Federal Sector Equal Employment Opportunity, 57879-57881 [2023-18100]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
§ 72.3
[Amended]
42. In § 72.3, amend the definition of
‘‘High-level radioactive waste or HLW’’,
in paragraph (1), by removing the text
‘‘radioacive’’ and adding in its place the
text ‘‘radioactive.’’
■
PART 73—PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF
PLANTS AND MATERIALS
43. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
secs. 53, 147, 149, 161, 161A, 170D, 170E,
170H, 170I, 223, 229, 234, 1701 (42 U.S.C.
2073, 2167, 2169, 2201, 2210d, 2210e, 2210h,
2210i, 2273, 2278a, 2282, 2297f); Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, secs. 201, 202
(42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842); Nuclear Waste Policy
Act of 1982, secs. 135, 141 (42 U.S.C. 10155,
10161); 44 U.S.C. 3504 note.
Section 73.37(b)(2) also issued under Sec.
301, Public Law 96–295, 94 Stat. 789 (42
U.S.C. 5841 note).
44. In § 73.4 revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 73.4
Communications.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) By hand delivery to the NRC’s
offices at 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852–2783;
*
*
*
*
*
§ 73.50
[Amended]
45. In § 73.50, amend the introductory
text by adding the article ‘‘a’’ before the
words ‘‘nuclear reactor’’.
■
Dated: August 18, 2023.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cindy K. Bladey,
Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking
Support Branch, Division of Rulemaking,
Environmental, and Financial Support, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2023–18183 Filed 8–23–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1614
RIN 3046–AB23
Federal Sector Equal Employment
Opportunity
Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
AGENCY:
The Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (‘‘EEOC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) is issuing a final rule
revising its Federal sector complaint
processing regulations to allow for the
digital transmission of equal
employment opportunity hearing and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:37 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
appellate documents and to address
various uses of the Commission’s
Electronic Public Portal.
DATES: Effective August 24, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Oram, Assistant Legal
Counsel, at (202) 921–2665 or
kathleen.oram@eeoc.gov, or Gary J.
Hozempa, Senior Staff Attorney, at (202)
921–2672 or gary.hozempa@eeoc.gov,
Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission.
Requests for this document in an
alternative format should be made to the
EEOC’s Office of Communications and
Legislative Affairs at (202) 921–3191
(voice), 1–800–669–6820 (TTY), or 1–
844–234–5122 (ASL video phone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On September 27, 2022, the EEOC
published in the Federal Register a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(‘‘NPRM’’) announcing its intention to
amend 29 CFR part 1614 by authorizing
the EEOC, the Office of Federal
Operations (‘‘OFO’’), and the EEOC’s
Administrative Judges (‘‘AJs’’) to issue
and receive documents electronically
instead of, or in addition to, using first
class U.S. mail (‘‘first class mail’’).
Currently, 29 CFR 1614.109(i) provides
that an AJ ‘‘shall send copies of the
hearing . . . decision to the parties.’’
Section 1614.405(a) requires that a
Commission appellate decision be
‘‘transmitted to the complainant and the
agency by first class mail.’’ The NPRM
proposed authorizing the Commission
to transmit its hearing and appellate
decisions, orders, and related
documents to registered complainants
through the EEOC Electronic Public
Portal (‘‘Public Portal’’ or ‘‘Portal’’). It
also was proposed that complainants
could file hearing requests, appeals, and
related documents through the Portal.
The NPRM further proposed requiring
agencies to notify complainants that
they can use the Public Portal to file
hearing requests and appeals. Finally,
the NPRM asked commenters to address
when an EEOC decision transmitted
through the Portal should be considered
to be received.
The final rule formalizes the current
use of electronic communications
between the EEOC and its stakeholders
by explicitly providing for the digital
transmission of complaint files, hearing
requests and associated documents,
appeals and associated documents, and
Commission decisions. The final rule
confirms that the digital receipt of
hearing requests, appeals, Commission
hearing and appellate decisions, and
related documents, is equivalent to
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57879
receipt by first class mail. Nevertheless,
the final rule makes clear that a
complainant’s use of the Portal is
voluntary.
Thus, for complainants who choose
not to establish a Portal account, or who
establish an account but do not agree to
receive EEOC communications only
through the Portal, OFO will use first
class mail to communicate with, and
send documents to, complainants, even
while transmitting the same documents
to agencies via FedSEP (the EEOC’s
separate electronic Portal for agencyonly use); AJs also will use email to
transmit documents. These same
complainants will be able to file hearing
requests, appeals, and related
documents through the current methods
available (first class and registered mail,
facsimile, personal delivery, and email).
Comments Generally
The EEOC received five comments
about the NPRM, four from individuals
and one from an attorney organization
(‘‘organization’’). The commentors
generally favor authorizing the EEOC
and its AJs to transmit decisions and
orders through the Portal. They also
approve of allowing complainants to use
the Portal to transmit hearing and
appellate requests and documents. The
organization opposes certain proposals
while it and some of the individuals
recommend specific modifications.
Most provided suggestions regarding
determining a receipt date for Portaltransmitted decisions.
Specific Comments and EEOC’s
Response
Complainant Opt-In To Communicate
via the Portal
The NPRM provided that, where a
complainant registers with the Portal,
the EEOC will communicate with the
complainant only through the Portal
unless and until the complainant
informs the EEOC that they want to
receive EEOC documents by first class
mail. The organization argues for a final
rule specifying that a complainant will
receive documents electronically only
after the complainant affirmatively
consents, or opts-in, to receive
documents through the Portal. It further
proposes that, even when providing
consent, the complainant should retain
the option to send and receive
documents by other methods, such as
first class mail, in addition to receiving
these same documents through the
Portal. To this end, the organization
proposes that a final rule should require
agencies and the EEOC to provide
complainants with relevant contact
information for all filing methods
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
57880
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
during all stages of the complaint
process.
The EEOC agrees that complainants
who establish Portal accounts should be
given an opportunity to affirmatively
declare whether they agree to receive
documents only through the Portal. A
functionality will be added to the Portal
for complainants to indicate this
preference. Complainants who do not
give their consent will receive OFO
communications through first class mail
and AJ communications through first
class mail or email (if they provide an
email address). However, the EEOC does
not think it efficient to continue to use
first class mail or other methods of
communicating after a complainant
affirmatively agrees to communicate via
the Portal. Receipt by OFO of
documents in the same matter through
multiple means will complicate OFO
recordkeeping, increase expenses, and
cause delays.
Regarding addressing the various
ways a complainant may communicate
with an agency, the EEOC declines to
implement the organization’s
recommendations as they exceed the
scope of this rule. The EEOC did not
intend to address in this rulemaking
either an agency’s communication
methods with a complainant or a
complainant’s communication methods
with an agency. Absent an opportunity
for public comment on these matters, it
is not appropriate to address them in
this final rule.
Receipt Date of Decisions Issued via the
Portal
As noted earlier, the NPRM
specifically asked commenters to
suggest when a decision or other
document sent through the Portal
should be deemed to be received by the
complainant. Three individuals suggest
that the receipt date should be the date
the decision is first accessed by the
complainant, regardless of when it is
uploaded to the Portal. Two of these
individuals stated that if the EEOC uses
a standard such as, ‘‘a decision is
deemed to be received within X days of
when it is uploaded to the Portal,’’ the
rule also should state that this
presumption does not apply if the EEOC
learns that the decision ‘‘did not reach
the person to be served.’’
The organization suggests creating
two separate rules regarding receipt
dates, depending on whether only the
Portal is used, or email is used as well.
If only email is used, the organization
favors a rebuttable receipt date of seven
days from the date of the email. If only
the Portal is used, receipt should be
deemed to occur when the complainant
downloads the document. If both means
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:37 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
of transmittal are used, the receipt date
should be the date the decision is
accessed via the Portal or email, or
seven days after the email is sent,
whichever occurs first.
The EEOC appreciates receiving these
suggestions about a receipt date and
concludes that it will address this topic
based on these submissions. The final
rule borrows from some of the
comments and 29 CFR 1614.604(b),
which deems receipt of regular mail to
occur within five days of when a
document is mailed. Thus, for Portal,
email, and all other digital
communications, the final rule provides
that receipt is deemed to occur when a
document is accessed on the Portal or
received via electronic means, or within
5 days of when a document is uploaded
to the Portal or transmitted
electronically, whichever occurs first.
Further, 29 CFR 1614.604(c), which
allows equitable tolling of time frames,
will apply to all transmissions, digital or
otherwise. Finally, 29 CFR 1614.605(d)
provides that receipt of a document is
calculated from the complainant’s
receipt, unless the complainant is
represented by an attorney, in which
case the attorney’s receipt controls. This
provision requires no edits to apply to
digital receipts.
Useability of the Portal
The organization discusses difficulties
it and its clients have had with certain
features of the Portal. The organization
offers a number of proposed technical
enhancements to the Portal designed to
make the Portal more user-friendly.
These suggestions, while helpful, are
not the proper subject matter for this
final rule. Nevertheless, the EEOC will
continue to work with its stakeholders
to improve the functionality of the
Public Portal (and FedSEP).
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
The Commission has complied with
the principles in section 1(b) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review. This NPRM is not
a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of the order and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of the
order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 35) applies to
rulemakings in which an agency creates
a new paperwork burden on regulated
entities or modifies an existing burden.
This final rule contains no new
information collection requirements on
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the public, and therefore, it creates no
new paperwork burdens or
modifications to existing burdens
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Commission certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this NPRM will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because it applies exclusively to
employees, applicants for employment,
and agencies of the Federal Government
and does not impose a burden on any
business entities. For this reason, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This NPRM will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This NPRM does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, it is not
a ‘‘rule’’ pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act. Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1614
Administrative practice and
procedure, Age discrimination, Color
discrimination, Equal employment
opportunity, Equal pay, Genetic
information discrimination,
Government employees, Individuals
with disabilities, National origin
discrimination, Pregnancy
discrimination, Race discrimination,
Religious discrimination, Sex
discrimination.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission amends
chapter XIV of title 29 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1614—FEDERAL SECTOR
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 29 CFR
part 1614 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 206(d), 633a, 791 and
794a; 42 U.S.C. 2000e–16 and 2000ff–6(e);
E.O. 10577, 3 CFR, 1954–1958 Comp., p. 218;
E.O. 11222, 3 CFR, 1964–1965 Comp., p. 306;
E.O. 11478, 3 CFR, 1969 Comp., p. 133; E.O.
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 163 / Thursday, August 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
12106, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 263; Reorg.
Plan No. 1 of 1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p.
321.
2. Amend § 1614.108 by:
a. Adding a sentence at the end of
paragraph (f); and
■ b. Revising the first sentence in
paragraph (h).
The additions read as follows:
■
■
§ 1614.108
Investigation of complaints.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * * The notice that the
complainant has the right to request a
hearing and decision from an
administrative judge shall inform the
complainant that the hearing request
may be filed using the EEOC Public
Portal, available at https://publicportal.
eeoc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Where the complainant has
received the notice required in
paragraph (f) of this section or at any
time after 180 days have elapsed from
the filing of the complaint, the
complainant may request a hearing by
submitting a written request for a
hearing directly to the EEOC office
indicated in the agency’s
acknowledgment letter, or by filing a
request for a hearing through the EEOC
Public Portal.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1614.109
[Amended]
3. In § 1614.109 amend paragraph (i)
in the second sentence by removing the
word ‘‘send’’ and adding in its place the
word ‘‘transmit’’.
■ 4. Amend § 1614.110 by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 1614.110
Final action by agencies.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) When an agency takes final action
by issuing a final order or decision that
requires the agency to include a notice
that the complainant has the right to file
an appeal with the EEOC, the notice
shall inform the complainant that the
appeal may be filed using the EEOC
Public Portal, available at https://
publicportal.eeoc.gov.
■ 5. Amend § 1614.204 by adding
sentences at the end paragraphs (j)(1)
and (l)(3) to read as follows:
§ 1614.204
Class complaints.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(j)(1) * * * When an agency takes
final action by issuing a final order or
decision that requires the agency to
include a notice that the class agent has
the right to file an appeal with the
EEOC, the notice shall inform the class
agent that the appeal may be filed using
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:37 Aug 23, 2023
Jkt 259001
the EEOC Public Portal, available at
https://publicportal.eeoc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
(l)(3) * * * When an agency takes
final action by issuing a final order or
decision that requires the agency to
include a notice that the class member
has the right to file an appeal with the
EEOC, the notice shall inform the class
member that the appeal may be filed
using the EEOC Public Portal, available
at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov.
§ 1614.403
[Amended]
6. Amend § 1614.403 paragraph (a) by
adding the words ‘‘by email, or through
FedSEP or the EEOC’s Public Portal, as
applicable,’’ after the word
‘‘electronically’’.
■ 7. Amend § 1614.405 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 1614.405
Decisions on appeals.
(a) The Office of Federal Operations,
on behalf of the Commission, shall issue
a written decision setting forth its
reasons for the decision. The
Commission shall dismiss appeals in
accordance with §§ 1614.107,
1614.403(c) and 1614.409. The decision
shall be based on the preponderance of
the evidence. The decision on an appeal
from an agency’s final action shall be
based on a de novo review, except that
the review of the factual findings in a
decision by an administrative judge
issued pursuant to § 1614.109(i) shall be
based on a substantial evidence
standard of review. If the decision
contains a finding of discrimination,
appropriate remedy(ies) shall be
included and, where appropriate, the
entitlement to interest, attorney’s fees or
costs shall be indicated. The decision
shall reflect the date of its issuance,
inform the complainant of his or her
civil action rights, and be transmitted to
the complainant and the agency. For
complainants who are not registered
with the EEOC Public Portal, the
decision will be transmitted by first
class mail. For complainants who are
registered with the Public Portal, the
decision will be transmitted via the
Portal provided the complainant
affirmatively consents to receive the
decision through the Portal. For
registered complainants who do not
provide affirmative consent, and for
complainants who affirmatively consent
but subsequently notify the Commission
that they withdraw their consent, the
decision will be transmitted by first
class mail. The Commission will
transmit the decision to the agency via
FedSEP.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 1614.604 by:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57881
a. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and
(d) as paragraphs (f) and (g).
■ b. Adding new paragraphs (c), (d), and
(e).
The additions read as follows:
■
§ 1614.604
Filing and computation of time.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) A hearing request, appeal, brief, or
other document filed by a complainant
using the EEOC Public Portal, or filed by
an agency using FedSEP, shall be
deemed filed on the date the document
is uploaded to the Public Portal or
FedSEP. The timeliness of documents
submitted through the Public Portal and
FedSEP will be determined based on the
time zone from which the document
was submitted.
(d) An EEOC decision that is
transmitted to a complainant through
the Public Portal or by email shall be
deemed to be received when the
decision is accessed on the Portal or
when received if transmitted via email,
or within five days of when the decision
is uploaded to the Portal or emailed,
whichever occurs first.
(e) For the purposes of §§ 1614.108,
1614.109, 1614.204(i), and 1614.401
through 1614.405, the terms accept, file,
filed, filing, issue, issuance, issuing,
notify, notified, receive, receipt, send,
serve, served, service, submit,
submission, submitted, transmit, and
transmitted, shall include digital
transmissions made through FedSEP,
the EEOC Public Portal, or by email.
Dated: August 17, 2023.
Charlotte A. Burrows,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2023–18100 Filed 8–23–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Natural Resources Revenue
30 CFR Part 1206
[Docket No. ONRR–2011–0016; DS63644000
DRT000000.CH7000 223D1113RT]
RIN 1012–AA07
Amendments to OMB Control Numbers
and Certain Forms; Correction
Office of Natural Resources
Revenue (‘‘ONRR’’), Interior.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
On December 8, 2011, ONRR
published a direct final rule that, among
other things, corrected a thermal energy
displaced equation without updating an
image of the equation set forth in the
regulations for illustration purposes.
This document provides a replacement
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM
24AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57879-57881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18100]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 1614
RIN 3046-AB23
Federal Sector Equal Employment Opportunity
AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (``EEOC'' or
``Commission'') is issuing a final rule revising its Federal sector
complaint processing regulations to allow for the digital transmission
of equal employment opportunity hearing and appellate documents and to
address various uses of the Commission's Electronic Public Portal.
DATES: Effective August 24, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Oram, Assistant Legal
Counsel, at (202) 921-2665 or [email protected], or Gary J.
Hozempa, Senior Staff Attorney, at (202) 921-2672 or
[email protected], Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission. Requests for this document in an alternative
format should be made to the EEOC's Office of Communications and
Legislative Affairs at (202) 921-3191 (voice), 1-800-669-6820 (TTY), or
1-844-234-5122 (ASL video phone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On September 27, 2022, the EEOC published in the Federal Register a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``NPRM'') announcing its intention to
amend 29 CFR part 1614 by authorizing the EEOC, the Office of Federal
Operations (``OFO''), and the EEOC's Administrative Judges (``AJs'') to
issue and receive documents electronically instead of, or in addition
to, using first class U.S. mail (``first class mail''). Currently, 29
CFR 1614.109(i) provides that an AJ ``shall send copies of the hearing
. . . decision to the parties.'' Section 1614.405(a) requires that a
Commission appellate decision be ``transmitted to the complainant and
the agency by first class mail.'' The NPRM proposed authorizing the
Commission to transmit its hearing and appellate decisions, orders, and
related documents to registered complainants through the EEOC
Electronic Public Portal (``Public Portal'' or ``Portal''). It also was
proposed that complainants could file hearing requests, appeals, and
related documents through the Portal. The NPRM further proposed
requiring agencies to notify complainants that they can use the Public
Portal to file hearing requests and appeals. Finally, the NPRM asked
commenters to address when an EEOC decision transmitted through the
Portal should be considered to be received.
The final rule formalizes the current use of electronic
communications between the EEOC and its stakeholders by explicitly
providing for the digital transmission of complaint files, hearing
requests and associated documents, appeals and associated documents,
and Commission decisions. The final rule confirms that the digital
receipt of hearing requests, appeals, Commission hearing and appellate
decisions, and related documents, is equivalent to receipt by first
class mail. Nevertheless, the final rule makes clear that a
complainant's use of the Portal is voluntary.
Thus, for complainants who choose not to establish a Portal
account, or who establish an account but do not agree to receive EEOC
communications only through the Portal, OFO will use first class mail
to communicate with, and send documents to, complainants, even while
transmitting the same documents to agencies via FedSEP (the EEOC's
separate electronic Portal for agency-only use); AJs also will use
email to transmit documents. These same complainants will be able to
file hearing requests, appeals, and related documents through the
current methods available (first class and registered mail, facsimile,
personal delivery, and email).
Comments Generally
The EEOC received five comments about the NPRM, four from
individuals and one from an attorney organization (``organization'').
The commentors generally favor authorizing the EEOC and its AJs to
transmit decisions and orders through the Portal. They also approve of
allowing complainants to use the Portal to transmit hearing and
appellate requests and documents. The organization opposes certain
proposals while it and some of the individuals recommend specific
modifications. Most provided suggestions regarding determining a
receipt date for Portal-transmitted decisions.
Specific Comments and EEOC's Response
Complainant Opt-In To Communicate via the Portal
The NPRM provided that, where a complainant registers with the
Portal, the EEOC will communicate with the complainant only through the
Portal unless and until the complainant informs the EEOC that they want
to receive EEOC documents by first class mail. The organization argues
for a final rule specifying that a complainant will receive documents
electronically only after the complainant affirmatively consents, or
opts-in, to receive documents through the Portal. It further proposes
that, even when providing consent, the complainant should retain the
option to send and receive documents by other methods, such as first
class mail, in addition to receiving these same documents through the
Portal. To this end, the organization proposes that a final rule should
require agencies and the EEOC to provide complainants with relevant
contact information for all filing methods
[[Page 57880]]
during all stages of the complaint process.
The EEOC agrees that complainants who establish Portal accounts
should be given an opportunity to affirmatively declare whether they
agree to receive documents only through the Portal. A functionality
will be added to the Portal for complainants to indicate this
preference. Complainants who do not give their consent will receive OFO
communications through first class mail and AJ communications through
first class mail or email (if they provide an email address). However,
the EEOC does not think it efficient to continue to use first class
mail or other methods of communicating after a complainant
affirmatively agrees to communicate via the Portal. Receipt by OFO of
documents in the same matter through multiple means will complicate OFO
recordkeeping, increase expenses, and cause delays.
Regarding addressing the various ways a complainant may communicate
with an agency, the EEOC declines to implement the organization's
recommendations as they exceed the scope of this rule. The EEOC did not
intend to address in this rulemaking either an agency's communication
methods with a complainant or a complainant's communication methods
with an agency. Absent an opportunity for public comment on these
matters, it is not appropriate to address them in this final rule.
Receipt Date of Decisions Issued via the Portal
As noted earlier, the NPRM specifically asked commenters to suggest
when a decision or other document sent through the Portal should be
deemed to be received by the complainant. Three individuals suggest
that the receipt date should be the date the decision is first accessed
by the complainant, regardless of when it is uploaded to the Portal.
Two of these individuals stated that if the EEOC uses a standard such
as, ``a decision is deemed to be received within X days of when it is
uploaded to the Portal,'' the rule also should state that this
presumption does not apply if the EEOC learns that the decision ``did
not reach the person to be served.''
The organization suggests creating two separate rules regarding
receipt dates, depending on whether only the Portal is used, or email
is used as well. If only email is used, the organization favors a
rebuttable receipt date of seven days from the date of the email. If
only the Portal is used, receipt should be deemed to occur when the
complainant downloads the document. If both means of transmittal are
used, the receipt date should be the date the decision is accessed via
the Portal or email, or seven days after the email is sent, whichever
occurs first.
The EEOC appreciates receiving these suggestions about a receipt
date and concludes that it will address this topic based on these
submissions. The final rule borrows from some of the comments and 29
CFR 1614.604(b), which deems receipt of regular mail to occur within
five days of when a document is mailed. Thus, for Portal, email, and
all other digital communications, the final rule provides that receipt
is deemed to occur when a document is accessed on the Portal or
received via electronic means, or within 5 days of when a document is
uploaded to the Portal or transmitted electronically, whichever occurs
first. Further, 29 CFR 1614.604(c), which allows equitable tolling of
time frames, will apply to all transmissions, digital or otherwise.
Finally, 29 CFR 1614.605(d) provides that receipt of a document is
calculated from the complainant's receipt, unless the complainant is
represented by an attorney, in which case the attorney's receipt
controls. This provision requires no edits to apply to digital
receipts.
Useability of the Portal
The organization discusses difficulties it and its clients have had
with certain features of the Portal. The organization offers a number
of proposed technical enhancements to the Portal designed to make the
Portal more user-friendly. These suggestions, while helpful, are not
the proper subject matter for this final rule. Nevertheless, the EEOC
will continue to work with its stakeholders to improve the
functionality of the Public Portal (and FedSEP).
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866
The Commission has complied with the principles in section 1(b) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. This NPRM is not
a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of the order and
does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of the order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) applies to
rulemakings in which an agency creates a new paperwork burden on
regulated entities or modifies an existing burden. This final rule
contains no new information collection requirements on the public, and
therefore, it creates no new paperwork burdens or modifications to
existing burdens subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Commission certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this NPRM will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities because it applies exclusively to employees, applicants for
employment, and agencies of the Federal Government and does not impose
a burden on any business entities. For this reason, a regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This NPRM will not result in the expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Congressional Review Act
This NPRM does not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties and, accordingly, it is not a ``rule'' pursuant
to the Congressional Review Act. Therefore, the reporting requirement
of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1614
Administrative practice and procedure, Age discrimination, Color
discrimination, Equal employment opportunity, Equal pay, Genetic
information discrimination, Government employees, Individuals with
disabilities, National origin discrimination, Pregnancy discrimination,
Race discrimination, Religious discrimination, Sex discrimination.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission amends chapter XIV of title 29 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1614--FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY [AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 29 CFR part 1614 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 206(d), 633a, 791 and 794a; 42 U.S.C.
2000e-16 and 2000ff-6(e); E.O. 10577, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p.
218; E.O. 11222, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 11478, 3 CFR,
1969 Comp., p. 133; E.O.
[[Page 57881]]
12106, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 263; Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 321.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1614.108 by:
0
a. Adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (f); and
0
b. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (h).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1614.108 Investigation of complaints.
* * * * *
(f) * * * The notice that the complainant has the right to request
a hearing and decision from an administrative judge shall inform the
complainant that the hearing request may be filed using the EEOC Public
Portal, available at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov.
* * * * *
(h) Where the complainant has received the notice required in
paragraph (f) of this section or at any time after 180 days have
elapsed from the filing of the complaint, the complainant may request a
hearing by submitting a written request for a hearing directly to the
EEOC office indicated in the agency's acknowledgment letter, or by
filing a request for a hearing through the EEOC Public Portal.
* * * * *
Sec. 1614.109 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 1614.109 amend paragraph (i) in the second sentence by
removing the word ``send'' and adding in its place the word
``transmit''.
0
4. Amend Sec. 1614.110 by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 1614.110 Final action by agencies.
* * * * *
(c) When an agency takes final action by issuing a final order or
decision that requires the agency to include a notice that the
complainant has the right to file an appeal with the EEOC, the notice
shall inform the complainant that the appeal may be filed using the
EEOC Public Portal, available at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov.
0
5. Amend Sec. 1614.204 by adding sentences at the end paragraphs
(j)(1) and (l)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 1614.204 Class complaints.
* * * * *
(j)(1) * * * When an agency takes final action by issuing a final
order or decision that requires the agency to include a notice that the
class agent has the right to file an appeal with the EEOC, the notice
shall inform the class agent that the appeal may be filed using the
EEOC Public Portal, available at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov.
* * * * *
(l)(3) * * * When an agency takes final action by issuing a final
order or decision that requires the agency to include a notice that the
class member has the right to file an appeal with the EEOC, the notice
shall inform the class member that the appeal may be filed using the
EEOC Public Portal, available at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov.
Sec. 1614.403 [Amended]
0
6. Amend Sec. 1614.403 paragraph (a) by adding the words ``by email,
or through FedSEP or the EEOC's Public Portal, as applicable,'' after
the word ``electronically''.
0
7. Amend Sec. 1614.405 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1614.405 Decisions on appeals.
(a) The Office of Federal Operations, on behalf of the Commission,
shall issue a written decision setting forth its reasons for the
decision. The Commission shall dismiss appeals in accordance with
Sec. Sec. 1614.107, 1614.403(c) and 1614.409. The decision shall be
based on the preponderance of the evidence. The decision on an appeal
from an agency's final action shall be based on a de novo review,
except that the review of the factual findings in a decision by an
administrative judge issued pursuant to Sec. 1614.109(i) shall be
based on a substantial evidence standard of review. If the decision
contains a finding of discrimination, appropriate remedy(ies) shall be
included and, where appropriate, the entitlement to interest,
attorney's fees or costs shall be indicated. The decision shall reflect
the date of its issuance, inform the complainant of his or her civil
action rights, and be transmitted to the complainant and the agency.
For complainants who are not registered with the EEOC Public Portal,
the decision will be transmitted by first class mail. For complainants
who are registered with the Public Portal, the decision will be
transmitted via the Portal provided the complainant affirmatively
consents to receive the decision through the Portal. For registered
complainants who do not provide affirmative consent, and for
complainants who affirmatively consent but subsequently notify the
Commission that they withdraw their consent, the decision will be
transmitted by first class mail. The Commission will transmit the
decision to the agency via FedSEP.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 1614.604 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as paragraphs (f) and (g).
0
b. Adding new paragraphs (c), (d), and (e).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1614.604 Filing and computation of time.
* * * * *
(c) A hearing request, appeal, brief, or other document filed by a
complainant using the EEOC Public Portal, or filed by an agency using
FedSEP, shall be deemed filed on the date the document is uploaded to
the Public Portal or FedSEP. The timeliness of documents submitted
through the Public Portal and FedSEP will be determined based on the
time zone from which the document was submitted.
(d) An EEOC decision that is transmitted to a complainant through
the Public Portal or by email shall be deemed to be received when the
decision is accessed on the Portal or when received if transmitted via
email, or within five days of when the decision is uploaded to the
Portal or emailed, whichever occurs first.
(e) For the purposes of Sec. Sec. 1614.108, 1614.109, 1614.204(i),
and 1614.401 through 1614.405, the terms accept, file, filed, filing,
issue, issuance, issuing, notify, notified, receive, receipt, send,
serve, served, service, submit, submission, submitted, transmit, and
transmitted, shall include digital transmissions made through FedSEP,
the EEOC Public Portal, or by email.
Dated: August 17, 2023.
Charlotte A. Burrows,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2023-18100 Filed 8-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P