Security Zone; Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV, 57354-57356 [2023-18170]
Download as PDF
57354
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Aug 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
temporary moving security zone of
limited duration in effect over a period
of ten days. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T11–138 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T11–138 Security Zone: Lake Tahoe,
Glenbrook, NV.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: (1) All waters within 100
yards of the vessel carrying high ranking
government officials and members of
their official party when transiting Lake
Tahoe.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a
Federal, State, or local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the
enforcement of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or a designated representative.
(2) The security zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative through the
Command Post at telephone (202) 604–
8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel
21A. Those in the security zone must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced, when necessary, from
12:01 a.m. on August 18, 2023, until
11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023.
Dated: August 17, 2023.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2023–18168 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0699]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook,
NV
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
in the navigable waters of Lake Tahoe,
Glenbrook, NV within the San Francisco
Captain of the Port Zone. The security
zone is along the Lake Tahoe shoreline
from approximately 200 yards from
shore in the Glenbrook area. The
security zone is necessary to protect the
harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities
of Lake Tahoe during a visit by highranking government officials and their
official party. Entry of vessels or persons
into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port San Francisco or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from August 23, 2023
through August 27, 2023. For the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from August 18, 2023, until
August 23, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0699 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LT William Harris, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco, Waterways
Management Division; telephone 415–
399–7443, email SFWaterways@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The Coast Guard was notified
of the need of this security zone with
less than two weeks’ notice and did not
receive final details until August 16,
2023. The high-ranking government
official visit will occur before
completion of any comment period,
thereby jeopardizing the security of the
official and the harbors, ports, and
waterfront facilities of Lake Tahoe.
Additionally, it is impracticable to
publish an NPRM because the visit is
scheduled to occur on August 18–27,
2023, and we must establish this
security zone by those dates. We lack
sufficient time to solicit comments and
review them prior to issuing a final
action.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Aug 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be impracticable because
immediate action is needed to provide
for the protection of high-ranking
government officials, security of the
harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities,
and mitigation of potential subversive
acts.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and
70124. The Captain of the Port (COTP)
has determined that the high-ranking
government officials and their official
party plan to visit the Glenbrook, NV
area on Lake Tahoe. This area is located
adjacent to U.S. navigable waters in the
San Francisco COTP zone. This rule is
needed to ensure the safety of highranking government officials and their
official party.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone
from August 18 through August 27,
2023. This security zone will cover all
navigable waters of Lake Tahoe, from
surface to bottom, within the area
formed by connecting the following
latitude and longitude points in the
following order: 39°5′33.7″ N,
119°56′37.8″ W; thence to 39°5′36.7″ N,
119°56′28.2″ W; thence along the shore
to 39°5′30.8″ N, 119°56′25.6″ W; thence
to 39°5′29.7″ N, 119°56′36.2″ W and
thence to the point of beginning. This
zone will be in effect from 12:01 a.m. on
August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on
August 27, 2023.
The duration of this zone is intended
to protect the harbors, ports, and
waterfront facilities during the highranking government officials’ visit to the
local area and to ensure the safety of the
official party. No vessel or person will
be permitted to enter the security zone
except for authorized support vessels,
aircraft, and support personnel, or other
vessels authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57355
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the security zone. The effect
of this rule will not be significant
because local waterways users will be
notified by on-scene enforcement to
ensure the security zone will result in
minimum impact. Additionally, vessel
traffic will be able to pass safely around
the area of the security zone. The
entities most likely to be affected are
pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities. The rule will allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone by
contacting the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative through the
Command Post at telephone (202) 604–
8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel
21A.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
57356
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Aug 22, 2023
Jkt 259001
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
security zone in effect 24 hours a day
over a period of ten days. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T11–137 to read as
follows:
■
operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a
Federal, State, or local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the
enforcement of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or a designated representative.
(2) The security zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative through the
Command Post at telephone (202) 604–
8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel
21A. Those in the security zone must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 12:01 a.m. on
August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on
August 27, 2023.
Dated: August 17, 2023.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2023–18170 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2023–0705]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; La Quinta and Corpus
Christi Shipping Channel, Ingleside, TX
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
§ 165.T11–137 Security Zone: Lake Tahoe,
Glenbrook, NV.
ACTION:
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All navigable waters,
from surface to bottom, within the area
formed by connecting the following
latitude and longitude points in the
following order: 39°5′33.7″ N,
119°56′37.8″ W; thence to 39°5′36.7″ N,
119°56′28.2″ W; thence to 39°5′30.8″ N,
119°56′25.6″ W; thence to 39°5′29.7″ N,
119°56′36.2″ W and thence along the
shoreline to the point of beginning.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary, moving safety
zone for all navigable waters of the La
Quinta and Corpus Christi Shipping
Channel between gated pair lights 11
and 12 to the Sea buoy. The safety zone
is needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from
potential hazards created by the rig NFE
PIONEER I while it is towed offshore
from the Kiewit Offshore Services
facility. Entry of vessels or persons into
this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Sector Corpus Christi or a
designated representative.
E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM
23AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57354-57356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18170]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2023-0699]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone in
the navigable waters of Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV within the San
Francisco Captain of the Port Zone. The security zone is along the Lake
Tahoe shoreline from approximately 200 yards from shore in the
Glenbrook area. The security zone is necessary to protect the harbors,
ports, and waterfront facilities of Lake Tahoe during a visit by high-
ranking government officials and their official party. Entry of vessels
or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port San Francisco or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from August 23,
2023 through August 27, 2023. For the
[[Page 57355]]
purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from August 18,
2023, until August 23, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0699 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email LT William Harris, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco,
Waterways Management Division; telephone 415-399-7443, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to
the public interest. The Coast Guard was notified of the need of this
security zone with less than two weeks' notice and did not receive
final details until August 16, 2023. The high-ranking government
official visit will occur before completion of any comment period,
thereby jeopardizing the security of the official and the harbors,
ports, and waterfront facilities of Lake Tahoe. Additionally, it is
impracticable to publish an NPRM because the visit is scheduled to
occur on August 18-27, 2023, and we must establish this security zone
by those dates. We lack sufficient time to solicit comments and review
them prior to issuing a final action.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be impracticable because immediate action is needed to provide for the
protection of high-ranking government officials, security of the
harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities, and mitigation of potential
subversive acts.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70051 and 70124. The Captain of the Port (COTP) has determined that the
high-ranking government officials and their official party plan to
visit the Glenbrook, NV area on Lake Tahoe. This area is located
adjacent to U.S. navigable waters in the San Francisco COTP zone. This
rule is needed to ensure the safety of high-ranking government
officials and their official party.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone from August 18 through August
27, 2023. This security zone will cover all navigable waters of Lake
Tahoe, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by connecting the
following latitude and longitude points in the following order:
39[deg]5'33.7'' N, 119[deg]56'37.8'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'36.7'' N,
119[deg]56'28.2'' W; thence along the shore to 39[deg]5'30.8'' N,
119[deg]56'25.6'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'29.7'' N, 119[deg]56'36.2'' W
and thence to the point of beginning. This zone will be in effect from
12:01 a.m. on August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023.
The duration of this zone is intended to protect the harbors,
ports, and waterfront facilities during the high-ranking government
officials' visit to the local area and to ensure the safety of the
official party. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
security zone except for authorized support vessels, aircraft, and
support personnel, or other vessels authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the security zone. The effect of this rule
will not be significant because local waterways users will be notified
by on-scene enforcement to ensure the security zone will result in
minimum impact. Additionally, vessel traffic will be able to pass
safely around the area of the security zone. The entities most likely
to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities.
The rule will allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone by
contacting the COTP or the COTP's designated representative through the
Command Post at telephone (202) 604-8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel
21A.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman
[[Page 57356]]
and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's
responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
security zone in effect 24 hours a day over a period of ten days. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-137 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-137 Security Zone: Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All navigable
waters, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by connecting
the following latitude and longitude points in the following order:
39[deg]5'33.7'' N, 119[deg]56'37.8'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'36.7'' N,
119[deg]56'28.2'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'30.8'' N, 119[deg]56'25.6'' W;
thence to 39[deg]5'29.7'' N, 119[deg]56'36.2'' W and thence along the
shoreline to the point of beginning.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a
Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting the Captain
of the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the enforcement of the security
zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative.
(2) The security zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative through the Command Post at telephone (202)
604-8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel 21A. Those in the security zone
must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 12:01
a.m. on August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023.
Dated: August 17, 2023.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2023-18170 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P