Pesticide Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and Comment; Notice of Availability, 47875-47876 [2023-15717]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2023 / Notices
Mariana Islands, and American Samoa),
Puerto Rico, and the District of
Columbia. EPA will use an abbreviated
version of the original DWINSA 2020
LSL questionnaire to collect LSL counts
from previously surveyed water
systems. Participation in the one-time
update is voluntary.
Service line information is rapidly
developing as States and water systems
develop inventories required under the
Lead and Copper Rule Revisions. This
update of the LSL questionnaire allows
water systems and States that provided
incomplete submissions to the original
lead service line questionnaire or are
still developing their LSL inventories to
provide additional information to the
data provided in 2021. This will result
in a Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)
Lead Service Line Replacement (LSLR)
allotment that reflects a more current
understanding of each State’s needs. As
mandated by section 1452(a)(1)(D)(ii) of
the Safe Drinking Water Act, EPA
intends for the update to impact the
LSLR allotments starting in FY 2024
(i.e., 3rd year of BIL funding). In order
to complete data collection within this
timeframe, the service line count update
must be conducted as an emergency
revision to the original ICR.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: The
respondents for the LSL count update to
the 2020 Drinking Water Infrastructure
Needs Survey and Assessment are
CWSs, NPNCWSs, and State agencies.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Voluntary.
Estimated number of respondents:
3,969 (total).
Frequency of response: One time.
Total estimated burden: 3,118.8 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b)
Total estimated cost: $194,265.4 (per
year), which includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance
costs.
Changes in the estimates: There is an
increase of 3,118.8 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared
with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This increase is a result of the
Agency conducting a one-time followup to the original lead service line (LSL)
questionnaire of the 2020 DWINSA in
order to help ensure Lead Service Line
Replacement (LSLR) allotments made
from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
(BIL) more accurately reflect each
State’s needs.
Jennifer McLain,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking
Water.
[FR Doc. 2023–15683 Filed 7–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Jul 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0720; FRL–11135–01–
OCSPP]
Pesticide Registration Review;
Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review
and Comment; Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of the EPA’s preliminary or
continuing work plans for the following
chemicals: Complex Polymeric
Polyhydroxy Acid (CPPA); Killed, nonviable Streptomyces acidiscabies strain
RL–110T cells and spent fermentation
media; penflufen; propionic acid;
straight chain lepidopteran pheromones;
and Streptomyces strain K61. With this
document, the EPA is opening the
public comment period for registration
review for these chemicals.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 25, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0720,
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting
the docket, along with more information
about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
pesticide specific information, contact:
The Chemical Review Manager for the
pesticide of interest identified in Table
1 in Unit IV.
For general questions on the
registration review program, contact:
Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 566–0701; email address:
biscoe.melanie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47875
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
Chemical Review Manager identified in
Table 1 in Unit IV.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to the EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI, and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When preparing and submitting your
comments, see the commenting tips at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to
achieve environmental justice, the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of any group, including minority and/or
low-income populations, in the
development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice
issues, the Agency seeks information on
any groups or segments of the
population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or
disproportionately high and adverse
human health impacts or environmental
effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared
to the general population.
II. Background
Registration review is the EPA’s
periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each
pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that
is, the pesticide can perform its
intended function without unreasonable
adverse effects on human health or the
environment. Registration review
dockets contain information that will
assist the public in understanding the
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
47876
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 25, 2023 / Notices
types of information and issues that the
agency may consider during registration
reviews. As part of the registration
review process, the Agency has
completed preliminary or continuing
workplans for all pesticides listed in
Table 1 in Unit IV. EPA initiates a
registration review by establishing a
public docket for a pesticide registration
review case. The docket contains a
Preliminary Work Plan (PWP)
summarizing information EPA has on
the pesticide and the anticipated path
forward. A continuing work plan (CWP)
allows for the registration review
process to continue for cases that have
not completed the first round of
registration review and need additional
data to complete the review. Through
this program, the EPA is ensuring that
each pesticide’s registration is based on
current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
III. Authority
The EPA is conducting its registration
review of the chemicals listed in Table
1 in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of
the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the
Procedural Regulations for Registration
Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among
other things, that the registrations of
pesticides are to be reviewed every 15
years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product
may be registered or remain registered
only if it meets the statutory standard
for registration given in FIFRA section
3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used
in accordance with widespread and
commonly recognized practice, the
pesticide product must perform its
intended function without unreasonable
adverse effects on the environment; that
is, without any unreasonable risk to
man or the environment, or a human
dietary risk from residues that result
from the use of a pesticide in or on food.
IV. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the Agency taking?
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.50, this notice
announces the availability of the EPA’s
preliminary or continuing work plans
for the pesticides shown in Table 1 and
opens a 60-day public comment period
on the work plans.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
TABLE 1—PRELIMINARY AND CONTINUING WORK PLANS BEING MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Registration review case name and number
Docket ID No.
Chemical review manager and contact
information
Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acid (CPPA),
Case Number 6320.
EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0793 .............................
Killed, non-viable Streptomyces acidiscabies
strain RL–110T cells and spent fermentation
media, Case Number 6523.
Penflufen, Case Number 7065 ..........................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0779 .............................
Hector Andres Maldonado,
maldonado.hector@epa.gov, (202) 566–
1373.
Monica Thapa, thapa.monica@epa.gov, (202)
566–1543.
Propionic Acid, Case Number 4078 ..................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0024 .............................
Straight Chain, Lepidopteran Pheromones,
Case Number 8200.
Streptomyces strain K61, Case Number 6066
EPA–HQ–OPP–2023–0102 .............................
B. Docket Content
data and assessment needs. Additional
documents provide more detailed
information. During this public
comment period, the agency is asking
that interested persons identify any
additional information they believe the
agency should consider during the
registration reviews of these pesticides.
The agency identifies in each docket the
areas where public comment is
specifically requested, though comment
in any area is welcome.
The registration review docket
contains information that the agency
may consider in the course of the
registration review. The agency may
include information from its files
including, but not limited to, the
following information:
• An overview of the registration
review case status.
• A list of current product
registrations and registrants.
• Federal Register notices regarding
any pending registration actions.
• Federal Register notices regarding
current or pending tolerances.
• Risk assessments.
• Bibliographies concerning current
registrations.
• Summaries of incident data.
• Any other pertinent data or
information.
Each docket contains a document
summarizing what the agency currently
knows about the pesticide case and a
preliminary (and for some cases a
continuing) work plan for anticipated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Jul 24, 2023
Jkt 259001
EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0223 .............................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0832 .............................
The registration review final rule at 40
CFR 155.50(b) provides for a minimum
60-day public comment period on all
preliminary registration review work
plans. This comment period is intended
to provide an opportunity for public
input and a mechanism for initiating
any necessary changes to a pesticide’s
workplan. All comments should be
submitted using the methods in
ADDRESSES and must be received by the
EPA on or before the closing date. These
comments will become part of the
docket for the pesticides included in
Table 1 in Unit IV. Comments received
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Anna Senninger, senninger.anna@epa.gov,
(202) 566–2216.
Quinn Gavin, gavin.quinn@epa.gov, (202)
566–2284.
Bibiana Oe, oe.bibiana@epa.gov, (202) 566–
1538.
Monica Thapa, thapa.monica@epa.gov, (202)
566–1543.
after the close of the comment period
will be marked ‘‘late.’’ The EPA is not
required to consider these late
comments.
The agency will carefully consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may provide a ‘‘Response to
Comments Memorandum’’ in the
docket. The final registration review
work plan will explain the effect that
any comments had on the final work
plan and provide the agency’s response
to significant comments.
Background on the registration review
program is provided at: https://
www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: July 18, 2023.
Mary Elissa Reaves,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2023–15717 Filed 7–24–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM
25JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47875-47876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15717]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0720; FRL-11135-01-OCSPP]
Pesticide Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for
Review and Comment; Notice of Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the EPA's
preliminary or continuing work plans for the following chemicals:
Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acid (CPPA); Killed, non-viable
Streptomyces acidiscabies strain RL-110T cells and spent fermentation
media; penflufen; propionic acid; straight chain lepidopteran
pheromones; and Streptomyces strain K61. With this document, the EPA is
opening the public comment period for registration review for these
chemicals.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0720, through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information,
contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in Table 1 in Unit IV.
For general questions on the registration review program, contact:
Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 566-0701;
email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager identified in Table 1 in Unit IV.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to the EPA
through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI, and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.
II. Background
Registration review is the EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. Registration review dockets contain
information that will assist the public in understanding the
[[Page 47876]]
types of information and issues that the agency may consider during
registration reviews. As part of the registration review process, the
Agency has completed preliminary or continuing workplans for all
pesticides listed in Table 1 in Unit IV. EPA initiates a registration
review by establishing a public docket for a pesticide registration
review case. The docket contains a Preliminary Work Plan (PWP)
summarizing information EPA has on the pesticide and the anticipated
path forward. A continuing work plan (CWP) allows for the registration
review process to continue for cases that have not completed the first
round of registration review and need additional data to complete the
review. Through this program, the EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's
registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health and the environment.
III. Authority
The EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals
listed in Table 1 in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.
IV. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the Agency taking?
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.50, this notice announces the availability
of the EPA's preliminary or continuing work plans for the pesticides
shown in Table 1 and opens a 60-day public comment period on the work
plans.
Table 1--Preliminary and Continuing Work Plans Being Made Available for
Public Comment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical review
Registration review case name manager and
and number Docket ID No. contact
information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-07 Hector Andres
Acid (CPPA), Case Number 6320. 93. Maldonado,
[email protected], (202)
566-1373.
Killed, non-viable Streptomyces EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-07 Monica Thapa,
acidiscabies strain RL-110T 79. [email protected]
cells and spent fermentation gov, (202) 566-
media, Case Number 6523. 1543.
Penflufen, Case Number 7065..... EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-02 Anna Senninger,
23. [email protected], (202) 566-
2216.
Propionic Acid, Case Number 4078 EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-00 Quinn Gavin,
24. [email protected], (202) 566-
2284.
Straight Chain, Lepidopteran EPA-HQ-OPP-2023-01 Bibiana Oe,
Pheromones, Case Number 8200. 02. [email protected], (202) 566-
1538.
Streptomyces strain K61, Case EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-08 Monica Thapa,
Number 6066. 32. [email protected], (202) 566-
1543.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Docket Content
The registration review docket contains information that the agency
may consider in the course of the registration review. The agency may
include information from its files including, but not limited to, the
following information:
An overview of the registration review case status.
A list of current product registrations and registrants.
Federal Register notices regarding any pending
registration actions.
Federal Register notices regarding current or pending
tolerances.
Risk assessments.
Bibliographies concerning current registrations.
Summaries of incident data.
Any other pertinent data or information.
Each docket contains a document summarizing what the agency
currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary (and for
some cases a continuing) work plan for anticipated data and assessment
needs. Additional documents provide more detailed information. During
this public comment period, the agency is asking that interested
persons identify any additional information they believe the agency
should consider during the registration reviews of these pesticides.
The agency identifies in each docket the areas where public comment is
specifically requested, though comment in any area is welcome.
The registration review final rule at 40 CFR 155.50(b) provides for
a minimum 60-day public comment period on all preliminary registration
review work plans. This comment period is intended to provide an
opportunity for public input and a mechanism for initiating any
necessary changes to a pesticide's workplan. All comments should be
submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES and must be received by the
EPA on or before the closing date. These comments will become part of
the docket for the pesticides included in Table 1 in Unit IV. Comments
received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.''
The EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
The agency will carefully consider all comments received by the
closing date and may provide a ``Response to Comments Memorandum'' in
the docket. The final registration review work plan will explain the
effect that any comments had on the final work plan and provide the
agency's response to significant comments.
Background on the registration review program is provided at:
https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: July 18, 2023.
Mary Elissa Reaves,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2023-15717 Filed 7-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P