Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Amendment 122 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area; Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program, 53704-53745 [2023-16526]
Download as PDF
53704
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 902
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 230728–0179]
RIN 0648–BL08
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Amendment 122 to
the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area;
Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative
Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this final rule to
implement Amendment 122 to the
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
(BSAI). Amendment 122 establishes the
Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program
(PCTC Program or Program), a limited
access privilege program (LAPP) to
harvest Pacific cod in the BSAI trawl
catcher vessel (CV) sector. The PCTC
Program allocates Pacific cod harvest
quota to qualifying groundfish License
Limitation Program (LLP) license
holders and qualifying processors and
requires participants to form
cooperatives to harvest the quota. This
action is necessary to increase the value
of the fishery, minimize bycatch to the
extent practicable, provide for the
sustained participation of fisherydependent communities, ensure the
sustainability and viability of the
resource, and promote safety and
stability in the harvesting and
processing sectors. This action is
intended to promote the goals and
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the BSAI
FMP, and other applicable law.
DATES: This rule is effective on
September 7, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
Environmental Assessment (EA), the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), and the
Social Impact Analysis (collectively
referred to as the ‘‘Analysis’’), and the
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) prepared for this final rule may
be obtained from https://
www.regulations.gov in docket number
NOAA–NMFS–2022–0072 or from the
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
NMFS Alaska Region website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this final rule
may be submitted to NMFS Alaska
Region, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802–1668, Attn: Gretchen Harrington;
and to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find the particular
information collection by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Warpinski, 907–586–7228 or
stephanie.warpinski@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
published a Notice of Availability for
Amendment 122 in the Federal Register
on December 30, 2022 (87 FR 80519),
with public comments invited through
February 28, 2023. NMFS published a
proposed rule to implement
Amendment 122 in the Federal Register
on February 9, 2023 (88 FR 8592) with
public comments invited through March
13, 2023. The Secretary of Commerce
approved Amendment 122 on March 24,
2023 after considering information from
the public and determining that
Amendment 122 is consistent with the
BSAI FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and other applicable laws. NMFS
received 16 comment letters on
Amendment 122 and the proposed rule.
A summary of the comments and
NMFS’ responses are provided under
the heading ‘‘Comments and
Responses’’ below.
Background
The following background sections
describe the PCTC Program and this
final rule. A detailed description of the
PCTC Program and its development is
provided in the preamble to the
proposed rule and in the Analysis.
I. Pacific Cod Management in the BSAI
Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) is
one of the most abundant and valuable
groundfish species harvested in the
BSAI. Vessels harvest Pacific cod using
trawl and non-trawl gear. Vessels
harvesting BSAI Pacific cod operate as
CVs that harvest and deliver the fish for
processing or as catcher/processors
(CPs) that harvest and process the catch
on board.
The overfishing level (OFL),
acceptable biological catch (ABC), and
total allowable catch (TAC) for BSAI
groundfish are specified through the
annual harvest specification process. A
detailed description of the annual
harvest specification process is
provided in the final 2023 and 2024
harvest specifications for groundfish of
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the BSAI (88 FR 14926, March 10,
2023). For Pacific cod, the harvest
specifications establish separate OFLs,
ABCs, and TACs for the Bering Sea (BS)
subarea and the Aleutian Islands (AI)
subarea of the BSAI. Allocations of
Pacific cod to the Community
Development Quota (CDQ) Program
sector and to the non-CDQ fishery
sectors are further apportioned by
seasons. Season dates for the CDQ and
non-CDQ fishery sectors are established
at 50 CFR 679.23(e)(5). In general,
regulations apportion trawl gear
allocations among three seasons that
correspond to January 20–April 1 (A
season), April 1–June 10 (B season), and
June 10–November 1 (C season).
The trawl CV sector is apportioned
22.1 percent of the BSAI Pacific cod
non-CDQ TAC, which is further divided
into seasonal allowances between the A,
B, and C seasons. A season is issued 74
percent of the trawl CV sector’s total
apportionment, B season is issued 11
percent, and C season is issued 15
percent. After NMFS deducts estimated
incidental catch from the trawl CV
sector apportionment, each seasonal
allowance is assigned to the trawl CV
sector as a BSAI directed fishing
allowance (DFA).
NMFS implemented the Groundfish
License Limitation Program (LLP) in
1998 (63 FR 52642, Oct. 1, 1998) and
issued LLP licenses to qualifying
participants based on historical
participation in the Federal groundfish
fisheries off Alaska. A groundfish LLP
license authorizes a vessel to participate
in a directed fishery for groundfish in
the BSAI in accordance with specific
area and species endorsements, vessel
and gear designations, and the
maximum length overall (MLOA), or
any exemption from the MLOA,
specified on the license. All Federal
Pacific cod harvesting activity in the
BSAI requires an LLP license and the
correct endorsements.
AI endorsements issued to certain
LLP licenses under Amendment 92 to
the BSAI FMP were intended to
facilitate shoreside deliveries of Pacific
cod to AI communities and provide
additional harvest opportunities for
non-American Fisheries Act (AFA)
trawl vessels who had demonstrated a
dependence on AI groundfish resources.
The AI endorsements issued to LLP
licenses used by non-AFA trawl CVs
less than 60 ft (18.3 m) length overall
(LOA) are severable from the LLP
license and transferable to another LLP
licenses with a MLOA under 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA. The transferability provision
was intended to allow smaller vessels
operational flexibility and avoid
stranding an AI endorsement on an LLP
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
license being used by a vessel that no
longer fished in the AI. No other area
endorsement in the LLP can be
transferred separately from an LLP
license.
II. PCTC Program Overview
The PCTC Program implements a
complex suite of measures to improve
fishery conditions for all participants.
This Program establishes criteria for
harvesters and processors in the BSAI
trawl CV sector Pacific cod fishery to
qualify for and receive quota share (QS),
criteria for allocating QS in the initial
year of implementation, and criteria for
the transfer of QS. QS holders are
required to join a cooperative
(harvesters) or associate with a
cooperative (processors). The aggregate
QS of cooperative members and
associated processors yields an
exclusive harvest privilege for PCTC
Program cooperatives, which NMFS will
issue as cooperative quota (CQ) each
year. CQ represents a portion of the A
and B season BSAI trawl CV sector
Pacific cod DFA. Of the total annual CQ,
77.5 percent is derived from QS issued
to LLP licenses, and 22.5 percent is
derived from QS issued to processors.
The DFA for the C season remains
available for harvest as a limited access
fishery open to all CVs with the
required trawl gear and area
endorsements on the LLP license
assigned to the vessel.
The PCTC Program includes
ownership and use caps to prevent a
permit holder from acquiring an
excessive share of the fishery as
required under Magnuson-Stevens Act
section 303A(c)(5)(D). No person is
permitted to hold more than 5 percent
of harvester-issued QS or 20 percent of
processor-issued QS. In addition, no
vessel is allowed to harvest more than
5 percent of the annual CQ, and no
company is allowed to process more
than 20 percent of the annual CQ. The
PCTC Program also includes legacy
exemptions for persons over these
ownership and use caps at the time of
PCTC Program implementation,
allowing participants to maintain levels
of historical participation rather than
forcing divestiture.
The PCTC Program reduces the
halibut and crab Prohibited Species
Catch (PSC) limits for participating
trawl CVs during the A and B seasons.
NMFS will apportion halibut and crab
PSC limits to PCTC Program
cooperatives during the annual harvest
specifications process based on the
percentage of total BSAI Pacific cod CQ
allocated to each cooperative.
To support the sustained participation
of AI communities in the Pacific cod
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
trawl CV fishery, cooperatives are
required to collectively set-aside 12
percent of the A season CQ for delivery
to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant (AI
CQ set-aside) during years in which an
AI community representative notifies
NMFS of their intent to process Pacific
cod.
The following sections describe the
primary management measures
included in the PCTC Program. Each
Program element is discussed in further
detail in the preamble to the proposed
rule prepared for this action (88 FR
8592, February 9, 2023).
III. Quota Share for Harvesters and
Processors
NMFS established a PCTC Program
official record containing all necessary
information concerning legal landings of
Pacific cod during the qualifying period,
vessel and processor ownership, LLP
license holdings, and any other
information needed for assigning QS.
NMFS will use the PCTC Program
official record as of December 31, 2022
to establish the initial pool of QS that
will be distributed to eligible harvesters
and processors.
A. Initial Allocation of Quota Share for
Harvesters
Under the PCTC Program, NMFS will
assign QS to eligible LLP licenses.
‘‘Eligible PCTC Program LLP license’’
means an LLP license that has
qualifying catch history (i.e., was
assigned to a vessel that made
qualifying legal landings) of targeted
trawl CV BSAI Pacific cod during the
qualifying years. The amount of QS
allocated to individual LLP licenses is
determined by historic participation
relative to other LLP licenses, as
described below.
‘‘Legal landings’’ means the retained
catch of Pacific cod caught by a CV
using trawl gear in the BSAI during the
directed fishing season for Pacific cod
that was: (1) made in compliance with
state and Federal regulations in effect at
that time, (2) recorded on a State of
Alaska fish ticket or shoreside logbook
for shoreside deliveries or in observer
data for mothership deliveries, and (3)
was the predominately retained species
on the fishing trip (i.e., Pacific cod was
targeted). A legal landing must have
been authorized by either (1) an LLP
license participating in the A or B
season of a Federal or parallel State
water groundfish fishery during the
qualifying years 2009 to 2019, or (2) an
LLP license with a transferable AI
endorsement that, prior to receiving that
AI endorsement, participated in the AI
parallel fishery from January 20, 2004
through September 13, 2009. NMFS
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53705
determines which LLP license(s) were
assigned to CVs that harvested and
offloaded Pacific cod that met all legal
landings requirements. Legal landings
for the PCTC Program do not include
landings in the CDQ fishery, in the State
of Alaska Guideline Harvest Level
fishery, or made during the C season by
vessels participating in a Federal or
parallel State water fishery.
Under this final rule, the Regional
Administrator will allocate PCTC
Program QS to an LLP license holder
who submits a timely Application for
PCTC Program QS that is approved by
NMFS. For each LLP license without a
transferable AI endorsement, NMFS will
assign a specific number of PCTC
Program QS units based on the BSAI
trawl CV Pacific cod legal landings of
that LLP license using information from
the PCTC Program official record
according to the following procedures:
(1) Determine the BSAI trawl CV
Pacific cod legal landings authorized by
an LLP license for each calendar year
from 2009 through 2019.
(2) Drop from consideration the
calendar year in which the LLP license
had the least amount of legal landings.
If an LLP license had one or more years
with zero harvest, drop one of those
years.
(3) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings
for the 10 years in which each LLP
license had the most landings. This
yields the QS units for each LLP license.
For each LLP license with a
transferable AI endorsement, NMFS will
assign a specific number of PCTC
Program QS units based on the legal
landings of each vessel that was used to
generate the transferable AI
endorsement and subsequent legal
landings authorized by the LLP license
associated with the endorsement using
information from the PCTC Program
official record according to the
following procedures:
(1) Determine the BSAI trawl CV
Pacific cod legal landings for each
vessel used to generate the transferable
AI endorsement from January 20, 2004
through September 13, 2009 and the
LLP license associated with that
transferable AI endorsement from
September 14, 2009 through the end of
2019.
(2) Drop from consideration the
calendar year which the vessel used to
generate the transferable AI
endorsement (January 20, 2004–
September 13, 2009) or the associated
LLP license (2009–2019) and during
which the vessel had the least amount
of legal landings. If a vessel or LLP
license had one or more years with zero
harvest, drop one of those years.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53706
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(3) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings
of the highest fifteen years for each LLP
license with transferable AI
endorsement. This yields the QS units
for each LLP license with a transferable
AI endorsement.
After the QS units for the LLP licenses
with and without transferable AI
endorsements are determined under
part 3 of each scenario above, NMFS
sums all harvester QS units to calculate
the harvesters’ total QS pool. NMFS will
then determine what portion of the 77.5
percent of the A and B season DFA
allocated as harvester QS is represented
by each LLP license’s QS units. To do
so, NMFS will divide each LLP license’s
total QS units by the sum (S) of all QS
units for all eligible LLP licenses based
on the PCTC Program official record as
presented in the following equation:
these cases, NMFS will assign the
qualifying catch history to a single LLP
license in one of two ways. First, the
LLP license owners may come to an
agreement regarding the division of
qualifying catch history and submit this
agreement to NMFS when they apply for
QS. Second, if no agreement is provided
by the LLP license holders, the owner of
the vessel that made the qualifying
catch can assign the history to one of the
LLP licenses that authorized the catch.
B. Initial Allocation of Quota Share for
Processors
‘‘Eligible PCTC Program processor’’
means a processing facility with an
active Federal Fisheries Permit (FFP) or
Federal Processing Permit (FPP) (subject
to eligibility requirements under
Amendment 120 to the BSAI FMP to
LLP license’s QS units/(S QS units for all LLP limit CPs acting as mothership) that has
historically received Pacific cod legal
licenses) × 100 = Percentage of the total
harvester QS pool allocated to that
landings during the PCTC Program
eligible LLP license.
qualifying years. NMFS will issue QS to
the owner of an eligible PCTC Program
The result (quotient) of this equation
processor based on deliveries of legal
is the percentage of the total harvesters’
landings in the Federal BSAI Pacific cod
portion of PCTC Program QS allocation
trawl fishery in the A and B seasons for
(which is 77.5 percent of the A and B
season DFA) that a QS holder can assign each calendar year from 2009 through
2019, with the calendar year in which
to a cooperative each year.
the processor received the least amount
NMFS will not divide QS among LLP
licenses. The current LLP license owner of legal landings dropped from the
calculation. Owners of eligible PCTC
is entitled to all QS derived from the
Program processors must submit a
LLP license and transferable AI
timely and complete Application for
endorsement catch history, unless
compensation was required by a private PCTC Program QS.
Processors that are no longer active
agreement associated with the sale of
(i.e., no longer hold an FPP or FFP upon
the LLP license.
the effective date of this final rule) will
Some legal landings during 2009
through 2019 were made by vessels with not be issued QS. The processing
history associated with those processors
two or more associated LLP licenses. In
will be deducted from the total amount
of eligible processing history during the
qualifying years when calculating the
distribution of QS to processors.
NMFS will assign a specific number
of PCTC Program QS units to each
processor’s PCTC Program QS permit
based on the qualifying legal landings
delivered to the processor using
information from the PCTC Program
official record according to the
following procedures:
(1) Determine the BSAI trawl CV
Pacific cod legal landings in the A and
B seasons delivered to each eligible
processor for each calendar year from
2009 through 2019.
(2) Drop from consideration the
calendar year in which the processor
received the least amount of legal
landings. If a processor had one or more
years with zero processing of Pacific cod
legal landings, drop one of those years.
(3) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings
of the highest 10 years for each eligible
processor. This yields the QS units for
each processor.
(4) Divide the QS units for each
eligible processor by the sum (S) of all
QS units for all processors based on the
PCTC official record as presented in the
following equation:
Processor’s QS units/S all processor QS units
× 100 = Percentage of the total processor
QS allocation for that processor.
The result (quotient) of this equation
is the percentage of the total processors’
portion of PCTC Program QS allocation
(which is 22.5 percent of the A and B
season DFA) that a QS holder can assign
to a cooperative each year.
TABLE 1—PCTC PROGRAM INITIAL QS POOL IN UNITS
Species
PCTC Program initial QS pool in units
Pacific cod (Holders of LLP Licenses with no transferable AI endorsement).
Pacific cod (Holders of LLP licenses with a transferable AI endorsement).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Pacific cod (All processors) ......................................................................
C. Application for PCTC Program QS
A person must submit an Application
for PCTC Program QS in order to receive
an initial allocation of PCTC QS. NMFS
requires an application to ensure that
QS is assigned to the appropriate
person(s) and to provide a process for
resolving claims of legal landings that
are contrary to the PCTC Program
official record. Once a person submits
an Application for PCTC Program QS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
S highest 10 years of BSAI Pacific cod catch history in metric tons in
the PCTC official record as of December 31, 2022 for LLP license
holders.
S highest 15 years of BSAI Pacific cod catch history in metric tons in
the PCTC official record as of December 31, 2022 for holders of LLP
licenses with a transferable AI endorsement.
S highest 10 years BSAI Pacific cod processing history in metric tons
in the PCTC official record as of December 31, 2022 for that BSAI
Pacific cod for eligible processors.
that is approved by NMFS, that person
will not need to resubmit an application
for QS in future years. NMFS will post
a list of the eligible PCTC Program LLP
license holders and the eligible PCTC
Program processors on the NMFS
Alaska Region web page (see
ADDRESSES).
NMFS will mail an application
package to the address on record for all
potentially eligible LLP license holders
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
and processors. This package will
include a letter informing potentially
eligible LLP license holders and
processors whether NMFS has
determined they are eligible to receive
QS, and if so, the amount of QS
calculated by NMFS based on qualifying
catch or processing history from the
PCTC Program official record.
Applications will also be available on
the NMFS Alaska Region web page (see
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
ADDRESSES), and interested persons can
also contact NMFS RAM to request an
application package.
An Application for PCTC Program QS
can be submitted electronically or by
mail as indicated in the instructions
provided on the application. A
completed Application for PCTC
Program QS must be received by NMFS
no later than 1700 hours AKST on
October 10, 2023, or if sent by U.S. mail,
postmarked by that time. Objective
written evidence of timely application
will be considered proof of a timely
application. If participants do not
submit an application by the deadline,
they will forfeit their PCTC Program QS.
If a participant agrees with the PCTC
Program official record summary, they
still must submit an Application for
PCTC Program QS by the deadline.
If a participant did not receive an
application package from NMFS, they
may still apply for QS by submitting an
Application for PCTC Program QS and
providing evidence of qualifying
participation in the BSAI trawl CV
sector Pacific cod fishery by the
application deadline.
If a participant would like to receive
QS and does not agree with the PCTC
Program official record summary, they
must complete an Application for PCTC
Program QS by the application deadline
and provide evidence of any claims of
participation that are contrary to the
official record.
If an LLP license holder’s PCTC
Program official record summary
includes shared catch history, the
participants with shared catch history
must execute an agreement specifying
the amount of shared catch history to
assign to each LLP license. If NMFS
does not receive an agreement, the
owner of the catcher vessel designated
on the LLP licenses at the time of
harvest will determine the amount of
QS assigned to each permit.
D. QS Application Review and Appeals
If any applicant disagrees with
NMFS’s initial calculations and
provides documentation with their
Application for PCTC Program QS to
support a claim of catch history that is
different from the PCTC Program official
record, NMFS will determine whether
such documentation is sufficient to
amend the official record. If so, NMFS
will issue QS to the applicant. If not,
NMFS will inform the applicant that the
submitted documentation was
insufficient and provide the applicant
with a 30-day evidentiary period to
further support their claims. After the
close of the 30-day evidentiary period,
NMFS will make its final decision about
the official record and issue an initial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
administrative determinations (IAD) to
the applicant. Applicants who disagree
with the IAD may appeal NMFS’s
decision through the NOAA National
Appeals Office according to the
procedures found at 50 CFR 679.43.
NMFS will identify in an IAD any
deficiencies or discrepancies in the
application, including any deficiencies
in the information or evidence
submitted to support an applicant’s
claims challenging the official record.
NMFS’s IAD will state which claims
cannot be approved based on the
available information or evidence and
provide information on how an
applicant can appeal an IAD. An
applicant who appeals an IAD will not
receive QS for contested landings data
unless and until the appeal is resolved
in the applicant’s favor. Once NMFS has
approved an Application for PCTC
Program QS in its entirety, NMFS will
assign QS units to an applicant’s LLP
license or issue a processor a PCTC
Program QS permit with a specified
number of QS units.
For the 2024 fishing season, NMFS
will issue CQ to cooperatives based on
the QS held by cooperative members at
the time of CQ issuance. Any ongoing
appeals or QS transfers allowed under
the 90-day transfer window for AFA
non-exempt CVs will apply to
subsequent fishing years.
E. Transferring QS
Under the PCTC Program, QS holders
may transfer QS concurrently with the
transfer of the LLP license, AI
endorsement, or processor PCTC
Program QS permit. In order to transfer
QS, a QS holder must submit to NMFS
an Application for Transfer of License
Limitation Program Groundfish/Crab
License or the Application for Transfer
of Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative
Program Quota Share (QS) for
Processors. Transfer of QS requires
approval by NMFS to properly track
ownership caps. For harvesters, QS may
be transferred with an LLP license or a
transferable AI endorsement to another
person through the existing LLP transfer
provisions described in regulations at 50
CFR 679.4(k)(7). Each application must
include any additional information
needed for the transfer of QS, including
amount of QS to be transferred
(generally all QS attached to the
license), the transferee, and the sale
price of QS. Applications are available
on the NMFS Alaska Region web page
(see ADDRESSES). Complete applications
can be submitted to NMFS
electronically.
To facilitate cooperative formation
under the PCTC Program in the first
year, QS transfers submitted after
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53707
November 1 and prior to the start of
PCTC Program fishing season will be
applied to the following year, meaning
if a transfer was submitted in December
2023, the transfer would not be applied
until after the PCTC Program fishing
season ends in 2024.
Under Amendment 92, the AI
endorsements issued to LLP licenses
used by non-AFA trawl CVs less than 60
ft (18.3 m) LOA are severable from the
LLP license they were initially issued
and transferable to another LLP licenses
with a MLOA under 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA.
NMFS modified the LLP license transfer
regulations to clarify the process for
transferring an AI endorsement
independent of the LLP license. As part
of the application process, a person
must specify the LLP license to which
the transferred AI area endorsement will
be assigned.
Once PCTC Program QS is issued, the
QS units will remain attached to the
associated LLP license or processor’s
PCTC Program QS permit in most
circumstances and cannot be severed or
otherwise transferred independently.
There are several limited exceptions to
non-severability: (1) QS can be fully or
partially transferred during the limited
90-day transfer provision for nonexempt AFA CVs; (2) QS attached to
LLP licenses with a transferable AI
endorsement can be transferred along
with the endorsement to another LLP
license that meets the criteria for a
transferable AI endorsement
(endorsements cannot be stacked on a
single LLP); (3) if a participant qualifies
for a legacy exemption and receives an
initial allocation of QS in excess of the
ownership cap, that participant’s QS
can be split during a transfer to prevent
any recipient from exceeding a cap; and
(4) QS can be separated from a processor
QS permit in any transfer of processorheld QS if necessary to prevent any
transferee from exceeding an ownership
or use cap.
Ninety Day Transfer Window for NonExempt AFA LLP Holders
For LLP licenses associated with AFA
non-exempt vessels, within 90 days of
initial issuance of QS, the owner of the
LLP license may transfer QS to another
LLP license associated with an AFA
non-exempt vessel. These QS transfers
are subject to the QS ownership cap.
This provision allows LLP license
holders that engaged in AFA sideboard
harvesting agreements during the
qualifying period to transfer resulting
QS back to the originating LLP license.
The transferor and the transferee must
submit to NMFS a letter, signed by both
persons, as evidence of their agreement
to transfer the QS in this one-time
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53708
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
opportunity. In the letter, they must
explain how much QS will be
transferred and to which LLP license or
licenses. If only one party submits
evidence of an agreement, the QS will
remain with the LLP license to which it
was initially assigned.
F. QS Ownership Caps
The PCTC program includes QS
ownership caps to prevent a permit
holder from acquiring an excessive
share of the fishery as required under
Magnuson-Stevens Act Section
303A(c)(5)(D). Individual ownership
caps for both harvesters and processors
are calculated using the ‘‘individual and
collective rule’’ which means a person
is deemed to own QS in the same
percentage that person owns or uses the
relevant license, permit, or vessel. If a
person owns QS equal to the cap, NMFS
will not approve a transfer of additional
QS to that person. The PCTC Program
also includes CQ use caps, described in
sections IV.E and IV.F.
Harvester QS Ownership Cap—5
Percent
With the exception of persons
qualifying for the legacy exemption, no
person is permitted to individually or
collectively own more than 5 percent of
the aggregate QS units initially assigned
to eligible LLP licenses. The number of
QS units is based on the PCTC Program
official record. When QS is transferred,
the person receiving the transfer is
prohibited from holding or using QS
over the 5 percent cap. This QS
ownership cap limits the amount of QS
assigned to an LLP license that can be
held or controlled by a single entity.
Processor QS does not count toward this
ownership cap.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Processor QS Ownership Cap—20
Percent
With the exception of persons
qualifying for the legacy exemption, no
person is permitted to individually or
collectively own more than 20 percent
of the aggregate QS units initially
assigned to QS permits held by eligible
processors. Processor QS ownership
caps are necessarily higher than
harvester-held QS caps because the total
number of eligible processors is
significantly less than the number of
harvesters. This cap is applied at the
aggregate company or firm level (not the
individual facility level). The processor
QS ownership cap limits the amount of
processor-held QS that can be held or
controlled by a single entity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Legacy Exemption From the Ownership
Caps
Under the PCTC Program, persons
over the cap at the time of QS issuance
are granted non-transferable legacy
exemptions. Because the ownership
caps fall well short of excessive shares
in the fishery and allocating QS based
on status quo levels of participation
would not result in any participant
holding an excessive share of limited
access privileges, the Program grants
legacy exemptions to participants whose
initial QS allocations exceed the
ownership caps. The legacy exemptions
are intended to preserve stability in the
fishery rather than force longtime
participants to divest and reduce their
reliance on the fishery. However, legacy
exemptions are unique to persons
receiving initial QS allocations and
cannot be transferred. All future
purchasers of QS would be subject to
the ownership caps.
G. Transferring QS in Excess of the
Ownership Caps
NMFS will not approve transfers of an
LLP license with QS or a PCTC Program
QS permit if the transfer would cause a
person to exceed the 5 percent harvester
QS ownership cap or the 20 percent
processor QS ownership cap.
For LLP licenses and PCTC Program
QS permit holders that are initially
issued QS greater than the ownership
cap (i.e., for persons granted a legacy
exemption from the ownership cap), the
LLP license holder or QS permit holder
may sever the amount of QS over the
cap from the permit (and, once severed,
transfer to one or more buyers) at the
time of transfer. This provision allows
the transfer of an LLP license or PCTC
Program QS permit subject to a legacy
exemption without the transferee
exceeding a QS ownership cap. In
addition, for QS assigned to a processor
holding a PCTC Program QS permit—
even if the transferor does not hold QS
in excess of any cap—QS can be divided
or transferred separately from that
processor permit if a sale will otherwise
result in the transferee exceeding an
ownership cap.
If a QS holder has a legacy exemption
from the QS ownership cap, NMFS will
not approve a QS transfer to that person
unless and until that person’s holdings
of QS are reduced to an amount below
the QS ownership cap.
IV. PCTC Program Cooperatives
The PCTC Program is a cooperativebased program that requires harvesters
to join a cooperative each year and
processors to associate with a
cooperative each year to benefit from QS
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
holdings. NMFS will issue cooperatives
annual CQ derived from the QS held by
the harvesters that join the cooperative
and associated processors. Under the
Program, cooperative members are
expected to coordinate their fishing
operations, potentially reduce
operational expenses, and increase the
quality and revenue from the product,
among other benefits.
A. Requirements for Forming a
Cooperative
Under the PCTC Program, forming a
cooperative requires at least three LLP
licenses with QS. Annually, each
cooperative must associate with at least
one permitted processor. There is no
limitation on the number of LLP
licenses that may join a single
cooperative, the number of processors a
cooperative can associate with, or on the
amount of QS a single cooperative can
control. There is also no limit on the
number of cooperatives that may form,
but each LLP license may only be
assigned to one cooperative. A person
may hold multiple LLP licenses,
meaning that an individual who holds
three or more LLP licenses may form a
cooperative in association with a
processor.
An LLP license holder may change
cooperatives and processor associations
may change annually without penalty.
However, an LLP license holder with
QS may not change cooperatives and
cooperatives may not change their
processor associations during the PCTC
Program fishing season. If an LLP
license is sold or transferred during the
season, it will remain with the
cooperative until the end of the season.
Inter-cooperative formation is allowed
and an inter-cooperative agreement (see
section IV.B) is required to implement
the AI set-aside and to allow for
efficient transfer of CQ or PSC limits
between cooperatives.
NMFS will issue annual CQ to each
cooperative based on the aggregate QS
held by all cooperative members and
associated processors. CQ constitutes an
exclusive harvest privilege for the A and
B seasons. NMFS will issue CQ by
season and rely on the cooperatives to
ensure the seasonal limits are not
exceeded. Any unused A season CQ
may be harvested during the B season.
Cooperative members will determine
their own harvest strategy, including
which vessels can harvest the CQ.
CQ is not designated for the BS or AI
subareas separately, but may be
harvested from either area because the
non-CDQ Pacific cod sector allocations
are BSAI wide. If the non-CDQ Pacific
cod TAC is or will be reached in either
the BS or the AI subareas, NMFS will
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
prohibit non-CDQ directed fishing for
Pacific cod in that subarea as provided
at § 679.20(d)(1)(iii). However, NMFS
will annually establish a separate AI
DFA to support the calculation of the AI
set-aside. For more information, see
Section VI of this preamble. Under
certain conditions, cooperatives would
be required to collectively set aside 12
percent of the A season CQ for delivery
to an AI shoreplant as described further
under the AI Community Protections
section below.
Cooperatives are limited in the
manner in which they distribute CQ
derived from processor-held QS for
harvest by cooperative vessels. To
address vertically integrated companies
where a processing company may also
own LLP licenses or CVs within a
cooperative, CQ derived from processorheld QS must be divided among
cooperative harvesting CVs
proportionately to the QS attached to
LLP licenses on board the CVs. In other
words, a cooperative should not allow a
CV or LLP license owned by a processor
to harvest a greater proportion of the CQ
resulting from processor-held QS than
the LLP license will have brought into
the cooperative absent any processorheld QS. Each cooperative will monitor
this provision and include reporting on
harvest of CQ resulting from processorheld QS in the PCTC Program
cooperative annual report to the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council).
B. Application for PCTC Program
Cooperative Quota (CQ)
All participants in the Program must
organize into cooperatives, and the
cooperative must submit a complete
Application for PCTC Program CQ prior
to the November 1 deadline each year to
receive an annual CQ permit. If the
cooperative fails to submit a timely
application for CQ, NMFS will not issue
CQ to the cooperative for that fishing
year.
NMFS will process the application for
CQ and, if approved, issue a CQ permit
and apportioned amounts of annual crab
PSC and halibut PSC limits to the
cooperative. NMFS will use these
applications to issue CQ permits,
establish annual cooperative accounts
for catch accounting purposes, and
identify specific harvester vessels for
each cooperative. As with other LAPPs,
the information received in this
application is annually used to review
ownership and control information for
various QS holders to ensure that QS
and CQ use caps are not exceeded.
Processors that receive deliveries of CQ
but do not hold a QS permit do not need
to be listed on the application for CQ.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
The Application for PCTC Program
CQ is available on the NMFS Alaska
Region website and may be submitted
electronically through the NMFS online
system or the NMFS Alaska Region
website. The following list summarizes
the information that is required:
• PCTC Program LLP license
identification numbers;
• Processor-held PCTC Program QS
permit number(s) and name of the
processor that holds that each QS
permit;
• PCTC Program QS ownership
documentation;
• PCTC Program cooperative business
address or identifier identification;
• Members of the PCTC Program
cooperative and the associated
processor that holds a QS permit;
• Trawl vessel identification,
including the name(s) and USCG
documentation number of vessel(s)
eligible to harvest the CQ issued to the
PCTC Program cooperative;
• A copy of the business license
issued by the state in which the PCTC
cooperative is registered as a business
entity;
• A copy of the articles of
incorporation or partnership agreement
of the PCTC Program cooperative;
• A list of the names of all persons,
to the individual level, holding an
ownership interest in the LLP licenses
that join the cooperative and the
percentage ownership each person and
individual holds in each LLP license;
• A list of trawl CVs eligible to
harvest a portion of that cooperative’s
CQ;
• A copy of the cooperative
agreement signed by the members of the
PCTC Program cooperative, which must
include, at a minimum, the following
terms: (1) QS holders affiliated with
processors cannot participate in price
setting negotiations except as permitted
by antitrust law; (2) monitoring
provisions, including sideboard
protections in the GOA, sufficient to
ensure compliance with the PCTC
Program; and (3) a provision that
specifies the obligations of PCTC QS
holders who are members of the
cooperative to ensure the full payment
of cost recovery fees that may be due;
• A copy of the inter-cooperative
agreement that provides the plan for
coordinating harvest and delivery of the
AI CQ set-aside;
• Designated representative and
cooperative members’ signatures and
certification; and
• Authorization for the designated
representative to act on behalf of the
cooperative to complete the application.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53709
C. Issuing PCTC CQ
NMFS will review the CQ
applications for accurate information,
including cooperative and intercooperative agreements, ownership and
use caps, and payment of any fees,
including cost recovery. If approved,
NMFS will issue a CQ permit to the
cooperative. NMFS will issue CQ
permits after the annual harvest
specifications are recommended by the
Council for the upcoming year. Permits
will generally be issued in early January
for the fishing year starting January 20.
The CQ permit will list the metric tons
of Pacific cod by A and B season that
the cooperative may harvest, the metric
tons of apportioned halibut PSC, and
the number of each species of crab PSC
that the cooperative may use during the
fishing year.
NMFS will issue CQ for A and B
seasons separately, with total CQ issued
to all cooperatives in each season equal
to the DFA. The remaining TAC for the
trawl CV sector will be the incidental
catch allowance (ICA) for Pacific cod
caught as bycatch in other fisheries,
such as pollock.
D. Processors in Cooperatives
A person holding a PCTC Program QS
permit is required to associate with a
cooperative to use their QS. This creates
an economic incentive for the
processors that hold QS to either
associate with a cooperative on an
annual basis or sell their permit to a
processor that will associate with a
cooperative. Processor-held QS that is
not associated with a specific
cooperative will be distributed as CQ
among all the cooperatives that form in
a given year in the same proportion as
the CQ assigned to each cooperative. A
cooperative may associate with a
processor that does not hold QS.
E. Vessel CQ Use Cap—5 Percent
A vessel use cap restricts the CQ that
can be consolidated and harvested by
one vessel during the year. The PCTC
Program includes a 5 percent vessel use
cap for CVs. With the exception of
persons qualifying under the legacy
exemption, no vessel is permitted to
harvest more than 5 percent of the
annual CQ issued in the fishery. A
vessel designated on an LLP license that
receives QS in excess of the QS
ownership cap at the time of QS
issuance will be granted a legacy
exemption from the vessel use cap
because that vessel would have
harvested over 5 percent of the total A
and B season trawl CV sector Pacific cod
allocation during the qualifying years.
The legacy exemption applies to the
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53710
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
vessel designated on an LLP license that
yields more than 5 percent of the QS at
the time of initial allocation. This legacy
exemption is not transferable if the LLP
license is transferred to a new owner.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
F. Processor CQ Use Cap—20 Percent
A processor’s CQ use cap protects
against excessive consolidation of
processing activity by limiting a person
(i.e., company or firm) to processing no
more than 20 percent of the annual CQ
using the individual and collective rule,
with the exception of persons qualifying
under the legacy exemption. The
processor CQ use cap is calculated
based on the total CQ issued under the
PCTC Program and not just QS initially
issued to processors. This ensures that
a processing company is limited to
processing a specific percentage of the
total PCTC Program allocation. A person
over the cap at the time of QS
issuance—i.e., a processor that, on
average, processed more than 20 percent
of the total A and B season trawl CV
sector Pacific cod allocation during the
qualifying years—is granted a nontransferable legacy exemption.
G. CQ and PSC Transfers
Under this Program, a cooperative
may transfer all or part of its CQ to
another cooperative for harvest subject
to the limitations imposed by the use
caps. Transfers of CQ are for a single
year’s annual allocation. The underlying
QS remains with the LLP license. This
CQ transfer provision provides
flexibility for cooperatives to transfer
Pacific cod for harvest or PSC to support
cooperative fishing. The ability to
transfer PSC allows cooperatives to
account for unforeseen circumstances,
but the incentive to avoid hitting a
cooperative PSC limit remains because
of the cost of acquiring PSC from
another cooperative.
This final rule allows post-delivery
transfers of CQ, but all transfers must be
completed prior to August 1, after the
close of the B season. At the end of the
fishing season, remaining CQ may be
consolidated into fewer cooperatives
(and for harvest by fewer vessels) due to
the requirement that a vessel may not
begin a fishing trip without unharvested
CQ. Consolidation of CQ to a smaller
number of cooperatives toward the end
of the fishing season facilitates ‘‘sweep
up’’ trips to complete the season’s
harvests.
To transfer CQ and associated PSC
limits between cooperatives, the
cooperative must use the NMFS online
system on the NMFS Alaska Region
website, which allows for automated
review and approval of transfer requests
within use cap constraints. NMFS will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
not approve a CQ transfer if the transfer
would result in a CV exceeding the use
cap. A transfer of CQ is not effective
until approved by NMFS.
H. Cooperative Reports
Under the PCTC Program, the Council
has requested cooperatives to provide
voluntary annual reports. Consistent
with other cooperative programs
developed by the Council, these reports
shall include specific information on
the structure, function, and operation of
the cooperatives.
Each year, the Council will receive
reports outlining the cooperatives’
performance at one of its regularly
scheduled meetings. These reports will
be used by the Council and NMFS to
ensure the program is functioning as
intended and to solicit timely
information on issues that may need to
be addressed by the Council. The
Council requested that each cooperative
report include information on CQ
leasing activities and any penalties
issued, harvest of CQ resulting from
processor-held QS, cooperative
membership, cooperative management,
and performance (including
implementation of the AI CQ set-aside
when in effect).
V. Prohibited Species Catch Limits
NMFS will annually apportion
halibut and crab PSC limits to PCTC
Program cooperatives based on the
percentage of total CQ allocated to their
cooperative. During the A and B
seasons, NMFS will monitor PSC use at
the sector level, and cooperatives will
manage PSC use at the cooperative
level. Cooperative vessels are prohibited
from fishing under the Program if a
halibut PSC limit is reached for the
cooperative or from fishing in a crab
bycatch limitation zone if a crab PSC
limit is reached in that relevant area.
PSC limits may be transferred between
cooperatives using the NMFS online
system to cover any overages or to allow
a cooperative to continue harvesting
Pacific cod.
A. Halibut PSC
Annually, NMFS will apportion the
halibut PSC limit assigned to the BSAI
trawl limited access sector Pacific cod
fishery to the trawl CV and AFA CP
sectors; 98 percent will be apportioned
to the trawl CV sector and 2 percent will
be apportioned to AFA CP sector. The
specific percentage of the total halibut
PSC limit assigned to the trawl limited
access sector may change annually.
NMFS will then apportion the halibut
PSC limit to the trawl CV sector for the
A, B, and C season. Of the halibut PSC
limit apportioned to the trawl CV sector,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
95 percent will be available for the
PCTC Program in the A and B seasons
and 5 percent is available for the C
season.
To implement the halibut PSC
reduction under the Program, NMFS
will annually apply a fixed percentage
reduction to the A and B season PSC
apportionment derived from the overall
trawl CV sector halibut PSC
apportionment. The total halibut PSC
reduction under the Program is 25
percent, which will be phased in over
two years. In the first year of the
Program, NMFS will apply a 12.5
percent reduction to the A and B season
trawl CV sector halibut PSC
apportionment in the annual harvest
specifications after the Council
recommends and NMFS approves the
BSAI trawl limited access sector’s PSC
limit apportionments to fishery
categories. In the second year of the
Program and every year thereafter,
NMFS will apply a 25 percent reduction
to the A and B season trawl CV sector
halibut PSC apportionment. Any
amount of the PCTC Program PSC limit
remaining after the B season will be
reallocated to the trawl CV limited
access fishery in the C season. Because
the annual halibut PSC limit for the
Program is not a fixed amount
established in regulation and, instead, is
determined annually through the
harvest specification process, NMFS
must apply the 25 percent reduction to
the A and B season apportionment of
the trawl CV sector apportionment to
implement the overall PSC reductions
under the Program.
B. Crab PSC
The annual crab PSC limits available
to the BSAI trawl limited access sector
Pacific cod fishery category will be
apportioned between the trawl CV
sector and the AFA CP sector based on
the proportion of BSAI Pacific cod
allocated to the two sectors: 90.6
percent to BSAI trawl CVs and 9.4
percent to AFA CPs. Of the crab PSC
limit apportioned to the trawl CV sector,
95 percent will be available for the
PCTC Program (A and B seasons) and 5
percent will be available for the C
season. NMFS will then reduce the crab
PSC limits by 35 percent during the A
and B seasons for the PCTC Program. As
with halibut PSC, any amount of the
PCTC Program PSC limit remaining after
the B season will be reallocated to the
C season trawl CV limited access
fishery.
VI. AI Community Protections
Under the PCTC Program,
cooperatives are required to collectively
set aside an amount of CQ equal to 12
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
percent of the overall A season CQ for
delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant (AI CQ set-aside) during
years in which an AI community
representative notifies NMFS of their
intent to process Pacific cod. The term
‘‘Aleutian Islands shoreplant’’ means a
processing facility that is physically
located on land west of 170° W.
longitude within the State of Alaska.
The rationale and need for this
provision is explained in detail in the
preamble to the proposed rule and in
Section 2.9.6 of the Analysis prepared
for this action (see ADDRESSES).
The AI CQ set-aside provides
additional incentives for harvesters to
deliver AI Pacific cod to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant. The AI CQ set-aside
is designed to provide benefits and
stability to fishery-dependent fishing
communities in the AI when a
shoreplant is operating and is
responsive to lingering effects caused by
changes in management regimes such as
rationalization programs. Without the
AI CQ set-aside, AI harvesters,
shoreplants, and fishing communities
could be preempted from the fishery by
the offshore sector. The AI CQ set-aside
is especially beneficial to AI
communities in low TAC years when
harvest can otherwise fully occur in the
BS, preventing any cod deliveries in the
AI.
This final rule does not affect any
sector’s BSAI Pacific cod allocation or
the CDQ Pacific cod allocation in the AI.
Non-CDQ sectors continue to receive
annual allocations as established under
Amendment 85 to the BSAI FMP (72 FR
50787, September 4, 2007). The
performance of this AI CQ set-aside
provision will be evaluated in the
periodic reviews of the Program.
A. Managing the AI CQ Set-Aside
The AI CQ set-aside provision for AI
processors requires cooperatives to setaside an amount of annual CQ for
delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant if the city of Adak or Atka
files a notice of intent to process that
year. The AI CQ set-aside is in effect
and available for delivery to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant during the A and B
seasons unless all notices of the intent
to process are withdrawn by the AI
communities. If all notices of intent to
process are withdrawn, any remaining
portion of the AI CQ set-aside will be
available for cooperatives to deliver to
any processor.
Cooperatives will manage the AI CQ
set-aside through an inter-cooperative
agreement. This agreement will ensure
annual coordination between the
cooperatives and shoreplants that are
operating in the AI and guarantee that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
the AI CQ set-aside is available for
delivery to the Aleutian Islands
shoreplants. This reduces the
management burden on NMFS and
relies on the cooperatives to organize
annual fishing activity.
Each year, the cooperative must
submit a copy of the inter-cooperative
agreement with the Application for
PCTC Program CQ to NMFS that
describes (1) how the AI CQ set-aside
would be administered by the
cooperatives, (2) how the cooperatives
intend to harvest the AI CQ set-aside,
and (3) how cooperatives would ensure
that CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA
assigned to an LLP license with a
transferable AI endorsement have the
opportunity to harvest 10 percent of the
AI CQ set-aside for delivery to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant. Each
cooperative is required to provide the
cooperative’s plan for coordinating
harvest and delivery of the AI CQ setaside to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant
regardless of whether that cooperative
intends to harvest any amount of the AI
CQ set-aside.
For the calendar year 2023, to provide
for implementation of the Program
during its first year, NMFS will allow
each cooperative to submit the intercooperative agreement on or before
December 31, 2023, after the November
1 deadline for the Application for PCTC
Program CQ.
B. Intent To Process and Eligibility for
AI CQ Set-Aside
This final rule allows the
representative of the City of Adak or the
City of Atka to submit an annual notice
of intent to process PCTC Program
Pacific cod in the upcoming fishing year
to the NMFS Regional Administrator no
later than October 15 of the year prior
to fishing. Submission of the notice of
intent by October 15 provides NMFS
inseason management with the timely
information it needs to manage the
upcoming fisheries and notify the
cooperatives that the AI CQ set-aside is
in effect for the upcoming year. If
neither Adak nor Atka submit a notice
of intent to process by October 15,
cooperatives are not required to set
aside CQ for delivery to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant in the subsequent
fishing season.
A city’s notice of intent to process
Pacific cod must contain the following
information: date, name of city, a
statement of intent to process Pacific
cod, statement of calendar year during
which the city intends to process Pacific
cod, and the contact information for the
city representative where the relevant
shoreplant is located.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53711
On or before November 30, the
Regional Administrator will notify the
representative of Adak or Atka
confirming receipt of their notice of
intent to process Pacific cod. Shortly
after receipt of a notice of intent to
process Pacific cod, NMFS will
announce through notice in the Federal
Register whether the AI CQ set-aside is
in effect for the upcoming fishing year.
Even if Adak or Atka is uncertain at
the time the notice of intent is due as
to whether an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant will be operational, there
would be no penalty to Adak or Atka or
the shoreplant for stating their intention
to process but then later withdrawing
that notice of intent. Adak or Atka
would be allowed to withdraw their
notice of intent at any time after
submitting it to NMFS. In the event that
both Adak and Atka withdraw their
notices of intent to process during the
A or B season, NMFS will publish a
notice in the Federal Register
announcing that the AI CQ set-aside is
no longer in effect and remove the
delivery requirement. The remaining
portion of the AI CQ set-aside would be
available for harvest without restrictions
on delivery location.
NMFS will monitor the
implementation of the AI CQ set-aside
throughout the A and B seasons. NMFS
will consider the number and frequency
of deliveries to Aleutian Islands
shoreplants as well as the season timing
and remaining CQ to be harvested. As
soon as practicable, if the Regional
Administrator determines that Aleutian
Islands shoreplants authorized under
the PCTC Program will not process the
entire AI set-aside, the Regional
Administrator may publish a notice in
the Federal Register to remove the
delivery requirement for some or all of
the projected unused AI CQ set-aside.
C. AI DFA
The Council and NMFS annually
establish separate OFLs, ABCs, and
TACs for the AI and BS subareas;
however, the non-CDQ sector
allocations (including the PCTC
Program allocations) remain BSAI-wide
allocations. Each year, during the
annual harvest specifications process
described at § 679.20(c), NMFS will
specify an ICA and a DFA derived from
the AI non-CDQ TAC. The amount of AI
Pacific cod that NMFS estimates will be
taken as incidental catch when directed
fishing for non-CDQ groundfish other
than Pacific cod in the AI subarea will
be the AI ICA. The amount of the AI ICA
may vary from year to year, and in
future years, NMFS will specify the AI
ICA in the annual harvest specifications
based on recent and anticipated
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53712
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
incidental catch of AI Pacific cod in
other AI non-CDQ directed groundfish
fisheries. The amount of the AI nonCDQ TAC remaining after subtraction of
the AI ICA will be the AI DFA.
NMFS will specify the AI ICA and
DFA so that NMFS can clearly establish
the amount of the AI CQ set-aside. It
will also aid the public in knowing how
much of the AI non-CDQ TAC is
available for directed fishing prior to the
start of fishing to aid in the planning of
fishery operations.
The amount of the annual AI CQ setaside for delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant is equal to the lesser of either
the AI Pacific cod non-CDQ DFA or 12
percent of the A season CQ and is in
effect during the A and B seasons. When
the AI CQ set-aside is equal to the AI
DFA, directed fishing for Pacific cod in
the AI may be conducted only by PCTC
Program vessels that deliver their catch
of AI Pacific cod to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant. However, if the AI DFA is
greater than the AI CQ set-aside (and
thus the set-aside is equal to 12 percent
of the A season CQ), the difference
between the AI DFA and the AI CQ setaside may be available for directed
fishing by all PCTC Program vessels
with no restrictions on where that CQ
must be delivered and processed.
VII. C Season Limited Access Fishery
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
The C season apportionment—which
is 15 percent of the total annual
allocation to the BSAI Pacific cod trawl
CV sector—remains a limited access
fishery open to all trawl CVs with LLP
license endorsements to harvest Pacific
cod in the BS and/or AI with trawl gear.
The C season limited access fishery,
which occurs June 10 through
November 1, continues to be managed
as it is under status quo conditions and
remains unchanged by this final rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Although directed fishing for Pacific
cod in the C season is an important part
of the annual fishing plan for some
trawl CVs, most of the trawl CV C
season catch is incidental to other
directed fishing. In the fall, as directed
fishing for Pacific cod that opens on
September 1 for the hook-and-line and
pot sectors progresses, NMFS estimates
any BSAI trawl CV C season allocation,
including any unused amounts of PCTC
Pacific cod and PSC limits rolled over
to the C season, will be available for
reallocation to other sectors. In some
years, projected unused amounts of the
trawl CV Pacific cod TAC will be
available to reallocate, and NMFS may
make a reallocation in late September or
October. In other years, there may not be
any projected unused amounts, and
NMFS will wait until after directed
fishing for pollock and Pacific cod by
the trawl CV sector closes. In that
circumstance, reallocations will occur
in November or December. When the BS
and AI Pacific cod TACs are higher,
trawl CV C season Pacific cod may go
unused and can be reallocated to other
sectors. For projected unused PSC
limits, the Regional Administrator may
reallocate a portion of crab PSC or
halibut PSC to Amendment 80
cooperatives if the amount assigned to
the BSAI trawl limited access sector is
not projected to be harvested or used
(§ 679.91(f)).
To help ensure efficient allocation
management, NMFS may rollover any
unused portion of a seasonal
apportionment from any non-CDQ
fishery sector (except the jig sector) to
that sector’s next season during the
current fishing year (§ 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B)
and (C)).
Under the PCTC Program, the
cooperatives are granted harvest
privileges in the A and B seasons of the
BSAI Pacific cod fishery. Those harvest
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
privileges alter the reallocation structure
from the trawl CV sector prior to the C
season since rollovers of unused CQ and
PSC limits to other sectors will not
occur until the close of the annual PCTC
fishing year (the end of the B season).
VIII. Additional PCTC Program
Provisions
A. Sideboard Limits in the PCTC
Program
The PCTC Program modifies existing
GOA sideboard limits and associated
GOA halibut PSC limits for non-exempt
AFA vessels and LLP license holders
and closes directed fishing where
sideboard limits are too small to support
a directed fishery. All GOA non-exempt
AFA CVs and associated AFA LLP
licenses are sideboarded in aggregate for
all GOA groundfish fishing activity and
for GOA halibut PSC based on their
GOA catch history during the qualifying
period, except when participating in the
Central Gulf of Alaska (CGOA) Rockfish
Program. The existing sideboards apply
to non-exempt AFA vessels as defined
at § 679.64(b)(2). The PCTC Program
modifies the calculation of the existing
sideboard limits for these non-exempt
AFA CVs based on the GOA catch
history. LLP licenses associated with
non-exempt AFA CVs are also subject to
the revised sideboard limits regardless
of which vessel is named on the LLP.
GOA sideboards are currently
calculated for non-exempt AFA CVs
based on the ratio of catch to the TAC
during the years 1995–1997. The PCTC
Program modifies the calculation of the
sideboard ratios for non-exempt AFA
CVs that will be used in the annual
GOA harvest specifications, looking at
the ratio of catch to the TAC in the
qualifying years of 2009–2019 (as shown
in Table 2).
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
In addition, the ratio used to
apportion GOA halibut PSC limits is
modified and the five seasonal
apportionments based on that sideboard
ratio is reduced to a single aggregate
annual amount. Providing an aggregate
annual halibut PSC limit provides
greater flexibility for the AFA vessels
and LLP licenses to assign halibut PSC
limits to those GOA groundfish
sideboard fisheries that have the greatest
value. Table 3 shows the new aggregate
GOA halibut PSC limit ratio based on
catch history during the qualifying
period 2009–2019 that will be used
annually in the GOA harvest
specifications table after the effective
date of this final rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
TABLE 3—GOA HALIBUT PSC LIMIT
RATIO AGGREGATED AT THE SEASON
AND COMPLEX LEVEL FOR ALL AFA
NON-EXEMPT CVS AND ASSOCIATED
LLP LICENSES UNDER THE QUALIFYING PERIOD
GOA
Halibut
PSC Limit
Qualifying
period
(2009–2019)
PSC Limit Ratio ....................
.072
Additionally, this final rule closes
directed fishing to all GOA non-exempt
AFA CVs and LLP licenses for the
following species categories: Southeast
Outside district of the Eastern GOA
pollock, Western GOA shallow-water
flatfish, Central and Eastern GOA deepwater flatfish, Central GOA dusky
rockfish, and Eastern GOA and Central
GOA Pacific ocean perch. NMFS will no
longer publish AFA Program sideboard
limits for these specific species or
species groups in the Federal Register
as part of the annual groundfish harvest
specifications and instead this final rule
specifies in regulation at
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53713
§ 679.64(b)(4)(ii) that directed fishing for
these species is closed to non-exempt
AFA CVs.
The Council directed cooperatives to
(1) ensure GOA AFA exempt and nonAFA CVs and CVs assigned to under 60
ft (18.3 m) LLP licenses with AI
transferrable endorsements do not lease
their CQ as a condition of benefiting
from a GOA sideboard exemption, (2)
implement a penalty structure for
violations, and (3) report leasing
activities and penalties issued in the
cooperative’s annual report to the
Council. The cooperative can allow
leasing for (1) AFA GOA-exempt CVs,
non-AFA CVs, and CVs assigned to
under 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA LLP licenses
with a transferable AI endorsement with
less than 300 metric tons of average
annual qualifying catch history, and (2)
CVs assigned to the LLP license that
only fishes in the CGOA Rockfish
Program during the calendar year.
Additionally, NMFS requires
cooperatives to include information
about the cooperative’s plan to monitor
CQ leasing activities, including into
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ER08AU23.008
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
53714
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
GOA fisheries, in the Application for
PCTC Program CQ.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
B. Changes to Existing BSAI Sideboard
Limits for AFA CVs
This final rule revises the BSAI
Pacific cod and halibut PSC sideboard
limits for AFA trawl CVs specified at
§ 679.64(b)(4)(i) and in Table 40 to part
679 to only apply in the C season. The
BSAI Pacific cod sideboard limit is no
longer necessary in the A and B seasons
because directed fishing in the BSAI for
Pacific cod is now managed under the
PCTC Program. NMFS removes the
halibut PSC sideboard limits for AFA
trawl CVs because the PCTC Program
establishes lower PSC limits for PCTC
Program participants. This final rule
does not change the BSAI crab PSC
sideboard limit for AFA trawl CVs
specified at § 679.64(b)(4)(i) and Table
41 to part 679.
C. At-Sea Processing Sideboard Limit
This final rule implements a
sideboard limit on the amount of CQ
that can be processed by a CP
designated on a groundfish LLP license
with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement. This
sideboard limit is assigned to each LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement that authorizes
the CP to act as a mothership in the
BSAI Pacific cod fishery as listed in
Table 57 to part 679. The Council
recommended that each eligible CP
acting as a mothership can process up
to 125 percent of the eligible CP’s
processing history during the qualifying
years (with no drop year). This at-sea
processing sideboard limit is
permanently attached to the associated
LLP license and applies to the
processing activity of any associated
vessel.
The data used to calculate the at-sea
processing sideboard limits and the
resulting sideboard limit assigned to
each LLP license is confidential. Each
LLP license holder is responsible for
coordinating with any cooperative to
ensure the applicable processing limit is
not exceeded. The at-sea processing
sideboard limit is not an allocation and
the PCTC Program does not require that
this amount be delivered to CPs acting
as a mothership, but it provides an
upper bound on how much CQ may be
delivered.
The at-sea processing sideboard limit
is consistent with Amendment 120 (84
FR 70064, December 20, 2019) that
restricted the number of CPs that are
eligible to operate as a mothership
receiving and processing Pacific cod
from CVs in the BSAI non-CDQ Pacific
cod directed fishery using trawl gear.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Under Amendment 120, NMFS issued a
BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement to two LLP licenses but
did not include a limit on the amount
of BSAI Pacific cod that can be
processed because it was not thought
that any one processor could increase
their capacity significantly under the
LLP management system. However,
under this rationalized, slower paced,
cooperative fishing Program, the
Council and NMFS determined it may
be possible for continued mothership
processing growth beyond historical
patterns, so the Council recommended
that a processing limit be established for
each LLP license listed in Table 57 to
part 679. For more information on
processing limits for the mothership
sector, please see section 2.9.5 of the
Analysis (see ADDRESSES).
Annually, NMFS will calculate the atsea processing sideboard limit,
expressed as a percentage of the
aggregate CQ that would apply to each
LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod
trawl mothership endorsement and
notify the LLP license holder upon
issuance of initial allocations. This final
rule does not change the regulations
pertaining to the transfer of LLP licenses
as specified at § 679.4(k)(7) nor the
process to change the designated vessel
on an LLP license as specified at
§ 679.4(k)(7)(vii). Each LLP license
subject to this at-sea processing
sideboard limit is prohibited from
exceeding the processing limit as
specified in regulations at
§ 679.133(b)(2).
D. Cost Recovery
The PCTC Program is a LAPP
established under the provisions of
Section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
requires that NMFS collect fees from
limited access privilege holders to cover
the actual costs of management, data
collection and analysis, and
enforcement activities associated with
LAPPs. Cost recovery fees may not
exceed three percent of the ex-vessel
value of the fish harvested under the
LAPP. NMFS will assess a fee on the exvessel value of PCTC Program Pacific
cod harvested by cooperatives in the
BSAI. Halibut and crab PSC are not
subject to a cost recovery fee because
PSC cannot be retained for sale and,
therefore, does not have an ex-vessel
value.
The annual PCTC Program cost
recovery process builds on other
existing cost recovery requirements
implemented under other programs.
NMFS annually receives information
used to calculate Pacific cod standard
prices in the existing BSAI Pacific cod
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Ex-vessel Volume and Value Report,
which is submitted in early November
of each year. NMFS will use this
existing data source to calculate
standard prices used to determine the
annual PCTC Program fishery value,
which will be used to calculate the
annual PCTC Program cost recovery fee
percentage. NMFS will begin tracking
PCTC Program management costs upon
the effective date of this final rule. PCTC
Program landings will be made in the A
and B seasons, which extends from
January 20 to June 10.
The following is an example to
illustrate the data NMFS will use in the
annual PCTC Program cost recovery
process using the year 2025. The PCTC
Program fishing year will have landings
subject to cost recovery starting on
January 20, 2025 and ending on June 10,
2025. NMFS will calculate standard
prices derived from the volume and
value report submitted by November 10,
2024 for landings made in 2024. Finally,
NMFS will use the management costs
from July 2024 through June 2025 to
calculate the 2025 fee percentage. By no
later than July 31, 2025, the Regional
Administrator will publish a notice
announcing the standard prices and fee
percentage in the Federal Register and
send invoices to cooperatives.
NMFS will send each cooperative a
fee liability letter to inform each
cooperative of the fee percentage
applied to the current year’s landings
and the total amount due (fee liability).
The letter will include a summary
explaining the fee liability
determination including the current fee
percentage and details of CQ pounds
debited from CQ allocations by permit,
date, and prices.
Fees must be paid by August 31 of
each year. NMFS requires that all
payments be submitted electronically in
U.S. dollars through the NMFS Alaska
Region website. Instructions for
electronic payment are made available
on the payment website and through a
fee liability summary letter NMFS will
mail to the cooperative.
Each cooperative is responsible for
paying cost recovery fees assessed on
cooperative landings. Failure to pay cost
recovery fee liabilities on time will
result in NMFS not approving a
cooperative’s application for a CQ
permit the following year until full
payment of the fee liability is received
by NMFS. NMFS will not issue a CQ
permit until NMFS receives a complete
application for CQ and confirmation of
the full payment of any cost recovery fee
liability. Communication with NMFS
using the contact information provided
in the fee liability letter will provide
ample opportunity for cooperative to
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
reconcile accounts. However, if the
account is not reconciled and the
individual does not pay, NMFS will
send an IAD to the cooperative. The IAD
would state that the cooperative’s
estimated fee liability due from the
cooperative had not been paid. The
cooperative may appeal the IAD. The
appeals process is described at § 679.43.
A cooperative who appeals an IAD
would not receive a new CQ permit
unless the appeal was resolved in the
applicant’s favor.
The agency may pursue collection of
the unpaid fees if the formal
determination is not appealed and the
account remains unpaid or under-paid
30 days after fees are due (August 31 of
each year). The Regional Administrator
will continue to prohibit issuance of a
CQ permit for any subsequent calendar
years until NMFS receives the unpaid
fees.
E. Monitoring Provisions
This final rule establishes
requirements for observer coverage and
other monitoring and enforcement
provisions to ensure that fleet-wide
harvests under the PCTC Program are
effectively monitored and that catches
remain within allocations. These
requirements include full observer
coverage for CVs harvesting CQ (except
for CVs delivering unsorted codends to
motherships, as explained below) and
requirements for communications
equipment to facilitate observer data
entry and electronic transmission to
NMFS. These monitoring provisions are
designed to maximize the quality of data
used to estimate PCTC Program catch
and bycatch, including PSC. Shoreside
processors are required to report
landings data to NMFS electronically
through eLandings. Estimates of at-sea
discards and PSC would be derived
solely from observer data.
All vessels used to harvest CQ are
required to carry equipment to facilitate
at-sea electronic transmission of
observer data to NMFS. This final rule
modifies regulations at
§ 679.51(e)(1)(iii)(A) to explicitly require
vessel operators to allow an observer to
use the vessel’s existing
communications equipment for
confidential entry, transmission, and
receipt of work-related messages.
All vessels participating in the PCTC
Program are required to provide an
onboard computer that meets minimum
specifications for use by an observer.
Currently, NMFS uses and installs
custom software (ATLAS) on the
vessel’s computer, and this software
application is used by observers to enter
the data they collect. The ATLAS
software contains business rules that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
perform many quality control and data
validation checks automatically, which
dramatically increases the quality of the
preliminary data. After the observer data
are entered into the ATLAS software,
they are transmitted to NMFS.
At-sea transmission of observer data
improves data quality. To minimize
impacts to small vessel operators, the
requirements for non-AFA trawl CVs to
install equipment necessary to facilitate
at-sea observer data transmission
become effective three years after the
effective date of this final rule. Though
the installation of equipment to
facilitate at-sea data transmission on
non-AFA vessels will not be required
immediately upon implementation of
the Program, this final rule clarifies that
if a vessel already has equipment
capable of facilitating at-sea data
transmission, that equipment must be
made available to the observer for use in
transmitting work-related messages
including collected data.
This final rule requires motherships
receiving unsorted codends from a
PCTC Program CV to comply with catch
monitoring requirements specified at
§ 679.93(c) for Amendment 80 vessels
and CPs. These requirements are already
applicable to Amendment 80 CPs acting
as motherships and would continue to
apply when acting as a mothership to
process PCTC Program CQ. This final
rule does not alter existing observer
coverage requirements for trawl CVs
delivering unsorted codends to a
mothership in the BSAI. A trawl CV
delivering unsorted codends to a
mothership is not required to carry an
observer because the catch is not
brought on board the CV and not
available for observer sampling. Rather,
the catch is sorted and sampled by
observers aboard the mothership.
Motherships receiving deliveries from
PCTC Program CVs are required to have
at least two observers aboard the
mothership, at least one of whom will
be required to be endorsed as a lead
level 2 observer. More than two
observers are required to be aboard if
the observer workload restriction would
otherwise preclude sampling as
required. All PCTC Program catch,
except halibut sorted on deck by vessels
participating in the halibut deck sorting
described at § 679.120, must be weighed
on a NMFS-approved scale in
compliance with the scale requirements
at § 679.28(b). Each haul must be
weighed separately and all catch made
available for sampling by an observer.
This Program establishes catch
monitoring requirements for all
shoreside processors receiving
deliveries from CVs harvesting PCTC
Program CQ. All groundfish landings
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53715
made to a shoreside processors must be
sorted; weighed on a scale approved by
the State of Alaska as described at
§ 679.28(c); and be made available for
sampling by an observer, NMFS staff, or
any individual authorized by NMFS.
Any of these persons must be allowed
to test any scale used to weigh
groundfish to determine its accuracy.
F. PCTC Program Review
The Council will review the PCTC
Program five years after implementation
to determine if the Program is
functioning as intended, as required by
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. This review
and evaluation by the Council will
include an assessment of the program
objectives. Specifically, the Council will
review whether the allocation of Pacific
cod is fair and equitable given
participation in the fishery, historical
investments in and dependence upon
the fishery, and employment in the
harvesting and processing sectors. The
Council will also assess performance of
the Program based on changes in annual
cooperative formation, changes in
product value, the number and
distribution of processing facilities, and
stability or use of annual processor
associations with harvesting
cooperatives. The focus of these reviews
will be the impact of this action on the
harvesting and processing sectors, as
well as on fishery dependent
communities. The Council will also
assess whether the needs for
management and enforcement, as well
as data collection and analysis, are
adequately met.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received 16 comment letters on
the NOA and the proposed rule. NMFS
has summarized and responded to the
55 unique comments below. The
comments were from individuals, local
government representatives, Alaska
Native corporations, and industry
participants including harvesters and
processors.
Comments in Support
Comment 1: Several commenters
expressed support for Amendment 122
and timely implementation of the PCTC
Program in 2024. The PCTC Program
will maintain or improve harvesting and
processing participation in the Pacific
cod fishery, it provides fair and
equitable allocation of QS to harvesters
and processors. It will reduce
environmental impacts of the fishery,
and it will promote conservation and
sustainability.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53716
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Comment 2: This rule is important to
recover and conserve our mammals.
This rule will help ensure the
productivity and sustainability of
fisheries.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment.
Comment 3: Limiting the amount of
Pacific cod that fisheries are allowed to
harvest is good because it balances
economics with the sustainability of the
environment.
Response: NMFS specifies the OFL,
ABC, and TAC for BSAI Pacific cod
through the annual harvest specification
process as further explained in Section
I of this preamble. For Pacific cod, the
harvest specifications establish separate
OFLs, ABCs, and TACs for the BS
subarea and the AI subarea of the BSAI.
Allocations of Pacific cod to the CDQ
Program and to the non-CDQ fishery
sectors are further apportioned by
seasons. The PCTC Program allocates
the available Pacific cod to the various
trawl harvesters during the A and B
season; this action does not change the
overall amount of Pacific cod that is
expected to be harvested annually.
Comment 4: Amendment 122 and the
efforts by the Council to establish the
PCTC Program are supported because
they recognize processing history as
well as investments in the fishery and
acknowledge what a shift a catch share
program can have on relationships
between harvesters and processors. The
qualifying years are appropriate and
were well-supported throughout the
Council’s lengthy process to establish
Amendment 122. The commenter
supports actions by the Council that do
the least amount of harm to the overall
participants in the BSAI cod fishery.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this
comment.
Conservation
Comment 5: Pelagic, or midwater,
trawlers use nets within the water
column between the surface and seabed.
Pelagic trawling is considered more
sustainable because of the belief that
their nets do not make contact with the
seabed, but pollock midwater trawlers
make contact with the seabed 40–70
percent of the time they are completing
a trawl. The Council is focusing on
Pacific cod because of the impact of
benthic trawls (also known as
nonpelagic or bottom trawls) on the
seabed and non-target species without
fully considering whether pelagic trawls
in more ecologically sensitive areas may
have a more significant overall impact.
Response: Under the PCTC Program,
vessels will use nonpelagic trawl gear,
as defined at § 679.2, to harvest CQ.
Nonpelagic trawl gear—trawl gear that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
targets fish species near the ocean
floor—is different than pelagic trawl
gear, which targets fish species in the
water column. This comment addresses
management issues that are beyond the
scope of Amendment 122 and this
regulatory action. This action is not
intended to modify authorized gear
types, including nonpelagic trawl gear
used in the PCTC Program, or address
their use in sensitive areas.
Modifications to authorized gear types
or use in sensitive areas would need to
be addressed in a separate regulatory
action developed through the Council
process. Section 3.1.2 of the Analysis
states that previous analyses have found
no substantial adverse effects to habitat
in the BSAI caused by fishing activities.
Any effects continue to be limited by
the amount of the groundfish TACs and
by the existing habitat conservation and
protection measures. Overall, the
combination of the direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects on habitat for both
living and non-living substrates, benthic
biodiversity, and habitat suitability are
not likely to be significant under this
action.
Comment 6: It is important to
understand the destruction of trawling
despite its efficiency. Effort can be made
to fish more sustainably. Trawling in
Alaska should be done less in order to
protect Pacific cod, other species, and
the ocean floor.
Response: NMFS manages the BSAI
Pacific cod fishery based on the best
scientific information available. To
ensure conservation of the resource, the
status of the Pacific cod stock is
reviewed by NMFS and the Council
each year through a public scientific
review process before the TAC is
allocated. The Council and NMFS
analyzed the environmental impacts of
Amendment 122 and concluded that it
would not result in a significant impact
on the human environment as presented
in the Analysis and FONSI prepared for
this action (see ADDRESSES). This action
is not intended to modify authorized
gear types.
Quota Share for Harvesters and
Processors
Comment 7: In recommending
Amendment 122 and this Program, the
Council intended for NMFS to consider
specific area endorsements on each LLP
license at the time of harvest in
determining how to attribute qualifying
catch history to an LLP license in the
situation when there were two or more
LLP licenses associated with the vessel.
The language in the proposed rule does
not clearly indicate that only the LLP
license with the appropriate area
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
endorsement would receive the
resulting qualifying catch history.
Response: NMFS agrees and clarifies
that specific area endorsements are
considered when determining how to
attribute qualifying catch history to LLP
licenses. In determining how to attribute
catch history when two or more LLP
licenses were associated with a vessel,
NMFS considers the area endorsements
on each of the LLP licenses at the time
fishing occurred.
An LLP license will only be eligible
for qualifying catch history in an area if
it had the endorsement for that area at
the time of harvest. In the event more
than one LLP license associated with a
vessel had the area endorsement for
where the catch occurred, the vessel
owner will decide how to assign QS to
the LLP licenses. In the event only one
LLP license associated with a vessel had
the area endorsement for where the
catch occurred, despite there being more
than one LLP license associated with
the vessel at the time fishing began, only
the LLP license with the correct area
endorsement will receive the resulting
qualifying catch history. The vessel
owner would not decide how this
portion of the QS would be assigned
between LLP licenses. For example, say
a vessel had qualifying catch history in
the BS and AI and was named on two
LLP licenses at the time the landing
occurred. One LLP license had a BS
endorsement and the other LLP license
had BS and AI endorsements. In this
scenario, fishing history in the BS
would be considered shared catch
between the two LLP licenses (because
both LLP licenses had the appropriate
endorsements authorizing the fishing
activity) and fishing history in the AI is
considered qualifying catch history only
for LLP license with the AI
endorsement.
Comment 8: NMFS should use
‘‘target’’ catch in the official record to
determine initial QS issued to
harvesters and processors.
Response: NMFS agrees. Under the
PCTC Program, NMFS determines QS
allocations based on legal landings of
target Pacific cod. The trawl CV sector
can have significant incidental catch of
Pacific cod in other fisheries like
pollock and yellowfin sole, and
historical amounts of incidental catch
have been variable. The Council
recommended that the PCTC Program
not include incidental catch in the
calculations for QS.
Comment 9: Will NMFS issue a PCTC
Program QS permit to the owner of a
processing facility that is no longer
operational, based on the qualifying
processing history at that facility?
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Response: No. NMFS will not issue a
PCTC Program QS permit to the owner
of an inactive processing facility (i.e.,
the facility is not authorized by an FPP
or FFP upon the effective date of this
final rule) based on the qualifying
processing history at that facility. Upon
approval of an Application for PCTC
Program QS, NMFS will issue a PCTC
Program QS permit to the owner of a
processing facility with an active FPP or
qualifying FFP. For a person (i.e.
processing firm) to receive a PCTC
Program QS permit, it requires two
things: (1) processing history in the
fishery during the qualifying years and
(2) a currently valid FPP or FFP (in the
case of an eligible CP with a Pacific cod
mothership endorsement).
Comment 10: Does the firm that
operated the Adak facility in 2013 get
credit for the Adak facility’s processing
history if the firm does not hold an FPP
for that facility now, but does operate
one or more facilities in the BS each
with its own FPP?
Response: No. Processing history is
facility specific. A firm will not receive
a PCTC Program QS permit for a facility
that does not have a current FPP. The
processing history associated with that
facility will be deducted from the total
amount of eligible processing history
during the qualifying years when
calculating the distribution of QS to
processors.
A person may own more than one
processing facility with qualifying
processing history and an FPP or FFP
and therefore may receive more than
one PCTC Program QS permit. A firm
that operated a processing facility that is
no longer active would be eligible to
receive a PCTC QS permit for a different
facility if it holds a valid FPP for that
facility and that facility has qualifying
processing history.
Comment 11: How would a new
processor become eligible to receive a
PCTC Program QS permit in order to
annually associate with a cooperative?
Response: A processor would need to
have an active FPP and purchase QS
from an existing PCTC Program QS
permit holder under the QS transfer
provisions in this final rule.
Note that any processor with an FPP
can process CQ. There is not a
requirement to hold a PCTC Program QS
permit or associate with a cooperative
for a processor to receive deliveries and
process CQ. Further, any shoreside
processor, stationary floating processor,
or mothership, including an eligible CP
with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement, may associate
with a cooperative regardless of whether
or not the processor holds a PCTC
Program QS permit. For PCTC Program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
QS permit holders, the only way to
receive benefits from a PCTC Program
QS permit is to associate annually with
a cooperative.
Comment 12: Include the years 2004
through 2009 in the PCTC Program
official record to determine an initial QS
allocation to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant, similar to the catch history
for determining initial allocations to CV
LLP licenses with a transferable AI
endorsement.
Response: Even if the PCTC Program
included 2004 through 2009 in the
qualifying years, the Aleutian Islands
shoreplant is ineligible for an initial QS
allocation because it does not have an
active FPP.
The QS issued to processors is
divided among eligible processors based
on the percentage of legal landings of
Pacific cod they processed during the A
and B seasons during the qualifying
years compared to the total legal
landings of BSAI Pacific cod processed
by all eligible processors. Because
processing facilities will be issued QS
based on deliveries of this catch history,
the Council chose to award QS based on
processing history by considering the
time frame of 2009–2019, the same time
frame used for the majority of CVs. The
Council did not recommend a variation
in the qualifying years for any processor
either in the BS or AI.
The Council and NMFS considered
several different options for the range of
qualifying years including an option
that would have included catch history
years from 2004 through 2019. The
Council selected 2009 through 2019 as
representative of history for the vast
majority of CVs because these years
reflect current and historical
participation and are consistent with the
Council’s approach to awarding QS
based on catch history in other
rationalization programs. The Council
decided against history earlier than
2009 for the majority of catch history
because that was prior to the
implementation of Amendment 85 to
the BSAI FMP. Amendment 85
established sector allocations for Pacific
and separate TAC splits for the Pacific
cod stock, which changed fishery
management and operations.
The one exception to the qualifying
years is for LLP licenses with a
transferable AI endorsement that, prior
to receiving that AI endorsement
through Amendment 92 to the BSAI
FMP, participated in the AI parallel
fishery from January 20, 2004 through
September 13, 2009 without an LLP
license. Eight vessels met the criteria for
eligibility to receive these transferable
AI endorsements based on their fishing
activity in parallel fisheries where they
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53717
did not qualify for an LLP license but
still fished in federal waters.
Comment 13: The degree to which an
LLP license holder will benefit from
dropping a year of catch history from
the calculation for initial QS allocations
will depend upon the consistency of
their annual participation in the fishery.
An LLP holder with one or more years
of low or no legal landings will benefit
from dropping that year more than an
LLP license holder with consistently
high annual participation.
Response: The Council and NMFS
considered a range of drop years from
zero to two years. The range of
qualifying years is 11 years, and
unforeseen events have occurred for
many fishery participants. The Council
recommended and NMFS is
implementing a provision to drop one
year of catch history from the initial
allocation as a fair way to remove one
year that may not be representative of
typical participation in the fishery.
Comment 14: Clarify that QS can only
be used if the QS holder annually joins
or associates with a cooperative.
Response: QS holders must annually
join or associate with a cooperative in
order for their QS to generate the CQ
necessary to harvest Pacific cod in the
BSAI trawl sector.
Comment 15: To acquire QS that
would attract vessels to deliver to a
processor that does not receive an initial
allocation of QS (such as an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant), a processor would
need to purchase an LLP license with
attached QS. This creates a barrier to
entry into the PCTC Program because
LLP licenses have a very high market
price and QS is only a small portion of
that value. Because QS is only a small
part of an LLP license’s value, this
makes it functionally impossible for an
Adak processor to purchase QS that it
would need to use in lieu of an initial
allocation of QS to attract vessels.
Response: A new entrant may acquire
either harvester QS by purchasing an
LLP license with associated QS or by
purchasing a processor-held PCTC
Program QS permit. It is not yet clear
what the market may be for processor
PCTC Program QS permits. Generally,
QS is non-severable from the LLP
license or PCTC Program QS permit
except in situations where an ownership
cap would be exceeded upon transfer.
Regulations specifying transfer
provisions and limitations for QS are
specified in regulations at § 679.130(j)
and ownership caps are at § 679.133.
This PCTC Program does not create a
closed class of processors who may
process CQ. Any shoreside processor,
stationary floating processor,
mothership, and eligible CPs with a
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53718
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement, may receive and process
CQ. A processor is not required to
associate with a cooperative to receive
deliveries and process CQ.
Aleutian Islands CQ Set-Aside
Comment 16: Establish a minimum
annual AI CQ set-aside amount equal to
5,000 metric tons. This is the amount of
Pacific cod determined to be the
minimum amount necessary to support
a processing plant in the AI under
Amendment 113 to the BSAI FMP.
Amendment 113 was implemented in
2016 to provide a 5,000 metric tons setaside delivery requirement of Pacific
cod for shoreplants in the communities
of Adak and Atka, considered to be the
minimum necessary to support the
regional economy. Without a floor of
5,000 metric tons of Pacific cod, the
volume of fish may not meet the
minimum viable amount for the
processing plant to operate in Adak.
Response: Shortly after the court’s
vacatur of Amendment 113, the Council
initiated action to rationalize the BSAI
trawl CV Pacific cod fishery and
included options to meet the objective
of supporting sustained participation by
AI communities in the Pacific cod trawl
CV fishery. The Council recommended
and this final rule implements
community protections for Adak and
Atka in the form of a set-aside
provision. Under the PCTC Program,
cooperatives are required to collectively
set-aside 12 percent of the A season CQ
for delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant during years in which a
community representative notifies
NMFS of their intent to process Pacific
cod. The AI CQ set-aside provides
opportunity for Pacific cod landings to
support an Aleutian Islands shoreplant
that, in conjunction with other fishery
landings and allocations, such as the AI
pollock fishery, benefit the communities
of Adak and Atka. This final rule strikes
a balance between supporting fisherydependent communities and ensuring
that the fishery sectors have a
meaningful opportunity to fully harvest
their allocations by including several
measures to prevent AI Pacific cod from
going unharvested.
This provision is different from the
set-aside implemented under
Amendment 113 but is intended achieve
a similar goal. The Council considered
maintaining the 5,000 metric tons floor
similar to Amendment 113, but
ultimately decided against it to maintain
the same allocation criteria for all
processors and to address concerns
about leasing the 5,000 metric tons floor
in years when there was not an active
Aleutian Islands shoreplant. In addition,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
all the allocations under the PCTC
Program are based on percentages of the
TAC, not static numbers. This allows for
flexibility in years of low TAC.
Comment 17: Clarify regulations at
§ 679.132(c)(4) governing the AI CQ setaside provision to direct the Regional
Administrator to remove the delivery
requirement rather than allow the
Regional Administrator to remove the
delivery requirement if the Regional
Administrator determines that Aleutian
Islands shoreplants will not process the
entire AI CQ set-aside.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
proposed regulatory language needed to
be clarified. NMFS removed language at
§ 679.132(c)(4) regarding reallocating
the projected unused AI set-aside to
PCTC Program cooperatives in
proportion to the amount of CQ that
each PCTC Program cooperative
received in the initial allocation of CQ
for the remainder of the A and B
seasons. This language is not applicable
to the PCTC Program because the
cooperatives manage the AI CQ setaside.
However, NMFS maintained in the
regulations that the Regional
Administrator may remove the delivery
requirement for some or all of the
projected unused AI CQ set-aside if the
Regional Administrator determines that
Aleutian Islands shoreplants will not
process the entire AI CQ set-aside.
NMFS will monitor the cooperative’s
implementation of the AI CQ set-aside
throughout the A and B seasons. NMFS
will consider the number and frequency
of deliveries to Aleutian Islands
shoreplants as well as the season timing
and remaining CQ to be harvested. The
Regional Administrator will use this
information to determine if it is
appropriate to remove the delivery
requirement for some or all of the
projected unused AI CQ set-aside.
Comment 18: Modify regulations at
§ 679.132(c)(4) to clarify that if both
communities of Adak and Atka file a
notice of intent to process, the delivery
requirement would be in effect until
both communities withdraw their notice
of intent.
Response: NMFS agrees and has
modified regulations at § 679.132(c)(5)
and (6). In the event all notices of intent
to process are withdrawn, the Regional
Administrator will remove the AI CQ
set-aside delivery requirement for that
calendar year by publishing a notice in
the Federal Register.
Comment 19: Reject the AI CQ setaside as inconsistent with National
Standard 4. All cooperative members get
the benefit of both A and B season CQ
allocations. However, an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant only gets a
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
‘‘reservation’’ for 12 percent of the A
season CQ. This takes care of the issue
of giving a disproportionate share of
processor-held CQ to company boats,
but it still allows processors to attract
new vessels with volume rather than
price using CQ off a company boat to
attract independent boats with a double
share of CQ, which an Adak processor
cannot do because it does not get any
CQ. This means an Adak processor
cannot offer a single share match, let
alone a double share, leaving the Adak
plant operator at an insurmountable
competitive disadvantage.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
allocations of QS under the PCTC
Program are inconsistent with National
Standard 4. National Standard 4 states
that ‘‘Conservation and management
measures shall not discriminate
between residents of different states. If
it becomes necessary to allocate or
assign fishing privileges among various
United States fishermen, such allocation
shall be (a) fair and equitable to all such
fishermen; (b) reasonably calculated to
promote conservation; and (c) carried
out in such manner that no particular
individual, corporation, or other entity
acquires an excessive share of such
privilege.’’
In considering whether an allocation
is fair and equitable under National
Standard 4, NMFS assesses whether the
allocation is rationally connected to
achieving OY in the fishery, would
maximize overall net benefits, and
achieve the objectives of the FMP. In
addition, NMFS considers the relative
impacts of various allocations in light of
status quo conditions. Here, the PCTC
Program allocates QS to processors
based on two objective criteria: (1)
historic participation in the fishery and
(2) an active processing license that
demonstrates ongoing participation.
This second criteria provides some
reasonable assurance any allocated
privileges will be utilized and OY will
continue to be achieved in the fishery.
There is currently no active processor
(with an active FPP) in Adak that could
be allocated QS based on historic
participation, and operations at the
Adak plant have been inconsistent. As
a result, under the processor-held QS
eligibility criteria alone, AI
communities would not receive QS
under this program.
However, the Council and NMFS
recognize that providing some degree of
support to AI communities remains a
management objective. Therefore, this
rule includes a set-aside for AI
communities that would require
cooperatives to deliver an amount of
annual CQ equal to the lesser of either
12 percent of their A season CQ or the
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
AI DFA, to an Adak or Atka if, in the
future, there is an active shoreplant in
the AI capable of receiving deliveries of
Pacific cod. The AI CQ set-aside
provision is rationally connected to a
management objective of supporting AI
fishing communities, while recognizing
that there is currently no active
processing facility in Adak to which
NMFS could allocate privileges.
NMFS disagrees that the PCTC
Program allocations are not fair and
equitable because they do not place AI
communities on the same footing as
active processors. The fact that the AI
CQ set-aside is based on total A season
CQ is immaterial to fairness and
equity—that simply provides a basis for
calculating the amount of the set-aside
in any given year. The set-aside remains
in effect through the B season, and it is
intended to mandate deliveries of an
amount of Pacific cod to Aleutian
Islands shoreplants through the B
season whenever Aleutian Islands
shoreplants are operating.
Comment 20: Given the historic
uncertainty that AI communities have
faced when trying to access fish, it is
good that the Council ensured
protections for Aleutian Islands
shoreplants within the PCTC Program.
However, there should be more clarity
over whether processors in the western
Aleutian Islands, including Adak,
would be required to join a cooperative
after signaling the Adak’s intention to
process fish in a given year. It appears
that Adak would not be required to join
a cooperative to receive the AI CQ setaside, but rather that cooperatives are
responsible for delivering the set-aside
to AI processors. Adak should not be
required to join a cooperative to receive
fish for processing.
Response: An Aleutian Islands
shoreplant is not required to associate
with a cooperative to receive deliveries
of CQ. An Aleutian Islands shoreplant
may choose to associate with a
cooperative, but that is not required to
receive the benefits of processing Pacific
cod under the AI CQ set-aside provision
of the PCTC Program. An Aleutian
Islands shoreplant with an active FPP
may purchase QS in the future and
associate with a cooperative by bringing
the QS into the cooperative.
Comment 21: Correctly describe all
references to the amount of the AI CQ
set-aside as 12 percent of the PCTC
Program A season CQ rather than 12.5
percent.
Response: In the preamble to the
proposed rule describing the PRA
requirements needed for this Program,
NMFS erroneously described the AI CQ
set-aside as 12.5 percent instead of 12
percent and has corrected the issue in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
the final rule. All other references to the
AI CQ set-aside in the proposed and
final rule correctly described it as 12
percent of A season CQ or the AI DFA,
whichever is less.
Comment 22: For the community of
Adak, the 5 year PCTC Program review
is more likely to be an autopsy report
unless there are significant changes to
the AI CQ set-aside component prior to
publication of a final rule. Access to
Pacific cod is crucial for the economic
success of the Aleutian Islands
shoreplant. Access to Pacific cod means
the Aleutian Islands shoreplant can
support AI harvesters of multiple
species. Without Aleutian Islands
shoreplant access to Pacific cod, these
harvesters are essentially stranded.
There is no other community or
processing facility in Alaska that is
more dependent on Pacific cod than
Adak. Pacific cod has accounted for the
overwhelming majority of landings in
Adak since the plant opened in 1999.
Adak is unique in this regard; the
pollock fishery (not Pacific cod) is the
primary fishery for Bering Sea
processors.
Response: The Aleutian Islands
shoreplants have a unique processing
history for many reasons, and their
remote coastal location is a challenge
both for plant operations and harvester
deliveries. NMFS understands that
Pacific cod has been crucial to the
economic success of Aleutian Islands
shoreplants, but Aleutian Islands
shoreplants have not always been open
to accept deliveries, as shown in the
past few years. Without an active AI
processor, there is no entity to which
NMFS could allocate QS on the same
terms as other processors. The PCTC
Program instead implements an AI CQ
set-aside element that provides an
opportunity for AI communities to
benefit from the PCTC Program in years
when an active processor is able to
accept deliveries.
Comment 23: The recommendation by
the Council to adopt an AI CQ set-aside
instead of a QS allocation fails to meet
National Standard 8 and does not
adequately respond to the problem
statement relative to the dependence of
the community of Adak on the AI
Pacific cod fishery.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the AI
CQ set-aside is inconsistent with
National Standard 8. National Standard
8 states ‘‘Conservation and management
measures shall, consistent with the
conservation requirements of this Act
(including the prevention of overfishing
and rebuilding of overfished stocks),
take into account the importance of
fishery resources to fishing communities
by utilizing economic and social data
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53719
that meet the requirement of paragraph
(2) [i.e., National Standard 2], in order
to (a) provide for the sustained
participation of such communities, and
(b) to the extent practicable, minimize
adverse economic impacts on such
communities.’’
The AI CQ set-aside is intended to
provide for the sustained participation
of AI communities in the event there is
an operational Aleutian Islands
shoreplant in future years. Currently, no
operating shoreplant is open to accept
deliveries of Pacific cod. Even if the
plant were open, without the PCTC
Program AI CQ set-aside vessels, would
have no obligation to deliver Pacific cod
to AI communities. Compared to current
conditions, the PCTC Program will
provide for the sustained participation
of AI communities and minimize
adverse economic impacts on AI
communities to the extent practicable
by ensuring these communities will
receive deliveries of Pacific cod in years
when an Aleutian Islands shoreplant is
in operation and able to take deliveries.
The Council and NMFS took into
account the importance of fishery
resources to fishing communities,
including but not limited to Adak. The
PCTC Program is designed to provide
for the sustained participation of many
different fishing communities (i.e., those
communities substantially engaged in
and/or dependent on the fishery), and
features a history-based approach for
initial allocation of QS that would be
made in proportion to historical levels
of participation in the fishery during the
qualifying period.
Comment 24: The recommendation by
the Council to adopt an AI CQ set-aside
instead of a QS allocation fails to meet
the Magnuson-Stevens Act 303A LAPP
standards.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
PCTC Program fails to meet the
Magnuson-Stevens Act 303A LAPP
standards. The PCTC Program is
authorized by section 303A of the MSA.
The QS issued under the PCTC Program
would qualify as a permit (per MSA
303A(b)(1)) and would give the
permittee exclusive access to those fish
while the permit is held.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act LAPP
provisions in Section 303A(c)(5)(A)
require that the Council ensure fair and
equitable initial allocations, including
consideration of (1) current and
historical harvests, (2) employment in
the harvesting and processing sectors,
(3) investments in and dependence on
the fishery, and (4) the current and
historical participation of fishing
communities. The Council developed
and NMFS implemented the PCTC
Program after considerable debate and
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
53720
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
review of the Analysis prepared to
support Amendment 122 and this final
rule. Any harvesters based in AI
communities will receive QS allocations
just like other participants. And all
processors are subject to the same
objective criteria for initial allocations
of QS. The AI CQ set-aside was a means
of providing some support to AI
communities despite there being no
active processor with history in the
fishery to which NMFS could allocate
QS. No communities are being allocated
QS under the PCTC program.
Comment 25: Disapprove Option 6.1
(a CQ set-aside to Aleutians Islands
shoreplants) and instead adopt the
structure of Option 6.2 (an allocation to
Aleutian Islands shoreplants). Adak
currently does not have a processor
operating the facility. It has not been
possible to attract an operator, in large
part because of the lack of leverage and
barriers to entry inherent in the PCTC
Program. The Council’s
recommendation of Option 6.1 rather
than 6.2 creates a fundamental
structural flaw.
Response: The Council recommended
Amendment 122, including option 6.1,
due to the unique characteristics of the
AI communities and the difficulties in
maintaining an open plant each year.
Option 6.1 creates the set-aside of 12
percent of the A season CQ for delivery
to AI shoreplants. The AI CQ set-aside
is designed to be in place during the
trawl CV sector Pacific cod A and B
seasons. Cooperatives are responsible
for submitting a plan to coordinate the
harvest and delivery of the set-aside.
The Council did not select Option 6.2
based, in part, on concerns about ability
to lease CQ in years that the Aleutian
Islands shoreplant was not operational,
which was not the intent of the Council
in providing processing opportunities
for the AI communities. The Aleutian
Islands shoreplants are the only
processing plants that have a set-aside
mechanism.
Similarly to other business
relationships between harvesters and
processors, a processing plant will need
to offer competitive prices to harvesters.
This is true for processing plants in all
of Alaska’s federal fisheries.
Comment 26: An Adak entity needs to
be able to associate with a cooperative
to have a seat at the table. Vessels have
disincentives to work with Adak
because those vessels would be walking
away from their pro-rata share of the
22.5 percent processor CQ. This is
asymmetrical and probably
disadvantages Adak. There is no limit
on the number of LLP licenses that may
join a single cooperative, the number of
processors a cooperative could associate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
with, nor on the amount of QS a single
cooperative could control.
Response: An Aleutian Islands
shoreplant is not required to associate
with a cooperative, but it may associate
with a cooperative whether or not it
holds a PCTC Program QS permit. In
addition, CVs harvesting CQ may
deliver to any shoreside processor,
including an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant, regardless of whether or not
that processor holds a PCTC Program
QS permit and regardless of whether or
not the processor is associated with a
PCTC Program cooperative.
Cooperatives may form annually in
association with a federally permitted
processor to harvest their CQ. That
processor must hold an active FPP or
FFP, but they are not required to also
hold QS. This extends to all active
processors, including potential Aleutian
Islands shoreplants. However,
processors do not form cooperatives and
will not be members of cooperatives
under the PCTC Program. In addition,
associating with a processor in Adak
would not require a cooperative to
forego access to processor-held QS.
Though each cooperative is required to
associate with at least one processor,
there is no limit on the number of
processors with which a cooperative
may associate.
Regarding incentives to deliver to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant,
cooperatives are required to annually
submit an inter-cooperative agreement
that describes, (1) how the AI CQ setaside would be administered by the
cooperatives; (2) how the cooperatives
intend to harvest the AI CQ set-aside;
and (3) how cooperatives would ensure
that CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA
assigned to an LLP license with a
transferable AI trawl endorsement have
the opportunity to harvest 10 percent of
the AI CQ set-aside for delivery to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant. In years the
AI CQ set-aside is in effect, refusing to
work with an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant could mean the cooperatives
forfeit 12 percent of their A season CQ.
Therefore, NMFS expects the
cooperatives will have an incentive to
work with an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant.
Comment 27: Each cooperative is
required to set aside 12 percent of its CQ
(independent of where the members’
catch history was earned or whether
they have AI LLP endorsements). This is
unnecessarily burdensome for all
parties; an Adak processor will have to
deal with each cooperative individually
under some very constrained deadlines.
Response: The cooperatives are
required to collectively set aside 12
percent of the A season CQ and come
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
up with a delivery strategy through an
inter-cooperative agreement. The
cooperatives will have an incentive to
come up with a plan that works for all
parties to ensure CQ would not go
unharvested when the set-aside is in
effect. Aleutian Islands shoreplants will
need to work with cooperatives but the
cooperative system allows the flexibility
to work with one cooperative or with all
cooperatives. It is possible the intercooperative agreement could designate
one cooperative (or more) to coordinate
deliveries with Adak so long as 12
percent of the total A season CQ is
delivered to the Aleutian Islands
shoreplants.
Comment 28: The definition of an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant needs to
recognize that the Aleut Corporation’s
lease to an operator includes buildings
and land connecting to the dock as well
as the dock itself. The final rule should
affirm that a stationary floating
processor that is moored to a dock that
is physically integrated into processing
operations on land qualifies as being
‘‘land based’’ west of 170 degrees.
Response: The Council selected a
specific definition for an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant, similar to
Amendment 113, based on public
testimony and the analysis to prevent
stationary floating processors from
relocating to Adak and competing with
the shoreplant. The definition of an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant does not
include a stationary floating processor at
this time.
Comment 29: Use caps apply at the
firm level, as they should. However, the
analysis shows that the fishery will be
dominated by a couple major companies
who will be grandfathered over the cap.
Meanwhile Aleutian Islands shoreplants
will be effectively capped at 12 percent
by the structure of the cooperative AI
CQ set-aside. Because the AI CQ setaside is not an allocation, the structure
of the program means the 12 percent is
also very likely to be a ceiling with
Aleutian Islands shoreplants effectively
capped at 12 percent, which is far less
than their historical average.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the 12
percent AI CQ set-aside is a ceiling. The
Council designed the community
protection measures to benefit Adak and
Atka if their plant is operational and
accepting deliveries for that year. The
12 percent AI CQ set-aside is a
minimum delivery requirement in years
when an Aleutian Islands shoreplant is
operational. Defining the set-aside as a
percentage of CQ rather than a fixed
amount avoids disproportionate impacts
on other PCTC Program participants in
years of low TAC (as opposed to the
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
static 5,000 metric tons delivery
requirement under Amendment 113).
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
use caps in development of a LAPP to
prevent any person from holding,
acquiring, or using an excessive share of
limited access privileges. One of the use
caps in the PCTC Program is a firm level
processor cap that no company may
process more than 20 percent of the CQ
(§ 679.133(a)(4) and (5)). This processing
cap does not apply to Aleutian Islands
shoreplants when the AI intent to
process is in effect.
Comment 30: Without a tag
identifying whether a unit of CQ was
designated as part of the AI CQ setaside, it will be difficult for the Regional
Administrator to know inseason
whether the AI CQ set-aside will be
harvested. If any Pacific cod delivered
to an AI shoreplant is assumed to accrue
against the set-aside until the 12 percent
amount has been delivered, that
introduces further complexities that
serve to make the 12 percent a de-facto
cap.
Response: All CQ caught in the PCTC
Program will be accounted for at the
dock, except deliveries to motherships,
and NMFS would consider all CQ
landed to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant to count toward the AI CQ
set-aside. There is no need to tag each
unit of CQ as part of the set-aside or not
part of the set-aside, because NMFS will
track all deliveries of Pacific cod, and
cooperatives will not be able to deliver
more than 88 percent of A season CQ to
anywhere other than an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant.
Once 12 percent of A season CQ has
been landed at an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant, cooperatives could continue
to deliver to AI communities but would
no longer be required to. In contrast,
once 88 percent of A season CQ had
been delivered elsewhere, vessels could
deliver CQ only to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant. If the cooperatives fail to
deliver 12 percent of A season CQ to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant, the
remainder of the set-aside would remain
in place for the B season rather than
being rolled over as CQ with no
restrictions on delivery. The operating
Aleutian Islands shoreplant may accept
deliveries of CQ harvested in either the
BS or the AI. The cooperatives would
monitor the conditions and terms of the
inter-cooperative agreement to ensure
those provisions are followed.
Comment 31: The proposed rule
appears to only limit CVs in the BS,
implying that the CVs could erode the
AI CQ set-aside by fishing in the AI.
Section 679.132(a)(4) outlines the DFA
limitations and seems to deal with that
by indicating CVs delivering to an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Aleutian Islands shoreplant are the only
vessels allowed to access the DFA.
NMFS should take a very careful review
of the text to confirm that the language
captures the intent of the AI CQ setaside.
Response: When the AI CQ set-aside
is in effect and set equal to the AI nonCDQ DFA, directed fishing for Pacific
cod in the AI may be conducted only by
PCTC Program CVs that deliver their
catch to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant.
However, when the AI DFA is greater
than the set-aside (i.e. greater than 12
percent of A season CQ), the amount of
the DFA in excess of the set-aside could
be harvested by vessels delivering to
any processor. That would not erode the
set-aside, which would remain at 12
percent of A season CQ and apply to all
CVs. Cooperatives may not deliver more
than the A season CQ minus the AI CQ
set-aside established under § 679.132 to
processors in the BS subarea when the
AI CQ set-aside is in effect.
Comment 32: When the AI CQ setaside is equal to the AI DFA, directed
fishing for Pacific cod in the AI may be
conducted only by CVs that deliver their
catch of AI Pacific cod to Aleutian
Islands shoreplants. This is a crucial
element of making the AI CQ set-aside
work under either set-aside option.
Response: NMFS acknowledges the
comment in support of the AI CQ setaside structure. In years when the AI CQ
set-aside is equal to the AI DFA, all CQ
harvested in the AI must be delivered to
an Aleutian Islands shoreplant unless
the Regional Administrator removes the
AI CQ set-aside because there is no
operational processor.
Comment 33: How can NMFS
guarantee that the cooperatives will
comply with the AI CQ set-aside and
what are the consequences if the
cooperatives fail to comply? Who
negotiates and must submit to the intercooperative agreement?
Response: The Council recommended,
and this final rule implements, a
requirement for all PCTC Program
cooperatives to form an intercooperative agreement that includes an
AI CQ set-aside delivery agreement. It is
the intention of the Council and NMFS
that cooperatives will negotiate with
one another to ensure delivery occurs
consistent with the AI CQ set-aside
provision.
Failure to come to any agreement
would result in NMFS withholding CQ.
NMFS will not issue CQ to cooperatives
until the inter-cooperative agreement is
submitted to NMFS with the
cooperative application.
If cooperatives fail to implement the
agreement and do not deliver the AI CQ
set-aside, the cooperatives would lose
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53721
access to that portion of the CQ in that
year, as it could only be harvested and
delivered to an AI shoreplant.
Antitrust Concerns With the AI CQ SetAside
Comment 34: The AI CQ set-aside
may have antitrust implications
between the processing plant operators
and the cooperatives because it would
force the Aleutian Islands shoreplant to
expose its fish prices and marketing
plans to its competitors prior to the
season. Amendment 122 creates an
opportunity for competitively sensitive
information to flow back to competing
processors, and it may also align the
cooperatives’ incentives with those of
competing processors (and lead to other
strategic behavior that undermines
competition). The opportunity for
collusion is so significant that this may
rise to the level of a ‘‘per se’’ violation
of the Sherman Act.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
PCTC Program would result in per se
antitrust violations. These same
concerns were raised prior to the
publication of the proposed action to
the Department of Justice (DOJ)
Antitrust Division, which has expertise
in the administration of federal antitrust
laws. DOJ did not inform NMFS that the
Program would result in any per se
antitrust violations. All catch share
programs create some potential for
anticompetitive behavior, but
participants are required to comply with
antitrust laws in order to retain their
fishing privileges. Pursuant to
Magnuson-Stevens Act section
303A(c)(1)(K), NMFS would revoke the
limited access privileges of any
participant found to have violated
federal antitrust laws.
Comment 35: Explain how the
Council and NMFS intend to manage
the cooperatives to avoid potential
antitrust law violations. The difference
between direct allocation and AI CQ setaside is competitively significant if
Adak is required to join a cooperative to
receive fish for processing. An intercooperative agreement controls the
terms for how a set-aside for Aleutian
Islands shoreplants will be
administered, clearly putting the Aleut
Corporation at a competitive
disadvantage and raising antitrust
concerns. Further, the proposed plan
does not provide any active
governmental supervision of the marketallocation arrangement to ensure fair
treatment of the Aleut Corporation. The
Aleut Corporation plant would be a
loser in this unlawful market allocation
agreement and would be forced to
accept products delivered under an
inter-cooperative agreement.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53722
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Response: The cooperatives are
responsible for management of the
cooperative system. All cooperatives are
intended to only conduct and
coordinate harvest activities of members
and are not Fishermen’s Collective
Marketing Act (FCMA) cooperatives. An
Aleutian Islands shoreplant would not
be required to join a cooperative to
receive CQ for processing. And, because
cooperatives would be required to
deliver a fixed percentage of CQ to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant when
operational, it is possible that
shoreplant may have some leverage in
negotiating deliveries. NMFS does not
regulate market prices. However, as
stated above, the Magnuson-Stevens Act
allows for NMFS to revoke and
redistribute any LAPP held by any
person found to have violated the
antitrust laws of the United States.
Impacts to Adak
Comment 36: Reject the FONSI
prepared for the EA analyzing the
impacts of Amendment 122 and
conduct an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). There are real impacts
to the human environment of Adak from
the lack of processing in the
community. The most recent major
positive impact to the economy was the
implementation of Amendment 113.
The loss of Amendment 113 and the
closure of the Adak plant have already
led to the collapse of the local economy
and the likely closure of the Adak
school in 2024. This loss of the
processing facility and its prolonged
closure will have sociological impacts
on the community. Each year that fish
processing does not occur, the
community loses residents, including
families with school-age children.
Amendment 122 will not likely
restore plant operations, revive the local
economy, or reopen the school. NMFS
must adequately analyze a solution to
provide relief and the environment to
allow fish processing to occur in Adak
to ensure consequences of existing
conditions are identified and mitigated.
Amendment 122 will have negative
impacts and likely lead to prolonged
closure of the processing facility.
The FONSI is incorrect when it states
that Amendment 122 would not have
any effect on the health of minority or
low-income communities. Adak is a
small, remote, island community with
significant Unangaxˆ population and
heritage. According to the Internal
Revenue Service, Adak is a Qualified
Opportunity Zone, which is defined as
‘‘an economically distressed
community.’’ It would be difficult to
argue that Adak is not a ‘‘minority or
low-income community.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
These effects should be welldocumented in an EIS as these impacts
need to be studied in detail in order for
NMFS and the Council to know the full
and true impacts Amendment 122 will
have on Adak.
Response: The PCTC Program
includes provisions designed to
facilitate processing activity that could
benefit the economy in Adak and Atka.
With respect to providing for the
sustained participation of fishing
communities (i.e., those communities
substantially engaged in and/or
dependent on the fishery), the PCTC
Program features a history-based
approach for initial allocation of QS in
proportion to historical levels of
participation in the fishery to address
fairness and equity.
NMFS acknowledges that there are
circumstances unique to Adak and that
the processing facility, which is
important to the local economy, was
relying on Amendment 113. However,
after a court struck down Amendment
113 and the plant closed, the Council
had to consider means of providing
some benefits in the future if a plant
were to open again while recognizing
there is no operating business that could
currently hold QS.
NMFS prepared an Analysis in
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to
determine whether the environmental
impact of the proposed action was
significant. The Analysis also analyzed
social and economic impacts of the
alternatives, including access to fishing
activity, compared to status quo
conditions. Section 2.10.5 of the
Analysis discussed the impact of the
proposed action on fishing
communities. Based on the Analysis,
NMFS concluded that Amendment 122
and this final rule will not have a
significant impact on the human
environment. NMFS has determined
that Amendment 122 will not have
significant adverse impacts on the City
of Adak.
NMFS anticipates there will be
beneficial economic effects compared to
status quo because the AI CQ set-aside
provision is designed to provide Pacific
cod deliveries to Adak and Atka in years
when there is an operational processor.
Because the EA demonstrates there will
be no significant impacts on the human
environment compared to current
conditions—as opposed to in
comparison to a different program not
currently under consideration—NMFS
is not required to prepare an EIS under
the requirements of NEPA.
Additionally, the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations
implementing NEPA state in 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
1502.16(b) that economic or social
effects by themselves do not require
preparation of an EIS.
Comment 37: The success or failure of
the Aleut Corporation owned processing
plant has direct and real impacts to all
4,000 of the shareholders; the economic
impact of decisions made for Adak
reach far wider than the community
alone. Harm to the economic stability
for the population of Adak would result
in significant health impacts.
Response: NMFS anticipates
beneficial effects on the health and the
environment of minority or low-income
communities like Adak may be expected
as a result of this action, compared to
status quo. For Adak specifically, the AI
CQ set-aside provision is designed to
provide Pacific cod deliveries to Adak
and Atka in years when there is an
operational processor. As a result, this
action includes provisions designed to
facilitate processing activity that might
not otherwise occur and could benefit
the economy in Adak and Atka.
Sections 2.10.5 and 2.10.8 of the
Analysis prepared for this action
provide additional detail (See
ADDRESSES).
PCTC Program Cooperatives
Comment 38: Clarify that a
cooperative can associate with any
permitted processor regardless of
whether that processor holds QS,
subject to some limitations on CPs
acting as motherships.
Response: NMFS agrees with this
clarification. There is nothing that
precludes cooperatives from associating
with a permitted processor that does not
hold QS. Additionally, cooperatives
may deliver Pacific cod harvested with
CQ to any federally-permitted processor,
whether or not it is associated with the
cooperative.
Comment 39: Only target catch should
count against CQ. Taking the ICA off the
top gives extra fish to boats that have
Pacific cod bycatch in other fisheries.
Response: NMFS concurs that only
target catch counts against CQ. Pacific
cod caught incidentally in other target
fisheries contribute to the Pacific cod
ICA. The Regional Administrator will
annually determine the amount of the A
and B season ICA needed in other trawl
CV target fisheries and deduct that
amount from the trawl CV TAC. The
ICA is determined based on the ICA
rates in previous years and the projected
amount necessary for the current year.
After deducting the ICA, the remaining
TAC is the DFA, which will be fully
allocated as Pacific cod CQ for the A
and B season under the PCTC Program.
Comment 40: For clarity, modify the
last sentence of § 679.131(j)(3)(i) to
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
mirror the preamble and Council motion
to clarify that all processors with an
eligible FPP or FFP are eligible to
process CQ under this program
(regardless of whether or not they are
issued processor-held QS), subject to
eligibility requirements under
Amendment 120 to limit CPs acting as
motherships and subject to the at-sea
processing limits placed on such CPs
under § 679.133(b)(2) of this rule.
Response: NMFS agrees and has
modified language at § 679.131(j)(3)(i) to
include this clarifying change. The
specific modification in the table adds
that ‘‘all processors’’ would include
processors with an FFP subject to
eligibility requirements under
Amendment 120 to limit CPs acting as
motherships as described at
§ 679.133(b)(2).
Comment 41: Clarify whether (1) a
vessel can be listed as eligible to harvest
in a cooperative other than the
cooperative to which it assigned its QS
and (2) a vessel can deliver its CQ to a
processor if it is a member of another
processor’s cooperative?
Response: NMFS agrees that a vessel
(as identified by its FFP) can be listed
on multiple cooperative applications as
an eligible harvester despite the vessel
owner not holding QS as a member of
each cooperative. Each LLP license and
associated QS may only be listed on one
cooperative application and the LLP
license holder is therefore a ‘‘member’’
of that cooperative.
Vessels may deliver CQ to a different
processor than the processor associated
with their cooperative. There is not a
closed class of processors eligible to
receive deliveries of CQ, meaning a
vessel may deliver some or all of the CQ
to multiple processors.
Comment 42: Cooperative reports
must be mandatory to provide
accountability, as cooperatives must
‘ensure/guarantee’ the PCTC Program
achieves its objective of supporting
sustained participation by fishery
dependent communities as stated in the
problem statement.
Response: There is precedent in other
programs, such as the Rockfish Program,
for relying on voluntary cooperative
reporting to the Council, and several
reasons to maintain that practice here.
The annual cooperative reports to the
Council contain the information that the
Council requested to determine whether
the PCTC Program is meeting its goals
and objectives. Voluntary reports reduce
the reporting burden on cooperatives
and their members without sacrificing
providing critical data to the Council.
NMFS separately collects the
information that it needs to manage the
fishery. Voluntary cooperative reports to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
the Council also reduce the time NMFS
spends collecting and storing the annual
reports and eliminates the need to
modify regulations for a mandatory
report that are burdensome and do not
provide information necessary to
manage the fishery.
Comment 43: In terms of use of the
CQ held in the cooperative, the
preamble of the proposed rule is correct
and explicit that a cooperative cannot
assign a greater proportion of the CQ
resulting from processor-held QS to an
LLP license owned by that processor for
harvest by a vessel owned by that
processor than the LLP license would
have brought into the cooperative absent
any processor-held QS. Part II.F of the
preamble to the proposed rule also
states the Council intended processorheld QS to be divided among
cooperative CVs proportionately to the
QS attached to LLP licenses on board
the harvesting vessel, but the only
restriction in the Council’s preferred
alternative is relative to processor-held
QS used on vessels that are owned by
the processor. In all other cases, it is up
to the cooperative, in partnership with
its associated processor, to determine
how best to optimize harvest within the
cooperative to meet the objectives of the
program.
Response: This final rule establishes
use caps to limit the amount of CQ a
vessel can harvest at § 679.133. To
address vertically integrated companies
where a processing company may also
own LLP licenses or CVs, the Council
intended processor held QS to be
divided among cooperative CVs
proportionately to the QS attached to
LLP licenses onboard the harvesting
vessel. In other words, a cooperative
should not allow a CV or LLP license
owned by that processor to harvest a
greater proportion of the CQ resulting
from processor-held QS than the LLP
license would have brought into the
cooperative absent any processor-held
QS. The Council specified that the
cooperative will monitor this provision
and include reporting on harvest of CQ
resulting from processor-held QS in the
PCTC Program cooperative annual
report.
The Council also directed that each
cooperative’s annual report provide
information on CQ leasing activities and
any penalties issued and harvest of CQ
resulting from processor-held QS.
Additionally, NMFS requires
cooperatives to include information
about the cooperative’s plan to monitor
CQ leasing activities and the use of CQ
derived from processor held QS within
the cooperative, in the Application for
PCTC Program CQ.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53723
Comment 44: Clarify the terms
‘‘affiliated with’’ and ‘‘ownership of a
vessel’’ with respect to the use of CQ
derived from processor-held QS.
Response: NMFS defines affiliation
and control at § 679.2 Affiliation for the
purpose of defining AFA, Rockfish
Program, and PCTC Program. See the
response to Comment 43 for more
discussion about processor-held QS
used in a cooperative with a processor
owned vessel.
Prohibited Species Catch Limits
Comment 45: There is no requirement
that the cooperatives will set aside a
proportionate amount of PSCs for the
CVs that agree to take on the obligation
of harvesting the AI CQ set-aside for
delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant. NMFS should make it
explicit that initial distribution of PSC
limits include pro-rata amounts to the
AI CQ set-aside and require that the
inter-cooperative agreement and each
cooperative agreement contain
provisions mandating initial
distribution of PSC pro-rata to the
individual’s QS percentage.
Response: NMFS requires an intercooperative agreement signed by all
cooperatives prior to issuing CQ each
year. The cooperatives must agree in the
inter-cooperative agreement which
cooperatives will deliver the AI CQ setaside to the Aleutian Islands
shoreplants. In that agreement,
cooperatives should confirm that there
would be sufficient CQ and PSC set
aside to accomplish deliveries. The
Council recommended a cooperative
system to manage the CQ and PSC limits
allocated within the PCTC Program.
NMFS anticipates that each cooperative
will maximize its usage of CQ and PSC
limits to the extent practicable,
including adhering to delivery
requirements to Aleutian Islands
shoreplants in years the AI CQ set-aside
is in effect.
Comment 46: Be explicit that the total
halibut PSC limit reduction is 25
percent, but in the first year, NMFS will
apply a 12.5 percent reduction. This is
consistent with the Council motion.
Response: NMFS clarified this change
in the final rule preamble and confirms
that this provision aligns with the
Council’s description of the PSC limit
reduction described in the analysis. To
clarify, the total halibut PSC reduction
is 25 percent, phased in over two years.
NMFS will reduce the halibut PSC for
the PCTC Program by 12.5 percent in
the first year of the Program, and will
apply a 25 percent reduction to halibut
PSC in the second year and each year
thereafter.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53724
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Comment 47: An Aleutian Islands
shoreplant needs to be able to associate
with a cooperative in order to be able to
access transfers of PSC limits.
Response: NMFS disagrees.
Cooperatives can process their Pacific
cod at any processor, subject to the atsea processing sideboard limit specified
at § 679.133(b)(2). Processors do not
need access to PSC limits; only
harvesters do.
Inter-Cooperative Agreement
Comment 48: NMFS should make the
PCTC Program official record or a list of
LLP license holder information
available to the inter-cooperative
manager when application packages are
sent out.
Response: NMFS will publish a list of
LLP license holders and processors who
are expected to qualify for QS under the
PCTC Program on the Alaska Region
website with the publication of this
final rule in the Federal Register.
Comment 49: The proposed rule states
that all participants in the Program
would be required to organize a
cooperative prior to the November 1
deadline each year. Does the intercooperative agreement need to be in
place by November 1st? Where are the
application requirements for the intercooperative agreement? In the proposed
rule, it appears that the individual
cooperative applications would simply
include a copy of the inter-cooperative
agreement that defines how the AI CQ
set-aside will be harvested.
Response: Inter-cooperative formation
needs to occur prior to November 1.
There are no application requirements
for the inter-cooperative agreement;
however, cooperatives must include a
copy of the inter-cooperative agreement
in order for their CQ application to be
approved, and that agreement must
specify how the AI CQ set-aside would
be harvested.
For the first year, NMFS is making a
change to the deadline to accommodate
timing concerns. For the calendar year
2023 only, each cooperative must
submit the inter-cooperative agreement
to NMFS prior to December 31, 2023,
described at § 679.131 (a)(4)(viii). Intercooperative formation would be allowed
and an inter-cooperative agreement
would be required to implement the AI
set-aside and to allow for efficient
transfers of CQ or PSC limits between
cooperatives.
Comment 50: The proposed rule does
not provide any guidance on how an
inter-cooperative agreement would be
agreed upon by the cooperative
members.
Response: The Council recommended
a cooperative-based structure for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
implementation of the PCTC Program
based on public testimony. NMFS
interprets this to mean that the
cooperatives will structure their intercooperative agreement in a way that
satisfies the AI CQ set-aside
requirements without further guidance
from NMFS on cooperative
management. There is precedent set for
cooperative systems using agreements
like this, including in other North
Pacific catch share programs. Because
an inter-cooperative agreement will be
required in order for NMFS to approve
applications for CQ, NMFS does not
anticipate additional procedural
guardrails are necessary to encourage
cooperatives to negotiate this required
agreement.
Use Caps
Comment 51: It is problematic to
provide information down to the
individual ownership level for certain
types of ownerships structures, such as
publicly-held companies. In order to
effectively enforce ownership and use
caps, the preamble to the proposed rule
would require a list of all persons, to the
individual level, holding an ownership
interest in the LLP licenses that join the
cooperative. The classic case is a
publicly traded owner. Because
individual ownership is constantly
changing and there is little public
disclosure of individual owners, it
would be impossible for a publicly
traded company to submit an ownership
list to the individual level. Similarly, a
company such as American Seafoods,
with a complex ownership structure and
private equity investment, does not have
access to ownership information to the
individual level.
Revise the proposed standard to
require the same information down to
the individual level for any person
having an ownership interest in excess
of five percent. If based on that
information NMFS has any concerns
about compliance with ownership and
use caps, the Agency can be authorized
to request additional ownership
information.
Response: The Application for PCTC
CQ, the Application for Transfer of LLP
Groundfish/Crab License, and the
Application for Transfer of PCTC QS for
Processors include fields to enter the
names of all persons, to the individual
level, holding an ownership interest in
the LLP licenses or QS permit. Federal
regulations at § 697.2 defines person as
any individual (whether or not a citizen
or national of the United States), any
corporation, partnership, association, or
other non-individual entity (whether or
not organized, or existing under the
laws of any state), and any Federal,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
state, local, or foreign government or
any entity of any such aforementioned
governments.
This collection of information is
necessary to monitor compliance with
the use caps on CQ and the ownership
caps on QS. NMFS does not currently
monitor ownership of publicly traded
companies beyond the person (i.e.,
beyond the company level), consistent
with other Alaska catch share programs.
Collections of information remain
unmodified from the proposed rule.
At-Sea Processing Sideboard Limit
Comment 52: A mothership vessel
operator receiving an unsorted codend
or ‘‘haul’’ should be allowed to assign
the appropriate management program
code rather than NMFS determining that
the catch would be assigned to the
PCTC Program based on the retained
catch composition as proposed in
regulations at § 679.20. Allowing the
vessel operator to designate which hauls
are PCTC Program hauls would be
consistent with the current practice of
evaluating the catch composition prior
to determining if a haul is CDQ or nonCDQ (open access).
Response: NMFS agrees. Based on this
comment, NMFS changed
§ 679.5(c)(6)(v)(J) in the final rule.
Rather than considering any unsorted
codend that is delivered to a mothership
to be CQ during the applicable PCTC
Program season that is in the Pacific cod
target fishery, the final rule implements
a method similar to how catch in an
unsorted codend is assigned to a CDQ
group. The mothership will have 2
hours after completion of weighing all
catch in the haul on the mothership to
assign a haul to the PCTC Program.
Comment 53: The two CPs acting as
motherships to process CQ should be
allowed to share processing sideboards
within a cooperative or by an intercooperative agreement. In Amendment
122, the Council adopted further
restrictions on these two vessels,
limiting each vessel to processing no
more than 125 percent of its average
Pacific cod processing history over the
years 2009–2019. However, the Council
did not address the issue of flexibility
between the two motherships with
respect to sideboard usage.
It is critical that final rule include this
flexibility. It is critical that the second
mothership be able to provide markets
if the first mothership breaks down. It
is critical that the two motherships be
able to work together as either of them
nears its sideboard limit to provide at
least a single market for those fishermen
who have no delivery alternatives.
The solution is to include in the final
rule a provision that allows either of the
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
two motherships to exceed its
individual sideboard based on a written
agreement submitted to NMFS
transferring a portion of its annual
sideboard to the other mothership. The
result would be that the total
mothership sideboard would remain in
full effect but the individual sideboards
could be shared on a voluntary basis
between the two motherships in the
same manner that CQ can be shared
within and among different
cooperatives.
Response: The PCTC Program does
not limit who may process Pacific cod,
but it does place specific limits on the
amount of CQ that may be processed by
different operation types. This final rule
includes the sideboard limit on the
amount of CQ that can be delivered by
trawl CVs to a CP designated on an LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement. This final rule
establishes an at-sea processing
sideboard limit of 125 percent of the
eligible CP’s processing history which
allows some opportunity for additional
offshore processing relative to the
historical annual average for each
operation. This provision allows two
eligible CPs acting as a mothership to
process up to 125 percent of their
individual average Pacific cod
processing history during the qualifying
years of 2009 through 2019 with no
years dropped.
This provision is not an allocation,
and the Council did not recommend a
sideboard that would function as a joint
processing sideboard limit for the CP
sector. Rather, any remaining CQ that
exceeds a vessel’s at-sea processing
sideboard limit may be delivered to any
other processor, including a shoreside
processor.
Comment 54: Issue the at-sea
processing sideboard limit applicable to
a CP designated on a groundfish LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement as a new
permit or as a transferable endorsement
that could be transferred separately from
the LLP license (i.e., similar to the
provisions that currently apply to
certain AI transferable endorsements for
smaller vessels).
Response: The Council recommended
maintaining the long-standing policy
that sideboard limits are not sector
allocations and therefore should not be
transferable.
Comment 55: Revise the regulations at
§ 679.133(b)(2) to accurately reflect how
at-sea processing sideboards are
determined. The first option sets the
sideboard at 125 percent of the relevant
processing history. The second option
sets it to 125 percent of the catch history
of certain catcher vessels but only up to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
125 percent of the processor’s relevant
processing history. In effect, the
outcome under each option will always
be that each mothership’s sideboard will
equal 125 percent of that vessel’s
relevant processing history. For drafting
simplicity, ease of future analysis and
implementation, we recommend that
the proposed language to determine
sideboard amounts be revised to reflect
only option 1.
Response: NMFS agrees and has
revised regulations at § 679.133(b)(2) to
reflect that NMFS will establish a
sideboard limit for each LLP license
with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement not to exceed
125 percent of a CP’s processing history.
Processing Pacific cod by a CP acting as
a mothership is limited by eligibility
requirements under Amendment 120
and subject to the at-sea processing
limits placed on such CPs under
§ 679.133(b)(2).
Changes From Proposed Rule to Final
Rule
This final rule includes the following
substantive changes from the proposed
to final rule to address public comment,
clarify regulatory language, or to correct
inadvertent errors in the proposed
regulations. Throughout the regulatory
text, NMFS also made technical and
grammar edits to correct regulatory
cross references, use consistent terms,
remove redundancy, and promote
clarity.
At § 679.2, NMFS modified the
definition for PCTC Program
cooperative to add that a cooperative
associates with a processor under the
requirements at § 679.131. NMFS also
modified the definition for PCTC
Program participants to include those
harvesters and processors who receive,
hold, or use PCTC Program QS. This
change was necessary to include future
Program participants who do not receive
initial allocations. NMFS removed the
definition for PCTC Program CQ
because it was duplicative and the
content is covered by the definition of
Cooperative Quota (CQ).
At § 679.5(c)(6)(v)(J)(1), NMFS
clarified the timing requirements for a
mothership to designate a haul as PCTC
Program management code based on
comment 52 and added a requirement to
record the observer’s haul number in the
mothership daily cumulative
production logbook (DCPL). The final
rule implements a method similar to the
regulation that is used for assigning an
unsorted codend to a CDQ group. The
mothership will have 2 hours after
completion of weighing all catch in the
haul on the mothership to assign a haul
to the PCTC Program. Also, NMFS
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53725
changed the final rule to require the
mothership to report the observer’s haul
number in the Mothership DCPL by
2400 hours, A.l.t., each day to record the
previous day’s delivery information.
This change is necessary to accurately
account for PCTC catch separate from
other management programs.
At § 679.7(m)(2)(i), NMFS removed
the phrase ‘‘while fishing under a CQ
permit issued to a PCTC Program
cooperative’’ to ensure that motherships
and shoreside processors would not be
excluded from the prohibition against
failing to follow the catch monitoring
requirements. At § 679.7(m)(4)(ii),
NMFS clarified that it is unlawful for
the manager of a shoreside processor or
stationary floating processor to process
any groundfish delivered by a CV
fishing under the authority of a CQ
permit not weighed on a scale approved
by the State of Alaska. NMFS removed
§ 679.7(m)(5)(i), Fail to retain any
Pacific cod caught by a vessel when that
vessel is fishing under the authority of
a CQ permit, because improved
retention/improved utilization (IR/IU)
regulations at § 679.27(c)(2) already
apply. NMFS removed § 679.7(m)(5)(iv)
Operate a vessel fishing under the
authority of a CQ permit issued to a
PCTC Program cooperative and have
any Pacific cod aboard the vessel unless
those fish were harvested under the
authority of a CQ permit, because this
prohibition would prevent a mothership
from possessing CDQ Program Pacific
cod onboard the vessels at the same
time as participating in the PCTC
Program. This is not necessary because
this final rule allows each haul
delivered to a mothership to be assigned
a management program code. NMFS
also removed references to joint and
several liability for violations because
existing agency regulations at 15 CFR
904.107 address joint and several
liability for any civil penalties issued.
NMFS changed to Table 56 to part 679
to include Central GOA dusky rockfish
and Central GOA Pacific ocean perch
sideboard limits for non-exempt AFA
CVs. This regulatory change was
inadvertently left out in the proposed
rule; however it was correctly described
in the preamble to the proposed rule at
Section VIII.A and in Table 3.
The proposed rule had erroneously
removed the harvesting sideboards for
AFA vessels at § 679.64(b)(3)(ii), (iv),
and (4)(ii). In the final rule, NMFS
added these paragraphs back in the
regulations. At § 679.64(b)(3)(ii), NMFS
specified that the BSAI Pacific cod
harvesting sideboard applies only to C
season. At §§ 679.64(b)(3)(iv) and
679.64(b)(4)(ii), NMFS corrected the
regulation to state that non-exempt AFA
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
53726
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
CVs and the associated LLP licenses are
also sideboarded upon implementation
of the PCTC Program. At
§ 679.64(b)(4)(ii), NMFS also corrected
the Gulf of Alaska halibut PSC limit for
the non-exempt AFA CVs and
associated LLP licenses.
At § 679.130(e), NMFS added that a
PCTC Program processor eligible to
receive an initial allocation of QS
includes a processor that holds a valid
FFP and an LLP license with a BSAI
Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement.
NMFS moved the paragraphs on the
non-severability of Pacific cod legal
landings and the exception provisions
from § 679.130(f)(4) to § 679.130(i)(5),
and made changes to the headings for
consistency and convention. NMFS
added that Pacific cod legal landings are
non-severable from transferable AI
endorsements. NMFS clarified in
§ 679.130(i)(5)(i) that, if multiple LLP
licenses authorized catch by a vessel,
the LLP license holders must submit to
NMFS an agreement specifying the
amount of shared catch history to assign
to each LLP license with the application
for PCTC Program QS.
At § 679.130(j)(3), NMFS clarified
several transfer requirements for
processor-held PCTC Program QS
permits. First, processors that received
an initial QS allocation must have an
active FPP or FFP to receive benefits
from their QS through associating with
a cooperative. Second, any transfer of
QS in excess of the ownership cap must
be to another PCTC Program QS permit
holder who remains below the
ownership cap or a new processor with
an active FPP. PCTC Program QS
permits issued to shoreside processors
can only be transferred to other
shoreside processors that hold an FPP.
NMFS also added language to specify
transfer restrictions for PCTC Program
QS permits initially issued to an FFP
holder. CPs acting as motherships may
transfer their QS permit to the onshore
or offshore sector, subject to eligibility
requirements under Amendment 120 to
limit CPs acting as motherships (i.e. may
transfer QS permits to processors that
hold a valid FPP or a valid FFP in
addition to an LLP license with a BSAI
Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement).
At § 679.131(a)(1)(i), NMFS clarified
that QS assigned to LLP licenses and
PCTC Program QS permits held by a
processor must be assigned to a
cooperative through a CQ permit to use
the CQ derived from that QS to catch
Pacific cod, crab PSC, or halibut PSC
assigned to the PCTC Program. NMFS
removed the terms ‘‘process or receive’’
because the PCTC Program does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
require a processor to hold QS or CQ to
process or receive Pacific cod from
cooperatives.
At § 679.131(a)(4)(viii), NMFS
modified the text to accommodate
cooperative formation prior to the first
year of the PCTC Program in response
to comment 49. NMFS will allow, for
the calendar year 2023 only, for each
cooperative to submit the intercooperative agreement to NMFS prior to
December 31, 2023. This single year
variation will give cooperatives
additional time to come to an agreement
after publication of the final rule. In all
years after 2023, the inter-cooperative
agreement must be submitted with the
cooperative application no later than
November 1 of each calendar year. The
inter-cooperative agreement is required
before NMFS issues CQ to each
cooperative and fishing begins in A
season (January 20). The intercooperative agreement must be
submitted regardless of whether an
Adak or Atka files a notice of intent to
process with NMFS per § 679.132(b).
At § 679.131(i), NMFS modified
language to reflect language in other
catch share programs when referring to
the NMFS online system used for intercooperative transfers. Instead of being
specific to the current program, eFish,
NMFS used ‘‘online system’’ to account
for any future application naming
conventions.
At § 679.131(j)(3)(i), NMFS clarified
that in order for a cooperative to
associate with a processor with an FFP,
the vessel must be named on an LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement in response to
comment 40.
At § 679.132(b)(5)(ii), NMFS modified
this text to clarify that cooperatives
must ensure that the PCTC Program
harvests from the BS do not exceed the
minimum AI CQ set-aside.
At § 679.132(c)(3) and (4), NMFS
clarified language pertaining to the
Regional Administrator removing the
delivery requirement and the process for
withdrawing a notice of intent to
process, in response to comments 17
and 18. NMFS removed language at
§ 679.132(c)(4) regarding removing the
projected unused AI set-aside to PCTC
Program cooperatives in proportion to
the amount of CQ that each PCTC
Program cooperative received in the
initial allocation of CQ for the
remainder of the A and B seasons.
NMFS maintained in the regulations
that the Regional Administrator may
remove the delivery requirement for
some or all of the projected unused AI
CQ set-aside if the Regional
Administrator determines that Aleutian
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Islands shoreplants will not process the
entire AI CQ set-aside.
NMFS also removed language limiting
when the City of Adak or City of Atka
could withdraw their notice of intent to
process. A notice of intent to process
may be withdrawn at any time after it
is submitted to NMFS. NMFS clarified
that all notices of intent must be
withdrawn for NMFS to remove the
delivery requirements applicable when
the AI CQ set-aside is in effect.
At § 679.133(a)(6)(iv), NMFS added
language to exempt an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant from processor use caps
when the AI CQ set-aside is in effect.
At § 679.133(b)(2), based on comment
55, NMFS modified the text to reflect
the Council recommendation that NMFS
establish a sideboard limit for each LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement not to exceed
125 percent of the CP’s processing
history. Processing Pacific cod by a CP
acting as a mothership is limited by
eligibility requirements under
Amendment 120.
At § 679.135(d)(2)(iv), NMFS clarified
that if a cooperative does not pay its
cost recovery fees and a member of that
cooperative leaves and joins another
cooperative, NMFS will withhold any
CQ generated by that person’s QS until
the original cooperative pays its
delinquent cost recovery fee.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(3) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator (AA) has
determined that this final rule is
consistent with Amendment 122 to the
BSAI FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law.
NMFS prepared an environmental
assessment (EA) for this action and the
AA concluded that there will be no
significant impact on the human
environment as a result of this rule. This
action creates a LAPP to rationalize the
BSAI Pacific cod trawl CV sector A and
B seasons but will not result in
significant changes to amount, timing,
or location of total harvest, or result in
other changes that would significantly
impact the quality of the human
environment. A copy of the EA is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a final regulatory
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
flexibility analysis, the agency shall
publish one or more guides to assist
small entities in complying with the
rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. The preambles to the
proposed rule and this final rule include
a detailed description of the actions
necessary to comply with this rule, and
as part of this rulemaking process,
NMFS included on its website a
summary of compliance requirements
that serves as the small entity
compliance guide: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/alaska/
commercial-fishing/pacific-cod-trawlcooperative-program. This action does
not require any additional compliance
from small entities that is not described
in the small entity compliance guide or
the preambles to the proposed rule and
this final rule. Copies of the proposed
rule and this final rule are available
from the NMFS website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA)
This FRFA incorporates the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), a
summary of the significant issues raised
by the public comments in response to
the IRFA, NMFS’ responses to those
comments, and a summary of the
analyses completed to support this
action.
Section 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that,
when an agency promulgates a final rule
under section 553 of Title 5 of the U.S.
Code, after being required by that
section or any other law to publish a
general notice of proposed rulemaking,
the agency shall prepare a FRFA.
Section 604 describes the required
contents of a FRFA: (1) a statement of
the need for and objectives of the rule;
(2) a statement of the significant issues
raised by the public comments in
response to the IRFA, a statement of the
assessment of the agency of such issues,
and a statement of any changes made to
the proposed rule as a result of such
comments; (3) the response of the
agency to any comments filed by the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA) in
response to the proposed rule, and a
detailed statement of any change made
to the proposed rule in the final rule as
a result of the comments; (4) a
description of and an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the
rule will apply or an explanation of why
no such estimate is available; (5) a
description of the projected reporting,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements of the rule, including an
estimate of the classes of small entities
that will be subject to the requirement
and the type of professional skills
necessary for preparation of the report
or record; and (6) a description of the
steps the agency has taken to minimize
the significant economic impact on
small entities consistent with the stated
objectives of applicable statutes
including a statement of the factual,
policy, and legal reasons for selecting
the alternative adopted in this final rule
and why each one of the other
significant alternatives to the rule
considered by the agency which affect
the impact on small entities was
rejected.
A description of this final rule and the
need for and objectives of this rule are
contained in the preamble to this final
rule and the preamble to the proposed
rule (88 FR 8592, February 9, 2023) and
are not repeated here.
Public and Chief Counsel for Advocacy
Comments on the IRFA
An IRFA was prepared in the
Classification section of the preamble to
the proposed rule. The Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the SBA did not file any
comments on the proposed rule. NMFS
received no comments specifically on
the IRFA.
Number and Description of Small
Entities Regulated by This Final Rule
This final rule directly regulates
owners and operators of harvesters and
processors that participate in the BSAI
trawl CV Pacific cod fishery including
(1) trawl CVs, (2) shoreside processors,
(3) floating processors, (4) trawl CPs
acting as motherships, and (5) small
government jurisdictions in the AI. This
rule may also impact observer providers
that support the BSAI trawl CV Pacific
cod fishery, but they are indirectly
impacted. Therefore, observer providers
are not considered directly regulated
entities in the IRFA prepared for this
action.
A small business includes any firm
that is independently owned and
operated and not dominant in its field
of operation. Businesses classified as
primarily engaged in commercial fishing
are considered small entities if they
have less than 11 million dollars in
annual gross receipts for all businesses
in the commercial fishing industry
(NAICS 11411). The RFA requires
consideration of affiliations between
entities for the purpose of assessing
whether an entity is classified as small.
The AFA pollock cooperatives, which
make up a subset of the entities
regulated under this final rule, are types
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53727
of affiliation between entities. All of the
AFA cooperatives have gross annual
revenues that are substantially greater
than 11 million dollars. Therefore,
NMFS considers members in these
cooperatives to be ‘‘affiliated’’ large
(non-small) entities for RFA purposes.
The eligible AFA entities are large
entities based on those affiliations. The
remaining 13 trawl CVs would be
considered small entities. This count
includes five trawl CVs that are greater
than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA and eight CVs
that are less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA
with a transferable AI endorsement.
Though CPs engage in both fish
harvesting and fish processing activities,
since at least 1993, NMFS Alaska
Region has considered CPs to be
predominantly engaged in fish
harvesting rather than fish processing.
Under this classification, the threshold
of 11 million dollars in annual gross
receipts is the appropriate threshold to
apply to identify any CPs that are small
entities. All the CPs that are directed
regulated by this action do not meet the
SBA definition of a small entity due to
cooperative affiliation.
Under the SBA’s size standard for
‘‘seafood product preparation and
packaging’’ (NAICS code 311710),
seafood processors are considered small
entities if they are independently owned
and operated, not dominant in their
field of operation, and have a combined
annual employment of fewer than 750
employees. Of the plants that took
deliveries of Pacific cod from 2017
through 2019 that are currently in
business, one firm would be considered
a small entity.
The RFA defines ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction’’ as the government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000 people. Two small
governmental jurisdictions are directly
regulated under the action. Adak and
Atka would be required to submit a
notice of their intent to process to
NMFS to receive a portion of the AI CQ
set-aside described in Section V of this
preamble. The set-aside amount is
intended to benefit the AI communities,
and participation by these communities
is voluntary.
Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Other
Compliance Requirements
This action implements new
recordkeeping, reporting, and
compliance requirements and revises
existing requirements. These
requirements are necessary for the
management and monitoring of the
PCTC Program.
All PCTC program participants are
required to provide additional
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
53728
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
information to NMFS for management
purposes. Each harvester is required to
track harvests to avoid exceeding their
allocation. As in other North Pacific
rationalized fisheries, processors
provide catch recording data to
managers to monitor harvest of
allocations. Processors are required to
record deliveries and processing
activities to aid in the Program
administration.
To participate in the Program, persons
are required to complete application
forms, transfer forms, reporting
requirements, and monitoring
requirements. These requirements
impose costs on small entities in
gathering the required information and
completing the information collections.
NMFS has estimated the costs of
complying with the requirements based
on information such as the burden
hours per response, number of
responses per year, and wage rate
estimates from industry or the Bureau of
Labor Statistics. Persons are required to
complete many of the requirements at
the start of the Program, such as the
application to participate in the
Program. Persons are required to
complete some requirements every year,
such as the cooperative application.
Additionally, reporting for purposes of
catch accounting or transfer of CQ
among cooperatives is completed more
frequently. The impacts of these
changes are described in more detail in
Sections 2.10.7 and 2.10.12 of the
Analysis prepared for this final rule (see
ADDRESSES).
New requirements for the PCTC
Program include the Application for
PCTC Program QS, applications for
transfer of QS during the 90-day transfer
window, the Application for PCTC
Program CQ, the Application for
Transfer of PCTC Program QS for
Processors, the AI notice of intent to
process, inter-cooperative transfers, the
appeals process, and cost recovery fee.
The initial allocation process requires
all eligible harvesters and processors
who want to participate in the PCTC
Program to submit an Application for
PCTC Program QS to receive QS. This
application is needed to determine the
allocation of QS to eligible LLP licenses
and to eligible processors. For
harvesters, NMFS will use the Catch
Accounting System data to determine
how much Pacific cod was harvested
using the LLP license authorizing a CV
and ask the current LLP license holder
to verify the catch estimate. For
processors NMFS will use the Catch
Accounting System data to determine
the amount of qualifying Pacific cod
delivered to the processor, and the
processors will verify the estimates.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
That information will also be used to
determine whether the QS holder
complies with the ownership and use
cap limitations imposed under the
program. Allowing persons to harvest a
given percentage of the fishery is
anticipated to allow harvesters to avoid
fishing in bad weather conditions,
improving safety of the fleet. The fleet
is also expected to be able to deliver a
consistently higher quality product.
Quality improvements are expected to
result from shorter times between
harvest and processing and less damage
to the fish in the holds by not fishing
in bad weather.
In addition, the initial allocation
process has a 90-day transfer window to
allow persons to transfer QS between
non-exempt AFA LLP licenses under
certain conditions to honor private
contracts and agreements associated
with harvest of the AFA Pacific cod
sideboard limits. This transfer window
allows persons to resolve any disputes
or request QS transfers between LLP
licenses. After the 90-day window for
these transfers has closed, QS cannot be
separated from an LLP license or
transferable AI endorsement unless
necessary to prevent exceedances of the
ownership or use caps, or if required by
an operation of law.
The PCTC Program includes a
standardized appeals process. The
appeals process provides participants
the required opportunity to dispute the
catch and processing history records in
the Catch Accounting System that are
used to determine a person’s allocation
of QS. The appeals process is in
addition to the 90-day transfer window
discussed above and open to all
participants.
Each year the cooperative manager for
each cooperative will be required to
submit an Application for PCTC
Program CQ that identifies the LLP
licenses and processor QS permits
named to the cooperative and the
vessels allowed to harvest the CQ. This
application includes the intercooperative agreement that defines how
the AI CQ set-aside will be harvested
during years it is in effect. The Council
requests that cooperatives submit an
annual cooperative report to the
Council.
The Application of Transfer of PCTC
Program QS for Processors will be
required for eligible processors to
transfer their QS to other processors.
Processor QS assigned to a processorheld PCTC Program QS permit
established under the PCTC program
may be transferred through the NMFS
online system with approval by NMFS.
The PCTC program requires the
cooperatives to set aside 12 percent of
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
their A season CQ allocation for
delivery to Aleutian Islands shoreplants
in years that a representative from the
City of Adak or the City of Atka files a
valid intent to process with NMFS. The
notice of intent to process is necessary
for NMFS and the cooperatives to know
whether the regulations established for
the set-aside are in effect during the A
and B seasons. If a notice of intent to
process is filed, it also triggers
additional reporting in the cooperative
report to the Council.
The PCTC Program is a LAPP, and
therefore NMFS is required to collect
fees for the PCTC Program under
sections 303A and 304(d)(2) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. Section
304(d)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
limits the cost recovery fee so that it
may not exceed 3 percent of the exvessel value of the Pacific cod harvested
under the PCTC Program. Ex-vessel
volume and value reports currently
being used to establish an average
annual price for BSAI trawl caught
Pacific cod will be used to establish the
standard price, and no additional
collection of price data will be
necessary. NMFS uses this information
to meet the required provisions in
sections 303A and 304(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act that require
NMFS to collect these fees associated
with recoverable costs.
In addition to the new requirements,
the PCTC Program revises existing
requirements.
If LLP license holders want to transfer
their LLP license or transferable AI
endorsement and the associated PCTC
Program QS, they must fill out an
Application to Transfer a Groundfish or
Crab LLP License. This form is revised
to collect information on the PCTC QS
transaction, including QS prices,
amount transferred, and whether there
are multiple transferees in the event
ownership caps would otherwise be
exceeded. Information is added to the
LLP license transfer form identifying
how PCTC QS would be distributed to
the other LLP licenses if the original
holder of the LLP license was assigned
QS that was over the 5 percent
ownership cap and qualified for the
legacy exemption.
The PCTC Program requires updating
ATLAS data transmission to enable the
timely electronic entry, archival, and
transmission of observer data for at-sea
operations and shorebased processing
plants.
This rule requires that all vessels
submit logbooks when fishing in the
PCTC program. All CVs greater than or
equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA currently
submit logbooks. Some CVs that
participate in the AI Pacific cod fishery
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
are less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA and
may already file logbooks when fishing
for Pacific cod. Many already complete
logbooks based on their participation in
other programs. However, a small
number of CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m)
LOA that do not currently submit a
logbook will need to begin submitting a
logbook if they choose to participate in
the PCTC Program.
Description of Significant Alternatives
That Minimize Adverse Impacts on
Small Entities
The Council and NMFS considered an
extensive and elaborate suite of
alternatives, options, and sub-options as
it designed and evaluated a quota share
program for the BSAI Pacific cod trawl
CV sector, including a ‘‘no action’’
alternative. The Analysis presents the
complete set of alternatives, in various
combinations with the complex suite of
elements and options. The Council
selected a preferred alternative that
includes a suite of elements and options
to manage the BSAI trawl CV Pacific
cod sector. The alternatives included no
action (Alternative 1) and action to
implement a cooperative-style LAPP for
the BSAI Pacific cod trawl CV sector
(Alternatives 2a and 2b and Alternative
3, which is the Council’s recommended
action).
In general, the recommended LAPP
includes allocations of QS to groundfish
LLP licenses based on the legal landings
of targeted BSAI Pacific cod in a Federal
fishery during a range of qualifying
years included in the options. The
action also allocates QS to a processors
based on processing history of legal
landings of BSAI Pacific cod harvested
in a Federal fishery and deducted from
the BSAI trawl CV sector apportionment
during the qualifying years. One
alternative considered but not selected
included gear conversion, which would
have authorized BSAI Pacific cod quota
associated with trawl CV LLP licenses to
be fished annually by CVs using pot
gear. In the end, the Council did not
include the gear conversion element in
its preferred alternative due to concerns
over the possibility of high crab PSC in
pot gear for red king crab (Zone 1) and
C. opilio.
A second option considered but
removed was a cooperative formation
approach based on existing AFA and
non-AFA membership. The AFA vessels
and non-AFA vessels would have
formed their cooperatives
independently of each other. A person
owning both an AFA vessel and nonAFA vessel would have been required to
join the AFA cooperative for the AFA
vessel and the non-AFA cooperative for
the non-AFA vessel. Allowing only an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
AFA and non-AFA cooperative was
rejected by the Council after considering
the obstacles it would create under the
various program elements being
considered by the Council and
withdrawal of industry support for the
option. Integrating multiple processors,
the potential limitation on competition,
and reduced cooperative formation
choice were ultimately the issues
associated with the two cooperative
approach that led to it being removed
from consideration. The recommended
action allows a cooperative to associate
with one or more processor(s). This
approach reduces antitrust concerns
that were raised to the Council under
the AFA and non-AFA cooperative
structure.
The alternatives discussed in this
section constitute the suite of
‘‘significant alternatives,’’ under this
action, for purposes of the RFA. Based
upon the best available scientific data,
and consideration of the objectives of
this action, NMFS did not identify
alternatives to the action that have the
potential to accomplish the stated
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and any other applicable statutes and
that have the potential to minimize any
significant adverse economic impact of
the rule on small entities. After public
process, the Council concluded that the
PCTC Program would best accomplish
the stated objectives articulated in the
problem statement and applicable
statutes, and minimize to the extent
practicable adverse economic impacts
on the universe of directly regulated
small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection of
information requirements subject to
review and approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This
final rule contains new collections of
information for the PCTC Program
under new OMB Control Number 0648–
0811 and revises requirements for
collections of information under
existing OMB Control Numbers 0648–
0213 (Alaska Region Logbook and
Activity Family of Forms); –0318 (North
Pacific Observer Program); –0334
(Alaska License Limitation Program for
Groundfish, Crab, and Scallops); –0711
(Alaska Cost Recovery and Fee
Programs); –0678 (North Pacific Fishery
Management Council Cooperative
Annual Reports); and –0515 (Alaska
Interagency Electronic Reporting
System). However, because the
collection of information authorized by
OMB Control Number 0648–0515 is
concurrently being revised in a separate
action, the revisions to that collection of
information in this rule will be assigned
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53729
a temporary control number, 0648–
0812, that will later be merged into
0648–0515. The existing collections of
information under OMB Control
Numbers 0648–0330 (NMFS Alaska
Region Scale & Catch Weighing
Requirements) and 0648–0445 (NMFS
Alaska Region Vessel Monitoring
System (VMS) Program) will also
provide information needed to
implement the PCTC Program and will
continue to apply. This rule does not
make changes to these two collections of
information. The public reporting
burden estimates provided below for
these collections of information include
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
OMB Control Number 0648–0811
This rule creates new collection of
information requirements to implement
PCTC Program. The new collections of
information authorize applications and
processes used by the PCTC Program
cooperatives, processors, LLP license
holders, and community representatives
to apply for permits, to transfer CQ and
QS, to manage fishing and processor
activity, and to appeal agency decisions.
These new collections are necessary for
NMFS to implement, monitor, and
enforce the PCTC Program. The data is
used to ensure that program participants
adhere to all harvesting, processing,
ownership, and use limits.
The public reporting burden per
individual response is estimated to
average 2 hours for the Application for
Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program
Quota Share, 2 hours for the
Application for Pacific Cod Trawl
Cooperative Program Cooperative
Quota, 2 hours for the Application for
Transfer of Pacific Cod Trawl
Cooperative Program Quota Share for
Processors, 10 minutes for the
Application for Inter-Cooperative
Transfer of Cooperative Quota, 30
minutes for the notification of intent to
process Aleutian Islands Pacific cod, 2
hours for the application to transfer QS
during the 90-day transfer window for
non-exempt AFA LLP license holders,
and 4 hours for appeals.
OMB Control Number 0648–0213
This rule revises the existing
requirements for the collection of
information 0648–0213 related to
logbooks because CVs participating in
the PCTC Program are required to
submit a CV trawl gear daily fishing
logbook. Some CVs less than 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA that do not currently submit
this logbook will need to begin doing so
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53730
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
to participate in the PCTC Program. The
revision to this collection of information
adds as new respondents the CVs less
than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA that will need
to start using the CV trawl gear daily
fishing logbook. CVs participating in the
PCTC Program have the option of using
either the paper logbook approved
under this collection or the electronic
option, which is approved under OMB
Control Number 0648–0515. The PCTC
Program does not change the
information collected by this logbook.
This rule requires CPs and shoreside
processors authorized as processors in
the PCTC Program to submit a product
transfer report. However, no changes are
needed to the respondents or responses
for this report because all expected
respondents are currently submitting it.
The public reporting burden per
individual response is estimated to
average 18 minutes for the Catcher
Vessel Trawl Daily Fishing Log and 20
minutes for the Product Transfer Report.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
OMB Control Number 0648–0318
This rule revises the existing
requirements for the collection of
information 0648–0318 related to the
North Pacific Observer Program because
all vessels participating in the PCTC
program are required to have a
computer onboard and use ATLAS to
submit observer data to NMFS. This
increases the number of vessels that
need to provide observers access to a
computer with ATLAS installed. PCTC
Program participants have up to three
years to install communication
equipment to facilitate electronic
transmission of observer data to NMFS.
Most vessels comply with this
requirement by allowing NMFS to
install ATLAS on an existing computer
on the vessel. Many, if not all, of the
vessels that will need to install ATLAS
already have a computer that meets the
minimum requirements, and they will
incur costs only if they choose to
purchase an additional computer.
Estimated costs to purchase and install
the data transmission system vary from
about $5,000 to $37,000, depending on
what a vessel needs to install. This rule
also revises the existing requirements in
this collection because CVs that choose
to participate in the PCTC Program are
required to be in the full observer
coverage category instead of the partial
observer coverage category. These CVs
will no longer be required to use ODDS
to log fishing trips; therefore, this
decreases the number of respondents
that log trips in ODDS. The public
reporting burden per individual
response is estimated to average 15
minutes to log a trip in ODDS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
OMB Control Number 0648–0334
This rule revises the existing
requirements for the collection of
information 0648–0334 related to the
LLP license and the transferable AI
endorsement to include PCTC Program
QS information on the groundfish/crab
LLP license transfer application form.
The public reporting burden per
individual response is estimated to
average 1 hour for the Application for
Transfer LLP Groundfish/Crab License.
OMB Control Number 0648–0812
This rule revises the collection of
information under OMB Control
Number 0648–0515 associated with
electronic reporting. However, due to
multiple concurrent actions for that
collection, the collection-of-information
requirements will be assigned a
temporary control number, 0648–0812,
that will later be merged into OMB
Control Number 0648–0515.
PCTC Program participants need to
use eLandings to submit landings and
production information, which is
approved under control number OMB
0648–0515. CVs participating in the
PCTC Program are required to submit a
CV trawl gear daily fishing logbook and
may use either the electronic logbook
approved under OMB Control Number
0648–0515 or the paper logbook
approved under OMB Control Number
0648–0213. CVs greater than 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA are already required to
maintain logbooks but this is a new
requirement for CVs less than 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA. Some CVs less than 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA that do not currently submit the
logbook will need to begin doing so. The
temporary control number covers the
revisions necessary to –0515 for the CVs
that choose to submit electronic
logbooks. The PCTC Program does not
change the information collected by this
logbook but does increase the number of
participants required to submit it. The
public reporting burden per individual
response is estimated to average 15
minutes for the CV electronic logbook.
A change from the proposed rule to
the final rule adds a new reporting
requirement for the mothership daily
cumulative production logbook, which
is approved under OMB Control
Number 0648–0515. This revision to
–0515 for the mothership logbook is
included in this temporary control
number. No changes are needed to the
respondents or responses for the
mothership logbook because all
expected respondents are currently
submitting it. No change was made to
the public reporting burden because the
estimate allows for differences in the
time needed to complete and submit the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
information. The public reporting
burden per individual response is
estimated to average 15 minutes for the
mothership logbook.
OMB Control Number 0648–0678
This rule revises the existing
collection of information under 0648–
0678 because the Council requests PCTC
Program cooperatives submit a
voluntary annual cooperative report to
the Council. This revision adds the
PCTC Program cooperatives as new
respondents that will submit an annual
cooperative report. The public reporting
burden per individual response is
estimated to average 18 hours for the
PCTC Program annual report.
OMB Control Number 0648–0711
This rule revises the existing
requirements for the collection of
information 0648–0711 related to cost
recovery because the PCTC Program is
a LAPP that is subject to a cost recovery
fee under Magnuson-Stevens Act 303A.
This revision adds the PCTC Program
cooperatives as new respondents that
will submit a cost recovery fee to NMFS.
The rule requires PCTC Program
processors to submit an annual Pacific
Cod Ex-vessel Volume and Value
Report; however, this does not change
the respondents or responses for this
report because all expected respondents
are currently submitting it. The public
reporting burden per individual
response is estimated to average 1
minute for the PCTC cost recovery fee
and 1 minute for the Pacific Cod Exvessel Volume and Value Report.
Public Comments
We invite the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on
proposed and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. Written comments
and recommendations for these
information collections should be
submitted on the following website:
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find the particular information
collection by using the search function
and entering either the title of the
collection or the OMB Control Number.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53731
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects
Title 15—Commerce and Foreign Trade
15 CFR Part 902
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 902—NOAA INFORMATION
COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT:
OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
1. The authority citation for part 902
continues to read as follows:
■
Dated: July 28, 2023.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
2. Amend § 902.1, in the table in
paragraph (b), under ‘‘50 CFR’’, by:
■ a. Revising the entry for ‘‘679.4’’;
■ b. Adding in numerical order an entry
for ‘‘679.5(x)’’;
■ c. Revising the entry for ‘‘679.7’’;
■
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS amends 15 CFR part
902 and 50 CFR part 679 as follows:
CFR part or section where the information
collection requirement is located
§ 902.1 OMB control numbers assigned
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
*
*
*
(b) * * *
*
*
Current OMB control number
(all numbers begin with 0648–)
*
*
50 CFR ................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
679.4 ...................................................................
*
*
*
*
–0206, –0272, –0334, –0393, –0513, –0545, –0565, –0665, and –0811.
*
*
*
679.5(x) ...............................................................
*
–0811.
*
*
*
679.7 ...................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
–0206, –0269, –0272, –0316, –0318, –0330, –0334, –0393, –0445, –0513, –0514, –0545,
–0565, and –0811.
*
*
679.7(m) ..............................................................
*
–0811
*
*
679.51 .................................................................
*
*
*
*
–0206, –0269, –0272, –0318, –0401, –0513, –0545, –0565, and –0811.
*
*
–0811.
–0811.
–0811.
–0811.
–0811.
679.130
679.131
679.132
679.134
679.135
*
*
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
...............................................................
*
*
3. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., 1801 et
seq., 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
4. Amend § 679.2 by:
a. Removing the definition of
‘‘Affiliation for the purpose of defining
AFA and the Rockfish Program’’;
■ b. Adding in alphabetical order a
definition for ‘‘Affiliation for the
purpose of defining AFA, Rockfish
Program, and PCTC Program’’;
■ c. Republishing the definition of
‘‘Aleutian Islands shoreplant’’;
■
■
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
Affiliation for the purpose of defining
AFA, Rockfish Program, and PCTC
Frm 00029
*
*
*
PO 00000
*
*
d. Revising the definitions of
‘‘Cooperative quota (CQ)’’ and ‘‘CQ
permit’’; and
■ e. Adding in alphabetical order
definitions for ‘‘NMFS Alaska Region
website,’’ ‘‘Pacific Cod Trawl
Cooperative (PCTC) Program,’’ ‘‘PCTC
Program cooperative,’’ ‘‘PCTC Program
harvester QS pool,’’ ‘‘PCTC Program
official record,’’ ‘‘PCTC Program
participants,’’ ‘‘PCTC Program processor
QS pool’’, ‘‘PCTC Program QS unit,’’
and ‘‘PCTC Program quota share (QS)’’.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 679.2
*
*
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
d. Adding in numerical order an entry
for ‘‘679.7(m)’’;
■ e. Revising the entry for ‘‘679.51’’; and
■ f. Adding in numerical order entries
for ‘‘679.130’’ through ‘‘679.132’’,
‘‘679.134’’, and ‘‘679.135’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Program means a relationship between
two or more individuals, corporations,
or other business concerns, except CDQ
groups, in which one concern directly
or indirectly owns a 10 percent or
greater interest in another, exerts control
over another, or has the power to exert
control over another; or a third
individual, corporation, or other
business concern directly or indirectly
owns a 10 percent or greater interest in
both, exerts control over both, or has the
power to exert control over both.
(1) What is 10 percent or greater
ownership? For the purpose of
determining affiliation, 10 percent or
greater ownership is deemed to exist if
an individual, corporation, or other
business concern directly or indirectly
owns 10 percent or greater interest in a
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
53732
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
second corporation or other business
concern.
(2) What is an indirect interest? An
indirect interest is one that passes
through one or more intermediate
entities. An entity’s percentage of
indirect interest in a second entity is
equal to the entity’s percentage of direct
interest in an intermediate entity
multiplied by the intermediate entity’s
direct or indirect interest in the second
entity.
(3) What is control? For the purpose
of determining affiliation, control is
deemed to exist if an individual,
corporation, or other business concern
has any of the following relationships or
forms of control over another
individual, corporation, or other
business concern:
(i) Controls 10 percent or more of the
voting stock of another corporation or
business concern;
(ii) Has the authority to direct the
business of the entity that owns the
fishing vessel or processor. The
authority to direct the business of the
entity does not include the right to
simply participate in the direction of the
business activities of an entity that owns
a fishing vessel or processor;
(iii) Has the authority in the ordinary
course of business to limit the actions of
or to replace the chief executive officer,
a majority of the board of directors, any
general partner or any person serving in
a management capacity of an entity that
holds 10 percent or greater interest in a
fishing vessel or processor. Standard
rights of minority shareholders to
restrict the actions of the entity are not
included in this definition of control
provided they are unrelated to day-today business activities. These rights
include provisions to require the
consent of the minority shareholder to
sell all or substantially all the assets, to
enter into a different business, to
contract with the major investors or
their affiliates, or to guarantee the
obligations of majority investors or their
affiliates;
(iv) Has the authority to direct the
transfer, operation, or manning of a
fishing vessel or processor. The
authority to direct the transfer,
operation, or manning of a vessel or
processor does not include the right to
simply participate in such activities;
(v) Has the authority to control the
management of or to be a controlling
factor in the entity that holds 10 percent
or greater interest in a fishing vessel or
processor;
(vi) Absorbs all the costs and normal
business risks associated with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
ownership and operation of a fishing
vessel or processor;
(vii) Has the responsibility to procure
insurance on the fishing vessel or
processor, or assumes any liability in
excess of insurance coverage;
(viii) Has the authority to control a
fishery cooperative through 10 percent
or greater ownership or control over a
majority of the vessels in the
cooperative, has the authority to
appoint, remove, or limit the actions of
or replace the chief executive officer of
the cooperative, or has the authority to
appoint, remove, or limit the actions of
a majority of the board of directors of
the cooperative. In such instance, all
members of the cooperative are
considered affiliates of the individual,
corporation, or other business concern
that exerts control over the cooperative;
or
(ix) Has the ability through any other
means whatsoever to control the entity
that holds 10 percent or greater interest
in a fishing vessel or processor.
*
*
*
*
*
Aleutian Islands shoreplant means a
processing facility that is physically
located on land west of 170° W.
longitude within the State of Alaska.
*
*
*
*
*
Cooperative quota (CQ)—(1) For
purposes of the Amendment 80 Program
means:
(i) The annual catch limit of an
Amendment 80 species that may be
caught by an Amendment 80
cooperative while fishing under a CQ
permit;
(ii) The amount of annual halibut and
crab PSC that may be used by an
Amendment 80 cooperative while
fishing under a CQ permit.
(2) For purposes of the Rockfish
Program means:
(i) The annual catch limit of a rockfish
primary species or rockfish secondary
species that may be harvested by a
rockfish cooperative while fishing under
a CQ permit;
(ii) The amount of annual halibut PSC
that may be used by a rockfish
cooperative in the Central GOA while
fishing under a CQ permit (see rockfish
halibut PSC in this section).
(3) For purposes of the PCTC Program
means:
(i) The annual catch limit of Pacific
cod that may be caught by a PCTC
Program cooperative while fishing
under a CQ permit;
(ii) The amount of annual halibut and
crab PSC that may be used by a PCTC
Program cooperative while fishing
under a CQ permit.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
CQ permit means a permit issued to
an Amendment 80 cooperative under
§ 679.4(o)(2), a rockfish cooperative
under § 679.4(n)(1), or a PCTC Program
cooperative under § 679.131(a).
*
*
*
*
*
NMFS Alaska Region website means
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/
alaska.
*
*
*
*
*
Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative (PCTC)
Program means the Pacific Cod Trawl
Cooperative Program as implemented
under subpart L of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
PCTC Program cooperative means a
group of eligible Pacific cod harvesters
who have chosen to form a cooperative
and associate with a processor under the
requirements at § 679.131 in order to
combine and harvest fish collectively
under a CQ permit issued by NMFS.
PCTC Program harvester QS pool
means the sum of Pacific cod QS units
assigned to LLP licenses established for
the PCTC Program fishery based on the
PCTC Program official record.
PCTC Program official record means
information used by NMFS necessary to
determine eligibility to participate in
the PCTC Program and assign specific
harvest privileges or limits to PCTC
Program participants based on Pacific
cod legal landings as defined at
§ 679.130.
PCTC Program participants means
those PCTC Program harvesters and
processors who receive, hold, or use
PCTC Program QS.
PCTC Program processor QS pool
means the sum of PCTC Program QS
units assigned to processor permits
issued under the PCTC Program based
on the PCTC Program official record.
PCTC Program QS unit means a single
share of the PCTC Program QS pool
based on Pacific cod legal landings.
PCTC Program quota share (QS)
means QS units issued by NMFS
expressed in metric tons, derived from
the Pacific cod legal landings assigned
to an LLP license or PCTC Program QS
permit held by a processor and used as
the basis for the issuance of annual CQ.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend § 679.4 by adding
paragraphs (a)(1)(xvi), (k)(16), and (q) to
read as follows:
■
§ 679.4
Permits.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53733
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Permit is in effect from issue date through the end
of:
If program permit or card type is:
*
*
*
*
*
(xvi) PCTC Program:
(A) PCTC Program QS permit (for processors) 10 Years ..................................................................
(B) PCTC Program CQ permit .......................... Until expiration date shown on permit ....................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(16) PCTC Program. In addition to
other requirements of this part, an LLP
license holder must have PCTC Program
QS assigned to their groundfish LLP
license to join a PCTC Program
cooperative to harvest Pacific cod.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) PCTC Program permits—(1) PCTC
Program cooperative quota permits. (i)
A CQ permit is issued annually to a
PCTC Program cooperative that submits
a complete and timely application for
CQ as described at § 679.131 that is
approved by the Regional
Administrator. A CQ permit authorizes
a PCTC Program cooperative to
participate in the PCTC Program. The
CQ permit will indicate the amount of
Pacific cod that may be harvested by the
PCTC Program cooperative, and the
amount of halibut PSC and crab PSC
that may be used by the PCTC Program
cooperative. The CQ permit will list the
members of the PCTC Program
cooperative, the trawl catcher vessels
that are authorized to fish under the CQ
permit for that cooperative, and the
PCTC Program processor(s) with whom
that cooperative is associated.
(ii) A CQ permit is valid only until the
end of the BSAI Pacific cod B season for
the year in which the CQ permit is
issued;
(iii) A legible copy of a valid CQ
permit must be carried on board the
vessel(s) used by the PCTC Program
cooperative.
(2) PCTC Program quota share
permits for processors. (i) NMFS will
issue PCTC Program QS permits to
eligible processors if the owner(s)
submits to the Regional Administrator a
completed application for PCTC
Program QS as described at § 679.130
that is subsequently approved.
(ii) A processor may associate the QS
assigned to the PCTC Program QS
permit with a PCTC Program
cooperative as described at § 679.131.
■ 6. Amend § 679.5 by:
■ a. Adding paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(G);
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(4)(i)
■ c. Adding paragraph (c)(6)(v)(J)(1) and
reserved paragraph (c)(6)(v)(J)(2); and
■ d. Adding paragraph (x).
The additions and revision read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
§ 679.5
(R&R).
Recordkeeping and reporting
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
If harvest made
under . . .
program
Record the . . .
For more information, see
. . .
*
*
*
*
*
(G) PCTC Program Cooperative
number subpart L to this part.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) Catcher vessels less than 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA. Except for vessels using pot
gear as described in paragraph
(c)(3)(i)(B)(1) of this section or vessels
participating in the PCTC Program as
described in paragraph (x) of this
section, the owner and operator of a
catcher vessel less than 60 ft (18.3 m)
LOA are not required to comply with
the R&R requirements of this section,
but must comply with the vessel activity
report described at paragraph (k) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(v) * * *
(J) * * *
(1) For the PCTC Program, enter the
observer’s haul number for each catcher
vessel delivery of an unsorted codend
by 2400 hours, A.l.t., each day to record
the previous day’s delivery information.
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(x) PCTC Program. The owners and
operators of catcher vessels and
processors authorized as participants in
the PCTC Program must comply with
the applicable R&R requirements of this
section and must assign all catch to a
PCTC Program cooperative at the time of
catch or receipt of groundfish. Owners
of catcher vessels and processors
authorized as participants in the PCTC
Program must ensure that their
designated representatives or employees
comply with applicable R&R
requirements as described at § 679.134.
■ 7. Amend § 679.7 b adding paragraph
(m) to read as follows:
§ 679.7
*
PO 00000
*
Prohibitions.
*
Frm 00031
*
Fmt 4701
*
Sfmt 4700
For more information, see . . .
*
*
Paragraph (q) of this section.
Paragraph (q) of this section.
(m) PCTC Program—(1) General. (i)
Name an LLP license in more than one
Application for PCTC Program CQ in a
fishing year.
(ii) Use a vessel to catch or receive a
PCTC Program cooperative’s Pacific cod
when that vessel was not listed on the
Application for PCTC Program CQ.
(iii) Fail to comply with any other
requirement or restriction specified in
this part or violate any provision of this
part.
(2) Vessel owners and operators
participating in the PCTC Program. (i)
Fail to follow the catch monitoring
requirements detailed at § 679.134.
(ii) Operate a vessel that is subject to
a sideboard limit detailed at § 679.133,
as applicable, and fail to follow the
catch monitoring requirements detailed
at § 679.134.
(iii) Exceed the ownership or use caps
specified at § 679.133.
(3) VMS. (i) Operate a vessel in a
PCTC Program cooperative and fail to
use functioning VMS equipment as
described at § 679.134.
(ii) Operate a vessel that is subject to
a sideboard limit detailed at § 679.133
and fail to use functioning VMS
equipment as described at § 679.134.
(4) PCTC Program processors. (i) Take
deliveries of, or process, PCTC Program
Pacific cod harvested by a catcher vessel
fishing under the authority of a CQ
permit unless the processor has an FPP
or FFP and LLP license with a BSAI
Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement.
(ii) For the manager of a shoreside
processor or stationary floating
processor to process any groundfish
delivered by a catcher vessel fishing
under the authority of a CQ permit not
weighed on a scale approved by the
State of Alaska.
(iii) Fail to submit a timely and
complete Pacific cod Ex-vessel Volume
and Value Report as required under
§ 679.5(u)(1).
(iv) Use a catcher/processor
designated on an LLP license with a
BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement to sort, process, or discard
any species, except halibut sorted on
deck by vessels participating in halibut
deck sorting described at § 679.120,
before the total catch is weighed on a
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53734
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
scale that meets the requirements of
§ 679.28(b).
(v) Use a catcher/processor designated
on an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific
cod trawl mothership endorsement to
process Pacific cod in excess of the atsea processing sideboard limit defined
at § 679.133(b)(2) and assigned to the
LLP license.
(vi) Process an amount of Pacific cod
that exceeds use caps specified at
§ 679.133.
(5) PCTC Program cooperatives. (i)
Harvest PCTC Program Pacific cod, use
halibut PSC, or use crab PSC assigned
to a PCTC Program cooperative in the
BSAI without having on board a legible
copy of valid CQ permit.
(ii) Begin a fishing trip for PCTC
Program Pacific cod with any vessel
named in a PCTC Program cooperative
if the total amount of unharvested PCTC
Program Pacific cod on a CQ permit
currently held by that cooperative is
zero or less.
(iii) Have a negative balance in a CQ
account after the end of the calendar
year for which a CQ permit was issued.
(iv) Fail to submit a PCTC Program
cost recovery fee payment as required
under § 679.135.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 679.20 by revising
paragraph (a)(7)(viii) and adding
paragraph (e)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
§ 679.20
General limitations.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(7) * * *
(viii) Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside
provisions. During the annual harvest
specifications process, the Regional
Administrator will establish the PCTC
Program Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside
through the process set forth at
§ 679.132.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) For a catcher/processor with a
BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement that receives an unsorted
codend delivered by a catcher vessel
authorized to harvest and that is
assigned to PCTC Program Pacific cod,
the maximum retainable amount for
each species or species group applies at
any time for the duration of the fishing
trip and must be applied to only the
PCTC Program hauls during a fishing
trip.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 679.21 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(B) introductory
text, (b)(1)(ii)(B)(5), (b)(2)(iii)(A) and (B),
(b)(4)(i)(B), (e)(3)(iv) introductory text,
and (e)(3)(iv)(E) and adding paragraph
(e)(7)(v) to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
§ 679.21 Prohibited species bycatch
management.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Trawl fishery categories. For
purposes of apportioning the trawl PSC
limit set forth under paragraph
(b)(1)(ii)(A)(1) of this section among
trawl fisheries, the following fishery
categories are specified and defined in
terms of round-weight equivalents of
those groundfish species or species
groups for which a TAC has been
specified under § 679.20.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Pacific cod fishery. Fishing with
trawl gear during any weekly reporting
period that results in a retained
aggregate amount of Pacific cod that is
greater than the retained amount of any
other groundfish fishery category
defined under this paragraph
(b)(1)(ii)(B). This Pacific cod fishery is
further apportioned between the PCTC
Program, the trawl catcher vessel
limited access C season, and AFA
catcher/processors as established at
§ 679.131(c) and (d).
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Unused seasonal apportionments.
Unused seasonal apportionments of
trawl fishery PSC allowances made
under this paragraph (b)(2) will be
added to the respective fishery PSC
allowance for the next season during a
current fishing year except for the
Pacific cod fishery apportionment to the
PCTC Program, which follows the
regulations at § 679.131(c) and (d).
(B) Seasonal apportionment
exceeded. If a seasonal apportionment
of a trawl fishery PSC allowance made
under this paragraph (b)(2) is exceeded,
the amount by which the seasonal
apportionment is exceeded will be
deducted from the respective
apportionment for the next season
during a current fishing year except for
the Pacific cod fishery apportionment to
the PCTC Program, which follows the
regulations at § 679.131(c) and (d).
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Closures. Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(4)(i)(A) of this section, if,
during the fishing year, the Regional
Administrator determines that U.S.
fishing vessels participating in any of
the trawl fishery categories listed in
paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(B)(2) through (6) of
this section will catch the halibut PSC
allowance, or seasonal apportionment
thereof, specified for that fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
category under paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (ii)
of this section, NMFS will publish in
the Federal Register a document to
close the entire BSAI to directed fishing
for each species and/or species group in
that fishery category for the remainder
of the year or for the remainder of the
season. This does not apply to
allocations to the PCTC Program
specified at § 679.133(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Trawl fishery categories. For
purposes of apportioning trawl PSC
limits for crab and herring among
fisheries, other than crab PSC CQ
assigned to an Amendment 80
cooperative, the following fishery
categories are specified and defined in
terms of round-weight equivalents of
those groundfish species or species
groups for which a TAC has been
specified under § 679.20.
*
*
*
*
*
(E) Pacific cod fishery. Fishing with
trawl gear during any weekly reporting
period that results in a retained
aggregate amount of Pacific cod that is
greater than the retained amount of any
other groundfish fishery category
defined under this paragraph (e)(3)(iv).
The Pacific cod fishery is further
apportioned between the PCTC
Program, the trawl catcher vessel
limited access C season, and AFA
catcher/processors as established at
§ 679.131(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(v) This paragraph (e)(7) does not
apply to apportionments to the PCTC
Program as described at § 679.130.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Amend § 679.51 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C)(4);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(C)(5)
and (a)(2)(vi)(G);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (e)(1)(iii)(A)
and (e)(1)(iii)(B) introductory text; and
■ d. Adding paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(D).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 679.51 Observer and Electronic
Monitoring System requirements for
vessels and plants.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(4) Using trawl gear in the BSAI if the
vessel has been placed in the full
observer coverage category under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section; or
(5) Participating in the PCTC Program.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) * * *
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(G) PCTC Program motherships. A
mothership that receives unsorted
codends from catcher vessels harvesting
Pacific cod under the PCTC Program
must have at least two observers aboard
the mothership, at least one of whom
must be endorsed as a lead level 2
observer. More than two observers must
be aboard if the observer workload
restriction would otherwise preclude
sampling as required.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Observer use of equipment. Allow
an observer to use the vessel’s
communications equipment and
personnel, on request, for the
confidential entry, transmission, and
receipt of work-related messages
(including electronic transmission of
data), at no cost to the observer or the
United States.
(B) Equipment, software, and data
transmission requirements. The operator
of a catcher/processor (except for a
catcher/processor placed in the partial
observer coverage category under
paragraph (a)(3) of this section),
mothership, catcher vessel 125 ft (38.1
m) LOA or longer (except for a catcher
vessel fishing for groundfish with pot
gear), or a catcher vessel participating in
the PCTC Program (except for paragraph
(e)(1)(iii)(D) of this section) must
provide the following equipment,
software and data transmission
capabilities:
*
*
*
*
*
(D) PCTC Program. The operator of a
non-AFA catcher vessel participating in
the PCTC Program is not required to
comply with paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(B)(3)
of this section to provide data
transmission capability until September
7, 2026. However, once any non-AFA
catcher vessel in the PCTC Program is
capable of at-sea data transmission, the
operator must comply.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Amend § 679.64 by revising
paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iv), removing
and reserving paragraph (b)(4)(i), and
revising paragraph (b)(4)(ii).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 679.64 Harvesting sideboard limits in
other fisheries.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) BSAI Pacific cod. The AFA
catcher vessel groundfish harvest limit
for BSAI Pacific cod will be equal to the
retained catch of BSAI Pacific cod in
1997 by AFA catcher vessels not
exempted under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
of this section divided by the BSAI
Pacific cod TAC available to catcher
vessels in 1997; multiplied by the BSAI
Pacific cod TAC available to catcher
vessels in the year or season in which
the harvest limit will be in effect. This
limit is in effect only for C season.
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) GOA groundfish. The non-exempt
AFA catcher vessels and the associated
LLP licenses groundfish harvest limit
for each GOA groundfish species or
species group will be equal to the
aggregate retained catch of that
groundfish species or species group
from 2009 through 2019 by AFA catcher
vessels not exempted under paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section; divided by the
sum of the TACs of that species or
species group available to catcher
vessels from 2009 through 2019;
multiplied by the TAC available to
catcher vessels in the year or season in
which the harvest limit will be in effect.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(ii) The non-exempt AFA catcher
vessels and the associated LLP licenses
PSC bycatch limit for halibut in the
GOA will be an annual amount based on
a static ratio of 0.072 derived from the
aggregate retained groundfish catch by
non-exempt AFA CVs in each PSC target
category from 2009 through 2019.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Add subpart L, consisting of
§§ 679.130 through 679.135, to read as
follows:
Subpart L—Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative
Program
Sec.
679.130 Allocation, use, and transfer of
PCTC Program QS permits.
679.131 PCTC Program annual harvester
privileges.
679.132 Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside
provisions in the PCTC Program.
679.133 PCTC Program ownership caps, use
caps, and sideboard limits.
679.134 PCTC Program permits, catch
monitoring, catch accounting, and
recordkeeping and reporting.
679.135 PCTC Program cost recovery.
Subpart L—Pacific Cod Trawl
Cooperative Program
§ 679.130 Allocation, use, and transfer of
PCTC Program QS permits.
(a) Applicable areas and seasons. (1)
The PCTC Program applies to the Pacific
cod trawl catcher vessel sector in the
BSAI as defined at § 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A).
(2) The following fishing seasons
apply to fishing under this subpart
subject to other provisions of this part:
(i) Fishing by vessels participating in
a cooperative is authorized for the PCTC
Program A season from 1200 hours,
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53735
A.l.t., January 20 through 1200 hours,
A.l.t., April 1.
(ii) Fishing by vessels participating in
a cooperative is authorized for the PCTC
Program B season from 1200 hours,
A.l.t., April 1 through 1200 hours, A.l.t.,
June 10.
(iii) The PCTC Program does not
apply to the Pacific cod trawl catcher
vessel C season, as defined at
§ 679.23(e)(5)(ii)(C)(1).
(b) Pacific cod legal landings. Pacific
cod legal landings means the retained
catch of Pacific cod caught using trawl
gear in a management area in the BSAI
by a catcher vessel during the directed
fishing season for Pacific cod that:
(1) Was made in compliance with
State and Federal regulations in effect at
that time; and
(2) Was recorded on a State of Alaska
fish ticket for shoreside deliveries or in
observer data for mothership deliveries;
and
(3) Was the predominately retained
species on the fishing trip; and
(4) Was authorized by:
(i) An LLP license and caught in the
A or B season of a Federal or parallel
groundfish fishery during the qualifying
years 2009 through 2019; or
(ii) An LLP license with a transferable
AI endorsement prior to receiving the AI
endorsement and was caught in a
parallel fishery between January 20,
2004, and September 13, 2009; and
(5) Was not made in a CDQ fishery;
and
(6) Was not made in a State of Alaska
GHL fishery.
(c) Eligible PCTC Program harvesters.
NMFS will assign Pacific cod legal
landings to an LLP license only if the
qualifying Pacific cod legal landings of
BSAI trawl catcher vessel Pacific cod
were made under the authority of a fully
transferable LLP license endorsed for BS
or AI Pacific cod with a trawl gear
designation from 2009 through 2019 or
under the authority of an LLP license
endorsed for Pacific cod with a trawl
gear designation prior to earning a
transferable AI endorsement from 2004
through September 13, 2009;
(d) Assigning trawl catcher vessel
Pacific cod legal landings to an LLP
license. (1) NMFS will assign Pacific
cod legal landings to an LLP license in
the form of PCTC Program QS only if
the holder of the LLP license that
authorized those landings submits a
timely and complete application for
PCTC Program QS under paragraph (h)
of this section that is approved by
NMFS.
(2) NMFS will assign Pacific cod legal
landings to an LLP license that meets
the requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
53736
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(3) NMFS will reissue LLP licenses to
eligible harvesters that specify the
number of PCTC Program QS units
assigned to their LLP licenses.
(e) Eligible PCTC Program processors.
NMFS will assign legal landings to an
eligible PCTC Program processor if the
processor operates under the authority
of either a valid FPP or FFP and holds
an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod
trawl mothership endorsement, and
received deliveries of legal landings of
Pacific cod from the trawl catcher vessel
sector from 2009 through 2019. A
processor is ineligible to receive PCTC
Program QS if it does not hold an active
FFP or FPP as of September 7, 2023.
(f) Assigning Pacific cod processing
history to an eligible processor. (1)
NMFS will assign Pacific cod processing
history to a processor in the form of
PCTC Program QS only if the FFP or
FPP holder submits a timely and
complete application for PCTC Program
QS that is approved by NMFS pursuant
to paragraph (h) of this section.
(2) NMFS will assign Pacific cod
processing history based on legal
landings delivered to a processor
authorized by an FPP or FFP that meets
the requirements of this section.
(3) For the initial allocation of PCTC
Program QS, qualifying processing
history is attached to the processor at
the time legal landings were received.
(4) An eligible processor will be
issued a PCTC Program QS permit that
specifies the number of QS units
assigned to that processor.
(g) PCTC Program official record. (1)
The PCTC Program official record will
contain information used by the
Regional Administrator to determine:
(i) The amount of Pacific cod legal
landings as defined at in this section
assigned to an LLP license;
(ii) The amount of Pacific cod
processing history of legal landings as
defined at § 679.130 assigned to an FPP
or FFP;
(iii) The amount of PCTC Program QS
resulting from Pacific cod legal landings
assigned to an LLP license held by an
eligible harvester, or QS resulting from
Pacific cod processing history assigned
to an FPP or FFP held by an eligible
processor;
(iv) The amount of Pacific cod
sideboard ratios assigned to LLP
licenses;
(v) Eligibility to participate in the
PCTC Program; and
(vi) QS assigned to PCTC Program
participants.
(2) The PCTC Program official record
is presumed to be correct. An applicant
participating in the PCTC Program has
the burden to prove otherwise.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
(3) Only Pacific cod legal landings
and processing history of legal landings,
as described in paragraph (b) of this
section, shall be used to establish an
allocation of PCTC Program QS.
Evidence of legal landings shall be
limited to documentation of state or
Federal catch reports that indicate the
amount of Pacific cod harvested, the
groundfish reporting area in which it
was caught, the vessel and gear type
used to catch it, and the date of
harvesting, landing, or reporting.
(h) Application for PCTC Program
quota share—(1) Submission of an
application for PCTC Program quota
share. A person who wishes to receive
QS to participate in the PCTC Program
as an eligible harvester or an eligible
processor must submit a timely and
complete application for PCTC Program
QS. An application form will be
provided by NMFS or available from
NMFS Alaska Region website as defined
at § 679.2. The acceptable submittal
methods will be described on the
application form.
(2) Deadline. A completed application
for PCTC Program QS must be received
by NMFS no later than 1700 hours,
A.l.t., on October 10, 2023, or if sent by
U.S. mail, postmarked by that time.
Objective written evidence of timely
application will be considered proof of
a timely application.
(3) Contents of application. A timely
and complete application must contain
the information specified on the
application for PCTC Program QS with
all required documentation attached.
(i) Additional required documentation
for LLP license holders. Vessel names,
ADF&G vessel registration numbers, and
USCG documentation numbers of all
vessels that fished under the authority
of each LLP license, including dates
when landings were made under the
authority of an LLP license from 2009
through 2019 or under the authority of
an LLP license prior to earning a
transferable AI endorsement from 2004–
2019;
(ii) Additional required
documentation for processors. Processor
name, FFP or FPP number, and location
of processing plant, including dates
when landings were made under the
authority of an LLP license from 2009
through 2019;
(iii) The applicant must sign and date
the application certifying under penalty
of perjury that all information is true
and correct. If the application is
completed by a designated
representative, then explicit
authorization signed by the applicant
must accompany the application.
(4) Application evaluation. The
Regional Administrator will evaluate
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
applications and compare all claims of
catch history or processing history in an
application with the information in the
PCTC Program official record.
Application claims that are consistent
with information in the PCTC Program
official record will be approved by the
Regional Administrator. Application
claims that are inconsistent with the
PCTC Program official record will not be
approved unless supported by
documentation sufficient to substantiate
such claims. An applicant who submits
claims of catch history or processing
history that are inconsistent with the
official record without sufficient
evidence, or an applicant who fails to
submit the information specified in
paragraph (d) of this section, will be
provided a single 30-day evidentiary
period to submit the specified
information, submit evidence to verify
their claims of catch or processing
history, or submit a revised application
consistent with information in the PCTC
Program official record. An applicant
who claims catch or processing history
that is inconsistent with information in
the PCTC Program official record has
the burden of proving that the submitted
claims are correct. Any claims that
remain unsubstantiated after the 30-day
evidentiary period will be denied. All
applicants will be notified of NMFS’s
final application determinations by an
initial administrative determination
(IAD), which will inform applicants of
their appeal rights under 15 CFR part
906.
(5) Appeals. An applicant may appeal
an IAD under the provisions in 15 CFR
part 906.
(i) Assigning PCTC Program QS to
Harvesters and Processors. The Regional
Administrator will assign PCTC
Program QS only to an eligible harvester
or eligible processor who submits a
timely application for PCTC Program QS
that is approved by NMFS.
(1) Calculation of PCTC Program QS
allocation to LLP licenses without a
transferable AI endorsement. NMFS will
assign a specific amount of PCTC
Program QS units to each LLP license
based on the Pacific cod legal landings
of each LLP license using information
from the PCTC Program official record
according to the following procedures:
(i) Determine the Pacific cod legal
landings for each LLP license for each
calendar year from 2009 through 2019.
(ii) Select the 10 calendar years from
the qualifying time period with the
highest amount of legal landings for
each LLP license, including years with
zero metric tons if necessary.
(iii) Sum the Pacific cod legal
landings of the highest 10 years for each
LLP license. This yields the PCTC
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
Program QS units (in metric tons) for
each LLP license.
(2) Calculation of PCTC Program QS
allocation to LLP licenses with a
transferable AI endorsement. NMFS will
assign a specific amount of PCTC
Program QS units to each LLP license
with a transferable AI endorsement
based on the Pacific cod legal landings
of each using information from the
PCTC Program official record according
to the following procedures:
(i) Determine the Pacific cod legal
landings for each LLP license with a
transferable AI endorsement for each
calendar year from 2004 through 2019.
(ii) Select the fifteen calendar years
that yield the highest amount of legal
landings for each LLP license, including
years with zero metric tons if necessary.
(iii) Sum the Pacific cod legal
landings of the highest fifteen years for
each LLP license with transferable AI
endorsement. This yields the PCTC
Program QS units (in metric tons) for
each LLP license with a transferable AI
endorsement.
(3) Official record date. The initial
PCTC Program QS pool for all LLP
licenses, with and without a transferable
AI endorsement, is the sum of the sum
of the PCTC Program QS units assigned
to all LLP licenses in metric tons based
on the PCTC Program official record as
of December 31, 2022.
(4) Calculation of PCTC Program QS
allocation to processors. NMFS will
assign a specific amount of PCTC
Program QS units to each eligible
processor based on the Pacific cod legal
landings delivered to each FPP or FFP
using information from the PCTC
Program official record according to the
following procedures:
(i) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings
delivered to each FPP or FFP for each
calendar year from 2009 through 2019;
(ii) Select the ten calendar years that
yield the highest amount of legal
landings delivered to each FPP or FFP,
including years with zero metric tons if
necessary;
(iii) Sum the Pacific cod legal
landings of the highest 10 years for each
FPP or FFP. This yields the QS units for
each eligible processor, which will be
specified on a PCTC Program QS permit
for that processor;
(iv) The PCTC Program QS pool for
processors is the sum of all QS units
assigned to processors in metric tons
based on the PCTC official record as of
December 31, 2022.
(5) Non-severability and exceptions.
Pacific cod legal landings are nonseverable from the LLP license,
transferable AI endorsement, or FPP to
which those Pacific cod legal landings
are assigned in the PCTC Program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:26 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
official record except under the
following provisions:
(i) If multiple LLP licenses authorized
catch by a vessel, the LLP license
holders must submit to NMFS an
agreement specifying the amount of
shared catch history to assign to each
LLP license with the application for
PCTC Program QS. In the absence of an
agreement, the owner of the vessel that
made the catch will assign qualifying
catch history to each LLP license.
(ii) For the LLP licenses associated
with non-exempt AFA catcher vessels,
within 90 days of initial issuance of
PCTC Program QS, the owners of the
LLP licenses that are associated with
AFA non-exempt catcher vessels that
engaged in fish transfer agreements
during the qualifying periods may
transfer PCTC Program QS to other LLP
licenses associated with AFA nonexempt vessels, subject to the
ownership cap at § 679.133.
(A) NMFS will execute permanent
transfers of PCTC Program QS between
eligible LLP licenses during the 90-day
transfer provision upon request. The
transferor and transferee must show
they agree to the one-time permanent
transfer of PCTC Program QS, or show
a transfer is authorized by an operation
of law (e.g., a court order). Requests to
transfer PCTC Program QS must specify
which LLP license is transferring PCTC
Program QS, which LLP license is
receiving PCTC Program QS, and the
amount of PCTC Program QS to be
transferred.
(B) After the expiration of the 90-day
transfer provision, PCTC Program QS
will no longer be severable from the LLP
license to which it is assigned unless
authorized by the transfer rules
specified in paragraph (j) or
modification is supported by an
operation of law.
(j) Transfer of PCTC Program QS. (1)
Transfer of an LLP license with PCTC
Program QS. A person may transfer an
LLP license and the PCTC Program QS
assigned to that LLP license under the
provisions at § 679.4(k)(7), provided that
the LLP license is not assigned PCTC
Program QS in excess of the ownership
cap specified at § 679.133 at the time of
transfer.
(2) Transfer of PCTC Program QS
assigned to LLP licenses that exceeds
PCTC Program QS ownership caps.
(i) If an LLP license receives an initial
allocation of PCTC Program QS that
exceeds an ownership cap specified at
§ 679.133(a), upon transfer of the LLP
license, the LLP license holder may
transfer the amount of PCTC Program
QS in excess of the ownership cap
separately from the LLP license and
assign it to one or more LLP licenses.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53737
However, a transfer will not be
approved by NMFS if that transfer
would cause the receiving LLP license
to exceed an ownership cap specified at
§ 679.133(a).
(ii) Prior to the transfer of an LLP
license that received an initial
allocation of PCTC Program QS that
exceeds an ownership cap specified at
§ 679.133(a), the LLP license holder
must transfer the PCTC Program QS that
is in excess of the ownership cap
separately from that LLP license and
assign it to one or more LLP licenses.
On completion of the transfer of PCTC
Program QS, the LLP license that was
initially allocated an amount of PCTC
Program QS in excess of the ownership
cap may not exceed any ownership cap
specified at § 679.133(a).
(iii) Any PCTC Program QS associated
with the LLP license that is in excess of
the ownership cap may be assigned to
another LLP license through the
application used to transfer LLP
licenses, and only if the application is
approved as specified at § 679.4(k)(7).
(iv) PCTC Program QS that is
transferred from an LLP license that was
initially allocated an amount of PCTC
Program QS in excess of the ownership
cap specified at § 679.133(a) and
assigned to another LLP license may not
be severed from the receiving LLP
license.
(3) Transfer of processor PCTC
Program QS Permits. A person may
transfer a PCTC Program QS permit to
another processor with an active FPP
issued under § 679.4. A transfer of
processor-held PCTC Program QS may
not cause the receiver of the permit to
exceed the ownership cap specified at
§ 679.133(a) at the time of transfer. A
PCTC Program QS permit held by a
processor and associated QS may be
transferred only if the application for
transfer of PCTC Program QS permit is
filled out entirely. A PCTC Program QS
permit initially issued to an FFP holder
may be transferred to a processor with
an active FPP issued under § 679.4 or to
a processor with an active FFP that
authorizes a vessel named on an LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement.
(4) Transfer of PCTC Program QS
assigned to a processor-held PCTC
Program QS permit that exceeds PCTC
Program ownership caps.
(i) If a PCTC Program QS permit
receives an initial allocation of QS that
exceeds an ownership cap specified at
§ 679.133(a), the processor may transfer
QS in excess of the ownership cap
separately from that PCTC Program QS
permit and assign it to the PCTC
Program QS permit of one or more
processors with an active FPP or FFP.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53738
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
However, a transfer will not be
approved by NMFS if that transfer
would cause the receiving processor to
exceed an ownership cap specified at
§ 679.133(a).
(ii) Prior to the transfer of a PCTC
Program QS permit that received an
initial allocation of QS that exceeds an
ownership cap specified at § 679.133(a),
the permit holder must transfer the QS
that is in excess of the ownership cap
separately from that PCTC Program QS
permit and assign it to one or more
PCTC Program QS permits. On
completion of the transfer of QS, the
PCTC Program QS permit that was
initially allocated an amount of QS in
excess of the ownership cap may not
exceed any ownership cap specified at
§ 679.133(a).
(iii) Any QS associated with the PCTC
Program QS permit held by a processor
that is in excess of an ownership cap
may be transferred only if the
application for transfer of PCTC
Program QS permit is filled out entirely.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
§ 679.131 PCTC Program annual harvester
privileges.
(a) Assigning CQ to a PCTC Program
cooperative—(1) General. (See also
§ 679.4(q)). (i) Every calendar year,
PCTC Program QS assigned to LLP
licenses and PCTC Program QS permits
held by a PCTC Program processor must
be assigned to a PCTC Program
cooperative through a CQ permit to use
the CQ derived from that PCTC Program
QS to catch Pacific cod, crab PSC, or
halibut PSC assigned to the PCTC
Program.
(ii) NMFS will issue a CQ permit to
a PCTC Program cooperative based on
the aggregate PCTC Program QS of all
LLP licenses and associated processors
designated on an application for CQ that
is approved by the Regional
Administrator as described under
paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(iii) Processors must associate with a
PCTC Program cooperative for the PCTC
Program QS assigned to that processor’s
PCTC Program QS permit to be issued
to a PCTC Program cooperative as CQ.
(2) PCTC Program QS issued after
issuance of CQ or Pacific cod trawl
catcher vessel sector TAC. Any PCTC
Program QS assigned to an LLP license
or PCTC Program QS permit after NMFS
has issued CQ for a calendar year will
not result in any additional CQ being
issued to a PCTC Program cooperative
even if that QS holder has assigned their
LLP license or PCTC Program QS permit
to a PCTC Program cooperative for that
calendar year.
(3) Failure to designate QS to a PCTC
Program cooperative. Failure to
designate an LLP license with PCTC
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
Program QS or a PCTC Program QS
permit on a timely and complete
application for CQ that is approved by
the Regional Administrator as described
under paragraph (a)(4) of this section,
will result in the Regional
Administrator not assigning that QS to
a PCTC Program cooperative for the
applicable calendar year.
(4) Application for PCTC Program CQ.
PCTC Program cooperatives must
submit a complete application by
November 1 to receive CQ that includes
the following:
(i) PCTC Program cooperative
identification, including but not limited
to the name of the cooperative and the
taxpayer identification number;
(ii) PCTC Program QS holders and
ownership documentation;
(iii) PCTC Program cooperative
member vessels and LLP licenses;
(iv) PCTC Program cooperative
associated processors;
(v) Vessels with FFPs on which the
CQ issued to the PCTC Program
cooperative will be used;
(vi) Certification of cooperative
representative;
(vii) An attached copy of the
membership agreement or contract that
includes the following terms:
(A) How the cooperative intends to
harvest its CQ;
(B) The obligations of QS holders who
are members of a PCTC Program
cooperative to ensure the full payment
of PCTC Program fee liabilities that may
be due;
(C) How cooperatives monitor and
report leasing activity in GOA fisheries;
and
(D) For a cooperative intending to
harvest any amount of the CQ set-aside,
the cooperative’s plan for coordinating
harvest and delivery of the CQ set-aside
with an Aleutian Islands shoreplant as
defined § 679.2.
(viii) Each year, all cooperatives must
establish an inter-cooperative
agreement. This inter-cooperative
agreement must be included as part of
each annual cooperative application and
is required before NMFS will issue CQ.
The inter-cooperative agreement must
establish how the cooperatives intend to
harvest the CQ set-aside in years when
it applies and ensure harvests in the BS
do not exceed the minimum set-aside as
specified at § 679.132(a)(4)(i). For the
calendar year 2023, NMFS will allow
each cooperative to submit the intercooperative agreement prior to
December 31, 2023.
(b) Allocations of Pacific cod to the
PCTC Program—(1) General. Each
calendar year, the Regional
Administrator will determine the
amount of the BSAI trawl catcher vessel
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
sector’s Pacific cod A and B season
allocations that will be assigned to the
PCTC Program as follows:
(i) Incidental catch allowance (ICA).
For the A and B seasons, the Regional
Administrator will establish an ICA to
account for projected incidental catch of
Pacific cod by trawl catcher vessels
engaged in directed fishing for
groundfish other than PCTC Program
Pacific cod.
(ii) Directed fishing allowance (DFA).
The remaining trawl catcher vessel
sector’s Pacific cod A and B season
allocations are established as a DFA for
the PCTC Program.
(2) Calculation—(i) Determination of
Pacific cod trawl catcher vessel TAC
allocated to the PCTC Program. NMFS
will determine the Pacific cod trawl
catcher vessel TAC in a calendar year in
the annual harvest specification process
at § 679.20.
(ii) Annual apportionment of Pacific
cod trawl catcher vessel TAC. The
annual apportionment of Pacific cod in
the A and B seasons between the PCTC
Program DFA and the ICA in a given
calendar year is established in the
annual harvest specifications.
(3) Allocations of Pacific Cod DFA to
PCTC Program—(i) Harvester
percentage of DFA. NMFS will assign
77.5 percent of the PCTC Program DFA
to the QS attached to LLP licenses
assigned to PCTC Program cooperatives.
Each LLP license’s QS units will
correspond to a portion of the DFA
according to the following equation:
(LLP license QS units/(sum of all LLP
license QS units)) × (.775 × DFA).
(ii) Processor percentage of DFA.
NMFS will assign 22.5 percent of the
PCTC Program DFA to the QS attached
to PCTC Program QS permits assigned
to PCTC Program cooperatives. Each QS
permit’s QS units will correspond to a
portion of the DFA according to the
following equation: (PCTC Program QS
permit QS units/(sum of all PCTC
Program QS permit QS units)) × (.225 ×
DFA).
(4) Allocation of CQ to PCTC Program
cooperatives—(i) General. Annual CQ
will be issued to each PCTC Program
cooperative by NMFS based on the
aggregate QS attached to LLP licenses
and PCTC Program QS permits that are
assigned to the cooperative. NMFS will
issue CQ by A and B season and
cooperatives will ensure the seasonal
limits are not exceeded. Unused A
season CQ may be rolled over to the B
season. Annual CQ may be harvested
from either BS or AI subareas subject to
any limitations on BS harvest when the
AI set-aside is in effect.
(ii) CQ allocation to PCTC Program
cooperatives. The amount of CQ that is
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
issued to a PCTC Program cooperative is
calculated according to the following
formula:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
CQ derived from QS assigned to LLP holders
= [(.775 × DFA)
× (Total LLP license QS units assigned to that
cooperative/sum of all LLP license QS
units)]
CQ derived from QS assigned to PCTC
Program QS permit holders = [(.225 ×
DFA)
× (Total PCTC Program Permit QS units
assigned to that cooperative/sum of all
PCTC Program QS permit QS units)]
The total CQ issued to that cooperative =
CQ derived from LLP license holders +
CQ derived from PCTC Program QS permit
holders
(iii) Issuance of CQ. A and B season
trawl catcher vessel Pacific cod sector
DFAs will be issued to PCTC Program
cooperatives as CQ. Annual CQ for each
PCTC cooperative will include separate
A and B season CQ.
(iv) AI set-aside. When in effect, the
AI set-aside will be established annually
as specified further at § 679.132.
(c) Allocations of halibut PSC—(1)
Halibut PSC limit for the PCTC Program.
NMFS specifies the overall halibut PSC
limit for the PCTC Program for each
calendar year in the harvest
specifications pursuant to the
procedures specified at § 679.21(b).
NMFS calculates the halibut PSC limit
according to the formula described in
this paragraph. NMFS assigns that
halibut PSC limit to PCTC Program
cooperatives pursuant to paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section.
(i) Multiply the halibut PSC limit
apportioned to the BSAI trawl limited
access sector’s Pacific cod fishery
category by 98 percent, which yields the
halibut PSC apportioned to the trawl
catcher vessel sector. The remaining 2
percent is apportioned to the AFA
catcher/processor sector as specified at
§ 679.21(b)(4).
(ii) Assign 95 percent of the trawl
catcher vessel sector’s halibut PSC limit
to the A and B seasons and 5 percent to
the C season.
(iii) Each year after apportioning
halibut PSC to the trawl catcher vessel
sector for the A and B season, apply one
of the following reductions to the A and
B season trawl catcher vessel halibut
PSC limit to determine the overall PCTC
Program halibut PSC limit:
(A) In the first year of the PCTC
Program, reduce the A and B season
halibut PSC limit by 12.5 percent.
(B) In the second year, and each year
thereafter, reduce the A and B season
halibut PSC limit by 25 percent.
(2) Halibut PSC assigned to each
PCTC Program cooperative. For each
calendar year, the amount of halibut
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PSC assigned to a cooperative is
determined by the following procedure
and the amount will be specified on the
CQ permit:
(i) Divide the amount of CQ units
assigned to each PCTC Program
cooperative by the amount of CQ
allocated to all cooperatives. This yields
the percentage of CQ units held by each
cooperative.
(ii) Multiply the overall PCTC
Program halibut PSC limit by the
percentage of the CQ assigned to a
cooperative. This yields the amount of
halibut PSC issued to that cooperative
as CQ.
(3) Use of halibut PSC in the PCTC
Program. Halibut PSC limits assigned to
the CQ permit issued to a PCTC Program
cooperative may only be used by the
members of that PCTC Program
cooperative while harvesting CQ in the
BSAI. Any halibut PSC used by a
cooperative must be deducted from the
amount of halibut PSC on its CQ permit.
Halibut PSC limits for cooperatives are
not subject to seasonal apportionment
under § 679.21. Halibut PSC limits are
issued to the PCTC Program for the
duration of the A and B seasons.
Unused halibut PSC limits may be
reapportioned to the C season.
(d) Allocations of crab PSC—(1) Crab
PSC limits for the PCTC Program. NMFS
specifies the overall crab PSC limit for
the PCTC Program for each calendar
year in the harvest specifications
pursuant to the procedures specified at
§ 679.21(e). NMFS calculates the crab
PSC limit according to the formula
described in this paragraph. NMFS then
assigns that crab PSC limit to PCTC
Program cooperatives with CQ pursuant
to paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
(i) Multiply the crab PSC limit
apportioned to the BSAI trawl limited
access sector’s Pacific cod fishery
category by 90.6 percent, which yields
the percentage of crab PSC apportioned
to the trawl catcher vessel sector. The
remaining 9.4 percent goes to the AFA
catcher/processor sector as specified at
§ 679.21(b)(4).
(ii) Assign 95 percent of the trawl
catcher vessel sector’s crab PSC limit to
the A and B seasons and 5 percent to the
C season.
(iii) Reduce the A and B season trawl
catcher vessel crab PSC limit by 35
percent to determine the overall PCTC
Program crab PSC limit.
(2) Crab PSC assigned to each PCTC
Program cooperative. For each calendar
year, the amount of crab PSC limit
assigned to a cooperative is determined
by the following procedure and the
amount will be specified on the CQ
permit:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53739
(i) Divide the amount of CQ assigned
to each PCTC Program cooperative by
the total CQ assigned to all cooperatives.
This yields the percentage of CQ held by
that cooperative.
(ii) Multiply the overall PCTC
Program crab PSC limit by the
percentage of the CQ pool assigned to a
cooperative. This yields the crab PSC
limit issued to that cooperative as CQ.
(3) Use of crab PSC in the PCTC
Program. Crab PSC limits assigned to
the CQ permit issued to a PCTC Program
cooperative may only be used by the
members of that PCTC Program
cooperative while harvesting CQ in the
BSAI. Any crab PSC used by a
cooperative must be deducted from the
amount of crab PSC limit on its CQ
permit. Crab PSC limits for cooperatives
are not subject to seasonal
apportionment under § 679.21. Crab
PSC limits are issued to the PCTC
Program for the duration of the A and
B seasons. Unused crab PSC limits may
be reapportioned to the C season.
(e) Transfer of PSC limits. Halibut and
crab PSC limits are transferable between
cooperatives according to the same rules
established for CQ in paragraph (i) of
this section.
(f) Non-allocated Groundfish species.
The PCTC Program allocations are for
directed fishing for Pacific cod by trawl
catcher vessels. All groundfish species
not allocated to PCTC Program
cooperatives are managed to the
maximum retainable amounts (MRAs),
as described under § 679.20(e).
(g) Rollover of Pacific cod. If, after
June 10, the Regional Administrator
determines that reallocating a portion of
the Pacific cod ICA or DFA from the
PCTC Program to the BSAI trawl limited
access sector C season is appropriate,
the Regional Administrator may do so
through notification in the Federal
Register consistent with regulations at
§ 679.20(a)(7)(iii).
(h) Rollover of PSC to the C Season.
If, after June 10, the Regional
Administrator determines that
reallocating a portion of the halibut or
crab PSC limits from the PCTC Program
to the BSAI trawl limited access sector
C season is appropriate, the Regional
Administrator may do so through
notification in the Federal Register
consistent with regulations at
§ 679.91(f)(4) and (5).
(i) Process for inter-cooperative
transfer of CQ. NMFS will process an
application through the NMFS online
system for an inter-cooperative transfer
of CQ, including PSC, provided that all
information is completed by the
transferor and transferee, with all
applicable fields accurately filled in,
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53740
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
and all required documentation is
provided.
(j) PCTC Program cooperatives—(1)
General. This section governs the
formation and operation of PCTC
Program cooperatives. The regulations
in this section apply only to PCTC
Program cooperatives that have formed
for the purpose of applying for and
fishing with CQ issued annually by
NMFS. PCTC Program cooperatives and
cooperative members are responsible for
ensuring the conduct of cooperatives is
consistent with any relevant State or
Federal antitrust laws. Membership in a
cooperative is voluntary. No person may
be required to join a cooperative. Any
LLP license holder with PCTC Program
QS may join a PCTC Program
cooperative and assign their QS to that
cooperative. Members may leave a
cooperative, but any CQ derived from
the QS held by that member will remain
with that cooperative for the duration of
the calendar year.
(2) Legal and organizational
requirements. A PCTC Program
cooperative must meet the following
legal and organizational requirements
before it is eligible to receive CQ:
(i) Each PCTC Program cooperative
must be formed as a partnership,
corporation, or other legal business
entity that is registered under the laws
of one of the 50 States or the District of
Columbia;
(ii) Each PCTC Program cooperative
must appoint an individual as the
designated representative to act on the
cooperative’s behalf and to serve as a
(i) Who may join or associate with a PCTC Program cooperative? ........
(ii) What is the minimum number of LLP licenses required to form a cooperative?
(iii) How many unique LLP license holders are required to form a cooperative?
(iv) Is there a minimum amount of PCTC Program QS units that must
be assigned to a PCTC Program cooperative?
(v) What is allocated to the PCTC Program cooperatives? .....................
(vi) Is this CQ an exclusive catch and use privilege?
(vii) Is there a period in a calendar year during which PCTC Program
cooperative vessels may catch Pacific cod?
(viii) Can any vessel catch a PCTC Program cooperative’s Pacific cod?
(ix) Can a member of a PCTC Program cooperative transfer CQ individually without the approval of the other members of the cooperative?
(x) Are GOA sideboard limits assigned to specific persons or PCTC
Program cooperatives?
(xi) Can PCTC Program QS assigned to an LLP license or QS held by
processors be assigned to more than one PCTC Program cooperative in a calendar year?
(xii) Which members may catch the PCTC Program cooperative’s CQ?
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
(xiii) Does a PCTC Program cooperative need a membership agreement or contract?
(xiv) What happens if the PCTC Program cooperative membership
agreement or contract is modified during the fishing year?
(xv) What happens if the cooperative exceeds its CQ amount? .............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
contact point for NMFS for questions
regarding the operation of the
cooperative. The designated
representative may be a member of the
cooperative, or some other individual
designated by the cooperative to act on
its behalf;
(iii) Each PCTC Program cooperative
must submit a timely and complete
application for CQ; and
(iv) Each PCTC Program cooperative
must meet the mandatory requirements
established in paragraph (j)(3) of this
section.
(3) Elements of PCTC Program
cooperatives. The following table
describes the necessary elements to
form and operate a PCTC Program
cooperative:
Any PCTC Program QS holder named on a timely and complete application for CQ for that calendar year that is approved by NMFS. Individuals who are not QS holders may be employed by, or serve as
the designated representative of, a cooperative, but cannot be members of the cooperative. Any processor with an FPP may associate
with a cooperative. A processor with an FFP must be named on an
LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement.
A minimum of three LLP licenses are needed to form a cooperative.
There is no minimum number of unique LLP license holders required to
form a cooperative.
No.
A and B season CQ for Pacific cod, halibut PSC limits, and crab PSC
limits, based on the total QS units assigned to the cooperative by its
members.
Yes, the cooperative has an exclusive privilege to collectively catch
and use this CQ. A cooperative can transfer all or a portion of this
CQ to another cooperative.
Yes, any cooperative vessel may harvest CQ during the during the A
and B seasons specified at § 679.130(a)(2).
No, only vessels that are listed on the cooperative’s Application for
PCTC Program CQ may catch Pacific cod assigned to that cooperative.
No, only the designated representative of the cooperative, and not individual members, may transfer CQ to another cooperative, and only if
that transfer is approved by NMFS.
Existing sideboard limits apply to individual vessels or LLP license
holders, not cooperatives.
QS assigned to an LLP license may be assigned to only one cooperative in a calendar year. Multiple QS permits or LLP licenses held by
a single person are not required to be assigned to the same cooperative. A processor may associate with more than one cooperative
and any QS held by the processor would be divided between the associated cooperatives in the same proportion as the CQ derived from
the LLP licenses.
Use of a cooperative’s CQ is determined by the cooperative contract
signed by its members. Any violations of this contract by a cooperative member may be subject to civil claims by other members of the
cooperative.
Yes, a cooperative must have a membership agreement or contract. A
copy of this agreement or contract must be submitted to NMFS with
the application for CQ. The membership agreement or contract must
specify: (A) How the cooperative intends to harvest its CQ; and (B)
The obligations of QS holders, who are members of a cooperative,
to ensure the full payment of fee liabilities that may be due.
A copy of the amended membership agreement or contract must be
sent to NMFS in accordance with § 679.131.
A cooperative is not authorized to catch Pacific cod or use halibut or
crab PSC limits in excess of the amount on its CQ permit. Exceeding
a CQ permit is a violation of the regulations.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(xvi) Is there a limit on how much CQ a PCTC Program cooperative
may hold?
(xvii) Is there a limit on how much Pacific cod a vessel may catch? ......
(xviii) Are there any special reporting requirements? ..............................
(xix) Is there a requirement that a PCTC Program cooperative pay
PCTC Program cost recovery fees?
(xx) Is there any restriction on deliveries of CQ? ....................................
(4) Successors-in-interest. If a member
of a PCTC Program cooperative dies (in
the case of an individual) or dissolves
(in the case of a business entity), the CQ
derived from the QS assigned to the
cooperative for that year from that
person remains under the control of the
cooperative for the duration of that
calendar year as specified in the
cooperative contract. Each cooperative
is free to establish its own internal
procedures for admitting a successor-ininterest during the fishing season due to
the death or dissolution of a cooperative
member.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
§ 679.132 Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside
provisions in the PCTC Program.
(a) Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside
provisions in the PCTC Program—(1)
Calculation of the Aleutian Islands
Pacific cod non-CDQ ICA and DFA.
Each year, during the annual harvest
specifications process set forth at
§ 679.20(c), the Regional Administrator
will specify the AI Pacific cod non-CDQ
ICA, the DFA from the AI Pacific cod
non-CDQ TAC, and the AI set-aside as
follows:
(2) Aleutian Islands Pacific cod nonCDQ ICA. The AI Pacific cod non-CDQ
ICA will be deducted from the aggregate
portion of the AI Pacific cod non-CDQ
TAC annually allocated to the non-CDQ
sectors identified at § 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A).
(3) Aleutian Islands Pacific cod nonCDQ DFA. The AI Pacific cod non-CDQ
DFA will be the amount of the AI
Pacific cod TAC remaining after
subtraction of the AI Pacific cod CDQ
reserve and the AI Pacific cod non-CDQ
ICA.
(4) Calculation of the Aleutian Islands
CQ set-aside. The Regional
Administrator will specify the AI setaside in either of the following ways:
(i) When the AI DFA exceeds 12
percent of A season CQ, the AI set-aside
is 12 percent of the PCTC Program A
season CQ and is in effect during the A
and B seasons.
(ii) If the AI non-CDQ DFA is below
12 percent of the PCTC Program A
season CQ, then the AI set-aside will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
No, but each QS holder is subject to ownership caps, and a vessel
may be subject to vessel use caps. See § 679.133.
Yes, generally a vessel may not catch more than 5 percent of the Pacific cod assigned to the PCTC Program for that calendar year. See
§ 679.133 for use cap provisions.
The designated representative of the cooperative may submit an annual PCTC Program cooperative report to the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council.
Yes, see § 679.135 for the provisions that apply. PCTC Program cooperatives are responsible for paying cost recovery fees.
Sometimes, if the AI CQ set-aside is in effect for the fishing year as
specified at § 679.132. Cooperatives must establish, through an
inter-cooperative agreement, how 12 percent of the BSAI A season
CQ will be set aside for delivery to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant.
set equal to the AI non-CDQ DFA and
is in effect during the A and B seasons.
When the AI set-aside is in effect and set
equal to the AI non-CDQ DFA, directed
fishing for Pacific cod in the AI may
only be conducted by PCTC Program
vessels that deliver their catch of AI
Pacific cod to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant. After June 10, the Regional
Administrator may open directed
fishing for AI non-CDQ Pacific cod for
other sectors.
(b) Annual notice of intent to process
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod—(1)
Submission of notice. The provisions of
this section will apply if a
representative of either the City of Adak
or the City of Atka submits to the
Regional Administrator a timely and
complete notice of its intent to process
PCTC Program Pacific cod during the
upcoming fishing year.
(2) Submission method and deadline.
The notice of intent to process PCTC
Program Pacific cod for the upcoming
fishing year must be submitted in
writing to the Regional Administrator by
a representative of the City of Adak or
the City of Atka no later than October
15 of each year in order for the
provisions of this section to apply
during the upcoming fishing year.
Notices of intent to process received
later than October 15 may not be
accepted by the Regional Administrator.
(3) Contents of notice. A notice of
intent to process PCTC Program Pacific
cod for the upcoming fishing year must
contain the following information:
(i) Date of submission,
(ii) Name of city,
(iii) Statement of intent to process
PCTC Program Pacific cod,
(iv) Identification of the fishing year
during which the city intends to process
PCTC Program Pacific cod,
(v) Contact information for the
representative of the city, and
(vi) Documentation of authority to
represent the City of Adak or the City
of Atka.
(4) NMFS confirmation and notice.
On or before November 30, the Regional
Administrator will notify the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
53741
Sfmt 4700
representative of the City of Adak or the
City of Atka, confirming receipt of their
official notice of intent to process PCTC
Program Pacific cod. Then, NMFS will
announce through notification in the
Federal Register whether the AI setaside will be in effect for the upcoming
fishing year.
(5) AI CQ set-aside PCTC Program
cooperative provisions. If the
representative of the City of Adak or the
City of Atka submits a timely and
complete notice of intent to process in
accordance of this section, then the
following provisions will apply for the
fishing year following the notice:
(i) The PCTC Program cooperative(s)
are required to set-aside an amount of
CQ calculated by the Regional
Administrator pursuant to (a)(4) of this
section for delivery to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant as defined at § 679.2.
(ii) All cooperatives must enter into
an inter-cooperative agreement that
describes how the AI set-aside will be
administered by the cooperatives to
ensure that the PCTC Program harvests
from the BS do not exceed the minimum
set-aside. This inter-cooperative
agreement must establish how the
cooperatives intend to harvest the AI
set-aside when it applies. This intercooperative agreement must be provided
as part of the annual PCTC Program
cooperative application as specified at
§ 679.131(a)(4) and is required before
NMFS can issue CQ.
(iii) The inter-cooperative agreement
must establish how cooperatives would
ensure that trawl catcher vessels less
than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA assigned to an
LLP license with a transferable AI trawl
endorsement have the opportunity to
harvest 10 percent of the AI set-aside for
delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant.
(c) PCTC Program A season CQ setaside limitations. (1) If the Regional
Administrator has approved a notice of
intent to process, vessels authorized
under the PCTC Program shall not
harvest the amount of the AI set-aside
in the BS subarea.
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53742
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(2) PCTC Program cooperatives may
not deliver more than the PCTC A
season CQ minus the AI set-aside
established under this section to
processors in the BS subarea when the
AI CQ set-aside is in effect.
(3) The City of Adak or the City of
Atka may withdraw their annual notice
of intent to process prior to the end of
B season.
(4) The Regional Administrator may
remove the delivery requirement for
some or all of the projected unused AI
CQ set-aside if the Regional
Administrator determines that the
Aleutian Islands shoreplants will not
process the entire AI CQ set-aside.
(5) In the event all notices of intent to
process are withdrawn, the Regional
Administrator will remove the delivery
requirement for CQ that was set-aside
for that calendar year.
(6) To remove the AI CQ set-aside
delivery requirement for that calendar
year, the Regional Administrator will
publish a document in the Federal
Register.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
§ 679.133 PCTC Program ownership caps,
use caps, and sideboard limits.
(a) Ownership and use caps—(1)
General. (i) Ownership caps limit the
amount of PCTC Program QS that may
be owned by a harvester or processor
and their affiliates. Use caps limit the
amount of CQ that may be harvested by
a vessel or received and processed by a
processor.
(ii) Use caps do not apply to halibut
or crab PSC CQ.
(iii) Ownership and use caps may not
be exceeded except as provided under
paragraph (a)(6) of this section.
(iv) All QS ownership caps are a
percentage of the initial PCTC Program
QS pool established by NMFS at
§ 679.130(e).
(v) The CQ processing use cap is a
percentage of the total amount of CQ
issued to cooperatives during a calendar
year.
(vi) The vessel use cap is a percentage
of the amount of CQ assigned to the
PCTC Program during a calendar year.
(2) Harvester PCTC Program QS
ownership cap. A person may not
individually or collectively own more
than 5 percent of the PCTC Program QS
initially assigned to harvesters unless
that person qualifies for an exemption to
this ownership cap under paragraph
(a)(6) of this section based on their
qualifying catch history. Processorissued QS does not count toward this
ownership cap.
(3) Vessel use cap. A catcher vessel
may not harvest an amount of CQ
greater than 5 percent of the CQ issued
to the PCTC Program during a calendar
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
year unless that vessel qualifies for an
exemption to this use cap under
paragraph (a)(6) of this section based on
their qualifying catch history.
(4) Processor ownership cap. A person
may not individually or collectively
own more than 20 percent of the PCTC
Program QS initially assigned to
processors unless that person qualifies
for an exemption to this ownership cap
under paragraph (a)(6) of this section
based on their qualifying processing
history.
(5) Processing use cap. A processor, at
the firm or company level, may not
process more than 20 percent of the CQ
assigned to the PCTC Program during a
calendar year unless that processor
qualifies for an exemption to this use
cap under paragraph (a)(6) of this
section based on their qualifying
processing history. The amount of CQ
that is received by a PCTC Program
processor is calculated based on the
sum of all landings made with CQ
received or processed by that processor
and the CQ received or processed by
any person affiliated with that processor
as that term is defined at § 679.2.
(6) Cap exemptions. (i) A person may
receive an initial allocation of PCTC
Program QS in excess of the harvester
ownership cap. This exemption is nontransferable.
(ii) A person may receive an initial
allocation of PCTC Program QS in
excess of the processor ownership cap.
This exemption is non-transferable.
(iii) A vessel designated on an LLP
license that received an initial
allocation of PCTC Program QS in
excess of the harvester ownership cap
may harvest CQ in excess of the vessel
use cap up to the amount of CQ
resulting from QS assigned to the LLP
license. This exemption is nontransferable.
(iv) Processor use cap exemptions. A
processor that received an initial
allocation of PCTC Program QS in
excess of the processor ownership cap
may process more than 20 percent of CQ
during a calendar year up to an amount
of CQ proportional to the ratio of QS
held by the processor to the total
amount of QS held by processors. This
exemption is non-transferable. An
Aleutian Islands shoreplant is not
subject to this processor use cap.
(7) Transfer limitations. An eligible
harvester that receives an initial
allocation of PCTC Program QS that
exceeds the ownership cap listed in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall not
receive any PCTC Program QS by
transfer unless and until the eligible
harvester’s holdings of PCTC Program
QS in the PCTC Program are reduced to
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
an amount below the use cap specified
in this paragraph (a).
(b) Sideboard limits—general. The
regulations in this section restrict the
holders of LLP licenses issued PCTC
Program QS from using the increased
flexibility provided by the PCTC
Program to expand their level of
participation in GOA groundfish
fisheries.
(1) Sideboard limit restrictions for LLP
licenses authorizing AFA non-exempt
catcher vessels. LLP licenses that
authorize AFA non-exempt catcher
vessels will be subject to the sideboard
limitations specified at § 679.64(b)(4)(i).
(2) At-Sea Processing Sideboard Limit.
A sideboard limit will be specified on
each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific
cod trawl mothership endorsement.
Each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific
cod trawl mothership endorsement may
receive CQ deliveries from a catcher
vessel not to exceed 125 percent of a
catcher/processor’s processing history
as defined at § 679.130 and subject to
eligibility requirements under BSAI
FMP Amendment 120 to limit CPs
acting as motherships.
§ 679.134 PCTC Program permits, catch
monitoring, catch accounting, and
recordkeeping and reporting.
(a) Permits. For permit information,
please see § 679.4(q).
(b) Catch monitoring requirements for
PCTC Program catcher vessels. The
owner and operator of a catcher vessel
must ensure the vessel complies with
the observer coverage requirements
described at § 679.51(a)(2) at all times
the vessel is participating in a PCTC
Program cooperative.
(c) Catch monitoring requirements for
motherships receiving unsorted codends
from a PCTC Program catcher vessel—
(1) Catch weighing. All catch, except
halibut sorted on deck by vessels
participating in the halibut deck sorting
described at § 679.120, must be weighed
on a NMFS-approved scale in
compliance with the scale requirements
at § 679.28(b). Each haul must be
weighed separately and all catch must
be made available for sampling by an
observer.
(2) Additional catch monitoring
requirements. Comply with catch
monitoring requirements specified at
§ 679.93(c).
(d) Catch monitoring requirements for
shoreside processors. All groundfish
landed by catcher vessels described at
§ 679.51(a)(2) must be sorted, weighed
on a scale approved by the State of
Alaska as described at § 679.28(c), and
be made available for sampling by an
observer, NMFS staff, or any individual
authorized by NMFS. Any of these
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
persons must be allowed to test any
scale used to weigh groundfish to
determine its accuracy.
(e) Catch accounting—(1) Pacific cod.
All Pacific cod harvests by a vessel that
is named on a PCTC Program CQ
application and fishing under a CQ
permit will be debited against the CQ
for that cooperative during the fishing
seasons as defined at § 679.130(a)(2).
(2) PCTC Program halibut and crab
PSC. All halibut and crab PSC used by
a vessel that is named on an Application
PCTC Program CQ and fishing under a
CQ permit will be debited against the
CQ for that cooperative during the
fishing seasons as defined at
§ 679.130(a)(2).
(3) Groundfish sideboard limits. All
groundfish harvests in the BSAI and
GOA that are subject to a sideboard
limit for that groundfish species as
described under § 679.133(c), except
groundfish harvested by a vessel when
participating in the Central GOA
Rockfish Program, will be debited
against the applicable sideboard limit.
(f) Recordkeeping and reporting. The
owners and operators of catcher vessels
and processors authorized as
participants in the PCTC Program must
comply with the applicable
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements of this section and must
assign all catch to a PCTC Program
cooperative as applicable at the time of
catch or receipt of Pacific cod. All
owners of catcher vessels and
processors authorized as participants in
the PCTC Program must ensure that
their designated representatives or
employees comply with all applicable
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
(1) Logbook—(i) DFL. Operators of
catcher vessels participating in the
PCTC Program fishery must maintain a
daily fishing logbook for trawl gear as
described at § 679.5.
(ii) ELB. Operators of a catcher/
processor designated on an LLP license
with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement or a
mothership receiving CQ must use a
combination of NMFS-approved
catcher/processor trawl gear ELB and
eLandings to record and report
groundfish and PSC information as
described at § 679.5 to record PCTC
Program landings and production.
(2) eLandings. Managers of shoreside
processors that receive Pacific cod in
the PCTC Program must use eLandings
or NMFS-approved software as
described at § 679.5(e) to record PCTC
Program landings and production.
(3) Production reports. Operators of a
catcher/processor designated on an LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
mothership endorsement that receives
and purchases landings of CQ must
submit a production report as described
at § 679.5(e)(10).
(4) Product transfer report (PTR),
processors. Operators of a catcher/
processor designated on an LLP license
with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement and managers
of shoreside processors that receive and
purchase landings of CQ must submit a
PTR as described at § 679.5(g).
(5) Vessel monitoring system (VMS)
requirements. Operators of catcher
vessels assigned to a PCTC Program
cooperative or that are subject to
sideboard limits detailed at § 679.133
must use functioning VMS equipment
as described at § 679.28(f) at all times
when operating in a reporting area off
Alaska during the A and B season.
(6) PCTC Program cost recovery fee
submission (See § 679.135).
(7) Pacific cod Ex-vessel Volume and
Value Report. A processor that receives
and purchases landings of CQ must
submit annually to NMFS a complete
Pacific cod Ex-vessel Volume and Value
Report, as described at § 679.5(u) for
each reporting period for which the
PCTC processor receives CQ.
§ 679.135
PCTC Program cost recovery.
(a) Cost recovery fees—(1)
Responsibility. Each PCTC Program
cooperative must comply with the
requirements of this section.
(i) Subsequent transfer of CQ or QS
held by PCTC Program cooperative
members does not affect the
cooperative’s liability for
noncompliance with this section.
(ii) Non-renewal of a CQ permit does
not affect the cooperative’s liability for
noncompliance with this section.
(iii) Changes in the membership in a
PCTC Program cooperative, such as
members joining or departing during the
relevant year, or changes in the amount
of QS holdings of those members does
not affect the cooperative’s liability for
noncompliance with this section.
(2) Fee collection. PCTC Program
cooperatives that receive CQ are
responsible for submitting the cost
recovery payment for all CQ landings
made under the authority of their CQ
permit.
(3) Payment. (i) A cooperative must
submit any cost recovery fee liability
payment(s) no later than August 31
following the calendar year in which the
CQ landings were made.
(ii) Make electronic payment payable
to NMFS.
(iii) Submit payment and related
documents as instructed on the NMFS
Alaska Region website as defined at
§ 679.2.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
53743
(iv) Payment must be made
electronically in U.S. dollars using an
approved payment method available on
the payment website.
(b) Pacific cod standard ex-vessel
value determination and use. NMFS
will use the standard prices calculated
for Pacific cod based on information
provided in the Pacific Cod Ex-vessel
Volume and Value Report described at
§ 679.5(u)(1) from the previous calendar
year.
(c) PCTC Program fee percentage—(1)
Fee percentage. The fee percentage is
the amount as determined by the factors
and methodology described in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section. This
amount will be announced by
publication in the Federal Register.
This amount must not exceed 3.0
percent of the gross ex-vessel value
pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 1854(d)(2)(B).
(2) Calculating fee percentage value.
Each year NMFS shall calculate and
publish the fee percentage following the
fishing season in which the CQ landings
were made, according to the following
factors and methodology:
(i) NMFS must use the following
factors to determine the fee percentage:
(A) The catch to which the PCTC
Program cost recovery fee will apply;
(B) The ex-vessel value of that catch;
and
(C) The costs directly related to the
management, data collection, and
enforcement of the PCTC Program.
(ii) NMFS must use the following
equations to determine the fee
percentage:
100 × DPC/V
where:
DPC = the direct program costs for the PCTC
Program for the previous calendar year
with any adjustments to the account
from payments received in the previous
year.
V = total of the standard ex-vessel value of
the catch subject to the PCTC cost
recovery fee liability for the current year.
(iii) The calculated fee percentage is
applied to the ex-vessel value of CQ
landings made in the previous calendar
year.
(3) Applicable fee percentage. The
cooperative must use the fee percentage
applicable at the time a PCTC landing
is debited from a CQ allocation to
calculate the cost recovery fee liability
for any retroactive payments for CQ
landed.
(4) Fee liability determination for a
cooperative. (i) All cooperatives are
subject to a fee liability for any CQ
debited from a CQ allocation during a
calendar year.
(ii) The PCTC Program fee liability
assessed to a PCTC Program cooperative
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
53744
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
is based on the proportion of the
standard ex-vessel value of Pacific cod
debited from the cooperative’s CQ
relative to all cooperatives during a
calendar year as determined by NMFS.
(iii) NMFS will provide a fee liability
summary letter to all cooperatives by no
later than August 1 of each year. The
summary will explain the fee liability
determination including the current fee
percentage, details of CQ pounds
debited from CQ allocations by permit,
species, date, and prices.
(d) Underpayment of fee liability. (1)
Pursuant to § 679.131, no cooperative
will receive any CQ unless that
cooperative has made full payment of
cost recovery liability at the time it
applies for CQ.
(2) If a cooperative fails to submit full
payment for PCTC Program cost
recovery fee liability by the date
described in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section:
(i) At any time thereafter the Regional
Administrator may send an IAD to the
cooperative stating the amount of the
cooperative’s estimated fee liability that
is past due and requesting payment. If
payment is not received by the 30th day
after the date on the IAD, the agency
may pursue collection of the unpaid
fees.
(ii) The Regional Administrator may
disapprove any application to transfer
CQ to or from the cooperative in
accordance with § 679.130.
(iii) No CQ permit will be issued to
that cooperative for that following
calendar year and the Regional
Administrator may continue to prohibit
issuance of a CQ permit for any
subsequent calendar years until NMFS
receives the unpaid fees.
(iv) No CQ will be issued based on the
QS held by the members of that PCTC
Program cooperative to any other CQ
permit for any subsequent calendar
years until NMFS receives the unpaid
fees.
(e) Over payment. Payment submitted
to NMFS in excess of the annual PCTC
Program cost recovery fee liability for a
cooperative will be credited against the
cooperative’s future cost recovery fee
liability unless the cooperative requests
the agency refund the over payment.
Payment processing fees may be
deducted from any fees returned to the
cooperative.
(f) Appeals. A cooperative that
receives an IAD for incomplete payment
of a fee liability may appeal the IAD
pursuant to 15 CFR part 906.
(g) Annual report. Each year, NMFS
will publish a report describing the
PCTC Program cost recovery fee
program.
13. Revise table 40 to part 679 to read
as follows:
■
TABLE 40 TO PART 679—BSAI HALIBUT PSC SIDEBOARD LIMITS FOR AFA CATCHER/PROCESSORS AND AFA CATCHER
VESSELS
In the following target species categories as
defined at § 679.21(b)(1)(iii) and (e)(3)(iv) . . .
The AFA catcher/processor halibut PSC
sideboard limit in metric tons is . . .
The AFA catcher vessel halibut PSC
sideboard limit in metric tons is . . .
All target species categories ................................
Pacific cod trawl ...................................................
Pacific cod hook-and-line or pot ..........................
Yellowfin sole .......................................................
Rock sole/flathead sole/‘‘other flatfish’’ 1 ..............
Turbot/Arrowtooth/Sablefish .................................
Rockfish 2 ..............................................................
Pollock/Atka mackerel/‘‘other species’’ ................
286
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
101
228
0
2
5
..................................................................
..................................................................
..................................................................
..................................................................
..................................................................
..................................................................
..................................................................
..................................................................
14. Revise table 56 to part 679 to read
as follows:
■
TABLE 56 TO PART 679—GOA SPECIES AND SPECIES GROUPS FOR WHICH DIRECTED FISHING FOR SIDEBOARD LIMITS
BY NON-EXEMPT AFA CATCHER VESSELS IS PROHIBITED
Management or regulatory area and processing
component (if applicable)
Species or species group
Pollock ......................................................................................................
Pacific cod ................................................................................................
Sablefish ...................................................................................................
Shallow-water flatfish ................................................................................
Deep-water flatfish ....................................................................................
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
Rex sole ....................................................................................................
Arrowtooth flounder ..................................................................................
Flathead sole ............................................................................................
Pacific ocean perch ..................................................................................
Northern rockfish ......................................................................................
Shortraker rockfish ...................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Southeast Outside District, Eastern GOA.
Eastern GOA, inshore component.
Eastern GOA, offshore component.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Western GOA.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
53745
TABLE 56 TO PART 679—GOA SPECIES AND SPECIES GROUPS FOR WHICH DIRECTED FISHING FOR SIDEBOARD LIMITS
BY NON-EXEMPT AFA CATCHER VESSELS IS PROHIBITED—Continued
Management or regulatory area and processing
component (if applicable)
Species or species group
Dusky rockfish ..........................................................................................
Rougheye rockfish ....................................................................................
Demersal shelf rockfish ............................................................................
Thornyhead rockfish .................................................................................
Other rockfish ...........................................................................................
Atka mackerel ...........................................................................................
Big skates .................................................................................................
Longnose skates ......................................................................................
Other skates .............................................................................................
Sculpins ....................................................................................................
Sharks .......................................................................................................
Octopuses .................................................................................................
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Southeast Outside District.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
GOA.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
GOA.
GOA.
GOA.
GOA.
[FR Doc. 2023–16526 Filed 8–3–23; 4:15 pm]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES4
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:30 Aug 07, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\08AUR4.SGM
08AUR4
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53704-53745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16526]
[[Page 53703]]
Vol. 88
Tuesday,
No. 151
August 8, 2023
Part IV
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
15 CFR Part 902
50 CFR Part 679
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Amendment 122 to
the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area; Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative
Program; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 151 / Tuesday, August 8, 2023 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 53704]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 902
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 230728-0179]
RIN 0648-BL08
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Amendment
122 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area; Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to implement Amendment 122 to the
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI). Amendment 122 establishes the
Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program (PCTC Program or Program), a
limited access privilege program (LAPP) to harvest Pacific cod in the
BSAI trawl catcher vessel (CV) sector. The PCTC Program allocates
Pacific cod harvest quota to qualifying groundfish License Limitation
Program (LLP) license holders and qualifying processors and requires
participants to form cooperatives to harvest the quota. This action is
necessary to increase the value of the fishery, minimize bycatch to the
extent practicable, provide for the sustained participation of fishery-
dependent communities, ensure the sustainability and viability of the
resource, and promote safety and stability in the harvesting and
processing sectors. This action is intended to promote the goals and
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the BSAI FMP, and other applicable law.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 7, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the Environmental Assessment (EA), the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), and the Social Impact Analysis
(collectively referred to as the ``Analysis''), and the Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) prepared for this final rule may be obtained
from https://www.regulations.gov in docket number NOAA-NMFS-2022-0072
or from the NMFS Alaska Region website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
final rule may be submitted to NMFS Alaska Region, P.O. Box 21668,
Juneau, AK 99802-1668, Attn: Gretchen Harrington; and to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find the particular information
collection by using the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Warpinski, 907-586-7228 or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS published a Notice of Availability for
Amendment 122 in the Federal Register on December 30, 2022 (87 FR
80519), with public comments invited through February 28, 2023. NMFS
published a proposed rule to implement Amendment 122 in the Federal
Register on February 9, 2023 (88 FR 8592) with public comments invited
through March 13, 2023. The Secretary of Commerce approved Amendment
122 on March 24, 2023 after considering information from the public and
determining that Amendment 122 is consistent with the BSAI FMP, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable laws. NMFS received 16
comment letters on Amendment 122 and the proposed rule. A summary of
the comments and NMFS' responses are provided under the heading
``Comments and Responses'' below.
Background
The following background sections describe the PCTC Program and
this final rule. A detailed description of the PCTC Program and its
development is provided in the preamble to the proposed rule and in the
Analysis.
I. Pacific Cod Management in the BSAI
Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) is one of the most abundant and
valuable groundfish species harvested in the BSAI. Vessels harvest
Pacific cod using trawl and non-trawl gear. Vessels harvesting BSAI
Pacific cod operate as CVs that harvest and deliver the fish for
processing or as catcher/processors (CPs) that harvest and process the
catch on board.
The overfishing level (OFL), acceptable biological catch (ABC), and
total allowable catch (TAC) for BSAI groundfish are specified through
the annual harvest specification process. A detailed description of the
annual harvest specification process is provided in the final 2023 and
2024 harvest specifications for groundfish of the BSAI (88 FR 14926,
March 10, 2023). For Pacific cod, the harvest specifications establish
separate OFLs, ABCs, and TACs for the Bering Sea (BS) subarea and the
Aleutian Islands (AI) subarea of the BSAI. Allocations of Pacific cod
to the Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program sector and to the non-
CDQ fishery sectors are further apportioned by seasons. Season dates
for the CDQ and non-CDQ fishery sectors are established at 50 CFR
679.23(e)(5). In general, regulations apportion trawl gear allocations
among three seasons that correspond to January 20-April 1 (A season),
April 1-June 10 (B season), and June 10-November 1 (C season).
The trawl CV sector is apportioned 22.1 percent of the BSAI Pacific
cod non-CDQ TAC, which is further divided into seasonal allowances
between the A, B, and C seasons. A season is issued 74 percent of the
trawl CV sector's total apportionment, B season is issued 11 percent,
and C season is issued 15 percent. After NMFS deducts estimated
incidental catch from the trawl CV sector apportionment, each seasonal
allowance is assigned to the trawl CV sector as a BSAI directed fishing
allowance (DFA).
NMFS implemented the Groundfish License Limitation Program (LLP) in
1998 (63 FR 52642, Oct. 1, 1998) and issued LLP licenses to qualifying
participants based on historical participation in the Federal
groundfish fisheries off Alaska. A groundfish LLP license authorizes a
vessel to participate in a directed fishery for groundfish in the BSAI
in accordance with specific area and species endorsements, vessel and
gear designations, and the maximum length overall (MLOA), or any
exemption from the MLOA, specified on the license. All Federal Pacific
cod harvesting activity in the BSAI requires an LLP license and the
correct endorsements.
AI endorsements issued to certain LLP licenses under Amendment 92
to the BSAI FMP were intended to facilitate shoreside deliveries of
Pacific cod to AI communities and provide additional harvest
opportunities for non-American Fisheries Act (AFA) trawl vessels who
had demonstrated a dependence on AI groundfish resources. The AI
endorsements issued to LLP licenses used by non-AFA trawl CVs less than
60 ft (18.3 m) length overall (LOA) are severable from the LLP license
and transferable to another LLP licenses with a MLOA under 60 ft (18.3
m) LOA. The transferability provision was intended to allow smaller
vessels operational flexibility and avoid stranding an AI endorsement
on an LLP
[[Page 53705]]
license being used by a vessel that no longer fished in the AI. No
other area endorsement in the LLP can be transferred separately from an
LLP license.
II. PCTC Program Overview
The PCTC Program implements a complex suite of measures to improve
fishery conditions for all participants. This Program establishes
criteria for harvesters and processors in the BSAI trawl CV sector
Pacific cod fishery to qualify for and receive quota share (QS),
criteria for allocating QS in the initial year of implementation, and
criteria for the transfer of QS. QS holders are required to join a
cooperative (harvesters) or associate with a cooperative (processors).
The aggregate QS of cooperative members and associated processors
yields an exclusive harvest privilege for PCTC Program cooperatives,
which NMFS will issue as cooperative quota (CQ) each year. CQ
represents a portion of the A and B season BSAI trawl CV sector Pacific
cod DFA. Of the total annual CQ, 77.5 percent is derived from QS issued
to LLP licenses, and 22.5 percent is derived from QS issued to
processors. The DFA for the C season remains available for harvest as a
limited access fishery open to all CVs with the required trawl gear and
area endorsements on the LLP license assigned to the vessel.
The PCTC Program includes ownership and use caps to prevent a
permit holder from acquiring an excessive share of the fishery as
required under Magnuson-Stevens Act section 303A(c)(5)(D). No person is
permitted to hold more than 5 percent of harvester-issued QS or 20
percent of processor-issued QS. In addition, no vessel is allowed to
harvest more than 5 percent of the annual CQ, and no company is allowed
to process more than 20 percent of the annual CQ. The PCTC Program also
includes legacy exemptions for persons over these ownership and use
caps at the time of PCTC Program implementation, allowing participants
to maintain levels of historical participation rather than forcing
divestiture.
The PCTC Program reduces the halibut and crab Prohibited Species
Catch (PSC) limits for participating trawl CVs during the A and B
seasons. NMFS will apportion halibut and crab PSC limits to PCTC
Program cooperatives during the annual harvest specifications process
based on the percentage of total BSAI Pacific cod CQ allocated to each
cooperative.
To support the sustained participation of AI communities in the
Pacific cod trawl CV fishery, cooperatives are required to collectively
set-aside 12 percent of the A season CQ for delivery to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant (AI CQ set-aside) during years in which an AI
community representative notifies NMFS of their intent to process
Pacific cod.
The following sections describe the primary management measures
included in the PCTC Program. Each Program element is discussed in
further detail in the preamble to the proposed rule prepared for this
action (88 FR 8592, February 9, 2023).
III. Quota Share for Harvesters and Processors
NMFS established a PCTC Program official record containing all
necessary information concerning legal landings of Pacific cod during
the qualifying period, vessel and processor ownership, LLP license
holdings, and any other information needed for assigning QS. NMFS will
use the PCTC Program official record as of December 31, 2022 to
establish the initial pool of QS that will be distributed to eligible
harvesters and processors.
A. Initial Allocation of Quota Share for Harvesters
Under the PCTC Program, NMFS will assign QS to eligible LLP
licenses. ``Eligible PCTC Program LLP license'' means an LLP license
that has qualifying catch history (i.e., was assigned to a vessel that
made qualifying legal landings) of targeted trawl CV BSAI Pacific cod
during the qualifying years. The amount of QS allocated to individual
LLP licenses is determined by historic participation relative to other
LLP licenses, as described below.
``Legal landings'' means the retained catch of Pacific cod caught
by a CV using trawl gear in the BSAI during the directed fishing season
for Pacific cod that was: (1) made in compliance with state and Federal
regulations in effect at that time, (2) recorded on a State of Alaska
fish ticket or shoreside logbook for shoreside deliveries or in
observer data for mothership deliveries, and (3) was the predominately
retained species on the fishing trip (i.e., Pacific cod was targeted).
A legal landing must have been authorized by either (1) an LLP license
participating in the A or B season of a Federal or parallel State water
groundfish fishery during the qualifying years 2009 to 2019, or (2) an
LLP license with a transferable AI endorsement that, prior to receiving
that AI endorsement, participated in the AI parallel fishery from
January 20, 2004 through September 13, 2009. NMFS determines which LLP
license(s) were assigned to CVs that harvested and offloaded Pacific
cod that met all legal landings requirements. Legal landings for the
PCTC Program do not include landings in the CDQ fishery, in the State
of Alaska Guideline Harvest Level fishery, or made during the C season
by vessels participating in a Federal or parallel State water fishery.
Under this final rule, the Regional Administrator will allocate
PCTC Program QS to an LLP license holder who submits a timely
Application for PCTC Program QS that is approved by NMFS. For each LLP
license without a transferable AI endorsement, NMFS will assign a
specific number of PCTC Program QS units based on the BSAI trawl CV
Pacific cod legal landings of that LLP license using information from
the PCTC Program official record according to the following procedures:
(1) Determine the BSAI trawl CV Pacific cod legal landings
authorized by an LLP license for each calendar year from 2009 through
2019.
(2) Drop from consideration the calendar year in which the LLP
license had the least amount of legal landings. If an LLP license had
one or more years with zero harvest, drop one of those years.
(3) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings for the 10 years in which
each LLP license had the most landings. This yields the QS units for
each LLP license.
For each LLP license with a transferable AI endorsement, NMFS will
assign a specific number of PCTC Program QS units based on the legal
landings of each vessel that was used to generate the transferable AI
endorsement and subsequent legal landings authorized by the LLP license
associated with the endorsement using information from the PCTC Program
official record according to the following procedures:
(1) Determine the BSAI trawl CV Pacific cod legal landings for each
vessel used to generate the transferable AI endorsement from January
20, 2004 through September 13, 2009 and the LLP license associated with
that transferable AI endorsement from September 14, 2009 through the
end of 2019.
(2) Drop from consideration the calendar year which the vessel used
to generate the transferable AI endorsement (January 20, 2004-September
13, 2009) or the associated LLP license (2009-2019) and during which
the vessel had the least amount of legal landings. If a vessel or LLP
license had one or more years with zero harvest, drop one of those
years.
[[Page 53706]]
(3) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings of the highest fifteen years
for each LLP license with transferable AI endorsement. This yields the
QS units for each LLP license with a transferable AI endorsement.
After the QS units for the LLP licenses with and without
transferable AI endorsements are determined under part 3 of each
scenario above, NMFS sums all harvester QS units to calculate the
harvesters' total QS pool. NMFS will then determine what portion of the
77.5 percent of the A and B season DFA allocated as harvester QS is
represented by each LLP license's QS units. To do so, NMFS will divide
each LLP license's total QS units by the sum ([Sigma]) of all QS units
for all eligible LLP licenses based on the PCTC Program official record
as presented in the following equation:
LLP license's QS units/([Sigma] QS units for all LLP licenses) x 100
= Percentage of the total harvester QS pool allocated to that
eligible LLP license.
The result (quotient) of this equation is the percentage of the
total harvesters' portion of PCTC Program QS allocation (which is 77.5
percent of the A and B season DFA) that a QS holder can assign to a
cooperative each year.
NMFS will not divide QS among LLP licenses. The current LLP license
owner is entitled to all QS derived from the LLP license and
transferable AI endorsement catch history, unless compensation was
required by a private agreement associated with the sale of the LLP
license.
Some legal landings during 2009 through 2019 were made by vessels
with two or more associated LLP licenses. In these cases, NMFS will
assign the qualifying catch history to a single LLP license in one of
two ways. First, the LLP license owners may come to an agreement
regarding the division of qualifying catch history and submit this
agreement to NMFS when they apply for QS. Second, if no agreement is
provided by the LLP license holders, the owner of the vessel that made
the qualifying catch can assign the history to one of the LLP licenses
that authorized the catch.
B. Initial Allocation of Quota Share for Processors
``Eligible PCTC Program processor'' means a processing facility
with an active Federal Fisheries Permit (FFP) or Federal Processing
Permit (FPP) (subject to eligibility requirements under Amendment 120
to the BSAI FMP to limit CPs acting as mothership) that has
historically received Pacific cod legal landings during the PCTC
Program qualifying years. NMFS will issue QS to the owner of an
eligible PCTC Program processor based on deliveries of legal landings
in the Federal BSAI Pacific cod trawl fishery in the A and B seasons
for each calendar year from 2009 through 2019, with the calendar year
in which the processor received the least amount of legal landings
dropped from the calculation. Owners of eligible PCTC Program
processors must submit a timely and complete Application for PCTC
Program QS.
Processors that are no longer active (i.e., no longer hold an FPP
or FFP upon the effective date of this final rule) will not be issued
QS. The processing history associated with those processors will be
deducted from the total amount of eligible processing history during
the qualifying years when calculating the distribution of QS to
processors.
NMFS will assign a specific number of PCTC Program QS units to each
processor's PCTC Program QS permit based on the qualifying legal
landings delivered to the processor using information from the PCTC
Program official record according to the following procedures:
(1) Determine the BSAI trawl CV Pacific cod legal landings in the A
and B seasons delivered to each eligible processor for each calendar
year from 2009 through 2019.
(2) Drop from consideration the calendar year in which the
processor received the least amount of legal landings. If a processor
had one or more years with zero processing of Pacific cod legal
landings, drop one of those years.
(3) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings of the highest 10 years for
each eligible processor. This yields the QS units for each processor.
(4) Divide the QS units for each eligible processor by the sum
([Sigma]) of all QS units for all processors based on the PCTC official
record as presented in the following equation:
Processor's QS units/[Sigma] all processor QS units x 100 =
Percentage of the total processor QS allocation for that processor.
The result (quotient) of this equation is the percentage of the
total processors' portion of PCTC Program QS allocation (which is 22.5
percent of the A and B season DFA) that a QS holder can assign to a
cooperative each year.
Table 1--PCTC Program Initial QS Pool in Units
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PCTC Program initial QS pool in
Species units
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific cod (Holders of LLP Licenses [Sigma] highest 10 years of
with no transferable AI endorsement). BSAI Pacific cod catch history
in metric tons in the PCTC
official record as of December
31, 2022 for LLP license
holders.
Pacific cod (Holders of LLP licenses [Sigma] highest 15 years of
with a transferable AI endorsement). BSAI Pacific cod catch history
in metric tons in the PCTC
official record as of December
31, 2022 for holders of LLP
licenses with a transferable
AI endorsement.
Pacific cod (All processors)........... [Sigma] highest 10 years BSAI
Pacific cod processing history
in metric tons in the PCTC
official record as of December
31, 2022 for that BSAI Pacific
cod for eligible processors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Application for PCTC Program QS
A person must submit an Application for PCTC Program QS in order to
receive an initial allocation of PCTC QS. NMFS requires an application
to ensure that QS is assigned to the appropriate person(s) and to
provide a process for resolving claims of legal landings that are
contrary to the PCTC Program official record. Once a person submits an
Application for PCTC Program QS that is approved by NMFS, that person
will not need to resubmit an application for QS in future years. NMFS
will post a list of the eligible PCTC Program LLP license holders and
the eligible PCTC Program processors on the NMFS Alaska Region web page
(see ADDRESSES).
NMFS will mail an application package to the address on record for
all potentially eligible LLP license holders and processors. This
package will include a letter informing potentially eligible LLP
license holders and processors whether NMFS has determined they are
eligible to receive QS, and if so, the amount of QS calculated by NMFS
based on qualifying catch or processing history from the PCTC Program
official record.
Applications will also be available on the NMFS Alaska Region web
page (see
[[Page 53707]]
ADDRESSES), and interested persons can also contact NMFS RAM to request
an application package.
An Application for PCTC Program QS can be submitted electronically
or by mail as indicated in the instructions provided on the
application. A completed Application for PCTC Program QS must be
received by NMFS no later than 1700 hours AKST on October 10, 2023, or
if sent by U.S. mail, postmarked by that time. Objective written
evidence of timely application will be considered proof of a timely
application. If participants do not submit an application by the
deadline, they will forfeit their PCTC Program QS.
If a participant agrees with the PCTC Program official record
summary, they still must submit an Application for PCTC Program QS by
the deadline.
If a participant did not receive an application package from NMFS,
they may still apply for QS by submitting an Application for PCTC
Program QS and providing evidence of qualifying participation in the
BSAI trawl CV sector Pacific cod fishery by the application deadline.
If a participant would like to receive QS and does not agree with
the PCTC Program official record summary, they must complete an
Application for PCTC Program QS by the application deadline and provide
evidence of any claims of participation that are contrary to the
official record.
If an LLP license holder's PCTC Program official record summary
includes shared catch history, the participants with shared catch
history must execute an agreement specifying the amount of shared catch
history to assign to each LLP license. If NMFS does not receive an
agreement, the owner of the catcher vessel designated on the LLP
licenses at the time of harvest will determine the amount of QS
assigned to each permit.
D. QS Application Review and Appeals
If any applicant disagrees with NMFS's initial calculations and
provides documentation with their Application for PCTC Program QS to
support a claim of catch history that is different from the PCTC
Program official record, NMFS will determine whether such documentation
is sufficient to amend the official record. If so, NMFS will issue QS
to the applicant. If not, NMFS will inform the applicant that the
submitted documentation was insufficient and provide the applicant with
a 30-day evidentiary period to further support their claims. After the
close of the 30-day evidentiary period, NMFS will make its final
decision about the official record and issue an initial administrative
determinations (IAD) to the applicant. Applicants who disagree with the
IAD may appeal NMFS's decision through the NOAA National Appeals Office
according to the procedures found at 50 CFR 679.43.
NMFS will identify in an IAD any deficiencies or discrepancies in
the application, including any deficiencies in the information or
evidence submitted to support an applicant's claims challenging the
official record. NMFS's IAD will state which claims cannot be approved
based on the available information or evidence and provide information
on how an applicant can appeal an IAD. An applicant who appeals an IAD
will not receive QS for contested landings data unless and until the
appeal is resolved in the applicant's favor. Once NMFS has approved an
Application for PCTC Program QS in its entirety, NMFS will assign QS
units to an applicant's LLP license or issue a processor a PCTC Program
QS permit with a specified number of QS units.
For the 2024 fishing season, NMFS will issue CQ to cooperatives
based on the QS held by cooperative members at the time of CQ issuance.
Any ongoing appeals or QS transfers allowed under the 90-day transfer
window for AFA non-exempt CVs will apply to subsequent fishing years.
E. Transferring QS
Under the PCTC Program, QS holders may transfer QS concurrently
with the transfer of the LLP license, AI endorsement, or processor PCTC
Program QS permit. In order to transfer QS, a QS holder must submit to
NMFS an Application for Transfer of License Limitation Program
Groundfish/Crab License or the Application for Transfer of Pacific Cod
Trawl Cooperative Program Quota Share (QS) for Processors. Transfer of
QS requires approval by NMFS to properly track ownership caps. For
harvesters, QS may be transferred with an LLP license or a transferable
AI endorsement to another person through the existing LLP transfer
provisions described in regulations at 50 CFR 679.4(k)(7). Each
application must include any additional information needed for the
transfer of QS, including amount of QS to be transferred (generally all
QS attached to the license), the transferee, and the sale price of QS.
Applications are available on the NMFS Alaska Region web page (see
ADDRESSES). Complete applications can be submitted to NMFS
electronically.
To facilitate cooperative formation under the PCTC Program in the
first year, QS transfers submitted after November 1 and prior to the
start of PCTC Program fishing season will be applied to the following
year, meaning if a transfer was submitted in December 2023, the
transfer would not be applied until after the PCTC Program fishing
season ends in 2024.
Under Amendment 92, the AI endorsements issued to LLP licenses used
by non-AFA trawl CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA are severable from
the LLP license they were initially issued and transferable to another
LLP licenses with a MLOA under 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA. NMFS modified the
LLP license transfer regulations to clarify the process for
transferring an AI endorsement independent of the LLP license. As part
of the application process, a person must specify the LLP license to
which the transferred AI area endorsement will be assigned.
Once PCTC Program QS is issued, the QS units will remain attached
to the associated LLP license or processor's PCTC Program QS permit in
most circumstances and cannot be severed or otherwise transferred
independently. There are several limited exceptions to non-
severability: (1) QS can be fully or partially transferred during the
limited 90-day transfer provision for non-exempt AFA CVs; (2) QS
attached to LLP licenses with a transferable AI endorsement can be
transferred along with the endorsement to another LLP license that
meets the criteria for a transferable AI endorsement (endorsements
cannot be stacked on a single LLP); (3) if a participant qualifies for
a legacy exemption and receives an initial allocation of QS in excess
of the ownership cap, that participant's QS can be split during a
transfer to prevent any recipient from exceeding a cap; and (4) QS can
be separated from a processor QS permit in any transfer of processor-
held QS if necessary to prevent any transferee from exceeding an
ownership or use cap.
Ninety Day Transfer Window for Non-Exempt AFA LLP Holders
For LLP licenses associated with AFA non-exempt vessels, within 90
days of initial issuance of QS, the owner of the LLP license may
transfer QS to another LLP license associated with an AFA non-exempt
vessel. These QS transfers are subject to the QS ownership cap. This
provision allows LLP license holders that engaged in AFA sideboard
harvesting agreements during the qualifying period to transfer
resulting QS back to the originating LLP license.
The transferor and the transferee must submit to NMFS a letter,
signed by both persons, as evidence of their agreement to transfer the
QS in this one-time
[[Page 53708]]
opportunity. In the letter, they must explain how much QS will be
transferred and to which LLP license or licenses. If only one party
submits evidence of an agreement, the QS will remain with the LLP
license to which it was initially assigned.
F. QS Ownership Caps
The PCTC program includes QS ownership caps to prevent a permit
holder from acquiring an excessive share of the fishery as required
under Magnuson-Stevens Act Section 303A(c)(5)(D). Individual ownership
caps for both harvesters and processors are calculated using the
``individual and collective rule'' which means a person is deemed to
own QS in the same percentage that person owns or uses the relevant
license, permit, or vessel. If a person owns QS equal to the cap, NMFS
will not approve a transfer of additional QS to that person. The PCTC
Program also includes CQ use caps, described in sections IV.E and IV.F.
Harvester QS Ownership Cap--5 Percent
With the exception of persons qualifying for the legacy exemption,
no person is permitted to individually or collectively own more than 5
percent of the aggregate QS units initially assigned to eligible LLP
licenses. The number of QS units is based on the PCTC Program official
record. When QS is transferred, the person receiving the transfer is
prohibited from holding or using QS over the 5 percent cap. This QS
ownership cap limits the amount of QS assigned to an LLP license that
can be held or controlled by a single entity. Processor QS does not
count toward this ownership cap.
Processor QS Ownership Cap--20 Percent
With the exception of persons qualifying for the legacy exemption,
no person is permitted to individually or collectively own more than 20
percent of the aggregate QS units initially assigned to QS permits held
by eligible processors. Processor QS ownership caps are necessarily
higher than harvester-held QS caps because the total number of eligible
processors is significantly less than the number of harvesters. This
cap is applied at the aggregate company or firm level (not the
individual facility level). The processor QS ownership cap limits the
amount of processor-held QS that can be held or controlled by a single
entity.
Legacy Exemption From the Ownership Caps
Under the PCTC Program, persons over the cap at the time of QS
issuance are granted non-transferable legacy exemptions. Because the
ownership caps fall well short of excessive shares in the fishery and
allocating QS based on status quo levels of participation would not
result in any participant holding an excessive share of limited access
privileges, the Program grants legacy exemptions to participants whose
initial QS allocations exceed the ownership caps. The legacy exemptions
are intended to preserve stability in the fishery rather than force
longtime participants to divest and reduce their reliance on the
fishery. However, legacy exemptions are unique to persons receiving
initial QS allocations and cannot be transferred. All future purchasers
of QS would be subject to the ownership caps.
G. Transferring QS in Excess of the Ownership Caps
NMFS will not approve transfers of an LLP license with QS or a PCTC
Program QS permit if the transfer would cause a person to exceed the 5
percent harvester QS ownership cap or the 20 percent processor QS
ownership cap.
For LLP licenses and PCTC Program QS permit holders that are
initially issued QS greater than the ownership cap (i.e., for persons
granted a legacy exemption from the ownership cap), the LLP license
holder or QS permit holder may sever the amount of QS over the cap from
the permit (and, once severed, transfer to one or more buyers) at the
time of transfer. This provision allows the transfer of an LLP license
or PCTC Program QS permit subject to a legacy exemption without the
transferee exceeding a QS ownership cap. In addition, for QS assigned
to a processor holding a PCTC Program QS permit--even if the transferor
does not hold QS in excess of any cap--QS can be divided or transferred
separately from that processor permit if a sale will otherwise result
in the transferee exceeding an ownership cap.
If a QS holder has a legacy exemption from the QS ownership cap,
NMFS will not approve a QS transfer to that person unless and until
that person's holdings of QS are reduced to an amount below the QS
ownership cap.
IV. PCTC Program Cooperatives
The PCTC Program is a cooperative-based program that requires
harvesters to join a cooperative each year and processors to associate
with a cooperative each year to benefit from QS holdings. NMFS will
issue cooperatives annual CQ derived from the QS held by the harvesters
that join the cooperative and associated processors. Under the Program,
cooperative members are expected to coordinate their fishing
operations, potentially reduce operational expenses, and increase the
quality and revenue from the product, among other benefits.
A. Requirements for Forming a Cooperative
Under the PCTC Program, forming a cooperative requires at least
three LLP licenses with QS. Annually, each cooperative must associate
with at least one permitted processor. There is no limitation on the
number of LLP licenses that may join a single cooperative, the number
of processors a cooperative can associate with, or on the amount of QS
a single cooperative can control. There is also no limit on the number
of cooperatives that may form, but each LLP license may only be
assigned to one cooperative. A person may hold multiple LLP licenses,
meaning that an individual who holds three or more LLP licenses may
form a cooperative in association with a processor.
An LLP license holder may change cooperatives and processor
associations may change annually without penalty. However, an LLP
license holder with QS may not change cooperatives and cooperatives may
not change their processor associations during the PCTC Program fishing
season. If an LLP license is sold or transferred during the season, it
will remain with the cooperative until the end of the season. Inter-
cooperative formation is allowed and an inter-cooperative agreement
(see section IV.B) is required to implement the AI set-aside and to
allow for efficient transfer of CQ or PSC limits between cooperatives.
NMFS will issue annual CQ to each cooperative based on the
aggregate QS held by all cooperative members and associated processors.
CQ constitutes an exclusive harvest privilege for the A and B seasons.
NMFS will issue CQ by season and rely on the cooperatives to ensure the
seasonal limits are not exceeded. Any unused A season CQ may be
harvested during the B season. Cooperative members will determine their
own harvest strategy, including which vessels can harvest the CQ.
CQ is not designated for the BS or AI subareas separately, but may
be harvested from either area because the non-CDQ Pacific cod sector
allocations are BSAI wide. If the non-CDQ Pacific cod TAC is or will be
reached in either the BS or the AI subareas, NMFS will
[[Page 53709]]
prohibit non-CDQ directed fishing for Pacific cod in that subarea as
provided at Sec. 679.20(d)(1)(iii). However, NMFS will annually
establish a separate AI DFA to support the calculation of the AI set-
aside. For more information, see Section VI of this preamble. Under
certain conditions, cooperatives would be required to collectively set
aside 12 percent of the A season CQ for delivery to an AI shoreplant as
described further under the AI Community Protections section below.
Cooperatives are limited in the manner in which they distribute CQ
derived from processor-held QS for harvest by cooperative vessels. To
address vertically integrated companies where a processing company may
also own LLP licenses or CVs within a cooperative, CQ derived from
processor-held QS must be divided among cooperative harvesting CVs
proportionately to the QS attached to LLP licenses on board the CVs. In
other words, a cooperative should not allow a CV or LLP license owned
by a processor to harvest a greater proportion of the CQ resulting from
processor-held QS than the LLP license will have brought into the
cooperative absent any processor-held QS. Each cooperative will monitor
this provision and include reporting on harvest of CQ resulting from
processor-held QS in the PCTC Program cooperative annual report to the
North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council).
B. Application for PCTC Program Cooperative Quota (CQ)
All participants in the Program must organize into cooperatives,
and the cooperative must submit a complete Application for PCTC Program
CQ prior to the November 1 deadline each year to receive an annual CQ
permit. If the cooperative fails to submit a timely application for CQ,
NMFS will not issue CQ to the cooperative for that fishing year.
NMFS will process the application for CQ and, if approved, issue a
CQ permit and apportioned amounts of annual crab PSC and halibut PSC
limits to the cooperative. NMFS will use these applications to issue CQ
permits, establish annual cooperative accounts for catch accounting
purposes, and identify specific harvester vessels for each cooperative.
As with other LAPPs, the information received in this application is
annually used to review ownership and control information for various
QS holders to ensure that QS and CQ use caps are not exceeded.
Processors that receive deliveries of CQ but do not hold a QS permit do
not need to be listed on the application for CQ.
The Application for PCTC Program CQ is available on the NMFS Alaska
Region website and may be submitted electronically through the NMFS
online system or the NMFS Alaska Region website. The following list
summarizes the information that is required:
PCTC Program LLP license identification numbers;
Processor-held PCTC Program QS permit number(s) and name
of the processor that holds that each QS permit;
PCTC Program QS ownership documentation;
PCTC Program cooperative business address or identifier
identification;
Members of the PCTC Program cooperative and the associated
processor that holds a QS permit;
Trawl vessel identification, including the name(s) and
USCG documentation number of vessel(s) eligible to harvest the CQ
issued to the PCTC Program cooperative;
A copy of the business license issued by the state in
which the PCTC cooperative is registered as a business entity;
A copy of the articles of incorporation or partnership
agreement of the PCTC Program cooperative;
A list of the names of all persons, to the individual
level, holding an ownership interest in the LLP licenses that join the
cooperative and the percentage ownership each person and individual
holds in each LLP license;
A list of trawl CVs eligible to harvest a portion of that
cooperative's CQ;
A copy of the cooperative agreement signed by the members
of the PCTC Program cooperative, which must include, at a minimum, the
following terms: (1) QS holders affiliated with processors cannot
participate in price setting negotiations except as permitted by
antitrust law; (2) monitoring provisions, including sideboard
protections in the GOA, sufficient to ensure compliance with the PCTC
Program; and (3) a provision that specifies the obligations of PCTC QS
holders who are members of the cooperative to ensure the full payment
of cost recovery fees that may be due;
A copy of the inter-cooperative agreement that provides
the plan for coordinating harvest and delivery of the AI CQ set-aside;
Designated representative and cooperative members'
signatures and certification; and
Authorization for the designated representative to act on
behalf of the cooperative to complete the application.
C. Issuing PCTC CQ
NMFS will review the CQ applications for accurate information,
including cooperative and inter-cooperative agreements, ownership and
use caps, and payment of any fees, including cost recovery. If
approved, NMFS will issue a CQ permit to the cooperative. NMFS will
issue CQ permits after the annual harvest specifications are
recommended by the Council for the upcoming year. Permits will
generally be issued in early January for the fishing year starting
January 20. The CQ permit will list the metric tons of Pacific cod by A
and B season that the cooperative may harvest, the metric tons of
apportioned halibut PSC, and the number of each species of crab PSC
that the cooperative may use during the fishing year.
NMFS will issue CQ for A and B seasons separately, with total CQ
issued to all cooperatives in each season equal to the DFA. The
remaining TAC for the trawl CV sector will be the incidental catch
allowance (ICA) for Pacific cod caught as bycatch in other fisheries,
such as pollock.
D. Processors in Cooperatives
A person holding a PCTC Program QS permit is required to associate
with a cooperative to use their QS. This creates an economic incentive
for the processors that hold QS to either associate with a cooperative
on an annual basis or sell their permit to a processor that will
associate with a cooperative. Processor-held QS that is not associated
with a specific cooperative will be distributed as CQ among all the
cooperatives that form in a given year in the same proportion as the CQ
assigned to each cooperative. A cooperative may associate with a
processor that does not hold QS.
E. Vessel CQ Use Cap--5 Percent
A vessel use cap restricts the CQ that can be consolidated and
harvested by one vessel during the year. The PCTC Program includes a 5
percent vessel use cap for CVs. With the exception of persons
qualifying under the legacy exemption, no vessel is permitted to
harvest more than 5 percent of the annual CQ issued in the fishery. A
vessel designated on an LLP license that receives QS in excess of the
QS ownership cap at the time of QS issuance will be granted a legacy
exemption from the vessel use cap because that vessel would have
harvested over 5 percent of the total A and B season trawl CV sector
Pacific cod allocation during the qualifying years. The legacy
exemption applies to the
[[Page 53710]]
vessel designated on an LLP license that yields more than 5 percent of
the QS at the time of initial allocation. This legacy exemption is not
transferable if the LLP license is transferred to a new owner.
F. Processor CQ Use Cap--20 Percent
A processor's CQ use cap protects against excessive consolidation
of processing activity by limiting a person (i.e., company or firm) to
processing no more than 20 percent of the annual CQ using the
individual and collective rule, with the exception of persons
qualifying under the legacy exemption. The processor CQ use cap is
calculated based on the total CQ issued under the PCTC Program and not
just QS initially issued to processors. This ensures that a processing
company is limited to processing a specific percentage of the total
PCTC Program allocation. A person over the cap at the time of QS
issuance--i.e., a processor that, on average, processed more than 20
percent of the total A and B season trawl CV sector Pacific cod
allocation during the qualifying years--is granted a non-transferable
legacy exemption.
G. CQ and PSC Transfers
Under this Program, a cooperative may transfer all or part of its
CQ to another cooperative for harvest subject to the limitations
imposed by the use caps. Transfers of CQ are for a single year's annual
allocation. The underlying QS remains with the LLP license. This CQ
transfer provision provides flexibility for cooperatives to transfer
Pacific cod for harvest or PSC to support cooperative fishing. The
ability to transfer PSC allows cooperatives to account for unforeseen
circumstances, but the incentive to avoid hitting a cooperative PSC
limit remains because of the cost of acquiring PSC from another
cooperative.
This final rule allows post-delivery transfers of CQ, but all
transfers must be completed prior to August 1, after the close of the B
season. At the end of the fishing season, remaining CQ may be
consolidated into fewer cooperatives (and for harvest by fewer vessels)
due to the requirement that a vessel may not begin a fishing trip
without unharvested CQ. Consolidation of CQ to a smaller number of
cooperatives toward the end of the fishing season facilitates ``sweep
up'' trips to complete the season's harvests.
To transfer CQ and associated PSC limits between cooperatives, the
cooperative must use the NMFS online system on the NMFS Alaska Region
website, which allows for automated review and approval of transfer
requests within use cap constraints. NMFS will not approve a CQ
transfer if the transfer would result in a CV exceeding the use cap. A
transfer of CQ is not effective until approved by NMFS.
H. Cooperative Reports
Under the PCTC Program, the Council has requested cooperatives to
provide voluntary annual reports. Consistent with other cooperative
programs developed by the Council, these reports shall include specific
information on the structure, function, and operation of the
cooperatives.
Each year, the Council will receive reports outlining the
cooperatives' performance at one of its regularly scheduled meetings.
These reports will be used by the Council and NMFS to ensure the
program is functioning as intended and to solicit timely information on
issues that may need to be addressed by the Council. The Council
requested that each cooperative report include information on CQ
leasing activities and any penalties issued, harvest of CQ resulting
from processor-held QS, cooperative membership, cooperative management,
and performance (including implementation of the AI CQ set-aside when
in effect).
V. Prohibited Species Catch Limits
NMFS will annually apportion halibut and crab PSC limits to PCTC
Program cooperatives based on the percentage of total CQ allocated to
their cooperative. During the A and B seasons, NMFS will monitor PSC
use at the sector level, and cooperatives will manage PSC use at the
cooperative level. Cooperative vessels are prohibited from fishing
under the Program if a halibut PSC limit is reached for the cooperative
or from fishing in a crab bycatch limitation zone if a crab PSC limit
is reached in that relevant area. PSC limits may be transferred between
cooperatives using the NMFS online system to cover any overages or to
allow a cooperative to continue harvesting Pacific cod.
A. Halibut PSC
Annually, NMFS will apportion the halibut PSC limit assigned to the
BSAI trawl limited access sector Pacific cod fishery to the trawl CV
and AFA CP sectors; 98 percent will be apportioned to the trawl CV
sector and 2 percent will be apportioned to AFA CP sector. The specific
percentage of the total halibut PSC limit assigned to the trawl limited
access sector may change annually. NMFS will then apportion the halibut
PSC limit to the trawl CV sector for the A, B, and C season. Of the
halibut PSC limit apportioned to the trawl CV sector, 95 percent will
be available for the PCTC Program in the A and B seasons and 5 percent
is available for the C season.
To implement the halibut PSC reduction under the Program, NMFS will
annually apply a fixed percentage reduction to the A and B season PSC
apportionment derived from the overall trawl CV sector halibut PSC
apportionment. The total halibut PSC reduction under the Program is 25
percent, which will be phased in over two years. In the first year of
the Program, NMFS will apply a 12.5 percent reduction to the A and B
season trawl CV sector halibut PSC apportionment in the annual harvest
specifications after the Council recommends and NMFS approves the BSAI
trawl limited access sector's PSC limit apportionments to fishery
categories. In the second year of the Program and every year
thereafter, NMFS will apply a 25 percent reduction to the A and B
season trawl CV sector halibut PSC apportionment. Any amount of the
PCTC Program PSC limit remaining after the B season will be reallocated
to the trawl CV limited access fishery in the C season. Because the
annual halibut PSC limit for the Program is not a fixed amount
established in regulation and, instead, is determined annually through
the harvest specification process, NMFS must apply the 25 percent
reduction to the A and B season apportionment of the trawl CV sector
apportionment to implement the overall PSC reductions under the
Program.
B. Crab PSC
The annual crab PSC limits available to the BSAI trawl limited
access sector Pacific cod fishery category will be apportioned between
the trawl CV sector and the AFA CP sector based on the proportion of
BSAI Pacific cod allocated to the two sectors: 90.6 percent to BSAI
trawl CVs and 9.4 percent to AFA CPs. Of the crab PSC limit apportioned
to the trawl CV sector, 95 percent will be available for the PCTC
Program (A and B seasons) and 5 percent will be available for the C
season. NMFS will then reduce the crab PSC limits by 35 percent during
the A and B seasons for the PCTC Program. As with halibut PSC, any
amount of the PCTC Program PSC limit remaining after the B season will
be reallocated to the C season trawl CV limited access fishery.
VI. AI Community Protections
Under the PCTC Program, cooperatives are required to collectively
set aside an amount of CQ equal to 12
[[Page 53711]]
percent of the overall A season CQ for delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant (AI CQ set-aside) during years in which an AI community
representative notifies NMFS of their intent to process Pacific cod.
The term ``Aleutian Islands shoreplant'' means a processing facility
that is physically located on land west of 170[deg] W. longitude within
the State of Alaska. The rationale and need for this provision is
explained in detail in the preamble to the proposed rule and in Section
2.9.6 of the Analysis prepared for this action (see ADDRESSES).
The AI CQ set-aside provides additional incentives for harvesters
to deliver AI Pacific cod to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant. The AI CQ
set-aside is designed to provide benefits and stability to fishery-
dependent fishing communities in the AI when a shoreplant is operating
and is responsive to lingering effects caused by changes in management
regimes such as rationalization programs. Without the AI CQ set-aside,
AI harvesters, shoreplants, and fishing communities could be preempted
from the fishery by the offshore sector. The AI CQ set-aside is
especially beneficial to AI communities in low TAC years when harvest
can otherwise fully occur in the BS, preventing any cod deliveries in
the AI.
This final rule does not affect any sector's BSAI Pacific cod
allocation or the CDQ Pacific cod allocation in the AI. Non-CDQ sectors
continue to receive annual allocations as established under Amendment
85 to the BSAI FMP (72 FR 50787, September 4, 2007). The performance of
this AI CQ set-aside provision will be evaluated in the periodic
reviews of the Program.
A. Managing the AI CQ Set-Aside
The AI CQ set-aside provision for AI processors requires
cooperatives to set-aside an amount of annual CQ for delivery to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant if the city of Adak or Atka files a notice
of intent to process that year. The AI CQ set-aside is in effect and
available for delivery to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant during the A
and B seasons unless all notices of the intent to process are withdrawn
by the AI communities. If all notices of intent to process are
withdrawn, any remaining portion of the AI CQ set-aside will be
available for cooperatives to deliver to any processor.
Cooperatives will manage the AI CQ set-aside through an inter-
cooperative agreement. This agreement will ensure annual coordination
between the cooperatives and shoreplants that are operating in the AI
and guarantee that the AI CQ set-aside is available for delivery to the
Aleutian Islands shoreplants. This reduces the management burden on
NMFS and relies on the cooperatives to organize annual fishing
activity.
Each year, the cooperative must submit a copy of the inter-
cooperative agreement with the Application for PCTC Program CQ to NMFS
that describes (1) how the AI CQ set-aside would be administered by the
cooperatives, (2) how the cooperatives intend to harvest the AI CQ set-
aside, and (3) how cooperatives would ensure that CVs less than 60 ft
(18.3 m) LOA assigned to an LLP license with a transferable AI
endorsement have the opportunity to harvest 10 percent of the AI CQ
set-aside for delivery to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant. Each
cooperative is required to provide the cooperative's plan for
coordinating harvest and delivery of the AI CQ set-aside to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant regardless of whether that cooperative intends to
harvest any amount of the AI CQ set-aside.
For the calendar year 2023, to provide for implementation of the
Program during its first year, NMFS will allow each cooperative to
submit the inter-cooperative agreement on or before December 31, 2023,
after the November 1 deadline for the Application for PCTC Program CQ.
B. Intent To Process and Eligibility for AI CQ Set-Aside
This final rule allows the representative of the City of Adak or
the City of Atka to submit an annual notice of intent to process PCTC
Program Pacific cod in the upcoming fishing year to the NMFS Regional
Administrator no later than October 15 of the year prior to fishing.
Submission of the notice of intent by October 15 provides NMFS inseason
management with the timely information it needs to manage the upcoming
fisheries and notify the cooperatives that the AI CQ set-aside is in
effect for the upcoming year. If neither Adak nor Atka submit a notice
of intent to process by October 15, cooperatives are not required to
set aside CQ for delivery to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant in the
subsequent fishing season.
A city's notice of intent to process Pacific cod must contain the
following information: date, name of city, a statement of intent to
process Pacific cod, statement of calendar year during which the city
intends to process Pacific cod, and the contact information for the
city representative where the relevant shoreplant is located.
On or before November 30, the Regional Administrator will notify
the representative of Adak or Atka confirming receipt of their notice
of intent to process Pacific cod. Shortly after receipt of a notice of
intent to process Pacific cod, NMFS will announce through notice in the
Federal Register whether the AI CQ set-aside is in effect for the
upcoming fishing year.
Even if Adak or Atka is uncertain at the time the notice of intent
is due as to whether an Aleutian Islands shoreplant will be
operational, there would be no penalty to Adak or Atka or the
shoreplant for stating their intention to process but then later
withdrawing that notice of intent. Adak or Atka would be allowed to
withdraw their notice of intent at any time after submitting it to
NMFS. In the event that both Adak and Atka withdraw their notices of
intent to process during the A or B season, NMFS will publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing that the AI CQ set-aside is no
longer in effect and remove the delivery requirement. The remaining
portion of the AI CQ set-aside would be available for harvest without
restrictions on delivery location.
NMFS will monitor the implementation of the AI CQ set-aside
throughout the A and B seasons. NMFS will consider the number and
frequency of deliveries to Aleutian Islands shoreplants as well as the
season timing and remaining CQ to be harvested. As soon as practicable,
if the Regional Administrator determines that Aleutian Islands
shoreplants authorized under the PCTC Program will not process the
entire AI set-aside, the Regional Administrator may publish a notice in
the Federal Register to remove the delivery requirement for some or all
of the projected unused AI CQ set-aside.
C. AI DFA
The Council and NMFS annually establish separate OFLs, ABCs, and
TACs for the AI and BS subareas; however, the non-CDQ sector
allocations (including the PCTC Program allocations) remain BSAI-wide
allocations. Each year, during the annual harvest specifications
process described at Sec. 679.20(c), NMFS will specify an ICA and a
DFA derived from the AI non-CDQ TAC. The amount of AI Pacific cod that
NMFS estimates will be taken as incidental catch when directed fishing
for non-CDQ groundfish other than Pacific cod in the AI subarea will be
the AI ICA. The amount of the AI ICA may vary from year to year, and in
future years, NMFS will specify the AI ICA in the annual harvest
specifications based on recent and anticipated
[[Page 53712]]
incidental catch of AI Pacific cod in other AI non-CDQ directed
groundfish fisheries. The amount of the AI non-CDQ TAC remaining after
subtraction of the AI ICA will be the AI DFA.
NMFS will specify the AI ICA and DFA so that NMFS can clearly
establish the amount of the AI CQ set-aside. It will also aid the
public in knowing how much of the AI non-CDQ TAC is available for
directed fishing prior to the start of fishing to aid in the planning
of fishery operations.
The amount of the annual AI CQ set-aside for delivery to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant is equal to the lesser of either the AI
Pacific cod non-CDQ DFA or 12 percent of the A season CQ and is in
effect during the A and B seasons. When the AI CQ set-aside is equal to
the AI DFA, directed fishing for Pacific cod in the AI may be conducted
only by PCTC Program vessels that deliver their catch of AI Pacific cod
to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant. However, if the AI DFA is greater
than the AI CQ set-aside (and thus the set-aside is equal to 12 percent
of the A season CQ), the difference between the AI DFA and the AI CQ
set-aside may be available for directed fishing by all PCTC Program
vessels with no restrictions on where that CQ must be delivered and
processed.
VII. C Season Limited Access Fishery
The C season apportionment--which is 15 percent of the total annual
allocation to the BSAI Pacific cod trawl CV sector--remains a limited
access fishery open to all trawl CVs with LLP license endorsements to
harvest Pacific cod in the BS and/or AI with trawl gear. The C season
limited access fishery, which occurs June 10 through November 1,
continues to be managed as it is under status quo conditions and
remains unchanged by this final rule.
Although directed fishing for Pacific cod in the C season is an
important part of the annual fishing plan for some trawl CVs, most of
the trawl CV C season catch is incidental to other directed fishing. In
the fall, as directed fishing for Pacific cod that opens on September 1
for the hook-and-line and pot sectors progresses, NMFS estimates any
BSAI trawl CV C season allocation, including any unused amounts of PCTC
Pacific cod and PSC limits rolled over to the C season, will be
available for reallocation to other sectors. In some years, projected
unused amounts of the trawl CV Pacific cod TAC will be available to
reallocate, and NMFS may make a reallocation in late September or
October. In other years, there may not be any projected unused amounts,
and NMFS will wait until after directed fishing for pollock and Pacific
cod by the trawl CV sector closes. In that circumstance, reallocations
will occur in November or December. When the BS and AI Pacific cod TACs
are higher, trawl CV C season Pacific cod may go unused and can be
reallocated to other sectors. For projected unused PSC limits, the
Regional Administrator may reallocate a portion of crab PSC or halibut
PSC to Amendment 80 cooperatives if the amount assigned to the BSAI
trawl limited access sector is not projected to be harvested or used
(Sec. 679.91(f)).
To help ensure efficient allocation management, NMFS may rollover
any unused portion of a seasonal apportionment from any non-CDQ fishery
sector (except the jig sector) to that sector's next season during the
current fishing year (Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B) and (C)).
Under the PCTC Program, the cooperatives are granted harvest
privileges in the A and B seasons of the BSAI Pacific cod fishery.
Those harvest privileges alter the reallocation structure from the
trawl CV sector prior to the C season since rollovers of unused CQ and
PSC limits to other sectors will not occur until the close of the
annual PCTC fishing year (the end of the B season).
VIII. Additional PCTC Program Provisions
A. Sideboard Limits in the PCTC Program
The PCTC Program modifies existing GOA sideboard limits and
associated GOA halibut PSC limits for non-exempt AFA vessels and LLP
license holders and closes directed fishing where sideboard limits are
too small to support a directed fishery. All GOA non-exempt AFA CVs and
associated AFA LLP licenses are sideboarded in aggregate for all GOA
groundfish fishing activity and for GOA halibut PSC based on their GOA
catch history during the qualifying period, except when participating
in the Central Gulf of Alaska (CGOA) Rockfish Program. The existing
sideboards apply to non-exempt AFA vessels as defined at Sec.
679.64(b)(2). The PCTC Program modifies the calculation of the existing
sideboard limits for these non-exempt AFA CVs based on the GOA catch
history. LLP licenses associated with non-exempt AFA CVs are also
subject to the revised sideboard limits regardless of which vessel is
named on the LLP.
GOA sideboards are currently calculated for non-exempt AFA CVs
based on the ratio of catch to the TAC during the years 1995-1997. The
PCTC Program modifies the calculation of the sideboard ratios for non-
exempt AFA CVs that will be used in the annual GOA harvest
specifications, looking at the ratio of catch to the TAC in the
qualifying years of 2009-2019 (as shown in Table 2).
[[Page 53713]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR08AU23.008
In addition, the ratio used to apportion GOA halibut PSC limits is
modified and the five seasonal apportionments based on that sideboard
ratio is reduced to a single aggregate annual amount. Providing an
aggregate annual halibut PSC limit provides greater flexibility for the
AFA vessels and LLP licenses to assign halibut PSC limits to those GOA
groundfish sideboard fisheries that have the greatest value. Table 3
shows the new aggregate GOA halibut PSC limit ratio based on catch
history during the qualifying period 2009-2019 that will be used
annually in the GOA harvest specifications table after the effective
date of this final rule.
Table 3--GOA Halibut PSC Limit Ratio Aggregated at the Season and
Complex Level for All AFA Non-Exempt CVs and Associated LLP Licenses
Under the Qualifying Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qualifying
GOA Halibut PSC Limit period (2009-
2019)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PSC Limit Ratio........................................ .072
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, this final rule closes directed fishing to all GOA
non-exempt AFA CVs and LLP licenses for the following species
categories: Southeast Outside district of the Eastern GOA pollock,
Western GOA shallow-water flatfish, Central and Eastern GOA deep-water
flatfish, Central GOA dusky rockfish, and Eastern GOA and Central GOA
Pacific ocean perch. NMFS will no longer publish AFA Program sideboard
limits for these specific species or species groups in the Federal
Register as part of the annual groundfish harvest specifications and
instead this final rule specifies in regulation at Sec.
679.64(b)(4)(ii) that directed fishing for these species is closed to
non-exempt AFA CVs.
The Council directed cooperatives to (1) ensure GOA AFA exempt and
non-AFA CVs and CVs assigned to under 60 ft (18.3 m) LLP licenses with
AI transferrable endorsements do not lease their CQ as a condition of
benefiting from a GOA sideboard exemption, (2) implement a penalty
structure for violations, and (3) report leasing activities and
penalties issued in the cooperative's annual report to the Council. The
cooperative can allow leasing for (1) AFA GOA-exempt CVs, non-AFA CVs,
and CVs assigned to under 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA LLP licenses with a
transferable AI endorsement with less than 300 metric tons of average
annual qualifying catch history, and (2) CVs assigned to the LLP
license that only fishes in the CGOA Rockfish Program during the
calendar year. Additionally, NMFS requires cooperatives to include
information about the cooperative's plan to monitor CQ leasing
activities, including into
[[Page 53714]]
GOA fisheries, in the Application for PCTC Program CQ.
B. Changes to Existing BSAI Sideboard Limits for AFA CVs
This final rule revises the BSAI Pacific cod and halibut PSC
sideboard limits for AFA trawl CVs specified at Sec. 679.64(b)(4)(i)
and in Table 40 to part 679 to only apply in the C season. The BSAI
Pacific cod sideboard limit is no longer necessary in the A and B
seasons because directed fishing in the BSAI for Pacific cod is now
managed under the PCTC Program. NMFS removes the halibut PSC sideboard
limits for AFA trawl CVs because the PCTC Program establishes lower PSC
limits for PCTC Program participants. This final rule does not change
the BSAI crab PSC sideboard limit for AFA trawl CVs specified at Sec.
679.64(b)(4)(i) and Table 41 to part 679.
C. At-Sea Processing Sideboard Limit
This final rule implements a sideboard limit on the amount of CQ
that can be processed by a CP designated on a groundfish LLP license
with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement. This sideboard
limit is assigned to each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement that authorizes the CP to act as a mothership in
the BSAI Pacific cod fishery as listed in Table 57 to part 679. The
Council recommended that each eligible CP acting as a mothership can
process up to 125 percent of the eligible CP's processing history
during the qualifying years (with no drop year). This at-sea processing
sideboard limit is permanently attached to the associated LLP license
and applies to the processing activity of any associated vessel.
The data used to calculate the at-sea processing sideboard limits
and the resulting sideboard limit assigned to each LLP license is
confidential. Each LLP license holder is responsible for coordinating
with any cooperative to ensure the applicable processing limit is not
exceeded. The at-sea processing sideboard limit is not an allocation
and the PCTC Program does not require that this amount be delivered to
CPs acting as a mothership, but it provides an upper bound on how much
CQ may be delivered.
The at-sea processing sideboard limit is consistent with Amendment
120 (84 FR 70064, December 20, 2019) that restricted the number of CPs
that are eligible to operate as a mothership receiving and processing
Pacific cod from CVs in the BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod directed fishery
using trawl gear. Under Amendment 120, NMFS issued a BSAI Pacific cod
trawl mothership endorsement to two LLP licenses but did not include a
limit on the amount of BSAI Pacific cod that can be processed because
it was not thought that any one processor could increase their capacity
significantly under the LLP management system. However, under this
rationalized, slower paced, cooperative fishing Program, the Council
and NMFS determined it may be possible for continued mothership
processing growth beyond historical patterns, so the Council
recommended that a processing limit be established for each LLP license
listed in Table 57 to part 679. For more information on processing
limits for the mothership sector, please see section 2.9.5 of the
Analysis (see ADDRESSES).
Annually, NMFS will calculate the at-sea processing sideboard
limit, expressed as a percentage of the aggregate CQ that would apply
to each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement and notify the LLP license holder upon issuance of initial
allocations. This final rule does not change the regulations pertaining
to the transfer of LLP licenses as specified at Sec. 679.4(k)(7) nor
the process to change the designated vessel on an LLP license as
specified at Sec. 679.4(k)(7)(vii). Each LLP license subject to this
at-sea processing sideboard limit is prohibited from exceeding the
processing limit as specified in regulations at Sec. 679.133(b)(2).
D. Cost Recovery
The PCTC Program is a LAPP established under the provisions of
Section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
requires that NMFS collect fees from limited access privilege holders
to cover the actual costs of management, data collection and analysis,
and enforcement activities associated with LAPPs. Cost recovery fees
may not exceed three percent of the ex-vessel value of the fish
harvested under the LAPP. NMFS will assess a fee on the ex-vessel value
of PCTC Program Pacific cod harvested by cooperatives in the BSAI.
Halibut and crab PSC are not subject to a cost recovery fee because PSC
cannot be retained for sale and, therefore, does not have an ex-vessel
value.
The annual PCTC Program cost recovery process builds on other
existing cost recovery requirements implemented under other programs.
NMFS annually receives information used to calculate Pacific cod
standard prices in the existing BSAI Pacific cod Ex-vessel Volume and
Value Report, which is submitted in early November of each year. NMFS
will use this existing data source to calculate standard prices used to
determine the annual PCTC Program fishery value, which will be used to
calculate the annual PCTC Program cost recovery fee percentage. NMFS
will begin tracking PCTC Program management costs upon the effective
date of this final rule. PCTC Program landings will be made in the A
and B seasons, which extends from January 20 to June 10.
The following is an example to illustrate the data NMFS will use in
the annual PCTC Program cost recovery process using the year 2025. The
PCTC Program fishing year will have landings subject to cost recovery
starting on January 20, 2025 and ending on June 10, 2025. NMFS will
calculate standard prices derived from the volume and value report
submitted by November 10, 2024 for landings made in 2024. Finally, NMFS
will use the management costs from July 2024 through June 2025 to
calculate the 2025 fee percentage. By no later than July 31, 2025, the
Regional Administrator will publish a notice announcing the standard
prices and fee percentage in the Federal Register and send invoices to
cooperatives.
NMFS will send each cooperative a fee liability letter to inform
each cooperative of the fee percentage applied to the current year's
landings and the total amount due (fee liability). The letter will
include a summary explaining the fee liability determination including
the current fee percentage and details of CQ pounds debited from CQ
allocations by permit, date, and prices.
Fees must be paid by August 31 of each year. NMFS requires that all
payments be submitted electronically in U.S. dollars through the NMFS
Alaska Region website. Instructions for electronic payment are made
available on the payment website and through a fee liability summary
letter NMFS will mail to the cooperative.
Each cooperative is responsible for paying cost recovery fees
assessed on cooperative landings. Failure to pay cost recovery fee
liabilities on time will result in NMFS not approving a cooperative's
application for a CQ permit the following year until full payment of
the fee liability is received by NMFS. NMFS will not issue a CQ permit
until NMFS receives a complete application for CQ and confirmation of
the full payment of any cost recovery fee liability. Communication with
NMFS using the contact information provided in the fee liability letter
will provide ample opportunity for cooperative to
[[Page 53715]]
reconcile accounts. However, if the account is not reconciled and the
individual does not pay, NMFS will send an IAD to the cooperative. The
IAD would state that the cooperative's estimated fee liability due from
the cooperative had not been paid. The cooperative may appeal the IAD.
The appeals process is described at Sec. 679.43. A cooperative who
appeals an IAD would not receive a new CQ permit unless the appeal was
resolved in the applicant's favor.
The agency may pursue collection of the unpaid fees if the formal
determination is not appealed and the account remains unpaid or under-
paid 30 days after fees are due (August 31 of each year). The Regional
Administrator will continue to prohibit issuance of a CQ permit for any
subsequent calendar years until NMFS receives the unpaid fees.
E. Monitoring Provisions
This final rule establishes requirements for observer coverage and
other monitoring and enforcement provisions to ensure that fleet-wide
harvests under the PCTC Program are effectively monitored and that
catches remain within allocations. These requirements include full
observer coverage for CVs harvesting CQ (except for CVs delivering
unsorted codends to motherships, as explained below) and requirements
for communications equipment to facilitate observer data entry and
electronic transmission to NMFS. These monitoring provisions are
designed to maximize the quality of data used to estimate PCTC Program
catch and bycatch, including PSC. Shoreside processors are required to
report landings data to NMFS electronically through eLandings.
Estimates of at-sea discards and PSC would be derived solely from
observer data.
All vessels used to harvest CQ are required to carry equipment to
facilitate at-sea electronic transmission of observer data to NMFS.
This final rule modifies regulations at Sec. 679.51(e)(1)(iii)(A) to
explicitly require vessel operators to allow an observer to use the
vessel's existing communications equipment for confidential entry,
transmission, and receipt of work-related messages.
All vessels participating in the PCTC Program are required to
provide an onboard computer that meets minimum specifications for use
by an observer. Currently, NMFS uses and installs custom software
(ATLAS) on the vessel's computer, and this software application is used
by observers to enter the data they collect. The ATLAS software
contains business rules that perform many quality control and data
validation checks automatically, which dramatically increases the
quality of the preliminary data. After the observer data are entered
into the ATLAS software, they are transmitted to NMFS.
At-sea transmission of observer data improves data quality. To
minimize impacts to small vessel operators, the requirements for non-
AFA trawl CVs to install equipment necessary to facilitate at-sea
observer data transmission become effective three years after the
effective date of this final rule. Though the installation of equipment
to facilitate at-sea data transmission on non-AFA vessels will not be
required immediately upon implementation of the Program, this final
rule clarifies that if a vessel already has equipment capable of
facilitating at-sea data transmission, that equipment must be made
available to the observer for use in transmitting work-related messages
including collected data.
This final rule requires motherships receiving unsorted codends
from a PCTC Program CV to comply with catch monitoring requirements
specified at Sec. 679.93(c) for Amendment 80 vessels and CPs. These
requirements are already applicable to Amendment 80 CPs acting as
motherships and would continue to apply when acting as a mothership to
process PCTC Program CQ. This final rule does not alter existing
observer coverage requirements for trawl CVs delivering unsorted
codends to a mothership in the BSAI. A trawl CV delivering unsorted
codends to a mothership is not required to carry an observer because
the catch is not brought on board the CV and not available for observer
sampling. Rather, the catch is sorted and sampled by observers aboard
the mothership.
Motherships receiving deliveries from PCTC Program CVs are required
to have at least two observers aboard the mothership, at least one of
whom will be required to be endorsed as a lead level 2 observer. More
than two observers are required to be aboard if the observer workload
restriction would otherwise preclude sampling as required. All PCTC
Program catch, except halibut sorted on deck by vessels participating
in the halibut deck sorting described at Sec. 679.120, must be weighed
on a NMFS-approved scale in compliance with the scale requirements at
Sec. 679.28(b). Each haul must be weighed separately and all catch
made available for sampling by an observer.
This Program establishes catch monitoring requirements for all
shoreside processors receiving deliveries from CVs harvesting PCTC
Program CQ. All groundfish landings made to a shoreside processors must
be sorted; weighed on a scale approved by the State of Alaska as
described at Sec. 679.28(c); and be made available for sampling by an
observer, NMFS staff, or any individual authorized by NMFS. Any of
these persons must be allowed to test any scale used to weigh
groundfish to determine its accuracy.
F. PCTC Program Review
The Council will review the PCTC Program five years after
implementation to determine if the Program is functioning as intended,
as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Act. This review and evaluation by
the Council will include an assessment of the program objectives.
Specifically, the Council will review whether the allocation of Pacific
cod is fair and equitable given participation in the fishery,
historical investments in and dependence upon the fishery, and
employment in the harvesting and processing sectors. The Council will
also assess performance of the Program based on changes in annual
cooperative formation, changes in product value, the number and
distribution of processing facilities, and stability or use of annual
processor associations with harvesting cooperatives. The focus of these
reviews will be the impact of this action on the harvesting and
processing sectors, as well as on fishery dependent communities. The
Council will also assess whether the needs for management and
enforcement, as well as data collection and analysis, are adequately
met.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received 16 comment letters on the NOA and the proposed rule.
NMFS has summarized and responded to the 55 unique comments below. The
comments were from individuals, local government representatives,
Alaska Native corporations, and industry participants including
harvesters and processors.
Comments in Support
Comment 1: Several commenters expressed support for Amendment 122
and timely implementation of the PCTC Program in 2024. The PCTC Program
will maintain or improve harvesting and processing participation in the
Pacific cod fishery, it provides fair and equitable allocation of QS to
harvesters and processors. It will reduce environmental impacts of the
fishery, and it will promote conservation and sustainability.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment.
[[Page 53716]]
Comment 2: This rule is important to recover and conserve our
mammals. This rule will help ensure the productivity and sustainability
of fisheries.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment.
Comment 3: Limiting the amount of Pacific cod that fisheries are
allowed to harvest is good because it balances economics with the
sustainability of the environment.
Response: NMFS specifies the OFL, ABC, and TAC for BSAI Pacific cod
through the annual harvest specification process as further explained
in Section I of this preamble. For Pacific cod, the harvest
specifications establish separate OFLs, ABCs, and TACs for the BS
subarea and the AI subarea of the BSAI. Allocations of Pacific cod to
the CDQ Program and to the non-CDQ fishery sectors are further
apportioned by seasons. The PCTC Program allocates the available
Pacific cod to the various trawl harvesters during the A and B season;
this action does not change the overall amount of Pacific cod that is
expected to be harvested annually.
Comment 4: Amendment 122 and the efforts by the Council to
establish the PCTC Program are supported because they recognize
processing history as well as investments in the fishery and
acknowledge what a shift a catch share program can have on
relationships between harvesters and processors. The qualifying years
are appropriate and were well-supported throughout the Council's
lengthy process to establish Amendment 122. The commenter supports
actions by the Council that do the least amount of harm to the overall
participants in the BSAI cod fishery.
Response: NMFS acknowledges this comment.
Conservation
Comment 5: Pelagic, or midwater, trawlers use nets within the water
column between the surface and seabed. Pelagic trawling is considered
more sustainable because of the belief that their nets do not make
contact with the seabed, but pollock midwater trawlers make contact
with the seabed 40-70 percent of the time they are completing a trawl.
The Council is focusing on Pacific cod because of the impact of benthic
trawls (also known as nonpelagic or bottom trawls) on the seabed and
non-target species without fully considering whether pelagic trawls in
more ecologically sensitive areas may have a more significant overall
impact.
Response: Under the PCTC Program, vessels will use nonpelagic trawl
gear, as defined at Sec. 679.2, to harvest CQ. Nonpelagic trawl gear--
trawl gear that targets fish species near the ocean floor--is different
than pelagic trawl gear, which targets fish species in the water
column. This comment addresses management issues that are beyond the
scope of Amendment 122 and this regulatory action. This action is not
intended to modify authorized gear types, including nonpelagic trawl
gear used in the PCTC Program, or address their use in sensitive areas.
Modifications to authorized gear types or use in sensitive areas would
need to be addressed in a separate regulatory action developed through
the Council process. Section 3.1.2 of the Analysis states that previous
analyses have found no substantial adverse effects to habitat in the
BSAI caused by fishing activities. Any effects continue to be limited
by the amount of the groundfish TACs and by the existing habitat
conservation and protection measures. Overall, the combination of the
direct, indirect, and cumulative effects on habitat for both living and
non-living substrates, benthic biodiversity, and habitat suitability
are not likely to be significant under this action.
Comment 6: It is important to understand the destruction of
trawling despite its efficiency. Effort can be made to fish more
sustainably. Trawling in Alaska should be done less in order to protect
Pacific cod, other species, and the ocean floor.
Response: NMFS manages the BSAI Pacific cod fishery based on the
best scientific information available. To ensure conservation of the
resource, the status of the Pacific cod stock is reviewed by NMFS and
the Council each year through a public scientific review process before
the TAC is allocated. The Council and NMFS analyzed the environmental
impacts of Amendment 122 and concluded that it would not result in a
significant impact on the human environment as presented in the
Analysis and FONSI prepared for this action (see ADDRESSES). This
action is not intended to modify authorized gear types.
Quota Share for Harvesters and Processors
Comment 7: In recommending Amendment 122 and this Program, the
Council intended for NMFS to consider specific area endorsements on
each LLP license at the time of harvest in determining how to attribute
qualifying catch history to an LLP license in the situation when there
were two or more LLP licenses associated with the vessel. The language
in the proposed rule does not clearly indicate that only the LLP
license with the appropriate area endorsement would receive the
resulting qualifying catch history.
Response: NMFS agrees and clarifies that specific area endorsements
are considered when determining how to attribute qualifying catch
history to LLP licenses. In determining how to attribute catch history
when two or more LLP licenses were associated with a vessel, NMFS
considers the area endorsements on each of the LLP licenses at the time
fishing occurred.
An LLP license will only be eligible for qualifying catch history
in an area if it had the endorsement for that area at the time of
harvest. In the event more than one LLP license associated with a
vessel had the area endorsement for where the catch occurred, the
vessel owner will decide how to assign QS to the LLP licenses. In the
event only one LLP license associated with a vessel had the area
endorsement for where the catch occurred, despite there being more than
one LLP license associated with the vessel at the time fishing began,
only the LLP license with the correct area endorsement will receive the
resulting qualifying catch history. The vessel owner would not decide
how this portion of the QS would be assigned between LLP licenses. For
example, say a vessel had qualifying catch history in the BS and AI and
was named on two LLP licenses at the time the landing occurred. One LLP
license had a BS endorsement and the other LLP license had BS and AI
endorsements. In this scenario, fishing history in the BS would be
considered shared catch between the two LLP licenses (because both LLP
licenses had the appropriate endorsements authorizing the fishing
activity) and fishing history in the AI is considered qualifying catch
history only for LLP license with the AI endorsement.
Comment 8: NMFS should use ``target'' catch in the official record
to determine initial QS issued to harvesters and processors.
Response: NMFS agrees. Under the PCTC Program, NMFS determines QS
allocations based on legal landings of target Pacific cod. The trawl CV
sector can have significant incidental catch of Pacific cod in other
fisheries like pollock and yellowfin sole, and historical amounts of
incidental catch have been variable. The Council recommended that the
PCTC Program not include incidental catch in the calculations for QS.
Comment 9: Will NMFS issue a PCTC Program QS permit to the owner of
a processing facility that is no longer operational, based on the
qualifying processing history at that facility?
[[Page 53717]]
Response: No. NMFS will not issue a PCTC Program QS permit to the
owner of an inactive processing facility (i.e., the facility is not
authorized by an FPP or FFP upon the effective date of this final rule)
based on the qualifying processing history at that facility. Upon
approval of an Application for PCTC Program QS, NMFS will issue a PCTC
Program QS permit to the owner of a processing facility with an active
FPP or qualifying FFP. For a person (i.e. processing firm) to receive a
PCTC Program QS permit, it requires two things: (1) processing history
in the fishery during the qualifying years and (2) a currently valid
FPP or FFP (in the case of an eligible CP with a Pacific cod mothership
endorsement).
Comment 10: Does the firm that operated the Adak facility in 2013
get credit for the Adak facility's processing history if the firm does
not hold an FPP for that facility now, but does operate one or more
facilities in the BS each with its own FPP?
Response: No. Processing history is facility specific. A firm will
not receive a PCTC Program QS permit for a facility that does not have
a current FPP. The processing history associated with that facility
will be deducted from the total amount of eligible processing history
during the qualifying years when calculating the distribution of QS to
processors.
A person may own more than one processing facility with qualifying
processing history and an FPP or FFP and therefore may receive more
than one PCTC Program QS permit. A firm that operated a processing
facility that is no longer active would be eligible to receive a PCTC
QS permit for a different facility if it holds a valid FPP for that
facility and that facility has qualifying processing history.
Comment 11: How would a new processor become eligible to receive a
PCTC Program QS permit in order to annually associate with a
cooperative?
Response: A processor would need to have an active FPP and purchase
QS from an existing PCTC Program QS permit holder under the QS transfer
provisions in this final rule.
Note that any processor with an FPP can process CQ. There is not a
requirement to hold a PCTC Program QS permit or associate with a
cooperative for a processor to receive deliveries and process CQ.
Further, any shoreside processor, stationary floating processor, or
mothership, including an eligible CP with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement, may associate with a cooperative regardless of
whether or not the processor holds a PCTC Program QS permit. For PCTC
Program QS permit holders, the only way to receive benefits from a PCTC
Program QS permit is to associate annually with a cooperative.
Comment 12: Include the years 2004 through 2009 in the PCTC Program
official record to determine an initial QS allocation to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant, similar to the catch history for determining
initial allocations to CV LLP licenses with a transferable AI
endorsement.
Response: Even if the PCTC Program included 2004 through 2009 in
the qualifying years, the Aleutian Islands shoreplant is ineligible for
an initial QS allocation because it does not have an active FPP.
The QS issued to processors is divided among eligible processors
based on the percentage of legal landings of Pacific cod they processed
during the A and B seasons during the qualifying years compared to the
total legal landings of BSAI Pacific cod processed by all eligible
processors. Because processing facilities will be issued QS based on
deliveries of this catch history, the Council chose to award QS based
on processing history by considering the time frame of 2009-2019, the
same time frame used for the majority of CVs. The Council did not
recommend a variation in the qualifying years for any processor either
in the BS or AI.
The Council and NMFS considered several different options for the
range of qualifying years including an option that would have included
catch history years from 2004 through 2019. The Council selected 2009
through 2019 as representative of history for the vast majority of CVs
because these years reflect current and historical participation and
are consistent with the Council's approach to awarding QS based on
catch history in other rationalization programs. The Council decided
against history earlier than 2009 for the majority of catch history
because that was prior to the implementation of Amendment 85 to the
BSAI FMP. Amendment 85 established sector allocations for Pacific and
separate TAC splits for the Pacific cod stock, which changed fishery
management and operations.
The one exception to the qualifying years is for LLP licenses with
a transferable AI endorsement that, prior to receiving that AI
endorsement through Amendment 92 to the BSAI FMP, participated in the
AI parallel fishery from January 20, 2004 through September 13, 2009
without an LLP license. Eight vessels met the criteria for eligibility
to receive these transferable AI endorsements based on their fishing
activity in parallel fisheries where they did not qualify for an LLP
license but still fished in federal waters.
Comment 13: The degree to which an LLP license holder will benefit
from dropping a year of catch history from the calculation for initial
QS allocations will depend upon the consistency of their annual
participation in the fishery. An LLP holder with one or more years of
low or no legal landings will benefit from dropping that year more than
an LLP license holder with consistently high annual participation.
Response: The Council and NMFS considered a range of drop years
from zero to two years. The range of qualifying years is 11 years, and
unforeseen events have occurred for many fishery participants. The
Council recommended and NMFS is implementing a provision to drop one
year of catch history from the initial allocation as a fair way to
remove one year that may not be representative of typical participation
in the fishery.
Comment 14: Clarify that QS can only be used if the QS holder
annually joins or associates with a cooperative.
Response: QS holders must annually join or associate with a
cooperative in order for their QS to generate the CQ necessary to
harvest Pacific cod in the BSAI trawl sector.
Comment 15: To acquire QS that would attract vessels to deliver to
a processor that does not receive an initial allocation of QS (such as
an Aleutian Islands shoreplant), a processor would need to purchase an
LLP license with attached QS. This creates a barrier to entry into the
PCTC Program because LLP licenses have a very high market price and QS
is only a small portion of that value. Because QS is only a small part
of an LLP license's value, this makes it functionally impossible for an
Adak processor to purchase QS that it would need to use in lieu of an
initial allocation of QS to attract vessels.
Response: A new entrant may acquire either harvester QS by
purchasing an LLP license with associated QS or by purchasing a
processor-held PCTC Program QS permit. It is not yet clear what the
market may be for processor PCTC Program QS permits. Generally, QS is
non-severable from the LLP license or PCTC Program QS permit except in
situations where an ownership cap would be exceeded upon transfer.
Regulations specifying transfer provisions and limitations for QS are
specified in regulations at Sec. 679.130(j) and ownership caps are at
Sec. 679.133.
This PCTC Program does not create a closed class of processors who
may process CQ. Any shoreside processor, stationary floating processor,
mothership, and eligible CPs with a
[[Page 53718]]
BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement, may receive and process
CQ. A processor is not required to associate with a cooperative to
receive deliveries and process CQ.
Aleutian Islands CQ Set-Aside
Comment 16: Establish a minimum annual AI CQ set-aside amount equal
to 5,000 metric tons. This is the amount of Pacific cod determined to
be the minimum amount necessary to support a processing plant in the AI
under Amendment 113 to the BSAI FMP. Amendment 113 was implemented in
2016 to provide a 5,000 metric tons set-aside delivery requirement of
Pacific cod for shoreplants in the communities of Adak and Atka,
considered to be the minimum necessary to support the regional economy.
Without a floor of 5,000 metric tons of Pacific cod, the volume of fish
may not meet the minimum viable amount for the processing plant to
operate in Adak.
Response: Shortly after the court's vacatur of Amendment 113, the
Council initiated action to rationalize the BSAI trawl CV Pacific cod
fishery and included options to meet the objective of supporting
sustained participation by AI communities in the Pacific cod trawl CV
fishery. The Council recommended and this final rule implements
community protections for Adak and Atka in the form of a set-aside
provision. Under the PCTC Program, cooperatives are required to
collectively set-aside 12 percent of the A season CQ for delivery to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant during years in which a community
representative notifies NMFS of their intent to process Pacific cod.
The AI CQ set-aside provides opportunity for Pacific cod landings to
support an Aleutian Islands shoreplant that, in conjunction with other
fishery landings and allocations, such as the AI pollock fishery,
benefit the communities of Adak and Atka. This final rule strikes a
balance between supporting fishery-dependent communities and ensuring
that the fishery sectors have a meaningful opportunity to fully harvest
their allocations by including several measures to prevent AI Pacific
cod from going unharvested.
This provision is different from the set-aside implemented under
Amendment 113 but is intended achieve a similar goal. The Council
considered maintaining the 5,000 metric tons floor similar to Amendment
113, but ultimately decided against it to maintain the same allocation
criteria for all processors and to address concerns about leasing the
5,000 metric tons floor in years when there was not an active Aleutian
Islands shoreplant. In addition, all the allocations under the PCTC
Program are based on percentages of the TAC, not static numbers. This
allows for flexibility in years of low TAC.
Comment 17: Clarify regulations at Sec. 679.132(c)(4) governing
the AI CQ set-aside provision to direct the Regional Administrator to
remove the delivery requirement rather than allow the Regional
Administrator to remove the delivery requirement if the Regional
Administrator determines that Aleutian Islands shoreplants will not
process the entire AI CQ set-aside.
Response: NMFS agrees that the proposed regulatory language needed
to be clarified. NMFS removed language at Sec. 679.132(c)(4) regarding
reallocating the projected unused AI set-aside to PCTC Program
cooperatives in proportion to the amount of CQ that each PCTC Program
cooperative received in the initial allocation of CQ for the remainder
of the A and B seasons. This language is not applicable to the PCTC
Program because the cooperatives manage the AI CQ set-aside.
However, NMFS maintained in the regulations that the Regional
Administrator may remove the delivery requirement for some or all of
the projected unused AI CQ set-aside if the Regional Administrator
determines that Aleutian Islands shoreplants will not process the
entire AI CQ set-aside. NMFS will monitor the cooperative's
implementation of the AI CQ set-aside throughout the A and B seasons.
NMFS will consider the number and frequency of deliveries to Aleutian
Islands shoreplants as well as the season timing and remaining CQ to be
harvested. The Regional Administrator will use this information to
determine if it is appropriate to remove the delivery requirement for
some or all of the projected unused AI CQ set-aside.
Comment 18: Modify regulations at Sec. 679.132(c)(4) to clarify
that if both communities of Adak and Atka file a notice of intent to
process, the delivery requirement would be in effect until both
communities withdraw their notice of intent.
Response: NMFS agrees and has modified regulations at Sec.
679.132(c)(5) and (6). In the event all notices of intent to process
are withdrawn, the Regional Administrator will remove the AI CQ set-
aside delivery requirement for that calendar year by publishing a
notice in the Federal Register.
Comment 19: Reject the AI CQ set-aside as inconsistent with
National Standard 4. All cooperative members get the benefit of both A
and B season CQ allocations. However, an Aleutian Islands shoreplant
only gets a ``reservation'' for 12 percent of the A season CQ. This
takes care of the issue of giving a disproportionate share of
processor-held CQ to company boats, but it still allows processors to
attract new vessels with volume rather than price using CQ off a
company boat to attract independent boats with a double share of CQ,
which an Adak processor cannot do because it does not get any CQ. This
means an Adak processor cannot offer a single share match, let alone a
double share, leaving the Adak plant operator at an insurmountable
competitive disadvantage.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the allocations of QS under the PCTC
Program are inconsistent with National Standard 4. National Standard 4
states that ``Conservation and management measures shall not
discriminate between residents of different states. If it becomes
necessary to allocate or assign fishing privileges among various United
States fishermen, such allocation shall be (a) fair and equitable to
all such fishermen; (b) reasonably calculated to promote conservation;
and (c) carried out in such manner that no particular individual,
corporation, or other entity acquires an excessive share of such
privilege.''
In considering whether an allocation is fair and equitable under
National Standard 4, NMFS assesses whether the allocation is rationally
connected to achieving OY in the fishery, would maximize overall net
benefits, and achieve the objectives of the FMP. In addition, NMFS
considers the relative impacts of various allocations in light of
status quo conditions. Here, the PCTC Program allocates QS to
processors based on two objective criteria: (1) historic participation
in the fishery and (2) an active processing license that demonstrates
ongoing participation. This second criteria provides some reasonable
assurance any allocated privileges will be utilized and OY will
continue to be achieved in the fishery. There is currently no active
processor (with an active FPP) in Adak that could be allocated QS based
on historic participation, and operations at the Adak plant have been
inconsistent. As a result, under the processor-held QS eligibility
criteria alone, AI communities would not receive QS under this program.
However, the Council and NMFS recognize that providing some degree
of support to AI communities remains a management objective. Therefore,
this rule includes a set-aside for AI communities that would require
cooperatives to deliver an amount of annual CQ equal to the lesser of
either 12 percent of their A season CQ or the
[[Page 53719]]
AI DFA, to an Adak or Atka if, in the future, there is an active
shoreplant in the AI capable of receiving deliveries of Pacific cod.
The AI CQ set-aside provision is rationally connected to a management
objective of supporting AI fishing communities, while recognizing that
there is currently no active processing facility in Adak to which NMFS
could allocate privileges.
NMFS disagrees that the PCTC Program allocations are not fair and
equitable because they do not place AI communities on the same footing
as active processors. The fact that the AI CQ set-aside is based on
total A season CQ is immaterial to fairness and equity--that simply
provides a basis for calculating the amount of the set-aside in any
given year. The set-aside remains in effect through the B season, and
it is intended to mandate deliveries of an amount of Pacific cod to
Aleutian Islands shoreplants through the B season whenever Aleutian
Islands shoreplants are operating.
Comment 20: Given the historic uncertainty that AI communities have
faced when trying to access fish, it is good that the Council ensured
protections for Aleutian Islands shoreplants within the PCTC Program.
However, there should be more clarity over whether processors in the
western Aleutian Islands, including Adak, would be required to join a
cooperative after signaling the Adak's intention to process fish in a
given year. It appears that Adak would not be required to join a
cooperative to receive the AI CQ set-aside, but rather that
cooperatives are responsible for delivering the set-aside to AI
processors. Adak should not be required to join a cooperative to
receive fish for processing.
Response: An Aleutian Islands shoreplant is not required to
associate with a cooperative to receive deliveries of CQ. An Aleutian
Islands shoreplant may choose to associate with a cooperative, but that
is not required to receive the benefits of processing Pacific cod under
the AI CQ set-aside provision of the PCTC Program. An Aleutian Islands
shoreplant with an active FPP may purchase QS in the future and
associate with a cooperative by bringing the QS into the cooperative.
Comment 21: Correctly describe all references to the amount of the
AI CQ set-aside as 12 percent of the PCTC Program A season CQ rather
than 12.5 percent.
Response: In the preamble to the proposed rule describing the PRA
requirements needed for this Program, NMFS erroneously described the AI
CQ set-aside as 12.5 percent instead of 12 percent and has corrected
the issue in the final rule. All other references to the AI CQ set-
aside in the proposed and final rule correctly described it as 12
percent of A season CQ or the AI DFA, whichever is less.
Comment 22: For the community of Adak, the 5 year PCTC Program
review is more likely to be an autopsy report unless there are
significant changes to the AI CQ set-aside component prior to
publication of a final rule. Access to Pacific cod is crucial for the
economic success of the Aleutian Islands shoreplant. Access to Pacific
cod means the Aleutian Islands shoreplant can support AI harvesters of
multiple species. Without Aleutian Islands shoreplant access to Pacific
cod, these harvesters are essentially stranded. There is no other
community or processing facility in Alaska that is more dependent on
Pacific cod than Adak. Pacific cod has accounted for the overwhelming
majority of landings in Adak since the plant opened in 1999. Adak is
unique in this regard; the pollock fishery (not Pacific cod) is the
primary fishery for Bering Sea processors.
Response: The Aleutian Islands shoreplants have a unique processing
history for many reasons, and their remote coastal location is a
challenge both for plant operations and harvester deliveries. NMFS
understands that Pacific cod has been crucial to the economic success
of Aleutian Islands shoreplants, but Aleutian Islands shoreplants have
not always been open to accept deliveries, as shown in the past few
years. Without an active AI processor, there is no entity to which NMFS
could allocate QS on the same terms as other processors. The PCTC
Program instead implements an AI CQ set-aside element that provides an
opportunity for AI communities to benefit from the PCTC Program in
years when an active processor is able to accept deliveries.
Comment 23: The recommendation by the Council to adopt an AI CQ
set-aside instead of a QS allocation fails to meet National Standard 8
and does not adequately respond to the problem statement relative to
the dependence of the community of Adak on the AI Pacific cod fishery.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the AI CQ set-aside is inconsistent
with National Standard 8. National Standard 8 states ``Conservation and
management measures shall, consistent with the conservation
requirements of this Act (including the prevention of overfishing and
rebuilding of overfished stocks), take into account the importance of
fishery resources to fishing communities by utilizing economic and
social data that meet the requirement of paragraph (2) [i.e., National
Standard 2], in order to (a) provide for the sustained participation of
such communities, and (b) to the extent practicable, minimize adverse
economic impacts on such communities.''
The AI CQ set-aside is intended to provide for the sustained
participation of AI communities in the event there is an operational
Aleutian Islands shoreplant in future years. Currently, no operating
shoreplant is open to accept deliveries of Pacific cod. Even if the
plant were open, without the PCTC Program AI CQ set-aside vessels,
would have no obligation to deliver Pacific cod to AI communities.
Compared to current conditions, the PCTC Program will provide for the
sustained participation of AI communities and minimize adverse economic
impacts on AI communities to the extent practicable by ensuring these
communities will receive deliveries of Pacific cod in years when an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant is in operation and able to take
deliveries.
The Council and NMFS took into account the importance of fishery
resources to fishing communities, including but not limited to Adak.
The PCTC Program is designed to provide for the sustained participation
of many different fishing communities (i.e., those communities
substantially engaged in and/or dependent on the fishery), and features
a history-based approach for initial allocation of QS that would be
made in proportion to historical levels of participation in the fishery
during the qualifying period.
Comment 24: The recommendation by the Council to adopt an AI CQ
set-aside instead of a QS allocation fails to meet the Magnuson-Stevens
Act 303A LAPP standards.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the PCTC Program fails to meet the
Magnuson-Stevens Act 303A LAPP standards. The PCTC Program is
authorized by section 303A of the MSA. The QS issued under the PCTC
Program would qualify as a permit (per MSA 303A(b)(1)) and would give
the permittee exclusive access to those fish while the permit is held.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act LAPP provisions in Section 303A(c)(5)(A)
require that the Council ensure fair and equitable initial allocations,
including consideration of (1) current and historical harvests, (2)
employment in the harvesting and processing sectors, (3) investments in
and dependence on the fishery, and (4) the current and historical
participation of fishing communities. The Council developed and NMFS
implemented the PCTC Program after considerable debate and
[[Page 53720]]
review of the Analysis prepared to support Amendment 122 and this final
rule. Any harvesters based in AI communities will receive QS
allocations just like other participants. And all processors are
subject to the same objective criteria for initial allocations of QS.
The AI CQ set-aside was a means of providing some support to AI
communities despite there being no active processor with history in the
fishery to which NMFS could allocate QS. No communities are being
allocated QS under the PCTC program.
Comment 25: Disapprove Option 6.1 (a CQ set-aside to Aleutians
Islands shoreplants) and instead adopt the structure of Option 6.2 (an
allocation to Aleutian Islands shoreplants). Adak currently does not
have a processor operating the facility. It has not been possible to
attract an operator, in large part because of the lack of leverage and
barriers to entry inherent in the PCTC Program. The Council's
recommendation of Option 6.1 rather than 6.2 creates a fundamental
structural flaw.
Response: The Council recommended Amendment 122, including option
6.1, due to the unique characteristics of the AI communities and the
difficulties in maintaining an open plant each year. Option 6.1 creates
the set-aside of 12 percent of the A season CQ for delivery to AI
shoreplants. The AI CQ set-aside is designed to be in place during the
trawl CV sector Pacific cod A and B seasons. Cooperatives are
responsible for submitting a plan to coordinate the harvest and
delivery of the set-aside. The Council did not select Option 6.2 based,
in part, on concerns about ability to lease CQ in years that the
Aleutian Islands shoreplant was not operational, which was not the
intent of the Council in providing processing opportunities for the AI
communities. The Aleutian Islands shoreplants are the only processing
plants that have a set-aside mechanism.
Similarly to other business relationships between harvesters and
processors, a processing plant will need to offer competitive prices to
harvesters. This is true for processing plants in all of Alaska's
federal fisheries.
Comment 26: An Adak entity needs to be able to associate with a
cooperative to have a seat at the table. Vessels have disincentives to
work with Adak because those vessels would be walking away from their
pro-rata share of the 22.5 percent processor CQ. This is asymmetrical
and probably disadvantages Adak. There is no limit on the number of LLP
licenses that may join a single cooperative, the number of processors a
cooperative could associate with, nor on the amount of QS a single
cooperative could control.
Response: An Aleutian Islands shoreplant is not required to
associate with a cooperative, but it may associate with a cooperative
whether or not it holds a PCTC Program QS permit. In addition, CVs
harvesting CQ may deliver to any shoreside processor, including an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant, regardless of whether or not that
processor holds a PCTC Program QS permit and regardless of whether or
not the processor is associated with a PCTC Program cooperative.
Cooperatives may form annually in association with a federally
permitted processor to harvest their CQ. That processor must hold an
active FPP or FFP, but they are not required to also hold QS. This
extends to all active processors, including potential Aleutian Islands
shoreplants. However, processors do not form cooperatives and will not
be members of cooperatives under the PCTC Program. In addition,
associating with a processor in Adak would not require a cooperative to
forego access to processor-held QS. Though each cooperative is required
to associate with at least one processor, there is no limit on the
number of processors with which a cooperative may associate.
Regarding incentives to deliver to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant,
cooperatives are required to annually submit an inter-cooperative
agreement that describes, (1) how the AI CQ set-aside would be
administered by the cooperatives; (2) how the cooperatives intend to
harvest the AI CQ set-aside; and (3) how cooperatives would ensure that
CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA assigned to an LLP license with a
transferable AI trawl endorsement have the opportunity to harvest 10
percent of the AI CQ set-aside for delivery to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant. In years the AI CQ set-aside is in effect, refusing to work
with an Aleutian Islands shoreplant could mean the cooperatives forfeit
12 percent of their A season CQ. Therefore, NMFS expects the
cooperatives will have an incentive to work with an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant.
Comment 27: Each cooperative is required to set aside 12 percent of
its CQ (independent of where the members' catch history was earned or
whether they have AI LLP endorsements). This is unnecessarily
burdensome for all parties; an Adak processor will have to deal with
each cooperative individually under some very constrained deadlines.
Response: The cooperatives are required to collectively set aside
12 percent of the A season CQ and come up with a delivery strategy
through an inter-cooperative agreement. The cooperatives will have an
incentive to come up with a plan that works for all parties to ensure
CQ would not go unharvested when the set-aside is in effect. Aleutian
Islands shoreplants will need to work with cooperatives but the
cooperative system allows the flexibility to work with one cooperative
or with all cooperatives. It is possible the inter-cooperative
agreement could designate one cooperative (or more) to coordinate
deliveries with Adak so long as 12 percent of the total A season CQ is
delivered to the Aleutian Islands shoreplants.
Comment 28: The definition of an Aleutian Islands shoreplant needs
to recognize that the Aleut Corporation's lease to an operator includes
buildings and land connecting to the dock as well as the dock itself.
The final rule should affirm that a stationary floating processor that
is moored to a dock that is physically integrated into processing
operations on land qualifies as being ``land based'' west of 170
degrees.
Response: The Council selected a specific definition for an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant, similar to Amendment 113, based on public
testimony and the analysis to prevent stationary floating processors
from relocating to Adak and competing with the shoreplant. The
definition of an Aleutian Islands shoreplant does not include a
stationary floating processor at this time.
Comment 29: Use caps apply at the firm level, as they should.
However, the analysis shows that the fishery will be dominated by a
couple major companies who will be grandfathered over the cap.
Meanwhile Aleutian Islands shoreplants will be effectively capped at 12
percent by the structure of the cooperative AI CQ set-aside. Because
the AI CQ set-aside is not an allocation, the structure of the program
means the 12 percent is also very likely to be a ceiling with Aleutian
Islands shoreplants effectively capped at 12 percent, which is far less
than their historical average.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the 12 percent AI CQ set-aside is a
ceiling. The Council designed the community protection measures to
benefit Adak and Atka if their plant is operational and accepting
deliveries for that year. The 12 percent AI CQ set-aside is a minimum
delivery requirement in years when an Aleutian Islands shoreplant is
operational. Defining the set-aside as a percentage of CQ rather than a
fixed amount avoids disproportionate impacts on other PCTC Program
participants in years of low TAC (as opposed to the
[[Page 53721]]
static 5,000 metric tons delivery requirement under Amendment 113).
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires use caps in development of a LAPP
to prevent any person from holding, acquiring, or using an excessive
share of limited access privileges. One of the use caps in the PCTC
Program is a firm level processor cap that no company may process more
than 20 percent of the CQ (Sec. 679.133(a)(4) and (5)). This
processing cap does not apply to Aleutian Islands shoreplants when the
AI intent to process is in effect.
Comment 30: Without a tag identifying whether a unit of CQ was
designated as part of the AI CQ set-aside, it will be difficult for the
Regional Administrator to know inseason whether the AI CQ set-aside
will be harvested. If any Pacific cod delivered to an AI shoreplant is
assumed to accrue against the set-aside until the 12 percent amount has
been delivered, that introduces further complexities that serve to make
the 12 percent a de-facto cap.
Response: All CQ caught in the PCTC Program will be accounted for
at the dock, except deliveries to motherships, and NMFS would consider
all CQ landed to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant to count toward the AI
CQ set-aside. There is no need to tag each unit of CQ as part of the
set-aside or not part of the set-aside, because NMFS will track all
deliveries of Pacific cod, and cooperatives will not be able to deliver
more than 88 percent of A season CQ to anywhere other than an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant.
Once 12 percent of A season CQ has been landed at an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant, cooperatives could continue to deliver to AI
communities but would no longer be required to. In contrast, once 88
percent of A season CQ had been delivered elsewhere, vessels could
deliver CQ only to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant. If the cooperatives
fail to deliver 12 percent of A season CQ to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant, the remainder of the set-aside would remain in place for
the B season rather than being rolled over as CQ with no restrictions
on delivery. The operating Aleutian Islands shoreplant may accept
deliveries of CQ harvested in either the BS or the AI. The cooperatives
would monitor the conditions and terms of the inter-cooperative
agreement to ensure those provisions are followed.
Comment 31: The proposed rule appears to only limit CVs in the BS,
implying that the CVs could erode the AI CQ set-aside by fishing in the
AI. Section 679.132(a)(4) outlines the DFA limitations and seems to
deal with that by indicating CVs delivering to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant are the only vessels allowed to access the DFA. NMFS should
take a very careful review of the text to confirm that the language
captures the intent of the AI CQ set-aside.
Response: When the AI CQ set-aside is in effect and set equal to
the AI non-CDQ DFA, directed fishing for Pacific cod in the AI may be
conducted only by PCTC Program CVs that deliver their catch to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant. However, when the AI DFA is greater than
the set-aside (i.e. greater than 12 percent of A season CQ), the amount
of the DFA in excess of the set-aside could be harvested by vessels
delivering to any processor. That would not erode the set-aside, which
would remain at 12 percent of A season CQ and apply to all CVs.
Cooperatives may not deliver more than the A season CQ minus the AI CQ
set-aside established under Sec. 679.132 to processors in the BS
subarea when the AI CQ set-aside is in effect.
Comment 32: When the AI CQ set-aside is equal to the AI DFA,
directed fishing for Pacific cod in the AI may be conducted only by CVs
that deliver their catch of AI Pacific cod to Aleutian Islands
shoreplants. This is a crucial element of making the AI CQ set-aside
work under either set-aside option.
Response: NMFS acknowledges the comment in support of the AI CQ
set-aside structure. In years when the AI CQ set-aside is equal to the
AI DFA, all CQ harvested in the AI must be delivered to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant unless the Regional Administrator removes the AI CQ
set-aside because there is no operational processor.
Comment 33: How can NMFS guarantee that the cooperatives will
comply with the AI CQ set-aside and what are the consequences if the
cooperatives fail to comply? Who negotiates and must submit to the
inter-cooperative agreement?
Response: The Council recommended, and this final rule implements,
a requirement for all PCTC Program cooperatives to form an inter-
cooperative agreement that includes an AI CQ set-aside delivery
agreement. It is the intention of the Council and NMFS that
cooperatives will negotiate with one another to ensure delivery occurs
consistent with the AI CQ set-aside provision.
Failure to come to any agreement would result in NMFS withholding
CQ. NMFS will not issue CQ to cooperatives until the inter-cooperative
agreement is submitted to NMFS with the cooperative application.
If cooperatives fail to implement the agreement and do not deliver
the AI CQ set-aside, the cooperatives would lose access to that portion
of the CQ in that year, as it could only be harvested and delivered to
an AI shoreplant.
Antitrust Concerns With the AI CQ Set-Aside
Comment 34: The AI CQ set-aside may have antitrust implications
between the processing plant operators and the cooperatives because it
would force the Aleutian Islands shoreplant to expose its fish prices
and marketing plans to its competitors prior to the season. Amendment
122 creates an opportunity for competitively sensitive information to
flow back to competing processors, and it may also align the
cooperatives' incentives with those of competing processors (and lead
to other strategic behavior that undermines competition). The
opportunity for collusion is so significant that this may rise to the
level of a ``per se'' violation of the Sherman Act.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the PCTC Program would result in per
se antitrust violations. These same concerns were raised prior to the
publication of the proposed action to the Department of Justice (DOJ)
Antitrust Division, which has expertise in the administration of
federal antitrust laws. DOJ did not inform NMFS that the Program would
result in any per se antitrust violations. All catch share programs
create some potential for anticompetitive behavior, but participants
are required to comply with antitrust laws in order to retain their
fishing privileges. Pursuant to Magnuson-Stevens Act section
303A(c)(1)(K), NMFS would revoke the limited access privileges of any
participant found to have violated federal antitrust laws.
Comment 35: Explain how the Council and NMFS intend to manage the
cooperatives to avoid potential antitrust law violations. The
difference between direct allocation and AI CQ set-aside is
competitively significant if Adak is required to join a cooperative to
receive fish for processing. An inter-cooperative agreement controls
the terms for how a set-aside for Aleutian Islands shoreplants will be
administered, clearly putting the Aleut Corporation at a competitive
disadvantage and raising antitrust concerns. Further, the proposed plan
does not provide any active governmental supervision of the market-
allocation arrangement to ensure fair treatment of the Aleut
Corporation. The Aleut Corporation plant would be a loser in this
unlawful market allocation agreement and would be forced to accept
products delivered under an inter-cooperative agreement.
[[Page 53722]]
Response: The cooperatives are responsible for management of the
cooperative system. All cooperatives are intended to only conduct and
coordinate harvest activities of members and are not Fishermen's
Collective Marketing Act (FCMA) cooperatives. An Aleutian Islands
shoreplant would not be required to join a cooperative to receive CQ
for processing. And, because cooperatives would be required to deliver
a fixed percentage of CQ to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant when
operational, it is possible that shoreplant may have some leverage in
negotiating deliveries. NMFS does not regulate market prices. However,
as stated above, the Magnuson-Stevens Act allows for NMFS to revoke and
redistribute any LAPP held by any person found to have violated the
antitrust laws of the United States.
Impacts to Adak
Comment 36: Reject the FONSI prepared for the EA analyzing the
impacts of Amendment 122 and conduct an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS). There are real impacts to the human environment of Adak from the
lack of processing in the community. The most recent major positive
impact to the economy was the implementation of Amendment 113. The loss
of Amendment 113 and the closure of the Adak plant have already led to
the collapse of the local economy and the likely closure of the Adak
school in 2024. This loss of the processing facility and its prolonged
closure will have sociological impacts on the community. Each year that
fish processing does not occur, the community loses residents,
including families with school-age children.
Amendment 122 will not likely restore plant operations, revive the
local economy, or reopen the school. NMFS must adequately analyze a
solution to provide relief and the environment to allow fish processing
to occur in Adak to ensure consequences of existing conditions are
identified and mitigated. Amendment 122 will have negative impacts and
likely lead to prolonged closure of the processing facility.
The FONSI is incorrect when it states that Amendment 122 would not
have any effect on the health of minority or low-income communities.
Adak is a small, remote, island community with significant Unangax
population and heritage. According to the Internal Revenue Service,
Adak is a Qualified Opportunity Zone, which is defined as ``an
economically distressed community.'' It would be difficult to argue
that Adak is not a ``minority or low-income community.''
These effects should be well-documented in an EIS as these impacts
need to be studied in detail in order for NMFS and the Council to know
the full and true impacts Amendment 122 will have on Adak.
Response: The PCTC Program includes provisions designed to
facilitate processing activity that could benefit the economy in Adak
and Atka. With respect to providing for the sustained participation of
fishing communities (i.e., those communities substantially engaged in
and/or dependent on the fishery), the PCTC Program features a history-
based approach for initial allocation of QS in proportion to historical
levels of participation in the fishery to address fairness and equity.
NMFS acknowledges that there are circumstances unique to Adak and
that the processing facility, which is important to the local economy,
was relying on Amendment 113. However, after a court struck down
Amendment 113 and the plant closed, the Council had to consider means
of providing some benefits in the future if a plant were to open again
while recognizing there is no operating business that could currently
hold QS.
NMFS prepared an Analysis in compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to determine whether the environmental
impact of the proposed action was significant. The Analysis also
analyzed social and economic impacts of the alternatives, including
access to fishing activity, compared to status quo conditions. Section
2.10.5 of the Analysis discussed the impact of the proposed action on
fishing communities. Based on the Analysis, NMFS concluded that
Amendment 122 and this final rule will not have a significant impact on
the human environment. NMFS has determined that Amendment 122 will not
have significant adverse impacts on the City of Adak.
NMFS anticipates there will be beneficial economic effects compared
to status quo because the AI CQ set-aside provision is designed to
provide Pacific cod deliveries to Adak and Atka in years when there is
an operational processor. Because the EA demonstrates there will be no
significant impacts on the human environment compared to current
conditions--as opposed to in comparison to a different program not
currently under consideration--NMFS is not required to prepare an EIS
under the requirements of NEPA. Additionally, the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations implementing NEPA state in 40 CFR
1502.16(b) that economic or social effects by themselves do not require
preparation of an EIS.
Comment 37: The success or failure of the Aleut Corporation owned
processing plant has direct and real impacts to all 4,000 of the
shareholders; the economic impact of decisions made for Adak reach far
wider than the community alone. Harm to the economic stability for the
population of Adak would result in significant health impacts.
Response: NMFS anticipates beneficial effects on the health and the
environment of minority or low-income communities like Adak may be
expected as a result of this action, compared to status quo. For Adak
specifically, the AI CQ set-aside provision is designed to provide
Pacific cod deliveries to Adak and Atka in years when there is an
operational processor. As a result, this action includes provisions
designed to facilitate processing activity that might not otherwise
occur and could benefit the economy in Adak and Atka. Sections 2.10.5
and 2.10.8 of the Analysis prepared for this action provide additional
detail (See ADDRESSES).
PCTC Program Cooperatives
Comment 38: Clarify that a cooperative can associate with any
permitted processor regardless of whether that processor holds QS,
subject to some limitations on CPs acting as motherships.
Response: NMFS agrees with this clarification. There is nothing
that precludes cooperatives from associating with a permitted processor
that does not hold QS. Additionally, cooperatives may deliver Pacific
cod harvested with CQ to any federally-permitted processor, whether or
not it is associated with the cooperative.
Comment 39: Only target catch should count against CQ. Taking the
ICA off the top gives extra fish to boats that have Pacific cod bycatch
in other fisheries.
Response: NMFS concurs that only target catch counts against CQ.
Pacific cod caught incidentally in other target fisheries contribute to
the Pacific cod ICA. The Regional Administrator will annually determine
the amount of the A and B season ICA needed in other trawl CV target
fisheries and deduct that amount from the trawl CV TAC. The ICA is
determined based on the ICA rates in previous years and the projected
amount necessary for the current year. After deducting the ICA, the
remaining TAC is the DFA, which will be fully allocated as Pacific cod
CQ for the A and B season under the PCTC Program.
Comment 40: For clarity, modify the last sentence of Sec.
679.131(j)(3)(i) to
[[Page 53723]]
mirror the preamble and Council motion to clarify that all processors
with an eligible FPP or FFP are eligible to process CQ under this
program (regardless of whether or not they are issued processor-held
QS), subject to eligibility requirements under Amendment 120 to limit
CPs acting as motherships and subject to the at-sea processing limits
placed on such CPs under Sec. 679.133(b)(2) of this rule.
Response: NMFS agrees and has modified language at Sec.
679.131(j)(3)(i) to include this clarifying change. The specific
modification in the table adds that ``all processors'' would include
processors with an FFP subject to eligibility requirements under
Amendment 120 to limit CPs acting as motherships as described at Sec.
679.133(b)(2).
Comment 41: Clarify whether (1) a vessel can be listed as eligible
to harvest in a cooperative other than the cooperative to which it
assigned its QS and (2) a vessel can deliver its CQ to a processor if
it is a member of another processor's cooperative?
Response: NMFS agrees that a vessel (as identified by its FFP) can
be listed on multiple cooperative applications as an eligible harvester
despite the vessel owner not holding QS as a member of each
cooperative. Each LLP license and associated QS may only be listed on
one cooperative application and the LLP license holder is therefore a
``member'' of that cooperative.
Vessels may deliver CQ to a different processor than the processor
associated with their cooperative. There is not a closed class of
processors eligible to receive deliveries of CQ, meaning a vessel may
deliver some or all of the CQ to multiple processors.
Comment 42: Cooperative reports must be mandatory to provide
accountability, as cooperatives must `ensure/guarantee' the PCTC
Program achieves its objective of supporting sustained participation by
fishery dependent communities as stated in the problem statement.
Response: There is precedent in other programs, such as the
Rockfish Program, for relying on voluntary cooperative reporting to the
Council, and several reasons to maintain that practice here. The annual
cooperative reports to the Council contain the information that the
Council requested to determine whether the PCTC Program is meeting its
goals and objectives. Voluntary reports reduce the reporting burden on
cooperatives and their members without sacrificing providing critical
data to the Council.
NMFS separately collects the information that it needs to manage
the fishery. Voluntary cooperative reports to the Council also reduce
the time NMFS spends collecting and storing the annual reports and
eliminates the need to modify regulations for a mandatory report that
are burdensome and do not provide information necessary to manage the
fishery.
Comment 43: In terms of use of the CQ held in the cooperative, the
preamble of the proposed rule is correct and explicit that a
cooperative cannot assign a greater proportion of the CQ resulting from
processor-held QS to an LLP license owned by that processor for harvest
by a vessel owned by that processor than the LLP license would have
brought into the cooperative absent any processor-held QS. Part II.F of
the preamble to the proposed rule also states the Council intended
processor-held QS to be divided among cooperative CVs proportionately
to the QS attached to LLP licenses on board the harvesting vessel, but
the only restriction in the Council's preferred alternative is relative
to processor-held QS used on vessels that are owned by the processor.
In all other cases, it is up to the cooperative, in partnership with
its associated processor, to determine how best to optimize harvest
within the cooperative to meet the objectives of the program.
Response: This final rule establishes use caps to limit the amount
of CQ a vessel can harvest at Sec. 679.133. To address vertically
integrated companies where a processing company may also own LLP
licenses or CVs, the Council intended processor held QS to be divided
among cooperative CVs proportionately to the QS attached to LLP
licenses onboard the harvesting vessel. In other words, a cooperative
should not allow a CV or LLP license owned by that processor to harvest
a greater proportion of the CQ resulting from processor-held QS than
the LLP license would have brought into the cooperative absent any
processor-held QS. The Council specified that the cooperative will
monitor this provision and include reporting on harvest of CQ resulting
from processor-held QS in the PCTC Program cooperative annual report.
The Council also directed that each cooperative's annual report
provide information on CQ leasing activities and any penalties issued
and harvest of CQ resulting from processor-held QS. Additionally, NMFS
requires cooperatives to include information about the cooperative's
plan to monitor CQ leasing activities and the use of CQ derived from
processor held QS within the cooperative, in the Application for PCTC
Program CQ.
Comment 44: Clarify the terms ``affiliated with'' and ``ownership
of a vessel'' with respect to the use of CQ derived from processor-held
QS.
Response: NMFS defines affiliation and control at Sec. 679.2
Affiliation for the purpose of defining AFA, Rockfish Program, and PCTC
Program. See the response to Comment 43 for more discussion about
processor-held QS used in a cooperative with a processor owned vessel.
Prohibited Species Catch Limits
Comment 45: There is no requirement that the cooperatives will set
aside a proportionate amount of PSCs for the CVs that agree to take on
the obligation of harvesting the AI CQ set-aside for delivery to an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant. NMFS should make it explicit that initial
distribution of PSC limits include pro-rata amounts to the AI CQ set-
aside and require that the inter-cooperative agreement and each
cooperative agreement contain provisions mandating initial distribution
of PSC pro-rata to the individual's QS percentage.
Response: NMFS requires an inter-cooperative agreement signed by
all cooperatives prior to issuing CQ each year. The cooperatives must
agree in the inter-cooperative agreement which cooperatives will
deliver the AI CQ set-aside to the Aleutian Islands shoreplants. In
that agreement, cooperatives should confirm that there would be
sufficient CQ and PSC set aside to accomplish deliveries. The Council
recommended a cooperative system to manage the CQ and PSC limits
allocated within the PCTC Program. NMFS anticipates that each
cooperative will maximize its usage of CQ and PSC limits to the extent
practicable, including adhering to delivery requirements to Aleutian
Islands shoreplants in years the AI CQ set-aside is in effect.
Comment 46: Be explicit that the total halibut PSC limit reduction
is 25 percent, but in the first year, NMFS will apply a 12.5 percent
reduction. This is consistent with the Council motion.
Response: NMFS clarified this change in the final rule preamble and
confirms that this provision aligns with the Council's description of
the PSC limit reduction described in the analysis. To clarify, the
total halibut PSC reduction is 25 percent, phased in over two years.
NMFS will reduce the halibut PSC for the PCTC Program by 12.5 percent
in the first year of the Program, and will apply a 25 percent reduction
to halibut PSC in the second year and each year thereafter.
[[Page 53724]]
Comment 47: An Aleutian Islands shoreplant needs to be able to
associate with a cooperative in order to be able to access transfers of
PSC limits.
Response: NMFS disagrees. Cooperatives can process their Pacific
cod at any processor, subject to the at-sea processing sideboard limit
specified at Sec. 679.133(b)(2). Processors do not need access to PSC
limits; only harvesters do.
Inter-Cooperative Agreement
Comment 48: NMFS should make the PCTC Program official record or a
list of LLP license holder information available to the inter-
cooperative manager when application packages are sent out.
Response: NMFS will publish a list of LLP license holders and
processors who are expected to qualify for QS under the PCTC Program on
the Alaska Region website with the publication of this final rule in
the Federal Register.
Comment 49: The proposed rule states that all participants in the
Program would be required to organize a cooperative prior to the
November 1 deadline each year. Does the inter-cooperative agreement
need to be in place by November 1st? Where are the application
requirements for the inter-cooperative agreement? In the proposed rule,
it appears that the individual cooperative applications would simply
include a copy of the inter-cooperative agreement that defines how the
AI CQ set-aside will be harvested.
Response: Inter-cooperative formation needs to occur prior to
November 1. There are no application requirements for the inter-
cooperative agreement; however, cooperatives must include a copy of the
inter-cooperative agreement in order for their CQ application to be
approved, and that agreement must specify how the AI CQ set-aside would
be harvested.
For the first year, NMFS is making a change to the deadline to
accommodate timing concerns. For the calendar year 2023 only, each
cooperative must submit the inter-cooperative agreement to NMFS prior
to December 31, 2023, described at Sec. 679.131 (a)(4)(viii). Inter-
cooperative formation would be allowed and an inter-cooperative
agreement would be required to implement the AI set-aside and to allow
for efficient transfers of CQ or PSC limits between cooperatives.
Comment 50: The proposed rule does not provide any guidance on how
an inter-cooperative agreement would be agreed upon by the cooperative
members.
Response: The Council recommended a cooperative-based structure for
implementation of the PCTC Program based on public testimony. NMFS
interprets this to mean that the cooperatives will structure their
inter-cooperative agreement in a way that satisfies the AI CQ set-aside
requirements without further guidance from NMFS on cooperative
management. There is precedent set for cooperative systems using
agreements like this, including in other North Pacific catch share
programs. Because an inter-cooperative agreement will be required in
order for NMFS to approve applications for CQ, NMFS does not anticipate
additional procedural guardrails are necessary to encourage
cooperatives to negotiate this required agreement.
Use Caps
Comment 51: It is problematic to provide information down to the
individual ownership level for certain types of ownerships structures,
such as publicly-held companies. In order to effectively enforce
ownership and use caps, the preamble to the proposed rule would require
a list of all persons, to the individual level, holding an ownership
interest in the LLP licenses that join the cooperative. The classic
case is a publicly traded owner. Because individual ownership is
constantly changing and there is little public disclosure of individual
owners, it would be impossible for a publicly traded company to submit
an ownership list to the individual level. Similarly, a company such as
American Seafoods, with a complex ownership structure and private
equity investment, does not have access to ownership information to the
individual level.
Revise the proposed standard to require the same information down
to the individual level for any person having an ownership interest in
excess of five percent. If based on that information NMFS has any
concerns about compliance with ownership and use caps, the Agency can
be authorized to request additional ownership information.
Response: The Application for PCTC CQ, the Application for Transfer
of LLP Groundfish/Crab License, and the Application for Transfer of
PCTC QS for Processors include fields to enter the names of all
persons, to the individual level, holding an ownership interest in the
LLP licenses or QS permit. Federal regulations at Sec. 697.2 defines
person as any individual (whether or not a citizen or national of the
United States), any corporation, partnership, association, or other
non-individual entity (whether or not organized, or existing under the
laws of any state), and any Federal, state, local, or foreign
government or any entity of any such aforementioned governments.
This collection of information is necessary to monitor compliance
with the use caps on CQ and the ownership caps on QS. NMFS does not
currently monitor ownership of publicly traded companies beyond the
person (i.e., beyond the company level), consistent with other Alaska
catch share programs. Collections of information remain unmodified from
the proposed rule.
At-Sea Processing Sideboard Limit
Comment 52: A mothership vessel operator receiving an unsorted
codend or ``haul'' should be allowed to assign the appropriate
management program code rather than NMFS determining that the catch
would be assigned to the PCTC Program based on the retained catch
composition as proposed in regulations at Sec. 679.20. Allowing the
vessel operator to designate which hauls are PCTC Program hauls would
be consistent with the current practice of evaluating the catch
composition prior to determining if a haul is CDQ or non-CDQ (open
access).
Response: NMFS agrees. Based on this comment, NMFS changed Sec.
679.5(c)(6)(v)(J) in the final rule. Rather than considering any
unsorted codend that is delivered to a mothership to be CQ during the
applicable PCTC Program season that is in the Pacific cod target
fishery, the final rule implements a method similar to how catch in an
unsorted codend is assigned to a CDQ group. The mothership will have 2
hours after completion of weighing all catch in the haul on the
mothership to assign a haul to the PCTC Program.
Comment 53: The two CPs acting as motherships to process CQ should
be allowed to share processing sideboards within a cooperative or by an
inter-cooperative agreement. In Amendment 122, the Council adopted
further restrictions on these two vessels, limiting each vessel to
processing no more than 125 percent of its average Pacific cod
processing history over the years 2009-2019. However, the Council did
not address the issue of flexibility between the two motherships with
respect to sideboard usage.
It is critical that final rule include this flexibility. It is
critical that the second mothership be able to provide markets if the
first mothership breaks down. It is critical that the two motherships
be able to work together as either of them nears its sideboard limit to
provide at least a single market for those fishermen who have no
delivery alternatives.
The solution is to include in the final rule a provision that
allows either of the
[[Page 53725]]
two motherships to exceed its individual sideboard based on a written
agreement submitted to NMFS transferring a portion of its annual
sideboard to the other mothership. The result would be that the total
mothership sideboard would remain in full effect but the individual
sideboards could be shared on a voluntary basis between the two
motherships in the same manner that CQ can be shared within and among
different cooperatives.
Response: The PCTC Program does not limit who may process Pacific
cod, but it does place specific limits on the amount of CQ that may be
processed by different operation types. This final rule includes the
sideboard limit on the amount of CQ that can be delivered by trawl CVs
to a CP designated on an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement. This final rule establishes an at-sea
processing sideboard limit of 125 percent of the eligible CP's
processing history which allows some opportunity for additional
offshore processing relative to the historical annual average for each
operation. This provision allows two eligible CPs acting as a
mothership to process up to 125 percent of their individual average
Pacific cod processing history during the qualifying years of 2009
through 2019 with no years dropped.
This provision is not an allocation, and the Council did not
recommend a sideboard that would function as a joint processing
sideboard limit for the CP sector. Rather, any remaining CQ that
exceeds a vessel's at-sea processing sideboard limit may be delivered
to any other processor, including a shoreside processor.
Comment 54: Issue the at-sea processing sideboard limit applicable
to a CP designated on a groundfish LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod
trawl mothership endorsement as a new permit or as a transferable
endorsement that could be transferred separately from the LLP license
(i.e., similar to the provisions that currently apply to certain AI
transferable endorsements for smaller vessels).
Response: The Council recommended maintaining the long-standing
policy that sideboard limits are not sector allocations and therefore
should not be transferable.
Comment 55: Revise the regulations at Sec. 679.133(b)(2) to
accurately reflect how at-sea processing sideboards are determined. The
first option sets the sideboard at 125 percent of the relevant
processing history. The second option sets it to 125 percent of the
catch history of certain catcher vessels but only up to 125 percent of
the processor's relevant processing history. In effect, the outcome
under each option will always be that each mothership's sideboard will
equal 125 percent of that vessel's relevant processing history. For
drafting simplicity, ease of future analysis and implementation, we
recommend that the proposed language to determine sideboard amounts be
revised to reflect only option 1.
Response: NMFS agrees and has revised regulations at Sec.
679.133(b)(2) to reflect that NMFS will establish a sideboard limit for
each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement
not to exceed 125 percent of a CP's processing history. Processing
Pacific cod by a CP acting as a mothership is limited by eligibility
requirements under Amendment 120 and subject to the at-sea processing
limits placed on such CPs under Sec. 679.133(b)(2).
Changes From Proposed Rule to Final Rule
This final rule includes the following substantive changes from the
proposed to final rule to address public comment, clarify regulatory
language, or to correct inadvertent errors in the proposed regulations.
Throughout the regulatory text, NMFS also made technical and grammar
edits to correct regulatory cross references, use consistent terms,
remove redundancy, and promote clarity.
At Sec. 679.2, NMFS modified the definition for PCTC Program
cooperative to add that a cooperative associates with a processor under
the requirements at Sec. 679.131. NMFS also modified the definition
for PCTC Program participants to include those harvesters and
processors who receive, hold, or use PCTC Program QS. This change was
necessary to include future Program participants who do not receive
initial allocations. NMFS removed the definition for PCTC Program CQ
because it was duplicative and the content is covered by the definition
of Cooperative Quota (CQ).
At Sec. 679.5(c)(6)(v)(J)(1), NMFS clarified the timing
requirements for a mothership to designate a haul as PCTC Program
management code based on comment 52 and added a requirement to record
the observer's haul number in the mothership daily cumulative
production logbook (DCPL). The final rule implements a method similar
to the regulation that is used for assigning an unsorted codend to a
CDQ group. The mothership will have 2 hours after completion of
weighing all catch in the haul on the mothership to assign a haul to
the PCTC Program. Also, NMFS changed the final rule to require the
mothership to report the observer's haul number in the Mothership DCPL
by 2400 hours, A.l.t., each day to record the previous day's delivery
information. This change is necessary to accurately account for PCTC
catch separate from other management programs.
At Sec. 679.7(m)(2)(i), NMFS removed the phrase ``while fishing
under a CQ permit issued to a PCTC Program cooperative'' to ensure that
motherships and shoreside processors would not be excluded from the
prohibition against failing to follow the catch monitoring
requirements. At Sec. 679.7(m)(4)(ii), NMFS clarified that it is
unlawful for the manager of a shoreside processor or stationary
floating processor to process any groundfish delivered by a CV fishing
under the authority of a CQ permit not weighed on a scale approved by
the State of Alaska. NMFS removed Sec. 679.7(m)(5)(i), Fail to retain
any Pacific cod caught by a vessel when that vessel is fishing under
the authority of a CQ permit, because improved retention/improved
utilization (IR/IU) regulations at Sec. 679.27(c)(2) already apply.
NMFS removed Sec. 679.7(m)(5)(iv) Operate a vessel fishing under the
authority of a CQ permit issued to a PCTC Program cooperative and have
any Pacific cod aboard the vessel unless those fish were harvested
under the authority of a CQ permit, because this prohibition would
prevent a mothership from possessing CDQ Program Pacific cod onboard
the vessels at the same time as participating in the PCTC Program. This
is not necessary because this final rule allows each haul delivered to
a mothership to be assigned a management program code. NMFS also
removed references to joint and several liability for violations
because existing agency regulations at 15 CFR 904.107 address joint and
several liability for any civil penalties issued.
NMFS changed to Table 56 to part 679 to include Central GOA dusky
rockfish and Central GOA Pacific ocean perch sideboard limits for non-
exempt AFA CVs. This regulatory change was inadvertently left out in
the proposed rule; however it was correctly described in the preamble
to the proposed rule at Section VIII.A and in Table 3.
The proposed rule had erroneously removed the harvesting sideboards
for AFA vessels at Sec. 679.64(b)(3)(ii), (iv), and (4)(ii). In the
final rule, NMFS added these paragraphs back in the regulations. At
Sec. 679.64(b)(3)(ii), NMFS specified that the BSAI Pacific cod
harvesting sideboard applies only to C season. At Sec. Sec.
679.64(b)(3)(iv) and 679.64(b)(4)(ii), NMFS corrected the regulation to
state that non-exempt AFA
[[Page 53726]]
CVs and the associated LLP licenses are also sideboarded upon
implementation of the PCTC Program. At Sec. 679.64(b)(4)(ii), NMFS
also corrected the Gulf of Alaska halibut PSC limit for the non-exempt
AFA CVs and associated LLP licenses.
At Sec. 679.130(e), NMFS added that a PCTC Program processor
eligible to receive an initial allocation of QS includes a processor
that holds a valid FFP and an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement.
NMFS moved the paragraphs on the non-severability of Pacific cod
legal landings and the exception provisions from Sec. 679.130(f)(4) to
Sec. 679.130(i)(5), and made changes to the headings for consistency
and convention. NMFS added that Pacific cod legal landings are non-
severable from transferable AI endorsements. NMFS clarified in Sec.
679.130(i)(5)(i) that, if multiple LLP licenses authorized catch by a
vessel, the LLP license holders must submit to NMFS an agreement
specifying the amount of shared catch history to assign to each LLP
license with the application for PCTC Program QS.
At Sec. 679.130(j)(3), NMFS clarified several transfer
requirements for processor-held PCTC Program QS permits. First,
processors that received an initial QS allocation must have an active
FPP or FFP to receive benefits from their QS through associating with a
cooperative. Second, any transfer of QS in excess of the ownership cap
must be to another PCTC Program QS permit holder who remains below the
ownership cap or a new processor with an active FPP. PCTC Program QS
permits issued to shoreside processors can only be transferred to other
shoreside processors that hold an FPP.
NMFS also added language to specify transfer restrictions for PCTC
Program QS permits initially issued to an FFP holder. CPs acting as
motherships may transfer their QS permit to the onshore or offshore
sector, subject to eligibility requirements under Amendment 120 to
limit CPs acting as motherships (i.e. may transfer QS permits to
processors that hold a valid FPP or a valid FFP in addition to an LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement).
At Sec. 679.131(a)(1)(i), NMFS clarified that QS assigned to LLP
licenses and PCTC Program QS permits held by a processor must be
assigned to a cooperative through a CQ permit to use the CQ derived
from that QS to catch Pacific cod, crab PSC, or halibut PSC assigned to
the PCTC Program. NMFS removed the terms ``process or receive'' because
the PCTC Program does not require a processor to hold QS or CQ to
process or receive Pacific cod from cooperatives.
At Sec. 679.131(a)(4)(viii), NMFS modified the text to accommodate
cooperative formation prior to the first year of the PCTC Program in
response to comment 49. NMFS will allow, for the calendar year 2023
only, for each cooperative to submit the inter-cooperative agreement to
NMFS prior to December 31, 2023. This single year variation will give
cooperatives additional time to come to an agreement after publication
of the final rule. In all years after 2023, the inter-cooperative
agreement must be submitted with the cooperative application no later
than November 1 of each calendar year. The inter-cooperative agreement
is required before NMFS issues CQ to each cooperative and fishing
begins in A season (January 20). The inter-cooperative agreement must
be submitted regardless of whether an Adak or Atka files a notice of
intent to process with NMFS per Sec. 679.132(b).
At Sec. 679.131(i), NMFS modified language to reflect language in
other catch share programs when referring to the NMFS online system
used for inter-cooperative transfers. Instead of being specific to the
current program, eFish, NMFS used ``online system'' to account for any
future application naming conventions.
At Sec. 679.131(j)(3)(i), NMFS clarified that in order for a
cooperative to associate with a processor with an FFP, the vessel must
be named on an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement in response to comment 40.
At Sec. 679.132(b)(5)(ii), NMFS modified this text to clarify that
cooperatives must ensure that the PCTC Program harvests from the BS do
not exceed the minimum AI CQ set-aside.
At Sec. 679.132(c)(3) and (4), NMFS clarified language pertaining
to the Regional Administrator removing the delivery requirement and the
process for withdrawing a notice of intent to process, in response to
comments 17 and 18. NMFS removed language at Sec. 679.132(c)(4)
regarding removing the projected unused AI set-aside to PCTC Program
cooperatives in proportion to the amount of CQ that each PCTC Program
cooperative received in the initial allocation of CQ for the remainder
of the A and B seasons. NMFS maintained in the regulations that the
Regional Administrator may remove the delivery requirement for some or
all of the projected unused AI CQ set-aside if the Regional
Administrator determines that Aleutian Islands shoreplants will not
process the entire AI CQ set-aside.
NMFS also removed language limiting when the City of Adak or City
of Atka could withdraw their notice of intent to process. A notice of
intent to process may be withdrawn at any time after it is submitted to
NMFS. NMFS clarified that all notices of intent must be withdrawn for
NMFS to remove the delivery requirements applicable when the AI CQ set-
aside is in effect.
At Sec. 679.133(a)(6)(iv), NMFS added language to exempt an
Aleutian Islands shoreplant from processor use caps when the AI CQ set-
aside is in effect.
At Sec. 679.133(b)(2), based on comment 55, NMFS modified the text
to reflect the Council recommendation that NMFS establish a sideboard
limit for each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement not to exceed 125 percent of the CP's processing history.
Processing Pacific cod by a CP acting as a mothership is limited by
eligibility requirements under Amendment 120.
At Sec. 679.135(d)(2)(iv), NMFS clarified that if a cooperative
does not pay its cost recovery fees and a member of that cooperative
leaves and joins another cooperative, NMFS will withhold any CQ
generated by that person's QS until the original cooperative pays its
delinquent cost recovery fee.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(3) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator (AA) has determined that this final rule is
consistent with Amendment 122 to the BSAI FMP, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
NMFS prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for this action and
the AA concluded that there will be no significant impact on the human
environment as a result of this rule. This action creates a LAPP to
rationalize the BSAI Pacific cod trawl CV sector A and B seasons but
will not result in significant changes to amount, timing, or location
of total harvest, or result in other changes that would significantly
impact the quality of the human environment. A copy of the EA is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a final regulatory
[[Page 53727]]
flexibility analysis, the agency shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with the rule, and shall designate
such publications as ``small entity compliance guides.'' The agency
shall explain the actions a small entity is required to take to comply
with a rule or group of rules. The preambles to the proposed rule and
this final rule include a detailed description of the actions necessary
to comply with this rule, and as part of this rulemaking process, NMFS
included on its website a summary of compliance requirements that
serves as the small entity compliance guide: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/alaska/commercial-fishing/pacific-cod-trawl-cooperative-program. This action does not require any additional
compliance from small entities that is not described in the small
entity compliance guide or the preambles to the proposed rule and this
final rule. Copies of the proposed rule and this final rule are
available from the NMFS website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
This FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA), a summary of the significant issues raised by the public
comments in response to the IRFA, NMFS' responses to those comments,
and a summary of the analyses completed to support this action.
Section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that,
when an agency promulgates a final rule under section 553 of Title 5 of
the U.S. Code, after being required by that section or any other law to
publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking, the agency shall
prepare a FRFA. Section 604 describes the required contents of a FRFA:
(1) a statement of the need for and objectives of the rule; (2) a
statement of the significant issues raised by the public comments in
response to the IRFA, a statement of the assessment of the agency of
such issues, and a statement of any changes made to the proposed rule
as a result of such comments; (3) the response of the agency to any
comments filed by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) in response to the proposed rule, and a detailed
statement of any change made to the proposed rule in the final rule as
a result of the comments; (4) a description of and an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the rule will apply or an explanation
of why no such estimate is available; (5) a description of the
projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements
of the rule, including an estimate of the classes of small entities
that will be subject to the requirement and the type of professional
skills necessary for preparation of the report or record; and (6) a
description of the steps the agency has taken to minimize the
significant economic impact on small entities consistent with the
stated objectives of applicable statutes including a statement of the
factual, policy, and legal reasons for selecting the alternative
adopted in this final rule and why each one of the other significant
alternatives to the rule considered by the agency which affect the
impact on small entities was rejected.
A description of this final rule and the need for and objectives of
this rule are contained in the preamble to this final rule and the
preamble to the proposed rule (88 FR 8592, February 9, 2023) and are
not repeated here.
Public and Chief Counsel for Advocacy Comments on the IRFA
An IRFA was prepared in the Classification section of the preamble
to the proposed rule. The Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA did not
file any comments on the proposed rule. NMFS received no comments
specifically on the IRFA.
Number and Description of Small Entities Regulated by This Final Rule
This final rule directly regulates owners and operators of
harvesters and processors that participate in the BSAI trawl CV Pacific
cod fishery including (1) trawl CVs, (2) shoreside processors, (3)
floating processors, (4) trawl CPs acting as motherships, and (5) small
government jurisdictions in the AI. This rule may also impact observer
providers that support the BSAI trawl CV Pacific cod fishery, but they
are indirectly impacted. Therefore, observer providers are not
considered directly regulated entities in the IRFA prepared for this
action.
A small business includes any firm that is independently owned and
operated and not dominant in its field of operation. Businesses
classified as primarily engaged in commercial fishing are considered
small entities if they have less than 11 million dollars in annual
gross receipts for all businesses in the commercial fishing industry
(NAICS 11411). The RFA requires consideration of affiliations between
entities for the purpose of assessing whether an entity is classified
as small. The AFA pollock cooperatives, which make up a subset of the
entities regulated under this final rule, are types of affiliation
between entities. All of the AFA cooperatives have gross annual
revenues that are substantially greater than 11 million dollars.
Therefore, NMFS considers members in these cooperatives to be
``affiliated'' large (non-small) entities for RFA purposes. The
eligible AFA entities are large entities based on those affiliations.
The remaining 13 trawl CVs would be considered small entities. This
count includes five trawl CVs that are greater than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA
and eight CVs that are less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA with a transferable
AI endorsement.
Though CPs engage in both fish harvesting and fish processing
activities, since at least 1993, NMFS Alaska Region has considered CPs
to be predominantly engaged in fish harvesting rather than fish
processing. Under this classification, the threshold of 11 million
dollars in annual gross receipts is the appropriate threshold to apply
to identify any CPs that are small entities. All the CPs that are
directed regulated by this action do not meet the SBA definition of a
small entity due to cooperative affiliation.
Under the SBA's size standard for ``seafood product preparation and
packaging'' (NAICS code 311710), seafood processors are considered
small entities if they are independently owned and operated, not
dominant in their field of operation, and have a combined annual
employment of fewer than 750 employees. Of the plants that took
deliveries of Pacific cod from 2017 through 2019 that are currently in
business, one firm would be considered a small entity.
The RFA defines ``small governmental jurisdiction'' as the
government of a city, county, town, school district or special district
with a population of less than 50,000 people. Two small governmental
jurisdictions are directly regulated under the action. Adak and Atka
would be required to submit a notice of their intent to process to NMFS
to receive a portion of the AI CQ set-aside described in Section V of
this preamble. The set-aside amount is intended to benefit the AI
communities, and participation by these communities is voluntary.
Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Other Compliance Requirements
This action implements new recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance
requirements and revises existing requirements. These requirements are
necessary for the management and monitoring of the PCTC Program.
All PCTC program participants are required to provide additional
[[Page 53728]]
information to NMFS for management purposes. Each harvester is required
to track harvests to avoid exceeding their allocation. As in other
North Pacific rationalized fisheries, processors provide catch
recording data to managers to monitor harvest of allocations.
Processors are required to record deliveries and processing activities
to aid in the Program administration.
To participate in the Program, persons are required to complete
application forms, transfer forms, reporting requirements, and
monitoring requirements. These requirements impose costs on small
entities in gathering the required information and completing the
information collections.
NMFS has estimated the costs of complying with the requirements
based on information such as the burden hours per response, number of
responses per year, and wage rate estimates from industry or the Bureau
of Labor Statistics. Persons are required to complete many of the
requirements at the start of the Program, such as the application to
participate in the Program. Persons are required to complete some
requirements every year, such as the cooperative application.
Additionally, reporting for purposes of catch accounting or transfer of
CQ among cooperatives is completed more frequently. The impacts of
these changes are described in more detail in Sections 2.10.7 and
2.10.12 of the Analysis prepared for this final rule (see ADDRESSES).
New requirements for the PCTC Program include the Application for
PCTC Program QS, applications for transfer of QS during the 90-day
transfer window, the Application for PCTC Program CQ, the Application
for Transfer of PCTC Program QS for Processors, the AI notice of intent
to process, inter-cooperative transfers, the appeals process, and cost
recovery fee.
The initial allocation process requires all eligible harvesters and
processors who want to participate in the PCTC Program to submit an
Application for PCTC Program QS to receive QS. This application is
needed to determine the allocation of QS to eligible LLP licenses and
to eligible processors. For harvesters, NMFS will use the Catch
Accounting System data to determine how much Pacific cod was harvested
using the LLP license authorizing a CV and ask the current LLP license
holder to verify the catch estimate. For processors NMFS will use the
Catch Accounting System data to determine the amount of qualifying
Pacific cod delivered to the processor, and the processors will verify
the estimates. That information will also be used to determine whether
the QS holder complies with the ownership and use cap limitations
imposed under the program. Allowing persons to harvest a given
percentage of the fishery is anticipated to allow harvesters to avoid
fishing in bad weather conditions, improving safety of the fleet. The
fleet is also expected to be able to deliver a consistently higher
quality product. Quality improvements are expected to result from
shorter times between harvest and processing and less damage to the
fish in the holds by not fishing in bad weather.
In addition, the initial allocation process has a 90-day transfer
window to allow persons to transfer QS between non-exempt AFA LLP
licenses under certain conditions to honor private contracts and
agreements associated with harvest of the AFA Pacific cod sideboard
limits. This transfer window allows persons to resolve any disputes or
request QS transfers between LLP licenses. After the 90-day window for
these transfers has closed, QS cannot be separated from an LLP license
or transferable AI endorsement unless necessary to prevent exceedances
of the ownership or use caps, or if required by an operation of law.
The PCTC Program includes a standardized appeals process. The
appeals process provides participants the required opportunity to
dispute the catch and processing history records in the Catch
Accounting System that are used to determine a person's allocation of
QS. The appeals process is in addition to the 90-day transfer window
discussed above and open to all participants.
Each year the cooperative manager for each cooperative will be
required to submit an Application for PCTC Program CQ that identifies
the LLP licenses and processor QS permits named to the cooperative and
the vessels allowed to harvest the CQ. This application includes the
inter-cooperative agreement that defines how the AI CQ set-aside will
be harvested during years it is in effect. The Council requests that
cooperatives submit an annual cooperative report to the Council.
The Application of Transfer of PCTC Program QS for Processors will
be required for eligible processors to transfer their QS to other
processors. Processor QS assigned to a processor-held PCTC Program QS
permit established under the PCTC program may be transferred through
the NMFS online system with approval by NMFS.
The PCTC program requires the cooperatives to set aside 12 percent
of their A season CQ allocation for delivery to Aleutian Islands
shoreplants in years that a representative from the City of Adak or the
City of Atka files a valid intent to process with NMFS. The notice of
intent to process is necessary for NMFS and the cooperatives to know
whether the regulations established for the set-aside are in effect
during the A and B seasons. If a notice of intent to process is filed,
it also triggers additional reporting in the cooperative report to the
Council.
The PCTC Program is a LAPP, and therefore NMFS is required to
collect fees for the PCTC Program under sections 303A and 304(d)(2) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Section 304(d)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
limits the cost recovery fee so that it may not exceed 3 percent of the
ex-vessel value of the Pacific cod harvested under the PCTC Program.
Ex-vessel volume and value reports currently being used to establish an
average annual price for BSAI trawl caught Pacific cod will be used to
establish the standard price, and no additional collection of price
data will be necessary. NMFS uses this information to meet the required
provisions in sections 303A and 304(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act that
require NMFS to collect these fees associated with recoverable costs.
In addition to the new requirements, the PCTC Program revises
existing requirements.
If LLP license holders want to transfer their LLP license or
transferable AI endorsement and the associated PCTC Program QS, they
must fill out an Application to Transfer a Groundfish or Crab LLP
License. This form is revised to collect information on the PCTC QS
transaction, including QS prices, amount transferred, and whether there
are multiple transferees in the event ownership caps would otherwise be
exceeded. Information is added to the LLP license transfer form
identifying how PCTC QS would be distributed to the other LLP licenses
if the original holder of the LLP license was assigned QS that was over
the 5 percent ownership cap and qualified for the legacy exemption.
The PCTC Program requires updating ATLAS data transmission to
enable the timely electronic entry, archival, and transmission of
observer data for at-sea operations and shorebased processing plants.
This rule requires that all vessels submit logbooks when fishing in
the PCTC program. All CVs greater than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA
currently submit logbooks. Some CVs that participate in the AI Pacific
cod fishery
[[Page 53729]]
are less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA and may already file logbooks when
fishing for Pacific cod. Many already complete logbooks based on their
participation in other programs. However, a small number of CVs less
than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA that do not currently submit a logbook will
need to begin submitting a logbook if they choose to participate in the
PCTC Program.
Description of Significant Alternatives That Minimize Adverse Impacts
on Small Entities
The Council and NMFS considered an extensive and elaborate suite of
alternatives, options, and sub-options as it designed and evaluated a
quota share program for the BSAI Pacific cod trawl CV sector, including
a ``no action'' alternative. The Analysis presents the complete set of
alternatives, in various combinations with the complex suite of
elements and options. The Council selected a preferred alternative that
includes a suite of elements and options to manage the BSAI trawl CV
Pacific cod sector. The alternatives included no action (Alternative 1)
and action to implement a cooperative-style LAPP for the BSAI Pacific
cod trawl CV sector (Alternatives 2a and 2b and Alternative 3, which is
the Council's recommended action).
In general, the recommended LAPP includes allocations of QS to
groundfish LLP licenses based on the legal landings of targeted BSAI
Pacific cod in a Federal fishery during a range of qualifying years
included in the options. The action also allocates QS to a processors
based on processing history of legal landings of BSAI Pacific cod
harvested in a Federal fishery and deducted from the BSAI trawl CV
sector apportionment during the qualifying years. One alternative
considered but not selected included gear conversion, which would have
authorized BSAI Pacific cod quota associated with trawl CV LLP licenses
to be fished annually by CVs using pot gear. In the end, the Council
did not include the gear conversion element in its preferred
alternative due to concerns over the possibility of high crab PSC in
pot gear for red king crab (Zone 1) and C. opilio.
A second option considered but removed was a cooperative formation
approach based on existing AFA and non-AFA membership. The AFA vessels
and non-AFA vessels would have formed their cooperatives independently
of each other. A person owning both an AFA vessel and non-AFA vessel
would have been required to join the AFA cooperative for the AFA vessel
and the non-AFA cooperative for the non-AFA vessel. Allowing only an
AFA and non-AFA cooperative was rejected by the Council after
considering the obstacles it would create under the various program
elements being considered by the Council and withdrawal of industry
support for the option. Integrating multiple processors, the potential
limitation on competition, and reduced cooperative formation choice
were ultimately the issues associated with the two cooperative approach
that led to it being removed from consideration. The recommended action
allows a cooperative to associate with one or more processor(s). This
approach reduces antitrust concerns that were raised to the Council
under the AFA and non-AFA cooperative structure.
The alternatives discussed in this section constitute the suite of
``significant alternatives,'' under this action, for purposes of the
RFA. Based upon the best available scientific data, and consideration
of the objectives of this action, NMFS did not identify alternatives to
the action that have the potential to accomplish the stated objectives
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and any other applicable statutes and that
have the potential to minimize any significant adverse economic impact
of the rule on small entities. After public process, the Council
concluded that the PCTC Program would best accomplish the stated
objectives articulated in the problem statement and applicable
statutes, and minimize to the extent practicable adverse economic
impacts on the universe of directly regulated small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection of information requirements
subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This final rule contains new collections of information for the
PCTC Program under new OMB Control Number 0648-0811 and revises
requirements for collections of information under existing OMB Control
Numbers 0648-0213 (Alaska Region Logbook and Activity Family of Forms);
-0318 (North Pacific Observer Program); -0334 (Alaska License
Limitation Program for Groundfish, Crab, and Scallops); -0711 (Alaska
Cost Recovery and Fee Programs); -0678 (North Pacific Fishery
Management Council Cooperative Annual Reports); and -0515 (Alaska
Interagency Electronic Reporting System). However, because the
collection of information authorized by OMB Control Number 0648-0515 is
concurrently being revised in a separate action, the revisions to that
collection of information in this rule will be assigned a temporary
control number, 0648-0812, that will later be merged into 0648-0515.
The existing collections of information under OMB Control Numbers 0648-
0330 (NMFS Alaska Region Scale & Catch Weighing Requirements) and 0648-
0445 (NMFS Alaska Region Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Program) will
also provide information needed to implement the PCTC Program and will
continue to apply. This rule does not make changes to these two
collections of information. The public reporting burden estimates
provided below for these collections of information include the time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
OMB Control Number 0648-0811
This rule creates new collection of information requirements to
implement PCTC Program. The new collections of information authorize
applications and processes used by the PCTC Program cooperatives,
processors, LLP license holders, and community representatives to apply
for permits, to transfer CQ and QS, to manage fishing and processor
activity, and to appeal agency decisions. These new collections are
necessary for NMFS to implement, monitor, and enforce the PCTC Program.
The data is used to ensure that program participants adhere to all
harvesting, processing, ownership, and use limits.
The public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to
average 2 hours for the Application for Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative
Program Quota Share, 2 hours for the Application for Pacific Cod Trawl
Cooperative Program Cooperative Quota, 2 hours for the Application for
Transfer of Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program Quota Share for
Processors, 10 minutes for the Application for Inter-Cooperative
Transfer of Cooperative Quota, 30 minutes for the notification of
intent to process Aleutian Islands Pacific cod, 2 hours for the
application to transfer QS during the 90-day transfer window for non-
exempt AFA LLP license holders, and 4 hours for appeals.
OMB Control Number 0648-0213
This rule revises the existing requirements for the collection of
information 0648-0213 related to logbooks because CVs participating in
the PCTC Program are required to submit a CV trawl gear daily fishing
logbook. Some CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA that do not currently
submit this logbook will need to begin doing so
[[Page 53730]]
to participate in the PCTC Program. The revision to this collection of
information adds as new respondents the CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m)
LOA that will need to start using the CV trawl gear daily fishing
logbook. CVs participating in the PCTC Program have the option of using
either the paper logbook approved under this collection or the
electronic option, which is approved under OMB Control Number 0648-
0515. The PCTC Program does not change the information collected by
this logbook. This rule requires CPs and shoreside processors
authorized as processors in the PCTC Program to submit a product
transfer report. However, no changes are needed to the respondents or
responses for this report because all expected respondents are
currently submitting it. The public reporting burden per individual
response is estimated to average 18 minutes for the Catcher Vessel
Trawl Daily Fishing Log and 20 minutes for the Product Transfer Report.
OMB Control Number 0648-0318
This rule revises the existing requirements for the collection of
information 0648-0318 related to the North Pacific Observer Program
because all vessels participating in the PCTC program are required to
have a computer onboard and use ATLAS to submit observer data to NMFS.
This increases the number of vessels that need to provide observers
access to a computer with ATLAS installed. PCTC Program participants
have up to three years to install communication equipment to facilitate
electronic transmission of observer data to NMFS. Most vessels comply
with this requirement by allowing NMFS to install ATLAS on an existing
computer on the vessel. Many, if not all, of the vessels that will need
to install ATLAS already have a computer that meets the minimum
requirements, and they will incur costs only if they choose to purchase
an additional computer. Estimated costs to purchase and install the
data transmission system vary from about $5,000 to $37,000, depending
on what a vessel needs to install. This rule also revises the existing
requirements in this collection because CVs that choose to participate
in the PCTC Program are required to be in the full observer coverage
category instead of the partial observer coverage category. These CVs
will no longer be required to use ODDS to log fishing trips; therefore,
this decreases the number of respondents that log trips in ODDS. The
public reporting burden per individual response is estimated to average
15 minutes to log a trip in ODDS.
OMB Control Number 0648-0334
This rule revises the existing requirements for the collection of
information 0648-0334 related to the LLP license and the transferable
AI endorsement to include PCTC Program QS information on the
groundfish/crab LLP license transfer application form. The public
reporting burden per individual response is estimated to average 1 hour
for the Application for Transfer LLP Groundfish/Crab License.
OMB Control Number 0648-0812
This rule revises the collection of information under OMB Control
Number 0648-0515 associated with electronic reporting. However, due to
multiple concurrent actions for that collection, the collection-of-
information requirements will be assigned a temporary control number,
0648-0812, that will later be merged into OMB Control Number 0648-0515.
PCTC Program participants need to use eLandings to submit landings
and production information, which is approved under control number OMB
0648-0515. CVs participating in the PCTC Program are required to submit
a CV trawl gear daily fishing logbook and may use either the electronic
logbook approved under OMB Control Number 0648-0515 or the paper
logbook approved under OMB Control Number 0648-0213. CVs greater than
60 ft (18.3 m) LOA are already required to maintain logbooks but this
is a new requirement for CVs less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA. Some CVs
less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA that do not currently submit the logbook
will need to begin doing so. The temporary control number covers the
revisions necessary to -0515 for the CVs that choose to submit
electronic logbooks. The PCTC Program does not change the information
collected by this logbook but does increase the number of participants
required to submit it. The public reporting burden per individual
response is estimated to average 15 minutes for the CV electronic
logbook.
A change from the proposed rule to the final rule adds a new
reporting requirement for the mothership daily cumulative production
logbook, which is approved under OMB Control Number 0648-0515. This
revision to -0515 for the mothership logbook is included in this
temporary control number. No changes are needed to the respondents or
responses for the mothership logbook because all expected respondents
are currently submitting it. No change was made to the public reporting
burden because the estimate allows for differences in the time needed
to complete and submit the information. The public reporting burden per
individual response is estimated to average 15 minutes for the
mothership logbook.
OMB Control Number 0648-0678
This rule revises the existing collection of information under
0648-0678 because the Council requests PCTC Program cooperatives submit
a voluntary annual cooperative report to the Council. This revision
adds the PCTC Program cooperatives as new respondents that will submit
an annual cooperative report. The public reporting burden per
individual response is estimated to average 18 hours for the PCTC
Program annual report.
OMB Control Number 0648-0711
This rule revises the existing requirements for the collection of
information 0648-0711 related to cost recovery because the PCTC Program
is a LAPP that is subject to a cost recovery fee under Magnuson-Stevens
Act 303A. This revision adds the PCTC Program cooperatives as new
respondents that will submit a cost recovery fee to NMFS. The rule
requires PCTC Program processors to submit an annual Pacific Cod Ex-
vessel Volume and Value Report; however, this does not change the
respondents or responses for this report because all expected
respondents are currently submitting it. The public reporting burden
per individual response is estimated to average 1 minute for the PCTC
cost recovery fee and 1 minute for the Pacific Cod Ex-vessel Volume and
Value Report.
Public Comments
We invite the general public and other Federal agencies to comment
on proposed and continuing information collections, which helps us
assess the impact of our information collection requirements and
minimize the public's reporting burden. Written comments and
recommendations for these information collections should be submitted
on the following website: www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find the
particular information collection by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
[[Page 53731]]
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 902
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: July 28, 2023.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS amends 15 CFR part
902 and 50 CFR part 679 as follows:
Title 15--Commerce and Foreign Trade
PART 902--NOAA INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT: OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 902 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 902.1, in the table in paragraph (b), under ``50 CFR'',
by:
0
a. Revising the entry for ``679.4'';
0
b. Adding in numerical order an entry for ``679.5(x)'';
0
c. Revising the entry for ``679.7'';
0
d. Adding in numerical order an entry for ``679.7(m)'';
0
e. Revising the entry for ``679.51''; and
0
f. Adding in numerical order entries for ``679.130'' through
``679.132'', ``679.134'', and ``679.135''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 902.1 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFR part or section where the
information collection Current OMB control number (all numbers
requirement is located begin with 0648-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
50 CFR....................... .........................................
* * * * * * *
679.4........................ -0206, -0272, -0334, -0393, -0513, -0545,
-0565, -0665, and -0811.
* * * * * * *
679.5(x)..................... -0811.
* * * * * * *
679.7........................ -0206, -0269, -0272, -0316, -0318, -0330,
-0334, -0393, -0445, -0513, -0514, -
0545, -0565, and -0811.
* * * * * * *
679.7(m)..................... -0811
* * * * * * *
679.51....................... -0206, -0269, -0272, -0318, -0401, -0513,
-0545, -0565, and -0811.
* * * * * * *
679.130...................... -0811.
679.131...................... -0811.
679.132...................... -0811.
679.134...................... -0811.
679.135...................... -0811.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
3. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., 1801 et seq., 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
4. Amend Sec. 679.2 by:
0
a. Removing the definition of ``Affiliation for the purpose of defining
AFA and the Rockfish Program'';
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order a definition for ``Affiliation for the
purpose of defining AFA, Rockfish Program, and PCTC Program'';
0
c. Republishing the definition of ``Aleutian Islands shoreplant'';
0
d. Revising the definitions of ``Cooperative quota (CQ)'' and ``CQ
permit''; and
0
e. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ``NMFS Alaska Region
website,'' ``Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative (PCTC) Program,'' ``PCTC
Program cooperative,'' ``PCTC Program harvester QS pool,'' ``PCTC
Program official record,'' ``PCTC Program participants,'' ``PCTC
Program processor QS pool'', ``PCTC Program QS unit,'' and ``PCTC
Program quota share (QS)''.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 679.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Affiliation for the purpose of defining AFA, Rockfish Program, and
PCTC Program means a relationship between two or more individuals,
corporations, or other business concerns, except CDQ groups, in which
one concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or greater
interest in another, exerts control over another, or has the power to
exert control over another; or a third individual, corporation, or
other business concern directly or indirectly owns a 10 percent or
greater interest in both, exerts control over both, or has the power to
exert control over both.
(1) What is 10 percent or greater ownership? For the purpose of
determining affiliation, 10 percent or greater ownership is deemed to
exist if an individual, corporation, or other business concern directly
or indirectly owns 10 percent or greater interest in a
[[Page 53732]]
second corporation or other business concern.
(2) What is an indirect interest? An indirect interest is one that
passes through one or more intermediate entities. An entity's
percentage of indirect interest in a second entity is equal to the
entity's percentage of direct interest in an intermediate entity
multiplied by the intermediate entity's direct or indirect interest in
the second entity.
(3) What is control? For the purpose of determining affiliation,
control is deemed to exist if an individual, corporation, or other
business concern has any of the following relationships or forms of
control over another individual, corporation, or other business
concern:
(i) Controls 10 percent or more of the voting stock of another
corporation or business concern;
(ii) Has the authority to direct the business of the entity that
owns the fishing vessel or processor. The authority to direct the
business of the entity does not include the right to simply participate
in the direction of the business activities of an entity that owns a
fishing vessel or processor;
(iii) Has the authority in the ordinary course of business to limit
the actions of or to replace the chief executive officer, a majority of
the board of directors, any general partner or any person serving in a
management capacity of an entity that holds 10 percent or greater
interest in a fishing vessel or processor. Standard rights of minority
shareholders to restrict the actions of the entity are not included in
this definition of control provided they are unrelated to day-to-day
business activities. These rights include provisions to require the
consent of the minority shareholder to sell all or substantially all
the assets, to enter into a different business, to contract with the
major investors or their affiliates, or to guarantee the obligations of
majority investors or their affiliates;
(iv) Has the authority to direct the transfer, operation, or
manning of a fishing vessel or processor. The authority to direct the
transfer, operation, or manning of a vessel or processor does not
include the right to simply participate in such activities;
(v) Has the authority to control the management of or to be a
controlling factor in the entity that holds 10 percent or greater
interest in a fishing vessel or processor;
(vi) Absorbs all the costs and normal business risks associated
with ownership and operation of a fishing vessel or processor;
(vii) Has the responsibility to procure insurance on the fishing
vessel or processor, or assumes any liability in excess of insurance
coverage;
(viii) Has the authority to control a fishery cooperative through
10 percent or greater ownership or control over a majority of the
vessels in the cooperative, has the authority to appoint, remove, or
limit the actions of or replace the chief executive officer of the
cooperative, or has the authority to appoint, remove, or limit the
actions of a majority of the board of directors of the cooperative. In
such instance, all members of the cooperative are considered affiliates
of the individual, corporation, or other business concern that exerts
control over the cooperative; or
(ix) Has the ability through any other means whatsoever to control
the entity that holds 10 percent or greater interest in a fishing
vessel or processor.
* * * * *
Aleutian Islands shoreplant means a processing facility that is
physically located on land west of 170[deg] W. longitude within the
State of Alaska.
* * * * *
Cooperative quota (CQ)--(1) For purposes of the Amendment 80
Program means:
(i) The annual catch limit of an Amendment 80 species that may be
caught by an Amendment 80 cooperative while fishing under a CQ permit;
(ii) The amount of annual halibut and crab PSC that may be used by
an Amendment 80 cooperative while fishing under a CQ permit.
(2) For purposes of the Rockfish Program means:
(i) The annual catch limit of a rockfish primary species or
rockfish secondary species that may be harvested by a rockfish
cooperative while fishing under a CQ permit;
(ii) The amount of annual halibut PSC that may be used by a
rockfish cooperative in the Central GOA while fishing under a CQ permit
(see rockfish halibut PSC in this section).
(3) For purposes of the PCTC Program means:
(i) The annual catch limit of Pacific cod that may be caught by a
PCTC Program cooperative while fishing under a CQ permit;
(ii) The amount of annual halibut and crab PSC that may be used by
a PCTC Program cooperative while fishing under a CQ permit.
* * * * *
CQ permit means a permit issued to an Amendment 80 cooperative
under Sec. 679.4(o)(2), a rockfish cooperative under Sec.
679.4(n)(1), or a PCTC Program cooperative under Sec. 679.131(a).
* * * * *
NMFS Alaska Region website means https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
* * * * *
Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative (PCTC) Program means the Pacific Cod
Trawl Cooperative Program as implemented under subpart L of this part.
* * * * *
PCTC Program cooperative means a group of eligible Pacific cod
harvesters who have chosen to form a cooperative and associate with a
processor under the requirements at Sec. 679.131 in order to combine
and harvest fish collectively under a CQ permit issued by NMFS.
PCTC Program harvester QS pool means the sum of Pacific cod QS
units assigned to LLP licenses established for the PCTC Program fishery
based on the PCTC Program official record.
PCTC Program official record means information used by NMFS
necessary to determine eligibility to participate in the PCTC Program
and assign specific harvest privileges or limits to PCTC Program
participants based on Pacific cod legal landings as defined at Sec.
679.130.
PCTC Program participants means those PCTC Program harvesters and
processors who receive, hold, or use PCTC Program QS.
PCTC Program processor QS pool means the sum of PCTC Program QS
units assigned to processor permits issued under the PCTC Program based
on the PCTC Program official record.
PCTC Program QS unit means a single share of the PCTC Program QS
pool based on Pacific cod legal landings.
PCTC Program quota share (QS) means QS units issued by NMFS
expressed in metric tons, derived from the Pacific cod legal landings
assigned to an LLP license or PCTC Program QS permit held by a
processor and used as the basis for the issuance of annual CQ.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 679.4 by adding paragraphs (a)(1)(xvi), (k)(16), and (q)
to read as follows:
Sec. 679.4 Permits.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
[[Page 53733]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit is in effect For more
If program permit or card type from issue date information, see
is: through the end of: . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(xvi) PCTC Program:
(A) PCTC Program QS permit 10 Years.............. Paragraph (q) of
(for processors). this section.
(B) PCTC Program CQ permit Until expiration date Paragraph (q) of
shown on permit. this section.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(16) PCTC Program. In addition to other requirements of this part,
an LLP license holder must have PCTC Program QS assigned to their
groundfish LLP license to join a PCTC Program cooperative to harvest
Pacific cod.
* * * * *
(q) PCTC Program permits--(1) PCTC Program cooperative quota
permits. (i) A CQ permit is issued annually to a PCTC Program
cooperative that submits a complete and timely application for CQ as
described at Sec. 679.131 that is approved by the Regional
Administrator. A CQ permit authorizes a PCTC Program cooperative to
participate in the PCTC Program. The CQ permit will indicate the amount
of Pacific cod that may be harvested by the PCTC Program cooperative,
and the amount of halibut PSC and crab PSC that may be used by the PCTC
Program cooperative. The CQ permit will list the members of the PCTC
Program cooperative, the trawl catcher vessels that are authorized to
fish under the CQ permit for that cooperative, and the PCTC Program
processor(s) with whom that cooperative is associated.
(ii) A CQ permit is valid only until the end of the BSAI Pacific
cod B season for the year in which the CQ permit is issued;
(iii) A legible copy of a valid CQ permit must be carried on board
the vessel(s) used by the PCTC Program cooperative.
(2) PCTC Program quota share permits for processors. (i) NMFS will
issue PCTC Program QS permits to eligible processors if the owner(s)
submits to the Regional Administrator a completed application for PCTC
Program QS as described at Sec. 679.130 that is subsequently approved.
(ii) A processor may associate the QS assigned to the PCTC Program
QS permit with a PCTC Program cooperative as described at Sec.
679.131.
0
6. Amend Sec. 679.5 by:
0
a. Adding paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(G);
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(4)(i)
0
c. Adding paragraph (c)(6)(v)(J)(1) and reserved paragraph
(c)(6)(v)(J)(2); and
0
d. Adding paragraph (x).
The additions and revision read as follows:
Sec. 679.5 Recordkeeping and reporting (R&R).
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If harvest made under . Record the . . . For more information,
. . program see . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(G) PCTC Program Cooperative number subpart L to this part.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Catcher vessels less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA. Except for
vessels using pot gear as described in paragraph (c)(3)(i)(B)(1) of
this section or vessels participating in the PCTC Program as described
in paragraph (x) of this section, the owner and operator of a catcher
vessel less than 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA are not required to comply with the
R&R requirements of this section, but must comply with the vessel
activity report described at paragraph (k) of this section.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) * * *
(v) * * *
(J) * * *
(1) For the PCTC Program, enter the observer's haul number for each
catcher vessel delivery of an unsorted codend by 2400 hours, A.l.t.,
each day to record the previous day's delivery information.
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(x) PCTC Program. The owners and operators of catcher vessels and
processors authorized as participants in the PCTC Program must comply
with the applicable R&R requirements of this section and must assign
all catch to a PCTC Program cooperative at the time of catch or receipt
of groundfish. Owners of catcher vessels and processors authorized as
participants in the PCTC Program must ensure that their designated
representatives or employees comply with applicable R&R requirements as
described at Sec. 679.134.
0
7. Amend Sec. 679.7 b adding paragraph (m) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(m) PCTC Program--(1) General. (i) Name an LLP license in more than
one Application for PCTC Program CQ in a fishing year.
(ii) Use a vessel to catch or receive a PCTC Program cooperative's
Pacific cod when that vessel was not listed on the Application for PCTC
Program CQ.
(iii) Fail to comply with any other requirement or restriction
specified in this part or violate any provision of this part.
(2) Vessel owners and operators participating in the PCTC Program.
(i) Fail to follow the catch monitoring requirements detailed at Sec.
679.134.
(ii) Operate a vessel that is subject to a sideboard limit detailed
at Sec. 679.133, as applicable, and fail to follow the catch
monitoring requirements detailed at Sec. 679.134.
(iii) Exceed the ownership or use caps specified at Sec. 679.133.
(3) VMS. (i) Operate a vessel in a PCTC Program cooperative and
fail to use functioning VMS equipment as described at Sec. 679.134.
(ii) Operate a vessel that is subject to a sideboard limit detailed
at Sec. 679.133 and fail to use functioning VMS equipment as described
at Sec. 679.134.
(4) PCTC Program processors. (i) Take deliveries of, or process,
PCTC Program Pacific cod harvested by a catcher vessel fishing under
the authority of a CQ permit unless the processor has an FPP or FFP and
LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement.
(ii) For the manager of a shoreside processor or stationary
floating processor to process any groundfish delivered by a catcher
vessel fishing under the authority of a CQ permit not weighed on a
scale approved by the State of Alaska.
(iii) Fail to submit a timely and complete Pacific cod Ex-vessel
Volume and Value Report as required under Sec. 679.5(u)(1).
(iv) Use a catcher/processor designated on an LLP license with a
BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement to sort, process, or
discard any species, except halibut sorted on deck by vessels
participating in halibut deck sorting described at Sec. 679.120,
before the total catch is weighed on a
[[Page 53734]]
scale that meets the requirements of Sec. 679.28(b).
(v) Use a catcher/processor designated on an LLP license with a
BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement to process Pacific cod in
excess of the at-sea processing sideboard limit defined at Sec.
679.133(b)(2) and assigned to the LLP license.
(vi) Process an amount of Pacific cod that exceeds use caps
specified at Sec. 679.133.
(5) PCTC Program cooperatives. (i) Harvest PCTC Program Pacific
cod, use halibut PSC, or use crab PSC assigned to a PCTC Program
cooperative in the BSAI without having on board a legible copy of valid
CQ permit.
(ii) Begin a fishing trip for PCTC Program Pacific cod with any
vessel named in a PCTC Program cooperative if the total amount of
unharvested PCTC Program Pacific cod on a CQ permit currently held by
that cooperative is zero or less.
(iii) Have a negative balance in a CQ account after the end of the
calendar year for which a CQ permit was issued.
(iv) Fail to submit a PCTC Program cost recovery fee payment as
required under Sec. 679.135.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 679.20 by revising paragraph (a)(7)(viii) and adding
paragraph (e)(3)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.20 General limitations.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(7) * * *
(viii) Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside provisions. During the annual
harvest specifications process, the Regional Administrator will
establish the PCTC Program Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside through the
process set forth at Sec. 679.132.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) For a catcher/processor with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement that receives an unsorted codend delivered by a
catcher vessel authorized to harvest and that is assigned to PCTC
Program Pacific cod, the maximum retainable amount for each species or
species group applies at any time for the duration of the fishing trip
and must be applied to only the PCTC Program hauls during a fishing
trip.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 679.21 by revising paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(B) introductory
text, (b)(1)(ii)(B)(5), (b)(2)(iii)(A) and (B), (b)(4)(i)(B),
(e)(3)(iv) introductory text, and (e)(3)(iv)(E) and adding paragraph
(e)(7)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.21 Prohibited species bycatch management.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Trawl fishery categories. For purposes of apportioning the
trawl PSC limit set forth under paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(A)(1) of this
section among trawl fisheries, the following fishery categories are
specified and defined in terms of round-weight equivalents of those
groundfish species or species groups for which a TAC has been specified
under Sec. 679.20.
* * * * *
(5) Pacific cod fishery. Fishing with trawl gear during any weekly
reporting period that results in a retained aggregate amount of Pacific
cod that is greater than the retained amount of any other groundfish
fishery category defined under this paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(B). This
Pacific cod fishery is further apportioned between the PCTC Program,
the trawl catcher vessel limited access C season, and AFA catcher/
processors as established at Sec. 679.131(c) and (d).
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Unused seasonal apportionments. Unused seasonal apportionments
of trawl fishery PSC allowances made under this paragraph (b)(2) will
be added to the respective fishery PSC allowance for the next season
during a current fishing year except for the Pacific cod fishery
apportionment to the PCTC Program, which follows the regulations at
Sec. 679.131(c) and (d).
(B) Seasonal apportionment exceeded. If a seasonal apportionment of
a trawl fishery PSC allowance made under this paragraph (b)(2) is
exceeded, the amount by which the seasonal apportionment is exceeded
will be deducted from the respective apportionment for the next season
during a current fishing year except for the Pacific cod fishery
apportionment to the PCTC Program, which follows the regulations at
Sec. 679.131(c) and (d).
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Closures. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(4)(i)(A) of this
section, if, during the fishing year, the Regional Administrator
determines that U.S. fishing vessels participating in any of the trawl
fishery categories listed in paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(B)(2) through (6) of
this section will catch the halibut PSC allowance, or seasonal
apportionment thereof, specified for that fishery category under
paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section, NMFS will publish in the
Federal Register a document to close the entire BSAI to directed
fishing for each species and/or species group in that fishery category
for the remainder of the year or for the remainder of the season. This
does not apply to allocations to the PCTC Program specified at Sec.
679.133(b).
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) Trawl fishery categories. For purposes of apportioning trawl
PSC limits for crab and herring among fisheries, other than crab PSC CQ
assigned to an Amendment 80 cooperative, the following fishery
categories are specified and defined in terms of round-weight
equivalents of those groundfish species or species groups for which a
TAC has been specified under Sec. 679.20.
* * * * *
(E) Pacific cod fishery. Fishing with trawl gear during any weekly
reporting period that results in a retained aggregate amount of Pacific
cod that is greater than the retained amount of any other groundfish
fishery category defined under this paragraph (e)(3)(iv). The Pacific
cod fishery is further apportioned between the PCTC Program, the trawl
catcher vessel limited access C season, and AFA catcher/processors as
established at Sec. 679.131(d).
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(v) This paragraph (e)(7) does not apply to apportionments to the
PCTC Program as described at Sec. 679.130.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec. 679.51 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C)(4);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(C)(5) and (a)(2)(vi)(G);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (e)(1)(iii)(A) and (e)(1)(iii)(B) introductory
text; and
0
d. Adding paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(D).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 679.51 Observer and Electronic Monitoring System requirements
for vessels and plants.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(4) Using trawl gear in the BSAI if the vessel has been placed in
the full observer coverage category under paragraph (a)(4) of this
section; or
(5) Participating in the PCTC Program.
* * * * *
(vi) * * *
[[Page 53735]]
(G) PCTC Program motherships. A mothership that receives unsorted
codends from catcher vessels harvesting Pacific cod under the PCTC
Program must have at least two observers aboard the mothership, at
least one of whom must be endorsed as a lead level 2 observer. More
than two observers must be aboard if the observer workload restriction
would otherwise preclude sampling as required.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) Observer use of equipment. Allow an observer to use the
vessel's communications equipment and personnel, on request, for the
confidential entry, transmission, and receipt of work-related messages
(including electronic transmission of data), at no cost to the observer
or the United States.
(B) Equipment, software, and data transmission requirements. The
operator of a catcher/processor (except for a catcher/processor placed
in the partial observer coverage category under paragraph (a)(3) of
this section), mothership, catcher vessel 125 ft (38.1 m) LOA or longer
(except for a catcher vessel fishing for groundfish with pot gear), or
a catcher vessel participating in the PCTC Program (except for
paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(D) of this section) must provide the following
equipment, software and data transmission capabilities:
* * * * *
(D) PCTC Program. The operator of a non-AFA catcher vessel
participating in the PCTC Program is not required to comply with
paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(B)(3) of this section to provide data
transmission capability until September 7, 2026. However, once any non-
AFA catcher vessel in the PCTC Program is capable of at-sea data
transmission, the operator must comply.
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec. 679.64 by revising paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iv),
removing and reserving paragraph (b)(4)(i), and revising paragraph
(b)(4)(ii).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 679.64 Harvesting sideboard limits in other fisheries.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) BSAI Pacific cod. The AFA catcher vessel groundfish harvest
limit for BSAI Pacific cod will be equal to the retained catch of BSAI
Pacific cod in 1997 by AFA catcher vessels not exempted under paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section divided by the BSAI Pacific cod TAC
available to catcher vessels in 1997; multiplied by the BSAI Pacific
cod TAC available to catcher vessels in the year or season in which the
harvest limit will be in effect. This limit is in effect only for C
season.
* * * * *
(iv) GOA groundfish. The non-exempt AFA catcher vessels and the
associated LLP licenses groundfish harvest limit for each GOA
groundfish species or species group will be equal to the aggregate
retained catch of that groundfish species or species group from 2009
through 2019 by AFA catcher vessels not exempted under paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section; divided by the sum of the TACs of that
species or species group available to catcher vessels from 2009 through
2019; multiplied by the TAC available to catcher vessels in the year or
season in which the harvest limit will be in effect.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) The non-exempt AFA catcher vessels and the associated LLP
licenses PSC bycatch limit for halibut in the GOA will be an annual
amount based on a static ratio of 0.072 derived from the aggregate
retained groundfish catch by non-exempt AFA CVs in each PSC target
category from 2009 through 2019.
* * * * *
0
12. Add subpart L, consisting of Sec. Sec. 679.130 through 679.135, to
read as follows:
Subpart L--Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program
Sec.
679.130 Allocation, use, and transfer of PCTC Program QS permits.
679.131 PCTC Program annual harvester privileges.
679.132 Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside provisions in the PCTC
Program.
679.133 PCTC Program ownership caps, use caps, and sideboard limits.
679.134 PCTC Program permits, catch monitoring, catch accounting,
and recordkeeping and reporting.
679.135 PCTC Program cost recovery.
Subpart L--Pacific Cod Trawl Cooperative Program
Sec. 679.130 Allocation, use, and transfer of PCTC Program QS
permits.
(a) Applicable areas and seasons. (1) The PCTC Program applies to
the Pacific cod trawl catcher vessel sector in the BSAI as defined at
Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A).
(2) The following fishing seasons apply to fishing under this
subpart subject to other provisions of this part:
(i) Fishing by vessels participating in a cooperative is authorized
for the PCTC Program A season from 1200 hours, A.l.t., January 20
through 1200 hours, A.l.t., April 1.
(ii) Fishing by vessels participating in a cooperative is
authorized for the PCTC Program B season from 1200 hours, A.l.t., April
1 through 1200 hours, A.l.t., June 10.
(iii) The PCTC Program does not apply to the Pacific cod trawl
catcher vessel C season, as defined at Sec. 679.23(e)(5)(ii)(C)(1).
(b) Pacific cod legal landings. Pacific cod legal landings means
the retained catch of Pacific cod caught using trawl gear in a
management area in the BSAI by a catcher vessel during the directed
fishing season for Pacific cod that:
(1) Was made in compliance with State and Federal regulations in
effect at that time; and
(2) Was recorded on a State of Alaska fish ticket for shoreside
deliveries or in observer data for mothership deliveries; and
(3) Was the predominately retained species on the fishing trip; and
(4) Was authorized by:
(i) An LLP license and caught in the A or B season of a Federal or
parallel groundfish fishery during the qualifying years 2009 through
2019; or
(ii) An LLP license with a transferable AI endorsement prior to
receiving the AI endorsement and was caught in a parallel fishery
between January 20, 2004, and September 13, 2009; and
(5) Was not made in a CDQ fishery; and
(6) Was not made in a State of Alaska GHL fishery.
(c) Eligible PCTC Program harvesters. NMFS will assign Pacific cod
legal landings to an LLP license only if the qualifying Pacific cod
legal landings of BSAI trawl catcher vessel Pacific cod were made under
the authority of a fully transferable LLP license endorsed for BS or AI
Pacific cod with a trawl gear designation from 2009 through 2019 or
under the authority of an LLP license endorsed for Pacific cod with a
trawl gear designation prior to earning a transferable AI endorsement
from 2004 through September 13, 2009;
(d) Assigning trawl catcher vessel Pacific cod legal landings to an
LLP license. (1) NMFS will assign Pacific cod legal landings to an LLP
license in the form of PCTC Program QS only if the holder of the LLP
license that authorized those landings submits a timely and complete
application for PCTC Program QS under paragraph (h) of this section
that is approved by NMFS.
(2) NMFS will assign Pacific cod legal landings to an LLP license
that meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
[[Page 53736]]
(3) NMFS will reissue LLP licenses to eligible harvesters that
specify the number of PCTC Program QS units assigned to their LLP
licenses.
(e) Eligible PCTC Program processors. NMFS will assign legal
landings to an eligible PCTC Program processor if the processor
operates under the authority of either a valid FPP or FFP and holds an
LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement, and
received deliveries of legal landings of Pacific cod from the trawl
catcher vessel sector from 2009 through 2019. A processor is ineligible
to receive PCTC Program QS if it does not hold an active FFP or FPP as
of September 7, 2023.
(f) Assigning Pacific cod processing history to an eligible
processor. (1) NMFS will assign Pacific cod processing history to a
processor in the form of PCTC Program QS only if the FFP or FPP holder
submits a timely and complete application for PCTC Program QS that is
approved by NMFS pursuant to paragraph (h) of this section.
(2) NMFS will assign Pacific cod processing history based on legal
landings delivered to a processor authorized by an FPP or FFP that
meets the requirements of this section.
(3) For the initial allocation of PCTC Program QS, qualifying
processing history is attached to the processor at the time legal
landings were received.
(4) An eligible processor will be issued a PCTC Program QS permit
that specifies the number of QS units assigned to that processor.
(g) PCTC Program official record. (1) The PCTC Program official
record will contain information used by the Regional Administrator to
determine:
(i) The amount of Pacific cod legal landings as defined at in this
section assigned to an LLP license;
(ii) The amount of Pacific cod processing history of legal landings
as defined at Sec. 679.130 assigned to an FPP or FFP;
(iii) The amount of PCTC Program QS resulting from Pacific cod
legal landings assigned to an LLP license held by an eligible
harvester, or QS resulting from Pacific cod processing history assigned
to an FPP or FFP held by an eligible processor;
(iv) The amount of Pacific cod sideboard ratios assigned to LLP
licenses;
(v) Eligibility to participate in the PCTC Program; and
(vi) QS assigned to PCTC Program participants.
(2) The PCTC Program official record is presumed to be correct. An
applicant participating in the PCTC Program has the burden to prove
otherwise.
(3) Only Pacific cod legal landings and processing history of legal
landings, as described in paragraph (b) of this section, shall be used
to establish an allocation of PCTC Program QS. Evidence of legal
landings shall be limited to documentation of state or Federal catch
reports that indicate the amount of Pacific cod harvested, the
groundfish reporting area in which it was caught, the vessel and gear
type used to catch it, and the date of harvesting, landing, or
reporting.
(h) Application for PCTC Program quota share--(1) Submission of an
application for PCTC Program quota share. A person who wishes to
receive QS to participate in the PCTC Program as an eligible harvester
or an eligible processor must submit a timely and complete application
for PCTC Program QS. An application form will be provided by NMFS or
available from NMFS Alaska Region website as defined at Sec. 679.2.
The acceptable submittal methods will be described on the application
form.
(2) Deadline. A completed application for PCTC Program QS must be
received by NMFS no later than 1700 hours, A.l.t., on October 10, 2023,
or if sent by U.S. mail, postmarked by that time. Objective written
evidence of timely application will be considered proof of a timely
application.
(3) Contents of application. A timely and complete application must
contain the information specified on the application for PCTC Program
QS with all required documentation attached.
(i) Additional required documentation for LLP license holders.
Vessel names, ADF&G vessel registration numbers, and USCG documentation
numbers of all vessels that fished under the authority of each LLP
license, including dates when landings were made under the authority of
an LLP license from 2009 through 2019 or under the authority of an LLP
license prior to earning a transferable AI endorsement from 2004-2019;
(ii) Additional required documentation for processors. Processor
name, FFP or FPP number, and location of processing plant, including
dates when landings were made under the authority of an LLP license
from 2009 through 2019;
(iii) The applicant must sign and date the application certifying
under penalty of perjury that all information is true and correct. If
the application is completed by a designated representative, then
explicit authorization signed by the applicant must accompany the
application.
(4) Application evaluation. The Regional Administrator will
evaluate applications and compare all claims of catch history or
processing history in an application with the information in the PCTC
Program official record. Application claims that are consistent with
information in the PCTC Program official record will be approved by the
Regional Administrator. Application claims that are inconsistent with
the PCTC Program official record will not be approved unless supported
by documentation sufficient to substantiate such claims. An applicant
who submits claims of catch history or processing history that are
inconsistent with the official record without sufficient evidence, or
an applicant who fails to submit the information specified in paragraph
(d) of this section, will be provided a single 30-day evidentiary
period to submit the specified information, submit evidence to verify
their claims of catch or processing history, or submit a revised
application consistent with information in the PCTC Program official
record. An applicant who claims catch or processing history that is
inconsistent with information in the PCTC Program official record has
the burden of proving that the submitted claims are correct. Any claims
that remain unsubstantiated after the 30-day evidentiary period will be
denied. All applicants will be notified of NMFS's final application
determinations by an initial administrative determination (IAD), which
will inform applicants of their appeal rights under 15 CFR part 906.
(5) Appeals. An applicant may appeal an IAD under the provisions in
15 CFR part 906.
(i) Assigning PCTC Program QS to Harvesters and Processors. The
Regional Administrator will assign PCTC Program QS only to an eligible
harvester or eligible processor who submits a timely application for
PCTC Program QS that is approved by NMFS.
(1) Calculation of PCTC Program QS allocation to LLP licenses
without a transferable AI endorsement. NMFS will assign a specific
amount of PCTC Program QS units to each LLP license based on the
Pacific cod legal landings of each LLP license using information from
the PCTC Program official record according to the following procedures:
(i) Determine the Pacific cod legal landings for each LLP license
for each calendar year from 2009 through 2019.
(ii) Select the 10 calendar years from the qualifying time period
with the highest amount of legal landings for each LLP license,
including years with zero metric tons if necessary.
(iii) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings of the highest 10 years
for each LLP license. This yields the PCTC
[[Page 53737]]
Program QS units (in metric tons) for each LLP license.
(2) Calculation of PCTC Program QS allocation to LLP licenses with
a transferable AI endorsement. NMFS will assign a specific amount of
PCTC Program QS units to each LLP license with a transferable AI
endorsement based on the Pacific cod legal landings of each using
information from the PCTC Program official record according to the
following procedures:
(i) Determine the Pacific cod legal landings for each LLP license
with a transferable AI endorsement for each calendar year from 2004
through 2019.
(ii) Select the fifteen calendar years that yield the highest
amount of legal landings for each LLP license, including years with
zero metric tons if necessary.
(iii) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings of the highest fifteen
years for each LLP license with transferable AI endorsement. This
yields the PCTC Program QS units (in metric tons) for each LLP license
with a transferable AI endorsement.
(3) Official record date. The initial PCTC Program QS pool for all
LLP licenses, with and without a transferable AI endorsement, is the
sum of the sum of the PCTC Program QS units assigned to all LLP
licenses in metric tons based on the PCTC Program official record as of
December 31, 2022.
(4) Calculation of PCTC Program QS allocation to processors. NMFS
will assign a specific amount of PCTC Program QS units to each eligible
processor based on the Pacific cod legal landings delivered to each FPP
or FFP using information from the PCTC Program official record
according to the following procedures:
(i) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings delivered to each FPP or FFP
for each calendar year from 2009 through 2019;
(ii) Select the ten calendar years that yield the highest amount of
legal landings delivered to each FPP or FFP, including years with zero
metric tons if necessary;
(iii) Sum the Pacific cod legal landings of the highest 10 years
for each FPP or FFP. This yields the QS units for each eligible
processor, which will be specified on a PCTC Program QS permit for that
processor;
(iv) The PCTC Program QS pool for processors is the sum of all QS
units assigned to processors in metric tons based on the PCTC official
record as of December 31, 2022.
(5) Non-severability and exceptions. Pacific cod legal landings are
non-severable from the LLP license, transferable AI endorsement, or FPP
to which those Pacific cod legal landings are assigned in the PCTC
Program official record except under the following provisions:
(i) If multiple LLP licenses authorized catch by a vessel, the LLP
license holders must submit to NMFS an agreement specifying the amount
of shared catch history to assign to each LLP license with the
application for PCTC Program QS. In the absence of an agreement, the
owner of the vessel that made the catch will assign qualifying catch
history to each LLP license.
(ii) For the LLP licenses associated with non-exempt AFA catcher
vessels, within 90 days of initial issuance of PCTC Program QS, the
owners of the LLP licenses that are associated with AFA non-exempt
catcher vessels that engaged in fish transfer agreements during the
qualifying periods may transfer PCTC Program QS to other LLP licenses
associated with AFA non-exempt vessels, subject to the ownership cap at
Sec. 679.133.
(A) NMFS will execute permanent transfers of PCTC Program QS
between eligible LLP licenses during the 90-day transfer provision upon
request. The transferor and transferee must show they agree to the one-
time permanent transfer of PCTC Program QS, or show a transfer is
authorized by an operation of law (e.g., a court order). Requests to
transfer PCTC Program QS must specify which LLP license is transferring
PCTC Program QS, which LLP license is receiving PCTC Program QS, and
the amount of PCTC Program QS to be transferred.
(B) After the expiration of the 90-day transfer provision, PCTC
Program QS will no longer be severable from the LLP license to which it
is assigned unless authorized by the transfer rules specified in
paragraph (j) or modification is supported by an operation of law.
(j) Transfer of PCTC Program QS. (1) Transfer of an LLP license
with PCTC Program QS. A person may transfer an LLP license and the PCTC
Program QS assigned to that LLP license under the provisions at Sec.
679.4(k)(7), provided that the LLP license is not assigned PCTC Program
QS in excess of the ownership cap specified at Sec. 679.133 at the
time of transfer.
(2) Transfer of PCTC Program QS assigned to LLP licenses that
exceeds PCTC Program QS ownership caps.
(i) If an LLP license receives an initial allocation of PCTC
Program QS that exceeds an ownership cap specified at Sec. 679.133(a),
upon transfer of the LLP license, the LLP license holder may transfer
the amount of PCTC Program QS in excess of the ownership cap separately
from the LLP license and assign it to one or more LLP licenses.
However, a transfer will not be approved by NMFS if that transfer would
cause the receiving LLP license to exceed an ownership cap specified at
Sec. 679.133(a).
(ii) Prior to the transfer of an LLP license that received an
initial allocation of PCTC Program QS that exceeds an ownership cap
specified at Sec. 679.133(a), the LLP license holder must transfer the
PCTC Program QS that is in excess of the ownership cap separately from
that LLP license and assign it to one or more LLP licenses. On
completion of the transfer of PCTC Program QS, the LLP license that was
initially allocated an amount of PCTC Program QS in excess of the
ownership cap may not exceed any ownership cap specified at Sec.
679.133(a).
(iii) Any PCTC Program QS associated with the LLP license that is
in excess of the ownership cap may be assigned to another LLP license
through the application used to transfer LLP licenses, and only if the
application is approved as specified at Sec. 679.4(k)(7).
(iv) PCTC Program QS that is transferred from an LLP license that
was initially allocated an amount of PCTC Program QS in excess of the
ownership cap specified at Sec. 679.133(a) and assigned to another LLP
license may not be severed from the receiving LLP license.
(3) Transfer of processor PCTC Program QS Permits. A person may
transfer a PCTC Program QS permit to another processor with an active
FPP issued under Sec. 679.4. A transfer of processor-held PCTC Program
QS may not cause the receiver of the permit to exceed the ownership cap
specified at Sec. 679.133(a) at the time of transfer. A PCTC Program
QS permit held by a processor and associated QS may be transferred only
if the application for transfer of PCTC Program QS permit is filled out
entirely. A PCTC Program QS permit initially issued to an FFP holder
may be transferred to a processor with an active FPP issued under Sec.
679.4 or to a processor with an active FFP that authorizes a vessel
named on an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement.
(4) Transfer of PCTC Program QS assigned to a processor-held PCTC
Program QS permit that exceeds PCTC Program ownership caps.
(i) If a PCTC Program QS permit receives an initial allocation of
QS that exceeds an ownership cap specified at Sec. 679.133(a), the
processor may transfer QS in excess of the ownership cap separately
from that PCTC Program QS permit and assign it to the PCTC Program QS
permit of one or more processors with an active FPP or FFP.
[[Page 53738]]
However, a transfer will not be approved by NMFS if that transfer would
cause the receiving processor to exceed an ownership cap specified at
Sec. 679.133(a).
(ii) Prior to the transfer of a PCTC Program QS permit that
received an initial allocation of QS that exceeds an ownership cap
specified at Sec. 679.133(a), the permit holder must transfer the QS
that is in excess of the ownership cap separately from that PCTC
Program QS permit and assign it to one or more PCTC Program QS permits.
On completion of the transfer of QS, the PCTC Program QS permit that
was initially allocated an amount of QS in excess of the ownership cap
may not exceed any ownership cap specified at Sec. 679.133(a).
(iii) Any QS associated with the PCTC Program QS permit held by a
processor that is in excess of an ownership cap may be transferred only
if the application for transfer of PCTC Program QS permit is filled out
entirely.
Sec. 679.131 PCTC Program annual harvester privileges.
(a) Assigning CQ to a PCTC Program cooperative--(1) General. (See
also Sec. 679.4(q)). (i) Every calendar year, PCTC Program QS assigned
to LLP licenses and PCTC Program QS permits held by a PCTC Program
processor must be assigned to a PCTC Program cooperative through a CQ
permit to use the CQ derived from that PCTC Program QS to catch Pacific
cod, crab PSC, or halibut PSC assigned to the PCTC Program.
(ii) NMFS will issue a CQ permit to a PCTC Program cooperative
based on the aggregate PCTC Program QS of all LLP licenses and
associated processors designated on an application for CQ that is
approved by the Regional Administrator as described under paragraph
(a)(4) of this section.
(iii) Processors must associate with a PCTC Program cooperative for
the PCTC Program QS assigned to that processor's PCTC Program QS permit
to be issued to a PCTC Program cooperative as CQ.
(2) PCTC Program QS issued after issuance of CQ or Pacific cod
trawl catcher vessel sector TAC. Any PCTC Program QS assigned to an LLP
license or PCTC Program QS permit after NMFS has issued CQ for a
calendar year will not result in any additional CQ being issued to a
PCTC Program cooperative even if that QS holder has assigned their LLP
license or PCTC Program QS permit to a PCTC Program cooperative for
that calendar year.
(3) Failure to designate QS to a PCTC Program cooperative. Failure
to designate an LLP license with PCTC Program QS or a PCTC Program QS
permit on a timely and complete application for CQ that is approved by
the Regional Administrator as described under paragraph (a)(4) of this
section, will result in the Regional Administrator not assigning that
QS to a PCTC Program cooperative for the applicable calendar year.
(4) Application for PCTC Program CQ. PCTC Program cooperatives must
submit a complete application by November 1 to receive CQ that includes
the following:
(i) PCTC Program cooperative identification, including but not
limited to the name of the cooperative and the taxpayer identification
number;
(ii) PCTC Program QS holders and ownership documentation;
(iii) PCTC Program cooperative member vessels and LLP licenses;
(iv) PCTC Program cooperative associated processors;
(v) Vessels with FFPs on which the CQ issued to the PCTC Program
cooperative will be used;
(vi) Certification of cooperative representative;
(vii) An attached copy of the membership agreement or contract that
includes the following terms:
(A) How the cooperative intends to harvest its CQ;
(B) The obligations of QS holders who are members of a PCTC Program
cooperative to ensure the full payment of PCTC Program fee liabilities
that may be due;
(C) How cooperatives monitor and report leasing activity in GOA
fisheries; and
(D) For a cooperative intending to harvest any amount of the CQ
set-aside, the cooperative's plan for coordinating harvest and delivery
of the CQ set-aside with an Aleutian Islands shoreplant as defined
Sec. 679.2.
(viii) Each year, all cooperatives must establish an inter-
cooperative agreement. This inter-cooperative agreement must be
included as part of each annual cooperative application and is required
before NMFS will issue CQ. The inter-cooperative agreement must
establish how the cooperatives intend to harvest the CQ set-aside in
years when it applies and ensure harvests in the BS do not exceed the
minimum set-aside as specified at Sec. 679.132(a)(4)(i). For the
calendar year 2023, NMFS will allow each cooperative to submit the
inter-cooperative agreement prior to December 31, 2023.
(b) Allocations of Pacific cod to the PCTC Program--(1) General.
Each calendar year, the Regional Administrator will determine the
amount of the BSAI trawl catcher vessel sector's Pacific cod A and B
season allocations that will be assigned to the PCTC Program as
follows:
(i) Incidental catch allowance (ICA). For the A and B seasons, the
Regional Administrator will establish an ICA to account for projected
incidental catch of Pacific cod by trawl catcher vessels engaged in
directed fishing for groundfish other than PCTC Program Pacific cod.
(ii) Directed fishing allowance (DFA). The remaining trawl catcher
vessel sector's Pacific cod A and B season allocations are established
as a DFA for the PCTC Program.
(2) Calculation--(i) Determination of Pacific cod trawl catcher
vessel TAC allocated to the PCTC Program. NMFS will determine the
Pacific cod trawl catcher vessel TAC in a calendar year in the annual
harvest specification process at Sec. 679.20.
(ii) Annual apportionment of Pacific cod trawl catcher vessel TAC.
The annual apportionment of Pacific cod in the A and B seasons between
the PCTC Program DFA and the ICA in a given calendar year is
established in the annual harvest specifications.
(3) Allocations of Pacific Cod DFA to PCTC Program--(i) Harvester
percentage of DFA. NMFS will assign 77.5 percent of the PCTC Program
DFA to the QS attached to LLP licenses assigned to PCTC Program
cooperatives. Each LLP license's QS units will correspond to a portion
of the DFA according to the following equation: (LLP license QS units/
(sum of all LLP license QS units)) x (.775 x DFA).
(ii) Processor percentage of DFA. NMFS will assign 22.5 percent of
the PCTC Program DFA to the QS attached to PCTC Program QS permits
assigned to PCTC Program cooperatives. Each QS permit's QS units will
correspond to a portion of the DFA according to the following equation:
(PCTC Program QS permit QS units/(sum of all PCTC Program QS permit QS
units)) x (.225 x DFA).
(4) Allocation of CQ to PCTC Program cooperatives--(i) General.
Annual CQ will be issued to each PCTC Program cooperative by NMFS based
on the aggregate QS attached to LLP licenses and PCTC Program QS
permits that are assigned to the cooperative. NMFS will issue CQ by A
and B season and cooperatives will ensure the seasonal limits are not
exceeded. Unused A season CQ may be rolled over to the B season. Annual
CQ may be harvested from either BS or AI subareas subject to any
limitations on BS harvest when the AI set-aside is in effect.
(ii) CQ allocation to PCTC Program cooperatives. The amount of CQ
that is
[[Page 53739]]
issued to a PCTC Program cooperative is calculated according to the
following formula:
CQ derived from QS assigned to LLP holders = [(.775 x DFA)
x (Total LLP license QS units assigned to that cooperative/sum of
all LLP license QS units)]
CQ derived from QS assigned to PCTC Program QS permit holders =
[(.225 x DFA)
x (Total PCTC Program Permit QS units assigned to that cooperative/
sum of all PCTC Program QS permit QS units)]
The total CQ issued to that cooperative =
CQ derived from LLP license holders +
CQ derived from PCTC Program QS permit holders
(iii) Issuance of CQ. A and B season trawl catcher vessel Pacific
cod sector DFAs will be issued to PCTC Program cooperatives as CQ.
Annual CQ for each PCTC cooperative will include separate A and B
season CQ.
(iv) AI set-aside. When in effect, the AI set-aside will be
established annually as specified further at Sec. 679.132.
(c) Allocations of halibut PSC--(1) Halibut PSC limit for the PCTC
Program. NMFS specifies the overall halibut PSC limit for the PCTC
Program for each calendar year in the harvest specifications pursuant
to the procedures specified at Sec. 679.21(b). NMFS calculates the
halibut PSC limit according to the formula described in this paragraph.
NMFS assigns that halibut PSC limit to PCTC Program cooperatives
pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
(i) Multiply the halibut PSC limit apportioned to the BSAI trawl
limited access sector's Pacific cod fishery category by 98 percent,
which yields the halibut PSC apportioned to the trawl catcher vessel
sector. The remaining 2 percent is apportioned to the AFA catcher/
processor sector as specified at Sec. 679.21(b)(4).
(ii) Assign 95 percent of the trawl catcher vessel sector's halibut
PSC limit to the A and B seasons and 5 percent to the C season.
(iii) Each year after apportioning halibut PSC to the trawl catcher
vessel sector for the A and B season, apply one of the following
reductions to the A and B season trawl catcher vessel halibut PSC limit
to determine the overall PCTC Program halibut PSC limit:
(A) In the first year of the PCTC Program, reduce the A and B
season halibut PSC limit by 12.5 percent.
(B) In the second year, and each year thereafter, reduce the A and
B season halibut PSC limit by 25 percent.
(2) Halibut PSC assigned to each PCTC Program cooperative. For each
calendar year, the amount of halibut PSC assigned to a cooperative is
determined by the following procedure and the amount will be specified
on the CQ permit:
(i) Divide the amount of CQ units assigned to each PCTC Program
cooperative by the amount of CQ allocated to all cooperatives. This
yields the percentage of CQ units held by each cooperative.
(ii) Multiply the overall PCTC Program halibut PSC limit by the
percentage of the CQ assigned to a cooperative. This yields the amount
of halibut PSC issued to that cooperative as CQ.
(3) Use of halibut PSC in the PCTC Program. Halibut PSC limits
assigned to the CQ permit issued to a PCTC Program cooperative may only
be used by the members of that PCTC Program cooperative while
harvesting CQ in the BSAI. Any halibut PSC used by a cooperative must
be deducted from the amount of halibut PSC on its CQ permit. Halibut
PSC limits for cooperatives are not subject to seasonal apportionment
under Sec. 679.21. Halibut PSC limits are issued to the PCTC Program
for the duration of the A and B seasons. Unused halibut PSC limits may
be reapportioned to the C season.
(d) Allocations of crab PSC--(1) Crab PSC limits for the PCTC
Program. NMFS specifies the overall crab PSC limit for the PCTC Program
for each calendar year in the harvest specifications pursuant to the
procedures specified at Sec. 679.21(e). NMFS calculates the crab PSC
limit according to the formula described in this paragraph. NMFS then
assigns that crab PSC limit to PCTC Program cooperatives with CQ
pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section.
(i) Multiply the crab PSC limit apportioned to the BSAI trawl
limited access sector's Pacific cod fishery category by 90.6 percent,
which yields the percentage of crab PSC apportioned to the trawl
catcher vessel sector. The remaining 9.4 percent goes to the AFA
catcher/processor sector as specified at Sec. 679.21(b)(4).
(ii) Assign 95 percent of the trawl catcher vessel sector's crab
PSC limit to the A and B seasons and 5 percent to the C season.
(iii) Reduce the A and B season trawl catcher vessel crab PSC limit
by 35 percent to determine the overall PCTC Program crab PSC limit.
(2) Crab PSC assigned to each PCTC Program cooperative. For each
calendar year, the amount of crab PSC limit assigned to a cooperative
is determined by the following procedure and the amount will be
specified on the CQ permit:
(i) Divide the amount of CQ assigned to each PCTC Program
cooperative by the total CQ assigned to all cooperatives. This yields
the percentage of CQ held by that cooperative.
(ii) Multiply the overall PCTC Program crab PSC limit by the
percentage of the CQ pool assigned to a cooperative. This yields the
crab PSC limit issued to that cooperative as CQ.
(3) Use of crab PSC in the PCTC Program. Crab PSC limits assigned
to the CQ permit issued to a PCTC Program cooperative may only be used
by the members of that PCTC Program cooperative while harvesting CQ in
the BSAI. Any crab PSC used by a cooperative must be deducted from the
amount of crab PSC limit on its CQ permit. Crab PSC limits for
cooperatives are not subject to seasonal apportionment under Sec.
679.21. Crab PSC limits are issued to the PCTC Program for the duration
of the A and B seasons. Unused crab PSC limits may be reapportioned to
the C season.
(e) Transfer of PSC limits. Halibut and crab PSC limits are
transferable between cooperatives according to the same rules
established for CQ in paragraph (i) of this section.
(f) Non-allocated Groundfish species. The PCTC Program allocations
are for directed fishing for Pacific cod by trawl catcher vessels. All
groundfish species not allocated to PCTC Program cooperatives are
managed to the maximum retainable amounts (MRAs), as described under
Sec. 679.20(e).
(g) Rollover of Pacific cod. If, after June 10, the Regional
Administrator determines that reallocating a portion of the Pacific cod
ICA or DFA from the PCTC Program to the BSAI trawl limited access
sector C season is appropriate, the Regional Administrator may do so
through notification in the Federal Register consistent with
regulations at Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(iii).
(h) Rollover of PSC to the C Season. If, after June 10, the
Regional Administrator determines that reallocating a portion of the
halibut or crab PSC limits from the PCTC Program to the BSAI trawl
limited access sector C season is appropriate, the Regional
Administrator may do so through notification in the Federal Register
consistent with regulations at Sec. 679.91(f)(4) and (5).
(i) Process for inter-cooperative transfer of CQ. NMFS will process
an application through the NMFS online system for an inter-cooperative
transfer of CQ, including PSC, provided that all information is
completed by the transferor and transferee, with all applicable fields
accurately filled in,
[[Page 53740]]
and all required documentation is provided.
(j) PCTC Program cooperatives--(1) General. This section governs
the formation and operation of PCTC Program cooperatives. The
regulations in this section apply only to PCTC Program cooperatives
that have formed for the purpose of applying for and fishing with CQ
issued annually by NMFS. PCTC Program cooperatives and cooperative
members are responsible for ensuring the conduct of cooperatives is
consistent with any relevant State or Federal antitrust laws.
Membership in a cooperative is voluntary. No person may be required to
join a cooperative. Any LLP license holder with PCTC Program QS may
join a PCTC Program cooperative and assign their QS to that
cooperative. Members may leave a cooperative, but any CQ derived from
the QS held by that member will remain with that cooperative for the
duration of the calendar year.
(2) Legal and organizational requirements. A PCTC Program
cooperative must meet the following legal and organizational
requirements before it is eligible to receive CQ:
(i) Each PCTC Program cooperative must be formed as a partnership,
corporation, or other legal business entity that is registered under
the laws of one of the 50 States or the District of Columbia;
(ii) Each PCTC Program cooperative must appoint an individual as
the designated representative to act on the cooperative's behalf and to
serve as a contact point for NMFS for questions regarding the operation
of the cooperative. The designated representative may be a member of
the cooperative, or some other individual designated by the cooperative
to act on its behalf;
(iii) Each PCTC Program cooperative must submit a timely and
complete application for CQ; and
(iv) Each PCTC Program cooperative must meet the mandatory
requirements established in paragraph (j)(3) of this section.
(3) Elements of PCTC Program cooperatives. The following table
describes the necessary elements to form and operate a PCTC Program
cooperative:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Who may join or associate with a Any PCTC Program QS holder
PCTC Program cooperative?. named on a timely and complete
application for CQ for that
calendar year that is approved
by NMFS. Individuals who are
not QS holders may be employed
by, or serve as the designated
representative of, a
cooperative, but cannot be
members of the cooperative.
Any processor with an FPP may
associate with a cooperative.
A processor with an FFP must
be named on an LLP license
with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl
mothership endorsement.
(ii) What is the minimum number of LLP A minimum of three LLP licenses
licenses required to form a are needed to form a
cooperative? cooperative.
(iii) How many unique LLP license There is no minimum number of
holders are required to form a unique LLP license holders
cooperative? required to form a
cooperative.
(iv) Is there a minimum amount of PCTC No.
Program QS units that must be assigned
to a PCTC Program cooperative?
(v) What is allocated to the PCTC A and B season CQ for Pacific
Program cooperatives?. cod, halibut PSC limits, and
crab PSC limits, based on the
total QS units assigned to the
cooperative by its members.
(vi) Is this CQ an exclusive catch and Yes, the cooperative has an
use privilege? exclusive privilege to
collectively catch and use
this CQ. A cooperative can
transfer all or a portion of
this CQ to another
cooperative.
(vii) Is there a period in a calendar Yes, any cooperative vessel may
year during which PCTC Program harvest CQ during the during
cooperative vessels may catch Pacific the A and B seasons specified
cod? at Sec. 679.130(a)(2).
(viii) Can any vessel catch a PCTC No, only vessels that are
Program cooperative's Pacific cod? listed on the cooperative's
Application for PCTC Program
CQ may catch Pacific cod
assigned to that cooperative.
(ix) Can a member of a PCTC Program No, only the designated
cooperative transfer CQ individually representative of the
without the approval of the other cooperative, and not
members of the cooperative? individual members, may
transfer CQ to another
cooperative, and only if that
transfer is approved by NMFS.
(x) Are GOA sideboard limits assigned Existing sideboard limits apply
to specific persons or PCTC Program to individual vessels or LLP
cooperatives? license holders, not
cooperatives.
(xi) Can PCTC Program QS assigned to an QS assigned to an LLP license
LLP license or QS held by processors may be assigned to only one
be assigned to more than one PCTC cooperative in a calendar
Program cooperative in a calendar year. Multiple QS permits or
year? LLP licenses held by a single
person are not required to be
assigned to the same
cooperative. A processor may
associate with more than one
cooperative and any QS held by
the processor would be divided
between the associated
cooperatives in the same
proportion as the CQ derived
from the LLP licenses.
(xii) Which members may catch the PCTC Use of a cooperative's CQ is
Program cooperative's CQ? determined by the cooperative
contract signed by its
members. Any violations of
this contract by a cooperative
member may be subject to civil
claims by other members of the
cooperative.
(xiii) Does a PCTC Program cooperative Yes, a cooperative must have a
need a membership agreement or membership agreement or
contract? contract. A copy of this
agreement or contract must be
submitted to NMFS with the
application for CQ. The
membership agreement or
contract must specify: (A) How
the cooperative intends to
harvest its CQ; and (B) The
obligations of QS holders, who
are members of a cooperative,
to ensure the full payment of
fee liabilities that may be
due.
(xiv) What happens if the PCTC Program A copy of the amended
cooperative membership agreement or membership agreement or
contract is modified during the contract must be sent to NMFS
fishing year? in accordance with Sec.
679.131.
(xv) What happens if the cooperative A cooperative is not authorized
exceeds its CQ amount?. to catch Pacific cod or use
halibut or crab PSC limits in
excess of the amount on its CQ
permit. Exceeding a CQ permit
is a violation of the
regulations.
[[Page 53741]]
(xvi) Is there a limit on how much CQ a No, but each QS holder is
PCTC Program cooperative may hold? subject to ownership caps, and
a vessel may be subject to
vessel use caps. See Sec.
679.133.
(xvii) Is there a limit on how much Yes, generally a vessel may not
Pacific cod a vessel may catch?. catch more than 5 percent of
the Pacific cod assigned to
the PCTC Program for that
calendar year. See Sec.
679.133 for use cap
provisions.
(xviii) Are there any special reporting The designated representative
requirements?. of the cooperative may submit
an annual PCTC Program
cooperative report to the
North Pacific Fishery
Management Council.
(xix) Is there a requirement that a Yes, see Sec. 679.135 for the
PCTC Program cooperative pay PCTC provisions that apply. PCTC
Program cost recovery fees? Program cooperatives are
responsible for paying cost
recovery fees.
(xx) Is there any restriction on Sometimes, if the AI CQ set-
deliveries of CQ?. aside is in effect for the
fishing year as specified at
Sec. 679.132. Cooperatives
must establish, through an
inter-cooperative agreement,
how 12 percent of the BSAI A
season CQ will be set aside
for delivery to an Aleutian
Islands shoreplant.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Successors-in-interest. If a member of a PCTC Program
cooperative dies (in the case of an individual) or dissolves (in the
case of a business entity), the CQ derived from the QS assigned to the
cooperative for that year from that person remains under the control of
the cooperative for the duration of that calendar year as specified in
the cooperative contract. Each cooperative is free to establish its own
internal procedures for admitting a successor-in-interest during the
fishing season due to the death or dissolution of a cooperative member.
Sec. 679.132 Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside provisions in the PCTC
Program.
(a) Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside provisions in the PCTC Program--
(1) Calculation of the Aleutian Islands Pacific cod non-CDQ ICA and
DFA. Each year, during the annual harvest specifications process set
forth at Sec. 679.20(c), the Regional Administrator will specify the
AI Pacific cod non-CDQ ICA, the DFA from the AI Pacific cod non-CDQ
TAC, and the AI set-aside as follows:
(2) Aleutian Islands Pacific cod non-CDQ ICA. The AI Pacific cod
non-CDQ ICA will be deducted from the aggregate portion of the AI
Pacific cod non-CDQ TAC annually allocated to the non-CDQ sectors
identified at Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A).
(3) Aleutian Islands Pacific cod non-CDQ DFA. The AI Pacific cod
non-CDQ DFA will be the amount of the AI Pacific cod TAC remaining
after subtraction of the AI Pacific cod CDQ reserve and the AI Pacific
cod non-CDQ ICA.
(4) Calculation of the Aleutian Islands CQ set-aside. The Regional
Administrator will specify the AI set-aside in either of the following
ways:
(i) When the AI DFA exceeds 12 percent of A season CQ, the AI set-
aside is 12 percent of the PCTC Program A season CQ and is in effect
during the A and B seasons.
(ii) If the AI non-CDQ DFA is below 12 percent of the PCTC Program
A season CQ, then the AI set-aside will be set equal to the AI non-CDQ
DFA and is in effect during the A and B seasons. When the AI set-aside
is in effect and set equal to the AI non-CDQ DFA, directed fishing for
Pacific cod in the AI may only be conducted by PCTC Program vessels
that deliver their catch of AI Pacific cod to an Aleutian Islands
shoreplant. After June 10, the Regional Administrator may open directed
fishing for AI non-CDQ Pacific cod for other sectors.
(b) Annual notice of intent to process Aleutian Islands Pacific
cod--(1) Submission of notice. The provisions of this section will
apply if a representative of either the City of Adak or the City of
Atka submits to the Regional Administrator a timely and complete notice
of its intent to process PCTC Program Pacific cod during the upcoming
fishing year.
(2) Submission method and deadline. The notice of intent to process
PCTC Program Pacific cod for the upcoming fishing year must be
submitted in writing to the Regional Administrator by a representative
of the City of Adak or the City of Atka no later than October 15 of
each year in order for the provisions of this section to apply during
the upcoming fishing year. Notices of intent to process received later
than October 15 may not be accepted by the Regional Administrator.
(3) Contents of notice. A notice of intent to process PCTC Program
Pacific cod for the upcoming fishing year must contain the following
information:
(i) Date of submission,
(ii) Name of city,
(iii) Statement of intent to process PCTC Program Pacific cod,
(iv) Identification of the fishing year during which the city
intends to process PCTC Program Pacific cod,
(v) Contact information for the representative of the city, and
(vi) Documentation of authority to represent the City of Adak or
the City of Atka.
(4) NMFS confirmation and notice. On or before November 30, the
Regional Administrator will notify the representative of the City of
Adak or the City of Atka, confirming receipt of their official notice
of intent to process PCTC Program Pacific cod. Then, NMFS will announce
through notification in the Federal Register whether the AI set-aside
will be in effect for the upcoming fishing year.
(5) AI CQ set-aside PCTC Program cooperative provisions. If the
representative of the City of Adak or the City of Atka submits a timely
and complete notice of intent to process in accordance of this section,
then the following provisions will apply for the fishing year following
the notice:
(i) The PCTC Program cooperative(s) are required to set-aside an
amount of CQ calculated by the Regional Administrator pursuant to
(a)(4) of this section for delivery to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant
as defined at Sec. 679.2.
(ii) All cooperatives must enter into an inter-cooperative
agreement that describes how the AI set-aside will be administered by
the cooperatives to ensure that the PCTC Program harvests from the BS
do not exceed the minimum set-aside. This inter-cooperative agreement
must establish how the cooperatives intend to harvest the AI set-aside
when it applies. This inter-cooperative agreement must be provided as
part of the annual PCTC Program cooperative application as specified at
Sec. 679.131(a)(4) and is required before NMFS can issue CQ.
(iii) The inter-cooperative agreement must establish how
cooperatives would ensure that trawl catcher vessels less than 60 ft
(18.3 m) LOA assigned to an LLP license with a transferable AI trawl
endorsement have the opportunity to harvest 10 percent of the AI set-
aside for delivery to an Aleutian Islands shoreplant.
(c) PCTC Program A season CQ set-aside limitations. (1) If the
Regional Administrator has approved a notice of intent to process,
vessels authorized under the PCTC Program shall not harvest the amount
of the AI set-aside in the BS subarea.
[[Page 53742]]
(2) PCTC Program cooperatives may not deliver more than the PCTC A
season CQ minus the AI set-aside established under this section to
processors in the BS subarea when the AI CQ set-aside is in effect.
(3) The City of Adak or the City of Atka may withdraw their annual
notice of intent to process prior to the end of B season.
(4) The Regional Administrator may remove the delivery requirement
for some or all of the projected unused AI CQ set-aside if the Regional
Administrator determines that the Aleutian Islands shoreplants will not
process the entire AI CQ set-aside.
(5) In the event all notices of intent to process are withdrawn,
the Regional Administrator will remove the delivery requirement for CQ
that was set-aside for that calendar year.
(6) To remove the AI CQ set-aside delivery requirement for that
calendar year, the Regional Administrator will publish a document in
the Federal Register.
Sec. 679.133 PCTC Program ownership caps, use caps, and sideboard
limits.
(a) Ownership and use caps--(1) General. (i) Ownership caps limit
the amount of PCTC Program QS that may be owned by a harvester or
processor and their affiliates. Use caps limit the amount of CQ that
may be harvested by a vessel or received and processed by a processor.
(ii) Use caps do not apply to halibut or crab PSC CQ.
(iii) Ownership and use caps may not be exceeded except as provided
under paragraph (a)(6) of this section.
(iv) All QS ownership caps are a percentage of the initial PCTC
Program QS pool established by NMFS at Sec. 679.130(e).
(v) The CQ processing use cap is a percentage of the total amount
of CQ issued to cooperatives during a calendar year.
(vi) The vessel use cap is a percentage of the amount of CQ
assigned to the PCTC Program during a calendar year.
(2) Harvester PCTC Program QS ownership cap. A person may not
individually or collectively own more than 5 percent of the PCTC
Program QS initially assigned to harvesters unless that person
qualifies for an exemption to this ownership cap under paragraph (a)(6)
of this section based on their qualifying catch history. Processor-
issued QS does not count toward this ownership cap.
(3) Vessel use cap. A catcher vessel may not harvest an amount of
CQ greater than 5 percent of the CQ issued to the PCTC Program during a
calendar year unless that vessel qualifies for an exemption to this use
cap under paragraph (a)(6) of this section based on their qualifying
catch history.
(4) Processor ownership cap. A person may not individually or
collectively own more than 20 percent of the PCTC Program QS initially
assigned to processors unless that person qualifies for an exemption to
this ownership cap under paragraph (a)(6) of this section based on
their qualifying processing history.
(5) Processing use cap. A processor, at the firm or company level,
may not process more than 20 percent of the CQ assigned to the PCTC
Program during a calendar year unless that processor qualifies for an
exemption to this use cap under paragraph (a)(6) of this section based
on their qualifying processing history. The amount of CQ that is
received by a PCTC Program processor is calculated based on the sum of
all landings made with CQ received or processed by that processor and
the CQ received or processed by any person affiliated with that
processor as that term is defined at Sec. 679.2.
(6) Cap exemptions. (i) A person may receive an initial allocation
of PCTC Program QS in excess of the harvester ownership cap. This
exemption is non-transferable.
(ii) A person may receive an initial allocation of PCTC Program QS
in excess of the processor ownership cap. This exemption is non-
transferable.
(iii) A vessel designated on an LLP license that received an
initial allocation of PCTC Program QS in excess of the harvester
ownership cap may harvest CQ in excess of the vessel use cap up to the
amount of CQ resulting from QS assigned to the LLP license. This
exemption is non-transferable.
(iv) Processor use cap exemptions. A processor that received an
initial allocation of PCTC Program QS in excess of the processor
ownership cap may process more than 20 percent of CQ during a calendar
year up to an amount of CQ proportional to the ratio of QS held by the
processor to the total amount of QS held by processors. This exemption
is non-transferable. An Aleutian Islands shoreplant is not subject to
this processor use cap.
(7) Transfer limitations. An eligible harvester that receives an
initial allocation of PCTC Program QS that exceeds the ownership cap
listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall not receive any PCTC
Program QS by transfer unless and until the eligible harvester's
holdings of PCTC Program QS in the PCTC Program are reduced to an
amount below the use cap specified in this paragraph (a).
(b) Sideboard limits--general. The regulations in this section
restrict the holders of LLP licenses issued PCTC Program QS from using
the increased flexibility provided by the PCTC Program to expand their
level of participation in GOA groundfish fisheries.
(1) Sideboard limit restrictions for LLP licenses authorizing AFA
non-exempt catcher vessels. LLP licenses that authorize AFA non-exempt
catcher vessels will be subject to the sideboard limitations specified
at Sec. 679.64(b)(4)(i).
(2) At-Sea Processing Sideboard Limit. A sideboard limit will be
specified on each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement. Each LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership
endorsement may receive CQ deliveries from a catcher vessel not to
exceed 125 percent of a catcher/processor's processing history as
defined at Sec. 679.130 and subject to eligibility requirements under
BSAI FMP Amendment 120 to limit CPs acting as motherships.
Sec. 679.134 PCTC Program permits, catch monitoring, catch
accounting, and recordkeeping and reporting.
(a) Permits. For permit information, please see Sec. 679.4(q).
(b) Catch monitoring requirements for PCTC Program catcher vessels.
The owner and operator of a catcher vessel must ensure the vessel
complies with the observer coverage requirements described at Sec.
679.51(a)(2) at all times the vessel is participating in a PCTC Program
cooperative.
(c) Catch monitoring requirements for motherships receiving
unsorted codends from a PCTC Program catcher vessel--(1) Catch
weighing. All catch, except halibut sorted on deck by vessels
participating in the halibut deck sorting described at Sec. 679.120,
must be weighed on a NMFS-approved scale in compliance with the scale
requirements at Sec. 679.28(b). Each haul must be weighed separately
and all catch must be made available for sampling by an observer.
(2) Additional catch monitoring requirements. Comply with catch
monitoring requirements specified at Sec. 679.93(c).
(d) Catch monitoring requirements for shoreside processors. All
groundfish landed by catcher vessels described at Sec. 679.51(a)(2)
must be sorted, weighed on a scale approved by the State of Alaska as
described at Sec. 679.28(c), and be made available for sampling by an
observer, NMFS staff, or any individual authorized by NMFS. Any of
these
[[Page 53743]]
persons must be allowed to test any scale used to weigh groundfish to
determine its accuracy.
(e) Catch accounting--(1) Pacific cod. All Pacific cod harvests by
a vessel that is named on a PCTC Program CQ application and fishing
under a CQ permit will be debited against the CQ for that cooperative
during the fishing seasons as defined at Sec. 679.130(a)(2).
(2) PCTC Program halibut and crab PSC. All halibut and crab PSC
used by a vessel that is named on an Application PCTC Program CQ and
fishing under a CQ permit will be debited against the CQ for that
cooperative during the fishing seasons as defined at Sec.
679.130(a)(2).
(3) Groundfish sideboard limits. All groundfish harvests in the
BSAI and GOA that are subject to a sideboard limit for that groundfish
species as described under Sec. 679.133(c), except groundfish
harvested by a vessel when participating in the Central GOA Rockfish
Program, will be debited against the applicable sideboard limit.
(f) Recordkeeping and reporting. The owners and operators of
catcher vessels and processors authorized as participants in the PCTC
Program must comply with the applicable recordkeeping and reporting
requirements of this section and must assign all catch to a PCTC
Program cooperative as applicable at the time of catch or receipt of
Pacific cod. All owners of catcher vessels and processors authorized as
participants in the PCTC Program must ensure that their designated
representatives or employees comply with all applicable recordkeeping
and reporting requirements.
(1) Logbook--(i) DFL. Operators of catcher vessels participating in
the PCTC Program fishery must maintain a daily fishing logbook for
trawl gear as described at Sec. 679.5.
(ii) ELB. Operators of a catcher/processor designated on an LLP
license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement or a
mothership receiving CQ must use a combination of NMFS-approved
catcher/processor trawl gear ELB and eLandings to record and report
groundfish and PSC information as described at Sec. 679.5 to record
PCTC Program landings and production.
(2) eLandings. Managers of shoreside processors that receive
Pacific cod in the PCTC Program must use eLandings or NMFS-approved
software as described at Sec. 679.5(e) to record PCTC Program landings
and production.
(3) Production reports. Operators of a catcher/processor designated
on an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod trawl mothership endorsement
that receives and purchases landings of CQ must submit a production
report as described at Sec. 679.5(e)(10).
(4) Product transfer report (PTR), processors. Operators of a
catcher/processor designated on an LLP license with a BSAI Pacific cod
trawl mothership endorsement and managers of shoreside processors that
receive and purchase landings of CQ must submit a PTR as described at
Sec. 679.5(g).
(5) Vessel monitoring system (VMS) requirements. Operators of
catcher vessels assigned to a PCTC Program cooperative or that are
subject to sideboard limits detailed at Sec. 679.133 must use
functioning VMS equipment as described at Sec. 679.28(f) at all times
when operating in a reporting area off Alaska during the A and B
season.
(6) PCTC Program cost recovery fee submission (See Sec. 679.135).
(7) Pacific cod Ex-vessel Volume and Value Report. A processor that
receives and purchases landings of CQ must submit annually to NMFS a
complete Pacific cod Ex-vessel Volume and Value Report, as described at
Sec. 679.5(u) for each reporting period for which the PCTC processor
receives CQ.
Sec. 679.135 PCTC Program cost recovery.
(a) Cost recovery fees--(1) Responsibility. Each PCTC Program
cooperative must comply with the requirements of this section.
(i) Subsequent transfer of CQ or QS held by PCTC Program
cooperative members does not affect the cooperative's liability for
noncompliance with this section.
(ii) Non-renewal of a CQ permit does not affect the cooperative's
liability for noncompliance with this section.
(iii) Changes in the membership in a PCTC Program cooperative, such
as members joining or departing during the relevant year, or changes in
the amount of QS holdings of those members does not affect the
cooperative's liability for noncompliance with this section.
(2) Fee collection. PCTC Program cooperatives that receive CQ are
responsible for submitting the cost recovery payment for all CQ
landings made under the authority of their CQ permit.
(3) Payment. (i) A cooperative must submit any cost recovery fee
liability payment(s) no later than August 31 following the calendar
year in which the CQ landings were made.
(ii) Make electronic payment payable to NMFS.
(iii) Submit payment and related documents as instructed on the
NMFS Alaska Region website as defined at Sec. 679.2.
(iv) Payment must be made electronically in U.S. dollars using an
approved payment method available on the payment website.
(b) Pacific cod standard ex-vessel value determination and use.
NMFS will use the standard prices calculated for Pacific cod based on
information provided in the Pacific Cod Ex-vessel Volume and Value
Report described at Sec. 679.5(u)(1) from the previous calendar year.
(c) PCTC Program fee percentage--(1) Fee percentage. The fee
percentage is the amount as determined by the factors and methodology
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. This amount will be
announced by publication in the Federal Register. This amount must not
exceed 3.0 percent of the gross ex-vessel value pursuant to 16 U.S.C.
1854(d)(2)(B).
(2) Calculating fee percentage value. Each year NMFS shall
calculate and publish the fee percentage following the fishing season
in which the CQ landings were made, according to the following factors
and methodology:
(i) NMFS must use the following factors to determine the fee
percentage:
(A) The catch to which the PCTC Program cost recovery fee will
apply;
(B) The ex-vessel value of that catch; and
(C) The costs directly related to the management, data collection,
and enforcement of the PCTC Program.
(ii) NMFS must use the following equations to determine the fee
percentage:
100 x DPC/V
where:
DPC = the direct program costs for the PCTC Program for the previous
calendar year with any adjustments to the account from payments
received in the previous year.
V = total of the standard ex-vessel value of the catch subject to
the PCTC cost recovery fee liability for the current year.
(iii) The calculated fee percentage is applied to the ex-vessel
value of CQ landings made in the previous calendar year.
(3) Applicable fee percentage. The cooperative must use the fee
percentage applicable at the time a PCTC landing is debited from a CQ
allocation to calculate the cost recovery fee liability for any
retroactive payments for CQ landed.
(4) Fee liability determination for a cooperative. (i) All
cooperatives are subject to a fee liability for any CQ debited from a
CQ allocation during a calendar year.
(ii) The PCTC Program fee liability assessed to a PCTC Program
cooperative
[[Page 53744]]
is based on the proportion of the standard ex-vessel value of Pacific
cod debited from the cooperative's CQ relative to all cooperatives
during a calendar year as determined by NMFS.
(iii) NMFS will provide a fee liability summary letter to all
cooperatives by no later than August 1 of each year. The summary will
explain the fee liability determination including the current fee
percentage, details of CQ pounds debited from CQ allocations by permit,
species, date, and prices.
(d) Underpayment of fee liability. (1) Pursuant to Sec. 679.131,
no cooperative will receive any CQ unless that cooperative has made
full payment of cost recovery liability at the time it applies for CQ.
(2) If a cooperative fails to submit full payment for PCTC Program
cost recovery fee liability by the date described in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section:
(i) At any time thereafter the Regional Administrator may send an
IAD to the cooperative stating the amount of the cooperative's
estimated fee liability that is past due and requesting payment. If
payment is not received by the 30th day after the date on the IAD, the
agency may pursue collection of the unpaid fees.
(ii) The Regional Administrator may disapprove any application to
transfer CQ to or from the cooperative in accordance with Sec.
679.130.
(iii) No CQ permit will be issued to that cooperative for that
following calendar year and the Regional Administrator may continue to
prohibit issuance of a CQ permit for any subsequent calendar years
until NMFS receives the unpaid fees.
(iv) No CQ will be issued based on the QS held by the members of
that PCTC Program cooperative to any other CQ permit for any subsequent
calendar years until NMFS receives the unpaid fees.
(e) Over payment. Payment submitted to NMFS in excess of the annual
PCTC Program cost recovery fee liability for a cooperative will be
credited against the cooperative's future cost recovery fee liability
unless the cooperative requests the agency refund the over payment.
Payment processing fees may be deducted from any fees returned to the
cooperative.
(f) Appeals. A cooperative that receives an IAD for incomplete
payment of a fee liability may appeal the IAD pursuant to 15 CFR part
906.
(g) Annual report. Each year, NMFS will publish a report describing
the PCTC Program cost recovery fee program.
0
13. Revise table 40 to part 679 to read as follows:
Table 40 to Part 679--BSAI Halibut PSC Sideboard Limits for AFA Catcher/
Processors and AFA Catcher Vessels
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The AFA catcher/ The AFA catcher
In the following target species processor halibut vessel halibut PSC
categories as defined at Sec. PSC sideboard sideboard limit in
679.21(b)(1)(iii) and (e)(3)(iv) limit in metric metric tons is . .
. . . tons is . . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All target species categories... 286............... N/A
Pacific cod trawl............... N/A............... N/A
Pacific cod hook-and-line or pot N/A............... 2
Yellowfin sole.................. N/A............... 101
Rock sole/flathead sole/``other N/A............... 228
flatfish'' \1\.
Turbot/Arrowtooth/Sablefish..... N/A............... 0
Rockfish \2\.................... N/A............... 2
Pollock/Atka mackerel/``other N/A............... 5
species''.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
14. Revise table 56 to part 679 to read as follows:
Table 56 to Part 679--GOA Species and Species Groups for Which Directed
Fishing for Sideboard Limits by Non-Exempt AFA Catcher Vessels is
Prohibited
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management or regulatory area
Species or species group and processing component (if
applicable)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pollock................................ Southeast Outside District,
Eastern GOA.
Pacific cod............................ Eastern GOA, inshore component.
Eastern GOA, offshore
component.
Sablefish.............................. Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Shallow-water flatfish................. Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Deep-water flatfish.................... Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Rex sole............................... Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Arrowtooth flounder.................... Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Flathead sole.......................... Western GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Pacific ocean perch.................... Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Northern rockfish...................... Western GOA.
Shortraker rockfish.................... Western GOA.
[[Page 53745]]
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Dusky rockfish......................... Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Rougheye rockfish...................... Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Demersal shelf rockfish................ Southeast Outside District.
Thornyhead rockfish.................... Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Other rockfish......................... Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Atka mackerel.......................... GOA.
Big skates............................. Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Longnose skates........................ Western GOA.
Central GOA.
Eastern GOA.
Other skates........................... GOA.
Sculpins............................... GOA.
Sharks................................. GOA.
Octopuses.............................. GOA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2023-16526 Filed 8-3-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P