Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 47233-47234 [2023-15437]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 139 / Friday, July 21, 2023 / Notices
request to release and sell property at
the Malden Regional Airport &
Industrial Park (MAW) submitted by the
Sponsor meets the procedural
requirements of the FAA and the release
and sale of the property does not and
will not impact future aviation needs at
the airport. The FAA may approve the
request, in whole or in part, no sooner
than thirty days after the publication of
this notice.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The Malden Regional Airport &
Industrial Park (MAW) is proposing the
release from obligations and sale of a
1.42 acre parcel of airport property. The
release of land is necessary to comply
with Federal Aviation Administration
Grant Assurances that do not allow
federally acquired airport property to be
used for non-aviation purposes. The sale
of the subject property will result in the
land at the Malden Regional Airport &
Industrial Park (MAW) being changed
from aeronautical to non-aeronautical
use and release the lands from the
conditions of the Airport Improvement
Program Grant Agreement Grant
Assurances in order to sell the land. In
accordance with 49 U.S.C.
47107(c)(2)(B)(i) and (iii), the airport
will receive fair market value for the
property, which will be subsequently
reinvested in another eligible airport
improvement project for general
aviation use.
Any person may inspect, by
appointment, the request in person at
the FAA office listed above under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In
addition, any person may request an
appointment to inspect the application,
notice and other documents determined
by the FAA to be related to the
application in person at the Malden City
Hall.
Issued in Kansas City, MO, on July 17,
2023.
James A. Johnson,
Director, FAA Central Region, Airports
Division.
[FR Doc. 2023–15450 Filed 7–20–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA–2023–0002–N–17]
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jul 20, 2023
Jkt 259001
Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
ACTION:
Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and its
implementing regulations, FRA seeks
approval of the Information Collection
Request (ICR) abstracted below. Before
submitting this ICR to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval, FRA is soliciting public
comment on specific aspects of the
activities identified in the ICR.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
September 19, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed ICR
should be submitted on regulations.gov
to the docket, Docket No. FRA–2023–
0002. All comments received will be
posted without change to the docket,
including any personal information
provided. Please refer to the assigned
OMB control number (2130–NEW) in
any correspondence submitted. FRA
will summarize comments received in
response to this notice in a subsequent
notice and include them in its
information collection submission to
OMB for approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Arlette Mussington, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, at email:
arlette.mussington@dot.gov or
telephone: (571) 609–1285 or Ms.
Joanne Swafford, Information Collection
Clearance Officer, at email:
joanne.swafford@dot.gov or telephone:
(757) 897–9908.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PRA,
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to
provide 60-days’ notice to the public to
allow comment on information
collection activities before seeking OMB
approval of the activities. See 44 U.S.C.
3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.8 through
1320.12. Specifically, FRA invites
interested parties to comment on the
following ICR regarding: (1) whether the
information collection activities are
necessary for FRA to properly execute
its functions, including whether the
activities will have practical utility; (2)
the accuracy of FRA’s estimates of the
burden of the information collection
activities, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to
determine the estimates; (3) ways for
FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information being
collected; and (4) ways for FRA to
minimize the burden of information
collection activities on the public,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47233
information technology. See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1).
FRA believes that soliciting public
comment may reduce the administrative
and paperwork burdens associated with
the collection of information that
Federal statutes and regulations
mandate. In summary, FRA reasons that
comments received will advance three
objectives: (1) reduce reporting burdens;
(2) organize information collection
requirements in a ‘‘user-friendly’’ format
to improve the use of such information;
and (3) accurately assess the resources
expended to retrieve and produce the
information requested. See 44 U.S.C.
3501.
The summary below describes the ICR
that FRA will submit for OMB clearance
as the PRA requires:
Title: Class I Freight-Train Length
Reporting.
OMB Control Number: 2130–NEW.
Abstract: On May 2, 2023, FRA issued
Safety Advisory 2023–03, ‘‘Accident
Mitigation and Train Length,’’ (Safety
Advisory) to ensure railroads and
railroad employees are aware of the
potential complexities associated with
operating longer trains and to
recommend that they take appropriate
measures to address those complexities
to ensure the safe operation of such
trains.1 The Safety Advisory cited three
significant incidents that occurred since
2022 involving trains with more than
200 cars, each approximately more than
10,000 feet in length and weighing more
than 17,000 trailing tons, where train
handling and train makeup is believed
to have caused, or contributed to, the
incidents. In the Safety Advisory, FRA
explained that the operation of these
longer trains presents different, more
complex, operational challenges, which
can be exacerbated by the weight and
makeup of trains. Consequently, FRA
recommended that railroads review
their operating rules and existing
locomotive engineer certification
programs to address operational
complexities of train length, take
appropriate action to prevent the loss of
communications between end-of-train
devices, and mitigate the impacts of
long trains on blocked crossings.2
In the Safety Advisory, FRA also
explained that in 2019, the U.S.
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) issued a report finding that
freight-train length, particularly for
Class I railroads, increased in recent
years.3 GAO was only able to procure
1 88
FR 27570.
2 Id.
3 Id. (citing GAO’s May 2019 report titled RAIL
SAFETY: Freight Trains Are Getting Longer, and
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
Continued
21JYN1
47234
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 139 / Friday, July 21, 2023 / Notices
limited data from some of the Class I
railroads but, one Class I railroad
provided data indicating an average
train length of 6,100 feet and a second
Class I railroad provided data indicating
an average train length of 7,500 feet.4
These data represent an increase in the
average length of a train of about 25
percent for both railroads over a 10-year
period.5 Each Class I railroad reportedly
told GAO that they operate some longer
trains, with one railroad operating a
train on a regular basis that was over
12,000 feet long and another railroad
operating a train on a regular basis that
was over 16,000 feet long.6 These same
railroads responded that trains over
10,000 feet long were only 1 to 2 percent
of their total train-miles.7
In the Safety Advisory, FRA also
acknowledged that it was in the process
of conducting research on the
operational complexities of longer
trains, including air brake system
performance and resulting train
dynamics.8 The Safety Advisory also
noted that in response to a statutory
requirement, FRA entered into an
agreement with the National Academies
of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine
(NAS) to examine factors associated
with the operation of freight trains
longer than 7,500 feet. FRA notes,
however, that any data collected from
the industry in the course of these
studies is likely to be limited in the
same way that the GAO was only able
to procure limited data for its report.9
As a next step, FRA is initiating a new
ICR to gather train length data from
Class I freight railroads as the safety
concerns of long trains is largely an
issue particular to these railroads.10
Specifically, the proposed information
collection would require Class I freight
railroads to provide FRA, on a monthly
basis, with data regarding the total
number of trains operated, the total
number of cars in those trains, as well
as the total trailing tonnage in specified
train length categories (e.g., less than or
equal to 7,500 feet, greater than 7,500
feet). In addition, FRA proposes to
collect data from the Class I freight
railroads that may inform potential
complexities and safety concerns
associated with operating longer trains,
such as the number of emergency
events, the number of communication
event losses, the number of broken
knuckles, the number of air hose
separations, the number of PTC
enforcements, and the number of
locomotive engineer revocations under
49 CFR part 240. The requested data
will be collected monthly using an
Excel-based form (Form FRA F
6180.277).
This data collection is necessary to
allow objective findings to be made that
can be used to either justify the status
quo or to provide justification for
further recommendations or agency
action. Of note, FRA is seeking to collect
data on train length on an ongoing basis,
as opposed to this being a one-time
study. FRA will use the collected data
to establish an initial baseline for the
length of trains operating within the
U.S. rail system as well as to determine
if train lengths are changing over time.
FRA may also use the collected data in
future analyses to better understand the
impact of train length on safety (e.g., to
Respondent
universe
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Form FRA F 6180.277 ...............................
Total annual
responses
(reports)
Average
time per
response 12
(hours)
Total annual
burden hours
Total cost
equivalent
(A)
(B)
(C) = A * B
(D) = C * wage rate 13
72
8
576
$49,496
Class I railroads .......
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
72 reports.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 576
hours.
Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour
Dollar Cost Equivalent: $49,496.
FRA informs all interested parties that
it may not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, a collection of information that does
not display a currently valid OMB
control number.
Additional Information is Needed to Assess Their
Impact, GAO–19–443 (available at https://
www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-443.pdf).
4 Id. at 11.
5 Id.
6 Id. at 12.
7 Id.
8 https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/
2022-2/2023_RDT_CurrentProjects_complete_
FINAL.pdf.
9 Information about NAS’s study and its meeting
agendas are available at https://www.national
acadameies.org/our-work/impacts-of-trains-longerthan-7500-feet. The study was required by the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law
117–58, 22422, 35 Stat. 751 (2021).
10 This ICR is limited to Class I railroads.
11 49 U.S.C. 20103(a).
12 The average burden also includes time for
reviewing the provided instructions, searching
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jul 20, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00136
determine whether trains of certain
lengths are disproportionately involved
in certain type of accidents/incidents or
other undesired events such as loss of
communications or train stalling).
FRA has incorporated several
measures to minimize the respondents’
paperwork burden in this proposed
collection. For example, to avoid
duplicating efforts, FRA is not asking
railroads to provide train length
information for any FRA-reportable
accident or incident for which a form
F6180.54 is filed. Instead, for any train
involved in an accident for which a
form F6180.54 is filed, FRA will review
train length data collected on that form
and will not seek to collect the same
data proposed in this collection.
As delegated by Congress to the
Secretary of the Department of
Transportation, FRA has broad statutory
authority to oversee matters related to
rail safety.11 As noted in the Safety
Advisory, the greater operational
complexities associated with longer
trains necessitate that railroads take
appropriate safety measures to manage
their potentially more complex in-train
forces. This proposed collection is
another component of FRA’s ongoing
research to closely monitor and analyze
the impact of train length on rail safety.
Type of Request: Approval of a new
collection of information.
Affected Public: Businesses.
Form(s): FRA F Form 6180.277.
Respondent Universe: Class I freight
railroads.
Frequency of Submission: Monthly/
recurring.
Reporting Burden:
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Allison Ishihara Fultz,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023–15437 Filed 7–20–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
existing data sources, gathering, and maintaining
necessary data, and completing and reviewing the
information collection.
13 The dollar equivalent cost is derived from the
Surface Transportation Board’s 2022 Full Year
Wage A&B data series for railroad workers. The
wage rate of $85.93 per hour includes a 75-percent
overhead charge.
E:\FR\FM\21JYN1.SGM
21JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47233-47234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15437]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket No. FRA-2023-0002-N-17]
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and its
implementing regulations, FRA seeks approval of the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below. Before submitting this ICR
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval, FRA is
soliciting public comment on specific aspects of the activities
identified in the ICR.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
September 19, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed ICR
should be submitted on regulations.gov to the docket, Docket No. FRA-
2023-0002. All comments received will be posted without change to the
docket, including any personal information provided. Please refer to
the assigned OMB control number (2130-NEW) in any correspondence
submitted. FRA will summarize comments received in response to this
notice in a subsequent notice and include them in its information
collection submission to OMB for approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Arlette Mussington, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, at email: [email protected] or
telephone: (571) 609-1285 or Ms. Joanne Swafford, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, at email: [email protected] or
telephone: (757) 897-9908.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520, and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, require Federal agencies to
provide 60-days' notice to the public to allow comment on information
collection activities before seeking OMB approval of the activities.
See 44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.8 through 1320.12. Specifically,
FRA invites interested parties to comment on the following ICR
regarding: (1) whether the information collection activities are
necessary for FRA to properly execute its functions, including whether
the activities will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FRA's
estimates of the burden of the information collection activities,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used to
determine the estimates; (3) ways for FRA to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information being collected; and (4) ways
for FRA to minimize the burden of information collection activities on
the public, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. See 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5
CFR 1320.8(d)(1).
FRA believes that soliciting public comment may reduce the
administrative and paperwork burdens associated with the collection of
information that Federal statutes and regulations mandate. In summary,
FRA reasons that comments received will advance three objectives: (1)
reduce reporting burdens; (2) organize information collection
requirements in a ``user-friendly'' format to improve the use of such
information; and (3) accurately assess the resources expended to
retrieve and produce the information requested. See 44 U.S.C. 3501.
The summary below describes the ICR that FRA will submit for OMB
clearance as the PRA requires:
Title: Class I Freight-Train Length Reporting.
OMB Control Number: 2130-NEW.
Abstract: On May 2, 2023, FRA issued Safety Advisory 2023-03,
``Accident Mitigation and Train Length,'' (Safety Advisory) to ensure
railroads and railroad employees are aware of the potential
complexities associated with operating longer trains and to recommend
that they take appropriate measures to address those complexities to
ensure the safe operation of such trains.\1\ The Safety Advisory cited
three significant incidents that occurred since 2022 involving trains
with more than 200 cars, each approximately more than 10,000 feet in
length and weighing more than 17,000 trailing tons, where train
handling and train makeup is believed to have caused, or contributed
to, the incidents. In the Safety Advisory, FRA explained that the
operation of these longer trains presents different, more complex,
operational challenges, which can be exacerbated by the weight and
makeup of trains. Consequently, FRA recommended that railroads review
their operating rules and existing locomotive engineer certification
programs to address operational complexities of train length, take
appropriate action to prevent the loss of communications between end-
of-train devices, and mitigate the impacts of long trains on blocked
crossings.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 88 FR 27570.
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Safety Advisory, FRA also explained that in 2019, the U.S.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report finding that
freight-train length, particularly for Class I railroads, increased in
recent years.\3\ GAO was only able to procure
[[Page 47234]]
limited data from some of the Class I railroads but, one Class I
railroad provided data indicating an average train length of 6,100 feet
and a second Class I railroad provided data indicating an average train
length of 7,500 feet.\4\ These data represent an increase in the
average length of a train of about 25 percent for both railroads over a
10-year period.\5\ Each Class I railroad reportedly told GAO that they
operate some longer trains, with one railroad operating a train on a
regular basis that was over 12,000 feet long and another railroad
operating a train on a regular basis that was over 16,000 feet long.\6\
These same railroads responded that trains over 10,000 feet long were
only 1 to 2 percent of their total train-miles.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Id. (citing GAO's May 2019 report titled RAIL SAFETY:
Freight Trains Are Getting Longer, and Additional Information is
Needed to Assess Their Impact, GAO-19-443 (available at https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-443.pdf).
\4\ Id. at 11.
\5\ Id.
\6\ Id. at 12.
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Safety Advisory, FRA also acknowledged that it was in the
process of conducting research on the operational complexities of
longer trains, including air brake system performance and resulting
train dynamics.\8\ The Safety Advisory also noted that in response to a
statutory requirement, FRA entered into an agreement with the National
Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) to examine
factors associated with the operation of freight trains longer than
7,500 feet. FRA notes, however, that any data collected from the
industry in the course of these studies is likely to be limited in the
same way that the GAO was only able to procure limited data for its
report.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2022-2/2023_RDT_CurrentProjects_complete_FINAL.pdf.
\9\ Information about NAS's study and its meeting agendas are
available at https://www.nationalacadameies.org/our-work/impacts-of-trains-longer-than-7500-feet. The study was required by the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law 117-58, 22422, 35
Stat. 751 (2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a next step, FRA is initiating a new ICR to gather train length
data from Class I freight railroads as the safety concerns of long
trains is largely an issue particular to these railroads.\10\
Specifically, the proposed information collection would require Class I
freight railroads to provide FRA, on a monthly basis, with data
regarding the total number of trains operated, the total number of cars
in those trains, as well as the total trailing tonnage in specified
train length categories (e.g., less than or equal to 7,500 feet,
greater than 7,500 feet). In addition, FRA proposes to collect data
from the Class I freight railroads that may inform potential
complexities and safety concerns associated with operating longer
trains, such as the number of emergency events, the number of
communication event losses, the number of broken knuckles, the number
of air hose separations, the number of PTC enforcements, and the number
of locomotive engineer revocations under 49 CFR part 240. The requested
data will be collected monthly using an Excel-based form (Form FRA F
6180.277).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ This ICR is limited to Class I railroads.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This data collection is necessary to allow objective findings to be
made that can be used to either justify the status quo or to provide
justification for further recommendations or agency action. Of note,
FRA is seeking to collect data on train length on an ongoing basis, as
opposed to this being a one-time study. FRA will use the collected data
to establish an initial baseline for the length of trains operating
within the U.S. rail system as well as to determine if train lengths
are changing over time. FRA may also use the collected data in future
analyses to better understand the impact of train length on safety
(e.g., to determine whether trains of certain lengths are
disproportionately involved in certain type of accidents/incidents or
other undesired events such as loss of communications or train
stalling).
FRA has incorporated several measures to minimize the respondents'
paperwork burden in this proposed collection. For example, to avoid
duplicating efforts, FRA is not asking railroads to provide train
length information for any FRA-reportable accident or incident for
which a form F6180.54 is filed. Instead, for any train involved in an
accident for which a form F6180.54 is filed, FRA will review train
length data collected on that form and will not seek to collect the
same data proposed in this collection.
As delegated by Congress to the Secretary of the Department of
Transportation, FRA has broad statutory authority to oversee matters
related to rail safety.\11\ As noted in the Safety Advisory, the
greater operational complexities associated with longer trains
necessitate that railroads take appropriate safety measures to manage
their potentially more complex in-train forces. This proposed
collection is another component of FRA's ongoing research to closely
monitor and analyze the impact of train length on rail safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 49 U.S.C. 20103(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of Request: Approval of a new collection of information.
Affected Public: Businesses.
Form(s): FRA F Form 6180.277.
Respondent Universe: Class I freight railroads.
Frequency of Submission: Monthly/recurring.
Reporting Burden:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The average burden also includes time for reviewing the
provided instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering,
and maintaining necessary data, and completing and reviewing the
information collection.
\13\ The dollar equivalent cost is derived from the Surface
Transportation Board's 2022 Full Year Wage A&B data series for
railroad workers. The wage rate of $85.93 per hour includes a 75-
percent overhead charge.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total annual Average time
Respondent universe responses per response Total annual Total cost equivalent
(reports) \12\ (hours) burden hours
(A) (B) (C) = A * B (D) = C * wage rate \13\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Form FRA F 6180.277........................ Class I railroads............. 72 8 576 $49,496
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Estimated Annual Responses: 72 reports.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 576 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour Dollar Cost Equivalent: $49,496.
FRA informs all interested parties that it may not conduct or
sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a collection
of information that does not display a currently valid OMB control
number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
Allison Ishihara Fultz,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023-15437 Filed 7-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P