Potato Research and Promotion Plan; Changes to Board Membership and Administrative Committee, 60599-60603 [2023-19003]
Download as PDF
60599
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 170
Tuesday, September 5, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1207
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–22–0041]
Potato Research and Promotion Plan;
Changes to Board Membership and
Administrative Committee
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement recommendations from the
National Potato Promotion Board
(Board) to change its membership and
organization by revising the formula
used to determine the number of
producer and importer seats on the
Board, reducing the maximum number
of importer seats on the Board, and
indefinitely suspending the
Administrative Committee. In addition
to these Board-recommended changes,
the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) would make several nonsubstantive changes to clarify the start
of the term of office for Board members
and modernize the Board’s procedures.
The Board administers the Potato
Research and Promotion Plan (Plan)
with oversight by the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS).
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 5, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule.
Comments may be mailed to the Docket
Clerk, Market Development Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or submitted
electronically by Email:
MDDComments@usda.gov; or via
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register. All comments will be made
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Sep 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours or can be viewed at
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments
submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the rulemaking
record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be made
public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexandra Caryl, Branch Chief, MidAtlantic Region Branch, Market
Development Division, Specialty Crop
Program, AMS, USDA, STOP 0244, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Room 1406–
S, Washington, DC 20250–0244;
Telephone: (202) 720–8805; or Email:
Alexandra.Caryl@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule affecting the Plan (7 CFR
part 1207) is authorized under the
Potato Research and Promotion Act of
1971 (Act) (7 U.S.C. 2611–2627).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
USDA is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
14094 reaffirms, supplements, and
updates Executive Order 12866 and
further directs agencies to solicit and
consider input from a wide range of
affected and interested parties through a
variety of means. This proposed rule is
not a significant regulatory action
within the meaning of Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this action has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under section
6 of the Executive Order.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Governments. AMS has assessed the
impact of this proposed rule on Indian
Tribes and determined that this rule
would not have Tribal implications that
require consultation under Executive
Order 13175. AMS hosts a quarterly
teleconference with Tribal leaders
where matters of mutual interest
regarding the marketing of agricultural
products are discussed. Information
about the proposed changes to the
regulations will be shared during an
upcoming quarterly call, and Tribal
leaders will be informed about the
proposed revisions to the regulation and
the opportunity to submit comments.
AMS will work with the USDA Office
of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided as needed with
regard to these proposed changes to the
Plan.
Executive Order 12988
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under sec.
311 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2620), a person
subject to the Plan may file a petition
with USDA stating that the Plan, any
provision of the Plan, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the Plan, is
not in accordance with law and
requesting a modification of the Plan or
to be exempted therefrom. Such person
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. Thereafter, USDA will
issue a ruling on the petition. The Act
provides that the district courts of the
United States for any district in which
the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if
the petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of USDA’s final ruling.
Background
Under the Plan, which became
effective on March 9, 1972, the Board
administers a nationally coordinated
program of research, development,
advertising, and promotion designed to
strengthen potatoes’ competitive
position and expand domestic and
foreign markets for potatoes and potato
products. This program is financed by
assessments on handlers and importers
of potatoes and potato products.
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
60600
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 5, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
This proposed rule would modify the
membership of the Board by revising the
formula to determine the number of
producer and importer seats on the
Board. This action would increase the
current threshold from one member seat
per five million hundredweight pounds
of potatoes produced or imported to one
seat per 10 million hundredweight for
both producer and importer seats. This
action would further revise importer
membership by reducing the maximum
number of importer seats from five to
two. Additionally, the action would
indefinitely suspend the Administrative
Committee. Finally, this proposed rule
would clarify the start date of the term
of office for Board members and
modernize certain Board procedures
relating to the submission of votes and
ballots.
The Board unanimously
recommended the proposed changes to
its membership and the indefinite
suspension of the Administrative
Committee at a public meeting on
March 9, 2022. Board members present
for the vote represented domestic
producers, importers, and the public,
and the recommendations incorporated
industry feedback collected by the
Board over a three-year period.
Board Recommendation To Change
Membership Rules
Section 1207.320(b) and (c) of the
Plan provides the formula used to
determine the number of producer and
importer seats on the Board. Under this
formula, one seat is created for every
five million hundredweight of potatoes
produced or imported. Therefore, as
more potatoes are produced and
imported, the Board has more seats.
The Board has encountered
significant challenges in filling Board
member seats. First, since the Board’s
inception, the potato industry has
experienced both increased production
and consolidation. Since the 1970s
when the Board was created, production
of potatoes in the U.S. as well as
imports from Canada and other
countries have increased substantially.
At the same time, the number of
commercial potato farmers and
importers has decreased significantly.
Accordingly, the number of seats has
grown but there are fewer eligible
producers and importers to fill them.
Second, Board members are volunteers,
nominated by peers to represent their
State or importer sector. To be a
member, domestic producers and
importers use time otherwise spent with
their businesses to travel to meetings
and participate in committees and
decision making. Board members are
also expected to communicate the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Sep 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
activities of the Board to their
constituencies and recruit future Board
members. While service as Board
members is important, it is timeconsuming.
As a result of these challenges, the
Board in recent years has typically had
approximately 125 total seats, of which
only about 100 have been filled.
Therefore, the Board has experienced
roughly 25 vacancies each year. The
proposal would increase the threshold
from one member seat per five million
hundredweight pounds of potatoes
produced or imported to one seat per 10
million hundredweight for both
producer and importer seats. With the
proposed changes, the Board expects the
number of member seats to reduce to 80.
Section 308 of the Act (7 U.S.C.
2617(b)) and §§ 1207.320(c) and
1207.322(d) of the Plan currently allow
for a maximum of five importer seats on
the Board. Since importers started
paying assessments in 1991, the Board
has always included the maximum of
five importer member seats. Like their
domestic producer counterparts,
however, potato importers continue to
experience industry consolidation.
According to Customs and Border
Protection data, in 2022 there were only
10 importers with annual receipts above
the Small Business Administration’s
(SBA) threshold of $34 million. The
Board has not filled all five positions in
the last 10 years because of the small
number of continuously active
importers. Given that members serve
three-year terms and cannot serve more
than two consecutive terms, along with
the small number of importers, it is
reasonable to decrease the maximum
number of importers from five to two.
Additionally, the Board conducted
extensive outreach to affected
stakeholders and received their support
for the change, as evidenced by the
unanimous vote for this change.
The initial request for these proposed
changes came from domestic producers
and importers. Since 2020, the Board
has met with various State organizations
across the country to discuss the
proposed changes. USDA and members
of industry also participated in
numerous public meetings conducted
by the Board to discuss the chronic
vacancies experienced by the Board as
a result of its current size and structure.
The proposed solution developed by the
Board reflects the input from these
stakeholders.
Board Recommendation To Suspend
the Administrative Committee
Section 1207.507 of the Plan
establishes an Administrative
Committee composed of 38 producer
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
members, one importer member, and the
public member, as provided for in the
Board’s bylaws. The Administrative
Committee is selected annually. The
Administrative Committee acts for the
Board in implementing marketing
research, development, advertising,
and/or promotion activities as directed
by the Board and is charged with
developing and submitting to USDA for
approval specific programs or projects.
The Administrative Committee also acts
for the Board in authorizing contracts or
agreements for the development and
carrying out of such programs or
projects and the payment of the costs
thereof with funds collected pursuant to
the Plan. Finally, the Administrative
Committee acts for the Board in
contracting with cooperating agencies
for the collection of assessments
pursuant to the Plan.
Due to the proposed changes to the
Board’s membership, which would
reduce membership seats to
approximately 80, the Board believes
the Administrative Committee is no
longer needed. Currently, the Board
uses the Administrative Committee like
a smaller Board that meets twice a year,
while the full Board only meets once. It
is easier and cheaper for the
Administrative Committee to convene
and conduct business because of its
reduced size. While the Board, with the
proposed changes, would still be larger
than the current Administrative
Committee, the reduced membership
under the proposed changes allows the
full Board to meet in lieu of the
Administrative Committee. Meeting
more frequently addresses a major
industry concern that only members of
committees, which make up the
Administrative Committee, have
sufficient interaction with staff to fully
understand the programs and activities
the Board implements. Although
meeting more frequently may require a
greater time commitment from Board
members, the Board believes the
benefits of this change would outweigh
any additional burden on members.
Furthermore, as explained in the next
section, USDA proposes to amend the
regulations to permit voting and
balloting via electronic methods, which
is expected to increase the efficiency of
the Board’s operations and make it
easier for members to participate. By
reducing the Board size to a more
reasonable number of members, the
Board hopes to include all members on
committees to promote Board member
interaction and involvement. Therefore,
the proposed changes would
indefinitely suspend the Administrative
Committee.
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 5, 2023 / Proposed Rules
USDA Proposed Changes
Under § 1207.321(a), the term of office
of Board members starts on July 1, or
such other date as may be specified in
the regulations. In 1973, USDA added
§ 1207.504, which provided that the
term of office would instead start on
April 1. In 1984, § 1207.504 was
amended to require the term of office to
start on March 1. Since then, each
member’s term has started on March 1.
USDA proposes to change the start date
in § 1207.321(a) from July 1 to March 1
to match § 1207.504 and be consistent
with the current practice of the Board.
In § 1207.325(c), the Plan provides
that Board members may vote on noncontroversial matters and matters of an
emergency nature when there is not
enough time to call an assembled
meeting by mail, telegraph, or
telephone. USDA proposes changing
this language to remove the reference to
telegraph as a means for voting and to
allow for voting by mail, electronic
mail, facsimile, or any other means of
communication. In § 1207.503(a), (b),
and (c), the Plan provides that
producers and importers may nominate
Board members at meetings or by mail
ballots. USDA proposes changing this
language to allow ballots to be
submitted by mail, electronic mail,
facsimile, or any other means of
communication. These proposed
changes would modernize the sections
and increase accessibility to the voting
and balloting processes by providing
additional options.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. The purpose of the
RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the
scale of businesses subject to such
actions so that small businesses will not
be unduly or disproportionately
burdened. The RFA requires, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small businesses affected by the rule.
This regulatory flexibility analysis
estimates a proportion of small
businesses where it is not feasible to
estimate a number.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) has established size standards
that determine whether a business
entity is a small business. The size
standards are based on the entity’s
economic activity, or industry, and
generally use the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS).
The size standards are expressed in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Sep 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
annual receipts in millions of dollars or
in number of employees, and indicate
the maximum allowed for an entity to
be considered a small business.
The SBA defines small potato
producers as those having annual
receipts equal to or less than $4.25
million (Potato Farming, NAICS code
111211). Small agricultural service firms
(handlers and importers) are defined as
those having annual receipts equal to or
less than $34 million (Postharvest Crop
Activities, NAICS code 115114) (13 CFR
121.201). These were the numbers in
effect when this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis was prepared in May
2023.
According to the Board, in 2021 there
were approximately 1,500 producers
and 955 handlers of potatoes. Since data
was not available on the number of
producers that are small businesses
according to the SBA standard, this
analysis computes an estimate of the
number of small farms using census
data from the USDA’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS).
Producers that pay Board assessments
have a minimum of five acres of
potatoes. The 2017 Agricultural Census
(the most recent census data available)
reported 2,420 farms with five or more
harvested acres of potatoes, which is
reasonably close to the Board estimate
of 1,500 producers that paid
assessments in 2021.
NASS reported a 2022 U.S. potato
crop value of $5,069,511,000 and
895,600 harvested acres (the most recent
annual data available). The estimated
average value per harvested acre is
$5,660 (obtained by dividing the crop
value of $5,069,511,000 by the number
of acres, 895,600). Thus, on average, a
farm would have to harvest 751 or fewer
acres of potatoes to meet the SBA’s
definition of a small business (obtained
by dividing the SBA threshold of $4.25
million by the estimated 2022 average
value per acre, $5,660).
According to the 2017 Agricultural
Census, out of the 2,420 potato farms
with five or more harvested acres, 2,030
farms (84 percent) harvested 749 or
fewer acres, very close to the 751 or
fewer acres in the previous
computation. Based on these
computations, and assuming a normal
distribution, a large majority of potato
farms paying assessments to the Board
are small businesses according to SBA
criteria.
As noted above, the SBA threshold
size for a small agricultural service
business is $34 million in annual sales.
The Board estimate of the number of
potato handlers in 2021 was 955.
Dividing the $5.07 billion NASS crop
revenue estimate by 955 yields an
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60601
annual estimate of potato sales per
handler of approximately $5.3 million
(farm level value), which is well below
$34 million, the SBA threshold size for
a small agricultural service business.
Potato handlers perform various
procedures to get the potatoes to market,
including grading, sorting, packaging,
and shipment. What handlers are paid
can be estimated by obtaining an annual
average shipping point price for
potatoes from AMS Market News. AMS
shipping point prices capture the prices
received by shippers (handlers) after
buying potatoes from growers, and then
grading, sorting, packaging, and
shipping. The 2022 average AMS
shipping point price received for
potatoes ($0.20 per pound) is 55 percent
higher than the 2022 average annual
NASS price of $0.129 per pound
received by growers. Adding 55 percent
to the $5.3 million potato sales per
handler at the farm level yields an
estimate of $8.2 million average annual
sales at the handler level, which is also
well below the SBA small business
threshold size of $34 million or less in
annual sales. Assuming a normal
distribution, a majority of potato
handlers are small agricultural service
businesses, according to SBA criteria.
Based on a review of 2022 potato
import data from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, there were
approximately 140 importers. Of those
140 importers, 130 (93 percent) had
potato imports valued at $34 million or
less, the SBA size threshold for small
agricultural service firms. Therefore,
130 potato importers are small
businesses in terms of potato import
value, using SBA business size criteria.
This proposal would amend
§§ 1207.320, 1207.321, 1207.322,
1207.325, and 1207.503, and suspend
§ 1207.507. The changes would modify
the membership of the Board by revising
the formula to determine the number of
seats on the Board and reducing the
maximum number of importer seats on
the Board. The changes would also
indefinitely suspend the Administrative
Committee, clarify the start date of the
term of office of Board members, and
modernize the Board’s voting and
balloting procedures.
This proposed rule would not impose
any new costs on producers, handlers,
or importers. This proposal would also
not impose any additional reporting,
recordkeeping, or information collection
requirements on affected entities. The
proposed changes are administrative in
nature and would allow the Board to
more effectively carry out the
requirements of the Plan while
potentially reducing costs and
increasing participation. With these
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
60602
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 5, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
changes, fewer individuals would be
required to attend meetings, reducing
the time burden and costs associated
with traveling and attending meetings.
Further, modernizing the Board’s
procedures to authorize additional
methods for casting votes and ballots
could help increase participation.
The Board considered taking no
action and continuing to experience
significant membership vacancies. The
Board decided against this option
because vacancies have become
pervasive. Therefore, these alternatives
were rejected.
As with all Federal promotion
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Regarding outreach efforts, all the
Board’s meetings, including the March
9, 2022, meeting during which the
Board recommendations relevant to this
action were discussed, are open to the
public and interested persons are
invited to participate and express their
views. No concerns were raised in these
meetings about the changes proposed in
this document.
We have performed this initial
regulatory flexibility analysis regarding
the impact of this proposed action on
small entities, and we invite comments
concerning potential effects of this
action on small businesses.
While this proposed rule as set forth
below has not yet received the approval
of USDA, it has been determined that it
is consistent with and would effectuate
the purposes of the Act.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
received in response to this proposed
rule will be considered prior to
finalizing this action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1207
Advertising, Agricultural research,
Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part
1207 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Sep 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
PART 1207—POTATO RESEARCH
AND PROMOTION PLAN
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1207 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2611–2627; 7 U.S.C.
7401.
2. Amend § 1207.320 by revising
paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 1207.320 Establishment and
membership.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Producer membership upon the
Board shall be determined on the basis
of the potato production reported in the
latest Crop Production Annual
Summary Report issued by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture. If a
State’s potato production data is not
provided by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service, the Board may use an
alternative data source that reliably
reflects potato production in the United
States. Unless the Secretary, upon
recommendation of the Board,
determines an alternate basis, for each
10 million hundredweight of such
production, or major fraction thereof,
produced within each State, such State
shall be entitled to one member.
However, each State shall initially be
entitled to at least one member.
(c) The number of importer member
positions on the Board shall be based on
the hundredweights of potatoes, potato
products equivalent to fresh potatoes,
and seed potatoes imported into the
United States but shall not exceed two
importer members. Unless the Secretary,
upon recommendation of the Board,
determines an alternate basis, there
shall be one importer member position
for each 10 million hundredweight, or
major fraction thereof, of potatoes,
potato product equivalents, and seed
potatoes imported into the United
States.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 1207.321 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 1207.321
Term of office.
(a) The term of office of Board
members shall be 3 years, beginning
March 1, or such other beginning date
as may be approved pursuant to
regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 1207.322 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 1207.322
Nominations and appointment.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The importer members shall be
nominated by importers of potatoes,
potato products and/or seed potatoes.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The number of importer members on the
Board shall be announced by the
Secretary and shall not exceed two
members. The Board may call upon
organizations of potato, potato products
and/or seed potato importers to assist in
nominating importers for membership
on the Board. If such organizations fail
to submit nominees or are determined
by the Board to not adequately represent
importers, then the Board may conduct
meetings of importers to nominate
eligible importers for Board member
positions. In determining if importer
organizations adequately represent
importers, the Board shall consider:
(1) How many importers belong to the
association;
(2) What percentage of the total
number of importers is represented by
the association;
(3) Is the association representative of
the potato, potato product, and seed
potato import industry;
(4) Does the association speak for
potato, potato product, and seed potato
importers; and
(5) Other relevant information as may
be warranted.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 1207.325 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 1207.325
Procedure.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) For routine and noncontroversial
matters which do not require
deliberation and the exchange of views,
and for matters of an emergency nature
when there is not enough time to call an
assembled meeting, the Board may act
upon a majority of concurring votes of
its members cast by mail, telephone,
electronic mail, facsimile, or any other
means of communication. Any vote cast
by telephone shall be confirmed
promptly in writing.
■ 6. Amend § 1207.503 by revising
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to read as
follows:
§ 1207.503
Nominations.
(a) Pursuant to § 1207.322 of the plan,
the Board shall assist producers in
producing sections or States each year
to nominate producer members for the
Board. Such nominations may be
conducted at meetings or with ballots
submitted by mail, electronic mail,
facsimile, or any other means of
communication. One individual shall be
nominated for each position to become
vacant. A list of nominees shall be
submitted to the Secretary for
consideration by November 1 of each
year.
(b) Pursuant to § 1207.322 of the plan,
the Board shall assist importers each
year to nominate importer members for
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 5, 2023 / Proposed Rules
the Board. Such nominations may be
conducted at meetings or with ballots
submitted by mail, electronic mail,
facsimile, or any other means of
communication.
(c) Nomination meetings or balloting
by mail, electronic mail, facsimile, or
any other means of communication
shall be well publicized with notice
given to producers, importers, and the
Secretary at least 10 days prior to each
meeting or distribution of ballots.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1207.507
■
[Stayed]
7. Stay § 1207.507 indefinitely.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–19003 Filed 9–1–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2023–1647; Project
Identifier AD–2023–00487–E]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain General Electric Company (GE)
Model GE90–90B, GE90–94B, GE90–
110B1, and GE90–115B engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by a
manufacturer investigation that revealed
certain high-pressure turbine (HPT)
stage 1 disks, HPT stage 2 disks, forward
HPT rotor seals, interstage HPT seals,
and stages 7–9 compressor rotor spools
were manufactured from powder metal
material suspected to contain iron
inclusion. This proposed AD would
require replacement of affected HPT
stage 1 disks, HPT stage 2 disks, forward
HPT rotor seals, interstage HPT seals,
and stages 7–9 compressor rotor spools.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by October 20,
2023.
DATES:
You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Sep 01, 2023
Jkt 259001
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2023–
1647; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For service information
incorporated by reference in this NPRM,
contact General Electric Company, 1
Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215;
phone: (513) 552–3272; email:
aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com; website:
ge.com.
• You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexei Marqueen, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street,
Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: (781)
238–7178; email: Alexei.T.Marqueen@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2023–1647; Project Identifier AD–
2023–00487–E’’ at the beginning of your
comments. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60603
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Alexei Marqueen,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200
South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA
98198. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA was notified by the
manufacturer of the detection of iron
inclusion in a turbine disk
manufactured from the same powder
metal material used to manufacture
certain HPT stage 1 disks, HPT stage 2
disks, forward HPT rotor seals,
interstage HPT seals, and stages 7–9
compressor rotor spools for GE90–90B,
GE90–94B, GE90–110B1, and GE90–
115B engines. Further investigation by
the manufacturer determined that the
iron inclusion is attributed to
deficiencies in the manufacturing
process and may cause reduced material
properties and a lower fatigue life
capability, which may result in
premature fracture and subsequent
uncontained failure. The FAA has been
informed that GE has communicated
with affected operators with affected
HPT stage 1 and stage 2 disks regarding
the proposed corrective action for this
unsafe condition. As a result, affected
operators are already aware of the
proposed corrective action and have
already performed the actions proposed
in this AD. Therefore, the FAA has
determined that the compliance time to
replace the affected HPT stage 1 and
stage 2 disks before further flight is
E:\FR\FM\05SEP1.SGM
05SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 5, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60599-60603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19003]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 5, 2023 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 60599]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1207
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-22-0041]
Potato Research and Promotion Plan; Changes to Board Membership
and Administrative Committee
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement recommendations from the
National Potato Promotion Board (Board) to change its membership and
organization by revising the formula used to determine the number of
producer and importer seats on the Board, reducing the maximum number
of importer seats on the Board, and indefinitely suspending the
Administrative Committee. In addition to these Board-recommended
changes, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) would make several
non-substantive changes to clarify the start of the term of office for
Board members and modernize the Board's procedures. The Board
administers the Potato Research and Promotion Plan (Plan) with
oversight by the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS).
DATES: Comments must be received by October 5, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposed rule. Comments may be mailed to the Docket
Clerk, Market Development Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax:
(202) 720-8938; or submitted electronically by Email:
[email protected]; or via internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the document number and the date and page
number of this issue of the Federal Register. All comments will be made
available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours or can be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov. Comments submitted in response to this proposed
rule will be included in the rulemaking record and will be made
available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexandra Caryl, Branch Chief, Mid-
Atlantic Region Branch, Market Development Division, Specialty Crop
Program, AMS, USDA, STOP 0244, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 1406-
S, Washington, DC 20250-0244; Telephone: (202) 720-8805; or Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule affecting the Plan (7 CFR
part 1207) is authorized under the Potato Research and Promotion Act of
1971 (Act) (7 U.S.C. 2611-2627).
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
USDA is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive
Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. Executive Order 14094 reaffirms,
supplements, and updates Executive Order 12866 and further directs
agencies to solicit and consider input from a wide range of affected
and interested parties through a variety of means. This proposed rule
is not a significant regulatory action within the meaning of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this action has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget under section 6 of the Executive Order.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments. AMS has assessed the impact of this proposed rule
on Indian Tribes and determined that this rule would not have Tribal
implications that require consultation under Executive Order 13175. AMS
hosts a quarterly teleconference with Tribal leaders where matters of
mutual interest regarding the marketing of agricultural products are
discussed. Information about the proposed changes to the regulations
will be shared during an upcoming quarterly call, and Tribal leaders
will be informed about the proposed revisions to the regulation and the
opportunity to submit comments. AMS will work with the USDA Office of
Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful consultation is provided as
needed with regard to these proposed changes to the Plan.
Executive Order 12988
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under sec. 311 of the Act (7
U.S.C. 2620), a person subject to the Plan may file a petition with
USDA stating that the Plan, any provision of the Plan, or any
obligation imposed in connection with the Plan, is not in accordance
with law and requesting a modification of the Plan or to be exempted
therefrom. Such person is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. Thereafter, USDA will issue a ruling on the petition. The Act
provides that the district courts of the United States for any district
in which the petitioner resides or conducts business shall have
jurisdiction to review a final ruling on the petition, if the
petitioner files a complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of USDA's final ruling.
Background
Under the Plan, which became effective on March 9, 1972, the Board
administers a nationally coordinated program of research, development,
advertising, and promotion designed to strengthen potatoes' competitive
position and expand domestic and foreign markets for potatoes and
potato products. This program is financed by assessments on handlers
and importers of potatoes and potato products.
[[Page 60600]]
This proposed rule would modify the membership of the Board by
revising the formula to determine the number of producer and importer
seats on the Board. This action would increase the current threshold
from one member seat per five million hundredweight pounds of potatoes
produced or imported to one seat per 10 million hundredweight for both
producer and importer seats. This action would further revise importer
membership by reducing the maximum number of importer seats from five
to two. Additionally, the action would indefinitely suspend the
Administrative Committee. Finally, this proposed rule would clarify the
start date of the term of office for Board members and modernize
certain Board procedures relating to the submission of votes and
ballots.
The Board unanimously recommended the proposed changes to its
membership and the indefinite suspension of the Administrative
Committee at a public meeting on March 9, 2022. Board members present
for the vote represented domestic producers, importers, and the public,
and the recommendations incorporated industry feedback collected by the
Board over a three-year period.
Board Recommendation To Change Membership Rules
Section 1207.320(b) and (c) of the Plan provides the formula used
to determine the number of producer and importer seats on the Board.
Under this formula, one seat is created for every five million
hundredweight of potatoes produced or imported. Therefore, as more
potatoes are produced and imported, the Board has more seats.
The Board has encountered significant challenges in filling Board
member seats. First, since the Board's inception, the potato industry
has experienced both increased production and consolidation. Since the
1970s when the Board was created, production of potatoes in the U.S. as
well as imports from Canada and other countries have increased
substantially. At the same time, the number of commercial potato
farmers and importers has decreased significantly. Accordingly, the
number of seats has grown but there are fewer eligible producers and
importers to fill them. Second, Board members are volunteers, nominated
by peers to represent their State or importer sector. To be a member,
domestic producers and importers use time otherwise spent with their
businesses to travel to meetings and participate in committees and
decision making. Board members are also expected to communicate the
activities of the Board to their constituencies and recruit future
Board members. While service as Board members is important, it is time-
consuming.
As a result of these challenges, the Board in recent years has
typically had approximately 125 total seats, of which only about 100
have been filled. Therefore, the Board has experienced roughly 25
vacancies each year. The proposal would increase the threshold from one
member seat per five million hundredweight pounds of potatoes produced
or imported to one seat per 10 million hundredweight for both producer
and importer seats. With the proposed changes, the Board expects the
number of member seats to reduce to 80.
Section 308 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 2617(b)) and Sec. Sec.
1207.320(c) and 1207.322(d) of the Plan currently allow for a maximum
of five importer seats on the Board. Since importers started paying
assessments in 1991, the Board has always included the maximum of five
importer member seats. Like their domestic producer counterparts,
however, potato importers continue to experience industry
consolidation. According to Customs and Border Protection data, in 2022
there were only 10 importers with annual receipts above the Small
Business Administration's (SBA) threshold of $34 million. The Board has
not filled all five positions in the last 10 years because of the small
number of continuously active importers. Given that members serve
three-year terms and cannot serve more than two consecutive terms,
along with the small number of importers, it is reasonable to decrease
the maximum number of importers from five to two. Additionally, the
Board conducted extensive outreach to affected stakeholders and
received their support for the change, as evidenced by the unanimous
vote for this change.
The initial request for these proposed changes came from domestic
producers and importers. Since 2020, the Board has met with various
State organizations across the country to discuss the proposed changes.
USDA and members of industry also participated in numerous public
meetings conducted by the Board to discuss the chronic vacancies
experienced by the Board as a result of its current size and structure.
The proposed solution developed by the Board reflects the input from
these stakeholders.
Board Recommendation To Suspend the Administrative Committee
Section 1207.507 of the Plan establishes an Administrative
Committee composed of 38 producer members, one importer member, and the
public member, as provided for in the Board's bylaws. The
Administrative Committee is selected annually. The Administrative
Committee acts for the Board in implementing marketing research,
development, advertising, and/or promotion activities as directed by
the Board and is charged with developing and submitting to USDA for
approval specific programs or projects. The Administrative Committee
also acts for the Board in authorizing contracts or agreements for the
development and carrying out of such programs or projects and the
payment of the costs thereof with funds collected pursuant to the Plan.
Finally, the Administrative Committee acts for the Board in contracting
with cooperating agencies for the collection of assessments pursuant to
the Plan.
Due to the proposed changes to the Board's membership, which would
reduce membership seats to approximately 80, the Board believes the
Administrative Committee is no longer needed. Currently, the Board uses
the Administrative Committee like a smaller Board that meets twice a
year, while the full Board only meets once. It is easier and cheaper
for the Administrative Committee to convene and conduct business
because of its reduced size. While the Board, with the proposed
changes, would still be larger than the current Administrative
Committee, the reduced membership under the proposed changes allows the
full Board to meet in lieu of the Administrative Committee. Meeting
more frequently addresses a major industry concern that only members of
committees, which make up the Administrative Committee, have sufficient
interaction with staff to fully understand the programs and activities
the Board implements. Although meeting more frequently may require a
greater time commitment from Board members, the Board believes the
benefits of this change would outweigh any additional burden on
members. Furthermore, as explained in the next section, USDA proposes
to amend the regulations to permit voting and balloting via electronic
methods, which is expected to increase the efficiency of the Board's
operations and make it easier for members to participate. By reducing
the Board size to a more reasonable number of members, the Board hopes
to include all members on committees to promote Board member
interaction and involvement. Therefore, the proposed changes would
indefinitely suspend the Administrative Committee.
[[Page 60601]]
USDA Proposed Changes
Under Sec. 1207.321(a), the term of office of Board members starts
on July 1, or such other date as may be specified in the regulations.
In 1973, USDA added Sec. 1207.504, which provided that the term of
office would instead start on April 1. In 1984, Sec. 1207.504 was
amended to require the term of office to start on March 1. Since then,
each member's term has started on March 1. USDA proposes to change the
start date in Sec. 1207.321(a) from July 1 to March 1 to match Sec.
1207.504 and be consistent with the current practice of the Board.
In Sec. 1207.325(c), the Plan provides that Board members may vote
on non-controversial matters and matters of an emergency nature when
there is not enough time to call an assembled meeting by mail,
telegraph, or telephone. USDA proposes changing this language to remove
the reference to telegraph as a means for voting and to allow for
voting by mail, electronic mail, facsimile, or any other means of
communication. In Sec. 1207.503(a), (b), and (c), the Plan provides
that producers and importers may nominate Board members at meetings or
by mail ballots. USDA proposes changing this language to allow ballots
to be submitted by mail, electronic mail, facsimile, or any other means
of communication. These proposed changes would modernize the sections
and increase accessibility to the voting and balloting processes by
providing additional options.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of
the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject
to such actions so that small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened. The RFA requires, where feasible, an
estimate of the number of small businesses affected by the rule. This
regulatory flexibility analysis estimates a proportion of small
businesses where it is not feasible to estimate a number.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size
standards that determine whether a business entity is a small business.
The size standards are based on the entity's economic activity, or
industry, and generally use the North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS). The size standards are expressed in annual receipts in
millions of dollars or in number of employees, and indicate the maximum
allowed for an entity to be considered a small business.
The SBA defines small potato producers as those having annual
receipts equal to or less than $4.25 million (Potato Farming, NAICS
code 111211). Small agricultural service firms (handlers and importers)
are defined as those having annual receipts equal to or less than $34
million (Postharvest Crop Activities, NAICS code 115114) (13 CFR
121.201). These were the numbers in effect when this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis was prepared in May 2023.
According to the Board, in 2021 there were approximately 1,500
producers and 955 handlers of potatoes. Since data was not available on
the number of producers that are small businesses according to the SBA
standard, this analysis computes an estimate of the number of small
farms using census data from the USDA's National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS). Producers that pay Board assessments have a
minimum of five acres of potatoes. The 2017 Agricultural Census (the
most recent census data available) reported 2,420 farms with five or
more harvested acres of potatoes, which is reasonably close to the
Board estimate of 1,500 producers that paid assessments in 2021.
NASS reported a 2022 U.S. potato crop value of $5,069,511,000 and
895,600 harvested acres (the most recent annual data available). The
estimated average value per harvested acre is $5,660 (obtained by
dividing the crop value of $5,069,511,000 by the number of acres,
895,600). Thus, on average, a farm would have to harvest 751 or fewer
acres of potatoes to meet the SBA's definition of a small business
(obtained by dividing the SBA threshold of $4.25 million by the
estimated 2022 average value per acre, $5,660).
According to the 2017 Agricultural Census, out of the 2,420 potato
farms with five or more harvested acres, 2,030 farms (84 percent)
harvested 749 or fewer acres, very close to the 751 or fewer acres in
the previous computation. Based on these computations, and assuming a
normal distribution, a large majority of potato farms paying
assessments to the Board are small businesses according to SBA
criteria.
As noted above, the SBA threshold size for a small agricultural
service business is $34 million in annual sales. The Board estimate of
the number of potato handlers in 2021 was 955. Dividing the $5.07
billion NASS crop revenue estimate by 955 yields an annual estimate of
potato sales per handler of approximately $5.3 million (farm level
value), which is well below $34 million, the SBA threshold size for a
small agricultural service business.
Potato handlers perform various procedures to get the potatoes to
market, including grading, sorting, packaging, and shipment. What
handlers are paid can be estimated by obtaining an annual average
shipping point price for potatoes from AMS Market News. AMS shipping
point prices capture the prices received by shippers (handlers) after
buying potatoes from growers, and then grading, sorting, packaging, and
shipping. The 2022 average AMS shipping point price received for
potatoes ($0.20 per pound) is 55 percent higher than the 2022 average
annual NASS price of $0.129 per pound received by growers. Adding 55
percent to the $5.3 million potato sales per handler at the farm level
yields an estimate of $8.2 million average annual sales at the handler
level, which is also well below the SBA small business threshold size
of $34 million or less in annual sales. Assuming a normal distribution,
a majority of potato handlers are small agricultural service
businesses, according to SBA criteria.
Based on a review of 2022 potato import data from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, there were approximately 140 importers. Of those 140
importers, 130 (93 percent) had potato imports valued at $34 million or
less, the SBA size threshold for small agricultural service firms.
Therefore, 130 potato importers are small businesses in terms of potato
import value, using SBA business size criteria.
This proposal would amend Sec. Sec. 1207.320, 1207.321, 1207.322,
1207.325, and 1207.503, and suspend Sec. 1207.507. The changes would
modify the membership of the Board by revising the formula to determine
the number of seats on the Board and reducing the maximum number of
importer seats on the Board. The changes would also indefinitely
suspend the Administrative Committee, clarify the start date of the
term of office of Board members, and modernize the Board's voting and
balloting procedures.
This proposed rule would not impose any new costs on producers,
handlers, or importers. This proposal would also not impose any
additional reporting, recordkeeping, or information collection
requirements on affected entities. The proposed changes are
administrative in nature and would allow the Board to more effectively
carry out the requirements of the Plan while potentially reducing costs
and increasing participation. With these
[[Page 60602]]
changes, fewer individuals would be required to attend meetings,
reducing the time burden and costs associated with traveling and
attending meetings. Further, modernizing the Board's procedures to
authorize additional methods for casting votes and ballots could help
increase participation.
The Board considered taking no action and continuing to experience
significant membership vacancies. The Board decided against this option
because vacancies have become pervasive. Therefore, these alternatives
were rejected.
As with all Federal promotion programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Regarding outreach efforts, all the Board's meetings, including the
March 9, 2022, meeting during which the Board recommendations relevant
to this action were discussed, are open to the public and interested
persons are invited to participate and express their views. No concerns
were raised in these meetings about the changes proposed in this
document.
We have performed this initial regulatory flexibility analysis
regarding the impact of this proposed action on small entities, and we
invite comments concerning potential effects of this action on small
businesses.
While this proposed rule as set forth below has not yet received
the approval of USDA, it has been determined that it is consistent with
and would effectuate the purposes of the Act.
A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments received in response to
this proposed rule will be considered prior to finalizing this action.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1207
Advertising, Agricultural research, Potatoes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 1207 as follows:
PART 1207--POTATO RESEARCH AND PROMOTION PLAN
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1207 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2611-2627; 7 U.S.C. 7401.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1207.320 by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1207.320 Establishment and membership.
* * * * *
(b) Producer membership upon the Board shall be determined on the
basis of the potato production reported in the latest Crop Production
Annual Summary Report issued by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. If a State's potato
production data is not provided by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service, the Board may use an alternative data source that reliably
reflects potato production in the United States. Unless the Secretary,
upon recommendation of the Board, determines an alternate basis, for
each 10 million hundredweight of such production, or major fraction
thereof, produced within each State, such State shall be entitled to
one member. However, each State shall initially be entitled to at least
one member.
(c) The number of importer member positions on the Board shall be
based on the hundredweights of potatoes, potato products equivalent to
fresh potatoes, and seed potatoes imported into the United States but
shall not exceed two importer members. Unless the Secretary, upon
recommendation of the Board, determines an alternate basis, there shall
be one importer member position for each 10 million hundredweight, or
major fraction thereof, of potatoes, potato product equivalents, and
seed potatoes imported into the United States.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 1207.321 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1207.321 Term of office.
(a) The term of office of Board members shall be 3 years, beginning
March 1, or such other beginning date as may be approved pursuant to
regulations.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 1207.322 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1207.322 Nominations and appointment.
* * * * *
(d) The importer members shall be nominated by importers of
potatoes, potato products and/or seed potatoes. The number of importer
members on the Board shall be announced by the Secretary and shall not
exceed two members. The Board may call upon organizations of potato,
potato products and/or seed potato importers to assist in nominating
importers for membership on the Board. If such organizations fail to
submit nominees or are determined by the Board to not adequately
represent importers, then the Board may conduct meetings of importers
to nominate eligible importers for Board member positions. In
determining if importer organizations adequately represent importers,
the Board shall consider:
(1) How many importers belong to the association;
(2) What percentage of the total number of importers is represented
by the association;
(3) Is the association representative of the potato, potato
product, and seed potato import industry;
(4) Does the association speak for potato, potato product, and seed
potato importers; and
(5) Other relevant information as may be warranted.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 1207.325 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1207.325 Procedure.
* * * * *
(c) For routine and noncontroversial matters which do not require
deliberation and the exchange of views, and for matters of an emergency
nature when there is not enough time to call an assembled meeting, the
Board may act upon a majority of concurring votes of its members cast
by mail, telephone, electronic mail, facsimile, or any other means of
communication. Any vote cast by telephone shall be confirmed promptly
in writing.
0
6. Amend Sec. 1207.503 by revising paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1207.503 Nominations.
(a) Pursuant to Sec. 1207.322 of the plan, the Board shall assist
producers in producing sections or States each year to nominate
producer members for the Board. Such nominations may be conducted at
meetings or with ballots submitted by mail, electronic mail, facsimile,
or any other means of communication. One individual shall be nominated
for each position to become vacant. A list of nominees shall be
submitted to the Secretary for consideration by November 1 of each
year.
(b) Pursuant to Sec. 1207.322 of the plan, the Board shall assist
importers each year to nominate importer members for
[[Page 60603]]
the Board. Such nominations may be conducted at meetings or with
ballots submitted by mail, electronic mail, facsimile, or any other
means of communication.
(c) Nomination meetings or balloting by mail, electronic mail,
facsimile, or any other means of communication shall be well publicized
with notice given to producers, importers, and the Secretary at least
10 days prior to each meeting or distribution of ballots.
* * * * *
Sec. 1207.507 [Stayed]
0
7. Stay Sec. 1207.507 indefinitely.
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-19003 Filed 9-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P