Agency Information Collection Activities; New Information Collection; Comment Request; Non-E-Verify Remote Document Examination Pilot 1, 51338-51340 [2023-16589]
Download as PDF
51338
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2023 / Notices
term ‘‘mitigation’’ as used in the context
of section 106 review, where it means
reducing the severity of a project’s
adverse effects to historic properties.]
• Resiliency/resilient: A capability to
anticipate, prepare for, respond to, and
recover from significant multi-hazard
threats with minimum damage to social
well-being, the economy, and the
environment. (U.S. Global Change
Research Program Web Site Glossary)
Adopted June 16, 2023.
(End of Document)
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 304102(a).
Dated: July 31, 2023.
Javier Marques,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023–16569 Filed 8–2–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–K6–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement
[OMB Control Number 1653–0051]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension of a Currently
Approved Collection: Standards To
Prevent, Detect, and Respond to
Sexual Abuse and Assault in
Confinement Facilities
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) will submit
the following Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until October 2, 2023.
ADDRESSES: All submissions received
must include the OMB Control Number
1653–0051 in the body of the
correspondence, the agency name and
Docket ID ICEB–2012–0003. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
(1) Online. Submit comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov under eDocket ID number ICEB–2012–0003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions related to this
collection please contact: Chelsea
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Aug 02, 2023
Jkt 259001
Dennis, ICE/OIPE, (202) 423–7456,
chelsea.y.dennis@ice.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2023–16567 Filed 8–2–23; 8:45 am]
Comment
BILLING CODE 9111–28–P
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information should address one or more
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a Currently Approved
Collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Standards to Prevent, Detect, and
Respond to Sexual Abuse and Assault in
Confinement Facilities.
(3) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individual or
Households. DHS sets standards for the
prevention, detection, and response to
sexual abuse in its confinement
facilities. For DHS facilities and as
incorporated in DHS contracts, these
standards require covered facilities to
retain and report to the agency certain
specified information relating to sexual
abuse prevention planning, responsive
planning, education and training, and
investigations, as well as to collect,
retain, and report to the agency certain
specified information relating to
allegations of sexual abuse within the
covered facility.
(4) An estimate of the total number of
respondents: 1,376,754.
(5) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 117,267 annual burden
hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Dated: July 31, 2023.
Scott Elmore,
ICE Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, OCIO.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement
[OMB Control Number 1653–NEW; Docket
ID ICEB–2023–0007]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; New Information Collection;
Comment Request; Non-E-Verify
Remote Document Examination Pilot 1
Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) invites the
public to comment upon this proposed
new collection of information. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the
information collection notice is
published in the Federal Register to
obtain comments regarding all aspects
of the information collection, the
categories of respondents, the estimated
burden (e.g., the time, effort, and
resources used by the respondents to
respond), the estimated cost to the
respondent, and the actual information
collection instruments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until October 2, 2023.
ADDRESSES: All submissions received
must include the OMB Control Number
1653–NEW in the body of the
correspondence, the agency name and
Docket ID ICEB–2023–0007. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal website at https://
www.regulations.gov under e-Docket ID
number ICEB–2023–0007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Hageman, Deputy Assistant
Director, Office of Regulatory Affairs
and Policy, U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, Department of
Homeland Security, telephone number
202–732–6960 (This is not a toll-free
number. Comments are not accepted via
telephone message.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Section 274A of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (INA), as amended,
prohibits the knowing employment of
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
unauthorized individuals and the hiring
of individuals without first verifying
their employment authorization and
identity. Section 274B of the INA
prohibits employment discrimination
based on citizenship, immigration
status, and national origin, in hiring,
firing, and during the employment
eligibility verification process. All
employers must examine the
documentation presented by individuals
seeking to establish identity and
employment authorization for the
purpose of completing the Form I–9,
Employment Eligibility Verification
(Form I–9). On July 25, 2023, DHS
published a final rule, Optional
Alternatives to the Physical Document
Examination Associated with
Employment Eligibility Verification
(Form I–9). 88 FR 47990. Under the rule,
the Secretary of Homeland Security (the
Secretary) may, as an optional
alternative to the in-person physical
document examination (physical
examination) method employers have
followed as part of the Form I–9 process
set forth in current regulations,
consistent with applicable law and via
notice published in the Federal
Register, authorize alternative
documentation examination procedures.
The Secretary may authorize alternative
documentation examination procedures
with respect to some or all employers as
part of a pilot program, or upon a
determination that such procedures
offer an equivalent level of security, or
as a temporary measure to address a
public health emergency declared by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
(pursuant to Section 319 of the Public
Health Service Act) or a national
emergency declared by the President
(pursuant to Sections 201 and 301 of the
National Emergencies Act). To date, the
Secretary has authorized one alternative
procedure under the rule, upon a
determination that such procedure
offers an equivalent level of security. 88
FR 47749. This Notice seeks comment
on a potential pilot procedure under the
rule.
Proposed Pilot
Through the Non-E-Verify Remote
Document Examination Pilot 1 (Pilot),
ICE seeks to identify the potential
effects of a specific Pilot procedure on
the security of the employment
verification system. ICE will evaluate a
range of potential effects on system
integrity, (such as error or fraud rates
and discrimination, between physical
examination of the Form I–9 documents
and remote examination pursuant to the
Pilot procedure. The Pilot procedure
would resemble the authorized
alternative procedure identified above
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Aug 02, 2023
Jkt 259001
(including with respect to remote
document inspection, document
retention, optionality, and protections
against discrimination). The Pilot
procedure would not, however, be
available to E-Verify employers, because
DHS has authorized an alternative
procedure involving the use of E-Verify.
The Pilot may be open to most
employers but limited to employers
below a specified size threshold (e.g.,
500 employees).
This information collection would
involve a form to be completed by
employers requesting to participate in
the Pilot. ICE would regularly 1 request
feedback data (e.g., number of new
hires, number of employees who
requested to have a physical inspection,
challenges associated with the Pilot
procedure) from participating
employers.
Participating employers would be
required to examine and retain
electronic copies that are clear and
legible of all supporting documentation
provided by individuals seeking to
establish identity and employment
authorization for the Form I–9 process.
Employers may be required to undertake
other measures to improve the security
of the Pilot procedure. For instance,
participating employers may be required
to undertake fraudulent document
detection and anti-discrimination
training. In addition, for those
employees who work onsite (i.e., at the
same physical worksite as a supervisor
or the official completing the Form I–9)
or in a hybrid capacity, the employer
may be prohibited from using the pilot
procedure, or provided a timeframe,
following the initial remote document
examination, during which to
physically examine the employee’s
Form I–9 documents and compare such
documents to the copies on file.
The INA specifically authorizes DHS,
the Immigrant and Employee Rights
Section of the Department of Justice’s
Civil Rights Division, and the
Department of Labor to inspect Forms I–
9, including any copies of employee
documents retained with the
corresponding Form I–9.2 Pilot
participants, like all employers, would
be subject to audits and investigations.
DHS would monitor and evaluate data
and information from ICE audits
conducted to assess any measurable
impacts to system integrity between the
employers that use the alternative
procedure and those that continue with
physical document inspection.
1 The burden estimate below assumes two
requests annually per participating employer.
2 See 8 U.S.C. 1324a(b)(3).
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51339
Comments
You may access the information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information by visiting the
Federal eRulemaking Portal site at:
https://www.regulations.gov and
entering ICEB–2023–0007 in the search
box. All submissions will be posted,
without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov, and will include
any personal information you provide.
Therefore, submitting this information
makes it public. You may wish to
consider limiting the amount of
personal information that you provide
in any voluntary submission you make
to DHS. DHS may withhold information
provided in comments from public
viewing that it determines may impact
the privacy of an individual or is
offensive. For additional information,
please read the Privacy Act notice that
is available via the link in the footer of
https://www.regulations.gov.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information should address one or more
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology
(e.g., permitting electronic submission
of responses).
As part of this feedback, DHS
welcomes and will consider input on all
aspects of the pilot’s potential terms and
conditions, as described above.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
New Collection.
(2) Title of the Collection: Non-EVerify Remote Document Examination
Pilot 1.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security
sponsoring the collection: New ICE
Form; ICE.
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
51340
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 148 / Thursday, August 3, 2023 / Notices
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Respondents will be employers
in the public, private, and not-for-profit
sectors, who volunteer to participate in
the pilot. These employers will submit
responses to the New ICE Form. Up to
twice a year, ICE may request feedback
data (e.g., number of new hires, number
of employees who requested to have a
physical inspection, challenges
associated with the Pilot procedure)
from participating employers. A subset
of the employers may take undertake
fraudulent document training. Finally,
employers participating in the Pilot
Number of
respondents
Collection type
Number of
annual
responses
Time per
response
(hours)
Average
annual hours
Questionnaire .......................................................................
Feedback Data .....................................................................
Training ................................................................................
Document Retention ............................................................
100,000
100,000
50,000
100,000
0.333
2
1
10
33,333
200,000
50,000
1,000,000
0.5
0.5
2
0.083
16,667
100,000
100,000
83,333
Average Annual Hours .................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
300,000
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total estimated annual
hour burden associated with this
collection is 300,000 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public
burden (in cost) associated with the
collections: There are no capital costs or
operating and maintenance costs
associated with this collection of
information. The information for this
collection may be submitted and
retained electronically.
Sharon Hageman,
Deputy Assistant Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs and Policy, U.S.
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2023–16589 Filed 8–2–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[234A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900]
HEARTH Act Approval of Cocopah
Tribe of Arizona Business Site Leasing
Ordinance
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) approved the Cocopah Tribe of
Arizona’s Leasing Ordinance under the
Helping Expedite and Advance
Responsible Tribal Homeownership Act
of 2012 (HEARTH Act). With this
approval, the Tribe is authorized to
enter into business leases without
further BIA approval.
DATES: BIA issued the approval on July
26, 2023.
SUMMARY:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Number of
annual
responses per
respondent
must retain records as stipulated by the
terms of the Pilot.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Aug 02, 2023
Jkt 259001
Ms.
Carla Clark, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Division of Real Estate Services, 1001
Indian School Road NW, Albuquerque,
NM 87104, carla.clark@bia.gov, (702)
484–3233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
The HEARTH Act makes a voluntary,
alternative land leasing process
available to Tribes, by amending the
Indian Long-Term Leasing Act of 1955,
25 U.S.C. 415. The HEARTH Act
authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter
into business leases of Tribal trust lands
with a primary term of 25 years, and up
to two renewal terms of 25 years each,
without the approval of the Secretary of
the Interior (Secretary). The HEARTH
Act also authorizes Tribes to enter into
leases for residential, recreational,
religious or educational purposes for a
primary term of up to 75 years without
the approval of the Secretary.
Participating Tribes develop Tribal
Leasing regulations, including an
environmental review process, and then
must obtain the Secretary’s approval of
those regulations prior to entering into
leases. The HEARTH Act requires the
Secretary to approve Tribal regulations
if the Tribal regulations are consistent
with the Department of the Interior’s
(Department) leasing regulations at 25
CFR part 162 and provide for an
environmental review process that
meets requirements set forth in the
HEARTH Act. This notice announces
that the Secretary, through the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved
the Tribal regulations for the Cocopah
Tribe of Arizona.
II. Federal Preemption of State and
Local Taxes
The Department’s regulations
governing the surface leasing of trust
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and restricted Indian lands specify that,
subject to applicable Federal law,
permanent improvements on leased
land, leasehold or possessory interests,
and activities under the lease are not
subject to State and local taxation and
may be subject to taxation by the Indian
Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR
162.017. As explained further in the
preamble to the final regulations, the
Federal government has a strong interest
in promoting economic development,
self-determination, and Tribal
sovereignty. 77 FR 72440, 72447–48
(December 5, 2012). The principles
supporting the Federal preemption of
State law in the field of Indian leasing
and the taxation of lease-related
interests and activities applies with
equal force to leases entered into under
Tribal leasing regulations approved by
the Federal government pursuant to the
HEARTH Act.
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization
Act, 25 U.S.C. 5108, preempts State and
local taxation of permanent
improvements on trust land.
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis
Reservation v. Thurston County, 724
F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411
U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly, section 5108
preempts State taxation of rent
payments by a lessee for leased trust
lands, because ‘‘tax on the payment of
rent is indistinguishable from an
impermissible tax on the land.’’ See
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Stranburg,
799 F.3d 1324, 1331, n.8 (11th Cir.
2015). In addition, as explained in the
preamble to the revised leasing
regulations at 25 CFR part 162, Federal
courts have applied a balancing test to
determine whether State and local
taxation of non-Indians on the
reservation is preempted. White
Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448
E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM
03AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 148 (Thursday, August 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51338-51340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
[OMB Control Number 1653-NEW; Docket ID ICEB-2023-0007]
Agency Information Collection Activities; New Information
Collection; Comment Request; Non-E-Verify Remote Document Examination
Pilot 1
AGENCY: Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) invites the public to comment upon this
proposed new collection of information. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the information collection
notice is published in the Federal Register to obtain comments
regarding all aspects of the information collection, the categories of
respondents, the estimated burden (e.g., the time, effort, and
resources used by the respondents to respond), the estimated cost to
the respondent, and the actual information collection instruments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until October 2,
2023.
ADDRESSES: All submissions received must include the OMB Control Number
1653-NEW in the body of the correspondence, the agency name and Docket
ID ICEB-2023-0007. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal
website at https://www.regulations.gov under e-Docket ID number ICEB-
2023-0007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Hageman, Deputy Assistant
Director, Office of Regulatory Affairs and Policy, U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, telephone number
202-732-6960 (This is not a toll-free number. Comments are not accepted
via telephone message.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as
amended, prohibits the knowing employment of
[[Page 51339]]
unauthorized individuals and the hiring of individuals without first
verifying their employment authorization and identity. Section 274B of
the INA prohibits employment discrimination based on citizenship,
immigration status, and national origin, in hiring, firing, and during
the employment eligibility verification process. All employers must
examine the documentation presented by individuals seeking to establish
identity and employment authorization for the purpose of completing the
Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9). On July 25,
2023, DHS published a final rule, Optional Alternatives to the Physical
Document Examination Associated with Employment Eligibility
Verification (Form I-9). 88 FR 47990. Under the rule, the Secretary of
Homeland Security (the Secretary) may, as an optional alternative to
the in-person physical document examination (physical examination)
method employers have followed as part of the Form I-9 process set
forth in current regulations, consistent with applicable law and via
notice published in the Federal Register, authorize alternative
documentation examination procedures. The Secretary may authorize
alternative documentation examination procedures with respect to some
or all employers as part of a pilot program, or upon a determination
that such procedures offer an equivalent level of security, or as a
temporary measure to address a public health emergency declared by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (pursuant to Section 319 of the
Public Health Service Act) or a national emergency declared by the
President (pursuant to Sections 201 and 301 of the National Emergencies
Act). To date, the Secretary has authorized one alternative procedure
under the rule, upon a determination that such procedure offers an
equivalent level of security. 88 FR 47749. This Notice seeks comment on
a potential pilot procedure under the rule.
Proposed Pilot
Through the Non-E-Verify Remote Document Examination Pilot 1
(Pilot), ICE seeks to identify the potential effects of a specific
Pilot procedure on the security of the employment verification system.
ICE will evaluate a range of potential effects on system integrity,
(such as error or fraud rates and discrimination, between physical
examination of the Form I-9 documents and remote examination pursuant
to the Pilot procedure. The Pilot procedure would resemble the
authorized alternative procedure identified above (including with
respect to remote document inspection, document retention, optionality,
and protections against discrimination). The Pilot procedure would not,
however, be available to E-Verify employers, because DHS has authorized
an alternative procedure involving the use of E-Verify. The Pilot may
be open to most employers but limited to employers below a specified
size threshold (e.g., 500 employees).
This information collection would involve a form to be completed by
employers requesting to participate in the Pilot. ICE would regularly
\1\ request feedback data (e.g., number of new hires, number of
employees who requested to have a physical inspection, challenges
associated with the Pilot procedure) from participating employers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The burden estimate below assumes two requests annually per
participating employer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participating employers would be required to examine and retain
electronic copies that are clear and legible of all supporting
documentation provided by individuals seeking to establish identity and
employment authorization for the Form I-9 process. Employers may be
required to undertake other measures to improve the security of the
Pilot procedure. For instance, participating employers may be required
to undertake fraudulent document detection and anti-discrimination
training. In addition, for those employees who work onsite (i.e., at
the same physical worksite as a supervisor or the official completing
the Form I-9) or in a hybrid capacity, the employer may be prohibited
from using the pilot procedure, or provided a timeframe, following the
initial remote document examination, during which to physically examine
the employee's Form I-9 documents and compare such documents to the
copies on file.
The INA specifically authorizes DHS, the Immigrant and Employee
Rights Section of the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division,
and the Department of Labor to inspect Forms I-9, including any copies
of employee documents retained with the corresponding Form I-9.\2\
Pilot participants, like all employers, would be subject to audits and
investigations. DHS would monitor and evaluate data and information
from ICE audits conducted to assess any measurable impacts to system
integrity between the employers that use the alternative procedure and
those that continue with physical document inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 8 U.S.C. 1324a(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
You may access the information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information by visiting the Federal
eRulemaking Portal site at: https://www.regulations.gov and entering
ICEB-2023-0007 in the search box. All submissions will be posted,
without change, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov, and will include any personal information you
provide. Therefore, submitting this information makes it public. You
may wish to consider limiting the amount of personal information that
you provide in any voluntary submission you make to DHS. DHS may
withhold information provided in comments from public viewing that it
determines may impact the privacy of an individual or is offensive. For
additional information, please read the Privacy Act notice that is
available via the link in the footer of https://www.regulations.gov.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information should
address one or more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information requirement is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
As part of this feedback, DHS welcomes and will consider input on
all aspects of the pilot's potential terms and conditions, as described
above.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: New Collection.
(2) Title of the Collection: Non-E-Verify Remote Document
Examination Pilot 1.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
Department of Homeland Security sponsoring the collection: New ICE
Form; ICE.
[[Page 51340]]
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Respondents will be employers in the public,
private, and not-for-profit sectors, who volunteer to participate in
the pilot. These employers will submit responses to the New ICE Form.
Up to twice a year, ICE may request feedback data (e.g., number of new
hires, number of employees who requested to have a physical inspection,
challenges associated with the Pilot procedure) from participating
employers. A subset of the employers may take undertake fraudulent
document training. Finally, employers participating in the Pilot must
retain records as stipulated by the terms of the Pilot.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Number of annual Number of Time per Average
Collection type respondents responses per annual response annual hours
respondent responses (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questionnaire................... 100,000 0.333 33,333 0.5 16,667
Feedback Data................... 100,000 2 200,000 0.5 100,000
Training........................ 50,000 1 50,000 2 100,000
Document Retention.............. 100,000 10 1,000,000 0.083 83,333
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Annual Hours........ .............. .............. .............. .............. 300,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: The total estimated annual hour burden associated
with this collection is 300,000 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public burden (in cost) associated
with the collections: There are no capital costs or operating and
maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. The
information for this collection may be submitted and retained
electronically.
Sharon Hageman,
Deputy Assistant Director, Office of Regulatory Affairs and Policy,
U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland
Security.
[FR Doc. 2023-16589 Filed 8-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-28-P