Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Municipal Solid Waste Landfill State Plan Approval for Designated Facilities and Pollutants, 46123-46125 [2023-15288]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Proposed Rules
T–302 CUKIS, OR TO GRIFT, IL
CUKIS, OR
JJETT, OR
CUPRI, OR
ZUDMI, OR
Wildhorse, OR (ILR)
JOSTN, OR
UKAYI, ID
ADEXE, ID
CANEK, ID
ALKAL, ID
FEVDO, ID
TOXEE, ID
JADUP, ID
MIKAE, WY
BXTER, WY
EEBEE, WY
REGVE, WY
Rock Springs, WY (OCS)
FIKLA, WY
Medicine Bow, WY (MBW)
Scottsbluff, NE (BFF)
WAKPA, NE
Alliance, NE (AIA)
MARSS, NE
PUKFA, NE
GIYED, NE
LLUKY, NE
KAATO, IA
ROKKK, IA
Waterloo, IA (ALO)
Dubuque, IA (DBQ)
JOOLZ, IL
GRIFT, IL
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 13,
2023.
Karen Chiodini,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and
Regulations.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R05–OAR–2023–0283; FRL–11127–
01–R5]
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill State Plan
Approval for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
Indiana’s state plan to control air
pollutants from Municipal Solid Waste
(MSW) Landfills. The Indiana
Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM) submitted the state
plan on March 20, 2023. The Indiana
MSW landfill state plan was submitted
to fulfill the state’s obligations under
section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) to implement and enforce the
requirements under the MSW Landfills
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
16:45 Jul 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
45°20′59.59″
44°56′35.43″
44°37′03.76″
44°19′59.29″
43°35′35.27″
43°34′16.92″
43°46′57.60″
43°30′16.79″
43°18′57.88″
43°00′58.35″
42°53′48.88″
42°41′41.81″
42°44′32.00″
42°06′36.88″
41°53′13.97″
41°44′07.05″
41°38′35.07″
41°35′24.76″
41°56′20.50″
41°50′43.88″
41°53′38.99″
42°03′21.64″
42°03′20.27″
42°27′48.92″
42°22′59.52″
42°30′22.02″
42°29′20.26″
42°35′06.89″
42°37′00.00″
42°33′23.39″
42°24′05.29″
42°20′41.49″
42°17′28.14″
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
122°21′49.41″
121°40′56.36″
121°15′13.89″
120°28′10.92″
118°57′18.18″
117°53′51.34″
117°05′24.14″
116°26′53.72″
115°48′28.06″
115°19′41.26″
115°02′00.30″
114°27′13.10″
113°42′15.22″
110°35′59.28″
110°04′52.38″
109°35′10.21″
109°20′30.96″
109°00′55.18″
106°57′11.03″
106°00′15.42″
103°28′55.31″
103°04′57.99″
102°48′16.00″
100°36′15.32″
099°59′36.42″
099°08′05.55″
098°38′11.44″
095°58′53.08″
094°04′03.00″
092°23′56.13″
090°42′32.68″
090°12′12.00″
088°53′41.42″
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
Emission Guidelines. The EPA is
proposing to approve the state plan.
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Comments must be received on
or before August 18, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2023–0283 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
hulting.melissa@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2023–15208 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
WP
WP
FIX
WP
VOR/DME
WP
WP
WP
FIX
FIX
WP
FIX
WP
WP
WP
WP
WP
VOR/DME
WP
VOR/DME
VORTAC
WP
VOR/DME
FIX
WP
FIX
WP
WP
WP
VOR/DME
VORTAC
WP
WP
46123
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Margaret Sieffert, Clean Air Strategies
Section, Air Toxics Branch (AT–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–1151,
sieffert.margaret@epa.gov. The EPA
Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays and facility
closures due to COVID–19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. Background
Section 111 of the CAA, ‘‘Standards of
Performance for New Stationary
Sources,’’ directs the EPA to establish
emission standards for stationary
sources of air pollution that could
potentially endanger public health or
welfare. These standards are referred to
as New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS). Section 111(b) directs EPA to
publish and periodically revise a list of
categories of stationary sources which
cause or significantly contribute to air
pollution, and to establish NSPS within
these categories. Section 111(b)(1)(B)
applies to new sources. Section 111(d)
addresses the process by which the EPA
and states regulate standards of
performance for existing sources
belonging to those categories established
in section 111(b). When NSPS are
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
46124
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Proposed Rules
promulgated for new sources, section
111(d) and EPA regulations require that
the EPA publish an Emission Guideline
(EG) to regulate the same pollutants
from existing facilities. While NSPS are
directly applicable to new sources, EGs
for existing sources (designated
facilities) are intended for states to use
to develop a state plan to submit to the
EPA.
State plan submittal and revisions
under CAA section 111(d) must be
consistent with the applicable EG and
the requirements of 40 CFR part 60,
subpart B, and part 62, subpart A. The
regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B,
contain general provisions applicable to
the adoption and submittal of state
plans under CAA section 111(d).
Additionally, 40 CFR part 62, subpart A,
provides the procedural framework by
which the EPA will approve or
disapprove such plans submitted by a
state. Once approved by the EPA, the
state plan becomes federally
enforceable. If a State does not submit
an approvable state plan to the EPA, the
EPA is responsible for developing,
implementing, and enforcing a Federal
plan.
The MSW landfills NSPS for new
landfills and EG for existing landfills
were first promulgated by the EPA on
March 12, 1996, in 40 CFR part 60,
subparts WWW and Cc, respectively (61
FR 9905). On August 29, 2016, EPA
finalized revisions to the MSW landfill
NSPS and EG in 40 CFR part 60,
subparts XXX and Cf, respectively (81
FR 59332; 81 FR 59313). The 2016 EG
revision updates the control
requirements and monitoring, reporting,
and recordkeeping provisions for
existing MSW landfill sources.
The current MSW landfill EG, found
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, pertains
to the regulation of landfill gas and its
components, including methane, from
MSW landfills for which construction,
reconstruction, or modification was
commenced on or before July 17, 2014.
Pursuant to section 111(d) of the CAA
and 40 CFR part 60, subpart B, states are
required to revise their state plans to
comply with the amended regulations.
On May 21, 2021, EPA finalized the
MSW landfill federal plan in 40 CFR
part 62, subpart OOO (86 FR 27756).
EPA issued technical amendments on
February 3, 2022 for both the NSPS in
40 CFR part 60 subpart XXX and the
federal plan in 40 CFR part 62, subpart
OOO (87 FR 8202). The MSW landfill
federal plan at 40 CFR part 62, subpart
OOO, applies to states that do not have
an EPA-approved state plan based on 40
CFR part 60 subpart Cf. Therefore, the
MSW landfill federal plan is currently
in effect in Indiana.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jul 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
IDEM submitted a MSW landfill state
plan on September 30, 1999. EPA
approved the state plan and it became
effective on May 30, 2000 (65 FR 1632).
In order to fulfill obligations under CAA
section 111(d) to submit a revised state
plan to reflect amendments to the MSW
landfill EG, IDEM submitted a revised
MSW landfill state plan on March 20,
2023. IDEM incorporated by reference
the federal plan located at 40 CFR part
62, subpart OOO to use as the
underlying rule which implements and
enforces the applicable provisions
under the MSW landfill EG at 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cf. For the reasons
discussed below, EPA believes that the
Indiana MSW landfill state plan meets
the relevant requirements of the CAA
section 111(d) implementing regulations
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B and 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cf.
II. What does the State plan contain
and what is EPA’s analysis?
EPA has evaluated the Indiana MSW
landfill state plan to determine whether
the state plan meets applicable
requirements from the MSW landfills
EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, and
the CAA section 111(d) implementing
regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B.
EPA’s detailed rationale and discussion
on the Indiana MSW landfill state plan
can be found in the EPA Technical
Support Document (TSD), located in the
docket for this rulemaking. The
applicable provisions and EPA’s
analysis are briefly summarized below.
A. A demonstration of the state’s legal
authority to carry out the MSW landfill
state plan as required by 40 CFR 60.26.
IDEM has provided a detailed list which
demonstrated that it has such legal
authority.
B. Identification of enforceable state
mechanisms that the State selected for
implementing the EGs as required by 40
CFR 60.24. IDEM has incorporated by
reference the federal plan at 40 CFR part
62, subpart OOO as its state rule into the
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) via
Article 326 IAC 8–8.2. EPA retains the
authorities listed in 40 CFR 62.16710(b)
that are not delegable to state, local or
Tribal agencies. If a design plan
includes alternative requests as listed as
non-delegable under 40 CFR
62.16710(b), IDEM must forward to EPA
for review and approval prior to
approving.
C. An inventory of affected MSW
landfills, including those that have
ceased operation but have not been
dismantled as required by 40 CFR
60.25(a). IDEM has provided this.
D. An inventory of the emissions from
affected MSW landfills as required by
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40 CFR 60.25(a). IDEM has provided
this.
E. Emission limitations for affected
MSW Landfills that are at least as
protective as the EGs as required by
60.24(c). IDEM references the emission
limitations contained in 40 CFR 62
subpart OOO, which are consistent with
the provisions of 40 CFR 60 Subpart Cf.
F. Compliance schedules for each
affected MSW landfills as required by
60.24(e)(1). IDEM references the
compliance schedules contained in 40
CFR 62 subpart OOO, which are
consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR
60 subpart Cf.
G. Performance testing, recordkeeping
and reporting requirements as required
by 60.25. IDEM references the
performance testing, recordkeeping and
reporting requirements contained in 40
CFR 62 subpart OOO, which are
consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR
60 subpart Cf.
H. Certification that the hearing on
the state plan was held, a list of
witnesses and their organizational
affiliations, if any, appearing at the
hearing, and a brief written summary of
each presentation or written submission
as required by 40 CFR 60.23. IDEM
received approval on November 15,
2022, for an alternative public hearing
request and adhered to this alternative.
I. A provision for state progress
reports to EPA as required by 40 CFR
61.25(e) and (f). IDEM commits to
submitting annual progress reports to
EPA. Each progress report will include:
enforcement actions, achievement of
increments of progress, identification of
sources that have ceased operation,
emission inventory updates, and copies
of technical reports on all emission
testing, including concurrent process
data.
III. Does the State plan meet the EPA
requirements?
The Indiana MSW landfill state plan
submittal package includes all materials
necessary to be deemed administratively
and technically complete according to
the criteria of 40 CFR part 60, subpart
B and 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf. EPA
evaluated the Indiana MSW Landfill
state plan and related information
submitted by IDEM for consistency with
the CAA, EPA regulations and policy.
The Indiana MSW landfill state plan has
been evaluated in detail, as described
more fully in the TSD. For the reasons
discussed above and in the TSD, EPA
has determined that the state plan meets
all applicable requirements and,
therefore, is approving it.
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Proposed Rules
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve the state
plan which IDEM submitted on March
20, 2023, for the control of emissions
from existing MSW landfill sources in
the State and to amend 40 CFR part 62,
subpart P, to codify EPA’s approval.
EPA is proposing to find that the
Indiana MSW landfill state plan is at
least as protective as the federal
requirements provided under the MSW
landfill EG, codified at 40 CFR part 60,
subpart Cf. Once approved by EPA, the
Indiana MSW landfill state plan will
become federally enforceable.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a CAA section
111(d) submission that complies with
the provisions of the CAA and
applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7411(d); 42 U.S.C. 7429; 40 CFR
part 60, subparts B and Cf; and 40 CFR
part 62, subparts A and OOO. Thus, in
reviewing CAA section 111(d) state plan
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
because it approves a state program;
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:56 Jul 18, 2023
Jkt 259001
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
In addition, the CAA section 111(d)
submission is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ‘‘no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
IDEM did not evaluate environmental
justice considerations as part of its
111(d) state plan submittal; the CAA
and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require
such an evaluation. EPA did not
perform an EJ analysis and did not
consider EJ in this action. Consideration
of EJ is not required as part of this
action, and there is no information in
the record inconsistent with the stated
goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for people of
color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waste treatment and
disposal.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
46125
Dated: July 13, 2023.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2023–15288 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 720, 721, 723, and 725
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2022–0902; FRL–7906–03–
OCSPP]
RIN 2070–AK65
Updates to New Chemicals
Regulations Under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA);
Extension of Comment Period
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is extending the comment
period for the proposed rule entitled
‘‘Updates to New Chemicals Regulations
Under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA)’’ that published in the Federal
Register on May 26, 2023, with an
established public comment period that
was scheduled to end on July 25, 2023.
In response to requests for additional
time to develop and submit comments
on the proposed rule, EPA is extending
the comment period for an additional 14
days, i.e., from July 25, 2023, to August
8, 2023.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published on May 26,
2023, at 88 FR 34100 (FRL–7906–01–
OCSPP), is now extended. Comments
must be received on or before August 8,
2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2022–0902,
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Additional
instructions on commenting and visiting
the docket, along with more information
about dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact:
Tyler Lloyd, New Chemicals Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46123-46125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15288]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R05-OAR-2023-0283; FRL-11127-01-R5]
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Municipal Solid Waste Landfill State
Plan Approval for Designated Facilities and Pollutants
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve Indiana's state plan to control air pollutants from Municipal
Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills. The Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM) submitted the state plan on March 20, 2023. The
Indiana MSW landfill state plan was submitted to fulfill the state's
obligations under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to
implement and enforce the requirements under the MSW Landfills Emission
Guidelines. The EPA is proposing to approve the state plan.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 18, 2023.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2023-0283 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Sieffert, Clean Air
Strategies Section, Air Toxics Branch (AT-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 353-1151, [email protected]. The EPA
Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility closures due to COVID-
19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
I. Background
Section 111 of the CAA, ``Standards of Performance for New
Stationary Sources,'' directs the EPA to establish emission standards
for stationary sources of air pollution that could potentially endanger
public health or welfare. These standards are referred to as New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS). Section 111(b) directs EPA to publish and
periodically revise a list of categories of stationary sources which
cause or significantly contribute to air pollution, and to establish
NSPS within these categories. Section 111(b)(1)(B) applies to new
sources. Section 111(d) addresses the process by which the EPA and
states regulate standards of performance for existing sources belonging
to those categories established in section 111(b). When NSPS are
[[Page 46124]]
promulgated for new sources, section 111(d) and EPA regulations require
that the EPA publish an Emission Guideline (EG) to regulate the same
pollutants from existing facilities. While NSPS are directly applicable
to new sources, EGs for existing sources (designated facilities) are
intended for states to use to develop a state plan to submit to the
EPA.
State plan submittal and revisions under CAA section 111(d) must be
consistent with the applicable EG and the requirements of 40 CFR part
60, subpart B, and part 62, subpart A. The regulations at 40 CFR part
60, subpart B, contain general provisions applicable to the adoption
and submittal of state plans under CAA section 111(d). Additionally, 40
CFR part 62, subpart A, provides the procedural framework by which the
EPA will approve or disapprove such plans submitted by a state. Once
approved by the EPA, the state plan becomes federally enforceable. If a
State does not submit an approvable state plan to the EPA, the EPA is
responsible for developing, implementing, and enforcing a Federal plan.
The MSW landfills NSPS for new landfills and EG for existing
landfills were first promulgated by the EPA on March 12, 1996, in 40
CFR part 60, subparts WWW and Cc, respectively (61 FR 9905). On August
29, 2016, EPA finalized revisions to the MSW landfill NSPS and EG in 40
CFR part 60, subparts XXX and Cf, respectively (81 FR 59332; 81 FR
59313). The 2016 EG revision updates the control requirements and
monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping provisions for existing MSW
landfill sources.
The current MSW landfill EG, found at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf,
pertains to the regulation of landfill gas and its components,
including methane, from MSW landfills for which construction,
reconstruction, or modification was commenced on or before July 17,
2014. Pursuant to section 111(d) of the CAA and 40 CFR part 60, subpart
B, states are required to revise their state plans to comply with the
amended regulations. On May 21, 2021, EPA finalized the MSW landfill
federal plan in 40 CFR part 62, subpart OOO (86 FR 27756). EPA issued
technical amendments on February 3, 2022 for both the NSPS in 40 CFR
part 60 subpart XXX and the federal plan in 40 CFR part 62, subpart OOO
(87 FR 8202). The MSW landfill federal plan at 40 CFR part 62, subpart
OOO, applies to states that do not have an EPA-approved state plan
based on 40 CFR part 60 subpart Cf. Therefore, the MSW landfill federal
plan is currently in effect in Indiana.
IDEM submitted a MSW landfill state plan on September 30, 1999. EPA
approved the state plan and it became effective on May 30, 2000 (65 FR
1632). In order to fulfill obligations under CAA section 111(d) to
submit a revised state plan to reflect amendments to the MSW landfill
EG, IDEM submitted a revised MSW landfill state plan on March 20, 2023.
IDEM incorporated by reference the federal plan located at 40 CFR part
62, subpart OOO to use as the underlying rule which implements and
enforces the applicable provisions under the MSW landfill EG at 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cf. For the reasons discussed below, EPA believes that
the Indiana MSW landfill state plan meets the relevant requirements of
the CAA section 111(d) implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 60,
subpart B and 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf.
II. What does the State plan contain and what is EPA's analysis?
EPA has evaluated the Indiana MSW landfill state plan to determine
whether the state plan meets applicable requirements from the MSW
landfills EG at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf, and the CAA section 111(d)
implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. EPA's detailed
rationale and discussion on the Indiana MSW landfill state plan can be
found in the EPA Technical Support Document (TSD), located in the
docket for this rulemaking. The applicable provisions and EPA's
analysis are briefly summarized below.
A. A demonstration of the state's legal authority to carry out the
MSW landfill state plan as required by 40 CFR 60.26. IDEM has provided
a detailed list which demonstrated that it has such legal authority.
B. Identification of enforceable state mechanisms that the State
selected for implementing the EGs as required by 40 CFR 60.24. IDEM has
incorporated by reference the federal plan at 40 CFR part 62, subpart
OOO as its state rule into the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) via
Article 326 IAC 8-8.2. EPA retains the authorities listed in 40 CFR
62.16710(b) that are not delegable to state, local or Tribal agencies.
If a design plan includes alternative requests as listed as non-
delegable under 40 CFR 62.16710(b), IDEM must forward to EPA for review
and approval prior to approving.
C. An inventory of affected MSW landfills, including those that
have ceased operation but have not been dismantled as required by 40
CFR 60.25(a). IDEM has provided this.
D. An inventory of the emissions from affected MSW landfills as
required by 40 CFR 60.25(a). IDEM has provided this.
E. Emission limitations for affected MSW Landfills that are at
least as protective as the EGs as required by 60.24(c). IDEM references
the emission limitations contained in 40 CFR 62 subpart OOO, which are
consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR 60 Subpart Cf.
F. Compliance schedules for each affected MSW landfills as required
by 60.24(e)(1). IDEM references the compliance schedules contained in
40 CFR 62 subpart OOO, which are consistent with the provisions of 40
CFR 60 subpart Cf.
G. Performance testing, recordkeeping and reporting requirements as
required by 60.25. IDEM references the performance testing,
recordkeeping and reporting requirements contained in 40 CFR 62 subpart
OOO, which are consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR 60 subpart Cf.
H. Certification that the hearing on the state plan was held, a
list of witnesses and their organizational affiliations, if any,
appearing at the hearing, and a brief written summary of each
presentation or written submission as required by 40 CFR 60.23. IDEM
received approval on November 15, 2022, for an alternative public
hearing request and adhered to this alternative.
I. A provision for state progress reports to EPA as required by 40
CFR 61.25(e) and (f). IDEM commits to submitting annual progress
reports to EPA. Each progress report will include: enforcement actions,
achievement of increments of progress, identification of sources that
have ceased operation, emission inventory updates, and copies of
technical reports on all emission testing, including concurrent process
data.
III. Does the State plan meet the EPA requirements?
The Indiana MSW landfill state plan submittal package includes all
materials necessary to be deemed administratively and technically
complete according to the criteria of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B and 40
CFR part 60, subpart Cf. EPA evaluated the Indiana MSW Landfill state
plan and related information submitted by IDEM for consistency with the
CAA, EPA regulations and policy. The Indiana MSW landfill state plan
has been evaluated in detail, as described more fully in the TSD. For
the reasons discussed above and in the TSD, EPA has determined that the
state plan meets all applicable requirements and, therefore, is
approving it.
[[Page 46125]]
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve the state plan which IDEM submitted on
March 20, 2023, for the control of emissions from existing MSW landfill
sources in the State and to amend 40 CFR part 62, subpart P, to codify
EPA's approval. EPA is proposing to find that the Indiana MSW landfill
state plan is at least as protective as the federal requirements
provided under the MSW landfill EG, codified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart
Cf. Once approved by EPA, the Indiana MSW landfill state plan will
become federally enforceable.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a CAA
section 111(d) submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d); 42 U.S.C. 7429;
40 CFR part 60, subparts B and Cf; and 40 CFR part 62, subparts A and
OOO. Thus, in reviewing CAA section 111(d) state plan submissions,
EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the
criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law
as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA.
In addition, the CAA section 111(d) submission is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In
those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that
``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
IDEM did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part
of its 111(d) state plan submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did
not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action.
Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there
is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of
E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-
income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment
and disposal.
Dated: July 13, 2023.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2023-15288 Filed 7-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P