Ledprona Double-Stranded RNA; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 69039-69043 [2023-22199]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Voluntary Agreement, suspended the case schedule. See Notice of Identity of Petitioners and Case Scheduling Order (July 18, 2023). Section 115(d)(7)(D)(v) of the Copyright Act authorizes the Judges to approve and adopt a negotiated agreement that has been agreed to by the Mechanical Licensing Collective and the Digital Licensee Coordinator in lieu of a determination of the administrative assessment. An administrative assessment adopted under sec. 115(d)(7)(D)(v) ‘‘shall apply to all digital music providers and significant nonblanket licensees engaged in covered activities during the period the administrative assessment is in effect.’’ Id. However, the Judges, in their discretion, may reject a proposed settlement for good cause shown. 17 U.S.C. 115(d)(7)(D)(v) and 37 CFR 355.6(d). Section 355.4(c)(4) of 37 CFR establishes a process for non-settling participants to comment on a proposed settlement and for the settling participants to respond. Because there were no non-settling participants in the instant proceeding, the proposed settlement was unopposed. Moreover, the participants explained to the Judges’ satisfaction how the Proposed Regulations comply with the provisions of the Copyright Act. See generally Voluntary Agreement. The Judges, finding no cause to reject the proposed settlement embodied in the Voluntary Agreement, hereby adopt it, and publish these final regulations implementing the settlement. List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 390 Copyright, Licensing and registration, Music, Phonorecords, Recordings, Royalties. Final Regulations For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Royalty Judges amend 37 CFR part 390 as follows: PART 390—AMOUNTS AND TERMS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENTS TO FUND MECHANICAL LICENSING COLLECTIVE 1. The authority citation for part 390 continues to read as follows: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 ■ Authority: 17 U.S.C. 115, 801(b). § 390.1 [Amended] 2. Amend § 390.1 as follows: a. In the definition of ‘‘Annual Assessment’’ remove ‘‘2021’’ and add in its place ‘‘2023’’. ■ b. Remove the definition of ‘‘Certified Minimum Fee Disclosure’’. ■ ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 Oct 04, 2023 Jkt 262001 3. Amend § 390.2 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (c)(1) introductory text to read as follows: ■ § 390.2 Amount of assessments. (a) 2023 Annual Assessment. The Annual Assessment for the calendar year 2023 shall be in the amount of $32,900,000. (b) 2024 Annual Assessment. The Annual Assessment for the calendar year 2024 shall be in the amount of $39,050,000. (c) * * * (1) For the calendar year 2025 and all subsequent years, the amount of the Annual Assessment will be automatically adjusted by increasing the amount of the Annual Assessment of the preceding calendar year by the lesser of: * * * * * ■ 4. Amend § 390.3 by: ■ a. In paragraph (b); ■ i. Removing ‘‘2021’’ and adding in its place ‘‘2024’’; ■ ii. Removing ‘‘2019’’ and adding in its place ‘‘2022’’; and ■ iii. Removing ‘‘2020’’ and adding in its place ‘‘2023’’. ■ b. Remove paragraph (c) and redesignate paragraphs (d) and (e) as paragraphs (c) and (d). ■ c. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (c) introductory text. The revision reads as follows: § 390.3 Annual minimum fees. * * * * * (c) Calculation by the MLC. The MLC will calculate each Licensee’s annual minimum fee based on usage reporting received from Licensees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 115(d)(4). The MLC shall send invoices for the appropriate annual minimum fee to each Licensee. Licensees shall pay the annual minimum fee invoices from the MLC by the later of: * * * * * ■ 5. Amend § 390.4 as follows: ■ a. In paragraph (b) remove the words ‘‘, except that the calculation period for the Quarterly Allocation for the first and second quarters of 2021 shall be the same as for the annual minimum fee for the 2021 Annual Assessment, and shall be calculated based upon the information provided in the Certified Minimum Fee Disclosures, as required by this part.’’ ■ b. Remove paragraph (c)(2)(i)(D) and redesignate paragraphs (c)(2)(i)(E) and (F) as (c)(2)(i)(D) and (E). ■ c. Revise paragraph (h). The revision reads as follows: § 390.4 Annual Assessment allocation and payment. * PO 00000 * * Frm 00037 * Fmt 4700 * Sfmt 4700 69039 (h) 2023 Annual Assessment allocation and payment. The 2023 Annual Assessment shall be paid in two separate processes: (1) The MLC will collect from Licensees the amount of $30,235,650 pursuant to the standard procedures outlined in the other provisions of this part for collection of the 2023 Annual Assessment, including the collection of Annual Minimum Fees and Quarterly Allocations. (2) The MLC will collect from Allocated Licensees the amount of $2,664,350 through a separately invoiced, one-time collection, with no minimum fees applied. The amount shall be divided into two equal parts and allocated among Licensees using the formulas set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. The calculation period shall be the first three months of 2023. The MLC may invoice for this collection at any time, with payment to be due no later than 45 days after receipt of the invoice from the MLC. Dated: September 25, 2023. David P. Shaw, Chief Copyright Royalty Judge. David R. Strickler, Copyright Royalty Judge. Steve Ruwe, Copyright Royalty Judge. Approved by: Carla D. Hayden, Librarian of Congress. [FR Doc. 2023–22179 Filed 10–4–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1410–72–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0269; FRL–10944–01– OCSPP] Ledprona Double-Stranded RNA; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Ledprona double-stranded (ds) RNA in or on potato when used as a foliar-applied insecticide for the selective control of Colorado potato beetle and in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. GreenLight Biosciences, Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1 69040 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Ledprona dsRNA under FFDCA when used in accordance with this exemption. DATES: This regulation is effective October 5, 2023. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before December 4, 2023, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0269, is available online at https:// www.regulations.gov. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madison Le, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511M), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (703) 305– 7090; email address: BPPDFRNotices@ epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? 16:35 Oct 04, 2023 Jkt 262001 Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2021–0269 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before December 4, 2023. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2021–0269, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Background and Statutory Findings You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR site at https:// www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40. To access the OCSPP test guidelines referenced in this document electronically, please go to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test Methods and Guidelines.’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? In the Federal Register of June 28, 2021 (86 FR 33922) (FRL–10025–08), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance petition (PP 1F8900) by GreenLight Biosciences, Inc., 200 Boston Ave., Suite 1000, Medford, MA 02155. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on all agricultural commodities and food products. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner GreenLight Biosciences, Inc., which is available in the docket, https:// www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. Based upon review of the data supporting the petition and in accordance with its authority under FFDCA section 408(d)(4)(A)(i), EPA is establishing a tolerance exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato only, rather than all agricultural commodities and food products as requested. The reasons for this change are explained in Unit III.C. In addition, EPA previously established a temporary tolerance exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato (40 CFR 180.1403; 88 FR 28427) in conjunction with Experimental Use Permit (EUP) No. 94614–EUP–1 issued to GreenLight BioSciences, Inc. in May 2023. The temporary tolerance exemption expires on April 30, 2025. Because this action establishes a permanent tolerance exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato, EPA is removing the temporary tolerance exemption as no longer necessary. III. Final Rule A. EPA’s Safety Determination Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but it does not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) and (D). FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2023 / Rules and Regulations infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . . ’’ Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency consider factors including ‘‘available information concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues’’ and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability, and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. A full explanation of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment based on those data can be found within the document entitled ‘‘Final human health risk assessment, review of product characterization and manufacturing process for the new end-use product, CalanthaTM, containing 0.8% of the new active ingredient ‘‘Ledprona’’ dsRNA’’ (Human Health Risk Assessment). This document, as well as other relevant information, is available in the docket for this action at docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0269. Ledprona (CAS# 2433753–68–3) consists of double-stranded ribonucleic acid (dsRNA) that induces mortality of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) via a gene silencing mode of action. When dsRNA is applied, it causes the inhibition (or silencing) of the gene product, messenger RNA (mRNA), preventing the translation of the mRNA to proteins. Ledprona dsRNA targets the Proteasome subunit beta type-5 (PSMB5) mRNA sequence in the Colorado potato beetle. PSMB5 mRNA encodes a protein that regulates proper folding of other proteins in the Colorado potato beetle. Once Ledprona is ingested by the Colorado potato beetle, over time the lack of PSMB5 mRNA leads to the reduction of the PSMB5 protein and ultimately causes mortality. Available data and scientific information have demonstrated that, with regard to humans, Ledprona presents no adverse effects of concern and exposure to the active ingredient will be insignificant. Dietary and drinking water exposure resulting from the proposed use is expected to be minimal due to the following factors: (1) the application rate is low (0.53 oz/acre/ calendar year); (2) residues of Ledprona dsRNA on food will be limited, as Ledprona dsRNA is a foliar insecticide VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 Oct 04, 2023 Jkt 262001 and is expected to undergo rapid degradation due to microbes in the environment once applied; (3) mammals possess physiological barriers to dsRNA uptake (i.e., nucleases in saliva and the gastrointestinal tract, acidic conditions in the stomach, and presence of multiple membrane barriers); and (4) Ledprona dsRNA degrades rapidly in simulated gastric and intestinal fluids, including when combined with certain tank mix components (i.e., fungicides and insecticides commonly used on potatoes). This information allows EPA to rely on a well-established history of exposure to RNA molecules via food and supports the conclusion that dietary exposure from the use of the active ingredient will be negligible. With respect to dietary and drinking water hazards, submitted data demonstrate that Ledprona dsRNA is expected to pose minimal hazard. Ledprona dsRNA was found to have low toxicity via the oral route of exposure (EPA Toxicity Category IV). In addition, a bioinformatic analysis was conducted to evaluate the likelihood of off-target effects of the Ledprona dsRNA in humans in silico (i.e., by computer analysis of Ledprona RNA segments). This analysis identified two potential human transcripts as ‘‘off targets.’’ However, further analyses of these transcripts coupled with the specificity of Ledprona dsRNA to its target indicate that Ledprona is not expected to affect these genes in vivo, resulting in negligible hazard. Ledprona is not proposed for residential use and therefore a residential exposure assessment was not conducted. For non-occupational exposure, bystander exposure may occur post-application (i.e., contact with treated foliage or through spray drift of nearby treated areas). Due to the low application rate coupled with spray drift advisories and restrictions on product labels, exposure via contact with treated foliage and spray drift is considered to be negligible. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ‘‘available information’’ concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ No risk of cumulative toxicity/effects from Ledprona dsRNA has been identified as no toxicity has been shown for Ledprona dsRNA in the submitted studies. Therefore, EPA has not assumed that Ledprona dsRNA has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. Although FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides for an PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 69041 additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects, EPA has determined that there are no such effects due to the lack of toxicity of Ledprona dsRNA. As a result, an additional margin of safety for the protection of infants and children is unnecessary. Based upon the evaluation described above and in the Human Health Risk Assessment, EPA concludes that there is reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Ledprona dsRNA. This includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this conclusion based on the rapid degradation of the active ingredient in environmental and biological conditions, mammalian physiological barriers limiting the uptake of dsRNA, and the lack of effects observed in toxicity testing. B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation. C. Revisions to Petitioned-for Tolerance Exemption The petitioner requested that EPA establish a permanent tolerance exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on all agricultural commodities and food products. EPA previously established a temporary tolerance exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato in conjunction with EUP No. 94614–EUP– 1. The exposure analysis and evaluation of additional data to establish this permanent tolerance exemption is based in part upon the specificity of Ledprona dsRNA to its target organism, the Colorado potato beetle, and the proposed use of Ledprona dsRNA on potatoes. No other use of Ledprona dsRNA on other agricultural commodities or food products has been proposed. As a result, EPA has not assessed whether use of Ledprona dsRNA on commodities other than potatoes would result in the same dietary exposures described in the current evaluation. Consequently, the permanent tolerance exemption for Ledprona dsRNA residues that EPA is granting in this action varies from what the petitioner sought and is limited to residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato when used as a foliar-applied insecticide for the selective control of Colorado potato beetle and in E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1 69042 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2023 / Rules and Regulations accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. rule has no net burden on small entities subject to the rule. D. Conclusion D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. Based on the conclusions detailed in Unit III.A. and the Human Health Risk Assessment, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Ledprona dsRNA. Therefore, an exemption is established for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato when used as a foliar-applied insecticide for the selective control of Colorado potato beetle and in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. In addition, EPA is replacing the previously established temporary tolerance exemption for Ledprona dsRNA (40 CFR 180.1403) with this permanent tolerance exemption. IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders can be found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executiveorders#influence. A. Executive Orders 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Orders 12866, October 4, 1993 (58 FR 51735), as amended by Executive Order 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023), because it establishes or modifies a pesticide tolerance or a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 408, and also applies to tolerance revocations for which extraordinary circumstances do not exist. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., because it does not contain any information collection activities. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. In making this determination, EPA concludes that the impact of concern for this rule is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities and that the Agency is certifying that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 Oct 04, 2023 Jkt 262001 E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132, August 10, 1999 (64 FR 43255) because it will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 13175, November 9, 2000 (65 FR 67249), because it will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866, and because EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to children. However, EPA’s Policy on Children’s Health applies to this action. This rule finalizes a tolerance action under the FFDCA, which requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . . .’’ (FFDCA 408(b)(2)(C)). Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this final tolerance action. PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, May 22, 2001 (66 FR 28355), because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA) This action does not involve technical standards under the NTTAA section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations (people of color and/or indigenous peoples) and low-income populations. EPA has considered the safety risks for the pesticide subject to this rulemaking and in the context of the tolerance action set out in this rulemaking. EPA believes that the human health and environmental conditions that exist prior to this action do not result in disproportionate and adverse effects on people of color, lowincome populations, and/or indigenous peoples. Furthermore, EPA believes that this action is not likely to result in new disproportionate and adverse effects on people of color, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples. K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 192 / Thursday, October 5, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Dated: September 29, 2023. Edward Messina, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. paragraph (II)(92)(a); § 175.900 also issued under 44 U.S.C. 3507.’’ [FR Doc. C1–2023–19421 Filed 10–4–23; 8:45 am] Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD [Docket No.: NTSB–2023–0006] 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: RIN 3147–AA27 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Revise § 180.1403 to subpart D to read as follows: ■ An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato when used as a foliar-applied insecticide for the selective control of Colorado potato beetle and in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. [FR Doc. 2023–22199 Filed 10–4–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 46 CFR Part 175 [Docket No. USCG–2023–0243] RIN 1625–AC88 DUKW Amphibious Passenger Vessels Correction In rule document 2023–19421, appearing on pages 62295–62301 in the issue of Monday, September 11, 2023, make the following correction: PART 175—GENERAL PROVISIONS [Corrected] On page 62300, in the third column, beginning in the second line from the bottom of the page and continuing into the first three lines, in the first column of page 62301, ‘‘Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3205, 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103– 206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. App. 1804; DHS Delegation 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2, paragraph (II)(92)(a); § 175.900 also issued under 44 U.S.C. 3507.’’ should read ‘‘Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3205, 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103; DHS Delegation 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3, ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 16:35 Oct 04, 2023 Jkt 262001 Official Seal Description National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: § 180.1403 Ledprona double-stranded RNA (CAS# 2433753–68–3); exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. VerDate Sep<11>2014 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD 49 CFR Part 803 ■ ■ BILLING CODE 0099–10–P The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is amending its regulatory description of the agency’s seal. Since the seal’s inception, the agency has utilized various versions of the seal. For consistency, the agency is updating the regulation and codifying current agency practice. These updates will provide a revised graphical representation of the seal. Additionally, the NTSB is including non-substantive technical amendments throughout part 803 due to recent internal organizational changes and a typographical error reflected in the agency’s mailing address. Since publishing the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), no comments have been received. DATES: The rule is effective November 6, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William T. (Tom) McMurry, Jr., General Counsel, (202) 314–6080, rulemaking@ ntsb.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background In 1975, the NTSB adopted an official seal as authorized by the Independent Safety Board Act of 1974 (Act), and codified the seal in part 803 of its regulations titled ‘‘Official Seal.’’ 40 FR 30232 (July 17, 1975). The adoption at that time marked the NTSB’s status as an independent Federal agency. 43 FR 36454 (Aug. 17, 1978). The original seal design was that of a triskelion, which was later replaced by the American bald eagle as set forth in the NTSB’s final rule. 43 FR 36454. The NTSB explained that the eagle was ‘‘adopted in the interest of ready recognition of the Board’s status as an independent agency of the Federal Government charged with the investigation of transportation accidents.’’ Id. The agency continued, ‘‘it is imperative that Board officials be readily recognized as agents of the U.S. Government . . . .’’ Id. PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 69043 Over thirty years later, the NTSB published its Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules per two Executive orders that altogether advised agencies to conduct such an analysis. 77 FR 37865, 37866 (June 25, 2012). After reviewing public comments, the NTSB subsequently announced its plan to update the agency’s regulations, which included part 803. 78 FR 1193 (Jan. 8, 2013). However, in the final rule, the NTSB ultimately amended certain sections of part 803, but did not revise the description of the seal found in § 803.1. See 81 FR 75729 (Nov. 1, 2016). Thus, the NTSB’s current seal has been in effect for more than 40 years. On July 6, 2023, the agency issued an NPRM announcing its intent to amend its regulatory description of the NTSB’s seal by updating the regulation and codifying current agency practice. 88 FR 43070 (July 6, 2023). The NTSB received no comments to date and is issuing this final rule as a result. II. Changes to § 803.1 Since the last revision of § 803.1 in August 1978, the NTSB has utilized various versions of the seal within the agency. For consistency, the NTSB is codifying what has evolved as standard agency practice. This change to update § 803.1 focuses on additional options for background colors and will provide a revised graphical representation of the seal. While respecting the current NTSB seal, the agency is slightly modifying the design to make the seal digitally applicable. For example, the digital version of the current seal alters in appearance when applied to the NTSB uniform; specifically, the current font changes when the seal is affixed to clothing. Thus, the update to the design optimizes the seal, making it compatible with digital platforms. Over the years, various versions of the seal have been recognized within the agency, but have never been codified; that recognition is now reflected in this final rule. The agency clarifies that when the full color seal is used in print or digital media, the seal must be in a white circle. When the full color seal is embroidered on the official NTSB uniform, the seal’s background color must be that of the material of the uniform. Also, this final rule updates the regulatory description to reflect modern times. The NTSB will now use genderneutral language to refer to the eagle. Further, the agency will replace the Latin terms ‘‘dexter’’ and ‘‘sinister’’ with ‘‘right’’ and ‘‘left’’, respectively. Additionally, the minor alteration of the NTSB’s eagle will be more E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM 05OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 192 (Thursday, October 5, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69039-69043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22199]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0269; FRL-10944-01-OCSPP]


Ledprona Double-Stranded RNA; Exemption From the Requirement of a 
Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of Ledprona double-stranded (ds) RNA in or 
on potato when used as a foliar-applied insecticide for the selective 
control of Colorado potato beetle and in accordance with label 
directions and good agricultural practices. GreenLight Biosciences, 
Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and

[[Page 69040]]

Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum 
permissible level for residues of Ledprona dsRNA under FFDCA when used 
in accordance with this exemption.

DATES: This regulation is effective October 5, 2023. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before December 4, 2023, 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0269, is available online at 
https://www.regulations.gov. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madison Le, Biopesticides and 
Pollution Prevention Division (7511M), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, 
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40. To access the OCSPP test guidelines 
referenced in this document electronically, please go to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ``Test Methods and Guidelines.''

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0269 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
December 4, 2023. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections 
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0269, by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of June 28, 2021 (86 FR 33922) (FRL-10025-
08), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance 
petition (PP 1F8900) by GreenLight Biosciences, Inc., 200 Boston Ave., 
Suite 1000, Medford, MA 02155. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 
180 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on all agricultural 
commodities and food products. That document referenced a summary of 
the petition prepared by the petitioner GreenLight Biosciences, Inc., 
which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There 
were no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
    Based upon review of the data supporting the petition and in 
accordance with its authority under FFDCA section 408(d)(4)(A)(i), EPA 
is establishing a tolerance exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in 
or on potato only, rather than all agricultural commodities and food 
products as requested. The reasons for this change are explained in 
Unit III.C.
    In addition, EPA previously established a temporary tolerance 
exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato (40 CFR 
180.1403; 88 FR 28427) in conjunction with Experimental Use Permit 
(EUP) No. 94614-EUP-1 issued to GreenLight BioSciences, Inc. in May 
2023. The temporary tolerance exemption expires on April 30, 2025. 
Because this action establishes a permanent tolerance exemption for 
residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato, EPA is removing the 
temporary tolerance exemption as no longer necessary.

III. Final Rule

A. EPA's Safety Determination

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings, but it does not include 
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in 
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in 
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) and (D). FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) requires 
EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children 
to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to 
``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
to

[[Page 69041]]

infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical 
residue. . . . '' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires 
that the Agency consider factors including ``available information 
concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's 
residues'' and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of 
toxicity.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of 
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability, 
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also 
considered available information concerning the variability of the 
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including 
infants and children. A full explanation of the data upon which EPA 
relied and its risk assessment based on those data can be found within 
the document entitled ``Final human health risk assessment, review of 
product characterization and manufacturing process for the new end-use 
product, CalanthaTM, containing 0.8% of the new active 
ingredient ``Ledprona'' dsRNA'' (Human Health Risk Assessment). This 
document, as well as other relevant information, is available in the 
docket for this action at docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0269.
    Ledprona (CAS# 2433753-68-3) consists of double-stranded 
ribonucleic acid (dsRNA) that induces mortality of the Colorado potato 
beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) via a gene silencing mode of action. 
When dsRNA is applied, it causes the inhibition (or silencing) of the 
gene product, messenger RNA (mRNA), preventing the translation of the 
mRNA to proteins. Ledprona dsRNA targets the Proteasome subunit beta 
type-5 (PSMB5) mRNA sequence in the Colorado potato beetle. PSMB5 mRNA 
encodes a protein that regulates proper folding of other proteins in 
the Colorado potato beetle. Once Ledprona is ingested by the Colorado 
potato beetle, over time the lack of PSMB5 mRNA leads to the reduction 
of the PSMB5 protein and ultimately causes mortality.
    Available data and scientific information have demonstrated that, 
with regard to humans, Ledprona presents no adverse effects of concern 
and exposure to the active ingredient will be insignificant. Dietary 
and drinking water exposure resulting from the proposed use is expected 
to be minimal due to the following factors: (1) the application rate is 
low (0.53 oz/acre/calendar year); (2) residues of Ledprona dsRNA on 
food will be limited, as Ledprona dsRNA is a foliar insecticide and is 
expected to undergo rapid degradation due to microbes in the 
environment once applied; (3) mammals possess physiological barriers to 
dsRNA uptake (i.e., nucleases in saliva and the gastrointestinal tract, 
acidic conditions in the stomach, and presence of multiple membrane 
barriers); and (4) Ledprona dsRNA degrades rapidly in simulated gastric 
and intestinal fluids, including when combined with certain tank mix 
components (i.e., fungicides and insecticides commonly used on 
potatoes). This information allows EPA to rely on a well-established 
history of exposure to RNA molecules via food and supports the 
conclusion that dietary exposure from the use of the active ingredient 
will be negligible.
    With respect to dietary and drinking water hazards, submitted data 
demonstrate that Ledprona dsRNA is expected to pose minimal hazard. 
Ledprona dsRNA was found to have low toxicity via the oral route of 
exposure (EPA Toxicity Category IV). In addition, a bioinformatic 
analysis was conducted to evaluate the likelihood of off-target effects 
of the Ledprona dsRNA in humans in silico (i.e., by computer analysis 
of Ledprona RNA segments). This analysis identified two potential human 
transcripts as ``off targets.'' However, further analyses of these 
transcripts coupled with the specificity of Ledprona dsRNA to its 
target indicate that Ledprona is not expected to affect these genes in 
vivo, resulting in negligible hazard.
    Ledprona is not proposed for residential use and therefore a 
residential exposure assessment was not conducted. For non-occupational 
exposure, bystander exposure may occur post-application (i.e., contact 
with treated foliage or through spray drift of nearby treated areas). 
Due to the low application rate coupled with spray drift advisories and 
restrictions on product labels, exposure via contact with treated 
foliage and spray drift is considered to be negligible. Section 
408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to 
establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider 
``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a 
particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.'' No risk of cumulative toxicity/effects 
from Ledprona dsRNA has been identified as no toxicity has been shown 
for Ledprona dsRNA in the submitted studies. Therefore, EPA has not 
assumed that Ledprona dsRNA has a common mechanism of toxicity with 
other substances. Although FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides for an 
additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the 
case of threshold effects, EPA has determined that there are no such 
effects due to the lack of toxicity of Ledprona dsRNA. As a result, an 
additional margin of safety for the protection of infants and children 
is unnecessary.
    Based upon the evaluation described above and in the Human Health 
Risk Assessment, EPA concludes that there is reasonable certainty that 
no harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and 
children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Ledprona dsRNA. This 
includes all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information. The Agency has arrived at this 
conclusion based on the rapid degradation of the active ingredient in 
environmental and biological conditions, mammalian physiological 
barriers limiting the uptake of dsRNA, and the lack of effects observed 
in toxicity testing.

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since 
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance without any numerical limitation.

C. Revisions to Petitioned-for Tolerance Exemption

    The petitioner requested that EPA establish a permanent tolerance 
exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on all agricultural 
commodities and food products. EPA previously established a temporary 
tolerance exemption for residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato in 
conjunction with EUP No. 94614-EUP-1. The exposure analysis and 
evaluation of additional data to establish this permanent tolerance 
exemption is based in part upon the specificity of Ledprona dsRNA to 
its target organism, the Colorado potato beetle, and the proposed use 
of Ledprona dsRNA on potatoes. No other use of Ledprona dsRNA on other 
agricultural commodities or food products has been proposed. As a 
result, EPA has not assessed whether use of Ledprona dsRNA on 
commodities other than potatoes would result in the same dietary 
exposures described in the current evaluation. Consequently, the 
permanent tolerance exemption for Ledprona dsRNA residues that EPA is 
granting in this action varies from what the petitioner sought and is 
limited to residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato when used as a 
foliar-applied insecticide for the selective control of Colorado potato 
beetle and in

[[Page 69042]]

accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices.

D. Conclusion

    Based on the conclusions detailed in Unit III.A. and the Human 
Health Risk Assessment, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable 
certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including 
infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of Ledprona 
dsRNA. Therefore, an exemption is established for residues of Ledprona 
dsRNA in or on potato when used as a foliar-applied insecticide for the 
selective control of Colorado potato beetle and in accordance with 
label directions and good agricultural practices. In addition, EPA is 
replacing the previously established temporary tolerance exemption for 
Ledprona dsRNA (40 CFR 180.1403) with this permanent tolerance 
exemption.

IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders#influence.

A. Executive Orders 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and 14094: 
Modernizing Regulatory Review

    This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under Executive Orders 12866, October 4, 1993 (58 FR 
51735), as amended by Executive Order 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 
2023), because it establishes or modifies a pesticide tolerance or a 
tolerance exemption under FFDCA section 408, and also applies to 
tolerance revocations for which extraordinary circumstances do not 
exist.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., because it does not contain any 
information collection activities.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA, 5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq. In making this determination, EPA concludes that the 
impact of concern for this rule is any significant adverse economic 
impact on small entities and that the Agency is certifying that this 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities because the rule has no net burden on small 
entities subject to the rule.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, 
local or tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132, August 10, 1999 (64 FR 43255) because it will 
not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship 
between the national government and the states, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175, November 9, 2000 (65 FR 67249), because it will 
not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the 
relationship between the Federal government and the Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
government and Indian tribes.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866, and because EPA does not 
believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by this 
action present a disproportionate risk to children. However, EPA's 
Policy on Children's Health applies to this action.
    This rule finalizes a tolerance action under the FFDCA, which 
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and 
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance 
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide 
chemical residue . . .'' (FFDCA 408(b)(2)(C)). Consistent with FFDCA 
section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified therein, EPA has 
reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information 
in support of this final tolerance action.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, May 22, 2001 
(66 FR 28355), because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This action does not involve technical standards under the NTTAA 
section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) directs 
federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by 
law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying 
and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse 
human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and 
activities on minority populations (people of color and/or indigenous 
peoples) and low-income populations. EPA has considered the safety 
risks for the pesticide subject to this rulemaking and in the context 
of the tolerance action set out in this rulemaking. EPA believes that 
the human health and environmental conditions that exist prior to this 
action do not result in disproportionate and adverse effects on people 
of color, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples. 
Furthermore, EPA believes that this action is not likely to result in 
new disproportionate and adverse effects on people of color, low-income 
populations and/or indigenous peoples.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.


[[Page 69043]]


    Dated: September 29, 2023.
Edward Messina,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR chapter I 
is amended as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Revise Sec.  180.1403 to subpart D to read as follows:


Sec.  180.1403  Ledprona double-stranded RNA (CAS# 2433753-68-3); 
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.

    An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for 
residues of Ledprona dsRNA in or on potato when used as a foliar-
applied insecticide for the selective control of Colorado potato beetle 
and in accordance with label directions and good agricultural 
practices.

[FR Doc. 2023-22199 Filed 10-4-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.