Air Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Montana; Libby 1997 Annual PM2.5 Limited Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request, 47380-47383 [2023-15435]
Download as PDF
47380
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 140 / Monday, July 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0003; FRL–10454–
02–R8]
Air Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Montana; Libby
1997 Annual PM2.5 Limited
Maintenance Plan and Redesignation
Request
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA
or Agency) is taking three separate but
related actions. First, EPA is finalizing
its determination that the Libby fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) nonattainment
area (Libby Area) is attaining the 1997
Annual PM2.5 national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS or standard)
based on 2014–2021 data. Secondly,
EPA is finalizing approval of Montana’s
plan for maintaining the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS (limited maintenance
plan). Lastly, the EPA is finalizing
approval of the redesignation of the
Libby Area to attainment for the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS, submitted by the
State of Montana on June 24, 2020. The
EPA is taking this action pursuant to the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on August
23, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket No.
EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0003. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the docket, some
information may not be publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through www.regulations.gov,
or please contact the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section for additional
availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amrita Singh, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8ARD–IO, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129,
telephone number: (303) 312–6103,
email address: singh.amrita@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means EPA.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
I. Background
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652), EPA
revised the NAAQS for particulate
matter to add new standards for PM2.5.
The Agency established the primary and
secondary Annual and 24-hour
standards for PM2.5. The annual
standard was set at 15.0 micrograms per
meter cubed (mg/m3) based on a 3-year
average of Annual mean PM2.5
concentrations, and the 24-hour (daily)
standard was set to 65 mg/m3 based on
the 3-year average of the annual 98th
percentile values of 24-hour PM2.5
concentrations at each populationorientated monitor within an area.
On December 14, 2012, EPA
promulgated the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS,
including a revision of the Annual
standard to 12.0 mg/m3 based on a 3-year
average of annual mean PM2.5.
concentrations. The Agency maintained
the 24-hour standard of 35 mg/m3 based
on a 3-year average of the 98th
percentile of 24-hour concentrations
(see 78 FR 3086; January 15, 2013).
Subsequent to promulgation of the
NAAQS, EPA issued the ‘‘Fine
Particulate Matter National Ambient Air
Quality Standards: State
Implementation Plan Requirements’’
(‘‘PM2.5 SIP Requirements Rule) (see 81
FR 58010; August 24, 2016). This rule
interprets the Act’s nonattainment area
requirements as they pertain to
implementation of any of the PM2.5
NAAQS. The PM2.5 SIP Requirements
Rule also addressed the revocation of
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for all areas. For
the Libby Area, revocation of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS will occur upon the
effective date of this action, i.e., after
EPA has approved a maintenance plan
and issued a redesignation for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS (see 81 FR 58010; August
24, 2016).
On March 17, 2011 (76 FR 14854),
EPA approved Montana’s attainment
plan which included an attainment
demonstration, an analysis of reasonable
available control technology/reasonable
available control measure (RACT/
RACM), base-year, and projection year
inventories, and contingency measures
for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for the Libby
Area. On July 14, 2015 (80 FR 40911),
EPA finalized its determination that the
Libby Area attained the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by the Area’s statutory
attainment date of December 31, 2011.
The determination was based upon
quality-assured and certified ambient
monitoring data for the 2007–2009
monitoring period that demonstrated
that the Libby area attained the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the attainment
date. In the same rulemaking, EPA also
issued a clean data determination under
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Agency’s Clean Data Policy based
upon quality-assured and certified
ambient air monitoring data that
demonstrated that the Libby area
continued to attain the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS based on the 2011–2014
monitoring data.
On June 24, 2020, the State of
Montana requested that EPA redesignate
the Libby Area to attainment for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and
submitted an associated SIP revision
containing a limited maintenance plan
(LMP) for the EPA to review. On
December 5, 2022, the EPA issued a
notice of proposed rulemaking to
approve Montana’s request to
redesignate the Libby PM2.5
nonattainment area to attainment for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 standard, as well as
proposing to approve Montana’s plan
for maintaining the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS (limited maintenance plan).1
The proposed rulemaking set forth the
basis for determining that Montana’s
redesignation request meets the CAA
requirements for redesignation for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 standard. Our
proposed rulemaking also described
how Montana had provided for
continued maintenance of the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS in accordance
with EPA’s guidance for LMPs, and
contained analysis of the complete,
quality-assured, and certified air quality
monitoring data for the Libby
nonattainment area for 2014–2021.
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received two comments.
The first comment was in support of the
redesignation of the Libby Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS. The second comment was
adverse. Our response to the adverse
comment is below. The comments have
been added to the docket (EPA–R08–
OAR–2021–0003) for this action and are
accessible at www.regulations.gov.
II. Response to Comments
Comment: The commenter alleged
that if EPA did not include a
requirement to phase out or ban wood
burning as part of the ‘‘SIP/FIP’’ that the
redesignation of the area to attainment
would prove ‘‘worthless.’’ The
commenter cited a review by Northeast
States for Coordinated Air Use
Management (NESCAUM) which the
commenter claims shows that ‘‘wood
stoves pollute more than EPA says.’’ As
a result, the commenter argued that the
continued presence of wood stoves
would be a liability to the Libby Area’s
attainment of the NAAQS. Finally,
commenter noted that ‘‘there is no safe
1 See
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
87 FR 74577.
24JYR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 140 / Monday, July 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
level of air pollution, which the NAAQS
do not reflect.’’
Response: We recognize that wood
stoves have been a major contributor of
PM2.5 pollution for the Libby Area, but
we disagree that a phase out or ban of
wood burning is a prerequisite before
EPA may redesignate the Libby Area.
The CAA establishes that EPA may
not redesignate an area to attainment
unless (1) the area has attained the
NAAQS in question, (2) EPA has fully
approved the applicable
implementation plan for the area, (3) the
improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions, (4) EPA has fully
approved a maintenance plan for the
area meeting CAA section 175A, and (5)
the state containing such area has met
all CAA section 110 and Part D
applicable requirements. As EPA
explained in the proposal, Montana has
met all these requirements. To the
extent that commenter is arguing that
these requirements are not met absent a
ban or phaseout of wood burning in the
Libby Area, we do not agree.
In its submission,2 Montana
acknowledged that wood combustion
accounts for the majority of PM2.5
concentrations in the Libby
nonattainment area based on the state’s
2005 baseline inventory analysis. In the
proposed rulemaking, we explained
how Montana’s approved Moderate
nonattainment plan included permanent
and enforceable rules from the Lincoln
County Air Pollution Control Program
that went into effect February 27th,
2006 3 and that addressed emissions
from solid fuel burning devices which
means any fireplace, fireplace insert,
wood stove, pellet stove, pellet furnace,
wood burning heater, wood-fired boiler,
wood or coal-fired furnace, coal stove,
or similar device burning any solid fuel
used for aesthetic, cooking, or heating
purposes which has a rated capacity of
less than 1,000,000 BTU’s per hour. We
also explained in our proposal that the
State has demonstrated that the area’s
improved air quality is largely attributed
to the emission reductions required by
the Lincoln County residential wood
combustion rules. Subchapter 2: Solid
Fuel Burning Device Regulations which
went into effect January 1, 2007,
discusses the operating and emission
limits restrictions for the Libby Area.
Section 75.1.204 states that no person
may install or operate any type of solid
fuel burning device without a valid
2 See Libby Area SIP submission, available in this
docket for this rulemaking.
3 See Resolution No. 1660 Lincoln County Air
Pollution Control Program, Health and Environment
Regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
Operating Permit issued by the
Department. Section 75.1.205 states
prior to installing or operating a solid
fuel burning device in any residential or
commercial property, a person shall
apply to the Department for the permit
and provide certain criteria of
information. Section 75.1.206 discusses
Air Pollution Alerts and states the
Department may declare an Air
Pollution Alert to be in effect whenever
ambient PM concentrations, as averaged
over a four-hour period, exceed a level
20 percent below any state or federal
ambient 24-hour standard established
for particulate matter; and when
scientific and meteorological data
indicate the average concentrations will
remain at or above those levels over the
next 24 hours.
Additionally, in the absence of an Air
Pollution Alert, no person operating a
solid fuel burning device may cause or
allow the discharge of visible emissions
greater than twenty percent opacity.
During an Air Pollution Alert, no person
operating a solid fuel burning device
that is permitted for use during an Alert,
may cause or allow the discharge of
visible emissions greater than 10
percent opacity. No person may operate
a standard catalytic or non-catalytic
solid fuel burning device during an Air
Pollution Alert.
There are conditions for burning that
are enforceable in Subchapter 4:
Outdoor Burning Regulations.
Furthermore, the Lincoln County Air
Pollution Control Program rules state
that unless prohibited by section
75.1.104(2)(d), and within 60 days of
notification from the Department or
EPA, the Department shall implement
the following contingency measures to
reduce emissions from a source(s)
identified as a contributor:
(a) If residential wood burning is
determined to be a contributing source,
the Department shall implement section
75.1.208.
(b) If re-entrained dust is determined
to be a contributing source, the
Department shall implement section
75.1.307.
(c) If industrial facility emissions are
determined to be a contributing source,
the Department shall initiate
contingency measures to reduce
emissions.
(d) The Department shall address
failure to attain NAAQS or to make
reasonable further progress in reducing
emissions attributable to natural events
or impacts generating activities
occurring outside state or local
jurisdictional control according to EPA
policy while initiating interim
contingency measures at the local level.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47381
(e) If no emission source(s) can be
identified as a contributor, the
Department shall conduct a
comprehensive review, including
chemical and microscopic filter
analysis. Until such time as the review
and analyses have been completed, the
Department shall implement at least one
of the above contingency measures on
an interim basis. Any selected interim
contingency measure(s) shall remain in
effect until the Department completes a
comprehensive review and determines
whether a permanent contingency
measure is necessary.
Based on our proposed rulemaking,
we analyzed the PM2.5 One-year Annual
Mean Concentrations for the Libby Area
from 2014–2021 which are all below the
1997 PM2.5 Annual NAAQS of 15.0 ug/
m3. In addition, none of the annual
design values from 2016–2021 from the
Libby Area monitoring site exceeded the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15.0 ug/
m3, and as such, EPA proposes to
determine that the Libby Area has
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
The NESCAUM report cited [https://
www.nescaum.org/documents/nescaumreview-of-epa-rwh-nsps-certificationprogram-rev-3-30-21.pdf] does raise
significant concerns with EPA’s
certification program relevant to Cord
Wood appliances, and EPA is taking
steps to revise Cord Wood appliance test
methods to rectify the concerns that
NESCAUM has raised. However, these
issues do not directly impact the Libby,
MT 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS redesignation
request and LMP approval, because we
do not rely on any way the Cord Wood
appliances test methods or results as a
basis for the redesignation or as a part
of the LMP. We therefore do not agree
that the NESCAUM review has any
relevance to this action.
The commenter’s statements
regarding safe levels of pollution and
whether the NAAQS are reflective of
such safe levels are beyond the scope of
this action, which revises one area’s
designation for a promulgated NAAQS
based on EPA’s assessment of the state’s
submission.
III. Final Action
Based on our review of the Libby
PM2.5 Plan submitted by State of
Montana, air quality monitoring data,
and other relevant materials, the
comment letters we received, and for
the reasons described in our proposed
rule, the EPA is finalizing approval of
Montana’s plan for maintaining the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS (limited
maintenance plan) and is redesignating
the Libby Area to attainment for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
47382
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 140 / Monday, July 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
By finalizing the redesignation of the
Libby Area to attainment for the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and finalizing the
approval of the LMP for the 1997
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 1997 primary
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS will be revoked
in the Libby Area on the effective date
of this redesignation, August 23, 2023.
Beginning on that date, the Area will no
longer be subject to transportation or
general conformity requirements for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS due to the
revocation of the primary NAAQS (see
81 FR 58125; August 24, 2016). The
Area is required to implement its
approved LMP for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS that is being approved in
this action. The approved LMP can only
be revised if the revision meets the
requirements of CAA section 110(l) and,
if applicable, CAA section 193.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an
area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a
maintenance plan under section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
create any new requirements, but rather
results in the applicability of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For these
reasons, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
affect small governments, described in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies
to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.
The State of Montana did not evaluate
environmental justice considerations as
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this
action. Due to the nature of the action
being taken here, this action is expected
to have a neutral to positive impact on
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the air quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 22, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
47383
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 140 / Monday, July 24, 2023 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks, and
Wilderness areas.
Dated: July 15, 2023.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1370
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart BB—Montana
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are
amended as follows:
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
2. In § 52.1370, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding the entry
■
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
‘‘Libby 1997 PM2.5 Limited Maintenance
Plan’’ under the heading entitled ‘‘(5)
Lincoln County’’ at the end of the
section to read as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
*
*
Notice of final
rule date
*
NFR citation
*
*
*
(5) Lincoln County
*
*
*
*
Libby 1997 PM2.5 Limited Maintenance Plan ............................................ ........................
*
*
*
3. In § 52.1374, add paragraph (i) to
read as follows:
7/24/2023
Control strategy: Particulate
*
*
*
*
*
(i) On June 24, 2020, the State of
Montana submitted limited
maintenance plans for the Libby PM2.5
nonattaiment areas and requested that
this area be redesignated to attainment
for the PM2.5 National Ambient Air
*
*
[insert Federal Register citation].
*
Quality Standards. The redesignation
request and limited maintenance plans
satisfy all applicable requirements of the
Clean Air Act.
■
§ 52.1374
matter.
*
*
*
*
Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment
Status Designations
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
5. In § 81.327, the table entitled
‘‘Montana—1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS’’ is amended by revising the
entry ‘‘Lincoln County (part)’’ to read as
follows:
4. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
§ 81.327
■
■
*
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
*
Montana.
*
*
*
MONTANA—1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
Designation a
Classification
Designated area
Date 1
*
*
*
*
Lincoln County (part) ............................................................................... August 23, 2023
The area bounded by lines from Universal Transverse Mercador Zone
11 (North American Datum 1983) coordinates beginning at
600,000mE, 5,370,000mN east to 620,000mE, 5370,000mN south to
620,000mE, 5340,000mN west to 600,000mE, 5,340,000mN north to
600,000mE, 5,370,000mN.
*
*
*
*
Date 2
Type
*
Attainment.
*
*
*
*
*
a Includes
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
1 This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
2 This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[FR Doc. 2023–15435 Filed 7–21–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Type
E:\FR\FM\24JYR1.SGM
24JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 140 (Monday, July 24, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47380-47383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15435]
[[Page 47380]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R08-OAR-2021-0003; FRL-10454-02-R8]
Air Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Montana;
Libby 1997 Annual PM2.5 Limited Maintenance Plan and Redesignation
Request
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or
Agency) is taking three separate but related actions. First, EPA is
finalizing its determination that the Libby fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) nonattainment area (Libby Area) is attaining the
1997 Annual PM2.5 national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS or standard) based on 2014-2021 data. Secondly, EPA is
finalizing approval of Montana's plan for maintaining the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS (limited maintenance plan). Lastly, the EPA is
finalizing approval of the redesignation of the Libby Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS, submitted by the
State of Montana on June 24, 2020. The EPA is taking this action
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on August 23, 2023.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-R08-OAR-2021-0003. All documents in the docket are
listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
docket, some information may not be publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through
www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amrita Singh, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-IO, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129, telephone number: (303) 312-6103, email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means EPA.
I. Background
On July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38652), EPA revised the NAAQS for
particulate matter to add new standards for PM2.5. The
Agency established the primary and secondary Annual and 24-hour
standards for PM2.5. The annual standard was set at 15.0
micrograms per meter cubed ([mu]g/m\3\) based on a 3-year average of
Annual mean PM2.5 concentrations, and the 24-hour (daily)
standard was set to 65 [mu]g/m\3\ based on the 3-year average of the
annual 98th percentile values of 24-hour PM2.5
concentrations at each population-orientated monitor within an area.
On December 14, 2012, EPA promulgated the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS, including a revision of the Annual standard to 12.0 [mu]g/m\3\
based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5.
concentrations. The Agency maintained the 24-hour standard of 35 [mu]g/
m\3\ based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour
concentrations (see 78 FR 3086; January 15, 2013).
Subsequent to promulgation of the NAAQS, EPA issued the ``Fine
Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards: State
Implementation Plan Requirements'' (``PM2.5 SIP Requirements
Rule) (see 81 FR 58010; August 24, 2016). This rule interprets the
Act's nonattainment area requirements as they pertain to implementation
of any of the PM2.5 NAAQS. The PM2.5 SIP
Requirements Rule also addressed the revocation of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS for all areas. For the Libby Area, revocation of
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS will occur upon the effective date of
this action, i.e., after EPA has approved a maintenance plan and issued
a redesignation for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS (see 81 FR 58010;
August 24, 2016).
On March 17, 2011 (76 FR 14854), EPA approved Montana's attainment
plan which included an attainment demonstration, an analysis of
reasonable available control technology/reasonable available control
measure (RACT/RACM), base-year, and projection year inventories, and
contingency measures for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS for the Libby
Area. On July 14, 2015 (80 FR 40911), EPA finalized its determination
that the Libby Area attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS by
the Area's statutory attainment date of December 31, 2011. The
determination was based upon quality-assured and certified ambient
monitoring data for the 2007-2009 monitoring period that demonstrated
that the Libby area attained the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS by
the attainment date. In the same rulemaking, EPA also issued a clean
data determination under the Agency's Clean Data Policy based upon
quality-assured and certified ambient air monitoring data that
demonstrated that the Libby area continued to attain the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS based on the 2011-2014 monitoring data.
On June 24, 2020, the State of Montana requested that EPA
redesignate the Libby Area to attainment for the 1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS and submitted an associated SIP revision
containing a limited maintenance plan (LMP) for the EPA to review. On
December 5, 2022, the EPA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to
approve Montana's request to redesignate the Libby PM2.5
nonattainment area to attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
standard, as well as proposing to approve Montana's plan for
maintaining the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS (limited maintenance
plan).\1\ The proposed rulemaking set forth the basis for determining
that Montana's redesignation request meets the CAA requirements for
redesignation for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 standard. Our
proposed rulemaking also described how Montana had provided for
continued maintenance of the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS in
accordance with EPA's guidance for LMPs, and contained analysis of the
complete, quality-assured, and certified air quality monitoring data
for the Libby nonattainment area for 2014-2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 87 FR 74577.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received two comments. The first comment was in
support of the redesignation of the Libby Area to attainment for the
1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The second comment was adverse. Our
response to the adverse comment is below. The comments have been added
to the docket (EPA-R08-OAR-2021-0003) for this action and are
accessible at www.regulations.gov.
II. Response to Comments
Comment: The commenter alleged that if EPA did not include a
requirement to phase out or ban wood burning as part of the ``SIP/FIP''
that the redesignation of the area to attainment would prove
``worthless.'' The commenter cited a review by Northeast States for
Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) which the commenter claims
shows that ``wood stoves pollute more than EPA says.'' As a result, the
commenter argued that the continued presence of wood stoves would be a
liability to the Libby Area's attainment of the NAAQS. Finally,
commenter noted that ``there is no safe
[[Page 47381]]
level of air pollution, which the NAAQS do not reflect.''
Response: We recognize that wood stoves have been a major
contributor of PM2.5 pollution for the Libby Area, but we
disagree that a phase out or ban of wood burning is a prerequisite
before EPA may redesignate the Libby Area.
The CAA establishes that EPA may not redesignate an area to
attainment unless (1) the area has attained the NAAQS in question, (2)
EPA has fully approved the applicable implementation plan for the area,
(3) the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and enforceable
reductions in emissions, (4) EPA has fully approved a maintenance plan
for the area meeting CAA section 175A, and (5) the state containing
such area has met all CAA section 110 and Part D applicable
requirements. As EPA explained in the proposal, Montana has met all
these requirements. To the extent that commenter is arguing that these
requirements are not met absent a ban or phaseout of wood burning in
the Libby Area, we do not agree.
In its submission,\2\ Montana acknowledged that wood combustion
accounts for the majority of PM2.5 concentrations in the
Libby nonattainment area based on the state's 2005 baseline inventory
analysis. In the proposed rulemaking, we explained how Montana's
approved Moderate nonattainment plan included permanent and enforceable
rules from the Lincoln County Air Pollution Control Program that went
into effect February 27th, 2006 \3\ and that addressed emissions from
solid fuel burning devices which means any fireplace, fireplace insert,
wood stove, pellet stove, pellet furnace, wood burning heater, wood-
fired boiler, wood or coal-fired furnace, coal stove, or similar device
burning any solid fuel used for aesthetic, cooking, or heating purposes
which has a rated capacity of less than 1,000,000 BTU's per hour. We
also explained in our proposal that the State has demonstrated that the
area's improved air quality is largely attributed to the emission
reductions required by the Lincoln County residential wood combustion
rules. Subchapter 2: Solid Fuel Burning Device Regulations which went
into effect January 1, 2007, discusses the operating and emission
limits restrictions for the Libby Area. Section 75.1.204 states that no
person may install or operate any type of solid fuel burning device
without a valid Operating Permit issued by the Department. Section
75.1.205 states prior to installing or operating a solid fuel burning
device in any residential or commercial property, a person shall apply
to the Department for the permit and provide certain criteria of
information. Section 75.1.206 discusses Air Pollution Alerts and states
the Department may declare an Air Pollution Alert to be in effect
whenever ambient PM concentrations, as averaged over a four-hour
period, exceed a level 20 percent below any state or federal ambient
24-hour standard established for particulate matter; and when
scientific and meteorological data indicate the average concentrations
will remain at or above those levels over the next 24 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Libby Area SIP submission, available in this docket for
this rulemaking.
\3\ See Resolution No. 1660 Lincoln County Air Pollution Control
Program, Health and Environment Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, in the absence of an Air Pollution Alert, no person
operating a solid fuel burning device may cause or allow the discharge
of visible emissions greater than twenty percent opacity. During an Air
Pollution Alert, no person operating a solid fuel burning device that
is permitted for use during an Alert, may cause or allow the discharge
of visible emissions greater than 10 percent opacity. No person may
operate a standard catalytic or non-catalytic solid fuel burning device
during an Air Pollution Alert.
There are conditions for burning that are enforceable in Subchapter
4: Outdoor Burning Regulations. Furthermore, the Lincoln County Air
Pollution Control Program rules state that unless prohibited by section
75.1.104(2)(d), and within 60 days of notification from the Department
or EPA, the Department shall implement the following contingency
measures to reduce emissions from a source(s) identified as a
contributor:
(a) If residential wood burning is determined to be a contributing
source, the Department shall implement section 75.1.208.
(b) If re-entrained dust is determined to be a contributing source,
the Department shall implement section 75.1.307.
(c) If industrial facility emissions are determined to be a
contributing source, the Department shall initiate contingency measures
to reduce emissions.
(d) The Department shall address failure to attain NAAQS or to make
reasonable further progress in reducing emissions attributable to
natural events or impacts generating activities occurring outside state
or local jurisdictional control according to EPA policy while
initiating interim contingency measures at the local level.
(e) If no emission source(s) can be identified as a contributor,
the Department shall conduct a comprehensive review, including chemical
and microscopic filter analysis. Until such time as the review and
analyses have been completed, the Department shall implement at least
one of the above contingency measures on an interim basis. Any selected
interim contingency measure(s) shall remain in effect until the
Department completes a comprehensive review and determines whether a
permanent contingency measure is necessary.
Based on our proposed rulemaking, we analyzed the PM2.5
One-year Annual Mean Concentrations for the Libby Area from 2014-2021
which are all below the 1997 PM2.5 Annual NAAQS of 15.0 ug/
m\3\. In addition, none of the annual design values from 2016-2021 from
the Libby Area monitoring site exceeded the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS of 15.0 ug/m\3\, and as such, EPA proposes to
determine that the Libby Area has attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS.
The NESCAUM report cited [https://www.nescaum.org/documents/nescaum-review-of-epa-rwh-nsps-certification-program-rev-3-30-21.pdf]
does raise significant concerns with EPA's certification program
relevant to Cord Wood appliances, and EPA is taking steps to revise
Cord Wood appliance test methods to rectify the concerns that NESCAUM
has raised. However, these issues do not directly impact the Libby, MT
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS redesignation request and LMP approval,
because we do not rely on any way the Cord Wood appliances test methods
or results as a basis for the redesignation or as a part of the LMP. We
therefore do not agree that the NESCAUM review has any relevance to
this action.
The commenter's statements regarding safe levels of pollution and
whether the NAAQS are reflective of such safe levels are beyond the
scope of this action, which revises one area's designation for a
promulgated NAAQS based on EPA's assessment of the state's submission.
III. Final Action
Based on our review of the Libby PM2.5 Plan submitted by
State of Montana, air quality monitoring data, and other relevant
materials, the comment letters we received, and for the reasons
described in our proposed rule, the EPA is finalizing approval of
Montana's plan for maintaining the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
(limited maintenance plan) and is redesignating the Libby Area to
attainment for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
[[Page 47382]]
By finalizing the redesignation of the Libby Area to attainment for
the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS and finalizing the approval of
the LMP for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 1997 primary
Annual PM2.5 NAAQS will be revoked in the Libby Area on the
effective date of this redesignation, August 23, 2023. Beginning on
that date, the Area will no longer be subject to transportation or
general conformity requirements for the 1997 Annual PM2.5
NAAQS due to the revocation of the primary NAAQS (see 81 FR 58125;
August 24, 2016). The Area is required to implement its approved LMP
for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS that is being approved in
this action. The approved LMP can only be revised if the revision meets
the requirements of CAA section 110(l) and, if applicable, CAA section
193.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a maintenance plan under section 107(d)(3)(E)
are actions that affect the status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to attainment does not in and of
itself create any new requirements, but rather results in the
applicability of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have
been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For these reasons, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that
``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.
The State of Montana did not evaluate environmental justice
considerations as part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an
evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ
in this action. Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this
action is expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air
quality of the affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 22, 2023. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
[[Page 47383]]
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
and Wilderness areas.
Dated: July 15, 2023.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR parts 52 and 81
are amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart BB--Montana
0
2. In Sec. 52.1370, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding
the entry ``Libby 1997 PM2.5 Limited Maintenance Plan''
under the heading entitled ``(5) Lincoln County'' at the end of the
section to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1370 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of
Title/subject State final rule NFR citation
effective date date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Lincoln County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Libby 1997 PM2.5 Limited Maintenance Plan..... .............. 7/24/2023 [insert Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. In Sec. 52.1374, add paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1374 Control strategy: Particulate matter.
* * * * *
(i) On June 24, 2020, the State of Montana submitted limited
maintenance plans for the Libby PM2.5 nonattaiment areas and
requested that this area be redesignated to attainment for the
PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The
redesignation request and limited maintenance plans satisfy all
applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act.
PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES
0
4. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart C--Section 107 Attainment Status Designations
0
5. In Sec. 81.327, the table entitled ``Montana--1997 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS'' is amended by revising the entry ``Lincoln
County (part)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 81.327 Montana.
* * * * *
Montana--1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation \a\ Classification
Designated area -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date \1\ Type Date \2\ Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Lincoln County (part)............. August 23, 2023...... Attainment...........
The area bounded by lines from
Universal Transverse Mercador
Zone 11 (North American Datum
1983) coordinates beginning at
600,000mE, 5,370,000mN east to
620,000mE, 5370,000mN south to
620,000mE, 5340,000mN west to
600,000mE, 5,340,000mN north to
600,000mE, 5,370,000mN.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
\1\ This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
\2\ This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-15435 Filed 7-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P