Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) User Fee Update, 68456-68459 [2023-22103]
Download as PDF
68456
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(4) This AD does not adopt the provisions
specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2023–0062.
(5) This AD does not adopt the ‘‘Remarks’’
section of EASA AD 2023–0062.
(k) New Provisions for Alternative Actions
and Intervals
After the existing maintenance or
inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) and
intervals are allowed unless they are
approved as specified in the provisions of the
‘‘Ref. Publications’’ section of EASA AD
2023–0062.
(l) Terminating Action for AD 2010–26–05
Accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) or (i) of this AD terminates the
requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of AD 2010–
26–05, for Model MYSTERE–FALCON 20–
C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 20–F5 airplanes on
which the SSIP has been embodied into the
airplane’s existing maintenance or inspection
program only.
(m) Additional AD Provisions
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (n) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR-730-AMOC@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Dassault
Aviation’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2023–0062, dated March 20,
2023.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) The following service information was
approved for IBR on April 2, 2020 (85 FR
11289, February 27, 2020).
(i) Chapter 5–40–01, Airworthiness
Limitations, of the Dassault Falcon 20
Retrofit 731 Maintenance Manual, Revision
10, dated January 1, 2019.
(ii) [Reserved]
(5) For EASA AD 2023–0062, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email: ADs@easa.europa.eu; website:
easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA AD
on the EASA website: ad.easa.europa.eu.
(6) For Dassault Aviation service
information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet Corporation, Teterboro
Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack,
NJ 07606; telephone 201–440–6700; website
dassaultfalcon.com.
(7) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th
Street, Des Moines, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 206–231–3195.
(8) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email fr.inspection@nara.gov, or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on September 28, 2023.
Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–22068 Filed 10–3–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 300
[TD 9980]
RIN 1545–BQ78
(n) Additional Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Tom Rodriguez, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone: 206–231–
3226; email: tom.rodriguez@faa.gov.
Preparer Tax Identification Number
(PTIN) User Fee Update
(o) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on November 8, 2023.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Oct 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
This document contains
interim final regulations relating to the
imposition of certain user fees on tax
return preparers. These regulations
reduce the amount of the user fee to
apply for or renew a preparer tax
identification number (PTIN) and affect
individuals who apply for or renew a
PTIN. The Independent Offices
Appropriation Act of 1952 authorizes
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the charging of user fees. The text of the
interim final regulations also serves as
the text of the proposed regulations set
forth in the notice of proposed
rulemaking on this subject in this issue
in the Proposed Rules section of this
edition of the Federal Register.
DATES:
Effective date: These regulations are
effective on October 19, 2023.
Applicability date: For date of
applicability, see paragraph (d) of these
interim final regulations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the interim final
regulations, Jamie Song at (202) 317–
6845; concerning cost methodology,
Michael A. Weber at (202) 803–9738
(not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains interim final
amendments to 26 CFR part 300
regarding user fees.
A. User Fee Authority
The Independent Offices
Appropriation Act of 1952 (IOAA),
which is codified at 31 U.S.C. 9701,
authorizes agencies to prescribe
regulations that establish user fees for
services provided by the agency. The
IOAA provides that regulations
implementing user fees are subject to
policies prescribed by the President;
these policies are set forth in the Office
of Management and Budget Circular A–
25, 58 FR 38142 (July 15, 1993) (OMB
Circular A–25).
Under OMB Circular A–25, Federal
agencies that provide services that
confer benefits on identifiable recipients
are to establish user fees that recover the
full cost of providing the service. An
agency that seeks to impose a user fee
for government-provided services must
calculate the full cost of providing those
services. In general, a user fee should be
set at an amount that allows the agency
to recover the direct and indirect costs
of providing the service, unless the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) grants an exception. OMB
Circular A–25 provides that agencies are
to review user fees biennially and
update them as necessary.
B. PTIN Requirement
Section 6109(a)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury or her delegate
to prescribe regulations for the inclusion
of a tax return preparer’s identifying
number on a return, statement, or other
document required to be filed with the
IRS. On September 30, 2010, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
published final regulations (TD 9501)
under section 6109 in the Federal
Register (75 FR 60309) to provide that,
for returns or claims for refund filed
after December 31, 2010, the identifying
number of a tax return preparer is the
individual’s PTIN or such other number
prescribed by the IRS in forms,
instructions, or other appropriate
guidance. Those regulations require a
tax return preparer who prepares or who
assists in preparing all or substantially
all of a tax return or claim for refund
after December 31, 2010, to have a PTIN.
C. PTIN User Fee
Final regulations (TD 9503) published
in the Federal Register (75 FR 60316) on
September 30, 2010, established a $50
user fee to apply for or renew a PTIN,
based on a 2010 Cost Model. In
addition, a $14.25 fee for a new
application and a $13 fee for an
application for renewal was payable
directly to a third-party contractor.
In 2013, the IRS conducted a biennial
review of the PTIN user fee and issued
a new Cost Model that estimated an
increase of the PTIN user fee, to $54.
However, the IRS determined to keep
the fee at $50 for the next two years.
In 2015, the IRS conducted a biennial
review of the PTIN user fee and issued
a new Cost Model, which determined
that the full cost of administering the
PTIN program going forward was
reduced from $50 to $33 per application
or application for renewal, plus a $17
fee per application or application for
renewal payable directly to a third-party
contractor. Final regulations (TD 9781)
published in the Federal Register (81
FR 52766) on August 10, 2016,
superseded and adopted temporary
regulations (TD 9742) published in the
Federal Register (80 FR 66792) on
October 30, 2015, and established the
$33 annual user fee to apply for or
renew a PTIN, plus $17 per application
or application for renewal payable
directly to a third-party contractor.
In 2017, the IRS again conducted a
biennial review of the PTIN user fee and
issued a new Cost Model, which
determined that the amount of the fee
going forward should be reduced to $31
per application or application for
renewal, plus an amount payable
directly to a third-party contractor.
However, on June 1, 2017, before a
notice of proposed rulemaking
proposing to reduce the amount of the
PTIN user fee was issued, the IRS was
enjoined from charging a PTIN user fee.
In Steele v. United States, 260 F. Supp.
3d 52 (D.D.C. 2017), the United States
District Court for the District of
Columbia concluded that the Treasury
Department and the IRS lacked the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Oct 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
statutory authority to charge a PTIN user
fee and enjoined the IRS from charging
a PTIN user fee. See Steele, 2017 WL
3621747 (D.D.C. July 10, 2017) (final
judgment and permanent injunction).
The government filed an appeal and on
March 1, 2019, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit reversed the district court’s
decision and lifted the injunction
against charging the PTIN user fee. See
Montrois v. United States, 916 F.3d
1056 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (holding that a
PTIN provides tax return preparers a
specific benefit by allowing them to
provide an identifying number that is
not a social security number on returns
they prepare and stating that the
permissible amount of the fee would be
the same regardless of whether the
specific benefit was instead the ability
to prepare tax returns for
compensation). The case was remanded
to the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia to determine
whether the fee amounts were
excessive. Id. at 1068.
In 2019, the IRS again conducted a
biennial review of the PTIN user fee and
issued a new Cost Model, which
determined that the amount of the fee
going forward should be reduced to $21
per application or application for
renewal, plus a $14.95 fee per
application or application for renewal
payable directly to a third-party
contractor. Final regulations (TD 9903)
published in the Federal Register (85
FR 43433) on July 17, 2020, adopted the
proposed regulations (REG–117138–17)
published in the Federal Register (85
FR 21126) on April 16, 2020, and
established the $21 annual user fee to
apply for or renew a PTIN, plus $14.95
per application or application for
renewal payable directly to a third-party
contractor.
In Steele v. United States, No. 1:14–
cv–1523–RCL, --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2023
WL 2139722 (Feb. 21, 2023), the United
States District Court for the District of
Columbia on remand considered
whether the fee amounts were excessive
under the IOAA. Explaining that while
an agency may charge only the
reasonable cost incurred to provide a
service, or the value of the service to the
recipient, whichever is less, the district
court allowed that the activities charged
for need only be ‘‘reasonably related’’ to
the cost to the agency and the value to
the recipient, and the amount may
include both ‘‘direct and indirect costs’’
associated with the service provided.
2023 WL 2139722, at *7. The court
further noted that where an activity
produces an independent public benefit,
the fee that would otherwise be charged
must be reduced by that portion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68457
costs attributable to the public benefit.
Id.
The district court concluded that the
PTIN fees for fiscal years (FYs) 2011
through 2017 were excessive to the
extent they were based on: (1) the
activities already conceded by the
government in the case; 1 (2) any
compliance activities other than direct
and indirect costs of investigating ghost
preparers who do not list their PTINs on
returns they prepared for compensation
as required by law, handling complaints
regarding improper use of a PTIN, use
of a compromised PTIN, or use of a
PTIN obtained through identity theft,
and composing the data to refer to those
specific types of complaints to other IRS
business units; (3) any suitability
activities; (4) any support activities,
other than those for the provision of
PTINs and maintenance of the PTIN
database, that facilitated provision of an
independent benefit to the agency and
the public; and (5) any activities of the
third-party contractor, other than those
related to the issuance, renewal, and
maintenance of PTINs, that facilitated
provision of an independent benefit to
the agency and the public. Id. at *19.
In accordance with the biennial
review requirement in OMB Circular A–
25 and taking into account the district
court’s February 2023 memorandum
opinion in Steele, the IRS has issued a
new Cost Model that re-determines costs
that the government continues to incur
for providing PTINs and administering
the PTIN program, and re-calculates the
amount of the user fee as $11 per
application or application for renewal,
plus a $8.75 fee per application or
application for renewal payable directly
to a third-party contractor. The amount
payable directly to the third-party
contractor also takes into account
certain costs that were addressed by the
district court’s February 2023
memorandum opinion in Steele.
Subsequently, the IRS entered into a
modified contract that allows the
1 The government previously conceded
$26,576,661, $26,623,420, and $25,685,247 for
amounts collected in FY 2011, FY 2012, and FY
2013, respectively, which related to certain
communications, compliance, Office of Professional
Responsibility (OPR), and operations support
activities; $8,737,123 and $9,010,458 for amounts
collected in FY 2014 and FY 2015, respectively,
which related to certain communications, Office of
the Director, Strategy and Finance, suitability,
compliance and complaint referrals, competency
and standards, continuing education, OPR, enrolled
agent and enrolled retirement plan agent
department, and contractor processing activities;
and $6,904,345 and $6,784,762 for amounts
collected in FY 2016 and FY 2017, respectively,
which related to certain communications, Office of
the Director, Strategy and Finance, suitability,
compliance and complaint referrals, OPR, enrolled
agent and enrolled retirement plan agent
department, and contractor processing activities.
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
68458
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
government to pay those costs rather
than the individuals who apply for or
renew a PTIN.
The government is authorized to
charge a PTIN user fee under the IOAA
because, in exchange for the fee, it
provides a service by issuing and
maintaining PTINs, which provide tax
return preparers a specific benefit by
allowing them to provide an identifying
number that is not a social security
number on returns and claims for
refund and to prepare returns and
claims for refund for compensation.
OMB Circular A–25 states that user fees
should be collected in advance of or
simultaneously with the provision of a
service. The PTIN user fee is collected
when tax return preparers apply for or
renew their PTINs during the
application season, which begins
annually in October.
Explanation of Provisions
The IRS follows generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in
calculating the full cost of administering
PTIN applications and renewals. The
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory
Board (FASAB) is the body that
establishes GAAP that apply for Federal
reporting entities, such as the IRS.
FASAB publishes the FASAB Handbook
of Federal Accounting Standards and
Other Pronouncements, as Amended
(Current Handbook), available at https://
files.fasab.gov/pdffiles/2022_
%20FASAB_%20Handbook.pdf. The
Current Handbook includes the
Statement of Federal Financial
Accounting Standards (SFFAS) No. 4:
Managerial Cost Accounting Standards
and Concepts. SFFAS No. 4 establishes
internal costing standards to accurately
measure and manage the full cost of
Federal programs, and the methodology
below is in accordance with SFFAS No.
4.
1. Cost Estimation of Direct Labor
The IRS uses various costmeasurement techniques to estimate the
cost attributable to the program. These
techniques include using various
timekeeping systems to measure the
time required to accomplish activities,
or using information provided by
subject-matter experts on the time
devoted to a program. To determine the
labor and benefits cost incurred to
provide the service of providing a PTIN,
the IRS estimated the number of fulltime employees required to conduct
activities related to the costs of issuing
and renewing PTINs. The number of
full-time employees is based on both
current employment numbers and
future hiring estimates. When the
indirect cost of a service or activity is
not specifically identified from the cost
accounting system, an overhead rate is
added to the identifiable direct cost to
arrive at full cost.
2. Overhead
Overhead is an indirect cost of
operating an organization that is not
specifically identifiable with an activity.
Overhead includes costs of resources
that are jointly or commonly consumed
by one or more organizational unit’s
activities but are not specifically
identifiable to a single activity. These
costs can include:
• Financial, human resources,
information technology, and general
management and administrative.
• Rent and building.
• Procurement, other services, and
consulting.
• Property, plant, and equipment.
• Publication services.
• Research, analytical, statistical,
library and legal services.
To calculate the overhead allocable to
a service, the IRS applies an overhead
rate to the identified direct labor and
benefits and other direct costs. The
overhead rate is the ratio of the IRS’s
indirect labor, benefits, and non-labor
costs of business divisions that do not
interact with taxpayers to the labor and
benefits costs of business divisions that
interact with taxpayers. The IRS
calculates an overhead rate annually.
Expense
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Oct 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
3. Calculation of PTIN User Fee
The IRS used projections for FYs 2024
through 2026 to determine the direct
and indirect costs associated with the
PTIN program that are includible in the
PTIN user fee calculation taking into
account the district court’s February
2023 memorandum opinion in Steele.
Direct costs are incurred by the Return
Preparer Office and include staffing and
contract-related costs for activities,
processes, and procedures related to
administering the PTIN program.
Staffing costs included in the PTIN user
fee calculation relate to the compliance
activities of investigating ghost
preparers; handling complaints
regarding the improper use of a PTIN,
use of a compromised PTIN, or use of
a PTIN obtained through identity theft;
and composing the data to refer those
specific types of complaints to other IRS
business units. The PTIN user fee also
takes into account indirect costs for
support activities related to the
provision of PTINs and maintenance of
the PTIN database. In accordance with
Steele, the PTIN user fee calculation
does not take into account compliance
costs other than those described in this
paragraph, costs incurred by the
Suitability Department, support costs
other than those described in this
paragraph, and costs previously
conceded by the government in Steele,
as detailed earlier in this preamble.
The labor and benefits for the work
performed related to the PTIN program
is projected to be $16,536,827 in total
over FYs 2024 through 2026. In addition
to labor and benefits and overhead
expenses, the IRS projects incurring
travel, training, and supplies costs of
$115,000 in each of FYs 2024 through
2026. The total labor and benefits,
travel, training, and supplies, and
overhead expenses projected are shown
below:
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2026
$5,364,566
115,000
3,424,729
$5,510,939
115,000
3,516,212
$5,661,322
115,000
3,610,201
Labor and benefits ...........................................................................................
Travel, training, and supplies ..........................................................................
Overhead (62.5 percent) .................................................................................
The total cost for FYs 2024 through
2026 are therefore projected to be
$27,432,969. The number of users is
based on FY 2022 numbers adjusted by
a projected increase in applications over
the next three FYs. Dividing this total
cost by the projected population of users
for FYs 2024 through 2026 results in a
For the FY 2023 user fee review, an
overhead rate of 62.5 percent was used.
Total
$16,536,827
345,000
10,551,142
user fee per application or application
for renewal is $11.
Total Costs .............................
$27,432,969
Costs related to a third-party
Number of Applications ........
÷ 2,542,665 contractor’s activities for the issuance,
Cost per Application .............
$10.79 renewal, and maintenance of PTINs,
such as processing applications and
operating a call center, are included in
Taking into account the full amount
of these costs, the amount of the PTIN
the PTIN user fee calculation, in
cost per application of $11 as shown
below:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 4, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with Steele, which will be
set at $8.75 per application or
application for renewal, in addition to
the amount charged by the government.
The third-party contractor was chosen
through a competitive bidding process.
The amount of the third-party contractor
portion may change in 2026 when the
contract expires and will be recomputed.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review
The OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Analysis has determined that
these regulations are not significant and
are not subject to review under section
6(b) of Executive Order 12866.
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby
certified that these interim final
regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These
regulations affect all individuals who
prepare or assist in preparing all or
substantially all of a tax return or claim
for refund for compensation. Only
individuals, not businesses, can have a
PTIN. Thus, the economic impact of
these regulations on any small entity
generally will be a result of an
individual tax return preparer who is
required to have a PTIN owning a small
business or a small business otherwise
employing an individual tax return
preparer who is required to have a
PTIN. The Treasury Department and the
IRS estimate that approximately 847,555
individuals will apply annually for an
initial or renewal PTIN. Although these
regulations will likely affect a
substantial number of small entities, the
economic impact on those entities is not
significant. These regulations will
establish an $11 fee per application or
application for renewal (plus $8.75
payable directly to the third-party
contractor), which is a reduction from
the previously established fee and will
not have a significant economic impact
on a small entity. Accordingly, the rule
is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, and a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
III. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated
costs and benefits and take certain other
actions before issuing a final rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Oct 03, 2023
Jkt 262001
by a State, local, or Tribal government,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. This rule does
not include any Federal mandate that
may result in expenditures by State,
local, or Tribal governments, or by the
private sector in excess of that
threshold.
IV. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
prohibits an agency from publishing any
rule that has federalism implications if
the rule either imposes substantial,
direct compliance costs on State and
local governments, and is not required
by statute, or preempts State law, unless
the agency meets the consultation and
funding requirements of section 6 of the
Executive order. These interim final
regulations do not have federalism
implications and do not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments or preempt
State law within the meaning of the
Executive order.
The annual PTIN application and
renewal period for the 2024 filing
season will begin shortly. It would be
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest for the IRS to continue to charge
the current, higher user fee pending
public comment after the IRS has
determined pursuant to the biennial
review conducted under OMB Circular
A–25 that the PTIN user fee should be
reduced going forward. To enable the
reduced fee amount to be in effect for
PTINs issued or renewed by tax return
preparers preparing returns or claims for
refund in 2024, the Treasury
Department and the IRS find that there
is good cause to dispense with (1) notice
and public comment pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b) and (c) and (2) a delayed
effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d). The Treasury Department and
the IRS will consider public comments
submitted in response to the crossreferenced notice of proposed
rulemaking published in the Proposed
Rules section of this issue of the Federal
Register and will promulgate a final rule
after considering those comments.
VI. Submission to Small Business
Administration
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, this Treasury decision has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for the
Office of Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Jamie Song, Office of the
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration). Other personnel from
the Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in the development of the
regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Fees, Gift
taxes, Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is
amended as follows:
PART 300—USER FEES
V. Good Cause
PO 00000
68459
Sfmt 9990
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 300 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701.
Par. 2. Section 300.11 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read
as follows:
■
§ 300.11 Fee for obtaining a preparer tax
identification number.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Fee. The fee to apply for or renew
a preparer tax identification number is
$11 per year and is in addition to the
fee charged by the contractor.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Applicability date. This section
applies to applications for or renewal of
a preparer tax identification number
filed on or after October 19, 2023.
Douglas W. O’Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: September 25, 2023.
Lily Batchelder,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2023–22103 Filed 9–29–23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 4, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68456-68459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-22103]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 300
[TD 9980]
RIN 1545-BQ78
Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) User Fee Update
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains interim final regulations relating to
the imposition of certain user fees on tax return preparers. These
regulations reduce the amount of the user fee to apply for or renew a
preparer tax identification number (PTIN) and affect individuals who
apply for or renew a PTIN. The Independent Offices Appropriation Act of
1952 authorizes the charging of user fees. The text of the interim
final regulations also serves as the text of the proposed regulations
set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject in this
issue in the Proposed Rules section of this edition of the Federal
Register.
DATES:
Effective date: These regulations are effective on October 19,
2023.
Applicability date: For date of applicability, see paragraph (d) of
these interim final regulations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the interim final
regulations, Jamie Song at (202) 317-6845; concerning cost methodology,
Michael A. Weber at (202) 803-9738 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains interim final amendments to 26 CFR part 300
regarding user fees.
A. User Fee Authority
The Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952 (IOAA), which is
codified at 31 U.S.C. 9701, authorizes agencies to prescribe
regulations that establish user fees for services provided by the
agency. The IOAA provides that regulations implementing user fees are
subject to policies prescribed by the President; these policies are set
forth in the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-25, 58 FR 38142
(July 15, 1993) (OMB Circular A-25).
Under OMB Circular A-25, Federal agencies that provide services
that confer benefits on identifiable recipients are to establish user
fees that recover the full cost of providing the service. An agency
that seeks to impose a user fee for government-provided services must
calculate the full cost of providing those services. In general, a user
fee should be set at an amount that allows the agency to recover the
direct and indirect costs of providing the service, unless the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) grants an exception. OMB Circular A-25
provides that agencies are to review user fees biennially and update
them as necessary.
B. PTIN Requirement
Section 6109(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) authorizes
the Secretary of the Treasury or her delegate to prescribe regulations
for the inclusion of a tax return preparer's identifying number on a
return, statement, or other document required to be filed with the IRS.
On September 30, 2010, the Treasury Department and the IRS
[[Page 68457]]
published final regulations (TD 9501) under section 6109 in the Federal
Register (75 FR 60309) to provide that, for returns or claims for
refund filed after December 31, 2010, the identifying number of a tax
return preparer is the individual's PTIN or such other number
prescribed by the IRS in forms, instructions, or other appropriate
guidance. Those regulations require a tax return preparer who prepares
or who assists in preparing all or substantially all of a tax return or
claim for refund after December 31, 2010, to have a PTIN.
C. PTIN User Fee
Final regulations (TD 9503) published in the Federal Register (75
FR 60316) on September 30, 2010, established a $50 user fee to apply
for or renew a PTIN, based on a 2010 Cost Model. In addition, a $14.25
fee for a new application and a $13 fee for an application for renewal
was payable directly to a third-party contractor.
In 2013, the IRS conducted a biennial review of the PTIN user fee
and issued a new Cost Model that estimated an increase of the PTIN user
fee, to $54. However, the IRS determined to keep the fee at $50 for the
next two years.
In 2015, the IRS conducted a biennial review of the PTIN user fee
and issued a new Cost Model, which determined that the full cost of
administering the PTIN program going forward was reduced from $50 to
$33 per application or application for renewal, plus a $17 fee per
application or application for renewal payable directly to a third-
party contractor. Final regulations (TD 9781) published in the Federal
Register (81 FR 52766) on August 10, 2016, superseded and adopted
temporary regulations (TD 9742) published in the Federal Register (80
FR 66792) on October 30, 2015, and established the $33 annual user fee
to apply for or renew a PTIN, plus $17 per application or application
for renewal payable directly to a third-party contractor.
In 2017, the IRS again conducted a biennial review of the PTIN user
fee and issued a new Cost Model, which determined that the amount of
the fee going forward should be reduced to $31 per application or
application for renewal, plus an amount payable directly to a third-
party contractor. However, on June 1, 2017, before a notice of proposed
rulemaking proposing to reduce the amount of the PTIN user fee was
issued, the IRS was enjoined from charging a PTIN user fee. In Steele
v. United States, 260 F. Supp. 3d 52 (D.D.C. 2017), the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia concluded that the Treasury
Department and the IRS lacked the statutory authority to charge a PTIN
user fee and enjoined the IRS from charging a PTIN user fee. See
Steele, 2017 WL 3621747 (D.D.C. July 10, 2017) (final judgment and
permanent injunction). The government filed an appeal and on March 1,
2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit reversed the district court's decision and lifted the
injunction against charging the PTIN user fee. See Montrois v. United
States, 916 F.3d 1056 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (holding that a PTIN provides
tax return preparers a specific benefit by allowing them to provide an
identifying number that is not a social security number on returns they
prepare and stating that the permissible amount of the fee would be the
same regardless of whether the specific benefit was instead the ability
to prepare tax returns for compensation). The case was remanded to the
United States District Court for the District of Columbia to determine
whether the fee amounts were excessive. Id. at 1068.
In 2019, the IRS again conducted a biennial review of the PTIN user
fee and issued a new Cost Model, which determined that the amount of
the fee going forward should be reduced to $21 per application or
application for renewal, plus a $14.95 fee per application or
application for renewal payable directly to a third-party contractor.
Final regulations (TD 9903) published in the Federal Register (85 FR
43433) on July 17, 2020, adopted the proposed regulations (REG-117138-
17) published in the Federal Register (85 FR 21126) on April 16, 2020,
and established the $21 annual user fee to apply for or renew a PTIN,
plus $14.95 per application or application for renewal payable directly
to a third-party contractor.
In Steele v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-1523-RCL, --- F. Supp. 3d -
---, 2023 WL 2139722 (Feb. 21, 2023), the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia on remand considered whether the fee
amounts were excessive under the IOAA. Explaining that while an agency
may charge only the reasonable cost incurred to provide a service, or
the value of the service to the recipient, whichever is less, the
district court allowed that the activities charged for need only be
``reasonably related'' to the cost to the agency and the value to the
recipient, and the amount may include both ``direct and indirect
costs'' associated with the service provided. 2023 WL 2139722, at *7.
The court further noted that where an activity produces an independent
public benefit, the fee that would otherwise be charged must be reduced
by that portion of the costs attributable to the public benefit. Id.
The district court concluded that the PTIN fees for fiscal years
(FYs) 2011 through 2017 were excessive to the extent they were based
on: (1) the activities already conceded by the government in the case;
\1\ (2) any compliance activities other than direct and indirect costs
of investigating ghost preparers who do not list their PTINs on returns
they prepared for compensation as required by law, handling complaints
regarding improper use of a PTIN, use of a compromised PTIN, or use of
a PTIN obtained through identity theft, and composing the data to refer
to those specific types of complaints to other IRS business units; (3)
any suitability activities; (4) any support activities, other than
those for the provision of PTINs and maintenance of the PTIN database,
that facilitated provision of an independent benefit to the agency and
the public; and (5) any activities of the third-party contractor, other
than those related to the issuance, renewal, and maintenance of PTINs,
that facilitated provision of an independent benefit to the agency and
the public. Id. at *19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The government previously conceded $26,576,661, $26,623,420,
and $25,685,247 for amounts collected in FY 2011, FY 2012, and FY
2013, respectively, which related to certain communications,
compliance, Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and
operations support activities; $8,737,123 and $9,010,458 for amounts
collected in FY 2014 and FY 2015, respectively, which related to
certain communications, Office of the Director, Strategy and
Finance, suitability, compliance and complaint referrals, competency
and standards, continuing education, OPR, enrolled agent and
enrolled retirement plan agent department, and contractor processing
activities; and $6,904,345 and $6,784,762 for amounts collected in
FY 2016 and FY 2017, respectively, which related to certain
communications, Office of the Director, Strategy and Finance,
suitability, compliance and complaint referrals, OPR, enrolled agent
and enrolled retirement plan agent department, and contractor
processing activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with the biennial review requirement in OMB Circular
A-25 and taking into account the district court's February 2023
memorandum opinion in Steele, the IRS has issued a new Cost Model that
re-determines costs that the government continues to incur for
providing PTINs and administering the PTIN program, and re-calculates
the amount of the user fee as $11 per application or application for
renewal, plus a $8.75 fee per application or application for renewal
payable directly to a third-party contractor. The amount payable
directly to the third-party contractor also takes into account certain
costs that were addressed by the district court's February 2023
memorandum opinion in Steele. Subsequently, the IRS entered into a
modified contract that allows the
[[Page 68458]]
government to pay those costs rather than the individuals who apply for
or renew a PTIN.
The government is authorized to charge a PTIN user fee under the
IOAA because, in exchange for the fee, it provides a service by issuing
and maintaining PTINs, which provide tax return preparers a specific
benefit by allowing them to provide an identifying number that is not a
social security number on returns and claims for refund and to prepare
returns and claims for refund for compensation. OMB Circular A-25
states that user fees should be collected in advance of or
simultaneously with the provision of a service. The PTIN user fee is
collected when tax return preparers apply for or renew their PTINs
during the application season, which begins annually in October.
Explanation of Provisions
The IRS follows generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in
calculating the full cost of administering PTIN applications and
renewals. The Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) is
the body that establishes GAAP that apply for Federal reporting
entities, such as the IRS. FASAB publishes the FASAB Handbook of
Federal Accounting Standards and Other Pronouncements, as Amended
(Current Handbook), available at https://files.fasab.gov/pdffiles/2022_%20FASAB_%20Handbook.pdf. The Current Handbook includes the
Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) No. 4:
Managerial Cost Accounting Standards and Concepts. SFFAS No. 4
establishes internal costing standards to accurately measure and manage
the full cost of Federal programs, and the methodology below is in
accordance with SFFAS No. 4.
1. Cost Estimation of Direct Labor
The IRS uses various cost-measurement techniques to estimate the
cost attributable to the program. These techniques include using
various timekeeping systems to measure the time required to accomplish
activities, or using information provided by subject-matter experts on
the time devoted to a program. To determine the labor and benefits cost
incurred to provide the service of providing a PTIN, the IRS estimated
the number of full-time employees required to conduct activities
related to the costs of issuing and renewing PTINs. The number of full-
time employees is based on both current employment numbers and future
hiring estimates. When the indirect cost of a service or activity is
not specifically identified from the cost accounting system, an
overhead rate is added to the identifiable direct cost to arrive at
full cost.
2. Overhead
Overhead is an indirect cost of operating an organization that is
not specifically identifiable with an activity. Overhead includes costs
of resources that are jointly or commonly consumed by one or more
organizational unit's activities but are not specifically identifiable
to a single activity. These costs can include:
Financial, human resources, information technology, and
general management and administrative.
Rent and building.
Procurement, other services, and consulting.
Property, plant, and equipment.
Publication services.
Research, analytical, statistical, library and legal
services.
To calculate the overhead allocable to a service, the IRS applies
an overhead rate to the identified direct labor and benefits and other
direct costs. The overhead rate is the ratio of the IRS's indirect
labor, benefits, and non-labor costs of business divisions that do not
interact with taxpayers to the labor and benefits costs of business
divisions that interact with taxpayers. The IRS calculates an overhead
rate annually. For the FY 2023 user fee review, an overhead rate of
62.5 percent was used.
3. Calculation of PTIN User Fee
The IRS used projections for FYs 2024 through 2026 to determine the
direct and indirect costs associated with the PTIN program that are
includible in the PTIN user fee calculation taking into account the
district court's February 2023 memorandum opinion in Steele. Direct
costs are incurred by the Return Preparer Office and include staffing
and contract-related costs for activities, processes, and procedures
related to administering the PTIN program. Staffing costs included in
the PTIN user fee calculation relate to the compliance activities of
investigating ghost preparers; handling complaints regarding the
improper use of a PTIN, use of a compromised PTIN, or use of a PTIN
obtained through identity theft; and composing the data to refer those
specific types of complaints to other IRS business units. The PTIN user
fee also takes into account indirect costs for support activities
related to the provision of PTINs and maintenance of the PTIN database.
In accordance with Steele, the PTIN user fee calculation does not take
into account compliance costs other than those described in this
paragraph, costs incurred by the Suitability Department, support costs
other than those described in this paragraph, and costs previously
conceded by the government in Steele, as detailed earlier in this
preamble.
The labor and benefits for the work performed related to the PTIN
program is projected to be $16,536,827 in total over FYs 2024 through
2026. In addition to labor and benefits and overhead expenses, the IRS
projects incurring travel, training, and supplies costs of $115,000 in
each of FYs 2024 through 2026. The total labor and benefits, travel,
training, and supplies, and overhead expenses projected are shown
below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expense FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor and benefits.............................. $5,364,566 $5,510,939 $5,661,322 $16,536,827
Travel, training, and supplies.................. 115,000 115,000 115,000 345,000
Overhead (62.5 percent)......................... 3,424,729 3,516,212 3,610,201 10,551,142
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total cost for FYs 2024 through 2026 are therefore projected to
be $27,432,969. The number of users is based on FY 2022 numbers
adjusted by a projected increase in applications over the next three
FYs. Dividing this total cost by the projected population of users for
FYs 2024 through 2026 results in a cost per application of $11 as shown
below:
Total Costs............................................... $27,432,969
Number of Applications.................................... / 2,542,665
-------------
Cost per Application...................................... $10.79
Taking into account the full amount of these costs, the amount of
the PTIN user fee per application or application for renewal is $11.
Costs related to a third-party contractor's activities for the
issuance, renewal, and maintenance of PTINs, such as processing
applications and operating a call center, are included in the PTIN user
fee calculation, in
[[Page 68459]]
accordance with Steele, which will be set at $8.75 per application or
application for renewal, in addition to the amount charged by the
government. The third-party contractor was chosen through a competitive
bidding process. The amount of the third-party contractor portion may
change in 2026 when the contract expires and will be re-computed.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review
The OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Analysis has
determined that these regulations are not significant and are not
subject to review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866.
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it
is hereby certified that these interim final regulations will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. These regulations affect all individuals who prepare or
assist in preparing all or substantially all of a tax return or claim
for refund for compensation. Only individuals, not businesses, can have
a PTIN. Thus, the economic impact of these regulations on any small
entity generally will be a result of an individual tax return preparer
who is required to have a PTIN owning a small business or a small
business otherwise employing an individual tax return preparer who is
required to have a PTIN. The Treasury Department and the IRS estimate
that approximately 847,555 individuals will apply annually for an
initial or renewal PTIN. Although these regulations will likely affect
a substantial number of small entities, the economic impact on those
entities is not significant. These regulations will establish an $11
fee per application or application for renewal (plus $8.75 payable
directly to the third-party contractor), which is a reduction from the
previously established fee and will not have a significant economic
impact on a small entity. Accordingly, the rule is not expected to have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
III. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take
certain other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. This rule does not include any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments, or by
the private sector in excess of that threshold.
IV. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either
imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts State law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive order. These interim final regulations do
not have federalism implications and do not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local governments or preempt State law
within the meaning of the Executive order.
V. Good Cause
The annual PTIN application and renewal period for the 2024 filing
season will begin shortly. It would be unnecessary and contrary to the
public interest for the IRS to continue to charge the current, higher
user fee pending public comment after the IRS has determined pursuant
to the biennial review conducted under OMB Circular A-25 that the PTIN
user fee should be reduced going forward. To enable the reduced fee
amount to be in effect for PTINs issued or renewed by tax return
preparers preparing returns or claims for refund in 2024, the Treasury
Department and the IRS find that there is good cause to dispense with
(1) notice and public comment pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (c) and
(2) a delayed effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d). The Treasury
Department and the IRS will consider public comments submitted in
response to the cross-referenced notice of proposed rulemaking
published in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal
Register and will promulgate a final rule after considering those
comments.
VI. Submission to Small Business Administration
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this Treasury decision has
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for the Office of Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Jamie Song, Office of
the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). Other
personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in the
development of the regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Fees, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:
PART 300--USER FEES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701.
0
Par. 2. Section 300.11 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 300.11 Fee for obtaining a preparer tax identification number.
* * * * *
(b) Fee. The fee to apply for or renew a preparer tax
identification number is $11 per year and is in addition to the fee
charged by the contractor.
* * * * *
(d) Applicability date. This section applies to applications for or
renewal of a preparer tax identification number filed on or after
October 19, 2023.
Douglas W. O'Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: September 25, 2023.
Lily Batchelder,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2023-22103 Filed 9-29-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P