Imazapyr; Pesticide Tolerances, 57891-57894 [2023-18222]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:37 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 16, 2023.
Edward Messina,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add § 180.725 to subpart C to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.725 Pyraclonil; tolerances for
residues.
(a)–(b) [Reserved]
(c) Tolerances with regional
registrations. Tolerances are established
for residues of the herbicide pyraclonil,
including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities to
the table to this paragraph (c).
Compliance with the tolerance levels
specified in the table to this paragraph
(c) is to be determined by measuring
only pyraclonil (1-(3-chloro-4,5,6,7tetrahydropyrazolo[1,5-a]pyridin-2-yl)5-(methyl-2-propyn-1-ylamino)-1Hpyrazole-4-carbonitrile).
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (c)
Commodity
Parts per
million
Rice, grain ................................
0.01
(d) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2023–18181 Filed 8–23–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0577; FRL–11274–01–
OCSPP]
Imazapyr; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
57891
Final rule.
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of imazapyr in or
on rice, bran and rice, grain. BASF
Corporation requested these tolerances
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 24, 2023. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 23, 2023, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0577, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or in-person at the Office of Pesticide
Programs Regulatory Public Docket
(OPP Docket) in the Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), West William Jefferson Clinton
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room and the OPP Docket is
(202) 566–1744. Please review the
visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Smith, Director, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 566–1030; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
57892
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Federal Register Office’s e-CFR site
at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
In the Federal Register of September
23, 2022 (87 FR 58047) (FRL–9410–05–
OCSPP), EPA issued a document
pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing
of a pesticide petition (PP 2E9009) by
BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709–3528.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.500 be amended by establishing
tolerances for residues of the herbicide
imazapyr, (2-[4,5-dihydro- 4-methyl-4(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid), in or on
rice, bran at 0.2 parts per million (ppm)
and rice, grain at 0.06 ppm. That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by BASF Corporation,
the registrant, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing one tolerance at a different
level than requested by the registrant.
The reason for these changes are
explained in Unit IV.C.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2022–0577 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before October 23, 2023. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2022–0577, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be CBI
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/where-sendcomments-epa-dockets.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:37 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for imazapyr
including exposure resulting from the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with imazapyr follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability as well as
the relationship of the results of the
studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
No hazard was identified for imazapyr
in the toxicity database, i.e., no toxicity
was demonstrated in acceptable
guideline studies generally up to the
highest doses tested of 250–1,000 mg/
kg/day. The data also show that there is
no evidence of neurotoxicity,
immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, or
carcinogenicity. Further, no adverse
developmental effects or adverse
reproductive effects were detected in
well-conducted guideline studies.
Therefore, EPA concluded that dietary,
occupational, and residential exposures
to imazapyr do not pose a significant
human health risk. Although there is
potential for exposure to imazapyr, no
hazard was identified from the wellconducted toxicity studies. No adverse
effects were observed in the submitted
toxicological studies regardless of the
route of exposure or the species tested.
Therefore, risk assessments are not
required. Furthermore, the toxicology
database is considered to be adequate,
and no additional studies are required.
Specific information on the studies
received and the nature of the adverse
effects caused by imazapyr as well as
the no-observed-adverse-effect-level
(NOAEL) and the lowest-observedadverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the
toxicity studies can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in document titled
‘‘Imazapyr Human Health Risks
Assessment for the Establishment of
Permanent Tolerances for Residues in/
on Rice’’ (hereinafter ‘‘Imazapyr Human
Health Risk Assessment’’) on pages 12–
15 in docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2022–0577.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide’s toxicological
profile is determined, EPA identifies
toxicological points of departure (POD)
and levels of concern to use in
evaluating the risk posed by human
exposure to the pesticide. For hazards
that have a threshold below which there
is no appreciable risk, the toxicological
POD is used as the basis for derivation
of reference values for risk assessment.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
PODs are developed based on a careful
analysis of the doses in each
toxicological study to determine the the
NOAEL and the the LOAEL.
Uncertainty/safety factors are used in
conjunction with the POD to calculate a
safe exposure level—generally referred
to as a population-adjusted dose (PAD)
or a reference dose (RfD)—and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For nonthreshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead
to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability
of an occurrence of the adverse effect
expected in a lifetime. For more
information on the general principles
EPA uses in risk characterization and a
complete description of the risk
assessment process, see https://
www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/assessinghuman-health-risk-pesticides.
Since no effects were seen in any
guideline toxicity studies at doses
relevant for human health risk
assessment, no toxicological points of
departure (PODs) were selected for
imazapyr.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to imazapyr, EPA considered
exposure under the petitioned-for
tolerances as well as all existing
imazapyr tolerances in 40 CFR 180.500.
There is likely to be dietary exposure to
imazapyr from its registered uses as a
pesticide on domestic crops. Should
exposure occur, however, minimal to no
risk is expected for the general U.S
population, including infants and
children, due to the low toxicity of
imazapyr.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. While there is no additional
exposure expected from imazapyr
tolerances for rice because it is for
import only, there is likely to be dietary
exposure to imazapyr in drinking water
from its registered uses as a pesticide on
domestic crops. Should exposure occur,
however, minimal to no risk is expected
for the general U.S population,
including infants and children, due to
the low toxicity of imazapyr.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., for lawn and garden pest control,
indoor pest control, termiticides, and
flea and tick control on pets).
Imazapyr is currently registered in the
United States for application in/around
the home (homeowner application
permitted) and to noncropland areas,
aquatic sites, grasslands, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:37 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
imidazolinone-tolerant field corn. Due
to the low toxicity of imazapyr,
quantitative exposure assessments are
not required. Residential exposure to
imazapyr is not expected to increase
with this tolerance because these
tolerances are for import only. EPA
concludes with reasonable certainty that
non-occupational exposures to imazapyr
do not pose a significant human health
risk.
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’ Unlike other
pesticides for which EPA has followed
a cumulative risk approach based on a
common mechanism of toxicity, EPA
has not made a common mechanism of
toxicity finding as to imazapyr and any
other substances. For the purposes of
this action, therefore, EPA has not
assumed that imazapyr has a common
mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. Further information
regarding EPA Pesticide Commulative
Risk Assessment can be found at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/pesticidecumulative-risk-assessment-framework.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of
FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
an additional tenfold (10X) margin of
safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for
prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines
based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
Food Quality Protection Agency Safety
Factor (SF). In applying this provision,
EPA either retains the default value of
10X, or uses a different additional safety
factor when reliable data available to
EPA support the choice of a different
factor.
2. Conclusion. No hazard was
identified from the toxicity studies. No
adverse effects were observed in the
submitted toxicological studies
regardless of the route of exposure or
the species tested. The toxicology
database for imazapyr is considered to
be adequate. No additional toxicological
studies are required, and no additional
safety factors to protect children are
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57893
needed and EPA is not retaining the 10X
safety factor.
E. Determination of Safety
Taking into account the available data
for imazapyr, EPA has concluded that
given the lack of toxicity of this
substance, no risks of concern are
expected. Therefore, EPA concludes that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to the general
population, or to infants and children,
from aggregate exposure to imazapyr.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology
(high-performance liquid
chromatography with tandem mass
spectroscopy (LC/MS/MS), method
SOP–PA.0288) is available for tolerance
enforcement.
The method may be requested from:
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex has not established a MRL
for imazapyr in or on rice.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
EPA is establishing the tolerance for
rice, bran at 0.15 ppm rather than at 0.2
ppm as requested by the petitioner. The
rice, bran tolerance is based on the
highest average field trial residue (0.031
ppm) and the median rice bran
processing factor of 3.2x. (0.031 ppm ×
3.2 = 0.099 ppm). The tolerance is being
established at 0.15 ppm because that is
the rounding class after 0.1 ppm. For the
rice grain tolerance of 0.06 ppm, EPA
used the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
maximum residue limit (MRL)
calculation procedures.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of imazapyr (2-[4,5-dihydro4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1Himidazol-2-yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic
acid), in or on rice, bran at 0.15 ppm
and rice, grain at 0.06 ppm.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
57894
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerances in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:37 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)—
Continued
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
*
1 There
are no U.S. registrations as of August 24, 2023.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–18222 Filed 8–23–23; 8:45 am]
VII. Congressional Review Act
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0502; FRL–11272–01–
OCSPP]
Trifluralin; Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
AGENCY:
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Dated: August 18, 2023.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.500, amend the table in
paragraph (a) by:
■ a. Adding a heading for the table;
■ b. Adding in alphabetical order the
entries ‘‘Rice, bran’’ and ‘‘Rice, grain’’;
and
■ c. Revising footnote 1.
The additions and revision read as
follows:
■
§ 180.500 Imazapyr; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of trifluralin in
or on tea, dried and tea, instant. Gowan
Company requested these tolerances
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 24, 2023. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 23, 2023, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0502, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room and OPP Docket
is (202) 566–1744. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services, docket
access, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Rice, bran 1 ...............................
Rice, grain 1 ..............................
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
0.15
0.06
Charles Smith, Director, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number: (202) 566–1030;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57891-57894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18222]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0577; FRL-11274-01-OCSPP]
Imazapyr; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
imazapyr in or on rice, bran and rice, grain. BASF Corporation
requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective August 24, 2023. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 23, 2023,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0577, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or in-person at the Office of Pesticide
Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson
Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room and the OPP Docket is (202) 566-
1744. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Director, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (202) 566-1030; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
[[Page 57892]]
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Federal Register
Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0577 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
October 23, 2023. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0577, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of September 23, 2022 (87 FR 58047) (FRL-
9410-05-OCSPP), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 2E9009) by BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709-3528. The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.500 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the
herbicide imazapyr, (2-[4,5-dihydro- 4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-
1H-imidazol-2- yl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid), in or on rice, bran at
0.2 parts per million (ppm) and rice, grain at 0.06 ppm. That document
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by BASF Corporation, the
registrant, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing one tolerance at a different level than requested by the
registrant. The reason for these changes are explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for imazapyr including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with imazapyr follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
No hazard was identified for imazapyr in the toxicity database,
i.e., no toxicity was demonstrated in acceptable guideline studies
generally up to the highest doses tested of 250-1,000 mg/kg/day. The
data also show that there is no evidence of neurotoxicity,
immunotoxicity, genotoxicity, or carcinogenicity. Further, no adverse
developmental effects or adverse reproductive effects were detected in
well-conducted guideline studies. Therefore, EPA concluded that
dietary, occupational, and residential exposures to imazapyr do not
pose a significant human health risk. Although there is potential for
exposure to imazapyr, no hazard was identified from the well-conducted
toxicity studies. No adverse effects were observed in the submitted
toxicological studies regardless of the route of exposure or the
species tested. Therefore, risk assessments are not required.
Furthermore, the toxicology database is considered to be adequate, and
no additional studies are required.
Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the
adverse effects caused by imazapyr as well as the no-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in document titled ``Imazapyr Human Health Risks
Assessment for the Establishment of Permanent Tolerances for Residues
in/on Rice'' (hereinafter ``Imazapyr Human Health Risk Assessment'') on
pages 12-15 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0577.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment.
[[Page 57893]]
PODs are developed based on a careful analysis of the doses in each
toxicological study to determine the the NOAEL and the the LOAEL.
Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with the POD to
calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a population-
adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe margin of
exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any
amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of the
adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides.
Since no effects were seen in any guideline toxicity studies at
doses relevant for human health risk assessment, no toxicological
points of departure (PODs) were selected for imazapyr.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to imazapyr, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned-for
tolerances as well as all existing imazapyr tolerances in 40 CFR
180.500. There is likely to be dietary exposure to imazapyr from its
registered uses as a pesticide on domestic crops. Should exposure
occur, however, minimal to no risk is expected for the general U.S
population, including infants and children, due to the low toxicity of
imazapyr.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. While there is no
additional exposure expected from imazapyr tolerances for rice because
it is for import only, there is likely to be dietary exposure to
imazapyr in drinking water from its registered uses as a pesticide on
domestic crops. Should exposure occur, however, minimal to no risk is
expected for the general U.S population, including infants and
children, due to the low toxicity of imazapyr.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
Imazapyr is currently registered in the United States for
application in/around the home (homeowner application permitted) and to
noncropland areas, aquatic sites, grasslands, and imidazolinone-
tolerant field corn. Due to the low toxicity of imazapyr, quantitative
exposure assessments are not required. Residential exposure to imazapyr
is not expected to increase with this tolerance because these
tolerances are for import only. EPA concludes with reasonable certainty
that non-occupational exposures to imazapyr do not pose a significant
human health risk.
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' Unlike other pesticides for
which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach based on a common
mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity
finding as to imazapyr and any other substances. For the purposes of
this action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that imazapyr has a common
mechanism of toxicity with other substances. Further information
regarding EPA Pesticide Commulative Risk Assessment can be found at
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/pesticide-cumulative-risk-assessment-framework.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality
Protection Agency Safety Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA
either retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional
safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of
a different factor.
2. Conclusion. No hazard was identified from the toxicity studies.
No adverse effects were observed in the submitted toxicological studies
regardless of the route of exposure or the species tested. The
toxicology database for imazapyr is considered to be adequate. No
additional toxicological studies are required, and no additional safety
factors to protect children are needed and EPA is not retaining the 10X
safety factor.
E. Determination of Safety
Taking into account the available data for imazapyr, EPA has
concluded that given the lack of toxicity of this substance, no risks
of concern are expected. Therefore, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general
population, or to infants and children, from aggregate exposure to
imazapyr.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology (high-performance liquid
chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy (LC/MS/MS), method SOP-
PA.0288) is available for tolerance enforcement.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address:
[email protected].
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4).
The Codex has not established a MRL for imazapyr in or on rice.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
EPA is establishing the tolerance for rice, bran at 0.15 ppm rather
than at 0.2 ppm as requested by the petitioner. The rice, bran
tolerance is based on the highest average field trial residue (0.031
ppm) and the median rice bran processing factor of 3.2x. (0.031 ppm x
3.2 = 0.099 ppm). The tolerance is being established at 0.15 ppm
because that is the rounding class after 0.1 ppm. For the rice grain
tolerance of 0.06 ppm, EPA used the Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD) maximum residue limit (MRL)
calculation procedures.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of imazapyr (2-
[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-
pyridinecarboxylic acid), in or on rice, bran at 0.15 ppm and rice,
grain at 0.06 ppm.
[[Page 57894]]
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply to this action. In addition,
this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 18, 2023.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.500, amend the table in paragraph (a) by:
0
a. Adding a heading for the table;
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order the entries ``Rice, bran'' and ``Rice,
grain''; and
0
c. Revising footnote 1.
The additions and revision read as follows:
Sec. 180.500 Imazapyr; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Rice, bran \1\............................................. 0.15
Rice, grain \1\............................................ 0.06
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no U.S. registrations as of August 24, 2023.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-18222 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P