Modifications to Performance Standards During Natural Disasters and Other Calamities, 44760-44764 [2023-14658]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
44760
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Home Energy Assistance Program; 42
U.S.C. 9849, Head Start; 42 U.S.C. 9918,
Community Services Block Grant
Program; and 42 U.S.C. 10406, Family
Violence Prevention and Services.
(f)(1) At any time, a recipient may
notify the HHS awarding agency, the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Financial Resources (ASFR), or the
Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the
recipient’s view that it is exempt from,
or requires modified application of,
certain provisions of this part due to the
application of a federal religious
freedom law, including the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and
the First Amendment.
(2) Once the awarding agency,
working jointly with ASFR or OCR,
receives such notification from a
particular recipient, they shall promptly
consider those views in responding to
any complaints, determining whether to
proceed with any investigation or
enforcement activity regarding that
recipient’s compliance with the relevant
provisions of this part, or in responding
to a claim raised by the recipient in the
first instance, in legal consultation with
the HHS Office of the General Counsel
(OGC). Any relevant ongoing
compliance activity regarding the
recipient shall be held in abeyance until
a determination has been made on
whether the recipient is exempt from
the application of certain provisions of
this part, or whether modified
application of the provision is required
as applied to specific contexts,
procedures, or services, based on a
federal religious freedom law.
(3) The awarding agency, working
jointly with ASFR or OCR, will, in legal
consultation with OGC, assess whether
there is a sufficient, concrete factual
basis for making a determination and
will apply the applicable legal standards
of the relevant law, and will
communicate their determination to the
recipient in writing. The written
notification will clearly set forth the
scope, applicable issues, duration, and
all other relevant terms of the
exemption request.
(4) If the awarding agency, working
jointly with ASFR or OCR, and in legal
consultation with OGC, determines that
a recipient is exempt from the
application of certain provisions of this
part or that modified application of
certain provisions is required as applied
to specific contexts, procedures, or
services, that determination does not
otherwise limit the application of any
other provision of this part to the
recipient or to other contexts,
procedures, or services.
(g) Any provision of this part held to
be invalid or unenforceable by its terms,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
or as applied to any person or
circumstance, shall be severable from
this part and shall not affect the
remainder thereof or the application of
the provision to other persons not
similarly situated or to other, dissimilar
circumstances.
Dated: July 6, 2023.
Xavier Becerra,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2023–14600 Filed 7–11–23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4153–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
45 CFR Part 305
RIN 0970–AC95
Modifications to Performance
Standards During Natural Disasters
and Other Calamities
Office of Child Support
Services (OCSS), Administration for
Children and Families (ACF),
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS or the Department).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
OCSS proposes to provide
temporary relief to states from certain
child support program performance
requirements and penalties during
natural disasters and other calamities
which have a negative impact on state
child support program operations. The
proposed rule would provide ACF with
ongoing authority to modify
performance measure requirements
when states are affected by natural
disasters and other calamities that have
resulted, or are expected to result, in the
failure of state child support programs
to achieve performance standards for
paternity establishment, support order
establishment, and current collections.
The proposed rule will enable states to
avoid the imposition of penalties due to
adverse data reliability audit findings
during, and subsequent to, natural
disasters and other calamities, including
pandemics and declared public health
emergencies.
DATES: Consideration will be given to
written comments on this notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) received
on or before September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by [docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
number (0970–AC95)], by one of the
following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Written comments may be
submitted to: Office of Child Support
Services, Attention: Director of Policy
and Training, 330 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20201.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tricia John, Division of Policy and
Training, OCSS, telephone (202) 260–
7143. Email inquiries to ocse.dpt@
acf.hhs.gov. Deaf and hearing-impaired
individuals may call the Federal Dual
Party Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. Eastern Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submission of Comments
Comments should be specific, address
issues raised by the proposed rule, and
explain reasons for any objections or
recommended changes. Additionally,
we will be interested in comments that
indicate agreement with the proposal.
We will not acknowledge receipt of the
comments we receive. However, we will
review and consider all comments that
are relevant and are received during the
comment period. We will respond to
these comments in the preamble to the
final rule.
Statutory Authority
This NPRM is published under the
authority granted to the Secretary of
Health and Human Services by section
1102 of the Social Security Act (the Act)
(42 U.S.C. 1302). Section 1102 of the
Act authorizes the Secretary to publish
regulations, not inconsistent with the
Act, as may be necessary for the
efficient administration of the functions
with which the Secretary is responsible
under the Act. The proposed relief from
the support order establishment and
current support collections performance
measures may be waived, modified, or
suspended through rulemaking under
section 409(a)(8)(A)(i)(I) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 609(a)(8)(A)(i)(I)). The proposed
relief from the paternity establishment
percentage (PEP) performance measure
and data reliability audit requirements
related to the PEP under this NPRM is
based on statutory authority granted
under section 452(g)(3)(A) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 652(g)(3)(A)).
Justification
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to authorize the Secretary to provide
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2023 / Proposed Rules
targeted and time-limited relief to states
from certain performance penalties due
to the impact of natural disasters and
other calamities when such events have
a negative impact on state child support
program operations.
Through this proposed rule, ACF will
have the authority to modify the
requirements for states to meet the
following performance standards: the
Paternity Establishment Percentage
(PEP) performance standard of 90
percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(1), the
support order establishment standard of
40 percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2),
and the current collections performance
standard of 35 percent under 45 CFR
305.40(a)(3). ACF may adjust these
performance standards to a lower level
to avoid imposing financial penalties on
states and may also modify the
requirements to avoid the imposition of
penalties due to adverse data reliability
audit findings. This would provide ACF
with the flexibility to modify the
performance requirements for a timelimited period during, and subsequent
to, natural disasters and other
calamities.
The need for rulemaking under the
discretionary authority provided to the
Secretary to modify performance
penalty requirements became apparent
during the COVID–19 pandemic. Due to
disruptions to state child support
program operations and to court
operations during the COVID–19
pandemic, states experienced significant
workload burdens and service backlogs.
Since the start of the pandemic in early
2020, states have appealed for relief
from program requirements in order to
support their operations during the
crisis. OCSS is able to provide certain
flexibilities for administrative
requirements under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) (See
OCSS Dear Colleague Letter 20–04:
Flexibilities for State and Tribal Child
Support Agencies during COVID–19
Pandemic 1). However, these flexibilities
do not extend to relief for financial
penalties related to performance or
adverse data reliability audit findings.
States are concerned that performancerelated financial penalties, which are
imposed in the form of a reduction to
state TANF grants, place an undue
burden on state budgets and threaten
funding that supports the very families
who are most in need during a time of
crisis.
To address penalty relief due to the
impact of the COVID–19 pandemic, ACF
1 https://www.acf.hhs.gov/css/policy-guidance/
flexibilities-state-and-tribal-child-support-agenciesduring-covid-19-pandemic.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
issued a final rule (87 FR 32090) on May
27, 2022, which provides states relief
from performance penalties by
modifying the PEP performance
requirement from 90 percent to 50
percent for fiscal years 2020, 2021, and
2022. While the COVID–19 relief
rulemaking was expedited due to the
emergency created by the pandemic, the
rulemaking effort required over 200
days from the time the NPRM was
published in 2021 until the final rule
was published in 2022. Due to the time
required to accomplish rulemaking,
ACF seeks the authority to provide relief
in similar circumstances through a more
streamlined approach, not requiring
additional rulemaking during each
event.
Without this NPRM, there is no
general authority in title IV–D (or in
other statutory authority) to relieve
states from these penalties similar to the
flexibility provided to the TANF
program. The TANF program’s authority
to promulgate such a regulation derives
from the TANF program statute (42
U.S.C. 609(b)). Without statutory
authority providing such flexibility to
the Secretary regarding IV–D
requirements, it is not possible to issue
a regulation similar to 45 CFR 262.5 for
relief from title IV–D penalties.
This proposed regulation seeks to
provide ACF ongoing authority to grant
time-limited, targeted flexibilities,
allowing ACF to provide timely relief to
states when natural disasters or other
calamities significantly affect program
operations without having to engage in
separate rulemaking, and will apply to
Federal fiscal year periods subsequent
to September 30, 2022. This relief
would support states who might
otherwise face penalties for not meeting
specific performance measure standards
or which may fail the data reliability
audits.
Background: State Child Support
Program Performance Requirements
Under Title IV–D of the Act, states are
required to achieve performance levels
in paternity establishment, support
order establishment, and current
support collections. Failure to achieve
required performance levels may lead to
penalties assessed as a percentage
against the state’s TANF grant.
The PEP, support order establishment,
and current collections performance
measures, which are part of the overall
performance, audit, penalties, and
incentives for the child support
program, are established under 452(g) of
the Act and 45 CFR 305.40. Section
452(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Act requires the
Secretary to determine whether statereported data used to determine the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44761
performance levels are complete and
reliable. Additionally, section
409(a)(8)(A) of the Act and 45 CFR
305.61(a)(1) include the assessment of a
financial penalty if there is a failure to
achieve the required level of
performance or an audit determines that
the data is incomplete or unreliable.
The required levels of performance for
the PEP, support order establishment,
and current collections performance
measures are set out in 45 CFR 305.40:
• The PEP performance level must be
at least 90 percent or an improvement
of 2 to 6 percentage points over the
previous year’s level of performance,
below which a state will incur a
penalty.
• The support order establishment
performance level must be at least 40
percent, below which a state will be
penalized unless an increase of 5
percent over the previous year is
achieved.
• The current collections
performance level must be at least 35
percent, below which a state will be
penalized unless an increase of 5
percent over the previous year is
achieved.
Section 409(a)(8)(A)(ii) of the Act and
45 CFR 305.61(a)(2) impose automatic
corrective action for the subsequent
fiscal year. A state also must submit
complete and reliable data used in the
performance measure calculations,
which will be audited according to 45
CFR 305.60.
If a state fails to meet the annual
performance measure standards, or to
show improvement in the subsequent
year (2 to 6 percentage points for the
PEP), the amount of the initial penalty
will be equal to one to two percent of
the adjusted State Family Assistance
Grant for the state’s TANF program in
accordance with 45 CFR 305.61(c) and
(d). A penalty against the state’s TANF
grant will also be imposed if the state
fails to submit complete and reliable
performance measure data and there is
an adverse data reliability audit finding
for a performance measure in the
subsequent year. The penalty will
continue to be assessed in accordance
with section 409(a)(8)(B) of the Act and
45 CFR 305.61 until the state is
determined to have submitted complete
and reliable data and achieved the
required performance measure
standards. In accordance with 45 CFR
262.1(e)(1), the state must expend
additional state funds equal to the
amount of the penalty (which will not
count toward the maintenance-of-effort
requirement under TANF) the year after
the TANF grant penalty is assessed.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
44762
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2023 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Section-by-Section Discussion of the
Provisions of This Proposed Rule
Section 305.61: Penalty for Failure To
Meet IV–D Requirements
We propose to add a new provision to
Part 305 (Program Performance
Measures, Standards, Financial
Incentives, and Penalties), to provide
the Secretary with the authority to
provide short-term relief from
performance requirements related to the
PEP, support order establishment, and
current collections performance
standards, when states are unable to
meet those requirements due to the
impact of natural disasters or other
calamities on state child support
program operations. We propose adding
a new paragraph (f) to § 305.61, Penalty
for failure to meet IV–D requirements, to
provide the Secretary with the
authority, during and subsequent to
natural disasters and other calamities, to
temporarily modify the performance
requirements for states to meet the
paternity establishment percentage
standard of 90 percent under 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), the support order
establishment standard of 40 percent
under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), and the
current collections standard of 35
percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3), to a
lower level to avoid imposing the
financial penalty on states. The
proposed rule would also authorize the
Secretary to set aside adverse data
reliability audit findings under section
452(g) of the Act during the same time
period.
The proposed rule would require
individual states and territories to
initiate the request to modify the
performance requirements specified
under section 452(g) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR 305.40(a)(1),
under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), or under 45
CFR 305.40(a)(3) when a state has
experienced a natural disaster or other
calamity that has or will make
compliance with the performance
standards impracticable. The state may
also ask the Secretary to set aside
adverse data reliability audit findings
under section 452(g) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.61(a)(1)(ii) for the same time period
as the time period for which a
modification of performance
requirements is sought.
A natural disaster or other calamity
includes state chief executive officerdeclared states of emergency,
pandemics, events designated by the
President under the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), and
declared public health emergencies
under section 319 of the Public Health
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d). The state’s
chief executive (or his or her designee,
this title is illustrative only and reflects
the position determined by the state
which holds this authority) must
demonstrate, based on available data,
that such emergency has made the
state’s ability to attain one or more of
the performance standards
impracticable. The request for relief
must include a narrative statement
which describes both the circumstances
and justification for the request. The
statement should also provide
information substantiating the
impracticability of compliance with the
standards, including a description of the
specific conditions caused by the
natural disaster or other calamity,
including preliminary data provided by
the state, as required under 45 CFR
305.32(f), showing reduced
performance.
The request must also include
information on the expected duration of
the conditions that make compliance
impracticable and include any other
documentation or other information that
the Secretary may require to make a
determination regarding relief.
The state must demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Secretary that the
natural disaster or other calamity has
directly resulted in a reduction in
performance or is expected to result in
a reduction in performance, based on
data provided by the state.
The statement and other
documentation must demonstrate that
the state: has not or will not meet one
or more existing performance
requirements, such that a performance
penalty would apply; has submitted
preliminary data to support the
statement; and has provided all required
information. Any additional information
must be submitted as soon as the
adverse effect of the natural disaster or
other calamity giving rise to the request
is known to the state.
The Secretary will make a
determination of the modified
performance requirements based on
preliminary data provided by the state
under 45 CFR 305.32(f) and shall
provide written communication to the
state of the decision and the period for
which any modified standards shall
apply. Relief from the performance
requirements will be time-limited, based
on the data presented by the state, and
the Federal fiscal year period in which
conditions are expected to make
compliance impracticable.
We propose providing the Secretary
with the authority to provide temporary
relief to align with the Federal fiscal
year timeframes which align with the
expected duration of the conditions that
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
make compliance with the performance
requirement impracticable. After the
relief period, the performance
requirements will revert back to the
levels described under section 452(g) of
the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2),
or under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3), and the
state will once again be subject to
penalties for adverse data reliability
audit findings related to the
performance measures after an
automatic corrective action year as
specified in 45 CFR 305.42. This
proposed rule will apply to Federal
fiscal year periods subsequent to
September 30, 2022.
Paperwork Reduction Act
No new information collection
requirements would be imposed by this
proposed regulation.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
meets the standards of Executive Order
13563 because it creates a short-term
public benefit, at minimal cost to the
Federal Government, by not imposing
penalties against a state’s TANF grant,
during a time when public assistance
funds are critically needed.
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this NPRM is
significant and was accordingly
reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Secretary proposes to certify that,
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), as enacted by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–
354), this proposed rule, if finalized,
will not result in a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The primary impact is on state
governments. State governments are not
considered small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2023 / Proposed Rules
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) requires
agencies to prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
annual expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or
more (adjusted annually for inflation).
That threshold level is currently
approximately $177 million. This rule
does not impose any mandates on state,
local, or tribal governments, or the
private sector, that will exceed this
threshold in any year.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999 requires Federal agencies to
determine whether a proposed policy or
regulation may affect family well-being.
If the agency’s determination is
affirmative, then the agency must
prepare an impact assessment
addressing seven criteria specified in
the law. ACF believes it is not necessary
to prepare a family policymaking
assessment (see Pub. L. 105–277)
because this regulation does not impose
requirements on states or families and
thus will not have any impact on family
well-being.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 prohibits an
agency from publishing any rule that
has federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute, or the rule preempts state law,
unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
rule does not have federalism impact as
defined in the Executive Order 13132.
January Contreras, Assistant Secretary
of the Administration for Children &
Families, approved this document on
March 15, 2023.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 305
Child support, Program performance
measures, standards, financial
incentives, and penalties.
Dated: July 6, 2023.
Xavier Becerra,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Health and
Human Services proposes to amend 45
CFR part 305 as set forth below:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
PART 305—PROGRAM
PERFORMANCE MEASURES,
STANDARDS, FINANCIAL
INCENTIVES, AND PENALTIES
1. The authority citation for part 305
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 609(a)(8), 652(a)(4)
and (g), 658a, and 1302.
2. Amend § 305.61 by adding new
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
§ 305.61 Penalty for failure to meet IV–D
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Authority to modify state
requirements to meet paternity
establishment percentages, support
order establishment, or current
collections performance measure
standards during natural disasters and
other calamities. During, and
subsequent to, natural disasters and
other calamities (e.g., state chief
executive officer-declared states of
emergency, pandemics, events
designated by the President under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
5170), and declared public health
emergencies under section 319 of the
Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C.
247d), the Secretary may temporarily
modify the performance measure
requirements for a state to meet the
paternity establishment percentage
standard of 90 percent under section
452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and
45 CFR 305.40(a)(1), the support order
establishment standard of 40 percent
under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), and the
current collections standard of 35
percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3), to
lower levels to avoid imposing financial
performance penalties on states, and
may set aside adverse data reliability
audit findings under section 452(g) of
the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.61(a)(1)(ii) during the same time
period.
For Federal fiscal years subsequent to
September 30, 2022, the performance
requirements for paternity
establishment under section 452(g) of
the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), for support order
establishment under 45 CFR
305.40(a)(2), and for current collections
under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3)—may be
modified by the Secretary to a lower
level under the conditions described in
this section.
(1) If a state experiences a natural
disaster or other calamity (e.g., state
chief executive officer-declared states of
emergency, pandemics, events
designated by the President under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44763
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
5170), and declared public health
emergencies under section 319 of the
Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C.
247d), the state’s chief executive officer
(or his or her designee) may submit to
the Secretary a request to modify one or
more of the performance requirements
specified under section 452(g) of the Act
(42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2),
or under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3).
(2) The state may also ask the
Secretary to set aside adverse data
reliability audit findings under section
452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and
45 CFR 305.61(a)(1)(ii) for the same time
period as the time period for which a
modification of performance
requirements is sought.
(3) The request for a modification to
the performance requirements must be
submitted in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraphs
(f)(4), (5) and (6) of this section. Any
request other than one submitted with
the initial application must be
submitted as soon as the adverse effect
of the natural disaster or other calamity
giving rise to the request is known to the
state.
(4) A request for a modification of one
or more of the performance
requirements must include the
following:
(i) A narrative statement describing
the circumstances and justification for
the request to modify the state’s
performance requirement;
(ii) Information substantiating the
impracticability of compliance with the
standards, including a description of the
specific conditions caused by the
natural disaster or other calamity which
make compliance impracticable,
including preliminary data provided by
the state, as required under 45 CFR
305.32(f), showing reduced
performance;
(iii) Information on the expected
duration of the conditions that make
compliance impracticable; and
(iv) Any other documentation or other
information that the Secretary may
require to make this determination.
(5) The state must demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Secretary that the
natural disaster or other calamity has
directly resulted in a reduction in
performance or is expected to result in
a reduction in performance, based on
data provided by the state. In its request
for a temporary modification to one or
more performance requirements, the
state must be able to demonstrate that it:
(i) Has not or will not meet one or
more existing performance
requirements, such that a performance
penalty would apply;
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
44764
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 133 / Thursday, July 13, 2023 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Has submitted preliminary data
supporting this statement; and
(iii) Has provided all required
information requested by the Secretary.
(6) The Secretary shall provide
written communication of the decision
to modify or decline to modify the
performance standards, and the period
for which any modified standards shall
apply, after receipt of appropriate
written communication from the chief
executive officer.
(i) If approved, a temporary
modification in a performance
requirement will expire on the last day
of the Federal fiscal year for which it
was approved.
(ii) Adverse findings of data reliability
audits of the state’s performance data
under 45 CFR 305.60 as reported during
the period in which the performance
requirement modification is approved
will not result in a financial penalty
pursuant to the state’s request as
specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this
section.
(iii) Unless the state receives a written
approval of its performance requirement
modification request, the performance
requirements under section 452(g) of the
Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2),
and under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3) remain
in effect.
(iv) If the request for a performance
requirement modification is denied, the
denial is not subject to administrative
appeal.
[FR Doc. 2023–14658 Filed 7–12–23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–41–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 230706–0161]
RIN 0648–BM27
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; SnapperGrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic;
Amendment 53
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations to
implement Amendment 53 to the
Fishery Management Plan for the
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic (FMP), as prepared and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jul 12, 2023
Jkt 259001
submitted by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council). For gag,
this proposed rule would revise the
sector annual catch limits (ACLs),
commercial trip limits, recreational bag,
vessel, and possession limits, and
recreational accountability measures
(AMs). For black grouper, this proposed
rule would revise the recreational bag,
vessel, and possession limits. In
addition, Amendment 53 would
establish a rebuilding plan, and revise
the overfishing levels, acceptable
biological catch (ABC), annual optimum
yield (OY), and sector allocations for
gag. The purpose of this proposed rule
and Amendment 53 is to end
overfishing of gag, rebuild the stock, and
achieve OY while minimizing, to the
extent practicable, adverse social and
economic effects.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule, identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2023–0045,’’ by either
of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and enter
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2023–0045’’, in the
Search box. Click the ‘‘Comment’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Frank Helies, Southeast Regional Office,
NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of Amendment 53,
which includes a fishery impact
statement and a regulatory impact
review, may be obtained from the
Southeast Regional Office website at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/
amendment-53-rebuilding-plan-gagand-management-gag-and-blackgrouper/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Helies, telephone: 727–824–5305,
or email: frank.helies@noaa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The South
Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery, which
includes gag and black grouper, is
managed under the FMP. The FMP was
prepared by the Council and
implemented through regulations at 50
CFR part 622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
that NMFS and regional fishery
management councils prevent
overfishing and achieve, on a
continuing basis, the OY from federally
managed fish stocks. These mandates
are intended to ensure that fishery
resources are managed for the greatest
overall benefit to the Nation,
particularly with respect to providing
food production and recreational
opportunities, and protecting marine
ecosystems. To further this goal, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires fishery
managers to minimize bycatch and
bycatch mortality to the extent
practicable.
All weights described in this
proposed rule are in gutted weight,
unless otherwise specified.
In 2006, the gag stock was assessed
through the Southeast Data, Assessment,
and Review (SEDAR) process as a
benchmark assessment (SEDAR 10). The
assessment indicated that the gag stock
was not overfished but was undergoing
overfishing. The Council and NMFS
implemented management measures,
including implementing a spawning
season closure to end overfishing
through the final rule for Amendment
16 to the FMP (74 FR 30964, July 29,
2009).
In 2014, the gag stock was assessed
again through the SEDAR 10 Update as
a standard assessment. The assessment
indicated that the gag stock was not
overfished but was still experiencing
overfishing. However, the Council’s
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) noted that the fishing mortality
rate for 2012, and the projected fishing
mortality rate in 2013, based on the
actual landings, suggested that
overfishing did not occur in 2012 and
2013. Consequently, NMFS determined
that the gag stock was not undergoing
overfishing. In response to the SEDAR
10 Update, the Council and NMFS
modified the ACLs and management
measures through the final rule for
Regulatory Amendment 22 to the FMP
(80 FR 48277, August 12, 2015).
Amendment 53 responds to the most
recent stock assessment for South
Atlantic gag (SEDAR 71 2021). The
Council’s SSC reviewed the gag stock
E:\FR\FM\13JYP1.SGM
13JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44760-44764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14658]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
45 CFR Part 305
RIN 0970-AC95
Modifications to Performance Standards During Natural Disasters
and Other Calamities
AGENCY: Office of Child Support Services (OCSS), Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS or the Department).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OCSS proposes to provide temporary relief to states from
certain child support program performance requirements and penalties
during natural disasters and other calamities which have a negative
impact on state child support program operations. The proposed rule
would provide ACF with ongoing authority to modify performance measure
requirements when states are affected by natural disasters and other
calamities that have resulted, or are expected to result, in the
failure of state child support programs to achieve performance
standards for paternity establishment, support order establishment, and
current collections. The proposed rule will enable states to avoid the
imposition of penalties due to adverse data reliability audit findings
during, and subsequent to, natural disasters and other calamities,
including pandemics and declared public health emergencies.
DATES: Consideration will be given to written comments on this notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) received on or before September 11, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) number (0970-AC95)], by one of the
following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Written comments may be submitted to: Office of
Child Support Services, Attention: Director of Policy and Training, 330
C Street SW, Washington, DC 20201.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this rulemaking. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tricia John, Division of Policy and
Training, OCSS, telephone (202) 260-7143. Email inquiries to
[email protected]. Deaf and hearing-impaired individuals may call
the Federal Dual Party Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m.
and 7 p.m. Eastern Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Submission of Comments
Comments should be specific, address issues raised by the proposed
rule, and explain reasons for any objections or recommended changes.
Additionally, we will be interested in comments that indicate agreement
with the proposal. We will not acknowledge receipt of the comments we
receive. However, we will review and consider all comments that are
relevant and are received during the comment period. We will respond to
these comments in the preamble to the final rule.
Statutory Authority
This NPRM is published under the authority granted to the Secretary
of Health and Human Services by section 1102 of the Social Security Act
(the Act) (42 U.S.C. 1302). Section 1102 of the Act authorizes the
Secretary to publish regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, as may
be necessary for the efficient administration of the functions with
which the Secretary is responsible under the Act. The proposed relief
from the support order establishment and current support collections
performance measures may be waived, modified, or suspended through
rulemaking under section 409(a)(8)(A)(i)(I) of the Act (42 U.S.C.
609(a)(8)(A)(i)(I)). The proposed relief from the paternity
establishment percentage (PEP) performance measure and data reliability
audit requirements related to the PEP under this NPRM is based on
statutory authority granted under section 452(g)(3)(A) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 652(g)(3)(A)).
Justification
The purpose of this proposed rule is to authorize the Secretary to
provide
[[Page 44761]]
targeted and time-limited relief to states from certain performance
penalties due to the impact of natural disasters and other calamities
when such events have a negative impact on state child support program
operations.
Through this proposed rule, ACF will have the authority to modify
the requirements for states to meet the following performance
standards: the Paternity Establishment Percentage (PEP) performance
standard of 90 percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(1), the support order
establishment standard of 40 percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), and the
current collections performance standard of 35 percent under 45 CFR
305.40(a)(3). ACF may adjust these performance standards to a lower
level to avoid imposing financial penalties on states and may also
modify the requirements to avoid the imposition of penalties due to
adverse data reliability audit findings. This would provide ACF with
the flexibility to modify the performance requirements for a time-
limited period during, and subsequent to, natural disasters and other
calamities.
The need for rulemaking under the discretionary authority provided
to the Secretary to modify performance penalty requirements became
apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to disruptions to state
child support program operations and to court operations during the
COVID-19 pandemic, states experienced significant workload burdens and
service backlogs. Since the start of the pandemic in early 2020, states
have appealed for relief from program requirements in order to support
their operations during the crisis. OCSS is able to provide certain
flexibilities for administrative requirements under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170)
(See OCSS Dear Colleague Letter 20-04: Flexibilities for State and
Tribal Child Support Agencies during COVID-19 Pandemic \1\). However,
these flexibilities do not extend to relief for financial penalties
related to performance or adverse data reliability audit findings.
States are concerned that performance-related financial penalties,
which are imposed in the form of a reduction to state TANF grants,
place an undue burden on state budgets and threaten funding that
supports the very families who are most in need during a time of
crisis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.acf.hhs.gov/css/policy-guidance/flexibilities-state-and-tribal-child-support-agencies-during-covid-19-pandemic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To address penalty relief due to the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic, ACF issued a final rule (87 FR 32090) on May 27, 2022, which
provides states relief from performance penalties by modifying the PEP
performance requirement from 90 percent to 50 percent for fiscal years
2020, 2021, and 2022. While the COVID-19 relief rulemaking was
expedited due to the emergency created by the pandemic, the rulemaking
effort required over 200 days from the time the NPRM was published in
2021 until the final rule was published in 2022. Due to the time
required to accomplish rulemaking, ACF seeks the authority to provide
relief in similar circumstances through a more streamlined approach,
not requiring additional rulemaking during each event.
Without this NPRM, there is no general authority in title IV-D (or
in other statutory authority) to relieve states from these penalties
similar to the flexibility provided to the TANF program. The TANF
program's authority to promulgate such a regulation derives from the
TANF program statute (42 U.S.C. 609(b)). Without statutory authority
providing such flexibility to the Secretary regarding IV-D
requirements, it is not possible to issue a regulation similar to 45
CFR 262.5 for relief from title IV-D penalties.
This proposed regulation seeks to provide ACF ongoing authority to
grant time-limited, targeted flexibilities, allowing ACF to provide
timely relief to states when natural disasters or other calamities
significantly affect program operations without having to engage in
separate rulemaking, and will apply to Federal fiscal year periods
subsequent to September 30, 2022. This relief would support states who
might otherwise face penalties for not meeting specific performance
measure standards or which may fail the data reliability audits.
Background: State Child Support Program Performance Requirements
Under Title IV-D of the Act, states are required to achieve
performance levels in paternity establishment, support order
establishment, and current support collections. Failure to achieve
required performance levels may lead to penalties assessed as a
percentage against the state's TANF grant.
The PEP, support order establishment, and current collections
performance measures, which are part of the overall performance, audit,
penalties, and incentives for the child support program, are
established under 452(g) of the Act and 45 CFR 305.40. Section
452(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Act requires the Secretary to determine whether
state-reported data used to determine the performance levels are
complete and reliable. Additionally, section 409(a)(8)(A) of the Act
and 45 CFR 305.61(a)(1) include the assessment of a financial penalty
if there is a failure to achieve the required level of performance or
an audit determines that the data is incomplete or unreliable.
The required levels of performance for the PEP, support order
establishment, and current collections performance measures are set out
in 45 CFR 305.40:
The PEP performance level must be at least 90 percent or
an improvement of 2 to 6 percentage points over the previous year's
level of performance, below which a state will incur a penalty.
The support order establishment performance level must be
at least 40 percent, below which a state will be penalized unless an
increase of 5 percent over the previous year is achieved.
The current collections performance level must be at least
35 percent, below which a state will be penalized unless an increase of
5 percent over the previous year is achieved.
Section 409(a)(8)(A)(ii) of the Act and 45 CFR 305.61(a)(2) impose
automatic corrective action for the subsequent fiscal year. A state
also must submit complete and reliable data used in the performance
measure calculations, which will be audited according to 45 CFR 305.60.
If a state fails to meet the annual performance measure standards,
or to show improvement in the subsequent year (2 to 6 percentage points
for the PEP), the amount of the initial penalty will be equal to one to
two percent of the adjusted State Family Assistance Grant for the
state's TANF program in accordance with 45 CFR 305.61(c) and (d). A
penalty against the state's TANF grant will also be imposed if the
state fails to submit complete and reliable performance measure data
and there is an adverse data reliability audit finding for a
performance measure in the subsequent year. The penalty will continue
to be assessed in accordance with section 409(a)(8)(B) of the Act and
45 CFR 305.61 until the state is determined to have submitted complete
and reliable data and achieved the required performance measure
standards. In accordance with 45 CFR 262.1(e)(1), the state must expend
additional state funds equal to the amount of the penalty (which will
not count toward the maintenance-of-effort requirement under TANF) the
year after the TANF grant penalty is assessed.
[[Page 44762]]
Section-by-Section Discussion of the Provisions of This Proposed Rule
Section 305.61: Penalty for Failure To Meet IV-D Requirements
We propose to add a new provision to Part 305 (Program Performance
Measures, Standards, Financial Incentives, and Penalties), to provide
the Secretary with the authority to provide short-term relief from
performance requirements related to the PEP, support order
establishment, and current collections performance standards, when
states are unable to meet those requirements due to the impact of
natural disasters or other calamities on state child support program
operations. We propose adding a new paragraph (f) to Sec. 305.61,
Penalty for failure to meet IV-D requirements, to provide the Secretary
with the authority, during and subsequent to natural disasters and
other calamities, to temporarily modify the performance requirements
for states to meet the paternity establishment percentage standard of
90 percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(1), the support order establishment
standard of 40 percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), and the current
collections standard of 35 percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3), to a
lower level to avoid imposing the financial penalty on states. The
proposed rule would also authorize the Secretary to set aside adverse
data reliability audit findings under section 452(g) of the Act during
the same time period.
The proposed rule would require individual states and territories
to initiate the request to modify the performance requirements
specified under section 452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), or under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3)
when a state has experienced a natural disaster or other calamity that
has or will make compliance with the performance standards
impracticable. The state may also ask the Secretary to set aside
adverse data reliability audit findings under section 452(g) of the Act
(42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR 305.61(a)(1)(ii) for the same time period
as the time period for which a modification of performance requirements
is sought.
A natural disaster or other calamity includes state chief executive
officer-declared states of emergency, pandemics, events designated by
the President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), and declared public health
emergencies under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 247d). The state's chief executive (or his or her designee, this
title is illustrative only and reflects the position determined by the
state which holds this authority) must demonstrate, based on available
data, that such emergency has made the state's ability to attain one or
more of the performance standards impracticable. The request for relief
must include a narrative statement which describes both the
circumstances and justification for the request. The statement should
also provide information substantiating the impracticability of
compliance with the standards, including a description of the specific
conditions caused by the natural disaster or other calamity, including
preliminary data provided by the state, as required under 45 CFR
305.32(f), showing reduced performance.
The request must also include information on the expected duration
of the conditions that make compliance impracticable and include any
other documentation or other information that the Secretary may require
to make a determination regarding relief.
The state must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary
that the natural disaster or other calamity has directly resulted in a
reduction in performance or is expected to result in a reduction in
performance, based on data provided by the state.
The statement and other documentation must demonstrate that the
state: has not or will not meet one or more existing performance
requirements, such that a performance penalty would apply; has
submitted preliminary data to support the statement; and has provided
all required information. Any additional information must be submitted
as soon as the adverse effect of the natural disaster or other calamity
giving rise to the request is known to the state.
The Secretary will make a determination of the modified performance
requirements based on preliminary data provided by the state under 45
CFR 305.32(f) and shall provide written communication to the state of
the decision and the period for which any modified standards shall
apply. Relief from the performance requirements will be time-limited,
based on the data presented by the state, and the Federal fiscal year
period in which conditions are expected to make compliance
impracticable.
We propose providing the Secretary with the authority to provide
temporary relief to align with the Federal fiscal year timeframes which
align with the expected duration of the conditions that make compliance
with the performance requirement impracticable. After the relief
period, the performance requirements will revert back to the levels
described under section 452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), or under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3),
and the state will once again be subject to penalties for adverse data
reliability audit findings related to the performance measures after an
automatic corrective action year as specified in 45 CFR 305.42. This
proposed rule will apply to Federal fiscal year periods subsequent to
September 30, 2022.
Paperwork Reduction Act
No new information collection requirements would be imposed by this
proposed regulation.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule meets the standards of Executive Order 13563
because it creates a short-term public benefit, at minimal cost to the
Federal Government, by not imposing penalties against a state's TANF
grant, during a time when public assistance funds are critically
needed.
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this NPRM
is significant and was accordingly reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Secretary proposes to certify that, under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), as
enacted by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354), this
proposed rule, if finalized, will not result in a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The primary impact is on state
governments. State governments are not considered small entities under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
[[Page 44763]]
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires
agencies to prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule that may result in an annual expenditure by
state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation). That threshold level is currently approximately $177
million. This rule does not impose any mandates on state, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector, that will exceed this
threshold in any year.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999 requires Federal agencies to determine whether a proposed
policy or regulation may affect family well-being. If the agency's
determination is affirmative, then the agency must prepare an impact
assessment addressing seven criteria specified in the law. ACF believes
it is not necessary to prepare a family policymaking assessment (see
Pub. L. 105-277) because this regulation does not impose requirements
on states or families and thus will not have any impact on family well-
being.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 prohibits an agency from publishing any rule
that has federalism implications if the rule either imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on state and local governments and is not
required by statute, or the rule preempts state law, unless the agency
meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the
Executive Order. This rule does not have federalism impact as defined
in the Executive Order 13132.
January Contreras, Assistant Secretary of the Administration for
Children & Families, approved this document on March 15, 2023.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 305
Child support, Program performance measures, standards, financial
incentives, and penalties.
Dated: July 6, 2023.
Xavier Becerra,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Health
and Human Services proposes to amend 45 CFR part 305 as set forth
below:
PART 305--PROGRAM PERFORMANCE MEASURES, STANDARDS, FINANCIAL
INCENTIVES, AND PENALTIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 305 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 609(a)(8), 652(a)(4) and (g), 658a, and
1302.
0
2. Amend Sec. 305.61 by adding new paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 305.61 Penalty for failure to meet IV-D requirements.
* * * * *
(f) Authority to modify state requirements to meet paternity
establishment percentages, support order establishment, or current
collections performance measure standards during natural disasters and
other calamities. During, and subsequent to, natural disasters and
other calamities (e.g., state chief executive officer-declared states
of emergency, pandemics, events designated by the President under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42
U.S.C. 5170), and declared public health emergencies under section 319
of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 247d), the Secretary may
temporarily modify the performance measure requirements for a state to
meet the paternity establishment percentage standard of 90 percent
under section 452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR
305.40(a)(1), the support order establishment standard of 40 percent
under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), and the current collections standard of 35
percent under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3), to lower levels to avoid imposing
financial performance penalties on states, and may set aside adverse
data reliability audit findings under section 452(g) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR 305.61(a)(1)(ii) during the same time period.
For Federal fiscal years subsequent to September 30, 2022, the
performance requirements for paternity establishment under section
452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR 305.40(a)(1), for
support order establishment under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), and for current
collections under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3)--may be modified by the Secretary
to a lower level under the conditions described in this section.
(1) If a state experiences a natural disaster or other calamity
(e.g., state chief executive officer-declared states of emergency,
pandemics, events designated by the President under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170),
and declared public health emergencies under section 319 of the Public
Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 247d), the state's chief executive
officer (or his or her designee) may submit to the Secretary a request
to modify one or more of the performance requirements specified under
section 452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45 CFR 305.40(a)(1),
under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), or under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(3).
(2) The state may also ask the Secretary to set aside adverse data
reliability audit findings under section 452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C.
652(g)) and 45 CFR 305.61(a)(1)(ii) for the same time period as the
time period for which a modification of performance requirements is
sought.
(3) The request for a modification to the performance requirements
must be submitted in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraphs (f)(4), (5) and (6) of this section. Any request other than
one submitted with the initial application must be submitted as soon as
the adverse effect of the natural disaster or other calamity giving
rise to the request is known to the state.
(4) A request for a modification of one or more of the performance
requirements must include the following:
(i) A narrative statement describing the circumstances and
justification for the request to modify the state's performance
requirement;
(ii) Information substantiating the impracticability of compliance
with the standards, including a description of the specific conditions
caused by the natural disaster or other calamity which make compliance
impracticable, including preliminary data provided by the state, as
required under 45 CFR 305.32(f), showing reduced performance;
(iii) Information on the expected duration of the conditions that
make compliance impracticable; and
(iv) Any other documentation or other information that the
Secretary may require to make this determination.
(5) The state must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary
that the natural disaster or other calamity has directly resulted in a
reduction in performance or is expected to result in a reduction in
performance, based on data provided by the state. In its request for a
temporary modification to one or more performance requirements, the
state must be able to demonstrate that it:
(i) Has not or will not meet one or more existing performance
requirements, such that a performance penalty would apply;
[[Page 44764]]
(ii) Has submitted preliminary data supporting this statement; and
(iii) Has provided all required information requested by the
Secretary.
(6) The Secretary shall provide written communication of the
decision to modify or decline to modify the performance standards, and
the period for which any modified standards shall apply, after receipt
of appropriate written communication from the chief executive officer.
(i) If approved, a temporary modification in a performance
requirement will expire on the last day of the Federal fiscal year for
which it was approved.
(ii) Adverse findings of data reliability audits of the state's
performance data under 45 CFR 305.60 as reported during the period in
which the performance requirement modification is approved will not
result in a financial penalty pursuant to the state's request as
specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this section.
(iii) Unless the state receives a written approval of its
performance requirement modification request, the performance
requirements under section 452(g) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 652(g)) and 45
CFR 305.40(a)(1), under 45 CFR 305.40(a)(2), and under 45 CFR
305.40(a)(3) remain in effect.
(iv) If the request for a performance requirement modification is
denied, the denial is not subject to administrative appeal.
[FR Doc. 2023-14658 Filed 7-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-41-P