1,4-Dioxane; Draft Revision to Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Risk Determination; Notice of Availability and Request for Comment, 48249-48259 [2023-15846]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
II. What action is the Agency taking?
This notice announces receipt by the
Agency of requests from registrants to
cancel certain pesticide products
registered under FIFRA section 3 (7
U.S.C. 136a) or 24(c) (7 U.S.C. 136v(c)).
These registrations are listed in
sequence by registration number (or
company number and 24(c) number) in
Table 1 of this unit.
48249
Unless the Agency determines that
there are substantive comments that
warrant further review of the requests or
the registrants withdraw their requests,
EPA intends to issue an order in the
Federal Register canceling all of the
affected registrations.
TABLE 1—REGISTRATIONS WITH PENDING REQUESTS FOR CANCELLATION
Registration
No.
Company
No.
10163–171 ...............................................
10163–215 ...............................................
10163–313 ...............................................
10163
10163
10163
Table 2 of this unit includes the
names and addresses of record for all
registrants of the products in Table 1 of
this unit, in sequence by EPA company
number. This number corresponds to
the first part of the EPA registration
numbers of the products listed in this
unit.
TABLE 2—REGISTRANTS REQUESTING
VOLUNTARY CANCELLATION
EPA
company
No.
10163 .....
Company name and address
Gowan Company, LLC, 370 S
Main St., Yuma, AZ 85366.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
III. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C.
136d(f)(1)) provides that a registrant of
a pesticide product may at any time
request that any of its pesticide
registrations be canceled. FIFRA further
provides that, before acting on the
request, EPA must publish a notice of
receipt of any such request in the
Federal Register.
Section 6(f)(1)(B) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C.
136d(f)(1)(B)) requires that before acting
on a request for voluntary cancellation,
EPA must provide a 30-day public
comment period on the request for
voluntary cancellation or use
termination. In addition, FIFRA section
6(f)(1)(C) (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)(C))
requires that EPA provide a 180-day
comment period on a request for
voluntary cancellation or termination of
any minor agricultural use before
granting the request, unless:
1. The registrants request a waiver of
the comment period, or
2. The EPA Administrator determines
that continued use of the pesticide
would pose an unreasonable adverse
effect on the environment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
Product name
Active ingredients
Imidan 1–E Insecticide ............................
Imidan 2.5–EC .........................................
Imidan 60 WDG .......................................
The registrants in Table 2 of Unit II,
have not requested that EPA waive the
180-day comment period. Accordingly,
EPA will provide a 180-day comment
period on the proposed requests.
IV. Procedures for Withdrawal of
Request
Phosmet (059201/732–11–6)—(11.7%).
Phosmet (059201/732–11–6)—(27.5%).
Phosmet (059201/732–11–6)—(60%).
previously approved labeling on, or that
accompanied, the canceled products.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: July 19, 2023.
Charles Smith,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2023–15815 Filed 7–25–23; 8:45 am]
Registrants who choose to withdraw a
request for cancellation should submit
such withdrawal in writing to the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. If the products
have been subject to a previous
cancellation action, the effective date of
cancellation and all other provisions of
any earlier cancellation action are
controlling.
V. Provisions for Disposition of Existing
Stocks
Existing stocks are those stocks of
registered pesticide products that are
currently in the United States and that
were packaged, labeled, and released for
shipment prior to the effective date of
the cancellation action. Because the
Agency has identified no significant
potential risk concerns associated with
these pesticide products, upon
cancellation of the products identified
in Table 1 of Unit II, EPA anticipates
allowing registrants to sell and
distribute existing stocks of these
products for 1 year after publication of
the Cancellation Order in the Federal
Register.
Thereafter, registrants will be
prohibited from selling or distributing
the pesticides identified in Table 1 of
Unit II, except for export consistent with
FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o) or for
proper disposal. Persons other than
registrants will generally be allowed to
sell, distribute, or use existing stocks
until such stocks are exhausted,
provided that such sale, distribution, or
use is consistent with the terms of the
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–0723; FRL–7918–02–
OCSPP]
1,4-Dioxane; Draft Revision to Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) Risk
Determination; Notice of Availability
and Request for Comment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and requesting public
comment on a draft revision to the risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane following
a risk evaluation issued under TSCA.
EPA published a risk evaluation for 1,4dioxane in December 2020 and a draft
supplement to the risk evaluation in
July 2023. This draft revision to the 1,4dioxane risk determination reflects
policy changes announced in June 2021,
to ensure the public is protected from
unreasonable risks from chemicals in a
way that is supported by science and
the law, as well as information from the
2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation. In this draft revision to the
risk determination EPA has
preliminarily determined that 1,4dioxane, as a whole chemical substance,
presents an unreasonable risk of injury
to health when evaluated under its
conditions of use. This draft risk
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
48250
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
determination considers the
occupational and consumer exposures
from the December 2020 Risk
Evaluation, as well as the occupational,
general population, and fenceline
community exposures in the draft
supplement to the risk evaluation,
including exposures that result from
conditions of use where 1,4-dioxane is
present due to production as a
byproduct and the risks from general
population and fenceline communities’
exposures to 1,4-dioxane released under
the conditions of use to drinking water
sourced from surface and ground water
and ambient air. In addition, this
revised risk determination does not
reflect an assumption that all workers
always appropriately wear personal
protective equipment (PPE). EPA
understands that there could be
adequate occupational safety
protections in place at certain
workplace locations; however, not
assuming use of PPE reflects EPA’s
recognition that unreasonable risk may
exist for subpopulations of workers that
may be highly exposed because they are
not covered by Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA)
standards, or their employers are out of
compliance with OSHA standards, or
because many of OSHA’s chemicalspecific permissible exposure limits
largely adopted in the 1970’s are
described by OSHA as being ‘‘outdated
and inadequate for ensuring protection
of worker health,’’ or because EPA finds
unreasonable risk for purposes of TSCA
notwithstanding OSHA requirements.
This revision, when final, would
supersede the condition of use-specific
no unreasonable risk determinations in
the December 2020 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation (and withdraw the associated
order) and would make a revised
determination of unreasonable risk for
1,4-dioxane as a whole chemical
substance.
Comments must be received on
or before September 8, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA—EPA–HQ–OPPT–2016–
0723, through https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
For technical information contact:
Cindy Wheeler, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (7404M),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; telephone number: (202)
566–0484; email address:
dioxane.TSCA@EPA.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. This action may, however, be
of interest to those involved in the
manufacture, processing, distribution,
use, disposal, and/or the assessment of
risks involving chemical substances and
mixtures. You may be potentially
affected by this action if you
manufacture (defined under TSCA to
include import), process (including
recycling), distribute in commerce, use,
or dispose of 1,4-dioxane, including 1,4dioxane in products and including
processes that produce 1,4-dioxane as a
byproduct. Since other entities may also
be interested in this draft revision to the
risk determination, EPA has not
attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
action.
B. What is EPA’s authority for taking
this action?
TSCA section 6, 15 U.S.C. 2605,
requires EPA to conduct risk
evaluations to determine whether a
chemical substance presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or
the environment, without consideration
of costs or other non-risk factors,
including an unreasonable risk to a
potentially exposed or susceptible
subpopulation (PESS) identified as
relevant to the risk evaluation by the
Administrator, under the conditions of
use. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(A). TSCA
sections 6(b)(4)(A) through (H)
enumerate the deadlines and minimum
requirements applicable to this process,
including provisions that provide
instruction on chemical substances that
must undergo evaluation, the minimum
components of a TSCA risk evaluation,
and the timelines for public comment
and completion of the risk evaluation.
TSCA also requires that EPA operate in
a manner that is consistent with the best
available science, make decisions based
on the weight of the scientific evidence,
and consider reasonably available
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information. 15 U.S.C. 2625(h), (i), and
(k).
The statute identifies the minimum
components for all chemical substance
risk evaluations. For each risk
evaluation, EPA must publish a
document that outlines the scope of the
risk evaluation to be conducted, which
includes the hazards, exposures,
conditions of use, and the potentially
exposed or susceptible subpopulations
that EPA expects to consider. 15 U.S.C.
2605(b)(4)(D). The statute further
provides that each risk evaluation must
also: (1) integrate and assess available
information on hazards and exposures
for the conditions of use of the chemical
substance, including information that is
relevant to specific risks of injury to
health or the environment and
information on relevant potentially
exposed or susceptible subpopulations;
(2) describe whether aggregate or
sentinel exposures were considered and
the basis for that consideration; (3) take
into account, where relevant, the likely
duration, intensity, frequency, and
number of exposures under the
conditions of use; and (4) describe the
weight of the scientific evidence for the
identified hazards and exposures. 15
U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(F)(i) through (ii) and
(iv) through (v). Each risk evaluation
must not consider costs or other nonrisk factors. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(F)(iii).
EPA has inherent authority to
reconsider previous decisions and to
revise, replace, or repeal a decision to
the extent permitted by law and
supported by reasoned explanation. FCC
v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S.
502, 515 (2009); see also Motor Vehicle
Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm Mutual Auto.
Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 42 (1983).
Pursuant to such authority, EPA is
reconsidering the risk determinations in
the December 2020 1,4-Dioxane Risk
Evaluation and issuing a 2023 draft risk
determination that encompasses the
information in the 2023 Draft
Supplement to the risk evaluation.
C. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is announcing the availability of
and seeking public comment on a 2023
draft revision to the risk determination
for the 2020 1,4-Dioxane Risk
Evaluation under TSCA (Ref. 1). This
includes revision to the risk
determination initially published in
December 2020 (Ref. 2) and addition of
information from the 2023 Draft
Supplement to the risk evaluation (Ref.
3), which includes evaluation of
additional conditions of use of 1,4dioxane and critical exposure pathways
not included in the 2020 1,4-Dioxane
Risk Evaluation. EPA has announced
the availability of the 2023 Draft
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
Supplement to the risk evaluation in a
separate Federal Register notice, which
also describes the requests for public
comment and the peer review process
for the 2023 Draft Supplement (88 FR
43562, July 10, 2023) (FRL–10798–02–
OCSPP).
EPA is seeking public comment on
the draft revision to the risk
determination for the risk evaluation
where the agency preliminarily intends
to determine that 1,4-dioxane, as a
whole chemical, presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health
when evaluated under its conditions of
use. The Agency has preliminarily
determined that the risk determination
for 1,4-dioxane is better characterized as
a whole chemical risk determination
rather than condition-of-use-specific
risk determinations. Accordingly, EPA
would revise and replace section 5 of
the 2020 Risk Evaluation for 1,4-dioxane
where the findings of unreasonable risk
to health were previously made for the
individual conditions of use evaluated.
EPA would also withdraw the order
issued previously for two conditions of
use previously determined not to
present unreasonable risk. However,
before finalization of the risk
determination, EPA is specifically
seeking public comment on several
aspects of the 2023 draft unreasonable
risk determination, including EPA’s
finding that general population and
fenceline community exposure to 1,4dioxane in drinking water contributes to
the determination that 1,4-dioxane
presents an unreasonable risk and
whether the risks to the general
population and fenceline communities
from drinking water exposure can be
attributed to specific conditions of use
of 1,4-dioxane. A more robust
description of the request for comment
is in Unit II.D.
This proposed revision to the 2020
unreasonable risk determination would
be consistent with EPA’s plans to revise
specific aspects of the first ten TSCA
chemical risk evaluations in order to
ensure that the risk evaluations better
align with TSCA’s objective of
protecting health and the environment.
EPA proposes that the 2023 draft
revision would include several changes.
First, EPA would make an unreasonable
risk determination for 1,4-dioxane as a
whole chemical substance, rather than
making unreasonable risk
determinations separately on each
individual condition of use evaluated in
the risk evaluation. EPA proposes that
this is the most appropriate approach to
1,4-dioxane under the statute and
implementing regulations, with more
explanation provided in Unit II.C.1.
Second, EPA would remove the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
assumption that workers always and
appropriately wear PPE (see Unit II.C.)
in making the whole chemical risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane. The
impacts of this change are described in
detail in Unit II.C.2. Third, based on the
2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation, several additional
conditions of use would also contribute
to the unreasonable risk determination
due to worker inhalation and dermal
risks; these are described in more detail
in Unit II.C.3. Fourth, EPA proposes to
include risks to the general population
and fenceline communities from
drinking water sourced from surface
water contaminated with 1,4-dioxane
that is discharged from industrial
facilities (including where it is
produced as a byproduct) as
contributing to the unreasonable risk
from 1,4-dioxane and is seeking public
comment on several issues. These risks
are described in more detail in Unit
II.C.4 and a description of the request
for comment is in Unit II.D. The list of
the conditions of use evaluated for the
1,4-dioxane TSCA risk evaluation is in
Table 6–1 of the draft revised
unreasonable risk determination (Ref. 1)
and in Table D–1 of the 2023 Draft
Supplement to the Risk Evaluation for
1,4-Dioxane (Ref. 3)).
D. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
comments.html.
II. Background
A. What is 1,4-dioxane and what did
EPA evaluate in 2020?
1,4-Dioxane is primarily used as a
solvent in commercial and industrial
applications. It can also be produced as
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48251
a byproduct of several common
manufacturing processes, including but
not limited to ethoxylation processes
used in the production of surfactants
used in soaps and detergents and
production of polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) plastics. 1,4Dioxane produced as a byproduct may
remain present in consumer and
commercial products, including soaps
and detergents, cleaning products,
antifreeze, textile dyes, and paints/
lacquers. 1,4-Dioxane is released to the
environment from industrial and
commercial releases and from consumer
and commercial products that are
washed down the drain or disposed of
in landfills. People may be exposed to
1,4-dioxane through occupational
exposure, consumer products, or contact
with water, land, or air where 1,4dioxane has been released to the
environment. Health effects of 1,4dioxane include risks of liver toxicity,
adverse effects in the olfactory
epithelium, and cancer.
1,4-Dioxane is one of the first 10
chemical substances undergoing the
TSCA risk evaluation process under
TSCA section 6(b). In 2019, EPA
released the draft 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation, which assessed risk from
occupational exposures and surface
water exposures to environmental
organisms. This assessment, which
included the physical and chemical
properties, lifecycle information,
environmental fate and transport
information, and hazard identification
and dose-response analysis received
public comment, was reviewed by the
Science Advisory Committee on
Chemicals (SACC). The Agency
considered the SACC feedback and is
not seeking additional review of that
information at this time as this
information has not changed.
A 2020 supplement to the draft 1,4dioxane risk evaluation assessed an
additional eight additional conditions of
use of 1,4-dioxane present in consumer
products and general population
exposure to 1,4-dioxane from incidental
contact with surface water. Both
assessments were incorporated into the
2020 Risk Evaluation, which was
released in December 2020.
The December 2020 Risk Evaluation
assessed a total of 24 conditions of use.
In December 2020, EPA determined that
13 conditions of use presented
unreasonable risks due to exposure to
workers or occupational non-users, and
that 11 conditions of use did not present
an unreasonable risk (of those 11, 3
were industrial/commercial uses, and 8
were consumer uses). EPA found that
none of the conditions of use present an
unreasonable risk to the environment.
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
48252
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
B. Why is EPA re-issuing the risk
determination for the 2023 1,4-dioxane
risk evaluation conducted under TSCA?
In 2016, as directed by TSCA section
6(b)(2)(A), EPA chose the first ten
chemical substances to undergo risk
evaluations under the amended TSCA.
These chemical substances are asbestos,
1-bromopropane, carbon tetrachloride,
C.I. Pigment Violet (PV 29), cyclic
aliphatic bromide cluster (HBCD), 1,4dioxane, methylene chloride, nmethylpyrrolidone (NMP),
perchloroethylene (PCE), and
trichloroethylene (TCE).
From June 2020 to January 2021, EPA
published risk evaluations on the first
ten chemical substances, including for
1,4-dioxane in December 2020. The risk
evaluations included individual
unreasonable risk determinations for
each condition of use evaluated. EPA
issued determinations that particular
conditions of use did not present an
unreasonable risk by order under TSCA
section 6(i)(1).
In accordance with Executive Order
13990 (Ref. 4) and other Administration
priorities (Refs. 5, 6, and 7), EPA
reviewed the risk evaluations for the
first ten chemical substances, including
1,4-dioxane, to ensure that they meet
the requirements of TSCA, including
conducting decision making in a
manner that is consistent with the best
available science.
As a result of this review, EPA
announced plans to revise specific
aspects of the first ten risk evaluations
in order to ensure that the risk
evaluations appropriately identify
unreasonable risks and thereby help
ensure the protection of human health
and the environment (Ref. 8). EPA also
announced plans, in response to public
comments and peer review, to
supplement the 2020 Risk Evaluation
for 1,4-Dioxane to assess critical human
exposure pathways not previously
considered in the 2020 Risk Evaluation,
and to consider occupational exposures
to conditions of use where 1,4-dioxane
is present due to production as a
byproduct. EPA has now developed the
2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation and has announced its
availability and request for public
comment in a separate Federal Register
notice, which also describes the peer
review process (88 FR 43562, July 10,
2023) (FRL–10798–02–OCSPP). In the
2023 Draft Supplement, EPA assessed
the risks from 8 industrial/commercial
uses of 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct, from
processing 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct,
and from the general population
exposures to 1,4-dioxane in ambient air
and drinking water. This 2023 draft
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
revised risk determination is for 1,4dioxane as a whole chemical—and thus
includes not only information from the
2023 Draft Supplement to the 1,4dioxane risk evaluation but also
proposes revisions to the 2020 risk
determination based on the 2020 Risk
Evaluation. EPA is releasing this 2023
draft revised unreasonable risk
determination separately from the draft
supplement to the risk evaluation but is
aligning the comment period for the two
documents so that the final
unreasonable risk determination can be
released concurrently with the final
supplemental risk evaluation.
This action pertains only to the risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane. While
EPA has taken additional similar actions
on other of the first ten chemicals, EPA
is taking a chemical-specific approach
to reviewing the risk evaluations and is
incorporating new policy direction in a
surgical manner, while being mindful of
the Congressional direction on the need
to complete risk evaluations and move
toward any associated risk management
activities in accordance with statutory
deadlines.
C. What are EPA’s considerations in the
draft revised unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane?
In this draft revised unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane, EPA is
reconsidering two key aspects of the risk
determinations for 1,4-dioxane
published in December 2020, proposing
several additional changes and updates,
and highlighting specific requests for
comment.
First, following a review of specific
aspects of the December 2020 1,4dioxane risk evaluation, EPA proposes
that making an unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane as a
whole chemical substance, rather than
making unreasonable risk
determinations separately on each
individual condition of use evaluated in
the risk evaluation, is the most
appropriate approach to 1,4-dioxane
under the statute and implementing
regulations. Second, EPA proposes that
the risk determination should be
explicit that it does not rely on
assumptions regarding the use of
personal protective equipment (PPE) in
making the unreasonable risk
determination under TSCA section 6,
even though some facilities might be
using PPE as one means to reduce
workers’ exposures; rather, the use of
PPE as a means of addressing
unreasonable risk will be considered
during risk management, as appropriate.
As a result, EPA preliminarily identifies
two additional conditions of use from
the 2020 Risk Evaluation as contributing
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to the determination that 1,4-dioxane
presents unreasonable risk.
Additionally, for some of the conditions
of use in the 2020 Risk Evaluation that
were identified as ‘‘presenting’’ an
unreasonable risk to workers due to
cancer, eliminating the PPE assumption
means that acute and chronic noncancer effects from inhalation exposure
now also contribute to the unreasonable
risk. Third, based on the 2023
supplement to the risk evaluation, EPA
proposes to identify several additional
conditions of use as contributing to the
unreasonable risk determination due to
worker inhalation and dermal risks.
Fourth, EPA proposes that the risks to
the general population and fenceline
communities from exposures to 1,4dioxane in drinking water sourced from
surface water contaminated with
industrial discharges of 1,4-dioxane
(including when it is generated as a
byproduct) contributes to the
determination that 1,4-dioxane presents
an unreasonable risk, and is seeking
public comment on several issues
related to this proposed determination,
as described in Unit II.D.
1. What is a whole chemical view of
the unreasonable risk determination for
the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation?
TSCA section 6 repeatedly refers to
determining whether a chemical
substance presents unreasonable risk
under its conditions of use.
Stakeholders have disagreed over
whether a chemical substance should
receive: A single determination that is
comprehensive for the chemical
substance after considering the
conditions of use, referred to as a wholechemical determination; or multiple
determinations, each of which is
specific to a condition of use, referred
to as condition-of-use-specific
determinations.
The proposed risk evaluation
procedural rule was premised on the
whole chemical approach to making an
unreasonable risk determination (Ref.
9). In that proposed rule, EPA
acknowledged a lack of specificity in
statutory text that might lead to different
views about whether the statute
compelled EPA’s risk evaluations to
address all conditions of use of a
chemical substance or whether EPA had
discretion to evaluate some subset of
conditions of use (i.e., to scope out some
manufacturing, processing, distribution
in commerce, use, or disposal
activities), but also stated that ‘‘EPA
believes the word ‘the’ [in TSCA section
6(b)(4)(A)] is best interpreted as calling
for evaluation that considers all
conditions of use.’’ (Ref. 9).
The proposed rule, however, was
unambiguous on the point that an
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
unreasonable risk determination would
be for the chemical substance as a
whole, even if based on a subset of uses.
(See Ref. 9 at pgs. 7565–66: ‘‘TSCA
section 6(b)(4)(A) specifies that a risk
evaluation must determine whether ‘a
chemical substance’ presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or
the environment ‘under the conditions
of use.’ The evaluation is on the
chemical substance—not individual
conditions of use—and it must be based
on ‘the conditions of use.’ In this
context, EPA believes the word ‘the’ is
best interpreted as calling for evaluation
that considers all conditions of use.’’).
In the proposed regulatory text, EPA
proposed to determine whether the
chemical substance presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or
the environment under the conditions of
use (Ref. 9 at pg. 7480).
The final risk evaluation procedural
rule stated (82 FR 33726, July 20, 2017)
(FRL–9964–38) (Ref. 10): ‘‘As part of the
risk evaluation, EPA will determine
whether the chemical substance
presents an unreasonable risk of injury
to health or the environment under each
condition of uses [sic] within the scope
of the risk evaluation, either in a single
decision document or in multiple
decision documents.’’ (See also 40 CFR
702.47). For the unreasonable risk
determinations in the first ten risk
evaluations, EPA applied this provision
by making individual risk
determinations for each condition of use
evaluated in each risk evaluation (i.e.,
the condition-of-use-specific approach
to risk determinations). That approach
was based on one particular passage in
the preamble to the final risk evaluation
procedural rule, which stated that EPA
will make individual risk
determinations for all conditions of use
identified in the scope. (Ref. 10 at pg.
33744).
In contrast to this portion of the
preamble of the final risk evaluation
procedural rule, the regulatory text itself
and other statements in the preamble
reference a risk determination for the
chemical substance under its conditions
of use, rather than separate risk
determinations for each of the
conditions of use of a chemical
substance. In the key regulatory
provision excerpted earlier from 40 CFR
702.47, the text explains that ‘‘[a]s part
of the risk evaluation, EPA will
determine whether the chemical
substance presents an unreasonable risk
of injury to health or the environment
under each condition of uses [sic]
within the scope of the risk evaluation,
either in a single decision document or
in multiple decision documents’’ (Ref.
10, emphasis added). Other language
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
reiterates this perspective. For example,
40 CFR 702.31(a) states that the purpose
of the rule is to establish the EPA
process for conducting a risk evaluation
to determine whether a chemical
substance presents an unreasonable risk
of injury to health or the environment
as required under TSCA section
6(b)(4)(B). Likewise, there are recurring
references to whether the chemical
substance presents an unreasonable risk
in 40 CFR 702.41(a). See, for example,
40 CFR 702.41(a)(6), which explains
that the extent to which EPA will refine
its evaluations for one or more
condition of use in any risk evaluation
will vary as necessary to determine
whether a chemical substance presents
an unreasonable risk. Notwithstanding
the one preambular statement about
condition-of-use-specific risk
determinations, the preamble to the
final rule also contains support for a risk
determination on the chemical
substance as a whole. In discussing the
identification of the conditions of use of
a chemical substance, the preamble
notes that this task inevitably involves
the exercise of discretion on EPA’s part,
and ‘‘as EPA interprets the statute, the
Agency is to exercise that discretion
consistent with the objective of
conducting a technically sound,
manageable evaluation to determine
whether a chemical substance—not just
individual uses or activities—presents
an unreasonable risk.’’ (Ref. 9 at pg.
33729).
Therefore, notwithstanding EPA’s
choice to issue condition-of-use-specific
risk determinations to date, EPA
interprets its risk evaluation regulation
to also allow the Agency to issue wholechemical risk determinations. Either
approach is permissible under the
regulation. A panel of the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals also recognized the
ambiguity of the regulation on this
point. Safer Chemicals v. EPA, 943 F.3d
397, 413 (9th Cir. 2019) (holding a
challenge about ‘‘use-by-use risk
evaluations [was] not justiciable because
it is not clear, due to the ambiguous text
of the Risk Evaluation Rule, whether the
Agency will actually conduct risk
evaluations in the manner Petitioners
fear’’).
EPA plans to consider the appropriate
approach for each chemical substance
risk evaluation on a case-by-case basis,
taking into account considerations
relevant to the specific chemical
substance in light of the Agency’s
obligations under TSCA. The Agency
expects that this case-by-case approach
will provide greater flexibility in the
Agency’s ability to evaluate and manage
unreasonable risk from individual
chemical substances. EPA believes this
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48253
is a reasonable approach under TSCA
and the Agency’s implementing
regulations.
With regard to the specific
circumstances of 1,4-dioxane, as further
explained in this notice, EPA proposes
that a whole chemical approach is
appropriate for 1,4-dioxane in order to
protect health and the environment. The
whole chemical approach is appropriate
for 1,4-dioxane because there are
benchmark exceedances for multiple
conditions of use (spanning across most
aspects of the chemical lifecycle—from
manufacturing (including import),
processing, industrial and commercial
use, and disposal) for health of workers,
occupational non-users, and fenceline
communities and the general
population, and the understanding that
the health effects (specifically liver
toxicity, olfactory epithelium effects,
and cancer) associated with 1,4-dioxane
exposures are irreversible. Because
these chemical-specific properties cut
across the conditions of use within the
scope of the risk evaluation, it is
appropriate for the Agency to make a
determination for 1,4-dioxane that the
whole chemical presents an
unreasonable risk.
As explained later in this document,
the revisions to the unreasonable risk
determination (section 5 of the 2020
Risk Evaluation) would be based on the
existing risk characterization section of
the 2020 Risk Evaluation (section 4 of
the 2020 Risk Evaluation) and the 2023
Draft Supplement to the Risk Evaluation
for 1,4-Dioxane. The discussion of the
issues presented in this Federal Register
notice and in the accompanying draft
revision to the risk determination would
supersede any conflicting statements in
the prior 2020 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation and the response to
comments document (Ref. 11). With
respect to the 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation, while EPA intends to change
the risk determination to a whole
chemical approach without considering
the use of PPE, EPA is basing the 2023
draft unreasonable risk determination
on the underlying scientific analysis
from the 2020 Risk Evaluation and 2023
Draft Supplement to the Risk
Evaluation. EPA does not intend to
amend, nor does a whole chemical
approach require amending, the
underlying scientific analysis of the risk
evaluation in the risk characterization
section of the 2020 Risk Evaluation.
EPA also notes the Correction of Dermal
Acute and Chronic Non-Cancer Hazard
Values Used to Evaluate Risks from
Occupational Exposures that explained,
while the corrections slightly alter
occupational dermal risk estimates, they
do not appreciably impact the overall
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
48254
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
risk conclusions (Ref. 12). Because
updates are not necessary for the 2020
publication, EPA views the peer
reviewed hazard and exposure
assessments and associated risk
characterization as robust and
upholding the standards of best
available science and weight of the
scientific evidence per TSCA sections
26(h) and (i).
EPA is announcing the availability of
and seeking public comment on the
2023 draft unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane,
including a description of the risks
contributing to the unreasonable risk
determination under the conditions of
use for the chemical substance as a
whole. For purposes of TSCA section
6(i), EPA is making a draft risk
determination on 1,4-dioxane as a
whole chemical. Under the proposed
revised approach, the ‘‘whole chemical’’
risk determination for 1,4-dioxane
would supersede the no unreasonable
risk determinations (and withdraw the
associated order) for 1,4-dioxane that
were premised on a condition-of-usespecific approach to determining
unreasonable risk. When finalized,
EPA’s revised unreasonable risk
determination would also contain an
order withdrawing the TSCA section
6(i)(1) order in section 5.4.1 of the
December 2020 1,4-Dioxane Risk
Evaluation.
2. What revision does EPA propose
about the use of PPE for the 1,4-dioxane
risk evaluation?
In the risk evaluations for the first ten
chemical substances, as part of the
unreasonable risk determination, EPA
assumed for several conditions of use
that workers were provided and always
used PPE in a manner that achieves the
stated assigned protection factor (APF)
for respiratory protection, or used
impervious gloves for dermal
protection. In support of this
assumption, EPA used reasonably
available information such as public
comments indicating that some
employers, particularly in the industrial
setting, provide PPE to their employees
and follow established worker
protection standards (e.g., Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) requirements for protection of
workers).
For the December 2020 1,4-Dioxane
Risk Evaluation, EPA assumed, based on
reasonably available information, that
workers use PPE—specifically
respirators with an APF ranging from 10
to 50 and gloves with PF 10 or 20—for
15 occupational conditions of use.
However, in the December 2020 Risk
Evaluation, EPA determined that there
is unreasonable risk for 13 of those 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
occupational conditions of use even
with assumed PPE.
EPA is revising the assumption for
1,4-dioxane that workers always or
properly use PPE. However, this does
not mean that EPA questions the
veracity of public comments which
describe occupational safety practices
often followed by industry. EPA
believes it is appropriate when
conducting risk evaluations under
TSCA to evaluate the levels of risk
present in baseline scenarios where PPE
is not assumed to be used by workers.
This approach of not assuming PPE use
by workers considers the risk to
potentially exposed or susceptible
subpopulations (workers and
occupational non-users) who may not be
covered by OSHA standards, such as
self-employed individuals and public
sector workers who are not covered by
a State Plan. It should be noted that, in
some cases, baseline conditions may
reflect certain mitigation measures, such
as engineering controls, in instances
where exposure estimates are based on
monitoring data at facilities that have
engineering controls in place.
In addition, EPA believes it is
appropriate to evaluate the levels of risk
present in scenarios considering
applicable OSHA requirements (e.g.,
chemical-specific permissible exposure
limits (PELs) and/or chemical-specific
PELs with additional substance-specific
standards) as well as scenarios
considering industry or sector best
practices for industrial hygiene that are
clearly articulated to the Agency.
Consistent with this approach, the
December 2020 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation (Ref. 2) characterized risk to
workers both with and without the use
of PPE. By characterizing risks using
scenarios that reflect different levels of
mitigation, EPA risk evaluations can
help inform potential risk management
actions by providing information that
could be used during risk management
to tailor risk mitigation appropriately to
address any unreasonable risk
identified, or to ensure that applicable
OSHA requirements or industry or
sector best practices that address the
unreasonable risk are required for all
potentially exposed or susceptible
subpopulations (including selfemployed individuals and public sector
workers who are not covered by an
OSHA State Plan). Similarly, for the
occupational exposures assessed as part
of the added conditions of use in the
2023 Draft Supplement to the 1,4Dioxane Risk Evaluation, EPA
characterizes risks to workers with and
without the use of PPE (Complete risk
calculations and results for occupational
conditions of use from the 2020 Risk
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Evaluation and the 2023 Draft
Supplement are in the Draft Supplement
to the Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane—
Supplemental Information File:
Occupational Exposure and Risk
Estimates (Ref. 13)).
When undertaking unreasonable risk
determinations as part of TSCA risk
evaluations, however, EPA does not
believe it is appropriate to assume as a
general matter that an applicable OSHA
requirement or industry practices
related to PPE use is consistently and
always properly applied. Mitigation
scenarios included in the EPA risk
evaluation (e.g., scenarios considering
use of various PPE) likely represent
what is happening already in some
facilities. However, the Agency cannot
assume that all facilities have adopted
these practices for the purposes of
making the TSCA risk determination
(Ref. 14).
Therefore, EPA proposes to make a
determination of unreasonable risk for
1,4-dioxane from a baseline scenario
that does not assume compliance with
OSHA standards, including any
applicable exposure limits or
requirements for use of respiratory
protection or other PPE. Making
unreasonable risk determinations based
on the baseline scenario should not be
viewed as an indication that EPA
believes there are no occupational safety
protections in place at any location, or
that there is widespread noncompliance with applicable OSHA
standards. Rather, it reflects EPA’s
recognition that unreasonable risk may
exist for subpopulations of workers that
may be highly exposed because they are
not covered by OSHA standards, such as
self-employed individuals and public
sector workers who are not covered by
a State Plan, or because their employer
is out of compliance with OSHA
standards, or because many of OSHA’s
chemical-specific permissible exposure
limits largely adopted in the 1970’s are
described by OSHA as being ‘‘outdated
and inadequate for ensuring protection
of worker health,’’ (Ref. 15) or because
EPA finds unreasonable risk for
purposes of TSCA notwithstanding
OSHA requirements.
In accordance with this approach,
EPA is proposing the draft revision to
the 1,4-dioxane risk determination
without relying on assumptions
regarding the occupational use of PPE in
making the unreasonable risk
determination under TSCA section 6;
rather, information on the use of PPE as
a means of mitigating risk (including
information received from industry
respondents about occupational safety
practices in use) would be considered
during the risk management phase as
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
appropriate. This would represent a
change from the approach taken in the
2020 Risk Evaluation for 1,4-dioxane
and EPA invites comments on this 2023
draft change to the 1,4-dioxane risk
determination. As a general matter,
when undertaking risk management
actions, EPA intends to strive for
consistency with applicable OSHA
requirements and industry best
practices, including appropriate
application of the hierarchy of controls,
when those measures would address an
identified unreasonable risk, including
unreasonable risk to potentially exposed
or susceptible subpopulations.
Consistent with TSCA section 9(d), EPA
will consult and coordinate TSCA
activities with OSHA and other relevant
Federal agencies for the purpose of
achieving the maximum applicability of
TSCA while avoiding the imposition of
duplicative requirements. Informed by
the mitigation scenarios and
information gathered during the risk
evaluation and risk management
process, the Agency might propose rules
that require risk management practices
that may be already common practice in
many or most facilities. Adopting clear,
comprehensive regulatory standards
will foster compliance across all
facilities (ensuring a level playing field)
and assure protections for all affected
workers, especially in cases where
current OSHA standards may not apply
or be sufficient to address the
unreasonable risk.
Removing the assumption that
workers always and appropriately wear
PPE in making the whole chemical risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane would
mean that for the conditions of use
evaluated in the 2020 Risk Evaluation,
two conditions of use in addition to the
original 13 conditions of use would
contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane; an
additional route of exposure (i.e.,
inhalation) would also be identified as
contributing to the unreasonable risk to
workers in five of those 13 conditions of
use; and additional risks for acute and
chronic non-cancer effects from
inhalation exposures would also
contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination from seven of those 13
conditions of use (where previously
those conditions of use were identified
as presenting unreasonable risk from
inhalation exposures only from cancer).
The draft revision to the risk
determination would clarify that EPA
does not rely on the assumed use of PPE
when making the risk determination for
the whole substance. EPA is requesting
comment on this potential change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
3. What conditions of use is EPA
adding to the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination?
1,4-Dioxane produced as a byproduct
of manufacturing processes can result in
occupational exposures in industrial
settings and may be present in
consumer and commercial products. It
also may be released to the environment
through direct and indirect industrial
and commercial releases. While the
2020 Risk Evaluation considered risks to
consumers and bystanders from 1,4dioxane present in consumer products
due to its production as a byproduct, it
did not evaluate other exposures to 1,4dioxane produced as a byproduct. The
2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation considers occupational,
fenceline community, and general
population exposures that result from
conditions of use where 1,4-dioxane is
present, including as a result of
production as a byproduct. These
exposures include 1,4-dioxane present
in drinking water sourced from surface
water as a result of direct and indirect
industrial releases and down-the-drain
releases of consumer and commercial
products; 1,4-dioxane present in
drinking water sourced from
groundwater contaminated as a result of
disposals; and 1,4-dioxane released to
air from industrial and commercial
sources.
The following conditions of use are
added to the 2023 Draft Supplement:
• Processing as a byproduct
(including polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) byproduct and ethoxylation
process byproduct);
• Industrial/commercial use: Other
uses: Hydraulic fracturing;
• Industrial/commercial use: Arts,
crafts, and hobby materials: Textile dye;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Automotive care products: Antifreeze;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Cleaning and furniture care products:
Surface cleaner;
• Industrial/commercial use: Laundry
and dishwashing products: Dish soap;
• Industrial/commercial use: Laundry
and dishwashing products: Dishwasher
detergent;
• Industrial/commercial use: Laundry
and dishwashing products: Laundry
detergent; and
• Industrial/commercial use: Paints
and coatings: Paint and floor lacquer;
For each of these conditions of use,
EPA evaluated risks of non-cancer and
cancer effects due to acute or chronic
inhalation or dermal exposure. For the
2023 draft supplement, EPA relied on
the physical and chemical properties
information, as well as lifecycle
information, environmental fate and
transport information, and hazard
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48255
identification and dose-response
analyses presented in the 2020 Risk
Evaluation (Ref. 2).
4. Which exposure pathways are being
added to EPA’s 2023 revised
unreasonable risk determination?
The 2020–2021 risk evaluations for
several of the first 10 chemicals,
including 1,4-dioxane, excluded
exposure pathways that were or could
be regulated under another EPAadministered statute. For 1,4-dioxane,
the air and drinking water exposure
pathways were excluded from the 2020
Risk Evaluation and were not assessed.
The 2023 Draft Supplement evaluates
risks from general population and
fenceline community exposures to 1,4dioxane released to surface and
groundwater, air, and land. The risks
EPA evaluated to fenceline communities
and the general population (using
reasonably available monitoring and
modeling data for inhalation, dermal,
and ingestion exposures) include risks
from the conditions of use assessed in
the 2020 Risk Evaluation as well as the
conditions of use assessed in the 2023
Draft Supplement, including conditions
of use where 1,4-dioxane is
manufactured, or where it is present due
to production as a byproduct. These
exposures to 1,4-dioxane include
releases to air and water from
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic
manufacturing, ethoxylation processes,
hydraulic fracturing operations, and use
of a range of consumer and commercial
products.
D. What conclusions is EPA proposing
to reach in the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination and on
what is EPA seeking public comment?
In the 2020 Risk Evaluation, EPA
determined that 1,4-dioxane presents an
unreasonable risk to health under the
following 13 conditions of use, based on
risks to workers:
• Manufacturing (domestic
manufacture);
• Manufacturing (import/
repackaging);
• Processing: Repackaging;
• Processing: Recycling;
• Processing: Non-incorporative;
• Processing: Processing as a reactant;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Intermediate;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Processing aid;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Laboratory chemicals;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Adhesives and sealants;
• Industrial/commercial use: Printing
and printing compositions;
• Industrial/commercial use: Dry film
lubricant; and
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
48256
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
• Disposal.
Under the proposed whole chemical
approach to the 1,4-dioxane risk
determination, those same conditions of
use would continue to contribute to the
unreasonable risk from 1,4-dioxane. In
addition, by removing the assumption of
PPE use in making the whole chemical
risk determination for 1,4-dioxane, two
conditions of use (in addition to the
original 13 conditions of use in the 2020
Risk Evaluation found to contribute to
the unreasonable risk) would contribute
to the unreasonable risk:
• Industrial/commercial use:
Functional fluids (open and closed
system): Metalworking fluid, cutting
and tapping fluid, polyalkylene glycol
fluid; and
• Industrial/commercial use: Other
uses: Spray polyurethane foam.
Of the conditions of use that have
been added in the 2023 Draft
Supplement, EPA has preliminarily
determined that the following would
contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination, based on risks to
workers:
• Processing as a byproduct
(including polyethylene terephthalate
(PET) byproduct and ethoxylation
process byproduct);
• Industrial/commercial use: Other
uses: Hydraulic fracturing;
• Industrial/commercial use: Arts,
crafts, and hobby materials: Textile dye;
• Industrial/commercial use: Laundry
and dishwashing products: Dish soap;
• Industrial/commercial use: Laundry
and dishwashing products: Dishwasher
detergent; and
• Industrial/commercial use: Paints
and coatings: Paint and floor lacquer.
Based on the occupational risk
estimates and EPA’s confidence in
them, EPA finds that the worker
exposure to 1,4-dioxane from all but
four occupational conditions of use (Ref.
1) contributes to the unreasonable risk
from 1,4-dioxane.
In the 2020 Risk Evaluation, EPA
evaluated risks to consumers from eight
conditions of use and found that they
did not present an unreasonable risk to
consumers or bystanders. In the 2023
draft revised unreasonable risk
determination, EPA does not propose to
identify the consumer conditions of use
as contributing to the unreasonable risk
determination from 1,4-dioxane.
However, EPA notes that the generation
of 1,4-dioxane as an ethoxylation
process byproduct—i.e., the upstream
processing of many of these the
consumer products—does contribute to
the unreasonable risk determination,
due to worker risks of cancer and noncancer effects from inhalation and
dermal exposures during those
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
processes and risk to the general
population and fenceline communities
from exposures to drinking water
sourced from surface water
contaminated with 1,4-dioxane
discharged from industrial facilities.
Regarding ambient air exposures, EPA
estimated risks from fenceline
community exposures to 1,4-dioxane
released to air. Risks were evaluated for
air releases from industrial conditions of
use, hydraulic fracturing operations,
and industrial and institutional laundry
facilities. EPA’s modeling
methodologies, risk estimates, and
confidence in those estimates is
described in Section 5 of the draft
supplemental risk evaluation (Ref. 3).
Standard cancer benchmarks used by
EPA and other regulatory agencies are
an increased cancer risk above
benchmarks ranging from 1 in 1,000,000
to 1 in 10,000 (i.e., 1x10¥6 to 1x10¥4)
depending on the subpopulation
exposed. Based on the risk estimates for
cancer, non-cancer acute effects, and
non-cancer chronic effects, the fact that
the risk estimates are within the
applicable benchmark range, and EPA’s
confidence in the risk estimates, EPA
preliminarily finds that fenceline
community exposure to 1,4-dioxane in
ambient air from releases from
industrial conditions of use, including
hydraulic fracturing, industrial laundry
facilities, and institutional laundry
facilities does not contribute to EPA’s
unreasonable risk determination. More
details on EPA’s preliminary
determination regarding fenceline
communities’ exposure to 1,4-dioxane
in ambient air is in the 2023 draft
revised risk determination (Ref. 1).
Regarding drinking water exposures,
in the 2023 Draft Supplement, EPA
evaluated oral exposures via ingestion
of drinking water sourced from surface
water or groundwater contaminated
with 1,4-dioxane from facility-specific
releases, down-the-drain releases of
consumer and commercial products that
contain 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct,
hydraulic fracturing releases, and
leaching from landfills. 1,4-Dioxane is
not readily removed through typical
wastewater or drinking water treatment
processes. Sources of 1,4-dioxane in
surface water include direct and
indirect industrial releases from COUs
where 1,4-dioxane is manufactured,
processed, or used, industrial COUs
where 1,4-dioxane is present due to
production as a byproduct (including
PET manufacturing, ethoxylation
processes, and hydraulic fracturing
operations), and down-the-drain
releases of 1,4-dioxane present in
consumer and commercial products.
EPA considered risks from these sources
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
individually and in aggregate. The
relative contribution from different
sources varies under different
conditions and is likely to be driven by
site-specific factors including the
amounts released from each source,
flow rates of receiving water bodies, and
proximity of releases to drinking water
intakes. Drinking water exposure and
risk estimates for surface water are
highly dependent on the amount of 1,4dioxane released and the flow of the
receiving water body. Exposure and risk
estimates are also influenced by
whether there is a drinking water intake
downstream of a release and the degree
of dilution that occurs between the
point of release and the drinking water
intake. Available surface water
monitoring datasets are not designed to
reflect source water impacts of direct
and indirect releases into water bodies.
Therefore, EPA estimated
concentrations using modeling for a
range of specific release scenarios.
Similarly, for groundwater, EPA
estimated cancer and non-cancer risks
for a range of general population and
fenceline community exposures to
groundwater used as drinking water;
sources of 1,4-dioxane in groundwater
may include leachate from landfills and
disposal of hydraulic fracturing waste.
Based on information in the 2023
Draft Supplement to the risk evaluation,
several conditions of use of 1,4-dioxane
could result in exposures to the general
population and fenceline communities
from 1,4-dioxane in drinking water after
it is discharged from facilities engaging
in one of several conditions of use. EPA
also notes that many of the conditions
of use assessed in the 2023 Draft
Supplement contribute to more than one
exposure pathway. For example, 1,4dioxane present as a byproduct of PET
manufacturing may contribute to
occupational exposures during
manufacturing as well as exposures to
the general population and fenceline
communities through releases to water.
In addition, for many of the exposure
pathways assessed, multiple conditions
of use contribute to 1,4-dioxane
exposure. For example, many
conditions of use can contribute to
general population and fenceline
communities’ exposures to 1,4-dioxane
in surface water, including industrial
releases from a range of conditions of
use and down-the-drain releases of
consumer and commercial products.
EPA proposes to include the risks to
the general population and fenceline
communities from drinking water
sourced from surface water
contaminated with 1,4-dioxane that is
discharged from industrial facilities
(including where it is produced as a
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
byproduct) as contributing to the
unreasonable risk determination.
However, due to the uncertainties
described in this Unit, in more detail in
section 6.2.4 of the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination, and
throughout the 2023 Draft Supplement,
EPA has outlined several specific
requests for comment regarding this
draft risk determination, in this Unit.
As described in the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination, EPA’s
proposed unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane as a
whole chemical is based on cancer and
non-cancer risks to workers from
inhalation and dermal exposures, and
cancer risks to the general population
and fenceline communities from
exposures to 1,4-dioxane in drinking
water sourced from surface water
contaminated by industrial discharges
of 1,4-dioxane (including when it is
generated as a byproduct). EPA
proposes to identify the following
conditions of use, from both the 2020
Risk Evaluation and the 2023 Draft
Supplement, as contributing to the
unreasonable risk from 1,4-dioxane:
• Manufacture (including domestic
manufacture and import);
• Processing (including repackaging,
recycling, non-incorporative, as a
reactant, and as a byproduct);
• Industrial/commercial use:
Functional fluids (open and closed
system): Metalworking fluid, cutting
and tapping fluid, polyalkylene glycol
fluid, hydraulic fluid;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Intermediate;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Processing aid;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Laboratory chemicals;
• Industrial/commercial use:
Adhesives and sealants;
• Industrial/commercial use: Other
uses: Printing and printing
compositions;
• Industrial/commercial use: Other
uses: Dry film lubricant;
• Industrial/commercial use: Other
uses: Spray polyurethane foam;
• Industrial/commercial use: Other
uses: Hydraulic fracturing;
• Industrial/commercial use: Arts,
crafts, and hobby materials: Textile dye;
• Industrial/commercial use: Laundry
and dishwashing products: Dish soap;
• Industrial/commercial use: Laundry
and dishwashing products: Dishwasher
detergent;
• Industrial/commercial use: Paints
and coatings: Paint and floor lacquer;
and
• Disposal.
Because the risk estimates for all
processing COUs identified and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
evaluated in the 2020 Risk Evaluation
and the 2023 Draft Supplement
(including those where 1,4-dioxane is
processed as a byproduct) contribute to
the unreasonable risk, EPA believes that
it is appropriate to conclude that any
processing of 1,4-dioxane contributes to
the unreasonable risk. This would
include circumstances described but not
necessarily individually quantified in
the 2020 Risk Evaluation or the 2023
Draft Supplement, such as when 1,4dioxane is generated as a byproduct
during sulfonation, sulfation, and
esterification processes. EPA also
emphasizes that this determination
identifies any manufacturing,
processing, or disposal of 1,4-dioxane—
including as a byproduct—as
contributing to the unreasonable risk if
the 1,4-dioxane contaminates surface
water that is the source of drinking
water.
EPA is seeking public comment for
certain considerations for determining
unreasonable risk to the general
population or fenceline communities
from 1,4-dioxane in drinking water. EPA
notes that the agency has preliminarily
determined that the worker risks
identified provide sufficient basis for
the determination that 1,4-dioxane as a
whole chemical presents unreasonable
risk. Nonetheless, for the purposes of
transparency, clear public
communication on unreasonable risk,
and to inform future risk management
activities, EPA is seeking comment on
the following:
• Industrial discharges of 1,4-dioxane
to surface water. EPA is able to provide
risk estimates for drinking water
contaminated with 1,4-dioxane from
surface water discharges from some
facility-specific releases of 1,4-dioxane,
including from some facilities that
manufacture, process, or use 1,4dioxane (including as a byproduct).
Several high-end risk estimates exceed
the range of applicable benchmarks for
increased cancer risk (i.e., 1x10¥4 to
1x10¥6), and EPA has higher
confidence in the facility-specific risk
estimates for discharges to surface water
compared to other drinking water risk
estimates (i.e., groundwater, down-thedrain releases from commercial and
consumer products). In general, the
aggregate analysis for drinking water
sourced from surface water indicates
that the high-end risk analysis may be
driven primarily by high-end industrial
releases, under certain conditions. EPA
has preliminarily determined that
exposures to surface water containing
1,4-dioxane from industrial discharges
contribute to the unreasonable risk.
EPA seeks comment on whether
EPA’s evaluation of facilities that
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48257
discharge 1,4-dioxane in processes that
manufacture 1,4-dioxane or generate
1,4-dioxane as a byproduct (e.g., PET
manufacturing, and ethoxylation
processes), can reasonably be assumed
to represent the spectrum of facilities or
sectors producing 1,4-dioxane as a
byproduct for the purposes of risk
determination and, if necessary, any risk
management action.
Because multiple sources may
contribute to 1,4-dioxane concentrations
in drinking water sourced from surface
water in a single location, EPA
estimated aggregate general population
exposures and risks that could occur
from combined contributions from
multiple sources. EPA seeks comment
on whether an unreasonable risk
determination is supported in instances
where EPA is unable to attribute
exposures to specific COUs as specific
sources of risk, but rather is able to
attribute exposures to sources of the
chemical covering many COUs as an
aggregate contributor to unreasonable
risk.
• Down-the-drain releases of 1,4dioxane from consumer and commercial
products. EPA evaluated the potential
contribution of down-the-drain releases
of consumer and commercial products
that contain 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct
to drinking water exposure and risk.
EPA’s drinking water exposure
estimates correspond to surface water
concentrations estimated by
probabilistic modeling of down-thedrain releases under varying population
sizes and stream flows. With some
combinations of factors, exposures to
down-the-drain releases of 1,4-dioxane
in drinking water alone result in
increased cancer risks within EPA’s
benchmark range of 1x10¥6 to 1x10¥4
in some instances. Assuming no
dilution between the point of release
and the drinking water intake, the
estimated risks range from 2.04×10¥11
to 6.11×10¥5 with the risks increasing
as population increases and stream flow
decreases. Based on the conservative
analysis of no assumed dilution,
confidence in risk estimates, and
consideration of uncertainties, EPA has
preliminarily determined that downthe-drain releases of 1,4-dioxane do not
contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination.
EPA seeks comment regarding to what
extent factors such as stream flow and
population size should be factored into
the unreasonable risk determination, or
whether consideration of those factors is
more appropriate for the risk
management stage.
EPA seeks comment on its draft
determination that down-the-drain
releases of 1,4-dioxane do not contribute
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
48258
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
to the unreasonable risk determination
due to the uncertainties identified in the
risk characterization regarding
consumer and commercial products that
contain 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct (i.e.,
soaps, dishwashing detergents, and
laundry detergent).
• Groundwater and potential 1,4dioxane exposure in drinking water.
EPA estimated risks from exposures that
could occur if groundwater containing
1,4-dioxane is used as a source of
drinking water. These risk estimates are
not tied to known releases at specific
locations. Rather, the analysis defines
the conditions under which 1,4-dioxane
disposal to landfills or from hydraulic
fracturing operations could result in
varying levels of risk from groundwater
concentrations of 1,4-dioxane. EPA’s
drinking water exposure scenario relies
on the assumption that modeled
groundwater concentrations reflect the
actual groundwater concentrations that
occur at well locations. While the
modeling methodology is robust and the
release information relied on as model
input data is supported by moderate
evidence, no monitoring data are
available to confirm detection of 1,4dioxane in groundwater, specifically
near hydraulic fracturing operations.
EPA has preliminarily determined that
groundwater containing 1,4-dioxane
does not contribute to the unreasonable
risk determination. EPA seeks comment
on its draft determination that
groundwater exposures from 1,4dioxane do not contribute to the
unreasonable risk determination due to
the uncertainties identified in the risk
characterization regarding releases of
1,4-dioxane from landfill leachate and
hydraulic fracturing operations.
• Determination of general
population and fenceline community
risks. As described in the 2023 Draft
Supplement (Ref. 3), fenceline
communities are members of the general
population that are in proximity to airemitting facilities or a receiving
waterbody, and who therefore may be
disproportionately exposed to a
chemical undergoing risk evaluation
under TSCA section 6. For the air
pathway, proximity goes out to 10,000
meters from an air emitting source. For
the water pathway, proximity does not
refer to a specific distance measured
from a receiving waterbody, but rather
to those members of the general
population that may interact with the
receiving waterbody and thus may be
exposed. EPA seeks comment, for the
purposes of drinking water, on what
parameters EPA should consider in
identifying whether exposures to the
general populations contribute to an
unreasonable risk determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
Specifically, EPA seeks comment on
whether and how to incorporate
exposures to the general population
from multiple sources that cannot be
attributed to COUs, is dependent on
site-specific circumstances, variable
across the country, or dependent on
stream flow, population size, or
population density. EPA also seeks
comment on whether other parameters
should be considered, and, if so, how
they should be incorporated.
As noted in Unit II.C.1., EPA is also
seeking comment on the draft
superseding unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane,
including a description of the risks that
contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination under the conditions of
use for the chemical substance as a
whole. Additionally, as noted in Unit
II.C.2, EPA is also seeking comment on
EPA’s 2023 draft revision to the 1,4dioxane risk determination without
relying on assumptions regarding the
occupational use of PPE in making the
unreasonable risk determination under
TSCA section 6.
III. Revision of the December 2020 Risk
Evaluation
A. Why is EPA proposing to revise the
risk determination for the 1,4-dioxane
risk evaluation?
EPA is proposing to revise the risk
determination for the 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation pursuant to TSCA section
6(b) and consistent with Executive
Order 13990, (‘‘Protecting Public Health
and the Environment and Restoring
Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis’’)
and other Administration priorities
(Refs. 4, 5, and 7). EPA is revising
specific aspects of the first ten TSCA
existing chemical risk evaluations in
order to ensure that the risk evaluations
better align with TSCA’s objective of
protecting health and the environment.
For the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation,
this includes the draft revisions: (1)
making the risk determination in this
instance based on the whole chemical
substance instead of by individual
conditions of use, (2) emphasizing that
EPA does not rely on the assumed use
of PPE when making the risk
determination and identifying which
conditions of use in the 2020 Risk
Evaluation would contribute to the
unreasonable risk determination based
on worker exposure without assuming
use of PPE, (3) identifying which of the
additional conditions evaluated in the
2023 Draft Supplement contribute to the
unreasonable risk determination based
on worker exposure, and (4) proposing
that the risks to fenceline communities
from exposure to 1,4-dioxane in
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
drinking water sourced from surface
water contaminated by industrial
discharges of 1,4-dioxane (including
when it is generated as a byproduct) and
(5) seeking public comment on several
issues, as listed in Unit II.D.
B. What are the draft revisions?
EPA is releasing a draft revision of the
risk determination for the 1,4-dioxane
risk evaluation pursuant to TSCA
section 6(b). Under the revised
determination, EPA proposes to
conclude that 1,4-dioxane, as evaluated
in the risk evaluation as a whole,
presents an unreasonable risk of injury
to health under its conditions of use.
This revision would replace the
previous unreasonable risk
determinations made for 1,4-dioxane by
individual conditions of use, supersede
the determinations (and withdraw the
associated order) of no unreasonable
risk for the conditions of use identified
in the TSCA section 6(i)(1) no
unreasonable risk order, clarify the lack
of reliance on assumed use of PPE as
part of the risk determination, and
incorporate information (including the
addition of conditions of use and
exposure pathways) assessed in the
2023 Draft Supplement to the Risk
Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane.
These draft revisions do not alter any
of the underlying technical or scientific
information that informs the risk
characterization in the 2020 Risk
Evaluation, and as such the hazard,
exposure, and risk characterization
sections in the 2020 Risk Evaluation are
not changed except to the extent that
statements about PPE assumptions in
the executive summary and including
sections 4.2.2.6 (Occupational Risk
Estimation for Cancer Effects), 4.6.2.1
(Summary of Risk for Workers and
ONUs), and section 5.1.1.3 (Determining
Unreasonable Risk of Injury to Health)
of the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation would
be superseded and the 2023 draft risk
determination also reflects the 2023
supplemental risk evaluation. The
discussion of the issues in this notice
and in the accompanying draft revision
to the risk determination would
supersede any conflicting statements in
the prior executive summary, including
sections 4.2.2.6, 4.6.2.1, and section
5.1.1.3 from the 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation and the response to
comments document (Refs. 2 and 11).
C. Will the draft revised risk
determination be peer reviewed?
The risk determination (section 5 in
the December 2020 Risk Evaluation) was
not part of the scope of the peer review
of the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation by the
SACC. Thus, consistent with that
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 26, 2023 / Notices
approach, EPA is not seeking peer
review of the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination for the
1,4-dioxane risk evaluation. EPA is,
however, seeking peer review as well as
public comment on the 2023 Draft
Supplement to the 1,4-Dioxane Risk
Evaluation, as described in a separate
Federal Register notice (88 FR 43562,
July 10, 2023) (FRL–10798–02–OCSPP).
EPA will consider changes made to the
risk evaluation in response to peer
review and public comment on that
supplement when developing the final
risk determination.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
D. What are the next steps for finalizing
revisions to the risk determination?
EPA will review and consider public
comment received on the draft revised
risk determination for the 1,4-dioxane
risk evaluation and will review and
consider public comment and peer
review on the 2023 Draft Supplement to
the 1,4-Dioxane Risk Evaluation. After
considering those public comments,
EPA will issue the revised final 1,4dioxane risk determination. If finalized
as drafted, EPA would also issue a new
order to withdraw the TSCA section
6(i)(1) no unreasonable risk order issued
in Section 5.4.1 of the 2020 1,4-dioxane
risk evaluation. This final revised risk
determination would supersede the
December 2020 risk determinations of
no unreasonable risk. Consistent with
the statutory requirements of TSCA,
EPA would initiate risk management for
1,4-dioxane either by applying one or
more of the requirements under TSCA
section 6(a) to the extent necessary so
that 1,4-dioxane no longer presents an
unreasonable risk or determining
pursuant to TSCA sections 9(a) and/or
9(b) that other Federal laws can
eliminate or reduce to a sufficient extent
the unreasonable risk.
IV. References
The following is a listing of the
documents that are specifically
referenced in this document. The docket
includes these documents and other
information considered by EPA,
including documents that are referenced
within the documents that are included
in the docket, even if the referenced
document is not physically located in
the docket. For assistance in locating
these other documents, please consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
1. EPA Draft Revised Unreasonable Risk
Determination for 1,4-Dioxane, July
2023.
2. EPA. Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane.
December 2020. EPA Document #EPA–
740–R1–8007. https://
www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:56 Jul 25, 2023
Jkt 259001
HQ-OPPT-2019-0238-0092.
3. EPA. Draft Supplemental Risk Evaluation
for 1,4-Dioxane. July 2023. EPA
Document #EPA–740–D–23–001. https://
www.regulations.gov/document/EPAHQ-OPPT-2022-0905-0027.
4. Executive Order 13990. Protecting Public
Health and the Environment and
Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate
Crisis. Federal Register. 86 FR 7037,
January 25, 2021.
5. Executive Order 13985. Advancing Racial
Equity and Support for Underserved
Communities Through the Federal
Government. Federal Register. 86 FR
7009, January 25, 2021.
6. Executive Order 14008. Tackling the
Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad.
Federal Register. 86 FR 7619, February
1, 2021.
7. Presidential Memorandum. Memorandum
on Restoring Trust in Government
Through Scientific Integrity and
Evidence-Based Policymaking. Federal
Register. 86 FR 8845, February 10, 2021.
8. EPA Press Release. EPA Announces Path
Forward for TSCA Chemical Risk
Evaluations. June 2021. https://
www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epaannounces-path-forward-tsca-chemicalrisk-evaluations.
9. EPA. Proposed Rule; Procedures for
Chemical Risk Evaluation Under the
Amended Toxic Substances Control Act.
Federal Register. 82 FR 7562, January
19, 2017 (FRL–9957–75).
10. EPA. Final Rule; Procedures for Chemical
Risk Evaluation Under the Amended
Toxic Substances Control Act. Federal
Register. 82 FR 33726, July 20, 2017
(FRL–9964–38).
11. EPA. Summary of External Peer Review
and Public Comments and Disposition
for 1,4-Dioxane. December 2020. https://
www.regulations.gov/document/EPAHQ-OPPT-2019-0238-0093.
12. EPA. Correction of Dermal Acute and
Chronic Non-Cancer Hazard Values Used
to Evaluate Risks from Occupational
Exposures in the Final Risk Evaluation
for 1,4-dioxane. June 26, 2023.
13. EPA. Draft Supplement to the Risk
Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane—
Supplemental Information File:
Occupational Exposure and Risk
Estimates. July 2023.
14. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA). Top 10 Most
Frequently Cited Standards for Fiscal
Year 2021 (Oct. 1, 2020, to Sept. 30,
2021). Accessed October 13, 2022.
https://www.osha.gov/
top10citedstandards.
15. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration. Permissible Exposure
Limits—Annotated Tables. Accessed
June 13, 2022. https://www.osha.gov/
annotated-pels.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
Dated: July 21, 2023.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical
Safety and Pollution Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023–15846 Filed 7–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48259
FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
EXAMINATION COUNCIL
[Docket No. AS23–10]
Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of
Meeting
Appraisal Subcommittee of the
Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council.
ACTION: Notice of special closed
meeting.
AGENCY:
Description: In accordance with
Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery,
and Enforcement Act of 1989, as
amended, notice is hereby given that the
Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for
a Special Closed Meeting on this date.
Location: Virtual meeting via Webex.
Date: July 12, 2023
Time: 11:00 a.m. ET
Action and Discussion Item
Personnel Matter
The ASC convened a Special Closed
Meeting to discuss a personnel matter.
No action was taken by the ASC.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2023–15787 Filed 7–25–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7071–N–16]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Comment Request; FHA
Insured Title I Property Improvement
and Manufactured Home Loan
Programs; OMB Control No.: 2502–
0328
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
Comments Due Date: September
25, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\26JYN1.SGM
26JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48249-48259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15846]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0723; FRL-7918-02-OCSPP]
1,4-Dioxane; Draft Revision to Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) Risk Determination; Notice of Availability and Request for
Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the
availability of and requesting public comment on a draft revision to
the risk determination for 1,4-dioxane following a risk evaluation
issued under TSCA. EPA published a risk evaluation for 1,4-dioxane in
December 2020 and a draft supplement to the risk evaluation in July
2023. This draft revision to the 1,4-dioxane risk determination
reflects policy changes announced in June 2021, to ensure the public is
protected from unreasonable risks from chemicals in a way that is
supported by science and the law, as well as information from the 2023
Draft Supplement to the risk evaluation. In this draft revision to the
risk determination EPA has preliminarily determined that 1,4-dioxane,
as a whole chemical substance, presents an unreasonable risk of injury
to health when evaluated under its conditions of use. This draft risk
[[Page 48250]]
determination considers the occupational and consumer exposures from
the December 2020 Risk Evaluation, as well as the occupational, general
population, and fenceline community exposures in the draft supplement
to the risk evaluation, including exposures that result from conditions
of use where 1,4-dioxane is present due to production as a byproduct
and the risks from general population and fenceline communities'
exposures to 1,4-dioxane released under the conditions of use to
drinking water sourced from surface and ground water and ambient air.
In addition, this revised risk determination does not reflect an
assumption that all workers always appropriately wear personal
protective equipment (PPE). EPA understands that there could be
adequate occupational safety protections in place at certain workplace
locations; however, not assuming use of PPE reflects EPA's recognition
that unreasonable risk may exist for subpopulations of workers that may
be highly exposed because they are not covered by Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, or their employers are out
of compliance with OSHA standards, or because many of OSHA's chemical-
specific permissible exposure limits largely adopted in the 1970's are
described by OSHA as being ``outdated and inadequate for ensuring
protection of worker health,'' or because EPA finds unreasonable risk
for purposes of TSCA notwithstanding OSHA requirements. This revision,
when final, would supersede the condition of use-specific no
unreasonable risk determinations in the December 2020 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation (and withdraw the associated order) and would make a revised
determination of unreasonable risk for 1,4-dioxane as a whole chemical
substance.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 8, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA--EPA-HQ-OPPT-2016-0723, through https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to
be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional instructions on
visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets
generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact: Cindy Wheeler, Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics (7404M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (202) 566-0484; email address: [email protected].
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to those involved in the manufacture,
processing, distribution, use, disposal, and/or the assessment of risks
involving chemical substances and mixtures. You may be potentially
affected by this action if you manufacture (defined under TSCA to
include import), process (including recycling), distribute in commerce,
use, or dispose of 1,4-dioxane, including 1,4-dioxane in products and
including processes that produce 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct. Since
other entities may also be interested in this draft revision to the
risk determination, EPA has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action.
B. What is EPA's authority for taking this action?
TSCA section 6, 15 U.S.C. 2605, requires EPA to conduct risk
evaluations to determine whether a chemical substance presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment, without
consideration of costs or other non-risk factors, including an
unreasonable risk to a potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulation
(PESS) identified as relevant to the risk evaluation by the
Administrator, under the conditions of use. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(A).
TSCA sections 6(b)(4)(A) through (H) enumerate the deadlines and
minimum requirements applicable to this process, including provisions
that provide instruction on chemical substances that must undergo
evaluation, the minimum components of a TSCA risk evaluation, and the
timelines for public comment and completion of the risk evaluation.
TSCA also requires that EPA operate in a manner that is consistent with
the best available science, make decisions based on the weight of the
scientific evidence, and consider reasonably available information. 15
U.S.C. 2625(h), (i), and (k).
The statute identifies the minimum components for all chemical
substance risk evaluations. For each risk evaluation, EPA must publish
a document that outlines the scope of the risk evaluation to be
conducted, which includes the hazards, exposures, conditions of use,
and the potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations that EPA
expects to consider. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(D). The statute further
provides that each risk evaluation must also: (1) integrate and assess
available information on hazards and exposures for the conditions of
use of the chemical substance, including information that is relevant
to specific risks of injury to health or the environment and
information on relevant potentially exposed or susceptible
subpopulations; (2) describe whether aggregate or sentinel exposures
were considered and the basis for that consideration; (3) take into
account, where relevant, the likely duration, intensity, frequency, and
number of exposures under the conditions of use; and (4) describe the
weight of the scientific evidence for the identified hazards and
exposures. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(F)(i) through (ii) and (iv) through
(v). Each risk evaluation must not consider costs or other non-risk
factors. 15 U.S.C. 2605(b)(4)(F)(iii).
EPA has inherent authority to reconsider previous decisions and to
revise, replace, or repeal a decision to the extent permitted by law
and supported by reasoned explanation. FCC v. Fox Television Stations,
Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009); see also Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n v.
State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 42 (1983). Pursuant to
such authority, EPA is reconsidering the risk determinations in the
December 2020 1,4-Dioxane Risk Evaluation and issuing a 2023 draft risk
determination that encompasses the information in the 2023 Draft
Supplement to the risk evaluation.
C. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is announcing the availability of and seeking public comment on
a 2023 draft revision to the risk determination for the 2020 1,4-
Dioxane Risk Evaluation under TSCA (Ref. 1). This includes revision to
the risk determination initially published in December 2020 (Ref. 2)
and addition of information from the 2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation (Ref. 3), which includes evaluation of additional conditions
of use of 1,4-dioxane and critical exposure pathways not included in
the 2020 1,4-Dioxane Risk Evaluation. EPA has announced the
availability of the 2023 Draft
[[Page 48251]]
Supplement to the risk evaluation in a separate Federal Register
notice, which also describes the requests for public comment and the
peer review process for the 2023 Draft Supplement (88 FR 43562, July
10, 2023) (FRL-10798-02-OCSPP).
EPA is seeking public comment on the draft revision to the risk
determination for the risk evaluation where the agency preliminarily
intends to determine that 1,4-dioxane, as a whole chemical, presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health when evaluated under its
conditions of use. The Agency has preliminarily determined that the
risk determination for 1,4-dioxane is better characterized as a whole
chemical risk determination rather than condition-of-use-specific risk
determinations. Accordingly, EPA would revise and replace section 5 of
the 2020 Risk Evaluation for 1,4-dioxane where the findings of
unreasonable risk to health were previously made for the individual
conditions of use evaluated. EPA would also withdraw the order issued
previously for two conditions of use previously determined not to
present unreasonable risk. However, before finalization of the risk
determination, EPA is specifically seeking public comment on several
aspects of the 2023 draft unreasonable risk determination, including
EPA's finding that general population and fenceline community exposure
to 1,4-dioxane in drinking water contributes to the determination that
1,4-dioxane presents an unreasonable risk and whether the risks to the
general population and fenceline communities from drinking water
exposure can be attributed to specific conditions of use of 1,4-
dioxane. A more robust description of the request for comment is in
Unit II.D.
This proposed revision to the 2020 unreasonable risk determination
would be consistent with EPA's plans to revise specific aspects of the
first ten TSCA chemical risk evaluations in order to ensure that the
risk evaluations better align with TSCA's objective of protecting
health and the environment. EPA proposes that the 2023 draft revision
would include several changes. First, EPA would make an unreasonable
risk determination for 1,4-dioxane as a whole chemical substance,
rather than making unreasonable risk determinations separately on each
individual condition of use evaluated in the risk evaluation. EPA
proposes that this is the most appropriate approach to 1,4-dioxane
under the statute and implementing regulations, with more explanation
provided in Unit II.C.1. Second, EPA would remove the assumption that
workers always and appropriately wear PPE (see Unit II.C.) in making
the whole chemical risk determination for 1,4-dioxane. The impacts of
this change are described in detail in Unit II.C.2. Third, based on the
2023 Draft Supplement to the risk evaluation, several additional
conditions of use would also contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination due to worker inhalation and dermal risks; these are
described in more detail in Unit II.C.3. Fourth, EPA proposes to
include risks to the general population and fenceline communities from
drinking water sourced from surface water contaminated with 1,4-dioxane
that is discharged from industrial facilities (including where it is
produced as a byproduct) as contributing to the unreasonable risk from
1,4-dioxane and is seeking public comment on several issues. These
risks are described in more detail in Unit II.C.4 and a description of
the request for comment is in Unit II.D. The list of the conditions of
use evaluated for the 1,4-dioxane TSCA risk evaluation is in Table 6-1
of the draft revised unreasonable risk determination (Ref. 1) and in
Table D-1 of the 2023 Draft Supplement to the Risk Evaluation for 1,4-
Dioxane (Ref. 3)).
D. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed CBI. In addition to one complete
version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy
of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so
marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set
forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
II. Background
A. What is 1,4-dioxane and what did EPA evaluate in 2020?
1,4-Dioxane is primarily used as a solvent in commercial and
industrial applications. It can also be produced as a byproduct of
several common manufacturing processes, including but not limited to
ethoxylation processes used in the production of surfactants used in
soaps and detergents and production of polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
plastics. 1,4-Dioxane produced as a byproduct may remain present in
consumer and commercial products, including soaps and detergents,
cleaning products, antifreeze, textile dyes, and paints/lacquers. 1,4-
Dioxane is released to the environment from industrial and commercial
releases and from consumer and commercial products that are washed down
the drain or disposed of in landfills. People may be exposed to 1,4-
dioxane through occupational exposure, consumer products, or contact
with water, land, or air where 1,4-dioxane has been released to the
environment. Health effects of 1,4-dioxane include risks of liver
toxicity, adverse effects in the olfactory epithelium, and cancer.
1,4-Dioxane is one of the first 10 chemical substances undergoing
the TSCA risk evaluation process under TSCA section 6(b). In 2019, EPA
released the draft 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation, which assessed risk
from occupational exposures and surface water exposures to
environmental organisms. This assessment, which included the physical
and chemical properties, lifecycle information, environmental fate and
transport information, and hazard identification and dose-response
analysis received public comment, was reviewed by the Science Advisory
Committee on Chemicals (SACC). The Agency considered the SACC feedback
and is not seeking additional review of that information at this time
as this information has not changed.
A 2020 supplement to the draft 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation assessed
an additional eight additional conditions of use of 1,4-dioxane present
in consumer products and general population exposure to 1,4-dioxane
from incidental contact with surface water. Both assessments were
incorporated into the 2020 Risk Evaluation, which was released in
December 2020.
The December 2020 Risk Evaluation assessed a total of 24 conditions
of use. In December 2020, EPA determined that 13 conditions of use
presented unreasonable risks due to exposure to workers or occupational
non-users, and that 11 conditions of use did not present an
unreasonable risk (of those 11, 3 were industrial/commercial uses, and
8 were consumer uses). EPA found that none of the conditions of use
present an unreasonable risk to the environment.
[[Page 48252]]
B. Why is EPA re-issuing the risk determination for the 2023 1,4-
dioxane risk evaluation conducted under TSCA?
In 2016, as directed by TSCA section 6(b)(2)(A), EPA chose the
first ten chemical substances to undergo risk evaluations under the
amended TSCA. These chemical substances are asbestos, 1-bromopropane,
carbon tetrachloride, C.I. Pigment Violet (PV 29), cyclic aliphatic
bromide cluster (HBCD), 1,4-dioxane, methylene chloride, n-
methylpyrrolidone (NMP), perchloroethylene (PCE), and trichloroethylene
(TCE).
From June 2020 to January 2021, EPA published risk evaluations on
the first ten chemical substances, including for 1,4-dioxane in
December 2020. The risk evaluations included individual unreasonable
risk determinations for each condition of use evaluated. EPA issued
determinations that particular conditions of use did not present an
unreasonable risk by order under TSCA section 6(i)(1).
In accordance with Executive Order 13990 (Ref. 4) and other
Administration priorities (Refs. 5, 6, and 7), EPA reviewed the risk
evaluations for the first ten chemical substances, including 1,4-
dioxane, to ensure that they meet the requirements of TSCA, including
conducting decision making in a manner that is consistent with the best
available science.
As a result of this review, EPA announced plans to revise specific
aspects of the first ten risk evaluations in order to ensure that the
risk evaluations appropriately identify unreasonable risks and thereby
help ensure the protection of human health and the environment (Ref.
8). EPA also announced plans, in response to public comments and peer
review, to supplement the 2020 Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane to
assess critical human exposure pathways not previously considered in
the 2020 Risk Evaluation, and to consider occupational exposures to
conditions of use where 1,4-dioxane is present due to production as a
byproduct. EPA has now developed the 2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation and has announced its availability and request for public
comment in a separate Federal Register notice, which also describes the
peer review process (88 FR 43562, July 10, 2023) (FRL-10798-02-OCSPP).
In the 2023 Draft Supplement, EPA assessed the risks from 8 industrial/
commercial uses of 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct, from processing 1,4-
dioxane as a byproduct, and from the general population exposures to
1,4-dioxane in ambient air and drinking water. This 2023 draft revised
risk determination is for 1,4-dioxane as a whole chemical--and thus
includes not only information from the 2023 Draft Supplement to the
1,4-dioxane risk evaluation but also proposes revisions to the 2020
risk determination based on the 2020 Risk Evaluation. EPA is releasing
this 2023 draft revised unreasonable risk determination separately from
the draft supplement to the risk evaluation but is aligning the comment
period for the two documents so that the final unreasonable risk
determination can be released concurrently with the final supplemental
risk evaluation.
This action pertains only to the risk determination for 1,4-
dioxane. While EPA has taken additional similar actions on other of the
first ten chemicals, EPA is taking a chemical-specific approach to
reviewing the risk evaluations and is incorporating new policy
direction in a surgical manner, while being mindful of the
Congressional direction on the need to complete risk evaluations and
move toward any associated risk management activities in accordance
with statutory deadlines.
C. What are EPA's considerations in the draft revised unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane?
In this draft revised unreasonable risk determination for 1,4-
dioxane, EPA is reconsidering two key aspects of the risk
determinations for 1,4-dioxane published in December 2020, proposing
several additional changes and updates, and highlighting specific
requests for comment.
First, following a review of specific aspects of the December 2020
1,4-dioxane risk evaluation, EPA proposes that making an unreasonable
risk determination for 1,4-dioxane as a whole chemical substance,
rather than making unreasonable risk determinations separately on each
individual condition of use evaluated in the risk evaluation, is the
most appropriate approach to 1,4-dioxane under the statute and
implementing regulations. Second, EPA proposes that the risk
determination should be explicit that it does not rely on assumptions
regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in making the
unreasonable risk determination under TSCA section 6, even though some
facilities might be using PPE as one means to reduce workers'
exposures; rather, the use of PPE as a means of addressing unreasonable
risk will be considered during risk management, as appropriate. As a
result, EPA preliminarily identifies two additional conditions of use
from the 2020 Risk Evaluation as contributing to the determination that
1,4-dioxane presents unreasonable risk. Additionally, for some of the
conditions of use in the 2020 Risk Evaluation that were identified as
``presenting'' an unreasonable risk to workers due to cancer,
eliminating the PPE assumption means that acute and chronic non-cancer
effects from inhalation exposure now also contribute to the
unreasonable risk. Third, based on the 2023 supplement to the risk
evaluation, EPA proposes to identify several additional conditions of
use as contributing to the unreasonable risk determination due to
worker inhalation and dermal risks. Fourth, EPA proposes that the risks
to the general population and fenceline communities from exposures to
1,4-dioxane in drinking water sourced from surface water contaminated
with industrial discharges of 1,4-dioxane (including when it is
generated as a byproduct) contributes to the determination that 1,4-
dioxane presents an unreasonable risk, and is seeking public comment on
several issues related to this proposed determination, as described in
Unit II.D.
1. What is a whole chemical view of the unreasonable risk
determination for the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation?
TSCA section 6 repeatedly refers to determining whether a chemical
substance presents unreasonable risk under its conditions of use.
Stakeholders have disagreed over whether a chemical substance should
receive: A single determination that is comprehensive for the chemical
substance after considering the conditions of use, referred to as a
whole-chemical determination; or multiple determinations, each of which
is specific to a condition of use, referred to as condition-of-use-
specific determinations.
The proposed risk evaluation procedural rule was premised on the
whole chemical approach to making an unreasonable risk determination
(Ref. 9). In that proposed rule, EPA acknowledged a lack of specificity
in statutory text that might lead to different views about whether the
statute compelled EPA's risk evaluations to address all conditions of
use of a chemical substance or whether EPA had discretion to evaluate
some subset of conditions of use (i.e., to scope out some
manufacturing, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or disposal
activities), but also stated that ``EPA believes the word `the' [in
TSCA section 6(b)(4)(A)] is best interpreted as calling for evaluation
that considers all conditions of use.'' (Ref. 9).
The proposed rule, however, was unambiguous on the point that an
[[Page 48253]]
unreasonable risk determination would be for the chemical substance as
a whole, even if based on a subset of uses. (See Ref. 9 at pgs. 7565-
66: ``TSCA section 6(b)(4)(A) specifies that a risk evaluation must
determine whether `a chemical substance' presents an unreasonable risk
of injury to health or the environment `under the conditions of use.'
The evaluation is on the chemical substance--not individual conditions
of use--and it must be based on `the conditions of use.' In this
context, EPA believes the word `the' is best interpreted as calling for
evaluation that considers all conditions of use.''). In the proposed
regulatory text, EPA proposed to determine whether the chemical
substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the
environment under the conditions of use (Ref. 9 at pg. 7480).
The final risk evaluation procedural rule stated (82 FR 33726, July
20, 2017) (FRL-9964-38) (Ref. 10): ``As part of the risk evaluation,
EPA will determine whether the chemical substance presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment under each
condition of uses [sic] within the scope of the risk evaluation, either
in a single decision document or in multiple decision documents.'' (See
also 40 CFR 702.47). For the unreasonable risk determinations in the
first ten risk evaluations, EPA applied this provision by making
individual risk determinations for each condition of use evaluated in
each risk evaluation (i.e., the condition-of-use-specific approach to
risk determinations). That approach was based on one particular passage
in the preamble to the final risk evaluation procedural rule, which
stated that EPA will make individual risk determinations for all
conditions of use identified in the scope. (Ref. 10 at pg. 33744).
In contrast to this portion of the preamble of the final risk
evaluation procedural rule, the regulatory text itself and other
statements in the preamble reference a risk determination for the
chemical substance under its conditions of use, rather than separate
risk determinations for each of the conditions of use of a chemical
substance. In the key regulatory provision excerpted earlier from 40
CFR 702.47, the text explains that ``[a]s part of the risk evaluation,
EPA will determine whether the chemical substance presents an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment under each
condition of uses [sic] within the scope of the risk evaluation, either
in a single decision document or in multiple decision documents'' (Ref.
10, emphasis added). Other language reiterates this perspective. For
example, 40 CFR 702.31(a) states that the purpose of the rule is to
establish the EPA process for conducting a risk evaluation to determine
whether a chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk of injury to
health or the environment as required under TSCA section 6(b)(4)(B).
Likewise, there are recurring references to whether the chemical
substance presents an unreasonable risk in 40 CFR 702.41(a). See, for
example, 40 CFR 702.41(a)(6), which explains that the extent to which
EPA will refine its evaluations for one or more condition of use in any
risk evaluation will vary as necessary to determine whether a chemical
substance presents an unreasonable risk. Notwithstanding the one
preambular statement about condition-of-use-specific risk
determinations, the preamble to the final rule also contains support
for a risk determination on the chemical substance as a whole. In
discussing the identification of the conditions of use of a chemical
substance, the preamble notes that this task inevitably involves the
exercise of discretion on EPA's part, and ``as EPA interprets the
statute, the Agency is to exercise that discretion consistent with the
objective of conducting a technically sound, manageable evaluation to
determine whether a chemical substance--not just individual uses or
activities--presents an unreasonable risk.'' (Ref. 9 at pg. 33729).
Therefore, notwithstanding EPA's choice to issue condition-of-use-
specific risk determinations to date, EPA interprets its risk
evaluation regulation to also allow the Agency to issue whole-chemical
risk determinations. Either approach is permissible under the
regulation. A panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals also
recognized the ambiguity of the regulation on this point. Safer
Chemicals v. EPA, 943 F.3d 397, 413 (9th Cir. 2019) (holding a
challenge about ``use-by-use risk evaluations [was] not justiciable
because it is not clear, due to the ambiguous text of the Risk
Evaluation Rule, whether the Agency will actually conduct risk
evaluations in the manner Petitioners fear'').
EPA plans to consider the appropriate approach for each chemical
substance risk evaluation on a case-by-case basis, taking into account
considerations relevant to the specific chemical substance in light of
the Agency's obligations under TSCA. The Agency expects that this case-
by-case approach will provide greater flexibility in the Agency's
ability to evaluate and manage unreasonable risk from individual
chemical substances. EPA believes this is a reasonable approach under
TSCA and the Agency's implementing regulations.
With regard to the specific circumstances of 1,4-dioxane, as
further explained in this notice, EPA proposes that a whole chemical
approach is appropriate for 1,4-dioxane in order to protect health and
the environment. The whole chemical approach is appropriate for 1,4-
dioxane because there are benchmark exceedances for multiple conditions
of use (spanning across most aspects of the chemical lifecycle--from
manufacturing (including import), processing, industrial and commercial
use, and disposal) for health of workers, occupational non-users, and
fenceline communities and the general population, and the understanding
that the health effects (specifically liver toxicity, olfactory
epithelium effects, and cancer) associated with 1,4-dioxane exposures
are irreversible. Because these chemical-specific properties cut across
the conditions of use within the scope of the risk evaluation, it is
appropriate for the Agency to make a determination for 1,4-dioxane that
the whole chemical presents an unreasonable risk.
As explained later in this document, the revisions to the
unreasonable risk determination (section 5 of the 2020 Risk Evaluation)
would be based on the existing risk characterization section of the
2020 Risk Evaluation (section 4 of the 2020 Risk Evaluation) and the
2023 Draft Supplement to the Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane. The
discussion of the issues presented in this Federal Register notice and
in the accompanying draft revision to the risk determination would
supersede any conflicting statements in the prior 2020 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation and the response to comments document (Ref. 11). With
respect to the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation, while EPA intends to change
the risk determination to a whole chemical approach without considering
the use of PPE, EPA is basing the 2023 draft unreasonable risk
determination on the underlying scientific analysis from the 2020 Risk
Evaluation and 2023 Draft Supplement to the Risk Evaluation. EPA does
not intend to amend, nor does a whole chemical approach require
amending, the underlying scientific analysis of the risk evaluation in
the risk characterization section of the 2020 Risk Evaluation. EPA also
notes the Correction of Dermal Acute and Chronic Non-Cancer Hazard
Values Used to Evaluate Risks from Occupational Exposures that
explained, while the corrections slightly alter occupational dermal
risk estimates, they do not appreciably impact the overall
[[Page 48254]]
risk conclusions (Ref. 12). Because updates are not necessary for the
2020 publication, EPA views the peer reviewed hazard and exposure
assessments and associated risk characterization as robust and
upholding the standards of best available science and weight of the
scientific evidence per TSCA sections 26(h) and (i).
EPA is announcing the availability of and seeking public comment on
the 2023 draft unreasonable risk determination for 1,4-dioxane,
including a description of the risks contributing to the unreasonable
risk determination under the conditions of use for the chemical
substance as a whole. For purposes of TSCA section 6(i), EPA is making
a draft risk determination on 1,4-dioxane as a whole chemical. Under
the proposed revised approach, the ``whole chemical'' risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane would supersede the no unreasonable risk
determinations (and withdraw the associated order) for 1,4-dioxane that
were premised on a condition-of-use-specific approach to determining
unreasonable risk. When finalized, EPA's revised unreasonable risk
determination would also contain an order withdrawing the TSCA section
6(i)(1) order in section 5.4.1 of the December 2020 1,4-Dioxane Risk
Evaluation.
2. What revision does EPA propose about the use of PPE for the 1,4-
dioxane risk evaluation?
In the risk evaluations for the first ten chemical substances, as
part of the unreasonable risk determination, EPA assumed for several
conditions of use that workers were provided and always used PPE in a
manner that achieves the stated assigned protection factor (APF) for
respiratory protection, or used impervious gloves for dermal
protection. In support of this assumption, EPA used reasonably
available information such as public comments indicating that some
employers, particularly in the industrial setting, provide PPE to their
employees and follow established worker protection standards (e.g.,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements for
protection of workers).
For the December 2020 1,4-Dioxane Risk Evaluation, EPA assumed,
based on reasonably available information, that workers use PPE--
specifically respirators with an APF ranging from 10 to 50 and gloves
with PF 10 or 20--for 15 occupational conditions of use. However, in
the December 2020 Risk Evaluation, EPA determined that there is
unreasonable risk for 13 of those 15 occupational conditions of use
even with assumed PPE.
EPA is revising the assumption for 1,4-dioxane that workers always
or properly use PPE. However, this does not mean that EPA questions the
veracity of public comments which describe occupational safety
practices often followed by industry. EPA believes it is appropriate
when conducting risk evaluations under TSCA to evaluate the levels of
risk present in baseline scenarios where PPE is not assumed to be used
by workers. This approach of not assuming PPE use by workers considers
the risk to potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations (workers
and occupational non-users) who may not be covered by OSHA standards,
such as self-employed individuals and public sector workers who are not
covered by a State Plan. It should be noted that, in some cases,
baseline conditions may reflect certain mitigation measures, such as
engineering controls, in instances where exposure estimates are based
on monitoring data at facilities that have engineering controls in
place.
In addition, EPA believes it is appropriate to evaluate the levels
of risk present in scenarios considering applicable OSHA requirements
(e.g., chemical-specific permissible exposure limits (PELs) and/or
chemical-specific PELs with additional substance-specific standards) as
well as scenarios considering industry or sector best practices for
industrial hygiene that are clearly articulated to the Agency.
Consistent with this approach, the December 2020 1,4-dioxane risk
evaluation (Ref. 2) characterized risk to workers both with and without
the use of PPE. By characterizing risks using scenarios that reflect
different levels of mitigation, EPA risk evaluations can help inform
potential risk management actions by providing information that could
be used during risk management to tailor risk mitigation appropriately
to address any unreasonable risk identified, or to ensure that
applicable OSHA requirements or industry or sector best practices that
address the unreasonable risk are required for all potentially exposed
or susceptible subpopulations (including self-employed individuals and
public sector workers who are not covered by an OSHA State Plan).
Similarly, for the occupational exposures assessed as part of the added
conditions of use in the 2023 Draft Supplement to the 1,4-Dioxane Risk
Evaluation, EPA characterizes risks to workers with and without the use
of PPE (Complete risk calculations and results for occupational
conditions of use from the 2020 Risk Evaluation and the 2023 Draft
Supplement are in the Draft Supplement to the Risk Evaluation for 1,4-
Dioxane--Supplemental Information File: Occupational Exposure and Risk
Estimates (Ref. 13)).
When undertaking unreasonable risk determinations as part of TSCA
risk evaluations, however, EPA does not believe it is appropriate to
assume as a general matter that an applicable OSHA requirement or
industry practices related to PPE use is consistently and always
properly applied. Mitigation scenarios included in the EPA risk
evaluation (e.g., scenarios considering use of various PPE) likely
represent what is happening already in some facilities. However, the
Agency cannot assume that all facilities have adopted these practices
for the purposes of making the TSCA risk determination (Ref. 14).
Therefore, EPA proposes to make a determination of unreasonable
risk for 1,4-dioxane from a baseline scenario that does not assume
compliance with OSHA standards, including any applicable exposure
limits or requirements for use of respiratory protection or other PPE.
Making unreasonable risk determinations based on the baseline scenario
should not be viewed as an indication that EPA believes there are no
occupational safety protections in place at any location, or that there
is widespread non-compliance with applicable OSHA standards. Rather, it
reflects EPA's recognition that unreasonable risk may exist for
subpopulations of workers that may be highly exposed because they are
not covered by OSHA standards, such as self-employed individuals and
public sector workers who are not covered by a State Plan, or because
their employer is out of compliance with OSHA standards, or because
many of OSHA's chemical-specific permissible exposure limits largely
adopted in the 1970's are described by OSHA as being ``outdated and
inadequate for ensuring protection of worker health,'' (Ref. 15) or
because EPA finds unreasonable risk for purposes of TSCA
notwithstanding OSHA requirements.
In accordance with this approach, EPA is proposing the draft
revision to the 1,4-dioxane risk determination without relying on
assumptions regarding the occupational use of PPE in making the
unreasonable risk determination under TSCA section 6; rather,
information on the use of PPE as a means of mitigating risk (including
information received from industry respondents about occupational
safety practices in use) would be considered during the risk management
phase as
[[Page 48255]]
appropriate. This would represent a change from the approach taken in
the 2020 Risk Evaluation for 1,4-dioxane and EPA invites comments on
this 2023 draft change to the 1,4-dioxane risk determination. As a
general matter, when undertaking risk management actions, EPA intends
to strive for consistency with applicable OSHA requirements and
industry best practices, including appropriate application of the
hierarchy of controls, when those measures would address an identified
unreasonable risk, including unreasonable risk to potentially exposed
or susceptible subpopulations. Consistent with TSCA section 9(d), EPA
will consult and coordinate TSCA activities with OSHA and other
relevant Federal agencies for the purpose of achieving the maximum
applicability of TSCA while avoiding the imposition of duplicative
requirements. Informed by the mitigation scenarios and information
gathered during the risk evaluation and risk management process, the
Agency might propose rules that require risk management practices that
may be already common practice in many or most facilities. Adopting
clear, comprehensive regulatory standards will foster compliance across
all facilities (ensuring a level playing field) and assure protections
for all affected workers, especially in cases where current OSHA
standards may not apply or be sufficient to address the unreasonable
risk.
Removing the assumption that workers always and appropriately wear
PPE in making the whole chemical risk determination for 1,4-dioxane
would mean that for the conditions of use evaluated in the 2020 Risk
Evaluation, two conditions of use in addition to the original 13
conditions of use would contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane; an additional route of exposure (i.e.,
inhalation) would also be identified as contributing to the
unreasonable risk to workers in five of those 13 conditions of use; and
additional risks for acute and chronic non-cancer effects from
inhalation exposures would also contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination from seven of those 13 conditions of use (where
previously those conditions of use were identified as presenting
unreasonable risk from inhalation exposures only from cancer). The
draft revision to the risk determination would clarify that EPA does
not rely on the assumed use of PPE when making the risk determination
for the whole substance. EPA is requesting comment on this potential
change.
3. What conditions of use is EPA adding to the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination?
1,4-Dioxane produced as a byproduct of manufacturing processes can
result in occupational exposures in industrial settings and may be
present in consumer and commercial products. It also may be released to
the environment through direct and indirect industrial and commercial
releases. While the 2020 Risk Evaluation considered risks to consumers
and bystanders from 1,4-dioxane present in consumer products due to its
production as a byproduct, it did not evaluate other exposures to 1,4-
dioxane produced as a byproduct. The 2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation considers occupational, fenceline community, and general
population exposures that result from conditions of use where 1,4-
dioxane is present, including as a result of production as a byproduct.
These exposures include 1,4-dioxane present in drinking water sourced
from surface water as a result of direct and indirect industrial
releases and down-the-drain releases of consumer and commercial
products; 1,4-dioxane present in drinking water sourced from
groundwater contaminated as a result of disposals; and 1,4-dioxane
released to air from industrial and commercial sources.
The following conditions of use are added to the 2023 Draft
Supplement:
Processing as a byproduct (including polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) byproduct and ethoxylation process byproduct);
Industrial/commercial use: Other uses: Hydraulic
fracturing;
Industrial/commercial use: Arts, crafts, and hobby
materials: Textile dye;
Industrial/commercial use: Automotive care products:
Antifreeze;
Industrial/commercial use: Cleaning and furniture care
products: Surface cleaner;
Industrial/commercial use: Laundry and dishwashing
products: Dish soap;
Industrial/commercial use: Laundry and dishwashing
products: Dishwasher detergent;
Industrial/commercial use: Laundry and dishwashing
products: Laundry detergent; and
Industrial/commercial use: Paints and coatings: Paint and
floor lacquer;
For each of these conditions of use, EPA evaluated risks of non-
cancer and cancer effects due to acute or chronic inhalation or dermal
exposure. For the 2023 draft supplement, EPA relied on the physical and
chemical properties information, as well as lifecycle information,
environmental fate and transport information, and hazard identification
and dose-response analyses presented in the 2020 Risk Evaluation (Ref.
2).
4. Which exposure pathways are being added to EPA's 2023 revised
unreasonable risk determination?
The 2020-2021 risk evaluations for several of the first 10
chemicals, including 1,4-dioxane, excluded exposure pathways that were
or could be regulated under another EPA-administered statute. For 1,4-
dioxane, the air and drinking water exposure pathways were excluded
from the 2020 Risk Evaluation and were not assessed. The 2023 Draft
Supplement evaluates risks from general population and fenceline
community exposures to 1,4-dioxane released to surface and groundwater,
air, and land. The risks EPA evaluated to fenceline communities and the
general population (using reasonably available monitoring and modeling
data for inhalation, dermal, and ingestion exposures) include risks
from the conditions of use assessed in the 2020 Risk Evaluation as well
as the conditions of use assessed in the 2023 Draft Supplement,
including conditions of use where 1,4-dioxane is manufactured, or where
it is present due to production as a byproduct. These exposures to 1,4-
dioxane include releases to air and water from polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) plastic manufacturing, ethoxylation processes,
hydraulic fracturing operations, and use of a range of consumer and
commercial products.
D. What conclusions is EPA proposing to reach in the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination and on what is EPA seeking public
comment?
In the 2020 Risk Evaluation, EPA determined that 1,4-dioxane
presents an unreasonable risk to health under the following 13
conditions of use, based on risks to workers:
Manufacturing (domestic manufacture);
Manufacturing (import/repackaging);
Processing: Repackaging;
Processing: Recycling;
Processing: Non-incorporative;
Processing: Processing as a reactant;
Industrial/commercial use: Intermediate;
Industrial/commercial use: Processing aid;
Industrial/commercial use: Laboratory chemicals;
Industrial/commercial use: Adhesives and sealants;
Industrial/commercial use: Printing and printing
compositions;
Industrial/commercial use: Dry film lubricant; and
[[Page 48256]]
Disposal.
Under the proposed whole chemical approach to the 1,4-dioxane risk
determination, those same conditions of use would continue to
contribute to the unreasonable risk from 1,4-dioxane. In addition, by
removing the assumption of PPE use in making the whole chemical risk
determination for 1,4-dioxane, two conditions of use (in addition to
the original 13 conditions of use in the 2020 Risk Evaluation found to
contribute to the unreasonable risk) would contribute to the
unreasonable risk:
Industrial/commercial use: Functional fluids (open and
closed system): Metalworking fluid, cutting and tapping fluid,
polyalkylene glycol fluid; and
Industrial/commercial use: Other uses: Spray polyurethane
foam.
Of the conditions of use that have been added in the 2023 Draft
Supplement, EPA has preliminarily determined that the following would
contribute to the unreasonable risk determination, based on risks to
workers:
Processing as a byproduct (including polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) byproduct and ethoxylation process byproduct);
Industrial/commercial use: Other uses: Hydraulic
fracturing;
Industrial/commercial use: Arts, crafts, and hobby
materials: Textile dye;
Industrial/commercial use: Laundry and dishwashing
products: Dish soap;
Industrial/commercial use: Laundry and dishwashing
products: Dishwasher detergent; and
Industrial/commercial use: Paints and coatings: Paint and
floor lacquer.
Based on the occupational risk estimates and EPA's confidence in
them, EPA finds that the worker exposure to 1,4-dioxane from all but
four occupational conditions of use (Ref. 1) contributes to the
unreasonable risk from 1,4-dioxane.
In the 2020 Risk Evaluation, EPA evaluated risks to consumers from
eight conditions of use and found that they did not present an
unreasonable risk to consumers or bystanders. In the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination, EPA does not propose to identify the
consumer conditions of use as contributing to the unreasonable risk
determination from 1,4-dioxane. However, EPA notes that the generation
of 1,4-dioxane as an ethoxylation process byproduct--i.e., the upstream
processing of many of these the consumer products--does contribute to
the unreasonable risk determination, due to worker risks of cancer and
non-cancer effects from inhalation and dermal exposures during those
processes and risk to the general population and fenceline communities
from exposures to drinking water sourced from surface water
contaminated with 1,4-dioxane discharged from industrial facilities.
Regarding ambient air exposures, EPA estimated risks from fenceline
community exposures to 1,4-dioxane released to air. Risks were
evaluated for air releases from industrial conditions of use, hydraulic
fracturing operations, and industrial and institutional laundry
facilities. EPA's modeling methodologies, risk estimates, and
confidence in those estimates is described in Section 5 of the draft
supplemental risk evaluation (Ref. 3). Standard cancer benchmarks used
by EPA and other regulatory agencies are an increased cancer risk above
benchmarks ranging from 1 in 1,000,000 to 1 in 10,000 (i.e.,
1x10-\6\ to 1x10-\4\) depending on the
subpopulation exposed. Based on the risk estimates for cancer, non-
cancer acute effects, and non-cancer chronic effects, the fact that the
risk estimates are within the applicable benchmark range, and EPA's
confidence in the risk estimates, EPA preliminarily finds that
fenceline community exposure to 1,4-dioxane in ambient air from
releases from industrial conditions of use, including hydraulic
fracturing, industrial laundry facilities, and institutional laundry
facilities does not contribute to EPA's unreasonable risk
determination. More details on EPA's preliminary determination
regarding fenceline communities' exposure to 1,4-dioxane in ambient air
is in the 2023 draft revised risk determination (Ref. 1).
Regarding drinking water exposures, in the 2023 Draft Supplement,
EPA evaluated oral exposures via ingestion of drinking water sourced
from surface water or groundwater contaminated with 1,4-dioxane from
facility-specific releases, down-the-drain releases of consumer and
commercial products that contain 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct, hydraulic
fracturing releases, and leaching from landfills. 1,4-Dioxane is not
readily removed through typical wastewater or drinking water treatment
processes. Sources of 1,4-dioxane in surface water include direct and
indirect industrial releases from COUs where 1,4-dioxane is
manufactured, processed, or used, industrial COUs where 1,4-dioxane is
present due to production as a byproduct (including PET manufacturing,
ethoxylation processes, and hydraulic fracturing operations), and down-
the-drain releases of 1,4-dioxane present in consumer and commercial
products. EPA considered risks from these sources individually and in
aggregate. The relative contribution from different sources varies
under different conditions and is likely to be driven by site-specific
factors including the amounts released from each source, flow rates of
receiving water bodies, and proximity of releases to drinking water
intakes. Drinking water exposure and risk estimates for surface water
are highly dependent on the amount of 1,4-dioxane released and the flow
of the receiving water body. Exposure and risk estimates are also
influenced by whether there is a drinking water intake downstream of a
release and the degree of dilution that occurs between the point of
release and the drinking water intake. Available surface water
monitoring datasets are not designed to reflect source water impacts of
direct and indirect releases into water bodies. Therefore, EPA
estimated concentrations using modeling for a range of specific release
scenarios. Similarly, for groundwater, EPA estimated cancer and non-
cancer risks for a range of general population and fenceline community
exposures to groundwater used as drinking water; sources of 1,4-dioxane
in groundwater may include leachate from landfills and disposal of
hydraulic fracturing waste.
Based on information in the 2023 Draft Supplement to the risk
evaluation, several conditions of use of 1,4-dioxane could result in
exposures to the general population and fenceline communities from 1,4-
dioxane in drinking water after it is discharged from facilities
engaging in one of several conditions of use. EPA also notes that many
of the conditions of use assessed in the 2023 Draft Supplement
contribute to more than one exposure pathway. For example, 1,4-dioxane
present as a byproduct of PET manufacturing may contribute to
occupational exposures during manufacturing as well as exposures to the
general population and fenceline communities through releases to water.
In addition, for many of the exposure pathways assessed, multiple
conditions of use contribute to 1,4-dioxane exposure. For example, many
conditions of use can contribute to general population and fenceline
communities' exposures to 1,4-dioxane in surface water, including
industrial releases from a range of conditions of use and down-the-
drain releases of consumer and commercial products.
EPA proposes to include the risks to the general population and
fenceline communities from drinking water sourced from surface water
contaminated with 1,4-dioxane that is discharged from industrial
facilities (including where it is produced as a
[[Page 48257]]
byproduct) as contributing to the unreasonable risk determination.
However, due to the uncertainties described in this Unit, in more
detail in section 6.2.4 of the 2023 draft revised unreasonable risk
determination, and throughout the 2023 Draft Supplement, EPA has
outlined several specific requests for comment regarding this draft
risk determination, in this Unit.
As described in the 2023 draft revised unreasonable risk
determination, EPA's proposed unreasonable risk determination for 1,4-
dioxane as a whole chemical is based on cancer and non-cancer risks to
workers from inhalation and dermal exposures, and cancer risks to the
general population and fenceline communities from exposures to 1,4-
dioxane in drinking water sourced from surface water contaminated by
industrial discharges of 1,4-dioxane (including when it is generated as
a byproduct). EPA proposes to identify the following conditions of use,
from both the 2020 Risk Evaluation and the 2023 Draft Supplement, as
contributing to the unreasonable risk from 1,4-dioxane:
Manufacture (including domestic manufacture and import);
Processing (including repackaging, recycling, non-
incorporative, as a reactant, and as a byproduct);
Industrial/commercial use: Functional fluids (open and
closed system): Metalworking fluid, cutting and tapping fluid,
polyalkylene glycol fluid, hydraulic fluid;
Industrial/commercial use: Intermediate;
Industrial/commercial use: Processing aid;
Industrial/commercial use: Laboratory chemicals;
Industrial/commercial use: Adhesives and sealants;
Industrial/commercial use: Other uses: Printing and
printing compositions;
Industrial/commercial use: Other uses: Dry film lubricant;
Industrial/commercial use: Other uses: Spray polyurethane
foam;
Industrial/commercial use: Other uses: Hydraulic
fracturing;
Industrial/commercial use: Arts, crafts, and hobby
materials: Textile dye;
Industrial/commercial use: Laundry and dishwashing
products: Dish soap;
Industrial/commercial use: Laundry and dishwashing
products: Dishwasher detergent;
Industrial/commercial use: Paints and coatings: Paint and
floor lacquer; and
Disposal.
Because the risk estimates for all processing COUs identified and
evaluated in the 2020 Risk Evaluation and the 2023 Draft Supplement
(including those where 1,4-dioxane is processed as a byproduct)
contribute to the unreasonable risk, EPA believes that it is
appropriate to conclude that any processing of 1,4-dioxane contributes
to the unreasonable risk. This would include circumstances described
but not necessarily individually quantified in the 2020 Risk Evaluation
or the 2023 Draft Supplement, such as when 1,4-dioxane is generated as
a byproduct during sulfonation, sulfation, and esterification
processes. EPA also emphasizes that this determination identifies any
manufacturing, processing, or disposal of 1,4-dioxane--including as a
byproduct--as contributing to the unreasonable risk if the 1,4-dioxane
contaminates surface water that is the source of drinking water.
EPA is seeking public comment for certain considerations for
determining unreasonable risk to the general population or fenceline
communities from 1,4-dioxane in drinking water. EPA notes that the
agency has preliminarily determined that the worker risks identified
provide sufficient basis for the determination that 1,4-dioxane as a
whole chemical presents unreasonable risk. Nonetheless, for the
purposes of transparency, clear public communication on unreasonable
risk, and to inform future risk management activities, EPA is seeking
comment on the following:
Industrial discharges of 1,4-dioxane to surface water. EPA
is able to provide risk estimates for drinking water contaminated with
1,4-dioxane from surface water discharges from some facility-specific
releases of 1,4-dioxane, including from some facilities that
manufacture, process, or use 1,4-dioxane (including as a byproduct).
Several high-end risk estimates exceed the range of applicable
benchmarks for increased cancer risk (i.e., 1x10-\4\ to
1x10-\6\), and EPA has higher confidence in the facility-
specific risk estimates for discharges to surface water compared to
other drinking water risk estimates (i.e., groundwater, down-the-drain
releases from commercial and consumer products). In general, the
aggregate analysis for drinking water sourced from surface water
indicates that the high-end risk analysis may be driven primarily by
high-end industrial releases, under certain conditions. EPA has
preliminarily determined that exposures to surface water containing
1,4-dioxane from industrial discharges contribute to the unreasonable
risk.
EPA seeks comment on whether EPA's evaluation of facilities that
discharge 1,4-dioxane in processes that manufacture 1,4-dioxane or
generate 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct (e.g., PET manufacturing, and
ethoxylation processes), can reasonably be assumed to represent the
spectrum of facilities or sectors producing 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct
for the purposes of risk determination and, if necessary, any risk
management action.
Because multiple sources may contribute to 1,4-dioxane
concentrations in drinking water sourced from surface water in a single
location, EPA estimated aggregate general population exposures and
risks that could occur from combined contributions from multiple
sources. EPA seeks comment on whether an unreasonable risk
determination is supported in instances where EPA is unable to
attribute exposures to specific COUs as specific sources of risk, but
rather is able to attribute exposures to sources of the chemical
covering many COUs as an aggregate contributor to unreasonable risk.
Down-the-drain releases of 1,4-dioxane from consumer and
commercial products. EPA evaluated the potential contribution of down-
the-drain releases of consumer and commercial products that contain
1,4-dioxane as a byproduct to drinking water exposure and risk. EPA's
drinking water exposure estimates correspond to surface water
concentrations estimated by probabilistic modeling of down-the-drain
releases under varying population sizes and stream flows. With some
combinations of factors, exposures to down-the-drain releases of 1,4-
dioxane in drinking water alone result in increased cancer risks within
EPA's benchmark range of 1x10-\6\ to 1x10-\4\ in
some instances. Assuming no dilution between the point of release and
the drinking water intake, the estimated risks range from
2.04x10-\11\ to 6.11x10-\5\ with the risks
increasing as population increases and stream flow decreases. Based on
the conservative analysis of no assumed dilution, confidence in risk
estimates, and consideration of uncertainties, EPA has preliminarily
determined that down-the-drain releases of 1,4-dioxane do not
contribute to the unreasonable risk determination.
EPA seeks comment regarding to what extent factors such as stream
flow and population size should be factored into the unreasonable risk
determination, or whether consideration of those factors is more
appropriate for the risk management stage.
EPA seeks comment on its draft determination that down-the-drain
releases of 1,4-dioxane do not contribute
[[Page 48258]]
to the unreasonable risk determination due to the uncertainties
identified in the risk characterization regarding consumer and
commercial products that contain 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct (i.e.,
soaps, dishwashing detergents, and laundry detergent).
Groundwater and potential 1,4-dioxane exposure in drinking
water. EPA estimated risks from exposures that could occur if
groundwater containing 1,4-dioxane is used as a source of drinking
water. These risk estimates are not tied to known releases at specific
locations. Rather, the analysis defines the conditions under which 1,4-
dioxane disposal to landfills or from hydraulic fracturing operations
could result in varying levels of risk from groundwater concentrations
of 1,4-dioxane. EPA's drinking water exposure scenario relies on the
assumption that modeled groundwater concentrations reflect the actual
groundwater concentrations that occur at well locations. While the
modeling methodology is robust and the release information relied on as
model input data is supported by moderate evidence, no monitoring data
are available to confirm detection of 1,4-dioxane in groundwater,
specifically near hydraulic fracturing operations. EPA has
preliminarily determined that groundwater containing 1,4-dioxane does
not contribute to the unreasonable risk determination. EPA seeks
comment on its draft determination that groundwater exposures from 1,4-
dioxane do not contribute to the unreasonable risk determination due to
the uncertainties identified in the risk characterization regarding
releases of 1,4-dioxane from landfill leachate and hydraulic fracturing
operations.
Determination of general population and fenceline
community risks. As described in the 2023 Draft Supplement (Ref. 3),
fenceline communities are members of the general population that are in
proximity to air-emitting facilities or a receiving waterbody, and who
therefore may be disproportionately exposed to a chemical undergoing
risk evaluation under TSCA section 6. For the air pathway, proximity
goes out to 10,000 meters from an air emitting source. For the water
pathway, proximity does not refer to a specific distance measured from
a receiving waterbody, but rather to those members of the general
population that may interact with the receiving waterbody and thus may
be exposed. EPA seeks comment, for the purposes of drinking water, on
what parameters EPA should consider in identifying whether exposures to
the general populations contribute to an unreasonable risk
determination. Specifically, EPA seeks comment on whether and how to
incorporate exposures to the general population from multiple sources
that cannot be attributed to COUs, is dependent on site-specific
circumstances, variable across the country, or dependent on stream
flow, population size, or population density. EPA also seeks comment on
whether other parameters should be considered, and, if so, how they
should be incorporated.
As noted in Unit II.C.1., EPA is also seeking comment on the draft
superseding unreasonable risk determination for 1,4-dioxane, including
a description of the risks that contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination under the conditions of use for the chemical substance as
a whole. Additionally, as noted in Unit II.C.2, EPA is also seeking
comment on EPA's 2023 draft revision to the 1,4-dioxane risk
determination without relying on assumptions regarding the occupational
use of PPE in making the unreasonable risk determination under TSCA
section 6.
III. Revision of the December 2020 Risk Evaluation
A. Why is EPA proposing to revise the risk determination for the 1,4-
dioxane risk evaluation?
EPA is proposing to revise the risk determination for the 1,4-
dioxane risk evaluation pursuant to TSCA section 6(b) and consistent
with Executive Order 13990, (``Protecting Public Health and the
Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis'') and
other Administration priorities (Refs. 4, 5, and 7). EPA is revising
specific aspects of the first ten TSCA existing chemical risk
evaluations in order to ensure that the risk evaluations better align
with TSCA's objective of protecting health and the environment.
For the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation, this includes the draft
revisions: (1) making the risk determination in this instance based on
the whole chemical substance instead of by individual conditions of
use, (2) emphasizing that EPA does not rely on the assumed use of PPE
when making the risk determination and identifying which conditions of
use in the 2020 Risk Evaluation would contribute to the unreasonable
risk determination based on worker exposure without assuming use of
PPE, (3) identifying which of the additional conditions evaluated in
the 2023 Draft Supplement contribute to the unreasonable risk
determination based on worker exposure, and (4) proposing that the
risks to fenceline communities from exposure to 1,4-dioxane in drinking
water sourced from surface water contaminated by industrial discharges
of 1,4-dioxane (including when it is generated as a byproduct) and (5)
seeking public comment on several issues, as listed in Unit II.D.
B. What are the draft revisions?
EPA is releasing a draft revision of the risk determination for the
1,4-dioxane risk evaluation pursuant to TSCA section 6(b). Under the
revised determination, EPA proposes to conclude that 1,4-dioxane, as
evaluated in the risk evaluation as a whole, presents an unreasonable
risk of injury to health under its conditions of use. This revision
would replace the previous unreasonable risk determinations made for
1,4-dioxane by individual conditions of use, supersede the
determinations (and withdraw the associated order) of no unreasonable
risk for the conditions of use identified in the TSCA section 6(i)(1)
no unreasonable risk order, clarify the lack of reliance on assumed use
of PPE as part of the risk determination, and incorporate information
(including the addition of conditions of use and exposure pathways)
assessed in the 2023 Draft Supplement to the Risk Evaluation for 1,4-
Dioxane.
These draft revisions do not alter any of the underlying technical
or scientific information that informs the risk characterization in the
2020 Risk Evaluation, and as such the hazard, exposure, and risk
characterization sections in the 2020 Risk Evaluation are not changed
except to the extent that statements about PPE assumptions in the
executive summary and including sections 4.2.2.6 (Occupational Risk
Estimation for Cancer Effects), 4.6.2.1 (Summary of Risk for Workers
and ONUs), and section 5.1.1.3 (Determining Unreasonable Risk of Injury
to Health) of the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation would be superseded and
the 2023 draft risk determination also reflects the 2023 supplemental
risk evaluation. The discussion of the issues in this notice and in the
accompanying draft revision to the risk determination would supersede
any conflicting statements in the prior executive summary, including
sections 4.2.2.6, 4.6.2.1, and section 5.1.1.3 from the 1,4-dioxane
risk evaluation and the response to comments document (Refs. 2 and 11).
C. Will the draft revised risk determination be peer reviewed?
The risk determination (section 5 in the December 2020 Risk
Evaluation) was not part of the scope of the peer review of the 1,4-
dioxane risk evaluation by the SACC. Thus, consistent with that
[[Page 48259]]
approach, EPA is not seeking peer review of the 2023 draft revised
unreasonable risk determination for the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation.
EPA is, however, seeking peer review as well as public comment on the
2023 Draft Supplement to the 1,4-Dioxane Risk Evaluation, as described
in a separate Federal Register notice (88 FR 43562, July 10, 2023)
(FRL-10798-02-OCSPP). EPA will consider changes made to the risk
evaluation in response to peer review and public comment on that
supplement when developing the final risk determination.
D. What are the next steps for finalizing revisions to the risk
determination?
EPA will review and consider public comment received on the draft
revised risk determination for the 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation and will
review and consider public comment and peer review on the 2023 Draft
Supplement to the 1,4-Dioxane Risk Evaluation. After considering those
public comments, EPA will issue the revised final 1,4-dioxane risk
determination. If finalized as drafted, EPA would also issue a new
order to withdraw the TSCA section 6(i)(1) no unreasonable risk order
issued in Section 5.4.1 of the 2020 1,4-dioxane risk evaluation. This
final revised risk determination would supersede the December 2020 risk
determinations of no unreasonable risk. Consistent with the statutory
requirements of TSCA, EPA would initiate risk management for 1,4-
dioxane either by applying one or more of the requirements under TSCA
section 6(a) to the extent necessary so that 1,4-dioxane no longer
presents an unreasonable risk or determining pursuant to TSCA sections
9(a) and/or 9(b) that other Federal laws can eliminate or reduce to a
sufficient extent the unreasonable risk.
IV. References
The following is a listing of the documents that are specifically
referenced in this document. The docket includes these documents and
other information considered by EPA, including documents that are
referenced within the documents that are included in the docket, even
if the referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For
assistance in locating these other documents, please consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
1. EPA Draft Revised Unreasonable Risk Determination for 1,4-
Dioxane, July 2023.
2. EPA. Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane. December 2020. EPA Document
#EPA-740-R1-8007. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0238-0092.
3. EPA. Draft Supplemental Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane. July
2023. EPA Document #EPA-740-D-23-001. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2022-0905-0027.
4. Executive Order 13990. Protecting Public Health and the
Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis.
Federal Register. 86 FR 7037, January 25, 2021.
5. Executive Order 13985. Advancing Racial Equity and Support for
Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government. Federal
Register. 86 FR 7009, January 25, 2021.
6. Executive Order 14008. Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and
Abroad. Federal Register. 86 FR 7619, February 1, 2021.
7. Presidential Memorandum. Memorandum on Restoring Trust in
Government Through Scientific Integrity and Evidence-Based
Policymaking. Federal Register. 86 FR 8845, February 10, 2021.
8. EPA Press Release. EPA Announces Path Forward for TSCA Chemical
Risk Evaluations. June 2021. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-announces-path-forward-tsca-chemical-risk-evaluations.
9. EPA. Proposed Rule; Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under
the Amended Toxic Substances Control Act. Federal Register. 82 FR
7562, January 19, 2017 (FRL-9957-75).
10. EPA. Final Rule; Procedures for Chemical Risk Evaluation Under
the Amended Toxic Substances Control Act. Federal Register. 82 FR
33726, July 20, 2017 (FRL-9964-38).
11. EPA. Summary of External Peer Review and Public Comments and
Disposition for 1,4-Dioxane. December 2020. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2019-0238-0093.
12. EPA. Correction of Dermal Acute and Chronic Non-Cancer Hazard
Values Used to Evaluate Risks from Occupational Exposures in the
Final Risk Evaluation for 1,4-dioxane. June 26, 2023.
13. EPA. Draft Supplement to the Risk Evaluation for 1,4-Dioxane--
Supplemental Information File: Occupational Exposure and Risk
Estimates. July 2023.
14. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Top 10
Most Frequently Cited Standards for Fiscal Year 2021 (Oct. 1, 2020,
to Sept. 30, 2021). Accessed October 13, 2022. https://www.osha.gov/top10citedstandards.
15. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Permissible
Exposure Limits--Annotated Tables. Accessed June 13, 2022. https://www.osha.gov/annotated-pels.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
Dated: July 21, 2023.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-15846 Filed 7-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P