Security Zone; Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV, 57354-57356 [2023-18170]

Download as PDF 57354 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:56 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a temporary moving security zone of limited duration in effect over a period of ten days. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3. 2. Add § 165.T11–138 to read as follows: ■ § 165.T11–138 Security Zone: Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV. (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: (1) All waters within 100 yards of the vessel carrying high ranking government officials and members of their official party when transiting Lake Tahoe. (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the enforcement of the security zone. (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. (2) The security zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative. (3) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative through the Command Post at telephone (202) 604– 8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel 21A. Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced, when necessary, from 12:01 a.m. on August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023. Dated: August 17, 2023. Taylor Q. Lam, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Francisco. [FR Doc. 2023–18168 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG–2023–0699] RIN 1625–AA87 Security Zone; Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone in the navigable waters of Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV within the San Francisco Captain of the Port Zone. The security zone is along the Lake Tahoe shoreline from approximately 200 yards from shore in the Glenbrook area. The security zone is necessary to protect the harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities of Lake Tahoe during a visit by highranking government officials and their official party. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port San Francisco or a designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from August 23, 2023 through August 27, 2023. For the SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM 23AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from August 18, 2023, until August 23, 2023. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023– 0699 in the search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’ If you have questions about this rule, call or email LT William Harris, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, Waterways Management Division; telephone 415– 399–7443, email SFWaterways@ uscg.mil. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 II. Background Information and Regulatory History The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The Coast Guard was notified of the need of this security zone with less than two weeks’ notice and did not receive final details until August 16, 2023. The high-ranking government official visit will occur before completion of any comment period, thereby jeopardizing the security of the official and the harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities of Lake Tahoe. Additionally, it is impracticable to publish an NPRM because the visit is scheduled to occur on August 18–27, 2023, and we must establish this security zone by those dates. We lack sufficient time to solicit comments and review them prior to issuing a final action. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:56 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to provide for the protection of high-ranking government officials, security of the harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities, and mitigation of potential subversive acts. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and 70124. The Captain of the Port (COTP) has determined that the high-ranking government officials and their official party plan to visit the Glenbrook, NV area on Lake Tahoe. This area is located adjacent to U.S. navigable waters in the San Francisco COTP zone. This rule is needed to ensure the safety of highranking government officials and their official party. IV. Discussion of the Rule This rule establishes a security zone from August 18 through August 27, 2023. This security zone will cover all navigable waters of Lake Tahoe, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by connecting the following latitude and longitude points in the following order: 39°5′33.7″ N, 119°56′37.8″ W; thence to 39°5′36.7″ N, 119°56′28.2″ W; thence along the shore to 39°5′30.8″ N, 119°56′25.6″ W; thence to 39°5′29.7″ N, 119°56′36.2″ W and thence to the point of beginning. This zone will be in effect from 12:01 a.m. on August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023. The duration of this zone is intended to protect the harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities during the highranking government officials’ visit to the local area and to ensure the safety of the official party. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the security zone except for authorized support vessels, aircraft, and support personnel, or other vessels authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 57355 This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the security zone. The effect of this rule will not be significant because local waterways users will be notified by on-scene enforcement to ensure the security zone will result in minimum impact. Additionally, vessel traffic will be able to pass safely around the area of the security zone. The entities most likely to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities. The rule will allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone by contacting the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative through the Command Post at telephone (202) 604– 8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel 21A. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM 23AUR1 57356 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 23, 2023 / Rules and Regulations and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:56 Aug 22, 2023 Jkt 259001 Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a security zone in effect 24 hours a day over a period of ten days. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3. 2. Add § 165.T11–137 to read as follows: ■ operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the enforcement of the security zone. (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. (2) The security zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative. (3) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative through the Command Post at telephone (202) 604– 8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel 21A. Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 12:01 a.m. on August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023. Dated: August 17, 2023. Taylor Q. Lam, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Francisco. [FR Doc. 2023–18170 Filed 8–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG–2023–0705] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; La Quinta and Corpus Christi Shipping Channel, Ingleside, TX Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: § 165.T11–137 Security Zone: Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV. ACTION: (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All navigable waters, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by connecting the following latitude and longitude points in the following order: 39°5′33.7″ N, 119°56′37.8″ W; thence to 39°5′36.7″ N, 119°56′28.2″ W; thence to 39°5′30.8″ N, 119°56′25.6″ W; thence to 39°5′29.7″ N, 119°56′36.2″ W and thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning. (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary, moving safety zone for all navigable waters of the La Quinta and Corpus Christi Shipping Channel between gated pair lights 11 and 12 to the Sea buoy. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by the rig NFE PIONEER I while it is towed offshore from the Kiewit Offshore Services facility. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Corpus Christi or a designated representative. E:\FR\FM\23AUR1.SGM 23AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 23, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57354-57356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0699]
RIN 1625-AA87


Security Zone; Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone in 
the navigable waters of Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV within the San 
Francisco Captain of the Port Zone. The security zone is along the Lake 
Tahoe shoreline from approximately 200 yards from shore in the 
Glenbrook area. The security zone is necessary to protect the harbors, 
ports, and waterfront facilities of Lake Tahoe during a visit by high-
ranking government officials and their official party. Entry of vessels 
or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized 
by the Captain of the Port San Francisco or a designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from August 23, 
2023 through August 27, 2023. For the

[[Page 57355]]

purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from August 18, 
2023, until August 23, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0699 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document 
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, 
call or email LT William Harris, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, 
Waterways Management Division; telephone 415-399-7443, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to 
the public interest. The Coast Guard was notified of the need of this 
security zone with less than two weeks' notice and did not receive 
final details until August 16, 2023. The high-ranking government 
official visit will occur before completion of any comment period, 
thereby jeopardizing the security of the official and the harbors, 
ports, and waterfront facilities of Lake Tahoe. Additionally, it is 
impracticable to publish an NPRM because the visit is scheduled to 
occur on August 18-27, 2023, and we must establish this security zone 
by those dates. We lack sufficient time to solicit comments and review 
them prior to issuing a final action.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would 
be impracticable because immediate action is needed to provide for the 
protection of high-ranking government officials, security of the 
harbors, ports, and waterfront facilities, and mitigation of potential 
subversive acts.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 
70051 and 70124. The Captain of the Port (COTP) has determined that the 
high-ranking government officials and their official party plan to 
visit the Glenbrook, NV area on Lake Tahoe. This area is located 
adjacent to U.S. navigable waters in the San Francisco COTP zone. This 
rule is needed to ensure the safety of high-ranking government 
officials and their official party.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a security zone from August 18 through August 
27, 2023. This security zone will cover all navigable waters of Lake 
Tahoe, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by connecting the 
following latitude and longitude points in the following order: 
39[deg]5'33.7'' N, 119[deg]56'37.8'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'36.7'' N, 
119[deg]56'28.2'' W; thence along the shore to 39[deg]5'30.8'' N, 
119[deg]56'25.6'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'29.7'' N, 119[deg]56'36.2'' W 
and thence to the point of beginning. This zone will be in effect from 
12:01 a.m. on August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023.
    The duration of this zone is intended to protect the harbors, 
ports, and waterfront facilities during the high-ranking government 
officials' visit to the local area and to ensure the safety of the 
official party. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the 
security zone except for authorized support vessels, aircraft, and 
support personnel, or other vessels authorized by the COTP or a 
designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as 
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). 
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, and duration of the security zone. The effect of this rule 
will not be significant because local waterways users will be notified 
by on-scene enforcement to ensure the security zone will result in 
minimum impact. Additionally, vessel traffic will be able to pass 
safely around the area of the security zone. The entities most likely 
to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in recreational activities. 
The rule will allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone by 
contacting the COTP or the COTP's designated representative through the 
Command Post at telephone (202) 604-8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel 
21A.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman

[[Page 57356]]

and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 
Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's 
responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by 
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The 
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or 
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and 
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of 
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a 
security zone in effect 24 hours a day over a period of ten days. It is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of 
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A 
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is 
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see 
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so 
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-137 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T11-137  Security Zone: Lake Tahoe, Glenbrook, NV.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All navigable 
waters, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by connecting 
the following latitude and longitude points in the following order: 
39[deg]5'33.7'' N, 119[deg]56'37.8'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'36.7'' N, 
119[deg]56'28.2'' W; thence to 39[deg]5'30.8'' N, 119[deg]56'25.6'' W; 
thence to 39[deg]5'29.7'' N, 119[deg]56'36.2'' W and thence along the 
shoreline to the point of beginning.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, 
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel, and a 
Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting the Captain 
of the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the enforcement of the security 
zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in 
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described 
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or a 
designated representative.
    (2) The security zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as 
may be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (3) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's 
designated representative through the Command Post at telephone (202) 
604-8857 or by VHF Marine Radio channel 21A. Those in the security zone 
must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the 
COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 12:01 
a.m. on August 18, 2023, until 11:59 p.m. on August 27, 2023.

    Dated: August 17, 2023.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2023-18170 Filed 8-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.