Television Broadcasting Services Knoxville, Tennessee, 48784-48785 [2023-16040]

Download as PDF 48784 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2023 / Proposed Rules measures to remedy any future violations of the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS and procedures for evaluating potential violations. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 IX. Proposed Actions EPA is proposing to: (1) Approve the maintenance plan for the Northern Kentucky Area, including the NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2026 and 2035, and incorporate it into the Kentucky SIP, and (2) approve Kentucky’s redesignation request for the 2015 8hour ozone NAAQS for the Area. Further, as part of this proposed action, EPA is also describing the status of its adequacy determination for the NOX and VOC MVEBs for the 2026 and 2035 in accordance with 40 CFR 93.118(f)(1). Within 24 months from the effective date of EPA’s adequacy determination for the MVEBs or the effective date for the final rule for this action, whichever is earlier, the transportation partners will need to demonstrate conformity to the new NOX and VOC MVEBs pursuant to 40 CFR 93.104(e)(3). If finalized, approval of the redesignation request would change the official designation of a portion of Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties in Kentucky for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS from nonattainment to attainment, as found at 40 CFR part 81. X. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the accompanying approval of a maintenance plan under section 107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the status of a geographical area and do not impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those imposed by State law. A redesignation to attainment does not in and of itself create any new requirements, but rather results in the applicability of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. These actions merely propose to approve State law as meeting Federal requirements and do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, these proposed actions: • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Jul 27, 2023 Jkt 259001 October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Do not impose an information collection burdens under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Do not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Are not economically significant regulatory actions based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Are not significant regulatory actions subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and • Are not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rules do not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address ‘‘disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects’’ of their actions on minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that ‘‘no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 commercial operations or programs and policies.’’ The Cabinet and District did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part of its redesignation request or SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ as part of Kentucky’s redesignation request or SIP submittal in these proposed actions. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of these proposed actions, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples. List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Jeaneanne Gettle, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2023–16223 Filed 7–27–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [MB Docket No. 23–244; RM–11955; DA 23– 622; FR ID 157779] Television Broadcasting Services Knoxville, Tennessee Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Commission has before it a petition for rulemaking filed by Tennessee TV, LLC (Petitioner), the licensee of WKNX–TV, channel 7, Knoxville, Tennessee. The Petitioner requests the substitution of channel 21 for channel 7 at Knoxville in the Table of Allotments. DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 28, 2023 and reply comments on or before September 11, 2023. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM 28JYP1 48785 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 144 / Friday, July 28, 2023 / Proposed Rules Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for the Petitioner as follows: Coe W. Ramsey, Esq., Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey and Leonard, L.L.P, Wells Fargo Capitol Center, Suite 1700, Raleigh, NC 27601. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at (202) 418–1647; or Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In support, the Petitioner states that WKNX–TV’s proposed channel substitution would serve the public interest by resolving current reception challenges within the Station’s existing service area. Viewers within the Station’s currently authorized channel 7 service area have experienced difficulty receiving the Station’s signal, particularly since the June 12, 2009 digital transition. Petitioner further states that the Commission has recognized that VHF channels pose challenges for their use in providing digital television service, including propagation characteristics that allow undesired signals and noise to be receivable at relatively far distances and large variability in the performance of indoor antennas available to viewers, with most antennas performing very poorly on high VHF channels. The Petitioner’s engineering analysis shows that the 50,322 persons currently located in the loss area along the eastern, southern, and western fringes of the proposed channel 21 facility would continue to be within the noise limited contour of least five other full power or lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 ADDRESSES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Jul 27, 2023 Jkt 259001 Class A television stations, including four other Knoxville television stations. This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 23–244; RM–11955; DA 23–622, adopted July 20, 2023, and released July 20, 2023. The full text of this document is available for download at https://www.fcc.gov/edocs. To request materials in accessible formats (braille, large print, computer diskettes, or audio recordings), please send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (VOICE), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). This document does not contain information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601– 612, do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that all ex parte contacts are prohibited from the time a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is issued to the time the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, see 47 CFR 1.1208. There are, however, exceptions to this prohibition, which can be found in Section 1.1204(a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.1204(a). See Sections 1.415 and 1.420 of the Commission’s rules for information regarding the proper filing procedures for comments, 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Television. Federal Communications Commission. Thomas Horan, Chief of Staff, Media Bureau. Proposed Rule For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICE 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 307, 309, 310, 334, 336, 339. 2. In § 73.622, in the table in paragraph (j), under Tennessee, revise the entry for Knoxville to read as follows: ■ § 73.622 Digital television table of allotments. * * * (j) * * * * * Community * Channel No. * * * * Tennessee * * Knoxville ........ * * * * * 10, 15, 21, 26, * 29, 34. * * [FR Doc. 2023–16040 Filed 7–27–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P E:\FR\FM\28JYP1.SGM 28JYP1 *

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48784-48785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16040]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 23-244; RM-11955; DA 23-622; FR ID 157779]


Television Broadcasting Services Knoxville, Tennessee

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission has before it a petition for rulemaking filed 
by Tennessee TV, LLC (Petitioner), the licensee of WKNX-TV, channel 7, 
Knoxville, Tennessee. The Petitioner requests the substitution of 
channel 21 for channel 7 at Knoxville in the Table of Allotments.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 28, 2023 and reply 
comments on or before September 11, 2023.

[[Page 48785]]


ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 
45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments 
with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for the 
Petitioner as follows: Coe W. Ramsey, Esq., Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, 
Humphrey and Leonard, L.L.P, Wells Fargo Capitol Center, Suite 1700, 
Raleigh, NC 27601.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at 
(202) 418-1647; or Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In support, the Petitioner states that WKNX-
TV's proposed channel substitution would serve the public interest by 
resolving current reception challenges within the Station's existing 
service area. Viewers within the Station's currently authorized channel 
7 service area have experienced difficulty receiving the Station's 
signal, particularly since the June 12, 2009 digital transition. 
Petitioner further states that the Commission has recognized that VHF 
channels pose challenges for their use in providing digital television 
service, including propagation characteristics that allow undesired 
signals and noise to be receivable at relatively far distances and 
large variability in the performance of indoor antennas available to 
viewers, with most antennas performing very poorly on high VHF 
channels. The Petitioner's engineering analysis shows that the 50,322 
persons currently located in the loss area along the eastern, southern, 
and western fringes of the proposed channel 21 facility would continue 
to be within the noise limited contour of least five other full power 
or Class A television stations, including four other Knoxville 
television stations.
    This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 23-244; RM-11955; DA 23-622, adopted July 20, 
2023, and released July 20, 2023. The full text of this document is 
available for download at https://www.fcc.gov/edocs. To request 
materials in accessible formats (braille, large print, computer 
diskettes, or audio recordings), please send an email to [email protected] 
or call the Consumer & Government Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 
(VOICE), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
    This document does not contain information collection requirements 
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In 
addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information 
collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer than 25 
employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 
2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, do not apply to 
this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited from the time a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is issued to 
the time the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or 
court review, see 47 CFR 1.1208. There are, however, exceptions to this 
prohibition, which can be found in Section 1.1204(a) of the 
Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1204(a).
    See Sections 1.415 and 1.420 of the Commission's rules for 
information regarding the proper filing procedures for comments, 47 CFR 
1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television.

Federal Communications Commission.
Thomas Horan,
Chief of Staff, Media Bureau.

Proposed Rule

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICE

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 301, 303, 307, 309, 310, 334, 
336, 339.

0
2. In Sec.  73.622, in the table in paragraph (j), under Tennessee, 
revise the entry for Knoxville to read as follows:


Sec.  73.622  Digital television table of allotments.

* * * * *
    (j) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Community                           Channel No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Tennessee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                * * * * *
Knoxville.................................  10, 15, 21, 26, * 29, 34.
 
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[FR Doc. 2023-16040 Filed 7-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.