Development of Small Dispensers Assessment Under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act; Request for Comments, 54320-54322 [2023-17140]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
54320
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 153 / Thursday, August 10, 2023 / Notices
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH
Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue,
MS C–34, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226–1998.
Instructions: All information received
in response to this notice must include
the agency name and docket number
(CDC–2023–0057; NIOSH–156–F). All
relevant comments, including any
personal information provided, will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov. Do not submit
comments by email. CDC does not
accept comments by email. For access to
the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R.
Todd Niemeier, Ph.D., National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health,
MS–C15, 1090 Tusculum Avenue,
Cincinnati, OH 45226. Telephone: (513)
533–8166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NIOSH is
requesting public comment and
technical review on a draft IDLH Value
Profile document for the chemical
hydrogen chloride. To facilitate the
review of this document, NIOSH
requests comment on the following
specific questions for the draft Profile
document:
1. Does this document clearly outline
the health hazards associated with acute
(or short-term) exposures to the
chemical? If not, what specific
information is missing from the
document?
2. Are the rationale and logic behind
the derivation of an IDLH value for a
specific chemical clearly explained? If
not, what specific information is needed
to clarify the basis of the IDLH value?
3. Are the conclusions supported by
the data?
4. Are the tables clear and
appropriate?
5. Is the document organized
appropriately? If not, what
improvements are needed?
6. Are you aware of any scientific data
reported in government publications,
databases, peer-reviewed journals, or
other sources that should be included
within this document?
The draft IDLH Value Profile was
developed to provide the scientific
rationale behind derivation of IDLH
values for the following chemical:
Document #
Chemical
CAS #
X–XX .............
Hydrogen Chloride
(#7647–01–0)
The IDLH Value Profile provides a
detailed summary of the health hazards
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Aug 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
of acute exposures to high airborne
concentrations of the chemical and the
rationale for the IDLH value.
Background: In 2013, NIOSH
published Current Intelligence Bulletin
(CIB) 66: Derivation of Immediately
Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH)
Values [https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/
2014-100/pdfs/2014-100.pdf] [NIOSH
2013]. The information presented in this
CIB represents the scientific rationale
and the current methodology used to
derive IDLH values. Since the
establishment of the IDLH values in the
1970s, NIOSH has continued to review
available scientific data to improve the
protocol used to derive acute exposure
guidelines, in addition to the chemical
specific IDLH values.
IDLH values are based on health
effects considerations determined
through a critical assessment of the
toxicology and human health effects
data. This approach ensures that the
IDLH values reflect an airborne
concentration of a substance that
represents a high-risk situation that may
endanger workers’ lives or health.
The primary steps applied in the
establishment of an IDLH value include
the following:
1. Critical review of human and
animal toxicity data to identify
potentially relevant studies and
characterize the various lines of
evidence that can support the derivation
of the IDLH value;
2. Determination of a chemical’s mode
of action or description of how a
chemical exerts its toxic effects;
3. Application of duration
adjustments (time scaling) to determine
30-minute-equivalent exposure
concentrations and the conduct of other
dosimetry adjustments, as needed;
4. Experimental or other data to
establish a point of departure (POD)
such as lethal concentrations (e.g.,
LC50), lowest observed adverse effect
level (LOAEL), or no observed adverse
effect level (NOAEL);
5. Selection and application of an
uncertainty factor (UF) for POD or
critical adverse effect concentration,
identified from the available studies to
account for issues associated with
interspecies and intraspecies
differences, severity of the observed
effects, data quality, or data
insufficiencies; and
6. Development of the final
recommendation for the IDLH value
from the various alternative lines of
evidence, with use of a weight-ofevidence approach to all the data.
dangerous to life or health (IDLH) values.
Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health
and Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS
(NIOSH) Publication 2014–100.
Reference
Electronic Submissions
NIOSH [2013]. Current intelligence
bulletin 66: derivation of immediately
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: August 4, 2023.
John J. Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023–17129 Filed 8–9–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2023–N–3103]
Development of Small Dispensers
Assessment Under the Drug Supply
Chain Security Act; Request for
Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
seeking stakeholder comments on the
development of a technology and
software assessment that examines the
feasibility of dispensers with 25 or
fewer full-time employees conducting
interoperable, electronic tracing of
products at the package level. FDA
would like to obtain information
regarding issues to be addressed in the
assessment related to the accessibility of
the necessary software and hardware to
such dispensers; whether the necessary
software and hardware is prohibitively
expensive to obtain, install, and
maintain for such dispensers; and if the
necessary hardware and software can be
integrated into business practices.
DATES: Either electronic or written
comments on the notice must be
submitted by September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. The https://
www.regulations.gov electronic filing
system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of
September 11, 2023. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for
written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are received
on or before that date.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 153 / Thursday, August 10, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2023–N–3103 for ‘‘Development of
Small Dispensers Assessment under the
Drug Supply Chain Security Act;
Request for Comments.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Aug 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Bellingham, Office of
Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
301–796–3130, daniel.bellingham@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 27, 2013, the Drug
Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA)
(Title II of Pub. L. 113–54) was signed
into law. The DSCSA outlines steps to
achieve interoperable, electronic tracing
of products at the package level to
identify and trace certain prescription
drugs as they are distributed in the
United States. Section 202 of the DSCSA
added the new sections 581 and 582 to
the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360eee and
360eee–1). Under section 582(g)(3), FDA
is required to enter into a contract with
a private, independent consulting firm
with expertise to conduct a technology
and software assessment that looks at
the feasibility of dispensers with 25 or
fewer full-time employees conducting
interoperable, electronic tracing of
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54321
products at the package level. Under
section 582(g)(1), dispensers and other
trading partners will be required to,
amongst other requirements, exchange
transaction information and transaction
statements in a secure, interoperable,
electronic manner for each package;
implement systems and processes for
package-level verification, including the
standardized numerical identifier; and
implement systems and processes to
facilitate the gathering of information
necessary to produce the transaction
information and statement for each
transaction going back to the
manufacturer if FDA or a trading partner
requests an investigation in the event of
a recall or for purposes of investigating
a suspect or illegitimate product. These
enhanced drug distribution security
requirements are also referred to as
‘‘enhanced product tracing’’ or
‘‘enhanced verification.’’
II. Purpose of the Request for
Comments
FDA is issuing this request for public
comments prior to beginning the
assessment, in accordance with section
582(g)(3)(D). The statement of work
requires the selected firm to conduct an
assessment that will address the
proposed questions articulated below.
In addition to commenting on the
proposed questions below, stakeholders
may provide comments on any aspect of
the small dispenser assessment under
the DSCSA.
Stakeholders that may be interested in
responding to this request for
information include manufacturers,
repackagers, wholesale distributors,
dispensers, State and Federal
authorities, solution providers, and
standards organizations, among others.
FDA is particularly interested in
receiving comments from the various
sectors of the dispenser community,
particularly pharmacies. FDA is seeking
comments on the following proposed
questions for small dispensers (i.e.,
dispensers with 25 or fewer full-time
employees). We are interested in
receiving feedback on the questions
themselves and whether or not they
should be edited to be more useful for
the assessment. FDA is also interested
in any new questions that stakeholders
may recommend.
• Have you begun preparations for
DSCSA requirements regarding the
interoperable, electronic tracing of
products at the package level required
under section 582(g)(1) of the FD&C Act
(i.e., enhanced product tracing or
enhanced verification)?
• How are you currently exchanging
data with your trading partners (e.g., by
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
54322
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 153 / Thursday, August 10, 2023 / Notices
paper-based methods, electronic
methods, or both)?
• If not currently exchanging data
with trading partners in a fully
electronic manner, will you be able to
in the near future? If not, what are the
barriers? Elaborate on why or how, as
appropriate. Please specify issues
related to:
• accessibility of necessary software
and hardware;
• cost to obtain, install, and maintain
necessary software and hardware,
particularly if it is prohibitively
expensive;
• integration of necessary software
and hardware into business practices,
such as with wholesale distributors;
• other relevant information related
to feasibility of dispensers with 25 or
fewer full-time employees to conduct
interoperable, electronic tracing of
product at the package level.
• What type of software systems and
hardware do you currently utilize to
facilitate the electronic exchange of
DSCSA-related data for transactions of
products?
• What new or modified software
systems and hardware do you anticipate
putting in place to comply with the
interoperable, electronic tracing
requirements?
• How likely are you to change and
upgrade your existing software systems
that are already in use so that you can
comply with the interoperable,
electronic tracing requirements?
• Have you or do you plan to connect
your system(s) with your trading
partner(s) (e.g., manufacturer(s),
repackager(s), or wholesale
distributor(s)) in order to facilitate
electronic DSCSA-related data
exchange? If so, have you experienced
technical issues when attempting to
establish connectivity? If not, how do
you or how do you plan to manage
electronic DSCSA-related data received
from an upstream trading partner (e.g.,
maintain the data in your dispenser
system or use a third-party agreement
for another entity to confidentially
maintain the DSCSA-related data on
your behalf (e.g., use of a secure web
portal provided by your wholesale
distributor))?
• Have you considered data integrity
and security concerns when establishing
agreements with third-party entities
(e.g., solution providers or wholesale
distributors) for electronic data
exchange and maintenance?
• Have you ever received transaction
information from a trading partner, such
as your wholesale distributor, that does
not match the product that you
received? If so, how long did it take to
resolve the discrepancy on average?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Aug 09, 2023
Jkt 259001
What if any unique challenges arose
from these situations? How often does
this happen?
• If you currently routinely scan a 2D
data matrix barcode, how often do you
receive a 2D data matrix barcode of the
product identifier that cannot be
scanned or read? Why are you unable to
scan or read the 2D data matrix barcode
(e.g., barcode quality, scanner
performance, software issue) and what
is your process for handling these
situations, including when manual steps
are taken by your staff when an
automated process was inadequate or
failed?
• If you currently routinely scan the
2D data matrix barcode, how often you
encounter a 2D data matrix barcode
with missing or inaccurate data? What
are the reasons for this and what is your
process for handling these situations,
including when manual steps are taken
by your staff when an automated
process was inadequate or failed?
• What new demands do you expect
the DSCSA requirements in section
582(g)(1) of the FD&C Act to have on
your current staff resources?
• How long do you expect it will take
to train staff on the new requirements,
how to use any new software or
hardware, and any process changes?
What additional resources do you
anticipate needing to comply with the
interoperable, electronic tracing
requirements?
• Are there additional challenges not
already identified when
operationalizing new systems and
processes for interoperable, electronic
tracing of products at the package level
required under section 582(g)(1) of the
FD&C Act (i.e., enhanced product
tracing or enhanced verification)?
Stakeholders may provide other
relevant information that may inform
the development of the small dispenser
assessment under the DSCSA.
Dated: August 7, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023–17140 Filed 8–9–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2023–N–1529]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Voluntary Qualified
Importer Program
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Submit written comments
(including recommendations) on the
collection of information by September
11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be submitted to https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function. The OMB
control number for this information
collection is 0910–0840. Also include
the FDA docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel Showalter, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three
White Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, 240–994–7399, PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Voluntary Qualified Importer Program
OMB Control Number 0910–0840—
Extension
This information collection supports
implementation of FDA’s Voluntary
Qualified Importer Program (VQIP), a
voluntary fee-based program that
provides expedited review and import
entry of human and animal foods into
the United States. Program participants
may import products to the United
States with greater speed and
predictability, avoiding unexpected
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 153 (Thursday, August 10, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54320-54322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17140]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2023-N-3103]
Development of Small Dispensers Assessment Under the Drug Supply
Chain Security Act; Request for Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is seeking
stakeholder comments on the development of a technology and software
assessment that examines the feasibility of dispensers with 25 or fewer
full-time employees conducting interoperable, electronic tracing of
products at the package level. FDA would like to obtain information
regarding issues to be addressed in the assessment related to the
accessibility of the necessary software and hardware to such
dispensers; whether the necessary software and hardware is
prohibitively expensive to obtain, install, and maintain for such
dispensers; and if the necessary hardware and software can be
integrated into business practices.
DATES: Either electronic or written comments on the notice must be
submitted by September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of September 11, 2023. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are received on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
[[Page 54321]]
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2023-N-3103 for ``Development of Small Dispensers Assessment under
the Drug Supply Chain Security Act; Request for Comments.'' Received
comments, those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Bellingham, Office of
Compliance, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
301-796-3130, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 27, 2013, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA)
(Title II of Pub. L. 113-54) was signed into law. The DSCSA outlines
steps to achieve interoperable, electronic tracing of products at the
package level to identify and trace certain prescription drugs as they
are distributed in the United States. Section 202 of the DSCSA added
the new sections 581 and 582 to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) (21 U.S.C. 360eee and 360eee-1). Under section 582(g)(3), FDA is
required to enter into a contract with a private, independent
consulting firm with expertise to conduct a technology and software
assessment that looks at the feasibility of dispensers with 25 or fewer
full-time employees conducting interoperable, electronic tracing of
products at the package level. Under section 582(g)(1), dispensers and
other trading partners will be required to, amongst other requirements,
exchange transaction information and transaction statements in a
secure, interoperable, electronic manner for each package; implement
systems and processes for package-level verification, including the
standardized numerical identifier; and implement systems and processes
to facilitate the gathering of information necessary to produce the
transaction information and statement for each transaction going back
to the manufacturer if FDA or a trading partner requests an
investigation in the event of a recall or for purposes of investigating
a suspect or illegitimate product. These enhanced drug distribution
security requirements are also referred to as ``enhanced product
tracing'' or ``enhanced verification.''
II. Purpose of the Request for Comments
FDA is issuing this request for public comments prior to beginning
the assessment, in accordance with section 582(g)(3)(D). The statement
of work requires the selected firm to conduct an assessment that will
address the proposed questions articulated below. In addition to
commenting on the proposed questions below, stakeholders may provide
comments on any aspect of the small dispenser assessment under the
DSCSA.
Stakeholders that may be interested in responding to this request
for information include manufacturers, repackagers, wholesale
distributors, dispensers, State and Federal authorities, solution
providers, and standards organizations, among others. FDA is
particularly interested in receiving comments from the various sectors
of the dispenser community, particularly pharmacies. FDA is seeking
comments on the following proposed questions for small dispensers
(i.e., dispensers with 25 or fewer full-time employees). We are
interested in receiving feedback on the questions themselves and
whether or not they should be edited to be more useful for the
assessment. FDA is also interested in any new questions that
stakeholders may recommend.
Have you begun preparations for DSCSA requirements
regarding the interoperable, electronic tracing of products at the
package level required under section 582(g)(1) of the FD&C Act (i.e.,
enhanced product tracing or enhanced verification)?
How are you currently exchanging data with your trading
partners (e.g., by
[[Page 54322]]
paper-based methods, electronic methods, or both)?
If not currently exchanging data with trading partners in
a fully electronic manner, will you be able to in the near future? If
not, what are the barriers? Elaborate on why or how, as appropriate.
Please specify issues related to:
accessibility of necessary software and hardware;
cost to obtain, install, and maintain necessary software
and hardware, particularly if it is prohibitively expensive;
integration of necessary software and hardware into
business practices, such as with wholesale distributors;
other relevant information related to feasibility of
dispensers with 25 or fewer full-time employees to conduct
interoperable, electronic tracing of product at the package level.
What type of software systems and hardware do you
currently utilize to facilitate the electronic exchange of DSCSA-
related data for transactions of products?
What new or modified software systems and hardware do you
anticipate putting in place to comply with the interoperable,
electronic tracing requirements?
How likely are you to change and upgrade your existing
software systems that are already in use so that you can comply with
the interoperable, electronic tracing requirements?
Have you or do you plan to connect your system(s) with
your trading partner(s) (e.g., manufacturer(s), repackager(s), or
wholesale distributor(s)) in order to facilitate electronic DSCSA-
related data exchange? If so, have you experienced technical issues
when attempting to establish connectivity? If not, how do you or how do
you plan to manage electronic DSCSA-related data received from an
upstream trading partner (e.g., maintain the data in your dispenser
system or use a third-party agreement for another entity to
confidentially maintain the DSCSA-related data on your behalf (e.g.,
use of a secure web portal provided by your wholesale distributor))?
Have you considered data integrity and security concerns
when establishing agreements with third-party entities (e.g., solution
providers or wholesale distributors) for electronic data exchange and
maintenance?
Have you ever received transaction information from a
trading partner, such as your wholesale distributor, that does not
match the product that you received? If so, how long did it take to
resolve the discrepancy on average? What if any unique challenges arose
from these situations? How often does this happen?
If you currently routinely scan a 2D data matrix barcode,
how often do you receive a 2D data matrix barcode of the product
identifier that cannot be scanned or read? Why are you unable to scan
or read the 2D data matrix barcode (e.g., barcode quality, scanner
performance, software issue) and what is your process for handling
these situations, including when manual steps are taken by your staff
when an automated process was inadequate or failed?
If you currently routinely scan the 2D data matrix
barcode, how often you encounter a 2D data matrix barcode with missing
or inaccurate data? What are the reasons for this and what is your
process for handling these situations, including when manual steps are
taken by your staff when an automated process was inadequate or failed?
What new demands do you expect the DSCSA requirements in
section 582(g)(1) of the FD&C Act to have on your current staff
resources?
How long do you expect it will take to train staff on the
new requirements, how to use any new software or hardware, and any
process changes? What additional resources do you anticipate needing to
comply with the interoperable, electronic tracing requirements?
Are there additional challenges not already identified
when operationalizing new systems and processes for interoperable,
electronic tracing of products at the package level required under
section 582(g)(1) of the FD&C Act (i.e., enhanced product tracing or
enhanced verification)?
Stakeholders may provide other relevant information that may inform
the development of the small dispenser assessment under the DSCSA.
Dated: August 7, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-17140 Filed 8-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P