Amended Record of Decision for the Production of Tritium in Commercial Light Water Reactors, 63099-63100 [2023-19909]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2023 / Notices
(56,776 burden hours times $87.36 per
hour.)
EIA estimates that respondents will
have no additional costs associated with
the surveys other than the burden hours
and the maintenance of the information
during the normal course of business.
Comments are invited on whether or
not: (a) The proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of agency functions,
including whether the information will
have a practical utility; (b) EIA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used, is accurate; (c) EIA
can improve the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information it will collect;
and (d) EIA can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents, such as automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Statutory Authority: 15 U.S.C. 772(b)
and 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.
Signed in Washington, DC, on September
11, 2023.
Samson A. Adeshiyan,
Director, Office of Statistical Methods and
Research, U.S. Energy Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023–19929 Filed 9–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security
Administration
Amended Record of Decision for the
Production of Tritium in Commercial
Light Water Reactors
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
AGENCY:
The National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), a
semi-autonomous agency within the
Department of Energy (DOE), is
announcing this amendment to the June
22, 2016, Record of Decision (ROD) for
the Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement for the Production of
Tritium in a Commercial Light Water
Reactor (CLWR SEIS) (DOE/EIS–0288–
S1). NNSA is amending the 2016
decision in partnership with the
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). TVA
is considering increasing the number of
TPBARs irradiated in their reactors at
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) using
tritium-producing burnable absorber
rods (TPBARs). NNSA initially decided
to implement the CLWR SEIS Preferred
Alternative, Alternative 6, which allows
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Sep 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
for the irradiation of up to a total of
5,000 TPBARs every 18 months using
TVA reactors at both the Watts Bar and
Sequoyah sites. Subsequent to the
CLWR SEIS, WBN Unit 1 increased
tritium production under Unit 1 License
Amendment #107 (July 2016) and Unit
2 tritium production was authorized
under Unit 2 License Amendment #27
(May 2019). Hence, TVA and NNSA are
now opting to choose the previously
analyzed CLWR SEIS Alternative 4,
which allows for the irradiation of up to
a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18
months at the Watts Bar site using Watts
Bar Units 1 and 2.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on NNSA’s NEPA process,
please contact Mr. James Sanderson,
NEPA Compliance Officer, National
Nuclear Security Administration, Office
of General Counsel, Telephone (202)
586–1402; or by email to
jim.sanderson@nnsa.doe.gov. This
Amended Record of Decision is
available on the internet at https://
energy.gov/nepa. The 2016 ROD, the
CLWR SEIS, and related NEPA
documents are available on the DOE
NEPA website at https://
www.energy.gov/nepa/doeenvironmental-impact-statements.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NNSA is
the lead Federal agency responsible for
maintaining and enhancing the safety,
security, reliability, and performance of
the United States (U.S.) nuclear
weapons stockpile. Tritium, a
radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is an
essential component of every weapon in
the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile and
must be replenished periodically due to
its short half-life. In March 1999, DOE
published the 1999 EIS, which
addressed the production of tritium in
the TVA’s Watts Bar and Sequoyah
nuclear reactors using TPBARs. The
1999 EIS assessed the potential
environmental impacts of irradiating up
to 3,400 TPBARs per reactor per fuel
cycle (a fuel cycle lasts about 18
months). On May 14, 1999, DOE
published the ROD for the 1999 EIS (64
FR 26369) in which it announced its
decision to enter into an agreement with
TVA to irradiate TPBARs in the Watts
Bar Unit 1 reactor (Watts Bar 1) in Rhea
County, Tennessee, near Spring City;
and Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 reactors
(Sequoyah 1 and 2) in Hamilton County,
Tennessee, near Soddy-Daisy. In 2002,
TVA received license amendments from
the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) to irradiate TPBARs
in those reactors. (However, TVA’s
license for the Sequoyah reactors no
longer allows for the irradiation of
TPBARs.) Since 2003, TVA has been
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63099
irradiating TPBARs for NNSA by
irradiating TPBARs only in Watts Bar 1.
(In 2020, TVA began irradiating TPBARs
in Watts Bar 2.) After irradiation, NNSA
transports the TPBARs to the Tritium
Extraction Facility at the DOE Savannah
River Site in South Carolina. NNSA’s
Interagency Agreement with TVA to
irradiate TPBARs is in effect until the
earlier of either (a) November 30, 2035,
or (b) the date TVA no longer has a
pressurized water reactor in operation.
NNSA prepared the 2016 CLWR SEIS
to update the environmental analyses in
the 1999 Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the Production of Tritium
in a Commercial Light Water Reactor
(DOE/EIS–0288; the 1999 EIS). The 2016
CLWR SEIS provides analysis of the
potential environmental impacts from
TPBAR irradiation based on a
conservative estimate of the tritium
permeation rate through the TPBAR
cladding, NNSA’s revised estimate of
the maximum number of TPBARs
necessary to support the current and
projected future tritium supply
requirements, and a maximum
production scenario of irradiating no
more than a total of 5,000 TPBARs every
18 months. NNSA initially decided to
implement the Preferred Alternative,
Alternative 6, which allows for the
irradiation of up to a total of 5,000
TPBARs every 18 months using TVA
reactors at both the Watts Bar and
Sequoyah sites. Although near-term
tritium requirements could likely be met
with the irradiation of 2,500 TPBARs
every 18 months, at the time, this
decision provided the greatest flexibility
to meet potential future needs that
could arise from various plausible but
unexpected events. Subsequent to the
2016 SEIS, WBN Unit 1 increased the
irradiation of TPBARs under Unit 1
License Amendment #107 (July 2016)
and Unit 2 TPBAR irradiation was
authorized under Unit 2 License
Amendment #27 (May 2019). Hence,
TVA and NNSA are now opting to
choose the previously analyzed CLWR
SEIS Alternative 4, which allows for the
irradiation of up to a total of 5,000
TPBARs every 18 months at the Watts
Bar site using Watts Bar 1 and 2. TVA
noted new information or circumstances
relevant to environmental concerns that
could potentially have a bearing on the
current proposal or its impacts. This
new information was analyzed in a
February 6, 2023 TVA memorandum,
‘‘Determination of NEPA Adequacy,
Production of Tritium in a Commercial
Light Water Nuclear Reactor (Watts Bar
Nuclear Plant), Tennessee Valley
Authority.’’ In this memo, TVA
addressed their recent review of the
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
63100
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 177 / Thursday, September 14, 2023 / Notices
2016 CLWR SEIS to determine if
additional environmental review under
NEPA was needed, consistent with CEQ
regulations at 40 CFR 1502.9(d). The
analysis demonstrated that the current
proposal does not represent a
substantive change to operations,
activities, and associated impacts
assessed in existing NEPA
documentation. Both the TVA analysis
and the CLWR SEIS analysis indicate
that there would not be any significant
increase in radiation exposure
associated with TPBAR irradiation for
facility workers or the public. For all
analyzed alternatives (including both
Alternatives 4 and 6), estimated
radiation exposures would remain well
below regulatory limits. The calculated
estimated exposures for normal reactor
operations with even the maximum
number of TPBARs are comparable to
those for normal reactor operation
without TPBARs.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Amended Decision
NNSA is amending its previous
decision (81 FR 40685), which was to
choose the 2016 CLWR SEIS’s
Alternative 6 that assumes TVA would
irradiate up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs
every 18 months using both the Watts
Bar and Sequoyah sites. Because TVA
would irradiate a maximum of 2,500
TPBARs in any one reactor, this could
involve the use of one or both reactors
at each of the sites. Instead, NNSA’s
new decision is to choose the 2016
CLWR SEIS’s Alternative 4 that assumes
TVA would irradiate up to a total of
5,000 TPBARs every 18 months at the
Watts Bar site using Watts Bar 1 and 2
reactors. Since TVA would irradiate a
maximum of 2,500 TPBARs in any one
reactor, this would involve use of both
Watts Bar reactors. Under this decision,
TVA will not irradiate TPBARs for
tritium production at the Sequoyah site.
Basis for Decision
The environmental impacts of this
proposed action have been addressed in
previous environmental impact
statements, i.e., the 1999 Final EIS for
the Production of Tritium in a
Commercial Light Water Reactor (DOE/
EIS–0288) and the 2016 CLWR SEIS.
However, TVA staff reviewed new
information or circumstances relevant to
environmental concerns that could
potentially have a bearing on the current
proposal or its impacts. This new
information was analyzed in a February
6, 2023 TVA memorandum, i.e.,
‘‘Determination of NEPA Adequacy,
Production of Tritium in a Commercial
Light Water Nuclear Reactor (Watts Bar
Nuclear Plant), Tennessee Valley
Authority.’’ In this memo, TVA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Sep 13, 2023
Jkt 259001
addresses their recent review of the
2016 CLWR SEIS to determine if
additional environmental review under
NEPA was needed, consistent with CEQ
regulations at 40 CFR 1502.9(d). During
an interagency teleconference held in
May 2021, NNSA requested information
from TVA to help NNSA in its
determination of the adequacy of the
2016 SEIS as far as TVA’s updated
proposal. Additional information given
to NNSA addresses anticipated effects
on the amount of spent fuel to be
generated at Watts Bar, the fuel cycle
there, and the amount of tritiated
wastewater estimated to be generated
from TPBAR irradiation. In terms of the
amount of spent fuel to be generated at
Watts Bar, TVA’s current proposal
would result in 36 additional fuel
assemblies every 18 months. The SEIS
assumed up to 41 additional fuel
assemblies, so it provides a conservative
bounding analysis of the approximately
2500 TPBAR equilibrium core designs.
There would be additional spent fuel
generated with the new proposal.
However, TVA has assured NNSA that
it has infrastructure in place to manage
the increased volume of spent nuclear
fuel assemblies. Regarding the new
proposal’s effects on the fuel cycle, the
cycle length is only mentioned in the
SEIS twice, and only in the context of
being a ‘‘potential uncertainty’’ in
determining if it was necessary to
assume in the SEIS a higher, more
conservative tritium permeation rate.
TVA does not consider the operating
cycle length to be uncertain, and it also
does not anticipate that irradiation of up
to 2500 TPBARs at each reactor would
affect the typical fuel cycle. Therefore,
the issue has no bearing on the review
for adequacy of the SEIS for any future
TVA action to irradiate up to 5000
TPBARs at Watts Bar. Lastly, the
estimated amount of tritiated
wastewater (due to permeation from the
TPBARs into the cooling water) was not
identified in the SEIS, as it is difficult
to separate this out from other releases
from such things as turbine building
sumps, floor drain collector sumps,
groundwater sumps, etc. However, to
keep maximum tritium concentrations
low, TVA will use a ‘‘feed and bleed’’
technique, which will require additional
cooling water per fuel cycle in order to
ensure that TVA discharges are within
regulatory limits. TVA estimates that
using this technique will increase water
usage by approximately 25% but is not
expected to affect environmental
impacts. The current proposal does not
represent a substantive change to
operations, activities, and associated
impacts assessed in existing NEPA
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
documentation. Therefore, the decision
to choose the previously analyzed 2016
CLWR SEIS Alternative 4, along with
the updated analysis provided by TVA
(summarized previously) and confirmed
by NNSA, is reasonable, and
accordingly, no further NEPA analysis
of this TVA proposal is required.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on June 29, 2023, by
Jill Hruby, Under Secretary for Nuclear
Security and Administrator, NNSA,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on September
11, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2023–19909 Filed 9–13–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP23–82–000]
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC;
Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the
Proposed Lucas and Pavonia Wells
Abandonment Project
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) for the
Lucas and Pavonia Wells Abandonment
Project, proposed by Columbia Gas
Transmission, LLC (Columbia) in the
above-referenced docket. Columbia
requests authorization to abandon 37
injection/withdrawal wells and
associated pipelines and appurtenances
at its existing certificated Lucas and
Pavonia Storage Fields in Ashland and
Richland Counties, Ohio.
The EA assesses the potential
environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the Lucas
and Pavonia Wells Abandonment
Project in accordance with the
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63099-63100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19909]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security Administration
Amended Record of Decision for the Production of Tritium in
Commercial Light Water Reactors
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-
autonomous agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), is announcing
this amendment to the June 22, 2016, Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Production of
Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor (CLWR SEIS) (DOE/EIS-0288-
S1). NNSA is amending the 2016 decision in partnership with the
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). TVA is considering increasing the
number of TPBARs irradiated in their reactors at Watts Bar Nuclear
Plant (WBN) using tritium-producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs).
NNSA initially decided to implement the CLWR SEIS Preferred
Alternative, Alternative 6, which allows for the irradiation of up to a
total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months using TVA reactors at both the
Watts Bar and Sequoyah sites. Subsequent to the CLWR SEIS, WBN Unit 1
increased tritium production under Unit 1 License Amendment #107 (July
2016) and Unit 2 tritium production was authorized under Unit 2 License
Amendment #27 (May 2019). Hence, TVA and NNSA are now opting to choose
the previously analyzed CLWR SEIS Alternative 4, which allows for the
irradiation of up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months at the
Watts Bar site using Watts Bar Units 1 and 2.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on NNSA's NEPA
process, please contact Mr. James Sanderson, NEPA Compliance Officer,
National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of General Counsel,
Telephone (202) 586-1402; or by email to [email protected].
This Amended Record of Decision is available on the internet at https://energy.gov/nepa. The 2016 ROD, the CLWR SEIS, and related NEPA
documents are available on the DOE NEPA website at https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doe-environmental-impact-statements.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NNSA is the lead Federal agency responsible
for maintaining and enhancing the safety, security, reliability, and
performance of the United States (U.S.) nuclear weapons stockpile.
Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, is an essential component
of every weapon in the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile and must be
replenished periodically due to its short half-life. In March 1999, DOE
published the 1999 EIS, which addressed the production of tritium in
the TVA's Watts Bar and Sequoyah nuclear reactors using TPBARs. The
1999 EIS assessed the potential environmental impacts of irradiating up
to 3,400 TPBARs per reactor per fuel cycle (a fuel cycle lasts about 18
months). On May 14, 1999, DOE published the ROD for the 1999 EIS (64 FR
26369) in which it announced its decision to enter into an agreement
with TVA to irradiate TPBARs in the Watts Bar Unit 1 reactor (Watts Bar
1) in Rhea County, Tennessee, near Spring City; and Sequoyah Units 1
and 2 reactors (Sequoyah 1 and 2) in Hamilton County, Tennessee, near
Soddy-Daisy. In 2002, TVA received license amendments from the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to irradiate TPBARs in those
reactors. (However, TVA's license for the Sequoyah reactors no longer
allows for the irradiation of TPBARs.) Since 2003, TVA has been
irradiating TPBARs for NNSA by irradiating TPBARs only in Watts Bar 1.
(In 2020, TVA began irradiating TPBARs in Watts Bar 2.) After
irradiation, NNSA transports the TPBARs to the Tritium Extraction
Facility at the DOE Savannah River Site in South Carolina. NNSA's
Interagency Agreement with TVA to irradiate TPBARs is in effect until
the earlier of either (a) November 30, 2035, or (b) the date TVA no
longer has a pressurized water reactor in operation.
NNSA prepared the 2016 CLWR SEIS to update the environmental
analyses in the 1999 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the
Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Reactor (DOE/EIS-
0288; the 1999 EIS). The 2016 CLWR SEIS provides analysis of the
potential environmental impacts from TPBAR irradiation based on a
conservative estimate of the tritium permeation rate through the TPBAR
cladding, NNSA's revised estimate of the maximum number of TPBARs
necessary to support the current and projected future tritium supply
requirements, and a maximum production scenario of irradiating no more
than a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months. NNSA initially decided to
implement the Preferred Alternative, Alternative 6, which allows for
the irradiation of up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months using
TVA reactors at both the Watts Bar and Sequoyah sites. Although near-
term tritium requirements could likely be met with the irradiation of
2,500 TPBARs every 18 months, at the time, this decision provided the
greatest flexibility to meet potential future needs that could arise
from various plausible but unexpected events. Subsequent to the 2016
SEIS, WBN Unit 1 increased the irradiation of TPBARs under Unit 1
License Amendment #107 (July 2016) and Unit 2 TPBAR irradiation was
authorized under Unit 2 License Amendment #27 (May 2019). Hence, TVA
and NNSA are now opting to choose the previously analyzed CLWR SEIS
Alternative 4, which allows for the irradiation of up to a total of
5,000 TPBARs every 18 months at the Watts Bar site using Watts Bar 1
and 2. TVA noted new information or circumstances relevant to
environmental concerns that could potentially have a bearing on the
current proposal or its impacts. This new information was analyzed in a
February 6, 2023 TVA memorandum, ``Determination of NEPA Adequacy,
Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Nuclear Reactor
(Watts Bar Nuclear Plant), Tennessee Valley Authority.'' In this memo,
TVA addressed their recent review of the
[[Page 63100]]
2016 CLWR SEIS to determine if additional environmental review under
NEPA was needed, consistent with CEQ regulations at 40 CFR 1502.9(d).
The analysis demonstrated that the current proposal does not represent
a substantive change to operations, activities, and associated impacts
assessed in existing NEPA documentation. Both the TVA analysis and the
CLWR SEIS analysis indicate that there would not be any significant
increase in radiation exposure associated with TPBAR irradiation for
facility workers or the public. For all analyzed alternatives
(including both Alternatives 4 and 6), estimated radiation exposures
would remain well below regulatory limits. The calculated estimated
exposures for normal reactor operations with even the maximum number of
TPBARs are comparable to those for normal reactor operation without
TPBARs.
Amended Decision
NNSA is amending its previous decision (81 FR 40685), which was to
choose the 2016 CLWR SEIS's Alternative 6 that assumes TVA would
irradiate up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months using both the
Watts Bar and Sequoyah sites. Because TVA would irradiate a maximum of
2,500 TPBARs in any one reactor, this could involve the use of one or
both reactors at each of the sites. Instead, NNSA's new decision is to
choose the 2016 CLWR SEIS's Alternative 4 that assumes TVA would
irradiate up to a total of 5,000 TPBARs every 18 months at the Watts
Bar site using Watts Bar 1 and 2 reactors. Since TVA would irradiate a
maximum of 2,500 TPBARs in any one reactor, this would involve use of
both Watts Bar reactors. Under this decision, TVA will not irradiate
TPBARs for tritium production at the Sequoyah site.
Basis for Decision
The environmental impacts of this proposed action have been
addressed in previous environmental impact statements, i.e., the 1999
Final EIS for the Production of Tritium in a Commercial Light Water
Reactor (DOE/EIS-0288) and the 2016 CLWR SEIS. However, TVA staff
reviewed new information or circumstances relevant to environmental
concerns that could potentially have a bearing on the current proposal
or its impacts. This new information was analyzed in a February 6, 2023
TVA memorandum, i.e., ``Determination of NEPA Adequacy, Production of
Tritium in a Commercial Light Water Nuclear Reactor (Watts Bar Nuclear
Plant), Tennessee Valley Authority.'' In this memo, TVA addresses their
recent review of the 2016 CLWR SEIS to determine if additional
environmental review under NEPA was needed, consistent with CEQ
regulations at 40 CFR 1502.9(d). During an interagency teleconference
held in May 2021, NNSA requested information from TVA to help NNSA in
its determination of the adequacy of the 2016 SEIS as far as TVA's
updated proposal. Additional information given to NNSA addresses
anticipated effects on the amount of spent fuel to be generated at
Watts Bar, the fuel cycle there, and the amount of tritiated wastewater
estimated to be generated from TPBAR irradiation. In terms of the
amount of spent fuel to be generated at Watts Bar, TVA's current
proposal would result in 36 additional fuel assemblies every 18 months.
The SEIS assumed up to 41 additional fuel assemblies, so it provides a
conservative bounding analysis of the approximately 2500 TPBAR
equilibrium core designs. There would be additional spent fuel
generated with the new proposal. However, TVA has assured NNSA that it
has infrastructure in place to manage the increased volume of spent
nuclear fuel assemblies. Regarding the new proposal's effects on the
fuel cycle, the cycle length is only mentioned in the SEIS twice, and
only in the context of being a ``potential uncertainty'' in determining
if it was necessary to assume in the SEIS a higher, more conservative
tritium permeation rate. TVA does not consider the operating cycle
length to be uncertain, and it also does not anticipate that
irradiation of up to 2500 TPBARs at each reactor would affect the
typical fuel cycle. Therefore, the issue has no bearing on the review
for adequacy of the SEIS for any future TVA action to irradiate up to
5000 TPBARs at Watts Bar. Lastly, the estimated amount of tritiated
wastewater (due to permeation from the TPBARs into the cooling water)
was not identified in the SEIS, as it is difficult to separate this out
from other releases from such things as turbine building sumps, floor
drain collector sumps, groundwater sumps, etc. However, to keep maximum
tritium concentrations low, TVA will use a ``feed and bleed''
technique, which will require additional cooling water per fuel cycle
in order to ensure that TVA discharges are within regulatory limits.
TVA estimates that using this technique will increase water usage by
approximately 25% but is not expected to affect environmental impacts.
The current proposal does not represent a substantive change to
operations, activities, and associated impacts assessed in existing
NEPA documentation. Therefore, the decision to choose the previously
analyzed 2016 CLWR SEIS Alternative 4, along with the updated analysis
provided by TVA (summarized previously) and confirmed by NNSA, is
reasonable, and accordingly, no further NEPA analysis of this TVA
proposal is required.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on June 29,
2023, by Jill Hruby, Under Secretary for Nuclear Security and
Administrator, NNSA, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance
with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as
an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on September 11, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2023-19909 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P