Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Request-Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy Study, 46128-46136 [2023-15209]
Download as PDF
46128
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
complete one nomination packet for the
program year. State agencies will review
each nomination received from sponsors
in their respective States one time; State
agencies are expected to receive an
average of 4.167 nominations each.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
FNS expects 150 nominations from
sponsors, which will then be reviewed
by State agencies. The total annual
responses is 300.
Estimated Time per Response: The
estimated time of response varies from
30 to 60 minutes per nomination,
depending on respondent group. FNS
estimates it will take each sponsor
approximately 1 hour to complete the
nomination form, compile other
supplemental information, and submit
the nomination packet to the State
agency. FNS estimates it will take each
reviewing State agency approximately
Estimated
number
respondents
Respondent
Responses
annually per
respondent
30 minutes to review each nomination
packet and complete a one-page
checklist to verify that the nominees are
eligible for the award. The table below
illustrates the burden on both sponsors
and State agencies, with an average total
estimated time of 1.5 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 225 hours. See the table
below for estimated total annual burden
for each type of respondent.
Total annual
responses
Estimated avg.
number of
hours per
response
Estimated
total hours
Reporting Burden
Program Sponsors (Businesses) .....................................................
150
1.00
150
1.00
150.00
State Agency Employees .................................................................
36
4.1666667
150
0.50
75.00
Total Reporting Burden ............................................................
186
......................
300
........................
225.00
Tameka Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–15286 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Request—Understanding
Risk Assessment in Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
Payment Accuracy Study
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This collection is a new collection. The
primary purpose of this study is to
provide FNS with information about
SNAP State agencies’ use of risk
assessment (RA) tools to reduce
payment errors, the effects of these
tools, and best practices for FNS and the
SNAP State agencies to consider in the
development and use of RA tools. RA
tools may apply statistical models using
SNAP household characteristics to
estimate the relative risk of improper
payment.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before September 18,
2023.
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
Comments may be sent to:
Eric Williams, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA
22314. Comments may also be
submitted via email to eric.williams@
usda.gov. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically. All written
comments will be open for public
inspection at the office of FNS during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m. Monday through Friday) at 1320
Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will be a matter
of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Eric Williams at
703–305–2640.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments
are invited on the following topics: (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
respondents, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Title: Understanding Risk Assessment
in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy.
Form Number: Not applicable.
OMB Number: 0584–NEW.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) is the
largest hunger safety net program in the
United States, providing food assistance
benefits to roughly one in eight
Americans. SNAP is administered by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
(USDA) Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS). Although the benefits are
federally funded and must be issued in
accordance with Federal statutes and
regulations, SNAP State agencies are
responsible for determining eligibility
and calculating appropriate benefit
amounts for eligible participants. SNAP
State agencies have flexibility in
administering the program through a
range of policy options, waivers of
regulations, and demonstration projects.
The challenges associated with
accurately documenting households’
circumstances and calculating benefits
within the context of complex
regulations, options, and waivers lead to
a degree of improper payments.
The Payment Integrity Information
Act of 2019 continues the work of
previous related legislation in requiring
Federal agencies to track and mitigate
improper payments, which are defined
as payments that either should not have
been made or were made in an incorrect
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
amount. FNS and the SNAP State
agencies use SNAP Quality Control (QC)
to closely monitor the program for
improper payments. SNAP State
agencies must conduct a QC review of
a random sample of current cases each
month (referred to as active cases) to
identify underpayments and
overpayments and calculate total
payment error. At the end of the review
period for each month’s cases, the SNAP
State agencies share the case files and
results with Federal SNAP staff, who
review a subsample of the cases for
accuracy and use the results to calculate
an annual official payment error rate for
each State agency’s official payment
error rate.
Some social welfare agencies and
criminal justice organizations have
begun using risk assessment (RA) tools.
These tools apply a statistical model to
case characteristics to estimate the
relative risk of a particular outcome.
Agencies that use RA tools may use the
output to allocate staff resources such
that the riskiest cases receive the most
time and attention. This is intended to
improve program outcomes but may
have unintended consequences. As RA
tool use becomes more common across
social sectors, it is critical to address the
risk of bias in these tools. Bias can enter
RA tools through the data used to build
them and the way the tool uses those
data to predict risk and may impinge on
civil rights by leading to disparate
treatments and/or disparate impacts.
FNS is conducting a study,
Understanding Risk Assessment in
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy, to
develop a comprehensive picture of
whether and how SNAP State agencies
use RA tools and determine if these
tools create disparate impacts on
protected classes. The key research
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
objectives follow: (1) determine which
States use RA tools to reduce error rates;
(2) determine what factors and variables
are being used in RA tools; (3) identify
how SNAP State agencies act on the
results of their RA tools; (4) determine
whether SNAP State agencies’ RA tools
are successful in reducing error rates; (5)
determine if the RA tools create (or
relieve) racial or other disparities by
which individuals are flagged for further
review; and (6) determine best practices
in the development and use of RA tools.
The study approach includes a
survey, case studies, and a request for
administrative data from SNAP State
agencies. Data will be collected via a
web-based census survey of the 53
SNAP State agencies. Case studies will
be completed with six SNAP State
agencies; these case studies will include
telephone interviews with up to five
types of State-level staff and up to two
types of local SNAP agency staff (as
applicable). The types of State-level staff
will include RA tool development leads,
SNAP Quality Control Directors, SNAP
Quality Assurance Directors, IT systems
staff, and data analysis staff. The types
of local SNAP agency staff will include
local agency supervisors and local
agency eligibility staff. The study team
will also request administrative data
from the SNAP State agencies that use
an RA tool.
Affected Public: Respondent groups
identified include the following: (1)
individuals/households (pretest
participants); and (2) State, local, and
Tribal government (SNAP State agencies
and SNAP local offices).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The total estimated sample size and the
number of respondents is 100. The team
expects all sample units to respond to
all relevant data collection activities.
The study includes 53 SNAP State
agency directors and up to 5 other staff
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46129
in 6 selected SNAP State agencies that
use RA tools. The study also includes a
SNAP local office supervisor and a local
office eligibility staff member for local
offices of relevant selected SNAP State
agencies that use RA tools. The study
also has 5 pretest participants from a
pool of 5 possible pretest participants.
Some pretest participants will pretest
more than one instrument. The study
team expects all SNAP State agencies to
respond to the survey. The exact
number of SNAP State agencies that use
RA tools is currently unknown, but
estimates suggest the number is 15 or
fewer. Under the assumption that 15
SNAP State agencies have RA tools, the
study team expects all 15 of these SNAP
State agencies to respond to the survey
and provide data on their RA tool. The
team expects 6 of these 15 SNAP State
agencies to also participate in case study
interviews. These estimates assume all
potential respondents will eventually
respond to their relevant information
collections.
Estimated Frequency of Response:
The estimated frequency of response is
7.44 annually for respondents.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
The total estimated number of responses
for data collection is 744 from
respondents.
Estimated Time per Respondent: The
estimated time of response varies from
2 minutes to 1 hour and 45 minutes,
depending on the respondent group and
activity, as shown in table 1. The
average estimated response is 0.15
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: The total public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated at 111 hours (annually).
The estimated burden for each type of
respondent is provided in table 1.
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
EN19JY23.161
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
46130
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
46131
EN19JY23.162
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
EN19JY23.163
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
46132
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
46133
EN19JY23.164
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
EN19JY23.165
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
46134
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
46135
EN19JY23.166
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
46136
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices
Tameka Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2023–15209 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–C
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
[Docket No. NRCS–2023–0012]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Joint System Canal Project,
Jackson County, OR
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
AGENCY:
The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Oregon
State Office announces its intent to
prepare a Watershed Plan and EIS for
the Joint System Canal Project, located
approximately 4 miles east of Eagle
Point, in Jackson County, Oregon. The
proposed Watershed Plan will examine
alternatives through the EIS process for
modernizing the Joint System Canal to
improve agricultural water management.
Medford Irrigation District (MID) is the
sponsoring local organization for the
project and Rogue River Valley
Irrigation District (RRVID) is a partner
organization. NRCS is requesting
comments to identify significant issues,
potential alternatives, and analyses
relevant to the proposed action from all
interested individuals, Federal and State
agencies, and Tribes.
DATES: We will consider comments that
we receive by September 5, 2023.
Comments received after close of the
comment period will be considered to
the extent possible.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
comments in response to this notice.
You may submit your comments
through one of the methods below:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for docket ID NRCS–2023–0012. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments; or
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Jack Friend,
District Manager, Medford Irrigation
District, 5045 Jacksonville Hwy., Central
Point, OR 97502. For written comments,
specify the docket ID NRCS–2023–0012.
All comments received will be posted
without change and made publicly
available on www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Diridoni, telephone: (503) 414–3092;
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:36 Jul 19, 2023
Jkt 259001
email: Gary.Diridoni@USDA.gov for
questions related to submitting
comments; or visit the project website
at: https://oregonwatershedplans.org/
medford-id. Individuals who require
alternative means for communication
should contact the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at
(202) 720–2600 (voice and text
telephone (TTY)) or dial 711 for
Telecommunications Relay service (both
voice and text telephone users can
initiate this call from any telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
The primary purpose of the proposed
watershed project is to improve
agricultural water management by
modernizing the Joint System Canal in
Jackson County, Oregon. Watershed
planning is authorized under the
Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act of 1954 (Pub. L. 83–566),
as amended, and the Flood Control Act
of 1944 (Pub. L. 78–534).
The proposed project is needed due to
existing system water losses, inefficient
water delivery, and the risk of
infrastructure failure. The Joint System
Canal’s age and deteriorating condition
have reduced the water delivery
reliability for agricultural, residential,
industrial, and recreational uses.
Catastrophic failure of the canal would
flood adjacent properties and require
water deliveries to be stopped while the
canal was fixed, which could have large
impacts to crops and users that rely on
that water.
MID and RRVID jointly own, operate,
and maintain the Joint System Canal.
The two irrigation districts collectively
divert water from North Fork Little
Butte Creek and South Fork Little Butte
Creek into the North Fork Canal and the
South Fork Canal, respectively. The
North Fork and South Fork canals merge
to form the 13-mile Joint System Canal,
which conveys water to the Bradshaw
Drop pipeline. At the Bradshaw Drop,
the canal splits into MID’s and RRVID’s
systems. Since the Joint System Canal is
at the head of MID’s and RRIVD’s
systems, the districts have identified
eliminating this failure risk as critical to
maintaining agricultural water supplies.
The proposed project would
modernize the Joint System Canal and
associated siphons from the junction of
the North Fork Canal and South Fork
Canal to the Bradshaw Drop. The aging,
earthen and concrete-lined canal loses
approximately 6.7 cubic feet per second
of water, or 4,850 acre-feet annually,
due to seepage and evaporation. These
water losses are equivalent to
approximately 13 percent of the water
conveyed annually and contribute to
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
water supply challenges for the districts
and local farms. Modernizing the canal
would significantly reduce water losses,
dramatically reduce the risk of failure,
and improve water delivery reliability.
MID and RRVID deliver water to
irrigate approximately 2,225 farms and
orchards on 21,758 irrigated acres in
Jackson County, Oregon. Agricultural
producers on these farms and orchards
grow high value pears, wine grapes, and
other fruit, as well as hay and other
crops. Agriculture is an essential part of
the Rogue Valley economy and
agricultural production depends on
reliable water deliveries from MID and
RRVID. The districts also deliver water
for outdoor residential use, industrial
users, golf courses and cemeteries.
Estimated federal funds required for
the construction of the proposed action
may exceed $25 million. The proposed
action will therefore require
congressional approval per the 2018
Agriculture Appropriations Act
amended funding threshold. In
accordance with 7 CFR 650.7(a)(2), an
EIS is required for projects requiring
congressional approval.
Preliminary Proposed Action and
Alternatives
The objective of the EIS is to
formulate and evaluate alternatives for
agricultural water management on the
Joint System Canal. The EIS is expected
to evaluate three alternatives: two action
alternatives and a no action alternative.
The alternatives that may be considered
for detailed analysis include:
—Alternative 1— No Action: Taking no
action would consist of activities
carried out if no Federal action or
funding were provided. No watershed
project would be implemented, and
the Joint System Canal and associated
infrastructure would not be
modernized.
—Alternative 2— Proposed Action: This
alternative would include the
following system improvement
measures including: piping the canal
in primarily the existing alignment,
with potentially small sections in new
alignments, siphon replacement,
access road improvements, and
upgraded turnouts. Options for each
measure would be evaluated.
—Alternative 3—This alternative would
include the following system
improvement measures including:
canal reshaping and lining in the
existing alignment, canal
stabilization, siphon replacement,
access road improvements, and
upgraded turnouts. Options for each
measure would be evaluated.
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46128-46136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15209]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comments Request--Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy Study
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection. This collection is a new
collection. The primary purpose of this study is to provide FNS with
information about SNAP State agencies' use of risk assessment (RA)
tools to reduce payment errors, the effects of these tools, and best
practices for FNS and the SNAP State agencies to consider in the
development and use of RA tools. RA tools may apply statistical models
using SNAP household characteristics to estimate the relative risk of
improper payment.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 18,
2023.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: Eric Williams, Food and Nutrition
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1320 Braddock Place,
Alexandria, VA 22314. Comments may also be submitted via email to
[email protected]. Comments will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and
follow the online instructions for submitting comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the office
of FNS during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday
through Friday) at 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314. All
responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will be a
matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Eric
Williams at 703-305-2640.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on the following
topics: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden
of the collection of information on respondents, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Title: Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy.
Form Number: Not applicable.
OMB Number: 0584-NEW.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is
the largest hunger safety net program in the United States, providing
food assistance benefits to roughly one in eight Americans. SNAP is
administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS). Although the benefits are federally funded and
must be issued in accordance with Federal statutes and regulations,
SNAP State agencies are responsible for determining eligibility and
calculating appropriate benefit amounts for eligible participants. SNAP
State agencies have flexibility in administering the program through a
range of policy options, waivers of regulations, and demonstration
projects. The challenges associated with accurately documenting
households' circumstances and calculating benefits within the context
of complex regulations, options, and waivers lead to a degree of
improper payments.
The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 continues the work of
previous related legislation in requiring Federal agencies to track and
mitigate improper payments, which are defined as payments that either
should not have been made or were made in an incorrect
[[Page 46129]]
amount. FNS and the SNAP State agencies use SNAP Quality Control (QC)
to closely monitor the program for improper payments. SNAP State
agencies must conduct a QC review of a random sample of current cases
each month (referred to as active cases) to identify underpayments and
overpayments and calculate total payment error. At the end of the
review period for each month's cases, the SNAP State agencies share the
case files and results with Federal SNAP staff, who review a subsample
of the cases for accuracy and use the results to calculate an annual
official payment error rate for each State agency's official payment
error rate.
Some social welfare agencies and criminal justice organizations
have begun using risk assessment (RA) tools. These tools apply a
statistical model to case characteristics to estimate the relative risk
of a particular outcome. Agencies that use RA tools may use the output
to allocate staff resources such that the riskiest cases receive the
most time and attention. This is intended to improve program outcomes
but may have unintended consequences. As RA tool use becomes more
common across social sectors, it is critical to address the risk of
bias in these tools. Bias can enter RA tools through the data used to
build them and the way the tool uses those data to predict risk and may
impinge on civil rights by leading to disparate treatments and/or
disparate impacts.
FNS is conducting a study, Understanding Risk Assessment in
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy, to
develop a comprehensive picture of whether and how SNAP State agencies
use RA tools and determine if these tools create disparate impacts on
protected classes. The key research objectives follow: (1) determine
which States use RA tools to reduce error rates; (2) determine what
factors and variables are being used in RA tools; (3) identify how SNAP
State agencies act on the results of their RA tools; (4) determine
whether SNAP State agencies' RA tools are successful in reducing error
rates; (5) determine if the RA tools create (or relieve) racial or
other disparities by which individuals are flagged for further review;
and (6) determine best practices in the development and use of RA
tools.
The study approach includes a survey, case studies, and a request
for administrative data from SNAP State agencies. Data will be
collected via a web-based census survey of the 53 SNAP State agencies.
Case studies will be completed with six SNAP State agencies; these case
studies will include telephone interviews with up to five types of
State-level staff and up to two types of local SNAP agency staff (as
applicable). The types of State-level staff will include RA tool
development leads, SNAP Quality Control Directors, SNAP Quality
Assurance Directors, IT systems staff, and data analysis staff. The
types of local SNAP agency staff will include local agency supervisors
and local agency eligibility staff. The study team will also request
administrative data from the SNAP State agencies that use an RA tool.
Affected Public: Respondent groups identified include the
following: (1) individuals/households (pretest participants); and (2)
State, local, and Tribal government (SNAP State agencies and SNAP local
offices).
Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated sample size
and the number of respondents is 100. The team expects all sample units
to respond to all relevant data collection activities. The study
includes 53 SNAP State agency directors and up to 5 other staff in 6
selected SNAP State agencies that use RA tools. The study also includes
a SNAP local office supervisor and a local office eligibility staff
member for local offices of relevant selected SNAP State agencies that
use RA tools. The study also has 5 pretest participants from a pool of
5 possible pretest participants. Some pretest participants will pretest
more than one instrument. The study team expects all SNAP State
agencies to respond to the survey. The exact number of SNAP State
agencies that use RA tools is currently unknown, but estimates suggest
the number is 15 or fewer. Under the assumption that 15 SNAP State
agencies have RA tools, the study team expects all 15 of these SNAP
State agencies to respond to the survey and provide data on their RA
tool. The team expects 6 of these 15 SNAP State agencies to also
participate in case study interviews. These estimates assume all
potential respondents will eventually respond to their relevant
information collections.
Estimated Frequency of Response: The estimated frequency of
response is 7.44 annually for respondents.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: The total estimated number of
responses for data collection is 744 from respondents.
Estimated Time per Respondent: The estimated time of response
varies from 2 minutes to 1 hour and 45 minutes, depending on the
respondent group and activity, as shown in table 1. The average
estimated response is 0.15 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: The total public
reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated at 111
hours (annually). The estimated burden for each type of respondent is
provided in table 1.
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
[[Page 46130]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.161
[[Page 46131]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.162
[[Page 46132]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.163
[[Page 46133]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.164
[[Page 46134]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.165
[[Page 46135]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.166
[[Page 46136]]
Tameka Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-15209 Filed 7-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-C