Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Request-Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy Study, 46128-46136 [2023-15209]

Download as PDF 46128 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices complete one nomination packet for the program year. State agencies will review each nomination received from sponsors in their respective States one time; State agencies are expected to receive an average of 4.167 nominations each. Estimated Total Annual Responses: FNS expects 150 nominations from sponsors, which will then be reviewed by State agencies. The total annual responses is 300. Estimated Time per Response: The estimated time of response varies from 30 to 60 minutes per nomination, depending on respondent group. FNS estimates it will take each sponsor approximately 1 hour to complete the nomination form, compile other supplemental information, and submit the nomination packet to the State agency. FNS estimates it will take each reviewing State agency approximately Estimated number respondents Respondent Responses annually per respondent 30 minutes to review each nomination packet and complete a one-page checklist to verify that the nominees are eligible for the award. The table below illustrates the burden on both sponsors and State agencies, with an average total estimated time of 1.5 hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 225 hours. See the table below for estimated total annual burden for each type of respondent. Total annual responses Estimated avg. number of hours per response Estimated total hours Reporting Burden Program Sponsors (Businesses) ..................................................... 150 1.00 150 1.00 150.00 State Agency Employees ................................................................. 36 4.1666667 150 0.50 75.00 Total Reporting Burden ............................................................ 186 ...................... 300 ........................ 225.00 Tameka Owens, Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. 2023–15286 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Nutrition Service Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Request—Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy Study Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA. AGENCY: ACTION: Notice. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment on this proposed information collection. This collection is a new collection. The primary purpose of this study is to provide FNS with information about SNAP State agencies’ use of risk assessment (RA) tools to reduce payment errors, the effects of these tools, and best practices for FNS and the SNAP State agencies to consider in the development and use of RA tools. RA tools may apply statistical models using SNAP household characteristics to estimate the relative risk of improper payment. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: Written comments must be received on or before September 18, 2023. DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 Comments may be sent to: Eric Williams, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314. Comments may also be submitted via email to eric.williams@ usda.gov. Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https:// www.regulations.gov, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments electronically. All written comments will be open for public inspection at the office of FNS during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314. All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will be a matter of public record. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of this information collection should be directed to Eric Williams at 703–305–2640. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on the following topics: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 respondents, including use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Title: Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy. Form Number: Not applicable. OMB Number: 0584–NEW. Expiration Date: Not yet determined. Type of Request: New collection. Abstract: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest hunger safety net program in the United States, providing food assistance benefits to roughly one in eight Americans. SNAP is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service (FNS). Although the benefits are federally funded and must be issued in accordance with Federal statutes and regulations, SNAP State agencies are responsible for determining eligibility and calculating appropriate benefit amounts for eligible participants. SNAP State agencies have flexibility in administering the program through a range of policy options, waivers of regulations, and demonstration projects. The challenges associated with accurately documenting households’ circumstances and calculating benefits within the context of complex regulations, options, and waivers lead to a degree of improper payments. The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 continues the work of previous related legislation in requiring Federal agencies to track and mitigate improper payments, which are defined as payments that either should not have been made or were made in an incorrect E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 amount. FNS and the SNAP State agencies use SNAP Quality Control (QC) to closely monitor the program for improper payments. SNAP State agencies must conduct a QC review of a random sample of current cases each month (referred to as active cases) to identify underpayments and overpayments and calculate total payment error. At the end of the review period for each month’s cases, the SNAP State agencies share the case files and results with Federal SNAP staff, who review a subsample of the cases for accuracy and use the results to calculate an annual official payment error rate for each State agency’s official payment error rate. Some social welfare agencies and criminal justice organizations have begun using risk assessment (RA) tools. These tools apply a statistical model to case characteristics to estimate the relative risk of a particular outcome. Agencies that use RA tools may use the output to allocate staff resources such that the riskiest cases receive the most time and attention. This is intended to improve program outcomes but may have unintended consequences. As RA tool use becomes more common across social sectors, it is critical to address the risk of bias in these tools. Bias can enter RA tools through the data used to build them and the way the tool uses those data to predict risk and may impinge on civil rights by leading to disparate treatments and/or disparate impacts. FNS is conducting a study, Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy, to develop a comprehensive picture of whether and how SNAP State agencies use RA tools and determine if these tools create disparate impacts on protected classes. The key research VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 objectives follow: (1) determine which States use RA tools to reduce error rates; (2) determine what factors and variables are being used in RA tools; (3) identify how SNAP State agencies act on the results of their RA tools; (4) determine whether SNAP State agencies’ RA tools are successful in reducing error rates; (5) determine if the RA tools create (or relieve) racial or other disparities by which individuals are flagged for further review; and (6) determine best practices in the development and use of RA tools. The study approach includes a survey, case studies, and a request for administrative data from SNAP State agencies. Data will be collected via a web-based census survey of the 53 SNAP State agencies. Case studies will be completed with six SNAP State agencies; these case studies will include telephone interviews with up to five types of State-level staff and up to two types of local SNAP agency staff (as applicable). The types of State-level staff will include RA tool development leads, SNAP Quality Control Directors, SNAP Quality Assurance Directors, IT systems staff, and data analysis staff. The types of local SNAP agency staff will include local agency supervisors and local agency eligibility staff. The study team will also request administrative data from the SNAP State agencies that use an RA tool. Affected Public: Respondent groups identified include the following: (1) individuals/households (pretest participants); and (2) State, local, and Tribal government (SNAP State agencies and SNAP local offices). Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated sample size and the number of respondents is 100. The team expects all sample units to respond to all relevant data collection activities. The study includes 53 SNAP State agency directors and up to 5 other staff PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46129 in 6 selected SNAP State agencies that use RA tools. The study also includes a SNAP local office supervisor and a local office eligibility staff member for local offices of relevant selected SNAP State agencies that use RA tools. The study also has 5 pretest participants from a pool of 5 possible pretest participants. Some pretest participants will pretest more than one instrument. The study team expects all SNAP State agencies to respond to the survey. The exact number of SNAP State agencies that use RA tools is currently unknown, but estimates suggest the number is 15 or fewer. Under the assumption that 15 SNAP State agencies have RA tools, the study team expects all 15 of these SNAP State agencies to respond to the survey and provide data on their RA tool. The team expects 6 of these 15 SNAP State agencies to also participate in case study interviews. These estimates assume all potential respondents will eventually respond to their relevant information collections. Estimated Frequency of Response: The estimated frequency of response is 7.44 annually for respondents. Estimated Total Annual Responses: The total estimated number of responses for data collection is 744 from respondents. Estimated Time per Respondent: The estimated time of response varies from 2 minutes to 1 hour and 45 minutes, depending on the respondent group and activity, as shown in table 1. The average estimated response is 0.15 hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: The total public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated at 111 hours (annually). The estimated burden for each type of respondent is provided in table 1. BILLING CODE 3410–30–P E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 EN19JY23.161</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 46130 VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 46131 EN19JY23.162</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices VerDate Sep<11>2014 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 EN19JY23.163</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 46132 VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 46133 EN19JY23.164</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices VerDate Sep<11>2014 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 EN19JY23.165</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 46134 VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 46135 EN19JY23.166</GPH> ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices 46136 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 19, 2023 / Notices Tameka Owens, Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. 2023–15209 Filed 7–18–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–C DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Natural Resources Conservation Service [Docket No. NRCS–2023–0012] Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Joint System Canal Project, Jackson County, OR Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). AGENCY: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Oregon State Office announces its intent to prepare a Watershed Plan and EIS for the Joint System Canal Project, located approximately 4 miles east of Eagle Point, in Jackson County, Oregon. The proposed Watershed Plan will examine alternatives through the EIS process for modernizing the Joint System Canal to improve agricultural water management. Medford Irrigation District (MID) is the sponsoring local organization for the project and Rogue River Valley Irrigation District (RRVID) is a partner organization. NRCS is requesting comments to identify significant issues, potential alternatives, and analyses relevant to the proposed action from all interested individuals, Federal and State agencies, and Tribes. DATES: We will consider comments that we receive by September 5, 2023. Comments received after close of the comment period will be considered to the extent possible. ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit comments in response to this notice. You may submit your comments through one of the methods below: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for docket ID NRCS–2023–0012. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments; or • Mail or Hand Delivery: Jack Friend, District Manager, Medford Irrigation District, 5045 Jacksonville Hwy., Central Point, OR 97502. For written comments, specify the docket ID NRCS–2023–0012. All comments received will be posted without change and made publicly available on www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Diridoni, telephone: (503) 414–3092; ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 00:36 Jul 19, 2023 Jkt 259001 email: Gary.Diridoni@USDA.gov for questions related to submitting comments; or visit the project website at: https://oregonwatershedplans.org/ medford-id. Individuals who require alternative means for communication should contact the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and text telephone (TTY)) or dial 711 for Telecommunications Relay service (both voice and text telephone users can initiate this call from any telephone). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose and Need The primary purpose of the proposed watershed project is to improve agricultural water management by modernizing the Joint System Canal in Jackson County, Oregon. Watershed planning is authorized under the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954 (Pub. L. 83–566), as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944 (Pub. L. 78–534). The proposed project is needed due to existing system water losses, inefficient water delivery, and the risk of infrastructure failure. The Joint System Canal’s age and deteriorating condition have reduced the water delivery reliability for agricultural, residential, industrial, and recreational uses. Catastrophic failure of the canal would flood adjacent properties and require water deliveries to be stopped while the canal was fixed, which could have large impacts to crops and users that rely on that water. MID and RRVID jointly own, operate, and maintain the Joint System Canal. The two irrigation districts collectively divert water from North Fork Little Butte Creek and South Fork Little Butte Creek into the North Fork Canal and the South Fork Canal, respectively. The North Fork and South Fork canals merge to form the 13-mile Joint System Canal, which conveys water to the Bradshaw Drop pipeline. At the Bradshaw Drop, the canal splits into MID’s and RRVID’s systems. Since the Joint System Canal is at the head of MID’s and RRIVD’s systems, the districts have identified eliminating this failure risk as critical to maintaining agricultural water supplies. The proposed project would modernize the Joint System Canal and associated siphons from the junction of the North Fork Canal and South Fork Canal to the Bradshaw Drop. The aging, earthen and concrete-lined canal loses approximately 6.7 cubic feet per second of water, or 4,850 acre-feet annually, due to seepage and evaporation. These water losses are equivalent to approximately 13 percent of the water conveyed annually and contribute to PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 water supply challenges for the districts and local farms. Modernizing the canal would significantly reduce water losses, dramatically reduce the risk of failure, and improve water delivery reliability. MID and RRVID deliver water to irrigate approximately 2,225 farms and orchards on 21,758 irrigated acres in Jackson County, Oregon. Agricultural producers on these farms and orchards grow high value pears, wine grapes, and other fruit, as well as hay and other crops. Agriculture is an essential part of the Rogue Valley economy and agricultural production depends on reliable water deliveries from MID and RRVID. The districts also deliver water for outdoor residential use, industrial users, golf courses and cemeteries. Estimated federal funds required for the construction of the proposed action may exceed $25 million. The proposed action will therefore require congressional approval per the 2018 Agriculture Appropriations Act amended funding threshold. In accordance with 7 CFR 650.7(a)(2), an EIS is required for projects requiring congressional approval. Preliminary Proposed Action and Alternatives The objective of the EIS is to formulate and evaluate alternatives for agricultural water management on the Joint System Canal. The EIS is expected to evaluate three alternatives: two action alternatives and a no action alternative. The alternatives that may be considered for detailed analysis include: —Alternative 1— No Action: Taking no action would consist of activities carried out if no Federal action or funding were provided. No watershed project would be implemented, and the Joint System Canal and associated infrastructure would not be modernized. —Alternative 2— Proposed Action: This alternative would include the following system improvement measures including: piping the canal in primarily the existing alignment, with potentially small sections in new alignments, siphon replacement, access road improvements, and upgraded turnouts. Options for each measure would be evaluated. —Alternative 3—This alternative would include the following system improvement measures including: canal reshaping and lining in the existing alignment, canal stabilization, siphon replacement, access road improvements, and upgraded turnouts. Options for each measure would be evaluated. E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46128-46136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15209]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comments Request--Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental 
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy Study

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment 
on this proposed information collection. This collection is a new 
collection. The primary purpose of this study is to provide FNS with 
information about SNAP State agencies' use of risk assessment (RA) 
tools to reduce payment errors, the effects of these tools, and best 
practices for FNS and the SNAP State agencies to consider in the 
development and use of RA tools. RA tools may apply statistical models 
using SNAP household characteristics to estimate the relative risk of 
improper payment.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 18, 
2023.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: Eric Williams, Food and Nutrition 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1320 Braddock Place, 
Alexandria, VA 22314. Comments may also be submitted via email to 
[email protected]. Comments will also be accepted through the 
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and 
follow the online instructions for submitting comments electronically. 
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the office 
of FNS during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday 
through Friday) at 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314. All 
responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request 
for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will be a 
matter of public record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of this information collection should be directed to Eric 
Williams at 703-305-2640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on the following 
topics: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy 
of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
that were used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden 
of the collection of information on respondents, including use of 
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Title: Understanding Risk Assessment in Supplemental Nutrition 
Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy.
    Form Number: Not applicable.
    OMB Number: 0584-NEW.
    Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Abstract: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is 
the largest hunger safety net program in the United States, providing 
food assistance benefits to roughly one in eight Americans. SNAP is 
administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food and 
Nutrition Service (FNS). Although the benefits are federally funded and 
must be issued in accordance with Federal statutes and regulations, 
SNAP State agencies are responsible for determining eligibility and 
calculating appropriate benefit amounts for eligible participants. SNAP 
State agencies have flexibility in administering the program through a 
range of policy options, waivers of regulations, and demonstration 
projects. The challenges associated with accurately documenting 
households' circumstances and calculating benefits within the context 
of complex regulations, options, and waivers lead to a degree of 
improper payments.
    The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 continues the work of 
previous related legislation in requiring Federal agencies to track and 
mitigate improper payments, which are defined as payments that either 
should not have been made or were made in an incorrect

[[Page 46129]]

amount. FNS and the SNAP State agencies use SNAP Quality Control (QC) 
to closely monitor the program for improper payments. SNAP State 
agencies must conduct a QC review of a random sample of current cases 
each month (referred to as active cases) to identify underpayments and 
overpayments and calculate total payment error. At the end of the 
review period for each month's cases, the SNAP State agencies share the 
case files and results with Federal SNAP staff, who review a subsample 
of the cases for accuracy and use the results to calculate an annual 
official payment error rate for each State agency's official payment 
error rate.
    Some social welfare agencies and criminal justice organizations 
have begun using risk assessment (RA) tools. These tools apply a 
statistical model to case characteristics to estimate the relative risk 
of a particular outcome. Agencies that use RA tools may use the output 
to allocate staff resources such that the riskiest cases receive the 
most time and attention. This is intended to improve program outcomes 
but may have unintended consequences. As RA tool use becomes more 
common across social sectors, it is critical to address the risk of 
bias in these tools. Bias can enter RA tools through the data used to 
build them and the way the tool uses those data to predict risk and may 
impinge on civil rights by leading to disparate treatments and/or 
disparate impacts.
    FNS is conducting a study, Understanding Risk Assessment in 
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Payment Accuracy, to 
develop a comprehensive picture of whether and how SNAP State agencies 
use RA tools and determine if these tools create disparate impacts on 
protected classes. The key research objectives follow: (1) determine 
which States use RA tools to reduce error rates; (2) determine what 
factors and variables are being used in RA tools; (3) identify how SNAP 
State agencies act on the results of their RA tools; (4) determine 
whether SNAP State agencies' RA tools are successful in reducing error 
rates; (5) determine if the RA tools create (or relieve) racial or 
other disparities by which individuals are flagged for further review; 
and (6) determine best practices in the development and use of RA 
tools.
    The study approach includes a survey, case studies, and a request 
for administrative data from SNAP State agencies. Data will be 
collected via a web-based census survey of the 53 SNAP State agencies. 
Case studies will be completed with six SNAP State agencies; these case 
studies will include telephone interviews with up to five types of 
State-level staff and up to two types of local SNAP agency staff (as 
applicable). The types of State-level staff will include RA tool 
development leads, SNAP Quality Control Directors, SNAP Quality 
Assurance Directors, IT systems staff, and data analysis staff. The 
types of local SNAP agency staff will include local agency supervisors 
and local agency eligibility staff. The study team will also request 
administrative data from the SNAP State agencies that use an RA tool.
    Affected Public: Respondent groups identified include the 
following: (1) individuals/households (pretest participants); and (2) 
State, local, and Tribal government (SNAP State agencies and SNAP local 
offices).
    Estimated Number of Respondents: The total estimated sample size 
and the number of respondents is 100. The team expects all sample units 
to respond to all relevant data collection activities. The study 
includes 53 SNAP State agency directors and up to 5 other staff in 6 
selected SNAP State agencies that use RA tools. The study also includes 
a SNAP local office supervisor and a local office eligibility staff 
member for local offices of relevant selected SNAP State agencies that 
use RA tools. The study also has 5 pretest participants from a pool of 
5 possible pretest participants. Some pretest participants will pretest 
more than one instrument. The study team expects all SNAP State 
agencies to respond to the survey. The exact number of SNAP State 
agencies that use RA tools is currently unknown, but estimates suggest 
the number is 15 or fewer. Under the assumption that 15 SNAP State 
agencies have RA tools, the study team expects all 15 of these SNAP 
State agencies to respond to the survey and provide data on their RA 
tool. The team expects 6 of these 15 SNAP State agencies to also 
participate in case study interviews. These estimates assume all 
potential respondents will eventually respond to their relevant 
information collections.
    Estimated Frequency of Response: The estimated frequency of 
response is 7.44 annually for respondents.
    Estimated Total Annual Responses: The total estimated number of 
responses for data collection is 744 from respondents.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: The estimated time of response 
varies from 2 minutes to 1 hour and 45 minutes, depending on the 
respondent group and activity, as shown in table 1. The average 
estimated response is 0.15 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: The total public 
reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated at 111 
hours (annually). The estimated burden for each type of respondent is 
provided in table 1.
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P

[[Page 46130]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.161


[[Page 46131]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.162


[[Page 46132]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.163


[[Page 46133]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.164


[[Page 46134]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.165


[[Page 46135]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19JY23.166



[[Page 46136]]


Tameka Owens,
Assistant Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-15209 Filed 7-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-C


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.