Redefining Bona Fide Cotton Spot Markets, 49993-49994 [2023-16295]
Download as PDF
49993
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 88, No. 146
Tuesday, August 1, 2023
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 27
[Doc. No. AMS–CN–22–0061]
Redefining Bona Fide Cotton Spot
Markets
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule amends the
regulation that defines two of the seven
designated spot markets and changing
the names of the affected markets.
Specifically, market price data for
cotton grown in Oklahoma and Kansas
are reassigned from the East Texas/
Oklahoma spot market to the West
Texas spot market. This action also
changes the names of these two markets
to describe the markets more accurately.
DATES: Effective August 1, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Meredith, Division Director,
Cotton Market News, Cotton & Tobacco
Program, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling
Road, Room 10, Memphis, TN 38133.
Telephone: (901) 384–3300, or Email:
Barbara.Meredith @usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Background
The Secretary of Agriculture is
authorized under the United States
Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b) to
designate at least five bona fide spot
markets from which cotton price
information can be collected. A spot
market—also called the ‘‘cash market’’
or ‘‘physical market’’—is a market
where commodities are sold on the spot
for cash at current market prices and
delivered immediately. Updated
designations for these bona fide spot
markets and the determination of which
counties and states compose each of
these spot markets were most recently
published in the Federal Register on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Jul 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
April 30, 2013 (78 FR 25181). For each
of these bona fide spot markets, the
Agricultural Marketing Service’s (AMS)
Cotton and Tobacco Program collects
market price information under the
United States Cotton Futures Act (7
U.S.C. 15b), the Cotton Statistics and
Estimates Act (7 U.S.C. 473b) and the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7
U.S.C. 1622(g)). This price information
is then used to calculate price
differences for cotton futures contracts.
The Cotton and Tobacco Program
(Program) received a request from the
American Cotton Shippers Association
(ACSA) and the National Cotton Council
of America (NCC), to evaluate the
structure of the cotton spot markets in
East and West Texas, Oklahoma, and
Kansas. The Program’s analysis of the
East Texas/Oklahoma market
determined that cotton grown in
Oklahoma and Kansas has similar
quality characteristics and was traded
under the same terms and conditions as
West Texas cotton. Further, the analysis
showed that there was not any
significant difference in the prices
reported to Cotton and Tobacco Market
News when comparing Oklahoma and
Kansas cotton to West Texas cotton. As
a result, ACSA and NCC requested that
market price data for cotton grown in
Oklahoma and Kansas be reassigned
from the East Texas/Oklahoma spot
market to the West Texas spot market by
amending the definitions of cotton spot
markets in 7 CFR part 27. Revisions to
the regulations concerning bona fide
spot market definitions are necessary to
assure consistency with the revised
Cotton Research and Promotion Act and
to allow for published spot quotes to
consider spot prices of cotton marketed
in Kansas and Oklahoma.
Corresponding changes the names of
these two spot markets are made to
describe the markets more accurately.
Comment Summary and Analysis
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on March 27, 2023 (88 FR
18076). A copy of the proposed rule was
made available through the internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 60-day comment period
ending May 26, 2023, was provided for
interested persons to respond to the
proposal. AMS received a total of seven
comments. Six of the seven comments
were explicitly supportive of the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
proposed action and one expressed
concern about market concentration
within the U.S. cotton industry, which
is not relevant to the proposed action.
Accordingly, no changes were made to
the rule as proposed.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation would not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal
governments and would not have
significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be non-significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866; and,
therefore has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. It is not intended to have
retroactive effect. There are no
administrative procedures that must be
exhausted prior to any judicial
challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this action on
small entities and has determined that
its implementation will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so
that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are
an estimated 25,000 cotton growers in
the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS
cotton classing services annually, and
the majority of these cotton growers are
small businesses under the criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201).
Changes in cotton spot market
definitions as stated will not
significantly affect small businesses as
defined in the RFA because:
(1) How spot prices are estimated are
not expected to be impacted by this
action;
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
49994
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 1, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Business practices of the U.S.
cotton industry are not expected to
change as a result of this action;
(3) Costs associated with providing
market news services will not be
significantly changed by this action;
(4) Market news services are paid for
by appropriated funds; therefore, users
are not charged fees for the provision of
the services.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations
(5 CFR part 1320), which implement the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501), the information collection
requirements contained in the
provisions amended by this rule have
been previously approved by OMB and
were assigned OMB control number
0581–0009, Cotton Classification and
Market News Service. No changes in
these requirements will be necessary as
a result of this rule. Should any changes
become necessary, they will be
submitted to OMB for approval.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
AMS has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 27 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 15b, 7 U.S.C. 473b, 7
U.S.C. 1622(g).
2. In § 27.93, the definitions of the
‘‘East Texas and Oklahoma,’’ and ‘‘West
Texas’’ markets are revised to read as
follows:
■
Bona fide spot markets.
*
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
East Texas and South Texas
Texas counties east of and including
Montague, Wise, Parker, Erath,
Comanche, Mills, San Saba, Mason,
Sutton, Edwards, Kinney, Maverick,
Webb, Zapata, Star and Hidalgo
counties.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Jul 31, 2023
Jkt 259001
*
*
*
*
(a) For cotton delivered in settlement
of any No. 2 contract on the
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE);
Southeastern, North and South Delta,
East Texas and South Texas, West
Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Desert
Southwest.
*
*
*
*
*
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–16295 Filed 7–31–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Parts 93 and 130
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
■
*
*
Process for Establishing Rates for
Veterinary Services User Fees
PART 27—COTTON CLASSIFICATION
UNDER COTTON FUTURES
LEGISLATION
*
§ 27.94 Spot markets for contract
settlement purposes.
RIN 0579–AE67
Commodity futures, Cotton.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Agricultural Marketing
Service amends 7 CFR part 27 as
follows:
*
All counties in Kansas and Oklahoma,
all Texas counties not included in the
East Texas, South Texas, and Desert
Southwest Markets and the New Mexico
counties of Union, Quay, Curry,
Roosevelt, and Lea.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 27.94, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
[Docket No. APHIS–2021–0052]
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 27
§ 27.93
West Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma
We are revising the
regulations concerning user fees that we
charge for veterinary diagnostic services
and for certain import-related and
export-related services for live animals,
animal products and byproducts, birds,
germplasm, organisms, and vectors. We
are removing the tables providing the
individual fees from the regulations and
posting them on an Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service website. The
regulations instead specify the
methodology (formula) used to calculate
the fees (including imputed costs), and
the fees will be updated using a noticebased process. Replacing the current
user fee listings with a standardized
methodology will increase transparency
in the process of setting fee rates, align
the regulations with other Agency
practices, and allow us to streamline
processes and reduce the number of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rules needed and thus the time
necessary in order to update the fees.
DATES:
This rule is effective August 31,
2023.
Ms.
Lisa Slimmer, User Fee Financial Team
Manager, Veterinary Services Money
Management, 920 Main Campus Drive,
Raleigh, NC 27606; (919) 855–7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The regulations in 9 CFR part 130
(referred to below as the regulations or
the user fee regulations) cover user fees
to reimburse the U.S. Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
for the costs of providing veterinary
diagnostic services and import/export
related services for live animals, animal
products and byproducts, poultry, birds,
germplasm, organisms, and vectors.
These user fees are authorized by
section 2509(c) of the Food, Agriculture,
Conservation, and Trade Act (FACT
Act) of 1990, as amended (21 U.S.C.
136a(c)), which provides that the
Secretary of Agriculture may, among
other things, prescribe regulations and
collect fees to recover the costs of
providing import/export related services
for animals, animal products and
byproducts, birds, germplasm,
organisms, and vectors, and for
veterinary diagnostics relating to the
control and eradication of
communicable diseases of livestock or
poultry within the United States.
Since fiscal year (FY) 1992, APHIS
has received no directly appropriated
funds to cover the cost of certain
veterinary diagnostics or to provide
import/export related services for
animals, animal products and
byproducts, birds, germplasm,
organisms, and vectors. Our ability to
provide these services depends on user
fees. User fees are associated with
providing services for live animal,
animal product, bird, and germplasm
imports and exports and fund, among
other things, quarantine services, the
processing of import permit
applications, port of entry inspections,
inspections and approvals of import/
export facilities and establishments,
endorsements of export certificates, and
services related to emergency situations
that arise during the export or import
process.
Discussion of Comments
On October 3, 2022, we published in
the Federal Register (87 FR 59731–
59740, Docket No. APHIS–2021–0052) a
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 1, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49993-49994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16295]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 146 / Tuesday, August 1, 2023 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 49993]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 27
[Doc. No. AMS-CN-22-0061]
Redefining Bona Fide Cotton Spot Markets
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the regulation that defines two of the seven
designated spot markets and changing the names of the affected markets.
Specifically, market price data for cotton grown in Oklahoma and Kansas
are reassigned from the East Texas/Oklahoma spot market to the West
Texas spot market. This action also changes the names of these two
markets to describe the markets more accurately.
DATES: Effective August 1, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Meredith, Division Director,
Cotton Market News, Cotton & Tobacco Program, AMS, USDA, 3275 Appling
Road, Room 10, Memphis, TN 38133. Telephone: (901) 384-3300, or Email:
Barbara.Meredith @usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized under the United States
Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b) to designate at least five bona fide
spot markets from which cotton price information can be collected. A
spot market--also called the ``cash market'' or ``physical market''--is
a market where commodities are sold on the spot for cash at current
market prices and delivered immediately. Updated designations for these
bona fide spot markets and the determination of which counties and
states compose each of these spot markets were most recently published
in the Federal Register on April 30, 2013 (78 FR 25181). For each of
these bona fide spot markets, the Agricultural Marketing Service's
(AMS) Cotton and Tobacco Program collects market price information
under the United States Cotton Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15b), the Cotton
Statistics and Estimates Act (7 U.S.C. 473b) and the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1622(g)). This price information is
then used to calculate price differences for cotton futures contracts.
The Cotton and Tobacco Program (Program) received a request from
the American Cotton Shippers Association (ACSA) and the National Cotton
Council of America (NCC), to evaluate the structure of the cotton spot
markets in East and West Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. The Program's
analysis of the East Texas/Oklahoma market determined that cotton grown
in Oklahoma and Kansas has similar quality characteristics and was
traded under the same terms and conditions as West Texas cotton.
Further, the analysis showed that there was not any significant
difference in the prices reported to Cotton and Tobacco Market News
when comparing Oklahoma and Kansas cotton to West Texas cotton. As a
result, ACSA and NCC requested that market price data for cotton grown
in Oklahoma and Kansas be reassigned from the East Texas/Oklahoma spot
market to the West Texas spot market by amending the definitions of
cotton spot markets in 7 CFR part 27. Revisions to the regulations
concerning bona fide spot market definitions are necessary to assure
consistency with the revised Cotton Research and Promotion Act and to
allow for published spot quotes to consider spot prices of cotton
marketed in Kansas and Oklahoma. Corresponding changes the names of
these two spot markets are made to describe the markets more
accurately.
Comment Summary and Analysis
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on March 27, 2023 (88 FR 18076). A copy of the proposed rule
was made available through the internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending May 26, 2023, was
provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. AMS
received a total of seven comments. Six of the seven comments were
explicitly supportive of the proposed action and one expressed concern
about market concentration within the U.S. cotton industry, which is
not relevant to the proposed action. Accordingly, no changes were made
to the rule as proposed.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements
of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments. The review reveals that this regulation would not
have substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and would not
have significant Tribal implications.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be non-significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866; and, therefore has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. There
are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted prior to any
judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), AMS has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities and has determined that its
implementation will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small businesses.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened. There are an estimated 25,000 cotton
growers in the U.S. who voluntarily use the AMS cotton classing
services annually, and the majority of these cotton growers are small
businesses under the criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201).
Changes in cotton spot market definitions as stated will not
significantly affect small businesses as defined in the RFA because:
(1) How spot prices are estimated are not expected to be impacted
by this action;
[[Page 49994]]
(2) Business practices of the U.S. cotton industry are not expected
to change as a result of this action;
(3) Costs associated with providing market news services will not
be significantly changed by this action;
(4) Market news services are paid for by appropriated funds;
therefore, users are not charged fees for the provision of the
services.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320), which
implement the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501), the
information collection requirements contained in the provisions amended
by this rule have been previously approved by OMB and were assigned OMB
control number 0581-0009, Cotton Classification and Market News
Service. No changes in these requirements will be necessary as a result
of this rule. Should any changes become necessary, they will be
submitted to OMB for approval.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
AMS has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 27
Commodity futures, Cotton.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Agricultural
Marketing Service amends 7 CFR part 27 as follows:
PART 27--COTTON CLASSIFICATION UNDER COTTON FUTURES LEGISLATION
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 27 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 15b, 7 U.S.C. 473b, 7 U.S.C. 1622(g).
0
2. In Sec. 27.93, the definitions of the ``East Texas and Oklahoma,''
and ``West Texas'' markets are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 27.93 Bona fide spot markets.
* * * * *
East Texas and South Texas
Texas counties east of and including Montague, Wise, Parker, Erath,
Comanche, Mills, San Saba, Mason, Sutton, Edwards, Kinney, Maverick,
Webb, Zapata, Star and Hidalgo counties.
West Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma
All counties in Kansas and Oklahoma, all Texas counties not
included in the East Texas, South Texas, and Desert Southwest Markets
and the New Mexico counties of Union, Quay, Curry, Roosevelt, and Lea.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 27.94, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 27.94 Spot markets for contract settlement purposes.
* * * * *
(a) For cotton delivered in settlement of any No. 2 contract on the
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE); Southeastern, North and South Delta,
East Texas and South Texas, West Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Desert
Southwest.
* * * * *
Erin Morris,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-16295 Filed 7-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P