Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 69873-69876 [2023-22332]

Download as PDF 69873 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 88, No. 194 Tuesday, October 10, 2023 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY bottom, ‘‘I Content.’’ should read, ‘‘(c) Content.’’ § 2424.31 7. On page 62459, in the second column, amendatory instruction 14 is corrected to read as follows: ■ 14. Amend § 2424.31 by revising the heading, introductory text, and paragraph (c) to read as follows: Corrections In Rule Document 2023–19269, appearing on pages 62445 through 62460 in the issue of Tuesday, September 12, 2023, make the following corrections: § 2424.2 [Corrected] 1. Beginning on page 62455, in the third column, amendatory instruction 3 is corrected to read as follows: ■ 3. Amend § 2424.2 by revising paragraphs (a), (c)(2) and (c)(3), adding paragraphs (c)(4) through (7), and revising paragraphs (e) and (f). The revisions and additions read as follows: ■ § 2424.11 [Corrected] 2. On page 62456, in the second column, in the third line from the bottom, ‘‘© Unrequested agency allegation.’’ should read ‘‘(c) Unrequested agency allegation.’’ ■ § 2424.22 [Corrected] 3. On the same page, in the third column, in the fifth line from the bottom, ‘‘I Content.’’ should read, ‘‘(c) Content.’’ ■ § 2424.23 [Corrected] 4. On page 62457, in the second column, in the twenty-seventh and twenty-eighth lines, ‘‘Ö Discretionary extension of time limits.’’ should read, ‘‘(c) Discretionary extension of time limits.’’ ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 ■ § 2424.24 [Corrected] 5. On page the page, in the third column, in the fourth line, ‘‘I Content.’’ should read, ‘‘(c) Content.’’ ■ § 2424.25 [Corrected] 8. On page the same page, in the third column, beginning on the nineth line, (2) and (e) are corrected to read as set forth below: (2) Failure to respond to an argument or assertion raised by the other party may, in the Authority’s discretion, be treated as conceding such argument or assertion. (e) Failure to participate in conferences; failure to respond to Authority orders. Where a party fails to participate in a post-petition conference pursuant to § 2424.23, a direction or proceeding under § 2424.31, or otherwise fails to provide timely or responsive information pursuant to an Authority order, including an Authority procedural order directing the correction of technical deficiencies in filing, the Authority may, in addition to those actions set forth in paragraph (d) of this section, take any other action that, in the Authority’s discretion, it deems appropriate, including dismissal of the petition for review (with or without prejudice to the exclusive representative’s refiling of the petition for review), and granting the petition for review and directing bargaining or rescission of an agency head disapproval under 5 U.S.C. 7114(c) (with or without conditions). ■ Negotiability Proceedings § 2424.40 [Corrected] 9. On same page, in the same column, in the sixth line from the bottom, ‘‘(d) Cases involving provisions.’’ should read, ‘‘(c) Cases involving provisions.’’ ■ [FR Doc. C1–2023–19269 Filed 10–5–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 0099–10–P [Corrected] 6. On page 62458, in the first column, in the twenty-fourth line from the ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Oct 06, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Agricultural Marketing Service [Corrected] ■ § 2424.32 5 CFR Part 2424 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 7 CFR Part 932 [Doc. No. AMS–SC–22–0094] Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This final rule implements a recommendation from the California Olive Committee (Committee) to increase the assessment rate established for the 2023 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years. The assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated. DATES: Effective November 9, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Sasselli, Marketing Specialist, or Gary Olson, Chief, West Region Branch, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–5901 or Email: Jeremy.Sasselli@usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–8085, or Email: Richard.Lower@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 932, as amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating the handling of olives grown in California. Part 932 referred to as the ‘‘Order’’ is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of olives operating within the area of production and may have one public member. The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is issuing this final rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 69874 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2023 / Rules and Regulations to assess costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 updates and modernizes Executive Order 12866 and directs agencies to conduct proactive outreach to engage interested and affected parties through a variety of means, such as through field offices, and alternative platforms and media. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175— Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal implications. AMS has determined that this rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the Order now in effect, California olive handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order are derived from such assessments. The assessment rate established herein will be applicable to all assessable olives beginning on January 1, 2023, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the District Court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Oct 06, 2023 Jkt 262001 the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. The Order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of AMS, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and to collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members are familiar with the Committee’s needs and with the costs of goods and services in their local area, and can formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting, and all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input. This final rule increases the assessment rate from $16 per ton of assessed olives, the rate that was established for the 2022 and subsequent fiscal years, to $35 per ton of assessed olives for the 2023 and subsequent fiscal years. The higher rate is the result of the significantly lower crop size in 2022 (fruit that is marketed over the course of the 2023 fiscal year) and the need to maintain the Committee’s financial reserve. The Committee met on December 13, 2022, and unanimously recommended 2023 fiscal year expenditures of $1,154,412 and an assessment rate of $35 per ton of assessed olives. In comparison, last year’s budgeted expenditures were $1,245,085. The assessment rate of $35 is $19 higher than the rate currently in effect. Producer receipts show a yield of 19,912 tons of assessable olives from the 2022 crop year, which is substantially less than the quantity of olives harvested in the 2021 crop year, in which 46,359 tons of assessable olives were produced. Olives harvested in 2022 will be marketed over the course of the 2023 fiscal year, which begins on January 1, 2023. The 19,912 tons of assessable olives from the 2022 crop should generate $696,920 in assessment revenue at the $35 per ton assessment rate. The balance of funds needed to cover budgeted expenditures will come from interest income, Federal grants, and the Committee’s financial reserve. The 2023 fiscal year assessment rate increase is appropriate to ensure the Committee has sufficient revenue to fund the recommended 2023 fiscal year budgeted expenditures. Funds in the reserve are expected to remain within the Order’s requirement of no more than approximately one fiscal year’s budgeted expenses. The Order has a fiscal year and a crop year that are independent of each other. The crop year is a 12-month period that begins on August 1 of each year and PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 ends on July 31 of the following year. The fiscal year is the 12-month period that begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 of each year. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a large crop (2021) followed by a small crop (2022). For this assessment rate rule, the actual 2022 crop year receipts are used to determine the assessment rate for the 2023 fiscal year. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2023 fiscal year include $547,700 for program administration, $193,000 for marketing activities, $325,712 for research, and $88,000 for inspection. Budgeted expenses for these items during the 2022 fiscal year were $538,700; $284,000; $379,485; and $42,900, respectively. The assessment rate recommended by the Committee resulted from consideration of anticipated fiscal year expenses, actual olive tonnage received by handlers during the 2022 crop year, and the amount in the Committee’s financial reserve. Income derived from handler assessments and other revenue sources is expected to be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. The assessment rate established in this rulemaking will continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by AMS upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other available information. Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or AMS. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. AMS will evaluate Committee recommendations and other available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The Committee’s budget for subsequent fiscal years will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by AMS. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered the economic impact of this final rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2023 / Rules and Regulations businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 800 producers of olives in the production area and 2 handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural producers of olives are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual olive receipts of less than $3.5 million (NAICS code 111339, Other Noncitrus Fruit Farming), and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $34 million (NAICS code 115114, Postharvest Crop Activities) (13 CFR 121.201). Because of the large year-to-year variation in California olive production, it is helpful to use two-year averages of seasonal average grower price when undertaking calculations relating to average grower revenue. The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported season average grower prices of olives utilized for canning for 2020 and 2021 of $1,060 and $1,110 per ton, respectively, with a two-year average price of $1,085. The appropriate quantities to consider are the annual assessable olive quantities, which were 19,912 tons in 2022 and 43,336 tons in 2021, with twoyear average production of 31,624 tons. Multiplying 31,624 tons by the two-year average grower price of $1,085 yields a two-year average crop value of $34.312 million. Dividing the crop value by the number of olive producers (800) yields calculated annual average revenue per producer of $42,890, much less than SBA’s size standard of $3.5 million. Thus, the majority of olive producers may be classified as small entities. Dividing the $34.312 million average crop value by 2 (the number of handlers) equals $17.156 million, which is the annual average olive crop value processed by each of the 2 handlers over the two-year period. Subtracting $17.156 million average crop value from the large handler size threshold of $34 million yields a difference of $16.844 million. Dividing the $16.844 million difference by $17.156 average crop value processed by each of the handlers yields an average manufacturing margin of 98 percent to be considered large handlers. A key question is whether 98 percent is a reasonable estimate of a manufacturing margin for the olive canning process. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Oct 06, 2023 Jkt 262001 A review of economic literature on canned food manufacturing margins found no recent published estimates. A series of Economic Research Service reports on cost components of farm to retail price spreads, published in the late 1970s and early 1980s, found that margins above crop value for a canned vegetable product were in the range of 76 to 85 percent. These margins are somewhat below the computed margin estimate of 98 percent to reach the $34 million SBA threshold to be a large, canned olive handler. Although the studies are not recent, key observations are that canning technology has not changed significantly in that time period, but canning costs may have risen somewhat. Therefore, the conclusion to be drawn from these computations is that the two handlers are slightly below the large handler threshold of $34 million in annual canned olive sales, using two-year average data, and assuming that the 2 handlers are about the same size. In a large crop year, one or both handlers could be considered large handlers, depending on the proportion of the olive crop that each of the handlers processed. For example, the 2021 quantity of assessable olives was 43,336 tons, and half of that quantity was 21,668 tons. Multiplying that tonnage by the average grower price of $1,085 per ton yields a crop value per handler estimate of $23.51 million. To reach the $34 million size threshold would mean canning costs of at least $10.49 million, which would be a manufacturing margin of 45 percent ($10.49/$23.51)—well below the range of canning margins shown above. The contrasting examples presented here show that in terms of canned olive sales, the processors can be viewed as either being above or below the SBA large handler size threshold, depending on the assumptions used in alternative calculations. This final rule increases the assessment rate collected from handlers for the 2023 and subsequent fiscal years from $16 to $35 per ton of assessable olives. The Committee unanimously recommended 2023 expenditures of $1,154,412 and an assessment rate of $35 per ton. The increased assessment rate of $35 is $19 higher than the 2022 rate. The quantity of assessable olives harvested in the 2022 crop year was 19,912 tons, as compared to 46,359 tons in 2021. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a large crop (2021) followed by a small crop (2022). Income derived from the $35 per ton assessment rate, along with interest income, Federal grants, and funds from the authorized PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 69875 reserve, should be adequate to meet this fiscal year’s budgeted expenditures. The Committee’s financial reserve is projected to be sufficient to partially fund 2023 fiscal year budgeted expenditures and remain within the requirements of § 932.40(a)(2) of the Order. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2023 fiscal year include $547,700 for program administration, $193,000 for marketing activities, $325,712 for research, and $88,000 for inspection. Budgeted expenses for these items during the 2022 fiscal year were $538,700; $284,000; $379,485; and $42,900 respectively. The Committee deliberated on many of the expenses, weighed the relative value of various programs or projects, and decreased the budgeted expenses for research and marketing activities, while increasing the budget for administration and inspection program costs. Overall, the 2023 fiscal year budget of $1,154,412 is $90,673 less than the $1,245,085 budgeted for the 2022 fiscal year. Prior to arriving at the budget and recommended assessment rate, the Committee considered information from various sources including the Committee’s Executive, Marketing, Inspection, and Research Subcommittees. Alternate expenditure levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the relative value of various projects to the olive industry and the decreased olive production. The assessment rate of $35 per ton of assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated expenses, the relatively low volume of assessable olives, the current balance in the monetary reserve, and additional pertinent factors. A review of NASS information indicates that the average producer price for the 2021 crop year, the most recent crop year surveyed by NASS, was $851 per ton. The quantity of assessable olives harvested during the 2022 crop year was 19,912 tons, which makes estimated total producer revenue $16,945,112 ($851 multiplied by 19,912 tons). Therefore, using the assessment rate of $35 per ton, the assessment revenue for the 2023 fiscal year as a percentage of estimated total producer revenue is expected to be approximately 4.1 percent ($35 multiplied by 19,912 tons divided by $16,945,112 multiplied by 100). This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs are expected to be offset by E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 69876 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 10, 2023 / Rules and Regulations the benefits derived by the operation of the Order. The Committee’s meetings are widely publicized throughout the production area. The olive industry and all interested persons are invited to attend the meetings and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the December 13, 2022, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. In addition, interested persons were invited to submit comments on this rule, including the regulatory and information collection impacts of this action on small businesses. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order’s information collection requirements have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 Vegetable and Specialty Crops. No changes are necessary in those requirements as a result of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they will be submitted to OMB for approval. This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California olive handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this action. A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2023 (88 FR 39374). Copies of the proposed rule were also mailed or sent via email to California olive handlers. A copy of the proposed rule was made available through the internet by AMS via https:// www.regulations.gov. A 30-day comment period ending July 17, 2023, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. Accordingly, no changes have been made to the rule as proposed. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https:// www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/ moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Oct 06, 2023 Jkt 262001 sent to Richard Lower at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. After consideration of all relevant material presented, including the information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and other available information, AMS has determined that this rule tends to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932 Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 932 as follows: PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. 2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows: ■ § 932.230 Assessment rate. On and after January 1, 2023, an assessment rate of $35.00 per ton is established for California olives. Erin Morris, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2023–22332 Filed 10–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 956 [Doc. No. AMS–SC–23–0006] Sweet Onions Grown in the Walla Walla Valley of Southeast Washington and Northeast Oregon; Increased Assessment Rate Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This rule implements a recommendation from the Walla Walla Sweet Onion Marketing Committee (Committee) to increase the assessment rate established for the 2023 and subsequent fiscal periods. The assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated. DATES: Effective November 9, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Novotny, Marketing Specialist, or Gary SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Olson, Chief, West Region Branch, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–2724, or Email: DaleJ.Novotny@usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–8085, or Email: Richard.Lower@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement and Order No. 956, both as amended (7 CFR part 956), regulating the handling of sweet onions grown in the Walla Walla Valley of southeast Washington and northeast Oregon. Part 956 referred to as the ‘‘Order’’ is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of Walla Walla sweet onions operating within the area of production, and a public member. The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 reaffirms, supplements, and updates Executive Order 12866 and further directs agencies to solicit and consider input from a wide range of affected and interested parties through a variety of means. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175—Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal implications. E:\FR\FM\10OCR1.SGM 10OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 10, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69873-69876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22332]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 932

[Doc. No. AMS-SC-22-0094]


Olives Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule implements a recommendation from the 
California Olive Committee (Committee) to increase the assessment rate 
established for the 2023 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years. The 
assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, 
suspended, or terminated.

DATES: Effective November 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeremy Sasselli, Marketing Specialist, 
or Gary Olson, Chief, West Region Branch, Market Development Division, 
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901 or Email: 
[email protected] or [email protected].
    Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Market Development Division, 
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-8085, or Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, 
amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 
7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 932, as 
amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating the handling of olives grown in 
California. Part 932 referred to as the ``Order'' is effective under 
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee 
administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of 
olives operating within the area of production and may have one public 
member.
    The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is issuing this final rule 
in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive 
Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies

[[Page 69874]]

to assess costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, 
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that 
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, 
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). 
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both 
costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting 
flexibility. Executive Order 14094 updates and modernizes Executive 
Order 12866 and directs agencies to conduct proactive outreach to 
engage interested and affected parties through a variety of means, such 
as through field offices, and alternative platforms and media. This 
action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
    This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175--
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which 
requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would 
have Tribal implications. AMS has determined that this rule is unlikely 
to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes.
    This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
Justice Reform. Under the Order now in effect, California olive 
handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order are 
derived from such assessments. The assessment rate established herein 
will be applicable to all assessable olives beginning on January 1, 
2023, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
    The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the United States 
Department of Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating that the order, any 
provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with 
the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of 
the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the 
opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA 
would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the District Court of 
the United States in any district in which the handler is an 
inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has 
jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an 
action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of 
the ruling.
    The Order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval 
of AMS, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and to collect 
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members are 
familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs of goods and 
services in their local area, and can formulate an appropriate budget 
and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in 
a public meeting, and all directly affected persons have an opportunity 
to participate and provide input.
    This final rule increases the assessment rate from $16 per ton of 
assessed olives, the rate that was established for the 2022 and 
subsequent fiscal years, to $35 per ton of assessed olives for the 2023 
and subsequent fiscal years. The higher rate is the result of the 
significantly lower crop size in 2022 (fruit that is marketed over the 
course of the 2023 fiscal year) and the need to maintain the 
Committee's financial reserve.
    The Committee met on December 13, 2022, and unanimously recommended 
2023 fiscal year expenditures of $1,154,412 and an assessment rate of 
$35 per ton of assessed olives. In comparison, last year's budgeted 
expenditures were $1,245,085. The assessment rate of $35 is $19 higher 
than the rate currently in effect. Producer receipts show a yield of 
19,912 tons of assessable olives from the 2022 crop year, which is 
substantially less than the quantity of olives harvested in the 2021 
crop year, in which 46,359 tons of assessable olives were produced.
    Olives harvested in 2022 will be marketed over the course of the 
2023 fiscal year, which begins on January 1, 2023. The 19,912 tons of 
assessable olives from the 2022 crop should generate $696,920 in 
assessment revenue at the $35 per ton assessment rate. The balance of 
funds needed to cover budgeted expenditures will come from interest 
income, Federal grants, and the Committee's financial reserve. The 2023 
fiscal year assessment rate increase is appropriate to ensure the 
Committee has sufficient revenue to fund the recommended 2023 fiscal 
year budgeted expenditures. Funds in the reserve are expected to remain 
within the Order's requirement of no more than approximately one fiscal 
year's budgeted expenses.
    The Order has a fiscal year and a crop year that are independent of 
each other. The crop year is a 12-month period that begins on August 1 
of each year and ends on July 31 of the following year. The fiscal year 
is the 12-month period that begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 
of each year. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a large crop 
(2021) followed by a small crop (2022). For this assessment rate rule, 
the actual 2022 crop year receipts are used to determine the assessment 
rate for the 2023 fiscal year.
    The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2023 
fiscal year include $547,700 for program administration, $193,000 for 
marketing activities, $325,712 for research, and $88,000 for 
inspection. Budgeted expenses for these items during the 2022 fiscal 
year were $538,700; $284,000; $379,485; and $42,900, respectively.
    The assessment rate recommended by the Committee resulted from 
consideration of anticipated fiscal year expenses, actual olive tonnage 
received by handlers during the 2022 crop year, and the amount in the 
Committee's financial reserve. Income derived from handler assessments 
and other revenue sources is expected to be adequate to cover budgeted 
expenses. The assessment rate established in this rulemaking will 
continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or 
terminated by AMS upon recommendation and information submitted by the 
Committee or other available information.
    Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite 
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each 
fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or AMS. 
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may 
express their views at these meetings. AMS will evaluate Committee 
recommendations and other available information to determine whether 
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would 
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's budget for subsequent 
fiscal years will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by AMS.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of 
this final rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this 
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of

[[Page 69875]]

businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
entities acting on their own behalf.
    There are approximately 800 producers of olives in the production 
area and 2 handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small 
agricultural producers of olives are defined by the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) as those having annual olive receipts of less than 
$3.5 million (NAICS code 111339, Other Noncitrus Fruit Farming), and 
small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual 
receipts are less than $34 million (NAICS code 115114, Postharvest Crop 
Activities) (13 CFR 121.201).
    Because of the large year-to-year variation in California olive 
production, it is helpful to use two-year averages of seasonal average 
grower price when undertaking calculations relating to average grower 
revenue. The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) reported 
season average grower prices of olives utilized for canning for 2020 
and 2021 of $1,060 and $1,110 per ton, respectively, with a two-year 
average price of $1,085.
    The appropriate quantities to consider are the annual assessable 
olive quantities, which were 19,912 tons in 2022 and 43,336 tons in 
2021, with two-year average production of 31,624 tons. Multiplying 
31,624 tons by the two-year average grower price of $1,085 yields a 
two-year average crop value of $34.312 million. Dividing the crop value 
by the number of olive producers (800) yields calculated annual average 
revenue per producer of $42,890, much less than SBA's size standard of 
$3.5 million. Thus, the majority of olive producers may be classified 
as small entities.
    Dividing the $34.312 million average crop value by 2 (the number of 
handlers) equals $17.156 million, which is the annual average olive 
crop value processed by each of the 2 handlers over the two-year 
period. Subtracting $17.156 million average crop value from the large 
handler size threshold of $34 million yields a difference of $16.844 
million. Dividing the $16.844 million difference by $17.156 average 
crop value processed by each of the handlers yields an average 
manufacturing margin of 98 percent to be considered large handlers. A 
key question is whether 98 percent is a reasonable estimate of a 
manufacturing margin for the olive canning process.
    A review of economic literature on canned food manufacturing 
margins found no recent published estimates. A series of Economic 
Research Service reports on cost components of farm to retail price 
spreads, published in the late 1970s and early 1980s, found that 
margins above crop value for a canned vegetable product were in the 
range of 76 to 85 percent. These margins are somewhat below the 
computed margin estimate of 98 percent to reach the $34 million SBA 
threshold to be a large, canned olive handler. Although the studies are 
not recent, key observations are that canning technology has not 
changed significantly in that time period, but canning costs may have 
risen somewhat. Therefore, the conclusion to be drawn from these 
computations is that the two handlers are slightly below the large 
handler threshold of $34 million in annual canned olive sales, using 
two-year average data, and assuming that the 2 handlers are about the 
same size.
    In a large crop year, one or both handlers could be considered 
large handlers, depending on the proportion of the olive crop that each 
of the handlers processed. For example, the 2021 quantity of assessable 
olives was 43,336 tons, and half of that quantity was 21,668 tons. 
Multiplying that tonnage by the average grower price of $1,085 per ton 
yields a crop value per handler estimate of $23.51 million. To reach 
the $34 million size threshold would mean canning costs of at least 
$10.49 million, which would be a manufacturing margin of 45 percent 
($10.49/$23.51)--well below the range of canning margins shown above.
    The contrasting examples presented here show that in terms of 
canned olive sales, the processors can be viewed as either being above 
or below the SBA large handler size threshold, depending on the 
assumptions used in alternative calculations.
    This final rule increases the assessment rate collected from 
handlers for the 2023 and subsequent fiscal years from $16 to $35 per 
ton of assessable olives. The Committee unanimously recommended 2023 
expenditures of $1,154,412 and an assessment rate of $35 per ton. The 
increased assessment rate of $35 is $19 higher than the 2022 rate. The 
quantity of assessable olives harvested in the 2022 crop year was 
19,912 tons, as compared to 46,359 tons in 2021. Olives are an 
alternate-bearing crop, with a large crop (2021) followed by a small 
crop (2022). Income derived from the $35 per ton assessment rate, along 
with interest income, Federal grants, and funds from the authorized 
reserve, should be adequate to meet this fiscal year's budgeted 
expenditures.
    The Committee's financial reserve is projected to be sufficient to 
partially fund 2023 fiscal year budgeted expenditures and remain within 
the requirements of Sec.  932.40(a)(2) of the Order. The major 
expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2023 fiscal year 
include $547,700 for program administration, $193,000 for marketing 
activities, $325,712 for research, and $88,000 for inspection. Budgeted 
expenses for these items during the 2022 fiscal year were $538,700; 
$284,000; $379,485; and $42,900 respectively. The Committee deliberated 
on many of the expenses, weighed the relative value of various programs 
or projects, and decreased the budgeted expenses for research and 
marketing activities, while increasing the budget for administration 
and inspection program costs. Overall, the 2023 fiscal year budget of 
$1,154,412 is $90,673 less than the $1,245,085 budgeted for the 2022 
fiscal year.
    Prior to arriving at the budget and recommended assessment rate, 
the Committee considered information from various sources including the 
Committee's Executive, Marketing, Inspection, and Research 
Subcommittees. Alternate expenditure levels were discussed by these 
groups, based upon the relative value of various projects to the olive 
industry and the decreased olive production. The assessment rate of $35 
per ton of assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated 
expenses, the relatively low volume of assessable olives, the current 
balance in the monetary reserve, and additional pertinent factors.
    A review of NASS information indicates that the average producer 
price for the 2021 crop year, the most recent crop year surveyed by 
NASS, was $851 per ton. The quantity of assessable olives harvested 
during the 2022 crop year was 19,912 tons, which makes estimated total 
producer revenue $16,945,112 ($851 multiplied by 19,912 tons). 
Therefore, using the assessment rate of $35 per ton, the assessment 
revenue for the 2023 fiscal year as a percentage of estimated total 
producer revenue is expected to be approximately 4.1 percent ($35 
multiplied by 19,912 tons divided by $16,945,112 multiplied by 100).
    This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on 
handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some 
of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs are 
expected to be offset by

[[Page 69876]]

the benefits derived by the operation of the Order.
    The Committee's meetings are widely publicized throughout the 
production area. The olive industry and all interested persons are 
invited to attend the meetings and participate in Committee 
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the December 
13, 2022, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and 
small, were able to express views on this issue. In addition, 
interested persons were invited to submit comments on this rule, 
including the regulatory and information collection impacts of this 
action on small businesses.
    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been 
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 Vegetable and 
Specialty Crops. No changes are necessary in those requirements as a 
result of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they will 
be submitted to OMB for approval.
    This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or 
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California olive 
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and 
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
    AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote 
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide 
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information 
and services, and for other purposes.
    AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, 
overlap, or conflict with this action.
    A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
Register on June 16, 2023 (88 FR 39374). Copies of the proposed rule 
were also mailed or sent via email to California olive handlers. A copy 
of the proposed rule was made available through the internet by AMS via 
https://www.regulations.gov. A 30-day comment period ending July 17, 
2023, was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. 
No comments were received. Accordingly, no changes have been made to 
the rule as proposed.
    A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: 
https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any 
questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at 
the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
the information and recommendations submitted by the Committee and 
other available information, AMS has determined that this rule tends to 
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932

    Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural 
Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 932 as follows:

PART 932--OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 601-674.


0
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  932.230  Assessment rate.

    On and after January 1, 2023, an assessment rate of $35.00 per ton 
is established for California olives.

Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-22332 Filed 10-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.