60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Assessing CDBG-DR and Disaster Recovery Outcomes of Renter Households, OMB Control No.: 2528-NEW, 67336-67338 [2023-21438]
Download as PDF
67336
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2023 / Notices
[Docket No. FR–7070–N–60]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards Act
Reporting Requirements, OMB Control
No.: 2502–0253
Office of Policy Development
and Research, Chief Data Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for an additional 30 days of
public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: October 30,
2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Interested persons are
also invited to submit comments
regarding this proposal and comments
should refer to the proposal by name
and/or OMB Control Number and
should be sent to: Colette Pollard,
Clearance Officer, REE, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW, Room 8210, Washington,
DC 20410–5000; email
PaperworkReductionActOffice@
hud.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, REE, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email
Colette.Pollard@hud.gov or telephone
202–402–3400. This is not a toll-free
number. HUD welcomes and is prepared
to receive calls from individuals who
are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as
individuals with speech or
communication disabilities. To learn
more about how to make an accessible
telephone call, please visit: https://
www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/
telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Pollard.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:46 Sep 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on July 14, 2023 at
88 FR 45237.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards Act Reporting
Requirements.
OMB Approval Number: 2502–0253.
OMB Expiration Date: January 31,
2024.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Form Number: None.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: To carry
out its responsibilities under the
Manufactured Housing Construction
and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (the
Act), HUD issued the Federal
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards (the Standards), 24
CFR 3280. The Department has also
issued the Manufactured Home
Procedural and Enforcement
Regulations (the Regulations), 24 CFR
3282, to enforce the Standards. OMB
Collection 2502–0253 covers the
majority of the information collection
and recordkeeping requirements for the
Standards and Regulations that support
the programs administered by HUD’s
Office of Manufactured Housing
Programs.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit; State, Local or Tribal
Government; Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
196.
Estimated Number of Responses:
197,326.
Frequency of Response: 1,007.
Average Hours per Response: 1.21.
Total Estimated Burden: 239,537.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
(5) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comments in response to these
questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of Policy Development and Research,
Chief Data Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023–21491 Filed 9–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7075–N–12]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Assessing CDBG–DR and
Disaster Recovery Outcomes of Renter
Households, OMB Control No.: 2528–
NEW
Office of Policy Development
and Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
Comments Due Date: November
28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection can be submitted
within 60 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting,
‘‘Currently under 60-day Review—Open
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
67337
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2023 / Notices
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function. Interested persons are
also invited to submit comments
regarding this proposal by name and/or
OMB Control Number and can be sent
to: Anna Guido, Reports Management
Officer, REE, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 8210, Washington, DC
20410–5000 or email at
PaperworkReductionActOffice@
hud.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Guido, Reports Management
Officer, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410; email Anna
Guido at Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov,
telephone 202–402–5535 (this is not a
toll-free number). HUD welcomes and is
prepared to receive calls from
individuals who are deaf or hard of
hearing, as well as individuals with
speech or communication disabilities.
To learn more about how to make an
accessible telephone call, please visit
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/
telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Assessing CDBG–DR and Disaster
Recovery Outcomes of Renter
Households.
OMB Approval Number: 2528–XXXX.
Type of Request: New data collection.
Form Number: N/A.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
Office of Policy Development and
Research (PD&R), at the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), is proposing the
collection of information for the HUDRD
CDBG Disaster Recovery Outcomes of
Renter Households Cooperative
Agreement.
The goal of this research is to improve
disaster recovery effectiveness for renter
households by examining the disaster
recovery outcomes of renter households
and rental housing stock in places that
received Community Development
Block Grant-Disaster Recovery grants
(CDBG–DR). This research is expected
to help the Federal government, states,
and communities throughout the United
States improve disaster recovery
effectiveness for renter households by
providing information about how
disaster recovery programs funded
through CDBG–DR have different
impacts on renters and homeowners,
and how disasters impact affordable
rental housing stock over time. This
research will be used to assess renter
outcomes, barriers to accessing recovery
resources, and mechanisms of Federal
and local implementation of CDBG–DR
grants. Results from this study will
support HUD in identifying
opportunities for changes to legislation,
policy and program implementation in
disaster recovery to improve outcomes
for renters.
This Federal Register Notice provides
an opportunity to comment on the
information collection for this study
titled HUDRD CDBG Disaster Recovery
Outcomes of Renter Households. The
information collection is designed to
support the study of disaster outcomes
on renters, including to better
understand CDBG–DR allocations across
housing tenure, specifically for renters,
identify successful processes with
corresponding outcomes for rental
housing recovery aid programs and
translate this research into actionable
programmatic recommendations with
appropriate timelines, policy making
and implementation changes to improve
these outcomes. The study includes a
survey, interviews and focus groups in
communities that have received CDBG–
DR funding.
Respondents: CDBG–DR grantee
representatives and administrators;
elected and appointed government
officials in CDBG–DR grantee
jurisdictions and municipalities;
landlords and developers in CDBG–DR
grantee jurisdictions; representatives
from housing and tenant advocacy
organizations; and renters living in
CDBG–DR grantee jurisdictions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
This information collection will affect
approximately 435 respondents. This
includes: (1) 150 individual qualitative
interviews with renters, rental property
developers and landlords within the
study area; (2) 185 responses to a renter
focused survey; (3); (4) 50 focus group
participants in 5 focus groups; and (5)
50 responses to a survey of CDBG–DR
recipients.
Estimated Time per Response:
Interviews are expected to take one hour
each, surveys of renters are expected to
take 30 minutes each, surveys of CDBG–
DR recipients are expected to take up to
one hour each, and renter focus groups
are expected to take four hours and will
meet twice. The total estimated time is
692.5 hours.
Frequency of Response: One time for
each interview and survey. Focus
groups will meet twice.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$30,576.48 for all individual document/
information solicited for related
research activities covered under
approval for researchers conducting
primary (interview, survey, focus group)
data collection and research
participants.
The Table below provides the
estimated burden hours for in-person
focus groups, interviews, and survey
data collection. These estimates assume
the maximum targeted number of study
participants and are calculated as the
time needed to complete individual
surveys and interviews or participate in
focus groups.
Calculating the annual total cost
burden to respondents, the project team
utilized Occupational Employment
Statistics from the U.S. Department of
Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics to
identify the median hourly wages (as
classified by Standard Occupational
Classification, SOC, codes) for
potentially relevant occupations for
interview and focus group participants.
ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Annual
burden
hours
Hourly cost
per
response
Frequency
of response
Interviews with renters, developers, landlords. .........................
Surveys of Renters ...................................................................
Renter focus groups ..................................................................
Survey of CDBG–DR recipients ................................................
150
185
50
50
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0.5
4
1
150
92.5
400
50
$43.07
43.07
43.07
58.08
$6,460.5
3,983.98
17,228.00
2,904.00
Total ...................................................................................
435
....................
....................
....................
692.5
....................
30,576.48
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:46 Sep 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Responses
per annum
Burden hour
per
response
Number of
respondents
Information collection
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Cost
67338
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2023 / Notices
Division of Real Estate Services, 1001
Indian School Road NW, Albuquerque,
NM 87104, carla.clark@bia.gov, (702)
484–3233.
Respondent’s Obligation:
Participation is voluntary.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected, and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comments in response to these
questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507.
Kurt G. Usowski,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023–21438 Filed 9–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[234A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900]
HEARTH Act Approval of Prairie Band
Potawatomi Nation Residential Leasing
Ordinance Leasing Ordinance
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) approved the Prairie Band
Potawatomi Nation Leasing Ordinance
under the Helping Expedite and
Advance Responsible Tribal
Homeownership Act of 2012 (HEARTH
Act). With this approval, the Tribe is
authorized to enter into residential
leases without further BIA approval.
DATES: BIA issued the approval on
September 21, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carla Clark, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:46 Sep 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
The HEARTH Act makes a voluntary,
alternative land leasing process
available to Tribes, by amending the
Indian Long-Term Leasing Act of 1955,
25 U.S.C. 415. The HEARTH Act
authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter
into business leases of Tribal trust lands
with a primary term of 25 years, and up
to two renewal terms of 25 years each,
without the approval of the Secretary of
the Interior (Secretary). The HEARTH
Act also authorizes Tribes to enter into
leases for residential, recreational,
religious or educational purposes for a
primary term of up to 75 years without
the approval of the Secretary.
Participating Tribes develop Tribal
Leasing regulations, including an
environmental review process, and then
must obtain the Secretary’s approval of
those regulations prior to entering into
leases. The HEARTH Act requires the
Secretary to approve Tribal regulations
if the Tribal regulations are consistent
with the Department of the Interior’s
(Department) leasing regulations at 25
CFR part 162 and provide for an
environmental review process that
meets requirements set forth in the
HEARTH Act. This notice announces
that the Secretary, through the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved
the Tribal regulations for the Prairie
Band Potawatomi Nation.
II. Federal Preemption of State and
Local Taxes
The Department’s regulations
governing the surface leasing of trust
and restricted Indian lands specify that,
subject to applicable Federal law,
permanent improvements on leased
land, leasehold or possessory interests,
and activities under the lease are not
subject to State and local taxation and
may be subject to taxation by the Indian
Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR
162.017. As explained further in the
preamble to the final regulations, the
Federal government has a strong interest
in promoting economic development,
self-determination, and Tribal
sovereignty. 77 FR 72440, 72447–48
(December 5, 2012). The principles
supporting the Federal preemption of
State law in the field of Indian leasing
and the taxation of lease-related
interests and activities applies with
equal force to leases entered into under
Tribal leasing regulations approved by
the Federal government pursuant to the
HEARTH Act. Section 5 of the Indian
Reorganization Act (IRA), 25 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5108, preempts State and local taxation
of permanent improvements on trust
land. Confederated Tribes of the
Chehalis Reservation v. Thurston
County, 724 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.
2013) (citing Mescalero Apache Tribe v.
Jones, 411 U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly,
section 5108 of the IRA preempts State
taxation of rent payments by a lessee for
leased trust lands, because ‘‘tax on the
payment of rent is indistinguishable
from an impermissible tax on the land.’’
See Seminole Tribe of Florida v.
Stranburg, 799 F.3d 1324, 1331, n.8
(11th Cir. 2015). In addition, as
explained in the preamble to the revised
leasing regulations at 25 CFR part 162,
Federal courts have applied a balancing
test to determine whether State and
local taxation of non-Indians on the
reservation is preempted. White
Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448
U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The Bracker
balancing test, which is conducted
against a backdrop of ‘‘traditional
notions of Indian self- government,’’
requires a particularized examination of
the relevant State, Federal, and Tribal
interests. We hereby adopt the Bracker
analysis from the preamble to the
surface leasing regulations, 77 FR at
72447–48, as supplemented by the
analysis below.
The strong Federal and Tribal
interests against State and local taxation
of improvements, leaseholds, and
activities on land leased under the
Department’s leasing regulations apply
equally to improvements, leaseholds,
and activities on land leased pursuant to
Tribal leasing regulations approved
under the HEARTH Act. Congress’s
overarching intent was to ‘‘allow Tribes
to exercise greater control over their
own land, support self-determination,
and eliminate bureaucratic delays that
stand in the way of homeownership and
economic development in Tribal
communities.’’ 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682
(May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was
intended to afford Tribes ‘‘flexibility to
adapt lease terms to suit [their] business
and cultural needs’’ and to ‘‘enable
[Tribes] to approve leases quickly and
efficiently.’’ H. Rep. 112–427 at 6
(2012).
Assessment of State and local taxes
would obstruct these express Federal
policies supporting Tribal economic
development and self-determination,
and also threaten substantial Tribal
interests in effective Tribal government,
economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills
Indian Community, 572 U.S. 782, 810
(2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring)
(determining that ‘‘[a] key goal of the
Federal Government is to render Tribes
more self-sufficient, and better
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67336-67338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21438]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-7075-N-12]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Assessing CDBG-
DR and Disaster Recovery Outcomes of Renter Households, OMB Control
No.: 2528-NEW
AGENCY: Office of Policy Development and Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: November 28, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection can be submitted within 60 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting, ``Currently under 60-day Review--
Open
[[Page 67337]]
for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. Interested
persons are also invited to submit comments regarding this proposal by
name and/or OMB Control Number and can be sent to: Anna Guido, Reports
Management Officer, REE, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
451 7th Street SW, Room 8210, Washington, DC 20410-5000 or email at
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Guido, Reports Management
Officer, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna Guido at [email protected],
telephone 202-402-5535 (this is not a toll-free number). HUD welcomes
and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard
of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication
disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone
call, please visit https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from
Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in
Section A.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Assessing CDBG-DR and Disaster
Recovery Outcomes of Renter Households.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-XXXX.
Type of Request: New data collection.
Form Number: N/A.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The
Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R), at the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is proposing the
collection of information for the HUDRD CDBG Disaster Recovery Outcomes
of Renter Households Cooperative Agreement.
The goal of this research is to improve disaster recovery
effectiveness for renter households by examining the disaster recovery
outcomes of renter households and rental housing stock in places that
received Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery grants
(CDBG-DR). This research is expected to help the Federal government,
states, and communities throughout the United States improve disaster
recovery effectiveness for renter households by providing information
about how disaster recovery programs funded through CDBG-DR have
different impacts on renters and homeowners, and how disasters impact
affordable rental housing stock over time. This research will be used
to assess renter outcomes, barriers to accessing recovery resources,
and mechanisms of Federal and local implementation of CDBG-DR grants.
Results from this study will support HUD in identifying opportunities
for changes to legislation, policy and program implementation in
disaster recovery to improve outcomes for renters.
This Federal Register Notice provides an opportunity to comment on
the information collection for this study titled HUDRD CDBG Disaster
Recovery Outcomes of Renter Households. The information collection is
designed to support the study of disaster outcomes on renters,
including to better understand CDBG-DR allocations across housing
tenure, specifically for renters, identify successful processes with
corresponding outcomes for rental housing recovery aid programs and
translate this research into actionable programmatic recommendations
with appropriate timelines, policy making and implementation changes to
improve these outcomes. The study includes a survey, interviews and
focus groups in communities that have received CDBG-DR funding.
Respondents: CDBG-DR grantee representatives and administrators;
elected and appointed government officials in CDBG-DR grantee
jurisdictions and municipalities; landlords and developers in CDBG-DR
grantee jurisdictions; representatives from housing and tenant advocacy
organizations; and renters living in CDBG-DR grantee jurisdictions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: This information collection will
affect approximately 435 respondents. This includes: (1) 150 individual
qualitative interviews with renters, rental property developers and
landlords within the study area; (2) 185 responses to a renter focused
survey; (3); (4) 50 focus group participants in 5 focus groups; and (5)
50 responses to a survey of CDBG-DR recipients.
Estimated Time per Response: Interviews are expected to take one
hour each, surveys of renters are expected to take 30 minutes each,
surveys of CDBG-DR recipients are expected to take up to one hour each,
and renter focus groups are expected to take four hours and will meet
twice. The total estimated time is 692.5 hours.
Frequency of Response: One time for each interview and survey.
Focus groups will meet twice.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $30,576.48 for all individual
document/information solicited for related research activities covered
under approval for researchers conducting primary (interview, survey,
focus group) data collection and research participants.
The Table below provides the estimated burden hours for in-person
focus groups, interviews, and survey data collection. These estimates
assume the maximum targeted number of study participants and are
calculated as the time needed to complete individual surveys and
interviews or participate in focus groups.
Calculating the annual total cost burden to respondents, the
project team utilized Occupational Employment Statistics from the U.S.
Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics to identify the median
hourly wages (as classified by Standard Occupational Classification,
SOC, codes) for potentially relevant occupations for interview and
focus group participants.
Annualized Burden Table
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden hour Annual Hourly cost
Information collection Number of Frequency Responses per burden per Cost
respondents of response per annum response hours response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interviews with renters, developers, landlords............... 150 1 1 1 150 $43.07 $6,460.5
Surveys of Renters........................................... 185 1 1 0.5 92.5 43.07 3,983.98
Renter focus groups.......................................... 50 1 2 4 400 43.07 17,228.00
Survey of CDBG-DR recipients................................. 50 1 1 1 50 58.08 2,904.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................... 435 ........... ........... ........... 692.5 ........... 30,576.48
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 67338]]
Respondent's Obligation: Participation is voluntary.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comments in response to
these questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
3507.
Kurt G. Usowski,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-21438 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P