at: https://
www.soa.org/49c106/globalassets/assets/files/
resources/experience-studies/2019/pri-2012mortality-tables-report.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
population used in determining the
denominator in the mortality ratio are
calculated by adjusting the mortality
rates in the generally applicable
mortality tables. Specifically, the
proposed regulations would provide
that, for each 12-month period that is
included in the experience study period
and that begins after 2019 and before
2024, the expected mortality rate for an
individual is determined by multiplying
the expected mortality rate for that
individual from the standard mortality
tables by an adjustment factor.3 The
adjustment factor for each of these years
would approximate the ratio (as
reported by the National Center for
Health Statistics, which is part of the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention) 4 of (1) the actual number of
deaths for the general population for the
year to (2) the expected number of
deaths for the general population for
that year.
Applicability Date
The proposed regulations are
proposed to apply for plan years
beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
Statement of Availability of IRS
Documents
IRS Revenue Rulings, Revenue
Procedures, and Notices cited in this
document are published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin (or Cumulative
Bulletin) and are available from the
Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Publishing Office,
Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting
the IRS website at www.irs.gov.
Special Analyses
Pursuant to the Memorandum of
Agreement, Review of Treasury
Regulations under Executive Order
12866 (June 9, 2023), tax regulatory
actions issued by the IRS are not subject
to the requirements of section 6 of
Executive Order 12866, as amended.
Therefore, a regulatory impact
assessment is not required.
It is hereby certified that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small
employers generally cannot use planspecific substitute mortality tables
because their defined benefit pension
3 This approach is similar to the fourth approach
suggested by commenters, as described in the
Background section of this preamble because a
direct adjustment to the expected mortality rates
during the COVID–19 pandemic period would be
more appropriate than calculating mortality ratios
using an approach that either ignores the mortality
experience during the COVID–19 pandemic period
or reduces the weighting of that experience.
4 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/
excess_deaths.htm.
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 202 / Friday, October 20, 2023 / Proposed Rules
plans do not have credible mortality
experience (which is defined as a
minimum number of deaths during the
experience study period) as is required
to use substitute mortality tables.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, these proposed regulations will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their
impact on small business.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs
and benefits and take certain other
actions before issuing a final rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
by a State, local, or Tribal government,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. The proposed
regulations do not propose any rule that
would include any Federal mandate that
may result in expenditures by State,
local, or Tribal governments, or by the
private sector in excess of that
threshold.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
prohibits an agency from publishing any
rule that has federalism implications if
the rule either imposes substantial,
direct compliance costs on State and
local governments, and is not required
by statute, or preempts State law, unless
the agency meets the consultation and
funding requirements of section 6 of the
Executive order. The proposed
regulations do not propose rules that
would have federalism implications,
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments, or
preempt State law within the meaning
of the Executive order.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Consideration will be given to
comments that are submitted timely to
the IRS as prescribed in the preamble
under the ADDRESSES section. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on all aspects of these
proposed regulations. Any comments
submitted will be made available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing will be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person who
timely submits electronic or written
comments. Requests for a public hearing
are also encouraged to be made
electronically. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date and time
for the public hearing will be published
in the Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Oct 19, 2023
Jkt 262001
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Arslan Malik and Linda
S. F. Marshall of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits,
Exempt Organizations, and Employment
Taxes). However, other personnel from
Treasury and the IRS participated in the
development of these regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS propose to amend 26 CFR
part 1 as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read, in part, as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.430(h)(3)–2 is
amended by:
■ a. In paragraph (a) removing
‘‘§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘§ 601.601(d)’’;
■ b. In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(B) removing
the text ‘‘January 1, 2019 year is’’ and
adding in its place the text ‘‘January 1,
2019 is’’;
■ c. Revising paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(A).
■ d. Redesignating paragraph
(d)(4)(iii)(B) as paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(C)
and adding a new paragraph
(d)(4)(iii)(B).
■ e. Revising paragraph (g).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
§ 1.430(h)(3)–2 Plan-specific substitute
mortality tables used to determine present
value.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Projection of base table. Except as
otherwise provided in this paragraph
(d)(4)(iii), the standard mortality table
for a year is the mortality table
determined by applying cumulative
mortality improvement factors
determined under § 1.430(h)(3)–
1(b)(2)(ii) to the base mortality table
under § 1.430(h)(3)–1(d) for the period
beginning with the base year for that
mortality table and ending in the base
year for the base substitute mortality
table determined under paragraph
(c)(3)(ii) of this section. For purposes of
the preceding sentence, the cumulative
mortality improvement factors are
determined using the mortality
improvement rates described in
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
72411
§ 1.430(h)(3)–1(b)(1)(iii) that apply for
the calendar year during which the plan
sponsor submits the request for
approval to use substitute mortality
tables.
(B) Adjustments to standard mortality
table for 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. If
a 12-month period in the experience
study period begins after December 31,
2019, and before January 1, 2024, the
probability of death for an individual
under paragraph (d)(4)(ii)(A)(2)(i) of this
section is determined as the mortality
rate for the individual’s age (at the
beginning of the year) and gender from
the standard mortality table determined
under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this
section multiplied by the adjustment
factor in Table 1 for the calendar year
that includes the first day of the 12month period. For example, for an
experience study period that begins
April 1, 2019, and ends March 31, 2023,
the probability of death for the year
beginning April 1, 2022, for a male
annuitant who is age 65 as of that date
is the probability of death from the base
mortality table (0.01087), multiplied by
the cumulative mortality improvement
factor for the period from 2012 to 2021
(1.02292) and by the adjustment factor
for the 2022 calendar year of 1.10,
resulting in a probability of death of
0.01223.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(4)(iii)(B)
Calendar year
2020
2021
2022
2023
Adjustment
factor
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
*
1.15
1.15
1.10
1.05
*
*
*
*
(g) Applicability date—(1) General
rule. This section applies for plan years
beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
Except as provided in paragraph (g)(2)
of this section, the substitute mortality
table used for a plan for such a plan year
must comply with the rules of
paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section.
(2) Transition rule for previously
approved substitute mortality tables. If a
plan sponsor has received approval
from the Commissioner to use substitute
mortality tables for a plan year
beginning in 2025, then the plan’s base
substitute mortality tables that were
approved are treated as satisfying the
requirements of paragraph (d) or (e) of
this section, as applicable.
Douglas W. O’Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2023–23268 Filed 10–19–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 202 (Friday, October 20, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72409-72411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23268]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-103525-23]
RIN 1545-BQ67
Plan-Specific Substitute Mortality Tables for Determining Present
Value
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document sets forth proposed regulations that would
update the requirements that a plan sponsor of a single-employer
defined benefit plan must meet to obtain IRS approval to use mortality
tables specific to the plan in calculating present value for minimum
funding purposes (as a substitute for the generally applicable
mortality tables). These regulations would affect participants in,
beneficiaries of, employers maintaining, and administrators of certain
retirement plans.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by December 19, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic submissions via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (indicate IRS and REG-103525-
23) by following the online instructions for submitting comments.
Requests for a public hearing must be submitted as prescribed in the
``Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing'' section. Once submitted
to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited or
withdrawn. The Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the
IRS will publish for public availability any comments submitted to the
IRS's public docket. Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
103525-23), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben
Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the regulations, Arslan
Malik or Linda S. F. Marshall at (202) 317-6700 (not a toll-free
number); concerning submissions of comments and requests for a public
hearing, Vivian Hayes at (202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free number) or by
sending an email to [email protected] (preferred).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 412 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) prescribes minimum
funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans. Section 430
specifies the minimum funding requirements that apply generally to
defined benefit plans that are single-employer plans (that is, not
multiemployer plans).\1\ For a plan subject to section 430, section
430(a) defines the minimum required contribution for a plan year by
reference to the plan's funding target for the plan year. Under section
430(d)(1), a plan's funding target for a plan year generally is the
present value of all benefits accrued or earned under the plan as of
the first day of that plan year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 302 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, Public Law 93-406, 88 Stat. 829 (1974), as amended (ERISA),
sets forth funding rules that are parallel to those in section 412
of the Code, and section 303 of ERISA sets forth additional funding
rules for defined benefit plans (other than multiemployer plans)
that are parallel to those in section 430 of the Code. Pursuant to
section 101 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App., as
amended, the Secretary of the Treasury has interpretive jurisdiction
over the subject matter addressed in these proposed regulations for
purposes of ERISA, as well as the Code. Thus, these proposed
Treasury regulations issued under section 430 of the Code would also
apply for purposes of section 303 of ERISA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 430(h)(3) provides rules regarding the mortality tables to
be used under section 430. Under section 430(h)(3)(A), except as
provided in section 430(h)(3)(C) or (D), the Secretary is to prescribe
by regulation mortality tables to be used in determining any present
value or making any computation under section 430. Section 430(h)(3)(C)
prescribes rules for a plan sponsor's use of substitute mortality
tables reflecting the specific mortality experience of a plan's
population instead of using the generally applicable mortality tables.
Under section 430(h)(3)(C), the plan sponsor may request the
Secretary's approval to use plan-specific substitute mortality tables
that meet requirements specified in the statute. If the Secretary
determines that the proposed tables meet the statutory standards and
approves the request, the substitute mortality tables are used to
determine present values and make computations under section 430 during
the period of consecutive plan years (not to exceed 10) specified in
the request.
Under section 430(h)(3)(C)(iii), a substitute mortality table may
be used for a plan only if: (1) the plan has a sufficient number of
plan participants and has been maintained for a sufficient period of
time to have credible mortality information necessary to create a
substitute mortality table; and (2) the table reflects the actual
mortality experience of the plan's participants and projected trends in
general mortality experience. Except as provided by the Secretary, a
plan sponsor may not use substitute mortality tables for any plan
unless substitute mortality tables are established and used for each
plan maintained by the plan sponsor or a member of its controlled
group.
Final regulations (TD 9826) under section 430(h)(3) were published
in the Federal Register on October 5, 2017 (82 FR 46388). The final
regulations issued
[[Page 72410]]
in 2017 include rules regarding generally applicable mortality tables,
which are set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1 (the 2017 general mortality
table regulations), as well as rules regarding substitute mortality
tables, which are set forth in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 (the 2017 substitute
mortality table regulations). The 2017 substitute mortality table
regulations provide that any substitute mortality tables must be based
on the plan's mortality experience during an experience study period
that consists of 2, 3, 4, or 5 consecutive 12-month periods. In
conjunction with the 2017 substitute mortality table regulations, the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS issued
Rev. Proc. 2017-55, 2017-43 IRB 373, which sets forth the procedure by
which a plan sponsor of a defined benefit plan may request and obtain
approval for the use of plan-specific substitute mortality tables.
Beginning in 2020 and extending into 2023, for many pension plans,
the mortality experience of the plan participants was significantly
higher than expected due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Treasury
Department and the IRS are concerned that, if a plan sponsor applied
for approval of plan-specific substitute mortality tables using an
experience study period that reflects the actual mortality experience
for the plan's population during those years, then the existing rules
and procedures used for generating those tables would result in plan-
specific substitute mortality tables that overstate the expected future
mortality for the plan's population. This is because substitute
mortality tables are constructed based on a mortality ratio calculated
for the plan's population, which is determined by dividing the actual
mortality experience for plan participants during the experience study
period by the expected mortality under the generally applicable
mortality tables. In the absence of any changes to the rules and
procedures for generating plan-specific substitute mortality tables, a
mortality ratio developed using an experience study period that
includes the period in which the COVID-19 pandemic occurred (COVID-19
pandemic period) will likely be unusually high, as the numerator of the
mortality ratio (the plan's actual experience) will reflect the actual
number of deaths during this period, while the denominator of that
ratio (the expected deaths for the plan population) will be based on
the expected number of deaths from the generally applicable mortality
tables (which reflect only a small fraction of the significant short-
term increase in mortality rates that occurred during the COVID-19
pandemic period).
The Treasury Department and the IRS are issuing final regulations
updating the generally applicable mortality tables under section
430(h)(3)(A) (TD 9983) in the Rules and Regulations section of this
issue of the Federal Register. Those final regulations adopt mortality
tables that are based on the mortality tables in the Pri-2012 Private
Retirement Plans Mortality Tables Report (Pri-2012),\2\ which were
developed using the mortality experience for private sector pension
plans during the period from 2010 to 2014. In light of the fact that
the Pri-2012 mortality tables did not reflect any mortality experience
from the COVID-19 pandemic period, the preamble to the proposed
regulations that preceded those final regulations asked for comments
about whether the rules and procedures relating to development of
substitute mortality tables should be modified to recognize the
potential that the mortality experience for the COVID-19 pandemic
period is not accurately predictive of the future mortality experience
for participants of a plan for which substitute mortality tables are
requested. In response, commenters suggested various solutions that
included: (1) excluding mortality data from the COVID-19 pandemic
period, (2) applying a reduced weight to the mortality data from the
COVID-19 pandemic period in developing the substitute mortality tables,
(3) extending the duration of the experience study period (which has a
similar effect of reducing the weight of the mortality data for that
period), and (4) computing the mortality ratio for a substitute
mortality table by comparing pre-2020 data to the Pri-2012 base
mortality table and post-2019 data to the Pri-2012 base mortality table
(as projected) with a specified load.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Pri-2012 Report can be found at: https://www.soa.org/49c106/globalassets/assets/files/resources/experience-studies/2019/pri-2012-mortality-tables-report.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Explanation of Provisions
These proposed regulations would generally retain the methodology
for development of substitute mortality tables included in the 2017
substitute mortality table regulations but provide additional rules
regarding the use of mortality experience data for the COVID-19
pandemic period. In order to develop a mortality ratio that is more
accurately predictive of future mortality experience for a plan
population, these proposed regulations would provide that the expected
deaths for the plan population used in determining the denominator in
the mortality ratio are calculated by adjusting the mortality rates in
the generally applicable mortality tables. Specifically, the proposed
regulations would provide that, for each 12-month period that is
included in the experience study period and that begins after 2019 and
before 2024, the expected mortality rate for an individual is
determined by multiplying the expected mortality rate for that
individual from the standard mortality tables by an adjustment
factor.\3\ The adjustment factor for each of these years would
approximate the ratio (as reported by the National Center for Health
Statistics, which is part of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention) \4\ of (1) the actual number of deaths for the general
population for the year to (2) the expected number of deaths for the
general population for that year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This approach is similar to the fourth approach suggested by
commenters, as described in the Background section of this preamble
because a direct adjustment to the expected mortality rates during
the COVID-19 pandemic period would be more appropriate than
calculating mortality ratios using an approach that either ignores
the mortality experience during the COVID-19 pandemic period or
reduces the weighting of that experience.
\4\ https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicability Date
The proposed regulations are proposed to apply for plan years
beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
Statement of Availability of IRS Documents
IRS Revenue Rulings, Revenue Procedures, and Notices cited in this
document are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (or Cumulative
Bulletin) and are available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the
IRS website at www.irs.gov.
Special Analyses
Pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement, Review of Treasury
Regulations under Executive Order 12866 (June 9, 2023), tax regulatory
actions issued by the IRS are not subject to the requirements of
section 6 of Executive Order 12866, as amended. Therefore, a regulatory
impact assessment is not required.
It is hereby certified that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small employers generally cannot use plan-specific substitute mortality
tables because their defined benefit pension
[[Page 72411]]
plans do not have credible mortality experience (which is defined as a
minimum number of deaths during the experience study period) as is
required to use substitute mortality tables. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, these proposed regulations
will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain
other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a State,
local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. The proposed regulations do not propose any rule that would
include any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures by State,
local, or Tribal governments, or by the private sector in excess of
that threshold.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either
imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts State law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive order. The proposed regulations do not
propose rules that would have federalism implications, impose
substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments, or
preempt State law within the meaning of the Executive order.
Comments and Requests for a Public Hearing
Consideration will be given to comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in the preamble under the ADDRESSES section.
The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all aspects of
these proposed regulations. Any comments submitted will be made
available at www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any
person who timely submits electronic or written comments. Requests for
a public hearing are also encouraged to be made electronically. If a
public hearing is scheduled, notice of the date and time for the public
hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Arslan Malik and
Linda S. F. Marshall of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Employee
Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and Employment Taxes). However, other
personnel from Treasury and the IRS participated in the development of
these regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS propose to amend
26 CFR part 1 as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read, in
part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.430(h)(3)-2 is amended by:
0
a. In paragraph (a) removing ``Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)'' and adding
in its place ``Sec. 601.601(d)'';
0
b. In paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(B) removing the text ``January 1, 2019 year
is'' and adding in its place the text ``January 1, 2019 is'';
0
c. Revising paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(A).
0
d. Redesignating paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(B) as paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(C)
and adding a new paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(B).
0
e. Revising paragraph (g).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-2 Plan-specific substitute mortality tables used to
determine present value.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Projection of base table. Except as otherwise provided in this
paragraph (d)(4)(iii), the standard mortality table for a year is the
mortality table determined by applying cumulative mortality improvement
factors determined under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(b)(2)(ii) to the base
mortality table under Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(d) for the period beginning
with the base year for that mortality table and ending in the base year
for the base substitute mortality table determined under paragraph
(c)(3)(ii) of this section. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the
cumulative mortality improvement factors are determined using the
mortality improvement rates described in Sec. 1.430(h)(3)-1(b)(1)(iii)
that apply for the calendar year during which the plan sponsor submits
the request for approval to use substitute mortality tables.
(B) Adjustments to standard mortality table for 2020, 2021, 2022,
and 2023. If a 12-month period in the experience study period begins
after December 31, 2019, and before January 1, 2024, the probability of
death for an individual under paragraph (d)(4)(ii)(A)(2)(i) of this
section is determined as the mortality rate for the individual's age
(at the beginning of the year) and gender from the standard mortality
table determined under paragraph (d)(4)(iii) of this section multiplied
by the adjustment factor in Table 1 for the calendar year that includes
the first day of the 12-month period. For example, for an experience
study period that begins April 1, 2019, and ends March 31, 2023, the
probability of death for the year beginning April 1, 2022, for a male
annuitant who is age 65 as of that date is the probability of death
from the base mortality table (0.01087), multiplied by the cumulative
mortality improvement factor for the period from 2012 to 2021 (1.02292)
and by the adjustment factor for the 2022 calendar year of 1.10,
resulting in a probability of death of 0.01223.
Table 1 to Paragraph (d)(4)(iii)(B)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustment
Calendar year factor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020.................................................... 1.15
2021.................................................... 1.15
2022.................................................... 1.10
2023.................................................... 1.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(g) Applicability date--(1) General rule. This section applies for
plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2025. Except as provided in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the substitute mortality table used
for a plan for such a plan year must comply with the rules of
paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section.
(2) Transition rule for previously approved substitute mortality
tables. If a plan sponsor has received approval from the Commissioner
to use substitute mortality tables for a plan year beginning in 2025,
then the plan's base substitute mortality tables that were approved are
treated as satisfying the requirements of paragraph (d) or (e) of this
section, as applicable.
Douglas W. O'Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2023-23268 Filed 10-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P