Plant Records To Include Grade Label Butterfat Testing, 55426-55428 [2023-17052]

Download as PDF 55426 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules Carbon Daggett Duchesne Emery Garfield (Does not include the Bryce Canyon, Capitol Reef, and Canyonlands National Parks portions) Grand (Does not include the Arches and Canyonlands National Parks portions) Iron (Does not include the Cedar Breaks National Monument and Zion National Park portions) Juab Millard Morgan Piute Rich Sevier Sanpete Summit Uintah Wasatch Wayne (Does not include the Capitol Reef and Canyonlands National Parks portions) * * * * * [FR Doc. 2023–17374 Filed 8–14–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–39–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 7 CFR Part 58 [Doc. No. AMS–DA–22–0064] RIN 0581–AE20 Plant Records To Include Grade Label Butterfat Testing Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: This document invites comments on a proposed amendment to the plant records requirement for the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Dairy Grading and Inspection program. The proposal would allow butterfat tests to be performed at an in-house or approved third party laboratory and add a requirement for plants to maintain and make such records available for examination by a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) inspector. This amendment would increase efficiency by conforming to current industry practice. DATES: Comments on proposed amendments must be received by October 16, 2023 to be assured of consideration. Comments on the proposed information collection and the associated burden must also be received by October 16, 2023. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Aug 14, 2023 Jkt 259001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew M. Siedschlaw, Grading and Standardization Division, Dairy Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 2756—South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–0230: Telephone: (202) 937– 4901; Email: Matthew.Siedschlaw@ usda.gov. The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized by the Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1621, et seq.), to provide voluntary Federal dairy inspection and grading services to facilitate the orderly marketing of and enable consumers to purchase high quality dairy products. Plants participating in the voluntary, fee-based AMS Dairy Grading and Inspection Program process milk into dairy foods that enter commerce as retail products, ingredients for further processing, purchases for Federal food assistance programs, and exports to other countries. Services provided by the program enhance the marketability and add value to dairy and foods that contain dairy. Dairy products manufactured in facilities complying with the USDA inspection requirements are eligible to be graded against official quality standards and specifications established by AMS. Dairy products tested and graded by AMS have certificates issued describing the product’s quality and condition. Historically, when the Grading and Inspection Program was implemented, the quality of butter was inconsistent, and quality-control testing by USDA was necessary to ensure a consistent product for the market. Today, plants more consistently manufacture highquality butter products and maintain the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agricultural Marketing Service SUMMARY: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule. Comments may be submitted through the Federal erulemaking portal at https:// www.regulations.gov and should reference the document number, date, and page number of this issue of the Federal Register. Written comments may be submitted via mail to USDA/ AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop 0225-Room 2530, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–0225. All comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting comments will be made public on the internet at the address provided above. ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 butterfat standard necessary to be granted a USDA grade label for butter. Currently, USDA inspectors or designated plant personnel perform tests of butter samples that have been selected by a USDA inspector for quality control on randomized batches of finished product pursuant to 7 CFR 58.338. Testing frequency varies by the volume of butter processed and whether a batch is randomly selected. Typically, USDA conducts monthly or weekly testing depending on the volume of butter processed. It is also current industry practice for plants to perform routine internal tests on their butter products to ensure quality and compliance with composition standards. Specific requirements for these tests are outlined in 7 CFR 58.336. During manufacturing it is normal to have fluctuations in butterfat composition at different stages in butter making, and consequently test results may not be consistent throughout the process. Therefore, butter processing facilities continually monitor butterfat composition throughout production and make necessary adjustments to maintain the 80% butterfat required for butter (7 CFR 58.305). The facility maintains these monitoring records as part of its internal quality program and testing requirements. Under the current Dairy Grading and Inspection program, USDA conducts a single butterfat test at the time of grading, which provides a limited perspective on overall butterfat composition of butter manufactured by the plant. The proposed amendments would exempt plants from butterfat testing administered by a USDA inspector and allow in-plant quality control testing to satisfy butterfat testing requirements. The proposal would replace testing performed by a USDA inspector at the time of grading with a review of a plant’s testing records. A records review of a plant’s routine testing rather than a single-point test would provide a more accurate picture of whether the plant’s butter products meet quality standards. It would also reduce costs to a facility by eliminating duplicate butterfat testing by a USDA inspector that it currently must pay for. As explained in the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis below, AMS estimates adopting a records review would save participating plants $4,560 to $31,450 annually. Currently, the final butter product must contain a minimum of 80% butterfat by weight for it to comply with the regulations. That would not change as a result of the proposed amendment. However, under the proposal, AMS would annually review each plant’s E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM 15AUP1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 butterfat test records to gauge the facility’s compliance with the regulations. Butterfat tests are already conducted as a normal, standard business operating procedure by plants engaged in the manufacture of butter. If a facility is out of compliance, AMS would perform more frequent reviews to see what preventative and corrective actions are being taken. Failure to rectify the problem could result in ineligibility to use the USDA Grade Label shield on products produced by the facility. Records inspected would include plant records of butterfat tests performed as required under 7 CFR 58.336, and analysis of records. The change to the recordkeeping requirements would apply to records kept in the regular course of business by the plant. As records would be reviewed on-site by USDA inspectors, plants would not be required to submit information to the agency. Finally, AMS is proposing a revision of an administrative nature to correct a misspelling in the regulations. A proposed revision to § 58.336(a) would replace the word ‘‘insure’’ with ‘‘ensure.’’ Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), AMS has requested approval of new information collection and recordkeeping requirements for the Dairy Grading and Inspection Program and comments are invited on this new information collection. All comments received on this information collection will be summarized and included in the final request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. Title: Regulations Governing the Review of Butterfat Testing Records for the Dairy Grading and Inspection Butter Program. OMB Number: 0581–NEW. Expiration Date of Approval: This is a NEW collection. Type of Request: Approval of New Information Collection. Abstract: The Dairy Grading and Inspection program is a voluntary, feebased program authorized under the Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627). The regulations governing inspection and grading services of manufactured or processed dairy products are contained in 7 CFR part 58. Under the program, a plant can submit to grading and inspection of its butter products by a USDA grader following the U.S. Grade Standards to ensure each product meet the U.S. grade requirements. This program provides uniform quality of VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Aug 14, 2023 Jkt 259001 dairy products in the marketplace. The information collection requirements in this request are essential to carry out the intent of the AMA—to ensure that dairy products are produced under sanitary conditions and buyers are purchasing a quality product. Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2.5 hours per year. Recordkeepers: Butter manufacturers. Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 17. Estimated Number of Hours per Recordkeeper: 2.5 hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Recordkeepers: 42.5 hours. The information collection seeks to replace testing by USDA inspectors with an annual review of a plant’s butterfat testing records. The review encompasses plant records of butterfat tests performed as required under 7 CFR 58.336, and analysis of records. Plants seeking USDA inspection for butter grading conduct their own routine, audited, butterfat tests to ensure quality and compliance with composition standards. The information sought in this collection is contained in records kept in the regular course of business by the inspected facility. Records would be reviewed on-site by a USDA inspector. The facility would not be required to submit information to the agency. E-Government Act USDA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) by promoting the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 USDA is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, which direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health, and safety effects; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866; and, therefore has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 55427 Executive Order 12988 This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have a retroactive effect. If adopted, this proposed rule would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered the economic impact of the action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RFA). The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. The Small Business Administration’s definition (13 CFR 121.201) of small agricultural service firms, which includes dairy processors, varies based on the type of dairy product manufactured. Small butter manufacturers processors are defined as having 750 or fewer employees. Seventeen plants producing grade label butter in the U.S. participate in the Grade Label Program. According to AMS calculations, about 12, or approximately two-thirds, are operated by dairy farmer cooperatives, while the remaining 5 are independently owned. AMS estimates that six of 17 the participating butter processors would be considered small businesses. AMS has determined that establishment of this proposal would not have a significant economic impact on small entities. The Dairy Grading and Inspection Program is a voluntary program. Small businesses have the option to participate. The proposed change would not unduly or disproportionately burden small butter processing entities. It would reduce costs to small businesses by eliminating a redundant butterfat test currently performed by USDA. AMS estimates the cost to plants for meeting USDA butterfat testing requirements ranges from $5,000 to $32,000 annually. The significant cost difference depends on whether the plant has an approved onsite laboratory or must ship samples to an outside AMS laboratory, and the frequency of butterfat samples submitted for testing. The change would replace the USDAinspector’s test with a review of records of butterfat tests that manufacturers currently conduct in the normal course E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM 15AUP1 55428 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules of business to ensure quality and compliance with composition standards. The plants would be charged for the inspectors’ time to conduct the records review, estimated to take four hours annually. At an hourly rate of $110, a records review would cost the plant approximately $440. This results in annual net saving to plants ranging from $4,560 to $31,560. Program provisions would be applied uniformly to both large and small businesses and would not be expected to burden small entities unduly or disproportionately. Executive Order 13175 This proposed rule has been reviewed under E.O. 13175—Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal implications. AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 58 Dairy product, Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 58 as follows: PART 58—GRADING AND INSPECTION, GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED PLANTS AND STANDARDS FOR GRADES OF DAIRY PRODUCTS 1. The authority for part 58 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627. 2. Amend § 58.148 by adding paragraph (h) to read as follows: ■ § 58.148 Plant records. * * * * (h) Butterfat test records. Retain for 12 months. ■ 3. Amend § 58.336 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows: ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 * § 58.336 Frequency of sampling for quality control of cream, butter and related products. (a) Microbiological. Samples shall be taken from churnings or batches and should be taken as often as is necessary to ensure microbiological control. (b) Sampling and testing. (1) Composition. Sampling and testing for VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:44 Aug 14, 2023 Jkt 259001 product composition shall be made on churns or batches as often as is necessary to insure adequate composition control. For in-plant control, the Kohman or modified Kohman test may be used. (2) Sampling. Butterfat sampling may be performed as part of an in-plant quality program. * * * * * Erin Morris, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2023–17052 Filed 8–14–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R05–OAR–2020–0555; FRL–11148– 01–R5] Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 2015 Ozone Standard Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency on October 22, 2020, and February 14, 2023. The revisions address the emissions inventory requirements for the Chicago and Metro-East nonattainment areas under the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The Chicago nonattainment area includes Cook, DuPage, Grundy (Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships), Kane, Kendall (Oswego Township), Lake, McHenry, and Will counties. The Metro-East nonattainment area includes Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair counties. The CAA requires emissions inventories for all ozone nonattainment areas. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 14, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2020–0555 at https:// www.regulations.gov or via email to blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Crispell, Environmental Scientist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8512, crispell.emily@ epa.gov. The EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility closures due to COVID–19. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the state’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives such comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM 15AUP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55426-55428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17052]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 58

[Doc. No. AMS-DA-22-0064]
RIN 0581-AE20


Plant Records To Include Grade Label Butterfat Testing

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document invites comments on a proposed amendment to the 
plant records requirement for the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) 
Dairy Grading and Inspection program. The proposal would allow 
butterfat tests to be performed at an in-house or approved third party 
laboratory and add a requirement for plants to maintain and make such 
records available for examination by a United States Department of 
Agriculture (USDA) inspector. This amendment would increase efficiency 
by conforming to current industry practice.

DATES: Comments on proposed amendments must be received by October 16, 
2023 to be assured of consideration. Comments on the proposed 
information collection and the associated burden must also be received 
by October 16, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on this 
proposed rule. Comments may be submitted through the Federal e-
rulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov and should reference 
the document number, date, and page number of this issue of the Federal 
Register. Written comments may be submitted via mail to USDA/AMS/Dairy 
Programs, Stop 0225-Room 2530, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, 
DC 20250-0225. All comments submitted in response to this proposed rule 
will be included in the record and will be made available to the 
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or 
entities submitting comments will be made public on the internet at the 
address provided above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew M. Siedschlaw, Grading and 
Standardization Division, Dairy Program, Agricultural Marketing 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 2756--South Building, 
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-0230: Telephone: 
(202) 937-4901; Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized 
by the Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
1621, et seq.), to provide voluntary Federal dairy inspection and 
grading services to facilitate the orderly marketing of and enable 
consumers to purchase high quality dairy products. Plants participating 
in the voluntary, fee-based AMS Dairy Grading and Inspection Program 
process milk into dairy foods that enter commerce as retail products, 
ingredients for further processing, purchases for Federal food 
assistance programs, and exports to other countries. Services provided 
by the program enhance the marketability and add value to dairy and 
foods that contain dairy. Dairy products manufactured in facilities 
complying with the USDA inspection requirements are eligible to be 
graded against official quality standards and specifications 
established by AMS. Dairy products tested and graded by AMS have 
certificates issued describing the product's quality and condition.
    Historically, when the Grading and Inspection Program was 
implemented, the quality of butter was inconsistent, and quality-
control testing by USDA was necessary to ensure a consistent product 
for the market. Today, plants more consistently manufacture high-
quality butter products and maintain the butterfat standard necessary 
to be granted a USDA grade label for butter.
    Currently, USDA inspectors or designated plant personnel perform 
tests of butter samples that have been selected by a USDA inspector for 
quality control on randomized batches of finished product pursuant to 7 
CFR 58.338. Testing frequency varies by the volume of butter processed 
and whether a batch is randomly selected. Typically, USDA conducts 
monthly or weekly testing depending on the volume of butter processed. 
It is also current industry practice for plants to perform routine 
internal tests on their butter products to ensure quality and 
compliance with composition standards. Specific requirements for these 
tests are outlined in 7 CFR 58.336.
    During manufacturing it is normal to have fluctuations in butterfat 
composition at different stages in butter making, and consequently test 
results may not be consistent throughout the process. Therefore, butter 
processing facilities continually monitor butterfat composition 
throughout production and make necessary adjustments to maintain the 
80% butterfat required for butter (7 CFR 58.305). The facility 
maintains these monitoring records as part of its internal quality 
program and testing requirements.
    Under the current Dairy Grading and Inspection program, USDA 
conducts a single butterfat test at the time of grading, which provides 
a limited perspective on overall butterfat composition of butter 
manufactured by the plant.
    The proposed amendments would exempt plants from butterfat testing 
administered by a USDA inspector and allow in-plant quality control 
testing to satisfy butterfat testing requirements. The proposal would 
replace testing performed by a USDA inspector at the time of grading 
with a review of a plant's testing records. A records review of a 
plant's routine testing rather than a single-point test would provide a 
more accurate picture of whether the plant's butter products meet 
quality standards. It would also reduce costs to a facility by 
eliminating duplicate butterfat testing by a USDA inspector that it 
currently must pay for. As explained in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Analysis below, AMS estimates adopting a records review would save 
participating plants $4,560 to $31,450 annually.
    Currently, the final butter product must contain a minimum of 80% 
butterfat by weight for it to comply with the regulations. That would 
not change as a result of the proposed amendment. However, under the 
proposal, AMS would annually review each plant's

[[Page 55427]]

butterfat test records to gauge the facility's compliance with the 
regulations. Butterfat tests are already conducted as a normal, 
standard business operating procedure by plants engaged in the 
manufacture of butter. If a facility is out of compliance, AMS would 
perform more frequent reviews to see what preventative and corrective 
actions are being taken. Failure to rectify the problem could result in 
ineligibility to use the USDA Grade Label shield on products produced 
by the facility.
    Records inspected would include plant records of butterfat tests 
performed as required under 7 CFR 58.336, and analysis of records. The 
change to the recordkeeping requirements would apply to records kept in 
the regular course of business by the plant. As records would be 
reviewed on-site by USDA inspectors, plants would not be required to 
submit information to the agency.
    Finally, AMS is proposing a revision of an administrative nature to 
correct a misspelling in the regulations. A proposed revision to Sec.  
58.336(a) would replace the word ``insure'' with ``ensure.''

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), AMS has requested approval of new information 
collection and recordkeeping requirements for the Dairy Grading and 
Inspection Program and comments are invited on this new information 
collection. All comments received on this information collection will 
be summarized and included in the final request for Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval.
    Title: Regulations Governing the Review of Butterfat Testing 
Records for the Dairy Grading and Inspection Butter Program.
    OMB Number: 0581-NEW.
    Expiration Date of Approval: This is a NEW collection.
    Type of Request: Approval of New Information Collection.
    Abstract: The Dairy Grading and Inspection program is a voluntary, 
fee-based program authorized under the Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) 
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627). The regulations governing inspection and 
grading services of manufactured or processed dairy products are 
contained in 7 CFR part 58. Under the program, a plant can submit to 
grading and inspection of its butter products by a USDA grader 
following the U.S. Grade Standards to ensure each product meet the U.S. 
grade requirements. This program provides uniform quality of dairy 
products in the marketplace. The information collection requirements in 
this request are essential to carry out the intent of the AMA--to 
ensure that dairy products are produced under sanitary conditions and 
buyers are purchasing a quality product.
    Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection 
of information is estimated to average 2.5 hours per year.
    Recordkeepers: Butter manufacturers.
    Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 17.
    Estimated Number of Hours per Recordkeeper: 2.5 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Recordkeepers: 42.5 hours.
    The information collection seeks to replace testing by USDA 
inspectors with an annual review of a plant's butterfat testing 
records. The review encompasses plant records of butterfat tests 
performed as required under 7 CFR 58.336, and analysis of records. 
Plants seeking USDA inspection for butter grading conduct their own 
routine, audited, butterfat tests to ensure quality and compliance with 
composition standards. The information sought in this collection is 
contained in records kept in the regular course of business by the 
inspected facility. Records would be reviewed on-site by a USDA 
inspector. The facility would not be required to submit information to 
the agency.

E-Government Act

    USDA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act (44 U.S.C. 
3601, et seq.) by promoting the use of the internet and other 
information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen 
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    USDA is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive 
Orders 12866 and 13563, which direct agencies to assess all costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits 
(including potential economic, environmental, public health, and safety 
effects; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This 
proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of 
Executive Order 12866; and, therefore has not been reviewed by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have a 
retroactive effect. If adopted, this proposed rule would not preempt 
any State or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present 
an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic 
impact of the action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared 
this Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RFA).
    The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be 
unduly or disproportionately burdened. The Small Business 
Administration's definition (13 CFR 121.201) of small agricultural 
service firms, which includes dairy processors, varies based on the 
type of dairy product manufactured. Small butter manufacturers 
processors are defined as having 750 or fewer employees. Seventeen 
plants producing grade label butter in the U.S. participate in the 
Grade Label Program. According to AMS calculations, about 12, or 
approximately two-thirds, are operated by dairy farmer cooperatives, 
while the remaining 5 are independently owned. AMS estimates that six 
of 17 the participating butter processors would be considered small 
businesses.
    AMS has determined that establishment of this proposal would not 
have a significant economic impact on small entities. The Dairy Grading 
and Inspection Program is a voluntary program. Small businesses have 
the option to participate. The proposed change would not unduly or 
disproportionately burden small butter processing entities. It would 
reduce costs to small businesses by eliminating a redundant butterfat 
test currently performed by USDA. AMS estimates the cost to plants for 
meeting USDA butterfat testing requirements ranges from $5,000 to 
$32,000 annually. The significant cost difference depends on whether 
the plant has an approved onsite laboratory or must ship samples to an 
outside AMS laboratory, and the frequency of butterfat samples 
submitted for testing.
    The change would replace the USDA-inspector's test with a review of 
records of butterfat tests that manufacturers currently conduct in the 
normal course

[[Page 55428]]

of business to ensure quality and compliance with composition 
standards. The plants would be charged for the inspectors' time to 
conduct the records review, estimated to take four hours annually. At 
an hourly rate of $110, a records review would cost the plant 
approximately $440. This results in annual net saving to plants ranging 
from $4,560 to $31,560.
    Program provisions would be applied uniformly to both large and 
small businesses and would not be expected to burden small entities 
unduly or disproportionately.

Executive Order 13175

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under E.O. 13175--Consultation 
and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires 
agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal 
implications. AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to 
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 58

    Dairy product, Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

    For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing 
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 58 as follows:

PART 58--GRADING AND INSPECTION, GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR 
APPROVED PLANTS AND STANDARDS FOR GRADES OF DAIRY PRODUCTS

0
1. The authority for part 58 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.

0
2. Amend Sec.  58.148 by adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:


Sec.  58.148  Plant records.

* * * * *
    (h) Butterfat test records. Retain for 12 months.
0
3. Amend Sec.  58.336 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  58.336  Frequency of sampling for quality control of cream, 
butter and related products.

    (a) Microbiological. Samples shall be taken from churnings or 
batches and should be taken as often as is necessary to ensure 
microbiological control.
    (b) Sampling and testing. (1) Composition. Sampling and testing for 
product composition shall be made on churns or batches as often as is 
necessary to insure adequate composition control. For in-plant control, 
the Kohman or modified Kohman test may be used.
    (2) Sampling. Butterfat sampling may be performed as part of an in-
plant quality program.
* * * * *

Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-17052 Filed 8-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.