Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions, 68035-68042 [2023-21563]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as described in the previous paragraph, and then select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ in the Document Type column. Public comments will also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following instructions on the https:// www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked Questions web page. Also, if you click on the’’ Dockets’’ tab and then the proposed rule, you should see a ‘‘Subscribe’’ option for email alerts. Selecting this option will enable notifications when comments are posted, or if/when a final rule is published. We review all comments received, but we will only post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive. Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this document, see DHS’s eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; DHS Delegation No. 0170.1, Revision No. 01.3. 2. Amend § 117.799 by: a. Staying paragraph (h) until 3:30 p.m. on May 15, 2024. ■ b. Adding paragraph (k). The addition to read as follows: ■ ■ § 117.799 Long Island, New York Inland Waterway from East Rockaway Inlet to Shinnecock Canal. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 * * * * * (k) The draw of the Meadowbrook State Parkway Bridge across Sloop Channel, mile 12.8, shall operate on single leaf openings until May 15, 2024. The draw will open for commercial vessels engaged in commerce and shall open Monday through Friday from 6:20 a.m. to 9:50 a.m. and 3:20 p.m. to 7:20 p.m. on signal at 20 and 50 minutes after the hour, and on signal at all other times. For all other vessels, the draw shall open on Monday thru Friday from VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Jkt 262001 6:20 a.m. to 7:20 p.m. on signal at 20 and 50 minutes after the hour, and the draw shall open on Saturday, Sunday, and Federal holidays from 7:20 a.m. to 8:20 p.m. on signal at 20 and 50 minutes after the hour, and on signal at all other times. Dated: August 21, 2023. J.W. Mauger, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2023–21754 Filed 9–28–23; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service 36 CFR Part 261 RIN 0596–AD57 Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions Forest Service, Agriculture. Proposed rule; request for public comment. AGENCY: ACTION: The Forest Service (Forest Service or Agency), United States Department of Agriculture, is proposing to revise the Forest Service’s criminal prohibitions to enhance consistency of the Forest Service’s law enforcement practices with those of State and other Federal land management agencies. The Forest Service is proposing to streamline enforcement of criminal prohibitions in related to fire and use of vehicles on National Forest System roads and trails by eliminating the requirement to issue an order for enforcement. DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received in writing by December 4, 2023. ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by RIN 0596–AD57, may be submitted via one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for sending comments. 2. Mail: Director, Law Enforcement and Investigations Staff, Mail Stop 1140, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–1140. 3. Hand Delivery/Courier: Director, Law Enforcement and Investigations Staff, Room 1SC, 201 14th Street SW, Washington, DC. Comments should be confined to issues pertinent to the proposed rule; should explain the reasons for any recommended changes; and should reference the specific section and wording being addressed, where possible. All timely comments, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 68035 including names and addresses when provided, will be placed in the record and will be available for public review and copying. The public may review comments at the Office of the Director, Law Enforcement and Investigations Staff, Room 1SC, 201 14th Street SW, Washington, DC, during normal business hours. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 703–605–4730 to facilitate entry into the building. Comments may also be viewed on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. In the search box, enter ‘‘RIN 0596–AD57,’’ and click the ‘‘Search’’ button. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Smithson, Assistant Director— Investigations, Law Enforcement and Investigations Staff, 703–605–4730 or wilmer.smithson@usda.gov. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the hearing impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background and Need This proposed rule would revise certain criminal prohibitions in 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, to enhance consistency of the Forest Service’s law enforcement practices with those of State and other Federal land management law enforcement agencies. In addition, this proposed rule would streamline enforcement of some of the criminal prohibitions found in 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, which are enforceable only through issuance of an order, by moving them to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, which contains criminal prohibitions that are enforceable without issuance of an order. Forest Service law enforcement personnel continue to encounter a significant volume of violations for simple possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia. Agency personnel routinely deal with under-age alcohol possession on National Forest System (NFS) lands. These violations pose a threat to the safety of visitors to NFS lands as well as to Forest Service personnel. This proposed rule would enhance the Forest Service’s authority to address public safety issues by adding prohibitions relating to controlled substances, drug paraphernalia, and alcoholic beverages. These proposed prohibitions would enable the Forest Service to enforce more effectively violations on NFS lands for simple possession of controlled substances, possession of alcoholic beverages in violation of State law (for open containers or under-age E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1 68036 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 drinking), and furnishing alcoholic beverages to minors. The proposed rule also would authorize the Forest Service to enforce violations for the possession of drug paraphernalia if prohibited by State law. These proposed changes are intended to align the Forest Service’s law enforcement practices more closely with those of State and local law enforcement agencies. Additionally, the proposed rule would update the prohibitions to enhance protection of persons visiting and working on NFS lands from theft of personal property and from disorderly conduct by other visitors. The proposed rule would enhance enforcement of wildfire prevention prohibitions by moving them from 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, which requires issuance of an order, to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, which does not, and by adding a prohibition banning exploding targets year-round. The proposed rule also would make other revisions such as updating the prohibitions relating to offroad vehicles and updating the penalty for violating the criminal prohibitions in 36 CFR part 261 consistent with current statutory law. Proposed revisions to specific types of public safety prohibitions are discussed below. Prohibition Relating to Controlled Substances It is a violation of Federal law for a person knowingly or intentionally to possess controlled substances (21 U.S.C. 844(a)). Forest Service law enforcement officers enforce 21 U.S.C. 844(a) on NFS lands, and in some circumstances off these lands, under the National Forest System Drug Control Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 559b–559g). A violation of 21 U.S.C. 844(a) without aggravating factors is classified as a Class A misdemeanor. With aggravating factors, this type of violation is classified as a felony (18 U.S.C. 3559(a)). Violations of 21 U.S.C. 844(a) require referral to the appropriate United States Attorney’s Office for the filing of a complaint or information and prosecution before a United States District Court judge. Guidelines established by the United States Attorney’s Office for prosecutions under 21 U.S.C. 844(a) are based upon the amount of the controlled substance involved in the violation. In many instances, violations for simple possession of a controlled substance on NFS lands are not prosecuted under 21 U.S.C. 844(a) because they involve small amounts that are insufficient to meet these prosecutorial guidelines. The Forest Service’s criminal prohibitions at 36 CFR part 261, subpart VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Jkt 262001 A, do not expressly prohibit the possession of controlled substances on NFS lands. To provide an alternative to proceeding under 21 U.S.C. 844(a), the Forest Service is proposing to revise 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, to prohibit knowingly or intentionally possessing a controlled substance in violation of Federal law. The proposed rule also would add a definition for the term ‘‘controlled substance’’ that tracks the definition of that term in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). With these changes, the possession of small amounts of a controlled substance could be handled through issuance of a notice of violation by a Forest Service law enforcement officer and prosecution before a United States magistrate judge and would be classified as a Class B misdemeanor. Forest Service law enforcement personnel would continue to refer cases involving larger amounts of controlled substances that meet prosecutorial guidelines to the appropriate United States Attorney’s Office. Prohibition Relating to Drug Paraphernalia Possession of drug paraphernalia is not a violation of Federal law (see 21 U.S.C. 863(d)). Some States prohibit possession of drug paraphernalia only if it contains the residue of a controlled substance. Other States prohibit possession of drug paraphernalia even if it does not contain the residue of a controlled substance. The proposed rule would add a prohibition that would prohibit knowingly or intentionally possessing drug paraphernalia in either situation when it is in violation of State law. Prohibitions Relating to Alcoholic Beverages The Forest Service has limited authority in 36 CFR part 261 to address underage drinking and other violations of State law relating to alcoholic beverages, such as State laws prohibiting open containers of alcoholic beverages and furnishing alcoholic beverages to minors. The current authority is contained in 36 CFR 261.58(bb), which prohibits possession of an alcoholic beverage as defined by State law when enforced through issuance of an order issued under 36 CFR part 261, subpart B. The proposed rule would add two prohibitions relating to alcoholic beverages (possessing an alcoholic beverage in violation of State law and providing an alcoholic beverage to a minor in violation of State law) to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A. These changes would make the prohibitions generally PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 applicable to NFS lands and enforceable without issuance of an order. These proposed changes are intended to allow the Forest Service to address more effectively the use of NFS lands at gatherings where alcoholic beverages are consumed by giving Forest Service law enforcement officers the same enforcement options as their State and local counterparts. The prohibition in 36 CFR 261.58(bb) would be retained to allow the Forest Service to prohibit consumption of alcoholic beverages temporarily in specific areas of NFS lands when appropriate to protect public safety, such as at a large event, regardless of whether consumption of alcoholic beverages is in violation of State law. Protection of Persons on NFS Lands Both Federal and State laws apply to the national forests (16 U.S.C. 480). Generally, States enforce State laws, while Forest Service law enforcement personnel enforce Federal laws, including the criminal prohibitions in 36 CFR part 261, subparts A and C, and in orders issued under 36 CFR part 261, subpart B. In most cases, the Federal laws and prohibitions relate to the Agency’s resource protection responsibilities. However, with the urbanization and development of areas near NFS lands, crimes against persons and personal property have become an increasing public safety concern. The Forest Service cooperates with State and local law enforcement agencies in the execution of their responsibilities related to NFS lands. Under the Cooperative Law Enforcement Act of 1971 (16 U.S.C. 551a), the Forest Service has entered into reimbursable agreements with some State and local law enforcement agencies (usually a county sheriff’s office) for the protection of persons and their property on NFS lands where these lands and facilities account for increased visitor use. Over time, however, it has become evident that reimbursement through the cooperative law enforcement program alone cannot always provide for the appropriate level of protection. Many local law enforcement agencies find that their limited personnel, the remote location of NFS lands, and the seasonal nature of use those lands receive impede rapid response to crimes committed on NFS lands. When a person is victimized by theft of or damage to personal property on NFS lands—for example at a campsite or a trailhead parking lot—and State or local enforcement personnel are unable to respond, Forest Service law enforcement personnel have limited E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules authority to assist. The proposed rule would add a prohibition that would allow Forest Service law enforcement personnel to take appropriate action in response to theft of or damage to personal property on NFS lands. To protect persons on NFS lands, the proposed rule also would revise the prohibitions relating to disorderly conduct. A significant increase in visitation to national forests and grasslands has coincided with an increase in incidents of public behavior that threatens the safety of others. Forest Service law enforcement personnel frequently encounter situations in which a person makes lewd or obscene comments to another person; follows another person around, including into a restroom, with no legitimate purpose and in a threatening manner; or engages in indecent exposure. The proposed rule would revise the disorderly conduct prohibitions in 36 CFR 261.4 to address these situations. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Traffic Prohibitions The proposed rule would incorporate State traffic law in § 261.12 so that State traffic law is enforceable as Federal traffic law. Specifically, the proposed rule would incorporate two commonly cited violations of State traffic law: operating a motor vehicle without a valid license and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or a controlled substance. The proposed rule also would incorporate a catch-all prohibition that would incorporate any other State traffic laws so that they are enforceable as Federal traffic law. Prohibitions Relating to Prevention of Wildfire Wildland fires, including catastrophic wildfires, have increased in frequency and severity on NFS lands. An accumulation of hazardous fuels combined with severe drought have resulted in extreme fire conditions and very large fires. Forest Service estimates indicate that more than 460 million acres of all vegetated lands are at moderate to high risk from uncharacteristically large wildfires, encompassing many wildland-urban interfaces with high densities of structures that intermingle with undeveloped wildlands. In 2022, more than 7.5 million acres burned in the United States, and more than 2,700 structures were destroyed, including 1,294 residences. These fires have longterm and sometimes irreversible consequences, including damage to watersheds that supply drinking water and damage to critical habitat for endangered species. The Forest Service VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Jkt 262001 also incurs significant annual costs related to wildland fire suppression. This proposed rule would allow the Forest Service to take additional enforcement actions to prevent wildfires on NFS lands. The possession and use of fireworks or other pyrotechnic devices are not generally prohibited on NFS lands. However, they may be prohibited in areas specified in an order issued under 36 CFR 261.52(f). Typically, the Forest Service issues orders under 36 CFR 261.52(f) on a seasonal basis when the threat of fire is high. However, given the higher risk and greater severity of wildland fires, the Agency has determined that a yearround ban is necessary to protect NFS lands and resources, persons using those lands, and surrounding communities from the threat of catastrophic wildfire. The proposed rule would move these prohibitions to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, so that they are enforceable anywhere on NFS lands during any season without issuance of an order under 36 CFR part 261, subpart B. Prohibition Relating to Exploding Targets Exploding targets—targets that explode when struck by a bullet—have become popular throughout the United States, and their use is increasing on NFS lands. Exploding targets can be purchased legally and are intended for use as a target for firearms practice. However, when detonated by a bullet, exploding targets often result in a fireball that can ignite vegetation and surrounding materials and spread to adjacent areas. A growing number of wildfires on NFS lands have been caused by exploding targets; from 2012 to 2022, multiple fires burned over 139,000 acres as result of exploding targets, costing taxpayers millions of dollars to suppress. Additionally, trash is often left behind after exploding targets are used, including undetonated targets, which present additional safety risks for visitors, employees, and firefighters. Exploding targets are regulated by the Forest Service as explosives under the Agency’s authority to issue orders banning the use of explosives in specified areas under 36 CFR 261.52(b). Because exploding targets present a significant fire hazard at any time of year, the Forest Service is proposing to add a generally applicable prohibition to 36 CFR 261.5 that does not require issuance of an order and that would ban possession as well as use of an exploding target on NFS lands. Exploding targets generally consist of two separate chemical components PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 68037 (usually an oxidizer like ammonium nitrate and a fuel such as aluminum or another metal) that become a binary explosive when combined. The individual components, which often are pre-packaged together, are kept separate within individual containers for sale and transport. Kept separate, the components are not explosives. Combined, however, the components become explosive and thus are subject to Federal explosive laws and regulations. To avoid triggering Federal law until they are ready to be used and to minimize the risk of injury, the components are typically combined at the site where the exploding targets are going to be used. This proposed rule would ban the possession and use of an exploding target (the binary explosive that is created by combining the two components). The Forest Service recognizes hunting and safe target shooting as valid uses of NFS lands. This proposed rule would not affect these valid uses. Proposed Regulatory Revisions A section-by-section description of the proposed rule follows. Section 261.1b Penalty The proposed rule would make a technical change to 36 CFR 261.1b, which governs penalties for violating a criminal prohibition in 36 CFR part 261, to make it consistent with current statutory law. The regulations at 36 CFR 261.1b refer to the penalty in 16 U.S.C. 551, which provides that a violation shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500, imprisonment for not more than six months, or both. Violations were classified as petty offenses. The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 established categories of offenses based on the maximum amount of imprisonment for each offense (18 U.S.C. 3559). Offenses with a maximum term of six months of imprisonment, such as those offenses covered by 36 CFR part 261, are considered Class B misdemeanors. The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 also prescribes a range of fines for Class B misdemeanors, depending on specific circumstances associated with the violation, with a maximum fine of $5,000 for a person and $10,000 for an organization (18 U.S.C. 3571). The proposed revision reflects this statutory change and provides for exceptions when a statute establishing an offense expressly sets a different penalty. Section 261.2 Definitions The proposed rule would add six definitions to 36 CFR 261.2 for the terms ‘‘alcoholic beverage,’’ ‘‘controlled E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 68038 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules substance,’’ ‘‘exploding target,’’ ‘‘firework,’’ ‘‘pyrotechnic device,’’ and ‘‘recreation site.’’ The proposed rule also would revise the definition of ‘‘developed recreation site.’’ The term ‘‘alcoholic beverage’’ would be defined to have the same meaning as under State law. This definition is consistent with the current use of the term in 36 CFR 261.58(bb). The term ‘‘controlled substance’’ would be defined to have the same meaning as in the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). The term ‘‘exploding target’’ would be defined to mean a binary explosive that is designed to explode when struck by a bullet. Exploding targets consist of two components that are combined to create the explosive. Individually, the parts are inert. However, when combined, they become explosive. The term ‘‘firework’’ would be defined to have the same meaning as in 27 CFR 555.11. As defined in those regulations, the term ‘‘firework’’ means any composition or device that is designed to produce a visible or an audible effect by combustion, deflagration, or detonation and that meets the definition of ‘‘consumer fireworks’’ or ‘‘display fireworks’’ as defined by 27 CFR 555.11. This definition is consistent with the Forest Service’s current interpretation of what constitutes a firework. The term ‘‘pyrotechnic device’’ would be defined to have the same meaning as the term ‘‘articles pyrotechnic’’ in 27 CFR 555.11. As currently defined in those regulations, the term ‘‘articles pyrotechnic’’ means devices for professional use that are similar to consumer fireworks in chemical composition and construction but are not intended for consumer use. This definition is consistent with the Forest Service’s current interpretation of what constitutes a pyrotechnic device. This proposed rule would amend 36 CFR 261.2 by revising the definition of ‘‘developed recreation site’’ and adding a definition of ‘‘recreation site’’ to be consistent with the definitions of those terms in Chapter 50 of the Forest Service’s Recreation Site Handbook, Forest Service Handbook 2309.13. Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook defines the terms ‘‘developed recreation site’’ and ‘‘recreation site’’ based on the scale of development at a site. Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook also contains a recreation site development scale showing the characteristics of each scale of development. The term ‘‘developed recreation site’’ is currently defined in 36 CFR 261.2 as ‘‘an area which has been improved or VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Jkt 262001 developed for recreation.’’ The proposed definition of ‘‘developed recreation site’’ would be more specific than the current definition and would match the definition of that term in Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook. As defined in Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook, a developed recreation site is ‘‘a recreation site that has a development scale of 3, 4, or 5 (sec. 50.5, ex. 01)’’. Recreation sites with a development scale of 3, 4, or 5 range from moderate to extensive site development. Additionally, the proposed rule would add a definition of ‘‘recreation site’’ to 36 CFR 261.2 that tracks the definition of that term in Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook. Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook defines the term ‘‘recreation site’’ as ‘‘an area that is improved, developed, or otherwise authorized by the Forest Service for recreation and that has a development scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 (sec. 50.5, ex. 01).’’ Under this added definition, the term ‘‘recreation site’’ would cover a broader range of areas than the term ‘‘developed recreation site’’ and would include recreation sites with a development scale of 0, 1, or 2, which range from no to little site modification. Currently, the term ‘‘developed recreation site’’ is used in the criminal prohibitions in 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, specifically, in 36 CFR 261.10(d)(1), (i), and (j) and 261.16. These prohibitions would continue to apply only to developed recreation sites, that is, to recreation sites that have a development scale of 3, 4, or 5. The prohibitions would not be broadened to apply to recreation sites with a development scale of 0, 1, or 2, which have little to no site modification, because the public may not have adequate notice that such a site exists, given the lack of development, and that a prohibition applies. In contrast, the term ‘‘recreation site’’ would be substituted for ‘‘developed recreation site’’ each time the latter term appears in prohibitions designated by order in 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, specifically, in 36 CFR 261.52(d) and 261.58(b) and (d). Prohibitions designated by orders can be broader in scope and can cover recreation sites with a development scale of 0, 1, or 2 because orders specify the area to which they apply. Section 261.4 Disorderly Conduct The prohibitions in 36 CFR 261.4 pertain to disorderly conduct. This proposed rule would add a criminal intent element, or mens rea, that the violator acted intentionally or recklessly PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 in committing the offense. To be cited for a violation of disorderly conduct, a person must have committed one of the acts described in paragraphs (a) through (c) with the intent to cause, or recklessly to create a substantial risk of causing, public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence. The criminal intent standard would require a showing that the violator knowingly intended to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence by the prohibited acts or words. Alternatively, the reckless standard, which has a lesser mens rea, would require a showing that the violator was aware of, but consciously disregarded, the substantial risk that the prohibited acts or words would cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence. This proposed rule also would revise the types of conduct that would constitute disorderly conduct when committed with the requisite mens rea. The current paragraph (a) prohibits only fighting. This proposed rule would add threatening or other violent behavior. This proposed rule also would revise paragraph (b) and would substitute it for current paragraphs (b) and (c), which cover ‘‘fighting words,’’ such as utterances that are likely to provoke violence or unlawful acts. Fighting words are not protected speech under the First Amendment. Revised paragraph (b) would cover fighting words by prohibiting ‘‘making an utterance or performing an act . . . that is made or performed in a manner likely to inflict injury or to incite an immediate breach of peace.’’ Because revised paragraph (b) also would cover an utterance or act that is obscene or threatening when committed with the intent to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence, or recklessly create a risk thereof, revised paragraph (b) would address situations when a person (1) makes lewd or obscene comments short of solicitation to another person; (2) follows another person around, including into a restroom, with no legitimate purpose if done in a threatening manner; and (3) commits indecent exposure. This proposed rule also would redesignate paragraph (d) as paragraph (c) and would provide further instruction as to what constitutes unreasonable noise in violation of the disorderly conduct prohibition. Section 261.5 Fire The Forest Service proposes to add paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) to 36 CFR 261.5, which contains prohibitions relating to fire. The prohibitions in proposed paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) are currently enforceable only through E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules issuance of an order under 36 CFR 261.52. Moving these prohibitions to § 261.5 would make them generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without issuance of an order. Specifically, proposed paragraph (h) would prohibit possessing or using an exploding target or any kind of firework or other pyrotechnic device. The prohibition banning the possession or use of fireworks or other pyrotechnic devices is currently enforced in areas specified by an order issued under 36 CFR 261.52(f). The proposed rule would move this prohibition to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, which would make it generally applicable to NFS lands yearround and enforceable without issuance of an order. The proposed rule also would add a prohibition to paragraph (h) that would ban the possession and use of exploding targets. Proposed paragraph (i) would prohibit violating any State law concerning burning or fires or any State law whose purpose is to prevent or restrict the spread of fire. This prohibition is currently enforced in areas specified by an order issued under 36 CFR 261.52(k). The Forest Service may incorporate State law concerning burning or fires or any State law which is for the purpose of preventing or restricting the spread of fire in an order issued under § 261.52(k). Violations of these orders constitute violations of Federal law. The proposed rule would move this prohibition to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, which would make it generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without issuance of an order. Proposed paragraph (j) would prohibit operating or using any internal or external combustion engine without a properly installed and maintained spark-arresting device that meets specified requirements. This prohibition is currently enforced in areas specified by an order issued under 36 CFR 261.52(j). The proposed rule would move this prohibition to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, which would make it generally applicable to NFS lands yearround and enforceable without issuance of an order. paragraphs (o) through (s) to 36 CFR 261.10 relating to occupancy and use of NFS lands. Paragraph (a) currently prohibits constructing, placing, or maintaining certain improvements on NFS lands or facilities without an authorization. Signs are not listed as a type of improvement that is prohibited without an authorization. This proposed rule would revise paragraph (a) to prohibit constructing, placing, or maintaining a sign on NFS lands or facilities without an authorization. Paragraph (e) prohibits abandoning any personal property. Forest Service law enforcement personnel have encountered a noticeable increase in personal property, such as camping and other recreational equipment, being stored on NFS lands. Because the term ‘‘abandon’’ connotes relinquishing property without an intent to reclaim possession, the Forest Service needs a better tool to manage illegally stored personal property on NFS lands. This proposed rule would prohibit leaving personal property unattended for longer than 24 hours, except in locations where longer periods have been designated. Paragraph (o) prohibits discharging or igniting a firecracker, rocket or other firework, or explosive into or within any cave. This prohibition is no longer necessary because it is covered by proposed paragraph (h) that would be added to § 261.5. Paragraph (p) in 36 CFR 261.10 would become paragraph (o). Proposed paragraphs (p) and (q) would add prohibitions for simple possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia, respectively. Proposed paragraph (r) would add a prohibition for possessing an alcoholic beverage in violation of State law. Under this proposed prohibition, Forest Service law enforcement personnel could issue a notice of violation for possession of alcohol by a minor or for possession of an open container in a vehicle, where prohibited by State law. Proposed paragraph (s) would add a prohibition for providing an alcoholic beverage to a minor in violation of State law. Section 261.9 Property This proposed rule would add paragraph (j) to 36 CFR 261.9 to provide enforcement authority for theft by prohibiting damaging or removing without authorization any personal property belonging to another person. Section 261.12 National Forest System Roads and Trails The proposed rule would move the prohibition in 36 CFR 261.54(f), which prohibits operating a vehicle or motor vehicle carelessly, recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that would endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property, to proposed paragraph (e) of 36 CFR 261.12, which contains prohibitions relating to NFS roads and NFS trails. Moving this Section 261.10 Occupancy and Use This proposed rule would revise paragraphs (a) and (e), would remove paragraph (o), and would add VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 68039 prohibition to § 261.12 would make it generally applicable to NFS lands yearround and enforceable without issuance of an order. The proposed rule also would add a prohibition for operating a motor vehicle in violation of a posted sign or traffic control device. Section 261.15 Roads Use of Vehicles Off The proposed rule would amend 36 CFR 261.15, which pertains to off-road vehicle use on NFS lands. The proposed rule would revise paragraphs (e) and (g). Paragraph (e), which prohibits off-road vehicle use while under the influence of alcohol or another drug, would be updated to refer to the proposed defined terms in § 261.2, i.e., ‘‘alcoholic beverage’’ and ‘‘controlled substance.’’ The terminology in paragraph (g), which prohibits careless and reckless driving, also would be updated without altering the substance of the prohibition. Section 261.50 Orders The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has interpreted 36 CFR 261.50 to allow only those persons holding the positions specified in 36 CFR 261.50(a) and (b), including persons acting in those positions, to issue orders under 36 CFR part 261, subpart B. United States v. True, 946 F.2d 682, 687 (9th Cir. 1991). The proposed rule would amend § 261.50(a) and (b) to expressly authorize the persons holding the positions specified in those paragraphs to delegate the authority to issue orders under 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, to officials acting in those positions or to their deputy. The proposed rule would amend § 261.50(a) and (b) to clarify that the authority of officials issuing an order is limited to areas over which those officials have delegated authority. Section 261.52 Fire This proposed rule would move the prohibitions in paragraphs (f), (j), and (k) to § 261.5, which would make the prohibitions generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without issuance of an order. Section 261.53 Special Closures This proposed rule would amend 36 CFR 261.53 relating to special closures. The changes to the heading and introductory text of § 261.53 would clarify that this provision can be used to restrict use of an area, such as to close an area to a particular use, as well as to close an area in its entirety to all uses. E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1 68040 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules Section 261.54 National Forest System Roads The proposed rule would move the prohibition in 36 CFR 261.54(f), which prohibits operating a vehicle or motor vehicle carelessly, recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that would endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property, to proposed paragraph (e) of 36 CFR 261.12, which contains prohibitions relating to NFS roads and NFS trails. This revision would make the prohibition in 36 CFR 261.54(f) generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without issuance of an order. Section 261.58 Occupancy and Use The authority to issue orders relating to occupancy and use of NFS lands is contained in 36 CFR 261.58. Paragraph (bb) prohibits possession of an alcoholic beverage as defined under State law, when enforced through issuance of an order. This proposed rule would revise paragraph (bb) to be consistent with the proposed definition of ‘‘alcoholic beverage’’ that would be added to § 261.2. Regulatory Certifications ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563) Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget will determine whether a regulatory action is significant as defined by E.O. 12866 and will review significant regulatory actions. OIRA has determined that this proposed rule is not significant as defined by E.O. 12866. E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for improvements in the Nation’s regulatory system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. The Agency has developed the proposed rule consistent with E.O. 13563. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (known as the Congressional Review Act) (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), OIRA has designated this proposed rule as not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). National Environmental Policy Act The proposed rule would streamline enforcement of criminal prohibitions in existing regulations by providing for enforcement without issuance of an order and enhance consistency of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Jkt 262001 Forest Service’s law enforcement practices with those of State and other Federal land management agencies. Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR 220.6(d)(2) exclude from documentation in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement ‘‘rules, regulations, or policies to establish servicewide administrative procedures, program processes, or instructions.’’ The Agency’s preliminary assessment is that this proposed rule falls within this category of actions and that no extraordinary circumstances exist which would require preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. A final determination will be made upon adoption of the final rule. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Forest Service has considered this proposed rule under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602 et. seq.). This proposed rule would not have any direct effect on small entities as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This proposed rule would not impose recordkeeping requirements on small entities; would not affect their competitive position in relation to large entities; and would not affect their cash flow, liquidity, or ability to remain in the market. Therefore, the Forest Service has determined that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Federalism The Agency has considered this proposed rule under the requirements of E.O. 13132, Federalism. The Agency has determined that the proposed rule conforms with the federalism principles set out in this executive order; would not impose any compliance costs on the States; and would not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the Federal government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, the Agency has concluded that this proposed rule would not have federalism implications. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, requires Federal agencies to consult and coordinate with Tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies that have Tribal implications, including regulations, legislative comments or proposed legislation, and PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 other policy statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. This proposed rule would streamline enforcement of criminal prohibitions in existing regulations by providing for enforcement without issuance of an order and enhance consistency of the Forest Service’s law enforcement practices with those of State and other Federal land management agencies. The Agency has reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with the requirements of E.O. 13175 and has determined that this proposed rule would not have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Therefore, consultation and coordination with Indian Tribal governments is not required for this proposed rule. No Takings Implications The Agency has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the principles and criteria in E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protect Property Rights. The Agency has determined that the proposed rule would not pose the risk of a taking of private property. Energy Effects The Agency has reviewed this proposed rule under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. The Agency has determined that this proposed rule would not constitute a significant energy action as defined in E.O. 13211. Civil Justice Reform The Forest Service has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the principles and criteria in E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform. After adoption of this proposed rule, (1) all State and local laws and regulations that conflict with this proposed rule or that impede its full implementation would be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect would be given to this proposed rule; and (3) it would not require administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court challenging its provisions. Unfunded Mandates Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538), the Agency has assessed E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules the effects of this proposed rule on State, local, and Tribal governments and the private sector. This proposed rule would not compel the expenditure of $100 million or more by any State, local, or Tribal government or anyone in the private sector. Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the Act is not required. Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public This proposed rule does not contain any recordkeeping or reporting requirements or other information collection requirements as defined in 5 CFR part 1320 that are not already required by law or not already approved for use and therefore would impose no additional paperwork burden on the public. Accordingly, the review provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not apply. List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 261 Law enforcement, National forests. Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Forest Service proposes to amend chapter II of title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 261—PROHIBITIONS § 261.4 1. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1011(f); 16 U.S.C. 460l–6d, 472, 551, 620(f), 1133(c)–(d)(1), 1246(i). ■ 2. Revise § 261.1b to read as follows: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 § 261.1b Penalty. Unless otherwise provided by law, the punishment for violation of any prohibition in or order issued under this part shall be imprisonment of not more than six months or a fine in accordance with the applicable provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3571 or both. ■ 3. Amend § 261.2 by: ■ a. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ‘‘alcoholic beverage,’’ and ‘‘controlled substance’’; ■ b. Revising the definition for ‘‘developed recreation site’’; and ■ c. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ‘‘exploding target,’’ ‘‘firework,’’ ‘‘pyrotechnic device,’’ and ‘‘recreation site.’’ The additions and revisions read as follows: § 261.2 Definitions. * * * * * Alcoholic beverage means alcoholic beverage as defined by State law. * * * * * VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Controlled substance means a drug or other substance, its immediate precursor included in schedules I, II, III, IV, or V of section 202 of the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 812), or a drug or other substance added to these schedules under the terms of the Act. * * * * * Developed recreation site has the same meaning as in Chapter 50 of Forest Service Handbook 2309.13. * * * * * Exploding target means a binary explosive consisting of two separate components (usually an oxidizer like ammonium nitrate and a fuel such as aluminum or another metal) that is designed to explode when struck by a bullet. * * * * * Firework has the same meaning as in 27 CFR 555.11 or a successor regulation. * * * * * Pyrotechnic device has the same meaning as the term ‘‘articles pyrotechnic’’ in 27 CFR 555.11 or a successor regulation. * * * * * Recreation site has the same meaning as in Chapter 50 of Forest Service Handbook 2309.13. * * * * * ■ 4. Revise § 261.4 to read as follows: Jkt 262001 Disorderly conduct. The following are prohibited when committed intentionally to cause, or recklessly to create a substantial risk of causing, public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence: (a) Engaging in fighting or any threatening or other violent behavior. (b) Making an utterance or performing an act that is obscene or threatening or that is made or performed in a manner that is likely to inflict injury or incite an immediate breach of peace. (c) Making noise that is unreasonable considering the nature and purpose of the conduct, location, and time. ■ 5. Amend § 261.5 by adding paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) to read as follows: § 261.5 Fire. * * * * * (h) Possessing or using an exploding target or any kind of firework or other pyrotechnic device. (i) Violating any State law concerning burning or fires or any State law that is for the purpose of preventing or restricting the spread of fire. (j) Operating or using any internal or external combustion engine without a spark arresting device that is properly installed, maintained, and in effective working order in accordance with USDA Forest Service Standard 5100–1. PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 68041 6. Amend § 261.9 by adding paragraph (j) to read as follows: ■ § 261.9 Property. * * * * * (j) Damaging or removing without authorization any personal property that belongs to another person. ■ 7. Amend § 261.10 by revising paragraphs (a), (e), (o), and (p), and adding paragraphs (q), (r), and (s) to read as follows: § 261.10 Occupancy and use. The following are prohibited: (a) Constructing, placing, or maintaining any kind of road, trail, structure, fence, enclosure, communications equipment, sign, significant surface disturbance, or other improvement on National Forest System lands or facilities without a special use authorization, contract, approved plan of operations, or other written authorization when that written authorization is required. * * * * * (e) Leaving personal property unattended for longer than 24 hours, except in locations where longer periods have been designated. (o) Use or occupancy of National Forest System lands or facilities without a special use authorization, contract, approved plan of operations, or other written authorization when that written authorization is required. (p) Knowingly or intentionally possessing any controlled substance in violation of Federal law. (q) Knowingly or intentionally possessing any drug paraphernalia in violation of State law. (r) Possessing any alcoholic beverage in violation of State law. (s) Providing any alcoholic beverage to a minor in violation of State law. ■ 8. Amend § 261.12 by adding paragraphs (e) through (i) to read as follows: § 261.12 National Forest System roads and National Forest System trails. The following are prohibited: * * * * (e) Operating a motor vehicle without a valid license as required by State law. (f) Operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or a controlled substance in violation of State law. (g) Operating a motor vehicle in violation of any State law other than those described in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section. (h) Operating a vehicle or motor vehicle carelessly, recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that would endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property. * E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1 68042 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 3, 2023 / Proposed Rules (i) Operating a motor vehicle in violation of a posted sign or traffic control device. ■ 9. Amend § 261.15 by revising paragraphs (e) and (g) to read as follows: § 261.15 Use of vehicles off roads. * * * * (e) While under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or a controlled substance in violation of State law. * * * * * (g) Carelessly, recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that endangers or is likely to endanger any person or property. * * * * * ■ 10. Amend § 261.50 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows: Orders. (a) The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station Director, the head of each administrative unit, their deputies, or persons acting in these positions may issue orders, consistent with their delegations of authority, that close or restrict the use of described areas by applying the prohibitions authorized in this subpart, individually or in combination. (b) The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station Director, the head of each administrative unit, their deputies, or persons acting in these positions may issue orders, consistent with their delegations of authority, that close or restrict the use of any National Forest System road or National Forest System trail. * * * * * ■ 11. Revise § 261.52 to read as follows: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 § 261.52 Fire. When provided by an order, the following are prohibited: (a) Building, maintaining, attending, or using a fire, campfire, or stove fire. (b) Using an explosive. (c) Smoking. (d) Smoking, except within an enclosed vehicle or building, at a recreation site, or while stopped in an area at least 3 feet in diameter that is barren or cleared of all flammable material. (e) Entering or being in an area. (f) Entering an area without any firefighting tool prescribed by the order. (g) Operating an internal combustion engine. (h) Welding or operating an acetylene or other torch with open flame. ■ 12. Amend § 261.53 by revising the title and introductory text to read as follows: § 261.53 Special closures or restrictions. When provided by an order, it is prohibited to go into or be in any area VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Oct 02, 2023 Jkt 262001 § 261.54 [Amended] 13. Amend § 261.54 by removing paragraph (f). ■ 14. Amend § 261.58 by revising paragraphs (b), (d), and (bb) to read as follows: ■ * § 261.50 which is closed or restricted for the protection of: * * * * * § 261.58 Occupancy and use. * * * * * (b) Entering or using a recreation site or portion thereof. * * * * * (d) Occupying a recreation site with prohibited camping equipment prescribed by the order. * * * * * (bb) Possessing an alcoholic beverage. * * * * * Homer Wilkes, Under Secretary, Natural Resources and Environment. [FR Doc. 2023–21563 Filed 10–2–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3411–15–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 46 CFR Part 10 [Docket No. USCG–2021–0288] RIN 1625–AC83 Exemption for Active-Duty Uniformed Service Members From Merchant Mariner Credentialing Fees Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is proposing to exempt certain members of the uniformed services from Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC) fees for the evaluation of an MMC application, the administration of an examination required for an MMC endorsement, and the issuance of an MMC. This proposal is in response to Executive Order 13860, ‘‘Supporting the Transition of ActiveDuty Service Members and Military Veterans Into the Merchant Marine,’’ and section 3511 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020. Under this proposal, members of the uniformed services would be exempt from paying fees for an MMC. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before January 2, 2024. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2021–0288 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. Collection of information. Submit comments on the collection of information discussed in section VI.D of this preamble both to the Coast Guard’s online docket and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) using their website www.reginfo.gov/public/ do/PRAMain. Comments sent to OIRA on the collection of information must reach OMB on or before the comment due date listed on their website. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document, call or email Mr. James Cavo, U.S. Coast Guard Office of Merchant Mariner Credentialing; telephone 202–372–1205, email James.D.Cavo@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: Table of Contents for Preamble I. Public Participation and Request for Comments II. Abbreviations III. Background IV. Legal Authority V. Discussion of Proposed Rule VI. Regulatory Analyses A. Regulatory Planning and Review B. Small Entities C. Assistance for Small Entities D. Collection of Information E. Federalism F. Unfunded Mandates G. Taking of Private Property H. Civil Justice Reform I. Protection of Children J. Indian Tribal Governments K. Energy Effects L. Technical Standards M. Environment I. Public Participation and Request for Comments The Coast Guard views public participation as essential to effective rulemaking and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal Decision Making Portal at www.regulations.gov. To do so, go to E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM 03OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68035-68042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21563]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

36 CFR Part 261

RIN 0596-AD57


Law Enforcement; Criminal Prohibitions

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service (Forest Service or Agency), United States 
Department of Agriculture, is proposing to revise the Forest Service's 
criminal prohibitions to enhance consistency of the Forest Service's 
law enforcement practices with those of State and other Federal land 
management agencies. The Forest Service is proposing to streamline 
enforcement of criminal prohibitions in related to fire and use of 
vehicles on National Forest System roads and trails by eliminating the 
requirement to issue an order for enforcement.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received in writing by 
December 4, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Comments, identified by RIN 0596-AD57, may be submitted via 
one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the instructions for sending comments.
    2. Mail: Director, Law Enforcement and Investigations Staff, Mail 
Stop 1140, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-1140.
    3. Hand Delivery/Courier: Director, Law Enforcement and 
Investigations Staff, Room 1SC, 201 14th Street SW, Washington, DC.
    Comments should be confined to issues pertinent to the proposed 
rule; should explain the reasons for any recommended changes; and 
should reference the specific section and wording being addressed, 
where possible. All timely comments, including names and addresses when 
provided, will be placed in the record and will be available for public 
review and copying. The public may review comments at the Office of the 
Director, Law Enforcement and Investigations Staff, Room 1SC, 201 14th 
Street SW, Washington, DC, during normal business hours. Visitors are 
encouraged to call ahead to 703-605-4730 to facilitate entry into the 
building. Comments may also be viewed on the Federal eRulemaking Portal 
at https://www.regulations.gov. In the search box, enter ``RIN 0596-
AD57,'' and click the ``Search'' button.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Smithson, Assistant Director--
Investigations, Law Enforcement and Investigations Staff, 703-605-4730 
or [email protected]. Individuals who use telecommunication 
devices for the hearing impaired may call the Federal Relay Service at 
800-877-8339 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday 
through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background and Need

    This proposed rule would revise certain criminal prohibitions in 36 
CFR part 261, subpart A, to enhance consistency of the Forest Service's 
law enforcement practices with those of State and other Federal land 
management law enforcement agencies. In addition, this proposed rule 
would streamline enforcement of some of the criminal prohibitions found 
in 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, which are enforceable only through 
issuance of an order, by moving them to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, 
which contains criminal prohibitions that are enforceable without 
issuance of an order.
    Forest Service law enforcement personnel continue to encounter a 
significant volume of violations for simple possession of controlled 
substances and drug paraphernalia. Agency personnel routinely deal with 
under-age alcohol possession on National Forest System (NFS) lands. 
These violations pose a threat to the safety of visitors to NFS lands 
as well as to Forest Service personnel. This proposed rule would 
enhance the Forest Service's authority to address public safety issues 
by adding prohibitions relating to controlled substances, drug 
paraphernalia, and alcoholic beverages. These proposed prohibitions 
would enable the Forest Service to enforce more effectively violations 
on NFS lands for simple possession of controlled substances, possession 
of alcoholic beverages in violation of State law (for open containers 
or under-age

[[Page 68036]]

drinking), and furnishing alcoholic beverages to minors. The proposed 
rule also would authorize the Forest Service to enforce violations for 
the possession of drug paraphernalia if prohibited by State law. These 
proposed changes are intended to align the Forest Service's law 
enforcement practices more closely with those of State and local law 
enforcement agencies.
    Additionally, the proposed rule would update the prohibitions to 
enhance protection of persons visiting and working on NFS lands from 
theft of personal property and from disorderly conduct by other 
visitors. The proposed rule would enhance enforcement of wildfire 
prevention prohibitions by moving them from 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, 
which requires issuance of an order, to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, 
which does not, and by adding a prohibition banning exploding targets 
year-round. The proposed rule also would make other revisions such as 
updating the prohibitions relating to off-road vehicles and updating 
the penalty for violating the criminal prohibitions in 36 CFR part 261 
consistent with current statutory law.
    Proposed revisions to specific types of public safety prohibitions 
are discussed below.

Prohibition Relating to Controlled Substances

    It is a violation of Federal law for a person knowingly or 
intentionally to possess controlled substances (21 U.S.C. 844(a)). 
Forest Service law enforcement officers enforce 21 U.S.C. 844(a) on NFS 
lands, and in some circumstances off these lands, under the National 
Forest System Drug Control Act of 1986 (16 U.S.C. 559b-559g). A 
violation of 21 U.S.C. 844(a) without aggravating factors is classified 
as a Class A misdemeanor. With aggravating factors, this type of 
violation is classified as a felony (18 U.S.C. 3559(a)).
    Violations of 21 U.S.C. 844(a) require referral to the appropriate 
United States Attorney's Office for the filing of a complaint or 
information and prosecution before a United States District Court 
judge. Guidelines established by the United States Attorney's Office 
for prosecutions under 21 U.S.C. 844(a) are based upon the amount of 
the controlled substance involved in the violation. In many instances, 
violations for simple possession of a controlled substance on NFS lands 
are not prosecuted under 21 U.S.C. 844(a) because they involve small 
amounts that are insufficient to meet these prosecutorial guidelines.
    The Forest Service's criminal prohibitions at 36 CFR part 261, 
subpart A, do not expressly prohibit the possession of controlled 
substances on NFS lands. To provide an alternative to proceeding under 
21 U.S.C. 844(a), the Forest Service is proposing to revise 36 CFR part 
261, subpart A, to prohibit knowingly or intentionally possessing a 
controlled substance in violation of Federal law. The proposed rule 
also would add a definition for the term ``controlled substance'' that 
tracks the definition of that term in the Controlled Substances Act (21 
U.S.C. 801 et seq.).
    With these changes, the possession of small amounts of a controlled 
substance could be handled through issuance of a notice of violation by 
a Forest Service law enforcement officer and prosecution before a 
United States magistrate judge and would be classified as a Class B 
misdemeanor. Forest Service law enforcement personnel would continue to 
refer cases involving larger amounts of controlled substances that meet 
prosecutorial guidelines to the appropriate United States Attorney's 
Office.

Prohibition Relating to Drug Paraphernalia

    Possession of drug paraphernalia is not a violation of Federal law 
(see 21 U.S.C. 863(d)). Some States prohibit possession of drug 
paraphernalia only if it contains the residue of a controlled 
substance. Other States prohibit possession of drug paraphernalia even 
if it does not contain the residue of a controlled substance. The 
proposed rule would add a prohibition that would prohibit knowingly or 
intentionally possessing drug paraphernalia in either situation when it 
is in violation of State law.

Prohibitions Relating to Alcoholic Beverages

    The Forest Service has limited authority in 36 CFR part 261 to 
address underage drinking and other violations of State law relating to 
alcoholic beverages, such as State laws prohibiting open containers of 
alcoholic beverages and furnishing alcoholic beverages to minors. The 
current authority is contained in 36 CFR 261.58(bb), which prohibits 
possession of an alcoholic beverage as defined by State law when 
enforced through issuance of an order issued under 36 CFR part 261, 
subpart B. The proposed rule would add two prohibitions relating to 
alcoholic beverages (possessing an alcoholic beverage in violation of 
State law and providing an alcoholic beverage to a minor in violation 
of State law) to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A. These changes would make 
the prohibitions generally applicable to NFS lands and enforceable 
without issuance of an order. These proposed changes are intended to 
allow the Forest Service to address more effectively the use of NFS 
lands at gatherings where alcoholic beverages are consumed by giving 
Forest Service law enforcement officers the same enforcement options as 
their State and local counterparts.
    The prohibition in 36 CFR 261.58(bb) would be retained to allow the 
Forest Service to prohibit consumption of alcoholic beverages 
temporarily in specific areas of NFS lands when appropriate to protect 
public safety, such as at a large event, regardless of whether 
consumption of alcoholic beverages is in violation of State law.

Protection of Persons on NFS Lands

    Both Federal and State laws apply to the national forests (16 
U.S.C. 480). Generally, States enforce State laws, while Forest Service 
law enforcement personnel enforce Federal laws, including the criminal 
prohibitions in 36 CFR part 261, subparts A and C, and in orders issued 
under 36 CFR part 261, subpart B. In most cases, the Federal laws and 
prohibitions relate to the Agency's resource protection 
responsibilities. However, with the urbanization and development of 
areas near NFS lands, crimes against persons and personal property have 
become an increasing public safety concern.
    The Forest Service cooperates with State and local law enforcement 
agencies in the execution of their responsibilities related to NFS 
lands. Under the Cooperative Law Enforcement Act of 1971 (16 U.S.C. 
551a), the Forest Service has entered into reimbursable agreements with 
some State and local law enforcement agencies (usually a county 
sheriff's office) for the protection of persons and their property on 
NFS lands where these lands and facilities account for increased 
visitor use.
    Over time, however, it has become evident that reimbursement 
through the cooperative law enforcement program alone cannot always 
provide for the appropriate level of protection. Many local law 
enforcement agencies find that their limited personnel, the remote 
location of NFS lands, and the seasonal nature of use those lands 
receive impede rapid response to crimes committed on NFS lands. When a 
person is victimized by theft of or damage to personal property on NFS 
lands--for example at a campsite or a trailhead parking lot--and State 
or local enforcement personnel are unable to respond, Forest Service 
law enforcement personnel have limited

[[Page 68037]]

authority to assist. The proposed rule would add a prohibition that 
would allow Forest Service law enforcement personnel to take 
appropriate action in response to theft of or damage to personal 
property on NFS lands.
    To protect persons on NFS lands, the proposed rule also would 
revise the prohibitions relating to disorderly conduct. A significant 
increase in visitation to national forests and grasslands has coincided 
with an increase in incidents of public behavior that threatens the 
safety of others. Forest Service law enforcement personnel frequently 
encounter situations in which a person makes lewd or obscene comments 
to another person; follows another person around, including into a 
restroom, with no legitimate purpose and in a threatening manner; or 
engages in indecent exposure. The proposed rule would revise the 
disorderly conduct prohibitions in 36 CFR 261.4 to address these 
situations.

Traffic Prohibitions

    The proposed rule would incorporate State traffic law in Sec.  
261.12 so that State traffic law is enforceable as Federal traffic law. 
Specifically, the proposed rule would incorporate two commonly cited 
violations of State traffic law: operating a motor vehicle without a 
valid license and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence 
of an alcoholic beverage or a controlled substance. The proposed rule 
also would incorporate a catch-all prohibition that would incorporate 
any other State traffic laws so that they are enforceable as Federal 
traffic law.

Prohibitions Relating to Prevention of Wildfire

    Wildland fires, including catastrophic wildfires, have increased in 
frequency and severity on NFS lands. An accumulation of hazardous fuels 
combined with severe drought have resulted in extreme fire conditions 
and very large fires. Forest Service estimates indicate that more than 
460 million acres of all vegetated lands are at moderate to high risk 
from uncharacteristically large wildfires, encompassing many wildland-
urban interfaces with high densities of structures that intermingle 
with undeveloped wildlands. In 2022, more than 7.5 million acres burned 
in the United States, and more than 2,700 structures were destroyed, 
including 1,294 residences. These fires have long-term and sometimes 
irreversible consequences, including damage to watersheds that supply 
drinking water and damage to critical habitat for endangered species. 
The Forest Service also incurs significant annual costs related to 
wildland fire suppression.
    This proposed rule would allow the Forest Service to take 
additional enforcement actions to prevent wildfires on NFS lands. The 
possession and use of fireworks or other pyrotechnic devices are not 
generally prohibited on NFS lands. However, they may be prohibited in 
areas specified in an order issued under 36 CFR 261.52(f). Typically, 
the Forest Service issues orders under 36 CFR 261.52(f) on a seasonal 
basis when the threat of fire is high. However, given the higher risk 
and greater severity of wildland fires, the Agency has determined that 
a year-round ban is necessary to protect NFS lands and resources, 
persons using those lands, and surrounding communities from the threat 
of catastrophic wildfire. The proposed rule would move these 
prohibitions to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, so that they are 
enforceable anywhere on NFS lands during any season without issuance of 
an order under 36 CFR part 261, subpart B.

Prohibition Relating to Exploding Targets

    Exploding targets--targets that explode when struck by a bullet--
have become popular throughout the United States, and their use is 
increasing on NFS lands. Exploding targets can be purchased legally and 
are intended for use as a target for firearms practice. However, when 
detonated by a bullet, exploding targets often result in a fireball 
that can ignite vegetation and surrounding materials and spread to 
adjacent areas. A growing number of wildfires on NFS lands have been 
caused by exploding targets; from 2012 to 2022, multiple fires burned 
over 139,000 acres as result of exploding targets, costing taxpayers 
millions of dollars to suppress. Additionally, trash is often left 
behind after exploding targets are used, including undetonated targets, 
which present additional safety risks for visitors, employees, and 
firefighters.
    Exploding targets are regulated by the Forest Service as explosives 
under the Agency's authority to issue orders banning the use of 
explosives in specified areas under 36 CFR 261.52(b). Because exploding 
targets present a significant fire hazard at any time of year, the 
Forest Service is proposing to add a generally applicable prohibition 
to 36 CFR 261.5 that does not require issuance of an order and that 
would ban possession as well as use of an exploding target on NFS 
lands.
    Exploding targets generally consist of two separate chemical 
components (usually an oxidizer like ammonium nitrate and a fuel such 
as aluminum or another metal) that become a binary explosive when 
combined. The individual components, which often are pre-packaged 
together, are kept separate within individual containers for sale and 
transport. Kept separate, the components are not explosives. Combined, 
however, the components become explosive and thus are subject to 
Federal explosive laws and regulations. To avoid triggering Federal law 
until they are ready to be used and to minimize the risk of injury, the 
components are typically combined at the site where the exploding 
targets are going to be used. This proposed rule would ban the 
possession and use of an exploding target (the binary explosive that is 
created by combining the two components).
    The Forest Service recognizes hunting and safe target shooting as 
valid uses of NFS lands. This proposed rule would not affect these 
valid uses.

Proposed Regulatory Revisions

    A section-by-section description of the proposed rule follows.

Section 261.1b Penalty

    The proposed rule would make a technical change to 36 CFR 261.1b, 
which governs penalties for violating a criminal prohibition in 36 CFR 
part 261, to make it consistent with current statutory law. The 
regulations at 36 CFR 261.1b refer to the penalty in 16 U.S.C. 551, 
which provides that a violation shall be punished by a fine of not more 
than $500, imprisonment for not more than six months, or both. 
Violations were classified as petty offenses.
    The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 established categories 
of offenses based on the maximum amount of imprisonment for each 
offense (18 U.S.C. 3559). Offenses with a maximum term of six months of 
imprisonment, such as those offenses covered by 36 CFR part 261, are 
considered Class B misdemeanors. The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 
1984 also prescribes a range of fines for Class B misdemeanors, 
depending on specific circumstances associated with the violation, with 
a maximum fine of $5,000 for a person and $10,000 for an organization 
(18 U.S.C. 3571). The proposed revision reflects this statutory change 
and provides for exceptions when a statute establishing an offense 
expressly sets a different penalty.

Section 261.2 Definitions

    The proposed rule would add six definitions to 36 CFR 261.2 for the 
terms ``alcoholic beverage,'' ``controlled

[[Page 68038]]

substance,'' ``exploding target,'' ``firework,'' ``pyrotechnic 
device,'' and ``recreation site.'' The proposed rule also would revise 
the definition of ``developed recreation site.''
    The term ``alcoholic beverage'' would be defined to have the same 
meaning as under State law. This definition is consistent with the 
current use of the term in 36 CFR 261.58(bb).
    The term ``controlled substance'' would be defined to have the same 
meaning as in the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).
    The term ``exploding target'' would be defined to mean a binary 
explosive that is designed to explode when struck by a bullet. 
Exploding targets consist of two components that are combined to create 
the explosive. Individually, the parts are inert. However, when 
combined, they become explosive.
    The term ``firework'' would be defined to have the same meaning as 
in 27 CFR 555.11. As defined in those regulations, the term 
``firework'' means any composition or device that is designed to 
produce a visible or an audible effect by combustion, deflagration, or 
detonation and that meets the definition of ``consumer fireworks'' or 
``display fireworks'' as defined by 27 CFR 555.11. This definition is 
consistent with the Forest Service's current interpretation of what 
constitutes a firework.
    The term ``pyrotechnic device'' would be defined to have the same 
meaning as the term ``articles pyrotechnic'' in 27 CFR 555.11. As 
currently defined in those regulations, the term ``articles 
pyrotechnic'' means devices for professional use that are similar to 
consumer fireworks in chemical composition and construction but are not 
intended for consumer use. This definition is consistent with the 
Forest Service's current interpretation of what constitutes a 
pyrotechnic device.
    This proposed rule would amend 36 CFR 261.2 by revising the 
definition of ``developed recreation site'' and adding a definition of 
``recreation site'' to be consistent with the definitions of those 
terms in Chapter 50 of the Forest Service's Recreation Site Handbook, 
Forest Service Handbook 2309.13. Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site 
Handbook defines the terms ``developed recreation site'' and 
``recreation site'' based on the scale of development at a site. 
Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook also contains a recreation 
site development scale showing the characteristics of each scale of 
development.
    The term ``developed recreation site'' is currently defined in 36 
CFR 261.2 as ``an area which has been improved or developed for 
recreation.'' The proposed definition of ``developed recreation site'' 
would be more specific than the current definition and would match the 
definition of that term in Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook. 
As defined in Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook, a developed 
recreation site is ``a recreation site that has a development scale of 
3, 4, or 5 (sec. 50.5, ex. 01)''. Recreation sites with a development 
scale of 3, 4, or 5 range from moderate to extensive site development.
    Additionally, the proposed rule would add a definition of 
``recreation site'' to 36 CFR 261.2 that tracks the definition of that 
term in Chapter 50 of the Recreation Site Handbook. Chapter 50 of the 
Recreation Site Handbook defines the term ``recreation site'' as ``an 
area that is improved, developed, or otherwise authorized by the Forest 
Service for recreation and that has a development scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 
4, or 5 (sec. 50.5, ex. 01).'' Under this added definition, the term 
``recreation site'' would cover a broader range of areas than the term 
``developed recreation site'' and would include recreation sites with a 
development scale of 0, 1, or 2, which range from no to little site 
modification.
    Currently, the term ``developed recreation site'' is used in the 
criminal prohibitions in 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, specifically, in 
36 CFR 261.10(d)(1), (i), and (j) and 261.16. These prohibitions would 
continue to apply only to developed recreation sites, that is, to 
recreation sites that have a development scale of 3, 4, or 5. The 
prohibitions would not be broadened to apply to recreation sites with a 
development scale of 0, 1, or 2, which have little to no site 
modification, because the public may not have adequate notice that such 
a site exists, given the lack of development, and that a prohibition 
applies.
    In contrast, the term ``recreation site'' would be substituted for 
``developed recreation site'' each time the latter term appears in 
prohibitions designated by order in 36 CFR part 261, subpart B, 
specifically, in 36 CFR 261.52(d) and 261.58(b) and (d). Prohibitions 
designated by orders can be broader in scope and can cover recreation 
sites with a development scale of 0, 1, or 2 because orders specify the 
area to which they apply.

Section 261.4 Disorderly Conduct

    The prohibitions in 36 CFR 261.4 pertain to disorderly conduct. 
This proposed rule would add a criminal intent element, or mens rea, 
that the violator acted intentionally or recklessly in committing the 
offense. To be cited for a violation of disorderly conduct, a person 
must have committed one of the acts described in paragraphs (a) through 
(c) with the intent to cause, or recklessly to create a substantial 
risk of causing, public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence. The 
criminal intent standard would require a showing that the violator 
knowingly intended to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or 
violence by the prohibited acts or words. Alternatively, the reckless 
standard, which has a lesser mens rea, would require a showing that the 
violator was aware of, but consciously disregarded, the substantial 
risk that the prohibited acts or words would cause public alarm, 
nuisance, jeopardy, or violence.
    This proposed rule also would revise the types of conduct that 
would constitute disorderly conduct when committed with the requisite 
mens rea. The current paragraph (a) prohibits only fighting. This 
proposed rule would add threatening or other violent behavior. This 
proposed rule also would revise paragraph (b) and would substitute it 
for current paragraphs (b) and (c), which cover ``fighting words,'' 
such as utterances that are likely to provoke violence or unlawful 
acts. Fighting words are not protected speech under the First 
Amendment. Revised paragraph (b) would cover fighting words by 
prohibiting ``making an utterance or performing an act . . . that is 
made or performed in a manner likely to inflict injury or to incite an 
immediate breach of peace.'' Because revised paragraph (b) also would 
cover an utterance or act that is obscene or threatening when committed 
with the intent to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence, 
or recklessly create a risk thereof, revised paragraph (b) would 
address situations when a person (1) makes lewd or obscene comments 
short of solicitation to another person; (2) follows another person 
around, including into a restroom, with no legitimate purpose if done 
in a threatening manner; and (3) commits indecent exposure. This 
proposed rule also would redesignate paragraph (d) as paragraph (c) and 
would provide further instruction as to what constitutes unreasonable 
noise in violation of the disorderly conduct prohibition.

Section 261.5 Fire

    The Forest Service proposes to add paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) to 
36 CFR 261.5, which contains prohibitions relating to fire. The 
prohibitions in proposed paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) are currently 
enforceable only through

[[Page 68039]]

issuance of an order under 36 CFR 261.52. Moving these prohibitions to 
Sec.  261.5 would make them generally applicable to NFS lands year-
round and enforceable without issuance of an order.
    Specifically, proposed paragraph (h) would prohibit possessing or 
using an exploding target or any kind of firework or other pyrotechnic 
device. The prohibition banning the possession or use of fireworks or 
other pyrotechnic devices is currently enforced in areas specified by 
an order issued under 36 CFR 261.52(f). The proposed rule would move 
this prohibition to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, which would make it 
generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without 
issuance of an order. The proposed rule also would add a prohibition to 
paragraph (h) that would ban the possession and use of exploding 
targets.
    Proposed paragraph (i) would prohibit violating any State law 
concerning burning or fires or any State law whose purpose is to 
prevent or restrict the spread of fire. This prohibition is currently 
enforced in areas specified by an order issued under 36 CFR 261.52(k). 
The Forest Service may incorporate State law concerning burning or 
fires or any State law which is for the purpose of preventing or 
restricting the spread of fire in an order issued under Sec.  
261.52(k). Violations of these orders constitute violations of Federal 
law. The proposed rule would move this prohibition to 36 CFR part 261, 
subpart A, which would make it generally applicable to NFS lands year-
round and enforceable without issuance of an order.
    Proposed paragraph (j) would prohibit operating or using any 
internal or external combustion engine without a properly installed and 
maintained spark-arresting device that meets specified requirements. 
This prohibition is currently enforced in areas specified by an order 
issued under 36 CFR 261.52(j). The proposed rule would move this 
prohibition to 36 CFR part 261, subpart A, which would make it 
generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without 
issuance of an order.

Section 261.9 Property

    This proposed rule would add paragraph (j) to 36 CFR 261.9 to 
provide enforcement authority for theft by prohibiting damaging or 
removing without authorization any personal property belonging to 
another person.

Section 261.10 Occupancy and Use

    This proposed rule would revise paragraphs (a) and (e), would 
remove paragraph (o), and would add paragraphs (o) through (s) to 36 
CFR 261.10 relating to occupancy and use of NFS lands.
    Paragraph (a) currently prohibits constructing, placing, or 
maintaining certain improvements on NFS lands or facilities without an 
authorization. Signs are not listed as a type of improvement that is 
prohibited without an authorization. This proposed rule would revise 
paragraph (a) to prohibit constructing, placing, or maintaining a sign 
on NFS lands or facilities without an authorization.
    Paragraph (e) prohibits abandoning any personal property. Forest 
Service law enforcement personnel have encountered a noticeable 
increase in personal property, such as camping and other recreational 
equipment, being stored on NFS lands. Because the term ``abandon'' 
connotes relinquishing property without an intent to reclaim 
possession, the Forest Service needs a better tool to manage illegally 
stored personal property on NFS lands. This proposed rule would 
prohibit leaving personal property unattended for longer than 24 hours, 
except in locations where longer periods have been designated.
    Paragraph (o) prohibits discharging or igniting a firecracker, 
rocket or other firework, or explosive into or within any cave. This 
prohibition is no longer necessary because it is covered by proposed 
paragraph (h) that would be added to Sec.  261.5. Paragraph (p) in 36 
CFR 261.10 would become paragraph (o).
    Proposed paragraphs (p) and (q) would add prohibitions for simple 
possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia, 
respectively.
    Proposed paragraph (r) would add a prohibition for possessing an 
alcoholic beverage in violation of State law. Under this proposed 
prohibition, Forest Service law enforcement personnel could issue a 
notice of violation for possession of alcohol by a minor or for 
possession of an open container in a vehicle, where prohibited by State 
law. Proposed paragraph (s) would add a prohibition for providing an 
alcoholic beverage to a minor in violation of State law.

Section 261.12 National Forest System Roads and Trails

    The proposed rule would move the prohibition in 36 CFR 261.54(f), 
which prohibits operating a vehicle or motor vehicle carelessly, 
recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that would endanger or be 
likely to endanger any person or property, to proposed paragraph (e) of 
36 CFR 261.12, which contains prohibitions relating to NFS roads and 
NFS trails. Moving this prohibition to Sec.  261.12 would make it 
generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without 
issuance of an order. The proposed rule also would add a prohibition 
for operating a motor vehicle in violation of a posted sign or traffic 
control device.

Section 261.15 Use of Vehicles Off Roads

    The proposed rule would amend 36 CFR 261.15, which pertains to off-
road vehicle use on NFS lands. The proposed rule would revise 
paragraphs (e) and (g). Paragraph (e), which prohibits off-road vehicle 
use while under the influence of alcohol or another drug, would be 
updated to refer to the proposed defined terms in Sec.  261.2, i.e., 
``alcoholic beverage'' and ``controlled substance.'' The terminology in 
paragraph (g), which prohibits careless and reckless driving, also 
would be updated without altering the substance of the prohibition.

Section 261.50 Orders

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has 
interpreted 36 CFR 261.50 to allow only those persons holding the 
positions specified in 36 CFR 261.50(a) and (b), including persons 
acting in those positions, to issue orders under 36 CFR part 261, 
subpart B. United States v. True, 946 F.2d 682, 687 (9th Cir. 1991). 
The proposed rule would amend Sec.  261.50(a) and (b) to expressly 
authorize the persons holding the positions specified in those 
paragraphs to delegate the authority to issue orders under 36 CFR part 
261, subpart B, to officials acting in those positions or to their 
deputy. The proposed rule would amend Sec.  261.50(a) and (b) to 
clarify that the authority of officials issuing an order is limited to 
areas over which those officials have delegated authority.

Section 261.52 Fire

    This proposed rule would move the prohibitions in paragraphs (f), 
(j), and (k) to Sec.  261.5, which would make the prohibitions 
generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable without 
issuance of an order.

Section 261.53 Special Closures

    This proposed rule would amend 36 CFR 261.53 relating to special 
closures. The changes to the heading and introductory text of Sec.  
261.53 would clarify that this provision can be used to restrict use of 
an area, such as to close an area to a particular use, as well as to 
close an area in its entirety to all uses.

[[Page 68040]]

Section 261.54 National Forest System Roads

    The proposed rule would move the prohibition in 36 CFR 261.54(f), 
which prohibits operating a vehicle or motor vehicle carelessly, 
recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that would endanger or be 
likely to endanger any person or property, to proposed paragraph (e) of 
36 CFR 261.12, which contains prohibitions relating to NFS roads and 
NFS trails. This revision would make the prohibition in 36 CFR 
261.54(f) generally applicable to NFS lands year-round and enforceable 
without issuance of an order.

Section 261.58 Occupancy and Use

    The authority to issue orders relating to occupancy and use of NFS 
lands is contained in 36 CFR 261.58. Paragraph (bb) prohibits 
possession of an alcoholic beverage as defined under State law, when 
enforced through issuance of an order. This proposed rule would revise 
paragraph (bb) to be consistent with the proposed definition of 
``alcoholic beverage'' that would be added to Sec.  261.2.

Regulatory Certifications

Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)

    Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management 
and Budget will determine whether a regulatory action is significant as 
defined by E.O. 12866 and will review significant regulatory actions. 
OIRA has determined that this proposed rule is not significant as 
defined by E.O. 12866. E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 
12866 while calling for improvements in the Nation's regulatory system 
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, 
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory 
ends. The Agency has developed the proposed rule consistent with E.O. 
13563.

Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (known as the Congressional Review Act) (5 U.S.C. 
801 et seq.), OIRA has designated this proposed rule as not a major 
rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

National Environmental Policy Act

    The proposed rule would streamline enforcement of criminal 
prohibitions in existing regulations by providing for enforcement 
without issuance of an order and enhance consistency of the Forest 
Service's law enforcement practices with those of State and other 
Federal land management agencies. Forest Service regulations at 36 CFR 
220.6(d)(2) exclude from documentation in an environmental assessment 
or environmental impact statement ``rules, regulations, or policies to 
establish servicewide administrative procedures, program processes, or 
instructions.'' The Agency's preliminary assessment is that this 
proposed rule falls within this category of actions and that no 
extraordinary circumstances exist which would require preparation of an 
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. A final 
determination will be made upon adoption of the final rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Forest Service has considered this proposed rule under the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602 et. seq.). This proposed rule 
would not have any direct effect on small entities as defined by the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act. This proposed rule would not impose record-
keeping requirements on small entities; would not affect their 
competitive position in relation to large entities; and would not 
affect their cash flow, liquidity, or ability to remain in the market. 
Therefore, the Forest Service has determined that this proposed rule 
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Federalism

    The Agency has considered this proposed rule under the requirements 
of E.O. 13132, Federalism. The Agency has determined that the proposed 
rule conforms with the federalism principles set out in this executive 
order; would not impose any compliance costs on the States; and would 
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the Federal government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. 
Therefore, the Agency has concluded that this proposed rule would not 
have federalism implications.

Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, requires Federal agencies to consult and coordinate with 
Tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies that have Tribal 
implications, including regulations, legislative comments or proposed 
legislation, and other policy statements or actions that have 
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes. This proposed rule would streamline 
enforcement of criminal prohibitions in existing regulations by 
providing for enforcement without issuance of an order and enhance 
consistency of the Forest Service's law enforcement practices with 
those of State and other Federal land management agencies. The Agency 
has reviewed this proposed rule in accordance with the requirements of 
E.O. 13175 and has determined that this proposed rule would not have 
substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes, on the relationship 
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes. Therefore, consultation and coordination 
with Indian Tribal governments is not required for this proposed rule.

No Takings Implications

    The Agency has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the 
principles and criteria in E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and 
Interference with Constitutionally Protect Property Rights. The Agency 
has determined that the proposed rule would not pose the risk of a 
taking of private property.

Energy Effects

    The Agency has reviewed this proposed rule under E.O. 13211, 
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. The Agency has determined that this proposed rule 
would not constitute a significant energy action as defined in E.O. 
13211.

Civil Justice Reform

    The Forest Service has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance 
with the principles and criteria in E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform. 
After adoption of this proposed rule, (1) all State and local laws and 
regulations that conflict with this proposed rule or that impede its 
full implementation would be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect would 
be given to this proposed rule; and (3) it would not require 
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court 
challenging its provisions.

Unfunded Mandates

    Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 
U.S.C. 1531-1538), the Agency has assessed

[[Page 68041]]

the effects of this proposed rule on State, local, and Tribal 
governments and the private sector. This proposed rule would not compel 
the expenditure of $100 million or more by any State, local, or Tribal 
government or anyone in the private sector. Therefore, a statement 
under section 202 of the Act is not required.

Controlling Paperwork Burdens on the Public

    This proposed rule does not contain any recordkeeping or reporting 
requirements or other information collection requirements as defined in 
5 CFR part 1320 that are not already required by law or not already 
approved for use and therefore would impose no additional paperwork 
burden on the public. Accordingly, the review provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.) and its 
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part 1320 do not apply.

List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 261

    Law enforcement, National forests.
    Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Forest 
Service proposes to amend chapter II of title 36 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations as follows:

PART 261--PROHIBITIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1011(f); 16 U.S.C. 460l-6d, 472, 551, 
620(f), 1133(c)-(d)(1), 1246(i).

0
2. Revise Sec.  261.1b to read as follows:


Sec.  261.1b  Penalty.

    Unless otherwise provided by law, the punishment for violation of 
any prohibition in or order issued under this part shall be 
imprisonment of not more than six months or a fine in accordance with 
the applicable provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3571 or both.
0
3. Amend Sec.  261.2 by:
0
a. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ``alcoholic beverage,'' 
and ``controlled substance'';
0
b. Revising the definition for ``developed recreation site''; and
0
c. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ``exploding target,'' 
``firework,'' ``pyrotechnic device,'' and ``recreation site.''
    The additions and revisions read as follows:


Sec.  261.2  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Alcoholic beverage means alcoholic beverage as defined by State 
law.
* * * * *
    Controlled substance means a drug or other substance, its immediate 
precursor included in schedules I, II, III, IV, or V of section 202 of 
the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. 812), or a drug or other 
substance added to these schedules under the terms of the Act.
* * * * *
    Developed recreation site has the same meaning as in Chapter 50 of 
Forest Service Handbook 2309.13.
* * * * *
    Exploding target means a binary explosive consisting of two 
separate components (usually an oxidizer like ammonium nitrate and a 
fuel such as aluminum or another metal) that is designed to explode 
when struck by a bullet.
* * * * *
    Firework has the same meaning as in 27 CFR 555.11 or a successor 
regulation.
* * * * *
    Pyrotechnic device has the same meaning as the term ``articles 
pyrotechnic'' in 27 CFR 555.11 or a successor regulation.
* * * * *
    Recreation site has the same meaning as in Chapter 50 of Forest 
Service Handbook 2309.13.
* * * * *
0
4. Revise Sec.  261.4 to read as follows:


Sec.  261.4  Disorderly conduct.

    The following are prohibited when committed intentionally to cause, 
or recklessly to create a substantial risk of causing, public alarm, 
nuisance, jeopardy, or violence:
    (a) Engaging in fighting or any threatening or other violent 
behavior.
    (b) Making an utterance or performing an act that is obscene or 
threatening or that is made or performed in a manner that is likely to 
inflict injury or incite an immediate breach of peace.
    (c) Making noise that is unreasonable considering the nature and 
purpose of the conduct, location, and time.
0
5. Amend Sec.  261.5 by adding paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  261.5  Fire.

* * * * *
    (h) Possessing or using an exploding target or any kind of firework 
or other pyrotechnic device.
    (i) Violating any State law concerning burning or fires or any 
State law that is for the purpose of preventing or restricting the 
spread of fire.
    (j) Operating or using any internal or external combustion engine 
without a spark arresting device that is properly installed, 
maintained, and in effective working order in accordance with USDA 
Forest Service Standard 5100-1.
0
6. Amend Sec.  261.9 by adding paragraph (j) to read as follows:


Sec.  261.9  Property.

* * * * *
    (j) Damaging or removing without authorization any personal 
property that belongs to another person.
0
7. Amend Sec.  261.10 by revising paragraphs (a), (e), (o), and (p), 
and adding paragraphs (q), (r), and (s) to read as follows:


Sec.  261.10  Occupancy and use.

    The following are prohibited:
    (a) Constructing, placing, or maintaining any kind of road, trail, 
structure, fence, enclosure, communications equipment, sign, 
significant surface disturbance, or other improvement on National 
Forest System lands or facilities without a special use authorization, 
contract, approved plan of operations, or other written authorization 
when that written authorization is required.
* * * * *
    (e) Leaving personal property unattended for longer than 24 hours, 
except in locations where longer periods have been designated.
    (o) Use or occupancy of National Forest System lands or facilities 
without a special use authorization, contract, approved plan of 
operations, or other written authorization when that written 
authorization is required.
    (p) Knowingly or intentionally possessing any controlled substance 
in violation of Federal law.
    (q) Knowingly or intentionally possessing any drug paraphernalia in 
violation of State law.
    (r) Possessing any alcoholic beverage in violation of State law.
    (s) Providing any alcoholic beverage to a minor in violation of 
State law.
0
8. Amend Sec.  261.12 by adding paragraphs (e) through (i) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  261.12  National Forest System roads and National Forest System 
trails.

    The following are prohibited:
* * * * *
    (e) Operating a motor vehicle without a valid license as required 
by State law.
    (f) Operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an 
alcoholic beverage or a controlled substance in violation of State law.
    (g) Operating a motor vehicle in violation of any State law other 
than those described in paragraph (e) or (f) of this section.
    (h) Operating a vehicle or motor vehicle carelessly, recklessly, or 
in a manner or at a speed that would endanger or be likely to endanger 
any person or property.

[[Page 68042]]

    (i) Operating a motor vehicle in violation of a posted sign or 
traffic control device.
0
9. Amend Sec.  261.15 by revising paragraphs (e) and (g) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  261.15  Use of vehicles off roads.

* * * * *
    (e) While under the influence of an alcoholic beverage or a 
controlled substance in violation of State law.
* * * * *
    (g) Carelessly, recklessly, or in a manner or at a speed that 
endangers or is likely to endanger any person or property.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec.  261.50 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  261.50  Orders.

    (a) The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station 
Director, the head of each administrative unit, their deputies, or 
persons acting in these positions may issue orders, consistent with 
their delegations of authority, that close or restrict the use of 
described areas by applying the prohibitions authorized in this 
subpart, individually or in combination.
    (b) The Chief, each Regional Forester, each Experiment Station 
Director, the head of each administrative unit, their deputies, or 
persons acting in these positions may issue orders, consistent with 
their delegations of authority, that close or restrict the use of any 
National Forest System road or National Forest System trail.
* * * * *
0
11. Revise Sec.  261.52 to read as follows:


Sec.  261.52  Fire.

    When provided by an order, the following are prohibited:
    (a) Building, maintaining, attending, or using a fire, campfire, or 
stove fire.
    (b) Using an explosive.
    (c) Smoking.
    (d) Smoking, except within an enclosed vehicle or building, at a 
recreation site, or while stopped in an area at least 3 feet in 
diameter that is barren or cleared of all flammable material.
    (e) Entering or being in an area.
    (f) Entering an area without any firefighting tool prescribed by 
the order.
    (g) Operating an internal combustion engine.
    (h) Welding or operating an acetylene or other torch with open 
flame.
0
12. Amend Sec.  261.53 by revising the title and introductory text to 
read as follows:


Sec.  261.53  Special closures or restrictions.

    When provided by an order, it is prohibited to go into or be in any 
area which is closed or restricted for the protection of:
* * * * *


Sec.  261.54  [Amended]

0
13. Amend Sec.  261.54 by removing paragraph (f).
0
14. Amend Sec.  261.58 by revising paragraphs (b), (d), and (bb) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  261.58  Occupancy and use.

* * * * *
    (b) Entering or using a recreation site or portion thereof.
* * * * *
    (d) Occupying a recreation site with prohibited camping equipment 
prescribed by the order.
* * * * *
    (bb) Possessing an alcoholic beverage.
* * * * *


Homer Wilkes,
Under Secretary, Natural Resources and Environment.
[FR Doc. 2023-21563 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.