Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act and Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act, 49496-49497 [2023-16191]
Download as PDF
49496
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 145 / Monday, July 31, 2023 / Notices
7413(b) and 7477, for violation of (1) the
CAA’s Prevention of Significant
Deterioration of Air Quality (PSD)
provisions; (2) the CAA’s New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS)
provisions and the NSPS regulations for
ferroalloy production facilities (subpart
Z), and (3) the Ohio State
Implementation Plan’s opacity limits, as
incorporated into Globe’s Title V
permit, and Ohio’s Title V permit
program. Under the proposed Consent
Decree, Globe will pay a $2.6 million
civil penalty, construct a new baghouse,
restrict sulfur content of process inputs
to specified limits, and implement a
detailed monitoring regime to address
opacity concerns. Additionally, as
mitigation for past exceedances, Globe
will extend its sulfur content limits and
Subpart Z obligations to all furnaces.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Globe Metallurgical,
Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–11643. All
comments must be submitted no later
than 30 days after the publication date
of this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $17.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Patricia S. McKenna,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–16190 Filed 7–28–23; 8:45 am]
18:11 Jul 28, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act and Emergency Planning and
Community Right-To-Know Act
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. Robert Yundt Homes,
LLC, et al., No. 3:23–cv–00073–JMK,
was lodged with the United States
District Court for the District of Alaska
on July 24, 2023.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Defendants Robert
Yundt Homes, LLC, and Robert D.
Yundt II, pursuant to sections 309(b)
and (d) of the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), to obtain
injunctive relief from and impose civil
penalties against Defendants for
violating the Clean Water Act by
discharging pollutants without a permit
into waters of the United States and
violating Administrative Orders on
Consent issued by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). The proposed Consent Decree
resolves these allegations by requiring
Defendants to restore the impacted
areas, perform mitigation pursuant to
EPA-approved restoration plans, and
pay a civil penalty.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to this
proposed Consent Decree for 30 days
from the date of publication of this
Notice. Please address comments to
Daniel J. Martin, United States
Department of Justice, Environment and
Natural Resources Division,
Environmental Defense Section, Post
Office Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044,
or pubcomment_eds.enrd@usdoj.gov,
and refer to United States v. Robert
Yundt Homes, LLC, et al., DJ # 90–5–1–
1–22275.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the District of
Alaska, James M. Fitzgerald United
States Courthouse and Federal Building,
222 West 7th Avenue, Room 229,
Anchorage, AK 99513. In addition, the
proposed Consent Decree may be
examined electronically at https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
Cherie Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Defense Section, Environment and Natural
Resources Division.
On July 26, 2023 the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Rhode Island in
the lawsuit entitled United States v.
Taylor Farms New England, Inc., Civil
Action No. 1:23–cv–00311.
The United States filed this lawsuit
under the Clean Air Act and the
Emergency Planning and Community
Right-To-Know Act. The United States’
complaint seeks injunctive relief and
civil penalties for violations of the
statutory and regulatory provisions that
govern the prevention and notice of
accidental releases of extremely
hazardous substances at the defendant’s
food processing facility in North
Kingstown, Rhode Island. The consent
decree requires the defendant to
perform injunctive relief and pay a
$650,000 civil penalty.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Taylor Farms New
England, Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–
12458. All comments must be submitted
no later than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
[FR Doc. 2023–16084 Filed 7–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 145 / Monday, July 31, 2023 / Notices
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Henry S. Friedman,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–16191 Filed 7–28–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2023–
17; Exemption Application No. D–11963]
Exemption From Certain Prohibited
Transaction Restrictions Involving J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan
Investment Management Inc., J.P.
Morgan Advisors (Formerly, J.P.
Morgan Securities; JPMS Brokerage),
and Chase Wealth Management
Located in New York, New York
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of exemption.
AGENCY:
This document contains a
notice of exemption issued by the
Department of Labor (the Department)
from certain of the prohibited
transaction restrictions of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). This
exemption involves certain principal
trades involving J.P. Morgan Securities
LLC (JPMS), J.P. Morgan Investment
Management Inc. (JPMIM), J.P. Morgan
Advisors (formerly, J.P. Morgan
Securities; JPMS Brokerage), and Chase
Wealth Management (CWM)
(collectively, the Applicants), and
certain of their client plans that are
subject to Code section 4975 but not
covered by Title I of ERISA (the NonERISA Plan Clients).1 These principal
transactions resulted in the Non-ERISA
Plan Clients purchasing or selling
securities from or to the Applicants.
DATES: The exemption will be in effect
from December 14, 2010, until
September 16, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Anna Vaughan of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8565. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Applicants requested an individual
exemption pursuant to Code section
4975(c)(2) in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 29 CFR part
2570, subpart B (76 FR 66637, 66644,
October 27, 2011). Effective December
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
31, 1978, section 102 of the
Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, (5
U.S.C. App. 1 (1996)) transferred the
authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Accordingly, this exemption is being
issued solely by the Department.
On October 15, 2021, the Department
published a notice of proposed
exemption in the Federal Register.2
After considering the entire record
developed in connection with the
Applicants’ exemption application,
including the information discussed
below, the Department has determined
to grant the exemption subject to the
conditions described below. The
exemption provides only the relief
specified in its text and does not
provide relief from violations of any law
other than the prohibited transaction
provisions of ERISA expressly stated
herein. The Department makes the
requisite findings under Code section
4975(c)(2) that the exemption is (1)
administratively feasible, (2) in the
interest of the plans and their
participants and beneficiaries, and (3)
protective of the rights of the plans’
participants and beneficiaries, so long as
all of the exemption conditions are met.
Accordingly, affected parties should be
aware that the conditions incorporated
in this exemption are, taken as a whole,
necessary for the Department to grant
the relief requested by the Applicants.
Absent these or similar conditions, the
Department would not have granted this
exemption.
Background
1. As discussed in further detail in the
notice of proposed exemption, and
described below, JPMS and JPMIM
previously caused or executed
prohibited principal transactions on
behalf of certain plan clients covered by
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA Plan
Clients) and on behalf of certain plan
clients covered only by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (Non-ERISA Plan
Clients).3 The Applicants previously
corrected the ERISA Plan Client-related
prohibited transactions under the
Department’s Voluntary Fiduciary
Compliance Program (the VFC Program)
and received ‘‘no action letters.’’ 4
2. The VFC Program is not available
to correct prohibited transactions
involving non-ERISA plans. Therefore,
the Applicants requested an exemption
for JPMS and JPMIM to correct the
2 86
FR 57446 (October 15, 2021).
FR 57446 (October 15, 2021).
4 See 67 FR 15062 (March. 28, 2002), as updated
at 71 FR 20262 (April 19, 2006).
3 86
1 JPMS Brokerage and CWM are lines of business
within JPMS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Jul 28, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49497
prohibited principal transactions that
involved their Non-ERISA Plan Clients
(the Covered Transactions).
The Covered Transactions Involving
JPMIM 5
3. A total of 3,989 trades of securities
issued by third parties were executed
for the Chase Wealth Management line
of business (the CWM Wrap Program)
on a principal basis. According to the
Applicants, 3,985 of the trades were
sales by a Non-ERISA Plan Client to a
counterparty (a JPM Counterparty)
affiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPMorgan), with an aggregate sales
price of $2,682,332.34 (the JPMIM Sales
Transactions),6 and four trades were
purchases by a Non-ERISA Plan Client
from a JPM Counterparty (the JPMIM
Purchase Transactions) with an
aggregate purchase price of $46,940.55.
The purchased shares had not been resold by the Non-ERISA Plan Client as of
the date the transactions were
corrected.7 The Applicants represent
that JPMIM and JPMS endeavored to
correct the prohibited transactions as
quickly as possible in the manner
described under the ‘‘Covered
Transaction Corrections’’ heading of the
proposed exemption.8
4. The Applicants represent that the
trades did not result in any
commissions being paid by the NonERISA Plan Clients to JPMIM or its
affiliates. Rather, the trades were
executed under the CWM Wrap
Program, under which all clients pay a
wrap fee (i.e., a comprehensive charge)
that covered all of the investment
advisory-related and transactional
services provided by JPMorgan to such
accounts. As a result, no additional
compensation was paid in connection
with either the JPMIM Sales
Transactions or the JPMIM Purchase
Transactions. The Applicants represent
that JPMIM is no longer enabled to
execute trades on JPM–X, an
‘‘alternative trading system’’ owned and
operated by JPMS.
5. Further, the Applicants represent
that there were no identifiable profits
received by JPMIM or its affiliates in
connection with any of the
aforementioned transactions, because
the securities traded were liquid
securities that JPMorgan and its
affiliates regularly hold in inventory,
deal in or make a market in. In this
regard, because JPMorgan is a market
5 As described more fully in the proposed
exemption and in Section II, below.
6 These trades involved 3,784 Non-ERISA Plan
Clients.
7 These trades involved two Non-ERISA Plan
Clients.
8 86 FR 57446, 57448.
E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM
31JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 145 (Monday, July 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49496-49497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16191]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act and Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act
On July 26, 2023 the Department of Justice lodged a proposed
Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District
of Rhode Island in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Taylor Farms
New England, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00311.
The United States filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air Act and
the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act. The United
States' complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties for
violations of the statutory and regulatory provisions that govern the
prevention and notice of accidental releases of extremely hazardous
substances at the defendant's food processing facility in North
Kingstown, Rhode Island. The consent decree requires the defendant to
perform injunctive relief and pay a $650,000 civil penalty.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and
should refer to United States v. Taylor Farms New England, Inc., D.J.
Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-12458. All comments must be submitted no later than
thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments
may be submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ [email protected].
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of
the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ--
[[Page 49497]]
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Henry S. Friedman,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-16191 Filed 7-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P