Air Quality Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: California; Amador Air District; New Source Review, 65647-65649 [2023-20669]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0355; FRL–11176–
01–R9]
Air Quality Plans; Approvals and
Promulgations: California; Amador Air
District; New Source Review
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
permitting rule submitted as a revision
to the Amador Air District (AAD or
‘‘District’’) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns the District’s New
Source Review (NSR) permitting
program for new and modified sources
of air pollution under part D of Title I
of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’).
This action will update the District’s
applicable SIP with a rule revised to
address deficiencies identified in a
previous limited disapproval action.
This action also proposes to revise
regulatory text to clarify that the District
is not subject to the Federal
Implementation Plan related to
protection of visibility. We are taking
comments on this proposal and plan to
follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 25, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2023–0355 at https://
SUMMARY:
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information the disclosure of which is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include a
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file-sharing systems). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit:
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need
assistance in a language other than
English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karima Zulfo, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. Phone: (415) 972–3953 or email
at zulfo.karima@epa.gov.
65647
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
proposal with the dates when it was
revised by the District and submitted to
the EPA for SIP approval by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).
This rule constitutes part of the
District’s program for preconstruction
review and permitting of new or
modified stationary sources under its
jurisdiction. The rule revisions that are
the subject of this action represent an
update to the AAD’s preconstruction
review and permitting program and are
intended to satisfy the requirements
under part D of Title I of the Act
(‘‘Nonattainment NSR’’ or ‘‘NNSR’’)
including the implementing regulations
at 40 CFR 51.160–165, and the relevant
regulatory requirements at 40 CFR
51.307, as well as the requirements of
sections 110(l) and 193 of the Act.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Revision
date
Rule No.
Rule title
400 ....................
Requirements for New and Modified Major Sources in Nonattainment Areas .............
CARB’s March 3, 2023 SIP submittal
package meets the completeness criteria
in 40 CFR part 51, which must be met
before formal EPA review. The EPA’s
signed notice of proposed rulemaking
for our proposed action on this
submittal will serve as the EPA’s formal
completeness determination for this
submittal.
1/17/2023
Submitted
date
3/3/2023
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
The previously SIP-approved version
of AAD Rule 400 is identified in Table
2.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
TABLE 2—SIP APPROVED RULE
SIP approval
date
Rule No.
Rule title
400 ....................
Requirements for New and Modified Major Sources in Nonattainment Area ...............
Our action approving this previous
version of Rule 400 into the SIP was a
limited approval and limited
disapproval. If the EPA finalizes the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
action proposed herein, this rule will be
replaced in the SIP by the submitted
rule listed in Table 1. Additionally, as
described below, the EPA’s final
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1/12/2022
Federal Register
citation
87 FR 1683
approval of Rule 400 will resolve all
deficiencies forming the basis for our
previous limited disapproval.
E:\FR\FM\25SEP1.SGM
25SEP1
65648
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
The submitted rule is intended to
resolve the NSR program deficiencies
we identified in our January 12, 2022
final action (‘‘2022 NSR Action’’),1
which included limited disapproval of a
prior version of Rule 400. In addition,
the District made minor revisions to
correct typographical errors, provide
clarifying edits, and make other similar
minor editorial revisions.
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
The EPA has evaluated the submitted
rule to determine whether it addresses
the deficiencies identified in our 2022
NSR Action. We have also evaluated
various additional minor revisions to
Rule 400 that were made for clarity and
accuracy. We have reviewed the rule as
revised for consistency with the Act’s
NNSR requirements, including the
implementing regulations at 40 CFR
51.160–165, and the relevant regulatory
requirements at 40 CFR 51.307, as well
as the requirements in sections 110(l)
and 193 of the Act for SIP revisions.
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
We find that the revisions to Rule 400
correct all deficiencies identified in the
2022 NSR Action, and we find that the
other minor revisions to the rule are
approvable. The technical support
document (TSD) for this proposed
rulemaking contains a more detailed
analysis and is included in the docket
for this action.
The submitted rule complies with the
substantive and procedural
requirements of CAA section 110(l).
With respect to the procedural
requirements, based on our review of
the public process documentation
included with the submitted rule, we
find that the District has provided
sufficient evidence of public notice and
opportunity for comment and public
hearings prior to the submittal of this
SIP revision and has satisfied these
procedural requirements under CAA
section 110(l).
With respect to the substantive
requirements of CAA section 110(l), we
have determined that our approval of
the submitted rule would not interfere
with the area’s ability to attain or
maintain the NAAQS or with any other
applicable requirements of the CAA.
Similarly, we find that the submitted
rule is approvable under section 193 of
the Act because it does not modify any
control requirement in effect before
1 87
FR 1683.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
November 15, 1990, without ensuring
equivalent or greater emission
reductions. The submitted rule is
otherwise consistent with the criteria for
the EPA’s approval of regulations
submitted for inclusion in the SIP.
For the reasons stated above and
explained further in our TSD, we find
that submitted Rule 400 satisfies the
applicable requirements under part D of
Title I of the Act and other applicable
requirements of the Act. This submittal
also corrects the deficiencies described
in our 2022 NSR Action.
C. Proposed Action and Public
Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, the EPA is proposing approval
of Rule 400 into the California SIP. We
are proposing this action based on our
determination that the submitted rule
satisfies the applicable statutory and
regulatory provisions governing the
regulation of stationary sources under
part D of title I of the Act and
accompanying regulations at 40 CFR
51.160–165, as well as 40 CFR 51. 307.
In support of our proposed action, we
have concluded that our approval
would comply with sections 110(l) and
193 of the Act because the amended rule
will not interfere with the continued
attainment of the NAAQS in Amador
County and does not relax any
requirements in the SIP.
This action would also revise the
regulatory provisions at 40 CFR
52.281(d) concerning the applicability
of the visibility Federal implementation
plan (FIP) at 40 CFR 52.28 as it pertains
to California, to provide that this FIP
does not apply to sources subject to
review under the District’s SIPapproved NNSR program. As described
in more detail in the TSD for this action,
the EPA has previously found
Subsections 3.6 and 5.1 of Rule 400
acceptable to meet the visibility
provisions for sources subject to the
NNSR program at 40 CFR 51.307.2
We will accept comments from the
public on this proposal until October
25, 2023. If we finalize this action as
proposed, our action will resolve the
limited disapproval of Rule 400,
incorporate the submitted rule into the
SIP and our action would be codified
through revisions to 40 CFR 52.220,
‘‘Identification of plan—in part.’’ In
conjunction with our final approval into
the SIP of the submitted version of Rule
400, we would remove from the SIP the
previous version of the rule, identified
in Table 2 above.
2 See
16:46 Sep 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
TSD for 2018 NSR Action, Section 6.2.
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rulemaking, the EPA is
proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the rule
identified and discussed in section I.A.
of this preamble that includes revisions
concerning the District’s NSR permitting
program for new and modified sources
of air pollution under part D of Title I
of the CAA. The EPA has made and will
continue to make, these materials
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
because it proposes to approve a state
program;
E:\FR\FM\25SEP1.SGM
25SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 184 / Monday, September 25, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
The State did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. The EPA did not perform an
EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in
this action. Due to the nature of the
action being taken here, this action is
expected to have a neutral to positive
impact on the air quality of the affected
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Sep 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
area. Consideration of EJ is not required
as part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, and Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 18, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023–20669 Filed 9–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
65649
incorporate by reference into the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) those
provisions of the State regulations that
are authorized and that the EPA will
enforce under RCRA.
Send written comments by
October 25, 2023.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
RCRA–2023–0034, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
detailed instructions for submitting
comments electronically or by other
methods in the ADDRESSES section of the
direct final rule located in the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Moye Lin at (303) 312–6667, lin.moye@
epa.gov.
In the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Federal Register, the EPA is authorizing
changes to the Wyoming program, in
addition to codifying and incorporating
by reference the State’s hazardous waste
program as a direct final rule. The EPA
did not make a proposal prior to the
direct final rule because we believe
these actions are not controversial and
do not expect comments that oppose
them. We have explained the reasons for
this authorization and incorporation by
reference in the preamble to the direct
final rule.
Unless EPA receives written
comments that oppose the authorization
and incorporation by reference during
the comment period, the direct final
rule will become effective on the date it
establishes, and we will not take further
action on this proposal. If we get
comments that oppose the
authorization, we will withdraw the
direct final rule and it will not take
immediate effect. We will then respond
to public comments in a later final rule
based on this proposal. You may not
have another opportunity for comment.
If you want to comment on this action,
you must do so at this time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 271 and 272
[EPA–R08–RCRA–2023–0034; FRL 10614–
01–R8]
Wyoming: Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions and Incorporation
by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to grant
authorization to the State of Wyoming
for the changes to its hazardous waste
program under the Solid Waste Disposal
Act, as amended, commonly referred to
as the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). The EPA has
determined that these changes satisfy all
requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization and is authorizing the
State’s changes through a direct final
action, which can be found in the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Federal Register. In addition, the EPA is
proposing to codify in the regulations
entitled, ‘‘Hazardous Waste Rules and
Regulations, Chapter 1, General
Provisions,’’ Wyoming’s authorized
hazardous waste program. The EPA will
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Dated: August 31, 2023.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2023–20522 Filed 9–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\25SEP1.SGM
25SEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65647-65649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20669]
[[Page 65647]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0355; FRL-11176-01-R9]
Air Quality Plans; Approvals and Promulgations: California;
Amador Air District; New Source Review
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a permitting rule submitted as a revision to the Amador Air
District (AAD or ``District'') portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the District's New
Source Review (NSR) permitting program for new and modified sources of
air pollution under part D of Title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
``Act''). This action will update the District's applicable SIP with a
rule revised to address deficiencies identified in a previous limited
disapproval action. This action also proposes to revise regulatory text
to clarify that the District is not subject to the Federal
Implementation Plan related to protection of visibility. We are taking
comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 25, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2023-0355 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions
(audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The
written comment is considered the official comment and should include a
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file-sharing systems).
For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit: https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karima Zulfo, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. Phone: (415) 972-3953 or email
at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the dates
when it was revised by the District and submitted to the EPA for SIP
approval by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). This rule
constitutes part of the District's program for preconstruction review
and permitting of new or modified stationary sources under its
jurisdiction. The rule revisions that are the subject of this action
represent an update to the AAD's preconstruction review and permitting
program and are intended to satisfy the requirements under part D of
Title I of the Act (``Nonattainment NSR'' or ``NNSR'') including the
implementing regulations at 40 CFR 51.160-165, and the relevant
regulatory requirements at 40 CFR 51.307, as well as the requirements
of sections 110(l) and 193 of the Act.
Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule No. Rule title Revision date Submitted date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
400.................................. Requirements for New and Modified 1/17/2023 3/3/2023
Major Sources in Nonattainment
Areas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARB's March 3, 2023 SIP submittal package meets the completeness
criteria in 40 CFR part 51, which must be met before formal EPA review.
The EPA's signed notice of proposed rulemaking for our proposed action
on this submittal will serve as the EPA's formal completeness
determination for this submittal.
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
The previously SIP-approved version of AAD Rule 400 is identified
in Table 2.
Table 2--SIP Approved Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIP approval Federal Register
Rule No. Rule title date citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
400.................................. Requirements for New and Modified 1/12/2022 87 FR 1683
Major Sources in Nonattainment Area.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our action approving this previous version of Rule 400 into the SIP
was a limited approval and limited disapproval. If the EPA finalizes
the action proposed herein, this rule will be replaced in the SIP by
the submitted rule listed in Table 1. Additionally, as described below,
the EPA's final approval of Rule 400 will resolve all deficiencies
forming the basis for our previous limited disapproval.
[[Page 65648]]
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
The submitted rule is intended to resolve the NSR program
deficiencies we identified in our January 12, 2022 final action (``2022
NSR Action''),\1\ which included limited disapproval of a prior version
of Rule 400. In addition, the District made minor revisions to correct
typographical errors, provide clarifying edits, and make other similar
minor editorial revisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 87 FR 1683.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
The EPA has evaluated the submitted rule to determine whether it
addresses the deficiencies identified in our 2022 NSR Action. We have
also evaluated various additional minor revisions to Rule 400 that were
made for clarity and accuracy. We have reviewed the rule as revised for
consistency with the Act's NNSR requirements, including the
implementing regulations at 40 CFR 51.160-165, and the relevant
regulatory requirements at 40 CFR 51.307, as well as the requirements
in sections 110(l) and 193 of the Act for SIP revisions.
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
We find that the revisions to Rule 400 correct all deficiencies
identified in the 2022 NSR Action, and we find that the other minor
revisions to the rule are approvable. The technical support document
(TSD) for this proposed rulemaking contains a more detailed analysis
and is included in the docket for this action.
The submitted rule complies with the substantive and procedural
requirements of CAA section 110(l). With respect to the procedural
requirements, based on our review of the public process documentation
included with the submitted rule, we find that the District has
provided sufficient evidence of public notice and opportunity for
comment and public hearings prior to the submittal of this SIP revision
and has satisfied these procedural requirements under CAA section
110(l).
With respect to the substantive requirements of CAA section 110(l),
we have determined that our approval of the submitted rule would not
interfere with the area's ability to attain or maintain the NAAQS or
with any other applicable requirements of the CAA. Similarly, we find
that the submitted rule is approvable under section 193 of the Act
because it does not modify any control requirement in effect before
November 15, 1990, without ensuring equivalent or greater emission
reductions. The submitted rule is otherwise consistent with the
criteria for the EPA's approval of regulations submitted for inclusion
in the SIP.
For the reasons stated above and explained further in our TSD, we
find that submitted Rule 400 satisfies the applicable requirements
under part D of Title I of the Act and other applicable requirements of
the Act. This submittal also corrects the deficiencies described in our
2022 NSR Action.
C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is proposing
approval of Rule 400 into the California SIP. We are proposing this
action based on our determination that the submitted rule satisfies the
applicable statutory and regulatory provisions governing the regulation
of stationary sources under part D of title I of the Act and
accompanying regulations at 40 CFR 51.160-165, as well as 40 CFR 51.
307. In support of our proposed action, we have concluded that our
approval would comply with sections 110(l) and 193 of the Act because
the amended rule will not interfere with the continued attainment of
the NAAQS in Amador County and does not relax any requirements in the
SIP.
This action would also revise the regulatory provisions at 40 CFR
52.281(d) concerning the applicability of the visibility Federal
implementation plan (FIP) at 40 CFR 52.28 as it pertains to California,
to provide that this FIP does not apply to sources subject to review
under the District's SIP-approved NNSR program. As described in more
detail in the TSD for this action, the EPA has previously found
Subsections 3.6 and 5.1 of Rule 400 acceptable to meet the visibility
provisions for sources subject to the NNSR program at 40 CFR 51.307.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See TSD for 2018 NSR Action, Section 6.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until
October 25, 2023. If we finalize this action as proposed, our action
will resolve the limited disapproval of Rule 400, incorporate the
submitted rule into the SIP and our action would be codified through
revisions to 40 CFR 52.220, ``Identification of plan--in part.'' In
conjunction with our final approval into the SIP of the submitted
version of Rule 400, we would remove from the SIP the previous version
of the rule, identified in Table 2 above.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rulemaking, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA
rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the rule identified and discussed in section
I.A. of this preamble that includes revisions concerning the District's
NSR permitting program for new and modified sources of air pollution
under part D of Title I of the CAA. The EPA has made and will continue
to make, these materials available through https://www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for
more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law
as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it proposes to approve a state program;
[[Page 65649]]
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA
did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action.
Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this action is
expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air quality of the
affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this
action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the
stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people
of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, and Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 18, 2023.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2023-20669 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
