Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Establish an Information Collection, 71033-71036 [2023-22598]
Download as PDF
71033
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2023 / Notices
and Wages, May 2022.1 According to
this report, the mean hourly rate is
$46.38 for biological scientists (code
191020), and $42.96 for geoscientists
(code 192040). We used $46 as the
amount to calculate burden. Estimated
numbers are based on FY22 # of
The following table shows the estimated
burden and costs to respondents, who
are PIs or coPIs of NSF proposals to the
BIO and GEO directorates. This
estimated hourly rate is based on a
report from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics’ Occupational Employment
Directorate
Solicitation
BIO .............................................................
BIO .............................................................
BIO .............................................................
BIO .............................................................
BIO .............................................................
BIO .............................................................
BIO .............................................................
GEO ...........................................................
GEO ...........................................................
GEO ...........................................................
23–580
23–578
23–547
23–559
23–548
23–542
23–549
23–572
23–540
23–539
Estimated Number of Responses
(given ∼85% response rate) for PI
Survey: We will survey approximately
800 individuals, given the information
in the table above, which includes the
estimated number of submissions to
each of the solicitations in the SAIF
Pilot, and the % of those proposals with
fieldwork.
Estimated Number of PI Interviews:
We will interview approximately 70
individuals, with sampling aross all of
the solicitations participating in the
SAIF Pilot.
Dated: October 10, 2023.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
Citations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Number of
submitters
in FY22
Clancy, K.B., H., R.G. Nelson, J.N.
Rutherford, and K. Hinde. 2014. Survey
of academic field experiences (SAFE):
Trainees report harassment and assault.
PLoS ONE 9:e102172.
Demery, A.C., and M.A. Pipkin. 2021. Safe
fieldwork strategies for at-risk
individuals, their supervisors and
institutions. Nature Ecology and
Evolution 5:5–9.
Giles, S., C. Jackson, and N. Stephen. 2020.
Barriers to fieldwork in undergraduate
geology degrees. Nature Reviews Earth &
Environment 1:77–78. https://doi.org/
10.1038/s43017-020-0022-5.
John, C.M., and S.B. Khan. 2018. Mental
health in the field. Nature Geoscience
11:618–620.
Marin-Spiotta, E., R.T. Barnes, A.A. Berhe,
M.G. Hastings, A. Mattheis, B.
Schneider, and B.M. Williams. 2020.
Hostile climates are barriers to
diversifying the geosciences. Advances
in Geosciences 53:117–127. https://
doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-117-2020.
National Academies of Sciences,
% with
fieldwork
147
84
444
98
394
109
318
211
14
16
∼# PIs with
fieldwork
7
7
40
50
5
100
75
67
75
30
Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Sexual
harassment of women: Climate, culture,
and consequences in academic sciences,
engineering, and medicine. The National
Academies Press. https://doi.org/
10.17226/24994.
National Academies of Sciences,
Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. The
science of effective mentorship in
STEMM. The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/25568.
Nelson, R.G., et al. 2017. Signaling safety:
Characterizing fieldwork experiences
and their implications for career
trajectories. American Anthropologist
119:710–722.
O’Brien, L.T., H.L. Bart, and D.M. Garcia.
2020. Why are there so few ethnic
minorities in ecology and evolutionary
biology? Challenges to inclusion and the
role of sense of belonging. Social
Psychology of Education 23:449–477.
Ramirez-Castaneda, V., E.P. Westeen, J.
Frederick, et al. (+30) 2022. A set of
principles and practical suggestions for
equitable fieldwork in biology.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 119e:2122667119. https://
doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122667119.
Yarincik, K., A. Kelly, T. McGlynn, R.M.
Verble. 2023. Best practices to promote
field science safety. Integrative and
Comparative Biology 63:145–161.
[FR Doc. 2023–22679 Filed 10–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To
Establish an Information Collection
Directorate for Technology,
Innovation, and Partnerships, National
Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
submissions to each of the participating
solicitations and then estimating the %
with field work for each solicitation,
using advice from Program Officers
familiar with each program.
Burden
hours per
respondent
10
6
178
49
197
109
239
141
11
5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
16:55 Oct 12, 2023
Jkt 262001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5.2
2.9
88.8
24.5
98.5
54.5
119.3
70.7
5.3
2.4
Estimated
annual
cost
237
135
4,085
1,127
4,531
2,507
5,486
3,252
242
110
Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, and as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, the Directorate
for Technology, Innovation, and
Partnerships (TIP), National Science
Foundation (NSF) is inviting the general
public or other Federal agencies to
comment on this proposed information
collection.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by December 12, 2023,
to be assured consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
Send comments to the address below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation,
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite E7400,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314; telephone
(703) 292–7556; or send email to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339, which is accessible 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a
year (including federal holidays).
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Foundation, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Foundation’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
SUMMARY:
1 https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes251021.htm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Total
hour
burden
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
71034
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2023 / Notices
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Generic Clearance
for the Regional Innovation Engines
Evaluation and Monitoring Plan.
OMB Number: 3145–NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not
applicable.
Type of Request: New information
collection.
Description: The instruments will
collect data on (1) individuals in
leadership or governance roles in
funded NSF Regional Innovation Engine
(NSF Engine), and individuals engaged
or participating in the NSF Engine’s
activities; (2) organizations that are
partnering with the NSF Engine or
participating in NSF Engine activities;
and (3) information on the
programmatic activities, outputs,
impact, and/or outcomes of the Engine
(i.e., use-inspired research, development
and translation, impact on the economy,
new jobs created, new industries
launched, and others).
Background: The CHIPS and Science
Act of 2022 codified the National
Science Foundation’s cross-cutting
Directorate for Technology, Innovation
and Partnerships (TIP), NSF’s first new
directorate in more than 30 years, and
charged it with the critical mission of
advancing U.S. competitiveness through
investments that accelerate the
development of key technologies and
address pressing national, societal and
geostrategic challenges. NSF’s TIP
directorate deepens the Agency’s
commitment to support use-inspired
research and the translation of research
results to the market and society. In
doing so, TIP strengthens the intense
interplay between foundational and useinspired work, enhancing the full cycle
of discovery and innovation.
TIP integrates with NSF’s existing
directorates and fosters partnerships—
with government, industry, nonprofits,
civil society, and communities of
practice—to leverage, energize and
rapidly bring to society use-inspired
research and innovation. TIP spurs useinspired research and innovation to
meet the nation’s priorities by
accelerating the development of
breakthrough technologies and
advancing solutions.
The NSF Regional Innovation Engines
(NSF Engines) program serves as a
flagship funding program of the TIP
directorate, with the goal of expanding
and accelerating scientific and
technological innovation within the
U.S. by catalyzing regional innovation
ecosystems throughout every region of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 12, 2023
Jkt 262001
our nation. The NSF Engines program
was authorized in the CHIPS and
Science Act of 2022 (Section 10388) to
(1) advance multidisciplinary,
collaborative, use-inspired and
translational research, technology
development, in key technology focus
areas;
(2) address regional, national, societal,
or geostrategic challenges;
(3) leverage the expertise of multidisciplinary and multi-sector partners,
including partners from private
industry, nonprofit organizations, and
civil society organizations; and
(4) support the development of
scientific, innovation, entrepreneurial,
and STEM educational capacity within
the region of the Regional Innovation
Engine to grow and sustain regional
innovation.
The NSF Engines program aims to
fund regional coalitions of partnering
organizations to establish NSF Engines
that will catalyze technology and
science-based regional innovation
ecosystems. Each NSF Engine is focused
on addressing specific aspects of a major
national, societal and/or geostrategic
challenge that are of significant interest
in the NSF Engine’s defined ‘‘region of
service.’’ The NSF Engines program
envisions a future in which all sectors
of the American population can
participate in and benefit from
advancements in scientific research and
development equitably to advance U.S.
global competitiveness and leadership.
The program’s mission is to establish
sustainable regional innovation
ecosystems that address pressing
regional, national, societal, or
geostrategic challenges by advancing
use-inspired and translational research
and development in key technology
focus areas. The programmatic level
goals of NSF Engines are to:
• Goal 1: Stimulate innovation in
regions with low levels of innovation;
• Goal 2: Build and train an inclusive
workforce;
• Goal 3: Advance key technologies;
• Goal 4: Create a culture that promotes
inclusive and equitable prosperity;
• Goal 5: Cultivate new, sustainable,
trusting cross-sector partnerships;
• Goal 6: Create a sustainable
innovation ecosystem;
• Goal 7: Increase economic growth;
• Goal 8: Increase job creation.
To achieve these goals, each NSF
Engine will carry out an integrated and
comprehensive set of activities spanning
use-inspired research, translation-topractice, entrepreneurship, and
workforce development to nurture and
accelerate regional industries. In
addition, each NSF Engine is expected
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to embody a culture of innovation and
have a demonstrated, intense, and
meaningful focus on improving
diversity throughout its regional science
and technology ecosystem. NSF Engines
are awarded as cooperative agreements
and are expected to undergo an annual
comprehensive evaluation assessment of
the NSF Engine’s performance, which
will inform subsequent year funding.
The total funding for each NSF Engine
is up to $160 million over 10 years with
the first-ever group of NSF Engines
expected to be announced in late 2023.
Effective monitoring, assessment, and
evaluation of NSF Engines will be
critical for making programmatic
funding decisions and increasing the
understanding of how regional
innovation ecosystems are created.
Systematic data and information
collection will be qualitative,
quantitative, and descriptive in nature
and will provide a means for managing
Program Directors to monitor progress
throughout a given NSF Engine the
award and ensure that the award is in
good standing. These data will also
allow NSF to assess the NSF Engines
Program in terms of intellectual,
technological, societal, commercial, and
economic impacts that are core to the
NSF merit review criteria. Finally, in
compliance with the Evidence Act of
2019, information collected will be used
for both internal and external program
evaluation and assessment, satisfying
Congressional requests, and supporting
the Agency’s policymaking and
reporting needs.
Methodology: This information
collection, which entails collecting
information from NSF Engines grantees
and participants through a series of
surveys, interviews, focus groups, and
case studies, is in accordance with the
Agency’s commitment to improving
service delivery as well as the Agency’s
strategic goal to ‘‘advance the capability
of the Nation to meet current and future
challenges.’’
For this effort, four categories of
survey instruments have been
developed, each of which will include
closed-ended and open-ended questions
to generate quantitative and qualitative
data. For ease of use for our respondent
pool, survey questionnaires will be
programmed into interactive web
surveys and distributed to eligible
respondents by email.
The surveys, which will serve as a
census for all applicable NSF Engines
grantees, partner organizations, and
participants, will be used to collect
baseline measures at the start of the
program and vital information on how
grantees, partner organizations, and
participants progress through the
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2023 / Notices
program. All data collected through web
surveys will be made available to the
external evaluator(s) for each NSF
Engine to be used for their own
analyses, assessments, and evaluation.
The four categories of data that will be
collected for each NSF Engine through
web-based surveys are outlined below:
• Input data for a given NSF Engine
Æ The Chief Executive Officer, or
designated personnel, will be asked to
provide basic information on each NSF
Engine participant (e.g., name of
individual, email address of individual,
which NSF Engine activity the
individual is involved in), each partner
organization (e.g., name and address of
partner organization, point of contact for
organization’s involvement with NSF
Engines, email address for
organization’s point of contact), and
each programmatic activity (e.g., title of
activity, activity lead name and email
address, short description of the
activity). Automated web-based surveys
will be sent to the email addresses
collected from this input. Data will be
collected on a rolling basis as NSF
Engine activities may start at any time
during the award.
• Individual level data
Æ Demographic and personal data
(e.g., age, gender, race, educational
attainment, socioeconomic status, job
status) will be collected for all
participants in a given NSF Engine,
including the Chief Executive Officer;
members of the leadership team,
governance board, and advisory
committees, as applicable; researchers;
and workforce development
participants. Data collected from
individuals will be used to monitor and
assess whether the NSF Engine’s
participants reflect the demographic
diversity of the region of service defined
by the NSF Engine. In addition, these
data can be used by individual NSF
Engines to assess whether they are
meeting their diversity, equity,
inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA)
objectives and targets. Surveys for
individuals will be conducted once a
year.
• Partner organization level data
Æ Partner organizations that are
involved in any NSF Engines activities
or provide any monetary, in-kind, or
other contributions will be surveyed
twice a year and asked to provide basic
information about its organization (e.g.,
employer identification number, legal
name of organization, type of
organization); in which NSF Engine
activities the organization participated;
the monetary or estimated value of inkind and other resources they
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 12, 2023
Jkt 262001
contributed to the NSF Engine; with
which other partner organizations
within the NSF Engine they
collaborated; why they are a partner of
the NSF Engine; and other information
related to the roles and responsibilities
an organization has within NSF Engine.
Individual Engines may use the data for
internal assessments and to help inform
decision making. Data collected from
this effort will be used to monitor and
assess the level of cross-sector
partnerships created within and across
NSF Engines.
• Programmatic-level data
Æ NSF Engines activities fall into one
of four programmatic categories: (1) useinspired and translational research, (2)
workforce development, (3) diversity,
equity, inclusion, and accessibility
(DEIA), and (4) ecosystem building (e.g.,
stakeholder engagement, strategic
planning, building of infrastructure,
partner outreach). The lead of each
activity will be asked to provide
information about the activity twice a
year. Different survey questionnaires
will be used for each of the four
programmatic categories. Basic
information to be collected for all
activities include activity status (i.e.,
active, completed, on hold, or
cancelled); identification of milestones;
and milestone status (i.e., on track, at
risk, or off track). Information specific to
each programmatic category will also be
collected. For instance, the survey
questionnaire on use-inspired and
translational research activities will also
collect information on intellectual
property (e.g., invention disclosures,
patents granted, licensing agreements,
royalties earned) as well as where along
is the research spectrum of an activity
(e.g., technology and adoption readiness
levels). For the workforce development
survey questionnaire, information will
also be collected on the targeted
population(s) of the workforce
development activity. Individual NSF
Engines may use the data for internal
assessments and to help inform decision
making. Data collected from this effort
will also be used to monitor and assess
the progress made in use-inspired and
translational research, workforce
development, DEIA, and ecosystem
building within and across NSF
Engines.
In addition to the web-based surveys,
follow-up interviews and focus groups
will be conducted with project team
leaders, such as Principal Investigators
(PIs), Principal Directors (PDs), Chief
Executive Officers (CEO), and members
of the governance boards, as well as
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71035
NSF Engines stakeholders, such NSF
Engines participants, and partner and
community-based organizations. Case
studies and focus group interviews will
be used to collect qualitatively rich
discursive and observational
information that cannot be collected
within web surveys. Both interviews
(focus groups and/or follow-up) and
case studies will be conducted virtually
with the possibility of in-person
interviews and non-participant
observation to be held in the future.
NSF’s TIP directorate will only
submit a collection for approval under
this clearance if it meets the following
conditions:
Æ The collection has a reasonably low
burden for respondents (based on
considerations of total burden hours,
total number of respondents, or burdenhours per respondent) and is low-cost
for the Federal government;
Æ The collection is non-controversial
and does not raise issues of concern for
other Federal agencies; and
Æ Information gathered will be used
for the dual and interrelated purposes of
disseminating information about the
NSF Engines program and using this
information to conduct enhanced
program monitoring for NSF Engines,
identify and implement efficiencies, and
make programmatic improvements.
Feedback collected under this
clearance provides useful information
for the continued evolution of the NSF
Engines program, but it may not yield
data that can be generalized to the
overall population in all instances. Our
qualitative data collection campaigns—
follow-up interviews, focus groups, and
case studies—are designed to provide
contextual understanding of the
progress made by each NSF Engine, and
to identify NSF Engines or projects that
demonstrate exceptional performance in
efforts to build an inclusive, sustainable
innovation ecosystem. All data
collection campaigns (e.g., web-based
surveys, interviews, focus groups),
collectively, will help TIP monitor the
progress of individual NSF Engines,
identify trends over time, and assess
overall program performance.
Affected Public: Please refer to the
detailed descriptions of each
programmatic category for the targeted
groups.
Average Expected Annual Number of
Activities: For each Engine award, we
anticipate the following lower and
upper bounds for the numbers of
responses and response burdens by
collection method:
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
71036
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 197 / Friday, October 13, 2023 / Notices
Collection method
Programmatic
category
Web-based surveys
NSF Engine input ...
Individuals ..............
Partner organizations.
Programmatic activities.
NSF Engine wide ...
Interviews and focus
groups.
45 .............................
20 .............................
10 .............................
350 ...........................
200 ...........................
100 ...........................
5
10
30
Rolling basis ...........
Once a year ...........
Twice a year ..........
4
3
10
29
33
100
15 .............................
50 .............................
45
Twice a year ..........
23
75
15 individuals ...........
50 individuals ...........
90
Up to twice a year ..
45
150
Dated: October 6, 2023.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2023–22598 Filed 10–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
710th Meeting of the Advisory
Committee on Reactor Safeguards
(ACRS)
In accordance with the purposes of
Sections 29 and 182b of the Atomic
Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2039, 2232(b)),
the Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS) will hold meetings
on November 1–3, 2023. The Committee
will be conducting meetings that will
include some Members being physically
present at the NRC while other Members
participate remotely. Interested
members of the public are encouraged to
participate remotely in any open
sessions via MS Teams or via phone at
301–576–2978, passcode 861933379#. A
more detailed agenda including the
MSTeams link may be found at the
ACRS public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/acrs/agenda/. If
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 12, 2023
Approximate
upper bound
response
burden
(hours)
Estimated
upper bound
(number of
responses)
Respondents: Lower bound estimate
of 60 individuals and upper bound
estimate of 400 individuals per NSF
Engine award per year.
Annual Responses: Lower and upper
bound estimates of 100 and 600
responses per NSF Engine per year,
respectively. The total number of annual
responses will be based on the total
number of NSF Engines awarded, which
is determined by annual funding
availability.
Frequency of Response: Please refer to
the description of programmatic
categories for frequency of data
collection.
Average Minutes per Response: 30.
Burden Hours: Lower and upper
bound estimates of approximately 85
and 400 hours per NSF Engine award,
respectively.
Jkt 262001
Estimated
average
response time
(min)
Approximate
lower bound
response
burden
(hours)
Estimated
lower bound
(number of
responses)
you would like the MSTeams link
forwarded to you, please contact the
Designated Federal Officer as follows:
Quynh.Nguyen@nrc.gov, or
Lawrence.Burkhart@nrc.gov.
Wednesday, November 1, 2023
8:30 a.m.–8:35 a.m.: Opening
Remarks by the ACRS Chairman
(Open)—The ACRS Chairman will make
opening remarks regarding the conduct
of the meeting.
8:35 a.m.–10:30 a.m.: Level 3
Probabilistic Risk Assessment (Open)—
The Committee will have presentations
and discussion with the NRC staff
regarding the subject topic.
10:30 a.m.–1 p.m.: Level 3
Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Committee Deliberation (Open)—The
Committee will have deliberations with
the NRC staff regarding the subject
topic.
1 p.m.–6 p.m.: Planning and
Procedures Session/Future ACRS
Activities/Reconciliation of ACRS
Comments and Recommendations/
Preparation of Reports (Open/Closed)—
The Committee will hear discussion of
the recommendations of the Planning
and Procedures Subcommittee regarding
items proposed for consideration by the
Full Committee during future ACRS
meetings, and/or proceed to preparation
of reports as determined by the
Chairman. [Note: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(2), a portion of this session may
be closed to discuss organizational and
personnel matters that relate solely to
internal personnel rules and practices of
the ACRS.] [Note: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(4), a portion of this session may
be closed to discuss and protect
information designated as proprietary.]
Thursday, November 2, 2023
8:30 a.m.–10:30 a.m.: Increased
Enrichment Rulemaking Regulatory
Basis (Open)—The Committee will have
presentations and discussion with the
NRC staff regarding the subject topic.
10:30 a.m.–1 p.m.: Increased
Enrichment Rulemaking Regulatory
Basis Committee Deliberation (Open)—
The Committee will have deliberations
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Frequency of
data collection
with the NRC staff regarding the subject
topic.
1 p.m.–6 p.m.: Committee
Deliberation/Preparation of Reports
(Open)—The Committee will deliberate
and continue its discussion of proposed
ACRS reports.
Friday, November 3, 2023
8:30 a.m.–6 p.m.: Committee
Deliberation/Preparation of Reports
(Open)—The Committee will deliberate
and continue its discussion of proposed
ACRS reports.
Procedures for the conduct of and
participation in ACRS meetings were
published in the Federal Register on
June 13, 2019 (84 FR 27662). In
accordance with those procedures, oral
or written views may be presented by
members of the public, including
representatives of the nuclear industry.
Persons desiring to make oral statements
should notify Quynh Nguyen, Cognizant
ACRS Staff and the Designated Federal
Officer (Telephone: 301–415–5844,
Email: Quynh.Nguyen@nrc.gov), 5 days
before the meeting, if possible, so that
appropriate arrangements can be made
to allow necessary time during the
meeting for such statements. In view of
the possibility that the schedule for
ACRS meetings may be adjusted by the
Chairman as necessary to facilitate the
conduct of the meeting, persons
planning to attend should check with
the cognizant ACRS staff if such
rescheduling would result in major
inconvenience.
An electronic copy of each
presentation should be emailed to the
cognizant ACRS staff at least one day
before the meeting.
In accordance with subsection 10(d)
of Public Law 92–463 and 5 U.S.C.
552b(c), certain portions of this meeting
may be closed, as specifically noted
above. Use of still, motion picture, and
television cameras during the meeting
may be limited to selected portions of
the meeting as determined by the
Chairman. Electronic recordings will be
permitted only during the open portions
of the meeting.
ACRS meeting agendas, meeting
transcripts, and letter reports are
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 197 (Friday, October 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71033-71036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22598]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Establish an Information
Collection
AGENCY: Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships,
National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, the
Directorate for Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships (TIP),
National Science Foundation (NSF) is inviting the general public or
other Federal agencies to comment on this proposed information
collection.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received by December 12,
2023, to be assured consideration. Comments received after that date
will be considered to the extent practicable. Send comments to the
address below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite
E7400, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; telephone (703) 292-7556; or send
email to [email protected]. Individuals who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is accessible 24 hours a day, 7
days a week, 365 days a year (including federal holidays).
Comments: Comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Foundation, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Foundation's estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including through the
[[Page 71034]]
use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Generic Clearance for the Regional Innovation
Engines Evaluation and Monitoring Plan.
OMB Number: 3145-NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not applicable.
Type of Request: New information collection.
Description: The instruments will collect data on (1) individuals
in leadership or governance roles in funded NSF Regional Innovation
Engine (NSF Engine), and individuals engaged or participating in the
NSF Engine's activities; (2) organizations that are partnering with the
NSF Engine or participating in NSF Engine activities; and (3)
information on the programmatic activities, outputs, impact, and/or
outcomes of the Engine (i.e., use-inspired research, development and
translation, impact on the economy, new jobs created, new industries
launched, and others).
Background: The CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 codified the National
Science Foundation's cross-cutting Directorate for Technology,
Innovation and Partnerships (TIP), NSF's first new directorate in more
than 30 years, and charged it with the critical mission of advancing
U.S. competitiveness through investments that accelerate the
development of key technologies and address pressing national, societal
and geostrategic challenges. NSF's TIP directorate deepens the Agency's
commitment to support use-inspired research and the translation of
research results to the market and society. In doing so, TIP
strengthens the intense interplay between foundational and use-inspired
work, enhancing the full cycle of discovery and innovation.
TIP integrates with NSF's existing directorates and fosters
partnerships--with government, industry, nonprofits, civil society, and
communities of practice--to leverage, energize and rapidly bring to
society use-inspired research and innovation. TIP spurs use-inspired
research and innovation to meet the nation's priorities by accelerating
the development of breakthrough technologies and advancing solutions.
The NSF Regional Innovation Engines (NSF Engines) program serves as
a flagship funding program of the TIP directorate, with the goal of
expanding and accelerating scientific and technological innovation
within the U.S. by catalyzing regional innovation ecosystems throughout
every region of our nation. The NSF Engines program was authorized in
the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 (Section 10388) to
(1) advance multidisciplinary, collaborative, use-inspired and
translational research, technology development, in key technology focus
areas;
(2) address regional, national, societal, or geostrategic
challenges;
(3) leverage the expertise of multi-disciplinary and multi-sector
partners, including partners from private industry, nonprofit
organizations, and civil society organizations; and
(4) support the development of scientific, innovation,
entrepreneurial, and STEM educational capacity within the region of the
Regional Innovation Engine to grow and sustain regional innovation.
The NSF Engines program aims to fund regional coalitions of
partnering organizations to establish NSF Engines that will catalyze
technology and science-based regional innovation ecosystems. Each NSF
Engine is focused on addressing specific aspects of a major national,
societal and/or geostrategic challenge that are of significant interest
in the NSF Engine's defined ``region of service.'' The NSF Engines
program envisions a future in which all sectors of the American
population can participate in and benefit from advancements in
scientific research and development equitably to advance U.S. global
competitiveness and leadership. The program's mission is to establish
sustainable regional innovation ecosystems that address pressing
regional, national, societal, or geostrategic challenges by advancing
use-inspired and translational research and development in key
technology focus areas. The programmatic level goals of NSF Engines are
to:
Goal 1: Stimulate innovation in regions with low levels of
innovation;
Goal 2: Build and train an inclusive workforce;
Goal 3: Advance key technologies;
Goal 4: Create a culture that promotes inclusive and equitable
prosperity;
Goal 5: Cultivate new, sustainable, trusting cross-sector
partnerships;
Goal 6: Create a sustainable innovation ecosystem;
Goal 7: Increase economic growth;
Goal 8: Increase job creation.
To achieve these goals, each NSF Engine will carry out an
integrated and comprehensive set of activities spanning use-inspired
research, translation-to-practice, entrepreneurship, and workforce
development to nurture and accelerate regional industries. In addition,
each NSF Engine is expected to embody a culture of innovation and have
a demonstrated, intense, and meaningful focus on improving diversity
throughout its regional science and technology ecosystem. NSF Engines
are awarded as cooperative agreements and are expected to undergo an
annual comprehensive evaluation assessment of the NSF Engine's
performance, which will inform subsequent year funding. The total
funding for each NSF Engine is up to $160 million over 10 years with
the first-ever group of NSF Engines expected to be announced in late
2023.
Effective monitoring, assessment, and evaluation of NSF Engines
will be critical for making programmatic funding decisions and
increasing the understanding of how regional innovation ecosystems are
created. Systematic data and information collection will be
qualitative, quantitative, and descriptive in nature and will provide a
means for managing Program Directors to monitor progress throughout a
given NSF Engine the award and ensure that the award is in good
standing. These data will also allow NSF to assess the NSF Engines
Program in terms of intellectual, technological, societal, commercial,
and economic impacts that are core to the NSF merit review criteria.
Finally, in compliance with the Evidence Act of 2019, information
collected will be used for both internal and external program
evaluation and assessment, satisfying Congressional requests, and
supporting the Agency's policymaking and reporting needs.
Methodology: This information collection, which entails collecting
information from NSF Engines grantees and participants through a series
of surveys, interviews, focus groups, and case studies, is in
accordance with the Agency's commitment to improving service delivery
as well as the Agency's strategic goal to ``advance the capability of
the Nation to meet current and future challenges.''
For this effort, four categories of survey instruments have been
developed, each of which will include closed-ended and open-ended
questions to generate quantitative and qualitative data. For ease of
use for our respondent pool, survey questionnaires will be programmed
into interactive web surveys and distributed to eligible respondents by
email.
The surveys, which will serve as a census for all applicable NSF
Engines grantees, partner organizations, and participants, will be used
to collect baseline measures at the start of the program and vital
information on how grantees, partner organizations, and participants
progress through the
[[Page 71035]]
program. All data collected through web surveys will be made available
to the external evaluator(s) for each NSF Engine to be used for their
own analyses, assessments, and evaluation. The four categories of data
that will be collected for each NSF Engine through web-based surveys
are outlined below:
Input data for a given NSF Engine
[cir] The Chief Executive Officer, or designated personnel, will be
asked to provide basic information on each NSF Engine participant
(e.g., name of individual, email address of individual, which NSF
Engine activity the individual is involved in), each partner
organization (e.g., name and address of partner organization, point of
contact for organization's involvement with NSF Engines, email address
for organization's point of contact), and each programmatic activity
(e.g., title of activity, activity lead name and email address, short
description of the activity). Automated web-based surveys will be sent
to the email addresses collected from this input. Data will be
collected on a rolling basis as NSF Engine activities may start at any
time during the award.
Individual level data
[cir] Demographic and personal data (e.g., age, gender, race,
educational attainment, socioeconomic status, job status) will be
collected for all participants in a given NSF Engine, including the
Chief Executive Officer; members of the leadership team, governance
board, and advisory committees, as applicable; researchers; and
workforce development participants. Data collected from individuals
will be used to monitor and assess whether the NSF Engine's
participants reflect the demographic diversity of the region of service
defined by the NSF Engine. In addition, these data can be used by
individual NSF Engines to assess whether they are meeting their
diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) objectives and
targets. Surveys for individuals will be conducted once a year.
Partner organization level data
[cir] Partner organizations that are involved in any NSF Engines
activities or provide any monetary, in-kind, or other contributions
will be surveyed twice a year and asked to provide basic information
about its organization (e.g., employer identification number, legal
name of organization, type of organization); in which NSF Engine
activities the organization participated; the monetary or estimated
value of in-kind and other resources they contributed to the NSF
Engine; with which other partner organizations within the NSF Engine
they collaborated; why they are a partner of the NSF Engine; and other
information related to the roles and responsibilities an organization
has within NSF Engine. Individual Engines may use the data for internal
assessments and to help inform decision making. Data collected from
this effort will be used to monitor and assess the level of cross-
sector partnerships created within and across NSF Engines.
Programmatic-level data
[cir] NSF Engines activities fall into one of four programmatic
categories: (1) use-inspired and translational research, (2) workforce
development, (3) diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility
(DEIA), and (4) ecosystem building (e.g., stakeholder engagement,
strategic planning, building of infrastructure, partner outreach). The
lead of each activity will be asked to provide information about the
activity twice a year. Different survey questionnaires will be used for
each of the four programmatic categories. Basic information to be
collected for all activities include activity status (i.e., active,
completed, on hold, or cancelled); identification of milestones; and
milestone status (i.e., on track, at risk, or off track). Information
specific to each programmatic category will also be collected. For
instance, the survey questionnaire on use-inspired and translational
research activities will also collect information on intellectual
property (e.g., invention disclosures, patents granted, licensing
agreements, royalties earned) as well as where along is the research
spectrum of an activity (e.g., technology and adoption readiness
levels). For the workforce development survey questionnaire,
information will also be collected on the targeted population(s) of the
workforce development activity. Individual NSF Engines may use the data
for internal assessments and to help inform decision making. Data
collected from this effort will also be used to monitor and assess the
progress made in use-inspired and translational research, workforce
development, DEIA, and ecosystem building within and across NSF
Engines.
In addition to the web-based surveys, follow-up interviews and
focus groups will be conducted with project team leaders, such as
Principal Investigators (PIs), Principal Directors (PDs), Chief
Executive Officers (CEO), and members of the governance boards, as well
as NSF Engines stakeholders, such NSF Engines participants, and partner
and community-based organizations. Case studies and focus group
interviews will be used to collect qualitatively rich discursive and
observational information that cannot be collected within web surveys.
Both interviews (focus groups and/or follow-up) and case studies will
be conducted virtually with the possibility of in-person interviews and
non-participant observation to be held in the future.
NSF's TIP directorate will only submit a collection for approval
under this clearance if it meets the following conditions:
[cir] The collection has a reasonably low burden for respondents
(based on considerations of total burden hours, total number of
respondents, or burden-hours per respondent) and is low-cost for the
Federal government;
[cir] The collection is non-controversial and does not raise issues
of concern for other Federal agencies; and
[cir] Information gathered will be used for the dual and
interrelated purposes of disseminating information about the NSF
Engines program and using this information to conduct enhanced program
monitoring for NSF Engines, identify and implement efficiencies, and
make programmatic improvements.
Feedback collected under this clearance provides useful information
for the continued evolution of the NSF Engines program, but it may not
yield data that can be generalized to the overall population in all
instances. Our qualitative data collection campaigns--follow-up
interviews, focus groups, and case studies--are designed to provide
contextual understanding of the progress made by each NSF Engine, and
to identify NSF Engines or projects that demonstrate exceptional
performance in efforts to build an inclusive, sustainable innovation
ecosystem. All data collection campaigns (e.g., web-based surveys,
interviews, focus groups), collectively, will help TIP monitor the
progress of individual NSF Engines, identify trends over time, and
assess overall program performance.
Affected Public: Please refer to the detailed descriptions of each
programmatic category for the targeted groups.
Average Expected Annual Number of Activities: For each Engine
award, we anticipate the following lower and upper bounds for the
numbers of responses and response burdens by collection method:
[[Page 71036]]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Approximate Approximate
Programmatic Estimated lower Estimated upper average Frequency of lower bound upper bound
Collection method category bound (number of bound (number response time data collection response response
responses) of responses) (min) burden (hours) burden (hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Web-based surveys............. NSF Engine input. 45............... 350............. 5 Rolling basis... 4 29
Individuals...... 20............... 200............. 10 Once a year..... 3 33
Partner 10............... 100............. 30 Twice a year.... 10 100
organizations.
Programmatic 15............... 50.............. 45 Twice a year.... 23 75
activities.
Interviews and focus groups... NSF Engine wide.. 15 individuals... 50 individuals.. 90 Up to twice a 45 150
year.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondents: Lower bound estimate of 60 individuals and upper bound
estimate of 400 individuals per NSF Engine award per year.
Annual Responses: Lower and upper bound estimates of 100 and 600
responses per NSF Engine per year, respectively. The total number of
annual responses will be based on the total number of NSF Engines
awarded, which is determined by annual funding availability.
Frequency of Response: Please refer to the description of
programmatic categories for frequency of data collection.
Average Minutes per Response: 30.
Burden Hours: Lower and upper bound estimates of approximately 85
and 400 hours per NSF Engine award, respectively.
Dated: October 6, 2023.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2023-22598 Filed 10-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P