United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins, 71459-71461 [2023-22695]
Download as PDF
71459
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 199
Tuesday, October 17, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 52
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–21–0091]
United States Standards for Grades of
Processed Raisins
Agricultural Marketing Service,
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) has revised the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Processed
Raisins. AMS is modifying two
references to the allowances for
capstems within the standards to
modernize the standards to reflect
current industry practices. The revision
also includes minor editorial changes to
the table headings to align with updated
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
formatting requirements and correction
of a typographical error from a previous
revision.
DATES: Effective November 16, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian E. Griffin, USDA, Specialty Crops
Inspection Division, 100 Riverside
Parkway, Suite 101, Fredericksburg, VA
22406; Telephone (202) 748–2155; Fax
(202) 690–1527; or Email
SCIStandards@usda.gov. Copies of the
U.S. Standards for Grades of Processed
Raisins are available on the Specialty
Crops Inspection Division website at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/gradesstandards/fruits.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations at 7 CFR part 52
issued under the Agricultural Marketing
Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as
amended. This revision to the U.S.
grade standards will also be reflected in
enforcement of the grade requirements
under the Federal marketing order, 7
CFR part 989, issued under the
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937 (7 U.S.C. 601–674) which
regulates the handling of raisins
produced from grapes grown in
California, and 7 CFR part 999, which
regulates the importation of raisins into
the United States. AMS is revising these
U.S. Standards for Grades using the
procedures that appear in part 36 of title
7 of the Code of Federal Regulations (7
CFR part 36).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
14094 reaffirms, supplements, and
updates Executive Order 12866 and
further directs agencies to solicit and
consider input from a wide range of
affected and interested parties through a
variety of means. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments, which requires agencies
to consider whether their rulemaking
actions would have Tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this rule is
unlikely to have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This action is not intended to
have retroactive effect. There are no
administrative procedures that must be
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Background
AMS continually reviews all fruit and
vegetable grade standards to ensure
their usefulness to the industry, and to
modernize language and remove
duplicative terminology. Changes to the
headings for all tables within the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Processed
Raisins are required to reflect current
CFR formatting requirements.
Conforming changes to cross references
to those tables within the standards are
also applied. After publication of the
proposed rule (88 FR 14296, March 8,
2023) a typographical error was found
in Table 1 to § 52.1852—Allowances for
Defects in Raisins with Seeds—Except
Layer or Cluster. Under Defects, Pieces
of Stem, U.S. Grade A, allowances were
erroneously listed as 7, and are
corrected to read as 1.
On October 13, 2017, AMS received a
petition from the Raisin Administrative
Committee (RAC), which locally
administers the Federal marketing order
regulating the handling of raisins
produced from grapes grown in
California (7 CFR part 989). The petition
requested that AMS reduce the number
of allowable capstems for all varietals,
except Zante Currants, in all three
Grades (A, B, and C) as follows: for Type
I, Seedless Raisins and Type II, Golden
Seedless Raisins the allowances for
capstems would change in Grade A,
from 15 to 10, in Grade B from 25 to 15,
and in Grade C from 35 to 20. For
Sultana Raisins the allowances for
capstems would change in Grade A from
25 to 10, in Grade B from 45 to 15, and
in Grade C from 65 to 20. The RAC
further stated that, since 1978, the
industry has adopted major
improvements, including laser sorters,
x-rays, and super vacuums, which allow
the industry to clean and sort with far
superior results that ultimately exceed
the current U.S. Standards for Grades of
Processed Raisins.
The AMS Agricultural Analytics
Division (AAD) performed a study
encompassing a total of 28,059
inspection results of all varietals, except
Zante Currants, of both domestically
produced raisins and imported raisins
to compare USDA inspection results for
capstems for a specified period of time
with those that would be obtained
under the proposed changes submitted
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
71460
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
by the RAC based on data collected from
AMS offices. AAD found that only
slightly more than 1% of raisin
inspections would result in a change of
grade under the proposed rule.
AMS also contacted the United
Nations Economic Commission for
Europe’s (UNECE) largest member
countries that produce raisins; Turkey;
Germany, Europe’s largest importer and
consumer of raisins and dean of the
European Union standardization sector;
and the International Nut and Dried
Fruit Council (INC), the largest
international dry produce (fruits and
nuts) member organization. AMS
reached out in July 2020 and heard
responses from October 2020 to
February 2021 and ultimately made the
decision to continue forward. While
there was not consensus on the changes,
which is not uncommon, with the AAD
finding that only slightly more than 1%
of recent raisin inspections would result
in a change of grade under the proposed
rule, AMS concluded that the proposed
rule would not be overly burdensome
on the domestic or international market,
if enacted.
Comments
On March 8, 2023, AMS published a
proposed rule inviting comments on
proposed revisions to the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Processed
Raisins in the Federal Register (88 FR
14296). Two anonymous comments
were received, one suggesting no price
increase based on increased regulation,
and one not supporting the proposed
changes stating, ‘‘The AMS believes that
they will not have a significant impact
on the market if they are enacted, so
they are not worth to put into effect.’’
The intent of the AMS comments
regarding the significance of impact on
handlers or growers is based on the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis,
which considered the economic impact
of this action on small entities. Based on
the initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, AMS does not believe there
will be significant impact on handlers’
or growers’ benefits or costs. AMS is
moving forward with the revisions as
proposed by the RAC as they provide
common language for trade and better
reflect the current marketing of
processed raisins.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
AMS has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
According to the industry, there are
approximately 2,000 raisin growers in
California. According to the National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS),
for the 2020/21 season, the total value
of production for raisin grapes was
$353,200,000. Taking the total value of
production for raisins and dividing it by
the total number of raisin growers
provides a return per grower of
$176,600. A small raisins grower as
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
is one that grosses $4,000,000 1 or less,
annually. Therefore, most raisin
producers are considered small entities
under SBA’s standards.
According to the industry, for the
2020/21 season there are 22 handlers. A
small agricultural service firm as
defined by the SBA is one that grosses
$34,000,000 2 or less, annually. Based
on the annual handler report, for the
2020/21 season, 242,427 tons of raisins
have been transferred to handlers for
packing and shipment as of August 31,
2021. The average grower price for
raisins, for the 2020 crop, was $1,191
per ton. A reasonable assumption is that
handlers would sell at a 10 percent
markup over the grower price, resulting
in a selling price of approximately
$1,310 per ton. Multiplying the
handler’s selling price per ton by the
total number of packed tons shipped
during the 2020 season provides a gross
revenue of $317,579,370. Dividing the
total revenue by the number of handlers
reveals an average revenue per handler
of $14,435,425. Based on the
calculations above, the majority of raisin
handlers are considered small entities
under SBA’s standard. This action
should not have any impact on
handlers’ or growers’ benefits or costs.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 52
Administrative practice, Fees, Food
grades and standards, Food labeling,
Frozen foods, Fruit juices, Fruits,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vegetables.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
the Agricultural Marketing Service
amends 7 CFR part 52 as follows:
PART 52—PROCESSED FRUITS AND
VEGETABLES, PROCESSED
PRODUCTS THEREOF, AND CERTAIN
OTHER PROCESSED FOOD
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
2. Amend § 52.1846 by:
a. Removing, in paragraphs (a), (b),
and (c) the words ‘‘Table I of this
subpart’’ and adding in their places the
words ‘‘table 1 to this section’’; and
■ b. Revising, in the table following
paragraph (d), the heading and the entry
for ‘‘Capstems.’’
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 52.1846
*
*
Grades of seedless raisins.
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO § 52.1846—ALLOWANCES FOR DEFECTS IN TYPE I, SEEDLESS RAISINS AND TYPE II, GOLDEN SEEDLESS
RAISINS
Defects
*
*
*
*
U.S. Grade A
U.S. Grade B
U.S. Grade C
*
*
*
Maximum count (per 16 ounces)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Capstems ...................................................................................................................
*
*
*
1 The SBA threshold for small producers changed
after the publication of the proposed rule. Thus,
AMS changed the threshold to reflect the new SBA
threshold in this final rule. The change to the raisin
producer threshold does not impact AMS’s ultimate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
*
10
*
determination regarding the impact of the rule on
small entities.
2 The SBA threshold for small agricultural service
firms (handlers) changed after the publication of the
proposed rule. Thus, AMS changed the threshold to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
15
Sfmt 4700
*
20
*
reflect the new SBA threshold in this final rule. The
change to the handler threshold does not impact
AMS’s ultimate determination regarding the impact
of the rule on small entities.
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
71461
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.1849
[Amended]
3. Amend § 52.1849 by removing the
words ‘‘Table I’’ and adding in their
place the words ‘‘table 1 to § 52.1846’’.
■
■
a. Removing, in paragraphs (a), (b),
and (c), the words ‘‘Table II of this
subpart’’ and adding in their places the
words ‘‘table 1 to this section’’; and
■ b. Revising, in the table following
paragraph (d), the heading and the entry
for ‘‘Pieces of Stem.’’
The revisions read as follows:
■
4. Amend § 52.1852 by:
§ 52.1852 Grades of raisins with seeds—
except layer or cluster.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO § 52.1852—ALLOWANCES FOR DEFECTS IN RAISINS WITH SEEDS—EXCEPT LAYER OR CLUSTER
Defects
U.S. Grade A
U.S. Grade B
U.S. Grade C
Maximum count (per 32 ounces)
Pieces of Stem ...........................................................................................................
*
*
*
5. Amend § 52.1853 by:
a. Removing, in paragraphs (a) and (b),
the words ‘‘Table III of this subpart’’ and
adding in their place the words ‘‘table
1 to this section’’; and
■ b. Revising the heading of the table
following paragraph ©.
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
1
*
2
*
§ 52.1853 Grades of raisins with seeds—
layer or cluster.
*
*
*
*
*
Table 1 to § 52.1853—Allowances for
Defects in Layer or Cluster Raisins
with Seeds
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend § 52.1855 by:
a. Moving table IV to the end of the
section following paragraph (d);
■
*
*
b. Removing, in paragraphs (a), (b),
and (c), the words ‘‘Table IV of this
subpart’’ and adding in their place the
words ‘‘table 1 to this section’’; and
■ c. Revising, in the table following
paragraph (d), the heading and the entry
for ‘‘Capstems.’’
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 52.1855
■
3
*
*
Grades of Sultana raisins.
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO § 52.1855—ALLOWANCES FOR DEFECTS IN SULTANA RAISINS
Defects
*
*
*
*
U.S. Grade A
U.S. Grade B
U.S. Grade C
*
*
*
Maximum count (per 16 ounces)
Capstems ...................................................................................................................
*
*
*
7. Amend § 52.1857 by:
a. Moving table V to the end of the
section following paragraph (c);
■ b. Removing in paragraphs (a) and (b)
the words ‘‘Table V of this subpart’’ and
adding in their place the words ‘‘table
1 to this section’’; and
■ c. Revising the heading of the table
following paragraph (c).
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
§ 52.1857
Grades of zante currant raisins.
*
*
*
*
Table 1 to § 52.1857—Allowances for
Defects in Zante Currant Raisins
*
*
*
*
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–22695 Filed 10–16–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Oct 16, 2023
Jkt 262001
10
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–1492; Project
Identifier MCAI–2023–00195–T; Amendment
39–22571; AD 2023–20–12]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2022–18–
09, which applied to certain Airbus SAS
Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, and –133; A320–211,
–212, –214, –216, –231, –232, –233,
–251N, and –271N; and A321–111,
–112, –131, –211, –212, –213, –231,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
15
Sfmt 4700
*
20
*
–232, –251N, and –253N airplanes. AD
2022–18–09 continued to require the
actions in AD 2019–26–01 and AD
2021–23–15, and added airplanes to the
applicability. Since the FAA issued AD
2022–18–09, it was determined that
additional airplanes and galleys are
subject to the unsafe condition, and a
compliance time for certain airplanes
should be extended. This AD continues
to require the actions in AD 2022–18–
09 and requires expanding the
applicability, obtaining and following
additional instructions for certain
modified airplanes, and extending the
compliance time for certain airplanes, as
specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is
incorporated by reference. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective November
21, 2023.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
E:\FR\FM\17OCR1.SGM
17OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 17, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71459-71461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22695]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 17, 2023 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 71459]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 52
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-21-0091]
United States Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, Department of Agriculture
(USDA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) has revised the U.S. Standards for Grades of
Processed Raisins. AMS is modifying two references to the allowances
for capstems within the standards to modernize the standards to reflect
current industry practices. The revision also includes minor editorial
changes to the table headings to align with updated Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) formatting requirements and correction of a
typographical error from a previous revision.
DATES: Effective November 16, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian E. Griffin, USDA, Specialty
Crops Inspection Division, 100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101,
Fredericksburg, VA 22406; Telephone (202) 748-2155; Fax (202) 690-1527;
or Email [email protected]. Copies of the U.S. Standards for Grades
of Processed Raisins are available on the Specialty Crops Inspection
Division website at https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/fruits.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
amends regulations at 7 CFR part 52 issued under the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627), as amended. This revision
to the U.S. grade standards will also be reflected in enforcement of
the grade requirements under the Federal marketing order, 7 CFR part
989, issued under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (7
U.S.C. 601-674) which regulates the handling of raisins produced from
grapes grown in California, and 7 CFR part 999, which regulates the
importation of raisins into the United States. AMS is revising these
U.S. Standards for Grades using the procedures that appear in part 36
of title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 reaffirms,
supplements, and updates Executive Order 12866 and further directs
agencies to solicit and consider input from a wide range of affected
and interested parties through a variety of means. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted from review under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments, which
requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would
have Tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this rule is unlikely to have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have retroactive effect.
There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted prior to
any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Background
AMS continually reviews all fruit and vegetable grade standards to
ensure their usefulness to the industry, and to modernize language and
remove duplicative terminology. Changes to the headings for all tables
within the U.S. Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins are required
to reflect current CFR formatting requirements. Conforming changes to
cross references to those tables within the standards are also applied.
After publication of the proposed rule (88 FR 14296, March 8, 2023) a
typographical error was found in Table 1 to Sec. 52.1852--Allowances
for Defects in Raisins with Seeds--Except Layer or Cluster. Under
Defects, Pieces of Stem, U.S. Grade A, allowances were erroneously
listed as 7, and are corrected to read as 1.
On October 13, 2017, AMS received a petition from the Raisin
Administrative Committee (RAC), which locally administers the Federal
marketing order regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes
grown in California (7 CFR part 989). The petition requested that AMS
reduce the number of allowable capstems for all varietals, except Zante
Currants, in all three Grades (A, B, and C) as follows: for Type I,
Seedless Raisins and Type II, Golden Seedless Raisins the allowances
for capstems would change in Grade A, from 15 to 10, in Grade B from 25
to 15, and in Grade C from 35 to 20. For Sultana Raisins the allowances
for capstems would change in Grade A from 25 to 10, in Grade B from 45
to 15, and in Grade C from 65 to 20. The RAC further stated that, since
1978, the industry has adopted major improvements, including laser
sorters, x-rays, and super vacuums, which allow the industry to clean
and sort with far superior results that ultimately exceed the current
U.S. Standards for Grades of Processed Raisins.
The AMS Agricultural Analytics Division (AAD) performed a study
encompassing a total of 28,059 inspection results of all varietals,
except Zante Currants, of both domestically produced raisins and
imported raisins to compare USDA inspection results for capstems for a
specified period of time with those that would be obtained under the
proposed changes submitted
[[Page 71460]]
by the RAC based on data collected from AMS offices. AAD found that
only slightly more than 1% of raisin inspections would result in a
change of grade under the proposed rule.
AMS also contacted the United Nations Economic Commission for
Europe's (UNECE) largest member countries that produce raisins; Turkey;
Germany, Europe's largest importer and consumer of raisins and dean of
the European Union standardization sector; and the International Nut
and Dried Fruit Council (INC), the largest international dry produce
(fruits and nuts) member organization. AMS reached out in July 2020 and
heard responses from October 2020 to February 2021 and ultimately made
the decision to continue forward. While there was not consensus on the
changes, which is not uncommon, with the AAD finding that only slightly
more than 1% of recent raisin inspections would result in a change of
grade under the proposed rule, AMS concluded that the proposed rule
would not be overly burdensome on the domestic or international market,
if enacted.
Comments
On March 8, 2023, AMS published a proposed rule inviting comments
on proposed revisions to the U.S. Standards for Grades of Processed
Raisins in the Federal Register (88 FR 14296). Two anonymous comments
were received, one suggesting no price increase based on increased
regulation, and one not supporting the proposed changes stating, ``The
AMS believes that they will not have a significant impact on the market
if they are enacted, so they are not worth to put into effect.''
The intent of the AMS comments regarding the significance of impact
on handlers or growers is based on the Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, which considered the economic impact of this action on small
entities. Based on the initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, AMS
does not believe there will be significant impact on handlers' or
growers' benefits or costs. AMS is moving forward with the revisions as
proposed by the RAC as they provide common language for trade and
better reflect the current marketing of processed raisins.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), AMS has considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
According to the industry, there are approximately 2,000 raisin
growers in California. According to the National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS), for the 2020/21 season, the total value of
production for raisin grapes was $353,200,000. Taking the total value
of production for raisins and dividing it by the total number of raisin
growers provides a return per grower of $176,600. A small raisins
grower as defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) is one that grosses $4,000,000 \1\ or less, annually.
Therefore, most raisin producers are considered small entities under
SBA's standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The SBA threshold for small producers changed after the
publication of the proposed rule. Thus, AMS changed the threshold to
reflect the new SBA threshold in this final rule. The change to the
raisin producer threshold does not impact AMS's ultimate
determination regarding the impact of the rule on small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the industry, for the 2020/21 season there are 22
handlers. A small agricultural service firm as defined by the SBA is
one that grosses $34,000,000 \2\ or less, annually. Based on the annual
handler report, for the 2020/21 season, 242,427 tons of raisins have
been transferred to handlers for packing and shipment as of August 31,
2021. The average grower price for raisins, for the 2020 crop, was
$1,191 per ton. A reasonable assumption is that handlers would sell at
a 10 percent markup over the grower price, resulting in a selling price
of approximately $1,310 per ton. Multiplying the handler's selling
price per ton by the total number of packed tons shipped during the
2020 season provides a gross revenue of $317,579,370. Dividing the
total revenue by the number of handlers reveals an average revenue per
handler of $14,435,425. Based on the calculations above, the majority
of raisin handlers are considered small entities under SBA's standard.
This action should not have any impact on handlers' or growers'
benefits or costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The SBA threshold for small agricultural service firms
(handlers) changed after the publication of the proposed rule. Thus,
AMS changed the threshold to reflect the new SBA threshold in this
final rule. The change to the handler threshold does not impact
AMS's ultimate determination regarding the impact of the rule on
small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 52
Administrative practice, Fees, Food grades and standards, Food
labeling, Frozen foods, Fruit juices, Fruits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Vegetables.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service amends 7 CFR part 52 as follows:
PART 52--PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, PROCESSED PRODUCTS
THEREOF, AND CERTAIN OTHER PROCESSED FOOD PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
0
2. Amend Sec. 52.1846 by:
0
a. Removing, in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) the words ``Table I of
this subpart'' and adding in their places the words ``table 1 to this
section''; and
0
b. Revising, in the table following paragraph (d), the heading and the
entry for ``Capstems.''
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.1846 Grades of seedless raisins.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 52.1846--Allowances for Defects in Type I, Seedless Raisins and Type II, Golden Seedless
Raisins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defects U.S. Grade A U.S. Grade B U.S. Grade C
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------
Maximum count (per 16 ounces)
--------------------------------------------------------
Capstems............................................... 10 15 20
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 71461]]
Sec. 52.1849 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 52.1849 by removing the words ``Table I'' and adding in
their place the words ``table 1 to Sec. 52.1846''.
0
4. Amend Sec. 52.1852 by:
0
a. Removing, in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), the words ``Table II of
this subpart'' and adding in their places the words ``table 1 to this
section''; and
0
b. Revising, in the table following paragraph (d), the heading and the
entry for ``Pieces of Stem.''
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.1852 Grades of raisins with seeds--except layer or cluster.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 52.1852--Allowances for Defects in Raisins With Seeds--Except Layer or Cluster
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defects U.S. Grade A U.S. Grade B U.S. Grade C
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum count (per 32 ounces)
--------------------------------------------------------
Pieces of Stem......................................... 1 2 3
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5. Amend Sec. 52.1853 by:
0
a. Removing, in paragraphs (a) and (b), the words ``Table III of this
subpart'' and adding in their place the words ``table 1 to this
section''; and
0
b. Revising the heading of the table following paragraph (copyright).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 52.1853 Grades of raisins with seeds--layer or cluster.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 52.1853--Allowances for Defects in Layer or Cluster
Raisins with Seeds
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 52.1855 by:
0
a. Moving table IV to the end of the section following paragraph (d);
0
b. Removing, in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), the words ``Table IV of
this subpart'' and adding in their place the words ``table 1 to this
section''; and
0
c. Revising, in the table following paragraph (d), the heading and the
entry for ``Capstems.''
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.1855 Grades of Sultana raisins.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 52.1855--Allowances for Defects in Sultana Raisins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defects U.S. Grade A U.S. Grade B U.S. Grade C
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------
Maximum count (per 16 ounces)
--------------------------------------------------------
Capstems............................................... 10 15 20
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
7. Amend Sec. 52.1857 by:
0
a. Moving table V to the end of the section following paragraph (c);
0
b. Removing in paragraphs (a) and (b) the words ``Table V of this
subpart'' and adding in their place the words ``table 1 to this
section''; and
0
c. Revising the heading of the table following paragraph (c).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 52.1857 Grades of zante currant raisins.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 52.1857--Allowances for Defects in Zante Currant
Raisins
* * * * *
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-22695 Filed 10-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P