Plant Records To Include Grade Label Butterfat Testing, 55426-55428 [2023-17052]
Download as PDF
55426
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Carbon
Daggett
Duchesne
Emery
Garfield (Does not include the Bryce
Canyon, Capitol Reef, and
Canyonlands National Parks
portions)
Grand (Does not include the Arches
and Canyonlands National Parks
portions)
Iron (Does not include the Cedar
Breaks National Monument and
Zion National Park portions)
Juab
Millard
Morgan
Piute
Rich
Sevier
Sanpete
Summit
Uintah
Wasatch
Wayne (Does not include the Capitol
Reef and Canyonlands National
Parks portions)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2023–17374 Filed 8–14–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
7 CFR Part 58
[Doc. No. AMS–DA–22–0064]
RIN 0581–AE20
Plant Records To Include Grade Label
Butterfat Testing
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This document invites
comments on a proposed amendment to
the plant records requirement for the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
Dairy Grading and Inspection program.
The proposal would allow butterfat tests
to be performed at an in-house or
approved third party laboratory and add
a requirement for plants to maintain and
make such records available for
examination by a United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
inspector. This amendment would
increase efficiency by conforming to
current industry practice.
DATES: Comments on proposed
amendments must be received by
October 16, 2023 to be assured of
consideration. Comments on the
proposed information collection and the
associated burden must also be received
by October 16, 2023.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Aug 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew M. Siedschlaw, Grading and
Standardization Division, Dairy
Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Room 2756—South Building, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250–0230: Telephone: (202) 937–
4901; Email: Matthew.Siedschlaw@
usda.gov.
The
Secretary of Agriculture is authorized by
the Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA)
of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1621, et
seq.), to provide voluntary Federal dairy
inspection and grading services to
facilitate the orderly marketing of and
enable consumers to purchase high
quality dairy products. Plants
participating in the voluntary, fee-based
AMS Dairy Grading and Inspection
Program process milk into dairy foods
that enter commerce as retail products,
ingredients for further processing,
purchases for Federal food assistance
programs, and exports to other
countries. Services provided by the
program enhance the marketability and
add value to dairy and foods that
contain dairy. Dairy products
manufactured in facilities complying
with the USDA inspection requirements
are eligible to be graded against official
quality standards and specifications
established by AMS. Dairy products
tested and graded by AMS have
certificates issued describing the
product’s quality and condition.
Historically, when the Grading and
Inspection Program was implemented,
the quality of butter was inconsistent,
and quality-control testing by USDA
was necessary to ensure a consistent
product for the market. Today, plants
more consistently manufacture highquality butter products and maintain the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agricultural Marketing Service
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be
submitted through the Federal erulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov and should
reference the document number, date,
and page number of this issue of the
Federal Register. Written comments
may be submitted via mail to USDA/
AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop 0225-Room
2530, 1400 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20250–0225. All
comments submitted in response to this
proposed rule will be included in the
record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting comments will be made
public on the internet at the address
provided above.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
butterfat standard necessary to be
granted a USDA grade label for butter.
Currently, USDA inspectors or
designated plant personnel perform
tests of butter samples that have been
selected by a USDA inspector for quality
control on randomized batches of
finished product pursuant to 7 CFR
58.338. Testing frequency varies by the
volume of butter processed and whether
a batch is randomly selected. Typically,
USDA conducts monthly or weekly
testing depending on the volume of
butter processed. It is also current
industry practice for plants to perform
routine internal tests on their butter
products to ensure quality and
compliance with composition
standards. Specific requirements for
these tests are outlined in 7 CFR 58.336.
During manufacturing it is normal to
have fluctuations in butterfat
composition at different stages in butter
making, and consequently test results
may not be consistent throughout the
process. Therefore, butter processing
facilities continually monitor butterfat
composition throughout production and
make necessary adjustments to maintain
the 80% butterfat required for butter (7
CFR 58.305). The facility maintains
these monitoring records as part of its
internal quality program and testing
requirements.
Under the current Dairy Grading and
Inspection program, USDA conducts a
single butterfat test at the time of
grading, which provides a limited
perspective on overall butterfat
composition of butter manufactured by
the plant.
The proposed amendments would
exempt plants from butterfat testing
administered by a USDA inspector and
allow in-plant quality control testing to
satisfy butterfat testing requirements.
The proposal would replace testing
performed by a USDA inspector at the
time of grading with a review of a
plant’s testing records. A records review
of a plant’s routine testing rather than a
single-point test would provide a more
accurate picture of whether the plant’s
butter products meet quality standards.
It would also reduce costs to a facility
by eliminating duplicate butterfat
testing by a USDA inspector that it
currently must pay for. As explained in
the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
below, AMS estimates adopting a
records review would save participating
plants $4,560 to $31,450 annually.
Currently, the final butter product
must contain a minimum of 80%
butterfat by weight for it to comply with
the regulations. That would not change
as a result of the proposed amendment.
However, under the proposal, AMS
would annually review each plant’s
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
butterfat test records to gauge the
facility’s compliance with the
regulations. Butterfat tests are already
conducted as a normal, standard
business operating procedure by plants
engaged in the manufacture of butter. If
a facility is out of compliance, AMS
would perform more frequent reviews to
see what preventative and corrective
actions are being taken. Failure to
rectify the problem could result in
ineligibility to use the USDA Grade
Label shield on products produced by
the facility.
Records inspected would include
plant records of butterfat tests
performed as required under 7 CFR
58.336, and analysis of records. The
change to the recordkeeping
requirements would apply to records
kept in the regular course of business by
the plant. As records would be reviewed
on-site by USDA inspectors, plants
would not be required to submit
information to the agency.
Finally, AMS is proposing a revision
of an administrative nature to correct a
misspelling in the regulations. A
proposed revision to § 58.336(a) would
replace the word ‘‘insure’’ with
‘‘ensure.’’
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), AMS has requested
approval of new information collection
and recordkeeping requirements for the
Dairy Grading and Inspection Program
and comments are invited on this new
information collection. All comments
received on this information collection
will be summarized and included in the
final request for Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) approval.
Title: Regulations Governing the
Review of Butterfat Testing Records for
the Dairy Grading and Inspection Butter
Program.
OMB Number: 0581–NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: This is
a NEW collection.
Type of Request: Approval of New
Information Collection.
Abstract: The Dairy Grading and
Inspection program is a voluntary, feebased program authorized under the
Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) of
1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621–1627). The
regulations governing inspection and
grading services of manufactured or
processed dairy products are contained
in 7 CFR part 58. Under the program, a
plant can submit to grading and
inspection of its butter products by a
USDA grader following the U.S. Grade
Standards to ensure each product meet
the U.S. grade requirements. This
program provides uniform quality of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Aug 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
dairy products in the marketplace. The
information collection requirements in
this request are essential to carry out the
intent of the AMA—to ensure that dairy
products are produced under sanitary
conditions and buyers are purchasing a
quality product.
Estimate of Burden: Public
recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average
2.5 hours per year.
Recordkeepers: Butter manufacturers.
Estimated Number of Recordkeepers:
17.
Estimated Number of Hours per
Recordkeeper: 2.5 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Recordkeepers: 42.5 hours.
The information collection seeks to
replace testing by USDA inspectors with
an annual review of a plant’s butterfat
testing records. The review
encompasses plant records of butterfat
tests performed as required under 7 CFR
58.336, and analysis of records. Plants
seeking USDA inspection for butter
grading conduct their own routine,
audited, butterfat tests to ensure quality
and compliance with composition
standards. The information sought in
this collection is contained in records
kept in the regular course of business by
the inspected facility. Records would be
reviewed on-site by a USDA inspector.
The facility would not be required to
submit information to the agency.
E-Government Act
USDA is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act (44 U.S.C.
3601, et seq.) by promoting the use of
the internet and other information
technologies to provide increased
opportunities for citizen access to
Government information and services,
and for other purposes.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
USDA is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866 and 13563, which direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health,
and safety effects; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This proposed
rule has been determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866; and, therefore has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55427
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have a retroactive effect.
If adopted, this proposed rule would not
preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of the action on
small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (RFA).
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened. The
Small Business Administration’s
definition (13 CFR 121.201) of small
agricultural service firms, which
includes dairy processors, varies based
on the type of dairy product
manufactured. Small butter
manufacturers processors are defined as
having 750 or fewer employees.
Seventeen plants producing grade label
butter in the U.S. participate in the
Grade Label Program. According to
AMS calculations, about 12, or
approximately two-thirds, are operated
by dairy farmer cooperatives, while the
remaining 5 are independently owned.
AMS estimates that six of 17 the
participating butter processors would be
considered small businesses.
AMS has determined that
establishment of this proposal would
not have a significant economic impact
on small entities. The Dairy Grading and
Inspection Program is a voluntary
program. Small businesses have the
option to participate. The proposed
change would not unduly or
disproportionately burden small butter
processing entities. It would reduce
costs to small businesses by eliminating
a redundant butterfat test currently
performed by USDA. AMS estimates the
cost to plants for meeting USDA
butterfat testing requirements ranges
from $5,000 to $32,000 annually. The
significant cost difference depends on
whether the plant has an approved
onsite laboratory or must ship samples
to an outside AMS laboratory, and the
frequency of butterfat samples
submitted for testing.
The change would replace the USDAinspector’s test with a review of records
of butterfat tests that manufacturers
currently conduct in the normal course
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
55428
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2023 / Proposed Rules
of business to ensure quality and
compliance with composition
standards. The plants would be charged
for the inspectors’ time to conduct the
records review, estimated to take four
hours annually. At an hourly rate of
$110, a records review would cost the
plant approximately $440. This results
in annual net saving to plants ranging
from $4,560 to $31,560.
Program provisions would be applied
uniformly to both large and small
businesses and would not be expected
to burden small entities unduly or
disproportionately.
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under E.O. 13175—Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, which requires agencies
to consider whether their rulemaking
actions would have Tribal implications.
AMS has determined that this proposed
rule is unlikely to have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 58
Dairy product, Food grades and
standards, Food labeling, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
the Agricultural Marketing Service
proposes to amend 7 CFR part 58 as
follows:
PART 58—GRADING AND
INSPECTION, GENERAL
SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED
PLANTS AND STANDARDS FOR
GRADES OF DAIRY PRODUCTS
1. The authority for part 58 continues
to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
2. Amend § 58.148 by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
§ 58.148
Plant records.
*
*
*
*
(h) Butterfat test records. Retain for 12
months.
■ 3. Amend § 58.336 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
§ 58.336 Frequency of sampling for quality
control of cream, butter and related
products.
(a) Microbiological. Samples shall be
taken from churnings or batches and
should be taken as often as is necessary
to ensure microbiological control.
(b) Sampling and testing. (1)
Composition. Sampling and testing for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Aug 14, 2023
Jkt 259001
product composition shall be made on
churns or batches as often as is
necessary to insure adequate
composition control. For in-plant
control, the Kohman or modified
Kohman test may be used.
(2) Sampling. Butterfat sampling may
be performed as part of an in-plant
quality program.
*
*
*
*
*
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–17052 Filed 8–14–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2020–0555; FRL–11148–
01–R5]
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Base Year
Emissions Inventory for the 2015
Ozone Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve,
under the Clean Air Act (CAA),
revisions to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency on
October 22, 2020, and February 14,
2023. The revisions address the
emissions inventory requirements for
the Chicago and Metro-East
nonattainment areas under the 2015
ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard. The Chicago nonattainment
area includes Cook, DuPage, Grundy
(Aux Sable and Goose Lake Townships),
Kane, Kendall (Oswego Township),
Lake, McHenry, and Will counties. The
Metro-East nonattainment area includes
Madison, Monroe, and St. Clair
counties. The CAA requires emissions
inventories for all ozone nonattainment
areas.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2020–0555 at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Crispell, Environmental Scientist,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–8512, crispell.emily@
epa.gov. The EPA Region 5 office is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays and facility closures
due to COVID–19.
In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives such comments, the direct final
rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. Please note
that if EPA receives adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. For additional
information, see the direct final rule
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15AUP1.SGM
15AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55426-55428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17052]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 58
[Doc. No. AMS-DA-22-0064]
RIN 0581-AE20
Plant Records To Include Grade Label Butterfat Testing
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document invites comments on a proposed amendment to the
plant records requirement for the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
Dairy Grading and Inspection program. The proposal would allow
butterfat tests to be performed at an in-house or approved third party
laboratory and add a requirement for plants to maintain and make such
records available for examination by a United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) inspector. This amendment would increase efficiency
by conforming to current industry practice.
DATES: Comments on proposed amendments must be received by October 16,
2023 to be assured of consideration. Comments on the proposed
information collection and the associated burden must also be received
by October 16, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on this
proposed rule. Comments may be submitted through the Federal e-
rulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov and should reference
the document number, date, and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register. Written comments may be submitted via mail to USDA/AMS/Dairy
Programs, Stop 0225-Room 2530, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250-0225. All comments submitted in response to this proposed rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting comments will be made public on the internet at the
address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew M. Siedschlaw, Grading and
Standardization Division, Dairy Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 2756--South Building,
1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-0230: Telephone:
(202) 937-4901; Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized
by the Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA) of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C.
1621, et seq.), to provide voluntary Federal dairy inspection and
grading services to facilitate the orderly marketing of and enable
consumers to purchase high quality dairy products. Plants participating
in the voluntary, fee-based AMS Dairy Grading and Inspection Program
process milk into dairy foods that enter commerce as retail products,
ingredients for further processing, purchases for Federal food
assistance programs, and exports to other countries. Services provided
by the program enhance the marketability and add value to dairy and
foods that contain dairy. Dairy products manufactured in facilities
complying with the USDA inspection requirements are eligible to be
graded against official quality standards and specifications
established by AMS. Dairy products tested and graded by AMS have
certificates issued describing the product's quality and condition.
Historically, when the Grading and Inspection Program was
implemented, the quality of butter was inconsistent, and quality-
control testing by USDA was necessary to ensure a consistent product
for the market. Today, plants more consistently manufacture high-
quality butter products and maintain the butterfat standard necessary
to be granted a USDA grade label for butter.
Currently, USDA inspectors or designated plant personnel perform
tests of butter samples that have been selected by a USDA inspector for
quality control on randomized batches of finished product pursuant to 7
CFR 58.338. Testing frequency varies by the volume of butter processed
and whether a batch is randomly selected. Typically, USDA conducts
monthly or weekly testing depending on the volume of butter processed.
It is also current industry practice for plants to perform routine
internal tests on their butter products to ensure quality and
compliance with composition standards. Specific requirements for these
tests are outlined in 7 CFR 58.336.
During manufacturing it is normal to have fluctuations in butterfat
composition at different stages in butter making, and consequently test
results may not be consistent throughout the process. Therefore, butter
processing facilities continually monitor butterfat composition
throughout production and make necessary adjustments to maintain the
80% butterfat required for butter (7 CFR 58.305). The facility
maintains these monitoring records as part of its internal quality
program and testing requirements.
Under the current Dairy Grading and Inspection program, USDA
conducts a single butterfat test at the time of grading, which provides
a limited perspective on overall butterfat composition of butter
manufactured by the plant.
The proposed amendments would exempt plants from butterfat testing
administered by a USDA inspector and allow in-plant quality control
testing to satisfy butterfat testing requirements. The proposal would
replace testing performed by a USDA inspector at the time of grading
with a review of a plant's testing records. A records review of a
plant's routine testing rather than a single-point test would provide a
more accurate picture of whether the plant's butter products meet
quality standards. It would also reduce costs to a facility by
eliminating duplicate butterfat testing by a USDA inspector that it
currently must pay for. As explained in the Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis below, AMS estimates adopting a records review would save
participating plants $4,560 to $31,450 annually.
Currently, the final butter product must contain a minimum of 80%
butterfat by weight for it to comply with the regulations. That would
not change as a result of the proposed amendment. However, under the
proposal, AMS would annually review each plant's
[[Page 55427]]
butterfat test records to gauge the facility's compliance with the
regulations. Butterfat tests are already conducted as a normal,
standard business operating procedure by plants engaged in the
manufacture of butter. If a facility is out of compliance, AMS would
perform more frequent reviews to see what preventative and corrective
actions are being taken. Failure to rectify the problem could result in
ineligibility to use the USDA Grade Label shield on products produced
by the facility.
Records inspected would include plant records of butterfat tests
performed as required under 7 CFR 58.336, and analysis of records. The
change to the recordkeeping requirements would apply to records kept in
the regular course of business by the plant. As records would be
reviewed on-site by USDA inspectors, plants would not be required to
submit information to the agency.
Finally, AMS is proposing a revision of an administrative nature to
correct a misspelling in the regulations. A proposed revision to Sec.
58.336(a) would replace the word ``insure'' with ``ensure.''
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), AMS has requested approval of new information
collection and recordkeeping requirements for the Dairy Grading and
Inspection Program and comments are invited on this new information
collection. All comments received on this information collection will
be summarized and included in the final request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval.
Title: Regulations Governing the Review of Butterfat Testing
Records for the Dairy Grading and Inspection Butter Program.
OMB Number: 0581-NEW.
Expiration Date of Approval: This is a NEW collection.
Type of Request: Approval of New Information Collection.
Abstract: The Dairy Grading and Inspection program is a voluntary,
fee-based program authorized under the Agricultural Marketing Act (AMA)
of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1621-1627). The regulations governing inspection and
grading services of manufactured or processed dairy products are
contained in 7 CFR part 58. Under the program, a plant can submit to
grading and inspection of its butter products by a USDA grader
following the U.S. Grade Standards to ensure each product meet the U.S.
grade requirements. This program provides uniform quality of dairy
products in the marketplace. The information collection requirements in
this request are essential to carry out the intent of the AMA--to
ensure that dairy products are produced under sanitary conditions and
buyers are purchasing a quality product.
Estimate of Burden: Public recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average 2.5 hours per year.
Recordkeepers: Butter manufacturers.
Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 17.
Estimated Number of Hours per Recordkeeper: 2.5 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Recordkeepers: 42.5 hours.
The information collection seeks to replace testing by USDA
inspectors with an annual review of a plant's butterfat testing
records. The review encompasses plant records of butterfat tests
performed as required under 7 CFR 58.336, and analysis of records.
Plants seeking USDA inspection for butter grading conduct their own
routine, audited, butterfat tests to ensure quality and compliance with
composition standards. The information sought in this collection is
contained in records kept in the regular course of business by the
inspected facility. Records would be reviewed on-site by a USDA
inspector. The facility would not be required to submit information to
the agency.
E-Government Act
USDA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act (44 U.S.C.
3601, et seq.) by promoting the use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
USDA is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563, which direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health, and safety
effects; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866; and, therefore has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have a
retroactive effect. If adopted, this proposed rule would not preempt
any State or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present
an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic
impact of the action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared
this Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RFA).
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. The Small Business
Administration's definition (13 CFR 121.201) of small agricultural
service firms, which includes dairy processors, varies based on the
type of dairy product manufactured. Small butter manufacturers
processors are defined as having 750 or fewer employees. Seventeen
plants producing grade label butter in the U.S. participate in the
Grade Label Program. According to AMS calculations, about 12, or
approximately two-thirds, are operated by dairy farmer cooperatives,
while the remaining 5 are independently owned. AMS estimates that six
of 17 the participating butter processors would be considered small
businesses.
AMS has determined that establishment of this proposal would not
have a significant economic impact on small entities. The Dairy Grading
and Inspection Program is a voluntary program. Small businesses have
the option to participate. The proposed change would not unduly or
disproportionately burden small butter processing entities. It would
reduce costs to small businesses by eliminating a redundant butterfat
test currently performed by USDA. AMS estimates the cost to plants for
meeting USDA butterfat testing requirements ranges from $5,000 to
$32,000 annually. The significant cost difference depends on whether
the plant has an approved onsite laboratory or must ship samples to an
outside AMS laboratory, and the frequency of butterfat samples
submitted for testing.
The change would replace the USDA-inspector's test with a review of
records of butterfat tests that manufacturers currently conduct in the
normal course
[[Page 55428]]
of business to ensure quality and compliance with composition
standards. The plants would be charged for the inspectors' time to
conduct the records review, estimated to take four hours annually. At
an hourly rate of $110, a records review would cost the plant
approximately $440. This results in annual net saving to plants ranging
from $4,560 to $31,560.
Program provisions would be applied uniformly to both large and
small businesses and would not be expected to burden small entities
unduly or disproportionately.
Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule has been reviewed under E.O. 13175--Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires
agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have Tribal
implications. AMS has determined that this proposed rule is unlikely to
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 58
Dairy product, Food grades and standards, Food labeling, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to amend 7 CFR part 58 as follows:
PART 58--GRADING AND INSPECTION, GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR
APPROVED PLANTS AND STANDARDS FOR GRADES OF DAIRY PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority for part 58 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
0
2. Amend Sec. 58.148 by adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 58.148 Plant records.
* * * * *
(h) Butterfat test records. Retain for 12 months.
0
3. Amend Sec. 58.336 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 58.336 Frequency of sampling for quality control of cream,
butter and related products.
(a) Microbiological. Samples shall be taken from churnings or
batches and should be taken as often as is necessary to ensure
microbiological control.
(b) Sampling and testing. (1) Composition. Sampling and testing for
product composition shall be made on churns or batches as often as is
necessary to insure adequate composition control. For in-plant control,
the Kohman or modified Kohman test may be used.
(2) Sampling. Butterfat sampling may be performed as part of an in-
plant quality program.
* * * * *
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-17052 Filed 8-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P